WEBVTT - AI is Smart At Math But Stupid With Love

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Stricklund.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>tech are you. It's time for the tech news for

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the week ending July twenty sixth, twenty twenty four and

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>let's start off with a follow up on the CrowdStrike story. So,

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>if somehow you missed that event, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike pushed

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>out and update the customers on Windows based platforms that

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>caused machines to go into a reboot loop. And this

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>little oopsey caused massive outages all around the world and

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>some companies like major airlines are still dealing with the fallout.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>This week, CrowdStrike posted a quote preliminary post incident review

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or pir are end quote giving a high level view

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of what happened while promising a more thorough investigation that

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>will be shared down the line. So the post says

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that last Friday, quote CrowdStrike released a content configuration update

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Windows Sensor to gather telemetry on possible novel

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>threat techniques. These updates are a regular part of the

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>dynamic protection mechanisms of the Falcon platform. The problematic rapid

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>response content configuration update resulted in a Windows system crash

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>end quote. So the post goes on to say that

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>this rapid response content feature is meant to quote respond

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to the changing threat landscape at operational speed end quote,

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and by necessity that means CrowdStrike has to be very

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>quick to respond to emerging threats in order to protect customers.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But this particular update had an undetected error in it,

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and in addition, the content validator you can think of

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it as kind of like a bouncer standing outside a nightclub.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>The validator is a system that's meant to look for

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>mistakes before allowing updates to go through, but the validator

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>itself had a bug that essentially meant it was looking

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the other way. So the post goes on to stress

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that CrowdStrike will be instituting new processes to validate code

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and to test it thoroughly for errors before pushing it

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>out to customers in the future, because boy howdy, this

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>outage was incredibly disruptive and yeah, uh, the CrowdStrike partners

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are mightily miffed about the outage, so not just the

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>customers who were directly affected, but people who then had

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to step in and try to mitigate and repair systems

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that were affected by this. Countless people had to work

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>extremely long hours in an effort to get things working again.

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>But don't worry, CrowdStrike cares. That's why the company sent

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>out a ten dollars voucher to some teammates and partners

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>as a gesture of gratitude and sympathy. Now, as you

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>might imagine, not everyone took this very well. Some folks

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>interpreting crowdstrikes move as being insult added to injury that

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>somehow a ten dollars gift vouchure for coffee and donuts

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>would make up for having to provide seemingly endless support

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>to countless customers who were affected by this outage. Some

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>people maybe saw the gesture as being well intentioned and

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>they didn't take umbrage to it, but unfortunately a lot

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of them also had trouble using the vouchure in the

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>first place. The vouchuer was for uber eats, and uber

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Eats actually flagged it as fraud because so many people

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>were trying to use the code. Interestingly, I saw something

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>similar with ride haling services because someone I know was

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to make use of a promotional code, essentially to

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>use a right hailing service so that they could go

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and help their company out during the outage. The company

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>was saying, hey, if you need to get a ride,

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>here's a code you can use that we really need

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>your help. But then when they tried to use the code,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>they found that the code was flagged as being invalid,

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that too many people were using it. And this was

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>not a small, unknown company that was extending this right

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hailing offer in return for more help. It was a major,

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>major employer in the city of Atlanta. Anyway, it sounds

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to me like an effort to do something small but

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a little nice has backfired in crowdstrikes proverbial face. Okay,

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>now let's move on to get into a whole bunch

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of AI news. This week, Meta unveiled the Lama three

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>AI model and showed off generative AI capabilities, including support

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>for eight languages and the ability to write code, with

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>promises of multi modal capabilities in the future. So how

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>does Lama three stack up against say, open AI's GPT

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>model or other AI models for that matter. That's actually

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to say because it's very tricky to measure AI performance.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>There's not a whole lot of agreement over what constitutes

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a proper benchmark for AI capabilities. That are a lot

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of benchmarks that are being used, but they don't necessarily

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>say that one model is superior to others. It might

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>be that one model is better at specific sets of

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>tasks than others, but doesn't perform as well in other regards.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Meta's model did score smack dab between open ais GPT

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>four oh and Claude three point five on a math

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>benchmark for word problems. Meta clearly hopes that developers will

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.799
<v Speaker 1>rely on LAMA three more than on competing models running forward,

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds to me like the various AI models

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>out there right now perform at fairly similar levels, Like

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there is some variation, but from the big ones out there,

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they tend to be kind of neck and neck. So

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I think for a lot of developers it'll mostly come

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>down to which model works best from a financial standpoint,

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily just a technical one. But you know which

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>one's going to be the cheapest to use. Brianna Herschbach

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Star Tribune has a piece titled X's AI

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>chat bot groc spreads misinformation about Minnesota's ballots. Does the

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>tech giant care well? I suspect the answer to the

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>headline is that I'm sure there are some folks at

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>X who very much care. But whether that's the sentiment

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>held by the people in charge, I can't say, though

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I have my suspicions anyway. According to the article, Groc,

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the AI chat bot from X falsely claimed that it

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>was too late for presidential ballots to change in nine states,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>including in Minnesota, that the candidates were already locked and loaded,

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and that anyone who had failed to get on the

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>ballot already is out of luck. But quote, hey, there's

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>always twenty twenty eight right end quote. Because of course

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Grock is sassy. And this is relevant obviously because here

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, current President Joe Biden has dropped

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the election rate and Kamala Harris, the vice president,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is currently in line to get the Democratic nomination for

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party. So clearly, if we were at a

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>point where it's too late to put people on the

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>ballot to change the presidential ballots, then that would be

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge problem for the Democrats, because they're presumptive candidate

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>would not be allowed to be added However, that's not

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the case. No state has passed the deadline for candidates

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to be added to the ballot, not in Minnesota, not

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>any other state. We haven't reached that point. But now

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>misinformation is spreading online about this because GROX said, Hey,

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it's too late, so tough luck, and it's just not true.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I think most of us have a handle on how

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>social platforms can facilitate the distribution and misinformation. But this

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is a case where X isn't just facility hating the

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>spread of misinformation, it is generating the actual misinformation, Like

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the platform itself, or at least the AI chatbot that's

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>created for that platform, is doing it. Folks at X

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>have pointed out that GROC comes with a disclaimer that

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>urges users to independently verify the information that's coming out

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of the chatbot. I don't see this as a get

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>off jail free card. Actually, I see this as a

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>condemnation of AI, specifically generative AI, because if you know

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>that your tool is prone to or at least capable

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of generating falsehoods, maybe don't distribute the tool to customers. Like,

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>what is the point of having an AI chatbot if

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the user can't trust what the chatbot says, why have

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a chatbot at all unless the chatbot's reliable. If you

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>have to look up everything the chatbot tells you anyway,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you might as well skip having the chatbot, just go

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>straight to researching the question, right, because otherwise what are

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you doing? It seems in line, however, with Musk's approach

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>in general. It reminds me of how Tesla has both

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>autopilot and full self driving products and Tesla cars. Both

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of those, I would argue, give a false sense of

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>what they're capable of based upon their names. Like I've

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>often said, full self driving, which by the way, isn't

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>full self driving. That's my opinion, But I feel like

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it is in line with that, And I'm sure this

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 1>is just the tip of the iceberg as far as

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>how AI is playing a part in the dissemination of

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>information and misinformation during the election cycle. Okay, I've got

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a bunch more stories to go through before we start

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>into those, let's take a quick break. We're back. So,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in a rare event in US politics this week, week,

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the Senate unanimously passed a federal bill that would let

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>victims of non consensual deep fakes of a sexually explicit

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>nature sue the people who create and traffic in such material.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>This can include images, video, audio, et cetera. So deep

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>fakes have been a problem for a while now, and

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a problem that disproportionately victimizes women. So this bill

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>would make it possible for victims of deep fakes sexually

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>explicit deep fakes to seek civil penalties against those who

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>are making or sharing or receiving those deep fakes. The

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>bill will still need to pass the House of Representatives

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>before it can move on to the President's desk to

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>get signed into law, and as of right now, that

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>bill is in committee at the House of Representatives. Alexandra

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Occasio Cortes AOC. She's championing this and has made some

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>very passionate arguments as to why the bill is needed

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>because as of right now, there are very few avenues

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 1>that victims of deep fis can pursue to get justice

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or any kind of action on their behalf. And that

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is pretty horrifying, because, I mean, this is like a

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>consent issue, and deep fakes can cause not just incredible

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>emotional and psychological trauma, which they can. That alone is

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>enough to require some sort of of measure against them,

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>but they can also impact a person's ability to make

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a living through no fault of their own, Like the

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>person literally hasn't done anything, but an AI generated image

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>or video has given them a terrible reputation and there

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>has to be a system in place to seek justice

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>for this. So I feel this is a very good

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>step toward addressing a growing and disturbing problem. Moving on

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to other issues with AI. Sag AFTRA that's a union

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that presents typically actors and other performers in film, television,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and video games. Well, the video game group of performers

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>are now going on strike, so this includes voice performers

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>as well as motion capture performers, and the reason they're

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>going on strike is over the fact that the union

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>has been unable to reach a satisfying agreement during contract

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>negotiations with various video game companies. And these are like

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the big video game companies, so the contract agreement span

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of territory. It's not just one thing, but

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>one important element within all of that is over the

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>role of AI, and specifically AI's ability to replicate voices

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and likenesses. And that makes a lot of sense to me. That.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>This would be a big sticking point because if I

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>were hired for a gig because of my voice or

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>my likeness, I don't want AI to copy me, because

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>then that copy could be used in perpetuity without my

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>participation or compensation. I would be taking one gig and

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially putting myself out of a job forever because that

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>copy could get passed around, and who knows what stuff

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>my AI mimic might be incorporated into. I could find

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a copy of myself in projects that I never would

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have agreed to work on. That's not really cool, right,

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Like if I were hired to voice something that I

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>really believed in, I was like, Oh, this is a

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>really cool story, and I believe in the developer, and

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the story they're trying to tell. I

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>would love to be part of this, by the way,

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I would love to be part of stuff like that.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>That would be a lot of fun. Then, yeah, that's great,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But what if they then used my voice to generate

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a copy of it and put it into something that

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I would find morally objectionable or it goes against my

0:13:55.160 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>own personal beliefs. That's a real problem. Apparently, these AI

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>points in the agreements have been contentious, with video game

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>companies reluctant to promise that they're not going to use

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>AI tools that could lead to the detriment of union members. Interestingly,

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>striking members are still allowed to participate in appearances at

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>San Diego Comic Con, which started earlier this week and

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>goes through the weekend, and they can do so without

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>penalty because usually a striking sag after member isn't supposed

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to promote any work that is covered by the strike,

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>but in this case, the proximity of the strike to

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the Comic Con event called for an exception, so folks

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>who were scheduled to appear can still do so. They

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>can still talk about the projects they were hired to do,

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's really good news for fans. Potentially, it's also

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>good news for union members who may be able to

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>take the opportunity to speak about their concerns regarding AI

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and other aspects of the dispute. At the top of

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this episode, I talked about how Meta's Lama III performed

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>well in certain benchmarks against other AS models well. Google's

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Deep Mind department similarly unveiled a couple of AI systems,

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>one called Alpha Proof and another called alpha geometry two

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that performed really well on a very tough math test.

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>According to Google, the AI models were able to achieve

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of a silver metal performance by solving problems

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that were part of the most recent International Mathematical olympiad BENJ.

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Edwards of Ours Technica has a great piece about this.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It's titled Google claims Math breakthrough with proof solving AI models.

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Benje also does a really good job of pointing out

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that measuring AI capabilities is tricky. It is not always straightforward.

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it rarely is straightforward. The achievement does mark

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>advancements in AI's ability to parse and then solve complex

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>mathematical problems, and that is pretty cool. But ben J.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Edwards also quotes Sir Timothy Gowers about this. Sir Timothy

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Gowers took to AX and wrote, quote the program needed

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot longer than the human competitors, some of the

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>problems over sixty hours end quote, and that if human

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>competitors had been given the same luxury of time, they

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>probably would have scored higher in this test as well.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So what Gowers is saying is this is not an

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>apples to apples comparison. You can't say, oh, this AI

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>program is x times smarter than the average person when

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to math, because you have to take into

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>account all the different parameters and say, well, if the

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>people who are really good at math were given the

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>same amount of time to solve a problem, they might

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>have done it as well or better than the AI

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>model did. Gowers also pointed out that humans had to

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>convert these problems into a language that the AI models

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>could understand before they could tackle the problem in the

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>first place. So again, the AI models weren't presented with

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the exact same problem, or the problem wasn't framed the

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>exact same way for the AI versus the human competitors

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>who actually participated in the Olympiad, and that if the

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>AI had had to parse the problems the way that

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>humans did, maybe the AI wouldn't have performed as well.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's complicated hopping over to open ai because yeah,

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not done with AI yet. Open ai announced this

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>week that a prototype version of its search GPT product

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>is now ready to go. This is open AI's artificial

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>intelligence powered search tool. It is a clear shot across

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Google's bow, and according to open ai, the tool will

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>provide quote fast and timely answers with clear and relevant

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>sources end quote. I have signed up to join the

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>wait list to try this out, but as of this recording,

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I have not yet personally been able to use this tool.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I do have concerns similar to what I was saying earlier.

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I have these concerns with pretty much all AI enabled

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>tools that are like And one of those concerns is

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that I worry AI enhanced search will mean fewer people

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>will actually navigate to what the real sources of the

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>information were. They'll just be satisfied with the AI summarized

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or synthesized results and that's it, Which means the pages

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>that the AI is drawing from the source pages are

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>going to get less traffic, and that means less revenue,

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>which ultimately means the businesses that actually operate these pages

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>could find themselves strapped for cash. And then what happens,

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, when the underlying infrastructure that the AI is

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon goes rotten. What happens then? Plus there's still

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the worry of mistakes, you know, like confabulations slash hallucinations

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>with Generative AI. Google's version of this same sort of

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>tool famously suggested that people include non toxic glue in

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>their pizza ingredients in order to prevent cheese from sliding

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.239
<v Speaker 1>off their pizza. Clearly that is not good advice. So

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>how reliable will search GPTB and how will folks know

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if the answers they get are actually good? I mean,

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess one way you could check is you could

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 1>click through to the sources. But then again, why do

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you even need AI search at that point? Like, if

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>you already have to double check to make sure the

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>answer that AI gave you is relevant and accurate, what

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>good is the AI? If you have to double check,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>then you might as well just get rid of the

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>AI and go straight to the source in the first place.

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just like I was saying before, AI is just

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>making things, giving an extra step. It's like turning to

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a random person next to you and saying, like, how

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>do you repair a car? Like you have no idea

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they have any experience or knowledge in that realm, and

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>if they give you advice, you don't know if it's trustworthy.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You have to look it up. Well whatever open AI

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>made this announcement, and after that, alphabet shares fell around

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>three percent. So I guess like these questions are ones

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that don't necessarily run around the minds of investors. I'm

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>just gonna progressively go bonkers over here as the world

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>continues to embrace AI and I keep asking, but wait,

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I have questions. I also have more news. But before

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we get to that, let's take another quick break. So

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>before the break, I was talking about Google and speaking

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of alphabet slash Google. One of the other companies in

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that group of companies under alphabet is YouTube, and it

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>could be facing some pretty tough issues in Russia. So

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Russian government has indicated that YouTube could see that

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>the agents will throttle YouTube traffic by forty percent on

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>desktop computers this week, So slowing down YouTube traffic by

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>forty percent, that could increase to a seventy percent slowed

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>down by next week. And you might ask why why

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is the Russian government throttling traffic from YouTube in Russia? Well,

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it's because YouTube previously placed a block on some channels

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that were carrying Russian state media. Russian state media has

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a reputation for having, let us say,

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a biased view of the news, and that it often

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>is just really seen as a mouthpiece for the Russian

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>government itself, and thus is really a way of distributing propaganda.

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So presumably what has happened is YouTube determined that some

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Russian state media YouTube channels were in violation of YouTube's

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>policies and so block them, And the Russian government's response

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is We're going to make all traffic to YouTube super

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>duper slow, so that Russian users will get really frustrated

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about this unless you reinstate those channels. So essentially this

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is a threat. It's a standoff between YouTube and the

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Russian government. And I did not see any responses from

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube about this as of the time I'm recording this episode.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>That may be different by the time you hear it,

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, right now, it is like a standoff, which

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is a big old yikes from me. Now, if you

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>don't use Google, but you are used to seeing search

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>results include stuff from Reddit threads, that could be changing.

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So Reddit has a content policy that forbid sites from

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>crawling Reddit forums without first agreeing to follow Reddit's rules,

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and those rules cover a lot of ground. One of

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the big rules that Reddit has is that companies that

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>want to crawl Reddit for the purposes of gathering data

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to train AI models have to pay for that privilege

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>that you've got to fork over some cash if you're

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>going to use Reddit to train up your AI. This

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is something that a lot of Reddit users are actually

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>salty about because you know, a lot of people don't

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>want their stuff to be used to train AI in

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the first place. They don't have any say in the matter,

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like Reddit gets to make that call. They don't, And

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>some users are thinking that's not really fair that they

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>should have more control over the content they create. Reddit

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.239
<v Speaker 1>says no, once you post it here, it's ours, like

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it was yours then you hit post and now it

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>belongs to us. And users also are kind of salty

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>because the compensation it's going to Reddit doesn't go to

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the people who are generating the content in the first place. Right, Like,

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>these AI models are using Reddit content to train themselves,

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but the people who are making the content, they don't

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>get any of the money. The money goes to Reddit,

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to the platform, but not the people

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>who are creating the actual content that's training AI. So yeah,

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.719
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of reasons why Reddit users are

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>not happy about this. But anyway, this means that any

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>company that has not agreed to these these rules that

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Reddit has posted, they are not allowed to crawl the site.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Without crawling the site, you can't index it, and specific

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>threads will not pop up in search results. If that

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is the case. Apparently, search engines not named Google have

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>largely not yet forged these kinds of agreements with Reddit,

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So the result is that if you search for topics

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that are covered on Reddit forums or Reddit threads, you

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>will get fewer results on non Google search engines. Some

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of them will return some Reddit results, but others won't.

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>For a full breakdown on this issue, including some really

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>great insight into the search engine landscape in general, i

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>recommend reading Sharon Harding's excellent piece in Ours Technica's article

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>titled non Google search engines blocked from showing recent Reddit results.

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Shila Chiang CNBC reports that Apple is no longer among

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the top five smartphone brands in China. Rather, Chinese companies

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>domestic companies are taking up the top five spots, and

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple has fallen to hold fourteen percent of the market

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>share in the country. The Chinese market has been a

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>really important one for Apple. The company famously courted Chinese

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>officials and business representatives while trying to establish an inroad

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>into Chinese markets for the iPhone. Ironically, the iPhone was

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>being manufactured in China for two years, but not sold

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in Chinese stores, at least not legally sold in China

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for those two years. Earlier this year, Apple CEO Tim

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Cook declared China an extremely competitive market in the smartphone space,

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>which was I feel like it's coded language. The country's

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>government has frequently favored domestic companies over products coming from

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Western companies. I've talked several times about how tech companies

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>from the West have viewed China as a potential gold

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>mine because the country does have a truly enormous population.

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But I personally think the price of doing business in

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>China is really high. It's high enough to make it

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to say whether or not it's worth the effort. Also,

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.959
<v Speaker 1>it frequently means that you are implicated or complicit with

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>ethically questionable state programs, which is more than putting it lightly.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 1>In what could have been a nightmare scenario, a security

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>vendor called no B four that's all one word, No

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>B and then the Numeral four hired a software engineer

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to fill a job in the company's AI division. The

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>job hire purported to be a US based software engineer,

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>but in fact was a hacker from North Korea. And

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.719
<v Speaker 1>this hacker had stolen some US credentials and used a

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>stock photo and then altered it with AI to make

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a fake headshot in order to fool the company. They

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>apparently looked enough like that headshot to fool hiring managers

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>because they then went on multiple video conferencing calls as

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>part of the hiring process. But yeah, this hacker managed

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to get through the entire interview process, multiple rounds, even

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>got through a background check, and according to a company representative,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>quote we sent them their Mac workstation and the moment

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it was received, it immediately started to load malware end quote.

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>We say. Fortunately, the company security software caught on right

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>away and within short order, security kind of like sequestered

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>off the hire's computer so that they could not cause

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>further mischief, you know, to like company systems and stuff

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>like that. They think that it's quite possible this hacker

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>was a state backed operative that North Korea was actually

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of sponsoring hackers like this to try

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and infiltrate various companies like security companies and then cause

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>problems from there. There are few public details available about this,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>largely because Nobifore says there's an ongoing FBI investigation into

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the matter. But yeah, it sounds like hiring managers might

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>need to be on the lookout for potential threat agents

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>during the hiring process. Fun times. Around five hundred Microsoft

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>employees working on the venerable World of Warcraft title have

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>voted to join the hoard. By that, I mean they've

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>voted in support of unionization. Microsoft is pledged to remain

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>neutral in the proceedings. That was actually part of Microsoft's

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>concessions during the long process in which the company was

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>attempting to acquire Activision Blizzard, which it ultimately did. Activision Blizzard,

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is the company behind World of Warcraft.

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Blizzard has already recognized this union, which is a key step.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.959
<v Speaker 1>It's one that means the union employees won't have to

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>appeal to the US government in order to force Blizzard

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge them. Sometimes that does happen. When a company

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>refuses to recognize a union, the workers join a few

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>other unionized groups within Microsoft's video game division. More than

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>one seven hundred and fifty employees in that specific part

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of Microsoft are now in a union, and all I

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>can say is solidarity. Not long ago, I talked about

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>how SpaceX's Falcon nine was grounded following a launch vehicle's

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>mid flight failure that resulted in the loss of a

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>big group of Starlink satellites. But up to that point,

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the Falcon nine had a stellar, pun intended safety record,

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of unheard of in the space industry

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if we're being brutally honest, I mean, space is hard,

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>so having a vehicle that has had the reliability of

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the Falcon nine is a rare thing, indeed. But the

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>FAA has now ordered that the fleet, which was grounded

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to allow for an investigation, can now return to operation.

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>The investigation still ongoing, but the FAA says the found

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>no reason to block operations, so there were no public

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>safety issues present as far as they could tell. So

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>while they will continue to investigate the matter, the Falcon

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>nine can return to service. And that's great news for

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the industry as a whole, for the United States in particular,

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>because the Falcon nine is the launch vehicle that can

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>take people to the International Space Station here in the

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>United States. So yeah, SpaceX's launch vehicles have become absolutely

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>critical for the space industry here in the United States.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>The company says it will be ready to return to

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>operations as early as tomorrow, Saturday, July twenty seventh, twenty

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. Okay, that wraps up this episode of tech

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff with the Tech News. I do have a couple

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of recommendations for y'all in order to read up on stuff.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>First up is Jordan Velenski's piece for cnn dot Com

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>titled Grinder is limiting location services at the Olympics to

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>protect LGBTQ plus athletes. So this is about how the

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Grinder app is proactively protecting athlete identities. This is important

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>because some of those folks are coming from countries that

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>have draconian laws that target people who belong to the

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.959
<v Speaker 1>LGBTQ plus community. So, in other words, you're not going

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to be able to open the app and change your

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>location to the Olympic village and then go looking around

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for Olympic athletes who may be part of that LGBTQ

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>plus community. It's not going to work, and that's for

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the protection of those athletes. I think that's a good idea,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but the article goes into further detail, so check it out.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Next up is an article by Alphonso Maruccia of tech Spot.

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It's titled spyware Maker gets hacked. Data reveals thousands of

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>remotely controlled devices. So this article covers the case of

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a company called spy Tech Software, which is in a

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>questionable business I would argue, and talks about how hackers

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>got access to the company systems and what that all means.

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It is well worth a read. That's it for me

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this week. I hope all of you are well and

0:31:50.880 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.