WEBVTT - Airbnb CEO on Earnings, MicroStrategy CEO Steps Down (Podcast)

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay him Emily Chang in San Francisco, and this

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. Summer

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.959
<v Speaker 1>travel help boost Airbnb to a record quarter, but expectations

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>are even higher for the current quarter. I'll talk to

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO Brian Chesky about investors raising the sticks, plus Michael

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Sailor's next chapter, The micro Strategy co founder is stepping

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>down as CEO to focus on wait for it, more Bitcoin.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Sailor joins us later to talk about why he's making

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>moves in a continuing crypto winter, and despite record inflation

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and pressure on consumers, so far had better than expected results,

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>bucking a bad news trend for fintech. See EEO Anthony

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Nodo will share his view on the macro environment and

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>spending plans as competitors like robin Hood sort of massive

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>round of layoffs. We will get to all of that

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>in a moment, But first, Airbnb, as I said, just

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>notched its best second quarter revenue ever. The home sharing

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>giant says it's only going to get better. The travel

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>rebound has given hosts more pricing power, which with average

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>daily rates now tire than pre pandemic. Airbnb chair and

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>CEO Brian Chesky joins me. Now, so, Brian, I have

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about the market reaction here because shares

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>open down. They've paired most of their losses for the day,

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're still down thirty so far this year. What

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think investors are missing? I think there's a

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of insertinty on travel right now, and um, you know,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think the best thing we can do is

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to tell our story. Our revenue was up fifty

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>eight percent year of a year. We generated eight million

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow in the quarter, nearly nearly three billion

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars in the last year, and I think one of

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the things we shared with investors is that our bookings

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>actually accelerated from jundist July. So I think one of

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the things we saw is that there's a lot of

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>demand for our Q three Q four summer travel. And

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're just we're focused on things we can control,

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so that's what we're doing. Still, there's some disappointment about

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>your forecast still going to grow, but growing the same

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>rate as last quarter. We had Brent phil who covers

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb from jeffreys On saying, look, I might be the

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>perfect example of a person I just took a big trip.

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm back home. Maybe I'm gonna slowly spending down.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Slow might traveled down just because of what's happening in

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the macro environment. How concerned are you about that? You know,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not too concerned right now about the macro environment.

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>One of the things we learned was two years ago.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we experienced something that we think is going

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to be much worse than this current macro end of

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>my environment when the pandemic hit our business shop in

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks. But the thing that was remarkable is what

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>happened next. We recovered really fast round any other travel company.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>And that's because are models adaptable. We have nearly every

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>type of space and nearly every type of community. So

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever happens the economy, people I think are still gonna

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>want to live on Airbnb. They're still gonna want to travel.

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>If they want to save money. Everything's a great way

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And you know, we're great for crossing boarders,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>were great urban travel, but we also are great for

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>non urban destination stuff you want to get in a

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>car and travel nearby. We work from that through that

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I think we're a very adaptable model

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and in a difficult economic time. Whatever remind people were

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>actually born in the recession. During that period of time,

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>during the financial crisis, people turned to Airbnb to become hosts.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>People wanted to save money and seek the value that

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>they got from Airbnb. So we're actually feeling really positive

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>right now. So dark cause RuSHA He I spoke to

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>him yesterday, the CEO of Uber. He said he thinks

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Uber is quote recession resistant. Is that how you describe Airbnb?

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you recession proof? I mean, you know, we were

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>born in the recession. We dealt with a pandemic reloss

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of our business in eight weeks. We just

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>established that we had a record Q two and we're

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling really good about Q three. So I think we

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>are as well positioned as anybody for a recession if

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that were to happen. Obviously, we've been talking a lot

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>about the companies doing layoffs, big tech companies like Netflix, Shopify,

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>coin Base. We're just hearing Walmart doing layoffs. I I

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>spoke to Tim Cook just ahead of their earnings call

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Apple planning to slowdown spending on hiring and growth. Also

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>said Apple plans to be deliberate about its spending. Are

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you changing your spending or investing or hiring strategy at

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>all given the downturn? What's your approach? Absolutely not. We

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>are not pulling on the brakes. If anything, I'd be

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>interested in stepping onto the gas. And here's why, because

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>we've been through this movie before. Two years ago, we

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>had to right size our business. We made a lot

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>of difficult choices. We got really focused. That's why we

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>went from a company that had negative free castle and

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>now positive three billion of last year. So we are

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>not changing our Harvard plans, We are not changing any

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>any investment the thesis. We are staying really focused and

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we've sustained our discipline. We were disciplined over the last

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of years when we right sized our business, and

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we're staying discipline, We're staying focused, and actually we're we're

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>focused on right now is next travel season. We're focused

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on how can we step on the gas to be

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>prepared for the next travel season? All right, So what's

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen next travel season? It's clear from your results

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that Urban and cross border travel are back. What are

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the locations the destinations that are going to be most popular. Well,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be. You know, I thought last

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 1>year was gonna be the travel rebound of the century,

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and it nearly was, but then, of course we had

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic bounced back with delta strain. This was an

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>even bigger year. That's why this was a record cord

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>for US. Remember this is before Asia's recovered. You know,

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>a large percent of travel is Asia Pacific that is

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>not recovered because much of Asia Pacific is cross border

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and people aren't freely crossing borders yet. Also urban and

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>cross border more generally is just beginning to recover. Now.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Prosper order is double what it was this time last year.

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think that everything is going to continue to recover, obviously,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>notwithstanding whatever happens the economy. I think it's going to

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be even even bigger travel season next year. Now, Airbnb

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>closed shop in China at the end of July because

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it was just so tough to do business. They're given

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the zero COVID policy, But you're now focusing on outbound

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>China travel. Do you have any expectation of when restrictions

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>will ease and when that uh will open up. No,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I mean we are. We're not going to

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>try to be in the business of predicting when UM

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>countries are going to reopen, but we're going to be

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in the business being the most prepared whenever they do,

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>so we'll be ready whenever boarders reopened. And to be clear,

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that China outbound business was always the prize, the biggest

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>prize with the Chinese consumer base wanting to travel around

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the world and stay in homes. That's not really uh,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's not really a robust business right now

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>because people aren't really crossing the border. But when they are,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be ready. And the way we're preparing

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is of making sure we have enough homes in all

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the corridors, whether it's Japan, Korea, Southeast Stags or the

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>other places that Chinese travelers go. We're gonna be prepared

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to have enough homes. We're gonna market them that this

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is a great option for them. How much more pricing

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>power do you think hosts can have in this market?

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the worst inflationary environment that you

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>know Airbnb has ever seen. Well, I think that, um,

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we are at we you know, our businesses a somewhat

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>seasonal business. So right now it's peak booking windows. So

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are traveling right now, and so

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people are traveling right now, prices

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>will tend to go up a little bit now. Bookings

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>right now in August or typically for September on September

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>on is really after the peak travel season, and so

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that will provide some pricing relief presumably. So I do

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think there's going to be quite a bit of flex

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>um entering the system as we kind of go off

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of high season. There also seems to be a trend

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in companies by being up short term rentals in bulk,

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder if that makes you at all concerned

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>about inventory and what do you what do you mean

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>by that? I just make sure I understand the question. Well,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got these property companies, these property managers that are

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.239
<v Speaker 1>buying up short term rentals in bulk, which I wonder

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>if that could be more competition for Airbnb or inventory

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>growth more difficult, you know, I think that like for

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the most part, I think it's just good to remember

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the scale that Airbnb operates in. We have four million hosts.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>We have six million listings around the world, hundreds of

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>millions of guests. So I think the scale of Airbnb

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is critical, and I think that ultimately what hosts decide

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is they usually want to go to platform where they

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>get the most demand, and they always typically want incremental demand.

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And Airbnb has probably more demand for homes than any

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>other platform in the world. So I think that we're

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>still going to be the place for people to go.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the category that we created, and it's you know,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be something that I think you can stay

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>really strong. Airbnb employees might be driving some of that demand.

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I know. You know obviously earlier this year and you

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>announced that Airbnb employees could live and work from anywhere,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm so curious to learnings from this policy so far.

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>What's been great, what's been more challenging, anything that you

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>think needs to be tweaked. Yeah, it's been a really

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>great experiment so far. I mean, what we announced is

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that employees can live and work anywhere. We won't change

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>their pay if they move within the country, and we

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to make it easier for them to travel

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and work from up to a hundreds seven different countries.

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>What we found is that number one, the reaction was

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly amazing. We've actually had hundreds of thousands of people

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>visit our jobs paid, so clearly people want this. I

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to open up access to tons of

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the talent all over the world. We begin, we've begun

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to gather employees. Our guidance isn't to only be on Zoom.

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Our guidance is that we would like people to be

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>together at least a week of quarter. So we're trying

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to do is balance the best of Zoom the best

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of real world. And we don't think that's necessarily being

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the office three days a week. We think that's

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>less frequent, more meaningful engagements. What I've learned is it

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>takes central plan and you don't want a free for all.

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not you bring people back to an office,

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you allow remote work, you want to have it centrally

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>planned because if one team does an off site, that

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>can stop everything if they're clapping another team. So I

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think the key is being really organized, really disciplined. But

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>if you do that, you don't need to be an

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>office to see people working, to know they're getting their

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>job done. You just need to be really organized. And

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>more organized you are, the more flexibility you can offer.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Last quick question, I know you're back at your home

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, but you've been living on Airbnb for

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for some time now. I know I've seen some pictures

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of you and your dog Sophie. What what have been

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>your favorite destinations and where are you off to next? Well, like,

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite ones is Sophie and I went

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to ann Arbor, Michigan, where we stayed in a Frank

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Lloyd Right home. And who knew that franklid Right homes

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>are on Airbnb. Well, we have actually the entire collection

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of them under our design category on Airbnb, so that

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>was amazing. I'm actually going to Europe and a little

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>over a week, so I'll be looking forward to staying

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in some really great airbnbs as well. And I think

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I've stayed in like twelve to third different airbnbs obay

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>my last count um since the beginning of the year,

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>so I've gone to like places all over the country

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's really great. It turns out you can run

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a really large public company from a laptop and someone

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>else's home. I'm gonna have to track down your your

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve to thirteen reviews on Airbnb. Bryan Tesky, CEO of Airbnb,

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>always good to have you. Thank you for stopping by.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. How Speaker Nancy Pelosi I did her visit

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to Taiwan pledging the US would not abandon its commitment

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to the democratically elected government. China reacted, announcing the series

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of military exercises and trade sanctions on Taiwan are Bloomberg

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>News political director Jody Schneider joins US now from Washington. So, Jody,

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of this trip and the way

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that it has played out. Well, it's interesting, Emily, because

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>before the trip, we were hearing a lot of threats

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>from China from President Hu jumping directly from Chinese officials

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>who warned a gray of consequences if Nancy Pelosi made

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that trip to Taiwan. She's humping. The president himself said

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that there would be uh that the U s and

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan would get burned if that happened. But now she went,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>She got there safely, She spent the night, she met

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>with the Taiwan's president and some other government officials, and left.

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh said a lot of things about the US commitment

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to Taiwan, uh and Uh. Now China is sort of

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>backing off that belligerent tone and saying give us some time,

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>have patience with us while we develop our strategy for

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>determining what we do about Taiwan in terms of that retaliation.

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So it really has been a market difference in tone

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>in the past twenty four hours and since Nancy Pelosi

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>left the island. How are we expecting China to retaliate.

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>We spoke to an analyst yesterday who say, we're not

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>going to see it right away, but you're gonna see

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>them hold this against certain companies and this is going

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to play out over years, not days. Yeah, I think

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's probably right. China is famous for its you know,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>having a long view in terms of geopolitical kinds of things, uh,

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and certainly political kinds of events. One thing, I mean,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>there's two different categories. One is military. And while no

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>one expects uh that China and Ji Jimping are going

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>to try to do something that that could be um,

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, that would be very dramatic to try to

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>unify Taiwan with the mainland. We do expect that things

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>like missile tests and military drills will certainly be part

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of this, and they've already announced that. They've said that

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>missile tests could occur at any time to kind of

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>showcase the strength of China's army and China's defense forces.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But they and then also uh, these drills which they've

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>said we'll start soon, So I think we will see

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>some of that, but also economic the thing about some

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>of these military drills, as these could disrupt the Taiwan airspace,

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and Taiwan today complained about that, saying they wouldn't be

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>able to have commercial flights uh, and you know, operate

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of way. Also shipping, shipping could be disrupted,

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and trying to make some announcements today already about how

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>they would not send some products to Taiwan. Also, as

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you note tariffs and it could become economically punitive in

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>some categories of goods. So that could be a real

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>way to try to punish Taiwan. So I think we

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>will see this more over time, and perhaps a variety

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of strategies being used to try to squeeze Taiwan. Interesting, Okay,

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of complicated dynamics to continue to watch play out

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>over years. At Jody Schneider E Bloomberg political director. Thank

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you all right, Come at more companies moving out of

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, including one of the most chrominent venture capital

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>firms in tech. That story next. This is Bloomer Technology,

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>one of Silicon Valley's most prominent venture capital firms, has

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>announced the location of its new headquarters in the Cloud.

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Andrews and Harrowitz is the latest in a mass exodus

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>around the Bay Area since the pandemic. But as companies relocate,

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley still remains the top draw for venture capital dollars.

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco attracted fifty two billion in VC funding in

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the year, more than one third

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the total that according to Pitchbook. Bloom Brigs was

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>at Chapman covers venture capital and start outs for us.

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>She's with me here now. So it's a pretty big

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>deal that Andrewson Harrowitz is moving its headquarters, if you will,

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to the cloud, opening these offices in Miami and other

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>parts of the country. Right, it's a major deal. This

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is a watershed moment, uh for Silicon Valley Andrewson Horowitz.

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>For people that aren't as familiar with it, it's one

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of the largest um you know vcs with the most

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>under management, you know, the backed household names including Airbnb, Roadblocks,

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Lift as well as and Roll and coin based and others.

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And they employ more than than most other VC firms.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So for them saying hey, Silicon you no longer need

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we no longer need to be in Silicon Valley green

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>lights UM, that practice for founders who are already finding

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that working remotely works really well. So is this the

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>start of a trend? Well, I would say that it's

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a continuation of a trend that actually began before the

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>pandemic UM, and this simply accelerates it. For example, if

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you look globally, UM, you know how venture capital was distributed. UM,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the US got eighty four percent of the total venture

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>capital back in two thousand four. In two thousand twenty one,

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the US only got Silicon Valley UM share of that

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>continues to go down UM over time, and this is

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>accelerating that. And the reason why is because as there

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>are so many new places to get funding, it's not

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>just Sandhill Road anymore. So is your expectation that Silicon

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Valley will still maintain some sort of dominance, but that

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there will be a lot of mini Silicon Valleys across

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States and really around the world. Right. Um,

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty fair bet. Um. I think that,

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, based on some of the talent here, I

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's um, you know likely for you know, uh,

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, a massive exodus of people to suddenly say no,

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna rip, We're gonna sell all of our homes,

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>rip our rips, our kids out of schools and all

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>of that. But um, you know, there's there's definitely competition

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>from other hubs with lower costs of living, lower taxes,

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, equally equal access to cash and talent.

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>And some of them are pretty loud. I'm thinking about Miami.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Miami is very loud, la Is and l a is

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>very loud. Um as well as well as a number

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>of other markets that have been increasingly gaining steam, like

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>including you Salt Lake City, Atlanta. Um. You know, you

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>look at some of these other markets that were overlooked

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>by venture capitalist who didn't want to get on a

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>plane or arrange the travel to go and do a

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>seed deal and do the work with the very early

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>stage companies when they really need that one on one.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>They weren't willing to do that. So in a way

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>remote work makes venture capital more accessible to a larger

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>number of founders that maybe were historically overlooked. All right, fascinating,

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>will certainly continue to follow this trendler was that Chapman

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>always get to have you back on the show. By

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, Bloomberg LP, which owns Bloomberg News, has invested

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>in Andres and Harrowitz. Welcome back to Bloomber Technology and

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chang in San Francisco. Many fin tech stocks have

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten claubed in the first half of the year, lagging

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred with growth slowed by COVID. Add

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to that rising interest rates pressuring payment stocks, and fears

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>over a US for session. It always is a question

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of which payment stocks are best positioned to whether the

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>downturn or at ludlow back with us and what do

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you think that are so far kind of case and

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>point where you look at the numbers up twenties eight percent,

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest jump in the stocks in January, four straight day

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of gains, a really strong top line growth, adjusted net

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>revenues up fifty year on year, eighth consecutive quarter of

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>positive ebit DAR bring up the numbers, mr direction and

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>let's look at what the street was really paying attention to,

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>which was this strong guidance for the rest of the years,

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>showing growth for the second half this year despite changing

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>market in economic conditions, market volatility really interesting. Moving to

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>view products as well, Deposits for so Far Bank up

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a hundred quarter on quarter, relatively new product personal loans

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>also up, so they seem to be doing well. They

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be consistent, is what CEO Antoo had to

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>say during the earning school. Let's compare year to date

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>versus robin Hood as an example, had a lot of

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 1>news out of them this week. They actually will be

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of lead, lagging behind robin Hood. But big jump

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in the stock today and investors seem to think that

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>so Far as one stock that has some momentum in

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd love them. Thank you. I want to stick with

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Sofa now and bring in to you know Anthony himself, Anthony,

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>great to have you back with us. So look, strong earnings,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>you're bucking the trend here. How do you explain this

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>big uptick in deposit Sure, thank you for having me, Emily.

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>The big uptick and deposits reflects the fact that for

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the first time this quarter we had our national bank

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>open and having a bank license allows us to actually

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>offer the consumer and interest rate and checking or say

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>things that we determine as opposed to a bank sponsor

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>determining it. And we've taken an approach where we really

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>want to be the primary relationship with our members. We

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>want them to be with us for all the major

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>funcial decisions they make in their lives, in all the

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>days in between. In order to be that primary relationship,

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we really need to be the place they do their

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>direct deposit. So we're offering them one percent interest um

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>if they do direct deposit with us, and that's on checking,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>no minimum balance, no restricting on spending. They could spend

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>when they want. They just have to do direct to

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>posit with us. And that's allowing us to use those

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>deposits to fund their loans at a much lower cost.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And so the two businesses are really synergistic. Higher restrate

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in checking gives us more deposits at a lower cost,

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>so we can lend more to more people and it

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.719
<v Speaker 1>drives a great virtual circle. Now, I know you're expecting

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>strong growth in the second half, but you know you've

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>got a recession looming. We've got all these these dire

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>warnings from policymakers, from other CEOs, What are you preparing

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>for sure? Well, we've we've been preparing for a war

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>since March of two thousand and twenty, when the goal

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of pandemic hit UM. The President of United States told

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>federal student loan borrowers they didn't have to continue to

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>make payments on those federal student loans as part of

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the Carre's Act, and that was credibly important for our country. Well,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that had a negative impact on our student loan refinancing business.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're not paying your student loans, there's no motivation

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>to refinanceing to a lower rate. So that the US

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>went from generating about two point one billion dollars in

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>originations UM two and a half years ago in the

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Q one to only four in a million this quarter. Well,

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the reason we've been able to drive record revenue growth

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this quarter and the prior three quarters is because we're

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>one stop shop for the consumer's financial needs. So we

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>have businesses that can operate and off overcome challenges in

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>one area to another. As an example, our technology platform business,

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>we're building out the a ws fintech through two companies,

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Galileo and technicis Gallet saw on acceleration and its revenue

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>growth because of the greater need for people at lower

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>costs and use new technology platforms. So we really benefit

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in different environments. And in this environment, we're seeing great

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>trends and personal loans, checking and savings invest strong demand

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on credit card and also strong demand for technology services.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Now you've got the student lawn moraditorium set to end

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>at the end of this month, but it's unclear what

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration is gonna do if it's going to

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>extend that pause, you know, follow through on this idea

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of maybe canceling student debt altogether. What are you preparing

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for their I mean, does the war continue, Yes, it does.

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Our outlook for the second half of two thousand twenty

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>two assumes the student loan moratorium continues throughout the entire year,

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and also that the President does provide forgiveness at about

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars for individuals. Um. If that actually happens,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's definitive, we could see a little bit of benefit,

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but we're not counting on it. Um. We assume the

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>more torm will continue through the end of the year,

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but once the government makes it the definitive statement, then

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>people can make real choices. Right now, they're doing nothing

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually hurting them. They're not benefiting from refinancing

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>before rates go higher, and they're expected to go higher,

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so lose some of the savings. In addition to that,

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not sure how much it is gonna be forgiven,

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>or if it will be forgiven at all, so they're

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>not sure if they should refinance at all. So once

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>we have a decision, we'll be able to pivot off

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>of that and go to market in a in a

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>concerted way. But right now we're anticipating no benefit of

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the more Tory amending before the end of the year. Meantime,

0:23:58.160 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we still have what seems to be a

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>deteriorating macro environment. Walmart just announced more layoffs today. Robin

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Hood announced yesterday they're laying off their workforce. Robin Hood

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>as a competitor to so far in some respects. I

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>was on this call with Latin of the CEO, who said,

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, he anticipated market conditions, good market conditions would

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>lack less longer than they've lasted, So that's on me.

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He used those words, what's your own approach to hiring

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>another costs. I mean, you know, is there any chances

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>coming for you? Well, we've been built tightening since March

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand twenty when that largest business and our

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>most profitable business got cut by sv and so we've

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>been pretty prudent about how we're allocating our capital and

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're investing in. We've delivered eight consecutive quarters and

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>three quarters in a row of record revenue, and we

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>had gap profitability in our bank for the first time

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>this quarter. And that's because of a prudent relationship between

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>how much we invest, what risk we willing to take,

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and also dropping into the bottom line. So we endeavor

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to drop about thirty of incremental revenue to offense and reinvest.

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>That keeps us disciplined and on costs on the cost

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation, and not build up with fixed

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>expense that we can't cover within Coromonto revenue. Anthony not

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Sophie always going to have here, Anthony, thank

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you for joining. Thank you all right, coming up, Michael

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Sailor stepping down as CEO of micro Strategy. But it

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean the end of the bitcoin error. We're

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear directly from him about that and much more

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>coming up next. This is Bloomberg micro Strategy is changing

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>up its leadership. Michael Sailor, who co founded the company

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in ninety nine, is giving up his CEO title, saying

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>he will increase his advocacy efforts for holding bitcoin. Shares

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of microL Strategy climbed as much as after this announcement.

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Sailor will continue to service executive chair micro Strategy pro

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>is it in Funk, Well, we'll take on that CEO

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>role on August eight. Joining me to talk about all

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this and more is Michael Saylor himself. Michael, great to

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>have you with us, So talk to us about what

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>drove this decision to move on from that CEO spot.

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Is it the end of the Bitcoin era for micro Strategy? No, No,

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the getting of the bitcoin era. Um. We got

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>into bitcoin about two years ago and it's been a

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>story of great success. The stock is up a hundred

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:29.479
<v Speaker 1>and twenty three. We outperform bitcoin. We did three x

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>as well as any other enterprise software company, about three

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>x as well as any other big tech company. So

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the shareholder returns have have been better than any competitive

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>stock or any competitive asset. Class, and most importantly, our

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet has swelled. We've increased our enterprise value by

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>more than seven hundred and thirty in essence, from six

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred million to five and a half billion dollars over

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that twenty form on time frame. So now we've got

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to the to the next point in our development where

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>we've decided we wanted to have a full time, world

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>class CFO, and we also wanted to bring one more

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>person the management team. So Andrew Kang joined us in

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 1>May as CFO. Fongly had been the president and CFO

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>of the company, and when Andrew joined, that opened up

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the door for us to make Fong the president and

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>CEO and for me to move to the role of

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>executive chairman of the company. Now, some people have written

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in the news that somehow this is related to our

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterly result or this large impairment charge we talk in

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Q two. It's totally unrelated. The fact is I've been

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>working with Fong on CEO succession for about four years

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>now and it's always been part of the plan. We

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>finally got to the point where we had Andrew, our

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>new CFO on board and we could actually make the

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>change in Fong to b CEO. So I think that

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the markets responding to the fact that now instead of

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>two executives Uh Sailor and Fong Lee, we have free executives,

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and um, it allows me to do what I like

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to do, which is bitcoin advocacy bitcoin acquisition. I'll continue

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to provide oversight for bitcoin acquisition as the chair of

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>the Investments Committee of the board. I'll stay as the

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Chair of the board, and it means Fong who has

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 1>been the president and the chief operating executive, he'll just

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>be running the day to day business and Andrew, whose

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>world class CFO, will be here to help us pursue

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>all of our financial strategies. Okay, so just for the record, then,

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to those who are speculating that you were pushed out

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of this role, is there any truth to that? No,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm first of all, it's my idea, Emily, and second

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, some people say it's their idea. I'm the

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>controlling shareholder of the company. I have the majority of

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the voting stock and so I've been planning to place

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Falling as the CEO since we made him chief operating officer.

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>That was like and we made him president in and

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>at that point he was running sales, marketing, technology services,

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everything. And he was the CFO and so

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that was his two years to get comfortable in that role.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and we couldn't elevate him to CEO until

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we had another CFO. It's it's you know, it's totally

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate to have a CEO and CFO as one person

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in a publicly traded company. So the catalyst for this is, um,

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>when could I find a CFO and when would when

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>would Falling have had the time to season in the

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>role and both of those things. Uh, they the plan

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>predates my infatuation with bitcoin, Emily, it goes back that

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>far many years. All right, still, micro Strategy lost a

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:55.239
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars due to your bitcoin holdings. It's underperforming. You

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>know the biggest tech companies that are also underperforming. How

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>do you square that? You know, how much is too

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>much for you? Or when will it ever be too much? Okay, Well,

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's a non cash and definite and

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>tangible loss um. The number that matters to our shareholders

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is that's the number of bitcoin we hold on our

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. And as I've just laid out, over a

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>two year period, are our strategy outperformed in NASDAC by

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a factor of ten. So we are volatile in the

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>near term, more volatile than a lot of things. But

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>volatility is the price you pay for performance. We could

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>have chosen a more conventional path in August of and

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>just given five hundred million dollars back to the shareholders

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and operated an enterprise software company that would have been

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>worth about sixty dollars a share. But there's no way

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we could have achieved superior shareholder returns if we weren't

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>willing to take a risk and embrace that volatility. So

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the result that you can see it is the stock

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>is above three hundred dollars a share. It gyrates. We

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>had more volatility in one hour emily than we had

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in twelve weeks before. But I embraced the volatility because

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the alternative would be we're dead money and no one

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>cares about us now. Even Tesla sold seventy of its

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>crypto holdings, And on that day that Tesla announced it,

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you tweeted, if you sell seventy five a few bitcoin,

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you only have twenty of your bitcoin left? Is Elon

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Musk wrong? Such a sad day for Tesla? It's you know,

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we all regret having having chosen great assets, all of

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>my investment mistakes in my entire career where I bought

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a good thing and then I sold it too soon.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh, there's never going to be more than twenty

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>one million bitcoin. In a hundred years from now, there

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>will be no more than twenty one million bitcoin. So

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's a buy and hold strategy. I

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>think that, uh, you know, Tesla has has many other

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>issues that I am not pervy too, so it's not

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>my ways to criticize them. But I do think that

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>acquiring and folding high quality property forever is a good

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>investment strategy, and Bitcoin, in my opinion, is the highest

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>quality property in the world. Now, a housekeeping question. You

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>filed with the SEC to issue four hundred fifty thousand

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:19.959
<v Speaker 1>shares as part of an employee benefit plan. Is that

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>going to the new CEO to you two other employees. No, Um,

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>there will be a stock option grant to the new CEO.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>It's sixty thousand shares, um, but the rest goes to

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the employees, not to me. Um. I haven't had any

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>stock option grants since ten and I work for a

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>dollar a year, so uh, we have made a concerted

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>effort to make sure that nearly all of our employees

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have either stock options or restricted stock units, and that

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>way they share in in our bitcoin strategy success as

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>well as our enterprise business intelligence strategy success. And that's

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>been a highly successful motivational program. It's cut our attrition

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in half and been great from Morrel. So, look, I

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>know bitcoin supporters have been arguing for a decade that uh,

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, decentralized cryptocurrency would dethrone the US dollar. It

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>hasn't happened yet. Will that happen? No, I don't think

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it will happen. But what I do think is there's

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>incredible consensus that the entire world wants a digital dollar,

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>like a stable coin like Circle or tether and um,

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and they want it because their currencies are collapsing and

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:38.719
<v Speaker 1>eight billion people would like to have dollars on their

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Android phone. And I also think there's a consensus that

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a digital commodity like bitcoin is a really important asset

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to stand alongside things like gold or oil or land.

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's incredible demand for that sort of digital property

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And so I think bitcoin will. Bitcoin

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to grow as an asset class as it's

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>legitimized and embrace as an asset class. I think it

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>will coexist alongside other assets. And I think that there

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>will always be fiat currencies from strong, well run nation states.

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>But Emily, it is true that in place like Sri

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Lanka and Venezuela and Nigeria, their currencies aren't collapsing, and

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 1>those citizens are going to use the dollars and medium

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of exchange for the near term. And if you want

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a long term store of value, and I'm saying looking

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>out four years or longer, you want property, and and

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is is of course that long term digital property

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to hold is a store of value, all right,

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sailor. Always good to have you, Michael, Thank you.

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Onto the latest and the Twitter Musk saga Twitter suppeded

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>records from equity investors and sought information on investors like

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andreason and Ken Griffin and a whole of other

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>venture capital figures you may have seen tweeting about it

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this over Elon Musk's financing of the four billion dollar buyout.

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>We should note that Bloomberg LP, which owns Bloomberg News,

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 1>has invested in Andres and Horowitz and here to break

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it all down for us is Jeff Feely, our reporter

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 1>who covers the courts of Delaware and who has been

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>very busy over the last few weeks. So, look, are

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 1>these moves pretty common as part of discovery, Jeff, It's

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>standard operating procedure for both sides in these lawsuits to

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>issue a bunch of subpoenas to banks, equity investors, lawyers

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so they can gather the information they need to build

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>their cases. So we've actually spoken to some of these

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>friends of Elon Musk who have been subpoena and one

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of them is David Sacks, who's actually come on our

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 1>show a couple of times in the last few months

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the potential for this deal to happen.

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen to what he had to say. When

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you put bots on Twitter and pretend to be someone

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not, when you pretend, when you basically violate the

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>authenticity requirement, were basically perpetrating and kind of fraught that

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>is not free speech, that's fake speech. Is perfectly fair

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>game under any kind of free speech policy to take

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>down those kinds of bots, and I fully expect that

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Ellen will be far more effective at doing that than

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>the current management of Twitter because they've been unable to

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>do that. So you know, obviously we don't know what

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of discussions they've had behind the scenes, if if

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>any at all, But what might the courts be hoping

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to get from someone like a David sax Well. This,

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>this issue of the box is really where the rubber

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to meet the road. As my understanding, it's

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to get very specific numbers on these things

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>because everybody has to deal with them. That that's not

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 1>just Twitter, it's a common problem in the tech industry

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 1>when you're dealing with this kind of stuff. So it's

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to be an easy argument for Mr Musk

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to win on. And the Twitter folks, of course say

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that it's all sort of a pretext ginned up so

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to to provide a basis for him to walk away.

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Judge McCormick is going to be the ultimate decider of

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>all of it. Okay, what's next here, Well, we're still

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in the discovery phase, so we're gonna still have a

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>blizzard of subpoenas. Next we'll start with notice of depositions

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be you know, probably hundreds of depositions in

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>this case, bankers, Mr Musk, the Twitter folks. You know,

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna have to sit down and say their peace,

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna go to trial in October and

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it should be quite a show. A show. Indeed, we

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>will be following this blizzard of subpoenas and I know

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you will continue to be very busy through October. Jeff Phalely,

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you for waiting and appreciate it. Okay, that does

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.919
<v Speaker 1>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Coming up later

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>this week Thursday, we've got Steve Wesley from the Wesley Group.

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be covering Tesla's annual meeting. Of course, he

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>was a former director on Tesla's board. And don't forget

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to check out our podcast wherever you get your podcasts.

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily check in San Francisco. This is Blueberg. H