WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - April 11th, 2025

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Weekdaily

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Hi everyone, Welcome to the Bloomberg Business Week Weekend Podcast. Yes,

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 3>it's been a topsy turvy week. Reciprocal tariffs and almost

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 3>every US trading partner went into effect, stoking recession fears

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 3>and bond market turmoil. Then, in a sudden shift, President

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Trump announced a ninety day pause on those tariffs, but

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.319
<v Speaker 3>kept an earlier ten percent baseline rate in place. Now

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 3>that ninety day pause, well, it caused the major US

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 3>stock indices to surge, with the S and P five

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred staging historic and its best stock rally since two

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 3>thousand and eight.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 4>The notable exception to the tariff pause was China, which

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 4>responded with an eighty four percent tit for tat tariffs

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 4>on US imports. The retaliation prompted Trump to then respond

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 4>with an even higher tariff on China of one hundred

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 4>and twenty five.

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Percent, and let's not forget earning season got underway with

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 3>the big banks reporting all those details on the Bloomberg

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 3>and at Bloomberg dot Com. This hour the CEO of

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 3>autoparts manufacturer Magna, who describes today's environment as being like

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 3>the Great Financial Crisis, the COVID shutdown, and the auto

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 3>union walkout all rolled into one.

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 4>All that to come. We begin with an investment strategist

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 4>who sounded the alarm on the Trump administration even when

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street was feeling all in. Just after the US election.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Peter Barrison and his team at the research shop BCA

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 3>predicted that broad based, unilateral tariffs were coming and that

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 3>the new administration's proposals would go well beyond what had

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 3>been implemented in President Trump's first term. Needless to say,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 3>he was right.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Peter is chief Global investment strategist at BCA Research. He's

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 4>noted that the quote worst is yet to come. We

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 4>should note that we spoke to Peter before the President

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 4>announced a ninety day pause on reciprocal global tariffs.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Hi. Everyone, Welcome to the Bloomberg Business Week Weekend Podcast. Yes,

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 3>it's been a topsy turvy week. Reciprocal tariffs and almost

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>every US trading partner went into effect, stoking recession fears

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 3>and bond market turmoil. Then, in a sudden shift, President

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Trump announced a ninety day pause on those tariffs, but

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 3>kept an earlier ten percent baseline rate in place. Now

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>that ninety day pause, well, it caused the major US

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 3>stock indseaes to surge, with the S and P five hundred,

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>staging historic bounce and its best stock rally since two

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 3>thousand and eight.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 4>The notable exception to the tariff pause was China, which

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 4>responded with an eighty four percent tit for tat tariffs

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 4>on US imports. The retaliation prompted Trump to then respond

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 4>with an even higher tariff on China of one hundred

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 4>and twenty five percent.

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>And let's not forget earning season got underway with the

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 3>big banks reporting all those details on the Bloomberg and

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg dot com. This hour conversations from the C

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 3>suite on tariff's, Trump, earnings, and the global outlook.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 4>That includes our interview with the CEO of the industrial

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 4>supply and tool company fast Enow, also.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 3>The CEO of autoparts manufacturer Magna, who describes today's environment

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 3>as being like the Great Financial Crisis, the COVID shutdown,

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 3>and the auto union walkout all rolled into one.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 4>All that to come. We begin with an investment strategist

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 4>who sounded the alarm on the Trump administration even when

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street was feeling all in. Just after the US election.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Peter Barrison and his team at the research shop BCA

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>predicted that broad based, unilateral tariffs were coming and that

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the new administration's proposals would go well beyond what had

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>been implemented in President Trump's first term. Needless to say,

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>he was right.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 4>Peter is chief Global investment strategist at BCA Research. He's

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 4>noted that the quote worst is yet to come. We

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 4>should note that we spoke to Peter before the President

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 4>announced a ninety day pause on recip global tariffs.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the stock market has yet fully priced

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 5>in recession. I mean keep in mind that up until

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 5>a couple of years, up until a couple of days ago,

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 5>the four hundred and ninety three SMP companies that are

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 5>not the Magnificent seven were still actually up slightly for

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 5>the year. And these are generally cyclical companies that one

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 5>would expect to go down in recessionary scenario. So we're

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 5>starting to see that being priced in, but we're not

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 5>there yet. To get down to forty four to fifty,

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 5>which is my target, you don't need to make any

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 5>wild assumptions. All you need to assume is that the

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 5>forward P multiple drops to eighteen and the earnings estimates

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 5>followed by ten percent points. That's not crazy at all.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 5>On average, between twenty fifteen and twenty nineteen, the P

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.239
<v Speaker 5>multiple was sixteen point eight, and I'm talking about eighteen

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 5>in recessionary scenario. So if anything, my target, even though

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 5>going into this year it was fifteen hundred points below

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 5>the nearest person, might actually turn out to be a

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 5>little bit too bullish.

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Could we even go lower than that?

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 5>We certainly could go lower than that. I think it

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 5>would require a deepercession, but we could get a deepercession

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 5>if policy continues to be very unfavorable. And I'm not

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 5>just talking about tariff policy. We also have kind of

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 5>this discussion of the Morrow logo accord, this idea that

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 5>perhaps holders of Treasury bills will be forced to roll

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 5>their money over into low yielding long term bonds. I mean,

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 5>this is crazy, right. The treasury market is the ultimate

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 5>risk free asset. If we undermine the sanctity of the

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 5>treasury market, then we're looking at a worse financial crisis

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 5>than what occurred in two thousand and eight.

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 4>This was supposed to be the year.

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Wait you said we could, Sorry, tim a go ahead.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>I remember living through two thousand and eight. I know

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 3>you did too, and I just remember are you talking

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 3>to me? Yeah, I'm talking to you. I mean, Peter,

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 3>we thought the financial market system globally was coming down.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 3>I remember not going to bed because headlines were crossing,

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 3>and it was like which Wall Street firm was being

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>bought by whom and which one wasn't going to make it,

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>and so on and so forth, and what the government

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 3>was going to do. Say that again so that we

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 3>understand kind of the theft of what you are saying.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 5>The fact that the dollar is weakening now is very,

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 5>very unnerving because the dollar is supposed to be a

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 5>risk off currency. You buy treasuries when everything is going

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 5>to hell, and that requires more dollars, and that pushes

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 5>up the value of the dollar. The fact that the

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 5>dollar is weakening now is telling you that increasingly investors

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 5>are losing confidence in the US financial markets. And you know,

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 5>President Trump wants a lower trade deficit. The counter the

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 5>mirror image of a trade deficit as a capital count surplus. Yeah,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 5>foreigners decide that they don't want to hold US assets anymore.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 5>That's going to drive down the value of the dollar.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 5>That will make imports more expensive, make exports cheaper. That'll

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 5>result in a lower trade deficit. But we're talking about

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 5>something that will also entail a huge decline in stock

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 5>prices and probably a financial crisis.

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>So not exactly making America great again.

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Not quite.

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, it raises the question about how much damage

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 4>can be done before you believe that Trump will reverse

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 4>his policies. If that is something you believe, well, I.

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Think, for one thing, we've already sort of passed the

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 5>event horizon. I think at this point it's going to

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 5>be very difficult to avoid a recession, just based on

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 5>everything that's already happened. They kind of wasn't that strong

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 5>going into the latest escalation of the trade war. In February,

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 5>real wage and salary income was only one was only

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 5>up one percent year of a year. The CPI swap

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 5>more is telling us that these tariffs could push inflation

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 5>to well over three percent. We're potentially looking at negative

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 5>income growth that's going to be very difficult to maintain

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 5>without the economy weakening significantly in spending drawing up. So

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 5>I think the outlook is quite worrying at this point,

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 5>and it's probably too late to avoid recession. And I

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 5>don't think that Trump is willing to reverse course anyway.

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 6>He's been very.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Very clearly for like thirty years about how you want

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 5>to build this protectionist wall around the US. I don't

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 5>understand where this group thing came from, where people were

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 5>just saying, oh, it's going to be a negotiating ploy.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 5>It's not a negotiating ploy. He wants something that resembles autarchy.

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Are you concerned that we're going to see in financial

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 4>conditions titan too much right now? We could start to

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.119
<v Speaker 4>see some sort of panic or freeze.

0:08:58.480 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 5>We estimate that easing financial conditions last year mainly because

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 5>of rising stock prices, added around half a percentage point

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 5>to growth. The fact that financial conditions have tightened mainly

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 5>because stock prices have fallen, credit spreads have widened, is

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 5>based on kind of a very back of the envelope

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 5>and back of the envelope calculation will shave around half

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 5>a percentage points from growth, and that's not huge, but

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 5>the risk is that you get kind of in this

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 5>feedback loop situation where stocks go down that means people

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 5>feel less wealthy, that means they spend less, so there's

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 5>less sales, less profits, and even lower stock prices. That's

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 5>what we often see during recessions. And I think that's

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 5>what we're starting to see now.

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm looking at something I think you either

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 3>said or shared with market Watch, and this was around

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 3>late March, March twenty first, and that even though you

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 3>had this outlook for the S and P five hundred

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 3>this year, forty four fifty by the end of the year,

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 3>and I think when you compared it to any nobody else,

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>it was the lowest on the street, you did have

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 3>five scenarios that could boost stocks this year. And you

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 3>talk about the president, you know, walking back much of

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 3>his tariff agenda, kind of caving to pressure from the market,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 3>and a few other things. Do you still believe that

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 3>there are scenarios where the market could actually rally.

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 5>There's certainly scenarios, and you know, but that's not my

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 5>base case. I think that probably the trade war gets

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 5>worse rather than better, because Donald Trump had kind of

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 5>had this well, i'd almost say, like naive idea in

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 5>his mind that he's going to raise tariffs and that's

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 5>going to force other countries to reduce their tariffs. Well,

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 5>there's two flaws without argument. The first flaw is that

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 5>most rich countries don't actually have very large tariffs against

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 5>the US and don't really have very large non tariff

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 5>barriers against the US. I mean, they have regulations. All

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 5>countries have regulations, but they're not specifically targeted at US companies.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 5>For the most part, there's going to be exceptions of

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 5>so there's not a lot that other countries can do anyway.

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 5>And the second thing, which is more politically relevant, we've

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 5>seen this is certainly true here in Canada, that retaliation

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 5>is politically popular. Donald Trump has single handedly resurrected the

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Liberal Party, which was heading for a huge defeat in

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 5>the elections, and so people are saying, well, wait a second,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 5>if we can get more votes by retaliating, we'll retaliate.

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 5>And so we're not going to get countries acquiescing to

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump's demands we're going to get retaliation, and that

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 5>could very well spark another round of tariffs.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 3>One of the things I also wonder is that is

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 3>it possible that you know this? I guess what I'm

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 3>thinking about is what you said before a tarchy, and

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 3>that is the idea that right the US produces everything

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 3>that we need within our borders. Is that really you

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 3>think the goal of present Trump, because I think that's

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>one of the things that we've tried to figure out

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>with the tariffs, is that what's really his endgame, what's

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 3>really his mission here? But do you believe that his

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>mission is to that the US is kind of self

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 3>sufficient in providing everything it needs for its citizens within

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 3>its borders, and then cut down trade.

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 5>I think Donald Trump sees trade as a zero sum game,

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.479
<v Speaker 5>meaning that if one country is running a trade surplus

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 5>with the US, somehow that country is exploiting the US,

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 5>ripping the US off, as he likes to say. He

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 5>doesn't see trade as something that can lift all boats,

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 5>which is the way most economists see trade.

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 6>Nor does he kind of.

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Realize that the reason the US has this trade deficit

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 5>is because the US has been a very good place

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 5>in which to invest rather than buying US goods. Foreigners

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 5>have been buying in Nvidia stock or treasuries. That has

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 5>been a vote of confidence in the financial system. And yeah,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 5>if you force people to not buy US assets, you

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 5>leve a week or dollar to lower trade deficit. But

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 5>it's not really what you want.

