WEBVTT - Mitchell contract is a Cavs MISTAKE, LeBron latest rumors, Darryn Peterson summer league debut

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>The volume. All right, Well, good hoops to night here

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>at the volume heavy Wednesday, everybody. I hope all you

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>guys are having a great week so far. I got

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>a jampackshow for you guys today. We're gonna be reacting

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to some news around the NBA Donavan Mitchell four year,

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventy three million dollar extension. I want

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>to talk about my thoughts there, as well as a

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>brief update on the Lebron saga. I want to talk

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the Philadelphia seventy six ers, who

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>are getting a lot of buzz in recent days, especially

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>as Bob Myers went on the podcast with Rich Paul

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and Max Kellerman and essentially openly made his case for

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Lebron to go to Philly. As Lebron's kind of bizarre

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>free agency continues to play out. I want to talk

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the Golden State situation with the

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>leverage involving Anthony Davis. Then after that, I want to

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about Darren Peterson's first couple of games in Summerly.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is a legitimate data point worth

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>considering when we're talking about Darren in his long term development.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>He has looked amazing in a higher usage on ball

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>roll playing for the Jazz in summer League. Then at

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to that as promise, we're going to get to eight

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>mail bag questions from around the league. We're in bounce

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>around with a bunch of other topics. You guys are

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the job. Before we get started. Subscribe to the Hoops

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 1>in O YouTube channel so you don't miss any more

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of our videos. We have a goal to get two

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty thousand subs basically by the end

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of this week, so we need about eight thousand more.

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It would mean a lot to me if you guys

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>would scroll down and hit that subscribe button. If you're

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>already subscribed like this video, sign up for post notifications.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>It helps us a lot. This will be our mailbag

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for this week. We'll have another mail bag in about

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a week or so, so if you want to get

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>questions into that mail bag, drop them into the full

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>episodes on YouTube. Right, mail bag colon, write your question.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>We get to them in our mail bags throughout the

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season. A right, let's talk some basketball.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So details of Donovan Mitchell's contract four years, two hundred

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and seventy three million dollars and average, you will value

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>over sixty eight million dollars. And I'm just going to

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially reiterate what I said after the Calves lost in

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the postseason this past year. I when it comes to

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Mitchell, this was my greatest fear for the Calves

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was you were staring down the barrel of this long

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>extension and Donovan is you know, I think Donovan versus

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brown is actually a really good kind of framework

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to use when you have this discussion. When you're signing

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>up to pay this much money for a player. I

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's a certain expectation that you're going to get

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a superstar, right like in a legit, bona fide superstar.

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is there just aren't that many guys

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>like that in the NBA as of right now. I've

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>got five on my list being just Yannis Jokich, Luca Shay,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and Victor Weman Yama put him in whatever order you want.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Debate that over the course of the summer, but those

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>are the only five guys that I think are like

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>bona fide top tier superstar talents in the NBA as

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of right now. And obviously we've got some young players

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that are up and coming and entering into that conversation.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>The reality is is that with the way the CBA works,

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>there will be players that are off of that tier

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>that sign these types of deals that kind of comes

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>with the territory. I've kind of had a similar conversation

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>when we were talking about Austin Reeves. Everybody wants Austin

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Reeves to not make forty million because they don't because

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they think it's going to tie up too much money

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and they don't think he's worth it. And then you

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>forget conveniently that there are a lot of players in

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the NBA that make over forty million that just aren't

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that good, Guys like John Moran, Brandon Ingram, players that

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves are just like clearly better then, right, And

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that's just kind of the reality of the NBA is

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dudes get paid, and that extends even

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to the highest levels with these long term extensions. Donovan

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell versus Jalen Brown to me is an interesting example

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of when you're off that superstar tier or what caliber

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>player am I looking for in terms of a person

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that I'm comfortable tying up this kind of money with,

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and when I look at Jlen Brown for all the

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>flaws that exist in his game, and they're they're fair,

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and we've talked about them at length over the course

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of the last couple of weeks. He's an on an

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Island player. There's a lot of like parts of his

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>game that can struggle over the short sample, right or

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>over the large sample. Excuse me with the way it

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>shows in the data in the in the sense that

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the team doesn't necessarily score super well when he's involved.

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>But there are like two things with Jaylen Brown that

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are trump cards for me in that specific conversation. One

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>and they both involve his his apex athleticism. One is

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that no matter what the caliber of the

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>defense is, I feel like Jaylen Brown can get a

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>good shot for himself because of his physical tools. Right.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So there's a certain amount of like his game because

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>immensely valuable in tight space situations at the highest levels

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of the NBA playoffs, and I thought he showed that,

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>especially in his finals MVP in Eastern Conference Finals MVP

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>run in twenty twenty four. Then you look at it

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the defensive end of the four Similarly, one of the

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>most iconic memories to me of Jalen Brown's career is

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>picking up Luka Doncic full court in the twenty twenty

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>four NBA Finals and doing about as good a job

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as we've ever seen an individual defender do on a

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>superstar talent in a high leverage situation like the NBA Finals.

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brown brings enough alternative methods to impact winning and

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>enough physical imposition on the game that I'm comfortable with

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>paying him that kind of money, even though he's off

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the top tier of superstars. I thought that that was

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a relatively lame excuse from Boston in terms of moving

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>on from him. There were cases to be made. That

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>was one I didn't understand the life the financial side

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. I just think I think Jalen Brown's worth

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the money. Donovan Mitchell kind of tilts into a type

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>of player that I don't think is worth this kind

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>of money. His primary impact as an NBA player is

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>as a shot creator. Once you get beyond that, there's

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot else he brings to the table.

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>He had a miserable off ball scoring postseason. He was

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>ten for forty six on spot up threes in this

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>year's playoff run, just barely over twenty percent. That was

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a huge problem for Cleveland throughout the playoffs. He is

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>not a good defensive player, either on or off the ball.

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Mitchell doesn't bring a lot of impact beyond him

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>being a shot creator. But then when you did dive

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>into the shot creation data, he is a good not

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>great shot creator, and there are a lot of like

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>specific metrics with that that stand out, Like when you're

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about points per possession metrics. To me, the high

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>volume pick and roll guys, I want them up over

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>one point one points per possession including passes. I want

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a high level of efficiency from my primary shot creator

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and pick and roll Donovan Mitchell is a level below that.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>He's usually in the mid one point oh five territory

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>as a shot creator and pick and roll including passes.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I want strong on off data with the way that like,

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>because again, what is the role of the shot creator?

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Like dating all the way back to the debate that

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I had between Donovan Mitchell and Jalen Brunson back before

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>their playoff series got what was that three years ago

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>now when they faced off in the playoffs. The main

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that I was nitpicky about with Donovan Mitchell's game

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is that he's not a good game manager, meaning there's

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a job with a shot creator which goes deeper than

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the singular possession, which is it's not about can I

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>score efficiently for myself or can I get a shot

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that I can make. It's more about I'm about to

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>run or manage sixty to seventy possessions in this game,

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>either by running ball screens or even just getting the

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>ball to the floors versus ball pressure and getting the

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ball to the appropriate spot to start the possession right

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I am an offensive engine, I'm going to command

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>three four dozen possessions every single game, and I need

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to generate not just good shots for

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>myself but for my team. And that usually manifests in

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>those points per possession, including passes and pick and roll

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>being higher than the rest of the players in the league.

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>That manifests in strong on off data. And one of

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that is consistently flashed to the surface with

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Mitchell's game is that despite the fact that he

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>typically hovers in that even in the postseason, in that

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to thirty points per game range and somewhere

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in the high fifties and true shooting, which is fine.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not anywhere near as efficient as the upper tier

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>scoring guards in the league, but he's fine. He's right

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>around league averager above as is a high volume scorer,

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>right like. Despite that, when he's on the floor, it's

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>not generating good team offense. And that is the thing

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that has consistently risen to the surface this last postseason run.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>In the dating through first round, second round Conference Finals,

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cavs offense was eleven points better per one hundred

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>possessions with him off the floor versus when he was on.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>The year before, when they went to the second round

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and lost to Indy, the Caves offense was fifteen points

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>better per one hundred possessions with him off the floor

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>versus when he was on. Now, there are some stronger

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>data points as you go further back in his career,

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>but now we're talking about a younger, more explosive player.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>He turns thirty in two months. You want to know

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>why the Harden led offenses did better last year, and

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>this is what a This is a guy in James Harden,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>who is it's not considered one of the great offensive

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>engines in this league. But it's really that simple. Harden

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>has always been a master of the game management piece,

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>understanding the goal of fifty to sixty possessions that are

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>under his command, and how important it is to make

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>easy reads early in the clock that generate flow and

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>get the defense in rotation and help generate quality shots

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>for his teammates. That has been where Donovan Mitchell has struggled.

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And again, not every offensive engine has to be a

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>hardened level Lukadancch level, high volume pick and roll guy.

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the likes of Shay Gilders Alexander as a

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>scorer drive that level of offensive impact. But how by

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>being surgically efficient like mid sixties true shooting percentage by

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>the way, Shay struggled to do that in the postseason,

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but surgically efficient and they never turn the ball over.

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are the two things you need if you're going

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a score first guard to be one of

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the great offensive engines in the league. And so when

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I look at Donovan Mitchell about to turn thirty in

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>two months, I'm talking about his scoring guard who's not

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly high volume or particularly efficient, who there's pretty strong

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>data points that show that the offense functions better when

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he's off the floor, not to say that he doesn't

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>carry any offensive value, just that his offensive impact doesn't

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily lead to the team scoring at an extremely high level.

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And then, beyond his shot creation talent, he doesn't impact

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>winning in any other way that tilts to a level

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>of impact that is below that Jalen Brown tier of

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like non top tier superstar, but a guy that I'd

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be willing to pay the thirty five percent max to.

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that this was a mistake. I thought that

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 1>in his current situation, Donovan Mitchell was actually a pretty

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>valuable asset because there are teams out there that would

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>pay Donovan Mitchell and would pay you for his services,

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and his value will never ever, ever again approach the

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>value he was currently holding before this extension. From this

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>point forward, as he's a thirty year old, and as

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that extension starts to look more daunting, it will be

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>harder and harder to move him. And again, this isn't

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Jaylen Brown, This isn't a caliber of player where you go, man,

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think we need him to win. I don't

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think Donovan Mitchell is that level of player for Cleveland,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so I thought they should have traded him this offseason,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>even in the context to Lebron, I think they should

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>have moved him. I would have been Colin Dallas and

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>been like, y'all want Donovan Mitchell, We'll take Kyrie Irving.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting a better player with more financial flexibility for

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the future. I just I was really really surprised when

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw that deal. And I understand the idea of like, oh,

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we want stability, we want to demonstrate that we're building

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>something here in Cleveland. I just think that Donovan falls

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>below that kind of mandatory minimum level of talent I'm

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>expecting when I'm tying up that kind of money, And

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>with or without Lebron, you've put yourself in a really

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>tough position in the future. Let's say Evan Mobley blossoms

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.719
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of seasons and you want to

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>make some sort of pivot two three years from now.

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a hell of a lot harder

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to do when you've got a guy eating up seventy

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>plus million dollars on your cap, who's a thirty two

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>year old small guard who is years removed from when

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he was a inefficient shot creator. And so I was

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>just really surprised by the deal. Today's show is brought

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to you by presenting sponsor hard Rock Bet, Florida's sportsbook.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>We talk a lot of basketball here, but the world's

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest soccer tournament is here. Everyone is watching, National pride

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is on the line, superstars are chasing immortality, and for

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the next month, every match feels like a final. If

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you haven't tried hard Rock Bet yet, there's no better

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>time to get in the game. Hard Rock Bet is

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a top rated sportsbook app built to viva la copa.

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Whether you're backing your country, betting on your favorite superstar,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>or building the same game parlay for the biggest matches

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of the tournament. Hard Rock Bet is your way to

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>get in on the action. And if you're ever late

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to kick off, don't worry. Hard rock Bet lets you

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>live bet all match long, from the first minute to

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the final whistle. Plus, hard rock Bet has new promos daily.

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>We're talking profit boosts, no sweat bets, bonus bets, and more.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>May be sure to check out no Goals, No Problem

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in super sub two promos designed to give your bets

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>insurance all tournament loan. Sign up with hard rock Bet

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>today in place a five dollars bet if it wins.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You'll also score one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>A winning bet plus an extra one hundred and fifty

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars bet with Now. That's how you get this summer's

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>party started. Hard Rock Bet is Florida's only legal sportsbook,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>but you don't have to be in Florida to join

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the party. Hard Rock Bet is also live in Arizona, Ohio,

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado, and Michigan. Download

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the hard Rock Bet app today, Roll with us, Goal

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>with Us. Hard Rock Bet payable and bonus bets not

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a cash offer offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>In Florida offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC and

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>all other states, must be twenty one plus and physically

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida called one eight three to three play

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>wise in Indiana, If you or someone you know has

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a gambling problem and wants help, call one eight hundred

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and nine with it, Arizona, Ohio, and Virginia call one

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred my reset gambling problem called one hundred gambler

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, or Tennessee quick update

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Lebron situation quickly. On the Cavs front, there's

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>been some sort of like explanation that Cleveland actually stands

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to benefit more on the Lebron front with the Mitchell extension.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't really understand that at all. I don't know

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>why Lebron would care about Mitchell's extension in particular. I

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>won't reiterate this any more than I already have, other

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>than to just say everyone wants to say that Lebron

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>wants a better role, a better opportunity to command the

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>basketball and to be involved as a playmaker in the offense.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And all I can think about is, like, I'm not

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent sure Donavan Mitchell's better than Austin Reeves,

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>let alone Luka Doncic. And if Lebron was like going

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on podcast talking about how he's fine playing that role

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>for now but not for long as it pertains to

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Luka Freakin Doncic in Austin Reeves, I don't know why

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he would suddenly be okay with doing it behind Donovan

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell and James Harden. I AM going to have a

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>really hard time getting behind the Calves as a destination

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>unless they can make some sort of substantial pivot to

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>look like a different basketball team as as is, even

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>if they like especially if they dump strew Some and

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Shrewder who like SHREWDERO I think are good basketball players.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Calves are particularly good with Mitchell, Harden, Lebron,

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Jared Allen, and Evan Mobley. I think they're just another

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>good team in the Eastern Conference. Not anything that really

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>moves me. On the Philly front, it's really the exact

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>same thing everyone wants to talk about, how there's this

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>open hole at the four spot. You've got Embiid, you

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.479
<v Speaker 1>got Jalen Brown, you got vj Edge Comb, you got

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Tyree s Maxey once again, Jalen Brown, as we've talked about,

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of plays on an island. Maxi and MBI. There's

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a two main game partnership there for the two of them,

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's a spread, pick and roll attack with people

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>occupying the corners in the opposite wing. There is not

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>like a rhythm and flow offensively that will come naturally

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>with that group. I think it's a lot of like

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>diminishing returns, right, Like every basketball player has a fit

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that will maximize their talent and a fit that kind

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of marginalizes their talent. And to me, Lebron going to

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a place where he can fill roles physically as a big, strong,

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>athletic forward that that team doesn't have, there's a a

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>like an enhanced return on that, right, that's like kind

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>of like just a physical profile. So, yeah, does Lebron

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>physically help the Philly at a position of need? Sure?

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Would he physically helped Minnesota at a position of need? Sure?

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Like those make sense to me physically, But then you

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>look at his skill set again, Like, do I think

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Lebron will have a better jump shooting season next year? Yeah?

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>But do I think if you envision him as a

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>spot up shooter, I think you're gonna get diminishing returns.

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>This is why I've been so keyed in on Denver

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and Golden State. Denver and Golden State are the two

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>teams that can offer Lebron a role that specifically highlights

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>his playmaking talent, or in a case of Denver. Want

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you want to know why I'm high on Denver. Denver

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>can legitimately space out fives. Lebron has struggled to deal

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>with rim protection for years now because he's played with

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>bigs that can't shoot, including Anthony Davis, and somehow he

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>still gets to the rim a ton and he's still

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>super efficient when he gets there. Can you imagine a

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Denver situation where Jokic is constantly pulling the rim protector

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>away from the basket and Lebron's able to drive with

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>impunity and not have to worry about dealing with rim

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>protection when he gets there, and they don't have another

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>ball handler that is reliable beyond Jamal Murray, So like

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Lebron is literally your secondary ball handler from the perimeter,

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and they play with so much flow that Lebron's not

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>going to spend very many possessions standing in the corner there.

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be involved in the offense. So a

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>team like Denver can get an enhanced return for Lebron

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>physically and an enhanced return from Lebron in his skill set.

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Same thing goes with Golden State. The Lebron would literally

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>be the second best ball handler on the team beyond Steph.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Steph does play off ball a ton Steve Kurz offense

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>does involve high post playmaking in a variety of off

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>ball screening action, and a ton of movement. Those are

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the only two teams that can benefit from Lebron, both

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>physically and with this skill set. You go to these

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>other teams and they can benefit physically. The Cavs would

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>love to have a big, physical forward that can help

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>them in a lot of ways. So would Philly, so

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>a Minnesota. They can't benefit from the skill side of

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what Lebron brings to the table. There would be a

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>diminishing return there. And frankly, that's the part that I

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>think is being under discussed in all of this. I

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just can't imagine Lebron wants to go spend his final

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>season in the NBA standing in the corner. Miami is

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.959
<v Speaker 1>the other team, and this is why I think Miami

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>has to be taken seriously. They simil early Lebron would

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>probably be be their most reliable ball handler. Like I

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>legitimately could see universe where it's Lebron Jiannis two man

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>game at the end of games and Lebron's either screening

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Foris or Giannis is screening for Lebron and they're dealing

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with switches. But I could see Yannis like straight up

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>leaning on Lebron as a primary shock creator at the

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>end of games, like that's a role where and they're

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to be really good with their interior

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>passing because they're basically playing two big lineups with Jannis

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and Bam. So like Miami can benefit from Lebron's playmaking

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>town it would be a little clunky just because the

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>team construct, but they at least have a specific need

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for Lebron's skill set. That's a part that I think

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's under discussed in all of this. Lastly, on the

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Lebron front, this Golden State a d piece of it,

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>So it was It's been reported that Washington is asking

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>for the kitchen sink when it comes to the Anthony

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Davis trade, and I totally understand that. And my whole

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is is like, if they're there is an understanding

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that Lebron's not going to Golden State unless they get

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>ad it does put Golden State in a tough predicament

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>because paying multiple unprotected first for Anthony Davis would be

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>foolish simply because of the fact that that would be

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>way more than Washington originally paid for Anthony Davis. That

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>would be an overpay right, and you need to be

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>subsequently situated to make additional deals for perimeter talent. If

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you bring in Anthony Davis and all goes well, there's

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a chance you're looking at February and you're like, shit,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>we're really good, but we need another guard and it

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>would be really nice to have another first round pick

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to trade if you had to at that point in time,

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>or another wing, you know, with Moses Moody being out

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and with Andrew Wiggins's departure a few years ago, Like

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Golden State doesn't have your stereotypical primary point of attack

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>defender right like, they need to be situated for a

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>subsequent deal, so they kind of have to hold firm.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, Washington has no obligation to

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>necessarily get rid of ad and so I think really

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>where the Golden State part of this comes in is

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be a line of communication essentially that

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get this done, but we're gonna play a

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit of hardball because we need to make sure

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that we are situated for subsequent moves, and maybe there's

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a happy place to be found here where it's you know,

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Butler an unprotected first and like two second round

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>picks in a swap or something like that, where you

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>can situate it in a way where you find a

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>happy middle ground between the urgency of the situation, the

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>leverage that Washington has, and the fact that they're gonna

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>want to get a decent payday before they just ship

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis to Golden State. But ultimately, if you're Golden State,

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not trading draft picks for Anthony Davis. It's trading

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>draft picks for Anthony Davis and Lebron That's what you

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have to keep in mind. Everyone shits on the Paul

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>George trade, but that's because Paul George and Kawhi couldn't

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy and couldn't get the job done. The actual

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>deal in and of itself, if you really think about it,

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>get traded Shay Goods is Alexander and the four first

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>round picks or whatever it was for Paul George and

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Kawhi Leonard. That actually is a decent price tag for

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>two of what at the time were the top six

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or seven players. In the NBA. Similarly, if you're Golden State, yes,

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand playing a little bit of hardball with Washington,

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately, you pay what you gotta pay if you're

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna get Anthony Davis or Lebron. If you're gonna get

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis and Lebron. And lastly, and this is the

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 1>part that drives me the most crazy about it, if

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not a d make another move. I've never really

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>seen anything like this with the team where they command

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>basically the entire future of their draft, but they have

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>multiple years in a row now where they've got a

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>legendary superstar in his post prime that you seem uninterested

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in bolstering the talent level at all. And frankly, like

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I I understand why if you had like one or

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>two picks left and you had made efforts and nothing

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 1>had really worked, and you were looking towards the future,

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. You've passed on everything. You passed out Ogenna, no,

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>but you passed on Pascal Siakam. The one deal you

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>made was for a distressed star in Jimmy Butler, and

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>you gave up one pick. There has not been a

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>steady intentionality to improve the team to make them better

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>while also having some control of your future. The whole

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>point is is you're gonna be bad. I'm sorry, the

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Warriors are going to suck in the late twenty twenties guaranteed.

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if they never sell. I don't care

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>if they don't trade a single pick and they let

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Steph rode off into the sunset, they let Lebron go

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else, they make start accumulating draft picks right now.

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna suck in the late twenty Twentiesante they don't

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>have a single good player in their young core that

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>can actually lead a playoff team or anything close to it,

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>They're going to suck. So if you're going to suck,

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>while you're sucking, you can take in assets by taking

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>in bad money, and you can quickly recoup the draft

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>compensation that you sent out to improve the team. Like,

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>don't suck for no reason. When you suck is when

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you can start accumulating what you need to not suck.

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And what bothers me about this situation is there is

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a pathway where the Warriors can be very good. Now

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>for like two years, you can be really good, and

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>then while you suck. In a couple of years, you

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>can recoup what you've sent out and build for the future.

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 1>But what I what I'm worried is gonna happen here

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>for Golden State, is they're going to be sitting in

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a situation where it's twenty two, twenty eight. Steph's retired,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's retired, Draymond's retired. You suck, and it's gonna look

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>really bleak, and then it's gonna look really bleaked the

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>next year. And then it's gonna look really bleaked the

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>next year, and you're gonna be like, man, why didn't

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>we capitalize on that more? Why didn't we make a

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>greater effort to try to make the most of that group?

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And like, even if you don't get Lebron, Like if

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you go get Trey Murphy and you don't get Lebron,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>you're better this year and at least you have an

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to have more joy and more opportunity in what

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>is the twilight of one of the great eras in

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>NBA history. I just hope they do something, even if

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not involving Lebron. Darren Peterson. So one of the

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>things I said before the draft. If you guys remember,

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is that I picked AJ Devonsa to go number one,

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but a couple of specific things. I did say that

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Darren Peterson is a better basketball player right now,

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and I said there was a good chance that he

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a better NBA player than AJ Debonsa in

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the short term. And I specifically said, we could be

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>having a conversation twenty thirty games into the season where

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Darren Peterson as rookie of the Year

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and did the Wizards make the wrong pick and all

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of stuff. But then I said, I

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>think that Darren Peterson's ceiling is somewhere in that like

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Devin Booker territory, whereas I think AJ Debonsa has a

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>higher ceiling. And so as the years go by, is

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>where AJ Debonsa could make his number one overall pick

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>decision the right decision. I felt strongly that way, despite

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I'm not the biggest draft guy in

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, as you guys know, but I also am

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a big believer in don't overthink things, and I also

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>trust my eyes, and I think that this Darren Peterson's

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>summer league debut is like a real data point it

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>moves me. Does that necessarily mean that he was the

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>wrong pick to take a J Deabonson number one? No,

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>AJ debonce hasn't played yet. That is kind of an

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>important detail here, is like we're all kind of getting

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>excited and getting all worked up, and Ajdabansa doesn't play

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>until tomorrow. Jackson and I will be there in the

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>arena to watch. But what I do think is important

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge is that it has been a very long

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>time and it is exceedingly rare to see a guard

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:44.479
<v Speaker 1>that is this comfortable as a primary shot creator running

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>high volume pick and roll, high volume ISO at this

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>phase of his career. Darren, the biggest difference between these

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Summer League games and what you shot Kansas was the

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>sheer amount of time that they put the bast cantball

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>in his hands and let him get into his spread

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>pick and roll attack. If you dig into the numbers

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>at Kansas, Darren only averaged about seven point seven pick

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and rolls per game, including passes, a lot of off

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>ball work, a lot of catch and shoot opportunities. We

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen very many at all in these couple of

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Summer League games. He's not working off the ball at all.

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>It's him live dribble, running ball screens from the top.

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I obviously don't have the exact numbers, but I'm sure

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>he's running over twenty pick and rolls of games, so

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we're talking like triple the volume of on ball opportunity

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>compared to what he got at Kansas. What is interesting

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>there is it's allowed him to like really find a rhythm,

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and you could see it like he's dribbling the ball

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>so much and he's getting so many opportunities that he's

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>really comfortable. He's really settling in. He's not afraid to

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>make a mistake. He had eight turnovers in the first game.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Certainly as missus shrif shots. He looks comfortable and confident

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on the ball by virtue of the high usage and

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the many opportunities he's getting to work and pick and

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>roll from there. There's been a couple of specific things

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that have really stood out to me. One one of

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>my concerns when I was scouting him was his first

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>step quickness, and like, is he going to be able

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to just like look at really good defenders and just

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>get by them off the dribble, And we did see

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>some of that. He had a couple of straight ISOs

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the game against Centric Coward that

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>were really nice. One off of the right wing where

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he kind of got a hesitation dribble, got to his

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>left hand, bumped him and shot a little floater, and

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>he had another one where he shot a little turn

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>around fade away in the lane. And I think Centric

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Coward's the kind of a classic, really good NBA perimeter

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>defender talent, so like he certainly can do that, but

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's going to be I don't think

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be in Anthony Edwards esque, like you

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>can't freaking guard me one on one type of talent.

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Where I was super impressed was how he worked in

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>ball screens with like the timing of his attacks, the

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>way he's set up defenders, the understanding of leverage and

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>change of pace. If you don't have a great first step,

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the stuff you have to have if you're gonna

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to get to your spots. You have to understand,

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like when a defender is caught between steps and you

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity to hit a gap. You have to

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>understand when you can change pace. How if you like

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>wait for the big to like if he's showing at

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the level, but then he recovers. You wait till the

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>big starts backing off before the guard gets in, and

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>then you can shoot the gap you had, like a

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>little driving scooping layup on a similar type of shot

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>off of the right wing. In one of the two games.

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>He has this like combination of creativity and confidence but

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>also an understanding of the angles and change of pace,

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>where he was consistently just getting to his spots. Oh,

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I got you kind of trailing the action on the three.

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna slow down so that you catch up. And

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you slow down, but then I'm gonna hit the poundurable

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>sides and get plenty of separation and rise over the

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.959
<v Speaker 1>top like, Oh, I'm working you downhill on the ball screen.

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You're over pursuing towards my left hand drive. I'm gonna

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>stop on a diamond, turn over my left shoulder and

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>shoot a little hook. Or I'm gonna turn over my

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>left shoulder and shoot a little fade away in the lane.

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bump you off with my right shoulder to

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>get to space. Getting the little moves that help get

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the defender caught on the screen before he gets going

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>downhill in the ball screen. There was just like a

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>very natural feel for the pacing of an NBA pick

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and roll and how to get to his spots out

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of those actions. And then when you combine that with

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the shot making, and the shot making is ridiculous. And

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>like I thought, one of my favorite shots was the

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>dagger he ended up hitting in the I think it

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>was in the game against Memphis where he gets a

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>small on him and he dribbles off the ball screen,

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>faces a hard hedge. The hard hedge pushes him way

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>out to half court, but he ends up beating the hedge,

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and the hedge recovers and he's looking down at the

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>dude and the dude is small as guarding him, and

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>he just dribbles into a hesitation pull up because he

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>knows I've got separation because of the hedge, so I

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about getting into a specific move.

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Let me just rise up over the top. The dude

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>can't bother the shot, he's too short. There's just like

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a really good natural scoring Field've always talked about scoring

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>talent to me as like it's a specific talent. We

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>always think of individual basketball traits how well do you shoot,

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>how well do you dribble, what's your footwork like? To me,

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>scoring in and of itself is like a very natural

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>trait that some people have. There are a lot of

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>players that are great shooters that rep all the footwork,

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that rep all the ball handling, but they lack natural

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>scoring feel. And again we've talked about all the time,

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the scoring feel is about creativity and audacity or confidence,

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it, and then skill is

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the third piece of it. That doesn't work if you

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have supreme confidence and your ability and the creativity

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to constantly be kind of reacting to the defense rather

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>than telegraphing what you're doing. That's what that flow is.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>When they talk about a basketball player that's kind of

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>found his rhythm or gotten into a flow, he's just reacting.

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 1>He's not thinking, he's just playing, and there's a natural

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>scoring talent that just kind of rises out of the

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>player in the form of that creativity. When you get

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to that like tough left shoulder fade away over Cedric Coward,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not like he drove into the lane and thought

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going like at the start of the possession, like

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna drive at him and I'm gonna get to

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>my left shoulder fade. No, he's just playing basketball. And

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>when he makes that hard move to his left and

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>he feels the defender over pursue, he knows he can

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 1>turn over his left shoulder from there. It's a feel

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>thing like, Oh, I've got a ton of space. I'll

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the hook like he did in the early one. No,

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna actually need to get a little bit more

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>separation here. Now I'm gonna turn and fade over my

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.479
<v Speaker 1>left shoulder with a little jump shot. It is very

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>like impromptu improvisational and it requires a certain amount of creativity.

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>And I just think that Darren Peterson's scoring talent was

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>screaming off the screen in these games in a way

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that was like, Oh, this looks fundamentally different than it

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>did at Kansas. And so again, I'm not no one

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>should ever change their opinion about a player because of

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>two summer leagues. Aj Debonsa hasn't even had his chance

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to play. But I also think it's important to acknowledge that,

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>like what Darren Peterson showed in those two games is

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>shit that really works in the NBA. And if you're

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a Jazz fan, you should be extremely excited because he

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>looks a lot better in those two Summer League games

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>than the guy we watched at Kansas last year. A

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of basketball to play. The challenges will continue to

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>get tougher as the months go by, and as he's

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>playing against real NBA competition, and when he's trying to

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>share it, like, here's the thing, Kante George is gonna

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>have the basketball a lot. How does that disrupt Darren

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Peterson's rhythm? I would argue that'll be helpful because he'll

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>get more of those off ball opportunities too. But I

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>just think if I'm a Jazz fan I am, there's

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a spectrum of how you could feel about a prospect

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>between he's living up to expectations, he's exceeding expectations, or

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.919
<v Speaker 1>he's failing to live up to expectations. And through these

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>very small, this very small data set, these couple of

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Summer league games, I think it's a strong data point

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that Darren Peterson looks even better than we could have

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>hoped to this point as a prospect. All Right, We're

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna rip through this mail back quickly because I went

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:41.720
<v Speaker 1>long on the first part of the show. First question

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the financial return for a team. The financial return to

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the team would experience for just having Lebron on the

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>team would be immense. I think the Warriors should mortgage

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of first round picks to maximize Steph's final

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of seasons to acquire late twenties early thirties players

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>who can be a transition leader heading into the post

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>step era. That would also increase the odds of Lebron

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>joining that roster would have an incredibly high stealing with

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a major risk of availability issues due to injury and

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>load management. Still it'd be worth it. You only get

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Steph Curry once in a lifetime and Lebron is on

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the table. What do you think is the right balance

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>for Golden State to invest their picks in capital now

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>versus post Steph era? Put on your GM hat. I

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 1>won't get too far into this because we just talked

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>about it, but I would make a deal if your

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 1>concern is the long term viability of the team. Don't

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>get a d Go get Trey Murphy. Go get Trey

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Murphy at Dejante Murray, make some sort of splashy deal

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>with New Orleans and again to your point, Like, I

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's this idea that draft picks lose their value

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you spend them. They only lose their

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>value if you spend them on bad players. Like, yes,

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if you spend two first round picks on AD, you're

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to be able to turn around and

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>trade AD for two equally valuable first round picks. But

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>let's say you go get Trey Murphy. There's nothing stopping

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you from turning around trading Trey Murphy two years when

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Steph and Lebron retire and recouping some of what you

0:38:56.120 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>sent out, especially if he looks awesome play alongside Lebron

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>James and Steph Curry. If Lebron retires after a season,

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you train him in that offseason and you probably recoup

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a good amount of what you sent out. Just make

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>your team better. Make your team better, because maybe it

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>gets you Lebron, but if not, it just makes your

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>team better. I think I think a lot of this

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>has been overthought from the same point in the Warriors

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>front office. Hey, Jason, keep up a good work with

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>your content question. With the way that these superstars are

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>getting paid three hundred million dollars, would the lower seeded

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>teams are playing. Teams keep their superstars or trade them

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>before they end up paying them three hundred and four

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred million. I don't think teams want to pay out

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>massive contracts to just be a playing team. That goes

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to the conversation that we had early in the show

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 1>as it pertains to the difference between like a Jalen

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Brown and a Donovan Mitchell. The main line of demarcation

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for me is like multiple areas of impact, and we

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about checking boxes on a basketball team on both

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 1>ends of the floor. If I'm going to be paying

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>guy at thirty five percent max, I want him checking

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of boxes. The difference between a Donovan Mitchell

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and a Jalen Brown is with Donovan Mitchell, it is

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>one box that he checks his offensive engine, and he

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't check it very well, and there's nothing else that

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he provides. Is Jalen Brown a mediocre offensive engine? Two Yes,

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but he also comes with a lot of other utility

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>as an athlete and as a defender on the floor.

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Even if he's not a perfect basketball player, he brings

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other value. And that's why with the

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>guy like Jaylen Brown, he just kind of rises above

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>what I'd be willing to pay versus you know, Donovan Mitchell.

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a different kind of bracket there. What is

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's case for Lebron that you want to Why is

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's case for Lebron that you wouldn't want to see

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Lebron stand in the corner while LaMelo and Ant put

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:38.280
<v Speaker 1>up bad shots. LaMelo came to Minnesota to help facilitate offense.

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>The addition of playmaking directly decreases the style of offense

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>he just described. Between Rudy McDaniels, TJ. Shannon Bones, and

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Johan Barne. That's a good squad LaMelo and Ants. Gravity

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 1>would help Lebron creatively attack off the catch, find pockets

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>to shoot, or put the or put the ball on

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the floor to kick out. I don't see Lebron standing

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in the corner. I do believe that generation gap is

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a factor, so that's a fair point. Adding Lebron to

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Denver does not fix their core weakness size and athleticism.

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Gordon's injury concerns aren't cured, and it's tough to

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>say whether Watson will be retained. To be clear, I

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily like Denver unless they can retain Watson too. Like,

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the whole thing, is lebron Ag and

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Watson kind of combine into the amount of front court

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>size and athleticism that they would need the big difference.

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, LaMelo is an offensive engine, but he's a LaMelo.

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>He's an offensive engine as a spread, pick and roll creator.

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>He is not an offensive engine like Steph running around

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>off the ball, or like Jokic inverting the gravity of

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>ever inverting the rim protection of the defense to the

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>perimeter and running a bunch of like dhos and keeping

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved. LaMelo is an on an island pick and

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 1>roll shot creator. Anthony Edwards is literally a guy that

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 1>loves to shoot over multiple defenders. So like to me,

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's less like do I think that the Minnesota

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Timberwls have enough offensive talent? Of course they do. It's

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with primary defensive players in Jada McDaniels and

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Gobert and who are not necessarily the greatest feel

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>for the game offensive players, and then two kind of

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>on an island offensive guards that are not going to

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>be playing in a style or way that's going to

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>heavily incorporate Lebron James as a playmaker, So to me,

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it does relegate Lebron to like a Ruy Hatchamura esque

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>staying in the corner and shoot a bunch of catch

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and shoot threes and occasionally get to run a play

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 1>when we're in our bench groups or when one of

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>LaMelo or Ant is sitting out a game. But beyond that,

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, like when the Wolves are at their best,

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Lebron's offensive skill would be marginalized and from

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that standpoint, I just don't think it would be as

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>much fun for him. Next question, Even though San Antonio

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>made it to the finals this year, I don't think

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a guarantee. Like many people say that they're going

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to be back a ton in the next five to

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>six years. The league is constantly evolving and teams are

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>getting better. Even though I a Knicks fan, think we

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>can reach the finals, there's so many factors that come

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>into just making the finals again that don't make it

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a guarantee. Injuries, more hunger to win it than other teams,

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>bad matchups, and second apron could dictate whether a team

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>wins it all or is the first round exit. So

0:42:58.200 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>my question is, do you think teams should be changing

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>rosters every year. What we see big star movement each

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>year going forward, like this current offseason, based on each

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.319
<v Speaker 1>team's success in the postseason. Love the Show. I do

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a certain amount of like the

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>parody in the league right now is what's instigating the

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>heavy amount of player movement. So I do agree with

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you there as far as the like get getting back

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to the finals piece, Yeah, absolutely, there's no guarantee specifically

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for san Antonio. Like, okayse he's running it back and

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they've got a damn good team, and if Jadab is

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>healthy and aj Mitchell's healthy, like I they're like san

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Antonio's got their own improvements to make in order to

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>be able to survive that matchup. And yeah, you're right,

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Like for the Knicks, there's just better teams in the East.

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 1>This here, Toronto's gonna be better, Boston's gonna be better

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>if Tatum can stay healthy. There's a like you know,

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if Lebron ends up going to Miami or Cleveland,

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna have the Indiana's gonna be back, Like

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have like real challenges in the East. And

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:53.360
<v Speaker 1>so no one has like an easy path to the finals.

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But the thing with San Antonio that I think is

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>an important to understand is the best trade of their

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>team is defense. Like, it's just really hard to beat

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the Spur four times out of seven when Steph Castle

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and Dylan Harper and Victor wemen Yama are all on

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the floor getting up in your jersey and funneling you

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>into rim protection at the rim, and you also have

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the internal improvement, They're all gonna get a lot better

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>over the course of this offseason, especially after an embarrassing

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>loss in the finals. Like, do I think the Spurs

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are a safe bet to make the finals? No, but

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>they're just I'm telling you right now, they're gonna be

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:26.879
<v Speaker 1>my championship favorite next year. Next question, Hey, Jason, Given

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Okase's offseason moves bringing in to a Deamara alongside Bennett

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Sturtz and Otega Away, how do you see Mark Dagnall

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:37.959
<v Speaker 1>adjusting Okaysee's frontline, defensive and playmaking geometry, specifically to counter

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the San Antonio Spurs. What do you think would be

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the lineups. I'm gonna be honest with you, I think

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna look exactly like next year. They retained Isaiah Hartenstein,

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you still have Jay, Will you still have Chet Holmgren.

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 1>That's your front line. I don't think a Damara is

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be more than just a regular season guy who

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 1>pops in when guys are missing time. You know, we

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>could see Bennett starts with the loss of Isaiah Joe

0:44:58.200 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Wiggins. We could see him crack into the

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 1>perimeter rotation. And I think that okay See in general

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is favoring shooting a little bit more and being a

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>little less dependent on just defensive minded players understanding how

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they need to space out a team like san Antonio, like,

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't matter how good you are defensively in

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the regular season if you can't score against Victor women Yama.

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a big part of why they're

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of exploring more shooting talent on the perimeter. But

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a Demara is not going to bump one of those

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>three centers from the rotation for all intents and purposes

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>next year's game. If okay See and san Antonio run

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>into each other in a series, will we see some

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Tobias Harris, Yeah, will we see you know, you know,

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe some Bennett starts or more j Dubb and aj Mitchell. Sure,

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, it's going to look exactly like

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>last year. Guys. It's going to be a rematch. Those

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>teams are basically more or less running it back in

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of their core rotation talent. Next question shout out

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to DNVR where I first saw you there. What roles

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 1>could you see Nasried filling in Charlotte? I could see

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>him taking a large or unexpected role. Totally agree. I

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna have a lot of jump shooting opportunities

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 1>in the flow of just how much that team can

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>space teams out, and just having a reliable catch and

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>shoot guy at the four. But Nas is like a

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 1>legit matchup attacking forward. He's got some real ball skill

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>attacking matchups. And so when Charlotte runs into switching teams,

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>and that was a problem for them at various points

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 1>last year, when Charlotte runs into switching teams, doas Reed

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>is a legitimate switch beater, which I think is a

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>real asset. All right, Three more, I know you'll be

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>doing your player rankings at some point. It's something I

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>look forward to every year. I was wondering if you

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>would ever do a ranking of your all time favorite

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>players For me, those two lists vary drastically. Thanks for

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:40.359
<v Speaker 1>all the great content. I don't have time to watch

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>many games, so I can catch every episode to keep

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>up with it all. Thank you so much for supporting

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the show. So this is interesting question. Lebron obviously my

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite player is the one player that I have like

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>an actual, real rooting interest in in terms of like

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the way you think of like a traditional fan. I've

0:46:57.719 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>told the story of the show before. I won't tell

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it in full right now, but Lebron was the guy

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that got me to fall in love with basketball. I

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>grew up in a baseball football family and I just

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>randomly turned on the TV and saw Lebron playing in

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern Conference semis in two thousand and six, and

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that was what kind of got me into basketball. So, like,

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Lebron is always going to have like I'm going to

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have like a little bit of that like young, youthful

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>emotional fan rooting interest there, and when Lebron retires that

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>will fade. But like I have a lot of players

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that I've really grown to like as an adult basketball fan.

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Steph Curry is like my favorite natural became a fan

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>as an adult type of basketball player. Probably my second

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite player of all time, behind Lebron. It's probably the

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>biggest reason why Lebron going to Golden State doesn't bother me,

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 1>because I just really like Steph, I really like Lebron,

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and I just want to see them play together. I

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>think it would be a blast. But there are a

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of players over the years that I've really liked.

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I won number fifteen in college because I was a

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:55.399
<v Speaker 1>big fan of Carmelo Anthony in his high post games specifically,

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and if you watch any of my college tape, it's

0:47:57.960 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like face up, jab step kind of

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 1>mid post stuff. I did a lot of that kind

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of shit just because I was such a big fan

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of Carmelo Anthony. Anthony Edwards is a modern player that

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been a huge fan of. Kobe Bryant was a

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>player that I became a much bigger fan of after

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>he retired, really after he came back from his achilles.

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I just like had such an appreciation for the comeback.

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know how it is when you're a young fan,

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>When you're a really young fan, you have your guy

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:27.399
<v Speaker 1>that you love and then you hate everybody that they

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 1>compare him to. So That's why I didn't like Kobe.

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like Tim Duncan, I didn't like Steph. I

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't like KD when I was like young. But as

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I got older and I realized that, you know, actually,

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm a basketball fan and I love all

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:42.479
<v Speaker 1>these dudes. I became a huge KD fan. I became

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge Kawhi fan. I became a huge Kobe Bryant fan.

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Like Kobe. You know, I have a similar frame. I

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have long arms, and I'm six six, so like I

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:53.240
<v Speaker 1>play a lot of you know, high post, mid post stuff,

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and practiced a bunch of footwork that Kobe did just

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>because I wanted to look like him, because I'm a

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>fan and I just want to you know, it's just

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted. I just grew to love and appreciate

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>all these basketball players for different reasons. And you know,

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of the most fun parts about

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>being a basketball player is you can kind of pick

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and choose little pieces from everybody's game, and you can

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 1>practice it and you can add it to your game.

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what I think is fun. When

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you watch any young up and coming NBA player, is

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they usually just look like kind of a collection of

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of previous players that came before them, because

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you can tell they watched those guys and they became

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fans of their games for various reasons, and they kind

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of implemented those things into their game. But yeah, like

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the truth of the matter is, is I I as

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>an NBA fan. There are very few players that like

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I just don't like. I for the most part, end

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:50.719
<v Speaker 1>up finding things that I like about everybody's game just

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 1>because I find their skill level so impressive. Two more,

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this is beside the point of the pod, but why

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't the Knicks considered first tier contenders? They just set

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a million records in one title. They went sixteen and

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>three in the playoffs. They were so dominant that they

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:04.839
<v Speaker 1>set records that applied to the regular season as well.

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 1>They should also improve next season since they can build

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 1>off some of the offensive looks they stumbled upon in

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. People criticize how easy their path was, but

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the seeding they had to beat,

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 1>it's basically the same as previous champions. Definitely easier than

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics WHENU factor in injuries. Even though you could

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>say the Spurs were a good matchup. Putting the Knicks

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in that tier would just form a rock scissors paper

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 1>with the Spurs, okay see and the Knicks. So the

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>big difference between the Knicks and a real top tier

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>contender is the regular season. Like, how many of you

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 1>guys throughout the season talked shit in the comments about

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 1>how bad the Lakers were For various reasons, No one

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>ever thought the Lakers were a top tier contender. I

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 1>had best in March when they were fully healthy, thought

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of them as a second tier contender. The Knicks and

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:50.319
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers won the same amount of regular season games

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 1>last year. Yes, did the Knicks face a relatively easy

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>postseason run, Yes until the finals. Again, in their finals

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>opponent was a team that I thought they matched up

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:04.280
<v Speaker 1>really well with. That's true. But yeah, Boston easy playoff

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>run for the most part, okay see for the most part,

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 1>easy fortunate playoff run. When it comes to injuries, denver

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>relatively easy playoff run. You go down the line that

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>most of these champions recently have had relatively easy playoff runs.

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>The difference is is like Boston won sixty four games,

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>okay see, I can't even remember how many games when

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it was in the sixties. Like, the difference between a

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>top tier contender and a second tier contender is a

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>top tier contender from day one of the regular season

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>through the time that they hoist the trophy looks like

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a top tier contender. To me. The Knicks kind of

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:42.480
<v Speaker 1>fall more in line with like a Golden State, where

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they were more dominant in the postseason, but again, a

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>big part of that had to do with their opponents

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that they faced in the Eastern Conference. They're more dominant

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in the postseason, but during the majority of the season

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>they just looked like a second tier contender. I think

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the main difference. I think if you want to

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>be viewed as one of the great champions NBA history,

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you need to win sixty plus games and then cruise

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 1>through the playoffs. And by the way, that's kind of

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>why that Thunder team isn't remembered as like super super dominant,

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>because they were dominant in the regular season, but then

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they weren't dominant in the postseason. They won, but they

0:52:15.719 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>scraped by and got some injury luck, right, Like, it's

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:21.360
<v Speaker 1>very rare that you see a team like Boston, for example,

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that has sixty four wins and then kicks everyone's ass

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.239
<v Speaker 1>in the postseason, and it's just a resounding top tier

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>championship contender season. And I just didn't think the Knicks

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 1>totality of a season rose to that last question, Hi, Jason,

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.760
<v Speaker 1>how would you assess Detroit's offseason? Trajan called out adding

0:52:38.760 --> 0:52:41.680
<v Speaker 1>more ball handling, shooting, and shot creation prior to free agency,

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and thus he's so thus far he's only really addressed shooting.

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The Collins and Joe moves are certainly useful, but without

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that second initiator cough harrow, hero, I can't say with

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 1>any confidence we've improved. The best way I've heard it

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>described is that Cade's role will be easier given the

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>additional play shooting and play finishing, but ultimately the usage

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.879
<v Speaker 1>remain unsustainably high as the only guy that can break

0:53:02.920 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 1>down a set defense. Curious to hear your thoughts how

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we could proceed moving towards this free agency. Thanks as

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 1>always for your content. So I've been actually pretty happy

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Detroit offseason in the sense that I really

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:15.399
<v Speaker 1>do like Isaiah Joe. I've been telling you guys, John

0:53:15.440 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Collins was my favorite power forward that was available not

0:53:17.680 --> 0:53:20.880
<v Speaker 1>named Lebron, So they got my favorite power forward, Isaiah Joe.

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it is just a really good player. I

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think you guys are going to be impressed by him

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:26.919
<v Speaker 1>defensively as well. There's a lot that I really like there.

0:53:27.280 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>To me, the one thing I would say about the

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>ball handling piece is I don't mind them waiting as

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:38.879
<v Speaker 1>long as they eventually do something this season before the deadline,

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the trade deadline in February. Cauz Like Frankly, do I

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think Tyler Hero would help the Pistons? Yeah? But do

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Tyler Hero is the guy that elevates them

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>top tier championship contender. No, So maybe they're holding out

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>for a Devin Booker, Maybe they're holding out for a

0:53:56.440 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie Irving. Maybe they're holding out for a higher level

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>player at that spot. For instance. The reporting is is

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that they put together a real offer for Austin Reeves.

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm on board with that. I'm a huge Austin fan.

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Austin I think is a much better player than Tyler Hero.

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he'd be the kind of player that could

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:15.960
<v Speaker 1>actually elevate Detroit to another level. So, like to me,

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it's them kind of moving on the margins with savvy moves.

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But waiting to pounce on the right guard is the move,

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and from all indications, guys like Booker Kyrie they're not

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:32.720
<v Speaker 1>available yet, so like, as long as they eventually do something,

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm on board. I'd rather have them wait and do

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 1>something more splashy before this deadline than them take a

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:42.040
<v Speaker 1>move on Tyler Hero right now and then not be

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:44.640
<v Speaker 1>good enough to win the title next season. All right, guys,

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's all I have for today. Is always as sincerely

0:54:46.320 --> 0:54:48.919
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you guys for supporting us in supporting the show.