WEBVTT - Health Care Must Insure the Young to Make it Work, Miller Says

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Well, we talk a

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>lot about healthcare these days and how it may change

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>due to UH new congressional efforts. But here someone is

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>living with it and is in our studio right now.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Alan Miller, chief executive officer of Universal Health Services, which

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. But he is

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>here with us in our Bloomberg eleven three oh studio.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us, Allen. Um. I

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>want to start with your company, Universal Health. It shares

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>her up almost eight so far this year. This doesn't

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>really jibe with a lot of what we hear about

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the health care sector and how depressed it's been. What

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is your company doing? That has sort of led to

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>these Well, we're not. We've been in business for thirty

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>eight years. UM, we've grown every year. UM. We UM

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>are diversified, we are in acute care. We're in behavioral health.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>We're a leader in the nation and behavioral health, and

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we are international in the UK. We've been growing there,

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>so it's a nice diversified mix. We've done well financially. UM.

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We are in fast growing markets. That's our strategy. UH.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And we're reliable. People know the company. UM. We are conservative.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>UM Our debt is less than FI many others are

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>much much more leverage. So we've been doing this for

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a long time and I think people have become aware

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of us and they're comfortable that we're going to continue.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Know we're gonna get to the political side of this

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in a minute, but I want to just touch on

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the situation for hospitals in general, acute care hospitals across

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the country. We've heard a lot about, UH, the vacancy

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>rates in beds, the fact that reimbursements from medicated Medicare

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>have been challenging. UH. And I'm wondering, would you buy

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>an acute care hospital right now? We do. We just

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>built one. Yeah, we we just opened Henderson in Las Vegas.

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>It is our sixth acute care hospital in Las Vegas. UM.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 1>It is doing very well. We opened two years ago

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>we opened into Mecuela in southern California. It's doing very well.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, we we buy hospitals and we build hospitals.

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So what's this you here? Why do we hear so

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>much talk about the decline in hospitals. I don't understand

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that UM other than UM people are reflecting the fact

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps I'm sure UM Obamacare UM ensured twenty to

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>million people who did not have insurance before, and so

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:15.399
<v Speaker 1>that has been very good for the hospitals because obviously

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>when these people present themselves at a hospital, they have

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>some sort of ability to pay where they may have

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>not been able to do that in the past. So

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly very positive if your patients can pay. And

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>UM now with Obamacare in question because of the Republican

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>parties saying that they would replace it, UH and their

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>efforts have not been successful. At the first crack and

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>UM without going through all of it, which I am

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>very familiar with, UM, it did it did tend. It's complicated,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it did tend to UM reduce coverage. That's what the

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>big A back was, and a lot of people, including

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>many Republicans in Congress, said we can't stop coverage or

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>withdraw coverage, um from all these people that needed everyone

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>should have coverage. Have any Republican leaders reached out to

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you to ask you advice on how to reshape or

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>fine tune? Well, yes, Um, I wrote a book a

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>number of years ago, and a number of those things,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.559
<v Speaker 1>um or a number of the suggestions in the book

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>are still applicable. One of them is selling across state lines.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>And you see that now, because that would get the

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies more competitive and they more of them would

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>come into every market. So that makes a lot of sense. Um.

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I've always been very keen on tort reform because trial

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>lawyers should not be uh involved in premiums of insurance

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and then needs to be a tort reform um on

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a nationtional basis, state by state. It's happened, Just to

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>be clear, this is in order to cap potential medical practice.

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Laws of them give some sense of the premiums for say,

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>you know a neurosurgeon, it's something like a hundred thousand

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year or something to ensure yourself, right, it's something,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's something pretty pretty tremendous. It's it's it's it's outrageous

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>only because of the trial lawyers and UM situations where

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no cap on pain and suffering. We're not talking

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>about UM people being reimbursed for care. We're talking about

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>UM an outrageous situation in most cases where UM trial

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>lawyers are are driving up insurance premiums. What about drug prices?

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>There's been so much discussion about how high the cost

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is for pharmaceuticals. Do you feel like this issue is

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>something that is overblown. Do you think that there are

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>many savings that could come from some kind of agreement?

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I think what should happen, Well, what could happen is

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 1>let the federal government UM and negotiate with the farmer

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>industry UM. We buy out of a cooperative and so

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we do negotiate UM on an industry wide basis UM

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>based on volume. Other than that, I'm not an expert.

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>On hold on a second, what what kind of cooperative

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is this? It's called Premier and we buy through it. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>And a number of hospitals are involved. And it's just

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a question of volume, which is basic business. If you

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of volume, the sellers are very interested

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in dealing with you. So how optimistic are you that

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>there will be good changes? Made to Obamacare or a

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>potential replacement to it. Well, I think that UM, the

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>things I started to mention I did mention to you

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>UM would be helpful. And the big thing is UM

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>getting younger people to have insurance. UM. This enables the

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies their actuaries to not only be looking at

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>older people who are sicker, but having younger people in

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the mix makes the insurance more affordable. And they have

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>not been able to UM the mandates were too small

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to push these people to have insurance. We must have

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the younger people insured in order to make the whole

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>insurance thing work. Allen Miller, thank you so much for

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Really is a wonderful to have you. Allen

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Miller is chief executive officer of Universal Health Services. It

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, and it's a

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>broad based, multifaceted company that owns behavioral health facilities, acute

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>care hospitals, and ambulatory centers throughout the US, the UK,

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>put RICO, and the Virgin Islands. Leverage in US stocks

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>has risen to the highest level on record. How concerned

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>our investors about this. I am honored to bring in

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>David Lebovits global market strategist for JP Morgan, who's here

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>with us in our Bloomberg eleven three oh studio and

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>David we were just chatting about how much UH margin

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>debt has increased in US stocks. This to me indicates

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>an incredible amount of complacency, just that people are willing

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to double down on their bets. How are you taking this?

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>And does this sort of a raise some kind of

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>alarm to you? You know, I think that the biggest

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>concern is what this means and what it tells us

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>about investor sentiment. You know, our investors so excited about

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>equities that they're willing to borrow money to pump even

0:08:57.840 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>more into the stock market. And I think that it's

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's reasonable to look at this and see the

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>rate of change and see the levels that we're currently

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sitting at from a margin debt standpoint, and say, you know,

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>has this market come too far too fast? And we

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>have And that's the and that's the question. You know,

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we have seen we have seen quite a rally here,

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's our view that the underlying economic fundamentals actually

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>look pretty good. You know, this rally really began um

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>or at least we started to see yields rise and

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and give some more confidence to the equity market, you know,

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>back in the late summer of two thousands sixteen. So

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the economic data has been getting better for a while.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that the pullback we've seen here

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in the market is probably justified. It's a little bit

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>more of a backfill um as opposed to the beginning

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of something bigger. But what we're focused on is the

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>upcoming earning season. You know. The question to our mind

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is are these companies making money? If the cash flows

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are there, if the earnings are there, I think stock

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>prices can keep moving higher. If we see some weakness

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and earnings. I think that this thing is like margin debt,

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe worth keeping an eye on. Well. I mean,

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing some other cracks. I mean, because we

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about how that seems to be the

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>consensus right now that the economy is in fairly good

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>shape that you know, despite some clouds around the edges.

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>In general, things are chugging along. But we did see

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty substantial decline in commercial and industrial loans on

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>US bank balance sheets in a recent survey, and this

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>raised some alarms that either banks were tightening up their

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>lending criteria to such a degree that they're not allowing

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>companies to get credit, or that there just isn't the demand,

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>which suggests that the economy isn't growing that fast. How

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>do you interpret this? You know, we think that it's

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not as much a bank issue. UM. Lending standards have

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>been pretty tight, and you know, the quality of borrowers

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the banks of looking for has been pretty elevated for

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the better part of this business cycle. UM. Actually, one

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that we've found is that when you look at

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>capital expenditures and you look at CNI loans UM, the

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>capital expenditure data actually tends to lead some of the CNIDADA.

