WEBVTT - 2023 Week 8 Preview

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>The Around the NFL podcast ran in two up bund

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>saw this week.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 2>From the Chris Wesley podcast studio. It's Around the NFL

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the Week eight preview. I'm Dan hansis Heroes here, Greg Rosenthal,

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Mark Sessler.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>You know what the buzzsaw is this week?

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>It is the middle of the dang season and there

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>ain't no byes sixteen.

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Football games and we mean Thursday and Monday.

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and we you know, we were I was acknowledging.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 4>I think you were agree that, like I don't track

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 4>like buys obsessively until like the week is upon us.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 4>And I thought, we're in this nice little comfort zone

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 4>where like six teams are having the little week.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 2>It's like get one game off the But yeah, no, bro,

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I was a total buzzsaw buzzsaw bangjob.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>You know what the buzzey is my lox record right now.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that's how you come into the show.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow. They they brought it up on that graphic

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 3>at le say.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Greg Rise and Ghoul six and one, Damn Tansas four

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and three Westling Bros. Four and three Dark Sessler under

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 2>the five hundred mark. That's like being under the Mendoza

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>line in baseball mark getting under two hundred. I gotta

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 2>I got to get that up a little.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 4>I am going to shift into what's good for the

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 4>show at this point. Oh, don't do that. I'm not

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 4>gonna know. I'm going to try to win. Yeah, but

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to do it in a with some flare, Okay.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 2>And also, I guess we could use this as a

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 2>congratulate Greg on another title.

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>No, there's too much.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why. It's it's a buzz saw this

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 3>week to write that.

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 2>So, I don't know if we can we have Eric

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>behind the glass Madison, like, do we want to just

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>end it right now?

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Have you mathematically clinched yet? It's you're that far ahead.

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, winning, as I said before the season, winning four

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 5>out of five seasons would mean the end of the

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 5>entire segment because well, people just decide there's no drama

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 5>to it.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Well or danon Marker having literally no fun.

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I think you're mistaken about the power

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 2>dynamic a little bit. But the same time, congratulations. I

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>also not accepting this. It's the only way. See, it's

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the only thing that is what gets through Greg's armor.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Prematurely congratulating him on Picks competition.

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 6>There was the year.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 4>There was a year that I won this. It was

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 4>like half a decade ago. We were all younger, but like,

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 4>well you tied, you tied for the time. No, no, no,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 4>this was different.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 3>There was I waited out. Yeah it was me versus

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>West right down.

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he won.

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 3>You might have won the first one.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Well this is I put the trophy on Wes's desk

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 4>announcing was the winner around week and it got into

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 4>his head big time. It's not easy to do that

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 4>with Wes, but that did and I prevailed.

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>And really, maybe the darkest of the dark Sessler moments

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 2>is when you and I had a lock off Super

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 2>Bowl Bengals Rams and I needed the Rams to win

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 2>and Mark needed the Bengals. And when Aaron Donald flashed

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 2>around that edge and knocked that ball and forced the incompletion.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 2>Mark came back about three months later.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we didn't. We didn't see him the rest of

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 5>the night. There's all these pictures with us, with all

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 5>the West bros. Leaving the stadium. Where's Mark.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>I left early and came back to the office and

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 4>just like it was like, oh, it's a Super Bowl,

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 4>but I've got other priorities.

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, all right, so why would you want to

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 2>take this element the intensity and the rivalries of the

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>picks competition? But that this one's over, so we look

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 2>ahead to twenty twenty four. All right, now, Week eight,

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 2>we gave you the Island Games of the primetime games

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 2>we broke down as part of the QB Index episode

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>with Nick Shook.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Please check that out.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, Time for the first overall pick, presented by

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 2>Draft Kings and I have the first overall picked, and

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 2>this one is it couldn't be easier for me. We're

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna go to Santa Clara and we're going to talk

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>about the Cincinnati Bengals, a team that.

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>We think, we.

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Think figured it out a little bit before thereby obviously

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 2>they took care of business. The offense came to life

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>against Arizona in Week five, they kind of struggle and

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 2>lean on their defense. Well, the offense struggles after a

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>hot start against Seattle, and then they lean on their

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 2>defense to close out the Seahawks just barely.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, maybe they're good, maybe they're not.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Then you have the Niners, who started out hot as

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>a pistol five and zero killing everybody and then they

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 2>dropped two very close games that went right down to

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>the final plays nineteen seventeen to the Browns twenty two

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 2>to seventeen to the Vikings.

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes, seventeen points back to back weeks. So now they're back.

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Home after two tough road losses, and they might have

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 2>a new quarterback, Mark Sessler, because Brock Purdy went into

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>the concussion protocol, and as we've seen this season, it

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 2>seems more rock solid than ever. If you go in

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that protocol, you're probably out for the week. So it

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 2>could be Sam Darnaldtown.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's very little.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 4>I think there's been like one player in the last

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 4>year that went into protocol at this period and played

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 4>like that weekend.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 3>It just doesn't happen.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Chefter tweeted that out and then everyone pointed out how

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 5>many times that's not true that it took me like

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 5>twenty percent of the time.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you, Adam Chef.

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 4>But a great, great opening salvo by my for it

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 4>to be a midweek one where they didn't catch it

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 4>on Monday night, which again, this is happening a lot

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 4>where they don't catch it at the time, just saying

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 4>like that.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Wait, one in five players that go into the protocol

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>or something like that.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 5>I think there was like twenty something percent has been

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 5>able to like Moley Kyle.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so I I do think though, you know, pretty

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 4>to me, I feel like I always want to defend

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 4>him and Dan, I think you're in the same camp

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 4>and these people that just want to like, you're just

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 4>the mid level guy. It's not because of you that

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 4>you're succeeding. He's had a couple tough weeks. But isn't

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 4>there this sort of sense that everyone's waiting to see

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Sam Darnald in this offense, largely because like Kyle Shanahan

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 4>was like, you know, verbally unfurling Sea poems about Sam Donald.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 5>Everyone obvious the Donald hive, and there's another it's huge.

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>It's the hive.

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 4>It's not going away, and there would be reasons for

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 4>the hive to a dissembled, but like the hive is around,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 4>and I think there's like a little bit of juice

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 4>around the concept of like can Shanahan do with Sam

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Darnald what no one else has been able to do?

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 3>And I kind of find it fascinating for that reason.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Interesting because there wasn't much of a Sam Donald hive

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 2>when I've been pounding the table for him the last

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>three or four years.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 3>J T.

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 5>O'Sullivan, Mina Chimes, dan Orlowski. There are so many right

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 5>that Daniel Jeremiah that puts so much stock into Donald

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 5>pre draft and have stuck with him. And then he

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 5>does tend to start the seasons with these teams, whether

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 5>it was you know, the Panthers a year ago, when

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 5>he first comes out, like first couple games of the season,

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 5>Donald has been better. And look, he doesn't need to

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 5>be incredible, he just needs to be Nick Mullins as

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 5>a rookie. Nick Mullens as a rookie is averaging like

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 5>eight yards per attempt. I don't think he's as good

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 5>as Brock Purdy, but I also don't think this Bengals

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 5>defense is nearly as good as its reputation has been

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 5>this year. You know, I was thinking hard about locking

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 5>this game before it flipped from Purdy to Donald. I

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 5>just feel like my long standing Donald lack of belief

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 5>makes it hard to lock him up in a game

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 5>against Joe Burrow. But I still feel good about the

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 5>forty nine ers.

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 3>I'd even.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 5>Take the three and a half points and think they're

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 5>going to cover ultimately, because I think they're just a

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 5>better team top to bottom.

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 4>They are banged up though, Deebo Samuel not doing well,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Trent Williams not doing well.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>You don't have your quarterback.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 4>Like I I came away from the Vikings game kind

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 4>of being like, look at the Niners are going to

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 4>have a couple down weeks, but they couldn't run the

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 4>ball last week. I thought they got flamed in the

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 4>passing game a couple of times. And it's like the

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Vikings looked like the better team. And it's like the

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Niners the two week journey that they've been on, I

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 4>don't know, three weeks ago. I'm like, just put them

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 4>in the NFC Championship and probably the super Bowl. It

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 4>hasn't changed my opinion entirely, but like a couple of

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>injuries have changed that team.

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>What about the Cincinnati side of this, because Greg, what

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 2>did you take away? You know, the team goes away

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 2>for a week or two weeks, and that's actually great

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 2>because as much as we wanted to say Burrow looked

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 2>much better the last couple of weeks physically, and he did.

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's better than a bye week?

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 2>So now he gets more time to rest that calf

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and get the treatment and hopefully comes out and he's

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 2>even more kind of moved away from that, hopefully. Were

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>you concerned about the last essentially three quarters of that

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>game against Seattle.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 5>Yes, they had five first downs I think in the

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 5>last three quarter. Their offensive line no bad. Has been

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 5>poor all year. Burrow's injury made them look even worse

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 5>or showed how poor they are. They haven't been able

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 5>to run the ball. The defense has had some great games.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 5>Cam Taylor Brick is coming on as a true number

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 5>one type of cornerback. I think they have all the

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 5>players on both sides of the ball, so at some

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 5>point they should be the team that we expected to see,

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 5>but they just haven't been that team. And it's really

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 5>fascinating Burrow against this defense who was so disappointing last week.

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 5>Bosa is just not getting the production that you normally

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 5>like to see. But this is normally a spot where

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 5>you expect the forty nine Ers defensive line to eat.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 5>This is a good number one overall pick you got, Romo.

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 5>This is the best game of the week, the most fascinating.

0:08:58.240 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would not want to deal with the Niners

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 4>come off two losses and the Bengals like they are

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 4>walking talking about a buzzsaw.

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 5>But wouldn't you said you wouldn't want to face them

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 5>coming off one loss and then they played their worst

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 5>game of the year.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying, no, you're right, but that game was

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 4>like ultra surprising to me.

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, I just mean to try harder. And then they

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 5>show up and they did even worse.

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if any of that matters, but like

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 4>the Bengals have after this game. They have the Bills,

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 4>the Texans, who are suddenly frisky that's not an omadic

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 4>win anymore, the Ravens, and the Steelers. So it's like

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 4>you're kind of in this like need to show up situation.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 4>And I do think, like, because we talked with Nick

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 4>about Joe Burrow and his QB index yesterday, and like,

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 4>how do you deal with Burrow in that kind of ranking,

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 4>because what we've seen him them healthy is completely different

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 4>than before. It's like actual completion percentage rose by like

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 4>twenty points over the last two weeks. So it's like

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 4>that I just believe they can do anything if you

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 4>have the healthy.

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Burrow and t Higgins he's had the rib Jamar Chase,

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 2>it's time. It's time, no more excuses, ball out against

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 2>the Niners defense that was vulnerable.

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 5>I thought you were gonna lock up your boy Sam

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Donald in a big spot.

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Greg. Ever, the showman MS Sam Donald came into the

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>league as.

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>As the hero that would save my New York Jets,

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and what happened over the three years was nothing short

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of misery for the USC star. And I always thought

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>that that was unfair, Like Greg, very unfair. You would

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 2>I would get into these arguments and you would look

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 2>to like hit me when I was down and say, oh,

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>he's the biggest bust in.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>The history of the NFL, like one of them hitting me.

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this guy was, but in one of the worst

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 2>situations in recent NFL history, and he flamed out as

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>any almost any young quarterback would do. And I always wondered,

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 2>what if he just got into a better chance and

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 2>he went to Carolina and that didn't exactly work out,

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 2>but again, a very dysfunctional situation once more. And even

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 2>when he got a chance last year in Carolina, he

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>played pretty well and you look at the stats, the

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>numbers were pretty good. He moved that offense. They actually

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.719
<v Speaker 2>won four of the six games he started when he

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 2>goes to San Francisco, and I said it this summer.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Just get him in the lineup. Give this guy a chance.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 2>He's still stunningly only twenty six years old, came to

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the league very young, which is another aspect of his development.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Now is the time to put Sam in, because if

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 2>you put Sam Donald in, he ain't coming out.

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm locking up the Niners.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 3>He's not gonna get.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 5>I think time's so well with the music that was

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 5>beautiful done at this point.

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I like Rockberdy.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm and I think I think the Niners are on

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 2>buy next week. I might be mistaken on that take

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 2>a look, which would hurt Sam because I have every

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 2>confidence that he's gonna ball out in this game, and

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 2>there are people on Twitter that support Donald and also

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 2>think that he'll be in a good spot. But I've

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 2>always felt that he has a chance to do something

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 2>in this league and this is his stage.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope he gets more than.

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 2>One game, but I also don't think party's the problem

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco. I wish he got maybe more than

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 2>one start, but it's probably gonna be just one start,

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and I think he's gonna play well.

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm I'm so easy that just because I met Sam

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Darnold at LAX before the scouting.

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Wish we had that photo.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 3>It's around here somewhere.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 4>I actually don't love that photo because it's like, oh,

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Mark is like a foot and a half shorter than

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 4>the average and of hill quarterback, but like he couldn't

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 4>have been a more delightful guy. And so it's like

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 4>I kind of want to root for him.

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 2>So, so what you were you gonna lock him up to?

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, I told you what I do is for

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 4>the show. At this point, I've got a surprise. Oh

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 4>it's the Turnpike. By the way, that game is Niner

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>is favored by three and a half. The over under

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 4>is forty three and a half, and that is a

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Nance Romo Wolfson joint. All right, come on, Sam, Sam Richard,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 4>that's Samuel Samn Richard, Doniel Darneld, all right, let's.

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Get to it.

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 7>That was the Game of the Week presented by Draft

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 7>King Sports Book. New customers can bet us five dollars

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 7>and get two hundred in bonus bets. Instantly download the

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 7>Draft King Sports app and use code ATN. That's code

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 7>ATN only at Draft King sports Book Draft King sports Book,

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 7>an official sports betting partner of the NFL.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark, you were up with the second pick.

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'm gonna take my late game right out

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 3>of the gate.

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Here, let's go Sam.

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, he's not playing in this game. All right,

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 4>he's playing in your game. I'm taking the Browns at Seattle.

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I keep it.

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm a little mystified by that Colts game because you

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 4>got look at their calls at the end, like probably

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 4>you know in Jim Mercy of all people's coming out

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 4>strong saying the Colts got robbed there in that I

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 4>think there's a fair argument there, no doubt about it,

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 4>that happened. But Cleveland also did a lot of good

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 4>things in that game, but did a lot of bad things.

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 3>You got like pretty much terrible quarterback play.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 4>You couldn't really run the ball that well outside of

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Jerome Ford's like monster touchdown run. Miles Garrett played out

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 4>of his mind. The defense also arguably had its worst

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 4>game of the year and gave up monster yardage in

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 4>the passing game two. Gardner Minshew of all people. So

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 4>it's like you put it all together and they still

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 4>scored like thirty nine points in one in the end,

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't. I guess like I want to be hopeful

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 4>in say, Cleveland amidst all these ups and downs is

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 4>finding a way to win these games. Because they didn't

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 4>have good quarterback play against the Niners either, and you

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 4>don't have Nick Chubb, and they found a way to

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 4>get that done with like a stellar defensive effort in

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 4>bad weather. Miles Garrett right now is the centerpiece for me,

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 4>and I think it's the Miles Garrett and the rest

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 4>of that pass rushes match up with Charles Cross and

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Abraham Lucas of the Seahawks. Miles Garrett is on pace

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 4>for the greatest PFF pass rushing grade ever and it

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 4>looks like it, and he did a lot more than

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 4>just rush the pass thro a week ago. And so

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 4>I think it's like sometimes these games to me come

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 4>down to somewhat simple equations of like, if you're gonna

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 4>get this, if Miles Garrett's on a hot streak like

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 4>this and he's supported by a good defense around him,

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 4>it's gonna be a challenge for Seattle. I also feel

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 4>like this is the kind of game where Cleveland on

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 4>the road, if you know you got PJ. Walker in there.

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 4>When you get the really bad PJ. Walker game, it

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 4>just sort of explodes everything from the inside out.

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 5>Greg They're very thin though the Seahawks on the offensive line.

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 5>Abe Lucas not expected to return this week. I think

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 5>Phil Haynes their guard. They've been down three offensive linemen

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 5>all year, so that is worrisome for my guy Gino,

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 5>who is putting on a show the last few weeks.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Just like it's almost been a little Geno coaster within games.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 5>I would argue no one's made more high quality throws

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 5>than Gino Smith in the NFL the last two weeks.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you would have.

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 5>Honestly, I don't even think it's argue about it. If

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 5>you look, if you're on film, Twitter, they would all

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 5>agree too, Like he is throwing some outrageous passes and

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 5>then making huge mistakes in the red zone too. The

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 5>on balance, like he's looked a lot better once you

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 5>to watch the film and everything, but he when he's

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 5>under pressure, and he will be under pressure against Cleveland,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 5>you definitely worry about him making that.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that he's not making great throws in

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 2>these games, I guess.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>But I just like I think it would be the

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>anti It's kind of cute.

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter last two weeks. I'm just saying, it really.

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter what Gino does.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 2>You will find the spin to present him in the

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 2>most positive light. But that's because he's your favorite player now,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>like he's your favorite player in the league, Isn't.

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 3>He he is?

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 5>But I'm talking about the way his season has evolved.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm certainly not alone on this island.

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 5>He's sort of had a blah like not bad, not

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 5>good first four or five weeks of the season, and

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 5>then the last few seasons he is trying throws. Almost

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 5>no one else in the world other than Matthew Stafford's

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 5>a good comp I think, would try and he's hitting them.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 5>But he's also making some big time mistakes. So suddenly

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 5>the variance has gone with.

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 4>The throw when we were in London and we were

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 4>sleep deprived, but in the bucket to DK Metcalf, it's

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 4>like there's and you mentioned this too, that like when

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 4>we were there, is like he's playing with a kind

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 4>of confidence where it's like he's there's gonna be mistakes.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 4>But I kind of like this version of him more

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 4>than any other previous.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 5>Against the Browns. He threw well quadruple coverage the fan

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 5>that he hit last week.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 4>It was just like, yeah, but look how the Brown

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Browns like had a ton of busted coverage last week

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 4>made Josh Downs look like.

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Because I said this two weeks ago too, Greg like,

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's not playing well. I just think

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I said that. I feel like the Gino Coaster was

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>starting to ramp up. Now it's a more fun it's

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 2>a better roller coaster now. Yeah. But qb Index right, right,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 2>he's been a solid deed either. I mean, he's so

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 2>much more fun than the Gino Coaster back in the

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Meadowlands six years ago or whatever.

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>But he is.

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 2>There's almost a little bit of farving nature to the

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>game too, where he's like I can do anything and

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you can't. And it's gotten him in trouble in

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 2>a couple of spots with a couple of bad throws

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of weeks that have come back to

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>on him. But he's certainly not a problem by any stretch.

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh sorry, I was gonna say that we should mention

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 4>like the Deshaun Watson situation where it's like he said

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 4>he knew his shoulder was not right after the brief,

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 4>disastrous stint he had against the Cults, I kind of

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 4>wonder like if and when we're gonna see him again,

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 4>because like apparently like the shoulder injury he has. Right

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 4>if it were a pitcher, they say, you'd be out

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 4>like easily four to six weeks.

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 3>But you're not getting his agent through Adam Chef.

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well that's fine. I'm just saying that is a

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 4>comp of what's going But I are Pitchers aren't getting

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 4>slammed to the turf typically in a baseball game.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 2>If you are, if you are Cleveland, you rightfully should

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 2>see yourself as a team that could be playing for

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs in late December and early January. And nothing

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 2>happens without Watson being healthy in terms of the big

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 2>picture and what everyone really wants, which is the big trophy,

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 2>So like put him down, now, what are we doing?

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Like and very clear what you're saying about the agent

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and the team. You could sense it, even if the

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 2>big story hasn't dropped yet that there is some issues

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes in terms of communication and what his

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 2>status should be. But what if he has a bad shoulder,

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 2>you got to get him out of the mix and

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 2>and bring him back healthy.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 3>I uh do it right.

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 5>I pointed out some of the inconsistencies on Twitter today

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 5>and it wasn't that I have some like conspiracy that

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 5>he doesn't want to play, because he called his own

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 5>press conference essentially today that to say, it's ridiculous to

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 5>say I wouldn't want to play. Of course I want

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 5>to play. I believe that that's not That's not what

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm getting at. My My point is that the communication

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.479
<v Speaker 5>between him and the coach and the front office is

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 5>so off multi it's pretty weird that multiple times Stefanski

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 5>said he was medically cleared, and then he said after

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 5>last game he's going to start this week, and then

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 5>he's not starting this week. Andrew Barry was on record

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 5>saying it was going to be a short term injury

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 5>that was four weeks ago. That that is all pretty weird,

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 5>and it hints at at some sort of divide, some

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 5>some sort of confusion. And before we get out of there,

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 5>I do I do want to mention the Seahawks defense.

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 5>That's why I'm I'm higher on this team and I

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 5>ever expected going into this season. I actually think the

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 5>Seahawks have a little higher ceiling than I thought that

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 5>they could be a contender in the NFC if the

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 5>offense is better. Actually, Gino and the offense on balance

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 5>has been worse as a group than I thought, but

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 5>that's partly injury late. Their defense is coming. Witherspoon's coming.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 5>I love what Jamal Adams is added. They're very good

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 5>and versatile with their three safety group. Boy Mafe is

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 5>having a breakout season. They lost through Chenna Nuosa. We

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 5>should mention their best pass rusher for the season we

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 5>found out after last year trade deadline next week. But

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 5>better up front than I expect A. Dk Metcalf is

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 5>back this week, you know, Taylor Jamar. I just think

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 5>it's a better overall team than I expect it, and

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 5>that's why I'm locking them up on the round.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Greg is such a Seahawks fan, and that Cleveland's getting

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 4>four points, I'll see if it stays there.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Lackoff, lockoff, No, I'm going I have another no.

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't like.

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not doing Browns on.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 2>The road the last three weeks with a bye week

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 2>ind there for Seattle's defense pants.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 1>The Giants gave up three points.

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Shut down Joe Burrow in Cincinnati after two big drives

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>early only last seventeen and then Cardinals they just allowed

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 2>ten took care of business. I kind of like it's

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 2>annoying because Greg's hot out of the gates with the

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 2>locks this year.

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a good pick, though.

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good picky.

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I think Cleveland. I think this could be the PJ Walker?

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 2>Is it a courageous underground.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 4>You could There could be schools of thought that suggest

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 4>it's not incredible to lock up PJA against PJ Walker.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Lamb so high on them.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 5>They're they're literally four and two there, they've been good.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I said, schools have thought. I didn't say my all right, Greg,

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 3>you're up.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 5>I couldn't do it, Sam Darnold and I like now

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 5>that we're spreading it out, we have a strange schedule

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 5>which shook and I'm going to take the Ravens Cardinals

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 5>late because i want to because that's what I who

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 5>I want to watch live in the late window. I'm

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 5>not really feeling the other choice.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Did you, by the way, Mark, did you think that

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland and Seattle wasn't going to make it to the

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 2>fifth pick?

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>I guess with Greg's fandom.

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, I could of did I actually looking at

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 4>the landscape, I didn't think it would come back to me.

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I probably would have taken it. That's good, good Mark,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 5>good scouting. There's been a lot of reaches early on

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 5>for you this season. But yeah, I pick what I

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 5>prefer though.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of happening in real life too, and

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 3>I'll just do what I need to do.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 5>So not an incredible week of games, which is why

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm taking Ravens Cardinals through. I just want to take

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 5>my late game now. It's fine, get do.

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>We keep saying that, by the way, every week, that

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 2>is not a great slate of games, because everyone in

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 2>the league is three and four. Maybe said it consistently.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 2>It's been two teams are three and four. I know

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 2>the math doesn't seem to add up, but that's what's

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 2>happening right now.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 5>Kyler Murray is fully practicing this week fully.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 5>The Ravens are favored by eight in this game in Arizona.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 3>That says it's not a formidable stadium venue.

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 5>No, I'm sure there'll be a decent amount of Ravens

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 5>fans there as well. And uh yeah, they've been showing

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 5>the practice footage we got on our YouTube show, and

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 5>like he's looked good out there, and if he doesn't

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 5>start this week, it really feels like he will start

0:22:58.240 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 5>a week from now.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Now you could say, what's he returning to.

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 5>This team is a bit of a mess, and their

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 5>passing game with Dobbs has definitely taken a step back.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 5>I definitely don't think they'll be able to move the

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 5>ball well against Baltimore, but the offense has been fine.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 5>I actually am intrigued to see him in this Drew

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Petsig offense. It's really the defense that that is gonna

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 5>be in for a world of hurt this game. I

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 5>really think the Ravens offensive line getting healthy Linderbaum and

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 5>Stanley has changed everything because the line's playing well and

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 5>Lamar's playing out of his mind and some of the

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 5>other stuff with the receivers sometimes they're still in the

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 5>wrong place and it's a little janky, but Lamar is

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 5>making up for it.

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 3>And there's a lot of holes in this Cardinals defense.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 4>There are, and you get the sense that the Ravens

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 4>are heating up. And Greg, you were on top of

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 4>the speat a while ago, you know, it's fair to

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 4>say that it would have taken a month plus in

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 4>a new offense, a completely new offense, for everyone on

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 4>the team to get into this fashion.

0:23:58.359 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 3>But they're getting healthier.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 4>And I kind of just the one thing about Baltimore

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 4>because if you look at the scope of like the

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 4>last two or three seasons, it's like they've been among

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 4>the most injured teams in the league. And I think

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 4>they found a way to kind of gut their way

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 4>through some of that, still make playoffs, still win games

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 4>they should have no business winning. And so if you

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 4>get a healthier version, and you get a Lamar Jackson

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 4>who's playing the way he is right now, he's the

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 4>top five quarterback in the league, no questions asked. And

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 4>we'll see it right there on the YouTube copy. Like

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Mark Andrews, who's two touchdowns away, Well that's what it is.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 4>Right where else would you watch it? You're listening in

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 4>your car, You're out of luck. But it was Mark

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Andrews cut He's two touchdowns away from Ty and Todd

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Heap for the most touchdowns. Mark Andrews is like the

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 4>kind of guy that doesn't get almost enough credit somehow,

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, but like I just look at this

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Raven's offense and I feel like they this is maybe

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 4>where Arizona, who I've been I've had a bit of

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 4>a fetish for. I don't see it at this point,

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 4>like okay, falls out, thank you, I even a week

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 4>ago I've seen.

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I can't really pushed back on the Ravens because it's

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 2>the wrong time to do it, because they just played

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>better than anyone in the league in Week seven and

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 2>now they have a layup against the Cardinals.

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they're a little weird now you're I'm.

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 2>Just saying like they we're now now we're gonna view

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens as this unstoppable juggernaut, but they're kind of

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 2>proven a couple times ready this year.

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you don't know what's gonna happen with the Baltimore Ravens.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 4>But clean games are an argument, like they last week,

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 4>So let's make.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Up two in a row.

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Sure, And because it wasn't that clean in London when

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 2>we watched it.

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Gregy, you know what they got next week?

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Ravens Seahawks. Baby Greg torn from what day?

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what you're gonna do, Greg, That's a

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 3>fun game.

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I just like I like football. It's not

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 5>like I'm gonna either way my team wins.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh what a what a life for Greg? I have

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>fourteen favorite teams, so I can't lose.

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm just I'm just kidding.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Who would you? Who do you like better? Who do

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you like? The Ravens of the Sea.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, just in terms of like my emotions walkating

0:25:58.040 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 5>the game, I don't.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really living in dying either.

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 2>We would you rather win next week? We'll save it

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 2>for interesting, not even close?

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, Let's keep moving.

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 4>You're a Lamar like you like if you see that

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 4>Lamarmi coming out, you like, You're right.

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm rooting for him him as a player, but I'd

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 5>rather than the Seahawks win.

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It snakes too, all right.

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 5>I am going to take Kevin Burkhard's early game. It's

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 5>the Rams, It's the Cowboys. The Cowboys are six point

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 5>favorites in this game. Uh, and it's a lot.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 3>But I get it.

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 5>The Rams are coming off of a disappointing game, and

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 5>this is to me the ultimate test of this Rams

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 5>offensive line, which I think is really improved. I was

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 5>impressed how they played against Pittsburgh last week. I thought

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 5>they protected Matthew Stafford pretty well and they were able

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 5>to run the ball against Pittsburgh. And I know they

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 5>didn't win the game, but I just think if their

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 5>offensive line is good, then they're going to be around

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 5>to stay. But it's the ultimate test when you go

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 5>up against this Cowboys pass rush. So that's a fun

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 5>matchup on that side of the ball when Matthew Stafford

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 5>has it. Because I think they could be better than

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 5>their three and four record. They're one of the few

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 5>three and four teams where I look at that team like,

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 5>that's a good team.

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 2>How about for the Cowboys who are on by couldn't

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 2>have gone better for him? So you get the buy,

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 2>get to get healthy, get some shots off against the

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 2>league about you know, people give us a harder time

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 2>than the rest of the league. And then you see

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the lines get humiliated the way they were, and then

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 2>you see the Eagles.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>No who else went down? There was another San Francisco.

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco goes down, and all of a sudden, it's like, okay,

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 2>like I know we're not perfect, but you know they're

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 2>not perfect either, and they had a chance to reset.

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Now very interested to see I've been kind of banging

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 2>the drum a little bit, like, how does how we

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 2>nearly at the midpoint of the season and Dak Prescott

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 2>and Ceedee Lamb have hooked up for one touchdown this year?

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 3>That needs to be like very much.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 5>You're a fantasy team Matt Ryan season CD.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and Ceedee Lamb is on my fantasy team, but like,

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, come on now, like Ceedee Lamb, I think

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 2>we all kind of feel, or at least I feel

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 2>like he's a top ten receiver. Dak doesn't have a

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 2>ton of options on the field. How are they not

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 2>funneling targets and letting that guy make plays? Because when

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Ceede Lamb is making catches and he's still Ceedee Lamb

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 2>and he's electric to the ball in his hands, I

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 2>feel like that's an obvious missing part of their offense.

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 2>And then Texas Coast offense is the chemistry or at

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 2>least a production between those two guys. That said, it

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>is still a pretty small sample size, and you would

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 2>think by the end of the season these things even out.

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 2>So if he had a big game on Sunday, it

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 2>would not shock me. It's just weird that that huge

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 2>game hasn't happened.

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Yet, Yeah, I think they just haven't really been the

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 4>sum of their parts on offense, because there's nothing not

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 4>to like about the roster in general. But I don't

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 4>I think back in the summer, if I were to

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 4>tell you that the Rams would be eighth in passing

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 4>EPA and the Cowboys.

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Will be twelfth.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 4>The Rams will be fourth and rushing EPA and the

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 4>Cowboys will be sixteenth, I'd be like, well, wait, flip

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 4>those Like I don't even expect the Rams to be

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 4>much of anything, and they've been a surprise. But I

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 4>do think this is a time, it's an important, important

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 4>week for Dallas to like just simply shred the Rams

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 4>and look like the team that we want them to

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 4>look like. Their third against the pass, fourth against the rush,

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 4>first and pressure rate, the best man coverage team in

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 4>the league. Matthew Stafford has been like, it's weird. It's

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Matthew Stafford. We talked about it with Nick. It's like

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 4>seven touchdowns, six interceptions. The stats throw them out the

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 4>window because he's throwing the ball as well as he

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 4>ever has, and you've got a nice group of receivers.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 4>But Dallas has really no excuse to not take care

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 4>of business here if I'm if I'm to buy them

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 4>at all, Yeah, because you can say the Niners lost

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 4>and the Eagles did this or that, but it's like

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 4>the Cowboys had such I need I need them to

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 4>convince me you can take care of your own business.

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's kind of you're talking out of

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 2>two sides of them out there, because it's like, oh,

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the Rams are actually much better than the we thought,

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 2>and here's some data backing that up, and now the

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys have no business not taking care of business.

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 4>I think they're not the Cowboys at all like that.

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 4>So it's like, I I do think that the Rams.

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, I think this is a pretty good,

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>evenly matched game. Maybe the Cowboys are the favorite and

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 2>they're at home, but they've they've lost some guys on

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 2>their defense, and I think this should be closer than

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 2>perhaps the spread tells us.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 5>By the way, Ceedee Lamb is on pace for like

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 5>one hundred catches and thirteen hundred yeards, just telling. So

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 5>the touchdowns are random.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 2>But all right, throw the stats out the window. It's

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 2>not the same. It's not like what you expect. You know,

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 2>what I expect from cdee Lamb and Dak Prescott what

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Hurts and aj Brown are doing on something.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's fair.

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it was the Chargers game, you know, a sign

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 5>of things to come for Dak. That was his best

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 5>game by far the season, certainly since that playoff game.

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 5>He used his legs, which you know, just us believers

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 5>in Dak have been just begging, like what happened? Like

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 5>he never he uses legs in multiple times to make

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 5>throws and to run. That was huge, and so you

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 5>want to see that continue. And they did get rid

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 5>of Brett Maher. We didn't, we didn't mention it on

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 5>this show, but Brett Maher is no more in Los Angeles,

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 5>and it's great.

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 3>This team's crazy.

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 5>They bringing Darryl Henderson off the street and he's suddenly

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 5>like their number one guy and he's actually running the ball.

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, they get rid of their kicker, I thought.

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 5>Jordan rod Rieg our friend mentioned a great point the

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 5>Great Thursday that Sean McVay is among the league leaders

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 5>in losing you know, points added in terms of there's

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 5>a way to like look at it. In terms of

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 5>his fourth down decision. He is extremely conservative punting and

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 5>kicking field goals on fourth down, and yet they won't

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 5>pay for a kicker, and they're going the cheap route

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 5>and the kicker and those two things don't match up.

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 5>It's like you're losing points because you've got this great offense.

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>He pays for kickers for the most part.

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 5>Right, No, but they went out of their way to

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 5>get rid of the best kicker in the league, and

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 5>they're going on the cheap and they're not going for

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 5>it ever on fourth down. They're trusting their punter, who's

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 5>also not really playing well.

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 3>They're trusting their kicker instead.

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Who's the kicker? Now?

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 3>It's a man I was not familiar.

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Where the hell is Robbie Gould. Someone tell me where

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Gould is?

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 5>They have signed Lucas Haverson, and did Robbie Gould ever

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 5>to CLA.

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Something's something else going on with that story.

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I talked about it on last Sunday after

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the Maher meltdown. It's like, it's crazy to me that

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 2>they hope that the level of mental breakdown in that

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 2>playoff run with the Cowboys would never pop up again.

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 2>It was a huge roll of the dice, but also

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 2>it made me think after they made the right decision

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 2>sadly for Maher to move on here. Rather than get

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 2>into that sad dance, the Cowboys chose to stick with

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Maher last year in the same situation in the playoffs.

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'll never get over that, not really, let him

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>never get over that.

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 5>But it's like, hey, let's let's maybe not trust Maher

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 5>to hit a fifty yarder and let's trust Matthew freaking

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 5>Stafford and Cooper Cupp And that's.

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Fair, right.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 4>The other coach is a little conservative, like Sean McVay

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 4>is Kyle Shanahan.

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 2>All Right, let's take a break and then we will

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 2>continue with the draft.

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome back, Mark, it comes back to you.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 4>All right, I'm gonna take Jacksonville at Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh's getting

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 4>two and a half points in this. I guess I

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 4>just want to see what happens with the Steelers team,

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Like just basically on offense, I feel like the defense

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 4>is sort of the same thing.

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 3>It's like it's TJ.

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 4>Watt doing something game changing, scenery changing on a weekly basis,

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 4>and the rest of them I rely on for the

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 4>most part. I think the offense, it's like this, this

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 4>is the story of this team, and I want to

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 4>see more Jaleen Warren, George Pickens coming off too straight

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 4>one hundred yard games.

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 3>That's very promising.

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 4>And it's like I I with Pickett, I don't know,

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Like with Kenny Pickett, it's like I think he's just

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 4>sort of a middle of the pack Dalton Line type

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 4>of guy, but he does have a knack to like

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 4>keep these teams in games. And I think if you

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 4>get the best version of Pickens and Jaleen Warren away

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 4>from Najie Harris, am I crazy. I just like I

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 4>like the juice that Warren brings, and I like to

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 4>reorganize that offense that way where that's all they're trying

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 4>to do, and go up against the Jacksonville defense that's

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 4>been essentially the best in coverage league wide. No other

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 4>team on offense for the Jacksonville allows less pressure. Like

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 4>they've just been a very good like they've been a

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 4>surprising defense.

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.959
<v Speaker 3>So I think a lot of challenge for Pittsburgh, right.

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 5>I've been as surprised by their defense as any in

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 5>the NFL. Now it goes back to what I say

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 5>with like, look at the opponents that they faced, but

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 5>Kansas City, you know, is one of them.

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 3>It was early. Buffalo is one of them.

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 5>Houston's a decent offense, so it's not just beating up

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 5>on bad offenses, and the Steelers should be a bad offense.

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 5>Like the Jaguars are really good stopping the run, then

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 5>you make them one dimensional?

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Can you pick it?

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 5>Coming out of that, Buy had his best game of

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 5>the year by far, Like he looked like an NFL

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 5>quarterback again. And so if they somehow found something, and

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 5>then maybe it's just Deontay Johnson, like this is a

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 5>fun little game here.

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, Jacksonville Pittsburgh used to be a rivalry.

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, yeah, I think these are.

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 4>North way back, way back in the day AFC Central.

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 4>There's six teams in there.

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 2>These two teams have failed to capture my imagination, which

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 2>who cares? Who cares if they capture my imagination. But

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, like, when you guys are pumping it up,

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 2>and that makes that's cool, that's good.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what we do on the show. But when I

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>watch at Jaguars.

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of like waiting for it to be a

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit more exciting than it actually is. And and

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 2>they've been successful for the most part this season. But

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>and Pittsburgh, I just find them to be a slog

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I know they've they've come to life. And adding Pickens

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 2>back to the mix is such a big deal for

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 2>them because he is an actual playmaker and he helps

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback who I do believe is you know, like

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 2>you're saying, very middle of the pack at best. But

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 2>this is a hard game for me to pick. I

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 2>would say Pittsburgh at home. I like kind of them

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 2>keeping this thing of scoring. I kind of like the

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Steelers here.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 5>I like Jacksonville. They're favored by two and a half.

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 5>I just think they've been better. But you know, they

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 5>changed their strategy last week with Trevor Lawrence playing with

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 5>an injured knee, Like he got rid of the ball

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 5>so quickly, they weren't trying anything downfield. I think that

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 5>was to protect him. So we'll see if he's feeling

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 5>a little better. He ran well in that game anyways,

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 5>And I am just curious because the last game before

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 5>the trade deadline here, they feel like the team most

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 5>likely in my mind, to make a big trade this

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 5>next week.

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I think Jacksonville, Yeah, I think.

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 5>They will bring in a guy like Daniel Hunter or

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 5>Chase Young or Brian Burns. To me, they would be

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 5>my number one pick of like a team that is

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 5>gonna make a move. It's partly because Trayvon Walker is

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 5>not getting it done, but it's also because they have

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 5>the room. They need a pass rusher, and I think

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 5>they will be aggressive in doing It's.

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 2>A good check in time on Trayvon Walker. Oh, we're

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 2>in that place where Sachs don't represent havoc Trayvon Walker

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 2>causes We're in that stage of the narrative.

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, wait, what do you even when you go number one?

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what Mike Tomlin said this week, So I guess

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>he was pumping him up, pulling the Belchie.

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't think he's like a good run defender and

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 5>a minus pass rusher at this point.

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Number one overall pick.

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, Uh back to me, I will grab Oh

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>the Snoopy Bowl, it's back the New York Jets favored

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 2>by three first time.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Gang Green has been favored all season.

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 2>A little fun fact for you traveling or not traveling,

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 2>staying home at the Meadowlands.

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But they are the road team against the g men. Uh.

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's see if there's a lower over and under this week.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's even close. Yeah, thirty six and

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 2>a half Andrew Catalan and.

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 5>Falcons Titans with with our backups in Tennessee even a

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 5>little lower Nicks.

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Wow, uh oh, he got Tiki in the booth on

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this that home run.

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Back to back Giants games for Tiki, I know, I

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 3>see you. He's got to be professional.

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 2>En not need in the booth for this game. Let's Matt,

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Matt and Andrew can handle this one. Need is strong, Okay.

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Uh So Jets coming off thereby, it's a real it's

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 2>a kind of a gut check situation now for Jets

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 2>fans because you've now bought back in and you are

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 2>believing after the trauma of Week one stealing that game

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 2>against the Eagles, you kind of set yourself up now

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 2>with a schedule softening up to put yourself in a

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 2>good position to make the plauss with Aaron Rodgers in

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the background saying I could come back at the end

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 2>of the season, but these are exactly the type of

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 2>games you gotta win. You can't now show up flat

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 2>as the defense, as good as it's been, has been

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 2>not very good at all early in games and they

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of heat up as things go along. Tyrod Taylor

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 2>most likely the starting quarterback, although Daniel Jones is practicing

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday, he has not been cleared to play. It's

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:49.280
<v Speaker 2>a very tricky when you're dealing with a neck injury.

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 2>So I expect you're going to see Tyrod again with

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 2>no connection to the medical physicians connected to the Giants,

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 2>but we.

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Shall see either way.

0:38:57.840 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be interesting to see the Jets offensive,

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 2>which lost some key guys before the buye to injury

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 2>up against the Giants. Pass rush Mark that finally woke

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 2>up against Washington with six sacks after having five the

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 2>first six weeks. So if you get a pass rush

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 2>against Wilson, you could create turnovers and the Giants can

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 2>hang around. I think this will be a low scoring

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 2>game and it will come down to Wilson can continue

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 2>to build on his modest gains in recent week.

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 4>Feels like a seventeen to fourteen type situation. I mean,

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 4>two offensive lines, the Jets working around their limitations, the

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 4>Giants a disastrous offensive line. Andrew Thomas did return to

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 4>limited practice. We'll see what happens there. I love this

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 4>for the Jets. DJ Reid coming off with a concussion.

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 4>Full participant, Sauce Gardner, full participant. You've got one of

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 4>the deepest, densest, most terrorizing defensive lines in the league

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 4>against a Giants offensive line that has just simply said,

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 4>come and take our quarterback down to the turf five

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 4>to six times a game, week after week. I love

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 4>this for the Jets because I think the there something

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 4>going on with the Jets that is spiritual and strange.

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 4>The Giants to me at zero juice and I'm locking

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 4>up the Jets for the first time in.

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 3>About one thousand years. They're gonna win this night.

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>They're doing it.

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna win it.

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Are well. I don't know why not.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 3>What's not to like? Their three point favorites here, what's

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 3>not to like? What's not to like?

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 2>No, you're right, there's a lot of things pointing to

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the Jets should take care of business.

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 4>But you know, Snoopy Bold nuclear bomb blast occurs on Sunday.

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.919
<v Speaker 5>I'll give you one thing not to like, and that's

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 5>that Tyrod is playing at a higher level than Daniel

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Jones was.

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 3>If Tyrod plays, but.

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Where is he playing relative the rest to the rest

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 4>of the quarterbacks? In the league that like twenty fifth

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:38.399
<v Speaker 4>twenty six.

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I would say he'd.

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 5>Be right around the Dalton scale for the two games

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 5>that he's played.

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's played. I'm not scared of tyrod tail guys.

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I have.

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 8>If you want to direct this criticism to two groups

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 8>of people, we have a certain fellow who wants to wait, yes, oh, wait.

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>A minute to the zoo.

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 6>Hello, heroes. I know you're probably surprised to see me.

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 9>Since Phil said he was going to try to take

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 9>this over, all the brothers said, yeah, we got the

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 9>lock this week, Nick, We're gonna just do.

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 6>It for a while.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 9>Send the video in take care of business. Well guess

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 9>what they didn't follow through shocking development. I get a

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 9>text for Americ this morning saying, hey, Nick, no one

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 9>sent me a video.

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 6>We don't have a pick.

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 9>I swear I must be hanging out in the ape

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 9>house because I'm working with a bunch of orangutangs here.

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean, are you kill me? Guess what?

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Phil?

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 6>You suck, Tim, you suck, Mike, you stink. Eddie Larry.

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 6>You're all right because at least you didn't try.

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 9>To take it over and do something you knew you

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 9>weren't going to follow through on anyway. I'm gonna do

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 9>the exact opposite of what they would want. I'm walking

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 9>up the Jets. The Giants stink, they're terrible. Fork them,

0:41:56.360 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 9>get them out of here. The Jets will make the playoffs.

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Like whenever in the past, whenever Chris

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Wrestling would agree with anything I said about football, I

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 4>just sit in my chair, you mean, and like I

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 4>feel the same right here, friends, I do think who's

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:15.839
<v Speaker 4>going to get their act together?

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>All right? It's just like what is happening?

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:22.720
<v Speaker 2>And I want everyone to understand with these Westling brothers,

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 2>none of this is made up for the show. Like

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 2>they fight like cats and dogs or ranguetangs and monkeys,

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 2>whatever you want to say. And they are. They are

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 2>settling scores on a on a widely heard podcast. I

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 2>mean one of the quotes there from Nick, Phil you

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 2>suck like that? I mean that's within the context of

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that was well Phil, according to Nick. In fairness,

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Phil or whomever was supposed to provide, though, he's coming

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 2>with a lettle of vitriol.

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Because they did record the videos, so.

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 5>Nick wasn't supposed to totally blow the pick last week either,

0:42:57.880 --> 0:42:58.399
<v Speaker 5>which he did.

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Greg win in that direction.

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Sam, Sam Donald Zach Wilson one interception

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 2>his last one hundred and thirty four attempts.

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 3>His misses are better.

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 5>I actually think that's like the number one thing his

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 5>miss it he misses in the right spot.

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Also, yes, and and it's related.

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 2>He is hitting the layups now, which he couldn't do

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 2>last year, like it, checked downs, things like that, like

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 2>he he is. He's definitely shown improvement the last few weeks.

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Let's see if it continues. I'm worried about the Jets

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:29.919
<v Speaker 2>in this game. I think the Giants have played much

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:31.479
<v Speaker 2>better than the last two weeks. I think wing Martin

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Dill is a particular kind of test for a young

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 2>quarterback and a bad offensive line. I think Tyrod's been good.

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I think Saquon helps them. So I just Darren Waller

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 2>is in the mix. To me, it's just it's a

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 2>dangerous game. It's it's a coin flip. Do not do

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 2>not my son, as my sons do when they agree.

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, this feels like a dangerous game. Good

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:55.839
<v Speaker 2>luck to Nick and Mark Snakes to me and uh,

0:43:55.880 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 2>this one, I think you know, not two losing teams,

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 2>but intrigue Vikings at Packers, Vikings favored by one on

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 2>the road. So here are the Vikings, coming off the

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 2>win of their of their season so far by far.

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 2>They go and knock off the Niners in prime time

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and Kirk Cousins blazes ours off and absolutely shreds with

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Justin Jefferson on the sideline in sunglasses. So he's playing

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 2>with confidence. The Packers, you know, watching watching them this morning,

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 2>and I'm just like, this is tough. Nothing, nothing's easy

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:39.359
<v Speaker 2>for this team. And they kind of look like they're

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 2>gonna get blown out by the Broncos and it's like

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 2>this is rock bottom and and Greg, they found their

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:47.919
<v Speaker 2>way back into that game but fell short in the end,

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 2>and it just this has all the feeling right now

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 2>of a developmental season for an organization and a fan

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 2>base that doesn't know what that is. And that's why

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I see a lot of like angst around the Packers.

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.760
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's I'm not totally surprising and it shouldn't

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:03.359
<v Speaker 2>be that this is how the season has played out

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 2>so far.

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 3>I agree, but I still expected more.

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, the Vikings are the better team, and yet

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 5>this does feel like a spot where it's a division

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 5>game is just Minnesota's coming off of high A lot

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 5>of times it evens out.

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 3>But I think Matt.

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 5>Lafleur is stuck in a weird spot with his offense

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 5>because the Packers just can't run the ball. They were

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 5>supposed to have a really good offensive line. They are

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:31.240
<v Speaker 5>twenty ninth in run block win rate, and yet they're

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 5>really good protecting Jordan Love. I mean, you watch these

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 5>games and Jordan Love is just chilling back there, and

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.320
<v Speaker 5>I was like, does the eye test matchup with the numbers.

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 5>They're very high in the PFF bringings, their second in

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 5>pass block win rate, and they've got these receivers. So

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 5>you're asking Jordan Love to drop back there because that's

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 5>where your offensive line is good, and yet he's not

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 5>always making great decisions. And I think it's tough in

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 5>this matchup, particularly because this Vikings secondary. Their pass defense

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 5>has been fun to watch. Harrison Smith, this three safety

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:06.399
<v Speaker 5>tandem between him and cam Binam and Josh Mattellus, who

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:08.359
<v Speaker 5>they just gave a contract to have been really good

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 5>buying him was the NFC Defensive Player of the Week. Like,

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 5>do the Packers have answers for FLOORA is cooking up

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 5>his mad you know, blitz packages and different coverages and

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 5>changing posts. That that's a lot to ask of Jordan Love.

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 5>I don't feel great about it.

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't like it for Jordan Love in this situation.

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 4>I think you're right about the run game, like they've

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 4>not Aaron Jones has essentially played less than Nick Chubb

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 4>this season.

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 3>He has ninety four yards rushing this year.

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:35.959
<v Speaker 4>I think that was so key to them because AJ

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Dillon has not been helpful at all. You don't have him,

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Brian Flores defense number one and blitz rate and Harrison Smith.

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 4>Guys like Harris Smith's using them creatively. And I just

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.439
<v Speaker 4>wonder about Jordan Love. The offense to me is looked

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:53.720
<v Speaker 4>discombobulated in general. There's a lot of just young players

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 4>around him. And is this a situation with if you're

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 4>the Vikings where I think there's just a lot of

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 4>energy on that defense. It showed up last week. You

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 4>got guys like Jordan Addison on offense wilding up. And

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:06.880
<v Speaker 4>the next four opponents for the Vikings are the Falcon, Saints,

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 4>Broncos and Bears. Could this be the start of a

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 4>run that I think you pointed to Minnesota wise Dan,

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:15.240
<v Speaker 4>when we didn't get them forked out of this situation

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 4>like they're a weird team. They're still in all these

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 4>one score games. They lost a bunch, but they're starting

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 4>to win them now. Or they can morph into the

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 4>team we saw last year a little bit.

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, listen, the league is filled with parody and

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.279
<v Speaker 2>they can hanging out and win all of those games. Yeah,

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a little like Jordan Love. I don't

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 2>think it's playing well at all. And then the numbers

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 2>are backing that up. He has the lowest completion percentage

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. They they're averaging I believe, about seventeen

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:44.439
<v Speaker 2>points a game right now. And so the ball they're

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.399
<v Speaker 2>not moving the ball and and they're not scoring points, and.

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 5>The defense is bad. That's the disappointing part for me.

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.239
<v Speaker 5>I guess it's not surprising, but they have a lot

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 5>of good players on their defense.

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:56.800
<v Speaker 2>And you know, you haven't been bailed out by the

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 2>running game at all, because you've had Aaron Jones has

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 2>been banged up, like AJ Dillon is a leading rusher

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 2>for this team.

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's it's a tough situation. For Green Bay.

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, like.

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 2>You don't just always Mark just something that is given

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 2>certain fan bases a lot of aggravation. It's like you

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 2>don't always just to keep roll into one dynasty to

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the next, one era to the next. Like this is

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 2>a transition here, Vikings. Let's see you take care of

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 2>business with Kenny, Albert and Vilma on the call.

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:27.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, Mark, it is back to you. All right.

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:30.720
<v Speaker 4>I could see you saying, I'm not taking the greatest

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:32.959
<v Speaker 4>game here, but it fascinates me on my own level.

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm taking the Texans at the Panthers. You've got This

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 4>is a weird note, but this kind of got me

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 4>into it because of course it's Bryce Young versus c J.

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 3>Stroud. Do you know that they met at a middle

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 3>school summer camp?

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Wow? I was there too?

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 3>Actually were you? I don't think you were unless you

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:50.280
<v Speaker 3>were a council.

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 4>You're roughly twenty years older than them, but known each

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 4>other for a long time. And it's a bit of

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 4>a study and like two rebuilding teams that each went

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:00.239
<v Speaker 4>out and got their quarterback. And we know that the

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Panthers are a disaster right now in a lot of

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:04.879
<v Speaker 4>levels and it's not going well, and you know it's

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 4>too early to really even its hardy even scout Bryce

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Young in the situation he's in. So it's like I

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of just see what happens. But Jason, well what

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 4>it's for it, I mean, you know.

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 3>A little bit better. Yet he's coming off his best game. CJ.

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 5>Stroud coming off his worst, and that in that particular game,

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 5>I thought Bryce Young played excellent in the first half

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:26.560
<v Speaker 5>of that game and was fine in the second.

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:28.279
<v Speaker 4>He's made a couple of passes in every one of

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 4>these games, but also some like massive blunders, and I

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 4>think it's he's in a bad ecosystem.

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 3>The c J.

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Stroud, like Bobby Slowick offense and what they're doing in general,

0:49:37.280 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 4>Like they've won three of their last four games by

0:49:39.600 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 4>by seven or more points. They're like turning into a

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 4>real thing. And I know they've been sort of a

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 4>team of ATM like possibility. I think this feels like

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a trap game to me, just

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 4>because like Caroline, at some points gonna do it. But

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 4>I just think the Texans to me under Stroud, like

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:59.719
<v Speaker 4>they have I thought, I think they're well coached, that.

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 2>They're pretty you know, fortunate to get out of New

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Orleans there on Thursday night with a tight end dropping

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the ball there, not saying that that that means that

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 2>they didn't deserve to win that game, because they did.

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 2>But I'm I'm also not This one kind of was

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:14.440
<v Speaker 2>on my radart of it because I was like, oh,

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 2>this would be a game to lock up lock up

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the winless against the winless team. But yeah, I like

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 2>that the that you got Frank whright, got to go

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 2>into the by with Bryce Young coming off a good game,

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 2>and now they can kind of reset things against the

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Houston defense. Greg that while this team has improved, there's

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 2>no reason to think that the Panthers might not have

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:40.359
<v Speaker 2>success here at home and maybe finally get that first win.

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this game they think this could be it.

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 5>They could be it. I know they it doesn't They

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:46.800
<v Speaker 5>shouldn't be this bad. I think it's a great test

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 5>of you know, first year head coaches coming off of bye.

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 5>In general, I think coming off the bye is a

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 5>great test of coaches, and that they're both doing it

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 5>is interesting. And I mentioned I liked what I saw

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 5>at Bryce Young in a Miami game, especially in the

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:01.919
<v Speaker 5>first half.

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 3>They had some answers. I am a little worried about

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:06.360
<v Speaker 3>their pass.

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:09.479
<v Speaker 5>Protection versus Will Anderson and Jonathan Garnard, who have really

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 5>been a nice tandem. Anderson is one you mentioned. You know,

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:17.320
<v Speaker 5>we're using the whole trayvon Walker Saxtony how he's playing

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 5>with Will Anderson. It's absolutely true. He is really playing outstanding.

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:24.640
<v Speaker 5>His hurries, his hits are there with the leaders in

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 5>the league. It hasn't translated to sacks. It has a

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 5>little more for Gernard on the other side. So that's

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 5>a worry, worrisome factor. And I'm gonna go fantasy here.

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 5>It's like, if we're ever gonna get Damian Pearson my

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 5>preseason prediction to be right.

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 3>Ever, this is it.

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 5>There's too many negative runs in this Houston offense. There's

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 5>supposed to be a forty nine ers like offense. So

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 5>many and this is the worst run defense in the

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:49.760
<v Speaker 5>entire NFL. It's one of the very worst defenses in general.

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 5>That's a big reason why they're owing six nice said

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 5>Bryce Young doesn't get you know, it's not his fault

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 5>that they're the worst run defense in the NFL.

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And what a nice uh, what a nice pickup for

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 2>fantasy owners and feeling turning into like garbage stats monster.

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I wonder it would be with the trade deadline coming up,

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 2>it would be really nice to see the Panthers maybe

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:12.279
<v Speaker 2>pull something off and get another playmaker there.

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:14.439
<v Speaker 4>And it sounds like they want to. They've they've been

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 4>talked about for a couple of weeks. Is wanting a

0:52:16.120 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver. That's gonna change.

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Let us see And by the way, to your point,

0:52:19.200 --> 0:52:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Will Anderson, he's just got one sack, but eight QB hits.

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 2>That's tied for most on the team, second most QB

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 2>hits in NFL among rookies. I don't know if you

0:52:29.120 --> 0:52:33.240
<v Speaker 2>know who would have the most hits amongst rookies QB

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:36.800
<v Speaker 2>hit Yalen Carter Byron Young of the La Rams.

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:40.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, nice nic agent zero. I think they call him.

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:43.719
<v Speaker 5>By the way, Texans three point favorites. All right, let's

0:52:43.800 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 5>move to Greg Okay, I'm gonna take I got a

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 5>certain strategy this Sunday. It's a weird sunny Falcons Titans.

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:52.279
<v Speaker 5>Falcons are two and a half point favorites on the

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:57.280
<v Speaker 5>road against the Titans. Let's review the Titans quarterback situation.

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 5>Our guy Ian Rabbitport reported Will Levis is being prepared

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 5>to start multiple times all week, and this was on

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:07.240
<v Speaker 5>my raidar. Mike Rabel came out and said, we're preparing

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 5>both players to play. And when he said that, I

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 5>was like, does that mean that Levis is starting? But

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 5>they've sort of got some fun plays for Malik Phyllis.

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:20.719
<v Speaker 5>And then the reporters locally came back with him saying, hey,

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:24.799
<v Speaker 5>your guy rap sheet. Maybe you knew him back when

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 5>he was a Patriots reporter. Maybe not not sure if

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 5>they crossed paths. Okay, he reported, well, Levis is starting,

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:32.359
<v Speaker 5>what do you say? He's like, I'm preparing both players play,

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 5>So I think we know Levis starting a little bit

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:38.280
<v Speaker 5>of Willis. And then Tannehill showed up at practice Thursday

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 5>trying or Wednesday trying to do some stuff, and I

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 5>never you never know, so we could see him. I

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 5>just wanted to update you on the quarterbacks. Thank you

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 5>for the Tennessee Titan, and maybe we can put.

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Some like Halloween harror music under that, because I have

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 2>to say, like, does this ever work? Like, Oh, Team

0:53:56.160 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 2>X planning to use multiple quarterbacks on Sunday, It's like

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 2>good luck. It's like we don't have a quarterback we

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.399
<v Speaker 2>like enough to actually play. So we're gonna we're gonna

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 2>kitchen sink it and hope something happens. But you also

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 2>you get it because Malik Willis, you know, God love him,

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:13.279
<v Speaker 2>has been a disaster and what we've seen of him

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 2>as a pro so far. And now Levis, who is

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 2>touted as a guy with tools but raw and needs

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:23.680
<v Speaker 2>needs time to develop. Now you're gonna now develop means here,

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:25.920
<v Speaker 2>welcome to week eight. You're now playing in the NFL.

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think maybe Rabel greg is trying to keep

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:32.719
<v Speaker 2>his options open knowing that you know, both of those

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:33.800
<v Speaker 2>things can get hairy.

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So maybe if we will little this little of that.

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:39.719
<v Speaker 4>Wait, there's got no evidence that Mike Rabel is in

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 4>support of Malik Willis as his quarterback on any level.

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 4>It dates back to last season when they got Josh

0:54:45.160 --> 0:54:46.239
<v Speaker 4>Dobb zero.

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:48.839
<v Speaker 2>Zero chance Derek Henry doesn't get out of this game

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:50.719
<v Speaker 2>without throwing a pass, Well.

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 3>That may be their best option.

0:54:52.080 --> 0:54:54.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean coming out of the London game, Like, the

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 4>most striking visuals we saw were Ryan tannilent tandle getting

0:54:57.640 --> 0:54:58.800
<v Speaker 4>destroyed by the Ravens.

0:54:58.840 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 3>So it's like not a.

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Good all offensive line Malik Willis has shown us nothing. Well, Levis,

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 4>like you didn't beat out Malik Willis in camp. That's

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 4>a bit concerning. I mean I like the idea. I'm

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:13.880
<v Speaker 4>a little bit better. I think if you're in reverse.

0:55:14.000 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 4>If the Falcons are ever going to run the ball well,

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:18.960
<v Speaker 4>like in the last couple of weeks, the Colts ran

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:22.279
<v Speaker 4>over for one hundred and ninety three yards. Last week

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 4>the Ravens crushed the Titans for one hundred and thirty nine.

0:55:25.160 --> 0:55:26.799
<v Speaker 4>If the Falcons are ever going to do this, maybe

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:28.760
<v Speaker 4>it's this week because they've been a good run deem myself.

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:31.279
<v Speaker 2>How's our friend, how's our front beijon this week? Is

0:55:31.280 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 2>he physically is he practicing?

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Is he?

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 5>I think he's expected to play. But they're not a

0:55:38.080 --> 0:55:40.520
<v Speaker 5>good running team. I mean he's a great running back,

0:55:40.520 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 5>but they're not a good running team. They've been more

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 5>effective throwing the ball, except for the plays where Desmond

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Rider gives it away like Ritter is coming off, you know,

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 5>the best two game stretch of his career. But it's

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 5>just crazy that, like, oh wow, Desmond Ridder making nice throws.

0:55:55.440 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 5>He did it last week. I was impressed with a

0:55:57.280 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 5>lot of his throws and then he just kills you

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 5>with the mistakes.

0:56:01.600 --> 0:56:02.840
<v Speaker 1>The timing of the mistakes.

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, three red zone turnovers last week, and they're averaging

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:07.319
<v Speaker 2>thirteen points the game.

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:09.799
<v Speaker 5>But they also could be five and three after this week.

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 5>They are favored.

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think Colleen was on to something. All Right,

0:56:13.239 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg snakes to you.

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, I am going to take the Saints and.

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:25.080
<v Speaker 5>The Colts alright, a rematch of one of my favorite

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 5>Super Bowls of all time a long time ago.

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Now it was Saints are one point favorites on the road.

0:56:33.080 --> 0:56:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Don't like that. I like the underdog in this game.

0:56:36.480 --> 0:56:40.439
<v Speaker 5>I think the Colts are a better team overall, and

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 5>I think the Saints. There's just a lot going on

0:56:45.120 --> 0:56:48.879
<v Speaker 5>with this Saints team. Defensively, they can lock you up.

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:52.360
<v Speaker 5>But I really liked what I saw out of Indianapolis

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 5>in terms of their ground game and what they got

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:57.080
<v Speaker 5>going with Jonathan Taylor and the way Shanstiken can change

0:56:57.120 --> 0:57:00.320
<v Speaker 5>his game plan from week to week. And I think's

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 5>health really gives them a lot of options.

0:57:02.200 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Minshew.

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:05.399
<v Speaker 5>He's not going to be Anthony Richardson, but he can

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 5>at least provide a little bit of run threat on

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:11.480
<v Speaker 5>some of those fakes that work well enough, and I

0:57:11.560 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 5>just think they've been a tough minded team for the

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 5>most part, and the Saints are not a tough minded

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 5>team in my mind.

0:57:18.440 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Minshew ran the ball really well against Cleveland and it

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:23.760
<v Speaker 4>was like design run territories, and I think he gives

0:57:23.840 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 4>them that. I mean, it's been a couple sort of

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 4>somewhat atypical weeks for Minshe because of the giveaways coming

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 4>into this season, like his touchdown to interception ratio was

0:57:34.600 --> 0:57:38.080
<v Speaker 4>pretty spectacular, and the mistakes have cropped up and they've

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:40.840
<v Speaker 4>coached around it a little bit. I would also say

0:57:40.840 --> 0:57:43.760
<v Speaker 4>that he's had a really nice connection with Josh Downs,

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 4>who has been great as a rookie for them, and

0:57:46.800 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Michael Pittman two and so there's the big plays are happening,

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 4>and I think the biggest development there is that Jonathan

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Taylor against Cleveland looked like the Jonathan Taylor that we've

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 4>waited for, and that can change everything for them.

0:57:57.680 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Minshew has thrown four innerse options targeting Michael Pittman for

0:58:03.200 --> 0:58:05.880
<v Speaker 2>next gen stacks, and then Michael Pittman came out after

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the loss last week and said, maybe I'm not like

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:12.120
<v Speaker 2>an important guy in this offense, erase the dryboard. Because

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:15.400
<v Speaker 2>the wide receiver has spoken about being unhappy. So you

0:58:15.440 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 2>know what happens, because you saw what happened last week

0:58:17.320 --> 0:58:19.960
<v Speaker 2>with Tomtay Adams. They will funnel targets to Pittman to

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 2>try to keep him happy.

0:58:21.680 --> 0:58:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's give him some credit.

0:58:22.640 --> 0:58:27.760
<v Speaker 5>Though, on Wednesday, unprompted, he all the reporters over and said, like, man,

0:58:27.840 --> 0:58:29.760
<v Speaker 5>I was in my head Sunday, I was kind of

0:58:29.760 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 5>being an ass and apologize.

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, he didn't say he was being an ass.

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:35.600
<v Speaker 2>He said, I'm a sore loser, Like I don't, I

0:58:35.680 --> 0:58:37.440
<v Speaker 2>hate losing, and like I get that.

0:58:37.600 --> 0:58:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Is a culpa though unprompted, So I give it to

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 5>Derek Carr.

0:58:41.560 --> 0:58:43.880
<v Speaker 2>He had a heart to heart with Chris Alave and

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:47.440
<v Speaker 2>so they've had very productive conversations this week and they

0:58:47.480 --> 0:58:49.040
<v Speaker 2>had a great week of practice.

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see what happens with that.

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I felt real bad for that wide receiver on Thursday

0:58:52.240 --> 0:58:55.720
<v Speaker 2>night the drop, and I like seeing Alvin Kamara take

0:58:55.760 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 2>him off the field because he was just sitting alone

0:58:57.760 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 2>on the bench at the game long over.

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Good leadership from Kamara. And then my last.

0:59:02.320 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Thought, because we don't get to talk about Thursday night

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:07.800
<v Speaker 2>football when we're not on the games. Greg Kamara is

0:59:07.840 --> 0:59:11.560
<v Speaker 2>fascinating in this offense because he just gets the ball constantly,

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:13.840
<v Speaker 2>and Derek Carr, who's never been afraid of a checkdown,

0:59:13.880 --> 0:59:16.360
<v Speaker 2>now has one of the great checkdown running backs of

0:59:16.400 --> 0:59:20.320
<v Speaker 2>his era in Kamara. It was tough to watch Kamara

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 2>unable to crack that end zone. I know he's hyper productive,

0:59:24.600 --> 0:59:28.480
<v Speaker 2>but the old Kamara in that game finds the goal

0:59:28.560 --> 0:59:30.960
<v Speaker 2>line and gets himself over. That's the slight difference with

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 2>him that he doesn't have that same whatever it is,

0:59:33.560 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 2>is just a little bit off where he doesn't have

0:59:35.120 --> 0:59:37.240
<v Speaker 2>that same nose for the end zone, which he was

0:59:37.400 --> 0:59:39.439
<v Speaker 2>unparalleled a few years back.

0:59:39.560 --> 0:59:42.240
<v Speaker 5>I agree with you, he's not forcing as many mistackles,

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:45.880
<v Speaker 5>but five or six of those throws were Carr coming

0:59:45.880 --> 0:59:47.840
<v Speaker 5>to the checkdown too quickly.

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, I'm kind of referring to that one red zone driver.

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 2>They said, I'm going to give you the ball four

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:54.760
<v Speaker 2>times aka get in, and he didn't.

0:59:54.840 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But he's a PPR most so I'll tell you that,

0:59:59.080 --> 0:59:59.400
<v Speaker 1>all right.

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh and oh, one last note, Ersay, owner of the Cults,

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:08.600
<v Speaker 2>came out and said that the NFL now this is

1:00:08.600 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 2>what the owner of the coult said. Yeah, that the

1:00:10.680 --> 1:00:14.880
<v Speaker 2>NFL said both those calls were wrong late against Cleveland,

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 2>both against the same defensive back. His name is escaping

1:00:19.360 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 2>me as anybody recall it, both the defensive holding against

1:00:23.920 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Cooper and then the PI when the ball was almost

1:00:26.160 --> 1:00:28.440
<v Speaker 2>thrown into the front row. It was it Dallas Baker

1:00:28.640 --> 1:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't help. It doesn't help the standings. But I guess

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>if I'm a cult span, I'm like, Okay, at least

1:00:33.920 --> 1:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>the NFL said we boofed it.

1:00:35.240 --> 1:00:38.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, but they're also going to find j Mersey based

1:00:38.200 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 5>on past precedent.

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, publicly, which he doesn't care.

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 4>That's fine, But I like Anders says things you don't

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:44.720
<v Speaker 4>want him to say.

1:00:45.080 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 3>We all get that.

1:00:46.880 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>He says things, Oh you would care, you would care,

1:00:49.320 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Roberts if it was the bills, right.

1:00:51.240 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 3>I liked it. It came out and said this. I

1:00:53.320 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 3>liked it.

1:00:53.560 --> 1:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>He did that.

1:00:54.080 --> 1:00:56.280
<v Speaker 2>You want your owner to hold the NFL's feet to

1:00:56.280 --> 1:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the fire if they if they boof it.

1:00:57.960 --> 1:01:00.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, of course that was more. I don't care that

1:01:00.440 --> 1:01:03.600
<v Speaker 8>I'm getting fined as Jim. He's printing money. He doesn't

1:01:03.600 --> 1:01:05.360
<v Speaker 8>care about you know, it's always good for them. To

1:01:05.440 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 8>like speak up about a mistake. But yeah, that was

1:01:07.160 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 8>more of a first not caring about it.

1:01:09.440 --> 1:01:11.840
<v Speaker 5>I like you when Eric, when you wear this uh

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 5>buttons up Bill's bills, buttoned up Polo, it really pops.

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:17.800
<v Speaker 8>You know, I don't I want to dress up for

1:01:17.840 --> 1:01:19.960
<v Speaker 8>game day, but I just don't like wearing a jersey

1:01:20.160 --> 1:01:21.320
<v Speaker 8>around the office.

1:01:21.360 --> 1:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Take down that one lapel Breasa hart side, Yeah, down

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. There we go. There you go, and

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>look how clean that mustache is cleaned up? You know,

1:01:29.480 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it looks good. This is why you watch the YouTube.

1:01:31.960 --> 1:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Show do you put wax on it? Product? It's curious Thursday.

1:01:36.560 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 8>I know there might be some camera time on Thursday,

1:01:38.960 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 8>so you get it, you know, yeah, any of the

1:01:40.520 --> 1:01:41.000
<v Speaker 8>guys are.

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>At all the time.

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:43.000
<v Speaker 3>He'll be down there and makeup, and.

1:01:42.960 --> 1:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>There's a Tyson Pagent thing going on right now because

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:49.000
<v Speaker 2>look how clean cut Roberts looks. And then you know,

1:01:49.040 --> 1:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>you start, you know, pulling up the sleeve or you

1:01:50.960 --> 1:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>see him in a pair of shorts, and all of

1:01:52.280 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, it's like, am I at the Bikers Association

1:01:55.320 --> 1:01:56.040
<v Speaker 2>of America.

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:57.360
<v Speaker 8>Got to see me on the weekend for SHO I

1:01:57.360 --> 1:01:59.760
<v Speaker 8>would say that this show is a history of producers

1:02:00.520 --> 1:02:04.160
<v Speaker 8>for increasing and increasing camera time as the months go on,

1:02:04.240 --> 1:02:06.560
<v Speaker 8>and I'm not when you got Eric in that tornado, I.

1:02:07.080 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Think you've you've really maneuvered yourself very well, Eric, and

1:02:10.400 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 2>you're doing a great job as our producer.

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Mark back to you, all right.

1:02:13.920 --> 1:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll take Patriots at Dolphins.

1:02:16.760 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Patriots getting nine and a half in this huge, like

1:02:20.120 --> 1:02:24.240
<v Speaker 4>season saving or salvaging victory against the Bills, I don't

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 4>know if they can, if they could do it, if

1:02:25.560 --> 1:02:28.160
<v Speaker 4>they could ever pull it off in Miami, that would

1:02:28.160 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 4>be wild. I feel like the dating back to like

1:02:30.960 --> 1:02:33.600
<v Speaker 4>the middle of the eighteen hundreds, weird things happen to

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:35.240
<v Speaker 4>the Patriots in Miami.

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Usually not good.

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, weird things be like a typical.

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Trying to make a tackle on a return. Yeah, that

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:44.200
<v Speaker 5>those sort of things.

1:02:44.400 --> 1:02:46.200
<v Speaker 4>I feel like those things don't matter, but then they

1:02:46.280 --> 1:02:48.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of just seems to happen every year. I I

1:02:48.960 --> 1:02:51.000
<v Speaker 4>do look back at the first game though, where I

1:02:51.000 --> 1:02:54.960
<v Speaker 4>think Miami against Philadelphia, and like the two winning teams

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:58.280
<v Speaker 4>they've faced, they lost both of them. I don't know

1:02:58.320 --> 1:03:00.960
<v Speaker 4>what that tells me about the Dolphins. It's a little concerning.

1:03:01.440 --> 1:03:03.080
<v Speaker 4>They couldn't run the ball last week. I think it's

1:03:03.120 --> 1:03:06.000
<v Speaker 4>really important that someone like Raheem Mostert, who blew up

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:08.280
<v Speaker 4>for one hundred and twenty one yards and two touchdowns

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:10.960
<v Speaker 4>with a forty three yard scamper against New England, like simper,

1:03:11.040 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 4>if you can do that, like you're fine. You're absolutely fine,

1:03:14.240 --> 1:03:17.760
<v Speaker 4>because the only other thing about their offense, like most

1:03:17.960 --> 1:03:20.360
<v Speaker 4>actually did not practice. He's got a banged up ankle.

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:23.400
<v Speaker 4>Tyreek Hill has a banged up hip. It's like if

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:26.360
<v Speaker 4>you start to lose parts like then it's Mike McDaniel's challenge,

1:03:26.400 --> 1:03:28.919
<v Speaker 4>Mike McDaniels challenge to get out of not being able

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:31.720
<v Speaker 4>to do what he's done week after week. But I'm

1:03:31.840 --> 1:03:34.680
<v Speaker 4>leaning on the concept that what happened against New England

1:03:34.800 --> 1:03:36.200
<v Speaker 4>had a lot to do with the Bills being in

1:03:36.240 --> 1:03:39.360
<v Speaker 4>a funk and some of their strengths maybe working against Buffalo.

1:03:39.480 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 4>But to do it two weeks in a row, I

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:42.280
<v Speaker 4>can't get on.

1:03:42.160 --> 1:03:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Board with that.

1:03:42.840 --> 1:03:48.000
<v Speaker 5>Tyreekho did return on Thursday, which great news because the

1:03:48.080 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 5>vibes didn't sound great with him right on Wednesday. But

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:53.280
<v Speaker 5>it sounds like he'll be back for this game. It's

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 5>a big time test, I think for both coaches. I

1:03:55.360 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 5>think playing Belichick the second time is a unique test

1:03:57.840 --> 1:04:00.760
<v Speaker 5>in general in the afcast, but it goes the other

1:04:00.800 --> 1:04:02.960
<v Speaker 5>way too, So McDaniel and him having to go against

1:04:02.960 --> 1:04:05.320
<v Speaker 5>each other twice in such a short time. I think

1:04:05.360 --> 1:04:07.320
<v Speaker 5>you look at what the Patriots did last time they played,

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:10.720
<v Speaker 5>which was just back the hell up and try to

1:04:10.760 --> 1:04:12.720
<v Speaker 5>prevent the big play and slow it down.

1:04:12.760 --> 1:04:14.760
<v Speaker 3>And they did an okay job at that.

1:04:15.040 --> 1:04:17.080
<v Speaker 5>But I think they'll look at what Philadelphia did and

1:04:17.240 --> 1:04:20.120
<v Speaker 5>was really effective and I think really interesting, which is

1:04:20.360 --> 1:04:25.439
<v Speaker 5>Philadelphia really sold out to stop the run. They also

1:04:25.520 --> 1:04:28.440
<v Speaker 5>played almost entirely in zone coverage and they were in

1:04:28.480 --> 1:04:30.760
<v Speaker 5>cover too, just totally backed up trying to prevent the

1:04:30.800 --> 1:04:33.880
<v Speaker 5>big play. I mean, mostly everyone does that, but they

1:04:33.920 --> 1:04:35.600
<v Speaker 5>really made a point to have a lot of guys

1:04:35.600 --> 1:04:39.360
<v Speaker 5>on the line of scrimmage and prevent the run from

1:04:39.360 --> 1:04:42.600
<v Speaker 5>getting going and put them in long yardage situations. It's

1:04:42.600 --> 1:04:44.960
<v Speaker 5>an interesting way to attack the Dolphins and it worked

1:04:45.000 --> 1:04:45.560
<v Speaker 5>quite well.

1:04:46.200 --> 1:04:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Massive, Massive, and I buy into this trap game implications

1:04:51.200 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 2>for the Dolphins coming off Philadelphia in primetime, you get

1:04:56.160 --> 1:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the Pats at home, and then you go to Kansas

1:04:59.360 --> 1:05:01.920
<v Speaker 2>City next week in primetime to Germany.

1:05:02.800 --> 1:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh.

1:05:03.040 --> 1:05:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Shoot, that's right. Nine thirty am, Lower Prime. They're in

1:05:06.040 --> 1:05:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Germany for christ Sake, So the idea they're they're trying

1:05:10.320 --> 1:05:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to find their passports on Saturday on Saturday night when

1:05:13.640 --> 1:05:16.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe they should be studying what's going on with the

1:05:17.480 --> 1:05:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Patriots team. That this is gonna sound silly, but it

1:05:20.000 --> 1:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>is a fact as a fact they had when things

1:05:22.640 --> 1:05:24.760
<v Speaker 2>were in They are the little rock bottom moment there,

1:05:24.760 --> 1:05:26.880
<v Speaker 2>that two week stretch, Greggie, which is very tough for

1:05:28.120 --> 1:05:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you and the and the Pats fans. Thirty eight three

1:05:30.440 --> 1:05:34.080
<v Speaker 2>thirty four zip they have had since they've had the

1:05:34.080 --> 1:05:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo win, and in general, every other game other than

1:05:37.160 --> 1:05:39.640
<v Speaker 2>those two, it's been the loss has been seven points

1:05:39.720 --> 1:05:43.200
<v Speaker 2>or less. So it's not they and they they did

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>they did less than six weeks ago kind of shut

1:05:46.640 --> 1:05:49.959
<v Speaker 2>down the Miami tack or slow it down. So while

1:05:50.000 --> 1:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>this certainly certainly could be twenty one nothing at the

1:05:53.080 --> 1:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>end of the first quarter, I guess it's just that

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>old Belichick maybe has something up a sleeve, and the

1:06:00.400 --> 1:06:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Miami has yet to earn the benefit of the doubt

1:06:03.320 --> 1:06:05.400
<v Speaker 2>that they could roll over anybody they want. I see

1:06:05.440 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 2>them rolling over certain teams and not others. And I

1:06:07.880 --> 1:06:08.560
<v Speaker 2>don't think the Dolpins.

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, so they destroyed, no doubt, But I I just

1:06:13.000 --> 1:06:16.240
<v Speaker 4>I refuse to accept that the Patriots, like especially on offense,

1:06:16.480 --> 1:06:18.720
<v Speaker 4>have been reborn. I mean, prior to the Bills game,

1:06:19.080 --> 1:06:22.120
<v Speaker 4>their point totals last four weeks for fifteen points three

1:06:22.160 --> 1:06:24.160
<v Speaker 4>they got shut out by the Saints, give me a break,

1:06:24.280 --> 1:06:25.560
<v Speaker 4>and seventeen against the Well.

1:06:25.600 --> 1:06:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say that the offense the Patriots offen. I

1:06:27.800 --> 1:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>just think like, you got you gotta find it. Dolphins

1:06:31.040 --> 1:06:31.600
<v Speaker 2>can run though.

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:33.680
<v Speaker 4>If the Dolphins can do it with Moster, like, you've

1:06:33.680 --> 1:06:35.560
<v Speaker 4>got to find a way to hang around with Miami,

1:06:35.600 --> 1:06:37.320
<v Speaker 4>And I just like, how is well they're in New

1:06:37.360 --> 1:06:37.959
<v Speaker 4>England's way.

1:06:37.880 --> 1:06:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Out there, They're a different offense.

1:06:39.840 --> 1:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>They've already done it.

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 5>They they've gotten their offensive line healthier so and when

1:06:45.000 --> 1:06:47.040
<v Speaker 5>they were playing right tackle really shores up what I

1:06:47.320 --> 1:06:49.200
<v Speaker 5>was saying was the weakest position in football. And then

1:06:49.200 --> 1:06:51.439
<v Speaker 5>Cole Stranger attorney at I think they have a good

1:06:51.680 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 5>starting good enough starting five now in the offensive line,

1:06:54.120 --> 1:06:54.760
<v Speaker 5>and that was a problem.

1:06:55.080 --> 1:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>And then uh we got Pop Douglas.

1:06:57.240 --> 1:07:00.439
<v Speaker 5>Mark We're a different team here with Pop Douglas.

1:07:00.440 --> 1:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Doug It's crazy.

1:07:01.560 --> 1:07:06.280
<v Speaker 5>That a late round rookie like you know, gadget looking

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:10.000
<v Speaker 5>type of player is obviously the best and most explosive

1:07:10.000 --> 1:07:11.360
<v Speaker 5>offensive player on the Patriots.

1:07:11.360 --> 1:07:12.400
<v Speaker 3>It's not even like a question.

1:07:12.480 --> 1:07:14.640
<v Speaker 5>He's literally the only one on the team that can

1:07:14.640 --> 1:07:16.120
<v Speaker 5>make anyone miss.

1:07:16.520 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:19.560
<v Speaker 5>They also don't have Christian Gonzales, who played really well

1:07:19.600 --> 1:07:22.440
<v Speaker 5>in that first game, helping out against Tyreek Hill, and

1:07:22.520 --> 1:07:25.080
<v Speaker 5>instead you got J. C. Jackson, who's thinking, I already

1:07:25.080 --> 1:07:28.080
<v Speaker 5>got roasted by Tyreek Hill in Week one with the Chargers.

1:07:28.080 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Now I get traded to another team, then I gotta

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:31.240
<v Speaker 5>go deal with Tyreek Hill.

1:07:31.800 --> 1:07:32.479
<v Speaker 1>That's not fun.

1:07:33.160 --> 1:07:36.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, Let's take a break and we'll close out

1:07:36.280 --> 1:07:40.240
<v Speaker 2>the draft. All right, we're back. Let's close this thing.

1:07:40.040 --> 1:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Out back to back. Pick those got five games.

1:07:46.800 --> 1:07:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I only got two eyes, folks. We'll have to work

1:07:49.760 --> 1:07:54.920
<v Speaker 2>that out. Let's start interesting, all right, So there are

1:07:55.200 --> 1:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the two teams in the Super Bowl? Are from last

1:07:58.080 --> 1:08:00.280
<v Speaker 2>year are available? Is that right? That's how this this

1:08:00.480 --> 1:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>ended up?

1:08:01.200 --> 1:08:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's the opponents.

1:08:03.440 --> 1:08:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with uh. And let's start with the Chiefs

1:08:06.000 --> 1:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>at the Broncos. Chiefs getting seven points here as they should,

1:08:10.760 --> 1:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>in fact a little generous for the Broncos. So now

1:08:14.560 --> 1:08:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the Denver Broncos have played better. I think, like the Patriots,

1:08:18.080 --> 1:08:21.519
<v Speaker 2>we've probably seen probably seen the worst of them this year,

1:08:21.560 --> 1:08:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and now they're gonna start kind of figuring things out,

1:08:24.080 --> 1:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>hanging in games and not being a laughing stock.

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:29.599
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think it was interesting to.

1:08:29.560 --> 1:08:34.840
<v Speaker 2>See certain things with the Chiefs offense. You saw vintage

1:08:35.360 --> 1:08:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Travis Kelcey last week for the kind of first time

1:08:38.400 --> 1:08:41.160
<v Speaker 2>where it's like, Okay, that's that's the dude. You saw

1:08:41.479 --> 1:08:46.840
<v Speaker 2>vintage Mahomes who you know, his ability is peerless, ability

1:08:46.960 --> 1:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>to just manipulate and full defenses. With his ability outside

1:08:52.280 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 2>the pocket, I mean, he's at his peak form and

1:08:54.560 --> 1:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>just creating big plays just with his eyes and his

1:08:58.040 --> 1:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>legs and his hanny ability to know exactly where the

1:09:01.800 --> 1:09:02.720
<v Speaker 2>line of scrimmage is.

1:09:03.280 --> 1:09:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

1:09:03.520 --> 1:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>And then you have Rashid Rice, who they've been waiting.

1:09:06.479 --> 1:09:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Who is the guy that's gonna step up? It's Rice,

1:09:09.240 --> 1:09:11.320
<v Speaker 2>And you look at all the data points behind it

1:09:11.320 --> 1:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>his ability. He's their slot guy now, and he is

1:09:14.320 --> 1:09:16.639
<v Speaker 2>their yards after catch guy over the middle, and he's

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 2>filling He's filling a very important role if this stays

1:09:20.080 --> 1:09:23.120
<v Speaker 2>where it is. So everybody talked about Cadarius Tony before

1:09:23.120 --> 1:09:23.599
<v Speaker 2>the season.

1:09:23.960 --> 1:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>He's just a guy. He will always be just a guy.

1:09:26.439 --> 1:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>And they maybe even can use someone else Greg with

1:09:30.280 --> 1:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the trade deadline coming up. Nicole Hardman is is just

1:09:32.840 --> 1:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>a guy himself. But you're starting to see the chief.

1:09:36.120 --> 1:09:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Guys though, they get rid of something bringing anyone in.

1:09:38.800 --> 1:09:42.440
<v Speaker 2>You you gotta, you gotta, you gotta say the Chiefs

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:45.439
<v Speaker 2>might be starting to figure it out on offense again,

1:09:45.520 --> 1:09:48.679
<v Speaker 2>and with that defense that they're paired with, they're scary.

1:09:49.400 --> 1:09:56.040
<v Speaker 5>They you know, are the Super Bowl favorites. I am, oh, hey,

1:09:56.920 --> 1:09:58.960
<v Speaker 5>all right, we got we got all the youth culture.

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:03.400
<v Speaker 5>Now cut that for social media. You don't need to

1:10:03.439 --> 1:10:07.400
<v Speaker 5>know more than Patrick Mahomes and with one of the

1:10:07.439 --> 1:10:09.599
<v Speaker 5>better defensive league, that's all you need to know. And

1:10:09.680 --> 1:10:11.559
<v Speaker 5>the fact that the offense is coming off a good game.

1:10:11.600 --> 1:10:13.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm not going to say the offense is back though,

1:10:13.160 --> 1:10:15.840
<v Speaker 5>because just two weeks ago against this very same Broncos team,

1:10:15.960 --> 1:10:20.080
<v Speaker 5>who at the time had a historically bad defense, the Chiefs.

1:10:19.720 --> 1:10:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Offense didn't really maybe figured out.

1:10:22.800 --> 1:10:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I tend to agree, because again it's Patrick Mahomes

1:10:26.320 --> 1:10:29.960
<v Speaker 5>and in a really good offensive line. So that's the

1:10:30.000 --> 1:10:32.559
<v Speaker 5>mismatch to me and That's ultimately the problem for the

1:10:32.600 --> 1:10:36.160
<v Speaker 5>rest of the NFL is the Chiefs pass protection has

1:10:36.200 --> 1:10:39.720
<v Speaker 5>been incredible this year, and you have a matchup this

1:10:39.760 --> 1:10:42.639
<v Speaker 5>week where it's like, okay, you want to throw Nick

1:10:42.680 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 5>Benito and Zach Allen and Jonathan Cooper at us, Like, okay,

1:10:47.320 --> 1:10:50.280
<v Speaker 5>good luck with that. I have a feeling we're scoring

1:10:50.320 --> 1:10:52.799
<v Speaker 5>more than nineteen points this time around.

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:54.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't like the two matchups in three weeks.

1:10:54.800 --> 1:10:57.400
<v Speaker 5>I know the NFL scheduled makers are in a tough spot,

1:10:57.760 --> 1:11:00.840
<v Speaker 5>and it happens once or twice a year spots.

1:11:00.520 --> 1:11:02.599
<v Speaker 2>Now I think, remember it used to be like they

1:11:02.600 --> 1:11:05.840
<v Speaker 2>put them in a conference room with cigarettes and you know,

1:11:05.920 --> 1:11:09.200
<v Speaker 2>sendence takeout for three months and lock the door and

1:11:09.240 --> 1:11:11.160
<v Speaker 2>figure out the schedule your ghouls.

1:11:11.520 --> 1:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And now it's just like a I figured out matchups.

1:11:15.160 --> 1:11:17.760
<v Speaker 3>It is primarily done by a We were not a human.

1:11:17.840 --> 1:11:21.040
<v Speaker 5>We were just in London doing this recap like a

1:11:21.080 --> 1:11:21.519
<v Speaker 5>week ago.

1:11:21.640 --> 1:11:23.240
<v Speaker 3>It feels like it is silly.

1:11:23.320 --> 1:11:26.320
<v Speaker 5>It maybe the Denver defense, though now Mark is is normal.

1:11:26.360 --> 1:11:28.479
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, well, two weeks they played normal.

1:11:28.760 --> 1:11:32.800
<v Speaker 4>They did, you know, nineteen points against the Chiefs, seventeen

1:11:32.840 --> 1:11:36.640
<v Speaker 4>against a pretty shaky Packers offense. I'm not taking too

1:11:36.720 --> 1:11:38.160
<v Speaker 4>much from any of that, but I think that you

1:11:38.200 --> 1:11:41.080
<v Speaker 4>look at like what heck occurred in that game when

1:11:41.120 --> 1:11:43.679
<v Speaker 4>they played them just days ago. It feels like Travis

1:11:43.760 --> 1:11:47.639
<v Speaker 4>Kelcey had a huge, monster performance. I mean, I think

1:11:47.640 --> 1:11:51.160
<v Speaker 4>that can happen again, no problem. And it's like, in

1:11:51.240 --> 1:11:54.400
<v Speaker 4>what area does Denver outshine Kansas City on any level?

1:11:54.439 --> 1:11:57.880
<v Speaker 3>It's like they haven't beat him in how many years?

1:11:57.880 --> 1:12:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Sixteen straight losses? Patrick, there is not at all.

1:12:01.920 --> 1:12:04.360
<v Speaker 5>They didn't have Justin No, they did have Justin Simmons

1:12:04.400 --> 1:12:06.480
<v Speaker 5>back for that, they go, Yeah, the interception.

1:12:06.040 --> 1:12:08.639
<v Speaker 4>Over Mahomes is twenty nine and three versus the AFC

1:12:08.720 --> 1:12:11.600
<v Speaker 4>West and sixteen straight wins over the Broncos.

1:12:11.640 --> 1:12:12.679
<v Speaker 3>They don't match up well.

1:12:12.680 --> 1:12:14.519
<v Speaker 4>And this is one of the messier versions of the

1:12:14.520 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 4>Broncos defense we've seen.

1:12:16.600 --> 1:12:19.639
<v Speaker 2>I think if you're Sean McVay and note Sean Payton,

1:12:20.439 --> 1:12:21.760
<v Speaker 2>you're just like, how do I get out of here

1:12:21.800 --> 1:12:25.160
<v Speaker 2>without being humiliated again? And it is the scary thing

1:12:25.200 --> 1:12:28.559
<v Speaker 2>I think Greg is we say things like the Chiefs

1:12:28.560 --> 1:12:30.879
<v Speaker 2>you know recently is two weeks ago. They're still funky.

1:12:31.600 --> 1:12:35.960
<v Speaker 2>They are still second in total yards, they are first

1:12:35.960 --> 1:12:39.920
<v Speaker 2>and third down percentage, they are six tied for six

1:12:39.960 --> 1:12:42.599
<v Speaker 2>and points per game like, and that's after a kind

1:12:42.600 --> 1:12:45.800
<v Speaker 2>of slow start. Yep, I think there is going to

1:12:45.880 --> 1:12:47.840
<v Speaker 2>be a greg There could be a conversation and we

1:12:47.840 --> 1:12:51.080
<v Speaker 2>should move on. But when we're at in Vegas for

1:12:51.120 --> 1:12:55.439
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl, God willing, is this the best Chiefs

1:12:55.439 --> 1:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>team yet?

1:12:56.439 --> 1:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>That is going to be maybe the narrative around the AFC.

1:12:59.280 --> 1:13:02.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, they're gonna have to show me more offensively, but

1:13:03.880 --> 1:13:05.479
<v Speaker 5>certainly the best defense. And know, by the way, they

1:13:05.479 --> 1:13:08.320
<v Speaker 5>added Charles a Menaheue who's been a very productive player

1:13:08.479 --> 1:13:12.320
<v Speaker 5>off of his suspension for domestic violence last week and

1:13:12.400 --> 1:13:15.760
<v Speaker 5>he had, you know, an immediate impact for their for

1:13:15.840 --> 1:13:18.200
<v Speaker 5>their team this run. By the way, the Broncos, they're

1:13:18.240 --> 1:13:21.160
<v Speaker 5>running offense very good. Yeah, they did a nice job

1:13:21.240 --> 1:13:24.120
<v Speaker 5>showcasing Judy and Sutton last week. They both had nice games.

1:13:24.160 --> 1:13:26.320
<v Speaker 5>The offense is actually average. I don't know if that's

1:13:26.320 --> 1:13:28.720
<v Speaker 5>good enough, but the offense is okay. So it's a

1:13:29.000 --> 1:13:32.719
<v Speaker 5>showcase day. We're gonna showcase Judy and Sutton for the deadline?

1:13:32.760 --> 1:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Please can we just And I hated it when it

1:13:36.160 --> 1:13:39.839
<v Speaker 2>happened in seven I hated in the moment had happened

1:13:40.560 --> 1:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>when a Raiders future Hall of Famer got traded and

1:13:45.840 --> 1:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>was all of a sudden playing with one of the

1:13:47.240 --> 1:13:48.439
<v Speaker 2>greatest quarterbacks of all.

1:13:48.280 --> 1:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Time, and Randy Moss and Tom Brady made beautiful magic.

1:13:51.840 --> 1:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's not for the Raiders. Can you imagine DeVante Adams?

1:13:55.080 --> 1:13:57.439
<v Speaker 3>Well, why would they do that? They're not gonna help

1:13:57.479 --> 1:13:59.759
<v Speaker 3>out Risper about that on this show.

1:14:00.120 --> 1:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying, for fun thinking about them together.

1:14:02.479 --> 1:14:03.120
<v Speaker 3>That would be true.

1:14:03.680 --> 1:14:07.000
<v Speaker 5>Davis is not. I actually think he is rightful enough.

1:14:07.080 --> 1:14:09.280
<v Speaker 5>He would never allow that to happen, is he.

1:14:09.320 --> 1:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Though we don't know Mark like we knew Al I

1:14:12.400 --> 1:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>hang out.

1:14:12.800 --> 1:14:14.719
<v Speaker 3>I didn't meet Mark Davis at the Super Bowl.

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>You hang out with them in the bars a lot. Yeah.

1:14:18.160 --> 1:14:20.880
<v Speaker 5>AFC West is not helping out the Chiefs as they

1:14:20.880 --> 1:14:22.840
<v Speaker 5>clinched their seventeen.

1:14:23.640 --> 1:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You know what.

1:14:23.920 --> 1:14:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Another thing, if you want to talk about traits of

1:14:25.760 --> 1:14:30.280
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders historically unpredictable, you're right. I'm just saying I

1:14:30.280 --> 1:14:32.760
<v Speaker 2>would like well, I would love actually my favorite teams

1:14:32.760 --> 1:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>in the AFC, So I don't want to see this,

1:14:34.280 --> 1:14:35.720
<v Speaker 2>but it would be fun as hell.

1:14:35.760 --> 1:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>It's they do need another Wide receive the.

1:14:37.920 --> 1:14:40.439
<v Speaker 3>Juiciest landing spot for DeVante Adams by.

1:14:40.320 --> 1:14:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Far, which is why we did not even bring it

1:14:43.000 --> 1:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>up in the year. The GM segment, well done by

1:14:45.880 --> 1:14:53.400
<v Speaker 2>all involved. All Right, finally Eagles at Commanders, your fifth game.

1:14:54.040 --> 1:14:56.960
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, I am not looking forward to the post

1:14:56.960 --> 1:14:58.440
<v Speaker 5>show rejiggering.

1:14:58.640 --> 1:14:59.800
<v Speaker 3>This is confusing.

1:15:02.400 --> 1:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>That's blame the AI bots.

1:15:04.280 --> 1:15:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, they stuck it to us.

1:15:06.200 --> 1:15:10.839
<v Speaker 1>He did it. Uh yeah.

1:15:11.160 --> 1:15:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Sam Howell is uh, he's he's gonna be the He's

1:15:14.280 --> 1:15:16.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna be the decider here whether this game is a

1:15:16.360 --> 1:15:19.439
<v Speaker 2>blowout or not. If he's throwing the ball for grabs

1:15:19.439 --> 1:15:21.519
<v Speaker 2>and he's running for his life. Terrible job by the

1:15:21.520 --> 1:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>offensive line against the Giants, then uh, there's gonna be

1:15:26.240 --> 1:15:28.200
<v Speaker 2>some turnovers and then the Eagles are going to just

1:15:28.240 --> 1:15:31.880
<v Speaker 2>start humming and this is going to be grim. But

1:15:32.160 --> 1:15:35.280
<v Speaker 2>GREGI are we still on the point where we're a

1:15:35.280 --> 1:15:38.120
<v Speaker 2>little bit noivous about the Philly offense. We're just talking

1:15:38.120 --> 1:15:38.679
<v Speaker 2>about KC.

1:15:39.280 --> 1:15:42.439
<v Speaker 5>Okay, No, I mean there there are a little meat

1:15:42.439 --> 1:15:45.599
<v Speaker 5>and potatoes. It's not a lot of variation. I think

1:15:45.640 --> 1:15:50.240
<v Speaker 5>it was interesting that Vic Fangio was in that building

1:15:50.920 --> 1:15:54.559
<v Speaker 5>and knows that team. You know, he made a very

1:15:54.600 --> 1:15:58.000
<v Speaker 5>similar approach to what the Eagles did. Defensively, and he

1:15:58.080 --> 1:16:00.519
<v Speaker 5>really played it. They played in base defense the whole game,

1:16:00.680 --> 1:16:02.720
<v Speaker 5>and they said, we're gonna stop your running game if

1:16:02.760 --> 1:16:05.960
<v Speaker 5>at all possible, and we think we have a better

1:16:06.080 --> 1:16:08.880
<v Speaker 5>chance of winning if Hurtz is throwing the ball down

1:16:08.920 --> 1:16:10.640
<v Speaker 5>the field. And they did get a couple of turnovers

1:16:11.000 --> 1:16:14.360
<v Speaker 5>out of it, and that to me is telling. I

1:16:14.400 --> 1:16:16.360
<v Speaker 5>just don't know if the Commanders are set up to

1:16:16.439 --> 1:16:18.439
<v Speaker 5>possibly do it. They didn't do it when they played

1:16:18.439 --> 1:16:20.519
<v Speaker 5>earlier this year, but neither of the Eagles defense. The

1:16:20.560 --> 1:16:24.719
<v Speaker 5>worst performance by the Eagles defense all season was against

1:16:24.720 --> 1:16:27.120
<v Speaker 5>these Commanders. They actually didn't really get after Sam Howell

1:16:27.160 --> 1:16:29.840
<v Speaker 5>that well, and that that game, same Howl was kind

1:16:29.880 --> 1:16:31.240
<v Speaker 5>of throwing the ball all over the field.

1:16:31.240 --> 1:16:31.880
<v Speaker 3>There was a fun game.

1:16:32.040 --> 1:16:34.640
<v Speaker 5>This matchup over the last few years, including the Commanders

1:16:34.680 --> 1:16:37.320
<v Speaker 5>you know win over them last year, has been you know,

1:16:37.920 --> 1:16:40.040
<v Speaker 5>very close down to the wires. Just one of those

1:16:40.040 --> 1:16:42.519
<v Speaker 5>division matchups. So I think six and a half points

1:16:42.840 --> 1:16:44.599
<v Speaker 5>a little too much for washing for.

1:16:44.600 --> 1:16:48.160
<v Speaker 4>They It might be, I mean, like Howell, they may

1:16:48.200 --> 1:16:49.639
<v Speaker 4>not have gotten to him in the way that he's

1:16:49.680 --> 1:16:51.920
<v Speaker 4>been gotten to another games, but he was pressured twenty

1:16:51.960 --> 1:16:54.000
<v Speaker 4>seven times by the Eagles, which.

1:16:53.880 --> 1:16:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Is twenty seven, tied for the most how many quarters

1:16:56.680 --> 1:16:57.160
<v Speaker 2>did they play?

1:16:57.200 --> 1:16:58.880
<v Speaker 4>Man right, it was tied for the most in a

1:16:58.960 --> 1:17:01.479
<v Speaker 4>game by any player in twenty twenty three, other than

1:17:01.520 --> 1:17:04.439
<v Speaker 4>the fact that he was tied with himself against in

1:17:04.479 --> 1:17:06.120
<v Speaker 4>that terrible Buffalo game for a Howell.

1:17:06.560 --> 1:17:09.120
<v Speaker 3>So they didn't finish those plays and not enough that

1:17:09.160 --> 1:17:09.519
<v Speaker 3>they didn't.

1:17:09.560 --> 1:17:11.519
<v Speaker 4>But I also think it's like all every week after week,

1:17:11.560 --> 1:17:14.200
<v Speaker 4>it's like, is the offense rounding into shape? I just

1:17:14.200 --> 1:17:16.960
<v Speaker 4>look at the defense they allowed under two hundre yards

1:17:17.000 --> 1:17:18.840
<v Speaker 4>passing to the Dolphins forty five on the ground.

1:17:18.840 --> 1:17:19.960
<v Speaker 3>We talked about how they did that.

1:17:20.960 --> 1:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Hurts.

1:17:21.400 --> 1:17:22.879
<v Speaker 3>The giveaways have been the issue.

1:17:22.920 --> 1:17:26.040
<v Speaker 4>But Hurts is playing awesome otherwise, Like I'm not really

1:17:26.120 --> 1:17:28.559
<v Speaker 4>it's not like, oh, last year, maybe not be exactly

1:17:28.560 --> 1:17:31.160
<v Speaker 4>what we're gonna consistently. Like Hurts is doing incredible things.

1:17:31.320 --> 1:17:33.439
<v Speaker 4>It's been a couple of flurry of giveaways that have

1:17:33.520 --> 1:17:34.440
<v Speaker 4>caused problems.

1:17:34.120 --> 1:17:36.360
<v Speaker 5>That you in that game though, so that that is

1:17:36.439 --> 1:17:39.479
<v Speaker 5>something to watch. He's definitely playing this week, but just

1:17:39.520 --> 1:17:42.559
<v Speaker 5>something to watch whether he's as mobile, whether he can

1:17:42.640 --> 1:17:44.760
<v Speaker 5>run the ball as much, because that would change their

1:17:44.800 --> 1:17:45.559
<v Speaker 5>offense quite a bit.

1:17:45.680 --> 1:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>And let's let's give.

1:17:46.600 --> 1:17:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Him some love because he deserves it and Greg loves it.

1:17:51.760 --> 1:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>He has major fantasy implications. Greg was like a schoolboy

1:17:55.320 --> 1:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>when we were in the theater room watching aj Brown

1:17:57.400 --> 1:17:58.720
<v Speaker 2>do it again in primetime.

1:17:59.560 --> 1:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>This man seven hundred and one.

1:18:02.040 --> 1:18:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Yards since Week three, receiving five consecutive games with at

1:18:07.080 --> 1:18:09.800
<v Speaker 2>least one hundred and twenty five yards Wow through the air.

1:18:09.920 --> 1:18:13.640
<v Speaker 2>That ties them with Calvin Johnson and Mark somebody that

1:18:13.720 --> 1:18:16.559
<v Speaker 2>played when you were in elementary school. Pat stud still

1:18:17.439 --> 1:18:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen sixty six Lions for the longest streak I was.

1:18:20.720 --> 1:18:23.559
<v Speaker 3>Not even on the earth, but continue in with.

1:18:23.439 --> 1:18:26.040
<v Speaker 2>One hundred and twenty five plus receiving yards in edfall history.

1:18:26.360 --> 1:18:29.320
<v Speaker 2>And like what I was saying with Ceedee Lamb, he

1:18:29.560 --> 1:18:33.479
<v Speaker 2>is like like his counterpart rest in peace the twenty

1:18:33.520 --> 1:18:36.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty three Phillies Bryce Harper, like he's the showman. Like

1:18:36.720 --> 1:18:39.760
<v Speaker 2>when they need a big play, they just He's just got.

1:18:39.920 --> 1:18:43.479
<v Speaker 2>He's just a killer. He is a killer for this

1:18:43.520 --> 1:18:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Philly offense and is definitely in the running for Offensive

1:18:46.280 --> 1:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Player of the Year.

1:18:47.080 --> 1:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, how can he not be?

1:18:49.000 --> 1:18:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, of course I would say, like you, you

1:18:51.439 --> 1:18:54.080
<v Speaker 4>just can't drop this. If you're the Eagles, your schedule

1:18:54.120 --> 1:18:55.080
<v Speaker 4>is oh, they'll take care of it.

1:18:55.200 --> 1:18:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, they will, I agree.

1:18:56.200 --> 1:18:59.759
<v Speaker 4>Obi this one's coming up though, Cowboys, Chiefs, Bills, Niners,

1:19:00.040 --> 1:19:02.679
<v Speaker 4>Cowboys Seahawks.

1:19:01.600 --> 1:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Six and a half. We said, yeah, that was a spread.

1:19:03.960 --> 1:19:07.479
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's a dangerous one. I'm not I'm not like

1:19:07.640 --> 1:19:08.280
<v Speaker 3>racking it up.

1:19:08.840 --> 1:19:11.080
<v Speaker 5>It's an interesting one for Washington too though, just because

1:19:11.400 --> 1:19:13.680
<v Speaker 5>again trade deadline. It's fairly on my raidar they need

1:19:13.680 --> 1:19:16.560
<v Speaker 5>to push back the trade deadline two weeks, but Washington.

1:19:16.360 --> 1:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Going to that.

1:19:17.560 --> 1:19:19.920
<v Speaker 5>There's this whole idea that Chase Young could get traded

1:19:20.280 --> 1:19:22.880
<v Speaker 5>or maybe someone else from this team, and it makes sense.

1:19:22.920 --> 1:19:25.599
<v Speaker 5>But it's like, is Ron Rivera making the decisions? Because

1:19:25.640 --> 1:19:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Ron Rivera knows he's out at the end of this year,

1:19:28.439 --> 1:19:30.800
<v Speaker 5>so who would be making him make any trades? Because

1:19:30.840 --> 1:19:34.000
<v Speaker 5>if I'm Ron Rivera, I'm not trading a thing. What

1:19:34.320 --> 1:19:37.160
<v Speaker 5>does a second round pick next year do any good

1:19:37.200 --> 1:19:39.320
<v Speaker 5>for me? But if they're three and five, maybe there's

1:19:39.320 --> 1:19:41.120
<v Speaker 5>pressure from above saying you got it, you gotta make

1:19:41.120 --> 1:19:41.439
<v Speaker 5>a move.

1:19:41.439 --> 1:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

1:19:41.840 --> 1:19:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's new ownership, so I don't know what the

1:19:43.720 --> 1:19:46.439
<v Speaker 4>relationship is there in terms of telling Ron Rivera what

1:19:46.479 --> 1:19:48.400
<v Speaker 4>he has to do. But Martin Mayhew doesn't strike me

1:19:48.439 --> 1:19:50.519
<v Speaker 4>as like a super empowered general manner.

1:19:50.600 --> 1:19:52.880
<v Speaker 3>No, it's Rivera. It's Rivera making the calls.

1:19:53.280 --> 1:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Buyer up your Philadelphia defenses in fantasy because they're getting

1:19:57.120 --> 1:19:59.719
<v Speaker 2>after Sam Howell and they're gonna be playing from behind

1:19:59.760 --> 1:20:01.559
<v Speaker 2>why Washington, and he's going to start throwing it up

1:20:01.600 --> 1:20:03.679
<v Speaker 2>for grabs and it could be grizzly.

1:20:03.880 --> 1:20:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I love that for the Eagles, all.

1:20:06.960 --> 1:20:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, Greg, another fan, another team on the list? All right, Eagles, Seahawks,

1:20:15.280 --> 1:20:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Ravens on an island. Only one team can continue to exist.

1:20:20.080 --> 1:20:22.280
<v Speaker 5>It's really not about one team. It's about one man.

1:20:22.400 --> 1:20:24.439
<v Speaker 5>So it's the Seahawks right now.

1:20:25.080 --> 1:20:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Geno trumps all Oh, I just want it. It's been

1:20:27.720 --> 1:20:29.599
<v Speaker 3>an amazing journey.

1:20:29.680 --> 1:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is it so personal though the love?

1:20:32.160 --> 1:20:34.680
<v Speaker 5>It's been a fun journey, and it's like, for you,

1:20:34.880 --> 1:20:36.439
<v Speaker 5>how fun can this get?

1:20:36.479 --> 1:20:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Because this team is kind of frisky?

1:20:38.800 --> 1:20:40.559
<v Speaker 5>Can he can he be in a big spot in

1:20:40.600 --> 1:20:41.760
<v Speaker 5>a divisional round game?

1:20:41.800 --> 1:20:42.880
<v Speaker 3>That would be fun like that.

1:20:43.520 --> 1:20:45.519
<v Speaker 1>Let's first, we want to see how far the Geno

1:20:45.600 --> 1:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>coaster goes.

1:20:46.479 --> 1:20:48.680
<v Speaker 4>I wish we had an AI service that could tell

1:20:48.760 --> 1:20:51.080
<v Speaker 4>us like who's been mentioned the most over the last

1:20:51.080 --> 1:20:53.200
<v Speaker 4>like eighteen months, because it's got to be Geno Smith

1:20:53.320 --> 1:20:57.280
<v Speaker 4>number one and then the number two half as many times.

1:20:57.640 --> 1:21:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Rogers got a lot of play this summer, but this podcast,

1:21:07.200 --> 1:21:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Jordan takes up there. Jordan is up there, all right,

1:21:11.160 --> 1:21:15.160
<v Speaker 2>good stuff, good stuff. We will be back Thursday night,

1:21:15.560 --> 1:21:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Mark and I with recap of Thursday Night football, a

1:21:19.439 --> 1:21:20.800
<v Speaker 2>matchup between.

1:21:20.520 --> 1:21:22.519
<v Speaker 3>Mark, the Bills and the Bucks.

1:21:22.560 --> 1:21:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much, and uh so make sure you

1:21:26.000 --> 1:21:30.320
<v Speaker 2>check out that and our NFL plus Dreamatorium content rolling

1:21:30.360 --> 1:21:31.519
<v Speaker 2>out and everything else.

1:21:32.080 --> 1:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You've sent your way this week. We appreciate your patronage.

1:21:36.560 --> 1:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Until next time, Heed the call.