WEBVTT - Week 16 Updates, First Look At 2020

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find Sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences

0:00:39.760 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>du dinity. Yeah, as welcome your host by Bay from Marlan,

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>your co host by Guy from Saint Bret Trick step

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>fall back, your co host five eleven from Why Ladies

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen, your with that We want of you inside

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>on Studio thirty four. This is the BFFs. He's Frank Stanford,

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>He's e y Eric Young, I am Greg Sauceman. What's

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>happening gentlemen? Hey, what's up man? Happy hump day to you.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to the Fantasy Football Frenzy. I heard them

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>boys playing a little Barbie girl at the end of

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the show, Greg, and of course that was the lead

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>up to the BFS And you know what Greig, you

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and I we might be considered barbie girls, but one

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>person on the show that is certainly not. Once everybody

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>foot about our own show, I mean, I can see

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the argument for it, but e Y definitely not you

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Y not a barbie girl. The only person on the

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>show for sure not a barbie girl and looking to

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>take out the Pit League. E Y, what's going on? Body? Yeah?

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I try not to be a barbie girl. I mean,

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>sometimes can be an emotional creature at times. But yeah,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>in the finals of the pit in the finals of

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the w W main roster, in the finals in my

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>home league. Had had a good year this year, boys

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>had a real good year. Great year for e Y.

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Great year. They're going up against George Kurtz in the finals.

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Correct that correct? Correct? So maybe we have to put

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a little BFF fantasy football frenzy wager on this one, Grety,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? Sure do? What's what are we

0:02:57.919 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>offering here? I don't know. We'll figure it out. We'll talk.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So basically, if e Y wins George just to fly

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>up here, right, yeah, yeah, our our expenses are lifted

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>towards kurt test to pay for it. Yeah, this is great.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I love how this is on today's show, not some

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>news and notes we want to talk about. I know

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Frank was doing some research on so the great performances

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we have gotten this year, and I don't know it's

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a surprise. I know that, but I think he's just

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of putting into context how good certain players will be.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So let me start there and we'll get into any

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>news and notes could affect you for this weekend. Tomorrow

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll start pre you doing games. Certainly this all the

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Saturday games will get into tomorrow. Um Sunday, well, for

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>for Sunday, we'll do all that on Friday. Virginia Zaki

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>will join us tomorrow as well. But I want to

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>just take a second to reflect on a couple of

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>things we were talking about, and this is all things

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the next week's show. And I said that we were

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna do next year's draft on today show. We're gonna

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>push up the next week. We decided for the most part.

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But did we decide that, because I'm pretty sure the

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>headline of the show says round, Well, you you said

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to mix it with notes and other stuff

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>when we last talked, so I said that, you know,

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>parts of the show can be about things that are

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>happening right now, and then another part of the show

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>can be look ahead to next year. Right. Yeah, but

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I then really like and I think there was like

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a full first round, like I was trying to do

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>my head for next week. All right, Greig, this is

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>your show. You're the bus driver. I am passenger, one

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of the passengers here. We will do whatever you say.

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Whatever you say goes like the bus counselor yes, I'm

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the leader of the m T A. E. Wi is

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the guy in the back that's just jeering us while

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we're driving the bus. He's he's like the bouncer on

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the bus, like if someone is misbehaving, Ey throws them

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>off the bust. It got it. So anyway, as you

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>were doing research for next year, and I made the

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>case a lot of Lamar Jackson should maybe could or

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>could maybe should go first overall, and you've pointed out

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that not only has Christian McCaffrey been better, he's been

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>all time better. Yeah. So this year Christian McCaffrey, we

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>know how great he has been. But just to put

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this into context, he is averaging the fifth most Fantasy

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>points per game in PPR leagues of all time. That

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>includes Marshall Falk in the year two thousand. He is

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the leader all time in PPR points per game Priest

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Holmes and O two LT in two thousand and six,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Marshall Falk again in oh one, and this year Christian

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey averaging twenty nine point seven to PPR points per game.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just a ridiculous year. This is legitimately the fifth

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>best fantasy season by a player in NFL history, not

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just quarterback, not just running back, not to wide receiver,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of all players that have ever played the sport of football.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey is fifth right now in PPR points per game,

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>fifth all time. Ever you want like that's how amazing

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>that Christian McCaffrey has been. I think it's like remarkable

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and in a year that's all been amount Lamar Jackson,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand that he's the m v P. That's great.

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>He's been a renaissance. He's top ten all time with

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>his fantasy points per game this season, Christian McCaffrey has

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>been even better. Now e y next year he'll be

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the number one overall pick, as he should be. No issue.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you nervous but like the workload the last two

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 1>or three years has just been so monstrous for CMC.

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>With a new coach and a new regime there that

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>could change at all. Yeah, I mean I am worried,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and um, look at I was wrong on Christian McCaffrey.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>But the reason I was wrong is because I I

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thought he would be hurt because of the massive workload

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't happened. I never wish for injury and want

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>these players to be healthy every week. I don't want

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>anyone to get hurt, especially a player is exciting to

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>watch a Chris McCaffrey. But I just thought, Look, he's

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in great shape. Uh. He runs hard, but he is

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>not a big man. He is a smaller back uh,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and never shies away from contact and is their entire

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>running game and half of their passing game. He's touched

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball a ton this year, touched it a time

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. The injury bug is coming. It's not a

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>matter of if it is when. Um, And I was

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>early on on the whin I thought it would be

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this year and it wasn't. And Uh, he's putting up

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>an all time history making season. And I can accept that.

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I can accept that. I was wrong. But uh, I mean,

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he will still be ranked first overall. Um,

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'll rank him that far. I

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think that far ahead because I have too much

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>outs going on to think about that far ahead. But

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he probably will go first overall consensus. And uh, I

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>believe this year. Next year it will be wrong. Alright,

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this is why we do these things. That that kind

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of statement is the reason why we do this. That

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>will not deter me. What one bit. I mean, A

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>guy is still twenty three years old, he's in the

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>prime of his career. Of eighteen total touchdowns this year,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety four receptions. It won't deter me. He's the number

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>one pick, no doubt about it. Or Jackson is really good,

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>very good running back in a quarterback combined for Fantasy

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>pair one and two. Next year, we're back. You're the

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>BFFs party. NFL season is now upon us, and you

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>can become the eighth person away one million dollars in

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a fandueler Draft Kings tournament by setting their lineups using

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Order dot Com DFS line of optimizer. If

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you're playing Dailey Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>dot Com you're doing it wrong. Sign up now for

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections,

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and better results into promo code action for as ten

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>percent discount. And that's promo code action for as ten

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>percent discount. Daily order dot com where millionaires are made.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>What's gone? What's going on? Apparently the YouTube chat is

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>developing a Chuck Norris like persona for e Y right now,

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>saying all kinds of crazy things that e Y split

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the before. Uh, there's a few of these in here

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>if I can, if I can find ones entertain I

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>will Ey gargles top shelf, will whiskey in the morning

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>instead of listerine. Fact seen, it depends on what day

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you catch me. U. E Y shovel snow in his

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>flip flops and shorts, chop wood in my flip flops. Uh,

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Ey put cigarettes out on his tongue and then eats them. True. Ah, yeah,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>this is what's going on in the chat right now.

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You have you've quite the following here. Ey. It's uh,

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.839
<v Speaker 1>it's good. Good to be king boys and uh like

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 1>it said, representing the fantasy BFFs, I'll be sending your

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>pictures of my lineups looking for uh some advice. Uh,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of couple of pretty interesting calls this week.

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you got? What are these calls you're looking at?

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's start brain stormy. Now. You know it's only Wednesday,

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but I want to I want to start the process

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>now because, as we've seen, Frank changes a lot, right, like,

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>gives me opinion on Wednesday, I make a move by

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Friday's like, oh g did my rankings? Now? I feel

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit differently. So let's work shop this together here

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Alright, alright, we can. We can work

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>shop for sure. So, um, I don't really So I

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>picked up Mike Evans thinking that he was gonna gonna

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>do something and now he's on I R. So that's

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a that's a mistake. Alright, early we mistake. We can

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>come back from that, No big deal sometime. James Conner.

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>What are we thinking about James Conner? I know there's

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. I'm seeing this all over Twitter, um,

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>all over the places. What is James Conner going to

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>do this week? So the good news is that James

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Conner came out of the Bills game healthy, right, Like

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there was no setback. He says that he's all right.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>The good news by the Steelers is that they're still

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>fighting for a playoffs. This is not one team that's

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>done by any means. They are still playing for something.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>When you're playing for something, well, obviously you want all

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of your horses there. James Conner, that or worse, is

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those horses with the Pittsburgh Steelers. And I

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>understand he had what eight carries against Buffalo of fourteen

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>running back carries last week, only fourteen, he had eight

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of them. That's not you want more than that, though,

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>out of James Conner. Like normally, if I told you

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>that Steelers running backs we're getting fourteen carries this week,

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you would say James Conner is getting twelve of them

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>usually right like he would be the guy, he would

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>be the workhorse. But yeah, Buffalo defenses is way better.

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh sorry Frank, but they're playing the Jets. Of the

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>snap of the running back carries this past Sunday. I

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's a number now that he's back goes up

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to me. I don't know the other options you have

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>are e y. I like James Conner this week he's

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Jets. Gregg, who Yes, while their

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>defense overall has not been great this year, the one

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>spot where they have been great you wouldn't notice by

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>watching last week's Ravens game has been against the run,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>where they are allowing three point one six yards per

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>carry two opposing running back this year. Steelers have a

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.839
<v Speaker 1>really good offensive line, Greg, I think James Conner is

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>more of a flex play this week than the RB

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>two he has been for most of the season. Well,

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>that's where he'd be. It's flex. It's him Sanders, Uh,

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hide, Tyra Williams, Robby Anderson, those are my choices

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at flex. Well, we're gonna use Miles Sanders's yeah, We're

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna use Sanders over James absolutely using Miles Sanders over

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>James Conners. Howard's out, you know, yeah, well yeah, that's

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>my only question is Miles Sanders is in and and

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>uh I wrote him last week. Um, this is what

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought. I think me and you, Frank both kind

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>of judged him around in between week four and six

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of having this uh, and Jordan Howard looked great,

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>but then he got hurt, and Miles Sanders has taken

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 1>over and has looked really good. Yeah, I mean he

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>looked great last week. I mean the running back that

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw last week was the one that I had

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>ranked the week before going into I don't remember who

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they played in Week four team, but it was two

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago that I had him, you know, as a

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>top twelve running back. Was the game that he dealt

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>with the cramps um and then this past week goes

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>out there play of the snaps. The Eagles need all

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the help they can get on offense, so they're throwing

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>him the ball. They're throwing Boston Scott the ball. The

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>tight ends are involved, and he played of the snaps

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this past week a d seventy two total yards greg,

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>six receptions, two touchdowns. I don't think that Jordan Howard

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be back. I saw an update earlier today

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.599
<v Speaker 1>on him that basically said he is status quo. I

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>don't understand why the Eagles would go away from Miles

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Sanders based on the game that we just saw against Washington.

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>He's going up against the Cowboys. They are okay in

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of yards per carry against running backs. They do

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the ninth most receptions, so I think

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders will still have that role. He is a

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.599
<v Speaker 1>legitimate RB two for me this week, Greg and e Y,

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I would use Miles Sanders ahead of James Conner. I agree,

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So listen, I agree with the Miles Sanders has come

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>on as of late. I know Boston Scott stuck in

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>there a little bit, but Miles Sanders has been more

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>reliable than James Conner. And then even when Connor was healthy,

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't forget he's kind of underwhelming right like it was,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it was frustrating story James Conner. Miles Sanders is the

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>hot hand at this point. I totally agree with you

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders over James Conner here this week. Y. Yeah,

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. That's fair. Now, what about what are we

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>feeling about Terry McLaurin. Terry Terry against the New York Giants.

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a scary good matchup if you ask me, Ding

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>crushed it, scary, Terry, No, any crush. It was bad.

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>It was all right, all right? Yeah? That was That

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>was in the Alex Pozzano Book of Jokes. Uh. Speaking

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of Alex Posano, I just have to give you a

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>shout out, e Y. I know that your preads handled

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the New York Islanders last night. So I just had

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to give you a little shout out there. Yeah, that's

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the most goal scorer of the Islanders this year. Uh,

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Islanders are unbelievable, Like great defensive structure, two really good goaltenders. Uh.

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Ex coach that coached here in Nashville is there? Um.

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Nobody watching the show probably cares about fantasy hockey or

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>hockey in general. But I'm excited about it. Nothing about

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>hockey at all except four. Alex Bazzano downstairs in the pit.

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>We just heard him with the go aisles is a

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>huge Islanders fan, and then he revealed to me today

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that your Predators won eight to three. So I thought

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that I would bring it up and give you a

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>shout out of you. E. Why do you want to

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>use this opportunity to your uh New Year's Eve bash? Yeah?

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Eve bash in Dallas, Texas. Everyone's welcome, uh

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Nashville fans and that Tallas Stars fans alike. Brain dead Brewery. Um,

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Eve. Obviously it's gonna be really cool, man.

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's I'm excited about it. I mean there's there's no money,

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no nothing. It was just a place to have

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like minded, cool people to get together, have a couple

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of drinks, have some cool food food and have a

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>good time. And that's how it started. And it's bloomed,

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and um, I worry for Sam the owner. Uh you know,

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>he can hold about a hundred and sixty people. And

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel I'm gonna crush that. It literally

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>started as an idea just for away from me, about

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>people I know to be together down there, um and

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not have to wear a cedo or I'll be some

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>silly dance club. Um. And it's ballooned into this giant

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>thing and uh, pretty much the entire Fox Sports UM

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>broadcast crew is going to be there, co hosted by

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>how Gill and Chris Mason, UM, two commentators, two X

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>players too, super hilarious guys. Um. Yeah, it's gonna be awesome. Man,

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait. Yeah, if you're in the Dallas, Texas area,

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>go hey, y all New Year's Eve, it's just you

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>call them, You drink some beers, you eat some food,

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're in the New Year and get ready for

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Pride Stars next day. Yeah. I don't like hockey at all,

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but I do like e y and I kind of

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>want to go to that. Good's gonna be good. I

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>can't go. I will be I will be in Florida. No, no, no, no,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we're canceling Florida. We're going down to Dallas, Texas. We're

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>expensing it. You like that, Yes, yes, this is good.

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I got your attention to my attention. Terry McLarin greg scary.

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Terry McLaurin indeed vases off against the New York Giants

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in a scary matchup. Still kill on it. Scary, scary,

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>good exactly. McLaurin has found a connection here with Dwayne Askins,

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>who has improved as the season's gone on. I've killed

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Haskins a lot, but this match is clearly really GOODY.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Who's the other option that you have with Terry um?

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So right now, currently I have Miles Sanders on the bench,

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's because I've got um. But but I'm thinking

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>about starting him and possibly over Nick Chubb. Um. Nick

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Chubb worries me against Baltimore. I feel like they're going

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to be down and have to throw I don't know, alright,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>this is this is what I was waiting for. One

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of these is going galaxy brain here on the BFF.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>It's good what we do this because he was a

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>week ago where we already getting the text messages do

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>I start Lamar Jackson or not? And we're like, what

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>are we doing here? And that's kind of what we're doing.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb leads the league in Russian. He leads the

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>league in Russian. UI. He has the most rushing yards

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL is two hudred seventy carries and you

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>wanta imagine from mad matching. No, this is not don't

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>even think it's a bad match this. I was telling you, guys,

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. He's in my lineup right now. Sandra Sanders

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench, Nick Chubb is in. I'm telling

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you you asked me for the options. I'm telling you

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>who I have. So you have Terry mclardinized your flex

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're deciding between him and Miles Sanders. I have

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>him as my wide receiver to we as you guys

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>know or if you and if you don't, I'm telling

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you we have two flexes in the pit league. I've

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>got Davonte Parker and one and Kenyan Drake and one

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>available is Miles Sanders, Kenny Golladay, Danny Almondola. I just

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. I don't even Nick chu was available

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in that, but like, can you drink yours? Nick Chubb?

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL season is now upon us and you can be

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>going the eighth person away one million dollars in a

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>fandula Draft Kings tournament. My sittinger lineups using the Daily

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com DFS lot of optimizer. If you're playing

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>daily Fantasy sports and not using Daily Order dot Com,

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it wrong. Sign him now for the NFL

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results.

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a promo code action for ten cent discount. Is

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that's promo good action for a ten percent discount. Taylor

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Order dot com, where millionaires are made. Get in the

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>game of the Draft Kings sports bookward listening to the

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>show and get a deposit bonus aupposed to five whose

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 1>out works great a Draft King sports book account. Make

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a deposit and place your first bet. Draft Kings will

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 1>match it with a fift deposit bonus up to five.

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>The offer is eligible for all users plus new users.

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna risk me bet with the two hundred bucks.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Go to the Sportscreed dot com slash DK to play

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>sports Creed dot com slash DK to play gambling problem

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>calling a hundred gambler trying one and over in New

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Jersey only. Eligibility restrictions apply to a website for details.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I have hold up you wise team here from the

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>pet that's so taking a look at it, I think

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to put stacked by the way the sexy

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>real questions. If Madison and Cook don't play, doesn't he

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>have to start my boom? We can't take that risk

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>as someone there now you can't and he doesn't even

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>have to. I mean when you have Nick Chubb, mark Ingram,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake, and Miles Sanders. I mean even if both

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of those guys were ruled out, I don't know that

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>you would start Mike Boone over those players regardless, because

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>obviously these are all players that have been performing well.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>They have solid matchups. Miles Sanders against the Cowboys we mentioned,

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you know the Cowboys allowed a lot of receptions to

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>running backs. You can run on the Seahawks with Kenyan

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Drake coming off a monster game. Ingram has been great

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>all year. Don't overthink the Nick Chubb thing. If anyone

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>else is out there, the Ravens the way to beat

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that defense is actually by running the football, and Levian

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Bell just had a season high. He ran for over

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>eight yards against the Ravens last week, So I'm not

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>as worried about Nick Chubb. If they fall behind, maybe,

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>but overall, I think early on in that game he'll

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to do enough. When I think you should

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>do with this team here e y is, I would

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>put Davonte Parker at wide receiver over Terry McLaurin, so

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you get Miles Sanders in your flex over Terry McLaurin

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. I don't know if that makes sense to you. Yeah,

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's definitely. Uh. The problem right now

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is is not a bad problem to have, but I

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>mean sure other people are dealing with this too. Is

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of options, and because there's two flexes,

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>there's all kinds of things that I can do, and

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got, you know, four or five players that are

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>all around that same thing. So it's it is a

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>dart frow an important one at that, but it's a

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>good problem to have. It's not like I just have

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to start a lineup and hope I have choices. So

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll be I'll be I'll be diving deep into this

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as the week goes, no doubt about it. Were all,

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we were all we will all be diving deep as

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the week goes. And let me start this week looking

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>at the Dallas Cowboys where Dak Prescott had a shoulder injury.

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>He injured it on like the six play of the game.

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>He ran to the right, landing on his shoulder. It

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>was fun, right, obviously, threw all game in a good game,

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but didn't he even move his right shoulder. During practice

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>today they were doing jumping Jack's. He was doing one

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 1>arm jumping in Jack's as you told me during the break,

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank Jason garrats like, yeah, he's have a little trouble

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.719
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball right now. Now, he's the biggest game

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the season for Dallas's a playoff game for them.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>He's going to play, yes, but your fantasy owners play him.

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that as long as the Cowboys are throwing

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>him out there in a game this important, obviously, I mean,

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this is their season. Whoever wins this game between the

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Eagles and Cowboys will win the the NFC East Division.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I am worried about the injury, but I think that

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>as long as he plays great, you have to use

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.959
<v Speaker 1>him in fantasy. We just saw what Dwayne Haskins did

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>against this Eagles secondary the past couple of weeks. I

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>remember Ryan Fitzpatrick a couple of weeks ago against his

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Eagle secondary had a monster game as well. They've struggled

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>all year long, specifically with outside wide receivers. That's where

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys thrive with a Marii cooper um. So I

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>think if he's good enough to go, I am going

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to fire up Dak Prescott as my starting quarterback because

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>this matchup is one of, if not the best, you

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>can have for a quarterback. Yeah, the matches, he's brilliant.

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>We talked. I took Jim Sanas and Fan will hurry

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>up today and he's like, yeah, Michael Gallup and Laurie

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Coover like, when you have facing that Eagle secondary, you

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>want to stack him in DFS because Dallas has ability

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to go off and we've seen teams do it over

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks against Philadelphia. Eli Manning did

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>it against Philadelphia. Dak's playing, which he will. I think

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you go all in here with Dak Prescott. Yeah, I'm

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>not gonna argue with that. Seen this tweet from Calvin Watkins,

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>who is uh the beat reporter for Dallas News Dallas News,

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>he said Dak Prescott had an m r I on

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>his right shoulder, and Jason Garrett said it's hard for

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>him to function right now. So this is something we'll

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have to ask Virginia zakas of Inside Injuries about tomorrow

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>because not only does it have huge implications from a

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective for Dak Prescott, a lot of people are

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>relying on Dak, but a lot of people are also

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>relying on a Mari Cooper and Michael Gallup, and you know,

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>if he's not a d percent or if there's a

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>chance that he can seriously injure himself in this game,

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you might have to look in another direction. So we'll

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>find out tomorrow. Yeah, we will obviously find out tomorrow,

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>um when it comes more out of practice when it

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to Dak Prescott. Now, the other big news ey

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that I've been seeing was a guy that I a

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine named Blake leely ranked Julian Edelman as

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>his thirty fourth rights wide receiver this week. If you

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>do receiver rangs yet, jeffyks Julian Edeman barely on the

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three cusps. This is a guy that the

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one has been all season long. Obviously he's hurt,

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the magic isn't great against Buffalo. But if you're

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a Julian Edelman owner, is he a must start for

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>you this week? E wy Um, this is a problem

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm dealing with in in a in a home league

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>that I'm in. Um, I have him. He has been

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>questionable I think every week this week, so I mean

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play. Um, but was was poor? Was uh?

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And I know this will excite Frank he was rotten

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>last week. Um, And I've got him in right now.

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.239
<v Speaker 1>But I might have to start Anthony Miller over him.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's crazy to say, But I mean, I

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I can trust him, especially against the

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Bills defense. Yeah. I don't think that's crazy right now either.

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>The way that Anthony Miller is playing, the target share

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that he has seen recently, it's basically been a one

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>A and one B between him and Alan Robinson. The

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>chief secondary has been really good, but where they actually

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>can be attacked is in the slot. Over the past

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks, they're allowing the their seventeen in PPR points

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed to slot receivers, so um, they're much better against

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>outside receivers. I think that Anthony Miller could take advantage

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in this matchup. I think that that is a legitimate question.

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's see how the rest of the week goes.

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>But let's not downplay. I mean, this is a huge

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>game for the New England Patriots for the Bills divisional matchup.

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, if the Patriots lose this game in the

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs went out, the Chiefs are looking at getting the

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>by heading into the playoffs and the Patriots will not. Right,

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Patriots want that by I mean both Look, yes,

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants to buy obviously, but I think that the

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Patriots they know that they kind of need it. They

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>need that week of recovery older players on their team,

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously Tom Brady. The offense hasn't looked great. They need

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that buy. This is a big game for them. And

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if Julian Edelman is out there, I have a hard

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>time believing they're not going to use him. Last week

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>they didn't need him because they were up bigat against

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. Is that gonna happen against the Bills. I

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they're gonna be able to build a

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>lead like that without Julian Edelman's help, So I get

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it right, Like Edelman's double covered on every play, Like

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I I understand that because he is. Before last week

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 1>he had double digit targets in a trade games, Greg,

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>that's insane. I don't know how you've been shooting Edelman

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this week. I don't know how you do it. But

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't Anthony Miller in that discussion though? And absolutely yeah,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>having him having Julian Edelman ranks low and wide reciver three,

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is very aggressive on the opposite end

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum. Obviously. It's like because a guy like

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Edony Miller maybe ahead of him on that list, you

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>could be I don't know what to do. So like

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 1>my other ops, So a guy like ro Sharp Harriman, right,

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>like you're big pick up this week for the Bucks?

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that someone you're gonna store with Julian edom in

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>your championship? It's crazy? But how can you not That's

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about. But how can you not? Though?

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Seriously right, how can you not? Pretty easily? The Bills

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>secondary is great and look I know that I just

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>spoke up Julian Edelman. That's because I wouldn't. I haven't

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>done my rankings yet, but I am not going to

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:34.479
<v Speaker 1>rank him that low. He's not gonna be a low

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and wide receiver three for me. He might be on

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that cusp of like a low end wide rechiever two,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>high and wide receiver three, which would certainly be lower

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>than where he's been for most of the season. But

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Perriman is going to be right in that

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>area as well as a low end wide receiver to

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:49.719
<v Speaker 1>who also they're gonna throw the ball to. I mean,

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going up against the Texans. That secondary has been inconsistent.

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>They played better against wide receivers recently, Greg, but they

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>can still be beat. A. J. Brown has had a

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>monster game against the Houston Text and they the Tampa

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Bay Bucks throw the ball down the field. Nobody throws

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball down the field more. Actually looked this up

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>last night deep passing. No one has a higher deep

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>throw percentage than Jamis Winston this year. That is where

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Brashod Perryman thrives. I would start Brashod Perryman over Julian Edelman.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, But Week sixteen, Greg strip the name off

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the back of the jersey. I get it, I get it,

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like other than the last week has

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>been bad. No, he hasn't. But what if all the

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>injuries are finally catching up to him. He's dealing with

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a shoulder, he's dealing with a leg injury, He's dealing

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>with a lot. He's not a spring chicken man. He's

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty three years old. He might I mean, look, he's

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>tough as nails. He might be playing through some serious stuff.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>He was a legit, you know, game time decision last week,

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:47.959
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup against Buffalo. I mean, there are a lot

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of reasons to be worried about Edaman this week. Just

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>do you have one of those options? Perryman is is

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a low and wide receiver to this week he is.

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>There's there's no doubt about it. The only other options,

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>like I personally have, I don't have Priman is Matduel.

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Sanders is not something I started terrible last week. Yeah,

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>he was going the only the only thing that you

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>could say about Manuel Sanders is at least he's not

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna see Jalen Ramsey. Theoretically, Devo will Debo probably will

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>because Devo plays more on the outside Emmanuel Sanders plays

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in the slot, and the Rams like the Chiefs. The

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Rams have been good against wide receivers, but they are

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>susceptible against slot receivers. Greg, So that that's a legitimate

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>question for you as well, Sorry, Bud, Who are your

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>other options? So, like if you put Sanders in as

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>your wide receiver would be another flex option for you

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>over Edelman. Oh I don't like that, Grin Oh Scarborough, sure,

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know which way this was going talk about

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>an intern Petrick Domina, Oh, well, actually that might make

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sense against the Bengals. You've got some decisions. We've all

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>got decisions here, Greg, Championship we man it kills you

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Edelman getting hurt at the wrong We never like after

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the show yesterday, like we spent so much time talking

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>about like defenses, We don't do that normally, Like we're

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>going over all these different defenses this morning we came in,

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at defense rankings like you get hardcore, not

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're not always already over like you really dive

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in every little advantage. Championship I mean, in Championship Week

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>gets down to the nitty gritty, and yeah, we're splitting

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>hairs you're trying to find every single edge you possibly can.

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday we spoke about picking up players to block your opponent.

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are legitimate strategies here, so I don't

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's crazy. Man. You really do have to nitpick.

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look into your kicker research this week, find

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>out who's playing indoors where there's win this week. Uh,

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you know who allows the most fantasy points to opposing kickers.

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's how deep we're going this week. Absolutely defense. Alright,

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>so we'll come back. We have more news and notes.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure that we get to uh,

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>including Evan Ingram being out for the year from the Giants.

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth mentioning. I'll talk about that, my guess, basically,

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not all year anyway, that's not nice. It's a fact.

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>NFL season is now upon us, and you can become

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the eighth person away one million dollars in a Fandueler

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings tournament. My setting their lineups using the Daily

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com DFS lot of optimizer. If you're playing

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Dailey Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com,

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>results into promo code action for its ten percent discount.

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that's promo code action for as ten percent discount

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Daily order dot com where millionaires are made. I wo

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>think your husband out of the year. Yeah, when was

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the last time you played? Nine? Oh? Yeah, it's only

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the second half? What week? Is a great Week six? Team? Right? Alright?

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>The second half of the year? Thank you? Second half?

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Do we deal first half? You is there? This guy

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>has not played since week That's right what I said,

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he missed weeks six. I was gonna tell you that far.

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>He has played eight games this year, so that to

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>half a season. Half a season? Yeah, you're excited about that?

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Is he good for the first half of the season?

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good? All right? So yeah, I'm pretty excited about it.

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Score touchdowns in three out of eight games. If you

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would have parent Evan Ingram with Tyler Higban is pretty good? Well,

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Tyler Higby was doing anything and we

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>ted Greg Wells very good in the past three weeks.

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You could have paired him up with like Doyle for

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Then Tyler Higby, you're good? Then all right?

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you want to say about Evan Ingram. So,

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I want to say. It's it's

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>what I want to figure out because like next year,

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we talked a little bit yesterday about George Kittle and

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Zach ertz Um and Travis Kelsey like being once again

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the top three performing at the top three level being

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the top three next year. We discussed second or third

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>round and whatnot, and he Sy'll both go in the

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>first two rounds. All three of them will go in

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the first three two rounds. You think so, I think not.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think one them will go and might go in

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the third if they don't, because the they need wide receiver.

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>You were talking yesterday about how more Andrews is gonna

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:04.239
<v Speaker 1>wind up being in that like like Hunter Henry's here

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>from this year, right that that that middle round, he's

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna like a fourth, fourth through sixth, fourth or fifth

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>probably right, Darren Waller will be there as well, right, so, um,

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you have this mix Hunter Henry, they'll be back in.

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So the question that I have, that was the question

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for answered. I mean, no, he won't. Where does given

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram has had major injury issues now throughout his career,

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>where does Evan Ingram fall for you, EU, I just

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>eight games this season. He's ended up leave every season injured.

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of Evan Ingram next year? Are

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Is he gonna be somebody that you're on. No, I

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. I think if he falls farther enough,

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's just like the tight ends from this year.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be very similar to last year. They'll

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>be that top, like four to five guys. I think

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he falls out of that number. I think we can

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>all give up on O. J. Howard. That's over with

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And for people that if it's not over with, then

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>then I want to play in a league with you

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and I want you to draft him in high just

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like he was this year. Complete waste of time. Uh,

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>complete wasted draft capital. And Ingram will be, uh you

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>know for me outside of you know, fourth and fifth round,

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>he'll be that kind of like middle tier that where

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, ten or twelve other guys that are

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>all basically the same. I mean, he's proven that he

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>can't stay healthy. Um, offensively, this isn't going to be

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a powerhouse. Um. I think Daniel Jones another year in

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the system, Barkley coming back healthy, will help improve that,

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but Sterling Shepherd has got to stay healthy. They've got

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to find more help at the wide receiver position. Um

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Slayton could be the other option there. I guess Um

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate has to remain healthy. There's a lot of

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>questions on the on the Giants team, and Ingram might

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>be the number one question. Greg. I've got the complete

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>tight end breakdown for next year right now, ready to go?

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you here? We go? Here you go? It is

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>December eighteen. I will give you the tight end breakdown

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. Kelsey Earth's and George Kittle will all go

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the first three rounds somewhere in tho first round rounds.

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, fourth and fifth round those middle rounds you

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>will see Darren Waller, Mark Andrews, and Austin Hooper all

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>go in those fourth and fifth rounds. I do think

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper will be in that mix right after those guys,

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and much like he did this year, you will get

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook and that's six seventh round range, assuming that

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees is the quarterback. I believe that Evan Ingram

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>will be in that mix the six seventh round kind

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of range with Jared Cook and then you're sleeper tight end.

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>You're sleepers, you're sleeper tight ends. Next year, the guys

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that we will be drafting late that will be this

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>year's Darren Waller, this year's next year's Darren Waller and

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews will be Mike Asecki and Dawson Knox. You

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>heard it here first your first Dawson Knox and come

0:35:55.760 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>one okay, and maybe Dallas Goddard to they had another one?

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Can they had another one? Maybe I'm got do it.

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Harry be sure. He he's actually gonna go way

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead of these guys. When Delaney Walker retires, Johnny Smith

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>will be in there too. He should be, he should be,

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>You're right, but he's gonna end up. You know what's

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. He's gonna end up getting too much hype.

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Like if Delaney Walker's gone, John U Smith will go

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>right behind that Evan and Gram and Jared Cook crew.

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>He'll he'll be like a top ten, top twelve tight

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>end drafted him and Tyler Higbee will be in that

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 1>same area, a low end tight end one being drafted

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for next year. But the Sleepers who will have breakout

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>upside and no a fan No. A Fan will be

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>in this group as well. It will be No A Fan, Mikeasecki,

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Dawson Knox. Those will be the late round tight ends

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>for next year that are going to be the upside picks.

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>You heard it here first BFS December eighteen. There's all

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>we do, Greg we a stuff, lock it in, lock

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it in. I'm ready to draft right now for next year.

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 1>You ready, let's go. No right, he's doing a baseball

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>draft to Why can you scold him? Um, any time

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone does anything base ball, I'm allowed to scold them. Why.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll send you a screenshot on my team and you

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>will let me know who you would draft next pick. Okay,

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you. I'll give you a draft grade real quick.

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Got Joe Carter on that team? Not yet, Roberto Roberto Alibar.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting on those guys. They're sleepers. Jimmy Keat he

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just tried. Mr Williams. How do you feel they're in

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the Celebrity Softball League Fantasy League? Interesting? Yeah, go away, baseball,

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>go away? Come on? How can we go away? Garrett

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Cold just you know he had his press conference today.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you were all over that big news. Oh, yeah,

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I woke up early, made sure not to miss it.

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So this weekend, t Y Hilton also, as we said

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>with Um forget who we talked about came out of

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>last year. We talked about James Conner. Why Hilton came

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>out of last week? Also not heard. He was obviously

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>limited on Monday night against the Saints, didn't play his

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>normal complon Little Snaps. You gotta figure that one out,

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Frankie and Frank Reix's a even though we're out of it,

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.320
<v Speaker 1>he as a player. He's going to play this weekend.

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you confident to why Hilton comes back being t

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton Frankie, Yeah, I mean, look, he didn't do

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>much this week. I think it's more concern over Jacoby Brissette.

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>The way that Jacoby Brissett and this Colt offense is

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>playing right now. It's not necessarily on t Y Hilton.

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>T Y played just fifty two of the Snaps, and

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of course last week Frank Reich said, well, we're not

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw t Y Hilton out there until he's completely

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>healthy and ready to play his full compliment of Snaps. Well,

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank Reich, why did he only play of the Snaps? Then?

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe because they were getting blown out. But regardless, it

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is a good matchup against Carolina, greg I would put

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton in the wide receiver three category. You know, normally,

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>if he's healthy, he's good to go. In a solid

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 1>matchup like this against Carolina, he would be a high

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 1>end wide receiver two. I think because of question marks

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 1>about his health and the fact that this offense has

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>played very poorly, specifically Jacoby Brissette, I think that downgrades

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>t Why Hilton to a lower end wide receiver three.

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Where does Adams and fall for you? This is a

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>similar conversation. We had Adam Feeland last week and you

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>were relatively low on him in general, Frank, and you

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>were right about that, and he didn't reduce normal Adam

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>feeling levels that he didn't see the amount of targets

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that were us super feeling he was limited, and you

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>had it as a wider's either three? What you do

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it again? I am gonna have him as a in

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a similar spot to where I had him last week.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Low end wide receiver to high end wide receiver three.

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>The problem is you can run on Green Bay, So

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much Minnesota is gonna have to

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>throw in this game, we could see some back and forth. Obviously,

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.399
<v Speaker 1>divisional matchup Monday Night Football a huge game for both

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of these teams. I do like the fact that the

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Packers have struggled out of the slot recently. We just

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>saw Anthony Miller have a monster game against them, a

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighteen yards and a touchdown in the slot

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>against this team, So you can't take advantage an advantage

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of them there. The problem is I don't know how

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 1>much the Packers will have to throw. I think that

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 1>whoever the running back is, Dalvin Cook Mike Boone will

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>see a good workload and be able to have success.

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Because of that, I will likely rank him similar to

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 1>where I did last week lowand wide receiver too high

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and wide receiver three. So do you have hired Adam

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Feeling or whim? I would use Adam Feeling over to

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>better offense. For sure, Kirk Cousins is balling out this year,

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>and again that match up in the slot against Green

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Bay I think is an advantageous one for Adam Feeling. Okay,

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Adam Feeling Over at t Y Hilton

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>here this week. According to Frankie, let me continue on.

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank with some other notes for this weekend, and that

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>brings me to Odell Beckham Jr. And I got a

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>question I can throw out to you. E Y, We're

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>going to Odell's personal crap, Odell Beckham. We're Tyler Boyd

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>this week. E way. Man, it is so hard to

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 1>trust Odell Beckham. I feel like every week, you know,

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.959
<v Speaker 1>someone was saying, or we were saying, this is the week,

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the week. Keep trusting him, keep putting him

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in your starting lineup. He's been rotten, he's been, he's been,

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>he's been rotten. Um By. I mean it's they're going

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to have to throw I mean, I mean that's all

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I can say. They're going to be behind um But

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I wouldn't trust him this week. I think

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I would probably play Boyd, which is insane to say.

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not insane, you're actually spot on. I would use

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd over Odell Beckham. I don't think that it's close.

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I like this matchup going up against the Miami Dolphins.

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>They've been torched by wide receivers all season long. I

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>think Joe Mixon has a good game here as well.

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.399
<v Speaker 1>The targets have been relatively consistent for Tyler Boyd since

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton has taken over, hasn't had less than six

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>targets in a game with Andy Dalton. Um, I'm not

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>depending on Odell Beckham in my championship week again. He

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is in a similar territory as c Y Hilton, lower

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 1>end wide receiver three. The talent is there, but he's

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>just not right. He's playing with the sports herney, a

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>groin injury or whatever it might be, and it's a

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>tougher match up against the Baltimore Ravens. I'm not fooling around, Greg.

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm using Tyler Boyd over Odell Beckham. Where So you

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 1>said that Ode would use feeling over him as well?

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>What a Julian Edelman man? I would use Julian Edelman

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>over him as well. But I think Edelman is in

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>this in this range. I think he's a wide receiver

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>three this week. He he'll just you said a wide

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver three was too was too late. You'd have him

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>as a high endwivers a high low and wire re

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:18.240
<v Speaker 1>SIPER two. What you told it? Yeah, on that fringe

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>low and wide SIER two hind wide receiver three in

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>your head, that's what it feels like it's just I

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.879
<v Speaker 1>did kind of talk myself out of it before. Look,

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you just think about all the injuries right that Edelman

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is head and Baltimore. I mean, the Buffalo Bills have

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a great secondary, so you have to take all these

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>things into account. But when it's all said and done,

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>if they're in a competitive game, which I expect this

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>to be the Patriots and the Bills, I expect it

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a competitive game. It's easier to run against

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bills and it is to throw. But at some

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 1>point I think that the Patriots are gonna have to

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>make plays in this game, and Tom Brady will rely

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on Julian Edelman. There's nobody else he can rely on

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in the passing attack outside of maybe James White in

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>this offense right now. So I think that as long

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>as Edelman is healthy enough to suit up and playing

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>this game, he likely sees around eight targets and whatever

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>he does with that will remain to be seen. But

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think that solid volume will still be there

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>for Edelman this week in a competitive game. Okay, so

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Julie will take him over Odell Beckham and deal not

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:21.320
<v Speaker 1>over Adam Field. You're backing not necessarily. I don't. I

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>don't really like any of these guys. I'll take Tyler

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Boyd overall of him. Eric, do you think that Odell

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Becka will be in Cleveland next year? UM? My guess

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is is no. I mean, for all the stuff that

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing. Um, I mean, I guess there's no no

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>way to know for sure. Um, you know, they could

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 1>patch things up. I mean, I don't think he's going

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a very easier easy player to get rid

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of contract wise. But uh, I don't know. Man, these guys.

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:50.879
<v Speaker 1>White receivers are a mess. They're just a mess. It's

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's one headache after another. He was a

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>problem in New York, even even though he's one of

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the best receivers in the game at the time. Um.

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 1>But I think he's proven year that he's not that anymore. Um.

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:04.439
<v Speaker 1>And and it is a big ticket and just he's

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a headache. I mean, and and that messes with the

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>chemistry of a team, messes with the morale of a team.

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And and I think, I mean, part of to blame

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for him this year is is Cleveland's downfall. I mean,

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>this is it's part of that. I mean, that's it's

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it's the ultimate team sport, and having a guy like

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that on the roster can affect everybody around him. Fredky

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>better chance of Odell Becka is back in Cleveland and

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Kitchens. There is a better chance that Freddie Kitchens

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is back in Cleveland. Not not that I think that

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it's warranted. I just think that they might be that

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>dumb and bring back Freddy Kitchens. I'm with e Y.

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Odell Beckham probably is on the move somewhere.

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I know there was a report earlier today that he

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>says that he'll be back with Cleveland. I'm not necessarily

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>buying that. I'll tell you where he'll fit in perfectly,

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Greg San Francisco. They were in on Odell Beckham last year.

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>They need that game breaking wide receiver. One Emmanuel Sanders

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a free agent going into the

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 1>off season. If you put Beckham on a field with

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel, George Kittle, and it doesn't matter who the

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:09.919
<v Speaker 1>running backs are, because my Cayle Shanahan makes them all great.

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>That's I'm They're already a championship contender. You add Odell

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Beckham to that team, they're they're likely number one in

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFC going into next year. But he doesn't choose

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 1>where he goes. John Dorsey does. You're right, but I

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>could see San Francisco being very in on him. They

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>were with the giants in his face. Hey, you got me,

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe they will. Three questions three minutes arrive at all

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>up after this NFL season is now upon us, and

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you can become the eighth person a wain one million

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars in a Fandueler Draft Kings tournament my setting their

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>lineups using the Daily Order dot Com DFS lot of optimizer.

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 1>If you were playing Daily Fantasy Sports and not using

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Daily Order dot Com, you're doing there wrong. Sign up

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:50.280
<v Speaker 1>now for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, smarter

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>DFS projections, and better results into promo code action for

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>its ten percent discount. That's promo code action for its

0:45:57.080 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 1>ten percent discount. Daily Order dot Com. We're millionaires are

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>made you. I had to say, good bist, Frank so

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>instead having a three questions in three minutes for both

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>of you. Some holiday music too. Finally, we don't need

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't ever need holiday music? Why not? Greg? I

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>don't play the honekah song too I'm cool with it,

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>but I don't really like holiday music. No biases here?

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter what your holiday is? A? Question number one?

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:29.360
<v Speaker 1>What's your favorite holiday song? Question number one? What is

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>my favorite holiday song? Well, we did hear the Italian

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Donkey on Fantasy Football Friends. That is one of

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 1>my favorites. That Dominic the donkeys that you're going to,

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that that's my go to. My My

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>go to will be Christmas in Hollis by run DMCA.

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Qush number two, when do you know? Really what's your

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 1>go to meal on Christmas? My go to meal usually

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is my parents make a very there this is a

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 1>great one. Have you ever seen Jingle All the Way eight? Movie?

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Great song, isn't that movie? Um? Normally my parents make

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge meal, much like Thanksgiving. This year they are

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 1>not doing that. Kinga offered up a my fiance offered

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>up a pot luck for Christmas. She she was like,

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>come on, let's help your mom out, you know, like,

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:22.879
<v Speaker 1>let's offer up a potluck. She just kind of threw

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it out there. Never thought in a million years my

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>mom would agree to it. She did. So now everyone's

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>bringing a different dish kin will be making Buffalo chicken

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>cutlets for Christmas? Great? What does Frank make? Next question?

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I can bring a few chicken nuggets if you want,

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like buffalo chicken nuggets. Uh. Cooking not really my thing, Greg,

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm very good at breakfast. Are you contributing beer to this? Sure?

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Bring a little cider for the For the holidays, you

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta bring something from cider. It's not all on Kingda.

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:55.879
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, I can't drink too much because

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be here the next day. Unfortunately it's a Thursday.

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:02.840
<v Speaker 1>You know I will also be here Gabe. Gabe was

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>downstairs earlier. He said, we don't have off the day

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 1>after Christmas? What kind of crap is this? It's like,

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Gabe, we just have the whole

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>week off. Said, what kind of Christmas break is this?

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Who said it was a Christmas break? I don't know.

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I guess he was just expecting one. No, was Hi?

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your third question? Greg? The third question? You don't

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have one? Why do you think you were going to

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have off the day after Christmas? Everybody should have off

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the day after Christmas. It's like the day after the

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. Greg, you're looking you have off Christmas and

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you're taking off the day before Christmas, Christmas Eve, you

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:41.439
<v Speaker 1>have all three off. The Eve you could have off

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have the day after Christmas off.

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to take that day off. And you know what,

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:48.319
<v Speaker 1>we will. We will be contacting Michael Cardono on this one.

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll be here, He'll be here. I hope, we hope