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 4>Hey, you know you mentioned politics a little early, or

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 4>at least from the Canadian perspective. Here in the United States,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm wondering the sort of guardrails that you see on

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 4>this president and his policies. How do you see the

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 4>guardrails around this president here?

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 5>So I think that's going to be what happens next.

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 5>You're going to see more and more Republicans abandon Trump

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 5>and we're going to have real discord wow within the

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Republican Party. But unfortunately, the way the system works is

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 5>that Trump does have a lot of discretion over tariffs.

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 5>And unless his popularity plunges, and I would say, like

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 5>it's come down, but it hasn't plunged, He's not going

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 5>to change direction. I mean, realistically, if you spend like

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 5>a month talking about Liberation Day and then say, oh

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 5>wait a second, the stocks stocks have gone down. Just kidding,

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 5>he can't do that without looking really foolish. And so

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 5>he's not going to do that unless there's a lot

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 5>more pressure. We're just not there yet.

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Hey, one thing I want to ask you, all right,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 3>So if we buy what you're say saying about forty

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 3>four to fifty by the end, and it looks, you know,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 3>certainly possible, considering what we're going through right now, where

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>are you investing or suggesting investors suggest this money? You

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 3>guys advise a ton of advisors, share your research. Where

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 3>would you be putting money in this environment? Or is

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 3>it too late to move anything around right now?

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 5>I think it still makes sense to have a defensive

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 5>bias in one's portfolio. That means holding more cash than

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 5>one otherwise would hold. It means holding more bonds, although

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 5>there's of course risk around bonds given a large fiscal

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 5>deficit and the whole moral logo cord discussion. But nevertheless,

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 5>the Fed probably will be forced to cut rates quite

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 5>aggressively more than what the market is pricing in. So

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 5>you want to have more fixed income, less equity within equities,

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 5>You want to own more staples, healthcare, these defensive sectors,

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 5>and you probably also want to own a bit of

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 5>gold I think that's a true safe haven asset.

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 4>What would you say to folks out there who attempted

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 4>to buy this dip listen.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you're nimble, you can, of course do it,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 5>But I wouldn't bide with the expectation that stocks have bottomed.

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 5>I think we could get a rally that lasts for

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 5>a few days, perhaps even a few weeks, but ultimately,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 5>if we end up in recession, and I think that's

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 5>where we're heading, earnings estimates are going to come way

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 5>down and that whole dragstocks down with them. So I

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 5>think it's too early to move to an overweight stance

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 5>on stocks.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's like we like to remind everybody, markets don't

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 3>just go up. They don't go in one direction. They

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 3>go up and they go down. Hey, Peter, thank you

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 3>so much. Double duty. We know you spend some time

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 3>with our TV colleagues as well. Glad you could also

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 3>spend some time with us as well. As we said,

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 3>this story by our vil Donna Hirich, it is one

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of the most right stories on the Bloomberg Peter Bears

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 3>and his chief Global Investment Strategies at BCA Research joining

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 3>us from Montreal Canada. Peter, thank you so much.

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch us

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Well shares of everything soored this past Wednesday, including auto stocks.

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 3>After President Trump authorized a ninety day pause on certain tariffs,

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 3>keep in mind auto tariffs of twenty five percent still

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 3>in effect.

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Additionally, a twenty five percent tariff on major components such

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 4>as engines and transmissions is set to take effect note

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 4>later than May third, and could expand beyond those parts.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Those measures are expected to dramatically increase costs and up

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 4>end the supply chain.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 3>One of those suppliers affected is Magna International, a Canadian

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 3>based auto parts and auto technology company that creates components

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 3>for some of the biggest car companies in the world

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 3>that includes General Motors, Ford Stilantis. In terms of sales,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Magna International is the biggest automotive supplier in North America.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Swami Codaghari is CEO of Magna International.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 8>You know, we're right really focused on control the controllable,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 8>and things seem to be changing on every day basis.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 8>So open the playbooks that we've had during the rotating

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 8>UW strikes or COVID or two thousand and eight financial crisis,

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 8>or the chip crisis, and you put them all together.

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 8>I think that's what we seem to be having right now.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 4>What a way to put that all. So, the financial

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 4>crisis saw car many some car companies declare bankruptcy.

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 3>Right exactly, you're saying it's as bad as that, and

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 3>then some Yeah.

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 8>I think I think the important part, Carol, here is look.

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 8>Part of it is looking at tartifs of importing vehicles crossborder. Okay,

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 8>the OEMs are the importer of the record. We as suppliers,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, have to still look at any inter company

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 8>perts going across the border, and you have to look

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 8>at the tier end supply chain. But all in all,

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 8>even if we look at what we can do internally,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 8>all of this is going to lead, I believe, to

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 8>demand destruction, at least in the short term, which is

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 8>why I compared it, you know, to what.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 6>Happened during the two thousand and eight and two thousand

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 6>and nine.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 8>Where the volumes went down drastically, right, And that is

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 8>the reason for my comparison to that, As to mention.

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 3>In the introduction, you know your top customers GM, Mercedes, Ford, BMWVW, Stilantis, Nissan,

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 3>are you already seeing tell me like kind of what

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 3>the environment was going into the tariffs, and then how

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 3>it's changed in terms of demand from your customers now

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 3>that the tariffs are here.

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 6>OKL.

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 8>One of the important things in the automotive industry, certainty

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 8>is stability, and what we have today is the complete uncertainty.

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 8>It's difficult to plan in an industry such as ours,

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, on an everyday basis, right, And that's what

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 8>we're trying to deal with today. That you might have

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:09.719
<v Speaker 8>seen some of the announcements that have come starting April fourteenth,

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 8>some of them starting you know, last Monday already BMW

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 8>from the Spartenberg facility, or Jeneral Motors from Fort Wayne,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 8>Stilantis in Telukah, war On truck windsor you know, halted

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 8>productions or changing production schedules and so on and so forth.

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 8>So that's the fact we are starting to see. And obviously,

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, it's an industry that you can't flip the

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 8>switch to change things overnight. If there is a policy

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 8>roadmap towards whatever the outcome might be.

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 6>I think that's addressable.

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 8>But today the struggle seems to be addressing what's coming

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 8>at us on a daily or hourly basis.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 4>So who absorbs the cost here? What's you know, what

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 4>do your shareholders need to know about? Where customers will

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 4>see price increases? Where you will see a head to margins?

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 4>Where the end end user? Right, us people who go

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 4>and buy these cars will see price increases. Where do

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 4>the where do the chips fall?

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's kind of all of the about him, right,

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 8>because you know, from a supply base as well as

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 8>the automotive OEM's perspective, everybody look at whatever that can

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 8>be done. I think that is given. But given the

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 8>industry and the type of margins that are there that's

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 8>out there, you know, everybody knows that nobody can handle

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 8>the magnitude of the impact that we're talking about here.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 8>So I believe it has to some way, shape or

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 8>form pass on to the consumer. And if you look

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 8>at where the car prices are today in the market,

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 8>they're already you know, stretched quite a bit, right. So

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 8>that's why I talk about demand destruction and the consumers

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 8>ultimately facing, if not all of it, a significant part

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 8>of the impact of the tariffs.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 4>You know, you said, it's like the playbooks from the

0:20:55.880 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 4>financial crisis, COVID, the UAW strikes all can But I'm

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 4>wondering if as a result of this, you are making

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 4>any big changes to how you do business where these

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 4>parts are manufactured. Do you plan as a result of

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 4>these tariffs to do more in the United States?

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 8>It's too soon to say that, right, Like I said,

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 8>we are investing or not we as an industry, if

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 8>you're doing investments today, it is typically for starting production

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 8>in twenty seven or twenty eight, So we're talking at

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 8>least two years out right when we start talking about

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 8>what needs to be done. Should we react to what's

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 8>happening today? And where the policy ends up is going

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 8>to be ultimately what everybody's looking at. So from a

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 8>near term perspective, cash conservation and hesitancy or tentativeness to

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 8>say where will it end up? So if there is

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 8>a dollar that I can push out from a perspective

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 8>of investing today versus a month or two months from now,

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 8>I'll pick the later, right because I want to have

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 8>certain and where we are you know, ultimately going to

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 8>invest and get the return. I think going back, everybody

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 8>is now focused on free cash flow, conversion, capital efficiency,

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 8>so there's a little bit of a wait.

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 6>And see approach.

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 8>And you know, in the industry that depends on two

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 8>or three year cycles, that's you know, difficult.

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 3>So the thing I wanted to ask you, and I

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 3>keep going back to this interview that Shineli Basika Bloomberg

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 3>did with Boas Weinstein, and he said, you know, even

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 3>if we get it changed and perhaps the White House

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 3>the president comes out and says forget it, delay of

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 3>ninety days or you know what, let's call it off.

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 3>The problem is that the President's going to be in

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the White House for the next four years, and that

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 3>what he said is the uncertainty genie is out of

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 3>the bottle. I can kind of get away from this.

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 3>That would you feel if the president came out and said, oh,

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 3>change my mind, would you feel confident enough to move

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 3>forward or would you feel like you were constantly a

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 3>little bit off balance, not sure if something might change

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 3>from the White House.

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 8>I think the industry as a whole is going to

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 8>be a little bit more conservative, and think twice we've

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 8>always believed, you know, you have to produce locally, whether

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 8>it's a local for local, and we've always looked at

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 8>the entire North American market as one market. So that

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 8>is being questioned right now. So we have to work

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 8>very closely with the OEMs, not just as saying, I

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 8>think the whole ecosystem has to be pretty much aligned.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 8>As you think of investments going forward, which segment is

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 8>going to be consumed? Where where do you put the footprint?

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 8>So in short, Carol, I think there is going to

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 8>be a little bit more thought before new investment goes

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 8>into address, you know, especially where parts or vehicles are

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 8>going crossboard.

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, So then when we think about the US economy

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 3>or global economy, there are investments that will not happen

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 3>and there will be as we talked, was it a

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a demas and destruction, Like, there'll be

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 3>some destruction that economic impact we don't get back right

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 3>because of that conservative mode.

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 8>I think it's fair to say there is going to

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 8>be tentativeness in the investment cycle now until people get

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 8>a little bit more clarity. That's one thing, and the

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 8>second thing is short term, I think there is going

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 8>to be you know, reduction in volumes.

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned you have one hundred and seventy thousand employees

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 4>in countries throughout the world, stock down about twenty five

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 4>percent so far this year. You're going to take a

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 4>hit ostensibly as a result of these Are you going

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 4>to have to start making decisions about who keeps their

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 4>job and who doesn't keep their job.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 8>And tim Yes, that's the reason why I compared it

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 8>to what happened during the COVID or the uw rotaining strikes. Right,

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 8>you have to constantly react to how the OEMs are

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 8>planning their production schedules, whether it's lines coming down, complete factories,

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 8>assemblies that are stopping, which means we have to react accordingly.

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 8>So obviously there's going to be that impact. But we

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 8>have to as one of our guiding principles is a

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 8>long term strategy to look at our business as a

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 8>long term owner. So whatever decision we make, we have

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 8>to look in terms of today, but making sure that

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 8>it doesn't hurt us in the long term. So that's

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 8>a little bit more challenging today than it was a

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 8>few months ago.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 3>One of the things I want to ask, are you

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 3>afraid and do you feel like the c suites afraid

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 3>to really speak out against the Trump and mysters. You're

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 3>actually being pretty frank here. CEOs and some surveys are

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.959
<v Speaker 3>calling this the Trump recession. CNBC did a CEO survey,

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 3>yet it seems like most don't want their names attached

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 3>to the criticism of the administration. Is the corporate community

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 3>afraid to speak out?

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 6>Call from our side?

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 8>Look, I think Tim mentioned in the introduction. We are

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 8>in twenty eight different countries, so over the last year

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 8>and a half, nineteen of the countries that were present

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 8>in had elections, right, So policy is something we deal

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 8>with all the time. This is obviously a little bit

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 8>more disruptive than what we have seen elsewhere or seen

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 8>in my career here, but we have to look at

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 8>the industry long term.

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 8>Our design cycles four to five years, and maybe with

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 8>the changing industry it's dropped down to two or three years,

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 8>but you got to take a long term approach. So, yes,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 8>it's disruptive today, but we have dealt with this in

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 8>the past, and we just have to keep our head

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 8>down and hope we look at a policy roadmap rather

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 8>than react to something that's happening today.

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 3>One of the things I do want to ask then,

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 3>and kind of on that in terms of long term strategy,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 3>what does the auto supply chain look like if the

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Trump tariffs are here to stay. How long does it

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 3>take to realign a point that will mitigate tariff costs?

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 8>It's mitigation that is definitely going to lead to rationalization

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 8>of the footprint, right, we have to start looking at

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 8>balancing capacity. You know, luckily we have footprint in Mexico,

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 8>US and Canada. So again, like I said, it's not

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 8>going to happen over time. Depending on complexity of the

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 8>part in the system, it could be anywhere from months

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 8>to years. There are some complex systems where just to

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 8>give you an idea of some of our plants are

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 8>a million square feed facilities right with about three four

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 8>hundred million in invested capital. So those kind of plants

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 8>are not easy to transfer overnight.

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 6>Those will take years.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 8>And it's not just a unilateral decision either, right, this

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 8>has to be done in conjunction with the product cycle

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 8>planning of the OEM. Where is the assembly planted and

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 8>how we be going to work with them. So there's

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 8>a lot of complexity involved here. Some of the more

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 8>complex footprint rationalization might take years to crystallize.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 4>We talked a little bit about whether you'd move facilities.

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 4>You said, it's two really to say we are already

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 4>starting to see automakers reshoring assembly plants or make announcements.

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Hyundai was one of the ones we saw from the

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 4>White House just in the last month. If we see

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 4>more automakers reshore assembly in the US, will you need

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 4>to move facilities back to the US as well.

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 6>We have a footprint in the US.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 8>But to your point, Tim, yes, I think look as

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 8>a supply base, we look at the material availability of

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 8>the entire supply chain where it's coming from. We have

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 8>to look at the logistics. We have to be as closed,

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, as possible to the assembly based on the

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 8>type of the part and the complexity of the part.

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 8>So considering all of that stuff, if there is a

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 8>significant reshoring, yeah, we have to look at, you know,

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 8>rationalizing the footprint differently.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Hey, SA mean just to kind of wrap up here,

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, you kicked off and both Tim and and

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 3>I were like, a wait, what moment when you said

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 3>that you're thinking about this environment akin to I think

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 3>you said the gfc SE, COVID and Union strikes all together.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 3>That's today's environment. So is a recession here in the

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>United States given? Is maybe perhaps a global recession?

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 7>Given?

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think you know again, hopefully you know, everybody

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 8>comes to the table and has the discussion to avoid that.

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 8>But all indications seem to be, you know, heading in

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 8>that direction that the economy is taking a hit. But

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 8>like I said, this is happening so fast and so quick.

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 8>Part of it is you know who comes to the

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 8>table at what time, and you know how much can

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 8>you recover and how fast can you recover? But that's

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 8>definitely on the cards based on the facts today.

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, we really appreciate your honesty and giving us an

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 3>assessment of your world that really plays into all of

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the major auto manufacturers. Swami, thank you so much. Swammi

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Kudigeary's chief executive officer of Magna International, joining us right

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 3>here on Bloomberg BusinessWeek Daily.

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 2>This is so Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 2>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 2>station Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>No doubt that the biggest stories this week have been

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 3>the volatility in global markets, the cloud of uncertainty in

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the US economy, really the global economy too, and a

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 3>scorching hot trade war between the US and everyone, and

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 3>especially between the United States and China.

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Someone with a pulse on all of this is Mike Siegel.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Mike is a partner at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, serving

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 4>as global head of the insurance, asset management and liquidity

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 4>solutions businesses, as well as co head of the Client

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 4>Solutions Group in Asia Pacific. Mike manages over seven hundred

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 4>and seventy billion dollars in money markets and another four

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 4>hundred and sixty billion dollars in insurance assets. He joined

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 4>us alongside a Bloomberg Global Finance correspondent, Shanali Bassek.

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 9>I think that people are clearly on edge and are

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 9>reluctant to make any significant decisions until we get better

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 9>clarity as to where the tariffs are going to end,

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 9>where that situation is going to end. Once we have

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 9>more clarity to that, you can then go back and

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 9>see the markets will react, They'll adjust, the FED will react,

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.479
<v Speaker 9>It will adjust, and so will companies in terms of

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 9>how they're going to invest, including my insurance clients and

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 9>including the liquidity clients.

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 4>We don't know how it's going to end, but I'm

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.959
<v Speaker 4>curious if you've mapped likely scenarios for how they'll end,

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 4>what do you think is going to happen.

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, we do map scenarios, and so first I'll stick

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 9>with the insurance industry, which is very well capitalized and

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 9>not levered in the sense that they're not over their skis.

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 9>They don't hold a lot of equities on the balance sheet,

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 9>so the equity market volatility that we've been seeing is

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 9>not creating a capital strain. They are primarily fixed income investors.

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 9>And by the way, we're seeing the intermediate and long

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 9>into the curve rise, we're seeing credit spreads widen, so

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 9>on reinvestment, that's a pretty good situation as long as

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.959
<v Speaker 9>it just doesn't continue to cascade into something much more significant.

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You have insurance clients that are holding long term bonds

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and ten year thirty year notes are really blown out

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Are they suffering through a lot of

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>pain because of it?

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 9>Yeah? So, Soniali, You're absolutely right that on a mark

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 9>to market basis, these bonds have lost value, But most

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 9>of these institutions don't have to report on a mark

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 9>to market basis. They're able to hold their bonds to maturity,

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 9>So really they are more benefiting from the ability to

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 9>reinvest at higher yields than what's been happening to their

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 9>to the current holdings. Not the same thing being true

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 9>for hedge funds, example, or other institutions that are marked

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 9>on a daily basis may have to provide collateral as

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 9>their asset values are dropping, but that's not the case

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 9>for the insurance industry.

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 3>But do they feel that there is a certainty that

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 3>this does get resolved sooner rather than later. I think

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 3>I love your interview you did with Boaz Weinstein, who

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 3>I thought you know is assessing the situation and saying

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the thing is here we have a president who's in

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 3>for just under four years here and that he said,

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the uncertainty genie is out of the bottle. So do

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 3>we continue to in your view, and you've got to

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 3>think about short term, longer term, medium term, that uncertainty

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 3>will be with us throughout this tenure.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 9>I think uncertainty will be with us, hopefully not at

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 9>the level that we have right now, and again it's

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 9>it's our companies in a position where they're forced to

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 9>actor or not. And to the extent that they're not overlevered,

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 9>they're not forced to act. They could sit watch and

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 9>look for opportunities. I would say, you know, when you

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 9>gain plan out right now, this has primarily been an

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 9>equity market event. Concerns that it becomes a bond market event.

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 9>Rising yields are not that much.

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 10>Of a problem.

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 9>Draining liquidity becomes a problem, and you know, so there's

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 9>there's a concern or watch for that. Also, I would

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 9>say for our insurance clients, they are long term holders

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 9>of corporate debt. How are those corporations going to fare?

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 9>And certainly some corporations are going to be much more

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 9>affected by tariffs, which would we can credit others are

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 9>immune to it. So where we and our clients are

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 9>doing a lot of work right now, going literally bond

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 9>by bond, security by security.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 10>What is the sensitivity to the tariffs or not?

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, on a micro level, some of that uncertainty has

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 4>already led companies on a case by case basis to

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 4>pull guidance CarMax delta earlier this week. You mentioned a

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of uncertainty. Are you seeing signs of a recession?

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 10>So let me say this.

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 9>So one of the things we want to talk about

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 9>was the survey, And first I would say, on the

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 9>insurance survey.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 3>It's at fourteenth annual Global Insurance Survey, four hundred and

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 3>five companies representing over fourteen trillion dollars in balance sheets

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 3>assets combined. That's a lot.

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 10>That's a lot. It's about half the global industry's as base.

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 9>I bring that up because we've One of the questions

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 9>we said is what are you concerned about? And that

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 9>question they got absolutely right. They're concerned about inflation, they're

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 9>concerned about geopolitics. They aren't concerned about tariffs and market volatility.

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 9>What they didn't get right and nobody did, was the

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 9>magnitude of the tariffs and the implications for that. So

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 9>they didn't see recession this year. That view is changing,

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 9>including at Gold and Saxson. Within our clients, they thought

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 9>the equity markets would be well behaved, not riproaring, but

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 9>well behaved. That view is changing quite dramatically. That they

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 9>also thought that rates were had peaked and would be

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 9>coming down slowly. Both at the short end of the

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 9>long end, and I still think that that's the prevailing view.

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 9>So this backup in longer term rates is looking like

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 9>an investing opportunity. None of our clients have been selling

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 9>or directing us to sell on their behalf. They are

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 9>looking for opportunities to get into the market, but they're

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 9>not in a rush, you know, they want to see

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 9>how things settle out. Once they see how things settle out,

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 9>then they'll know where to put capital to work.

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you mentioned that you're looking bond by bond

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. And the reason that's so interesting to me

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is because you're already seeing somewhat of a capital market's freeze.

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you're worried about corporate debt at all in

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this environment, what does it mean for the way people

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have confidence in investing in corporate debt in the future

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and new issuance for example.

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So Sonali, that's really going to be industry by industry,

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 9>case case by case. And that gets back to this

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 9>uncertainty until we know how this unfolds, and it may not,

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 9>it may not unfold to a point where that we

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 9>have definition is that this is the way it's going

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 9>to work. You've elevated the amount of uncertainty, which is

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 9>elevating the amount of risk I need to get paid

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 9>a bigger risk premium to hold any of these instruments.

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:53.879
<v Speaker 9>And that's why we see credit spreads widening out.

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of people are saying this is

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>also a golden opportunity for a while public capital markets

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 1>are freezing to look at private capital because you're seeing

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 1>these private credit giants just float right in as the

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.919
<v Speaker 1>public markets are closed. But are you concerned that there's

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.240
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of pain under the surface in private

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>markets given that, you know, they call it the denominator effect.

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>These companies are seeing their public portfolios really shrink and

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 1>their private portfolios therefore become a bigger proportion of their holdings.

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 9>So let me take that question into two break that

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 9>into two parts. One is the underlying asset values themselves.

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 10>And so we've.

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 9>Got private equity, we've got real estate, we've got infrastructure,

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 9>we have private credit.

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 10>At the moment, we're.

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 9>Not seeing any of this flow through to the existing

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 9>investments that have been made.

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 10>But we have to see how things unfold, and if

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 10>we end up in a.

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 9>Deeper recession or deeper recession, that's going to weaken the

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 9>underlying asset values. Now, the thing you said about the

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:58.760
<v Speaker 9>denominator effect is the ability to put new capital to work,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 9>And there's two components. So that one is I already

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.439
<v Speaker 9>have a private equity portfolio. I was hoping to get

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 9>realizations give me fresh cash to put back to work.

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 9>And if the public markets are closed, particularly the IPO market,

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 9>You're not going to see as many of those realizations.

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 9>So I'm going to keeping more of my capital tied

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 9>up in those assets. And then the second point you're making,

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 9>which is more applicable quite frankly to pension plans and

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 9>sell from wealth funds, is as the public assets, particularly

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 9>the equity assets, decline and value, all of a sudden,

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 9>my exposure on an asset allocation basis to the private

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 9>assets has increased. Again reduces my willingness to invest more.

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 3>This was supposed to be the year, right, that all

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden we could tap the public markets, sell

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 3>sell some assets, IPO whatever, right or M and A

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and it.

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 10>Well, this was supposed to be the year. It is

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 10>only April.

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, so you are hopeful that it gets better.

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:03.879
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'm always hopeful, but we shall see.

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm just saying in an environment where if

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 3>we expect more uncertainty over the next three and a

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 3>half years, that makes it tricky.

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 10>Right, it makes it tricky.

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 9>I think you know right now the administration is in

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 9>the middle of trying to rebalance trade through tariffs. At

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 9>some point that will settle and then the markets can

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 9>assess what does it all mean, and then I think

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:26.720
<v Speaker 9>you will.

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 10>See markets open up again. You'll see more flow of capital.

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the risky stuff.

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm also wondering.

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>You have one of the biggest money market businesses in

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the world under your purview, So how are those behaving?

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>What are they being used for in an environment like this,

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>because it's generally safer than a lot of the debt

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>markets that we're talking about.

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So, Sonali, we manage over seven hundred billion of

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 9>short term liquidity products. We consider that to be the

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 9>canary in the coal mine, so we're always watching what's

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 9>happening with flows there, and at the moment things have

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 9>been very stable. The vast majority of the assets are

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 9>government assets, you know, short term short term treasury bills,

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 9>et cetera. And we don't see flows coming into that market.

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 10>We take that as a good sign.

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 9>Another part of the market, which is called prime, includes

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 9>a lot of commercial paper and other short term debt

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 9>of corporations, and we don't see companies moving out of prime.

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 10>So at the moment, and we watch very closely, things

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 10>feel calm at that end of the market.

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 4>When money leaves your money market funds, where does it go.

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 9>Over the last several crises, if I could say like that,

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 9>it's been actually coming into the money market funds basically,

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 9>you know, the two competing forces would be bank deposits

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 9>and money market funds. And you know, some of the

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 9>crises have called into question, you know, credit worthiness of banks,

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 9>so it comes into the money market funds.

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 10>If people are very nervous, it's going to go into.

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:56.879
<v Speaker 9>Government money market funds, so primarily T bills and other

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 9>government guaranteed forms of debt.

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 4>Are you calling this a crisis now?

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 11>No?

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Are you seeing money coming into money markets?

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 6>No?

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 12>As I said, we're watching on a daily.

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 9>And a minute by minute basis, and we haven't seen

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.879
<v Speaker 9>any flows come in unusual flows, nor have we seen

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 9>flows moving out of prime into government guys.

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, every single crisis for the last decade

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>or so, Mike has been one of my first calls,

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly, how's it going?

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 7>Really?

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 10>I hope that's not why you call it.

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Is there any money going outside the US? Increasingly?

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 10>So, you know you've seen so.

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 9>Coming into the beginning of the year, it looked like

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 9>the US economy was going to be the fastest outside

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 9>of China, the fastest growing economy in the.

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 3>World, exceptionals might we talked about American exceptional exceptionalism.

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 9>And you also saw the dollar strengthening over a long

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 9>period of time. So if I took foreign money and

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 9>put it into the US market, I had probably a

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 9>underlying market that was going to rally and I.

0:41:56.880 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 10>Pick up the currency appreciation WAMI.

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 9>Right now, the dollar's weakening and the US markets are

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 9>selling off, so I'm sure that that's putting a damper

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 9>on those flows.

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 4>I want to go to China and specifically the US

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 4>relationship with China. You spent a lot of time in China,

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 4>you live partly in Hong Kong, you're head of the

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 4>you're co head of the Client Solutions group in Asia Pacific.

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Is the relationship between the US and China broken?

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 9>That's really not in my Bailey Wick, But I will

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 9>tell you our relationships with the government entities and the

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 9>companies that are there between our firm and those entities

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.959
<v Speaker 9>is very strong. What's playing out is just playing out

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 9>above everybody's head, and we're leaving it to play out

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 9>at that level.

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 4>But it has significant implications for the way that companies

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 4>do business with one another. If one country has tariffs

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 4>that exceed that's a big deal.

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 9>It's very important for the two countries to have good relationships.

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 9>And then that translates down into the entities that we

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.919
<v Speaker 9>work with and the relationships we have with them.

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask you one last question. Oak Tree Capital

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Management coind of founder Howard Mark's today that Donald Trump's

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:03.720
<v Speaker 3>tower of policies have the potential to be the biggest

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 3>economic event of our lifetimes and warned that reversing them

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 3>could still have consequences. Do you agree.

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 9>I don't know if I agree with that statement, but

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 9>I will say this that volatility has a cost, and

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:21.760
<v Speaker 9>it's undermining people's confidence to invest, whether it's corporations building

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 9>plant and equipment, whether it's investors putting money to work.

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 9>So there is a cost of volatility, and we're seeing

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 9>that by the declines in the market and the widening

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 9>out of spreads.

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 3>So appreciate this. Thank you so much, so much. Mike Siegel,

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 3>partner at Goldman Sach's Asset Management, Global head of the insurance,

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:41.320
<v Speaker 3>asset management and Liquidity Solutions business, also co head of

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the Client Solutions group in Asia Pacific. Mike, thank you

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 3>very much, really appreciate it. And Janellie thanks for bringing

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:49.919
<v Speaker 3>us Mike Bloomberg TV Global Finance correspondence. So she calls you,

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 3>you know what it's about. Is this a crisis?

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 4>But he says no, for now. He says for now,

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 4>all right, let us know if that view changes. I

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 4>do appreciate it.

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 3>Plenty ahead in our second hour of the weekend edition

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.240
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Business Week, including the founder of fair Trade

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 3>USA on how tariffs affect the people who grow our tea, coffee, chocolate,

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 3>and so much more.

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Plus I know Carol's really excited for this one, and

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 4>I am too.

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Tim, I get to talk to Kate. I'm excited.

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.879
<v Speaker 4>Plus Chris Rouser is going to be here as well.

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 4>I know our Bloomberg Food editor, Kate Creator. She stops

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:39.919
<v Speaker 4>by with the winning formula for many of New York's

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 4>trendiest restaurants, making better butter and the top snacks for

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 4>certain CEOs. It's all in Bloomberg pursuits.

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 3>What I love about Kate is it's always all these

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 3>restaurants I want to go to, but I can't get in.

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 3>That's just what it comes out to.

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey.

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 3>First up this hour, though, I check on the health

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:56.760
<v Speaker 3>of an iconic California city that's still trying to recover

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 3>from the pandemic.

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco is facing a two year budge. What's a

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 4>deficit over eight hundred million dollars. On top of that,

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 4>it's been grappling with a homelessness crisis and damage to

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 4>its reputation as a tech industry hub.

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 3>For more, and what the city is doing to revitalize

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the tech sector and the impact tariffs and a potential

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:18.760
<v Speaker 3>pullback that federal funding could have on the city. Bloomberg

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 3>Technology co host Ludlow caught up with San Francisco Mayor

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Lourie.

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 13>I want to get straight to the idea behind San

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:30.720
<v Speaker 13>Francisco Downtown Development Corporation. It seems like the burden sharing

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 13>initiative is to get private capital to help you with

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 13>a lot of what the city needs.

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:37.959
<v Speaker 12>That's absolutely right.

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 14>Our business community, our nonprofit me, our arts community, we

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 14>want them to be partners in San Francisco's revitalization. I'm

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 14>really appreciative of the leadership of David Steepleman and that

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:56.360
<v Speaker 14>board that has formed for taking on the challenge of

0:45:56.400 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 14>helping all of us bring our city back and lifted

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 14>to new heights.

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 13>Is the scale of the challenge, billions of dollars and

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 13>who are the big names behind it.

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 12>That will give you that money.

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 14>Well, you've seen the board, the list of board members,

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:17.439
<v Speaker 14>but it's I don't know in terms of what they're

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 14>trying to raise, if it's one hundreds of millions or not,

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 14>but it's going to be private and public dollars. We

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 14>have to invest in small ways in big ways. We

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 14>are seeing momentum starting to build in Union Square. We

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 14>just got news that Zara is launching a new flagship

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 14>store forty thousands feet four stories.

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 12>Nintendo is opening up.

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 14>We just had a great local b petisserie, a bakery

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 14>open up in Union Square. So we're seeing wins happening

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 14>every single day here in San Francisco, and the Downtown

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 14>Development Corporation is going to build on those, on those

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 14>on those wins.

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 13>This is the first time, you know, I've spoken since

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 13>your election and since taking office. Prior to taking office,

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 13>you really put emphasis on partners that were helping you

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 13>right with the transition. Sam Outman was one name. What

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 13>is your relationship like with the technology industry now and

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.280
<v Speaker 13>the biggest figureheads of that industry in this city.

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 14>Well, we launched the Partnership for San Francisco. We have

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 14>twenty eight different business leaders from tech but also from

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 14>you know McKenzie and from Deloitte, and from UCSF and

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 14>from the San Francisco giants. We have the business community

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:44.839
<v Speaker 14>coming together. I have said to the region, I've said

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 14>to the country, and I've said to the world that

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 14>we are open for business again and San Francisco is

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 14>on the rise. We want a business back and we

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 14>want them to be part of the community, really focused

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:00.280
<v Speaker 14>on how they can help lift up our arts and culture,

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 14>our public schools and help us keep our streets safe,

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 14>keep them clean, and we have gotten a tremendous response

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:11.279
<v Speaker 14>in our first ninety or so days and we look

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 14>forward to partnering with them, our nonprofit community, and our

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 14>friends in labor.

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 12>Miss Larry.

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:18.800
<v Speaker 13>The main question I get for you from our audience

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 13>is how you make San Francisco competitive for the technology

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 13>industry new companies coming here versus Silicon Valley. Why bring

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 13>a headquarters into the city of San Francisco or require

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:34.760
<v Speaker 13>staff to be in the city of San Francisco versus

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 13>the broader Bay area.

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.760
<v Speaker 14>Well, first off, we're the most beautiful city in the world. Second,

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:43.719
<v Speaker 14>the horsepower is here, the intellectual horsepower is here. We

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 14>have great universities, including UCSF around here, and young people

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 14>want to be in.

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 12>Urban environments. They want to be in San Francisco.

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 14>That's been proven true throughout history, and we're going to

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 14>prove that again.

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:01.440
<v Speaker 12>We have great arts and culture institutions.

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 14>We were just named the culinary capital of the country,

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 14>so we have so much to be proud of. And

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 14>we know that workers want to be here. Our CEOs

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 14>who were talking to they know that their employees want

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 14>to be in San Francisco. No offense to my friends

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:23.320
<v Speaker 14>down in the Peninsula, But people live in San Francisco

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 14>and we want them to work here, and we do

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:27.920
<v Speaker 14>have to get competitive, but it starts with safe and

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 14>clean streets. Our property crime rates have dropped thirty five percent,

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 14>Our violent crime has dropped fifteen percent. Car break ins

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 14>in February the lowest in twenty two years. This is

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:45.879
<v Speaker 14>a safe American city and we want everybody coming back

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 14>to work here, to play here, and to live here.

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 13>It's very How is the White House and is Tariff's

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 13>policy going to impact your ability to do what you've

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:59.720
<v Speaker 13>just outlined, bring more of the technology industry to the city.

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.320
<v Speaker 14>Well, listen, we are all and you all are reporting

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 14>on it minute by minute. The uncertainty is impacting everybody

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 14>around the globe, and so we have to plan for

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 14>that here at city Hall. We're working with our department heads.

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 14>We have a big budget deficit. We inherited one of

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 14>the largest deficits in our city's history. So we're working

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 14>day and night to make sure that we tighten our belts,

0:50:25.440 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 14>we deliver core services to our taxpayers and to our residents,

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 14>making sure that we focus on public safety, focus on

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 14>the behavioral health crisis, and the drug crisis that is

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 14>causing people to feel the disorder on our streets. But

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 14>that is all starting to improve. And so we can

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 14>only control what we can control here in San Francisco,

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 14>and that's our fifteen point nine billion dollar budget. We

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:53.319
<v Speaker 14>have a one point one billion dollar budget deficit. Over

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 14>the next two years. We're going to get that under control.

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 12>We're going to.

0:50:57.080 --> 0:51:00.760
<v Speaker 14>Fix our structural budget deficit, and I'm telling you we're

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 14>then going to be off to the races.

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 12>Data Bricks knows it.

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:07.760
<v Speaker 14>They just secured an office space one hundred and fifty

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:11.879
<v Speaker 14>thousand square feet open AI just open new headquarters by

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:16.919
<v Speaker 14>Chase Center. We are on the cusp of lift off

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 14>here in San Francisco, and we want.

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:19.879
<v Speaker 12>Everybody to come be a part of it.

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 13>The other threat of the administration is to pull federal

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 13>funding from so called sanctuary cities. San Francisco included in

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:29.879
<v Speaker 13>that threat. Your response, please, may.

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 14>Our policies have kept us safe, and we have once again.

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:41.200
<v Speaker 14>Our property crime is down, our violent crime is down.

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 14>We are one of the safest American cities going right now,

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:48.160
<v Speaker 14>and we need to get that out into the world.

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 14>And that's got to be the narrative that people here

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 14>from us, and so I'm focused on making sure we

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 14>keep our citizens safe.

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:57.879
<v Speaker 12>Every single day.

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:01.879
<v Speaker 14>We're making sure that we're sending a message to those

0:52:01.920 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 14>that are coming here to deal drugs. We're no longer

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:06.719
<v Speaker 14>a city where you can come to deal drugs, or

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 14>to do drugs on our streets, or to sleep on

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 14>our streets. We had a report just that came into

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 14>me this morning. We used to have a couple hundred

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 14>tenths in the tenderline. We're down to seven as of yesterday.

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 14>So we are making sure that our streets are safe

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 14>and clean for our residents and for our taxpayers.

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 12>And that's what I'm going to focus on.

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 13>Trade, immigration, tariffs actions by the federal government one way

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 13>or another. How concerned are you about this sort of

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 13>the reputational damage to San Francisco? In other words, if

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:43.360
<v Speaker 13>you are a tourist from any other jurisdiction, Asia, Canada,

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 13>Latin America, or you're an entrepreneur, a startup founder, and

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:50.720
<v Speaker 13>you look at the situation with tariffs, are you worried

0:52:50.760 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 13>about how that impacts someone's perception about coming to our city.

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think we have been worried about that and

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 14>we frankly, we lost our way for a handful of

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 14>years and we took our status as a global destination

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 14>for granted. And those days are over. We are focused

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 14>on clean and safe streets. We're focused on winning conferences

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 14>and tourists back.

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:19.480
<v Speaker 12>We just had the NBA All Star Game weekend.

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 14>We have Super Bowl sixty coming, we have six World

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 14>Cup matches coming. We had the thirty thousand people here

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 14>for the Game Developers Conference. We have so many green

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.919
<v Speaker 14>shoots in San Francisco. I can't wait to welcome more

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 14>people from around the world. We're going to go visit

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:41.280
<v Speaker 14>different places in Europe and in Asia and invite people

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 14>back to San Francisco because they are starting to hear

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 14>the message from our administration that San Francisco is open

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.000
<v Speaker 14>for tourism, we're open for business, and that we are

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:55.280
<v Speaker 14>a city on the rise. Those days, that narrative that's

0:53:56.040 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 14>from a few years ago. We have a whole new

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:02.439
<v Speaker 14>story here in San Francis and that's one of being

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:05.319
<v Speaker 14>on the rise. And there's no better place to do

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 14>business or to visit than San Francisco right now.

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 4>That was Bloomberg Technologies Ed Ludlow with San Francisco Mayor

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Daniel Larry.

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:14.960
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Coming up, the founder

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 3>of fair Trade USA on how tariffs affect the people

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 3>who grow the things we love, you know, tea, coffee, chocolate. Yeah,

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:22.799
<v Speaker 3>I love chocolate and so much more.

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:54:36.760 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 2>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, farmers are worried that Trump's trade war with China

0:54:41.880 --> 0:54:45.879
<v Speaker 4>could cause disastrous consequences for their ability to sell soybeans.

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:48.839
<v Speaker 4>Even before the current administration took the rains, farmer income

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:50.880
<v Speaker 4>had been under pressure for a couple of years as

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 4>the cost of seeds, fertilizer, and equipment went up and

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:57.440
<v Speaker 4>crop prices decline. That's what's going on here in the

0:54:57.560 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 4>US with this trade war exactly. We want to go

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:02.919
<v Speaker 4>outside of the US and talk to somebody who spent

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:05.760
<v Speaker 4>his career thinking about where products, where commodities come from,

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 4>who brings them to us, how they're compensated, and the

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 4>working conditions of those individuals. Paul Rice is the founder

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 4>of fair Trade USA. It's the nonprofit fair trade certifier

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:20.080
<v Speaker 4>he started nearly thirty years ago. The organization says that

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:23.040
<v Speaker 4>a product is a fair Trade certified and that means

0:55:23.040 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 4>that it was quote made according to rigorous standards that

0:55:25.880 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 4>protect the livelihoods of farmers, fishers, and other producer communities

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 4>and the environment. He's got a new book out. It's

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:35.799
<v Speaker 4>called Every Purchase Matters How fair Trade farmers, companies, and

0:55:35.840 --> 0:55:40.160
<v Speaker 4>consumers are changing the world. He joins us from Berkeley, California. Paul,

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 4>great to have you. Congratulations on the new book. It's

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:46.200
<v Speaker 4>perfect to have somebody who understands trade and tariffs. You

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:48.960
<v Speaker 4>certainly understand these things. What is your view on tariff

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 4>specifically with regard to the world where you've spent the

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Speaker 4>last thirty years.

0:55:54.040 --> 0:55:57.719
<v Speaker 7>Well, tariffs are bad. There's no other there's no other

0:55:57.760 --> 0:56:00.640
<v Speaker 7>way to put it. Tariffs are dumb and they're going

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:02.239
<v Speaker 7>to hurt a lot of people. They're going to hurt

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:05.840
<v Speaker 7>American consumers as we all know, because the cost of

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:08.520
<v Speaker 7>things that we buy are going to go up, and

0:56:09.080 --> 0:56:14.040
<v Speaker 7>it's going to hurt American business because there's retaliatory tariffs.

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 7>I recently spoke with a US company that sells about

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:22.560
<v Speaker 7>forty percent of their roasted coffee into Canada. Retaliatory tariffs

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 7>are going to make it harder for him to do that.

0:56:24.680 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 7>And finally, tariffs are bad for sustainability.

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 6>Oh interesting.

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:34.360
<v Speaker 7>The onus is going to be pushed back onto a

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:38.720
<v Speaker 7>lot of developing world farmers and factory owners to absorb

0:56:38.920 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 7>some of that extra cost, and it's going to pressure

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:44.760
<v Speaker 7>a lot of people to cut back on sustainability measures

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:49.719
<v Speaker 7>that you know, things like installing solar panels or you know,

0:56:49.760 --> 0:56:53.280
<v Speaker 7>providing better housing for workers. So all the way around,

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:54.279
<v Speaker 7>tariffs are bad.

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 4>One of the reasons we wanted to speak to you

0:56:57.000 --> 0:57:01.720
<v Speaker 4>is because the products that we see the fair trade

0:57:02.080 --> 0:57:05.839
<v Speaker 4>certification on are often products that you can only get

0:57:05.880 --> 0:57:07.759
<v Speaker 4>outside of the United States. And I think it's fair

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:10.040
<v Speaker 4>to say the reason the President wants to impose these

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:13.040
<v Speaker 4>tariffs are because he has, in his view, the US

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:14.960
<v Speaker 4>has been treated unfairly when it comes to trade. He

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 4>wants to see manufacturing specifically and production specifically move back

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:23.880
<v Speaker 4>to this country. Is there a disconnect in your view

0:57:24.720 --> 0:57:28.440
<v Speaker 4>given that some of the stuff that could see tariffs

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 4>on it, you can't actually produce here in the US. Like,

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 4>help me make sense of that?

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, a huge disconnect. I mean, seventy percent of Americans

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 7>drink coffee. The US can't grow coffee, right, Coffee comes

0:57:42.600 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 7>from Latin America and Asia and Africa. And you know, similarly,

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 7>eighty percent of Americans eat bananas. Guess what, we don't

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:55.640
<v Speaker 7>grow bananas in the US. We import them. So tariffs

0:57:55.680 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 7>are going to hurt Americans because all of those things

0:57:58.000 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 7>that we love to drink and eat, like coffee and bananas,

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:03.960
<v Speaker 7>the price of those are going to go up. But furthermore,

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 7>you know, tariff's are really going to hurt those farmers

0:58:06.640 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 7>around the world. And so you know what is quite

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 7>possible is that a lot of those businesses are going

0:58:13.360 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 7>to fail because they cannot absorb the tariff, which means

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 7>more workers out of work. I mean, imagine what happens

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 7>if unemployment goes up in Mexico. What kind of pressure

0:58:25.040 --> 0:58:28.040
<v Speaker 7>that puts on the southern border. There's nothing good about

0:58:28.040 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 7>this whole tariff policy.

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Now when I think about Paul Supermarket, certainly here in

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the United States, they live on such slim margins, so

0:58:38.200 --> 0:58:41.000
<v Speaker 3>they have no choice but to pass any additional cost

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 3>off to consumers.

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 7>Correct, either they'll pass it on to the consumer or

0:58:47.000 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 7>they'll push it back onto the producer. And that's what

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean by you know, companies in Mexico, for example,

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:56.280
<v Speaker 7>going belly up or having to lay off workers. If

0:58:56.680 --> 0:58:59.440
<v Speaker 7>you know, if Whole Foods or Costco or Walmart decides

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 7>to push some of that extra cost back on to

0:59:03.160 --> 0:59:08.120
<v Speaker 7>the producer, then we're going to see some severe business

0:59:08.560 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 7>uh disruption south of the border, which is not going

0:59:11.640 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 7>to help our our national situation at all. And on

0:59:15.560 --> 0:59:17.960
<v Speaker 7>the you know, similarly, even if it all gets passed

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 7>on to consumers with prices already high, will consumers pay

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:26.960
<v Speaker 7>more for imported strawberries or tomatoes, or coffee or bananas.

0:59:27.000 --> 0:59:29.440
<v Speaker 7>I don't know, you know, I think it's quite possible

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 7>the demand goes down, which means a ripple effect around

0:59:34.120 --> 0:59:36.360
<v Speaker 7>the world that you know it's going to it's going

0:59:36.440 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 7>to be a tremendous hardship for a lot of people.

0:59:39.560 --> 0:59:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, that brings us to your book, And as we said,

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:45.440
<v Speaker 3>it's entitled every purchase Matters how fair trade, farmers, companies,

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 3>and consumers are changing the world. Fair trade I think

0:59:48.120 --> 0:59:50.120
<v Speaker 3>it's thrown around. I think we'd like to buy fair

0:59:50.160 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 3>trade goods, but explain to the world, just remind them

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 3>what fair trade is all.

0:59:54.320 --> 0:59:56.080
<v Speaker 4>And you're talking when you ask the question, Carol, you're

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:59.200
<v Speaker 4>asking about fair trade like capital F capital T fair trade,

0:59:59.200 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 4>not the concept of.

1:00:00.440 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Fair trade, no exactly, which is something the president might use.

1:00:04.080 --> 1:00:05.560
<v Speaker 3>But no, what fair trade?

1:00:05.920 --> 1:00:07.160
<v Speaker 7>Fair trade certified?

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:07.520
<v Speaker 12>There?

1:00:07.560 --> 1:00:07.959
<v Speaker 10>It is.

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 3>What gets that certification, What has to happen in order

1:00:12.040 --> 1:00:12.440
<v Speaker 3>to get it.

1:00:13.160 --> 1:00:16.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So fair trade is a rigorous two hundred point

1:00:17.120 --> 1:00:22.640
<v Speaker 7>checklist of social, labor and environmental criteria that farms and

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 7>factories meet and get audited against every year in order

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:30.720
<v Speaker 7>to wear the fair trade certified label. And on this

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 7>side of the market, our you know, two thousand plus

1:00:34.120 --> 1:00:38.600
<v Speaker 7>market partners from Whole Foods to Target to Walmart all

1:00:38.640 --> 1:00:41.640
<v Speaker 7>agree to pay a small premium back to those farmers

1:00:41.680 --> 1:00:44.760
<v Speaker 7>and workers, which they then can invest in healthcare and

1:00:44.920 --> 1:00:49.120
<v Speaker 7>education and better housing. So fair trade, you know, through

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:52.440
<v Speaker 7>the lens of global development, it's a market based approach

1:00:52.640 --> 1:00:56.080
<v Speaker 7>to global poverty and to protecting the planet for us

1:00:56.120 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 7>the consumer. Increasingly, consumers want to know that there's no

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 7>child labor in our chocolate bar and that the environment

1:01:02.520 --> 1:01:05.320
<v Speaker 7>wasn't destroyed in the production of our coffee. So fair

1:01:05.360 --> 1:01:08.400
<v Speaker 7>trade is a way that we as consumers can feel

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:12.360
<v Speaker 7>reassured that the products we're consuming are produced in a

1:01:12.400 --> 1:01:14.160
<v Speaker 7>responsible and sustainable way.

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:15.960
<v Speaker 4>What are the checks that are in place to make

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 4>sure these sustainable practices are followed when the folks from

1:01:19.840 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 4>your organization are not watching, when they're not there visiting

1:01:23.000 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 4>these plants.

1:01:24.600 --> 1:01:29.960
<v Speaker 7>So our one million plus farms and factories are audited

1:01:30.040 --> 1:01:34.400
<v Speaker 7>every year. The auditors talk with the workers, they may

1:01:34.840 --> 1:01:40.440
<v Speaker 7>visit the production sites. They do a rigorous inspection, and

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 7>that happens every year. And in addition, of course, all

1:01:44.240 --> 1:01:46.440
<v Speaker 7>of the brand partners or many of the brand partners

1:01:46.440 --> 1:01:49.040
<v Speaker 7>are visiting those farms and factories every year. So it's

1:01:49.160 --> 1:01:54.560
<v Speaker 7>an incredibly rigorous oversight. And the producers, for their own part,

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:58.080
<v Speaker 7>tend to be producers that are really bought into the

1:01:58.120 --> 1:02:01.280
<v Speaker 7>notion of greater responsibility and the getting this premium, So

1:02:01.360 --> 1:02:04.000
<v Speaker 7>producers don't want to run the risk of losing the

1:02:04.040 --> 1:02:07.200
<v Speaker 7>annual premium they get. So there's a real alignment of

1:02:07.280 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 7>incentives where the producer, the farmer, or the factory owners

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 7>get more money, the brands get a more secure and

1:02:16.720 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 7>reliable supply. Chain, and the consumer gets a product that

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:24.240
<v Speaker 7>makes us feel good because it's helping lift workers out

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:26.920
<v Speaker 7>of poverty, it's ensuring fair wages, and it's helping to

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:27.880
<v Speaker 7>protect the environment.

1:02:28.080 --> 1:02:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know Driscolls had kind of gone through a

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:34.360
<v Speaker 3>little bit of a path. Driscals. I think about strawberries

1:02:34.440 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>right like I.

1:02:34.920 --> 1:02:37.360
<v Speaker 4>Mean, every berry, every berry is just close.

1:02:37.640 --> 1:02:42.280
<v Speaker 3>It's the organic, it's the non organic. We are Bloomberg,

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:45.520
<v Speaker 3>and you know, we think, Tim and I think a

1:02:45.520 --> 1:02:49.880
<v Speaker 3>lot about profitability. Obviously right here we are in earning season,

1:02:50.160 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 3>but at the same time, the ability to be a

1:02:53.160 --> 1:02:57.960
<v Speaker 3>good company, be a good corporate citizen. Do well, what

1:02:58.120 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 3>is kind of the financial story of sustainability or fair

1:03:02.360 --> 1:03:03.320
<v Speaker 3>trade practices?

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:07.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I love I love this question, you know, because

1:03:07.200 --> 1:03:11.480
<v Speaker 7>I spent eleven years working with coffee farmers in the

1:03:11.520 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 7>mountains of Nicaragua in my twenties and then moved back

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:18.720
<v Speaker 7>here to start fair trade. And I've always felt that

1:03:18.800 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 7>fair trade would never work for the farmers if it

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:24.120
<v Speaker 7>didn't also work for business. So I've spent you know,

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:27.440
<v Speaker 7>the better part of the last thirty years working directly

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:33.000
<v Speaker 7>with companies to develop a strong business case for sourcing

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:35.360
<v Speaker 7>in a more sustainable way, not just because it's the

1:03:35.400 --> 1:03:39.080
<v Speaker 7>right thing to do, but because it creates value for

1:03:39.120 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 7>the firm, right what Michael Porter at Harvard calls shared value.

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:42.800
<v Speaker 6>Right.

1:03:42.840 --> 1:03:45.400
<v Speaker 7>So there's value for the farmer, for the worker, for

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:49.520
<v Speaker 7>the planet, but also there's supply chain resilience for the company,

1:03:49.560 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 7>there's brand differentiation for the company, and there's you know,

1:03:53.400 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 7>that emotional gratification as a consumer that we feel when

1:03:56.640 --> 1:04:00.120
<v Speaker 7>we buy something knowing that it did no harm. Give

1:04:00.160 --> 1:04:04.520
<v Speaker 7>you a recent example, Walmart piloted fair trade tomatoes and

1:04:04.840 --> 1:04:08.120
<v Speaker 7>saw their sales go up by three percent when the

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:10.600
<v Speaker 7>label went on the package. Now, who would have thought

1:04:10.640 --> 1:04:14.880
<v Speaker 7>that a Walmart consumer would care about tomato farm workers

1:04:15.000 --> 1:04:17.800
<v Speaker 7>in the developing world, And in fact they do. And

1:04:18.280 --> 1:04:21.880
<v Speaker 7>so it's just an indication of the business case for

1:04:21.960 --> 1:04:24.560
<v Speaker 7>fair trade right that consumers are moving in this direction.

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:28.080
<v Speaker 7>They're voting with their dollars, if you will, for the

1:04:28.160 --> 1:04:30.360
<v Speaker 7>kind of world they want to see. They're looking for

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 7>more socially and environmentally responsible products. And quite frankly, this

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:38.360
<v Speaker 7>macro trend is politics proof. I just wrote a piece

1:04:38.840 --> 1:04:42.720
<v Speaker 7>for a Wall Street Journal and OpEd piece entitled will

1:04:42.760 --> 1:04:47.000
<v Speaker 7>sustainability survive Trump's second term? And the reality is the

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:50.200
<v Speaker 7>business community is moving in this direction, not just because

1:04:50.200 --> 1:04:52.960
<v Speaker 7>it's the right thing to do, but because it's better business,

1:04:52.960 --> 1:04:54.320
<v Speaker 7>and it is better for business.

1:04:54.520 --> 1:04:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Paul, is there anything that cannot be produced, in your view,

1:04:58.560 --> 1:04:59.960
<v Speaker 4>in a fair trade way right now?

1:05:00.160 --> 1:05:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Can an iPhone? I don't even know that.

1:05:03.080 --> 1:05:05.880
<v Speaker 7>We would love to work with Apple on fair trade iPhones.

1:05:05.920 --> 1:05:09.000
<v Speaker 7>We're not there yet. But over the last twenty six years,

1:05:09.120 --> 1:05:12.080
<v Speaker 7>you know, we started with coffee, and then year after

1:05:12.200 --> 1:05:16.960
<v Speaker 7>year we engaged with lighthouse brands, pioneering brands who wanted

1:05:16.960 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 7>to take us into their industry. So now we work

1:05:19.400 --> 1:05:23.240
<v Speaker 7>in apparel, we work in cosmetics, we work in you know,

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:27.640
<v Speaker 7>in furniture with Williams Sonoma Inc. And we're certifying seafood,

1:05:27.680 --> 1:05:30.360
<v Speaker 7>we're certifying dairy. We sort of buy farms and factories

1:05:30.400 --> 1:05:33.640
<v Speaker 7>in the US now, not just abroad. And so you know,

1:05:33.880 --> 1:05:36.120
<v Speaker 7>our vision is fair trade for all, and it's the

1:05:36.160 --> 1:05:40.760
<v Speaker 7>notion that any and all supply chains, domestic or international,

1:05:40.920 --> 1:05:46.040
<v Speaker 7>can be can embrace responsible sourcing practices. And so yeah,

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:48.680
<v Speaker 7>stay tuned. Maybe next year you'll bring me on when

1:05:48.720 --> 1:05:49.960
<v Speaker 7>we have fair trade iPhones.

1:05:51.120 --> 1:05:53.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, we will do that. We will do that,

1:05:53.680 --> 1:05:55.680
<v Speaker 3>We will hold you to it, Paul, Thank you so much.

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Paul Rice glad we could finally get to you, founder

1:05:58.280 --> 1:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>of Fairtrade USA. His book Every Purchase Matters How fair

1:06:02.160 --> 1:06:05.320
<v Speaker 3>trade farmers, companies, and consumers are changing the world.

1:06:10.840 --> 1:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car

1:06:17.760 --> 1:06:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

1:06:20.760 --> 1:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

1:06:24.000 --> 1:06:27.480
<v Speaker 2>New York station, Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

1:06:27.280 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Thirty, a carefully selected playlist, soft golden lighting, old school

1:06:31.480 --> 1:06:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Gotham decor, and waiters with studiously casual attitudes count me in.

1:06:36.040 --> 1:06:38.360
<v Speaker 3>It's just some of the things many New York City

1:06:38.360 --> 1:06:41.280
<v Speaker 3>restaurants are doing just to become the buzziest place in

1:06:41.320 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 3>the city, and places I probably can't get into.

1:06:43.720 --> 1:06:45.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, waiters with cool sweaters who you want to

1:06:45.680 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 4>hang out with. Totally with us on that and more.

1:06:48.640 --> 1:06:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Is the editor of Bloomberg Pursuits, Chris Rouser and Bloomberg

1:06:51.640 --> 1:06:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Pursuits Food editor Kate Crator. She is calling in from London. Kate,

1:06:56.200 --> 1:06:59.360
<v Speaker 4>how do you get a reservation at one of the

1:06:59.400 --> 1:07:04.560
<v Speaker 4>buzziest restaurants in the buzziest city for food in the

1:07:04.720 --> 1:07:05.720
<v Speaker 4>entire we we just cut.

1:07:05.600 --> 1:07:07.480
<v Speaker 3>To the Chase man him.

1:07:07.560 --> 1:07:10.960
<v Speaker 11>You're asking the right question, and I wish I could

1:07:11.000 --> 1:07:14.720
<v Speaker 11>say it's like patience practice, but you know what you do.

1:07:15.000 --> 1:07:17.160
<v Speaker 11>You have to be intrepid. You have to be ready

1:07:17.200 --> 1:07:18.960
<v Speaker 11>to stand on a line at five o'clock at some

1:07:19.000 --> 1:07:23.000
<v Speaker 11>of these places. Because it's not at tree c which

1:07:23.080 --> 1:07:26.640
<v Speaker 11>is an offsit of Carbone, which everybody knows is one

1:07:26.680 --> 1:07:30.720
<v Speaker 11>of the toughest reservations in New York. Treecy is that

1:07:30.920 --> 1:07:33.960
<v Speaker 11>on blasts they have they can have up to seven

1:07:34.480 --> 1:07:38.400
<v Speaker 11>four hundred people on a wait list on any given night,

1:07:38.760 --> 1:07:40.960
<v Speaker 11>so you're you're going to have a lot of company

1:07:40.960 --> 1:07:41.840
<v Speaker 11>when you try to get in.

1:07:42.080 --> 1:07:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's completely insane. The reason we're talking to Kate

1:07:45.200 --> 1:07:48.600
<v Speaker 4>about getting a reservation at one of the hottest restaurants

1:07:49.200 --> 1:07:51.360
<v Speaker 4>in the hottest city for food right now, which Kate

1:07:51.440 --> 1:07:54.800
<v Speaker 4>argues is actually New York City, which it is is

1:07:54.840 --> 1:07:58.320
<v Speaker 4>because this is the Pursuit's food issue. Chris Rouser is

1:07:58.360 --> 1:08:01.320
<v Speaker 4>the editor of Bloomberg Pursuit. It's when you put together

1:08:01.400 --> 1:08:03.800
<v Speaker 4>something like this, Chris, what do you want to include?

1:08:04.120 --> 1:08:07.760
<v Speaker 15>Kate and I sit down. Let's I want to say

1:08:07.760 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 15>six months ago, but really it was. And yeah, you know,

1:08:13.120 --> 1:08:16.000
<v Speaker 15>sometimes at Tercy and we talk about coming up with

1:08:16.040 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 15>a great mix of stories about food, drinks, and restaurants,

1:08:19.680 --> 1:08:23.200
<v Speaker 15>and sometimes there's a bit of cooking. Sometimes there's a

1:08:23.200 --> 1:08:26.200
<v Speaker 15>bit of buying the stuff that you eat your food

1:08:26.240 --> 1:08:29.240
<v Speaker 15>off of. And this year we wanted to open up

1:08:29.320 --> 1:08:34.000
<v Speaker 15>with a story about hot restaurants because New York really

1:08:34.040 --> 1:08:36.880
<v Speaker 15>is having like a hot restaurant moments. It's been a

1:08:36.960 --> 1:08:39.479
<v Speaker 15>long time since we've had so many buzzy restaurants that

1:08:39.479 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 15>people are killing themselves to get into, because you know,

1:08:42.120 --> 1:08:45.559
<v Speaker 15>since the pandemic, we had a long recovery in terms

1:08:45.560 --> 1:08:47.400
<v Speaker 15>of restaurants in the city and now it's just like

1:08:47.439 --> 1:08:48.799
<v Speaker 15>it has not been this way in decades.

1:08:48.840 --> 1:08:50.439
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's where I want to go. I remember like

1:08:50.520 --> 1:08:52.759
<v Speaker 3>talking to you just at the start of the pandemic

1:08:52.800 --> 1:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>and through it and just kind of like your heart

1:08:54.920 --> 1:08:57.400
<v Speaker 3>was broken, because like there was just such a moment

1:08:57.600 --> 1:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>in New York City in terms of restaurants, like a

1:08:59.640 --> 1:09:02.400
<v Speaker 3>real and the pandemic just kind of killed it.

1:09:03.000 --> 1:09:06.200
<v Speaker 11>You're exactly right, And especially now on the side of

1:09:06.240 --> 1:09:09.840
<v Speaker 11>the pandemic, people are still craving social interaction, and in

1:09:09.840 --> 1:09:13.320
<v Speaker 11>the city like New York where people have microscopic kitchens

1:09:13.680 --> 1:09:16.240
<v Speaker 11>and no places, you know, they entertain in restaurants and

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:18.680
<v Speaker 11>they want to hang out in restaurants, and that's just

1:09:18.720 --> 1:09:21.160
<v Speaker 11>been put on blast in the past couple of years.

1:09:21.200 --> 1:09:25.160
<v Speaker 11>And right now it's just Simon Kim who has like

1:09:25.240 --> 1:09:28.400
<v Speaker 11>two of New York's tighest restaurants. One's called Koko Doc

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:32.280
<v Speaker 11>and the other is Coat. It's this really groovy Korean restaurant.

1:09:32.400 --> 1:09:34.760
<v Speaker 11>He said it so well. He said, you can have

1:09:34.920 --> 1:09:37.559
<v Speaker 11>like an MX Black card or whatever's the highest card.

1:09:37.560 --> 1:09:40.920
<v Speaker 11>You could have the most power JP Morgan account, but

1:09:41.000 --> 1:09:43.439
<v Speaker 11>nothing says you have social clout like an eight pm

1:09:43.520 --> 1:09:47.840
<v Speaker 11>reservation of these places. And it's true, It's totally.

1:09:47.560 --> 1:09:49.160
<v Speaker 12>True, so true, Kate.

1:09:49.200 --> 1:09:50.639
<v Speaker 15>One of the things that I loved in the story

1:09:50.680 --> 1:09:52.360
<v Speaker 15>is when you talk to Angie Rito, who is the

1:09:52.560 --> 1:09:55.240
<v Speaker 15>co chef and co owner of Don Angie, and she

1:09:55.360 --> 1:09:59.880
<v Speaker 15>made the point that because of Instagram and TikTok and

1:10:00.040 --> 1:10:02.840
<v Speaker 15>other social media, so many more people have a view

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:05.200
<v Speaker 15>into these restaurants and feel like they should be able

1:10:05.240 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 15>to participate in these cool restaurants. So like Don Angie

1:10:08.520 --> 1:10:11.360
<v Speaker 15>has this amazing lasagna where and if you look at it,

1:10:11.360 --> 1:10:13.479
<v Speaker 15>it's these spirals and everyone takes a picture of it,

1:10:13.520 --> 1:10:15.200
<v Speaker 15>and then everyone's like, oh my god, how'd you get in?

1:10:15.640 --> 1:10:18.519
<v Speaker 15>It just has brought the community of people to a

1:10:18.600 --> 1:10:21.200
<v Speaker 15>much bigger level, and then so the competition to get

1:10:21.240 --> 1:10:23.080
<v Speaker 15>in is so much deeper, right.

1:10:23.400 --> 1:10:26.120
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I know that's an excellent point. It really has broadened.

1:10:26.200 --> 1:10:28.479
<v Speaker 11>TikTok has been its we sort of call it the

1:10:28.520 --> 1:10:30.800
<v Speaker 11>TikTok effect, and you know, you just say it and

1:10:30.800 --> 1:10:33.720
<v Speaker 11>you think social media, but really what that's done is

1:10:33.840 --> 1:10:36.040
<v Speaker 11>created an even bigger ground swell, and you have people

1:10:36.040 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 11>who are willing to stay online. You know, like maybe

1:10:39.240 --> 1:10:42.600
<v Speaker 11>maybe a lot of finance people want to have that

1:10:42.680 --> 1:10:46.800
<v Speaker 11>eight pm reservation, but you have this whole universe of

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:49.680
<v Speaker 11>other people who have seen it now, who've seen like

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:52.519
<v Speaker 11>this food, like those awesome lasagna pin wheels that Chris

1:10:52.560 --> 1:10:55.040
<v Speaker 11>just talked about, and they think I want that, like

1:10:55.080 --> 1:10:56.360
<v Speaker 11>I want to taste it, I want to take a

1:10:56.400 --> 1:11:01.080
<v Speaker 11>picture of it, And that has indeed expanded the all exponentially.

1:11:01.880 --> 1:11:04.280
<v Speaker 4>They are these sort of sort of commonalities that you

1:11:04.400 --> 1:11:07.600
<v Speaker 4>find in these restaurants right now that didn't exist a

1:11:07.640 --> 1:11:09.599
<v Speaker 4>few years ago. I mean, you talk about the idea

1:11:09.640 --> 1:11:12.600
<v Speaker 4>of waiting fifteen minutes to order a drink at a

1:11:12.680 --> 1:11:15.720
<v Speaker 4>restaurant a few years ago. That's not the service that

1:11:16.200 --> 1:11:18.040
<v Speaker 4>you get right now. There's a lot of culling that

1:11:18.120 --> 1:11:21.479
<v Speaker 4>happens right now. What's the environment, what are the commonalities there?

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:25.320
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's another good point these places. It used to

1:11:25.360 --> 1:11:27.639
<v Speaker 11>be like at a place like Balsazar, which is historically

1:11:27.720 --> 1:11:30.720
<v Speaker 11>one of the cities like hot dining rooms and hangouts,

1:11:30.760 --> 1:11:32.640
<v Speaker 11>there would be a huge crowd at the bar. But

1:11:32.720 --> 1:11:35.120
<v Speaker 11>at a place like the Corner Store, which is another

1:11:35.160 --> 1:11:37.679
<v Speaker 11>one of these super hot restaurants, you can't get past

1:11:37.720 --> 1:11:40.599
<v Speaker 11>the matre d. You can't get past the front door

1:11:41.000 --> 1:11:43.840
<v Speaker 11>if you don't have a reservation, because they don't want

1:11:43.840 --> 1:11:46.720
<v Speaker 11>a stacked bar. They want everyone to feel like they're

1:11:46.760 --> 1:11:48.840
<v Speaker 11>having a great time. They don't want them to be jostled,

1:11:49.080 --> 1:11:51.639
<v Speaker 11>but they want them One thing that's also was one

1:11:51.640 --> 1:11:54.559
<v Speaker 11>thing I learned from reporting the story is both rich

1:11:54.680 --> 1:11:58.000
<v Speaker 11>Teresa who has that restaurant Tarsi, and then Eugene Ram

1:11:58.040 --> 1:12:01.080
<v Speaker 11>who has the Corner Store. We're saying they treat every

1:12:01.200 --> 1:12:04.760
<v Speaker 11>night like a play, like a musical, and you're the star.

1:12:04.880 --> 1:12:07.360
<v Speaker 11>You're the customer or the star every night, and so

1:12:07.439 --> 1:12:09.880
<v Speaker 11>it's all really well orchestrated. And if you want it

1:12:09.880 --> 1:12:11.960
<v Speaker 11>to be a fantastic night for people, you don't want

1:12:11.960 --> 1:12:14.240
<v Speaker 11>them to be waiting twenty minutes to get their martini.

1:12:14.439 --> 1:12:16.519
<v Speaker 3>I thought what was interesting too, is that, right, there's

1:12:16.520 --> 1:12:17.960
<v Speaker 3>one thing to kind of have a lot of buzz

1:12:17.960 --> 1:12:20.320
<v Speaker 3>in the beginning, right, and everybody wants to go. But

1:12:20.439 --> 1:12:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the real struggle or the real mission is to kind

1:12:23.160 --> 1:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>of keep that buzz going. And so these restaurants though,

1:12:26.080 --> 1:12:27.719
<v Speaker 3>have to make sure they cultivate some regulars.

1:12:27.840 --> 1:12:31.479
<v Speaker 11>Right, Yeah, no exactly, And that's one thing. Bridges Downtown

1:12:31.640 --> 1:12:34.920
<v Speaker 11>yet another one of these restaurants, which is right in

1:12:34.960 --> 1:12:37.120
<v Speaker 11>the corner of Chinatown. So it's not like a power

1:12:37.160 --> 1:12:42.000
<v Speaker 11>neighborhood necessarily, although it's become quite cool, but they always

1:12:42.120 --> 1:12:44.040
<v Speaker 11>leave room for walkins because they want to have a

1:12:44.040 --> 1:12:48.000
<v Speaker 11>neighborhood crowd and they know that. They know that. You know,

1:12:48.120 --> 1:12:50.040
<v Speaker 11>if you're shy, if you're like cooking on like a

1:12:50.080 --> 1:12:52.719
<v Speaker 11>white hot flame, at some point that flame it can't last.

1:12:52.720 --> 1:12:55.040
<v Speaker 11>So you want to have like steady heat, and you

1:12:55.160 --> 1:12:57.040
<v Speaker 11>want that just to go on and on. And that's

1:12:57.080 --> 1:13:00.200
<v Speaker 11>what's happened to don Angie. Like it's been around like

1:13:00.240 --> 1:13:03.160
<v Speaker 11>for eight years maybe now, and it's still going strong,

1:13:03.200 --> 1:13:06.080
<v Speaker 11>and it still has like super crowds of people trying

1:13:06.120 --> 1:13:08.040
<v Speaker 11>to get in or who want to get in, and

1:13:08.080 --> 1:13:10.519
<v Speaker 11>it has like very loyal following. And the way you

1:13:10.560 --> 1:13:13.200
<v Speaker 11>do that is by making customers feel special all the

1:13:13.240 --> 1:13:14.080
<v Speaker 11>time every night.

1:13:14.360 --> 1:13:18.120
<v Speaker 15>I recently went to don Angie and the food is incredible. No,

1:13:18.200 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 15>it's just like it's so good after all this time.

1:13:20.880 --> 1:13:23.200
<v Speaker 15>And a lot of it is the vibes as Kate's describing,

1:13:23.280 --> 1:13:25.360
<v Speaker 15>Like you go in, it's a lovely experience walking in,

1:13:25.400 --> 1:13:27.800
<v Speaker 15>and then the staff is really nice. It's not that

1:13:27.920 --> 1:13:29.479
<v Speaker 15>vibe of a sort of oh, I'm in a really

1:13:29.560 --> 1:13:32.559
<v Speaker 15>fancy French restaurant and like the waiters have accents and

1:13:32.600 --> 1:13:33.920
<v Speaker 15>I don't know what to say and I'm using the

1:13:33.920 --> 1:13:37.799
<v Speaker 15>wrong utensils. Like it's very casual. The lighting is super

1:13:37.840 --> 1:13:40.599
<v Speaker 15>golden and warm. Everyone looks great. The food is often

1:13:40.680 --> 1:13:43.639
<v Speaker 15>comfort food, so like at Corner Store, there are these

1:13:43.680 --> 1:13:46.400
<v Speaker 15>amazing like pizza rolls, which is like the very best

1:13:46.479 --> 1:13:50.559
<v Speaker 15>version of like a Totono's pizza roll in your story

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:53.639
<v Speaker 15>and it's just and Teresa, is that too? It's that's

1:13:53.680 --> 1:13:56.760
<v Speaker 15>these comfort food things with a twist, and it just

1:13:56.960 --> 1:13:59.960
<v Speaker 15>is such a nice, relaxing, unfussy vibe.

1:14:00.400 --> 1:14:02.080
<v Speaker 3>All Right, I gotta talk about it. We gotta talk

1:14:02.120 --> 1:14:04.240
<v Speaker 3>about butter, because I gotta tell you, one of my

1:14:04.240 --> 1:14:06.160
<v Speaker 3>favorite things is a good glass of red wine, some

1:14:06.280 --> 1:14:10.040
<v Speaker 3>great like fresh warm bread and butter, and I love

1:14:10.080 --> 1:14:12.840
<v Speaker 3>butter with olive oil. What the heck's going on with butter, Kate,

1:14:13.280 --> 1:14:14.599
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe it's butter.

1:14:18.960 --> 1:14:21.439
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that would have been a good headline for this too.

1:14:22.760 --> 1:14:26.559
<v Speaker 11>Butter butters, butters having a good moment, and boy especially

1:14:26.600 --> 1:14:29.200
<v Speaker 11>is having a good moment. They're called compound butters or

1:14:29.240 --> 1:14:32.679
<v Speaker 11>flavor flavored butters, and chefs are using them a sort

1:14:32.680 --> 1:14:35.879
<v Speaker 11>of a shortcut, a secret weapon. The cheff Laurent Torundel,

1:14:36.200 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 11>who has Lamico in New York and then also Elsie

1:14:40.000 --> 1:14:42.760
<v Speaker 11>Steak and Seafood down in Miami. It's really popular, like

1:14:42.800 --> 1:14:47.040
<v Speaker 11>hangout on Miami Beach. He uses he makes a cowboy

1:14:47.120 --> 1:14:50.439
<v Speaker 11>butter that's got like all these herbs and some spices

1:14:50.479 --> 1:14:52.599
<v Speaker 11>in it, and he plops it on every steak and

1:14:52.640 --> 1:14:55.439
<v Speaker 11>it's just instead of like worrying about all these sauces,

1:14:55.520 --> 1:14:57.960
<v Speaker 11>it's something you can make ahead. It cuts your kitchen time,

1:14:58.280 --> 1:15:01.280
<v Speaker 11>it probably cuts labor down to and so it's become

1:15:01.320 --> 1:15:03.800
<v Speaker 11>a sort of secret weapon that chefs are doing. At

1:15:03.840 --> 1:15:06.439
<v Speaker 11>this restaurant in La Joya called the Coke, they do

1:15:06.840 --> 1:15:10.000
<v Speaker 11>a chicken skin like they make this like awesome, like

1:15:10.000 --> 1:15:12.400
<v Speaker 11>like fry fry fried chicken skin and then make that

1:15:12.520 --> 1:15:14.679
<v Speaker 11>a butter that they serve with bread. And so you think,

1:15:14.720 --> 1:15:17.080
<v Speaker 11>like bread service is fine as it is, and then

1:15:17.080 --> 1:15:20.040
<v Speaker 11>you get to have this next level butter and you

1:15:20.080 --> 1:15:21.639
<v Speaker 11>think and then that changes everything.

1:15:21.880 --> 1:15:24.120
<v Speaker 15>That's that sounds so incredible.

1:15:24.640 --> 1:15:25.559
<v Speaker 4>Plus you're in La Joya.

1:15:25.800 --> 1:15:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you know? That's what's interesting too, is I have

1:15:28.560 --> 1:15:31.960
<v Speaker 3>noticed at restaurants that there's like often a bread meat

1:15:32.000 --> 1:15:34.680
<v Speaker 3>like choice, right, and there's like different butters with it

1:15:34.800 --> 1:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>or something. It's like become a thing. Hey, just thirty

1:15:37.000 --> 1:15:40.400
<v Speaker 3>seconds the hotel dinner party, what's going on?

1:15:40.720 --> 1:15:43.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think that's I think that's another really fun trend.

1:15:43.160 --> 1:15:44.720
<v Speaker 11>You know, it used to be that hotels went out

1:15:44.720 --> 1:15:47.320
<v Speaker 11>of their way to keep to keep people separate, you know,

1:15:47.439 --> 1:15:50.720
<v Speaker 11>to not to make sure you didn't have to sit

1:15:50.800 --> 1:15:53.120
<v Speaker 11>with somebody else. But now they're mixing it up and

1:15:53.160 --> 1:15:56.479
<v Speaker 11>they're doing it everywhere, Like in Florence at twenty five

1:15:56.560 --> 1:16:00.360
<v Speaker 11>hours they have a new hotel there or a newishowell there,

1:16:00.560 --> 1:16:05.479
<v Speaker 11>but they they installed that star butcher, Dario Tuccini, and

1:16:05.560 --> 1:16:07.840
<v Speaker 11>they do they have like a big table and they

1:16:07.840 --> 1:16:09.880
<v Speaker 11>have one seating a night, and so you can have

1:16:09.960 --> 1:16:12.360
<v Speaker 11>these sort of like jet lag tourists sitting down with

1:16:12.439 --> 1:16:15.080
<v Speaker 11>locals who think he's the local butcher. And so you

1:16:15.120 --> 1:16:18.400
<v Speaker 11>have all these fun conversations and it fosters, like, you know,

1:16:18.439 --> 1:16:21.280
<v Speaker 11>a sense of authenticity and experience, which is what so

1:16:21.400 --> 1:16:23.960
<v Speaker 11>many people want when they travel. So it's just a

1:16:24.040 --> 1:16:26.479
<v Speaker 11>super added bonus. It's really fun thing to look out

1:16:26.479 --> 1:16:26.880
<v Speaker 11>for now.

1:16:26.960 --> 1:16:28.479
<v Speaker 3>And I gotta say, there's also a section and when

1:16:28.479 --> 1:16:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the boss has a snack attack and it you guys

1:16:30.120 --> 1:16:32.360
<v Speaker 3>talk to some executives and what they like everything from

1:16:32.400 --> 1:16:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Dorita's to nuts.

1:16:33.479 --> 1:16:35.479
<v Speaker 11>And so and so that guy wants peanut butter.

1:16:36.000 --> 1:16:39.519
<v Speaker 15>All these CEOs came back with like gorp and dried magagos.

1:16:39.560 --> 1:16:41.760
<v Speaker 15>And I was like, Kate, find somebody who eats Dorito's.

1:16:42.160 --> 1:16:43.679
<v Speaker 2>It's true, a real person.

1:16:43.840 --> 1:16:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what's your favorite snack when you get hungry at work?

1:16:46.520 --> 1:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>You know what?

1:16:46.840 --> 1:16:48.519
<v Speaker 11>That's a funny, Like I was thinking about that when

1:16:48.600 --> 1:16:50.560
<v Speaker 11>Chris said that, because I was like, I think officially,

1:16:50.600 --> 1:16:52.400
<v Speaker 11>like on the record, I would be like, oh I

1:16:52.439 --> 1:16:56.040
<v Speaker 11>reach for some carrots, but you know I would I

1:16:56.080 --> 1:16:59.080
<v Speaker 11>can find I would like look for the best chocolate situation.

1:16:59.160 --> 1:17:02.559
<v Speaker 15>I could find, Chris Browser, mine's the chocolate covered almonds

1:17:02.600 --> 1:17:03.920
<v Speaker 15>that they have upstairs.

1:17:03.439 --> 1:17:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Only, but that only comes out in the afternoon when

1:17:05.760 --> 1:17:06.320
<v Speaker 4>we're on air.

1:17:06.560 --> 1:17:08.200
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, so next.

1:17:08.000 --> 1:17:11.479
<v Speaker 4>Time you will you please delivery? Returning to we're not

1:17:11.560 --> 1:17:13.880
<v Speaker 4>joking Carol Masser, I know it's cheerios for Carol.

1:17:14.760 --> 1:17:16.479
<v Speaker 3>I do love cheerios. And you know what, Tim Tim

1:17:16.520 --> 1:17:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Moore in the studio doing our live show, and he

1:17:18.800 --> 1:17:19.799
<v Speaker 3>like pulls out a sandwich.

1:17:20.160 --> 1:17:23.519
<v Speaker 4>Yeahiled eggs, My snacks are full meals.

1:17:24.439 --> 1:17:26.040
<v Speaker 3>It's like I look at him and he's got this

1:17:26.120 --> 1:17:29.639
<v Speaker 3>whole thing full sandwich. Kate Creator, you have made our day,

1:17:29.640 --> 1:17:30.360
<v Speaker 3>our week, our month.

1:17:30.479 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 11>He've made my day. Oh my god. Yeah, I'm floating.

1:17:33.840 --> 1:17:36.599
<v Speaker 3>Be well, Be well, kiddo. Our thanks to both of them,

1:17:37.200 --> 1:17:39.919
<v Speaker 3>Dynamic duo. We love talking with Chris Rouser. He's Bloomberg

1:17:39.960 --> 1:17:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Pursuits editor and of course Bloomberg Pursuits Food editor. Kate

1:17:43.160 --> 1:17:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Crator joining us from Lennon. Guys, thank you so much.

1:17:45.600 --> 1:17:47.200
<v Speaker 11>See you in New York restaurant. Bye.

1:17:47.320 --> 1:17:47.479
<v Speaker 10>Hi.

1:17:48.400 --> 1:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

1:17:53.880 --> 1:17:57.599
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

1:17:57.640 --> 1:18:01.679
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

1:18:01.720 --> 1:18:05.599
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

1:18:05.840 --> 1:18:08.599
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

1:18:08.840 --> 1:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal