WEBVTT - FBI Raids Trump’s Florida Home

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Stunning development and the ongoing legal battles involving former President Trump.

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>For the first time in history, a search warrant executed

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>at the home of a former president, and let's find

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>out more this morning, joined by Joe Matthew, the host

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg's Sound On. Joe, thanks for me with us.

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple of ways that the law enforcement

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can get stuff that they want, either through a subpoena

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>or a search warrant. In the distinction is important here, well,

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it is, and this is you know, we want to

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be careful here in the way we're framing this. People

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>are using the word raid because that's what Donald Trump

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.959
<v Speaker 1>called it in his statement to the media last night.

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>This was a search warrant facilitated by the Secret Service,

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to be clear. They weren't knocking

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>down doors, there were no battering rams. People were not

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>taken into custody. And this brings us back to January

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>when the National Archives first went in to retrieve fifteen

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>boxes at that point of documents and items from mar

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>A Lago that should have been turned over when Trump

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>left the White House. At that time, they said they

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>were continuing to search for additional records, and they have

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>been asking the Trump former White House, the former administration

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>to hand these over ever since. So what we saw yesterday,

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear, was was a very deliberate search

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>facilitated by the Secret Service, approved by a judge. And

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you cannot get a search warrant like this unless you

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>not only make the case of probable cause, but you

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>also have to be specific about what you are looking for. Now,

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>granted they took a lot of boxes out of there,

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they got into the safe, they could be looking for

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>as little as one document, as far as we know,

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>if it is top secret, that's all it would take

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to trigger that search yesterday. Is it implicit that not

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>going the root of a subpoena, Uh, they thought that

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't get it. Otherwise that's possible. We don't know this.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>We have to remember, of course, that there have been

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reports about Donald Trump disposing of documents,

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>tearing them up, flushing them down the toilet, and in fact,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.919
<v Speaker 1>some of the documents that were provided to the National

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Archives at the beginning of the or as I mentioned

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in January uh, in fact had been taped back together.

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They were torn up, thrown away and they had to

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>be reconstructed at the White House. All of that violates

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the Presidential Records Act. Do we know what the documents

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they were looking for possibly relate to? We We really don't.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is where it gets interesting here, Like, look,

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>just about every administration people should also understand this have

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>had some violation of the Presidential Records Act. The Washington

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Post reminds us this morning, Bill and Hillary Clinton had

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to return twenty eight thousand dollars in furnishings that they

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>said we're gifts were actually property of the White House.

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>We've just never seen anything on this scale. So it

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>does imply that this is important. This is a top

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>secret memo, It could be a series of documents, and

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 1>it also John could be tied potentially to the Department

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of Justices January six investigation. That remains completely unclear to us.

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And we have to be honest about how little we know. Okay,

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>so what is the former president and what are his

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>supporters saying at this point? Well, it's you know, it's

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a doom scroll. This morning on Twitter, Kevin McCarthy was

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>quick to tweet, this is the Minority leader that he

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>promises an investigation into this. He will be specifically investigating

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Merrick Garland. He tweeted to him, he said, put the

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>date on your calendar, assuming that he becomes speaker after

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms. New oversight to the FBI Marjorie Taylor

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Green among others. Uh, in Trump's uh ecosphere, if you will,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are calling for defunding the FBI, not unlike defund the police.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Now this is the new defund the FBI. Uh. Matt Gates,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>another Trump supporter congressman, refers to January six as the

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>FED surrection. So this really reinforces this allergy that Trump

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>supporters have to federal law enforcement. Well, can the former

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>president metaphorically sent fire to the Justice Department with his

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>supporters to evade responsibility? Could I ask the question again,

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>could he do what? Could he metaphorically set fire to

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department at this point? Well, if he got reelected,

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, but I'm not sure if you mean Donald Trump,

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what's way he would have over the

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department right now. If Republicans take the majority in

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the House, you're gonna see a lot of hearings. But

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that does not necessarily do anything to change the case

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump. And what does it do to change

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the case, possibly for the general election. That's a great question,

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty difficult to roll out more than two

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>years at the moment. Here. I would remind you, though,

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that Christopher Ray, the FBI director, was selected by President

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump after he fired director Come and uh, although you

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>would not necessarily expect, you know, such a bold move

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred days before the midterm elections for violating the

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Presidential Records Act, never mind elections. All right, Joe, thanks

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>very much. Well, before you go, what do we look

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for next? Well, gosh, that's a great question. Look, Donald

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump would also, it strikes me have a copy of

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that warrant. I think that we will. We will have

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to learn at some point what it is they were

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for. But knowing that they have laptops, hard drives,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>documents and so forth, there's gonna be weeks, if not months,

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of download and ingesting data, could be some time before

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we understand, unless, of course, the FBI is a little leaky,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and that we might know as soon as today. Joe,

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure, appreciate it. Joe Matthew hosts a Boomberg

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>sound on on