1 00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:12,440 Speaker 1: Welcome to Strictly Business Varieties, weekly podcasts featuring conversations with 2 00:00:12,520 --> 00:00:16,360 Speaker 1: industry leaders about the business of media and entertainment. I'm 3 00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:20,079 Speaker 1: Cynthia Littleton, co editor in chief of Variety Today. My 4 00:00:20,120 --> 00:00:24,440 Speaker 1: guest is Julia Borston, senior Media and Tech correspondent for CNBC. 5 00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:29,680 Speaker 1: Borston is no stranger to entertainment industry insiders. She's been 6 00:00:29,720 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 1: CNBC's Hollywood correspondent for years, but during the pandemic, she 7 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:37,640 Speaker 1: found time to pursue a passion project, writing a book 8 00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:41,480 Speaker 1: about female leaders in business. Let me tell you, listeners, 9 00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:45,120 Speaker 1: this is no breezy read, nor is it dominated by 10 00:00:45,159 --> 00:00:47,960 Speaker 1: interviews with the usual suspects when it comes to women 11 00:00:48,040 --> 00:00:52,519 Speaker 1: business leaders. Borston did her homework and her research. The 12 00:00:52,600 --> 00:00:55,880 Speaker 1: book is organized by broad themes that are probed in depth. 13 00:00:56,360 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: It's not platitudes about girl bosses. It's deeply report ordered 14 00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:03,000 Speaker 1: with facts and figures to back up her assertions that 15 00:01:03,120 --> 00:01:06,760 Speaker 1: female approaches to running companies are very often good for business. 16 00:01:07,560 --> 00:01:13,200 Speaker 1: Borston has the receipts on how women leaders lead into innovation, sustainability, 17 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:16,679 Speaker 1: and have a knack for finding discreete markets where money 18 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:19,560 Speaker 1: is being left on the table because others don't see 19 00:01:19,560 --> 00:01:23,440 Speaker 1: a need or profit potential, and she pulls no punches 20 00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:26,720 Speaker 1: in calling out the venture capital community for the pitifully 21 00:01:26,760 --> 00:01:31,200 Speaker 1: small volume of investment dollars that flow into female adventures 22 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:44,759 Speaker 1: every year. That's all coming up after the break. M Hey, 23 00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:47,520 Speaker 1: thanks for sticking around. We're back now with more on 24 00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:51,360 Speaker 1: the power of women in leadership from CNBC's Julia Borsen. 25 00:01:53,840 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 1: Julia Borston, senior median technology correspondent for CNBC A face 26 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:03,640 Speaker 1: that Hollywood business watchers no well from her terrific reports 27 00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:07,680 Speaker 1: and crack interviews with top CEOs, Julia Borston has written 28 00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:11,640 Speaker 1: a book called When Women Lead. It is terrific. It 29 00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:15,640 Speaker 1: is full of scholarship and data. This is not a 30 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:20,840 Speaker 1: breezy beach tread. It is a deeply reported, really intelligent 31 00:02:20,919 --> 00:02:24,640 Speaker 1: and I'm going to underscore intelligent look at what it 32 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:27,480 Speaker 1: means the impact of women in business, what it means 33 00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:31,919 Speaker 1: to have female leadership rising slowly but rising up through 34 00:02:31,919 --> 00:02:34,320 Speaker 1: the ranks in this country and around the world. It 35 00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:37,920 Speaker 1: is a book with a truly global focus. It's a 36 00:02:38,280 --> 00:02:43,080 Speaker 1: I am just absolutely staggered at the research and data 37 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:45,120 Speaker 1: that went into it. And I'm going to start with 38 00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:49,040 Speaker 1: the question that everybody probably asks you, Julia Borstein, who 39 00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:53,000 Speaker 1: is on CNBC all the time covering this most dynamic business, 40 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:55,680 Speaker 1: how on earth did you find the time to right 41 00:02:56,280 --> 00:02:59,120 Speaker 1: this deeply reported book. You know, I was very lucky, 42 00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:03,040 Speaker 1: um that during the pandemic, I was safely at home 43 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:06,440 Speaker 1: with my family, and I was broadcasting from home. As 44 00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:08,360 Speaker 1: you know, I've seen you in all sorts of different 45 00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:11,440 Speaker 1: cities around the country, at different conferences and things. But 46 00:03:11,680 --> 00:03:14,000 Speaker 1: my travel came to a halt and I set up 47 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:15,800 Speaker 1: a little studio in my house, a studio which has 48 00:03:15,800 --> 00:03:19,040 Speaker 1: since moved several times, but gone where the you know, 49 00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:22,040 Speaker 1: the days on the road gone, Where the afternoons and 50 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:25,919 Speaker 1: evenings out and events. I was really locked down, and Um, 51 00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:29,000 Speaker 1: I had started working in a book proposal before the 52 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:32,320 Speaker 1: pandemic started, and once the pandemic hit, I thought, I 53 00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 1: have this window. I'm at home, I'm not socializing, I'm 54 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:37,760 Speaker 1: not out on the road. I need to use this 55 00:03:37,840 --> 00:03:40,600 Speaker 1: time and get this proposal out and get this book written. 56 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:42,560 Speaker 1: And I felt like I had this deadline looming, and 57 00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:44,960 Speaker 1: I thought, any day now, any week now, the pandemics 58 00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:46,720 Speaker 1: can be over, so I should really get as much 59 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:48,720 Speaker 1: done as I can now, so as a result, it 60 00:03:48,800 --> 00:03:51,520 Speaker 1: was incredibly efficient. But the beauty for me of this 61 00:03:51,560 --> 00:03:54,400 Speaker 1: time at home is that everyone was at home, and 62 00:03:54,440 --> 00:03:56,560 Speaker 1: people who might have been really hard to get interviews 63 00:03:56,600 --> 00:03:59,800 Speaker 1: with are hard to nail down, were available. And I 64 00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:02,480 Speaker 1: had so many interviews with people when they were walking 65 00:04:02,520 --> 00:04:05,480 Speaker 1: their dogs, or when they were hiding in their closet 66 00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:08,160 Speaker 1: trying to get a break from their young children, or 67 00:04:08,200 --> 00:04:10,840 Speaker 1: when they were cooking dinner, and women just opened up 68 00:04:10,840 --> 00:04:13,000 Speaker 1: to me. And I spent hours and hours on zoom 69 00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:16,120 Speaker 1: and on the phone in people's really felt like I 70 00:04:16,120 --> 00:04:18,400 Speaker 1: was in their homes, and so A I had a 71 00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:22,440 Speaker 1: lot more access b I think that the conversations ended 72 00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:25,200 Speaker 1: up being much more intimate and personal because not only 73 00:04:25,240 --> 00:04:27,159 Speaker 1: was I in their homes with them at this time 74 00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:30,440 Speaker 1: um when everyone was kind of going through something together, 75 00:04:31,279 --> 00:04:33,880 Speaker 1: but also there was a sense that the world stopped 76 00:04:33,960 --> 00:04:36,119 Speaker 1: and everyone was taking a step back and thinking about 77 00:04:36,120 --> 00:04:39,560 Speaker 1: their purpose, thinking about why they were doing what they 78 00:04:39,560 --> 00:04:42,719 Speaker 1: were doing, What was their management strategy, why did they 79 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:45,320 Speaker 1: care about leading in a certain way, How do I 80 00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:48,200 Speaker 1: connect with my employees, what are my goals? And so 81 00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:51,560 Speaker 1: it was actually a really important moment for these leaders 82 00:04:51,640 --> 00:04:54,000 Speaker 1: to think about what they were doing and also for 83 00:04:54,040 --> 00:04:56,320 Speaker 1: me to connect with them and also see how they 84 00:04:56,360 --> 00:04:59,640 Speaker 1: were facing the biggest challenges of our time. What in 85 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:02,280 Speaker 1: truly inspired you to want to want to look at 86 00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:04,839 Speaker 1: this area. So I've been at CNBC for sixteen years. 87 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:06,919 Speaker 1: I have the most amazing job. As you know, the 88 00:05:06,960 --> 00:05:09,320 Speaker 1: media and tech industry has changed so much in that 89 00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:12,560 Speaker 1: time and that moment never a dull moment. And I 90 00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:15,520 Speaker 1: have these two projects that I love at CNBC. One 91 00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:18,200 Speaker 1: is the Disruptor fifty List. I launched it over ten 92 00:05:18,279 --> 00:05:21,240 Speaker 1: years ago, and I wanted to look at the fascinating 93 00:05:21,240 --> 00:05:25,240 Speaker 1: startups that were transforming business before they go public. Scenbcs, 94 00:05:25,279 --> 00:05:28,000 Speaker 1: of course focused on public companies, but I had covered 95 00:05:28,040 --> 00:05:30,279 Speaker 1: Facebook from the time it was relatively young through the 96 00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:32,120 Speaker 1: I p O, and I thought there was no model 97 00:05:32,480 --> 00:05:35,719 Speaker 1: for CNBC to look at these private companies long before 98 00:05:35,760 --> 00:05:37,200 Speaker 1: the I p O. We need to be getting these 99 00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:40,479 Speaker 1: companies and the types of technologies that they're representing on 100 00:05:40,520 --> 00:05:43,520 Speaker 1: our viewers radar early. So I created this list and 101 00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:46,839 Speaker 1: as a result, I've had the wonderful job of interviewing 102 00:05:47,160 --> 00:05:50,240 Speaker 1: a lot of private company ceo is fascinating innovators over 103 00:05:50,279 --> 00:05:52,320 Speaker 1: the past ten years. So in one hand, I was 104 00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:56,760 Speaker 1: interviewing all these amazing innovative, tech driven companies and the 105 00:05:57,000 --> 00:05:59,360 Speaker 1: other hand, I had launched this other project that I 106 00:05:59,360 --> 00:06:02,560 Speaker 1: love called Posing the Gap, and um after the whole 107 00:06:02,560 --> 00:06:04,560 Speaker 1: Times at Me Too movement, I thought, you know, we've 108 00:06:04,600 --> 00:06:06,960 Speaker 1: told all these negative stories, but we need to be 109 00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:10,240 Speaker 1: focusing on the solutions. We as a network need to 110 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:12,800 Speaker 1: be looking at the companies and individuals who are doing 111 00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:15,880 Speaker 1: positive work to close gender and diversity gaps. So my 112 00:06:15,920 --> 00:06:18,520 Speaker 1: colleagues and I created this franchise is online and is 113 00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:22,560 Speaker 1: on TV, and we told stories of ways companies like 114 00:06:22,680 --> 00:06:26,159 Speaker 1: Salesforce or PayPal, we're closing equity gaps in their pay 115 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:28,320 Speaker 1: and in promotion. So I was looking at all these 116 00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:31,520 Speaker 1: stats about pay equity and all these things. I kept 117 00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:34,200 Speaker 1: on coming across these stats that seemed insane to me, 118 00:06:34,640 --> 00:06:36,520 Speaker 1: and the one in particular that stuck out to me 119 00:06:36,640 --> 00:06:39,279 Speaker 1: was the fact that, yes, women are now eight percent 120 00:06:39,320 --> 00:06:43,279 Speaker 1: of the fortune five dred. They are maybe of boards 121 00:06:43,279 --> 00:06:46,200 Speaker 1: depending on when you cite that stat, but it comes 122 00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:50,080 Speaker 1: to venture capital funding, women over the past decade have 123 00:06:50,160 --> 00:06:54,320 Speaker 1: gotten three percent on average of all venture capital dollars. 124 00:06:54,720 --> 00:06:57,159 Speaker 1: And I thought, this is bananas. This is bananas. The 125 00:06:57,200 --> 00:07:01,000 Speaker 1: most recent stats were that two per scent of all 126 00:07:01,120 --> 00:07:04,919 Speaker 1: venture capital dollars went to companies without a single female 127 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:08,279 Speaker 1: co founder. So that means that all these billions of 128 00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:11,880 Speaker 1: dollars that are funneling into companies like Uber or Airbnb, 129 00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 1: they're going to change the way we live, don't have 130 00:07:14,320 --> 00:07:17,960 Speaker 1: women involved. So I thought, this is crazy. I was 131 00:07:18,040 --> 00:07:20,840 Speaker 1: interviewing women who had defied those odds, where those female leaders, 132 00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 1: and I thought, I want to know how these women 133 00:07:22,440 --> 00:07:24,520 Speaker 1: did it. And I was interviewing them for the Disruptor 134 00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 1: fifty lest I thought, these women are by definition exceptional, 135 00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:30,760 Speaker 1: and so I want to hear their stories and figure 136 00:07:30,800 --> 00:07:32,720 Speaker 1: out how they did it. And every I mean, it 137 00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:35,760 Speaker 1: just goes the venture capital stat which is so which 138 00:07:35,800 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 1: is just so like stubborn and annoying and annoying. Is 139 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:41,840 Speaker 1: that like when you it's so in Congress with knowing 140 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 1: is in the U, in the US as well as 141 00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:48,680 Speaker 1: in hugely in other areas Asia, Africa, where is you know, 142 00:07:48,800 --> 00:07:53,360 Speaker 1: more than the entrepreneurship is coming from women startup funds, 143 00:07:53,400 --> 00:07:57,320 Speaker 1: So you know, what message does what message does that send? 144 00:07:57,360 --> 00:07:59,240 Speaker 1: And it's you know, yeah, I mean and look for 145 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:02,080 Speaker 1: of all small businesses in the United States are run 146 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: by women. There are clearly plenty of entrepreneurial women. But 147 00:08:05,520 --> 00:08:08,400 Speaker 1: the fact that women last year female founded companies got 148 00:08:08,440 --> 00:08:11,760 Speaker 1: two percent of all VC dollars, that's crazy, and so 149 00:08:12,400 --> 00:08:14,440 Speaker 1: yet the ones who were doing it and have managed 150 00:08:14,480 --> 00:08:17,840 Speaker 1: to defy those odds are amazing. So I really sort 151 00:08:17,840 --> 00:08:19,960 Speaker 1: of use the lens of this area where women have 152 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:24,040 Speaker 1: the least representation, because in some ways they are most exceptional. 153 00:08:24,320 --> 00:08:27,239 Speaker 1: So the Bull book is full of lots of different stories. 154 00:08:27,320 --> 00:08:29,960 Speaker 1: I talked about Sarah Harden and Witherspoon and lead away 155 00:08:29,960 --> 00:08:33,360 Speaker 1: than some some CEOs of nonprofits, But I talk a 156 00:08:33,400 --> 00:08:35,559 Speaker 1: lot about the tech industry just because the stats are 157 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:38,080 Speaker 1: so crazy and the women have to be so amazing 158 00:08:38,120 --> 00:08:40,520 Speaker 1: to defy those odds. I mean going just going deep 159 00:08:40,559 --> 00:08:43,640 Speaker 1: into it, and again of a scholarship here is so 160 00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:48,840 Speaker 1: impressive is that you go into how that women who 161 00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:52,319 Speaker 1: frame their their pitches for for venture capital and private 162 00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:54,800 Speaker 1: equity funding, if they frame their pitches with a socially 163 00:08:54,840 --> 00:08:58,280 Speaker 1: conscious lens, they have a better better track record of 164 00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:01,320 Speaker 1: getting money and then and and having you know, then 165 00:09:01,400 --> 00:09:04,000 Speaker 1: getting a setting up a successful business with the kind 166 00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:07,280 Speaker 1: of capital which is you know, it's not bad. Socially 167 00:09:07,320 --> 00:09:10,640 Speaker 1: conscious is terrific, but it is that it is frustrating 168 00:09:10,679 --> 00:09:12,679 Speaker 1: because it's like, well, you have to be one thing, 169 00:09:12,679 --> 00:09:15,280 Speaker 1: you have to be warm and fuzzy. What's not budging them? Well, 170 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:17,080 Speaker 1: what's so interesting? I mean, it's so funny that so 171 00:09:17,120 --> 00:09:19,720 Speaker 1: many women I talked to said they founded a company 172 00:09:19,720 --> 00:09:21,720 Speaker 1: and they would take it to vcs and some would 173 00:09:21,720 --> 00:09:24,160 Speaker 1: ask them, so, who's your white male co found are 174 00:09:24,160 --> 00:09:25,959 Speaker 1: going to be? There was one Indian woman and people say, 175 00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:27,800 Speaker 1: who's your white You gotta you gotta get a white 176 00:09:27,840 --> 00:09:31,440 Speaker 1: male to be your partner. And wouldn't just like turn 177 00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:34,160 Speaker 1: over some furniture and walk out or give up? I 178 00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:36,559 Speaker 1: was it? Why didn't you give up? That's amazing. There 179 00:09:36,640 --> 00:09:38,800 Speaker 1: was a bunch of women said that they would pitch 180 00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:41,320 Speaker 1: their idea and the target audiences women, and the VCS 181 00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:43,640 Speaker 1: would say, I don't know. You know, my wife never 182 00:09:43,679 --> 00:09:45,840 Speaker 1: had a problem with that. There's this one woman, Shanlin Mot. 183 00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:48,400 Speaker 1: She's the CEA of a wedding company, like a wedding 184 00:09:48,400 --> 00:09:52,680 Speaker 1: registry planning company called Zola. It's incredibly popular and um 185 00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:54,600 Speaker 1: she pitched her idea with all this data to these 186 00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:57,760 Speaker 1: vcs and it was a bunch of men, and they said, 187 00:09:57,760 --> 00:09:59,719 Speaker 1: I don't know. Let's like pulling an assistant in here. 188 00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:02,080 Speaker 1: There's a woman. Let's pull in my assistant. She's a woman. 189 00:10:02,160 --> 00:10:04,199 Speaker 1: Let's get her thought on this. She's like, this is 190 00:10:04,240 --> 00:10:06,760 Speaker 1: a business. I'm giving you numbers and projections. I said, 191 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:08,640 Speaker 1: I don't know. The wedding industry just doesn't seem like 192 00:10:08,679 --> 00:10:10,880 Speaker 1: that big of a business. Of course, it's a fifty 193 00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:13,720 Speaker 1: billion dollar business, and now our business is doing great. 194 00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:17,360 Speaker 1: But so there was just this disconnect between the older 195 00:10:17,360 --> 00:10:19,920 Speaker 1: white men who were meeting with her and the actual 196 00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 1: understanding of the market data. So I think to answer 197 00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:27,679 Speaker 1: your question about why the investors are not um adequately 198 00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:30,319 Speaker 1: understanding the opportunity, a lot of that comes down to 199 00:10:30,360 --> 00:10:33,760 Speaker 1: the fact that the VC industry has not changed in 200 00:10:33,800 --> 00:10:36,560 Speaker 1: many years. It's not like Wall Street, which has gone 201 00:10:36,559 --> 00:10:40,640 Speaker 1: through various reckonings. Because those are public companies, they're transparent. 202 00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:44,000 Speaker 1: They report data. Any company, whether it's a tech giant 203 00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:46,360 Speaker 1: like Google or Apple, these are companies that are reporting 204 00:10:46,920 --> 00:10:49,520 Speaker 1: gender and racial diversity data, that put it on their 205 00:10:49,559 --> 00:10:52,800 Speaker 1: website every year, and every sort of study will tell 206 00:10:52,840 --> 00:10:56,959 Speaker 1: you that the best way to drive changes to have transparency. 207 00:10:57,400 --> 00:11:01,840 Speaker 1: Up until about there is no measure of the diversity 208 00:11:02,080 --> 00:11:06,000 Speaker 1: in in the Silicon Valley financial institutions. And these are 209 00:11:06,080 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 1: small groups of people who make a couple of big 210 00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:12,480 Speaker 1: bets a year and they're hoping really influence market, really 211 00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:15,480 Speaker 1: influence market, influence the price of tomatoes. They decide to 212 00:11:15,520 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 1: support something that needs tomato juice. You well, but it 213 00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:20,520 Speaker 1: really I mean, like, there are these crazy examples like 214 00:11:20,559 --> 00:11:23,000 Speaker 1: soft Bank, which has this three hundred year vision fund 215 00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:25,400 Speaker 1: and will just pour hundreds of millions of dollars into 216 00:11:25,440 --> 00:11:31,320 Speaker 1: an idea like an uber crashed crash U or the 217 00:11:31,400 --> 00:11:34,040 Speaker 1: Uber TV show. So but there are these There's so 218 00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:37,319 Speaker 1: much money at play, and there's a lot of really 219 00:11:37,320 --> 00:11:40,240 Speaker 1: interesting data about how this is not malicious. Right, There's 220 00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:43,360 Speaker 1: a lot of data showing that male investors, I'm sorry, 221 00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:46,360 Speaker 1: male investors are half as likely as female investors to 222 00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:49,560 Speaker 1: invest in a female D company. So that's really interesting. 223 00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:52,720 Speaker 1: So statistically, a female investors twice as likely to invest 224 00:11:52,760 --> 00:11:55,080 Speaker 1: in a female LAD company that a male investor is 225 00:11:55,240 --> 00:11:57,839 Speaker 1: the problem there is is that women represent a very 226 00:11:57,880 --> 00:12:00,400 Speaker 1: small percentage of the decision makers a e C S. 227 00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:03,800 Speaker 1: I think something like of decision makers at vcs. And 228 00:12:03,800 --> 00:12:06,120 Speaker 1: I'm going to have to double check that. But the 229 00:12:06,160 --> 00:12:09,760 Speaker 1: ideas that women aren't represented in terms of the powerful 230 00:12:09,800 --> 00:12:13,040 Speaker 1: positions in those ventor capital firms, and so therefore, if 231 00:12:13,040 --> 00:12:15,800 Speaker 1: they're twice as likely to invest in women, then you 232 00:12:15,800 --> 00:12:18,600 Speaker 1: don't have a lot of a lot of female founders 233 00:12:18,679 --> 00:12:21,440 Speaker 1: getting getting capital. And a lot of that comes down 234 00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:23,640 Speaker 1: to pattern matching. I want to make it really clear, 235 00:12:23,640 --> 00:12:25,840 Speaker 1: I'm not pointing fingers. I don't think this is malicious. 236 00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:27,920 Speaker 1: A lot of data in my book points to the 237 00:12:27,960 --> 00:12:32,040 Speaker 1: fact that female leaders are sometimes more likely to generate 238 00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:35,480 Speaker 1: high returns than mail leaders. So people care about making money, 239 00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:38,040 Speaker 1: they should be investing in female founders. The reason why 240 00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:40,920 Speaker 1: they're not is because they're looking for someone, oftentimes who 241 00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:44,120 Speaker 1: reminds them of Mark Zuckerberg. So many of these investments 242 00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:46,840 Speaker 1: are made at the early stage, before there is a 243 00:12:46,960 --> 00:12:52,160 Speaker 1: track record, before there's revenue or you know, profitability or 244 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:55,240 Speaker 1: anything to show the success of the actual business. So 245 00:12:55,280 --> 00:12:58,720 Speaker 1: many investors are bidding on ideas and founders. They're looking 246 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:01,200 Speaker 1: for founders who have a track record, and they're looking 247 00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:04,240 Speaker 1: for founders who remind them of a founder who succeeded 248 00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:05,520 Speaker 1: in the past. And I have a quote in there 249 00:13:05,520 --> 00:13:07,520 Speaker 1: of a VC saying he would invest in anyone who 250 00:13:07,559 --> 00:13:10,480 Speaker 1: reminds him of Mark Zuckerberg. So this is a vicious cycle. 251 00:13:10,559 --> 00:13:15,840 Speaker 1: It perpetuates itself. How much how much does the Elizabeth 252 00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:20,400 Speaker 1: Holmes thing hurt the cause of women trying to break 253 00:13:20,400 --> 00:13:23,840 Speaker 1: this log jam? Look, I loved the Elizabeth Holmes podcast. 254 00:13:24,240 --> 00:13:29,200 Speaker 1: I love the consumer. I think it's I think it's 255 00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:32,280 Speaker 1: fascinating and I think I mean I and I have 256 00:13:32,280 --> 00:13:34,079 Speaker 1: to say just as a as a consumer of content, 257 00:13:34,120 --> 00:13:37,160 Speaker 1: I really enjoyed all of the content around it. Having 258 00:13:37,160 --> 00:13:40,080 Speaker 1: said that, it's a it really is a bummer, for 259 00:13:40,200 --> 00:13:41,480 Speaker 1: lack of a better way to put it than when 260 00:13:41,520 --> 00:13:43,920 Speaker 1: you ask people like, think of a female CEO and tech, 261 00:13:44,240 --> 00:13:46,200 Speaker 1: the first person who comes to mind is Elizabeth Holmes. 262 00:13:46,280 --> 00:13:49,319 Speaker 1: They're billboards of Amanda Say f Reed playing Elizabeth Holmes 263 00:13:49,360 --> 00:13:52,120 Speaker 1: all over l A. That's who people think of. But 264 00:13:52,240 --> 00:13:55,640 Speaker 1: she is not representative of what female leaders are like, 265 00:13:56,000 --> 00:13:58,800 Speaker 1: especially in tech, because that you know that firm. Yeah, yeah, 266 00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:00,160 Speaker 1: I mean, I mean, first of all, it's she was 267 00:14:00,200 --> 00:14:03,240 Speaker 1: a total failure and it was never a tech from Yeah, 268 00:14:03,240 --> 00:14:05,160 Speaker 1: I mean it was an idea, you know, it was 269 00:14:05,200 --> 00:14:09,000 Speaker 1: a failed idea. But I think that um, it's very 270 00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:11,080 Speaker 1: easy to glom onto these archetypes. I mean, you think 271 00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:13,400 Speaker 1: about Hollywood, like, there are a couple of archetypes. There's 272 00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:15,960 Speaker 1: the you know, there's this silken valley brow in a 273 00:14:15,960 --> 00:14:19,400 Speaker 1: hoodie archetype. There's the man in a suit Wall Street 274 00:14:19,560 --> 00:14:22,800 Speaker 1: ceo archetype, and they're just The archetype of a female 275 00:14:22,840 --> 00:14:26,360 Speaker 1: CEO is an Elizabeth Holmes type. You know, a young white, 276 00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:29,480 Speaker 1: blond woman who fails. That's like what people have in 277 00:14:29,520 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 1: their head and it's just not accurate and it and 278 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:34,160 Speaker 1: it's and also to me what drives me crazy. And 279 00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:36,560 Speaker 1: one reason I wanted to tell the stories of about 280 00:14:36,600 --> 00:14:38,480 Speaker 1: sixty women in this book is there are such an 281 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:42,880 Speaker 1: amazing diversity, such a wide range of different ways that 282 00:14:42,960 --> 00:14:45,240 Speaker 1: women are leading, and they look and sound and do 283 00:14:45,360 --> 00:14:47,760 Speaker 1: things in entirely their own ways. I mean, they're never 284 00:14:47,840 --> 00:14:50,840 Speaker 1: women in the book who are introverts. They figured out 285 00:14:50,880 --> 00:14:54,840 Speaker 1: how to use their introversion as a superpower in business, 286 00:14:54,920 --> 00:14:57,440 Speaker 1: and I think that's so cool because it totally breaks 287 00:14:57,480 --> 00:15:00,000 Speaker 1: the stereotype of what a leader is supposed to be. 288 00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:03,760 Speaker 1: You like, I want to ask you about that. I 289 00:15:03,840 --> 00:15:06,200 Speaker 1: want to like jotting down things I want to ask 290 00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:08,840 Speaker 1: you before we move off of venture capitals. What about 291 00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:11,600 Speaker 1: hedge funds? So I don't go into hedge funds. I 292 00:15:11,640 --> 00:15:13,720 Speaker 1: don't get hedge funds. They are dealing mostly in public 293 00:15:13,720 --> 00:15:16,640 Speaker 1: companies and they're shorting in, they're doing long bets. But 294 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:20,600 Speaker 1: that because they're they are also they're more regulated because 295 00:15:20,600 --> 00:15:24,520 Speaker 1: they're dealing with public companies because of the SEC regulations. 296 00:15:24,520 --> 00:15:27,120 Speaker 1: But it is a different deal. Yeah, this is like 297 00:15:27,160 --> 00:15:30,760 Speaker 1: the venture capital is the power, and venture capital is 298 00:15:30,760 --> 00:15:33,000 Speaker 1: that there's an idea or an entrepreneur they believe in. 299 00:15:33,360 --> 00:15:36,160 Speaker 1: They can pour in tens, if not hundreds of millions 300 00:15:36,160 --> 00:15:39,120 Speaker 1: of dollars long before a company is profitable, so they 301 00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:43,280 Speaker 1: can determine whether or not an idea becomes a successful business. 302 00:15:43,920 --> 00:15:46,560 Speaker 1: And I think it has massive impact on our society 303 00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:49,040 Speaker 1: if you think about the way tech companies have changed everything. 304 00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:51,160 Speaker 1: Just look at our phones in the half of the 305 00:15:51,240 --> 00:15:53,320 Speaker 1: half of the apps. Um let me ask you the 306 00:15:53,360 --> 00:15:55,800 Speaker 1: opposite of that? Is there do you find when you 307 00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:58,480 Speaker 1: talk to especially the female founders, like, is there is 308 00:15:58,520 --> 00:16:01,480 Speaker 1: there a scenario or small can be beautiful? Is everybody 309 00:16:01,480 --> 00:16:03,440 Speaker 1: aiming for the big I p O? Or is there 310 00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:06,160 Speaker 1: a world where you have a nice I hate to 311 00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:07,960 Speaker 1: call it a nice little business, but you have a 312 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:11,480 Speaker 1: you have a business that is profitable and sustainable, and boy, 313 00:16:11,560 --> 00:16:13,800 Speaker 1: in some in some ways, that seems like a pretty 314 00:16:13,800 --> 00:16:15,600 Speaker 1: big home run. You know. I was just talking to 315 00:16:15,640 --> 00:16:19,400 Speaker 1: a bunch of of women and somewhere saying that, you know, 316 00:16:19,440 --> 00:16:22,120 Speaker 1: a number of female CEOs are wary of taking VC 317 00:16:22,280 --> 00:16:25,040 Speaker 1: dollars because if you take VC dollars, you might be 318 00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:27,560 Speaker 1: pushed to grow faster than you feel comfortable with, and 319 00:16:27,560 --> 00:16:30,080 Speaker 1: you might be pushed to grow faster than than is 320 00:16:30,080 --> 00:16:33,320 Speaker 1: a good idea for your actual business. So I do think, 321 00:16:33,440 --> 00:16:35,800 Speaker 1: especially because they're dealing with vcs who may not fully 322 00:16:35,880 --> 00:16:39,400 Speaker 1: understand their vision, there is a little bit more caution 323 00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:42,960 Speaker 1: around getting into a relationship with someone who's going to 324 00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:45,680 Speaker 1: pressure you to have a quick outcome or a five 325 00:16:45,760 --> 00:16:47,840 Speaker 1: year outcome. I think there are also plenty of women 326 00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:51,080 Speaker 1: who are incredibly ambitious. They want to create multi billion 327 00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:53,920 Speaker 1: dollar companies, They want to be successful. Maybe they want 328 00:16:53,920 --> 00:16:55,880 Speaker 1: to do it with an additional purpose. I mean women 329 00:16:55,920 --> 00:16:58,520 Speaker 1: are more likely to found purpose driven companies, so it's 330 00:16:58,560 --> 00:17:01,200 Speaker 1: not just about generally eating profits, but also having an 331 00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:04,399 Speaker 1: environmental impact or helping people, whether it's through health tech 332 00:17:04,520 --> 00:17:08,000 Speaker 1: or um social impact stuff, But I think it's I 333 00:17:08,000 --> 00:17:10,440 Speaker 1: think it's a mix. I think women have also seen 334 00:17:10,800 --> 00:17:12,639 Speaker 1: how easy it is to get taken down by the 335 00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:15,800 Speaker 1: media with numerous examples, so I think there is a 336 00:17:15,840 --> 00:17:18,280 Speaker 1: caution there. But at the same time, they understand that 337 00:17:18,320 --> 00:17:21,280 Speaker 1: having a public persona can help market your company. So 338 00:17:21,320 --> 00:17:23,200 Speaker 1: I think it's a big mix of things. But I've 339 00:17:23,200 --> 00:17:26,880 Speaker 1: seen plenty of women who are incredibly, incredibly ambitious and 340 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,600 Speaker 1: and really want to achieve the same kind of success 341 00:17:29,920 --> 00:17:32,439 Speaker 1: that men have, and we really haven't seen women at 342 00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:35,560 Speaker 1: the level of the Jeff bezos Is and Mark Zuckerberg's. 343 00:17:35,560 --> 00:17:37,720 Speaker 1: We just have it in terms of the self made 344 00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:41,600 Speaker 1: women even more so than like politics. Like that seems 345 00:17:41,640 --> 00:17:44,480 Speaker 1: like that's why I wanted to focus on this field, 346 00:17:44,520 --> 00:17:47,399 Speaker 1: because it was just such a disparity in such a 347 00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:50,560 Speaker 1: crazy gender gap. I thought it also interesting in a 348 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:53,399 Speaker 1: common thread through a lot of the interviews and anecdotes 349 00:17:53,560 --> 00:17:56,840 Speaker 1: was that women, even women, founded purpose driven, you know, 350 00:17:56,920 --> 00:18:00,800 Speaker 1: kind of socially conscious companies. Their first and most instinct 351 00:18:00,840 --> 00:18:03,239 Speaker 1: was there's a market here, there is profits to be 352 00:18:03,320 --> 00:18:06,359 Speaker 1: made here. Well, you know, social good is fantastic, but 353 00:18:06,440 --> 00:18:09,679 Speaker 1: they but the the impetus is not let's do this 354 00:18:09,680 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: because it's a good thing to do. But let's do 355 00:18:11,320 --> 00:18:13,280 Speaker 1: this because there's a there's a market here, there are 356 00:18:13,280 --> 00:18:15,720 Speaker 1: profits here. And also there are a lot of industries 357 00:18:15,840 --> 00:18:18,520 Speaker 1: or areas where people are like, oh, that's philanthropy, Like 358 00:18:18,560 --> 00:18:21,160 Speaker 1: you want to deal with food waste, Like that's philanthropy, 359 00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:23,520 Speaker 1: Like that's just garbage. Like maybe it'll help the environment, 360 00:18:23,520 --> 00:18:24,639 Speaker 1: but you're not going to make money on that. And 361 00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:26,520 Speaker 1: there's an amazing founder in the book, and she's saying, no, 362 00:18:27,160 --> 00:18:29,760 Speaker 1: if we can take this food waste and turn it 363 00:18:29,800 --> 00:18:33,600 Speaker 1: into a profitable business and sell the the leftover cauliflower 364 00:18:33,720 --> 00:18:35,960 Speaker 1: for cauliflower pizza crusts or whatever it is, Like the 365 00:18:37,160 --> 00:18:40,359 Speaker 1: green juice. You know, a thirteen dollar green juice doesn't 366 00:18:40,400 --> 00:18:43,879 Speaker 1: need to be made with pristine um lettuce, you know, 367 00:18:43,880 --> 00:18:45,680 Speaker 1: pieces of lettuce that you would buy a grocery store. 368 00:18:45,680 --> 00:18:47,920 Speaker 1: You can make it with a scraggly stuff that people 369 00:18:47,960 --> 00:18:49,480 Speaker 1: don't want to eat, but yet it would be perfect 370 00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:51,919 Speaker 1: for a green juice. So this idea that it's actually 371 00:18:52,000 --> 00:18:54,760 Speaker 1: much better over the long run to take a social 372 00:18:54,840 --> 00:18:58,600 Speaker 1: or environmental problem and solve it with a sustainable, profitable business, 373 00:18:58,840 --> 00:19:00,399 Speaker 1: because then you don't have to worry about winds of 374 00:19:00,520 --> 00:19:05,400 Speaker 1: change blowing philanthropy dollars somewhere else the book. I love 375 00:19:05,480 --> 00:19:08,800 Speaker 1: these stories. The book is full of that spark of inspiration. 376 00:19:08,920 --> 00:19:11,040 Speaker 1: I was standing in line at the supermarket, I was 377 00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:14,000 Speaker 1: stuck in traffic. I was doing like that spark of inspiration. 378 00:19:14,000 --> 00:19:16,120 Speaker 1: I always like when I talked to entrepreneurs, always trying 379 00:19:16,119 --> 00:19:18,920 Speaker 1: to what was that spark? What was that spark? Um? 380 00:19:18,920 --> 00:19:20,919 Speaker 1: I want to talk a little bit more about Hollywood stuff, 381 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:25,160 Speaker 1: but but in the in the very thirty thousand foot view, 382 00:19:25,320 --> 00:19:28,399 Speaker 1: I think one thing in reading the book, there's different 383 00:19:28,400 --> 00:19:34,080 Speaker 1: there's different examples. There's you know, as women especially started 384 00:19:34,119 --> 00:19:36,520 Speaker 1: in the seventies and eighties really going into business, there 385 00:19:36,520 --> 00:19:39,320 Speaker 1: seems to have always been kind of a debate in 386 00:19:39,840 --> 00:19:42,199 Speaker 1: that like do you make do you make the argument 387 00:19:42,200 --> 00:19:45,879 Speaker 1: that women are as capable as any male CEO can handle? 388 00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:48,040 Speaker 1: There's nothing you know that there is no there is 389 00:19:48,080 --> 00:19:51,240 Speaker 1: no difference in anything else as gender bias, or is 390 00:19:51,240 --> 00:19:53,880 Speaker 1: there an argument to be made that women do lead 391 00:19:53,960 --> 00:19:58,399 Speaker 1: differently and we should respect and appreciate what different You know, 392 00:19:58,400 --> 00:20:01,359 Speaker 1: what different leadership styles bring to any sector. I don't know, 393 00:20:01,440 --> 00:20:03,880 Speaker 1: and it doesn't have to be I don't think they're either, 394 00:20:04,040 --> 00:20:06,800 Speaker 1: or I think they're both. I think they're both, and 395 00:20:07,119 --> 00:20:10,200 Speaker 1: I think that, Um, it's been interesting, like looking at 396 00:20:10,200 --> 00:20:14,199 Speaker 1: the data about leading and managing in crisis. Women have 397 00:20:14,280 --> 00:20:17,920 Speaker 1: amazing performance managing in crisis, especially if you think about 398 00:20:17,920 --> 00:20:23,080 Speaker 1: the financial crisis, managing through the pandemic, And in some 399 00:20:23,119 --> 00:20:26,159 Speaker 1: ways they're leading very differently than male ceo s. But 400 00:20:26,240 --> 00:20:29,800 Speaker 1: in other ways maybe male CEOs are trying to or 401 00:20:29,840 --> 00:20:33,000 Speaker 1: should try to emulate them, particularly in times of crisis, 402 00:20:33,160 --> 00:20:36,200 Speaker 1: when say things like empathy manner matter more both employees 403 00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:41,239 Speaker 1: and customers. So I think that, Um, the overwhelming thing 404 00:20:41,280 --> 00:20:43,879 Speaker 1: that struck me and interviewing hundreds of people and and 405 00:20:43,920 --> 00:20:46,880 Speaker 1: reading all these academic studies is that while we may 406 00:20:46,920 --> 00:20:49,320 Speaker 1: have a couple of ideas of what leadership looks like 407 00:20:49,400 --> 00:20:51,679 Speaker 1: or what good leadership looks like, in fact, there are 408 00:20:51,720 --> 00:20:54,200 Speaker 1: many different skills that can be used for good leadership. 409 00:20:54,680 --> 00:20:59,040 Speaker 1: And the leaders who were most successful were those who 410 00:20:59,080 --> 00:21:02,199 Speaker 1: didn't try to force themselves into this box or this 411 00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:05,320 Speaker 1: stereotype or trying to fit a model of what leadership 412 00:21:05,320 --> 00:21:08,200 Speaker 1: looked like in the seventies. But instead we're saying, here's 413 00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:10,400 Speaker 1: what I'm really good at and here's how I could 414 00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:12,520 Speaker 1: hire people around me to fill in the things that 415 00:21:12,560 --> 00:21:14,760 Speaker 1: I know nothing about, and here's how I can lean 416 00:21:14,760 --> 00:21:16,880 Speaker 1: into the things that I'm really good at, whether it's 417 00:21:17,440 --> 00:21:20,480 Speaker 1: being an amazing listener and able to negotiate deals better 418 00:21:20,480 --> 00:21:23,840 Speaker 1: because you're an introvert, or leading with gratitude and using 419 00:21:23,840 --> 00:21:28,159 Speaker 1: that gratitude to focus on long term results, or or 420 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:31,600 Speaker 1: bringing in perspectives from across your team or across your company, 421 00:21:31,640 --> 00:21:34,439 Speaker 1: like that kind of communal bringing them together leadership. The 422 00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:36,560 Speaker 1: people who were able to figure out their skill set 423 00:21:37,240 --> 00:21:39,879 Speaker 1: and lean into it were the ones who I saw 424 00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:42,600 Speaker 1: able to make the most progress and also feel good 425 00:21:42,640 --> 00:21:45,159 Speaker 1: about the way they were they were managing their company. 426 00:21:45,200 --> 00:21:47,080 Speaker 1: I think for so long people have and I talked 427 00:21:47,119 --> 00:21:48,520 Speaker 1: to women about this. They felt like they had to 428 00:21:48,520 --> 00:21:51,280 Speaker 1: wear the boxy suit and act in a certain way. 429 00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:54,400 Speaker 1: But the shoulder pads, shoulder pads, their back, it's okay, 430 00:21:54,880 --> 00:21:57,320 Speaker 1: but but felt like they had to force themself to 431 00:21:57,320 --> 00:22:00,800 Speaker 1: act a certain way. And now the guy, the guys, yeah, 432 00:22:01,080 --> 00:22:03,440 Speaker 1: and now that there are more women in the room, 433 00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:06,000 Speaker 1: I think that everyone should be able to lead in 434 00:22:06,040 --> 00:22:08,119 Speaker 1: a way that they feel it's more authentic to that. 435 00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:14,920 Speaker 1: Don't go anywhere. We'll be right back with more from 436 00:22:14,960 --> 00:22:26,400 Speaker 1: SANDBCS Julia Borstion after this pause for monetization, and we're 437 00:22:26,440 --> 00:22:30,160 Speaker 1: back with more from SANBCS Julia Bortion on her new book, 438 00:22:30,320 --> 00:22:33,800 Speaker 1: When Women Lead. You've been a business reporter for a 439 00:22:33,800 --> 00:22:36,320 Speaker 1: long time. I know you knew a lot of this intuitively, 440 00:22:36,760 --> 00:22:40,440 Speaker 1: but what really surprised you from your reporting? I hadn't 441 00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:43,160 Speaker 1: read academic research like this in a really long time, 442 00:22:43,280 --> 00:22:45,919 Speaker 1: and I ended up going down so many rabbit holes 443 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:50,399 Speaker 1: about how about good leadership, about female leadership? And I 444 00:22:50,480 --> 00:22:52,919 Speaker 1: just read I mean literally three studies, and it was 445 00:22:52,960 --> 00:22:55,800 Speaker 1: so interesting to look at the fact that social scientists 446 00:22:55,800 --> 00:22:59,560 Speaker 1: are studying everything from how when you use humor in 447 00:22:59,560 --> 00:23:03,159 Speaker 1: the workplace, women are judged more harshly to um, you know, 448 00:23:03,240 --> 00:23:06,159 Speaker 1: to the fact that like athletes are more successful as 449 00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:08,479 Speaker 1: CEOs and why is that so just There's a lot 450 00:23:08,520 --> 00:23:11,040 Speaker 1: of interesting stuff in there. But to the point of Hollywood, 451 00:23:11,320 --> 00:23:14,440 Speaker 1: since since you cover Hollywood, there was some amazing data 452 00:23:14,520 --> 00:23:18,280 Speaker 1: about the power of Hollywood to create archetypes. And I 453 00:23:18,359 --> 00:23:21,280 Speaker 1: was blown away by the studies. And there's some great 454 00:23:21,280 --> 00:23:24,040 Speaker 1: stuff out of the GENA David's Institute just about gender 455 00:23:24,080 --> 00:23:26,480 Speaker 1: gaps in Hollywood. But also the one thing that I 456 00:23:26,560 --> 00:23:29,040 Speaker 1: keep on thinking about is I show movies to my kids, 457 00:23:29,560 --> 00:23:31,760 Speaker 1: because we showed them a lot of movies from from 458 00:23:31,840 --> 00:23:33,760 Speaker 1: when I was growing out from the eighties. There are 459 00:23:33,760 --> 00:23:35,560 Speaker 1: a bunch of movies in the early eighties that made 460 00:23:35,600 --> 00:23:38,840 Speaker 1: the heroes these young white geeky men, and they were 461 00:23:38,880 --> 00:23:42,480 Speaker 1: techie and they were solving problems with technology, and the 462 00:23:42,560 --> 00:23:45,720 Speaker 1: women were just their sidekicks, whether it was weird you know, 463 00:23:45,760 --> 00:23:49,160 Speaker 1: weird science or war games, and these movies, which were great. 464 00:23:49,200 --> 00:23:51,280 Speaker 1: I rewatched a bunch of them with my family and 465 00:23:51,359 --> 00:23:53,639 Speaker 1: when I was writing this book, they were great, but 466 00:23:53,680 --> 00:23:56,679 Speaker 1: they really didn't have women in that tech world. And 467 00:23:56,720 --> 00:23:59,840 Speaker 1: there was this amazing correlation between the rise of this 468 00:24:00,440 --> 00:24:03,800 Speaker 1: this new type of hero in Hollywood and set the image, 469 00:24:04,000 --> 00:24:07,119 Speaker 1: set the image culture. Image of the tech geek really 470 00:24:07,240 --> 00:24:09,840 Speaker 1: wasn't I was about fourteen when War Games came out. 471 00:24:10,119 --> 00:24:13,520 Speaker 1: It was the absolute target and the message couldn't have 472 00:24:13,520 --> 00:24:16,199 Speaker 1: been clear. This is a guys, this is a guy's 473 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:18,639 Speaker 1: tech is a guy's game. The girl is there to 474 00:24:18,680 --> 00:24:20,600 Speaker 1: go on the adventure, but you can't help with the 475 00:24:20,640 --> 00:24:23,159 Speaker 1: technology stuff. So there were all of these movies that 476 00:24:23,240 --> 00:24:25,960 Speaker 1: came out and over the next twenty years, there was 477 00:24:26,000 --> 00:24:28,400 Speaker 1: a twenty percentage point decline in the number of women 478 00:24:28,400 --> 00:24:31,879 Speaker 1: who enrolled in computer science as their major in college. Now, 479 00:24:31,920 --> 00:24:33,440 Speaker 1: obviously there were a lot of other things that were 480 00:24:33,480 --> 00:24:37,160 Speaker 1: going on as well, but the cultural archetype was that 481 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:41,520 Speaker 1: tech was a young guy's game. And the fact that 482 00:24:41,520 --> 00:24:43,800 Speaker 1: they were all these women who did who major in 483 00:24:44,200 --> 00:24:47,440 Speaker 1: computer science before that era is crazy to me. It 484 00:24:47,560 --> 00:24:50,399 Speaker 1: started to come up. It's that curve has definitely started 485 00:24:50,440 --> 00:24:53,840 Speaker 1: to change. Um. But I think that it really reminded 486 00:24:53,880 --> 00:24:57,680 Speaker 1: me how powerful Hollywood is. And look, my husband works 487 00:24:57,680 --> 00:24:59,600 Speaker 1: in Hollywood. I live here in l A. I'm so 488 00:24:59,640 --> 00:25:02,399 Speaker 1: I were these companies. But that's why I think the 489 00:25:02,400 --> 00:25:05,520 Speaker 1: work of companies like Hello Sunshine or lean Away with 490 00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:09,600 Speaker 1: Hilman Grad, both of which I wrote about in my book. 491 00:25:09,600 --> 00:25:11,560 Speaker 1: I think they're so important because just like the tech 492 00:25:11,560 --> 00:25:15,400 Speaker 1: companies are powerful, the Hollywood entertainment companies are powerful because 493 00:25:15,440 --> 00:25:19,399 Speaker 1: those are stereotypes and archetypes that are exported around the world. 494 00:25:19,880 --> 00:25:22,439 Speaker 1: It is it's you know, some some have called its 495 00:25:22,480 --> 00:25:26,280 Speaker 1: soft power, and it is fascinating, and I think I 496 00:25:26,320 --> 00:25:29,120 Speaker 1: think it is as much as the I C b ms. 497 00:25:29,320 --> 00:25:33,600 Speaker 1: That's what helped win the Cold War and Elvis Presley, 498 00:25:34,080 --> 00:25:37,800 Speaker 1: Beatles and Madonna and you know it just I really 499 00:25:37,840 --> 00:25:40,080 Speaker 1: do think that it was that. It was that, and 500 00:25:40,119 --> 00:25:42,560 Speaker 1: that's why Hollywood and pop culture can be used for 501 00:25:42,600 --> 00:25:44,479 Speaker 1: a force of good as well. I mean, and you 502 00:25:44,520 --> 00:25:47,400 Speaker 1: think about you know, I think about Black Panther and 503 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:51,000 Speaker 1: Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel and the fact that now 504 00:25:51,040 --> 00:25:53,320 Speaker 1: my kids have all these action heroes who were women, 505 00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:55,360 Speaker 1: and they're not just dressed in miniskirts like they were 506 00:25:55,359 --> 00:25:57,399 Speaker 1: when I started trying to buy them for them, you know, 507 00:25:57,440 --> 00:26:02,800 Speaker 1: a decade ago. Because I think in Hollywood understands um 508 00:26:02,840 --> 00:26:05,480 Speaker 1: that the audience is not just young white men, which 509 00:26:05,560 --> 00:26:07,520 Speaker 1: was you know, that's not all they should be marketing towards. 510 00:26:07,560 --> 00:26:09,480 Speaker 1: And so we're really seeing us I think a shift 511 00:26:09,560 --> 00:26:12,080 Speaker 1: in some of the imagery that's getting out there. Well, 512 00:26:12,160 --> 00:26:15,080 Speaker 1: yet again, in a business context, you're leaving money on 513 00:26:15,119 --> 00:26:17,720 Speaker 1: the tape exactly. I think that that that there's been 514 00:26:17,760 --> 00:26:21,200 Speaker 1: a dawning realization they're making movies like Black Panther or 515 00:26:21,240 --> 00:26:24,640 Speaker 1: Wonder Women are not philanthropy. It's too because there's a 516 00:26:24,720 --> 00:26:28,520 Speaker 1: huge financial opportunity. What specific because you said you spoke 517 00:26:28,520 --> 00:26:30,800 Speaker 1: with Lenaway than Hillman grad where she's been doing some 518 00:26:30,920 --> 00:26:34,400 Speaker 1: really interesting and they are dogged over there. The same 519 00:26:34,440 --> 00:26:37,720 Speaker 1: thing with Hello Sunshine, very impactful company, doing a lot, 520 00:26:37,800 --> 00:26:41,840 Speaker 1: incredibly impressive CEO and Sarah Harden Um tell me any 521 00:26:41,920 --> 00:26:45,800 Speaker 1: anything specifically about entrepreneurship or about the specific challenges of 522 00:26:45,840 --> 00:26:49,040 Speaker 1: Hollywood and content that stand out. What I think is 523 00:26:49,080 --> 00:26:51,560 Speaker 1: so important, and I talked to Sarah harden and Reese 524 00:26:51,600 --> 00:26:54,800 Speaker 1: Witherspoon about this, is this idea of authentic authorship. If 525 00:26:54,800 --> 00:26:57,280 Speaker 1: the studios are all run by white men, they're not 526 00:26:57,280 --> 00:26:59,639 Speaker 1: going to understand the vast majority of their audience. And 527 00:26:59,680 --> 00:27:02,720 Speaker 1: I think that's why we've seen the studios become become 528 00:27:02,760 --> 00:27:05,199 Speaker 1: far more diverse in their leadership. We have people like 529 00:27:05,280 --> 00:27:09,919 Speaker 1: Donna Langley running Universal, but also their investments in a 530 00:27:09,960 --> 00:27:13,240 Speaker 1: diverse assortment of filmmakers because it works. And so what's 531 00:27:13,240 --> 00:27:15,400 Speaker 1: so interesting is, you know, you see Hell of Sunshine, 532 00:27:15,400 --> 00:27:18,280 Speaker 1: they're saying, what are the shows that we would want 533 00:27:18,320 --> 00:27:20,359 Speaker 1: to see and what are the who are the filmmakers 534 00:27:20,400 --> 00:27:24,280 Speaker 1: that can adequately tell those stories? Um they talked about 535 00:27:24,359 --> 00:27:26,399 Speaker 1: how when they were making little fires everywhere, they're like, 536 00:27:26,440 --> 00:27:29,280 Speaker 1: what should the writer's room look like? It shouldn't look 537 00:27:29,280 --> 00:27:31,800 Speaker 1: like the people in the show and the characters in 538 00:27:31,840 --> 00:27:34,920 Speaker 1: the show and represent those stories. And look, it worked 539 00:27:34,920 --> 00:27:37,000 Speaker 1: out really well for them. They had that that big 540 00:27:37,040 --> 00:27:40,520 Speaker 1: exit to Candle Media, that Hell of Sunshine sales to 541 00:27:40,760 --> 00:27:43,040 Speaker 1: Candle Media, because they're all about figuring out how to 542 00:27:43,320 --> 00:27:47,800 Speaker 1: pair the content creators with a hungry audience at a 543 00:27:47,920 --> 00:27:51,480 Speaker 1: very high valuate, at a very high valuation, million dollar evaluation, 544 00:27:51,520 --> 00:27:53,280 Speaker 1: and we can we can talk about like was that 545 00:27:53,320 --> 00:27:55,800 Speaker 1: there was a lot of industry debate about that evaluation. 546 00:27:56,000 --> 00:27:58,119 Speaker 1: If that had been you know, if it had been 547 00:27:58,240 --> 00:28:00,560 Speaker 1: Ronald Witherspoon as opposed to Reese and we have had 548 00:28:00,600 --> 00:28:03,639 Speaker 1: the same level of valuation. Maybe Ronald weather spond has 549 00:28:03,680 --> 00:28:07,000 Speaker 1: been making great deals for a long time, so um, yeah, 550 00:28:07,480 --> 00:28:09,159 Speaker 1: but it's a debate, and look and reach wther is 551 00:28:09,200 --> 00:28:11,600 Speaker 1: a huge star. But I think, um, you know what's 552 00:28:11,640 --> 00:28:14,080 Speaker 1: been amazing about watching Hello Sunshine is there was this 553 00:28:14,119 --> 00:28:16,560 Speaker 1: period where all of these streaming services launched. Do you 554 00:28:16,560 --> 00:28:18,239 Speaker 1: remember that there was like an Apple Ta you were 555 00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:19,920 Speaker 1: probably there are these events. I remember going at the 556 00:28:19,920 --> 00:28:23,000 Speaker 1: Apple TV announcement and there was a Hulu announcement, and 557 00:28:23,160 --> 00:28:25,560 Speaker 1: every one of these announcements seemed to feature a show 558 00:28:25,840 --> 00:28:29,760 Speaker 1: from Hello Sunshine, and so I think that these studio 559 00:28:29,920 --> 00:28:32,760 Speaker 1: there are the streamers. We're figuring out how to leverage 560 00:28:32,760 --> 00:28:35,480 Speaker 1: the Hello Sunshine brand, while Hello Sunshine was figuring out 561 00:28:35,840 --> 00:28:39,000 Speaker 1: how to leverage the streamers to to boost their valuation. 562 00:28:39,360 --> 00:28:41,760 Speaker 1: But I think um, I was just really impressed by 563 00:28:41,760 --> 00:28:45,240 Speaker 1: this idea of the importance of them having financial success 564 00:28:45,400 --> 00:28:47,760 Speaker 1: is that it shows that women can do this and 565 00:28:47,840 --> 00:28:50,440 Speaker 1: it shows that it could be done. Um and Leana Wave, 566 00:28:50,560 --> 00:28:52,760 Speaker 1: I think, takes this idea of authentic authorship to the 567 00:28:52,800 --> 00:28:56,440 Speaker 1: next level, and she tells very specific stories and shows 568 00:28:56,440 --> 00:29:00,320 Speaker 1: the universal appeal of very specific stories. When I interview her, 569 00:29:00,560 --> 00:29:03,000 Speaker 1: she was telling me that, Um, I don't know if 570 00:29:03,040 --> 00:29:06,720 Speaker 1: you remember Master of None, that that very famous Thanksgiving 571 00:29:06,720 --> 00:29:11,040 Speaker 1: episode where she tells the story of her coming out 572 00:29:11,080 --> 00:29:14,480 Speaker 1: to her family and and you know that experience of 573 00:29:14,560 --> 00:29:18,400 Speaker 1: our Thanksgiving dinner, and that is a very specific experience. 574 00:29:18,760 --> 00:29:21,000 Speaker 1: But she said that people all over the country would 575 00:29:21,040 --> 00:29:23,440 Speaker 1: come up to her and say that was the most 576 00:29:23,480 --> 00:29:25,840 Speaker 1: amazing episode. It reminded me so much of my family. 577 00:29:25,840 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 1: And she said, these these straight white dudes would come 578 00:29:28,400 --> 00:29:30,080 Speaker 1: up to her and say, I related so much to 579 00:29:30,160 --> 00:29:33,160 Speaker 1: that episode. But the way she thinks about it is 580 00:29:33,200 --> 00:29:36,240 Speaker 1: that was so specific that in a way, there's something 581 00:29:36,240 --> 00:29:38,320 Speaker 1: about the specificity that people can relate to you. If 582 00:29:38,360 --> 00:29:41,320 Speaker 1: you just had a generic Thanksgiving dinner with families fighting 583 00:29:41,760 --> 00:29:43,360 Speaker 1: or not talking to each other, whatever it is, it 584 00:29:43,360 --> 00:29:46,960 Speaker 1: wouldn't feel as real. The specificity makes it feel real. 585 00:29:47,400 --> 00:29:49,800 Speaker 1: And also, I think she's really proven that you can 586 00:29:49,840 --> 00:29:52,760 Speaker 1: take something which may seem like a niche story and 587 00:29:52,840 --> 00:29:56,400 Speaker 1: show that niche stories have universal appeal and people want 588 00:29:56,400 --> 00:29:59,880 Speaker 1: to connect with content that feels real and different than 589 00:30:00,040 --> 00:30:02,920 Speaker 1: the same stuff they've been watching. My last question for you, 590 00:30:02,920 --> 00:30:05,000 Speaker 1: and I always i'd love to ask people this question, 591 00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:08,400 Speaker 1: how what was your process for writing? So you've done 592 00:30:08,400 --> 00:30:10,320 Speaker 1: all your research and oh my god, I know the 593 00:30:10,360 --> 00:30:12,360 Speaker 1: feeling of like, you know, you know, you know that 594 00:30:12,480 --> 00:30:14,680 Speaker 1: you're looking at deadlines and you're looking at you know, 595 00:30:14,960 --> 00:30:18,320 Speaker 1: blank files or pages. Did you write at the computer? 596 00:30:18,480 --> 00:30:20,840 Speaker 1: Did you write longhand did you write late at night 597 00:30:20,960 --> 00:30:25,160 Speaker 1: like many working moms do. Um, you know those really 598 00:30:25,240 --> 00:30:27,960 Speaker 1: giant like post it notes that are three feet tall? 599 00:30:28,080 --> 00:30:29,600 Speaker 1: Do you know what I'm talking about? Like those big 600 00:30:29,720 --> 00:30:34,960 Speaker 1: gm like sometimes notes. So I would do all the 601 00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:38,400 Speaker 1: interviews I would have, I would automatically transcribe them using Otter, 602 00:30:38,520 --> 00:30:43,400 Speaker 1: which is an amazing app UM, And after each interview 603 00:30:43,440 --> 00:30:45,240 Speaker 1: I would go through and re listen to it. I 604 00:30:45,240 --> 00:30:47,120 Speaker 1: would take notes on the themes, and then I would 605 00:30:47,160 --> 00:30:50,640 Speaker 1: take these giant post it notes. I have these giant 606 00:30:50,640 --> 00:30:53,240 Speaker 1: post repards all around our house, and I would write down, 607 00:30:53,280 --> 00:30:57,480 Speaker 1: like what category these women's characteristics building. It's very smartly 608 00:30:57,720 --> 00:31:02,600 Speaker 1: organized in not a company my company format theme and 609 00:31:02,720 --> 00:31:05,000 Speaker 1: it's really good. So I would have all of these 610 00:31:05,360 --> 00:31:08,040 Speaker 1: these giant posters basically all over the house with different 611 00:31:08,120 --> 00:31:10,520 Speaker 1: names and themes, and I would like run around like 612 00:31:10,520 --> 00:31:13,120 Speaker 1: a crazy person writing and start being on these giant 613 00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:16,160 Speaker 1: post reboards and so exactly. So that's how I would 614 00:31:16,240 --> 00:31:20,320 Speaker 1: organize the ideas. And then I would sometimes just sit 615 00:31:20,400 --> 00:31:23,880 Speaker 1: down and just write someone's story, um, going back to 616 00:31:23,920 --> 00:31:27,160 Speaker 1: the transcript and just like I found the story so amazing. 617 00:31:27,240 --> 00:31:30,320 Speaker 1: Sometimes I would cry when I was interviewing people I found, 618 00:31:30,400 --> 00:31:33,200 Speaker 1: I mean, the stories are so inspiring and in the 619 00:31:33,240 --> 00:31:35,440 Speaker 1: depths of the pandemic, to get to talk to these women, 620 00:31:36,280 --> 00:31:37,960 Speaker 1: That's why I love doing this, is because I was 621 00:31:38,040 --> 00:31:40,280 Speaker 1: so inspired and it makes you feel so hopeful about 622 00:31:40,320 --> 00:31:42,160 Speaker 1: the world that their leaders like this that are trying 623 00:31:42,200 --> 00:31:44,920 Speaker 1: to fix problems so I would sometimes just sit down 624 00:31:45,160 --> 00:31:48,400 Speaker 1: and write UM. But the truth is that because I 625 00:31:48,440 --> 00:31:51,400 Speaker 1: wake up very early for work on the weekends, I 626 00:31:51,400 --> 00:31:52,920 Speaker 1: would try to wake up at the same time and 627 00:31:52,960 --> 00:31:54,800 Speaker 1: I would sometimes I'd wake up with five and I 628 00:31:54,840 --> 00:31:58,200 Speaker 1: would just right for like four hours before my family 629 00:31:58,200 --> 00:32:00,080 Speaker 1: would bother me and I would just lock myself of 630 00:32:00,120 --> 00:32:02,720 Speaker 1: a way and without the interruptions of anyone, you could 631 00:32:02,720 --> 00:32:06,000 Speaker 1: really get a lot done. So UM, I thought it 632 00:32:06,040 --> 00:32:08,400 Speaker 1: was really fun. I really want to write another book. 633 00:32:14,400 --> 00:32:17,080 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening. Be sure to leave us a review 634 00:32:17,080 --> 00:32:20,840 Speaker 1: at Apple Podcasts. We love to hear from listeners. Please 635 00:32:20,880 --> 00:32:23,080 Speaker 1: go to Variety dot com and sign up for our 636 00:32:23,320 --> 00:32:27,560 Speaker 1: free Strictly Business newsletter, and don't forget to tune in 637 00:32:27,680 --> 00:32:30,480 Speaker 1: next week for another episode of Strictly Business