WEBVTT - Jobs Report Is Weak, Gross Says

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Good Morning everyone, Bloomberg Surveillance Jobs Day.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>In twenty nine minutes, we will bring you the data.

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll go beneath the headline data. We are fond of

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>doing that, and what we're really fond of is on

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a three day weekend, four day weekend, whatever it is,

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>David Gurral, five day weekend, I'm labor day weekend. We're

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>pleased to announce that William Gross and Jim Glassman are here.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They're here, are people talk to their people, and it's

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>very We're really honored if Alan Krueger with us earlier,

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>James Sweeney really doing well from Credit Sweee with some

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>terrific perspective, and then to have Professor Krueger from Venice,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Italy and to have uh Bill Gross join us in

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit from Janet Henderson is great. But we will

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>begin with James Glassman of JP Morgan, Jim Glassman here,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and I want to frame August and wrap it around you. Travels,

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 1>which is everybody's telling us as a job shortage, job

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>openings are there, this is that the other wage growth.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into all that. And yet there's twelve thousand

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>people lined up to fill cardboard boxes at Amazon. And

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the good thing about Jim Glassman is you're on the road,

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not in the three zip codes that straddled James Diamond

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>to me and David Gura, what have you witnessed on

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the road about a fully employed America? Are one lined

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>up to fill cardboard boxes at Amazon? Yeah? I mean

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>there are pockets that are struggling, but they're also pockets

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>out there that are just off the charts. Colorado, Nashville, Austin,

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>West Coast, East Coast. We're doing fine. Actually, everybody is

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.919
<v Speaker 1>doing pretty well. There are a few areas that are slow.

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the problem for a lot of workers is

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>there's just been so much change in the workplace. There's

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of automation, there's a lot of innovation. The

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>jobs that used to exist ten years ago don't exist anymore.

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So you can find jobs, but the problem is they're

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>not paying the same thing unless you can scale up.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's really what our clients are telling us, is

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they that the kind of jobs they need don't have.

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>They don't have people to write skills. Well. To me,

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that's music to my ears because that tells me that

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>something's changed over the last ten years. There are new

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunities opening up, and we just got to figure out

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>how to get people steered there. I think a lot

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of community colleges are very focused on this. If you

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>go to Miami Dade, all the very big community college systems,

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>they've got a lot of programs for training people with

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>specific skills. And I suspect that we will figure out

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and then in another few years we'll probably not here

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>as much about this story because I think people are

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>figuring out that there are things out there. You just

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>got to take the initiative to do something about it.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>We were having a conversation with James Swingeing from Credits

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was a little earlier just about what constitutes a skilled worker.

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>How much agreement is there on that, what? What what

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what we define as skilled worker as well? I don't know,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got to ask, you know, you need people who

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>know how to monitor computer systems and understand what what

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it is that all the stuff that's been mechanized, if

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they've got to understand the process there. So you'll get

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a different story depending on where you look. I think

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>what people tell you is you need people who learn

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>skills that we used to learn in shop class in

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>high school. You've got to have some math skills, you

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta know some programming, and honestly, you know, when I

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>think of it, I think of when I turned my

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>car into the local gas station to do routine maintenance.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I took it in the other day, they say to me,

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>can you come back in about three weeks because our

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>mechanic is out of town. He's on vacation. So no

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>one no when there. You know, just maintaining a car

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>has gotten much more complicated and you need to know

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>how to read the diagon gnostics and understand the way

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the car is working to make sense of that. So,

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, my suspicion is that it's not It doesn't

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>take an awful lot of training. The problem is it

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't really in anyone businesses interest to do. I mean,

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if if you spend the money to train somebody up, uh,

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>then they become marketable and they jump, they go somewhere else.

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is the role for the public sector and

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>for the community colleges. It's a partnership that you needed

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about that because I think this administration

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>has been keen to point out the parallel they'd like

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>to see between the US training system and that in

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Germany or other parts of Europe, and there it seems

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like you get an apprenticeship company, finances that in part

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>or at least in part, and then you stay with

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that company. How do you incentivize somebody who gets those

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>skills to stay? How do how do you make it

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so that that person doesn't have those marketable skills and

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to leave. Well, you know, when you look to

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina and North Carolina where the European auto industry

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>has come in, you see a lot of that going on.

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know, to some extent, uh, you're

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>not going to lose people if if the skills that

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you're learning are specific to that company. But the way

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you do it is you offer benefits to you know,

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>tie people in, and I think people, honestly, I think

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you just people appreciate the opportunities to develop, to know

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>something about your company and to learn those skills. I

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think people are that quick to jump. A lot

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of folks, you know where they sort of we like

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to stay in our comfort zone. If you give me

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in my comfort zone, I'm happy to stay there.

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think this problem is as big as

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you might think it is for the guy that learns

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the welding. Because if there's a hot paying job up

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in North Dakota and you teach me how to do

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>welding down here, I'm gonna go. If I can get

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>three times, this is really I was going to go

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>another wrangler. Well, this is what you do folks with

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Jim Glass and frankly with Mr Gross as well, you've

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>got something in your head to go to and they

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>say something so damn smart, you gotta go the other way.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's go the other way. On welders. I read a

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>paper at Iowa University of Iowa, Iowa State, I think

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the wrestling school Iowa State, and it was about it's

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>not about welders, it's about really good welders, average welders,

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and welders that are a joke. Now, let's take that

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>across the entire economy. The excellence and the demand for

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>jobs is because employers only want the best flight attendants,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the best radio announcers, the best welders. Right, yeah, and

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't get that with the first guy you hire.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>This is something you learn on the job. Is it

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>different now than it was when you were at Northwestern

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or Mr? Gore? I don't think so, because I didn't

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>know anything when I started a job, and we know that. Yeah, yeah,

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know I don't you get hired. God knows.

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>You have a great note out where you're looking at

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>our sense of worry about this this economy. I want

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to dig into that a little bit if if I could.

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of apprehension here, just sort of about

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>where we might be headed if we're on the precipice

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>of a recession. Uh, the sense of doubt as well,

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that things at least with regard to the economy aren't

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>as good or can't be as good for as long

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as we think they will be. How do you process that, Jim? Well,

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's always the case when you're coming out

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of a really bad time, people are always worried over

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the overcautious. Then when finally we wake up and we

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>realize here we are eight years. This is the eighth

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>labor Day of recovery from the Great Recession. When you

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>realize you've done a good job recovering, then you start

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to worry, oh my god, how can this last? And

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, it's legitimate. It's it's legitimate to

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>think about this because our history books tell us that

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>these recoveries last six and nine years, and and for

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>some reason we we trip up and fall and fall

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>back again. But if you look at why that happens,

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation problems, financial accesses, I don't think there's anything anything

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. Frankly, myself, I think we've got a

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>very good chance that this recovery, now that we've recovered

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the losses from the recession, we're gonna this The longevity

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of this cycle is probably gonna beat anything else we've seen.

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, it's natural to worry. Frankly, I'm

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>happy when people worry because that makes me think expectations

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are low. I'd like to hear people worry. We economists

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>should worry when businesses stop worrying, and that makes that's

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>what makes me nervous when you look at what might

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be leading to that worry. Is there an indicator that

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>stands out to you is something that is reasonable. You

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the markets, say, and how how the stock

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>market is is, for instance, is that something that gives

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>one cause for concern. Stock market to me, is just

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a symptom of all this stuff. The thing that I

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>would worry about is if I started to see inflation problems. Well,

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't see that those are the things. That is

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the number one thing that always trips us up because

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that forces the FED to step on the brakes, and

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we tend to overdo it, and often that sets the

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>stage for a new downturn. The other kind of thing

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that we've been seeing financial access is real estate go

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>back ten years, real estate values above what we have

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>ever seen before relative to income. There's nothing like that

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. Only you know, maybe in the commercial real

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>estate sector. You could argue that some assets are little pricing,

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know, that's that's something that can correct quickly.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>This is not like the real estate problems we saw

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>last The employment employment employment to population ratio has been growing.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>Women's you know, jobs and all that. From the sixties

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>up to sixty percent of Americans employed. Then we created

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>down to fifty eight percent, dragging themselves back the late

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>nineties seventies. We've come back, but we're nowhere near where

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we were. Do you have a hope that we normalize

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's six from the present, because you know, I don't

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>think we'll ever get there, because right now, for the

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>next ten years or so, we've got this massive wave

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of people who are approaching retirement. Why are you looking

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>at me, I'm looking in the mirror. We've got twenty

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>million people who have turned into gone into the fifties

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or sixties. Those guys don't want to work and really

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not think, but they want to retire in And what

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>you notice is when people get to about fifty years

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of age, they start scaling bad. Maybe you and I

0:09:54.720 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>put up you know what I mean, had a massive Democrats, David,

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I really suggest to smooth this over with, one of

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>our best guests is Dr Glassman should join us for

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a beverage of his choice on my grand Banks down

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in the East River. It's the forty eight foot Grand Banks, Jim,

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it's over your thirty fourth Street. It's called Tuition. He'll

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to see it, you know. And I'm making

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>a joke here, folks, because I know that Dr Glassman

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is familiar with that boat as well. We'll continue with

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Jim Glassman serious discussion on the state of the American

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>labor economy, and then we link it together with Bill

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>gross next Worldwide Coast to Coast Bloomberg Surveillance from our

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 1>studios here on Lexington Avenue at fifty Street, right across

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomingdale's in New York City. Davy girl, what's New

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>York about? It's about a justice with her picture on

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the wall down at the Federal Justice Building downtown where

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>people become new citizens. And last night in section one

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>oh four Yankee Stadium there she was in taking in

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>robe in row By might point out in the Judges

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty one errand Judge Yes on cinema or in the

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Bronx last night for that game against the Do you

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>watch last night? I watched. I watched enough to know

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to keep watching, but the three am beckoned

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>or to thirty am or whatever it was that's running anyways,

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>A major shout out to a Supreme Court justice who

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>got out with the people in right. Very nice last night. Justice.

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>We're with Jim Glassman, who knows about this, and to

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>speak of the justice's heritage, which is Hispanic. We have

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a huge announcement today by the President on immigration. Potentially

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I should say you have Toulouse or Na. Thank you

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>so much for that perspective from the White House an

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.599
<v Speaker 1>hour ago. Jim Glassman, how does immigration fold into the

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>job's report right now? Well, uh, you know, the demographics,

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the US demographics has the working age population slowing down

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot. We've had very little immigration in the last decade,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we're getting all this recovery in the

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>job market with slow growth. Immigration is an important part

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of what makes the US economy strong. And if if

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy is doing better and we don't have the

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>domestic workers to fill those jobs, we're going to see

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>more immigration. So want to give an hundred and fifty

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>thousand of non farm payroll ten or twenty years ago,

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>if it was two d or two twenty was the

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>delta immigration? Yeah, it seems it seems that might be

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty or sixty or seventy. This is what's confusing everybody

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>because we've never really when we talked about the broad economy,

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we've never really had to talk about immigration because are

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about demographics. Because whatever demographics was going on in the

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>US immigration would tend to fill the gap. If we

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>had the jobs and we didn't have the local workers,

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we would we would draw people in. This is not

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>true in Italy or Japan. Uh demographics dominates and they're

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they're used to this story. We're having to talk about

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>demographics because when we've not been getting the immigration, and

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if if the economy does really start picking

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>up speed, you gotta wonder, when you're getting two thousand

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>jobs a month, where is this coming from. It might

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>be that we're starting to see a little more immigration.

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>You go to Arizona. I mean, one thing you don't know, folks,

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is he's not just a radio star and television star.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>He lives in airports. When you go to Phoenix, what

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>do you tell the audience of institutional and high net

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>worth jpeoporgan people. Is immigration good for Senator Flank and

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.119
<v Speaker 1>for Senator McCain. Yeah, I mean I think everybody realizes,

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly in Texas, immigration is an important part of their economy.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Arizona has a more negative view of this because of

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the social problems that this brings. I don't really understand it,

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think we all deep down realize that we

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>are a nation of immigrants, and this is what's made

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>our economy strong. I think the issue is more about

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>illegal and you know, we gotta we gotta solve this

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>issue because immigration can solve a lot of issues. And

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the people coming in, it's the kids.

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I see this in my neighborhood, the families coming in

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>from India and Asia. They're obsessed with education. They drive

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>their kids into education. It's the next generation that really

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>brings the value to what you know, to the country.

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And we all know this story because our parents and

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>our grandparents went through the same process. What can you

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the Republic of Texas. Our eyes are

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on that state right now in light of the

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>devastating storm that hit it earlier this week. We're talking

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>about immigration, obviously hugely important to that state as well.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>What's the give us? Give us some context. You about

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the importance to the U. S economy of the Texas economy. Well,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hugely important because of the energy sector, right, but

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it's also a really diverse economy. It's a real entrepreneur

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to place and a real dynamic economy. Honestly, they're gonna

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>recover from this fashion And people think because it's just

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a really dynamic place. And uh, it's it's important for

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the U s economy. It was the big it's the

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>leading edge of the recovery because of the what's going

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>on the energy sector. You look at employment growth in Texas,

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's doing over the last ten years. It's done better

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>than anybody except for code during North Dakota. But honestly,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>not many people want to go to North Dakota. So

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an important it's an important state. Healthcare is a

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>gateway to the global to the to the global world.

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>It's energy sector is pretty dynamic. It's pretty critical to

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the US economy. Jim Glass, wind with US will continue.

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll go beneath the headline data here, David Gurr, we

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>should say to our people because we're we're full disclosure.

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>There are technical deficitions. This is this is interesting. We're

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna pull back the curtain here just a little bit. Uh.

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, the data comes across the Bloomberg at eight

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty when those numbers are released, in part because some technicians,

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>some people within Bloomberg and other outlets are able to

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>get those numbers first in put them into the system.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>There apparently are some technical difficulties across the board at

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Department preventing that from happening today. So at

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>eight thirty, we you, everybody will go to the web

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to get those data from the Labor Department. And that's

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>going to cause a bit of a delay here as

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to sort of pass through the numbers outside

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of the usual framework that we get them in. So

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it may be that we don't get the numbers right

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>at eight thirty. My be a few seconds afterwards today.

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Could you turn around, David and turn on the studio lights. Yes,

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll be here worldwide on minutes. Yeah, yeah, I gotta

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>get the orange going on the skin. You know, where's

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bayner when I knew? Uh? Futures up, six down,

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>futures up sixty five Jobs today with Jim Glass one in,

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross, stay with us. Welcome morning, David Gurra and

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene in New York, Bluebrick Surveillance on Bloomberg Radio.

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>On Jobs Today, we go out door colleague Vine Delle

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Judas at the first Word desk for the latest jobs

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers against some quirkiness here this morning, Vinney, Yes, David,

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>job unemployment. Let's let me just start over payroll growth

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>slowed in August one hundred and fifty six thousand the

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>prior month, an increase of one hundred eighty nine thousand,

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate meantime creeping up to four point four percent,

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Private payrolls up by one hundred sixty five thousand, looking

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>at average hourly earnings, a sore point up just point

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Yes, there were some problems. The government had

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a little trouble getting the news out this morning, but

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that hit on time just the same at eight thirtiesome

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>computer issues again. The Labor Department reporting non farm payrolls

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>rose by one hundred fifty six thousand. That's slower than

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>a prior month. That is below Wall Street forecasting. Unemployment

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>rate up a notch four point four percent, and average

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hourly earnings. I can't over emphasize this. This is a

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>sore point up just point one percent in August, and

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I might add the July earnings increased revised down. I'm finite,

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>s Bloomberg Radio. Let's go back to New York. These

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>are extraordinary numbers. We think our team in Washington, particularly

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>this morning, led by Brendan Murray, forgetting this out. There

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was some technical difficulties but we're acting normal with yields in.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You equity futures don't do much, David Guru, but yields

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in with curve flattening, it's just it's just a lighter

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>tone to the data. With the unemployment rate again up

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>four point for sind you know you look at moving averages,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Jim Blaste, which I know you love, and again this

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>pushes against the moving average vector that we want to

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>go up a hundred and fifty six thousand. With negative

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>forty one revision that gets you down to a hundred

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and ten thousand. Yeah, I think the what you're going

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear from my community is don't trust the initial

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>estimate of August because in the past seventeen years, with

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the exception of three years, you've seen this August number

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>get revised up by an average of seventy five thousand

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>by the time it's all in. So I think you've

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>got to be a little leery of this kind of stuff.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>People were saying even when we saw the ADP number,

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>they were telling you this, The information we're getting from

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the labor market is frankly quite good. The jobless claims

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>trend is gotten lower, ADP is finding an awful lot

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of employment. So I think with these monthly numbers, you

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have to be a little careful, particularly August, particularly August. Yeah,

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>just to continue to process what we're seeing here. How

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>big a deal is that headline? Miss said, do you think, Jim,

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's that big of deal. I've I've

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>got people worth sort of in the one two D

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand range, and the people who thought one fifty were saying,

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>there is this series. There's a significant bias that shows

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>up in August. The things tend to get revised up,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so don't be surprised if you see a two D

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>number out of this. Jim Glass, thank you so much.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It's JP Morgan as well. And now in Bloomberg Radio,

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Television, Good morning, Alex. Still looking forward to the

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>comments of Gary Cohen from the White House Law and

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, Alex, you'll do that here in a bit.

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Now we welcome William gross Off, Janet Snderson our coverage

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>of this job's report, how it folds into markets, and

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly how it folds into a most interesting September in Washington.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess Bill gross I look at this and I

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>see the revisions down in a little soggy report. It's

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>once again putting a good month back together with another

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>good month and another good month after that. We can't

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>seem to get there. I think that's true. And I

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>think August, you know, historically has has been different and

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit weak. But nonetheless, um, you know,

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the wage revisions I think strike me the most, and

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>the point one in terms of the wage growth strikes

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>me as well. You know it inflation tongue, not job

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>growth dominates central bank thinking these days. And uh, well,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I think low unemployment percentages historically have led the higher

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>wages and inflationary pressures, and the fabled Phillips curve which

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>assumes this, Um, I think it appears to be broken.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And and your are of your core inflation, which is

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>what the film looks at, is increasing only at one

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>point four percent, and it's down from the two point

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>one percent only six six months ago. So I think

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the fit is focused on wages and uh certainly inflation

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that wages are reflective in that. Let's

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>try and and and this is a weak report, Let's

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>synthesize Mr Gross's outlook their folks into what we see

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomer I've seen a two point one one

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>percent ten year bill in the angst of Korea. Five

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>days ago, we got down to two point zero nine percent.

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Steve major Over at HSBC says we can go below

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>two percent. Do you agree that there's a set of

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>news or a set of economic data that get will

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>give Janet Yelling at one point nine nine percent and

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>year yield. Well, geo political, perhaps, you know, North Korea

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>is certainly important, and uh, you know, money moves to

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>quality in the safety when when global events threatened. Uh,

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, global bonds have rallied tended fift thirty basis

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>points over the past few months due to in my opinion,

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily ding in North Korea, but unprecedented liquidity from

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the ECB and the b O G B o J.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>They've they've written one trillion dollars worth of free checks

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>per month. It keeps investors happy and economies humming for now.

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But uh, we see Japanese tenure race now at zero

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>percent and buns at thirty five basis points, and that

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>makes our tenure attractive at to ten and you know,

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it can go down to two percent because these

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>other alternatives are extremely low and moving lower bill. We're

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>making our annual pilgrimage to the edge of the fiscal cliff.

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>It seems we're gonna be talking about the debt ceiling

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>here over these next few weeks. Is Congress endeavors to

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>raise it, whether cleanly or with some other stuff attached

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to it. Of course, there's the issue of government funding

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. How much have you perfected your playbook with

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>how to deal with this kind of disaster again? We

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>faced it time and time again. Well, this one's extraordinary

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and the numbers still aren't certain in terms of how

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>much it will cost. Is it a hundred billion? Isn't more?

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>As a little bit less? Over what time period does

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it occur? But certainly, uh, it extends the budget deficit,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's something that has to be reckoned with. How

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>do they do that politically? Hopefully Republicans this time sort

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of avoid it with a special type of measure and

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>then you know, renore realize the budget in the next

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>few weeks as as uh as we move along. But

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the uh, you know, Harvey is is very important, and

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>it absorbs money and absorbs credit and put supply into

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the treasuring market. So uh, no doubt that that's important,

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>as is the tax cut situation, which presumably will be

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>addressed in the next two or three months. But when

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the dead ceiling in particular there

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>do do you have any level of anxiety that it's

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to be raised or raised on time? Oh?

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>None at all. And you know I wrote yesterday, I

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>tweeted yesterday that it was a sham. Um. You know,

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just a political maneuver. Congress spends money and uh,

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course the the Treasury has to raise

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that type of money. It's a one to relationship. It's symbiotic.

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>And uh, to the extent that the Congress wouldn't approve

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>their own spending, to me is ridiculous. It's just a

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>political maneuver to get something. And I think there's no

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>doubt that the US out of this solvent will be

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>for as long as I'm on this good earthing, we

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't worry about it. And Bill Gross, you have been

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>brilliant about the idea of financial repression, about you're gonna

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>get a low yield and when you take out inflation,

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing's gonna be there. All sorts of people we talked

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to are talking about better wage growth. It didn't happen

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>this month. They're talking about vectors that move upward. Do

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you have any hope that America gets out of the

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>financial repression you so well predicted, well, not typically at

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a financial repression tom to the extent that you might

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>define it. By zero percent real short term interest rates

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>versus two to three percent historically over the past ten

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years. That's a huge gap. And I don't

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna be narrowed. I don't think central banks,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>not only the FED, but the e c P and

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the b o J, they can't raise interest or it's

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>back to normal simply because there's a lot of debt

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and increasing the amount of debt and the cost of

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>cover that debt if increased by two to three percent,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>not just for the government, the government and the right checks,

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>but with corporations, it's probably just never going to happen.

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And uh, go ahead, Well, no, I just don't. I

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to cut you off. But this is so critical,

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill Goes, because you live this, and you live this

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with a Monroe trader on your desk at a shop

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>at Newport Beach a few years ago, and that is

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the deficit to g D P growing out. If we

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>get back to what you and I recall the days

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of Monroe traders in early Bloomberg's a five or six

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>percent deficit to g d P, I would suggest, respectfully,

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>bad things happen. Are we going to revisit that in

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty four or thirty six months. Well, it

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>depends on the tax cut program. I don't think it's

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be that radical. I don't think you know,

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats will will permit that type of increase. But you know,

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you make a good point. The US current account balance,

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>which is reflective of the stuffs, not one for one,

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but close has been and deficit by three to four

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>percent for the last forty years. It's an exorbitant privilege

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that the US has relative to the rest of the world.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really see any pressure to reduce the deficit,

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>despite the Republican rhetoric. I see it increasing, perhaps not

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the four or five percent, but two or three percent annually.

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>And the problem being, as I mentioned before Tom, the

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>interest rate, and to the extent the interest rates to

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>go up, I don't think they will. They can then

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy is threatened. We're gonna come back with Bill

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>gross on radio. But very quickly here Bill Gross on TV.

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe in a three percent g d P

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>American economy? I do not. It depends on productivity. Productivity

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>has been less than one percent, close to zero. Labor

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>growth is less than a half a percent. Those two

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>numbers to gether, you know, produce real GDP and it's

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a two percent at max real GDP. Bill. This again

0:26:55.920 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is about elasticities or responsiveness of market to economics, in

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that Mario dragging has a plan and it's good. People

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in Farmford have a plan and we've had a massive

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>move in euro trade weighted euro folks is well out

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>over two standard deviations back nine years strong euro Bill?

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Is this about the market, the euro vigilantes telling Mario

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Draggy what to do. Oh, I don't think so, Tommy.

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, and you know I was well impressed by

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the bond vigilantes and the nineties, and I guess in

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the early part of the century. But now I think

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>central banks dominate. There's no doubt that they have conversations

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>between the two, between the private market and the vigilantes

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and the central banks, and they take feedback from each other.

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think ultimately it's Druggy. Ultimately I think it's

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>corrode I. Ultimately I think it's Janet Yellen. And so

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. And I agree with you this this news

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 1>on December as a little startling because, Uh, while dr

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>has always been a dove, uh, this is a continuation

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of his devilishness. Do what we see from Carney, from Corota,

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>from drag? Does it migrate over to the United States

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>if they get a bill gross sub three g d P,

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>if they get any sense of a job report like

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>today and the tepid wage growth like today, Does yelling

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>become like drag where we see articles from our Washington

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>team saying the federal delay. Well perhaps, although I think

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's fairly well committed because they've they've you know,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>put on the line such a small amount of treasuries

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, taking off the balance sheet.

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's safety there. But I do think

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you know, central banks, especially the ECB

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and the b o J are addicted que and balance

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sheet expand and low and negative yields. You know, Japan,

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>as I've mentioned his cap their tenure JGB at ten

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>basis points it's now zero. Uh, and the e CBS

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. Historically the world's most conservative central bank has

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>expanded its balance sheet via que eat nearly five trillion dollars.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It's larger than the FEDS. And uh so these are

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think there are legitimate questions as to how

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>many bonds these central banks can buy before they effectively

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:34.719
<v Speaker 1>destroy the private market that capitalism requires. I don't want

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about Mario drag communicator. There was this

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>moment of miscommunication with the market in central Portugal just

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago. He spoke in Jackson Hole

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and we were talking with Dennis Gartman yesterday. He was

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.479
<v Speaker 1>saying that he couldn't quite figure out what it was

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Mario d was trying to lay out in that speech,

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>at least at least initially. I wonder if if if

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you're experiencing similar difficulty interpreting what he has to say,

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and if you think there was maybe a missed opportunity

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for him at it's an hold to talk more about

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the year at a job on the year a little bit, Well,

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I think so. And I think both the drug and

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>yell And deferred in terms of monetary policy and simply

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>shifted to regulation, which is fine and A and a

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>target and a legitimate target of central banks. They should

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have focused on that and the early part of the

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty one century. But nonetheless, drug he didn't tell us much.

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps today's statement is telling us something. I don't

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>know where it's coming from, but you know, the drug

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is very deficient. And to not criticize, but to compliment.

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I suppose their economy is doing well, Inflation is contained,

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>although not as high as they want. And so you know,

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to give these central bankers at the moment

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of cyclical results, uh, you know, somewhere in

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the B plus A category. But as I've mentioned in

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the past, over a long period of time, these uh,

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>financial repressive types of strategies have negative consequences on savers,

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have negative consequences on insurance companies, pension funds, and ultimately

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>capitalism does not do well under these circumstances. The girls,

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to rip up the script of the time

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got left the number one talking point for me

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and David Garrow this morning. I don't know if you've

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>seen it, Bill, but the essay in the Washington Post

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>by a grievously ill uh John McCain of your U. S. Navy.

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross served in the U. S. Navy a few

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>tours of duty ago. Uh Senator McCain. Bill Gross begs

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for bipartisan solutions in Washington. He begs for a return

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to the processes of another time and place. Can we

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>get tax reform, can we get infrastructure build out? Can

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we get Washington to do constructively in the present milieu?

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Or do we have to get back to what we

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>knew long ago? Well, I don't. I don't think it

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>would get much change under the current administration, to be critical,

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and under the current Congress, so less addressed. Tax cuts,

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>uh you know. The other day President Trump suggested that

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts would be good for the middle class because

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>when corporations have higher profits, they provide for higher wages, etcetera, etcetera. Well,

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>has that really happened over the past five to ten years.

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Not really, It's a different geopolitical world. I think tax cuts, um,

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>while not the highest in the world, is Trump claims,

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, are about average for the world at about

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>when you include all of our uh you know, special situations.

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I think tax cuts will continue the fabled carried interest policy,

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>which is, to my way of thinking, one of the

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>most ridiculous policies that ever existed. I think we're moving

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>towards a twenty two or average corporate tax rate. Uh.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think these policies will leave the middle class

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>even more behind. And I do think ultimately that the

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>universal income in the next ten or twenty years, perhaps

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>two different administrations, is where we're headed, and not to

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>lower and lower tax cuts and supply side economics. David

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>does it sound like he's running for office Newport Beach?

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>That the council very very good, phil Growth. I want

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about trade. We're seeing the resumption of

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>trade talks in Mexico City today. I believe between the US,

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Mexico and Canada, we've had a president use increasingly heated

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric about what might happen to NAFTA, talking openly about

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>terminating that particular deal. What would the effect of that

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.239
<v Speaker 1>be to to say, how we're going to scrap this

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>now long existing plan and uh, you know, I guess

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he hopes to rebuild it or start from scratch. What

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>would the effect of that be, as you see in well,

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it would be disastrous, you know, ten or fifteen years

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>on in terms of NAFTA, and to reoriin it or

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to uh, you know, to to cancel it. Um. You know,

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously NAFTA has had some negative effects in terms of

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>American wages that should have been expected. And to the

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>extent that it's what Trump is trying to attack, you know,

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>then find perhaps something else in terms of the UH

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the agreement could could take place. But yes, you know,

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump is art of the deal. Out of the talk.

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>UH to this point, out of the talk hasn't really

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>gained as much anywhere in terms of legislation. But I

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>think it would be disastrous and I think at all

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>costs it should be avoided. A free trade agreement between

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Mexico and Canada and North America has perhaps one of

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the strongest and most productive free trade agreements in the world. Bill,

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing with your portfolio? What is the

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>gross strategy? September is the new year for business. Everybody's

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>struggle struggling to find alpha in fixed income? What are

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you doing? What is the gross strategy with janis unconstrained? Well,

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>janison constrained. UH, it's objective Thomas four to five percent.

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>It's not a hedge fund. It isn't looking for double

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:58.359
<v Speaker 1>digit gains. How do you do that in this type

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of world with the treasury at two point one percent

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and stocks at a near historic pe ratio. It's very difficult.

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>What I've done over the past few months and a

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>few quarters is to sell volatility, not to buy it,

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>but to sell volatility to volatility, and to assume the

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>interest rates take the tenure treasury stay between two percent

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and two point three percent, and if that happens, then, uh,

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fortified percent number it can be can

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>be garnered based upon the premiums that options seller it

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>can provide. And so that in combination with you know,

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>two percent yields on eighteen month corporate paper, produce a

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>conservative but very low volatility type of portfolio with a

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>fortified percent return. Bill Gross, thank you so much, greatly,

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate that. Today he is with Janis Anderson David

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>what we learned there. I I'm still amazed that he

0:35:56.280 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>can't get above a three percent GDP. Yeah, no, it's uh,

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm I can tell he said the draft

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>jobs report was weak, and uh, you know, looking at

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>these data, one has to sympathize with that assessment of it,

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, and it'll be interesting to hear what Garrit

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Cone has to say with the White House, to say

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>how the President reacts to UH, to this job's report

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, in light of the numbers that we that

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>we got today. UH. And I was impressed also just

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>by how confident he is that we're not going to

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>see much differing when it comes to the dead ceiling,

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to funding the government here over these

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks. I know there are a lot of

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>economists and strangers I've talked to have more anxiety this

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>time around, saying that the terrain somehow different. I think

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>anxiety perfectly captures UH, the path forward for the next

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty days. I we don't even got October, you know.

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I am f meetings in October. That's what I can.

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>You bought your ticket right now? Yeah, I think I'm

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:48.919
<v Speaker 1>slotted in. I don't know what we're doing. We'll figure

0:36:48.960 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>out what to do. This is Gary Khen, National Economic

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Council Director, Gary Real, pleasure to have you with us.

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>How do you interpret the number today? Are we sort

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of back to normal in the jobs market or is

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this the beginning of a weaker cycle? Well, thanks for

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>having me, And before I get started, look I just

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>want to reach out to everyone in Louisiana and Texas,

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and you'll remind all of your viewers, you know, all

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the tragedy that they're still going through, and they remind

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>everyone that we at the White House, you know, are

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.760
<v Speaker 1>not forgetting about them for a second, and we're laser

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>focused on what's going on out there. Look on the

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>on the economic data today. You know, it's part of

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the natural growth that we're seeing in the economy. You know,

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the data we had this week,

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we had a GDP number of three percent. This week

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we had the jobs number that is still very good.

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>If I would have told you at the beginning of

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the year, told you inauguration day that we'd be at

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>three percent GDP and four point four percent unemployment, you

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>would have said, hey, those are great numbers that that

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be an amazing accomplishment by Labor day what

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>we're there. So overall, we're very, very pleased with where

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we are in the economy, where we are in the cycle.

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>We still know there's a lot of work to do

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in a lot more upside and the President is very

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 1>focused on that. That's why we launched our tax agenda

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this week because we think we can really grow the

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>economy much further from here before we get to taxes.

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You pointed the picture that jobs are consistently very very solid.

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.280
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side, wages just aren't really going anywhere

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>two and a half percent a year on year, and

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>also inflation also really stagnant. What is the right monetary

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>policy for something like that. So look, look, we we

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about the wages and that has a lot

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with our tax policy. If you listen to

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:39.240
<v Speaker 1>what the President outlined earlier this week, he talked about

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>our corporate tax system or a business tax system, and

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>how inefficient our business tax system is, and how we

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>really penalize businesses to being American. When you penalize businesses

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to being America, they don't hire American workers. We need

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to get our tax rates down to be competitive with

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. When they get our tax

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>rates down, we then compete for labor. You compete for

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>labor by driving wages and paying more wages to get

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.399
<v Speaker 1>people to work for you. So we are concerned about

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>wage growth. We do want to get wage growth back

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in the system. You're absolutely right. When I saw the

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers you know, the first thing I looked at was

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the wage number, and it's been flat at two and

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a half for a long period of time. We need

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to put more money back in US consumers pockets, and

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're trying to do, both by wage growth

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and by by by tax efficiency. So, yere, you kind

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of diverted my question there, So that seems that it's

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a fiscal policy issue, not a monetary policy issue. Do

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you feel monetary policy then cannot help with the wage

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>inflation debate? Look, I think wage inflation has to come

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>through demand for more workers at higher price. And the

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>way we create demand for workers is we create a

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>better operating environment in the United States. You create a

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>better operating environment in the United States by making the

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>United States more competitive. You create the competition by lowering

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the business tax rate and having businesses have to be

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>here and want to be here in the United States.

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what the President laid out earlier this week.

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's go to tax reform for a second.

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>We've been hearing I feel a lot of mixed messages

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>from the White House and lawmakers in terms of that

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>next step. For example, are you going to have to

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>release additional tax details in a blueprint later this month.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what we heard from Secretary Minution yesterday and some

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>news outlets. So as I think you're all acutely aware,

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Secretary Minutum, myself, the leadership of the Senate,

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>leadership of the House, we've been working literally since November

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and December on a tax blueprint. We've met NonStop since then.

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>The six of us have agreed on a outline of blueprint,

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a skeleton. We agree on what we need to do

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for tax reform. We're now working with the House Ways

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee to really

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>finalize what that blueprint will look like. I would say,

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>take a skeleton and put the muscles on and put

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the skin on it. That's going to get released in

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the next in the next whatever weeks or months, as

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>those committees get together and finalize all of the details,

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 1>as the natural governing process happens, and that's going to

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>start literally next week. So Gary is the legislation in

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the hands of the Tax Writing Committee right now. The

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>legislation is in all of our hands. We're working together,

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the group of six, the six of us will be

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>in the White House with the President next week. We're

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to drive Gary, I get that. But

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in order to move it forward, it has to be

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Tax Writing Committee. So have you have you

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>passed it off yet to them. There's a communal effort

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.720
<v Speaker 1>going on here. We're trying to we we're not trying.

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>We are working very collegially together to get tax reform

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>done in a way that everyone buys in in every

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>step of the way. And that's exactly what's going on here. Ultimately,

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>tax reform has to be voted on in the House

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Senate. So yes, we're working with the House

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>and the Senate to do that. Well, okay, fair enough,

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>so you're talking more. We're all working together. But then

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you have Senator McCain coming out in the Washington Post

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 1>with a very very scathing review on President Trump. Um,

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, we need to compromise, even if we have

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:00.919
<v Speaker 1>to take something off the table, well that we didn't want,

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but saying that we have a president without any experience,

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>he's poorly informed, he's impulsive. We don't answer to him.

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>We answered to the American people. Doesn't stuff like that

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>make the cooperation you're talking about impossible. It seems like

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of cooperation, a lot of momentum

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on tax reform. I think a lot of us understand

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the importance of getting taxes right, of simplifying the tax code,

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of returning more of people's heart earned income back to

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the American public, not sending it to the government to spend,

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>allowing people to spend their own money, simplifying the tax code.

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>The basic principles that the present laid out earlier this

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>week appeal to everyone in this country. Why shouldn't we

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>get out of the way and allow more Americans to

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>keep more of their hard EARA. I don't think there's

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a politician doesn't agree with that. I agree with you,

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I think as a person in the world who doesn't

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:49.880
<v Speaker 1>agree with that right. But then you have a Mitch McConnell,

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>who's a Trump has said very disparaging things on Twitter

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>about you, Speaker Paul Ryan, who is at odds with

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the President. Now you have Senator McCain coming out and

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 1>do very scathing review. You might want it, but how

0:42:59.840 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you get their matters and doesn't. How you get there

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work anymore. If we're like this in Congress, I'm

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>confident that we're working well with comngregrants because I'm and

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking to many of the people you just mentioned.

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.479
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking on a daily basis, and we've got great

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>momentum on taxes right now. Okay, So tell me what

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna do in February. What job are you going

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to have. I'm gonna be right here doing what I'm

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>doing right now. You're gonna be in front of the

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>White House, in front of a different building. I'm gonna

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>be doing right exactly what I'm doing right now, being

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>front the White House, with this beautiful new infrastructure being

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>built out here. We'll be working on infrastructure in February. Okay,

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>nice semm, Gary, But I asked the question because a

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of heat has been made about the fact that

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you weren't mentioned in that Missouri speech by President Trump

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday in terms of those working towards tax reform.

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's questions about whether you want to stick around

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to even be considered for FED chair. Now. I'm extremely

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>happy doing what I'm doing. I have a once in

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime opportunity something that hasn't been done in over

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, to reform the U S tax code. I

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>passionately believe it needs to be done, and I'm one

0:43:57.920 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of the luckiest people in the world. Do we have

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the opportun who to work on it. I'm really excited

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>about what I'm doing, So you do not want to

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be head of the FED. I'm really excited about doing

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.880
<v Speaker 1>what I'm doing. All right, let let's wind up on Harvey.

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>You brought it up in terms of extending your condolences

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to those in Texas and Louisiana. Many say that Harvey

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>could be the most expensive natural disaster in US history.

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>How much harder does the tax and budget debate become

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 1>now because you have deficit hawks in Congress in the

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party. Look, we have to deal with the Harvey situation.

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's it's not a debatable issue. What people

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in Texas and Louisa Zana are going through is unthinkable, unimaginable.

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I I've seen a lot of data. You've seen the data.

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.839
<v Speaker 1>We're analyzing it literally twenty four hours a day. Here.

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>We have to help the people, We have to help

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Houston return. It's just not a debate. So we're gonna

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>have to spend money, We're gonna have to pass some

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>incremental relief bills, and we're just gonna have to do that.

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:59.959
<v Speaker 1>It's not a choice. So it's just part of governing. Look,

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 1>part of running the government is dealing with unforeseen issues.

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna deal with this and we're gonna move on. Um. Look,

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the part that it's gonna be more troubling is it's

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna it's gonna have impact on a lot of the

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 1>economic data. You know, the economic data that we've just gotten.

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>This unemployment data is probably the last that a clean

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>unemployment data we're gonna have for many, many months. As

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we go through the recovery process and people go in

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and out of unemployment, as they rebuild their houses and

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 1>they rebuild their lives, we're gonna have a bunch of

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 1>data that maybe won't make as much sense for the

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>next three or four five months. So, you know, normalizing

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>data for hurricanes and natural disasters is going to be

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for us to truly get a bigger picture

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in the U. S. Economy. Gary Cohen,

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>real pleasure, Thank you so much for joining us. Gary Cohn,

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>pointing to the infrastructure happening behind him on the White

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>House Law and US National Economic Council Director Alex Steel

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television to radio worldwide with a lively interview.

0:45:55.080 --> 0:46:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I would state that that's the single most Gary tone

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I've heard, Gary Cone. He's getting used to the job,

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is how I would put it. Yeah, I'm mixing it up,

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say at Tessling a bit. She asked him

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>several times if he wanted to be fed cheered directly,

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and he said repeatedly, he's happy doing what he's doing.

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Is there is with all of this, there is on

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the job training. One of the things I always cite

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>when I talked to college students about this is Greg Mankou,

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the acclaimed professor at Harvard, and he talked to everybody

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the first three or four months he was chairman of

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the president Council of Economic Advisors, like it was a

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>lecture at ted lecture, and it took him a while

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to get towards the cadence it's expected, Yeah,

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of executive officials. And of course, I think teaching that

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>introductory economics course to thousands at Harvard probably prepares you

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 1>well for the public speaking component. But you're right, you're right,

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a learning curve here. And uh, you know

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a regular thing that Gary Cone

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>has to do now in this capacity. And I agree

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>with you. I think he's seemingly more comfortable with the role.

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.840
<v Speaker 1>He talked around the news of the day, which is

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the McCain essay and the Washington Post, but that he

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>did circle back and and it really address the delicacies

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of the administration, David speaking to legislative leaders as compared

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>to the president. That was an indirect illusion. Yeah, I'd said.

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We We've brought this piece up a couple of times today.

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 1>If you read anything today, read that piece in the

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post by the senior Senator from Arizona, John McCain,

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:30.919
<v Speaker 1>writing about, yes, the relationship between Congress and the White House,

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but also just about the institution he has served for

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>so many decades now, A very important piece in the

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post today. Usually when we get the points guy in,

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 1>we chit chat about banks and Miles and all that.

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.760
<v Speaker 1>We will do that today because that's what you expect

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 1>from Brian Kelly, but we must direct our attention to

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>his real real abilities to synthesize all going on at

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>George Bush Intercontinental and also hobbyist or Cobby Airport as well.

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Brian Kelly, tell us your perspective on the damaged airplane

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>travel in and out of Houston. Yeah, Houston, it's going

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to take a long time to get back up and running. Today.

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Actually yesterday I think they had United had twenty seven

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 1>departures and they normally have about five hundred, so we

0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are way way behind. You know, basically, avoid Houston at

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>all costs. You know, most airlines actually every airline will

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>let you reroute for free or change your flight. So basically,

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>avoid Houston at all costs. But that being said, this

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>weekend is still going to be a record weekend for

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Labor Day travel. So even if you're not going to

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Houston or through it, the planes are going to be

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>packed this weekend. How do how do airlines change or

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 1>or or express some flexibility when we see a natural

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>disaster like this one. I imagine there are a lot

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of people keen to get to the area to help out,

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to respond to the disaster. Do we see airlines accommodating

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:06.919
<v Speaker 1>interest in doing that. Yeah, well, in terms of giving

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 1>away free flights for relief help, some airlines will do that.

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:12.479
<v Speaker 1>I think on the opposite side, airlines you know, because

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge stress on their systems and their customer service,

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:18.399
<v Speaker 1>so they'll let people rebook for free, uh, to change

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:21.280
<v Speaker 1>their flights. Um. So they're called weather waivers, So anytime

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a storm coming most airlines it behooves them to

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to let consumers switch their flights for free. Um. Some

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>airlines are more generous than others with you know, the

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>time frames in which you can change. Brian, let's get

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>back to the business at hand, which is everybody's telling

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.399
<v Speaker 1>me airplane travels cheap. I look on the screens. You've

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>gotta be kidding me. I've never seen fairs as expensive

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as they are. Which way is it right now? Well,

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it depends on which cabin you're looking at. You know.

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Coach fairs are actually ridiculous on the blog if you

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>go to the points got a comp slash deals. We've

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 1>seen yesterday with two nine four round trip to Argentina. Uh,

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 1>we've been seeing you want to put ian baggage. You know,

0:50:01.800 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Air Canada had a fair mistake last week and then

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>also to to Israel. So um. But you know, even

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in the life lap business class we had South America

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight round trips, so you know, these deals, you

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>gotta you gotta act fast when you see it on

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:18.879
<v Speaker 1>social media. You always booked the deal and then talk,

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, think about it later because the airlines usually

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>give you twenty four hours to cancel, So don't try

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to round up fifty five friends. You know, you just

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:27.359
<v Speaker 1>like book a flight and then you know, figure out

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:29.319
<v Speaker 1>taking off work or whatever in the twenty four hour

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>safety period. But there are live fair one less flexible time.

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Who's driving the points guy bus right now? Are the

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:42.240
<v Speaker 1>banks driving the bus or the airlines driving the bus?

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everybody's addicted to your world. We get what

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you do, you save us some money, we hate you, etcetera.

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But who's driving the bus? In September of this year,

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>credit card companies are driving the bus. Actually, in September,

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America is popping into the rewards game. They're

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:00.800
<v Speaker 1>launching a new credit card. UM. The full details haven't

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>been released, but they have confirmed UM they have this

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 1>premium rewards credit card coming in September and it looks

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 1>really you know, fifty point bonus. So we've seen you know,

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Chase really up to a year ago with the Sapphire Reserve.

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>AMX is up their platinum. I mean, the competitions at

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:19.400
<v Speaker 1>all time high, so the credit card companies are in

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the pilot seat of of the points industry, so to speak.

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Brian Kelly, thank you so much and congratulations for changing

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:28.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody's life. Go to folks. You don't even have to

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 1>do the charge good thing. You can just go and

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>be an absolute awe of what Brian Kelly and others

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have wrought with this, this symbiotic relationship. Thanks for listening

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Key. David Gura is at

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.