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So actually, what I think is going on here in

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.599
<v Speaker 1>terms of the decline in the lending data is and

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>we went through this period from a two thousand fourteen

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to mid two thousand sixteen where manufacturing was under a

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of pressure because of lower commodity prices and

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a stronger dollar. I think we're just seeing some lagged

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>effects of that and some of the pullback in investment

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that companies went through, and that's why we're seeing c

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ANY loans cool off a little bit here. We don't

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily think again, it's the beginning of something bigger. More,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we think it's a reflection of what's actually happened in

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the past. You know, given the fact that what you're

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>saying is so coherent with when and jibs so directly

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>with what a lot of other people are saying, which

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is the economy is doing fairly well. Some of these

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>warning signs are a little concerning, but they're not anything

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that big. Uh. It seems like people are sort of

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>pricing in the same scenario, which is sort of chugging

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>along growth. Does this mean a that returns are going

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot lower because everybody is piling into

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the same trades and there isn't a lot of value

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to be found, or B that everybody's missing something and

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that the chance of of a substantial hiccup is getting greater.

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that it's more the former than

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the ladder. I think that return expectations for US assets

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in general, both stocks and bonds, have certainly come down

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>here the couple of years. So our view is that

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>over the next ten to fifteen years, US equities should

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>return you about five and a half percent a year um,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, a couple percent below the the

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>seven and eight percent bogies that have been thrown around previously.

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But what I would say is just because there's not

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>dwindling opportunity, perhaps less opportunity from a return standpoint in

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the US, we're thinking much more seriously about opportunities in Europe,

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and emerging markets, places outside of the US where

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the potential for elevated return seems to be a little

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>bit greater than here in the States. So where are

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you looking in particular, So within emerging markets, we like

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the Asian economies more than the Latin American economies. We

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like the manufacturers more than the commodity exporters. And then

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>within Europe, you know, we're really focusing on the domestic

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>recovery that's going on there. You have an unemployment rate

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>which is backed down at the level where it was

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>before the double dip back in two thousand twelve. You've

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>capath city utilization which is up around its long term average.

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The p m I data, It is a survey, but

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the p m I data has been pretty solid there.

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So we think that playing this domestic recovery, thinking about

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 1>some of the consumer companies in Europe is a good

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>way of going about that. How hard is it to

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>invest in Asia given the questions around the quality of

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the economic data that you get out of there,

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 1>It's it's difficult. You know. China in particular is kind

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of a kind of a black box. They say we

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have the six and a half percent growth target, and

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>magically they seem to come very close to six and

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a half. Well, did you read the art. I think

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it was black Rock using drones to look at factories

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in China to sort of assess growth in their own way.

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I have heard about the satellite images where people are

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>counting the cars in the parking lot. You know, some

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we do is we look at,

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, the Taiwan import data from China rather than

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the China export data to Taiwan. So we try to

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>square that circle in a couple of different ways. But

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know the benefit for investors is they're getting access

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to more information. They're finding themselves with new and different

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>ways of building a picture around what's going on in

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. So the data has been an issue. The

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>data will continue to be somewhat of an issue, but

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we're moving in the right direction, and I

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>think that investors are able to get a better sense

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of the profitability of some of these companies. What's the

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest risk area right now in markets? So I think

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that there are a couple of risks right now. To me,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the markets are standing on kind of two pillars. One

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of them is a political pillar and one of them

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is a nominal growth pillar. Now, the political pillar, you know,

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>both in the US and abroad, is looking a little

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>bit wobbly. We saw the UK, you know, begin their

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Brexit negotiations the other day. Um, we've had some disappointments

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>here in the US in terms of the pace of

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of policy reform relative to what some people were expecting.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But the nominal growth pillars still looks okay. So I

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>think one of the biggest risks is that the nominal data,

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that the activity data, starts to deteriorate. Because you know,

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>we're we're investors, right We're trying to follow the cash flows.

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to find the companies that are generating earnings,

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and if the economic data starts to deteriorate, that's a

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>signal that it's going to be more difficult for these

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>companies to generate profits going forward, and if we think

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>back to the last time that happened again from mid

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to mid six team, right, the stock market didn't

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere. People always say to me, David, why didn't

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the stock market go anywhere from June fourteen until the

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>middle of two thousand and sixteen. And my answer is, well,

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>because earnings weren't growing. So the biggest risk in my view,

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is that the activity data rolls over and that passes

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>through and hinder's corporate profitability. All right, thank you so

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Really, what I'm speaking with you

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>David Lebovitz. He is the global market strategist for JP

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Investment Management, and he joins us here in our

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven three oh studio. Right now, I want to

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about a three day gathering that's happening in May

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be host it by Amazon and attended

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>by executives from General Mills and Montalis, among others. Craig Giomana,

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>who wrote this fantastic story, is here with us in

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg eleven three oh studio. Craig um this is

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a tremendously interesting story because it really highlights how Amazon

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is trying to take over the entire retailing sector. Can

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you tell us a little bit about this three day meeting? Yes, So,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're right, the Amazon is trying to take

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>over everything. They're the everything store and kind of the

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>one area that they haven't really cracked is food. You know,

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they only e commerce for groceries is only like one

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>point five percent of the market. Amazon has taken over

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>everything else, and they're kind of looking at this really

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>hard and comes We've come to find out that in

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>May they're bringing you know, big companies sort of from

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the CpG world consumer package goods and household products out

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to Seattle to talk about logistics and supply chain stuff.

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And they're basically trying to get General Mills and Montolis

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and these companies that make our food to think about

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a world where e commerce is primary, So put it

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in different boxes and package it in a way that

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we can ship it to actly to people. So this

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>is Amazon really muscling in more to the grocery stores,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>turf and just to be clear, right now, food goes

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>largely through Walmart, Target or Costco and then it could

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>potentially be ordered on Amazon. Right, There's there's plenty of

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>delivery services that have popped up. I mean, I think

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>in New York City that stuff is popular. But you

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.239
<v Speaker 1>gotta remember it's a big country out there, and like

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, one point five percent of the grocery market

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.959
<v Speaker 1>is online, So really we're talking about people still going

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to Kroger Albertson's safe way to shop for groceries. People

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>don't buy food online at this point, but it's growing

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's clearly has gotten the attention of the general

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>mills is of the world. These guys are struggling for

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>sales growth and they really can't ignore Amazon, and they're

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out, you know, a world where, like

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>everything else, people used to say, we're never going to

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>buy shoes online, we have to try them on, or

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to buy books online. But that's where

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>we are with food. It's kind of the last frontier. Well,

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but to get a sense, I mean, because to your

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>point you were saying, in this city it's pretty popular

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with Fresh Direct or even just other delivery services from

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>grocery stores. It's more popular because people don't have cars.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>But in other places, I mean, what's the challenge for

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon just with respected distribution of shipping fresh food, and

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know some organization like fresh Direct, how much

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>penetration have they gotten outside of cities. But the shortager

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is not much. Fresh Direct does well in New York City.

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>There's something called Pepod, which is owned by the company

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that owns Stop and Shop. They've done okay, but it's

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>called the last mile. Basically, it's just incredibly expensive to

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>run those trucks and to do it economically when you

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>have one house on a block in the suburbs, to

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>run a refrigerated truck out there, make sure the ice

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>cream is cold, all the produce looks how the people wanted.

