WEBVTT - Trump Wins 2024 Presidential Election

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Focar playing and broud Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 2>Falls when you're live here on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Studio streaming live on YouTube as well YouTube, dot com

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>search Bloomberg Podcast. Policy changes. A lot of folks are

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 2>highlighting the financial services industry to benefit from a lot

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>of policy changes. The absolute author on all of the

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence work on this is Nathan Dean, Senior policy

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>ANALYSTO Bloomberg Intelligence. Nathan, I know you guys have gamed

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>this out. You've kind of looked at financial industry some

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>of the regulations that are that it's dealing with now

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and that are still kind of on the table. What

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 2>do you think you're with what we're seeing here with

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the elections.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, you know, with the fal services industry, it

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 3>all came down to this rule called the Basel three endgame.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, as outlined by the FED. You're talking about

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 3>a nine percent increase for the GESIPS, the Bank America

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan's of you will about three to four percent

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the regional banks. Now, with President Trump

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 3>winning the Office of the Control of the Currency is

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 3>likely going to flip on day one of next year.

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 3>So this rule is effectively indefinitely delayed. You know this,

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 3>you would need to fed the OCC and the FDIC

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 3>to move forward. Now we think at thirty percent chance

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 3>of it being finalized by twenty twenty six. The reason

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>why we're not down to zero is because there is

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 3>potential out there that a Republican led regulator may try

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 3>and move forth with it, but the idea is going

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 3>to be completely different and they're going to essentially start

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 3>from scratch. So if you're talking about capital requirements on

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>a global scale, remember the European banks have already implemented

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 3>their version of this. There could be some questions here

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>on if the Americans aren't going to do this, why

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 3>should the Europeans on the same side. So certainly a

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 3>lot to play here in terms of the you know,

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.559
<v Speaker 3>deregulatory efforts amongst the investment banks.

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Nathan Dean, you are the consummate Washington insider. When I

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 4>need to get my IF's answered about what's happening in Washington,

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 4>I call you so I have a question here. What

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 4>name should I be looking at more closely than others?

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Bill Lackman, Elon Musk's got Bess and Howard Lucknet. I mean,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 4>talk to us about what the potential for a Trump

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 4>cabinet may very well look like.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 3>So you know, obviously the big question is you going

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 3>to get the Wall Street President Trump? Or are you

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>going to get a populist President Trump? And that's the

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 3>question that I don't think anybody really has an answer

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 3>to because you know, for example, at the SEC, you

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 3>know you have Commissioner Hester Purse, who I think would

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 3>be a very popular SEC chair coming from more of

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the conservative wing the populist side of the party. But

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 3>then there's also going to be folks like former J. Clayton.

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, obviously his name's been in there for a Treasury,

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 3>but you know, somebody like a disciple, if you will,

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 3>a commissioner or chairman Clayton could be also a name

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 3>at the SEC. So the question that we have, and

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 3>we should find out about this more over the next

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 3>few weeks, is are you going to get the populist Trump?

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Are the Wall Street Trump, and I think you're probably

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>going to get a combination of the both, where if

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>President Trump cares about your issue in terms of he

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 3>specifically wants to be involved, you'll get a populist Trump.

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 3>If it's something where he's happy to delegate to other

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 3>folks in Washington, then I think you may get a

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street Trump.

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 4>Only think it took a long time for Trump to

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 4>pick his cabinet and his players back the first time around.

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Apparently he's much more prepared this time. Talk to us

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 4>about timing around some of those selections. When can we appear,

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 4>When can we expect to hear something there?

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think you're gonna hear it, probably before,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 3>probably within the next few weeks. I mean, to your point,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 3>you know they've been talking about this for some time.

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>But I would also note that the Republicans have somewhere

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 3>between fifty two potentially as much as fifty six seats

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 3>in the Senate, and as a result, the Republican Senate

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 3>is going to be able to confirm a lot of

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 3>President Trump's appointees on a much quicker basis than if

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 3>you were to have a Democrat controlled Senate or even

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>a fifty or fifty one. Now why do we care

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>about this, Well, because the faster that those regulatory leaders

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 3>come in place, the faster they can start these deregulatory efforts.

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, a regulatory leader, for the most part, can't

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 3>just come in and say, right, this regulation, We're going

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>to just completely roll it back on day one. It's

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna take nine months, twelve months, if not even two

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 3>years to move forth on that effort. So the quicker

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>those regulatory leaders come in place, the quicker the de

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 3>regulatory effort can take place.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Red headline crossing the Bloomberg terminal. Harris to deliver remarks

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 2>at Howard University at four pm Eastern time, so we

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>will have more reporting on that. Nathan is Brice president elect?

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is President elect Trump is see had Lamed

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Duck president? Is that a fair way to look at it? Now?

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>So generally, and I say this generally, in the second

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 3>term of a presidential term, if you will think President

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 3>Obama or President George W. Bush, you usually have about

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 3>eighteen months to expend your political capital. First one hundred

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 3>days of the presidency is critical. But as soon as

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Congress begins to think about their midterm elections, and then

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 3>as the result when they come back, you know, why

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 3>should they stick their necks out for the president who's

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be gone. So what do presidents tend to do.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>They tend to go internationally, and they tend to travel

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 3>because the power of the presidency it's more powerful there. So,

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, we do think President Trump is going to

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 3>be spending a lot of time abroad Ukraine, Middle East,

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 3>for example. There's a lot of stuff that he can

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 3>do there. But I wouldn't call him a lame duck

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 3>just yet, because again, the power of the presidency is

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 3>more powerful there.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Nathan, it'sok till ten thirty two am Eastern Time this

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 4>morning for China's Mystery of Foreign Affairs To congratulate President

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>elect Donald Trump. You know that China tariffs are coming.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 4>You're betting man, what kind of tariff regime do you

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 4>think we're entering into. Is it going to be that

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 4>ten percent broad? Is it going to be sixty percent

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 4>on China? What are you hearing?

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 3>So this is where I think the process of tariff

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 3>is key. Now, remember, let's just say January twentieth, President

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 3>comes in. You see a red line over the terminal.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>You say, President Trump signs an executive order saying tariffs

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 3>are coming. In the language of that executive order, however,

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 3>I think you'll see language that says the tariff is

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 3>not coming for two hundred and seventy days or three

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixty five days. Why, because tariffs are negotiation tools.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>President Trump doesn't know what the reciprocal tariff on China

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 3>from China would be, and President Trump wants to use

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 3>this as a negotiation. So I think there's going to

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 3>be language in there allowing flexibility, allowing President Trump to

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 3>come back and say, eh, maybe not sixty percent, maybe

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 3>we'll go to ten percent because gave us a win

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. So what we're saying is watch

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 3>out for that headline risk in the first or second

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 3>quarter of next year. But then you're gonna get probably

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 3>six months to actually truly understand what that tariff will

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.239
<v Speaker 3>look like before it goes into fruition.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Nathan, as always, thank you very much for

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 2>your analysis. Nathan Dean see your policy on US at

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence. You find all of Nathan's research at Big

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 2>on the Terminal. He really boils down some of this

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 2>very difficult policy minutia into something that like real people

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>can you know that real people can understand and use.

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 2>Live here in our Bloomberg and Actor Brokers studio, streaming

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 2>live on YouTube as well. All Right, we've got a

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Republican in the White House, got a Republican Senate in

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the houses yet to be determined. What does it mean

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 2>for policy? Our next guest has got some thoughts here.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Ed Mills, managing director in Washington, Policy analysts for Raymond

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 2>James ed, Okay, it's kind of a red wave. The

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>House is still to be determined. Now, what what policies

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 2>should we expect from a second Trump administration?

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 5>So I think one of the questions we've been answering

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 5>for folks here at Raymond James is what is different

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 5>this year from twenty sixteen? So, first and foremost, Trump

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 5>did not expect to win a twenty sixteen and didn't

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 5>have a transition Cheam, that's not true.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:37.559
<v Speaker 6>This time.

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 5>He's going to have a lot more personnel to start off,

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 5>a playbook that they've been developing to implement, and so

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 5>I do anticipate a lot of robust policies to start

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 5>off twenty twenty five. That's on taxes, on tariffs, on trade,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 5>on immigration. Now, to get taxes done, you probably need

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 5>the House of Representatives. As we're speaking right now, it's

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 5>starting to inch towards that complete sweep, and Republicans are

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 5>slightly better positioned to have a majority in the House

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 5>than Democrats. But there's a big difference between having a

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 5>majority and being able to govern ed mills.

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at the smp OR up two percent on

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 4>the day, led by the financial sector, the banks four

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 4>point seven percent on the day. We are up. Talk

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 4>us about financial regulation under a Trump administration, I mean,

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 4>is bar going to step down? Who's going to replace

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Powell at the FED? I mean, who's going to be

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 4>controlling the Fed?

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Here?

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we know deregulation is good for the banking sector.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 4>What are your thoughts there?

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Damian, you mentioned the two people that probably are

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 5>the only ones that stay with a Trump victory. Here,

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 5>every single federal financial regulator will lose his or her job.

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 5>This is the largest transition in US history. This has

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 5>become some court cases in the last couple of administrations

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 5>because of precedent. But we've been in what I've described

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 5>as a regulatory supersite. We've talked about higher capital standards

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 5>for big banks following the bank crisis last year and

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 5>the implementation of what's known as Basil three capital standards.

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 5>The regulators came out with new restrictive merger guidance in September.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 5>Throw all of that out the window with the Trump victory,

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 5>and so that's what financials are reacting to. Not only

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 5>are their capital standards not going to get higher, we

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 5>could see significant regulatory relief because there is a deregulatory bent,

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 5>and we're probably likely to see a considerable amount of

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 5>consolidation in the bank space, which has been almost non existent,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 5>lower than it was during the financial crisis. So the

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 5>financials are being viewed as a clear winner this morning.

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, Paul and I are thinking about allocating the merger arbitrage.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 4>I mean, talk to us a little bit about anti

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 4>trust regulation here in the US. I mean, can we

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 4>expect that to lighten up under Trump administration.

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 5>This is where it gets a little bit more interesting.

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 5>First and foremost, at the anti trust regulators. I look

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 5>at the FTC and Cheerly con Well. Her term's actually

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 5>already expired, but she gets to stay on as cheer

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 5>or as a commissioner in a democratic majority until the

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 5>president appoints in the Senate confirms her replacement. We'll be

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 5>watching to see if she steps down and goes on

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 5>to a different job. But in that case, it's still

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 5>only a two to two tie. So Donald Trump is

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 5>going to have to nominate someone to replace her and

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 5>elevate maybe one of the existing FTC commissioners to Cheer

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 5>before we have that change. At the Department of Justice

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 5>Anti Trust Division, Jonathan Canter will be gone on January

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 5>twentieth at twelve oh one. How long does it take

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 5>for Trump to make that change. That's something that we'll

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 5>be watching. Who is his attorney general, That's something that

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 5>we need to watch. That said, a lot of anti

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 5>trust activities started when Donald Trump was president. The lawsuit

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 5>against Google that we've been talking about in recent weeks,

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 5>that's finally gotten to the point where we might see

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 5>some action by the court to implement remedies that was

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 5>stuttered under Donald Trump. So populism is driving anti trust.

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 5>Populism drove Donald Trump. We will see some changes, but

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 5>it's not as clear cut of a change as we

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 5>discussed with financials.

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 4>And markets have been looking to, for example, comments by

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Scott Besson x Soros of increasing domestic oil supplied by

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 4>three million oil equivalent barrels per day. People are looking

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 4>at Elon Musk. I mean, is Who's going to be

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 4>in Trump's cabinet here? I mean, is Scott Bessont really

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 4>a candidate for US Treasury Secretary? Is Elon Musk going

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 4>to be running the Department of Transportation? I mean, talk

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 4>to us a little bit about what we can expect

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 4>in the weeks ahead on Trumps cabinet.

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. So when I look at one of the bigger

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 5>surprises of the election results was the size of the

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 5>victory for Republicans in the Senate, and the more that

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 5>Republicans pick up those seats, it could be a fifty

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 5>five seat majority when all is said and done from Republicans.

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 5>The higher that is, the more Trump is going to

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 5>be able to get anyone that he wants. And we

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't have to worry about one or two senators denying

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 5>that nomination. Scott Bessen absolutely could be Treasury Secretary. There's

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 5>others leading that role. I'm a little bit more skeptical

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 5>as it comes to Elon Musk. To be a confirmed individual,

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 5>you have to divest a lot from what you own.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 5>I just don't see that happening. The question I get

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 5>a lot from Elon too, is is he going to

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 5>drive all of these cuts? Call me skeptical of Congress

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 5>actually passing significant budget cuts. We get asked that after

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 5>every election, and our federal budget just continues to go up.

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Ed, thank you so much for joining us. I appreciate

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 2>getting your perspectives. Ed Mills. He's a managing director and

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Washington policy analyst over there at Raymond James joining us

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 2>from New York via a zoom.

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on fo card Playing and

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>broun Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>ever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Damian Sasauer sitting in for Alex deel On paulse When

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 2>You're live, here in a Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio streaming

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>live on YouTube as well. Donald Trump was elected the

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>forty seventh President of the United States, pulling off a

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 2>political comeback in one of the most polarized contests for

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 2>the White House in US history. While attending his supporters,

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 2>he said, this will truly be the Golden age of America.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 7>I will not rest until we have delivered the strong, safe,

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 7>and prosperous America that our children deserve and that you deserve.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 7>This will truly be the golden age of America. This

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 7>is a magnificent victory for the American people that will

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 7>allow us to make America great again.

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 6>All Right?

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>That was President elect Donald Trump's addressing his supporters last evening.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>The question I think for the Democratic Party is where

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>does it.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Go from here?

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's check in with Wendy Schuler, Professor Brown University and

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 2>interim director of the Watson Institute, joining us from Providence,

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Rhode Island via zoom. Wendy, we've had, you know, a

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 2>few hours here to digest the news. If you're the

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party, how deep do you really have to look

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>inside the party to get a sense of what needs

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to be done?

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, you have to ask yourself why, you know popular

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 8>incumbent senators have been reelected before shared Brown, Tammy, Baldwin, Casey,

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 8>and Pennsylvania could not withstand the red wave, and so

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 8>you can attribute it to Trump charisma. The Trump followers.

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 8>We can do that if we want to as observers.

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 8>But you know, this ran deep, This reaction across voters,

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 8>across different kinds of voters, from different backgrounds, different ages.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 8>This ran deep, and it was a signal that said,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 8>we don't like the policies that you're enacting. So what

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 8>can they do. I think it's curious to go back

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 8>to or I'm sorry, not curious informative to go back

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 8>to Obama. Obama had a much strict border policy than

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 8>Joe Biden, and I think he did that because he

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 8>sensed there wasn't enough support in America for something more

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 8>liberal and more open. So you can say to yourselves,

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 8>the Democrats close the border for too late. The Democrats

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 8>didn't push hard enough to get those interest rates down.

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 8>The Democrats didn't pay attention to the price of eggs,

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 8>and that's unusual for the Democrats, who usually care a

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 8>lot about the price of eggs. So I think this

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 8>is not necessarily a reboot completely, but they have got

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 8>to meet the voter where the voter is, and last

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 8>night the voter was not with the Democratic Party.

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 4>When do you mention the border? And let's look ahead here.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Trump is about to embark on what many believed to

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 4>be the largest deportation program in US history. How does

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 4>he expect to round them all up? And where does

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 4>he intend to send them?

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, Trump always surprises us in the sense

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 8>that he'll sort of go off the ranch and then

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 8>I'll kind of moderate. You know. The idea is how

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 8>long does Trump want to be president? You know, he's

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 8>constitutionally prohibited from electing, being elected, and serving, not from running,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 8>and so you know, does he want to last a

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 8>long time? Maybe get rid of the twenty second Amendment.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 8>I don't know what he plans, but I think he

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 8>will scale this idea up back, especially since the border

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 8>has been shut down and you know, undocumented migration has

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 8>slowed so much. Does he really have to do this?

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 8>Does he have to disrupt the country this way? You know,

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 8>he could do some of it, but I don't think

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 8>the pressure's on him to do all of it because

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 8>Biden has already taken this step, and he'll keep that

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 8>policy in place.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 4>When do you mention the twenty second Amendment? You're not

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 4>the first one today to talk about it, but you

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 4>know what I'm most interested in, And John Tucker mentions

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 4>it's the FED right. And Trump has made no secret

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 4>about his intention to have a greater say and monetary

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 4>policy here in the US. My question for you is

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 4>what legal mechanisms can Trump take advantage of in order

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 4>for the to give the Oval Office more control more

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 4>saying monetary policy.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean the Federal Reserve Act. I mean literally

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 8>the Act creating Federal Reserve and all the bills that

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 8>have come you know after that and reauthorizing it. You know,

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 8>that's something that's been sort of a partnership with private

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 8>monetary institutions BANG and the federal government. And the thing

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 8>about Donald Trump is gonna need cash, right, You can't,

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 8>you know, you can't crash the government and crash the

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 8>economy by the federal government running out of cash. So

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 8>there is a symbiotic relationship between really big banks and

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 8>the Federal Reserve itself and the success of a president.

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 8>So there's going to have to be negotiations there. But

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 8>I don't think the heads of big banks. You're just

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 8>going to hand over the keys of the kingdom to

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 8>the president of the United States and amount of who

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 8>they are, and so that will be a negotiation, and

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 8>Trump fancies himself as a very good negotiator.

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Wendy, does Kamala Harris have a future as a leader

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 2>of the Democratic Party. I'm thinking maybe in four years time.

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 8>I think, all things considered, she ran a good campaign

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 8>what she was given, the time frame that she had

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 8>to work within, and her balancing act of trying to

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 8>separate from the Biden record and also present some sort

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 8>of plan for the future and bringing in and solidifying

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 8>particularly younger women, even older women. I think there's still

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 8>a block and a constituency that she can tap if

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 8>she wanted to run again. I just don't see this

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 8>as a Kamala Harris failed campaign. I see it as

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 8>Trump being a former president and energizing their base and

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 8>not making the same campaign mistakes they did in twenty

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 8>twenty and the Biden record. You know those numbers from

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 8>exit polls yesterday on the wrong track, Those were extraordinarily

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 8>high numbers. And I don't know if anybody could have

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 8>won in the face of those numbers.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Wendy, I wonder if you could shift your attention here

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 4>to what's going on in Ukraine. Obviously, Zelenski was the

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 4>firebrand who rejected Trump's request for information on Hunter Biden's

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 4>dealings back during his first tenure. And look the battlefield's changing.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Just yesterday, right, Ukrainian forces had their first run in

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 4>with North Korean troops in the Kurk region. What comes

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 4>next for the Ukraine, for Zelenski, for Central Europe, and

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 4>for Russia under a Trump administration.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think Trump is a fan of Putin, and

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 8>I think Trump has said before that he thinks there's

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 8>a deal that can be reached. So my guess is

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 8>Trump says, listen, we're not going to send you the

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 8>same kind of weaponry, We're not going to support you

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 8>the same way. Go to the table, cut a deal,

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 8>up crimea I mean literally, these are the things that

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 8>he'll say. And maybe we'll make sure that more of

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 8>your people don't get chilled. I mean, I think that's

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 8>what we'll do. And in the Middle East, you know,

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 8>I think people who think that he'll be a diehard

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 8>suborner of Israel, maybe, but he may go to the

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 8>saudiast and say, what kind of deal do you want

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 8>to cut to get this thing over with against Iran.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean, he wants to make deals and be the hero.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 8>And that's something we've seen before and we'll see again.

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 8>So whatever whoever's dealing with him has to be able

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 8>to give him some sort of victory he can walk

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 8>away with.

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Wendy, thank you so much. We appreciate that.

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>As always.

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Wendy Schilder, Professor Brown University and Interim Director of the

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Watson Institute. Joining us from Providence, Rhode Island.

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also listen

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>He Bloomberg Interactive, Brooker Studio, or streaming live over YouTube

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 2>as well as to check that out Over there, the

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>world is reacting, trying to make sense of kind of

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the political elections we held here last evening in the

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>United States, new president, new Senate, and still to be determined,

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 2>a House of Representatives, so we're trying to talk to

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>some smart people around the world about kind of the

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 2>views of what might change going forward. Our next guest Mukunda.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 2>He's a professor, a lecturer of management practice at the

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Yale School of Management. So gotam a big surprise for

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people waking up this morning to find

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 2>out that Donald Trump is the president elect and that

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the Republicans have retaken the Senate. Here, what was your takeaway?

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 2>What do you hear when you when you talk to people.

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 9>Hi, Paul, So, first one is if you were surprised,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 9>that kind of means weren't paying attention, right, the polling

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 9>was very clear this could go either way that right,

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 9>You know, maybe you're surprised by the magnitude of Trump's victory,

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 9>but this was a fifty to fifty election going in.

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 9>Then fifty fifty elections have to get resolved one way

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 9>or the other. For what's going to happen next, I

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 9>think there's some things you can kind of bet on.

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 9>It looks at this point increasingly likely that Republicans are

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 9>going to take the House of Representatives too. If you

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 9>have Republicans in the House, the Senate, and the presidency,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 9>you can expect the tax cut. It'll be a realm

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 9>almost certainly a deficit finance tax cut, because that's what

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 9>always happens. Second, I think Trump has committed himself to

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 9>tariffs in a way that I suspect he's not likely

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 9>to back off from right away. But once he does that,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 9>you're going to see economic impacts within the United States,

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 9>going to see retaliatory tariffs. Like the way in which

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 9>that trade struggle escalates is going to shape the political

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 9>dynamic going forward in ways that we can't predict right

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 9>now because we just don't know what the reactions are

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 9>going to be. That's all domestic domestic policy. On foreign policy,

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 9>I think we can pretty quickly get some insight, and

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 9>there I would be really concerned. If I were the Ukrainians,

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 9>I would just I'm not sure Ukraine's position is tenable anymore.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 9>They will essentially have to rely on Western Europe to

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 9>supply them for their defense. I just don't know that

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 9>that's within Western Europe's industrial capacity, and I, you know,

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 9>for my friends in Ukraine, I don't know what to

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 9>say to them right now. And Second, the basic underpinning

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 9>of international politics since the Second World War has been

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 9>in a lot of different countries. We're willing to bet

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 9>their survival on the reliability of the United States as

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 9>an ally. That is not an overstatement. South Korea has

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 9>North Korea, but that has nuclear weapons, and they do

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 9>not have nuclear weapons. Japan has China not too far away,

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 9>that has nuclear weapons. They do not have nuclear weapons.

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 9>They had said that we trust the United States so

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 9>much to protect us that we are willing to risk

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 9>our national survival all that. If you are a defense

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 9>that you know you are part of the defense statism

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 9>in South Korea Japan, I don't see how you make

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 9>that bet anymore. I don't see how you could possibly

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 9>do that given Trump's express beliefs about alliances, and in

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 9>that situation, I would suspect both significant increase in defense spending.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 9>And you know, right now, I'm sure they're having meetings

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 9>about whether they need to acquire a nuclear and Drumman, if.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 4>You could talk to us a little bit about the

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 4>timeline between now and when Trump is expected to announce

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.239
<v Speaker 4>some of his cabinet picks, I mean any color air.

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 9>So we'll find out a lot more because the cabinet

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 9>picks will determine, you know, a huge amount of what

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 9>happens next. Democrats were obviously deeply concerned by rumors that,

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, Steve Bannon and Michael Flynn and Stephen Miller

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 9>would have very very senior roles in the Trump administration

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 9>and shaping its policy. But it's also possible that we'll

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 9>get the second term version of Steve Mnuchen and Jem

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 9>Mattison people like that. And I know when you talk

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 9>to people, you know, very sect people in the financial sector,

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 9>their expectation is that some of their peers will go

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 9>into this administration and act in the same way that

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 9>they did in the last one. Which one of those

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 9>happens is entirely up to Trump. And my guess is

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 9>what we'll start to see is if we look at

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 9>the people around him, the way I would say is

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 9>they're all ambitious and they don't play well with others.

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 9>That would be a characteristic describe to a lot of

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 9>these people, and so I think we're likely to see

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 9>some really intensive what you might call court politics. I

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 9>was just telling a bunch of students earlier today that

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 9>if you want to understand what's going to happen next,

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 9>you need to go back and read histories. The Byzantine Empire,

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 9>because that's kind of what we're thinking about, is lots

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 9>and lots of different people struggling to capture the ear

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.479
<v Speaker 9>of the king and to get his support for what

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 9>they want to do and for their own strength and power.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 9>And given what we've seen about Trump and Trump and

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 9>how fast he goes through staff, we might see that

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 9>shifting for a moment to moment, because if you look

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 9>at sort of what Stephen Miller wants to do and

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.959
<v Speaker 9>what say Elon Musk wants to do, there's not a

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 9>lot of overlap between those two.

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Gotham talk to us about the idea of checks and

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 2>balances here, Trump and the White House, Republican Senate, perhaps

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 2>a Republican led a House. Is it up to the

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court to act as a final check on a presidency?

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Is because there are some concerns that how the Supreme

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Court has evolved over the last several years that even

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 2>that may not be an effective check.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that's right. I mean, it'll be the

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 9>super because there's not it. There's no one else, especially

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 9>if Republicans take the House, that right, that that'll just

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 9>pit for the next two years. There will be no

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 9>center of power significant enough to stand up to the

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 9>White House. And I agree with you. The Supreme Court

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 9>has made a series of rulings that no significant, no

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 9>major legal scholar would have predicted, giving sort of the

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 9>Trump presidency and levels of authority that are unprecedented in

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 9>American history. But the other half of that, I'll say

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 9>is is two years is not that long, and American

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 9>politics is deeply reactive. Political scientists referred to it as thermostatic. Basically,

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 9>whatever the president does, the average Americans starts to oppose it,

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 9>and so we might, you know, ten years later, maybe

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 9>the support at the classic example that is Obamacare, where

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 9>when Barack Obama passed it, it cost him an enormous

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 9>landslide defeat in the next set of elections, but ten

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 9>years later it's actually quite popular. So what we could

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 9>expect is whatever Trump does, whether you agree with it

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 9>or disagree with it, everything we know about political science

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 9>says that the average American is going to disapprove because

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 9>that's just how big America free responder chain. If that

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 9>is strong enough, then you'll see the House switch sides

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 9>again in twenty twenty six, and then you'll might start

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 9>to see some real checks and balances. But for the

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 9>next for the next twenty four months, I expect them

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 9>to have essentially a free hand.

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, Gotham, thank you so much. We appreciate that.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Gotham mccondac Professor, Lecturer of Management Practice at the Yale

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 2>School of Management up in New Haven.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's see about policy, because a lot of changes to

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 2>be expected from a global policy here in a Trump administration,

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 2>particularly one where it also has a Republican in the

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Senate as well in the leadership roles. Monica guerre joins

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 2>US executive director and head US Policy from Morgan Stanley

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Wealth Management. Monica, thanks so much for joining us here. Uh,

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 2>I say, huge political news over last evening and into

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 2>this morning. How do you frame that out for your

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Stanley Wealth Management customers as it relates to their portfolios?

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no, that's that's a great question, you know, one

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 6>of the things that you know, we are really focusing

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 6>on is, you know, what does the president have control over,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 6>especially since we don't have the full outcome on Congress.

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 6>So that's what we're talking about right now. And what

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 6>we see is trade tariffs and energy policy really being

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 6>the most sensitive to President along Trump's second term. So

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 6>for example, you know, you can have higher tariffs on

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 6>China and a potential universal tariff and those could you know,

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 6>potentially negatively drag on growth and boost inflation in the

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 6>short term. But you know, we're also focusing on some

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 6>of the other you know, fact winners that could come

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 6>out of you know, his executive branch.

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 4>True Baby Drill, I mean, Monica talk to us a

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 4>little bit about what we're seeing in the commodity complex here.

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I see it off one and a half

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 4>percent year to date. It was just up a few

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 4>weeks ago. You would think maybe perhaps with some of

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 4>the policies that Trump is floating here on the energy sector,

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 4>are certainly you know, minerals that are hard to get

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 4>et cetera, that we would see something bounce back here.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 4>But it seems like things are kind of rolling over.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Curious to hear your thoughts there.

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and you know, the partment of energy. That's a

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 6>great example of you know where Trump has a lot

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 6>of control to acting the laterally on the on the

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 6>drilling side, and we don't see that really impacting the

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 6>market positively because you know, more supply could put pressure

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 6>on pricing as you're thinking about from the from the

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 6>market's perspective, that set. If we're thinking about energy broadly

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 6>inclusive of a clean energy agenda, there's a real risk

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 6>there to clean energy from my policy perspective, from a

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, rollback and potential inflation reduct Reduction Act tax credits.

0:28:58.120 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 6>But one of the things we want to highlight here

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 6>on energy is that even though you could have sort

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 6>of a deconstructive approach to tax credits, clean energy policy,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 6>et cetera, what you're really focusing on here is rates

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 6>the rate environment. Clean energy is an industry functions like

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 6>growth stocks, and so when rates are low and markets

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 6>right now are currently pricing in four cuts through the

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 6>end of twenty twenty six, essentially energy clean energy can outperform.

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 6>And so that's that's what we're focusing on in the

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 6>energy sector, is that while from a policy perspective, you

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 6>don't see much movement on traditional You could see movement

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 6>sort of negatively placing a drag on clean energy. The

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 6>real story is the rate story on clean energy.

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 4>So I'm looking at the vix here. As my colleague

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Paul Sweeney, you know, rightly points out, we're back down

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 4>to sixteen, off twenty two percent day over day, you know,

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 4>off nearly a third since you know, the fourth since Monday.

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, talk to us a little bit about, you know,

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 4>expectations for volatility under a Trump regime. I remember during

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 4>his first term, you know, you know, it was jump risk, right,

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 4>it was, you know, one day he says something, you know,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 4>his left leg is feeling one thing, and all of

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 4>a sudden he says it, and the markets kind of

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 4>react to that. You know, we've been in an environment

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 4>for the better part of the last four years, Monica,

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 4>where it's been all about rate differentials, all about monetary policies,

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 4>all about the Fed. Is there any chance that the Fed,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 4>that you know, rate differentials, can retake control of the

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 4>market narrative here or are we just in Trump's world

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 4>and everyone's just living in it.

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 6>That's a that's a great question. I mean, I think

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 6>the drop off in the vix that we're seeing that's

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 6>just par for the course with normal election year activity.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 6>Once you have right the president set, you have a

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 6>sense of what's happening with Congress. Granted we don't really

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 6>know what's happening with a House, volatility plummets. Yes, you're

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 6>going to see a headline response. One of the one

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 6>of the sort of murky areas around Trump is which

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 6>Trump are we going to get? Does that mean that

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 6>we get more disruption or is it really a story

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 6>all about Congress and what they do with taxes. In

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 6>that case, if it's focused on is things are likely

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 6>to remain more stable, especially as we lost the play

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 6>by play as they debate each provision under the Tax

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 6>Cuts and Jobs Act, you could get you an extension

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 6>of most of it. But what's important here is that

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 6>even if you have you know that's a shallow red

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 6>wave in the House and you have that unified government,

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 6>those thin margins mean that they're still room for the

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 6>GOP to play. So we are going to be watching

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 6>that for a while and I think that yes, Trump

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 6>is the disruptive, disruption president. Right, we're thinking about headline

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 6>reaction volatility that's short lived, but over the long run,

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 6>what we're all going to be focusing on is that

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 6>tax agend and what happens in Congress.

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, Monica, thanks so much for joining us. Monica Aguera,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 2>executive director a head of US policy for Morgan Stanley

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Wealth Management.

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal