WEBVTT - Full Episode - Could A Government Shutdown Backfire On Democrats + Diagnosis Doesn’t Define You: Growing Up With Autism

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Hello, They're happy Wednesday, and welcome to another episode of

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the Check Podcast. It is October first, and apparently what

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that means. It's October first, twenty twenty five. Do you

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>know if your government's open? Well, the answer is there

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are portions of the government not open today. What does

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it mean? Well, you heard, if you heard my last

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>monologue about this, you know this is a manufactured moment.

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a created political a manufactured political drama based

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>on legal interpretations of two Justice departments that go back

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Carter and Reagan era, and a whole bunch

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of members of Congress who claim they don't like these

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>shutdowns but have refused to pass legislation that actually would

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>make these showdowns moot. So I'm not going to bother

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to rehash that, but it really bothers me how that

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>New York Times did a story about sort of, oh,

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we've had fifty years of this polarizing and sort of

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't sort of glossed over the fact that this is

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>simply an interpretation. There's no law in the Constitution that

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>says the government is open or closed on October first,

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>depending on when you pass appropriations bills. This is essentially

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a decision that people in power made in order to

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>create a point of drama or leverage, apparently for no

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>particular good that's come from it. Right, this has just

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>been a disaster. And I think this is the challenge

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats have being the instigators of this, which is

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for my entire adult lifetime, it has been the Republicans

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that have been the instigators of the shutdown we've had these.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>It was when there was a Democratic president that we

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>had it in the nineties, democratic president, when we had

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it during Obama. It is with Trump. That's the first

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>time we've had this with a Republican Now, the first

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>time it was Republican. This is now the second time

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we've had a shutdown with Trump as president and Republicans

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in charge of both the House in the Senate now

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the filibuster. And I'm going to get to

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that in a minute, because you got to ask yourself,

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what if this is what ends the filibuster. I'm fascinated

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to see what the reaction would be among some of

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the left who've been agitating for getting rid of the

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>philibuster for some time. Imagine if this is the trigger

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for it, just something to put a pin in that right,

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just file this away for a second. But we're here,

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think the issue and it's reflective. I've got

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>some pull numbers I want to go through that are

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>actually well timed, sort of end of September polls. They're

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>well timed. But they we get at this question of shutdowns.

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Democrats have messaged for twenty years

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the shutdowns are bad, and now here they are on

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the other side saying passing up the opportunity for a

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>clean of temporary six week extension to keep the government

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>open because you know they want their And this is

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I said this before. I think tactically they made a

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>mistake not accepting this continuing resolution to November. I think

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they would be better off having this showdown over the

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>exact same issue healthcare subsidies, the Obamacare subsidies. They'd have

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>been better off, I think starting that fight in November

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>after the twenty twenty five elections in Virginia, New Jersey,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>New York, et cetera. But here's you know, here's what's interesting.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So the time says this new pulling out and let

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>me read you one of a couple of the questions

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that had to do with the with a shutdown, who

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>would you blame if there is a shutdown? The Democrats

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in Congress, Donald Trump, and the Republicans in Congress, both

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.839
<v Speaker 1>or both parties equally or all entities equally. Now they

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 1>combined Republicans and Donald Trump into one column. There's other

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>polling out there that has put Democrats in Congress, Republicans

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in Congress, and Donald Trump as separate three you know,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>three categories. So essentially, when you start to see it

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that way, if you separate it out, more people blame

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in Congress than Trump. But if you combined Republicans

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in Congress and Trump, you see where I'm going. But

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>there's essentially a third, a third and a third right.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>A third are saying it's one party's fault, a third

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are saying it's the other party's fault, and a third

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just blame everybody type of mindset. But I thought this

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. They just asked a straight up question, which

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>statement comes closer to you view your view, even if

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>neither is exactly right. The Democrats should shut down the

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>government if their demands are not met. Twenty seven percent

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>agreed with that statement. The Democrats should not shut down

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the government even if their demands are not met. Sixty

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>five percent agreed with that statement. That's the uphill battle

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>here that I think Democrats are dealing with because you've

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>got you've got a sort of a you've got a

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>confluence of things that have happened over the last twenty

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>years that frankly, have conditioned the public about shutdowns. One

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is they're not that serious. I explained this to you

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last episode. They exempt social Security, they exempt

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 1>military pay, they exempt TSA, They're not going to disrupt

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the flights, They exempt food inspectors, they exempt so many

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>things that it's sort of like, all right, it's it's

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of the operational part of government that matters, matters

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot. People will notice over time when those parts

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of government are shuttered, but they don't notice in the

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>immediate right. So anything that the public might notice immediately,

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>politicians over the years have tried to sort of, you know,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>shield that right. So that's how you've had these military

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>gets paid. Back pay for federal government workers is now guaranteed.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have all these little things in there

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that are done to sort of mitigate the consequences of

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a shutdown in the moment. But as I've said, what

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's done is lowered the consequences for a shutdown, if

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the consequences were much higher, as in Social Security checks

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>don't go out tomorrow morning, heart stop, Military doesn't get

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>paid next Friday, heart stop. I promise you there'd be

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>more urgency to this. But they took all of that out,

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>which is again and so the public has gotten used

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to it that these shutdowns are annoying, their distractions. You know,

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they over time impact the economy negatively. They're not good.

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>They slow down. I told you all the wasted government money,

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>wasted time for people, particularly in your fear in a

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>public private defense contractors have time wasted. They still get

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>paid but and the government will eventually remburse him, but

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't do the actual work. And this could be

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this could be, could be a few weeks, could be longer.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what the exit ramp is here

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for anybody. It does seem as if the Trump administration

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>would love to try this out. And the threats that

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump has made actually showcase an issue that I wish

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>more voters cared about, which is Donald Trump does not

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>believe he should govern for people that didn't vote for him,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and if anything, he wants to punish anybody by getting

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>rid of any program that the government funds that doesn't

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit him somehow politically. And he's essentially telegraphed this. He goes,

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be able to reverse some things that

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they're never going to be able to get back. He

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is almost excited about the opportunity to govern with a

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>political lens and a harsh one at that. Next week,

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have an interview with the mayor of

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City. But I want to give you a little

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>preview of something he said, which is, this is the

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.119
<v Speaker 1>consequences of these partisan primaries and the way we nominate people.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you have to answer to everybody all

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the time in your voters, if you're a member of

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress and you're facing all voters in a primary rather

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>than just this small slice of obsessed partisans, you're going

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to have a different incentive of who If you have

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to win over a middle of the road voter to

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>get a nomination to get to the second uh, to

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>get to actual general election, well you're going to comport

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>yourself a hell of a lot differently than if all

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is deal with a partisan set

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of voters. And you know, for him, it was his

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>explanation of my mayor's or the least polarized executive that

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you have in the country, that all across the country

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>where where the Republican mayors or Democratic mayors, almost all

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of them treat a pothole as a pothole. They don't

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>look to see what the precinct, how which way the

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>precinct voted before deciding to fill the pothole. Now I

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>know that they're back in the days of the machine

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>political machines of Chicago and New York, there was always

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>rumors that, you know, the daily wards got their potholes filled,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and if you weren't a daily guy, you didn't get

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>your pothole filled. But you can't get away with that

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>being a mayor of a city these days, and you

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. But it is remarkable to me how

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>often we're seeing some partisans governed this way as governors

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and as president. And it's particularly a hallmark of magga

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>driven politicians because the whole owned the Libs like it's ok,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're if if we're suffer, if we all suffer,

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and it makes the Libs cry, then it's a worthy

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>cause to do anyway. That's sort of this mindset at

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>times on the own the libs mentality, and so it's

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a it is this is the fact that Trump's going

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to do this. But the point is this gets to

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of all the times you have confrontations with Trump.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And don't get me wrong, I do think that that

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump respects a fight er more than he respects a capitulator.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that in some ways, if if

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the more resistance they put up in certain areas, that

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in a weird way, Trump will will will respect that

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>because he's a he likes to be resistant, but he's

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>also got a higher tolerance for this pain.

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't care how the mainstream media coverage goes. In

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>his mind, if if a major you know, if the

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>New York Times polling is showing it somehow it's Republican's fault.

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>He sees that as a political asset, not a political liability.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as long as his base is happy,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he believes his politics are doing well. And you sort

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of see that his base is happy, but the rest

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of the country is pretty sour in his leadership. This

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>latest New York Times Santa Pol shows he is basically

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at his presidential average. He's sitting at forty three percent

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>job approval in this bowl. It's about what he was

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the last time. It's about what he was for just

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about the entire first term that he had from seventeen

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to twenty. You know, he's never he's never really sniffed

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent. And in order to do that, you'd have

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to have at least fifty percent of independence happy. And

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem he's having. Is that independence or more

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>sour about his presidency? Then you know they look they don't.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>They're not as they're not as sour at his presidency

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as Democrats, but they're closer to looking like Democrats than

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they do Republicans when it comes to this. So I'll

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>fully confess here, I have no idea when this ends,

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>or how this sends, whether in what kind of stomach

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>senate Democrats are going to have for how long are

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they going to go on this? When I think about

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>who the seven votes would be, we know Fetterman's one,

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Jean Shaheen could be two, she's retiring. Would Tina Smith

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>be three as a retiring senator? I don't know uh

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>as as a third one, Gary Peters. He could be right,

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you see where I'm going here that some of them

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>who are not going to be in ballots could could

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>do this, uh, if they so chose to. But I

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there's seven that are that are ready

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to break completely. But ask me again in a week,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ask me again in two weeks. How aggressive does Russell Voight,

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the O and B director get and trying to potentially

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>fire furloughed government employees? Is it? Is it aggressive? So

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the reaction and some of the

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>stiffness of the spine. How stiff will the democratic spine

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>be depends I think on how aggressive omb is in

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>using the shutdown to maybe reorient government permanently in some

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>form or another. So we're, you know, like with many

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>things with Trump urban uncharted territory. Unlike the previous shutdown.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>With Trump, he's got a he's got two aids who

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>know their way around the bureaucracy. Russell Void's been thinking

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>about this for years as the author of Project twenty

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, and Stephen Miller understands how to manipulate the

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy in ways that are pretty much second to none

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of any presidential aid I've ever covered. Regardless of what

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you think of his politics, he's extraordinarily knowledgeable on how

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to on the co essentially the legal code, and on

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>the ability to sort of tinker with the federal government.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>We saw it during the pandemic, how he used it

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to shut down the border, came up with sort of

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>some interesting unique ways in rationales to do it. And

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so you know, that's that to me, is the uncharted

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>territory that we're entering and that we don't know a

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>lot about, and we don't know how aggressive and where

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this has headed. But I think if there's a big

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>danger for the Democrats besides what I just outlined with

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the aggressiveness of Trump, the other one is whether the

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>public is just paying attention, whether even the activists, whether

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this is turning into action, whether it does fire up folks,

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or if there's sort of an exhaustion that comes with this,

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>because again, the Democrats have never been on this side

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of a government shutdown, and we're going to see a

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of conservative media sites re treading all these quotes

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.239
<v Speaker 1>from the Chuck Schumers over the years of Nancy Pelosi's

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about clean CRS. Government shutdowns are bad, they should

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>never happen, etc.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Etc. Etc.

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And that could take a toll as well, and how

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>much of all of that gets traction. But this gets

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>into a larger issue, which is actually what I tackle.

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it's worth noting the Pew Center came

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>out with some new poll polling that happened to hit today,

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and what they had is they had some favorable unfavorable

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>ratings on the congressional leaders. And what's interesting is just

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>how unpopular Chuck Schumer. Chuck Schumer is the new Mitch McConnell.

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell was always the most unpopular of the four

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:57.239
<v Speaker 1>political leaders. When it was McConnell, Schumer, Pelosi, and McCarthy.

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>McConnell was always far and away the most unpopular because

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>McConnell was the only one that had negative ratings among

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and negative ratings among Republicans. Well, Chuck Schumer, welcome

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to Mitch McConnell country. He not only has negative ratings

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>among Republicans, but he has a negative ratings just narrowly

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine unfavorable, thirty five favorable among Democrats. By the way,

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey's numbers are not bad overall, he's got good numbers

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>among Democrats two to one on that favorable rating overall.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>That allows him to have a thirty to twenty four,

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>so he's he's got some he's got some room here.

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>He's sort of got a net positive view, which is

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rare for a gouvernile. John Thune, the least known of

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the of the of the current set of four, also

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>has a net positive. He's narrowly net negative. Je excuse me,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I read this wrong. Jeffreys is narrowly net negative. But

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>his positive rating with Republicans is with Democrats, is better

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>than for instance, Thunes p a a rating is among Republicans.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Sorry for confusing that there a little bit, but the

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>real headline of this is Chuck Schumer is unpopped more

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>unpopular among Democrats than he is popular among Democrats. And

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>that also means he's going to be really resistant to

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>caving because he's really afraid of the base. It's the

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 1>base that's the most angry with Schumer. He sort of

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>mismanaged the communication of the first one. I think he

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>made the right call, but he spent a day talking

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>up a shutdown and then completely reversed course, which is

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what really I think angered the left. He sort of

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>he led him on and then he yanked the carpet

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>from underneath them. I think on this one, he's going

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to want to stick it out longer. Well put it

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this way, If he's interested in running again and he's

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>up in twenty twenty eight, he's going to probably care

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>more about what the base thinks of this shutdown than

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>what swing voters think of this. Show them. But this

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>gets to the sort of larger dilemma that I think

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>democrats face, and it's the subject of my substack column.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I encourage you to go subscribe. I don't charge any

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it's all free. I don't charge for this podcast. It's

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>all free. I do not want to be captive to

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>an audience. I don't want to be captive to a paywall.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that has been that is that becomes self fulfilling.

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I am trying to swerve away from that way of

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>building an independent media operation. So it is free and

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to triculator and charge it. Okay. The

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>one place where you do have to pay to go

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>check out what I'm doing is new Sphere. It's a

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>unique app and there's some terrific journalists there. That do

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>deserve the subscription revenue. So I view that as myself

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>helping a whole bunch of independent journalists. There's a reason

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>results matter more than promises, just like there's a reason

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury law firm. For

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty five years, they've recovered twenty five billion

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars for more than half a million clients. It includes

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing, just hoping

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to get away with paying as little as possible. Morgan

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>which was a staggering forty times the amount that the

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>insurance company originally offered. That original offer six hundred and

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred and fifty

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. So with more than one thousand lawyers across

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the country, they know how to deliver for everyday people.

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>If you're injured, you need a lawyer, you need somebody

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to get your back. Check out for Thepeople dot Com,

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Slash podcast or Dow Pound Law Pound five to two

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>nine Law on your cell phone. And remember all law

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>firms are not the same. So check out Morgan and Morgan.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Their fee is free unless they win. But in the

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>substec I talk about this democratic dilemma, and that is

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>if Democrats want if a Democrat wants to win the

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>White House in twenty twenty eight, just saying Donald Trump

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is an existential threat and a dictator and a fascist

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to cut it, because in order to win

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the presidency, you're going to have to win over some

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Trump voters. So and in order to have a conversation

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>with us Trump voters, you're going to have to admit

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that Trump was right about some things. And you can

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>do it in a way. You know that Trump has

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>identified problems, He's just been terrible at solving them. In fact,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>his solutions make things worse in some cases. Right, he's

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to return manufacturing back to America. His transactional tariff policy,

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>which is turning us into a kleptocracy, is a horrendous

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>way to do this, Terrible for the economy, terrible for

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the consumer, and doing nothing to bring manufacturing back. But

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what the voters. You got to sort of understand what

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the voters were voting for when they voted for Trump

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen, and then they did it again in twenty four.

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like the old Verizon commercial. Can you hear me? Now?

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, Democrats misinterpreted the twenty twenty election. They thought

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the voters were like, Yep, Donald Trump was a mistake.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>This is an accident of history, and he needs to

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>be Trump and Trump is that needs to be excommunicated

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>essentially from mainstream American political debate. That's not what the

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>voters were saying. By the way, if Joe Biden had

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>had four hundred electoral votes, you could have made the

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>case that that's what the voters were saying. If he

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>did have, but Joe Biden, while he won every swing

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>stay but North Carolina, it only would have taken a couple,

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple of hundred thousand, basic, about one

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand plus votes for Trump to win the electoral college. Right,

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a landslide. It wasn't some sort of massive

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>repudiation of trump Ism. What it was was a bunch

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of swing voters exhausted from COVID and wanting off the

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>roller coaster. But it wasn't a repudiation of the reason

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>why Trump got elected in the first place. You know,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think when you now, I think we have

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to view Trump's election and this and this is sort

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of the blueprint that I think any successful Democrat in

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight has to follow. And that is, you know,

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen, when Donald Trump essentially launched his candidacy by

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>going after John McCain and the Bush family, many of

0:22:56.280 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>us stuck in some conventional thinking, myself included, thought, well,

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a mistake. Republicans are not going to tolerate that.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>They're going to punish him for that. It turns out,

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Trump knew this is what he

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was doing by doing it. He just did it because

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it was his instinct. He just got angry at people

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>who didn't take him seriously. This was no strategy. But

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I think the biggest sometimes we all

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>try to look for a strategy, and with Trump, Trump

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>just sort of stumbles into these things. But the voters

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have a strategy, okay, And that's where I think Democrats

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in general have to respect voter decision here a lot

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>better than they go about doing it right now, by

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 1>signaling that he was willing to take on McCain and Bush.

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>He signaled he was a different type of Republican, that

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't going to be the same type of Republican

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that they were used to that was doing essentially nothing

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but losing elections for them, Going back to George H. W. Bush,

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Bob Dole, George W. Bush winning only the popular vote

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>once right, John McCain met Ronniey. It singles that he's different,

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>he's willing a bucket. Party made him, gave him an

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>independent credential. So suddenly you had non Republicans going, huh,

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what that guy's up to. I want to

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>check that out. And so, yes, the sixteen election was

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>more of a vote against Clinton than it was a

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>vote for Trump. But Trump was a vehicle to say, no,

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't want establishment status quote politics.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden essentially won promising status quot politics because the pandemic

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>had so exhausted everybody from Trump's roller coaster that, yeah,

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that is what the public wanted. Now, Biden didn't bring that, right,

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden didn't do that. Biden instead governed very aggressively farther

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to the left than he had a mandate for, and

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>they attempted repudiation in their form of Essentially, the movement

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to excommunicate Trump and trump Ism. And I think

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason the voter ended up rallying around Trump was

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>not because they liked Trump, but they didn't want all

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>of us to forget the initial message in the first place,

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the same power, the same message that was sent by

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>electing Barack Obama, the same message that was sent by

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>electing Donald Trump, which is, we don't want the same old,

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>same old. We want something entirely different. We want not

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>restoration preservation, We want annihilation, if you will, of the

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>way things work, and a rebuilding and a renewal of

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>some sort. And in order to talk to that voter

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that didn't like the way things have been going, who's

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>been a Literally they voted Obama, they voted Trump, they

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>voted Biden, they went back to Trump. Right, who are

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>these unsatisfied people?

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>They feel they don't love their ability to move up

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the economic ladder. It feels like there's a whole bunch

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of rungs missing between them and the upper middle class,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Like they'd love to reach for it, but they can't

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>even get there. Income inequality has gotten worse, So there's

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that disconnect that a future. So I

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>say this and that in order to have a conversation

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with the very voters that reluctantly voted for Trump. These

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>people don't like them. This is great. I was telling

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you about a focus group last week that I observed

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>out of Michigan of Biden Trump voters. And there's one

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>voter going on and on not liking all the power

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that he's accumulating. I worry he wants to be a dictator,

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this voter said. And then like, well, do you approve

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of the job he's doing? Yeah, i'd say it. Do

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you regret your vote? No? I don't regret my vote.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So they, you know, they kind of already know that

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't really have the temperament for the job and

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't really and is going too far in what they

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>want him to do the latter, but they wanted something.

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>They wanted somebody to attempt something. Their biggest fear on

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris was that she wasn't going to change things.

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>She was gonna be status quo. And you know, look

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>it was revealing in her own memoir when she said

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>she underestimated the need that people wanted to know she

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a lot different from Joe Biden.

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>She thought her mere presence was enough to indicate she'd

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>be different from Joe Biden. I think we've learned in

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>politics you got to say something over and over again,

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and you sometimes have to make a symbolic sacrifice at

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the altar of sorts in order to prove to this

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>group of voters no, no, no, no, you're going to be

0:27:54.640 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>different in one form or another. And I say all

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that in that I know that some on the left

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hear that. That you can't acknowledge that

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Trump's gotten has identified some issues that the Democrats have

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>failed to address, and that the threat to democracy that

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>he presents is such a front and center threat that

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be the focal point. The problem is,

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the voters you need to win are

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>interested in that conversation, and they still want to know

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what are you going to do for them? They understand

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing, it's still going to come back of

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what are you going to do for me? And what

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>are you going to do about these problems he's identified?

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to do something about it? So you know,

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I think about it going back to Bill Clinton in

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the eighties. The Democrats spent the eighties trying to repudiate

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Reagan and Reaganism. Even in eighty eight, the campaign wasn't

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to sort of accept the premise that Reagan was

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a successful two term president. There was still the DNA

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Democrats in eighty eight was no, the Republicans

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>were wrong about everything. By ninety two, after another shellacking

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in eighty eight, Bill Clinton's was not sitting here repudiating

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>everything Reagan did. In fact, I always say that you know,

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you knew Reagan won the argument when in nineteen ninety

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>five Bill Clinton said the air of big government is

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>over right when a Democrat said that, just like I

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>believe in some ways. Barack Obama won the argument on

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>entitlements when Donald Trump is out there campaigning saying Social

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Security and Medicare cannot be touched, right, that is you know,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that was the central argument he said of the twenty

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve campaign between Obama and Romney. Ryan and Donald Trump said,

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Obama was right. He doesn't say it that way,

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's essentially saying it, which opened the door for

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>him to have a conversation with a whole bunch of

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>other voters who basically, while they may have agreed with

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and a lot of the cultural issues, just didn't

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>trust them on issues like social security and healthcare. And

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>then Donald Trump found a way to have that conversation

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>by saying no, no, no, I hear you on that.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a similar vibe. You got to get somewhere where,

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's crime in the cities, security at the border,

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>skepticism of big tech, getting other countries to share the

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>burden of global security. You do it in a way.

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>You could say, hey, look, he's identified these problems, but

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.719
<v Speaker 1>he's chosen ways that actually make it worse, doesn't make

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it better, or he you know, Essentially, Democrats would be

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>better served by running Trump against Trump, saying, hey, you know,

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump said he was going to do this. I was

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hoping that he actually might follow through on something. The

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>guy never follows through in everything. But it's too bad,

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and here's something but I And then you have days

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>like what happened Tuesday, where Trump behaves in such an

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Unamerican way, behaves in pretty much the worst way a

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>commander in chief could ever behave in front of America's

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>uniformed military leaders. And I understand why there are some

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>on the left that just can't stomach the idea that

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>gift accept the premise that there are some things his

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>presidency has identified that voters like. All Right, I get it.

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean what he did in front of the uniform

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>military was outrageous, the essentially declaring war on American citizens.

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's really put these military leaders in an

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>impossible situation. None of them have been given an illegal

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>order yet, and I think the moment, you know, if

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering, why aren't there should there be mass resignations.

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to plenty of my friends that have served,

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've asked them about this, whether they're they're disappointed

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that there hasn't been resignations in the upper echelons and

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>military rank to this just clown show that is Pete

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>hag Saith and what Trump has been doing by essentially

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>desperately trying to politicize the military, pit the military, you know,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially say the military has to be pro MAGA and

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they say, you know, until he until he issues an

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>un constitutional order, unlawful order. You know, if you're gonna

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>if the whole goal of the military is to stay

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>above politics, a political you salute whoever the people of

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the country decide to elect to that office. Then the

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>way they behave today is exactly correct, or excuse me,

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>behaved on Tuesday is exactly correct. Yes, I'm doing this

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on a Tuesday evening going into tomorrow.

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>And.

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>It's it's frankly, I think we should be proud of

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they stood there silently. They made it

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>as awkward as possible for hag Seth and Trump up there.

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>They put the country first. They put their rank and

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>file first. They put the military ahead of politics, ahead

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of ahead of whatever they thought they had to do.

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>They showed up because they were ordered to. Now, it's

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of pathetic that that hag Seth is trying to

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>lecture a whole bunch of people that have gotten a

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of more promotions than he ever got went

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in the military, and he's trying to lecture these guys

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>about what a warrior ethosays, Oh to be a oh

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a fly in their brains as they were

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about about about this, but just think about where

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't you don't really you didn't earn the respect,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>but you have to beg for it. You have to

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>demand it. Man whoever wants to be in a position

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>where they have to beg for respect. If you are

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in a position of leadership and you have not earned

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the respect of the people you're leading, it's on you.

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You've done something wrong here. So today's spectacle is and

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it is it is alarming. It is everything that folks

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that plenty of folks are saying, and it is going

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to be the counter that many have to what I'm

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>saying about. If you're gonna if you're gonna sort of

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>win back voters who left the Democratic Party, you're gonna

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>have to acknowledge the reason why they left, and you're

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have to acknowledge that there were some things

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that Trump tapped into that the Democrats failed on. So

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it's I get it instinctively, you're alarmed and want to

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>fight over here. But in some ways he's the one

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:25.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to bait everybody. He wants those debates on his terms.

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>He would love for people to spend all this time

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>criticizing him about military and how he's trying to use

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 1>it to deal with crime in the streets. What he

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>would be have a harder time dealing with is when

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you're like, boy, you know, well, he's right about getting manufacturing.

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>He's too bad. He's taking too many bribes from companies

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>in different ways that he's been that he's had his

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>own personal wealth enhands in lieu of actually doing what

0:35:56.200 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>he promised to do. So you're better off, particularly in

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a democracy that I still think is functioning here. Okay,

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I know it's we are not in a great place.

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the number two most important issue to

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>voters who volunteered, the New York Times did not give

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>them a list. Number one was the economy and number

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>two was political division. It was the only two issues

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>that got double digits. And again I liked the way

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the Times did it. They did not offer a list

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of issues and asked the respondents to pick. They said,

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>what's the most important issue, and they just waited for

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>them to say. It is the better way to figure

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>out what are the issues that voters care about most?

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You ask them and you let them. You don't prod them,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't push them, You let them tell you. The

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that political division was two. The fact that we

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 1>are now this poll and another one over sixty percent

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>think we have a problem with political division in this country.

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Another poll identified it as a political crisis. There's no

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>doubt that that that that the country is going to

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be looking for a leader that's going to figure out

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>how to bring us together. But part of being able

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to bring us together is acknowledging you know what it

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is that that Trump tapped into that the Democratic Party

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to lean into more. So we'll see, UH coming up,

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a terrific interview with a journalist, Leland Vittert.

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>He is an anchor and reporter for News Nation, used

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to be with Fox News UH, and he wrote a

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>personal story he dedicated to his UH. It's called Born Lucky,

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>A dedicated father, grateful son, and my journey with autism. Obviously,

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 1>autism has been in the news a lot with with

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy and Trump out there trying to UH claim that

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that maybe they have found the cause of autism. And

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I think what Leland's story is, and I really I

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>think you'll find it inspiring, is you know, it's sort

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of as the saying goes in the in the in

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the world of autism, when you've met one person with autism,

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you've met one person with autism, that every journey is different,

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>every ability sort of ceiling is different, and in many ways,

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I think what what Leland and his father are trying

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to say is, look, the regular programming codes to raising

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>a kid without autism didn't work with a kid with autism.

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>But Leland's dad essentially figured out another code and another

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>way to do this. And Leland's a very successful journalist,

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is married, is going to have is. So it is

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.839
<v Speaker 1>a remarkable story, particularly if you've got somebody in your

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 1>family or you've dealt with this. I think the book

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is worthwhile because it's Look, it's not a book that

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>tells you this is how you do it. It's simply

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a book that shares their story. So anyway, for those

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of you listening for the full thing, this is definitely

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what's coming up next. We'll sneak in a break

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and after the break my conversation with Leland and Vitter. Well,

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>joining me now is a familiar face to many of you.

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.919
<v Speaker 1>It's Leland Vitter. He is a anchor at News Nation,

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.879
<v Speaker 1>long time before that, longtime correspondent and journalist for Fox News,

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's out with a new personal memoir of sorts.

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It's called Born Lucky. A dedicated father, a grateful son,

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:02.919
<v Speaker 1>and my Journey with autom It's a very moving book.

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you're somebody, if you're a parent, if you

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>have a child struggling with some of these issues, I

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to find this story in this book

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>quite inspiring. And with this issue in the news, it

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is worth looking at how families deal with this, not

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>how governed. We're going to look at this from a

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>family perspective, not necessarily a government perspective. Leland, Welcome to

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the podcast.

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Nice to see you, Dot, Great to be with you.

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 2>I think we would say, as I've watched you for

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 2>many many years on radio, they would say, right, you know,

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 2>longtime listener, first time call. So it's great, great to

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 2>be with So, you.

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Know, I had a I found your book very compelling

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and it reminded me of my friend and I'm sure

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know this story because you're probably familiar with them,

0:40:56.120 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>with my friend Ron Fournier, longtime political journals that the

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Associated Press, who wrote a book about his journey with

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>his son and the battle that they had and how

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and just your stories about how Principles were treating you

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and your parents and there and it's just it's just

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>such a reminder how little the public does understand autism,

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>understand childhood development issues, and how little we understand is

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>how you can overcome.

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Them, right, And I think yeah.

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that to me feels like the purpose

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:32.399
<v Speaker 1>of this book.

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, Look you said it right, and I think

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 2>you've picked up on it. Chuck when you said, for

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 2>any parent, grandparent, aunt uncle, who has a kid who

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:48.879
<v Speaker 2>is struggling, because it goes way beyond autism to ADHD, anxiety,

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 2>physical disabilities, just the general bullying that goes on now

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and is so aggressive, and there's so many kids who

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 2>are struggling having such a hard time. And when I

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.839
<v Speaker 2>was diagnosed, you know, when my parents I write this

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 2>in the book, right, they know there's something wrong with me.

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 2>If a kid would touch me, I'd turn around and

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 2>slug them. I was really repellent to kids. And they

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 2>go into one of those little psychology testing centers, you know,

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 2>linoleum floors, crummy chairs, we've all been there, stale coffee,

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 2>old magazines. And they bring me back and take one

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to take me over to, you know, play with blocks

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. They talk to my parents and they look

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 2>at my parents, they said, we really can't imagine what's

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 2>going on inside his head, and my dad goes, is

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 2>there anything we can do? Anything? You know, he's desperate,

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 2>and she goes, generally, not, what year is this? This

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 2>is the mid eighties, right, nism wasn't understood what it was.

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say, like, you know, it's

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I was my under I felt like this is a

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>classic story of the eighties. I don't think that's the

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>response the school gives you. If this is two thousand

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and seven or two thousand and eight, what do you think?

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:00.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's I think that's fair. I think

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 2>those still to this point there are so many parents

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 2>who feel helpless because there is this idea, right in

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 2>my days, is there anything we can do? And she

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 2>said generally not, But you know, if the kids smart

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.359
<v Speaker 2>me once it there are a few things. But there

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 2>is now even more in our society, this desire to

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 2>put kids who have any type of special need in

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 2>bubble wrap, right, to give them medicine, and to say

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 2>meet them where they're at, and you have to accept

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 2>them as who you are they are, and you have

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:34.839
<v Speaker 2>to tell them that this is their superpower. And all

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 2>of these things that if my dad had done to me,

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 2>I would have had no chance to operate in the

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 2>world that I operate in now, because his method was

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 2>not about adapting the world to me. It was about

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 2>adapting me to the world. And he was brutally honest

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 2>about it, right, Chuck, And that's not something parents are

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 2>told to do. You know, when I was in seventh grade,

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to play tennis. My dad was a phenomenally

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 2>gifted athlete still and I writing born lucky. How he

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 2>took me to a couple of tennis lessons and after

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the third or fourth one, he looked at me and

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 2>he said, I'm your father. I love you. I will

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 2>come to every tennis lesson. I will drive you, I

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 2>will cheer you on. You will never be able to

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 2>play tennis. You just can't do it. You don't have

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the coordination, you don't have the hand eye coordination, you

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 2>don't have the depth perception, you don't have the motor skills.

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 2>It's never going to work. Which, considering I really hope

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 2>that tennis was my way into asking this girl out.

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I was heartbroken, but I knew then my dad would

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 2>always tell me the truth. And then when he said

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:38.320
<v Speaker 2>you can do something, boy, that meant something.

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, it's interesting what you just said

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:45.799
<v Speaker 1>about you felt. You said your dad wanted you to

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>adapt to the world that you live in, not make

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the world adapt to you. Right, boy, if this is

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>not sort of what I would argue. You know, we

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.359
<v Speaker 1>sit here and we have these these fights sometimes through

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>left right prisms, but I don't I think we're having

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>left these are because that's how in many ways, that's

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>how I was raised where and now, you know, especially

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:10.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're from a if you're if you're seen as

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 1>from a group that isn't part of the majority, whether

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a religious minority, whether it's a gender minority, whether

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, something else. Those that succeed are the

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:25.879
<v Speaker 1>ones that learn how to adapt to the world as

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 1>it is and then slowly but surely fight for acceptance

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>versus trying to turn you know, three hundred and forty

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>nine million people to your way right right, which is

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>which is something that you know, if everybody behaved that way,

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.400
<v Speaker 1>we'd never get anything done as a country.

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's a perfect point. And I think

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 2>it's one of those things, right, You've got to meet

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 2>people where they're at, and the world is where it's at,

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 2>especially you know, when I was a little kid, and

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I think about this story for fifth grade about my

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 2>dad really realizing there's a problem fifth grade going to

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 2>a small private school. He comes over to check on me.

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting bullied every day. I'm coming home crying every

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 2>day my sister.

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>And this is that private school. Yeah, your parents are

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>paying Yeah, in theory extra right, well, you know, you know,

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:20.719
<v Speaker 1>or at least more personalized more. I mean, why did

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:22.919
<v Speaker 1>we move from public to private? It was for that

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>right too, to be.

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Fair, though, you know, my parents didn't tell anybody. They

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:31.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't tell anybody that I was diagnosed with anything because

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 2>my dad said, I didn't want you to be defined

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 2>by it, and I didn't want you to all have that.

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 2>And I think people can say, you know, good things

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 2>are bad things about that, but it certainly was a

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 2>different way, and it now forced me to know that

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I could work through anything. But fifth grade private school.

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 2>He comes into c the pe teacher. I'm in Pe,

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 2>and my dad goes, hey, how's he doing in this

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 2>guy who he knew, big, big former football player, knew

0:46:59.920 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 2>my dad from football. He said, I think he's doing

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 2>better today, you know, better this week. But he goes great,

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 2>let's go, let's go see him in pee. And the

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 2>guy goes, I don't think that's a good idea, and

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 2>they're looking down on all the fields and dad goes

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 2>wise as well. He says, I've had to put him

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 2>with the girls because I had to protect him from

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 2>all the boys. So you think about that from a

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 2>father's perspective, a fifth grade father hearing that the only

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 2>way for the pe teacher to protect his kid is

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 2>to put him with the girls. My dad said okay,

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 2>thanks and walked off. But I think that sort of

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 2>shows you where I was at in my social ability

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 2>to interact with Some people were sort of magnetic in

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 2>their attraction of friends and kids. I was repellent.

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So I remember my friend Ron describing the issue with

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>his son, which was you know that you had to

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>learn social cues, right, It sounds like that's what you

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that's what you your father really helped you with, which

0:47:57.400 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 1>is sure how to how to read other In some

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:03.839
<v Speaker 1>way ways we don't realize that we're we quickly learn

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>how to read people, but not everybody can. And sometimes

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you just like you might need extra help to learn

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 1>actually read words. Some people need extra help to read

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:14.320
<v Speaker 1>social cues. Right, is that a fair description?

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Very fair? And I needed both, you know, two halves

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 2>to an IQ test, twenty points spread between the two

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 2>halves represents a learning disability. I was between genius and

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 2>mentally retarded, so half the test I was genius. Half

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the tests test I was mentally retarded, so seventy plus

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 2>points spread. So I needed a lot of help learning

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 2>how to read words and forcing through that. And then

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 2>also you pointed out social skills. So one of the

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 2>things my dad did was he would take me to

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 2>lunch with mister Todd, right. And it was easy because

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:52.279
<v Speaker 2>I didn't have any friends. I didn't have anything else

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 2>to do with my life. My dad was my only friend.

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 2>And I loved interacting with adults because I could talk

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 2>to them about things that I talked to my dad

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:01.320
<v Speaker 2>about about politics, about sports out I think that's much sports,

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:04.359
<v Speaker 2>but politics, business, all that kind of stuff. And we'd

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 2>go to munch with mister Todd. And this is a

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 2>perfect example because I would just be badgering the hell

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:11.360
<v Speaker 2>out of you with questions, how do you book your guests,

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 2>how do you decide what politician's telling the truth? How

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 2>do you come up with your questions on and on

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 2>and on, and my dad rather than sort of saying

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:22.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, okay, lucky, stop or enough, he would tap

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 2>his watch, and that was my moment to be.

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>That was a social cue. He was teaching you.

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 2>That was a social que. So to tap his watch,

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 2>that's my method message to stop talking, but also to bookmarket, right,

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:40.400
<v Speaker 2>because then we would go back and he'd say, okay,

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 2>mister Todd was talking about going on vacation with his

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 2>kids or taking his wife out to dinner on Saturday night,

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think that was the right time to

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 2>ask him about his show or politics or whatever it was.

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:59.479
<v Speaker 2>And it was teaching me how to understand and see

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 2>the world through, as you point out, the natural social

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 2>skills that so many other people have. It's a small example,

0:50:07.040 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 2>but it was a way to actually teach me in

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 2>real time what was happening, rather than just say, look,

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, he can't he can't come out with anybody,

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:18.319
<v Speaker 2>which at the time I really couldn't. But at the

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 2>same time, if you say to a kid okay, stop, okay,

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.400
<v Speaker 2>not now, okay, whatever, it embarrasses the kid. And so

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 2>that was the line he had to tell.

0:50:28.680 --> 0:50:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Was there a moment for you where it was like

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I get it, you read got it? Yeah? Or is

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 1>this a gradual thing where all of a sudden your

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:43.319
<v Speaker 1>dad said, do you realize that, you know, you're no

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:45.359
<v Speaker 1>different than anybody else out there in the world.

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Look, he always made it clear to me that I

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:52.839
<v Speaker 2>was different and what he would tell me, you know,

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 2>through the bullying and isolation of high school. I have

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 2>had a teacher in eighth grade who said to me

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:03.080
<v Speaker 2>in an art class, you know, tables and art around,

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, in front of the whole class. He said,

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, if my dog was as ugly as you,

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:09.920
<v Speaker 2>I'd shave its ass and make it walk backwards. And

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I came home that night and just, yeah, yeah, try

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 2>that one on for size.

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Gosh, that's something you don't forget.

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:20.719
<v Speaker 2>I guess, no, no, you don't. And I don't forget

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:22.359
<v Speaker 2>his name either, but we didn't put it in the book.

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I walked across the street back home that afternoon. My

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 2>dad was waiting for me, as he was every every

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 2>time that I came home from school, every day for

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty and I was just crying. I said, I was

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 2>just humiliated today and told them what had happened, and

0:51:39.040 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 2>he talked me through it and worked through it. And

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 2>what was interesting at the end of the conversation every

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 2>night he'd say to me, look, the qualities that make

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:50.360
<v Speaker 2>you unpopular now and that you are picked on now

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 2>and that make you humiliated now, is what's going to

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:57.400
<v Speaker 2>be your strength later on. And it wasn't ever about academics.

0:51:57.440 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't ever about being smart or successful. It was

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:03.759
<v Speaker 2>about turn hard work and self esteem was earned, not

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 2>given right. You know, I started as a kid doing

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 2>two hundred push ups a day at six or seven

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:11.839
<v Speaker 2>years old, because Dad was like, I can teach you

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 2>that hard work is rewarded and that goals matter. So

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 2>that was where he would He was very clear to

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:23.239
<v Speaker 2>me that I was different. I think you'll appreciate this, Chuck.

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Living where you and I both live now. I used

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 2>to say I never liked anyone who liked high school

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:30.920
<v Speaker 2>because the values of high school are so screwed up

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 2>that if you like high school, there's something wrong with you.

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 2>And there's a little bit to be said about that

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 2>about Washington too, But if you really.

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Like one student council, I know. I have a friend

0:52:40.000 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of mine who grew up in Arlington, Leland, you'll appreciate this.

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean to interrupt your train of thought there,

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but she loves to remind like she's a native Arlingtonian,

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 1>which means she's grown up in Washington, much different than

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:54.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of the people that live in this community

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:58.439
<v Speaker 1>of the DMB. And she said, just remember, everybody who

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to Washington wanted to be student council president. Doesn't

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>mean they ever became student council president, but they all wanted.

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So you have. The point is it's a town of busybodies,

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 1>right like it is. It is, it is, it is.

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It is that very part of high school on steroids.

0:53:15.280 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, you know the best training for a Washington

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 2>newsroom may have been middle school.

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I think some people in Congress would say that as well.

0:53:28.200 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I think Congress is the only one who has a

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:31.399
<v Speaker 2>lower approval rating in the media right now.

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting you say this about about high school

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and about Let me ask this, though, why did you

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>go public with the story? You know, I didn't I

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't know this, and I wouldn't have I would have

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>never picked up You know, sometimes I'd like to think,

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>oh so and so you know, you hear this phrase

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on the spectrum. And at this point I don't love

0:53:54.480 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the phrase because aren't we all on the spectrum? It

0:53:56.880 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 1>just depends, right, I mean, yeah, all on the spectrum.

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's this weird shorthand that we've given to Hey,

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they're a little bit off center from whatever the spectrum

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is and all this stuff. But why'd you choose to

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:15.880
<v Speaker 1>share your story? Because in some ways it sounds like

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>your dad's goal was to help you adapt so that

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have to constantly say I'm different, treat me different.

0:54:24.480 --> 0:54:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, look, I mean you think about where my

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 2>dad was. I think you have to sort of baseline

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 2>this seventh grade start a new school. My parents are

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 2>hoping for this change, sitting in the they get called

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 2>in two or three weeks into school, thinking like, hey,

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:39.319
<v Speaker 2>this is just a normal check in, right, you have kids,

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:41.240
<v Speaker 2>you know what you know this is like? And everybody

0:54:41.280 --> 0:54:44.320
<v Speaker 2>sat in the principal's office and the principal looks, starts

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the meeting off cold of my parents, you know, most

0:54:48.160 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 2>of the school here. In fact, everybody here really thinks

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:55.319
<v Speaker 2>Lucky is quite weird. That's a seventh grade prince Walchetize.

0:54:55.400 --> 0:54:57.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, I saw that line, you know, and you're

0:54:57.320 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>just sitting there going, yeah, how do you become a

0:55:00.680 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 1>principal writing about a kid that way? Yeah? Like it

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>really well, I'm not trying to like, you know, sound

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:08.720
<v Speaker 1>like you fire all these people, but my god, right.

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 2>And then right? And then you know, so arrow number

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 2>one through my parents' heart and and look, they know

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 2>that in some ways it's true that I was really

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:20.880
<v Speaker 2>different and really odd. And then she follows up with

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:24.720
<v Speaker 2>and I think he and frankly, I think he's pretty

0:55:24.760 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 2>weird too. So what told you is that people were

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 2>supposed to protect me weren't going to and thought it

0:55:31.040 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 2>was my fault. Again, great training for a newsroom. But

0:55:35.880 --> 0:55:38.839
<v Speaker 2>the reason I went public with it is because I

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:43.240
<v Speaker 2>think we are in a reckoning about parenting in America,

0:55:43.920 --> 0:55:48.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think parents need to know there is real hope.

0:55:48.560 --> 0:55:50.759
<v Speaker 2>George Will wrote the forward to this, and he said,

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 2>this is the proof of the mountain moving power of

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:55.920
<v Speaker 2>parntal love. And I think parents have been told for

0:55:55.960 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 2>so long, you know, let the village raise your kid,

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, but let your kid be them and and

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 2>sort of the experts know better, and there's this new

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 2>methodology and on and on and on and told parents

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:10.840
<v Speaker 2>basically not to take control, and mine did. And I

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 2>thought it was a really important story for people to hear.

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I well, that is a that is a great way

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to frame it, because you know, the fact is this

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is true not just when it comes to parenting, which

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is the parents need to take more control, right, And

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>there's there is this perception that somehow you don't have

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the ability to change things. It's also true with the

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>healthcare system, right if you if you don't take control

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of your own medical care. And and by the way,

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 1>remember that the doctors work for you. You don't work

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:50.439
<v Speaker 1>for the doctors. These people work for you. You don't

0:56:50.480 --> 0:56:53.200
<v Speaker 1>work for them type of mindset. But you, the parent

0:56:53.320 --> 0:56:56.200
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more station here and that you also

0:56:56.200 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more responsibility when it comes to your kids.

0:56:59.360 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love it when you when you it

0:57:03.120 --> 0:57:07.080
<v Speaker 1>feels like we have a a lot of broken young

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:12.440
<v Speaker 1>men out there right who are susceptible to all sorts

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of violent ideologies or violent actions. Perhaps some of this

0:57:20.640 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is social media or you know, whatever we're doing here,

0:57:25.200 --> 0:57:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know, there is a through line that I

0:57:28.080 --> 0:57:30.600
<v Speaker 1>notice in some of these people, whether it's a school

0:57:30.600 --> 0:57:33.200
<v Speaker 1>shoot or all that is, there is some sort of

0:57:34.160 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>lack of parenting, or a parent not in the picture,

0:57:38.800 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 1>or a parent sort of not seeing things. What I

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>find your story to be inspiring, it's it's a reminder

0:57:46.280 --> 0:57:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that the parent needs to take control here, because nobody

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>else is going to love this kid enough to do

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the kid right. Only the parent.

0:57:57.840 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 2>One thousand percent. I mean, there's so many different ways

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to go with that. Right when I was diagnosed with autism,

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I said this, you know, in the book, they didn't

0:58:04.760 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 2>really know what it was. It wasn't a spectrum. Was

0:58:06.480 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 2>either you're profoundly autistic, or you're nothing and a pervasive

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:15.080
<v Speaker 2>elemental dislay. Whatever. Now it's one in thirty one kids, boys,

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 2>one in twelve.

0:58:15.880 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, by the way, communities, what is what

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is your understanding of it? Are we learning to diagnose

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it better? Or is it increasing in the society.

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the answer to that is both. And what

0:58:27.600 --> 0:58:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I find interesting is is that there's there's lots of

0:58:33.640 --> 0:58:36.720
<v Speaker 2>theories about what autism. What it's not. You know, Oh no,

0:58:36.760 --> 0:58:39.360
<v Speaker 2>it's not rising, it's just we're diagnosing more. Oh no,

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:41.600
<v Speaker 2>it can't be vaccines don't know this. There's nobody who

0:58:41.680 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 2>will tell you definitively, this is what it is. This

0:58:43.760 --> 0:58:46.400
<v Speaker 2>is why we're seeing this. And by the way, you Leland,

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 2>who clearly was diagnosed with what we now know to

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 2>be autism, just got married to this wonderful woman who

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:56.560
<v Speaker 2>you want to have kids with. Here's we know that

0:58:56.600 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a higher chance that I will have an autistic child,

0:58:59.640 --> 0:59:02.920
<v Speaker 2>but we don't know why, and we don't know if

0:59:02.920 --> 0:59:04.600
<v Speaker 2>there's anything that can be done either during.

0:59:04.400 --> 0:59:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Pregnancy or I mean that implies it's genetic.

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 2>There's some genetic component, right, But at.

0:59:10.080 --> 0:59:12.480
<v Speaker 1>The same time we are having this debate about is

0:59:12.480 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it outside chemicals or something?

0:59:14.720 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I mean I think the answer is we

0:59:17.560 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know, and I think, you know, I think that

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:25.920
<v Speaker 2>intel science can tell us the answer to that. We

0:59:25.960 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 2>need to keep looking. It should be you know, we've

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 2>cured a not cured. You can live now with AIDS.

0:59:30.840 --> 0:59:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Is no longer descence dozens of cancers you can live

0:59:33.440 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 2>with over the past forty years that we're descence. Is

0:59:35.600 --> 0:59:37.480
<v Speaker 2>we can replace your joints and have you become a

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 2>bionic man. Diabetes, all this stuff and autism.

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:45.040
<v Speaker 3>They're like, you know it, it's not vaccines, but it

0:59:45.080 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 3>could be like come on guys.

1:00:01.240 --> 1:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just interviewed Michael Osterholme. It was an expert

1:00:06.520 --> 1:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>on pandemics and all this stuff, and he has a

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>very good way that he described science. He says, science

1:00:11.400 --> 1:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't truth. Science is the pursuit of truth. And we

1:00:15.360 --> 1:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>also have to be humble about science, meaning it does

1:00:19.720 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>change as we learn more, right, And that's it. And

1:00:23.960 --> 1:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact is, like we thought AIDS was a death sentence,

1:00:27.240 --> 1:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>as you point out, we thought cancer itself was a

1:00:29.280 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>death Now now all cancers aren't. You know, we're getting that.

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It's from my father died of hepatitis C in nineteen

1:00:35.640 --> 1:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight. If he gets diagnosed with hepatitis C. Today

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you take a pill and you're fine. But in nineteen

1:00:42.320 --> 1:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight, by the way modern medicine we sort of

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the eighty eight you know, you know,

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>I would have said, oh, the eighties are And yet

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight, right, that's like, you know, it feels like

1:00:55.680 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century. And it compares point what I.

1:00:59.760 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Think, you know, I had, I had doctor Jah and

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>not doctor Jay Boticharia. I have doctor John tonight. It's

1:01:07.120 --> 1:01:09.520
<v Speaker 2>amazing how TV works that way. But about a Charia

1:01:09.520 --> 1:01:12.400
<v Speaker 2>ahead of the nih That was his message. He goes,

1:01:13.240 --> 1:01:15.040
<v Speaker 2>we have to be humble enough to say we don't know,

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 2>and he said very few scientists are. But to pick

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:21.880
<v Speaker 2>up on what you were saying about fatherhood and everything else.

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 2>This tells fathers, you can make this enormous difference, and

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:29.960
<v Speaker 2>you should. And I again, over the past ten or

1:01:29.960 --> 1:01:32.200
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years, fathers have been really sort of told to

1:01:32.200 --> 1:01:34.760
<v Speaker 2>take a back seat and that, you know, not to

1:01:34.840 --> 1:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of demand more of their sons and demand that

1:01:37.880 --> 1:01:41.200
<v Speaker 2>their sons stand up and take responsibility. And I don't,

1:01:41.240 --> 1:01:42.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, do it two hundred push ups to day

1:01:42.680 --> 1:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>when you were five or six years old is not

1:01:44.560 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 2>you know. I'm sure now he would be counseled against

1:01:48.200 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 2>that because you're, you know, doing whatever. And it was

1:01:50.920 --> 1:01:53.840
<v Speaker 2>a very different way. And I write in the book

1:01:54.800 --> 1:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>you know and born lucky that how lucky I am

1:01:57.240 --> 1:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>also that I had two parents eighty you know, and

1:02:00.920 --> 1:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>a family say together, my parents have married for fifty

1:02:03.360 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 2>plus years. Tell the story about how they got engaged

1:02:07.040 --> 1:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>in your rip joint after three dates, but they you know,

1:02:13.760 --> 1:02:16.880
<v Speaker 2>that's not discussed at all. Eighty percent of kids who

1:02:16.960 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>have a disability of some type, right especially autism in

1:02:21.680 --> 1:02:24.920
<v Speaker 2>these other issues, eighty percent of them their parents get divorced.

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It's hard.

1:02:26.360 --> 1:02:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Look, you see nobody talks to Nobody talks about how

1:02:29.280 --> 1:02:30.120
<v Speaker 2>important that is.

1:02:30.440 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And you do a parent some parent, and look, I

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>don't I'm very hesitant to judge those decisions one hundred percent, right,

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>because none of us are in that bedroom. But you do.

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We see instances of this where one parent is willing

1:02:47.520 --> 1:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to devote themselves and the other parent maybe isn't right,

1:02:51.680 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>or the other parent feels overwhelmed or whatever it is,

1:02:55.280 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and when they walk away, they think are helping and

1:03:01.360 --> 1:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they're making it worse. Yeah, I mean it sounds like

1:03:03.680 --> 1:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the message. I mean, I don't want to get

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>into specific examples out of privacy concerns, but there's some

1:03:10.000 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of examples that way where I think

1:03:12.880 --> 1:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>when you have a single parent where the other parent

1:03:15.200 --> 1:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>walks away because it's just too hard right in their heads, right,

1:03:19.760 --> 1:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it is too disruptive, you know. The sad fact is

1:03:22.840 --> 1:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the reminder that we don't give out drivers,

1:03:25.680 --> 1:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't give out the equivalent of a driver's license

1:03:28.120 --> 1:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a parent, right, And if we did, that

1:03:31.880 --> 1:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>person probably wouldn't have qualified to be a parent if

1:03:34.360 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they're willing to walk at the first sign of struggle.

1:03:40.360 --> 1:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But that is it is. It's funny you say it

1:03:44.040 --> 1:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that you were lucky to be born with two parents

1:03:46.720 --> 1:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>willing to throw themselves into you, and if you didn't,

1:03:51.120 --> 1:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you might not be where you are today.

1:03:53.680 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>One thousand percent. And look, you know, it's important to

1:03:55.760 --> 1:03:57.959
<v Speaker 2>keep in mind. This isn't a prescription, it's not a cure,

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:00.320
<v Speaker 2>it's not anything else, but it is it is a.

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Sure story, my story for you.

1:04:02.800 --> 1:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>It's my story. It worked for me, it worked for

1:04:04.240 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 2>my Dad's a story of hope. And look, you know

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>my dad wrote the afterword, which I think is.

1:04:10.120 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>That was the first thing I thought of when I

1:04:13.320 --> 1:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>started reading, is I wonder how your dad feels about

1:04:15.760 --> 1:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>all this being public? And then of course you reward

1:04:18.720 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the reader with that.

1:04:20.160 --> 1:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the afterward from my dad and the forward from

1:04:22.360 --> 1:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>George will and I had to fill two hundred and

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:28.080
<v Speaker 2>forty pages in the middle. But he noted in the

1:04:28.120 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 2>afterward that the real hero in this is my mother, right,

1:04:31.000 --> 1:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>and because she held not only me but him together.

1:04:35.000 --> 1:04:36.959
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I didn't know this until I wrote

1:04:37.000 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the book. Okay, so I decided to write the book

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>and tell this story, and I think, you know, try

1:04:44.400 --> 1:04:46.920
<v Speaker 2>to inspire and give people a lot of hope. And

1:04:47.160 --> 1:04:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I told you about all the times that you know,

1:04:48.920 --> 1:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I would come home humiliated, bullied, pushed around, isolated at school,

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>and I would take it out on my dad. You know,

1:04:57.200 --> 1:05:00.000
<v Speaker 2>we go to my bedroom and he'd sit there and

1:05:00.040 --> 1:05:02.880
<v Speaker 2>listen to me, just hammer away about how angry I

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:05.000
<v Speaker 2>was and how upset I was and how hard this

1:05:05.240 --> 1:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>was and why am I having to do this and

1:05:06.760 --> 1:05:09.720
<v Speaker 2>why am I having to go through it? And he'd

1:05:09.720 --> 1:05:12.280
<v Speaker 2>put me to bed or leave and I'd read or whatever.

1:05:12.440 --> 1:05:16.480
<v Speaker 2>And I found this out now twenty five thirty years later.

1:05:17.040 --> 1:05:19.880
<v Speaker 2>He'd go downstairs by ten eleven at night. My mom

1:05:19.960 --> 1:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>would have been asleep or watching TV, whatever goes to sleep,

1:05:23.440 --> 1:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and she'd come out and find him in the living

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 2>room all dark, just sitting on the couch, crying himself,

1:05:29.240 --> 1:05:32.959
<v Speaker 2>having internalized everything that I had been through.

1:05:33.640 --> 1:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>She was his counselor sound yeah, And then you know.

1:05:36.440 --> 1:05:38.480
<v Speaker 2>He would then talk to her. I mean, it really

1:05:38.560 --> 1:05:42.120
<v Speaker 2>is it. I think, you know, the the amount of

1:05:42.160 --> 1:05:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the role that my mother played and what we talked

1:05:44.040 --> 1:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>about that I had two parents and that they had.

1:05:46.360 --> 1:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Changed your Has this changed your relationship with your mom

1:05:51.240 --> 1:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>today the more you learned.

1:05:53.720 --> 1:05:56.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's a great question. I never went to therapy.

1:05:56.960 --> 1:05:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Right now now every kid has a therapist, and on

1:05:59.480 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>and on and on, Nora.

1:06:01.080 --> 1:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Look, I that's you know, and to me, if you

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>have somebody to talk to, you have a therapist.

1:06:06.840 --> 1:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that's what therapy need is for us for

1:06:10.360 --> 1:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>those that don't have somebody to talk.

1:06:13.920 --> 1:06:16.440
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't don't either. But it was just it

1:06:16.480 --> 1:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>was just funny, you know, the typically in these situations,

1:06:19.600 --> 1:06:21.920
<v Speaker 2>and even I think kids who have great parents they

1:06:22.240 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 2>have a therapist. And but anyway, I never ad anything.

1:06:25.120 --> 1:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>So this has been like going to therapy on national television. Right.

1:06:29.800 --> 1:06:33.840
<v Speaker 2>But my dad and I still talk three or four

1:06:33.840 --> 1:06:35.800
<v Speaker 2>times a day. I still call him every night to

1:06:35.800 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>say good night. He is still my best friend. And

1:06:40.880 --> 1:06:43.320
<v Speaker 2>that's just him and I. I don't know how else

1:06:43.360 --> 1:06:45.880
<v Speaker 2>to say it. His our relationship changed because of it. No,

1:06:46.080 --> 1:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I think certainly in the in the course of writing

1:06:50.240 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 2>this book, and I talk about and tell the story

1:06:53.680 --> 1:06:56.560
<v Speaker 2>of Rachel and I meeting and her sort of realizing

1:06:58.200 --> 1:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>that as we got to know each other, better that

1:07:00.960 --> 1:07:04.600
<v Speaker 2>there were clearly moments that I revert back and there

1:07:04.680 --> 1:07:07.640
<v Speaker 2>still are right to sort of my old tendencies when

1:07:07.680 --> 1:07:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm less disciplined than I should be, and her learning

1:07:11.840 --> 1:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>to accept that. So yeah, I mean, I think I've

1:07:14.240 --> 1:07:18.800
<v Speaker 2>gained through hearing the stories and experiencing the emotion, not

1:07:18.880 --> 1:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>as a kid living in it, but reliving it as

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:25.480
<v Speaker 2>an adult. I've gained an enormous more amount of respect

1:07:25.720 --> 1:07:31.040
<v Speaker 2>and gratitude for my parents than I already had, which

1:07:31.120 --> 1:07:31.800
<v Speaker 2>was significant.

1:07:32.840 --> 1:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So you offer it up, so I would love for

1:07:36.880 --> 1:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you to share how did how did you decide how

1:07:41.720 --> 1:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to share your autism with your now wife?

1:07:49.680 --> 1:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it just sort of came up, right. My

1:07:53.680 --> 1:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>parents didn't tell me until I was like twenty four,

1:07:55.840 --> 1:07:58.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty five that I had been diagnosed with what we

1:07:58.280 --> 1:08:03.040
<v Speaker 2>now know to be autism. Right, and Rachel and I

1:08:03.120 --> 1:08:05.439
<v Speaker 2>met and we got set up on a blind date.

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Somebody said I'm gonna find you your wife. The next

1:08:08.760 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>day that person sent me a picture of Rachel and

1:08:10.360 --> 1:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>said I found your wife, And there you go. I

1:08:14.080 --> 1:08:17.000
<v Speaker 2>don't remember, like a Okay, we need to talk, you know,

1:08:17.840 --> 1:08:20.360
<v Speaker 2>turns out that I have whatever it was, I think

1:08:20.400 --> 1:08:24.240
<v Speaker 2>probably just came up in conversation, but she has an

1:08:24.280 --> 1:08:29.559
<v Speaker 2>e Q that's off the charts. Mine was near freezing.

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Probably did she pick up on it.

1:08:32.400 --> 1:08:35.519
<v Speaker 2>I think she picked up on that. There was, you know,

1:08:35.640 --> 1:08:37.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of a peculiar you know, So there were there

1:08:37.200 --> 1:08:41.640
<v Speaker 2>were different tendencies, and I've gotten pretty good at hiding them.

1:08:41.920 --> 1:08:45.639
<v Speaker 2>It still comes out sometimes, and there's times that she'll say, Okay,

1:08:45.720 --> 1:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>like you know, you're not seeing this rite or hey,

1:08:50.000 --> 1:08:53.080
<v Speaker 2>you need to be more thoughtful about whatever, that kind

1:08:53.120 --> 1:08:56.280
<v Speaker 2>of stuff. And you know, I tell for people who

1:08:56.560 --> 1:08:58.400
<v Speaker 2>watch this and are interesting. I tell the story in

1:08:58.439 --> 1:09:02.160
<v Speaker 2>the Book of the Faithful interview on Fox News after

1:09:02.160 --> 1:09:05.519
<v Speaker 2>the twenty twenty election when I went at it with

1:09:05.600 --> 1:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Prainey, who was a Trump spokesperson over the Trump

1:09:09.960 --> 1:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>claims that he had won and was just going after her.

1:09:14.240 --> 1:09:17.280
<v Speaker 2>And look, I think probably in the moment, did I

1:09:17.479 --> 1:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>know that that wasn't really what Fox wanted me to do. Probably,

1:09:22.760 --> 1:09:27.200
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's part of condition personality, whatever you

1:09:27.200 --> 1:09:29.960
<v Speaker 2>want to call it, that I kind of didn't care.

1:09:30.040 --> 1:09:31.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'd always been taught to do the right thing.

1:09:31.840 --> 1:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>My dad always said, do the right thing, no matter

1:09:34.880 --> 1:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the consequences, and I you know, it's sort of all

1:09:39.200 --> 1:09:44.560
<v Speaker 2>social graces and social stop points in your brain were lost.

1:09:44.800 --> 1:09:47.559
<v Speaker 2>Can I blame that on autism? I don't know, but

1:09:47.840 --> 1:09:50.680
<v Speaker 2>it certainly goes to there's times that sort of there

1:09:51.040 --> 1:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>are miss social cues.

1:09:52.120 --> 1:09:54.639
<v Speaker 1>So you thought you missed a social cue in that moment.

1:09:55.080 --> 1:09:56.559
<v Speaker 2>I think if you go back and watch the tape,

1:09:56.600 --> 1:10:00.640
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty clear that all of a sudden the guardrails

1:10:00.680 --> 1:10:01.200
<v Speaker 2>came off.

1:10:02.640 --> 1:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>What and so you do you attribute it to your autism?

1:10:06.240 --> 1:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you attribute it to? Here's a piece of

1:10:08.160 --> 1:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>information you know to be true and you can't believe

1:10:10.200 --> 1:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>someone is denying it.

1:10:11.320 --> 1:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that. I think that there's a there's

1:10:13.080 --> 1:10:16.240
<v Speaker 2>an indignity to that that comes over me and sort

1:10:16.240 --> 1:10:19.479
<v Speaker 2>of and I find it. And maybe it was because

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>my dad taught me for so long how important telling

1:10:22.320 --> 1:10:23.599
<v Speaker 2>the truth was and standing up.

1:10:24.240 --> 1:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>About blunt truth that you got from your father, right,

1:10:26.840 --> 1:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and so in some ways that's going to get passed on.

1:10:28.960 --> 1:10:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I found it sort of offensive that she

1:10:31.720 --> 1:10:35.840
<v Speaker 2>kept saying something that was just objectively untrue. And there

1:10:35.880 --> 1:10:38.680
<v Speaker 2>you go. I don't ever like to blame you know,

1:10:38.720 --> 1:10:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I blame my autism, but I mean I'll give you

1:10:41.120 --> 1:10:43.280
<v Speaker 2>another example that you know, people say, you know, well

1:10:43.320 --> 1:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>are you you know, how did you get over autism? Well,

1:10:45.400 --> 1:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>you never over it. You know. Two or three weeks ago,

1:10:47.479 --> 1:10:49.719
<v Speaker 2>I was with my father in law at his golf

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:53.040
<v Speaker 2>club and I was putting my golf clubs in my

1:10:53.120 --> 1:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>travel bag and I was late, and I was focused

1:10:56.240 --> 1:10:58.080
<v Speaker 2>on something else, and this older gentleman come over and

1:10:58.120 --> 1:11:03.040
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk. And one of the very you know,

1:11:03.320 --> 1:11:05.200
<v Speaker 2>classic tendencies of autism is that you just sort of

1:11:05.200 --> 1:11:07.479
<v Speaker 2>focus on a task and you just everything else gets

1:11:07.479 --> 1:11:11.200
<v Speaker 2>blocked out and you kind of become obsessive. And I

1:11:11.240 --> 1:11:13.800
<v Speaker 2>was obsessive by getting my golf backpacked, and I was

1:11:14.240 --> 1:11:15.599
<v Speaker 2>horrifically rude to him.

1:11:16.000 --> 1:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>To the point that even he disrupted your routine in

1:11:18.680 --> 1:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that moment, you were like, I can't be disrupted, and

1:11:20.880 --> 1:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I just.

1:11:21.280 --> 1:11:23.519
<v Speaker 2>Was focused on I have to get the backpacked. And

1:11:24.520 --> 1:11:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I was really rude, and I afterwards thought, you almost

1:11:28.120 --> 1:11:29.799
<v Speaker 2>in the moment, I knew I should have just stopped

1:11:29.800 --> 1:11:31.719
<v Speaker 2>what I was doing and if I was five minutes late, fine,

1:11:31.760 --> 1:11:34.760
<v Speaker 2>and I just didn't. And it was just and I

1:11:34.760 --> 1:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>thought to my you know, boy, you're better than this.

1:11:37.080 --> 1:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, your dad really taught you and it so

1:11:39.439 --> 1:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>it's still there very much so.

1:11:42.080 --> 1:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But you knew yeah in the moment.

1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:45.960
<v Speaker 2>And almost couldn't help myself.

1:11:46.080 --> 1:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But not not, but not all folks that have autism

1:11:49.800 --> 1:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>know that this is happening to them.

1:11:52.000 --> 1:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, I think I think it's very true. And

1:11:55.840 --> 1:11:58.760
<v Speaker 2>again born unlucky, not a cure, not a prescription. In

1:11:58.880 --> 1:12:02.759
<v Speaker 2>my story, I can't remember IF's autism Society Autism speaks

1:12:02.800 --> 1:12:04.799
<v Speaker 2>but says, you know, if you've met a kid with autism,

1:12:04.840 --> 1:12:09.080
<v Speaker 2>you've met one kid with autism. Yeah, so that you

1:12:09.360 --> 1:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>have to meet. You have to understand where people are.

1:12:13.840 --> 1:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So when you are where is it? What do you

1:12:18.960 --> 1:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like you? Where is it showcased itself as this

1:12:23.520 --> 1:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>superpower for you?

1:12:25.360 --> 1:12:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, because I don't know what it's like

1:12:27.120 --> 1:12:29.880
<v Speaker 2>to live without it. I'm always me.

1:12:30.400 --> 1:12:32.759
<v Speaker 1>I give that. I give that same answer when somebody says,

1:12:33.280 --> 1:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>when I tell people that my dad died when I

1:12:35.040 --> 1:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>was sixteen, oh, what was that like? I'm like, I

1:12:37.400 --> 1:12:39.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know, because I don't know any other way.

1:12:40.240 --> 1:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, you right, you.

1:12:41.880 --> 1:12:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Just don't know, right, you don't know the other way.

1:12:44.680 --> 1:12:47.519
<v Speaker 1>You just go right, And that's what you're saying is yea.

1:12:47.560 --> 1:12:49.479
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, the second I answer the question, you

1:12:49.479 --> 1:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>answered that way, I almost That's why I just knocked

1:12:52.200 --> 1:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>myself for it, because I know exactly you don't know

1:12:55.280 --> 1:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>any different because you're living your life.

1:12:58.680 --> 1:13:01.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and look, you know you you write you just

1:13:01.520 --> 1:13:04.719
<v Speaker 2>talked about your dad dying when sixteen that was really

1:13:04.760 --> 1:13:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the defining moment in my dad's life.

1:13:07.760 --> 1:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>It's the fork in the road for me. Everything goes

1:13:10.320 --> 1:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>back to that moment. For me. It's now I'm fifty three,

1:13:13.160 --> 1:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and I still like that. It's a yesterday moment I have.

1:13:17.600 --> 1:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, the weirdest thing that I'm going through now

1:13:20.040 --> 1:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is my son is now older than I was, and

1:13:23.880 --> 1:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>so now I'm having experienced father son experiences with my

1:13:27.240 --> 1:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>son as a freshman in college that I have nothing

1:13:30.120 --> 1:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to compare it to with my relationship with my father

1:13:33.600 --> 1:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>because he wasn't there, So now they're all new to me.

1:13:37.560 --> 1:13:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Well dad, Yeah.

1:13:38.880 --> 1:13:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I think about this all the time because I wonder,

1:13:40.760 --> 1:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>am I screwing something up? What about what if I

1:13:43.360 --> 1:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>do it? You know, I don't have any role model anymore, right, I,

1:13:46.800 --> 1:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in my head always had a role model up to

1:13:49.000 --> 1:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a point.

1:13:50.720 --> 1:13:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I hear you, I'm not a father I think this

1:13:52.360 --> 1:13:54.280
<v Speaker 2>is the first parenting book ever written not by a

1:13:54.320 --> 1:13:56.719
<v Speaker 2>father but by the kid, and.

1:13:58.120 --> 1:14:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Which I think is makes it more compelling because we

1:14:00.560 --> 1:14:03.639
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of these parenting books are written from

1:14:03.680 --> 1:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the parent's perspective and you don't know whether it really

1:14:07.360 --> 1:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>worked or not for the child. And I think this

1:14:10.760 --> 1:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>book is in some ways more powerful because it's written

1:14:13.360 --> 1:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>from your perspective rather than And you know, it's one

1:14:17.760 --> 1:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of those things I'd love to someday ask your father

1:14:20.800 --> 1:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>how he would have you know, now that he saw

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>your version of this, does it change how he may

1:14:26.320 --> 1:14:28.599
<v Speaker 1>describe what he did, if that makes sense?

1:14:29.560 --> 1:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it does. Good luck getting to talk

1:14:32.760 --> 1:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>about it.

1:14:34.320 --> 1:14:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I imagine if you were willing to talk, the two

1:14:36.439 --> 1:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of you would be here together. But yeah, this is

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:39.639
<v Speaker 1>your story to tell.

1:14:39.800 --> 1:14:43.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what he said. And he really objects to

1:14:43.680 --> 1:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>me calling him a hero, which I think is interesting.

1:14:48.439 --> 1:14:51.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, he lost his dad at sixteen. Yeah, so

1:14:52.240 --> 1:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it speaks exactly what you're saying.

1:14:55.120 --> 1:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>We got about five or so minutes here. Let's talk

1:14:57.680 --> 1:15:02.479
<v Speaker 1>about our industry, the media industry. I'm really rooting hard

1:15:02.479 --> 1:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for News Nation, thank you. And it's because what you

1:15:08.960 --> 1:15:13.639
<v Speaker 1>know there is no one answer to our media problem. Right,

1:15:13.680 --> 1:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we need more voice, Yes and right. It's a yes

1:15:16.920 --> 1:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and situation. And yet what you guys are trying to do,

1:15:25.200 --> 1:15:27.599
<v Speaker 1>what I'd like to think I'm trying to do, and

1:15:27.640 --> 1:15:30.599
<v Speaker 1>what I tried to do before, and the media industry

1:15:30.640 --> 1:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>fights against us, which is, Hey, you know, I'm a

1:15:33.640 --> 1:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>person who looks at politics through the prism of incrementalism,

1:15:39.160 --> 1:15:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Meaning when you're trying to govern three hundred and fifty

1:15:41.640 --> 1:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>million people who are pretty evenly divided, you can't do

1:15:45.760 --> 1:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>anything rashly. Right, if you want to turn an aircraft carrier,

1:15:51.080 --> 1:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you do it slowly, and you do it sort of

1:15:52.880 --> 1:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit at a time, because you want to

1:15:54.640 --> 1:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>bring everybody along. If you do it too fast, you

1:15:57.200 --> 1:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>will do one step forward, two steps back. And yet

1:16:01.560 --> 1:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we know in news or and information is I always

1:16:05.320 --> 1:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>say the people most interested have strong opinions. The people

1:16:09.479 --> 1:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>least interested are watching sports or are watching something else. Right,

1:16:14.600 --> 1:16:17.559
<v Speaker 1>And yet I get the sense you're trying to appeal

1:16:17.640 --> 1:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to that person somewhere between the thirty five yard lines.

1:16:21.479 --> 1:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It's center left, center right. I'd like to say I'm

1:16:24.120 --> 1:16:26.919
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing. And yet we know the business

1:16:27.000 --> 1:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is driven by those between the goal line and the

1:16:29.320 --> 1:16:30.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty yard lines. Right.

1:16:31.680 --> 1:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's an excellent analysis.

1:16:33.720 --> 1:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think works and what do you think

1:16:36.800 --> 1:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>has been a struggle in this idea of trying to

1:16:39.800 --> 1:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>create something that's a bit more I don't know if

1:16:43.240 --> 1:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it centrist, moderate, everybody's got their

1:16:46.200 --> 1:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>own description of it, but sort of somewhere broader than

1:16:50.400 --> 1:16:52.439
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen on traditional cable.

1:16:52.920 --> 1:16:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would say a few things. Number one, I

1:16:56.360 --> 1:16:59.439
<v Speaker 2>think your analysis is right, yes, And I will add

1:16:59.479 --> 1:17:06.439
<v Speaker 2>to it that the economic incentives have changed in media, right,

1:17:06.479 --> 1:17:11.240
<v Speaker 2>because when there were three television networks, broadcasters and broadsheet

1:17:11.280 --> 1:17:14.360
<v Speaker 2>newspapers one per town. In order to make money, they

1:17:14.400 --> 1:17:16.200
<v Speaker 2>had to appeal to everybody.

1:17:16.040 --> 1:17:17.719
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to pick up audience as possible.

1:17:18.280 --> 1:17:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Then, as technology has changed, we've gone from broadcasting to cable,

1:17:22.400 --> 1:17:25.960
<v Speaker 2>to narrow casting to YouTube everything else. So now nobody

1:17:26.040 --> 1:17:28.920
<v Speaker 2>has to watch anything that questions their worldview or makes

1:17:28.960 --> 1:17:31.160
<v Speaker 2>them uncomfortable or whatever it is, because of social media

1:17:31.160 --> 1:17:35.680
<v Speaker 2>algorithms is actually sort of tailored to you personally. So

1:17:36.760 --> 1:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>what has been underserved is the Center because people mistook

1:17:42.120 --> 1:17:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the Center for being bored and uninvolved and uncaring and

1:17:46.160 --> 1:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>watching sports and just sort of uninterested. And I think

1:17:49.320 --> 1:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>what we've found is that there is a radical center.

1:17:52.600 --> 1:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>There are people who are upset with both sides and

1:17:56.080 --> 1:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that sleeping giant of the of most of America that's

1:18:00.040 --> 1:18:02.320
<v Speaker 2>between the thirty five yard lines, as you point out,

1:18:03.479 --> 1:18:06.000
<v Speaker 2>that's in a bell shaped curve. That's where most people live.

1:18:06.320 --> 1:18:09.759
<v Speaker 2>They've been awoken and they don't they do care about sports,

1:18:10.200 --> 1:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>but now they're scared. They're scared of the extreme left

1:18:13.080 --> 1:18:16.360
<v Speaker 2>and they're scared of the extreme right. So we're at NewsNation.

1:18:16.479 --> 1:18:20.320
<v Speaker 2>We try to be is in the middle, calling out

1:18:20.360 --> 1:18:23.559
<v Speaker 2>both sides. Both sides get a hard get a hard time,

1:18:24.040 --> 1:18:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think, what's different about my show? And you

1:18:26.120 --> 1:18:29.360
<v Speaker 2>know I say this, I got asked or invited not

1:18:29.400 --> 1:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>to return to Fox News because I've went after Donald

1:18:33.360 --> 1:18:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump and I have had Trump send down the White House,

1:18:38.000 --> 1:18:40.240
<v Speaker 2>send out stories and commentaries I've done and said, look,

1:18:40.240 --> 1:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>see how great of a job we're doing. Leland says,

1:18:41.720 --> 1:18:43.240
<v Speaker 2>we're doing a great job. So to me, that's what

1:18:43.280 --> 1:18:47.639
<v Speaker 2>a journalist should be. And I think people are yearning

1:18:47.760 --> 1:18:53.519
<v Speaker 2>for and that radical center, for somebody to call balls

1:18:53.560 --> 1:18:56.960
<v Speaker 2>and strikes in a sense on both sides so that's

1:18:57.000 --> 1:19:01.759
<v Speaker 2>what we're trying to do. Book. So far, it's working

1:19:01.840 --> 1:19:05.480
<v Speaker 2>two ways. One, ratings are up significantly. We beat MSNBC

1:19:05.640 --> 1:19:14.800
<v Speaker 2>and CNN across the board last weekend. And two, I

1:19:14.840 --> 1:19:18.360
<v Speaker 2>think when I meet people and see them. It used

1:19:18.360 --> 1:19:20.439
<v Speaker 2>to be when I left Fox, like what happened to you? Oh,

1:19:20.479 --> 1:19:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I went to News Nation News, And now I have

1:19:25.280 --> 1:19:28.040
<v Speaker 2>people coming up to me saying, I see you on

1:19:28.120 --> 1:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>News Nation, and I love that you give both sides

1:19:30.360 --> 1:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>a hard time, and I love that I don't agree

1:19:33.040 --> 1:19:34.960
<v Speaker 2>with you all the time. And it's like, oh, okay,

1:19:35.000 --> 1:19:35.880
<v Speaker 2>so it must be working.

1:19:48.000 --> 1:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's A. That second part. I mean, you're right,

1:19:50.680 --> 1:19:54.759
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like, frankly, I experienced a brief period

1:19:54.800 --> 1:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of that, like you know, for a while too, where

1:19:57.280 --> 1:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>have you gone?

1:19:58.360 --> 1:19:58.479
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:19:58.520 --> 1:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And then now just suddenly people saying, boy, you're in

1:20:01.280 --> 1:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>my feeds all the time. I now see you. I'm like, okay,

1:20:03.360 --> 1:20:07.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm this This thing is is working. Breaking, it is,

1:20:07.600 --> 1:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but it is a It does feel like one of

1:20:10.640 --> 1:20:12.599
<v Speaker 1>my favorite expressions is peeing and a hurricane.

1:20:13.000 --> 1:20:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:20:13.439 --> 1:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it feels I'm a look, I grew up so

1:20:18.120 --> 1:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>far south. It's north, you know, Miami is the sixth

1:20:20.840 --> 1:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Borough of New York, right and Florida. You know, I joke,

1:20:24.280 --> 1:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we're so backwards in Florida to go you have to

1:20:26.200 --> 1:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>go north, to go south, because culturally, the farther north

1:20:30.160 --> 1:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you go the But I love me a good Southern

1:20:34.280 --> 1:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>expression like that, and I cleaned it up a little bit,

1:20:38.400 --> 1:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But that is the sense sometimes, right, you you sit

1:20:41.360 --> 1:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>here and I'll watch I'll watch a story go Haywire

1:20:46.920 --> 1:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>on cable, and I'll sit there and say, you know,

1:20:50.280 --> 1:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of other bigger stories happening that are

1:20:53.240 --> 1:20:57.759
<v Speaker 1>much more consequent, and yet we're obsessing over a vote.

1:20:58.479 --> 1:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to be dismissive of the Epstein story.

1:21:01.080 --> 1:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not dismissive of it. I'm not dismissive of what

1:21:03.439 --> 1:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>happened to the victims. I think they deserve their say.

1:21:07.680 --> 1:21:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But because of the way the incentive structure works in media,

1:21:11.439 --> 1:21:14.120
<v Speaker 1>there was this obsession over covering it, and it was

1:21:14.160 --> 1:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>across the board. It didn't matter whether it was on

1:21:16.080 --> 1:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of the legacy cable channels or on this And

1:21:19.120 --> 1:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You're sitting there going, you know, these tariffs are a

1:21:21.320 --> 1:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>much bigger story. What's happening with the Venezuela, whether or

1:21:24.760 --> 1:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>not the president has authority to bomb a boat in Venezuela,

1:21:28.200 --> 1:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not. You know, there are much more consequential stories,

1:21:32.479 --> 1:21:35.479
<v Speaker 1>but they're not as entertaining as Epstein, like, how do

1:21:35.560 --> 1:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you how do you fight that? I've got the luxury

1:21:38.280 --> 1:21:40.880
<v Speaker 1>where I don't have to have a boss these days,

1:21:41.360 --> 1:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But I if I look, I remember those days where

1:21:44.680 --> 1:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, I want to do this and if I

1:21:46.600 --> 1:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>want to do this story, I got to sort of

1:21:49.320 --> 1:21:51.559
<v Speaker 1>do this story so that I can do this story.

1:21:52.400 --> 1:21:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Look, I totally hear you. And that's the challenge in

1:21:56.240 --> 1:21:59.360
<v Speaker 2>a newsroom every day. And and I think to a

1:21:59.400 --> 1:22:02.760
<v Speaker 2>certain extent, you know, it's the challenge for all of

1:22:02.840 --> 1:22:05.479
<v Speaker 2>us of what is important, right, because there.

1:22:05.360 --> 1:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Is we're all curators. I look at it this way.

1:22:07.960 --> 1:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, we're all the same, and that we're

1:22:09.960 --> 1:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>all trying to curate what we think people should be

1:22:13.800 --> 1:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>focusing on. Yeah, and you know, and and now there's

1:22:16.880 --> 1:22:18.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of curators out there. We used to have three.

1:22:18.479 --> 1:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>As you point out, it was Walter, it was mister Brinkley, right,

1:22:22.479 --> 1:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was whatever combination of of unknown people. ABC

1:22:26.360 --> 1:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>would come up with, well said, right, yeah, un till

1:22:32.800 --> 1:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Jennings really right, NBC and ABC had had some NBC

1:22:35.880 --> 1:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and CBS had real stability, ABC less so because they

1:22:38.680 --> 1:22:40.559
<v Speaker 1>were always the number three, right, they were always trying

1:22:40.600 --> 1:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to catch Walter or mister Brinkley. I always call him

1:22:44.360 --> 1:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>mister Brinkley. I used his desk at NBC, so I

1:22:46.439 --> 1:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>have a very fond I I Brinkley at Russer type

1:22:50.680 --> 1:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of mindset there. But but it is a Now there's

1:22:57.840 --> 1:22:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a thousand of US curators.

1:22:59.600 --> 1:23:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah or more. Look, I think it goes back to

1:23:03.400 --> 1:23:05.879
<v Speaker 2>all news is biased, right, because it's done by humans,

1:23:06.120 --> 1:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's also you.

1:23:07.240 --> 1:23:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Know what I like to do. I checked my pulse

1:23:09.600 --> 1:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and people ask me about bias, and I'm like, you know,

1:23:11.400 --> 1:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we're all born with original bias, right, No, you just

1:23:14.280 --> 1:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about you had two parents. Not everybody's born to

1:23:17.240 --> 1:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>two parents. Not everybody's born right, like you know, not

1:23:20.439 --> 1:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody's born in a situation that can survive a challenge

1:23:25.720 --> 1:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>that's in health or whatever, and it shapes you. I

1:23:31.720 --> 1:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>would call that a bias, right the fact.

1:23:34.479 --> 1:23:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Look, I was always told bias isn't having an opinion,

1:23:36.960 --> 1:23:42.040
<v Speaker 2>it's excluding opinions. That's how That's how I was taught,

1:23:42.360 --> 1:23:46.599
<v Speaker 2>and I keep that in mind actually sort of as

1:23:46.600 --> 1:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>a north Star. And look, bias isn't so much how

1:23:49.760 --> 1:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>you cover the news, it's what you cover. Is you

1:23:51.920 --> 1:23:54.400
<v Speaker 2>just pointed out because of all your cover is Epstein,

1:23:54.840 --> 1:23:58.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of other stories out there that have different.

1:23:58.280 --> 1:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>You've made a decision not to right right.

1:24:03.400 --> 1:24:10.719
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean, I think it is. It's huge

1:24:11.520 --> 1:24:15.160
<v Speaker 2>in terms of what is decided to be covered. What

1:24:15.360 --> 1:24:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I think I try to think about, and you know,

1:24:18.280 --> 1:24:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I grew up in Missouri. I come from you know,

1:24:22.760 --> 1:24:25.040
<v Speaker 2>middle class, upper middle class family.

1:24:25.160 --> 1:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>In the city or Saint Louis.

1:24:26.479 --> 1:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Saint Louis, but I spent a lot of time outside

1:24:29.080 --> 1:24:31.479
<v Speaker 2>of Saint Louis and I and I kind of try

1:24:31.520 --> 1:24:33.040
<v Speaker 2>to go back and I spent a lot of time

1:24:33.080 --> 1:24:35.680
<v Speaker 2>in local news and small markets, and I spent a

1:24:35.680 --> 1:24:38.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of time, you know, in Colorado in small markets.

1:24:38.200 --> 1:24:40.719
<v Speaker 2>So I I think that I tend to go back

1:24:40.760 --> 1:24:46.639
<v Speaker 2>to when people are drinking with their buddies on Saturday afternoon,

1:24:46.680 --> 1:24:50.040
<v Speaker 2>wh they're watching college football, when they're playing golf, what

1:24:50.120 --> 1:24:52.759
<v Speaker 2>are people talking about, how is it how are their

1:24:52.800 --> 1:24:57.400
<v Speaker 2>lives being changed and affected? And in trying to cover

1:24:57.520 --> 1:25:01.439
<v Speaker 2>it through that prism. You know why why this matters.

1:25:02.080 --> 1:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>You came up through the business, through local markets.

1:25:05.000 --> 1:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I did.

1:25:06.080 --> 1:25:09.599
<v Speaker 1>Most people younger than you have not. I know, it's terrible,

1:25:09.920 --> 1:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I and I didn't. I came in a different way.

1:25:13.120 --> 1:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I was a I worked on a trade publication about

1:25:15.800 --> 1:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>campaign politics. I remember there was a moment.

1:25:19.080 --> 1:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>In the house, well I'm going to give you one

1:25:21.120 --> 1:25:24.360
<v Speaker 2>quick thing, But you were out in the field. Sure

1:25:24.479 --> 1:25:28.280
<v Speaker 2>know what it's like to hustle the stories, not in Washington, not.

1:25:28.640 --> 1:25:29.880
<v Speaker 2>You know what it's like to be on the trail.

1:25:30.240 --> 1:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But the reason I bring up local is that I

1:25:32.160 --> 1:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>really believe the loss of local is why they don't

1:25:35.120 --> 1:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>trust us as much as they used to do, because

1:25:38.200 --> 1:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>local was our character reference to the national. Right, your

1:25:42.400 --> 1:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>local people knew who the local journalists were. People's families knew,

1:25:46.320 --> 1:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, my son goes to school with his daughter

1:25:49.560 --> 1:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is, right, they knew they were members

1:25:51.880 --> 1:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the community, and that created a level of trust

1:25:56.360 --> 1:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>locally that could never be matched nationally because the national

1:26:00.720 --> 1:26:04.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't live there, right, the local lived there. And I

1:26:04.520 --> 1:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>also view that local journalism is different from national journalism

1:26:07.280 --> 1:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in that on the local level, you're there to help

1:26:09.360 --> 1:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>people live their lives. Ninety percent of the stories local

1:26:12.240 --> 1:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>news does is to help people live navigate their life

1:26:16.439 --> 1:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in that community. National news is different, right, It's about

1:26:21.240 --> 1:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>telling you what you need to know in civics, like

1:26:23.400 --> 1:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what you need to know about the country as a whole, which,

1:26:25.920 --> 1:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of course in and out of itself, is more divisive.

1:26:28.280 --> 1:26:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Local news much less divisive. But I think the loss

1:26:31.800 --> 1:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of local news, as I joke, a man named Craig

1:26:34.000 --> 1:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>came along and said, you know, classified ads ought to

1:26:37.120 --> 1:26:39.599
<v Speaker 1>be free. YadA, YadA, YadA. We destroyed the entire local

1:26:39.600 --> 1:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>news ecosystem, right. We didn't fully appreciate how much that

1:26:44.080 --> 1:26:49.559
<v Speaker 1>revenue stream kept so many local publications together. And yet

1:26:49.640 --> 1:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I look at our media problem today and I think

1:26:51.880 --> 1:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the loss of local is what is the biggest. It's

1:26:55.120 --> 1:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a house can stand up, but there's

1:26:58.040 --> 1:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>always one pillar that is keeping the whole thing up together.

1:27:01.800 --> 1:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And it turned out local news was that pillar. And

1:27:04.040 --> 1:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>when we wiped it out, it collapsed the entire information

1:27:07.400 --> 1:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem as far as I'm concerned, which given your experience

1:27:12.080 --> 1:27:15.519
<v Speaker 1>coming through local, how would you revitalize it? O.

1:27:15.520 --> 1:27:18.559
<v Speaker 2>Look, I got taught in one of the best parts

1:27:18.600 --> 1:27:22.400
<v Speaker 2>of writing born lucky is having been able to say

1:27:23.120 --> 1:27:26.000
<v Speaker 2>really nice things about people who helped me, who understood

1:27:26.040 --> 1:27:30.360
<v Speaker 2>that I was a weird kid and socially awkward and

1:27:30.760 --> 1:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>therefore was a target and protected me or took a

1:27:32.920 --> 1:27:34.360
<v Speaker 2>chance on me in one way or another. So we

1:27:34.479 --> 1:27:37.320
<v Speaker 2>used the names of all the really nice people, and

1:27:37.560 --> 1:27:39.519
<v Speaker 2>I didn't use the names of anybody who was mean

1:27:39.560 --> 1:27:42.519
<v Speaker 2>to me, because it wasn't about settling scores, and I

1:27:42.520 --> 1:27:43.479
<v Speaker 2>thought that was important.

1:27:43.760 --> 1:27:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Some people would have done it the exact opposite way.

1:27:46.560 --> 1:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I am my father's son, but a guy named

1:27:51.040 --> 1:27:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Brad Remington who was my first news director in Saint Louis, Missouri,

1:27:53.720 --> 1:27:55.679
<v Speaker 2>when I was an intern at KTBI, and then hired

1:27:55.680 --> 1:27:59.920
<v Speaker 2>me as an anchor at KTVR and Denver. Content drives viewers.

1:28:00.479 --> 1:28:04.120
<v Speaker 2>If you put out good content, they will come because

1:28:04.160 --> 1:28:09.439
<v Speaker 2>people are the viewer, and people are smart. They are

1:28:09.479 --> 1:28:17.880
<v Speaker 2>extraordinarily interested in their own city, town, state, country, and

1:28:18.040 --> 1:28:22.360
<v Speaker 2>that you if you fill that void with good, meaningful

1:28:22.439 --> 1:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>news and information, people will respond to it. And I

1:28:27.040 --> 1:28:30.200
<v Speaker 2>think that that is the lesson that good journalism is

1:28:30.240 --> 1:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>rewarded because it's something that people crave and always have.

1:28:34.200 --> 1:28:38.439
<v Speaker 2>People always want to know what the news is, and

1:28:39.040 --> 1:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I so, yes, it's become commoditized. The flip side of

1:28:43.400 --> 1:28:45.360
<v Speaker 2>that is, I think that if you if you offer

1:28:45.479 --> 1:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>something special, if you if you really offer people compelling,

1:28:52.280 --> 1:28:54.880
<v Speaker 2>must read, must know information. I remember there was research

1:28:54.920 --> 1:28:57.519
<v Speaker 2>done in the nineteen nineties about why people watch local news.

1:28:57.640 --> 1:28:59.840
<v Speaker 2>The number one reason was the weather the number two

1:29:00.160 --> 1:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and so they didn't sound stupid at the water cooler.

1:29:03.560 --> 1:29:07.800
<v Speaker 2>So if you can provide them that information in that context, well,

1:29:07.840 --> 1:29:08.720
<v Speaker 2>that's always a thing.

1:29:09.120 --> 1:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>That's always a reminder that what we really are as educators,

1:29:13.479 --> 1:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we just never call ourselves that. I like that because

1:29:17.640 --> 1:29:22.559
<v Speaker 1>ultimately we're helping. We're giving people information they didn't know. Hopefully,

1:29:22.600 --> 1:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>if we're a good teacher, we're putting it in context.

1:29:24.760 --> 1:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>If we're a great teacher, we're explaining, you know, the

1:29:27.920 --> 1:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>origin of it and all those things. But ultimately we're

1:29:30.200 --> 1:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>educators and are you are we good at Are you

1:29:32.960 --> 1:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a good educator? Are you a bad educator? But you're

1:29:35.120 --> 1:29:37.519
<v Speaker 1>educating no matter what you're doing when you're in the

1:29:37.680 --> 1:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>news and information business. Hey, Leland, I have to tell you,

1:29:40.240 --> 1:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's good to get to know you because reading

1:29:42.120 --> 1:29:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the book, I find it, I find it weirdly unfair

1:29:47.200 --> 1:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in a situation like this, Suddenly I feel like I

1:29:49.880 --> 1:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>know a lot about you right in this situation, and

1:29:53.680 --> 1:29:57.799
<v Speaker 1>it almost feels upside down. I mean, you've put yourself

1:29:57.800 --> 1:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>out here well and so people and I admire it,

1:30:02.000 --> 1:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's you gave up a little privacy.

1:30:06.120 --> 1:30:10.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, if it helps people, and if it helps parents

1:30:11.080 --> 1:30:14.200
<v Speaker 2>and family members of kids who are struggling, whatever it was,

1:30:15.000 --> 1:30:17.479
<v Speaker 2>to be more supportive, to show up more for those

1:30:17.560 --> 1:30:20.880
<v Speaker 2>kids to know that they're really making a difference, it's

1:30:20.880 --> 1:30:21.320
<v Speaker 2>worth it.

1:30:21.840 --> 1:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Look the number, you know. The simplest way I've described

1:30:25.080 --> 1:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it is that this is a reminder that parenting is.

1:30:27.160 --> 1:30:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Everything well, and I hope that there's enough parents who

1:30:33.520 --> 1:30:35.920
<v Speaker 2>gain something from it that it makes it so that

1:30:36.000 --> 1:30:39.840
<v Speaker 2>there's some lives that have been changed, and that then

1:30:39.880 --> 1:30:42.519
<v Speaker 2>it'll be worth it. So, I mean, Born Lucky is

1:30:42.560 --> 1:30:45.559
<v Speaker 2>my story. I always say, you know, it is my book.

1:30:46.520 --> 1:30:49.080
<v Speaker 2>It's about me, but it's not for me. It's for

1:30:50.040 --> 1:30:53.840
<v Speaker 2>parents and grandparents and aunts and uncles who have a kid.

1:30:53.840 --> 1:30:56.599
<v Speaker 2>And what parent doesn't want to help their kid.

1:30:56.280 --> 1:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. That's a reminder what we all have

1:30:59.200 --> 1:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in common. He Leland, congratulations, Thanks Chew. Like I said, uh,

1:31:18.000 --> 1:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed the conversation with Leland and if

1:31:20.720 --> 1:31:22.559
<v Speaker 1>you want to check him out and check out his reporting,

1:31:22.600 --> 1:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he's on News Nation in prime time. Formally, it's on

1:31:27.840 --> 1:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the what used to be WGN, and Hey, as a

1:31:31.240 --> 1:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>baseball fan when I hear WGN, I think of the

1:31:33.800 --> 1:31:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Cubs and Hey, we're in the middle of baseball season.

1:31:35.720 --> 1:31:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:31:37.120 --> 1:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It is Wednesday, which also means I've got a new

1:31:39.920 --> 1:31:40.919
<v Speaker 1>top five list.

1:31:40.840 --> 1:31:46.240
<v Speaker 2>The top Jest, Top five, Top top Jest.

1:31:46.160 --> 1:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Top And here's something that I am pledging to do

1:31:51.800 --> 1:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is that the first the first Wednesday of every month

1:31:55.120 --> 1:31:58.559
<v Speaker 1>when I have in which is October first, I will

1:31:58.560 --> 1:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>do Senate races up until November of twenty twenty six,

1:32:02.040 --> 1:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and the second Wednesday of every month, I'll do a

1:32:04.439 --> 1:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>top five involving governor's races. So my top five involving

1:32:07.040 --> 1:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>center races today are simply this the top five center

1:32:10.160 --> 1:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>races that are most likely to switch parties. I'm not

1:32:14.400 --> 1:32:16.719
<v Speaker 1>saying any of these five are going to switch parties,

1:32:17.320 --> 1:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but they're the in order of most likely to switch

1:32:22.240 --> 1:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to Essentially, in this case, it's the five most competitive

1:32:27.680 --> 1:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>races in the country, but in the order of most

1:32:31.000 --> 1:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>likely to flint. So number one on that list is

1:32:35.920 --> 1:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, the open seat. There. We've had a little

1:32:39.360 --> 1:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of early polling. You've got somebody who's held state

1:32:43.040 --> 1:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>wide office versus somebody who hasn't. Right, Michael Wattley has

1:32:46.200 --> 1:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it as essentially the Republican nominee to be and the

1:32:49.760 --> 1:32:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Democratic nominee to be. Roy Cooper has one state wide

1:32:53.439 --> 1:32:57.559
<v Speaker 1>office multiple times. But you already see it's I think

1:32:57.600 --> 1:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I've seen two different polls and they both basically have

1:33:00.520 --> 1:33:03.599
<v Speaker 1>shown the same thing. Cooper's got a lead, but it's

1:33:03.600 --> 1:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>all within the margin of era forty six, forty two,

1:33:05.920 --> 1:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>forty seven, forty four. And guess what, that's what the

1:33:09.640 --> 1:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers are going to be between now and November. This

1:33:12.880 --> 1:33:16.559
<v Speaker 1>will be, as the cliche goes, all about turnout. But

1:33:16.640 --> 1:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think since this is a Republican held seat,

1:33:19.800 --> 1:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats a slight favorite, right, I would probably make

1:33:22.720 --> 1:33:24.439
<v Speaker 1>if you want to do it as point spreads here,

1:33:24.800 --> 1:33:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably make Cooper a one and a half point

1:33:27.640 --> 1:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite here a little bit, but you know that's when

1:33:32.880 --> 1:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about margins that small. It doesn't take much

1:33:35.280 --> 1:33:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to lose this race. But when you look at it

1:33:37.479 --> 1:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the map, and I think it

1:33:40.400 --> 1:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>shows you how tough the path is for Democrats to

1:33:43.280 --> 1:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>pick up the four seats they need to win the

1:33:45.240 --> 1:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Senate when the best shot at flipping a seat that

1:33:48.280 --> 1:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they have is essentially a coin flip on its own, right,

1:33:52.439 --> 1:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you need your third or fourth seat to be the

1:33:54.400 --> 1:33:57.559
<v Speaker 1>coin flip. And the fact is they're not anywhere near that.

1:33:57.640 --> 1:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>They might get there. We'll see with recruiting. So right now,

1:34:00.120 --> 1:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>this one year and one month out from election day

1:34:03.160 --> 1:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, number one most likely Senate seat to

1:34:07.000 --> 1:34:11.280
<v Speaker 1>flip North Carolina number two. I didn't put an open

1:34:11.320 --> 1:34:13.280
<v Speaker 1>seat there. I think the last time I did this,

1:34:13.400 --> 1:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I said, I usually prioritize open seats, but I have

1:34:18.360 --> 1:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>as off there. I think the John Assoft seat Georgia's

1:34:21.160 --> 1:34:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat is all the polling have indicated. He's got

1:34:24.560 --> 1:34:30.639
<v Speaker 1>a narrow lead, just like Cooper, right, nothing's big I am.

1:34:31.200 --> 1:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I am not as convinced as others that George's a

1:34:34.000 --> 1:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>pure swing state. I think Georgia is a organizing state

1:34:38.080 --> 1:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats, you know, sort of have to a lot

1:34:41.200 --> 1:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of things have to go right for them to win

1:34:42.880 --> 1:34:47.679
<v Speaker 1>statewide races. The last time John Osoft was on the ballot,

1:34:49.720 --> 1:34:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Rafael Warnock was also on the ballot with them when

1:34:52.479 --> 1:34:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we had the two Senate seats at the same time.

1:34:55.479 --> 1:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>How much did that matter with mobilizing African American vote.

1:35:01.240 --> 1:35:06.479
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth something can Assoff generate the same

1:35:06.600 --> 1:35:12.439
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm as Reverend Warnock. That's an open question. When you

1:35:12.479 --> 1:35:16.519
<v Speaker 1>look at other statewide races in Georgia, right, it is, Yes,

1:35:16.760 --> 1:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Biden carried it in twenty twenty, Harris got close but

1:35:20.800 --> 1:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>lost it. One governor's race there has been fairly close,

1:35:25.080 --> 1:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but the second but the one in twenty twenty two

1:35:27.080 --> 1:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that close. It's still an uphill battle for Democrats

1:35:32.640 --> 1:35:34.439
<v Speaker 1>to win. State wide race is sort of in a

1:35:34.479 --> 1:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>generic environment. I'm not saying this is going to be

1:35:36.920 --> 1:35:39.599
<v Speaker 1>a generic environment, and a lot of this may depend

1:35:39.640 --> 1:35:41.559
<v Speaker 1>on who the primary is. But when you just look

1:35:41.600 --> 1:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>at the demographics of the state and sort of just

1:35:45.000 --> 1:35:49.679
<v Speaker 1>by the pure numbers, I put Georgia as the second

1:35:49.720 --> 1:35:53.559
<v Speaker 1>most likely to flip. And again the fact that Georgia

1:35:53.640 --> 1:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is above other Republican held seats. You know, this is

1:35:58.080 --> 1:36:01.479
<v Speaker 1>why the Democratic path to winning four seats to get

1:36:01.479 --> 1:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>control of the Senate. The path is so narrow that

1:36:04.520 --> 1:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>right now it's not visible. I'm not saying it might

1:36:07.439 --> 1:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not become visible, but right now it is not visible.

1:36:10.200 --> 1:36:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Number Three, I'm the most likely to flip. I put

1:36:12.640 --> 1:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the open seat in Michigan. Mike Rogers is not going

1:36:15.720 --> 1:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a primary. That's a big advantage. The Democratic

1:36:18.720 --> 1:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>primary is gonna be messy, it's going to be fascinating,

1:36:22.720 --> 1:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be telling in many ways. I think

1:36:26.080 --> 1:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a preview of what to expect in a twenty

1:36:28.400 --> 1:36:32.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight Democratic presidential primary. You have sort of different flavors.

1:36:32.840 --> 1:36:35.679
<v Speaker 1>You have sort of an establishment favored in Hailey Stevens.

1:36:35.720 --> 1:36:38.280
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have sort of an outsider but sort

1:36:38.280 --> 1:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of in the mainstream wing of the party in Molly McMorrow.

1:36:41.360 --> 1:36:43.679
<v Speaker 1>And then you have a more progressive candidate Abdul Sayed.

1:36:44.840 --> 1:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I'll do ALLOL sayat sorry, And I think

1:36:50.040 --> 1:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that's very representative of what you're going to see. Some

1:36:52.680 --> 1:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>outsiders that are mainstream. You're going to see some progressives

1:36:55.720 --> 1:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that are exciting the base and could create a very

1:37:01.160 --> 1:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>messy primary. It could be very hard to unify. But

1:37:04.920 --> 1:37:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't know yet. And I still think there's a

1:37:09.320 --> 1:37:13.280
<v Speaker 1>slight blue lean to Michigan generically, which is why I

1:37:13.320 --> 1:37:17.479
<v Speaker 1>have it further down on the list than Georgia on there.

1:37:17.880 --> 1:37:21.320
<v Speaker 1>As remember, right now Michigan is a Democratic held seat,

1:37:21.800 --> 1:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but it is you know, if you look at the

1:37:23.840 --> 1:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>open seats, the Democratic open seats Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Illinois,

1:37:30.760 --> 1:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Michigan is the best shot that Republicans have of winning

1:37:34.120 --> 1:37:36.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those open seats. But I still actually think

1:37:36.439 --> 1:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Georgia right now is still a better shot for them

1:37:40.280 --> 1:37:44.240
<v Speaker 1>than any of the open Democratic seats. I'll be doing

1:37:44.240 --> 1:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>these monthly, so this list could change. Number four on

1:37:47.120 --> 1:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the list. I tell you I vacillated on this. I

1:37:51.040 --> 1:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>went back and forth. I had three different seats in

1:37:54.040 --> 1:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>this slot over the last few hours as I was

1:37:58.640 --> 1:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>having these debates. I ended up settling on Maine at

1:38:01.680 --> 1:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>number four. I do think Susan Collins is very difficult

1:38:05.120 --> 1:38:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to beat, but I also think this is Susan Collins

1:38:07.600 --> 1:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>has never attempted to run for reelection this unpopular before.

1:38:11.240 --> 1:38:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Her favorable ratings are as low as they've ever been.

1:38:14.000 --> 1:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Her unfavorable rating in Maine is as high as it's

1:38:16.160 --> 1:38:21.839
<v Speaker 1>ever been. I am not going to underestimate her ability

1:38:21.880 --> 1:38:25.559
<v Speaker 1>to win elections, and this is not a presidential year.

1:38:26.080 --> 1:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I always thought she'd be more vulnerable in a presidential year.

1:38:30.200 --> 1:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. We could have an intense primary here

1:38:35.960 --> 1:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>if the governor Janet Mills does get in and it

1:38:37.960 --> 1:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>becomes sort of establishment versus progressive primary with the oyster farmer.

1:38:44.640 --> 1:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what happens. I will say this, I think

1:38:50.320 --> 1:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>if Janet Mills runs, she'd better come across more enthusiastic

1:38:53.760 --> 1:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>about wanting to be a Senator than she has so far.

1:38:57.000 --> 1:38:59.879
<v Speaker 1>The way that she sort of kept her likely candidacy

1:39:00.120 --> 1:39:04.879
<v Speaker 1>live has been this sort of if it's the mindset

1:39:04.880 --> 1:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I have to if you twist my arm. You know

1:39:09.240 --> 1:39:11.519
<v Speaker 1>one thing about Susan Collins, she loves being in the Senate.

1:39:14.240 --> 1:39:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it always plays well with voters.

1:39:16.479 --> 1:39:19.559
<v Speaker 1>I get that you may be a reluctant partisan and

1:39:19.640 --> 1:39:21.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe you don't want to do that, but are you

1:39:21.560 --> 1:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to actually do the job. I don't want to

1:39:24.439 --> 1:39:27.599
<v Speaker 1>be in Washington, Okay, then don't run for the office.

1:39:27.840 --> 1:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Right So I'm a little I'm gonna be if she runs.

1:39:34.760 --> 1:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm very curious to see what her rollout is because

1:39:37.000 --> 1:39:39.240
<v Speaker 1>she needs to show a lot more enthusiasm for this race,

1:39:39.920 --> 1:39:42.599
<v Speaker 1>I think to win it. Then she's shown so far

1:39:43.840 --> 1:39:47.479
<v Speaker 1>and in the number five slot. If I vacillated a

1:39:47.479 --> 1:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch with Maine, I always was gonna have Maine in

1:39:49.880 --> 1:39:54.519
<v Speaker 1>my top five. For this fifth slot, I contemplated three

1:39:54.520 --> 1:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>different races. New Hampshire right, it's an open seat. Johnny Soon,

1:40:00.040 --> 1:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>who news being recruited heavily. It looks like he's more

1:40:02.160 --> 1:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>likely than not. Big baseball card collector, by the way,

1:40:07.200 --> 1:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>really great collection. His is all pre war. He's real

1:40:10.240 --> 1:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>super old school in that. Scott Brown has not been

1:40:14.120 --> 1:40:17.599
<v Speaker 1>polling as well. I understand why Republicans think he's he's

1:40:17.640 --> 1:40:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he's not electable there. I still think that he would

1:40:20.360 --> 1:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>run a competitive race against Chris Pappus, but there's no

1:40:24.960 --> 1:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>doubt all the polling has shown that, you know, the

1:40:26.880 --> 1:40:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Chris sonun who hangover effect I think has really helped Johnson,

1:40:29.680 --> 1:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>who's name idea. What's funny is is well Johnson Who's

1:40:34.439 --> 1:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>no trumpy trumper. He was much more of a conservative

1:40:39.439 --> 1:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>ideologically than his brother. But his brother's governorship I've seen

1:40:43.479 --> 1:40:46.760
<v Speaker 1>very much through a moderate lens, and I think that

1:40:46.960 --> 1:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>spillover has really helped because and I think John would

1:40:51.000 --> 1:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>agree with me, his poll numbers look better today than

1:40:53.280 --> 1:40:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they did when he when he ended up losing reelection

1:40:57.439 --> 1:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the last time he ran for the Senate. So I

1:41:00.600 --> 1:41:03.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he wants to admit that his younger

1:41:03.360 --> 1:41:06.479
<v Speaker 1>brother might have helped his political political brand a little bit.

1:41:08.880 --> 1:41:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Ohio.

1:41:09.479 --> 1:41:11.519
<v Speaker 1>With Shared Brown in the race, I cond of played

1:41:11.600 --> 1:41:15.519
<v Speaker 1>putting that in five and then Iowa. I ultimately decided

1:41:15.520 --> 1:41:17.599
<v Speaker 1>to go with New Hampshire because Sonunu looks like he's

1:41:17.640 --> 1:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>more likely to be in And I do think Sonunu

1:41:20.400 --> 1:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a different ballgame, especially you're going to have real

1:41:24.040 --> 1:41:26.439
<v Speaker 1>investment of a whole bunch of money that comes with it,

1:41:26.600 --> 1:41:29.559
<v Speaker 1>so it'll become self fulfilling and we'll be staring at

1:41:29.600 --> 1:41:32.760
<v Speaker 1>one of these one two three point races in New Hampshire.

1:41:34.040 --> 1:41:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you my thinking on Ohio. I just don't

1:41:36.720 --> 1:41:42.439
<v Speaker 1>know how Shared Brown gets to fifty, right, I'm not

1:41:42.560 --> 1:41:45.480
<v Speaker 1>ruling it out. I also think Brown has a complicated

1:41:45.840 --> 1:41:48.719
<v Speaker 1>messaging challenge, which I've shared with you before. On tariffs.

1:41:49.320 --> 1:41:52.559
<v Speaker 1>On one hand, the tariffs are are causing a lot

1:41:52.600 --> 1:41:55.839
<v Speaker 1>of sort of consumer pain. On the other hand, tariffs

1:41:55.840 --> 1:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>are not a bad word to working people in Ohio.

1:41:58.680 --> 1:42:04.519
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to goods, perhaps you'll see a shared

1:42:04.560 --> 1:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>brown say, the food tariffs are bad, the tariffs on

1:42:10.720 --> 1:42:13.760
<v Speaker 1>autoparts are good, the tariffs on cars are good. They're

1:42:13.800 --> 1:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>bad on food. And I'm kind of wondering if we're

1:42:17.120 --> 1:42:20.639
<v Speaker 1>going to start to see that split because I've had

1:42:20.640 --> 1:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conversations with labor leaders where you know,

1:42:23.160 --> 1:42:26.639
<v Speaker 1>they like that Trump is willing to use tariffs. They

1:42:26.800 --> 1:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>liked that Biden was willing to use tariffs, particularly when

1:42:30.360 --> 1:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it came to some of the to steal into some

1:42:33.120 --> 1:42:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of those some of the sort of the non food tariffs, right,

1:42:37.640 --> 1:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>but the tariffs on ag are really causing pain. The

1:42:40.720 --> 1:42:44.559
<v Speaker 1>tariffs on coffee are causing all of us pain. So

1:42:44.800 --> 1:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you're going to start to see an

1:42:47.160 --> 1:42:50.639
<v Speaker 1>attempt by Democrats who are still trying to win labor

1:42:50.720 --> 1:42:53.960
<v Speaker 1>back and labor union members back, finding a way to

1:42:54.080 --> 1:42:58.760
<v Speaker 1>split at the attack on tariffs and essentially go after

1:42:59.160 --> 1:43:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the food tax, to griffs on agg and what's hurting

1:43:02.439 --> 1:43:05.839
<v Speaker 1>farmers and try to sort of create a create a

1:43:05.920 --> 1:43:09.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of a separate distinction with the steel tariffs and

1:43:10.000 --> 1:43:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the auto tariffs, and then I contemplated Iowa because of

1:43:14.479 --> 1:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the open seat. But I will tell you, h look,

1:43:18.360 --> 1:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been impressed without quickly Republicans have rallied around at

1:43:21.160 --> 1:43:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Hinson's campaign. I still think this is going to

1:43:23.320 --> 1:43:27.240
<v Speaker 1>be a competitive race. But another reason I kept it

1:43:27.280 --> 1:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the five slot is I've been following a

1:43:29.400 --> 1:43:30.840
<v Speaker 1>story and I don't know how many of you have,

1:43:30.960 --> 1:43:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but I keep an eye the story about the the

1:43:33.720 --> 1:43:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Moines superintendent who turned out to be not an American

1:43:36.560 --> 1:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>citizen that came to as a shock to a lot

1:43:39.320 --> 1:43:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of people in des Moines. He was apparently well regarded

1:43:42.040 --> 1:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in his job, but somehow he was in this country

1:43:46.120 --> 1:43:50.559
<v Speaker 1>illegally and had a de port deportation notice for over

1:43:50.600 --> 1:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a year, and there was sort of an awkward you know,

1:43:53.160 --> 1:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>as usual. How Ice has been conducting itself has been horrendous,

1:43:57.960 --> 1:44:02.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of unnecessarily confrontational. But it doesn't mask

1:44:02.680 --> 1:44:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the issue that apparently this the now former des Moines superintendent,

1:44:06.880 --> 1:44:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I believe he's resigned at this point, essentially lied to

1:44:11.520 --> 1:44:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the school board of des Moines. Well guess what one

1:44:13.479 --> 1:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of the people running for the US, Nate Jackie Norris,

1:44:17.720 --> 1:44:22.679
<v Speaker 1>is on the Des Moines school Board. This story hasn't

1:44:22.720 --> 1:44:30.639
<v Speaker 1>finished playing out, but I wonder how much this sets

1:44:30.680 --> 1:44:37.760
<v Speaker 1>back Democrats in the state. Generically, may not. It may

1:44:37.880 --> 1:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>end up being a non issue a year from now,

1:44:41.560 --> 1:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but it isn't a net positive for the Democratic brand,

1:44:46.720 --> 1:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's fair to say. Again, let's see

1:44:52.200 --> 1:44:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this whole story play out, make sure we have all

1:44:54.360 --> 1:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the facts on this, But it was I've been following

1:44:58.360 --> 1:45:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the story pretty closely. It's like, you're just like, wait,

1:45:01.720 --> 1:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what when I saw that Ice had detained the superintendent

1:45:06.439 --> 1:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of schools? Wait? And he was not an American citizen?

1:45:10.120 --> 1:45:13.439
<v Speaker 1>How did this happen? Right? There's a lot that needs

1:45:13.479 --> 1:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to be unpacked with this story. But to say that

1:45:17.120 --> 1:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's super high profile in the largest media market

1:45:22.160 --> 1:45:24.559
<v Speaker 1>in the state, so it's going to get its share

1:45:24.600 --> 1:45:27.799
<v Speaker 1>of attentions. In what I would call my others receiving

1:45:27.880 --> 1:45:31.800
<v Speaker 1>votes category, they're not near the top five yet, but

1:45:32.320 --> 1:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>who's to say they won't get there. Nebraska, Texas, Minnesota

1:45:37.560 --> 1:45:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have had a surprisingly hard time finding a credible

1:45:42.040 --> 1:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>candidate in the Minnesota open seat. Alaska and Louisiana still

1:45:47.040 --> 1:45:49.599
<v Speaker 1>waiting for some candidate things to develop there. But anyway,

1:45:49.640 --> 1:45:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the five right now most likely to flip my top

1:45:51.800 --> 1:45:55.760
<v Speaker 1>five right now thirteen months from election day North Carolina one,

1:45:55.800 --> 1:46:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Georgia two, Michigan, three, Main four New Hampshire. So with that,

1:46:01.920 --> 1:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>let's do a few questions.

1:46:03.280 --> 1:46:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Ask Chuck all right.

1:46:08.000 --> 1:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>First question comes from Luke anyways, Hey, Chuck, technical clarification question.

1:46:15.160 --> 1:46:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I keep hearing Republicans saying that the Democrats are going

1:46:17.360 --> 1:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to shut down the government for quote, illegal immigrants to

1:46:20.000 --> 1:46:22.320
<v Speaker 1>get healthcare? Is this true? Are the subsidies in question

1:46:22.400 --> 1:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>really just for undocumented immigrants? If not, and I suspect not,

1:46:25.800 --> 1:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>then why is this lie so pervasive and unquestioned? I

1:46:28.160 --> 1:46:30.559
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard left leaning outlets discuss this point, and it

1:46:30.600 --> 1:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder how much of a kernel of truth

1:46:32.400 --> 1:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>is in the claim that Dems are unwilling to admit.

1:46:34.760 --> 1:46:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Are Democrats able to handle this talking point without fracturing

1:46:37.920 --> 1:46:40.760
<v Speaker 1>what's left of their coalition? Thanks in advance, love the show, Luke.

1:46:41.120 --> 1:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So Luke, look, no, the answer is no, it's not true. Now.

1:46:45.200 --> 1:46:47.799
<v Speaker 1>What happened before is that they discovered that some people

1:46:47.800 --> 1:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>who were here, undocumented people were somehow accessing some benefits

1:46:52.080 --> 1:46:55.599
<v Speaker 1>because perhaps they were with somebody or had a child

1:46:56.240 --> 1:46:59.519
<v Speaker 1>who is an American citizen who was getting benefits. Right,

1:47:00.200 --> 1:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for the kernel of truth, it's not

1:47:04.120 --> 1:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the parents may be here illegally, but their kid is

1:47:07.439 --> 1:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>here legally. They do have access to the medicaid, to

1:47:12.000 --> 1:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>these various things, but the parent doesn't. So I'll let

1:47:18.880 --> 1:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you decide. Can you say, are the parents that are

1:47:21.840 --> 1:47:25.840
<v Speaker 1>not of legal status in this country benefiting because their

1:47:25.920 --> 1:47:29.360
<v Speaker 1>child who does have legal status is getting a benefit?

1:47:29.400 --> 1:47:31.639
<v Speaker 1>You see where I'm going here. So, if you're looking

1:47:31.680 --> 1:47:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for the kernel of truth, which many on the right

1:47:34.760 --> 1:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know democrats are claiming it's not true,

1:47:39.439 --> 1:47:42.479
<v Speaker 1>but you know they're benefiting from this, et cetera. So

1:47:44.640 --> 1:47:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the semantic you'd be debating over. But no, nobody

1:47:49.439 --> 1:47:52.599
<v Speaker 1>who's here illegally is supposed to be eligible for this.

1:47:53.680 --> 1:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you are an American citizen, and then you are.

1:47:57.760 --> 1:48:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And so where the gray area is is is the

1:48:02.720 --> 1:48:06.320
<v Speaker 1>children who are here who were born here to folks

1:48:06.880 --> 1:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>who are not of legal status. I hope that helps

1:48:09.960 --> 1:48:13.599
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in the clarification. Next question comes from

1:48:13.640 --> 1:48:17.280
<v Speaker 1>will E says, Hey, Chuck, your commentary was spot on.

1:48:17.600 --> 1:48:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know which commentary I'll keep going because

1:48:22.560 --> 1:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>aren't they all sorry? I think that's what you have

1:48:25.160 --> 1:48:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to do as a podcast host now, right, is I

1:48:26.800 --> 1:48:30.040
<v Speaker 1>have to overinflate my ego and how say how smart

1:48:30.080 --> 1:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and great?

1:48:30.360 --> 1:48:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I am? Right?

1:48:30.800 --> 1:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that what I'm supposed to say? Anyway? I digress,

1:48:33.920 --> 1:48:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, I went to my first Wisconsin game in

1:48:37.120 --> 1:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>over fifteen years and it was ugly student section channing

1:48:39.960 --> 1:48:43.599
<v Speaker 1>fi or fickle friends texting me f fickle don't see

1:48:43.640 --> 1:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>how he makes it for the rest of the season.

1:48:45.000 --> 1:48:46.559
<v Speaker 1>The bye this weekend is going to be our best

1:48:46.600 --> 1:48:48.599
<v Speaker 1>weekend for the rest of the season. Enjoy the show.

1:48:48.840 --> 1:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So obviously, what he's saying is my commentary on football

1:48:51.640 --> 1:48:54.519
<v Speaker 1>was spot on. I appreciate, thank you, and I By

1:48:54.560 --> 1:48:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the way, some of you are probably asking me, weren't

1:48:56.640 --> 1:48:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you at a football game this weekend? How come you

1:48:58.280 --> 1:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't talk about in the last show. I'll tell you

1:48:59.720 --> 1:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the second here, but I want to get through a

1:49:00.960 --> 1:49:04.920
<v Speaker 1>couple more questions. This next one comes from Deborah You. Hey,

1:49:05.000 --> 1:49:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Chuck love the podcast. Your recent discussion on polls showing

1:49:07.320 --> 1:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>democrats less interested in talking with Republicans really resonated with me.

1:49:10.760 --> 1:49:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Many of us have tried to have rational, civil conversations

1:49:13.280 --> 1:49:16.240
<v Speaker 1>with Trump supporters, presenting facts, listening, seeking common ground, but

1:49:16.320 --> 1:49:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it feels futile. I consider myself moderate and open to compromise,

1:49:19.439 --> 1:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>yet too often the loudest up voices drown out dialogue

1:49:22.120 --> 1:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>with outrage and hypocrisy, leaving me exhausted and disheartened. Well, Deborah,

1:49:27.200 --> 1:49:29.559
<v Speaker 1>I would just say start with people in your family

1:49:29.720 --> 1:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that that you know, Start with people you work with,

1:49:33.520 --> 1:49:36.320
<v Speaker 1>or people in your neighborhood that that you that you

1:49:36.400 --> 1:49:38.519
<v Speaker 1>know are on the other side, and try it that way.

1:49:39.200 --> 1:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think if you have some sort of previous relationship

1:49:42.200 --> 1:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that isn't political with somebody, that's where you can start

1:49:45.880 --> 1:49:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to break, to sort of break the ice and thaw

1:49:48.479 --> 1:49:57.559
<v Speaker 1>things out a little bit. I try humor, you know. Look,

1:49:57.600 --> 1:50:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I I have over I have my own ways that

1:50:02.040 --> 1:50:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I consider myself pretty good at reading people.

1:50:06.280 --> 1:50:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I kind of know where I think people will go. So,

1:50:09.040 --> 1:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I don't know somebody very well, I

1:50:13.080 --> 1:50:16.760
<v Speaker 1>usually try to connect on another subject first, sports or

1:50:17.320 --> 1:50:21.320
<v Speaker 1>weather or you know, if you're on an airplane, you

1:50:21.360 --> 1:50:25.240
<v Speaker 1>know the frustrations of flying or something, you know, sort

1:50:25.240 --> 1:50:31.519
<v Speaker 1>of non controversial like that. But I think it feels

1:50:31.600 --> 1:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like what you're describing is having a conversation with somebody

1:50:34.240 --> 1:50:38.519
<v Speaker 1>that's super online. And I will say, there's no I've

1:50:38.640 --> 1:50:43.080
<v Speaker 1>tried to have civil conversations with pen pals. I have

1:50:43.320 --> 1:50:47.360
<v Speaker 1>quite a few pen and piles I've I've I've accumulated

1:50:47.400 --> 1:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>over the years. Some of you may be listening now

1:50:49.160 --> 1:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that are regular pen piles with me. Where Frankly, if

1:50:52.000 --> 1:50:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you if you email me, I usually will respond if

1:50:55.320 --> 1:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you're fairly civil, even if you're tough and discree. You know,

1:50:58.840 --> 1:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you you know, I really you're always

1:51:01.000 --> 1:51:03.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, giving a pass to this side or give

1:51:03.520 --> 1:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it a pass to that side. You know, as long

1:51:05.720 --> 1:51:08.479
<v Speaker 1>as you're not like filled with venom, I'm usually going

1:51:08.560 --> 1:51:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to respond and try to have a civil back and

1:51:11.160 --> 1:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>forth because frankly, I'm always trying to learn. I'm trying

1:51:14.960 --> 1:51:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to understand the you know, what is it that has

1:51:17.840 --> 1:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you exercised? Maybe it's something I'm missing, So I always

1:51:20.880 --> 1:51:23.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's something to learn. But when the person's super

1:51:23.920 --> 1:51:27.040
<v Speaker 1>online and they're just sort of you know, you know,

1:51:27.479 --> 1:51:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they spend more time reading cat Turd fifty two or

1:51:31.720 --> 1:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever that right wing meme, Twitter feed is or TikTok feed.

1:51:37.520 --> 1:51:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I just call them all cat turns, but I think

1:51:40.760 --> 1:51:42.559
<v Speaker 1>one of them is called cat turd fifty two.

1:51:42.680 --> 1:51:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it?

1:51:42.960 --> 1:51:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's cat turn ninety six. I don't know, you know,

1:51:47.400 --> 1:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like they're all Mike Lee, right, I

1:51:49.960 --> 1:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Senator Mike Lee is like somebody who can't

1:51:52.160 --> 1:51:55.400
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation with anymore because he's just gotten. He

1:51:55.479 --> 1:51:58.920
<v Speaker 1>calls himself based Mike Lee, right, like in weird ways,

1:51:58.960 --> 1:52:02.559
<v Speaker 1>at least admitting that he's, hey, I am drunk on this,

1:52:03.320 --> 1:52:06.599
<v Speaker 1>and he is sort of drunk on online maga, right.

1:52:07.120 --> 1:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And I guess he's sort of like the reverse reform smoker, right.

1:52:10.120 --> 1:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>He was. He was anti he was an anti trumper

1:52:13.000 --> 1:52:15.559
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, and then when he flipped a maga,

1:52:15.600 --> 1:52:21.960
<v Speaker 1>he decided, I'm gonna smoke four packs a day. You're

1:52:21.960 --> 1:52:25.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a rational debate with with somebody

1:52:25.400 --> 1:52:30.080
<v Speaker 1>who's who's that online? So I guess, you know it.

1:52:30.080 --> 1:52:32.479
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly a better conversation to be had in person

1:52:32.520 --> 1:52:36.240
<v Speaker 1>then it will be, uh, you know, digitally anyway. But

1:52:36.320 --> 1:52:38.479
<v Speaker 1>it probably is best to start off with somebody you

1:52:38.560 --> 1:52:40.760
<v Speaker 1>might have a pre existing relationship with even if it's

1:52:40.760 --> 1:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>something as innocuous as you're dry cleaner, or you know

1:52:45.000 --> 1:52:47.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody you just happen to see while you're walking your

1:52:47.280 --> 1:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood all the time. Next question comes from Gail in Woodinville, Washington. Hey, Chuck,

1:52:54.120 --> 1:52:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so glad I discovered the toodcast me too. Tell your friends, Uh,

1:52:58.960 --> 1:53:01.960
<v Speaker 1>our numbers are growing a lot, that's for sure. You

1:53:02.000 --> 1:53:04.240
<v Speaker 1>know again, I think of Sister paud in my chest.

1:53:04.240 --> 1:53:09.200
<v Speaker 1>We're the fastest growing podcast in you know this section three,

1:53:09.240 --> 1:53:13.920
<v Speaker 1>two four five. So anyway, I'm sort of kidding. I

1:53:13.960 --> 1:53:15.720
<v Speaker 1>know hindsight is twenty twenty, but do you think the

1:53:15.760 --> 1:53:17.439
<v Speaker 1>country would be better off now if Trump had been

1:53:17.479 --> 1:53:20.559
<v Speaker 1>re elected in twenty twenty. I've heard this argument. For

1:53:20.600 --> 1:53:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the sake of argument. Let's forget that many of us

1:53:22.439 --> 1:53:25.280
<v Speaker 1>probably would have died from COVID under his leadership. But

1:53:25.320 --> 1:53:27.240
<v Speaker 1>had he been reelected, Mike Pence would have been VP,

1:53:27.479 --> 1:53:30.559
<v Speaker 1>and we might never have known of J. D. Varans.

1:53:30.640 --> 1:53:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump and his clown posse might have been bumbled through

1:53:33.760 --> 1:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the second term. With more guardrails. There would have been

1:53:36.240 --> 1:53:38.880
<v Speaker 1>no indictments or prosecutions to trigger his revenge to her.

1:53:39.120 --> 1:53:41.519
<v Speaker 1>There wouldn't have been the four years from twenty twenty

1:53:41.560 --> 1:53:43.639
<v Speaker 1>one to twenty twenty five to develop Project twenty twenty

1:53:43.680 --> 1:53:46.559
<v Speaker 1>five and give Stephen Miller the opportunity to consolidate power,

1:53:46.800 --> 1:53:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and best of all, Trump would be out of office

1:53:49.520 --> 1:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. What do you think? Keep up the great work, Gale.

1:53:55.120 --> 1:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I have had this conversation. I have humored this conversation

1:54:02.120 --> 1:54:05.760
<v Speaker 1>with various friends of mine on this front. It's a

1:54:07.000 --> 1:54:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it's as as you know, I'm going to have a

1:54:09.360 --> 1:54:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what if series coming up, and what I do is

1:54:13.880 --> 1:54:16.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of forks in the road. You know, what if

1:54:16.479 --> 1:54:19.559
<v Speaker 1>this would have happened instead of this? In the past,

1:54:19.600 --> 1:54:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I've done what if Hillary Clinton had run for president

1:54:21.439 --> 1:54:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and four instead of two thousand and eight,

1:54:23.360 --> 1:54:25.479
<v Speaker 1>which you've actually won the presidency in two thousand and four.

1:54:26.439 --> 1:54:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I certainly make the argument that her best chance was

1:54:29.400 --> 1:54:32.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four, more so than eight or sixteen

1:54:32.840 --> 1:54:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for a variety of reasons. What if Bill Clinton had

1:54:36.120 --> 1:54:39.360
<v Speaker 1>resigned in nineteen ninety eight, as many Democrats wanted him

1:54:39.400 --> 1:54:43.960
<v Speaker 1>do in the peak of Monica Lewinsky, then you would

1:54:43.960 --> 1:54:46.240
<v Speaker 1>have had a President Gore running for a full term

1:54:46.280 --> 1:54:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand what is that election like nine eleven

1:54:49.200 --> 1:54:51.800
<v Speaker 1>still happens, but this time it's ten straight years of

1:54:51.800 --> 1:54:55.000
<v Speaker 1>democratic So you see how you know, you start to

1:54:55.000 --> 1:55:00.240
<v Speaker 1>go down these roads. And so anyway you have I'll

1:55:00.240 --> 1:55:04.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you this, you have potentially helped preview one of

1:55:04.280 --> 1:55:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the what ifs that I want to go down because

1:55:06.640 --> 1:55:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is it is true. This is a

1:55:10.720 --> 1:55:14.800
<v Speaker 1>more damaging presidency to the sort of guard rails of

1:55:14.880 --> 1:55:21.720
<v Speaker 1>American democracy than if he had served two consecutive terms.

1:55:21.760 --> 1:55:26.280
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about it. It's an interesting question though,

1:55:26.320 --> 1:55:32.280
<v Speaker 1>whether I think it's weirdly, I think we need another

1:55:32.320 --> 1:55:36.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty years to figure out whether it was better or not.

1:55:40.640 --> 1:55:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, do any of the Biden policies work, And

1:55:44.240 --> 1:55:46.440
<v Speaker 1>if they do, you know you're going to have to

1:55:46.480 --> 1:55:51.200
<v Speaker 1>consider those as well. So I think it's I understand

1:55:51.240 --> 1:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>where you're coming from. I think there's there's certainly when

1:55:54.600 --> 1:55:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at the when you look at this the

1:56:00.560 --> 1:56:02.880
<v Speaker 1>what he's done so far and we're not even through

1:56:02.960 --> 1:56:08.400
<v Speaker 1>year one, and what I've said earlier about Steven Miller

1:56:08.440 --> 1:56:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see how the shutdown goes. I think it's

1:56:15.040 --> 1:56:17.800
<v Speaker 1>put it this way, Donald Trump is a much weaker

1:56:17.840 --> 1:56:21.400
<v Speaker 1>figure inside the Republican Party if he had won reelection,

1:56:21.480 --> 1:56:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and he'd have been a much weaker figure sooner inside

1:56:24.680 --> 1:56:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the party. And maybe Democrats control the Senate after twenty

1:56:29.520 --> 1:56:33.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two in a bigger way, not a smaller way.

1:56:33.800 --> 1:56:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe their map is more navigable, right Like, I could

1:56:37.360 --> 1:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly paint a very rosy picture for Democrats right now,

1:56:45.880 --> 1:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's a anyway. The point is is I think

1:56:51.720 --> 1:56:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a discussion that you should look forward to

1:56:55.320 --> 1:56:58.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Chuck Podcast towards the end of the holiday season,

1:56:59.160 --> 1:57:01.240
<v Speaker 1>when I will do my annual what if series that

1:57:01.280 --> 1:57:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I've done in my previous iterations of the Chuck Podcast.

1:57:04.440 --> 1:57:08.240
<v Speaker 1>If you search them, some of these episodes NBC's taken

1:57:08.320 --> 1:57:10.480
<v Speaker 1>off the website, but some of them you can find.

1:57:10.720 --> 1:57:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's I call it my what if series, so

1:57:13.160 --> 1:57:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you can check it off from there. Do one more question,

1:57:15.000 --> 1:57:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll give you a quick little update about

1:57:18.120 --> 1:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>my football travels. This next question comes from Cold Tea. Oh.

1:57:25.520 --> 1:57:28.160
<v Speaker 1>The question is, Hey, Chuck, hopefully you've seen this crazy story.

1:57:28.400 --> 1:57:30.880
<v Speaker 1>The Des Moines superintendent was arrested by ice, which is

1:57:30.880 --> 1:57:32.520
<v Speaker 1>crazy enough, but it could also take down a leading

1:57:32.560 --> 1:57:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Senate candidate, Jackie Norris, who was chair of the

1:57:34.720 --> 1:57:36.720
<v Speaker 1>school board. Wild stuff in Iowa. No one seems to

1:57:36.760 --> 1:57:41.480
<v Speaker 1>know what is true or not. You just summarized everything

1:57:41.520 --> 1:57:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I was saying earlier with my top five list and

1:57:43.960 --> 1:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>why I didn't put Iowa in that fifth spot because

1:57:46.720 --> 1:57:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to see this story finished playing out. It

1:57:49.960 --> 1:57:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is wild. If you don't know the story, it does

1:57:54.200 --> 1:57:59.320
<v Speaker 1>feel it's amazing people that love Look, the superintendent was

1:57:59.320 --> 1:58:02.200
<v Speaker 1>beloved by any people, and they don't want to believe

1:58:02.240 --> 1:58:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the facts that apparently are in this case. And that's

1:58:06.440 --> 1:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>why I think the the fallout from this could be

1:58:10.600 --> 1:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>more damaging to the Democratic brand. I again, I'm I

1:58:14.800 --> 1:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>want to wait. I'm not gonna lie. I want to

1:58:18.920 --> 1:58:21.400
<v Speaker 1>wait a little bit to just let's get all the

1:58:21.440 --> 1:58:23.760
<v Speaker 1>facts out. Let's see what everything looks like. Is he

1:58:24.600 --> 1:58:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is everything that's been said true that he you know

1:58:27.680 --> 1:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>about a weapon in his car, cash, et cetera. He

1:58:31.920 --> 1:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>was the second superintendent job. I mean, it's sort of

1:58:34.640 --> 1:58:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like does anybody do any vetting anywhere in this country

1:58:37.680 --> 1:58:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on this front? So there's a there's a more information

1:58:42.200 --> 1:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to know. But I thought Cole you summarized

1:58:45.480 --> 1:58:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it well. Have you seen this crazy story? You couldn't

1:58:49.200 --> 1:58:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have made up a story like this right as a

1:58:52.080 --> 1:58:56.120
<v Speaker 1>plot line. And this is always a reminder when you're

1:58:56.160 --> 1:59:00.720
<v Speaker 1>whenever I'm trying to write fictional political storyline, for the

1:59:00.800 --> 1:59:05.720
<v Speaker 1>various attempts I've done for political fiction, story like this happens,

1:59:05.720 --> 1:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, how do you manufacture fiction when the

1:59:09.240 --> 1:59:13.280
<v Speaker 1>truth is so much crazier? All right, I will tell

1:59:13.280 --> 1:59:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you I was at that crazy Dallas Green Bay game.

1:59:15.600 --> 1:59:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I sort of hinted that I was going

1:59:17.360 --> 1:59:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to that, which in full sort of toodcast behind the

1:59:22.600 --> 1:59:26.879
<v Speaker 1>curtain plotting. You know what that meant is that Monday

1:59:27.000 --> 1:59:30.400
<v Speaker 1>podcast I taped before I left for Dallas on Sunday morning.

1:59:30.680 --> 1:59:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I went down Sunday, came back Monday, so it was

1:59:33.960 --> 1:59:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a quick trip. My son's doing great. Thanks for asking.

1:59:38.720 --> 1:59:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I know some of you are at least thinking that,

1:59:40.880 --> 1:59:45.240
<v Speaker 1>so I thought I would pre answer that question. But

1:59:45.280 --> 1:59:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you this. I'll we get to the game

1:59:48.560 --> 1:59:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and it feels it felt like sixty forty cowboys to

1:59:53.800 --> 1:59:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Packers fans. There were Packers fans everywhere, and I know

1:59:57.840 --> 2:00:00.280
<v Speaker 1>some of it is like, oh, you know, we're packers,

2:00:00.280 --> 2:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so all we're seeing are the other Packers. Fans, But

2:00:02.400 --> 2:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>when the teams came out, you felt the cheers and

2:00:05.520 --> 2:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>early on, and of course the Packers got a quick

2:00:08.000 --> 2:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>start thirteen to nothing, and here they're about to kick

2:00:12.160 --> 2:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the extra point, and you could just feel the Dallas

2:00:14.760 --> 2:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>fans were like, oh, this is going exactly as I feared.

2:00:18.680 --> 2:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>US Packer fans were as cocky as ever. And then

2:00:21.760 --> 2:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>they blocked that extra point and run back for two

2:00:24.680 --> 2:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>points and it's instead of fourteen to nothing, it's thirteen

2:00:27.280 --> 2:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to two. And I just sit there and look at

2:00:30.200 --> 2:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>my son. I'm like, what the second week in a

2:00:32.800 --> 2:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>row we're getting We get that field goal block with

2:00:35.920 --> 2:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the Browns and then this extra point block, so we

2:00:39.160 --> 2:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>just are stewing from here on out. We stopped and

2:00:41.840 --> 2:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>joined the game. We're angry at Rich Bisaccia, who's the

2:00:45.720 --> 2:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>special teams coach, who a bunch of US Packer fans

2:00:48.560 --> 2:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>have been like, get rid of this guy. The special

2:00:51.200 --> 2:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>teams is atrocious. It's been atrocious for two years now.

2:00:55.200 --> 2:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And then every single time on the kickoff, the Packers

2:00:58.960 --> 2:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't know the rules. They kept the ball would bounce

2:01:02.400 --> 2:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in the landing zone and they'd take it in the

2:01:04.120 --> 2:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>end zone thinking they were getting it at the thirty five,

2:01:06.280 --> 2:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and they did it multiple times, and it comes out

2:01:08.560 --> 2:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to the twenty. All these little hidden yardages, and then

2:01:12.160 --> 2:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there was the bizarre play calling of Lafleur at the

2:01:14.920 --> 2:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>end of the first half, end of the regulation, and

2:01:17.640 --> 2:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the overtime. This was one of

2:01:21.280 --> 2:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>those where so the game ends in a tie and

2:01:26.240 --> 2:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas fans felt like they won something and all

2:01:29.120 --> 2:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of us Packer fans felt like we lost. This was

2:01:32.040 --> 2:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not one of those where everybody, yeah, and you did.

2:01:34.920 --> 2:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry I didn't leave gone. Boy, that was a

2:01:36.680 --> 2:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>great game. It was not a great game. The Packers

2:01:39.560 --> 2:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>played terribly. The Cowboys. It was really interesting. They were

2:01:45.480 --> 2:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>playing afraid for the first quarter and a half. It

2:01:48.640 --> 2:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was like they did not want Michael Parsons to even

2:01:51.000 --> 2:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>get a chance to sack doacks. They didn't even bother

2:01:53.280 --> 2:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to pass the ball, or if they did, it would

2:01:54.880 --> 2:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>be like a quick strop and a little dump off.

2:01:58.360 --> 2:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Then they get this two point conversion. Like Schottenheimer, the

2:02:01.720 --> 2:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Dallas coach decided, you know what, there are other plays

2:02:05.000 --> 2:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in the playbook, why not? And you know the way

2:02:07.880 --> 2:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>football is, right, it's like a this this game felt

2:02:11.320 --> 2:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like one of those college games where a highly ranked

2:02:16.120 --> 2:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>team is visiting an unranked team and they let the

2:02:19.320 --> 2:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>unranked team hang around, and then all of a sudden,

2:02:22.160 --> 2:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the unranked team realize they have a chance to win

2:02:24.440 --> 2:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and they start playing the best game of their lives.

2:02:27.000 --> 2:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>George Pickens, who's never consistent when he's on a football field,

2:02:31.560 --> 2:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>paid attention and seem to actually participate in the offense

2:02:36.000 --> 2:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>almost one hundred percent of the plays. And guess what,

2:02:39.840 --> 2:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>when he's fully paying attention, he's a dangerous threat. The

2:02:45.240 --> 2:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Packers couldn't get a pass rush. They were only you know,

2:02:49.040 --> 2:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole key to the Packers is just that doing

2:02:51.080 --> 2:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that four man pass rush, the assumption was they were

2:02:53.760 --> 2:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get to Dak and they couldn't get to him.

2:02:57.400 --> 2:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Really until the overtime did they finally seem to fit

2:03:00.000 --> 2:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>figure that out. But Schottenheimer out coached Halfley, and we

2:03:03.520 --> 2:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>hadn't seen Halfley out coach. So the Packers are are

2:03:07.440 --> 2:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what are we now? Two to one and one? And

2:03:10.360 --> 2:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it just feels off right, And now you got to

2:03:14.480 --> 2:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself, was was the Lions game sort of an

2:03:19.000 --> 2:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>anomaly where the Packers simply a little bit more ready

2:03:22.760 --> 2:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Lions weren't they were still in preseason mode,

2:03:26.520 --> 2:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because all of a sudden, they look like the best

2:03:28.520 --> 2:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>team in that division, and the Packers are not playing

2:03:31.280 --> 2:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>like the best team in that division. So what I

2:03:34.880 --> 2:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have to say, I think it's a full indictment on

2:03:37.560 --> 2:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the coaching staff, from Halflee to Lafleor to Bisachia Basacia.

2:03:42.720 --> 2:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>This is I don't I admire that Lafleur is very

2:03:46.880 --> 2:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>loyal to his coaches, but he kept the defensive coordinator

2:03:49.840 --> 2:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a season too long. And I think it's painfully obvious

2:03:53.320 --> 2:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>with these new special teams rules that nobody on the

2:03:56.200 --> 2:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>team seems to know that they probably kept the special

2:03:59.600 --> 2:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>teams coach a season too long on this front, And

2:04:03.680 --> 2:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>if you follow Packer, you know, for those of you

2:04:05.800 --> 2:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that follow the Packer stuff closely, you know that most

2:04:08.800 --> 2:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Packer fans are raging right now about that more than

2:04:11.640 --> 2:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>ever on the college front. Look, it was just a

2:04:17.920 --> 2:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>great game, great weekend of games, and it was great

2:04:20.440 --> 2:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to not have to worry about the Hurricanes to be

2:04:22.880 --> 2:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in that. I will say this, I'm a little bummed

2:04:26.160 --> 2:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that Florida State lost that Uva game on Friday night

2:04:29.680 --> 2:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>because what that sets up is a more desperate Florida

2:04:32.320 --> 2:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>State team against Miami this Saturday. This is another big

2:04:37.560 --> 2:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>test for crystabal rights. There was a couple of coaches

2:04:40.760 --> 2:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that have high ranked teams that have not been able

2:04:43.560 --> 2:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to win the big game. James Franklin at Penn State,

2:04:46.880 --> 2:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Mario Cristobal, whether it was at Oregon or at Miami.

2:04:50.520 --> 2:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, are you going to be able to win?

2:04:52.480 --> 2:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Be able to you know, not lose a dumb game.

2:04:56.120 --> 2:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Christa Ball passed one test against Florida when

2:04:59.440 --> 2:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they played not their best game. That's a game they

2:05:03.000 --> 2:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>would have lost last year, and they figured out how

2:05:05.280 --> 2:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to win it this year. This is the first road

2:05:07.560 --> 2:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>test against a team that's more desperate to win than Miamias.

2:05:12.440 --> 2:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, can we do? We do? We treat it

2:05:16.280 --> 2:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>as a business trip and we go up there and

2:05:18.200 --> 2:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>just out physical them. There's no reason why they shouldn't.

2:05:24.040 --> 2:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But Florida State's now a bit more desperate. I would

2:05:26.600 --> 2:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have preferred a more hyped up Florida State team thinking

2:05:30.680 --> 2:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to go nose for nose and would

2:05:33.320 --> 2:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>would have had a little bit more attention on that.

2:05:35.920 --> 2:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's uh. I'm looking forward to Saturday night in Tallahassee.

2:05:44.960 --> 2:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not gonna lie. I wish they had won

2:05:48.160 --> 2:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that Friday game because I think in some ways they're

2:05:51.440 --> 2:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be a bit more desperate, which means they're

2:05:53.800 --> 2:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be playing whatever that means, right, just slightly

2:05:58.600 --> 2:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>slightly with more urgent and see more in time, because

2:06:01.840 --> 2:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Florid State has to win if they want to get there.

2:06:04.840 --> 2:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Because I think one thing we know is true, ten

2:06:09.280 --> 2:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and two ACC teams are not getting into the playoff.

2:06:12.560 --> 2:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We already found that out. Might be found out the

2:06:14.280 --> 2:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>hard way. You're going to have to be eleven and

2:06:16.200 --> 2:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>one in the regular season. You can have two losses,

2:06:18.080 --> 2:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but your second loss has to come in in that

2:06:20.280 --> 2:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>conference title game. So Florida State has to. If they

2:06:26.800 --> 2:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>accumulate their second loss, I think they go down where

2:06:30.440 --> 2:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the only shot they have would be to win the

2:06:32.120 --> 2:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>conference a la Clemson last year. So we shall see

2:06:35.760 --> 2:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that's coming up. By the way, I want to share

2:06:39.120 --> 2:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>one more totally inane fact and for five of you

2:06:42.560 --> 2:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll find this funny or weird, or maybe you think,

2:06:46.480 --> 2:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>why the hell is he sharing this? But I did

2:06:49.000 --> 2:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>something that I have never done. I swear in my

2:06:51.520 --> 2:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>entire life. I got to the end of a chapstick too.

2:06:56.800 --> 2:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I am one of those people. I never have chapstick

2:06:59.040 --> 2:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>when I need it. So you go and you're always

2:07:00.480 --> 2:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>buying new ones, always buying new ones, and then you

2:07:02.040 --> 2:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>find your old stuff and all this stuff, right, and

2:07:04.840 --> 2:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>over time I end up with my little sticks of chapstick.

2:07:07.880 --> 2:07:08.080
<v Speaker 2>You know.

2:07:08.160 --> 2:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I got one near my my keys are, and one

2:07:10.440 --> 2:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in my car, and one near my bed and all

2:07:12.960 --> 2:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>these different things. Right, Well, I finally worked. I think

2:07:16.640 --> 2:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I had this stick of chapstick for three years. I

2:07:19.880 --> 2:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't know you could ever get to an end of

2:07:21.880 --> 2:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a chapstick tube. But I finally, for the first time

2:07:26.000 --> 2:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in my life, made it to the end of the

2:07:27.280 --> 2:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>chapstick tube. I feel like I've finally not wasted money

2:07:30.600 --> 2:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for once on all the unused chapstick that I have

2:07:34.080 --> 2:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>lost over the years. I'm sure it's all with all

2:07:36.800 --> 2:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of my missing pairs of sunglasses as well. So with

2:07:40.480 --> 2:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that piece of inane trivia that I hear that podcasters

2:07:44.360 --> 2:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to share with their with their listeners and viewers,

2:07:47.840 --> 2:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call it for twenty four hours and we'll

2:07:50.080 --> 2:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>see it when we upload again.