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>The steak is what they want. Amazon has been trying

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this for years. Amazon has been going after fresh food

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for you know, a decade at least, and it just

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't worked. So now they're really stepping up those efforts.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So is this do you expect that at this three

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>day meeting part of the discussion will be how they

0:18:55.080 --> 0:19:00.160
<v Speaker 1>can more efficiently transport these goods to people's houses other

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>than to the stores. Yes, I mean, I think what

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we know about it is it's Amazon saying to these

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>big companies, hey, let's come out and let's talk about

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a world where you're thinking not necessarily about the store first,

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>but about selling stuff direct to consumers online. So the

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Cheerios box, think about that, that's set up to catch

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>your eye in a store. You know, years and years

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>decades of people grocery shopping that way. That's how the

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>box is designed. So Amazon is going to say, let's

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>think about, we don't need this box like this necessarily,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's put it in a box that we can take

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>real quick and ship it out. So it's just them getting,

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to get these companies to change their

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>mindset a bit. So the Walmart targets and Costcoats of

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the world, they must be fighting back. They are right,

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So Walmart. The big thing for Walmart is something called

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>click and collect, where basically you're going to go online,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>order order your food, you drive up to the curb

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and they have it ready for you. Because Walmart wants

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to live in a world where you're still maybe going

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to go into that store. Plus, in a big part

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of the country, people are out on the weekends in

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>their cars. Again, this is a bit of a sort

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of New York City San Francisco versus the rest of

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the country thing. It's still convenient for people to pick

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 1>up those groceries in their cars. So you know, Walmart

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is just desperate to get you into the store where

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you start grabbing other stuff. That's how they make their margins.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Is this the first time Amazon has held a meeting

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like this that we know of? That we know of?

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And I mean again, it's very very small part of

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the business, and you know, grocery stores aren't going away

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. But I think why this is so interesting

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to everyone is that food is like the last thing

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:31.959
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon hasn't cracked. They've taken over electronics, clothes, books,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>all these other things, and now here they are coming

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>hard for the food business and they've been unsuccessful to

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this point, but are clearly going after it. Craig Jamanna,

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming in and talking with us.

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank It's really a fascinating story. The last frontier for

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and maybe the last frontier for some of these

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>big retailers that want to keep a corner on this market.

0:20:50.920 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Craig is a consumer reporter here at Bloomberg News, fresh

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>off the plane from Hong Kong. Mark Gabay, CEO of

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Asia Pacific LaSalle Investment Management, is here with US in

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg eleven three oh studio, and I am so

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>excited to speak with you Mark about what the flows

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are doing right now from Asia to the US with

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>respect to real estate. Uh. First, I want to start

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with these images that I'm sure a lot of people

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have seen, of these empty buildings that have been built

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>in China with not enough people to fill them. Uh.

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>This raises a lot of fear and expectation that the

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>housing market in China is going to collapse. What do

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you tell your your clients in the U S who

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>are looking to invest in China and how concerned are they? Right? So,

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's true there are a lot of

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>empty buildings and mostly the secondary cities in China, not

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>so much the primary cities like a Shanghai or Beijing,

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>but some of the other secondary city So it is

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a concern. But overall, we tell people they have to

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>understand in China that is a store of wealth for

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the retail market. So there's not a lot of options

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>for retail investors where to put their money in China.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Bank deposit rates are low, they tend to put it

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in real estate and so when they buy these units,

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not really looking to rent them out, so they're

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>actually quite comfortable leaving them empty, which is a typical

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>compared to the US, but typical for their But how

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>much of these purchases are being financed with leverage. It's

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not as highly levered as as the U S. So

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>usually we would say mortgagees there in the fifty to

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent range, maybe sev tops. So in Asia you

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>tend to have a bank market for retail where more

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>money is put down, so we don't believe it's leveraged,

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>but we would say is it a good thing for

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the overall real estate market? No, it's not good because

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>if if someone try to sell some of those units

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>would be much harder to sell them on the secondary market.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>So where are U S investors flanning opportunities within Asian

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate right now? Well, that really depends on your

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>risk profile. If you're a high risk investor or a

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>low risk investor. If you're a higher risk investor, then

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you are generally looking at the gateway cities and you're

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at commercial buildings that have good income profiles because

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally borrowing rates are quite low in the region and

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you can still generate good cap rates on your buildings

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's creating nice cash flow. So Tokyo, Sydney, soul um.

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, one thing that we were also talking

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>about is is a flip side so UH. For a

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>long time, China's Chinese investors are Since two thousand, Chinese

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>investors have been studily increasing their investment UH in the

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>US and in some of the big cities. And there's

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>been a big question about whether we're gonna start seeing

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>a pullback of that money and those investments due to

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>capital controls UH in China as well as a less

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>uh benevolent environment for them in the US. UM. What

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have you seen? It will edb and flow. I don't

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>think that will change, but I think the overall trend

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>will be the same. They will continue to flow out

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and look to diversify its holdings. And there's just so

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>much capital saved up in China across the board UH,

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and it is trying to get out for purposes of diversification.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And real estate tends to be an asset class of

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese like to use again to hold you know,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>to store wealth, so they don't really look at it

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so much as a cash flow asset. They look at

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it as as a way to to to save money

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and hold an asset over time. Although we have seen

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>reports about a slowdown in Chinese investors or Asian investors

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>generally in US property, there's a slowdown, but I think

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of capital that's already outside of it,

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>what we would characterize as Chinese capital that's already outside

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of China, and whether it's in Hong Kong or in

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Singapore and other cities, there's a fair amount of capital

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that's out out there. So if there's a slowdown, I'd

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>say it's temporary. UM. It's just the Chinese government trying

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to make sure the currency store stays in balance, and

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there's not dramatic capital flight, but that trends not going away. Well,

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>I'd expect we'd see more Chinese capital coming out. So

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>LESL Investment Management overseas about seven billion dollars real estate?

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Is that all in Asia? That the seven We are

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty billion globally with about twelve billion in securities and

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>forty eight billion in private. Of the forty eight billion

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of private, seven billion of it is in Asia. Okay,

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And so what have you invested in UM? Recently? We've

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>been UM by quite a bit of office and UM

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>logistics in in Tokyo. That's a favorite sector for US.

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Logistics in China is a favorite sector for US. Retail

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in Australia. What places have you been avoiding or sort

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of pulling back from? For US? Not really playing back,

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but i'd say avoiding. We're not really an emerging market investors,

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>so you don't see US investing in India. We don't

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>invest in Vietnam, Philippines, Thailand. So we tend to stay

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in the developed markets because we think the risk return

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>there is quite favorable. Do you think fears about China's

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>economy exploding are overblown right now? We do you think

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it's overblown? I think the Chinese have demonstrated, uh, they're

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a command economy, which means they can control UM a

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of what can be deemed as panic. I think

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they've done in a job controlling that in the last

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, and we expect they're going to continue

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to do it. So we don't think the hard landing

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>scenario is really um the main scenario. There's still potential

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of that, but it's not We're not worried about it.

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Given that. Have you seen an increase in US investors

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>looking to invest in Asia. Uh, definitely. We would say

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years that trend line has

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>probably been increasing ten to fifteen percent year a year

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>over year years. So a couple of years ago, we

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>would say that's about a twenty billion dollar kind of

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>market in terms of investors come into to UH Asia.

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Now it's it's in that billion dollar range, and recently

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>we'd say there's much more European and US money coming

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 1>into Asia, and I think it's about diversification fundamentally, and

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as far as Asian investors coming in, you're just saying

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>real quick kind of similar to that. I mean, it's

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>also a double digit growth rate. It's getting to be bigger,

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>but as you pointed out, it's going to EBB and

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>flow a little bit. But it's been a consistent uptake

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>year year over year. So I think what's happening is

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>there's so much money saved in the world and it's

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>looking to put it find a home someplace in real

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>estates natural that big ball of money just rolling around

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the world. Thank you so much for joining us. Mark Goobey,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Asia Pacific at LaSalle Investment Management, overseeing about

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>seven billion dollars of assets real estate assets in Asia.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 1>out there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio