WEBVTT - Surveillance: U.S. Oil Release with Hochstein

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane, along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferroll and Lisa Brownowitz Jaily. We bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg Terminal. We need to

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>look at that six dollar gallon of gas in Mammoth Mountain, California,

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and yacht's cheaper other places, but it is front and

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>center for President Biden joining us a gentleman hugely qualified

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>on this strange word energy security. Amos Hockstein is Senior

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Adviser of Energy Security at the Department of State and

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>joins us today. The thing here, Amos, every time around

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is whip inflation now. And every president has a different path,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>like Jerry Ford to whip inflation now. And you're reading

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a history is the same as mine. This is a

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>tough task. What is the first order of business for

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden? Well, I think, first of all, good morning

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for having me on the show. As

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 1>you said before, energy is energy security is a critical issue,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think the President took strong steps yesterday UH

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>to address the fallout in the energy markets as a

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>result a direct result of the Ukraine War and the invasion,

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the unjust invasion and brutal war that that Putin is

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>waging in Ukraine, and that has consequences, as the President

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday here at home, with rising costs of energy,

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>rising costs of oil, which of course translates, as you said,

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>into rising costs of gasoline for Americans. So President Biden

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>took a strong step yesterday announcing the largest UH SPR

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>released these strategic petroleum reserves a million barrels a day

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>for the next six months. H and that we've already

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>seen prices come down as a result of that announcement.

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>That's going to have a major impact in the oil markets,

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and the energy markets are at large. Okay, but Amos,

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>what's important here, and this is pizza's security. John. This

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>filters down into every product, including a slice of pizza

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at Famiglia in New York. It is up, up, up.

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>You're very delicate about the slice of pizza in New

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>York Times. I think it's as important as a girl

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on the gas. I agree, it's important. There's another measure, Amos,

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that you've announced yesterday, you called on Congress to do

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>something to make companies pay fees on wows from their

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>leases that they haven't used in years, and on acres

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of public lands that they are hoarding without producing. As

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>from the statement from the White House release yesterday, the

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Administration keeps talking about these nine thousand leases, Amos. I

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think if you wrote this, you would have written that,

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>because if I asked you the following question, I want

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>a direct answer to a direct question of those nine

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand leases, how many of those sit on productive land?

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So I will answer you a direct answer, but let

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>me just say on a slice of pizza price, I agree,

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the prices are going up everywhere. Part of that is.

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Part of that is as a result of these skyrockety

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>energy prices where we're not a farm to table economy,

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we're a farm to truck to table. So everything that

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we consume has to go on as a result, has

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>resulted in a gallon of gasoline or a gallon diesel

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>trucks coming criss crossing the country for for delivering whether

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.119
<v Speaker 1>it's ingredients for pizza or if it's for other commodities.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So there's a direct result, and that's why it's not

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>just uh, the gallon gasoline is not a political issue.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a real economic issue that we need to

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to address and that is a result of

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a foreign war that we have to be cognizant of.

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>As far as the leases look, we these are these

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>are in public lands. And your point is right. If

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>some of these leases are on uh, nonproductive acreage, then

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are holding these leases for several years

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes UH and are not doing any seismic, not doing

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the kind of work that needs to be done on

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>those on that acreage because there they think it's non productive.

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Then you have two choices. Either you can return the

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>lease or give it up, or you can simply pay

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the higher fees because you want to hold onto that

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>lease for a little longer um so that you can

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>develop it later. Uh. And I think that so that

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is I would have written that any less, you know

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>why they might want to sit on it and develop

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it later. It could be on third rate land that

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>requires a higher crude price. You know how this works.

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>The way this is being framed by the administration is

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that these land leases are being hoarded that were sitting

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>on productive land and it's not being produced because these

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>companies agreedy. I mean, I'll read the line out from

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the President his words, companies have an obligation that goes

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>beyond just the shareholders, to their customers, their communities in

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>their country. No American company should take advantage of a

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>pandemic or putin to enrich themselves at the expense of

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>American families. What evidence is that that they're holding those releases? Why,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll finished, then you can go, and I'll give you

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>all the time you need. What evidence is that that

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>they're holding those leases because they're being greedy to profit

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>from what's happening in Ukraine. So so let's disagregate there.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>There are a number of issues here, and the President

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>actually recognized the companies, the oil companies that are responding

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to this price environment, that are responding to this world

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>supply shortage that we're in and have announced extraordinary increases

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in capex uh and in reinvestment in the United States

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>in bringing on additional production. And he's recognized him and

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>said that was a that is progress and he and

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>he praised them for doing that. But there are other companies,

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know that, Jonathan, that are saying, look, I

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to increase production with prices at prices

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>were at a hundred and twenty and a hundred and

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty just just a week ago, and said I'm not

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it. And he called out some of those

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>who have said, even at two it or three barrel,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to increase production because a variety of reasons,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and some of them are saying, my, my, the funds

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that back me or that owned my that my my

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.559
<v Speaker 1>shareholders or my uh my holders of my debt are saying,

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. Give us increased dividends during this time.

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>There is no well that is not profitable at a

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>d and twenty a hundred and thirty. And if you're

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>making a decision at prolonged period of time of above

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty five dollars, which we've now been in for for

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a few months, that you can't make more investment to

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>bring on production than I think the President is right

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to call them out, especially when other companies are saying, no,

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this is the kind of exactly the kind of environment

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're that we are going to increase production. And look,

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we did two things. One the President announced that we're

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>going to release a million barrels a day in order

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to increase the certainty of liquidity in the in the

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>energy markets and to make sure there's enough oil on

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the market to support the U S economy as all

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>as the global coming number two. He has said that

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to replenish the reserve at a time when

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we finished dispersing and releasing the oil and when prices

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>come down, So we're gonna sell the oil now at

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>high prices buy it back later. That gives incentive to

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the oil companies to say, look, I know that even

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>though the US is going to release these reserves, I'm

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>going to have a buyer in the US government later on.

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So it continues that incentive to increase production. And I

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>think that this is what we needed. We needed to

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>put something into the system where we can bridge The

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>oil companies have said, you look at Exxon and Chevron,

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Conoco Oxy have said they're going to increase production. We're

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>going to increase nine thousand to a million barrels a

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>day this year, and that means but it's only gonna

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>come on in the middle of the third quarter to

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, So we have a gap

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>between now and that period of time. So what the

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>President did yesterday. This historic move is to say, I'm

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna the US government is going to fill that gap

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>between now and there and put that same million barrels

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a day of production that we were hoping to get

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end that we're going to get at the

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, and put that out now so

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're not replacing the private sector, We're incentivizing it

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and letting the American consumer benefit from lower prices between

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>now and there. They likes the Goldmen, Sex disagree. Jeff

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Curry says this the U S policy, use of an

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>SPR release, a potential deal with Iran, extreme price volatility,

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and the growing risk of a recession next year are

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all exacerbating the uncertainty face by producers, reducing their incentive

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to invest more. And What's the reason I bring this

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff up is that I want to avoid this really

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of simplistic conversation that something untoward is happening in

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the oil patch when you know that what happens in

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>the oil industry is incredibly complex. Now you've said something

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>else over the last few years as well, over the

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months. I'll bring up another thing. This was November.

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>President Biden urged the FTC Commission share to investigate oil

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and gas companies retail prices, blaming industry leaders. As gas

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>prices continue to saw, it's become this talking point the

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>oil majors are hoarding these leases, even though you admit,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what's on that acreage. We don't know

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what's on that acorage. Then there's this other talking point

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that somehow these companies are price couching and in the

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>President's words, taking advantage of a pandemic or putin to

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>enrich themselves at the expense of American families. I'm just

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>asking what evidences they're off that you wanted to start

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this probe. What have you found, What evidence is that

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>what companies are price couching right now? And if you

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>can identify them and the name them, what are you

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>doing about it? Well, first, I think, as we said yesterday,

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe person all to Mr Curry's comments. Uh.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I've i in my colleagues and the US government. We've

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>been in close contact with the energy industry, and most

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>companies have actually said that they believe what we did

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday was exactly the right thing to do, uh, and

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that they feel that it hasn't in sentive because it

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is for six months before their production comes online, and

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to spend the next couple of years

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>replenishing the reserve, that means that they are incentivized to

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to spend the capex that they've announced to increase production.

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So with respect to Golden Saxon, I take a lot

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of issue with some of the other things that he

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>said in that I have no tag you too. But

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>another question you'd be asked as well, Amoss, is who

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>would make who would make a decision like this to

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>boost capex on front month? Brent Futures, who would do that?

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>W c I Futures front month? Who would do that?

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>You know what the rest of the curve looks like.

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Why would they make a decision based on where the

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>front month is? Well, don't I'll tell you they are

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>making that decision. Uh. They have announced that they're going

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to several of the majors who are the largest holders

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and rulers in in the Permian UH and in other

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>shale basins, have said that they are increasing cap x.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to increase production. Total US production

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to grow by about ten percent by that

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>ninod to a million barrels. It's just that these things

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>don't happen overnight. You know that the decision to spend

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>money billions of dollars to bring up production doesn't mean

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>production comes on the next day. But I want to

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>address the point that you said, because I think the

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>President was very clear there are two We're not taking

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a broad swipe of the whole industry, he said. I

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted that he wanted to acknowledge the fact that part

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the industry has done exactly what it needs to

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>do and to see HI old prices incentivizing them to

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>bring about more production other companies, and we can't ignore

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>this done some companies have said, and the quote that

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>he used in his speech that even at two hundred

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars of barrel, I will not increase production because of

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>uh so called fiscal discipline, that is not I'm not

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>making that up there to be fair to you, just

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>let me jump in to be fair to you. That

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>was a comment on this network. I heard it, I

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about it, I repeated it. It's something I've said before.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Another thing I've highlighted as well was a Wall Street

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Journal report that came out in the last few weeks,

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the administration is trying to make a call to the

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Saudiast and read trying to arrange a call with the

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Crown Prince Mohammad have been Salman and they won't take

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the call. Now, I spoke to a member of OPEC,

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can respond to that in a moment. I

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>spoke to a member of OPEC this week, and I

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>thought it was utterly embarrassing for them that they had

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a meeting earlier this month that lasted thirteen minutes, and

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>one just yesterday there was one minute shorter. Now, I

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>wonder if it's more embarrassing for us that they're laughing

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in our faces and doing this. Now you speak to

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the Saudiast, talk to me about it. A. Is that false?

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Did the administration trying to arrange a call with Crown

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Prince Mohammad been some man and the President of the

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>United States? And B why are their meetings last thing

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>thirteen minutes if we're in a massive energy crisis. So one,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a call that was going to be arranged

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>between the President and King's onmone and that called did

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>take place. Nobody that those reports I'm seeing constantly reports

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of Saudi snubbing the US or I think there's an

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>interest in in certain quarters UH to to bring about

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this kind of narrative that is completely false. I was inside.

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I've been to Saudi Arabia on a number of occasions

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>over the last several weeks, on a couple of months,

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of occasions, I was told what the

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Saudis told me on the front pages of the news

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of a US newspaper about three hours before the meeting started, UH,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and I showed this out. He's the headline, so that

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>we can jointly comment about the the hyperbole of the

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>press on this. So I would really relax. I don't

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's any relationship between the United States and Saudi

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is strategic. We have a lot of issues that we

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>need to work on together. UH. There are complexities in

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that relationship that we are working on. We have a

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of issues that UH that are of common interest

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>fighting terrorism UH that Saudi has had to suffer through

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>over the last several weeks, specifically from the houthies. We

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of strategic interests elsewhere in the region

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and as well on energy, and I'll tell you that

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we're having very good discussions there the press and reality

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on this one are are really far apart. On OPEC. Look,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I was asked before the OPEC meeting if we had

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a message to OPEC, and my answer was, I have

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>no message for ROPE. But these are folks that know

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the industry, they know the market, they know the supply

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and demand. I must have a h difference of opinion. Uh,

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we believe that, not just believe, but I can see

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the physical evidence that the market is short about two

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>million barrels a day if not more from Russian supplies

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>into the global market. That is that is clear to me.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>We can see that. Obviously, some perhaps an OPEC, don't

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>see the shortage of supply, but I can understand that

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a complex issue for them with the OPEC versus

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>OPEC plus I think that that's uh, they're gonna have

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to take some time and perhaps if you're not going

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the issues very seriously, UM, perhaps eleven or

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve minutes is all you need. But at the end

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of the day, they've they've done what they needed to do,

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and UH they've increased production by announced that they're going

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue the increases of production. We don't think that's right.

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>The President is not asking other people to do the

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>work that we should do. He took action yesterday by

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>himself on behalf of the US government for the American

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>public of releasing a million barrels a day. I believe,

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Jonathan, that we're going to have additional

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>capacity coming online from our allies. Uh, and we the

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>President coordinated this release, as he has all other measures

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>against President putin with our allies when he was in

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>meetings at the G seven and the NATO summit last week.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>He's discussed it with leaders even earlier this week. We've

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I've had conversation with my counterparts and uh, there's a

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>meeting that is going on right now of the i

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>e A, the International Energy Agency to look at additional

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>releases from the international markets. So we won't just have

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>coming on the market United States would rather have well

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>coming online to the market in Asia and as well

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>as Europe over the next several months. Unless you're a professional,

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you've given us tons of time and that's valuable to me.

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>You know that. Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Amos hostein there of the US administration on the situation

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>right now here are the Secretary of Labor, Our John Pharaoh,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to us now on Bloomberg TV and on

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, US Labor Secretary Moddy Welsh Secretary Welsh, what

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a jobs report? Just fantastic. Most people have come on

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the program this morning with Tom and myself and Lisa

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Surveymance and on the open of all said,

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it looks great. What are you most infused by looking

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>at this? Well, I think one of the things that

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that that I like is we we saw at increase

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in labor participation rate. So one thing we spoke about

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning. You know, a good you know, unemployment number low,

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a good strong report, good last three months report, actually

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a good US eleven months report, over four hundred fifty jobs.

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And we think about moving forward into two you know,

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>one point six million people still need to return back

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to the workforce. How do we get them those folks

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>back to work? How do we make sure that that

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>labor participation number goes up? Certainly there's still jobs open

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the United States. That's one of the things I'm not

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>taking away from the report. I'm very excited about the report,

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but but I think we're thinking about here, how do

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we move forward. The second thing is we're also looking at,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, what what can be done by Congress. We

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>have the Bipodisan Innovation Act other known as the CHIPS Bill,

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that allows us opportunity for supply chain issues moving forward.

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>We have some COVID relief money still being talked about

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it at up a Capitol Hill. They need to pass

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that because we need to. We're watching I'm seeing what's

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>going on in China and parts of Europe with another

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>variant going up. We want to make sure that we're

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>prepared for that here in the United States. Uh And

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>then obviously inflation we're working to the President is is

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>very lazy focus on bringing the cost down. Lots of

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>challenges there. You were just talking about global challenges there

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that we have in other markets. You know, we have

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to you know, continue to work very closely on that.

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Fed Reserve they're gonna they're gonna take

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>their action. I can't really comment on that, but we

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>have to we have to make sure that in the

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>short term we do I mean we can and reduce

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>those prices, but also long term that it doesn't happen again.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of what we're seeing in inflation is due

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic obviously what we're seeing with with Putin

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and what he's doing with Ukraine. But but we also

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have to think long term, how do we prepare the

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>country that we don't go through us again it. Secondly, Welsh,

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I've only got a few more minutes with you because

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I know you've got to do a range of interviews.

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>You're a busy man this morning, so I went through

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other issues. There is a labor contract

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>covering about twenty two thousand West Coast dock workers at

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.959
<v Speaker 1>sites including l A and Long Beach Ports that expires

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>until life. F onest I know you're aware of that.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I want you to help me understand what's the difference

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>between those unions, those individuals behind those groups to represent them,

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>using their leverage to secure better terms and exploiting the

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>country's dependence on those ports. What's the difference. I don't

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 1>think they'll do that. I mean I was out in

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Seattle and Tacoma in Portland last week specifically to talk

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to the come penny in companies about about the negotiation,

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about how they feel about it in

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the unions and express the both sides the importance of

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>what we've gone through as a nation over the last

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months with supply chain and challenges and still having

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>ships out in the ocean. They all understand the importance

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, and I think that I don't. I don't

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>see either side exploiting the situation we're living in for

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>better wages. The contract will begin negotiation at some point

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in the next month or so. I believe that's when

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it'll start. They have to do some notification piece. But

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to monitor the situation very closely. Obviously, UM

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure that that we we don't

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>stop our ports. I mean that the last thing we

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>need in this country right now or in this world,

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>quite honestly, is shutting down other supply chain and creating

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>other supply chain issues. Are you going to step in

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>if I need to? I will, I saw, I said

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the both sides. I mean, I don't think I have

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to step in at this point. If I did, I'd

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>be having a very different conversation with you. But I think,

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I feel good where the conversation is with

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the with the sides right now. I think that they

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>all understand the magnitude of this particular moment. This is

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>on like any other moment they've ever had when it

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>comes to negotiations. Uh, still in coming out of a pandemic,

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, moving forward all these issues around this.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think they acknowledge very seriously the situation this

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>country is in, and quite honestly, I supply chain is in.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>You've been to those ports. You travel a lot. I

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>believe it's sixty cities in thirty states during the first year.

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>You know where I'm going with this. You've also been

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>really criticized because you've spent a hundred and sixty two

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>days in Boston out of your first two eight four

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>days in office. Second be well, So you know this

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>comes up often when you and I talk, keeps coming up,

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>People keep talking to me about it. Yeah, I think

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a ridiculous argument and ridiculous point that's

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>being made. In the very beginning of me being Secretary

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of Labor, we at just a department Labor where I'm

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>standing in front of right now. Nobody was in the office.

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>We were shut down because of COVID nineteen and I

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>was doing my job. I travel around the country. Some

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of those numbers, some of those numbers that are reported,

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I go home every weekend to Boston. I'm going to

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>continue to go home to Boston every weekend because I

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>have a mother that's there, and I have a family

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that's there, and I've made it very there from the

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>very beginning. So I think when when when that article

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>was written and that report to put those facts in,

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>she's incorporating the weekends into that. And if she took

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>those out and actually did an accurate account of what happened,

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>that would tell a very different start. Secondy, Walsh, I've

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>got a mother in London. I've got to be in

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>New York. That's what happens. Sometimes people are basically asking

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>why you haven't chosen to live in Washington, d C.

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I do live in Washington, I live in Now You've

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>got a permanent residence there in d C? Now, just

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>yes or not? I'm living out of a hotel. Okay. Secondly, Wealsh,

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna make you that thank you for being with

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a set our friend on John's Day, Jeffrey Rosenberg joins

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>his portfolio manager Systemic Multi Strategy funded black Rock Jeff Frozenberg.

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>We went curb and version off of this now negative

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>one basis points let's go back to Karnie Mellon and

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about the nuances and disaggregation of curve inversion.

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>There's zero, there's a little bit in verse. Did maybe

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there's more inversion. What is that nuance within this boom economy. Well, Tom,

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>this this report is just reaffirming what the markets were

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>expecting and the trend that you were talking about in

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of the bond market, of of yield curve inversion.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, no surprises in this report. As Jonathan just mentioned,

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the headline report, the headline number MS is really minor.

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the strength in the labor markets that's that's being

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>seen here again and that's the challenge for the FED.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>For the markets as we're seeing a little bit this morning,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more curve flattening. It is really much

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>more about UH. As Mike McKee was kind of highlighting,

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is good news, but it's a little

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>bit too much of good news, and this is an

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>economy and the labor markets that's overheating. The FED has

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate. Lots of expectations talked about at the top

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>of the show, some historic bond market and really financial

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>market UH losses in the first quarter. This is the

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>markets readjusting to a much faster pace of FED normalization,

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and today's report only will reaffirm that view. And that's

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing with that little bit of flattening continuing

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in the market that you're talking about, Jeff. For you,

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>is this good or bad news when it comes to

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>investing to investing, you know, I think it's just a

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>reaffirmation of our expectations, not good news or bad news,

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but just this is what we expected and what we

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>expect is this is a very difficult environment for investing

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>because of the challenges of the dual aspects were about

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to go into we're talking about from the May f

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>O m C, you know, the shrinking of the balance sheet,

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know markets are pricing in a move towards

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a fifty basis point hiking cycle. This is a very

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>very dramatic turn about. That's why you had such a

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>negative price performance across fixed income in the first quarter,

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>because we're waking up to the idea is a FED

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that wants to get out in front of the curve,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and that means a very accelerated pace of heightening. That's

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>a challenging environment for investing. As we just saw in

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the in the first quarter. When we get to the

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>back side of it and to some higher rates of

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>real interest rates eventually and higher levels of yield, this

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>will be an attractive environment. But the transition it's very

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>difficult environment for investors, as we saw in the first quarter.

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that it's basically a lock that we'll

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>get to we'll have one percentage point increase in the

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>FED funds rate by June. You know, I wouldn't say

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a lock. It's definitely uh, well, it's about

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent priced in terms of the market. You know,

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't say it's a lot because obviously some things

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can happen in the geopolitical side that we're all focused on.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>If that were to take a more dramatic turn that

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>you saw in terms of risk off environment, confidence shock,

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the shocks can be important, and financial conditions tightening,

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>which to date has been accelerated but is still on

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the longer view, very accommodative markets. If you had financial

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>markets kind of get really are ahead of where the

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>FED wanted to go, you could certainly slow that pace.

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't say it's a lock. But given what

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we know today and the fundamentals of the economy we

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>see out of this labor market report. I think the

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>odds are very high that we're gonna have two fifties

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>back to back in in the May and June reports.

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Frozenberg I went lord rhythmic on you. I've got

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to do that when you're on And the answer is

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the bloomberg Us Total Return aggregate index is not a

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>bear market. But negative eight percent is negative eight percent?

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Are we in a bear market? Or is that what

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>oasis in the bond market? Q two? You know, the

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>good news on the fixed income markets there, Mark, the

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>good news is that we very quickly reprice the expectations

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and and and term premium and inflation expectations. So the

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>repricing is the painful part. That's the negative eight percent.

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:00.479
<v Speaker 1>But fixed income, you recall, the key to returns is

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the level of income. And so why you had such

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>negative returns was you were starting at very very low

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>levels of starting income. So as we fast forward and

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you're at higher levels of income, it really gives you

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more cushion to subsequent increases and interest rates

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in that pace of negative returns is much harder to repeat.

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So then what do you do on a strategic standpoint,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're if you're systematic, did you shift

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>from full faith to a creditor move? What? What do

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you go to loans? I mean, what do you do

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 1>here within a strategy of down six seven? Yeah, you

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>know a couple of things here. First, in terms of

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of the directional part of our strategies. You know,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the front end of shorter maturities have certainly looked much

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>more attractive coming out of this environment. The repricing, that

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>curve flattening that you talked about, Well, that's really about

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>restoring the cushion to fixed income investing. And where do

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you see that strongest across the fixed income landscape. It's

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>really in those shorter maturity So that's an aspect of

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>our investing that we think is an opportunity going forward

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>where there's more cushion from further increases in interest rates.

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And then in our investing, you know, our tool kid

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>is both the kind of directional view that I just described,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but also looking at things that take out direction and

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>look in the cross section of investing and there what

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing is is a lot more opportunities to invest

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in dispersion. Both we invest in both the equity side

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and the fixed income side, and they're you're really seeing

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>more alpha opportunities. So it's shifting your mix, your weight

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in your portfolio of where you're getting your returns from

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less out of directionality. Because directionalities you

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>highlighted the beginning of the shows. Is impossible to forecast

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>where we're going, but the dispersion in the cross section

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is actually increased. It increases the opportunity to alpha investing.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Jeff blank Rop, Jeff great to get you to react

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to what looks like a really stung pay roast report.

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We digress at this moment, and we do so with

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>my book of the Summer or a couple of Summers

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>ago two thousand thirty four, a novel of the next world.

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>When Elliott Ackerman wrote this with James Travitas, they have

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>no idea the overlay of their book of the South

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>China Sea and how it would turn to Ukraine. The

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>former marine joins us this morning, Elliott Ackerman, you have

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>legit military duty. You're work in Afghanistan. H your your

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>work was c i A. At the end of the

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>tour you're The Atlantic article of you speaking to a

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>modern marine was stunning about the reality on the ground

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in Kiev and in Ukraine. What was the distinction of

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>your conversation with the marine in your Atlantic essay. Well, yeah,

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you might know, that there's been a

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, large number of foreign fighters, Americans, Brits, uh,

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>individuals from Balkan states who have come to Ukraine to

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>fight UH. And so I had a conversation with a

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>former marine who served in some of the similar infantry

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>units I had served in, and he had been fighting

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in the trenches around Kiev for the first UH about

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>month of the war. And you know, the most sailient

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>point he was making to me was that the anti

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>tank weapons that we've deployed to Ukraine, we're making a

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>huge difference in that fight and allowing two or three

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>well armed Ukrainians to stop entire Russian armored columns. Um. So,

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, that was one of the most sailing points

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>he made, as well as really just the intensity of

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the fighting that he had witnessed, which he said exceeded

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>anything that he had participated in in Afghanistan. Take us

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>beyond the media reports of brave journalists in Ukraine, those

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>covering it day by day. How did the Russians adapt

0:29:55.480 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to a difficult march. Well, it's yet to be seeing

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they're going to be able to adapt. Um.

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the Russian way of warfare is different

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>than the American or Western way of warfare. And one

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of the most critical ways that that difference manifests is,

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Russians have a very difficult time adapt

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>because they have extremely centralized decision making structures. So you know,

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>all the decisions are made by a group of colonels

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>or generals, uh and those decisions are disseminated down as

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>subordinates who aren't supposed to ask questions or show individual initiative.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>In Western militaries, we fight with something we called mission tactics,

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>which means even the lowest, you know, twenty one year

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>old corporal understands the mission in the intent behind the mission,

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>because the expectation is always that the plan is not

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna work, that the enemy has to say, and that

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that everyone's going to have to adapt. So our Western

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>militaries are very adaptable, and the Ukrainians since two thousand

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteen have undergone a series of reforms to make them

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>more like a Western military. So we're really seeing the

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>con test between a Western military stylid fighting and a

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>classic Sylviet or Russian style of fighting in Ukraine, and

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the result has been a lack of Russian adaptability. There's

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of times where the West has perhaps

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>miscast other nations that follow a different set of rules

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way that tries to reflect their own. Are

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we overstating or understating the hit to morale that so

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>many people talk about among Russian troops. I think that

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>we are underestimating it, and I think we've continually underestimated

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>not only the hit to the morale for the Russians,

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>but we've been habitually overestimating Russian capability and underestimating Ukrainian capability,

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>as though we for some reason seemed unwilling to conceive

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the Ukrainians could win this war. In fact,

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are winning this war right now. You know, it's important

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to note there's historical precedent for this. During the Second

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>World War, Russia, which defeated Germany in the Second World War,

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>invaded Finland, you know, a small all nation but very nationalistic,

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Finns defeated the Soviets um, so there's precedent

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>for this. The Ukrainians are winning, I think I think,

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.479
<v Speaker 1>having spent time there, that we should back a winner

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>usually that's a pretty good strategy and continue to support

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainians in this taking to Russia, Elliott Ackerman, we've

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>taken great pride in our interviews with the military in

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>this war. You may be aware there's another division of

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the U. S military called the Army, and we met

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>with their General Kimmitt, of course with a substantial infantry

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>experience in Germany and in the Persian Gulf, and General

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Kimmitt was heated that the Russians were unprepared for the

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>urban battles to come in the war. Is that what

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we've observed this month? And what do those new urban

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>battles look like for the Russians? Now? What we're seeing

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the Russians, I mean make you know, some gains in

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a few select Ukrainian cities, but they've had to completely

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>destroy those cities to to win in places like Marie Opal.

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>But the much larger story is in places like Kiev,

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, cities that are real centers of gravity politically,

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Russians haven't even got into Kiev. They've been

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>stopped in the suburbs. Kiev is a city before the

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>war of four million people. You know, the Russians just

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>simply do not have the what we call the troops

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to task, meaning that the you know, the troops they

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>would need to accomplish the mission, uh to take a

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>city like Kiev, let alone to take the entire country.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Ukraine is the a nation of over forty

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>million people. The Russians have an invasion force of two

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand, and it's a nation that has been completely

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>mobilized unlike anything I've ever seen in my lifetime, and

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the fourth war I've been around. How much

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>people are mobilized, from you know, twenty year olds up

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to two kids who are helping do work like nick

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>camouflage nets, to two grandmothers. Uh. It's gonna be very,

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>very difficult for the Russians to achieve anything more than

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>potentially some limited territorial game means. And even at that,

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the Ukrainians would allow President Zelinski

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to give any territory because, and rightly so, they perceive

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 1>themselves to be winning. So their view is, why should

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we be seating anything. We're winning this war, and that

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>complicates the talks all over again. Elliott a clinic and

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>education always learned something. Ellie Ackaman, the the author and

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>former US Marie. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to ten

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>day from six to nine am for insight from the

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And subscribe

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com,

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the terminal. I'm Tom Keene and

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg