WEBVTT - Washington's Delusional Ruling Class 

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Cheerio. Trump is visiting

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the UK and the liberal media's freaking out about it.

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that and oh so much more coming

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>up on The buck Sexton Show. Bucks Sexton Remission, Decoding

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence, magnor mistake American,

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>You're a great American again. This is the bucks Sexton

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>showtiate former CIA analysts. I can speak for three hours

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>without a phone call. Try doing that. Sometimes it is

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton, No, mister President. As we look to the future,

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm confident that our common values and shared interests will

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to unitus. Tonight we celebrate an alliance that has

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>helped to ensure the safety and prosperity of both our

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>people's for decades, and which I believe will endure for

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>many years to come. While the world has changed, we

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>are forever mindful of the original purpose of these structures,

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>nations working together to safeguard a hard one piece. Welcome

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to the buck sections Share everybody. Oh hello, Welcome to

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the buck Sexton Show. Indeed you have Queens Queen of

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>England telling everybody about the very important relationship between England

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Great Britain and the United States. Yeah, it's interesting. Our

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>producer Mike told me some some facts about this before

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we came out earlier. Mike, how many, how many people?

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>How many presents have been invited to this special banquet

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Queen. Trump's the third. Yeah, it seems to be.

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a rare honor for a US president. I'm pushing

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Obama have been the only two others, and I think

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>they only hold two banquets a year, So I bet

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>they serve tea and crumpets. Yeah, I hope they do,

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>not to be concerned with not to be rather confused

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>with tea and strumpets, which is a whole other things.

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So yes, indeed we have, Yes, indeed, everyone we have

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump over in the UK. We'll talk later on about

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of the fallout from this with

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the media baiting Trump into and it's so easy and

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of course he's gonna do it, getting into it with

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Sadiq Khan and getting into it with not really getting

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>into with Megan Markle. They're being being fake fake news.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>They're being fake news on that one. Don't trust them,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't trust them, a bunch of sketchy libs. You

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>haven't never know what they're up to. Ah, let's now

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>get into though, the latest in the saga of spying

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and Trump campaign undermining, the abuse of authority, and all

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the other terrible things that happened as a result of

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the Russia collusion to illusion. We have a little a

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit of movement on this because the preparations are

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>underway for the left to try and convince the American

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>people that there was really nothing, nothing to see here,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>no big issue other than how how Barr is a

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>terrible person. Of course he's a terrible person, and that's

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>because he has said some things that are that really

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>hit home. I mean I discussed with you a little

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>bit last week that that interview where Bar he was

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>dropping bombs. I mean, you go back, it's worth watching

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. It was on CBS. And he's not

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>over excited about anything. He's not. He's not stretching the truth,

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>he's not grandstanding. He's just saying, look, this is this

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is the deal. You know, everybody dies. That's his line.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But that was awesome. That was awesome. I think that

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the guy we need in this role. But

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>here are just just a few of as we get

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>into the effort to counter message it over the weekend,

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of Democrats will get Mark Warner and

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>others running around trying to make this guy seem like he's, Oh,

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a toady for the president and he's a bad guy.

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>He's doing all these things he shouldn't be doing. They

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>never tell us what he's doing that's bad, just that

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he's the president's man, and yeah, stuff like that. But

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>here's what Bill Barr had to say about the ruling

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>class here in DC played twelve. You don't think that

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>they permitted treason. That is a legal matter, right, But

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you have concerns about how they conducted the investigation. Yes,

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>but you know, when you're dealing with official government contact

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and intent is frequently a murky issue. I'm not suggesting

0:04:51.720 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>people did what they did necessarily because of conscious nefarious motives.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes people can convince themselves that what they're doing is

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>in the higher interests, the better good. They don't realize

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that what they're doing is really anathetical to the democratic

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>system we have. They start viewing themselves as the guardians

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of the people that are more informed and sensitive than

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. The guardians of the people that are more

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>informed and sensitive than everybody else. Who does that sound

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like a perfect description of from this whole saga of

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the last two years. Doesn't that sound quite a bit

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>like James Comey, doesn't sound quite a bit like Bob Muller,

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Brennan at the CIA, Clapper at the DNI, Yates at

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the DOJ. Doesn't that describe their mentality? Haven't we seen

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this on full display? They just thought they knew better

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and that justified whatever it is that they did then,

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and they think it still justifies what they have done

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>even looking back at it now. Barr understands this. The

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>current Attorney General knows who we're dealing with when you

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about the establishment Arrians. He knows this mentality that,

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in his sense, in order to save our democracy, they

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>had to undermine it. That's what they were willing to do.

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>That was the gamble that they took. That was the

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>position that they put themselves in. And Barr recognizes this

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.239
<v Speaker 1>as a very real threat, as a very serious problem,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>one that we have to get to the bottom of.

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>The same people who were screaming for two years about

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>how we must know the full extent of Russian interference

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in the election shouldn't we know the full extent of

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the federal bureaucracies interference in our own election. Shouldn't we

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>know if law enforcement powers were abused to try to

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>turn a presidential election. Shouldn't we get to the bottom

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of it, at least even for those people who don't

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>believe that that happened, shouldn't they want that to be verified?

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Why the change all of a sudden, Why the move

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>away from transparency and accountability to something else, to a

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>position of indifference to abuse? That seems all but certain

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to have occurred. I mean, I am certain it occurred. Well,

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>once we start to have a discussion at the national

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>level about the motives that were involved here, once you

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>have people of Barr's stature who will make the case that,

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not that they thought that they were

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>being little Hillary stooges in this process. They really believed

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they had convinced themselves they being the deep state operatives here,

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the Komis and the mccabees and the Yates and the Brennans,

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and they really thought that what they were doing was

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the stuff of great patriots who would be forever remembered

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>fondly by their countrymen. I mean, I think that they

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>had convinced themselves of it. They were wrong, They're delusional,

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But did they believe it? Do you think do you

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>think Komy thinks for one second that anything that he

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>has done is really questionable and maybe makes him even

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a bad guy? Of course not Coomy looks down on

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>all of us literally and figuratively because he is like

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>seven foot four, But he does look down on the

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>rest of the people while thinking simultaneously that he defends

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the people with his actions, the abuses

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that he and others engaged in, and we know there

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>were abuses. Releasing memos from your time as FBI director

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to the New York Times, that's an abuse, all right,

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no way around it. McCay lying three times the

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Inspector General about contacts with the media, that's an abuse.

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>There's no way around this. We will find out the

0:08:55.240 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>full extent of it, I hope from this Inspector General

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>report we will find out if there was a praetorianism

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on display here or a praetorian effect. Praetorianism is a

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty specific thing, but a praetorian effect where well here here,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>here's how the attorney general, I think rather astutely and

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>elegantly put it himself Play thirteen. When we talk about

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>foreign interference versus say, a government abuse of power, and yes,

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>wishes more troubling, Well, they're both. They're both troubling equally

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, they are sure. I mean, republics have

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>fallen because of praetorian guard mentality, where government officials get

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>very arrogant, they identify the national interest with their own

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>political preferences, and they feel that anyone who you know

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>has a different opinion, you know, somehow an enemy of

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the state, and and you know there is that tendency

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that they know better, and you know that they're there

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to protect as guardians of the people, that can easily

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>translate into essentially supervening the will of the majority and

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>getting your own way as a government official. Does anyone

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>at this point really even dispute that there were senior

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>government officials under the Obama administration who believed that Trump

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>was a clear and present danger to the United States.

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it quite obvious? I mean, some of them have

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>come out and said as much since then, but I

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's obvious from the actions they took at the time,

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and you might say, well, Buck, how could they view

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it as such, Well, he's a threat to the very

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>established structures and power dynamics that many of those individuals

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>have relied upon and called upon and supported and defended

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>their entire lives, certainly their whole careers. They don't want

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to see that dash. They don't want it to be

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the case that you don't need to have ever held

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>elected office to be the president. You know, some of

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>these things we take for granted now, But at the

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>time it was unthinkable to not just Libs, but a

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of center right Republican types, you know, GOP establishmentarians.

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It was the case with a lot of them that

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they thought that Trump would just be pulling down the

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>very fabric of American society by being president, that he

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>would that he would tear us apart, that there'd be

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that the stock markets would crash, and there'd be race

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>riots in the streets, and there'll be you know, a

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>war with well, not Russia, because of course we're Russia's puppet, right,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>but a war with North Korea, and a trade war

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with China and all there'd be all these things that

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>would happen that would result in the most the most

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic consequences. None of that has happened. That country's doing

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>really well, which is the single biggest slap in the

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>face that these deep staters could ever have. So that's

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>why they turned to the ad hominum. That's why. Then

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it's all, well, if we can't win just by trashing Trump,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe we trash Bar and the American people won't believe

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>what he has to say. Play fourteen, our bipartisan committee,

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the last bipartisan effort on the Hill looking at this issue,

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>reaffirmed unanimously that the Russians massively intervened. If we had

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>not acted, if our intelligence community and law enforcement had

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>not acted, they would have been irresponsible and candidly, mister

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Barr has very little credibility with me, and I think

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of candidly, not just Democrats, but many Americans,

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>because he, timing again, is not acting as our attorney

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>general but as a personal advocate for Donald Trump. The smear,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a lie. It's a stupid one from Mark Warner,

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>but I guess he has nowhere else to run with it. Yeah,

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>he has no credibility. Mark Warner says, here's somebody who

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>seems to think Bill Barr has credibility to play fifteen.

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I like and respect Bill Barr. I know he's an

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>institutionalist who cares deeply about the integrity of the Justice Department.

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sure he'll use the standard career resources. He

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>has to judge what he should be involved in, what

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>he shouldn't be involved in. But Bill Barr is a

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>talented person who was a good attorney general the first time.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I liked him very much. Then I think he'll serve

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department. Weather Wait, I thought Bill Barr had

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>no credibility. There's James Comey talking about how talented and

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>good and respectable and everything else he is. Oh, but

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't deliver Trump's impeachment on a silver platter

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Democrats like Muller did, he's a bad guy.

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Now could this be any more obvious? I mean, I

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>do hope that you take a great degree you listening

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to this across the country. I hope you take great

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>pride and solace and knowing that at least you're right

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're not one of the people that's been fooled.

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>You have him in Hoodwinn, you have him been deluded

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in this whole process. I think for so many liberals

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>out there, they can't admit to themselves what has really happened.

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>They can't accept that in this whole process they've been

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>swindled intellectually, they've been made to look like fools, they've

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>been turned into hysterics. So they'd much rather cling to

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that somehow, even with all the facts as

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they're out now, even seeing the actions of Muller and

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>knowing the truth of Komi and others, we're supposed to

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>think that this was all fine, this was all on

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the up and up. I'm sorry, that's just not going

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to cut it, not going to work. I get more

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on this, and then also the possible breakup of Facebook.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>The FTC took a step in at least investigating Facebook

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>for a possible trade violation. Very interesting stuff there. And

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we will get into the latest on Democrats freaking out

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>over gun control. Yes, they do, in fact want to

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>take your guns. That's not just a thing that we

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>tell each other. And if I have time, maybe even

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>get into some of the latest on China tariffs and Mexico.

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Mexico tariffs too. A lot of tariffs flying around. We

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>have a busy, busy show my friends much to discuss,

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and is racism against anyone possible or is racism only

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>possible against certain groups, certain individuals. That's all coming up.

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:28.479
<v Speaker 1>If you want to be dogs and big progressive goals,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>socialism is not the accident. I was reelected. I was

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>reelected in a purple stay in two thousand and fourteen,

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst years for Democrats, and a quarter

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sent I was we should thrive with a universal coverage

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>by removing private insurance from over one hundred and fifty

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>million of error. We should not try to time uplimate

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>change by guarantee. Hold on, hold on, I love it.

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's hick and Looper running for Democrat president and

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he's speaking in San Francisco and he said socialism is

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not the answer. And they go boom boom all over

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the place. Oh, because they think socialism is the answer.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Boom boom with your socialism, with your antisocialism. Oh man,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I really do think that Donald Trump could just run that.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that should be rnc ads going forward.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>This this is what happens when when a center left Democrat,

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>as he said, hick and Looper is from a purple state.

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's look, he's a Democrat, but he's just

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not among the far left, fringiest of Democrats. He says

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>socialism is not the answer, and they just terrupt into

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>boop boop. Now what are we to make of this?

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>When I talk about how socialism is on the rise

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>in this country? A lot of my Democrat friends and

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>colleagues will, of whom it feels there are fewer and

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>fewer these days, will say to me, but that's not true.

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And I would point out, well, you have Bernie Sanders

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>running as a Democratic socialist and he's number two out

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of twenty three candidates the Democratic Party right now, and

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you also have incidents like this. You know that we

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>can't entirely ignore. You've an entire auditorium full of people

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, in a liberal stronghold, and socialism comes up,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're clearly very favorle to it. Never mind Great

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>New Deal and single payer. There is a far not

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>just a far left fringe, there is a far left

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>control center of the Democratic Party. Now. The far left

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is calling the shots for them. And whether the rest

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party goes along with all of it

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>as a function of doctor and doesn't really matter because

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this is what the Democratic Party stands for now. This

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the party principles are increasingly socialist, increasingly far left.

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Green New Deal is socialism. It's just

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't call it that, but it is a socialist program.

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And the stuff they're talking about coming. You could look

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>at the Soviet Constitution. Some of it looks like it's

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>borrowed liberally from that. So there you high it all right, team,

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I've got a little more, a little more on the

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>bar Muller throwdown stuff. And then we got to talk

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the NRA, guns Democrats, Oh my, so much more. Stay

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>with me. I got questions for him. When did you

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>know there was no conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We knew when we deposed Jim Comey. When we deposed

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Jim Comey, he said, all the way up until the

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>day he was fired May nine, twenty seventeen, he told

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>us they had no evidence of any type of conspiracy,

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>clusion or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia. And

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that was after ten months of the FBI investigating him.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>That that was, that was after putting out returned next

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to George Papadopplas. That was after using the dossier to

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>spy on the Trump campaign via Carter Page. So after

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>ten months, if they couldn't establish collusion, how long did

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it take Bob Muller? And if you learned this early on,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>why did you wait almost two years before you told

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the country that there was no conspiracy between the Trump

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>campaign and Russia to influence the election? After all, that

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was your central focus, your central task of this entire

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>special Counsel investigation. So that's a question I think the

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>whole country has for Bob Muller. He didn't. I got

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions for Bob Muller. I would like

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>to see them answered under oath in a public setting

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill. Why should Muller get away without his

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>time in the hot seat? This is ridiculous. This is ridiculous.

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>But it shows us that all along the claims of

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>letting the process play out in transparency, and you know,

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>this is how democrats are are really Like if I

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.479
<v Speaker 1>don't know how many of you ever been to in

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>some countries, there'll be a tennis match and you're not

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>supposed to make noise during a tennis match. You know

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>when the point is being played. But some places they'll

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of noise. And imagine, you know, one side,

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>every time the player they don't like is about to

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball, they all yell, oh, they make a

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of noise. But then when the player they do

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>like is about to hit the ball that they're totally silent.

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And then when the other side that's rooting for the

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>guy that's had the noise says, well, we're gonna make noise,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>do this, and now, how dare you show respect? Be respectful?

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>They only want respect when it goes their way. They

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>only want the process to play out when it hurts Trump.

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>The moment that it doesn't hurt Trump or whatever, then

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>then the processes is irrelevant to them, or the moment

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the process will help Trump. They want to disregard it

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>right away. What they know in the meantime is that

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they thoroughly, thoroughly do not want to get answers from

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Bob Muller in front of the American public because it's

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty there's some questions that that would immediately come up.

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Immediately come up, and what could the answers possibly be.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Why is it, Mueller that you held that very weird

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>press conference was completely unnecessary unless you were trying to

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>just give a shove to the Democrats in Congress to

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>impeach the president. I no fair minded, serious person can

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>look at what Bob Muller has done and come away

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>from it thinking, oh, yeah, this guy didn't have an

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>AXA grind against the president. He's fine. No, there's no

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>problem here. Of course, he did a two year long

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>investigation for laying out, essentially laying out obstruction the whole

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia interference thing that could have been done on the DJ.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>There was no need for a special counsel on that.

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>The only reason and remember they all you don't remember,

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they hope that no one pays attention. The only reason

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for a special counsel was the inability of the DOJ

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>working for President Trump to be trusted, according to some

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>people in the J who are Obama pointees, because of

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of Russia and the President working together. If

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>it were just Russian interference the election, you could have

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>had a DJ investigation of that, no problem. Still brought

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the same charges that Mueller brought against those Russian troll

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>farms that are just really just showboating, don't don't do anything,

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have no real effective force. But no, they spent all

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this time putting together eleven cases of possible obstruction that

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>when you read them, you see there there's only one

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>where you could even make a vague and tortured and

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>stretched case of even really never mind obstruction, even impropriety.

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>The other ones are ridiculous, ridiculous, and yet Mueller put

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>them in there. But they're gonna be running over time,

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>my friends, to try to prevent this from getting out.

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It's where you're here. We are in June, and you've

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>got some people that are very concerned about just what

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be found out in this whole process.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's former Attorney General Michael Mukazee on exactly what is

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>at work here when it comes to the anti bar

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>anti Bill Barr narrative out there played twenty one. There

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of nervous people in Washington when he

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>decided that he was going to investigate how this ule

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>got started. I think a lot of people got very nervous.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you that the Mulla report, the first line

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>says that they opened the file in twenty sixteen after

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Papadopolis had this conversation in the bar. That's not what

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>started the investigation. He's saying. The first line of the

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Mulla report is a lie. It's a former attorney general,

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a very smart guy. It is a lie, of

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>course it is. Think about what the claim is here

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that you have so called legal experts and former senior

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration officials who go on TV and pair at

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Papadopoulos allegedly and disputedly claims that he heard

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>something from some guy who allegedly and disputedly said something about,

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Russia getting emails from Hillary or whatever, and

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they opened up a full FBI field investigation based on that.

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean to think that that's reasonable and rational, you'd

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>have to say, Buck, did you every time you got

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a an anonymous tip when you're at the NYPD about

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>how bin Laden was hiding under was hiding under someone's bed,

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know in Queens, why didn't you investigate that right away?

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't you put all your best guys on it? Well,

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>because you'd think there's some degree of verification and some

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>professionalism in the approach of people that have these kinds

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of powers. But if you thought that about the FBI

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>under the Obama administration with the Trump campaign in full swing,

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you'd be wrong. This is what we are told this

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>is what happens. This is the reality that we were

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>all facing. We have uh to talk about how Dems

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>hate the NRA, how Libs hate gun owners. That's coming up.

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>If I can't get, I'm the only candidate calling for

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a band and buy back on every single assault weapon.

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But I also believe that's invested in jobs and education,

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>block by block. If I can't get, because of course

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, you mentioned your plan for a mandatory buyback

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of assault weapons, weapons of war as you call them.

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>You told my colleague Jake Tapper that you'd be willing

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to support criminal prosecution of people who don't follow if

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that that requirement, if it were to become law. So

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>under a president Swalwell, you are saying that some Americans

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>would indeed have to give up their guns. Yeah, and

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm proposing something that Australia. Did you know in the nineties,

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Eric Swalwell, he's a zero percenter, meaning he's not yet

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>at one percent support. I believe he's in the zero percentile.

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Eric Swalwell, there is letting it be known that he

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>does he wants to take your guns. Let's let's not

0:25:57.800 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>let's not get this confused. Let's not get this to us.

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>He wants to take your guns. He believes the guns

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 1>should be taken from your home. It talks about Australia's

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>mandatory buyback program. Okay, how many times do you have

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to go over this? Australia's buyback program involved the grand

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>total of a few million firearms and a much smaller country,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and in fact there was less There are more firearms

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>in private hands today than at the height of the

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>buyback or the moment right after the buyback program essentially

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>wound out, although it kind of went on for many

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>years because the buyback program didn't do anything because criminals

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the buyback program and it's not a

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>successful way of not an effective way of trying to

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>reduce gun crime. But if we were really serious about

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>about reducing gun crime, wouldn't we Instead of Eric Swalwell

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>talking to us about how semi automatic rifles which is

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>what he's discussing and calls them weapons of war, which

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bolt action those of you who actually

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>have some familiarity with firearms, which I know is a

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>large law percentage of this audience, you know a bolt

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>action rifle can be a weapon of war. There are

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>there are marine snipers that still use a bolt action rifle.

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Weapons of war is a nonsense term. What does it

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>even mean? Is a side arm? Is a nine millimeter

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>or a forty five caliber hand got a weapon of war?

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Of course? It is. How many people you know in

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>war zones? I've carry a side arm in a war zone.

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty darned sure it's a weapon of war if

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I needed to, and what have shot somebody with it

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in a war zone? It's a weapon of war. So

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>why do they use that term, Well, because they're trying

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to stigmatize Second Amendment supporters and Second Amendment or gun

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>owners across the board. And that's really what this is about.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And I want to you know, while there's a part

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of it wants to talk about the specifics of this

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>band or that band and how it doesn't really doesn't

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>really matter. They they do this, meaning Democrats, they push

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. They stigmatize gun owners because they want to

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>show their base that they don't like those people. If

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it were about dealing with gun violence, don't you think

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you'd hear from these democrats a lot more people like

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Swallow and Jilabrand about how fifty people were shot in

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Chicago over the weekend. Fifty people in just a couple

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>of parts of Chicago. Five zero that's a lot of

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>ten of them were killed. Fifty shot at and Chicago

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most restrictive jurisdictions in the country

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for guns. And then they say, oh, but fuck, that's

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>because of neighboring jurisdictions. All right, Well, neighboring jurisdictions don't

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have a oh you can bring your gun into Chicago loophole.

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It's still illegal to have your gun in Chicago. So

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>why we'll passing more gun laws do anything about the

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>neighboring jurisdiction problem. No, what it means is that you'll

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>have someone who's allegal concealed carry permit holder who drives

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>into the wrong I'm sorry, producer might tells me it's

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>actually fifty two were shot in Chicago for the weekend. Mike,

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, fifty two one city. Why can't they

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>more effectively deal with that violence? That is another question

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that I never never get a worthwhile answer to. I

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>ask people about gun violence in Chicago, and I've had

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this conversation with Democrats and the immediately turn to police violence.

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>No, no no, no, no, it's not the police that shot

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty two people. That's not it's not a police violence problem.

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry you don't get to. But they don't want

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what's causing violence in Chicago because that's

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>not a fun talking point for Democrats. They want their base,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they want the left to know that they don't like

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>gun owners, that gun owners are bad people, they're mean people.

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>They are you know, foolish, simple minded, xenophobic, racist a

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>lot and live in the Bible Belt and in the

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>South where that's what they think of gun owners, or

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>they live in you know, Texas, places like that that's

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>what they think of gun owners. And this is why

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you have someone like Kurston Jilla Brand, who is really

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that she's trying to be the Pandora in chief. I mean,

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>she'll say anything. I mean, I wish I could sit

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in on the Gila Brand consultant meetings that happened, I'm

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sure every day, or they say, you know, here's your

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>messaging for today, and she just goes okay. I will

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.479
<v Speaker 1>say that it's like they're programming some kind of a

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>brainless Democrat robot. Whatever it needs to be said, I

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>will say, doesn't matter what I used to say here,

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 1>she is really trying to outdo the competition, the crazy

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>left wing competition on guns. And you can hear for

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>yourself play nine. And I think the most outrageous thing

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that's happened to our democracy is how much fear and

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>division and hate has been spread. I think the NRA

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is the worst organization in this country for doing exactly that.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>They care more about their profits than the American people.

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>They care more about selling guns to someone on the

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>terror watch list, or someone with grave mental illness, or

0:30:55.480 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>someone who has a violent criminal background, all lies. I mean,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know if she's so stupid

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that she does not realize that these are lies, or

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>if she's so reckless she just does not care. It

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is a tough call. It is not something that I

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>could easily tell you one way or the other. I mean,

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a case you made that maybe she is such

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>an airhead that she doesn't know what she's saying. Isn't

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>true that that the NRA absolutely does not does not

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>advocate for selling weapons to people that are gravely mentally ill.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>It is already illegal to sell a fire and the

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>NRA does not try to change any laws where a

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>violent criminal could or where bands a violent criminal from

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>buying a firearm. But the facts are not something that

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Kristin Kirstin and see Kristin Kirsten Kirsten Gillibrand troubles herself

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>much with it. Remember, this is the woman, folks, who

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the women, I should say, who wants to

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>be the next president of the United States. That's right,

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>We're supposed to feel like we'll sleep better at night

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>if we replaced Trump with her? Why exactly? She's what

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>do you get? What's the improvement with Jelo? If you

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>just want classic left wing non thinking, brainless talking points,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but you want the progressive policy apparatus behind it, then

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess, yeah, Jila Brand's fine. He just check the

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>identity politics box by being a woman. That's all they

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.479
<v Speaker 1>really care about right now. I guess finding somebody they

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>can shoehorn into the White House who gives them some

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>claim to democrats, some claim to diversity. At least that's

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what the left wants. You know, they're still clinging to

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Bernie and and Biden at the top of the at

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the top of the polls right now. So who knows.

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But here's what Jilla Brand said about the bum stock

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>band play ten. Is there anything you could have done

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that would have stopped this terrible incident? Yeah, stopping beholden

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to the NRA, like President Trump is. He does President

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump's bidding. Remember after the shooting in Las Vegas, he said, yeah, yeah,

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna ban the bum stocks. Did he ban the

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>bum stocks? No? Because the NRA came crashing down. She's wrong.

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>They did band bump stocks. They are now illegal to own,

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:19.479
<v Speaker 1>by or sell. President Trump took that action and issued

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the band gave them ninety days to turn them in

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>or bump stocks, as some of you know, it's really

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just a thing that allows you to engage in a

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>type of a method of firing a weapon. But does

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think that the fact checkers the Washington Post

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are running around with their hair on fire. I mean

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe they put it on some back page somewhere, But

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, Juliah Brand lied about Trump and bumping now,

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of course not because it's when Julah Brand lies, you see,

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a good lie. This is the way the media

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>breaks this stuff down. This is how the Democrats view it.

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>They are good lies and bad lies. When Trump lies

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>bad and it's not even necessarily a lie. When Trump

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>says that he's the handsomest they call him a liar.

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you think Trump is the handsomest

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>man in the world or not. But the President is

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed to think that and say that without everyone jumping

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>down is you know, jumping on his chest yelling about

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>how he's a liar. He's not a liar. He may

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>be may have a little bit of a high self regard,

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a little narcissistic, but it's not a liar. Jilla

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Brand is a liar saying things about the NRA that

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't true. The worst organization in America, though, isn't that remarkable?

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm somebody who's paid NRA dues. Really, I'm

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm the worst. I'm I'm supporting the worst organization of

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>America in might dollars. It's it's a remarkable thing for

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>them to say. But this is this is Democrats, all

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the stuff about guns, and this is why I'm so

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I just have no patience for these stupid Democrats on

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this issue. It's really not about gun violence. That's not

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the that they say. That is their concern. That is

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not true. It is not about gun violence. The real concern,

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the primary concern, is showing the left and the base

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>of the left that they dislike gun owners. It is

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>tipathy for you who listen to this show who own firearms.

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>They want all their little voters in the most blue

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>cities in the country to know gun owners are bad

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>people and we don't like them. The NRA is the

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>worst organization in the country because that gets donations going,

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>It gets media coverage from foolish libs who work for

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>all these different news organizations who don't know anything about firearms,

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.240
<v Speaker 1>who don't know anything about guns. They just know guns

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 1>bad and gun owner's bad too. Remember that. Don't let

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 1>them try to create this artificial separation, because as far

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>as they're concerned, there is no separation guns and gun owners.

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Leftists hate them both, my friends, unfortunately, but that's the reality.

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's kick this one off with a Trump tweet, shall we.

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe that if people stop using or subscribing to

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>A T and T, they'd be forced to make big

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>changes at CNN, which is dying in the ratings anyway.

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It is so unfair, such bad fake news. Why wouldn't

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they act when the world watches CNN, it gets a

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>false picture of the USA said, he is absolutely right

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about CNN, and I like that he goes after them

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>here and just says what needs to be said CNN

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is is American anti American propaganda, and it's time that

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>finally we are open to the discussion about what that

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 1>what that should mean for them going forward. I mean,

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I like the Trump let's let's it rip

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 1>on this stuff. And I just I'll note that after

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>my time in China, where I was seeing so much

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of the anti American nous on CNN International, Trump pushing

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>back on this and saying that people should put pressure

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in at and T. You know, this is where you

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>have the conservatives who jump out and say, oh no, no, no,

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't do that, we don't do that. Not to that,

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I say, well, what do we do? Suffer in silence?

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is it that corporate culture has been in my

0:36:56.680 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in my adult lifetime, effectively taken over by the left.

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Why does Disney feel so fine with saying that George

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>They're going to punish the entire state of Georgia for

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a completely legitimate legislative act of the Georgia State Assembly.

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Why do they think that that's okay, meaning that they

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>won't even have any pushback, meaningful pushback from it. Why

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>why do we know that cities or different localities discriminating

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>against Chick fil A because it is a company that

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>tries to promote Christian values. Why do we know that

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that they feel very safe, they feel very safe doing

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>these things, that they can hound people out of their jobs,

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they can get them fired, they can ruin them because

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't support leftist orthodoxy or because they run a

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>foul of in some way leftist orthodoxy. Do we just

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 1>allow this to continue? You know? This brings me into

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>something of the discussion over wartime versus peacetime conservatism that

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>has broken out recently. I don't know how much of

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>how many of you have been. This is kind of

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>deep in the weeds, blue check journo stuff. But apparently

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the peacetime conservatives are coming from me. Hear the sirens

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the background. But no, this is this is something

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that has blown out in the open the last week

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>or so as a function of the debate between David French,

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 1>somebody who you know well who listened to the show

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>from when he used to appear pretty regularly. He is

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a senior writer at National Review, and Sir Rob Amari,

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>who you also know. I mean, these are two guys

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I've had on the show a lot. Sir Rob is

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a writer at Commentary and recently put a book out,

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And I cannot do justice to both of their individual

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>conservative political philosophies. And I have invited Sir Rob, and

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to invite David on and I want them

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>to speak for themselves. But the issue boils down at

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>some level too. You know, do you sometimes have to

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>just roll up the sleeves and win? You know, do

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to be willing to use the state to

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>achieve conservative ends instead of just the taking this hands

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>off attitude of well, if we create an even playing field,

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>then conservative ideas will win out on the other side

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>keeps winning victories using the mechanisms of the state, And

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 1>not only do they win, but then they run around

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and bayonet the survivors. I mean that then they run

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>around and really ram it into our faces. You know, Oh,

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>not only do we need laws that say that, you know,

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a man can compete in women's athletics, but if you

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with that, you're violating that individual civil rights.

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you should be prosecuted. And it's not

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>enough to get their way. They want to get their

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>way and crush those who dissent. What's the best way

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it? The frenchie in way, although I

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>know I'm sure David would would quibble with this, disagree

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>with this, is to use the processes that are in place.

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Take it to court, you know, fight it out and

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>try to make the case, try to persuade the other side.

0:39:55.400 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Try to use the more Sarabamari way is how do

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we smash the argument of the other side. Take power,

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>take the power of the state into our own hands

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 1>for limited purposes, and achieve conservative ends, to achieve conservative

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>policy solutions. You know, it's it's really the more the

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>more Trumpian approach. And I think it's it's a fascining debate.

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I think there's very interesting dynamics on both sides, and

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I do believe it also revisits that schism that we

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>all saw from when during that and look, I was

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you know this who listened to the show. I was

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>initially a Ted Cruise supporter, and I was skeptical of Trump.

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I was never anti Trump, but I was skeptical in

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the early days and then I realized over time, oh wait,

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this is something, This is different. This is a movement,

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is a sea change. This is a separation

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>from the politics of the past. This needs to be

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>taken very, very seriously. Not every word that Trump breathes

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>need to be taken seriously, right we learn this, don't

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>take Trump literally, but take him seriously. But that that

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>debate within conservatism and the kind of Romney asque losing

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>like a gentleman, that is something that is going to

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>peat itself now, I think heading into the general election,

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and we see it with things like how to respond

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to the very aggressive comments of Disney, one of the

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>most powerful and iconic American companies in the world, clearly

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that you know, if you're pro life, we don't

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like you. That's what Disney. You know, this is up

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 1>there with Coca Cola. I mean, this is up there

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>with the most iconic American brands. You know, this be

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>like Ralph Lauren saying, and I don't even want to

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>know Ralph Lauren thinks on a corporate level, but Ralph

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Lauren saying, you know, if you're pro life, you're not

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>welcome in our stores. You're not welcome to shop with

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>us if you're pro life. I'm sure that there are

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>plenty of people at the very top of corporate America

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 1>who feel that way about about those who are pro life.

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And you'll note that the the converse there is the

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>obverse to converse. The contrary position is almost never articulated.

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't think of one off the top

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of my head where a major corporate official in America

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>says that if you are a conservative, you are not welcome.

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>You are not you know, part of our family. Sorry,

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>if you are a liberal, pardon me. If you're a liberal,

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you are not welcome. You're not part of our family.

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not somebody that can be involved in what we're doing.

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of that being the case. So how

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>do we respond to that? I mean, Trump's saying that

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>AT and T should be pressured because of CNN. How

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>badly for cn AM I supposed to feel When I

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>know that CNN anchors will individually reach out and use

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the power of their organization behind the scenes to try

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to crush conservative voices. I know about this personally. CNN

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on a corporate level will exert its influence and its

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>power to try and crush, not just any competitors that

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it can, but obviously to stifle and ostracized conservative voices.

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a lib propaganda outlet, that's what it is.

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So shouldn't we be willing to take our dollars elsewhere

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and show you know, this is really a conversation about

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 1>should conservatives start to boycott two folks? Do we need

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to fight fire with fire. I've been around for a

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>long time now in this game, We're not that long

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>compared to others, but I've been around for a while

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and us making the Burkean HIJACKI in, let's just level

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the market and let's just let things play out while

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we make our good arguments. You know, we're making that

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 1>argument sometimes while they're stomping our face into the curve.

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that this really has the intended effect.

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that that is the recognition of

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the Trump era that we've been getting crushed on the

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>government by the government when it comes to social issues

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. You know, we have now on

0:43:55.480 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the fight over gender and gender binarity. I don't know

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>if that's a word, but the gender binary construct male female.

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're not just making a social argument there,

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>leveraging the power of the state so that your kids

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>now are going to be learning, you know, in the

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>fifth grade in California that if if they're at if

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they feel like a woman, one day they're actually a woman.

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is gonna be this stuff is gonna get mandated,

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>This stuff is gonna be jammed down your throats. Is

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the response to that to ask them to get a

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:32.359
<v Speaker 1>subscription to you know, the Weekly Standard R I p uh.

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>You know what are you supposed to do? Are we?

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Are we to take action in response to the aggression

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of the left or not? And I mean action on

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a corporate level, financial action. Look, there's there's a degree

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:51.879
<v Speaker 1>of this. The conservative versus liberal corporate sphere right now

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a little bit of the way that the

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>US and China trade has gone. You know, on US

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>China trade, we're told we want to be free traders.

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Free trade creates well, free trade creates, free trade creates prosperity,

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we need to really focus in on

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:13.320
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And to that, I say, okay, but China

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>is not a free trade country with US. China has

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of tariffs and there are other ways too,

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that they they stack the deck in favor of their

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>state owned or state supported enterprises, and they are getting

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a free ride on our products through intellectual property theft.

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's all kinds of bats. So we

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:33.879
<v Speaker 1>can sit here and just stamp our feet and say

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, we're not going to do anything in

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>response because we're free traders. There's a little bit of

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that with corporate America and the liberal dominance, the dominance

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of liberal narratives in the in the C suite across

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the country. We don't we don't want to be punitive

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>and nasty to people because they're liberals. But can we

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>at least penalize corporations that are going to take these

0:45:56.440 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this kind of a line. Are we going to push

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:02.879
<v Speaker 1>back or just keep getting slapped around? I mean there

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is a there's a little bit of a of a

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:11.919
<v Speaker 1>conservative uh you know, overtolerance of well, if we just

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we just engage in you know, peaceful resistance,

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>if we go the Gandhi the Gandhi routine, you know,

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually the other side will see the light if we

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 1>do peaceful resistance and make our case. And to that,

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I say, well, you know, not if you're dealing I

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>was gonna go with this, but you know, not if

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with the Nazis is not going to make

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the case for you. You know, we got to remind

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 1>ourselves a little bit of Bonhofer here. You know, there

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:35.360
<v Speaker 1>comes a time when and I know we're going to

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the Nazi path. I'm not saying they're dealing with Nazis,

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but just there are there are times when you realize

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>that you got to change up your tactics because the

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>other side is just gonna cheat and they're just gonna

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>keep winning. They're just gonna keep winning. So Trump's tweet here,

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't got a lot of attention about stopping subscription

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:56.959
<v Speaker 1>to AT and T in order to bring bring about

0:46:57.040 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 1>change at CNN. I mean, you know, Jeff, Jeff Zucker

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>at CNN should go. CNN has become, to anyone paying attention,

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>who's honest, a laughing stock. It's not a news organization anymore.

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It is a It is a straight up propaganda channel.

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>They say all kinds of terrible things about Fox News

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on their air, and yet they get all all huffy

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>when you know, in response, the President says, well, look

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at you guys, you're you're the opposite of State TV.

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>You're you're something else. You're anti State TV, You're anti

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump TV. I do want us to fight back. I

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>do think it's not enough to sit around and hope

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that the market will the market as it stands now, right,

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>not a free market that is fair and open the

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 1>marketers that stands now, which has all kinds of inefficiencies

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and bureaucracies and biases built into it. I do think

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:48.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem, speaking of how we fight back and

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the not fair free market of ideas social media. I

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>got some thoughts on this one that a lot of

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention being paid to the fact that

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you have the FTC, Federal Trade Commission going to be

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>looking at Facebook. Everybody. This could be a big thing,

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:11.879
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, big situation. I have important thoughts on this.

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 1>And also we'll be joined by my friend Will Chamber

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:17.320
<v Speaker 1>from Human Events to discuss more coming up. The Federal

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Trade Commission, which would be leading any anti trust action

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>into Facebook. They now have they now have gotten this

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 1>thing started, folks. They're going to lead any anti trust

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 1>investigation to Facebook. This is the early stage of what

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>could be the breakup of the social media giant. Now

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>will it be broken up? Who knows. We have to

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>see how this shakes out. I'm sure Facebook will fight

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 1>very hard to prevent that. But this is an issue

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that everyone has to If you care about politics in America,

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:50.800
<v Speaker 1>if you care about culture and an American society in

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the future of this country, you are forced to care

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:57.359
<v Speaker 1>at some level about these social media giants. Even if

0:48:57.360 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>you don't. And I know some of you who listen

0:48:58.840 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have a Facebook account, have a Twitter account, have

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>an Instagram account. This stuff affects all that's going on

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 1>around you. It affects the affects elections, it affects our discourse,

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:15.399
<v Speaker 1>how we discuss issues, what we learn, what we know,

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:21.400
<v Speaker 1>how we communicate, and the amount of power that has

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>concentrated in the hands of just Facebook is pretty staggering.

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing in the in the history of humanity that

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>can really rival Facebook's ability to censor, magnify, disrupt, deflect, conversation,

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>information flow. It is incredible, incredible in the sense that

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to believe it's not incredible. Is an awesome

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.399
<v Speaker 1>So what Facebook has offered so far as well, We're

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna We're gonna come up with some kind of internal

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 1>rules and commissions, we won't rules the road because they've

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:02.359
<v Speaker 1>been playing this game where they're platform and publisher. So

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to be held responsible for what is

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>on their platform because it's obviously content generated by users

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and you don't know what crazy people and all kinds

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:14.319
<v Speaker 1>of people are going to put on there. But they

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 1>so they don't want to be responsible for that. But

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they also want the ability to censor what some people

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 1>do and establish these terms of service. So they to me,

0:50:24.360 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like they really want to have it both ways.

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:30.839
<v Speaker 1>And yet this is a company that is worth over

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:35.440
<v Speaker 1>five hundred billion dollars and by some estimates has about

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>three quarters of all social networking revenue. And it is

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a true giant. And you know we're talking about Trump

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:46.959
<v Speaker 1>before and how he wants pressure on AT and T. Well,

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department precedent that most people will point to

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for a breakup a possible breakup of Facebook is that

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of AT and T back in the nineteen fifties. Right,

0:50:56.640 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>AT and T many of us now think of as

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a self own cell phone company provider. Right they give

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:05.359
<v Speaker 1>your cell service or your phone service. But they used

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:09.839
<v Speaker 1>to be old landline phones, as you know, and they

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:15.640
<v Speaker 1>provided all kinds of telecommunications equipment. The government sued AT

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and T under antitrust and then there was all there

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:24.759
<v Speaker 1>was a whole you know, there's a consent aim out

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of it, and AT and T had to put out

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:30.880
<v Speaker 1>its its patents and also wasn't allowed to just jump

0:51:30.920 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>into and try to control the computer industry you look

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at So that was then, and now you know, AT

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and T is still around today, still a very large company,

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and I believe the stock did well after the initial break.

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 1>But if there is any case to be made ever

0:51:49.560 --> 0:51:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that somebody is too powerful, a guy like Mark Zuckerberg

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 1>who has sixty percent of the voting shares of Facebook,

0:51:55.960 --> 0:52:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook owns Instagram and WhatsApp billion of users and

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:07.040
<v Speaker 1>can determine, you know, what the algorithms do, what news

0:52:07.080 --> 0:52:11.400
<v Speaker 1>people see, what the privacy settings are. You know, what

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is protected speech is what is beyond the protection First

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Amendment protection, or rather Facebook's First Amendment protection. Who knows

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 1>what that even is. There's some really problematic stuff going

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on here, and we can hope that somebody else is

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.480
<v Speaker 1>going to come along with another platform and we'll be

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>able to compete with Facebook as it stands now. But

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Facebook acquires at their platforms, copies aspects of their tech,

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and then just runs them out of business. So what

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 1>does it mean in the meantime? You know, what is

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it to Caines who said in a long run, we're

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>ald dead. Yeah, maybe they'll be a Facebook competitor in

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty years, but Facebook right now could pretty much if

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.759
<v Speaker 1>it wanted to turn the next election. Do you want

0:52:50.760 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 1>one company to have that kind of power, especially as

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley left wing company. They're regulating all of our companies.

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 1>There's all kinds of regulation in place that we deal

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with our company, or not even our companies, just American

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.440
<v Speaker 1>companies deal with day in and day out. Should Facebook

0:53:05.480 --> 0:53:08.799
<v Speaker 1>be immune from all that? For some reason? Why we've

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>got my friend Will Chamberlin joining us to talk more

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:13.279
<v Speaker 1>stay with me. So is there a conservative case for

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:18.480
<v Speaker 1>breaking up some of these mega social media corporations out there?

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook top of the list, but Google also right there too.

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Some people are pointing at Amazon. Let's talk to our

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>friend Will Chamberlain about this. He's the publisher of Human Events,

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>which has been revived and is making all kinds of

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:36.240
<v Speaker 1>waves on the interwebs. Telling people good things about conservatism.

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Mister will, great to have you back, good to be

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with you, Buck as always. All right, man, So what's

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the what's the move that should be made here about Facebook?

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 1>What is the conservative case? Because you know, usually, as

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:52.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'll hear from most mainstream, mainline conservatives makes

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it sound like they'll wear monocles and ascots. But you

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:57.360
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, you'll hear from the conservative establishment

0:53:57.400 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that there's no such thing as a monopoly, a monopo.

0:54:00.120 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 1>These only possible if the government allows it to be,

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 1>or rather enforces a monopoly, and so social media cannot

0:54:07.640 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>be a monopoly. You say, what, sir, I mean, let's

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:13.719
<v Speaker 1>deal of that first. As a matter of economics, I

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:16.720
<v Speaker 1>think these companies are very clearly monopoly. You know, Facebook

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 1>as a market cap of something like five hundred billion dollars,

0:54:19.880 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Google closer to a trillion. Those are the market caps

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that are not a product of people who think that

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>these companies are in a competitive market and are facing

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 1>serious competition that will reduce their profits. These are You

0:54:32.600 --> 0:54:34.800
<v Speaker 1>get a market cap like that because you've got a

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:40.759
<v Speaker 1>monopoly and can essentially control pricing. And that's why not

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>only do you have these massive market caps, but nobody

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in the right mind thinks about competing with Google or Facebook.

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Like if you try to go to a venture capitalist

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley, even somebody who subscribes to the idea

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:54.439
<v Speaker 1>that competition here was the way to go. And you said,

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to compete with Google. This is I'm going

0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:57.399
<v Speaker 1>to set up a new company. We're going to beat

0:54:57.440 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 1>them in search stayed laugh you out of the room.

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with book. Yeah, and there's a lot of

0:55:03.040 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>ways they go about this, right, They buy, they buy

0:55:04.760 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>people out, they crush people, they copy people. I mean,

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they the idea that anyone could could compete with them

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:13.919
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be but you know, but they would

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 1>point well, and by the way, I mean, I I've

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:17.560
<v Speaker 1>already made my case, you're in the show. I do

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 1>think that there should be regulation of this, or rather

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 1>there should be a breakup of this for a whole

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different reasons. But the other side would say, well,

0:55:24.600 --> 0:55:27.680
<v Speaker 1>what about you know, friends stir and what about what's

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:30.359
<v Speaker 1>what's the other one called MySpace? And you know they

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:33.480
<v Speaker 1>could make a comeback, right, I mean, the problem is

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:36.440
<v Speaker 1>there are network effects here, Like you know, MySpace never

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 1>had a dominant monopoly in the way Facebook does now.

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And once you have a network like this where everyone

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is there's no reason for people to leave. And moreover,

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the advantages you get in terms of the data collection

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you have and the information you have on your users,

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they just create this massive competitive mode that's almost impossible

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to surmount. And I think the unique dynamic of the

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:01.759
<v Speaker 1>unique winner take all dynamics is really prevalent in tech

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>makes it so that these anti monopoly arguments just aren't

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:09.680
<v Speaker 1>very good. So why should conservatives care about this? Well,

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:12.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's not that these companies are using monopoly power

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to price gouge so much that's the normal lefty case

0:56:16.480 --> 0:56:19.600
<v Speaker 1>about regulating monopolies. This is a new problem. Instead of

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 1>price gouging, these companies are using their massive power to

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:28.320
<v Speaker 1>sway politics. And because they're not in a competitive environment,

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't just set up a competitor to outcompete them

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:33.840
<v Speaker 1>when they're doing things that hurt their bottom line for

0:56:33.920 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>political ends. So the ability of a company like Facebook

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to tweak its algorithm to disabor conservative candidates, or a

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Google to demonetize conservative YouTube creators so that conservative commentators

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>are discouraged for making videos you know, all these things

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 1>add up to essentially changing the landscape, the battlefield where

0:56:55.239 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 1>where politics is, where politics is resolved. And unless Conservators

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:04.600
<v Speaker 1>are willing to use government power to remedy that, to

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:07.600
<v Speaker 1>impose punishments on these companies when they decide the sense

0:57:07.640 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of conservatives, then we're going to be a structural disadvantage

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in elections. And I don't see a reason why the

0:57:12.520 --> 0:57:16.720
<v Speaker 1>conservative movement should tolerate that. I also always wonder how

0:57:16.760 --> 0:57:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the because you know, we get on our side, there

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of Conservatives who oppose this, and this

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:25.160
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a bit of the debate over tariffs, where

0:57:25.160 --> 0:57:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll just say, you know, free trade and tariffs or taxes.

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And the response to that now has become we'll hold

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on a second, free trade sounds great, we don't. We

0:57:32.840 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have free trade. That's that's not the status quo.

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So to start from this position of well, just our

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 1>answer to everything is free trade is to ignore the

0:57:41.000 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>reality of what is happening. This is specifically with China,

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>but actually with the EU, with Canada, with a lot

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of places. And I think there's a similar dynamic at

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:53.680
<v Speaker 1>work with the Facebook monopoly break up question because they

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:57.680
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to understand that Facebook operates as both as

0:57:57.720 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a publisher and as a platform, right, So sometimes wants

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>publish or protection, sometimes it wants platform protection. And I mean,

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting here talking to you on terrestrial radio. There

0:58:07.120 --> 0:58:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are all kinds of regulations on what I can say.

0:58:09.160 --> 0:58:12.280
<v Speaker 1>There are all kinds of limitations and issues and FCC

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and this and that and the other thing. So why

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:18.040
<v Speaker 1>should Facebook be exempt and write its own rules? Right?

0:58:18.200 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, usually this argument about not using the government,

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 1>people say it's a principle, but really it's just as

0:58:24.120 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>your ristic It's like, as a rule of fun, we

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't use government to regulate things. But these people aren't

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>objecting to things like civil rights laws that say, to

0:58:33.080 --> 0:58:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, hotel owners and restaurant owners, you can't just

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 1>turn away black people. Like I don't think most of

0:58:38.400 --> 0:58:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the people who talk about the virtues of the free

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:42.920
<v Speaker 1>market are going around thinking like, wow, we really need

0:58:42.960 --> 0:58:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of these civil rights laws that are

0:58:44.920 --> 0:58:48.800
<v Speaker 1>impinging on freedom of association. So for the same token

0:58:48.840 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen, to have meaningful free speech, you need

0:58:51.080 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to have Facebook and Twitter. You do if you don't

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 1>have those things it's just very difficult your downstream of communication,

0:58:57.480 --> 0:59:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to have any sort of impact. And

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so to protect the constitutional right under the First Amendent

0:59:03.960 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of free speech, to make that meaningful, we need to

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>think about platform access as a civil right. Now, why

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>can't we see a breakthrough of some of the more

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 1>specialized platforms. Yeah, people have been saying this for well,

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 1>why why doesn't conservative Facebook work? I mean, conservative Facebook

0:59:24.760 --> 0:59:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is just why would you move on to a different

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 1>another platform when the point of Facebook is really friends

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and family communication. You know, that's where everybody already is.

0:59:34.040 --> 0:59:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's just a it's a hasshole to have one

0:59:36.360 --> 0:59:39.320
<v Speaker 1>more app that isn't nearly as functional that doesn't provide

0:59:39.320 --> 0:59:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the same benefit that Facebook does because you can't easily

0:59:41.880 --> 0:59:44.560
<v Speaker 1>reach out the people you want to reach. So that's Facebook.

0:59:44.840 --> 0:59:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Conservative Twitter has problems because the entire journalistic you know,

0:59:49.520 --> 0:59:53.280
<v Speaker 1>industry is on Twitter, along with almost every politician and

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:58.120
<v Speaker 1>most major public figures. So meaning most serious public square

0:59:58.160 --> 1:00:00.440
<v Speaker 1>debate happens on Twitter. If you go on your own

1:00:00.480 --> 1:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>little conservative Twitter website, like you create consort of alternative

1:00:04.440 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>then all you end up with is talking with a

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>few people who've moved over there when the important I guess,

1:00:09.720 --> 1:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the important or the really contested public discussion is happening

1:00:13.840 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>on the platform you left. So it just it doesn't

1:00:16.160 --> 1:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>really get anywhere that That's what I mean by network effect.

1:00:18.720 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a winner take all dynamic, and Facebook and Twitter

1:00:21.200 --> 1:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>have kind of won already, and what's your prescription for

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>what should happen now? Right? So, I think that it's

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a very good start to see that President Trump is

1:00:34.000 --> 1:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>starting these anti trust investigations. I think that you know,

1:00:37.400 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>from his perspective, he should be looking at Facebook and

1:00:39.640 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter as adversarial institutions and essentially using levers of power

1:00:44.080 --> 1:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>against them until they decide to start playing fair and

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>not censoring conservatives. In terms of the ideal goal, the

1:00:50.280 --> 1:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of law that I want to see in place,

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I want it to be the case that if you

1:00:53.840 --> 1:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are wrongfully banned from social media, I mean your banned

1:00:56.600 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>for something that wasn't unlawful, then you should be able

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to walk into court and get your account back the

1:01:01.160 --> 1:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>very next day and actually instantiate the idea that platform

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>access as a civil right, and if a company takes

1:01:07.200 --> 1:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that away from you without a really really good reason,

1:01:09.880 --> 1:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>then the laws should step in and force them to

1:01:11.560 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>give you your account back. Sounds good to me, all right, everybody,

1:01:15.680 --> 1:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>will Chamberlain over at human Events go to human events

1:01:18.000 --> 1:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com to see what they are up to over there.

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>The site has been doing great work. And will we

1:01:23.000 --> 1:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your time, sir, Thank you so much. Buck, All right, team,

1:01:27.200 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back and nasty start to President Trump's

1:01:29.880 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>trip to England. He called Megan Marcole nasty and then

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>denied it, even though there is actually sound of him

1:01:36.160 --> 1:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>saying it. Nasty is a word Trump has used before

1:01:39.400 --> 1:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss Hillary Clinton present term called the American Princess

1:01:42.640 --> 1:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>nasty Megan Marcle, referring to her as nasty nasty. Trump

1:01:47.200 --> 1:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>denied that on Twitter, but roll the tape falling a

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:54.439
<v Speaker 1>woman nasty is not news now, especially when it comes

1:01:54.440 --> 1:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to women of color. What did Trump do? Oh? Good, heavens? Oh?

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Did he did he step out of line with the

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>with the royal family? Did he say something that was

1:02:05.880 --> 1:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>untoward about miss Megan Markle? Oh? No, he called her nasty,

1:02:11.240 --> 1:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're saying. Media was so upset Megan Markle.

1:02:15.240 --> 1:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>How could he? How could he? Sir? Have you no decency, sir, Well,

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>does the media have any accuracy? Let's put aside the

1:02:25.840 --> 1:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>decency question for a moment. Does that Does the media

1:02:28.280 --> 1:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>care if they're if they're in fact representing a story accurately,

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>because you know, will notice that, you know the line

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you take away and I saw fake Jake Tapper over

1:02:40.120 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>at CNN spreading this over the weekend, among others, the

1:02:42.720 --> 1:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>line you'll take away from missus, Well, he just called

1:02:44.680 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>her nasty. And oh because she's they say, a woman

1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of color, because she is half I believe half African American.

1:02:51.440 --> 1:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That makes this sin even worse. Meanwhile, Trump calls everybody names.

1:02:56.080 --> 1:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump calls you know, white, black, Asian Latino. Trump will

1:03:01.400 --> 1:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>swat at you on Twitter or with a sound bite,

1:03:04.200 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, even if he used to be your friend. Sometimes,

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, You know, you messed with

1:03:07.920 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump at your peril. Trump is an equal opportunity Twitter stomper.

1:03:12.480 --> 1:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's let's just skip past the nonsense. It's

1:03:16.080 --> 1:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>very obvious, right, Trump is equal opportunity about that stuff.

1:03:19.720 --> 1:03:25.479
<v Speaker 1>We know this, all right, So what did Trump really say? Though?

1:03:25.760 --> 1:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is really a case study of sorts

1:03:28.760 --> 1:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in fake news. What did Trump say play clip six. Megan,

1:03:33.600 --> 1:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>who's now the Duchess of Sussex. RIGHTO, we've done a

1:03:38.000 --> 1:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>different name. She can't make it because she's got maternity leave.

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you sorry to see her because she wasn't so

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>nice about you during the campaign. I don't know if

1:03:44.560 --> 1:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you saw that. I don't. I didn't know that. No, yeah,

1:03:46.840 --> 1:03:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know. No. I hope she's okay. I did

1:03:50.440 --> 1:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>not know that. She said she moved to Canada if

1:03:52.640 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you got elected. Turned out she moved to Britain. Think

1:03:57.160 --> 1:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people moving here, So can I

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>say no, I didn't know that she was nasty an

1:04:03.080 --> 1:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>American princess. I think it's nice. I think it's nice,

1:04:07.600 --> 1:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure she'll do excellently. She'll be she'll be

1:04:13.520 --> 1:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>very good, should be very good. I hope she does.

1:04:17.440 --> 1:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It is a misrepresentation of the context and of the

1:04:22.080 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>spirit of what that exchange was. Just to just pull

1:04:25.080 --> 1:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>out that he called her nasty. He was responding. I

1:04:29.000 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>mean he was pushed into this. They're saying this woman

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>said something bad about you, and his response was to say,

1:04:34.480 --> 1:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in full well, I didn't realize she said that not

1:04:37.840 --> 1:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>nice thing about me. But I think she'll be great

1:04:40.600 --> 1:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in this role here in Britain. That's what he really said. Now,

1:04:45.040 --> 1:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is it as as a function of pure um, you know,

1:04:50.320 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a pure one word quotation. Is it true to say

1:04:54.240 --> 1:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that he referred to Megan markle In with the word nasty. Well,

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, even that's a little bit of stretch, because

1:05:02.040 --> 1:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he really was referring to what she had said as

1:05:05.480 --> 1:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>nasty if you listen in context, which this matters, right,

1:05:09.040 --> 1:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the I'm sure some of you, with your

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>husbands and wives, significant others, you know, there's a difference

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>between you were being a jerk and you are a jerk. Right,

1:05:18.600 --> 1:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this is and this is a right, producer Mike, This

1:05:20.760 --> 1:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is an important distinction, absolutely, man, Yeah, right, Like you know,

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I will freely admit that, like sometimes I act like

1:05:27.920 --> 1:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a jerk, I will also tell people that I am

1:05:30.960 --> 1:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not a jerk though, right, I mean, you know these

1:05:33.040 --> 1:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>are different things, yeah, different contexts. This is where you're

1:05:35.920 --> 1:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to say, yeah, Buck, you're not a jerk. Thanks,

1:05:39.920 --> 1:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a given, you know, that's right, And we

1:05:42.120 --> 1:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>love you, producer Mike, thank you all right. Fishing for

1:05:44.880 --> 1:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>compliments here on the Buck Sexton Show, But no really

1:05:47.040 --> 1:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like there's a difference in context, there's a difference in

1:05:49.800 --> 1:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>how it was portrayed, but they don't care. They just

1:05:53.480 --> 1:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>want to go with the with the fake news. They

1:05:55.680 --> 1:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>just want to continue to right. I mean, Mike, I

1:05:57.880 --> 1:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>mean when you saw this, they were running with this

1:05:59.880 --> 1:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>all weekend. It was insane. It was insane. Actually when

1:06:02.360 --> 1:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you when you called me there, I was actually looking

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>for There are several articles and several times previous to

1:06:08.760 --> 1:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this where Markle has slammed the president and she has

1:06:10.800 --> 1:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>gone out of our way. This is, I think, to me,

1:06:13.520 --> 1:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is another example of Trump counterpunching. She has blasted him

1:06:17.040 --> 1:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in the past, much as other people in the UK have,

1:06:20.640 --> 1:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is this Trump turning around saying, you know what,

1:06:24.160 --> 1:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. She was nasty whatever it was telling mischaracterized,

1:06:26.920 --> 1:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but she has taken the first punch at him, and

1:06:28.760 --> 1:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody's talking about that. Yeah. And it's also just such

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a stupid, spoiled brat thing to say if somebody becomes president,

1:06:35.840 --> 1:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>really you're gonna bail on your country that quickly someone

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>comes president, you don't like he's probably only gonna last.

1:06:40.720 --> 1:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, according to libs four years in the role, Right,

1:06:42.840 --> 1:06:45.439
<v Speaker 1>you can't handle. For you, there's such this thing. Libs

1:06:45.480 --> 1:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>are such emotional babies. You see it over and over again.

1:06:48.840 --> 1:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Such a bunch of babies. I had to sit here

1:06:50.800 --> 1:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for eight years of Obama. Oh oh, he's brilliant, he's

1:06:54.040 --> 1:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a juniors, he's amazing, he's perfect, he's like a god. No,

1:06:56.960 --> 1:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that guy's actually full of himself, pretty boring, doesn't have

1:06:59.480 --> 1:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>any good ideas, and you know, managed to play the

1:07:02.120 --> 1:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>system really well to get where he was. But I

1:07:04.560 --> 1:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like, I'm gonna leave America. You know, I think

1:07:07.360 --> 1:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you conservatives don't threatened to leave America every time. I

1:07:09.960 --> 1:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even gonna leave America. Have Hello, Hillary became president

1:07:13.760 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and that shows dedication. That's how much I love this place.

1:07:16.320 --> 1:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So I just telling people, man, you know, they gotta lives,

1:07:20.840 --> 1:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>need to take a chill pill. You know, plenty of

1:07:23.120 --> 1:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>them take all kinds of pills. They should take a

1:07:24.720 --> 1:07:27.439
<v Speaker 1>chill pill. That would be a better way for them

1:07:27.480 --> 1:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to handle the stuff going forward. Did we also the

1:07:30.200 --> 1:07:32.479
<v Speaker 1>president of Mike talking about just how things are gonna

1:07:32.520 --> 1:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>go with Well, here here's Nigel Farage in saying that

1:07:37.680 --> 1:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the people in the UK are like in the trump'ster

1:07:39.360 --> 1:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>playing nineteen. I mean, look three years ago I was

1:07:43.560 --> 1:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>almost the only person in Britain starting up fighting with

1:07:46.440 --> 1:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump and saying he was the right person. It

1:07:48.880 --> 1:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>was a very lovely place. What people have seen in

1:07:52.160 --> 1:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this country are governments that get elected on promises and

1:07:55.720 --> 1:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>then break them. And in America you've got a president

1:07:59.520 --> 1:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>who was what he said he was elected to do.

1:08:02.480 --> 1:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>The label on the tin is right and he is

1:08:04.840 --> 1:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>earning credibility. His approval rating in Britton is now a third,

1:08:08.840 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but it was way less than that three years ago,

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>so people are beginning to understand that he is the

1:08:13.920 --> 1:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>right guy. People are starting to get at the UK.

1:08:17.400 --> 1:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>According to Nigel Farage, to the polls back that up.

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't really know, but at least Nigel's

1:08:25.360 --> 1:08:27.519
<v Speaker 1>out there making the case for Trump. And Nigel's got

1:08:27.520 --> 1:08:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that he's got that great British accent. But it's very

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>like inspiring, like oh like, let's go take that let's

1:08:33.439 --> 1:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>go take that hill, good sir. You know, he's very

1:08:35.640 --> 1:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>h he's got the kind of upbeat Britta thing going on.

1:08:38.560 --> 1:08:43.519
<v Speaker 1>Well hello, then he got Sudi Khan, who no surprise,

1:08:43.800 --> 1:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is crashing the president United State. This is the mayor

1:08:47.120 --> 1:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of London. How many of you even really care as

1:08:50.200 --> 1:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the mayor of London. There's a reason I'm bringing this

1:08:52.400 --> 1:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>up that we'll have some problem in the play eighteen.

1:08:54.280 --> 1:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Some of the things that Trump is owner than lost

1:08:56.040 --> 1:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>two three years London is find upon and offensive, rolling

1:09:01.400 --> 1:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>back the reproductive rights of women, separating children from their

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>parents on the Mexican border, introducing a band on Muslim

1:09:09.920 --> 1:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>majority countries, standing up and defending white supremacists, Neo Nazis

1:09:15.160 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and artic mights in Charlesville, amplifying messages from racists in

1:09:20.160 --> 1:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>this country, walking away from the Paris climate a court

1:09:25.560 --> 1:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and I could go on, and by frustration with our

1:09:28.240 --> 1:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister is she's I wouldn't say boo to a goose.

1:09:33.040 --> 1:09:35.479
<v Speaker 1>That's so he's just trashing the president and then the

1:09:35.560 --> 1:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>media trying to get all upset. When Trump responded, let

1:09:37.840 --> 1:09:39.799
<v Speaker 1>me just give you Trump's response to the Mayor of London,

1:09:40.680 --> 1:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Connor reminds me very much of our very dumb and

1:09:43.120 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>incompetent mayor of New York City, build A. Blasio, who

1:09:46.160 --> 1:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>has also done a terrible job. Only Zadig's half his height.

1:09:50.400 --> 1:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>In any event, I look forward to being a great

1:09:52.439 --> 1:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>friend of the United Kingdom, and I'm very much looking

1:09:54.160 --> 1:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>forward to my visit Landing now. You know, I look

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>stand where the presidents supposed to just take it from

1:10:01.760 --> 1:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the mayor of London. I don't think so. I think

1:10:03.240 --> 1:10:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Trump is right swat back at this guy, you know,

1:10:06.640 --> 1:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Sadik Khan, if you want to, you know, if you're

1:10:08.320 --> 1:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna come at the Trump, you better be ready for

1:10:10.479 --> 1:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the CounterPunch, my friend, and Trump Trump throws them with

1:10:13.960 --> 1:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the best of them. It is just a disgrace what

1:10:16.800 --> 1:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>happens onto people based on their sexual orientation, particularly around

1:10:20.720 --> 1:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>the globe, including countries where, by the way, a lot

1:10:23.560 --> 1:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of media companies film their movies. So those who are

1:10:27.040 --> 1:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about pulling other georgiinality happen to film their movies

1:10:30.120 --> 1:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and places that aren't particularly very kind to people of

1:10:34.600 --> 1:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>different orientations. But that aside, the President just tweeted out

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and said a couple of tweets about Pride Month and

1:10:42.680 --> 1:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>about and specifically trying to call try trying to bring

1:10:45.400 --> 1:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>other countries along with what we are doing in the

1:10:47.439 --> 1:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>United States from America and decriminalizing homosexuality. Notice how there's

1:10:54.439 --> 1:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>no credit that you see in immediate least given to

1:10:57.040 --> 1:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the administration for efforts to promote the decriminalization of homosexuality

1:11:02.200 --> 1:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Also note how Kelly and Conway there

1:11:06.280 --> 1:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>without getting too deep into the into the details, just

1:11:09.439 --> 1:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>pointed out how for so many Democrats and leftists who

1:11:14.760 --> 1:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>are willing to hurt economically, hurt cost jobs in the

1:11:18.680 --> 1:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>state of Georgia because the state legislature there did what

1:11:22.320 --> 1:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it should be able to do, which is write laws

1:11:24.840 --> 1:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about abortion. So interesting, isn't it that there are so

1:11:27.680 --> 1:11:31.479
<v Speaker 1>many Democrat females in particular in Hollywood that you'll see

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>who say, oh, you know, women of women of Georgia,

1:11:34.320 --> 1:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we are standing with you. Majority of women in Georgia

1:11:37.200 --> 1:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>agree with the bill. So what does that mean women

1:11:40.400 --> 1:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of Georgia were standing with you. Well, I think if

1:11:43.360 --> 1:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you ask most of the Hollywood and media libs who

1:11:48.320 --> 1:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are disdainful toward Georgia because of this bill, and he said,

1:11:51.400 --> 1:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the percentages of support from women

1:11:55.160 --> 1:11:57.479
<v Speaker 1>in Georgia for this bill? They have absolutely no idea

1:11:57.479 --> 1:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and they wouldn't even care if they found out the

1:11:59.040 --> 1:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>number was a clear majority. They think that this is

1:12:02.240 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 1>this is the fundamental woman's rights issue and This is

1:12:08.560 --> 1:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>then also echoed by Kamala Harris, who is at a

1:12:13.000 --> 1:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>planned Parenthood event in San Francisco, San Francisco, where they

1:12:18.120 --> 1:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>boo you for saying you don't think socialism is the

1:12:21.720 --> 1:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>answer to this country's problems. Here's what Kamala Harris has

1:12:27.120 --> 1:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to say about planned parent or at a planned parenthood event,

1:12:30.760 --> 1:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>which remember, you cannot be a democrat of any power

1:12:33.200 --> 1:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>or a good standing unless you are absolutely supportive of

1:12:35.920 --> 1:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>planned parenthood. Play too. This is a party about our conviction,

1:12:39.880 --> 1:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>our conviction to make sure that every woman has the

1:12:43.720 --> 1:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>right to do whatever she chooses to do with her

1:12:48.240 --> 1:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>life and her body. Every woman has the right to

1:12:53.040 --> 1:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>do whatever she chooses to do with her life and

1:12:55.720 --> 1:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>her body. That's interesting because there are a lot of

1:12:59.000 --> 1:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>things that the state says that a woman cannot choose

1:13:02.400 --> 1:13:04.599
<v Speaker 1>to do with her life and her body. All right,

1:13:04.600 --> 1:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we know this. It is in fact, and it should be.

1:13:08.040 --> 1:13:09.519
<v Speaker 1>It is in fact illegal to try to take your

1:13:09.560 --> 1:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>own life. For example, you know, if someone standing on

1:13:12.280 --> 1:13:15.479
<v Speaker 1>a bridge and the police arrive, you don't get to say, oh, well,

1:13:15.600 --> 1:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm making this decision. It's okay, you guys can go home. No,

1:13:18.960 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>they're going to try to stop you from taking your

1:13:20.560 --> 1:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>own life. You know you could not. You could not

1:13:24.840 --> 1:13:28.519
<v Speaker 1>say as a you know, as a thirteen year old, well,

1:13:28.560 --> 1:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, my body, my choice. I want to

1:13:30.240 --> 1:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>get married to an eighty year old man. You know

1:13:32.280 --> 1:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that that would not the state will not allow you

1:13:34.280 --> 1:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that. That would be illegal. There there are

1:13:36.280 --> 1:13:39.599
<v Speaker 1>plenty of things that already or not. So this is

1:13:39.640 --> 1:13:43.479
<v Speaker 1>this is this reductionist strong man. You know, it's it's

1:13:43.520 --> 1:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>always when you talk about the the pro life versus

1:13:47.160 --> 1:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>versus pro abortion issue, it's never straightforward. There's never a

1:13:51.320 --> 1:13:53.719
<v Speaker 1>willingness to engage on the actual Is this a baby?

1:13:54.000 --> 1:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Is this a human being? If it's a human being

1:13:55.560 --> 1:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have rights, that that's the whole discussion. Everything else

1:13:57.960 --> 1:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is is some secondary propagandistic nonsense. It does not really

1:14:04.120 --> 1:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>mean any It has no meaning except for the fact

1:14:06.960 --> 1:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that it is drummed into people's heads as being what

1:14:09.800 --> 1:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is so very very important, particularly for women and those

1:14:13.800 --> 1:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of you who have heard me talking to the National

1:14:15.360 --> 1:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Organization for Women president and ask her some very straightforward

1:14:18.800 --> 1:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>questions about why do men get to have opinions on

1:14:21.360 --> 1:14:24.599
<v Speaker 1>some things and not on others. According to her, she

1:14:24.680 --> 1:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>was flustered because she's just not used to answering a

1:14:27.080 --> 1:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>real question for a person who's thought about the issue.

1:14:30.560 --> 1:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>But Kamala Harris is not going to come up with

1:14:33.400 --> 1:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>anything worthwhile interesting to say on this, on this because

1:14:36.280 --> 1:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>she has to be doing exactly what Planned Parenthood wants

1:14:39.760 --> 1:14:41.439
<v Speaker 1>her to do, just the way it's going to be.

1:14:42.160 --> 1:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And Kelly and Conway pointing out that Democrats have far

1:14:45.160 --> 1:14:50.799
<v Speaker 1>less of an issue with the practices of foreign countries,

1:14:50.840 --> 1:14:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean foreign governments, especially, let's be honest, Islamic countries

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:57.639
<v Speaker 1>get a pass from the left on how they deal

1:14:57.680 --> 1:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with homosexuality. In particular, Islamic countries are just not because

1:15:02.080 --> 1:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>they're they're non white, non Christian majority countries, although there

1:15:07.680 --> 1:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are both white people and Christians in many Muslim countries,

1:15:10.320 --> 1:15:12.719
<v Speaker 1>but as they are majority and they're considered non white,

1:15:12.720 --> 1:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>non Christian, non Western leftists don't want to have too

1:15:17.520 --> 1:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>much nasty stuff to say about what they do, the

1:15:20.000 --> 1:15:22.799
<v Speaker 1>terrible things that they will do to same sex couples,

1:15:22.800 --> 1:15:27.479
<v Speaker 1>to same sex individuals, same sex attracted individuals. So there's

1:15:27.479 --> 1:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>just a huge double standard because the so called liberalism

1:15:30.920 --> 1:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of the left in this country is full of contradictions

1:15:36.040 --> 1:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the moment we take it outside US borders, all of

1:15:38.200 --> 1:15:43.519
<v Speaker 1>a sudden they fall into this anti colonial and anti

1:15:43.600 --> 1:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Western dialectic. I mean, they turn into this, well, you know,

1:15:47.720 --> 1:15:49.599
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to be pushy about what we think.

1:15:49.640 --> 1:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>They'll push be pushy about everything here in America, fundamental rights,

1:15:53.000 --> 1:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll call them. But then abroad when it comes to

1:15:54.800 --> 1:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>homosexuality and the decriminalization of it, they get very all

1:16:00.160 --> 1:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, they get very confused, very quiet. They

1:16:02.680 --> 1:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have much to say about it at all. By

1:16:04.200 --> 1:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, I mean, this is all really just unfortunately

1:16:07.320 --> 1:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a function of how crazy the left has become in

1:16:09.760 --> 1:16:14.519
<v Speaker 1>the era of Trump. Because of Trump's arrangement syndrome, you

1:16:14.680 --> 1:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>can't expect to have a civil conversation with people anymore.

1:16:17.080 --> 1:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons why I'm I'm just I can't.

1:16:20.640 --> 1:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't just sit around playing footsie with leftists. I mean,

1:16:23.840 --> 1:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a wartime conservative. Now. Ideologically speaking, here's what lunatic

1:16:28.439 --> 1:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>leftists do in places like DC. This happened in DC

1:16:31.080 --> 1:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>because the guy I was wearing a Maga hat play

1:16:32.760 --> 1:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>clip four. That creates cruelty. So let me tell you

1:16:36.720 --> 1:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a little mister, white male primis mother. When was America

1:16:39.960 --> 1:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>great for you? You? Huh? When was America great for you?

1:16:43.920 --> 1:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>When they stuck a little in all of the sick

1:16:46.120 --> 1:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>people who wearing in the slave ships? When was America

1:16:49.000 --> 1:16:53.559
<v Speaker 1>great for you? That's the price you pay for wearing

1:16:53.600 --> 1:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a you know, getting yelled at like that. That is

1:16:56.640 --> 1:16:58.599
<v Speaker 1>the price you pay for wearing a make America Great

1:16:58.640 --> 1:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Again hat in DC. That's the price, That's what That's

1:17:03.240 --> 1:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>what you subject yourself to. People have asked me, would

1:17:05.160 --> 1:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I be willing to walk around DC? Someone actually just

1:17:07.680 --> 1:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>said it to me over the weekend. Would I walk

1:17:09.640 --> 1:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>around here? I am in what is now the town

1:17:12.240 --> 1:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that I call home, although New York is still really

1:17:14.800 --> 1:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>my home. Would I feel comfortable with the answers? No?

1:17:18.040 --> 1:17:20.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean I wouldn't feel comfortable because somebody would say

1:17:20.640 --> 1:17:22.559
<v Speaker 1>something and I would say something back, and we would

1:17:22.560 --> 1:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have an incident, and you never know, I know a

1:17:24.640 --> 1:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people would say, oh fuck, you know, you

1:17:26.280 --> 1:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta just you know, tell those libs and you know

1:17:28.720 --> 1:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>if they lay a hand on you. And yeah, those

1:17:31.080 --> 1:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of you who have been in scraps and issues in

1:17:32.960 --> 1:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the street, you know, you know, you just want to

1:17:35.479 --> 1:17:37.479
<v Speaker 1>avoid that stuff. You don't know what's gonna happen. Who's

1:17:37.479 --> 1:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna pull what, who's gonna say you said what or

1:17:39.960 --> 1:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>did what? Or you know? But you can't even wear

1:17:42.280 --> 1:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a hat that the President United States wears in Washington,

1:17:46.400 --> 1:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>DC and feel safe. That's the America we live in now.

1:17:52.479 --> 1:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>We have a problem with racism in America today. If

1:17:57.360 --> 1:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this country wasn't racist, Stacey Abrams would be governor. Ah

1:18:05.960 --> 1:18:09.479
<v Speaker 1>go to the racism well when in doubt, Candidate Seth

1:18:10.040 --> 1:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Molton would be Democrat nominee for the presidency. He knows

1:18:14.240 --> 1:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that that the move the maneuver. If you want to

1:18:16.560 --> 1:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>get everyone clapping for you, just talk about how racist

1:18:19.120 --> 1:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>America is racist compared to what I would always want

1:18:23.680 --> 1:18:27.559
<v Speaker 1>to know. Find me a country that has our level

1:18:27.840 --> 1:18:34.599
<v Speaker 1>of ethnic and ideological and nationality based diversity, and tell

1:18:34.640 --> 1:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>me and show me that they get along better, are

1:18:37.280 --> 1:18:39.719
<v Speaker 1>more decent to each other than we are in this country.

1:18:40.280 --> 1:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>It does not exist. This is the This is the

1:18:43.240 --> 1:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>little secret that leftist never talk about here, but we

1:18:45.840 --> 1:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>are actually an incredibly agreeable with each other nation state,

1:18:53.800 --> 1:18:56.519
<v Speaker 1>especially given the degree of diversity and everything else that

1:18:56.560 --> 1:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we have. You know, yeah, there's not a lot of

1:19:00.439 --> 1:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>day to day struggles with racism in Japan because it's

1:19:03.280 --> 1:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>basically all Japanese people. It's a little different, you know,

1:19:05.880 --> 1:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't they don't have different races that have the

1:19:08.720 --> 1:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>possibility of day to day racism. But if you ask

1:19:11.520 --> 1:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in some of these countries or

1:19:13.200 --> 1:19:16.519
<v Speaker 1>have spent time in these countries, well, what are the

1:19:16.520 --> 1:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>attitudes of the people like they are truly xenophobic in

1:19:19.360 --> 1:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>those other countries? They do not like outsiders, they do

1:19:22.439 --> 1:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>not want outsiders, They do not have immigration, they do

1:19:24.479 --> 1:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>not allow immigration. So I just think just start from

1:19:28.960 --> 1:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this premise that we're always being told how racioust America is.

1:19:31.680 --> 1:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the the talking point for liberals

1:19:34.320 --> 1:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>when they have either nothing to say or you know,

1:19:37.320 --> 1:19:39.719
<v Speaker 1>just want to make sure that they get a cheap

1:19:39.800 --> 1:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>round of applause. It is the ultimate cheap applause line

1:19:42.920 --> 1:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that America is a racist country. And Seth Molton is

1:19:46.400 --> 1:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a guy who look, I mean, he's running for president

1:19:48.479 --> 1:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for his own reasons. I couldn't begin to understand what

1:19:52.080 --> 1:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they are because he's not gonna win. He's not even

1:19:54.920 --> 1:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get above one percent. So why but I suppose

1:19:58.320 --> 1:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>here I am talking about him on national video. So

1:20:00.479 --> 1:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's that, But he says that the country wasn't racist,

1:20:04.200 --> 1:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Abrams would be governor. There was record turnout for

1:20:09.439 --> 1:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the governor's race in Georgia. Why is racism? And the

1:20:13.640 --> 1:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>reasons Stacy Abrams didn't win? What great background of achievement

1:20:18.120 --> 1:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in politics or in leadership? It's Stacy Abrams? Hap, No, no

1:20:20.680 --> 1:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>no one even really seems to ever start there. Why

1:20:25.280 --> 1:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>would Stacy Abrams be governor if the country wasn't racist.

1:20:29.280 --> 1:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the country's fault that she didn't win the governorship.

1:20:32.240 --> 1:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is a stupid statement. I mean, this is

1:20:34.200 --> 1:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>a dumb thing to say. But Malton, I'm sure as

1:20:37.479 --> 1:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a bright guy, I mean, I'm you know, I think

1:20:39.120 --> 1:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he has fancy schools and everything. But as you know,

1:20:41.040 --> 1:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I always tell you the fancy schools and it doesn't

1:20:43.680 --> 1:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>mean what it used to. That's all changed a lot.

1:20:47.760 --> 1:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>But it also brings me to ask the question, you know,

1:20:51.000 --> 1:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is it is it even possible in the mind of

1:20:55.080 --> 1:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a leftist in America today to be racist a white people?

1:21:01.920 --> 1:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Is is that possible? I wonder? I asked the question

1:21:04.400 --> 1:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>just because over the weekend there was a tweet from

1:21:08.240 --> 1:21:12.719
<v Speaker 1>a verified account named Sarah raw So she's a blue check.

1:21:12.760 --> 1:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>She's one of the journalism Cadre online, and she shared

1:21:20.000 --> 1:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this tweet, this gem of analysis. White people have done

1:21:23.200 --> 1:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>everything to make my life miserable, Yet I'm supposed to

1:21:26.120 --> 1:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>not hate white people. She's a writer and columnist for

1:21:29.800 --> 1:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Brown Girl magazine and she's verified. Is that okay to say?

1:21:36.479 --> 1:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I say, is that okay? I'm not

1:21:38.080 --> 1:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not calling for censorship of it. I'm not saying

1:21:40.320 --> 1:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's hate speech. But isn't that racist? Isn't it

1:21:44.439 --> 1:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for somebody who's saying that white people make her make

1:21:47.080 --> 1:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>her life miserable, and why shouldn't she hate white people?

1:21:49.320 --> 1:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of racist, right? I don't know. If you

1:21:51.200 --> 1:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to leftists, they'll tell you that it's not possible

1:21:55.080 --> 1:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>because of the power dynamics at work in intersectionality. It is,

1:22:00.439 --> 1:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in fact, not possible for a non white person to

1:22:06.280 --> 1:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>be racist in America against white people. Maybe it's possible

1:22:09.400 --> 1:22:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in some other country, although I think that's probably doubtful.

1:22:12.920 --> 1:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrats would find that doubtful too. But if you want

1:22:16.160 --> 1:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to test out the theory, here's an example. I mean,

1:22:19.600 --> 1:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>this is the question, is it possible in this country

1:22:22.479 --> 1:22:25.479
<v Speaker 1>to be racist against white people, and that's can you

1:22:25.560 --> 1:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>be hateful toward white people in a way that would

1:22:27.880 --> 1:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>be described as racism? I obviously think the answer is yes.

1:22:31.040 --> 1:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of those topics of discussion

1:22:34.160 --> 1:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>that we're it's so radioactive. You know, you're not allowed

1:22:37.680 --> 1:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to you're not allowed to go there and not allowed

1:22:39.400 --> 1:22:42.559
<v Speaker 1>to have this. Why why can't we talk about this? Why?

1:22:42.680 --> 1:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't it worth our time to delve into whether

1:22:44.880 --> 1:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>or not America is a country where it is possible

1:22:47.680 --> 1:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to be racist against and then if it's possible, is

1:22:50.760 --> 1:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>there as arising tide of racism against white people from

1:22:55.760 --> 1:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>some non white individuals in America? Is that a conversation

1:22:58.680 --> 1:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that's even possible to you have? You might say, oh no, Buck,

1:23:02.680 --> 1:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we can't have a conversation. Okay, fine, Well I would

1:23:05.240 --> 1:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>want to know that how do we deal with this?

1:23:07.680 --> 1:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>There was a concert up in Nova Scotia, and this

1:23:13.560 --> 1:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is from the Daily Wire. Ledo Pimienta, a Colombian Canadian singer,

1:23:19.400 --> 1:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>asked audience members of color, Now this is in Canada,

1:23:23.200 --> 1:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>so don't people you don't have the yellow me o everybody?

1:23:24.960 --> 1:23:27.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean Canada, America were pretty much the same deal,

1:23:28.439 --> 1:23:30.599
<v Speaker 1>asked audience members of color to move to the front

1:23:30.640 --> 1:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and white members to move to the back. Unlike other

1:23:34.080 --> 1:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>times she made that request, some white members of the

1:23:36.840 --> 1:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>audience refused to act in accordance with her command, including

1:23:42.040 --> 1:23:45.479
<v Speaker 1>a white female volunteer who was reportedly there to photograph

1:23:45.560 --> 1:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the show. Now, this is really interesting, According to the

1:23:51.160 --> 1:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>National Post, ali Omanic quay, I don't know how to

1:23:56.040 --> 1:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>say that. Who shares management with Pimienta said, a female

1:23:59.320 --> 1:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>photographer would not budge from her position near the stage,

1:24:02.520 --> 1:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>prompting anger from some crowd members. Omenk Kay, whose version

1:24:07.080 --> 1:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of events was confirmed by festival spokesperson Trevor Murphy, said

1:24:11.439 --> 1:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that Pimienta, the performer here, just kept saying, moved to

1:24:15.800 --> 1:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the back. Finally, after saying it about ten times, white

1:24:19.120 --> 1:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>people moved to the back and the woman refused to move,

1:24:22.479 --> 1:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Pimienta said, you're cutting into my set time and you're

1:24:24.720 --> 1:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>disrespecting these women, and I don't have time for this.

1:24:28.800 --> 1:24:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So you now can be at a concert in Canada,

1:24:32.800 --> 1:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>but this could apply to America too, and the person

1:24:36.200 --> 1:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>who is there to entertain you could say, white people,

1:24:38.880 --> 1:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to go and have let's be honest, back

1:24:42.280 --> 1:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of the concert, you're gonna have a worse view. So

1:24:45.880 --> 1:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>give up your place, moved to the back of the

1:24:48.920 --> 1:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>venue and let people of color take your place in

1:24:51.479 --> 1:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the front. And if you, as a paying customer at

1:24:55.120 --> 1:24:58.599
<v Speaker 1>the concert, have an issue with that, you're the problem.

1:24:59.400 --> 1:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the and you're supposed to take away from this.

1:25:01.560 --> 1:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>You are the problem. White people go to the back.

1:25:05.760 --> 1:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm white. I don't think that I should be judged

1:25:07.360 --> 1:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>by my skin color. I'm here, I got here early.

1:25:09.840 --> 1:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I I like my position in the crowd. No, no,

1:25:13.560 --> 1:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to give up your position in the credit

1:25:15.080 --> 1:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>if you give it up to a person of color.

1:25:16.360 --> 1:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>If you don't, you're racist and you're part of the problem.

1:25:20.320 --> 1:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>That seems quite extreme, doesn't it. I wonder what the

1:25:25.320 --> 1:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the concert organizers thought of this. Oh, we know what

1:25:29.040 --> 1:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>they think of this. Again, thanks to some very good

1:25:33.320 --> 1:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>work from the Daily Wire quote the board of directors

1:25:35.920 --> 1:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>for Halifax Pop Explosion that sounds like quite a party,

1:25:40.080 --> 1:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>issued this statement, we will not accept this behavior, and

1:25:43.479 --> 1:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>neither should you be responsible for your friends. Talk to that. Wait,

1:25:48.000 --> 1:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>hold on, you might be thinking, buck. They said they

1:25:50.720 --> 1:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>will not accept this behavior. Whose behavior do you think

1:25:52.640 --> 1:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>they have a problem with the music. Act. That's telling people,

1:25:58.840 --> 1:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're white, go to the back of the room

1:26:00.439 --> 1:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>where you can't see. Oh no, that's not the person

1:26:03.479 --> 1:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>who had a problem with quote. Be responsible for your friends,

1:26:06.880 --> 1:26:08.599
<v Speaker 1>talk to them and support them as they move toward

1:26:08.760 --> 1:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>unpacking their racism. People of color deserve safe spaces, and

1:26:12.800 --> 1:26:15.479
<v Speaker 1>it is your responsibility to help. It is also ours

1:26:16.040 --> 1:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to the performer. Leto Pimienta, we are sorry that one

1:26:19.800 --> 1:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of our volunteers interrupted your art, your show, and your

1:26:22.400 --> 1:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>audience by being aggressive and racist. We have so much

1:26:25.920 --> 1:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>respect for the art and music you create and the

1:26:27.880 --> 1:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>space you make for women, people of color, transgender and

1:26:30.280 --> 1:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>non binary people. The way you interact with the world

1:26:33.080 --> 1:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>provide such a thoughtful example. You're a role model to us.

1:26:36.040 --> 1:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>We see it, we feel it. We hope you work

1:26:37.439 --> 1:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>with us again. That's right, folks, the woman who says

1:26:40.360 --> 1:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>white people go to the back of the venue so

1:26:42.520 --> 1:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>other people can see better because white people are racist

1:26:45.240 --> 1:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>than a problem, this is what they want. They want

1:26:50.439 --> 1:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to work with her again in the future. She's a

1:26:52.400 --> 1:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>model for a role model for others. Now, did one

1:26:56.439 --> 1:26:58.559
<v Speaker 1>of the white people who in the crowd say something

1:26:58.600 --> 1:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>really nasty. There's some report that someone said something that

1:27:01.680 --> 1:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>was bad or a gross or racist. I don't know

1:27:04.160 --> 1:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not I have not seen the specifics on it.

1:27:07.200 --> 1:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I have not seen a quote about it. And it's

1:27:11.000 --> 1:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>tough to tell. I mean, is it nasty and racist

1:27:13.320 --> 1:27:15.360
<v Speaker 1>for a white person to say I pay the same

1:27:15.439 --> 1:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>ticket price as everybody else? This is a standing show,

1:27:18.520 --> 1:27:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and I'm standing where I'm standing, and I'm not going

1:27:20.479 --> 1:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to just go to the back because I'm told to

1:27:22.400 --> 1:27:25.759
<v Speaker 1>go to the back back of the room at the concert.

1:27:25.840 --> 1:27:27.559
<v Speaker 1>It's what you're told now if you're white, and if

1:27:27.600 --> 1:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't do it, you're a problem. I think you

1:27:31.200 --> 1:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>might recognize this mentality is not limited just to this

1:27:34.920 --> 1:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>one concert. Confront your privilege. You're told now, confront your privilege,

1:27:39.880 --> 1:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>which means, oftentimes be lectured by very stupid people on

1:27:44.920 --> 1:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the left about how you need to do what they say,

1:27:47.880 --> 1:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to agree with different social policies, different political positions,

1:27:52.080 --> 1:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>or else you're a racist. This is a position of

1:27:56.320 --> 1:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>white and non white leftists. And if you fight back

1:27:59.400 --> 1:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>against this or you reject this, you are automatically a problem.

1:28:03.960 --> 1:28:05.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the country that we are living in now, Folks,

1:28:05.840 --> 1:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>This is what we are dealing with. And that's why

1:28:07.760 --> 1:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>someone like Seth Moulton can get up and just say

1:28:10.120 --> 1:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>America is a racist country. Because of the country wasn't racist,

1:28:13.280 --> 1:28:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Stacey Abrams would be governor, and there's wild cheering for

1:28:16.080 --> 1:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>him saying something that is just baseless and stupid and

1:28:20.400 --> 1:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>pandering Americans working into their seventies. This is becoming really common.

1:28:27.120 --> 1:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I was just talking to somebody about this over the weekend,

1:28:29.479 --> 1:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and now I see there's some new data in a

1:28:33.120 --> 1:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>news story. Here. Let me just give you some of

1:28:34.640 --> 1:28:36.519
<v Speaker 1>the facts and figures about this that we can talk

1:28:36.560 --> 1:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>about how this is. My expectation is this is going

1:28:39.680 --> 1:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to become the norm, and that retirement is going to

1:28:43.160 --> 1:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be something that people will think of in some ways

1:28:47.080 --> 1:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the way we now think about like working a seven

1:28:48.960 --> 1:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>day workweek or so. It's just not gonna not going

1:28:51.280 --> 1:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the norm. But here's this piece on courts.

1:28:56.280 --> 1:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Catherine Abraham, and economic professor at the University of Maryland

1:28:59.680 --> 1:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with was chatting with her hairdresser one night about her

1:29:02.200 --> 1:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>retirement plans. The economists said she plans to continue working

1:29:05.120 --> 1:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>because she wants to and has no plans for retiring.

1:29:07.760 --> 1:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>The hairdresser agreed, but for different reasons she needs the money.

1:29:11.760 --> 1:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Both scenarios are contributing to a big increase of the

1:29:14.960 --> 1:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>number of people in US working into their seventies. Over

1:29:19.000 --> 1:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty years, the share of Americans working in

1:29:21.479 --> 1:29:23.519
<v Speaker 1>their seventies has risen from less than ten percent to

1:29:23.680 --> 1:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>nearly fifteen percent, according to Census data. Now, this is

1:29:27.720 --> 1:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>there are some good reasons for this, or at least

1:29:29.800 --> 1:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>some reasons that are are only really positive as people

1:29:33.280 --> 1:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are living longer and healthier lives. So folks who are

1:29:39.200 --> 1:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in their seventies now are very sharp mind, feeling healthy

1:29:46.000 --> 1:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and fit, and plenty of energy, and they got all

1:29:47.960 --> 1:29:51.519
<v Speaker 1>they got a lot of stuff to do, whereas even

1:29:51.640 --> 1:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty forty years ago, people in their seventies tended to

1:29:53.920 --> 1:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>just have more wear and tear on their bodies, not

1:29:56.880 --> 1:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>quite the same energy level. You know, the met has improved,

1:30:01.479 --> 1:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>not as much as I would like it to have

1:30:02.800 --> 1:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>improved in that period, but medicine has improved somewhat. And

1:30:06.840 --> 1:30:10.719
<v Speaker 1>now looking at the way forward, I mean, there's obviously

1:30:10.800 --> 1:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>also a major economic incentive for people to work even later.

1:30:14.960 --> 1:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>But I mean my expectation is that unless you're in

1:30:17.800 --> 1:30:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a unless you're in a job that has a defined

1:30:19.880 --> 1:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>benefit plan and you know you hit You're certain. This

1:30:22.880 --> 1:30:24.719
<v Speaker 1>is true for a lot of public sector workers, although

1:30:24.720 --> 1:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I think fewer now than it used to be the case.

1:30:27.080 --> 1:30:29.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, you hit your end date and you're done.

1:30:29.520 --> 1:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, you hit that golden retirement day, and it's

1:30:31.960 --> 1:30:33.559
<v Speaker 1>all over for you in terms of having to show

1:30:33.600 --> 1:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>up to an office. A lot of people are going

1:30:35.400 --> 1:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to work in their seventies. I don't know how much

1:30:37.479 --> 1:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a bad thing. I think people who choose to

1:30:39.800 --> 1:30:42.479
<v Speaker 1>work in their seventies it's probably a great thing. You

1:30:42.760 --> 1:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>stay active, you stay But by the way, I believe

1:30:46.479 --> 1:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>how old is Warren Buffett? For example? Now he's super rich,

1:30:49.479 --> 1:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, but he's just an example of somebody who

1:30:52.920 --> 1:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>really likes what he's doing, and what would he do

1:30:54.680 --> 1:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if he wasn't doing it? Eighty eight, folks, Warren Buffett

1:30:58.479 --> 1:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is eighty eight years old, and he's worth tens of

1:31:02.000 --> 1:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars, still drives an old car. You know,

1:31:04.479 --> 1:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he likes living this persona. I don't think

1:31:07.080 --> 1:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's he's not oblivious to the fact that everyone thinks

1:31:11.840 --> 1:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of him like America's super rich grandfather but he's a

1:31:15.240 --> 1:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>guy who likes what he's doing it and this retirement

1:31:18.320 --> 1:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>for some people if you've been working in an a

1:31:20.240 --> 1:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>manual labor job or yeah, I get it. You know

1:31:22.479 --> 1:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you need to rest your body and you want to

1:31:24.320 --> 1:31:27.439
<v Speaker 1>go and play bocci ball and tennis and all this stuff.

1:31:27.520 --> 1:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>If you're somebody who shows up to an air conditioned

1:31:31.520 --> 1:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>office and you're looking at a screen and you like

1:31:33.280 --> 1:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what you do, you like your colleagues, and you're making

1:31:35.160 --> 1:31:37.519
<v Speaker 1>good money. And I think a lot of people you

1:31:37.560 --> 1:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>know that that number is fifteen percent of Americans working

1:31:40.080 --> 1:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>into their seventies. I think you're gonna see you go

1:31:42.000 --> 1:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to twenty and then twenty five. I really do. I

1:31:44.280 --> 1:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna have almost My guests would be the

1:31:46.240 --> 1:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>next ten years, you're gonna have a quarter of people

1:31:47.880 --> 1:31:50.439
<v Speaker 1>working into their seventies, and that will get closer to

1:31:50.600 --> 1:31:53.479
<v Speaker 1>being you know, and I think from there it probably

1:31:53.479 --> 1:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>just keeps going up too. People are living longer and

1:31:55.920 --> 1:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>just changing. Just in an interesting little side note that

1:31:58.439 --> 1:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>came up in a conversation with a friend this week,

1:32:00.080 --> 1:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, hey, man, like, you know, when

1:32:02.240 --> 1:32:03.519
<v Speaker 1>when would you want to retire? I was like, I

1:32:03.600 --> 1:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Do I get to keep doing radio. If

1:32:06.320 --> 1:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I get to keep doing radio, I don't think I

1:32:07.800 --> 1:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>retire at all, retire when I don't have a voice,

1:32:12.479 --> 1:32:15.479
<v Speaker 1>which hopefully that's not going to happen. Speaking of voices,

1:32:16.080 --> 1:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I will use mine to tell you about Roll Call

1:32:18.280 --> 1:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>coming up here in just a moment. The show ain't

1:32:23.360 --> 1:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>over yet, folks, keeping it real, It's time for roll call, man.

1:32:45.120 --> 1:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It really does feel like summer finally. Isn't that nice?

1:32:48.080 --> 1:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that a good thing? It's about time. Let's see

1:32:52.479 --> 1:32:56.519
<v Speaker 1>here we have Facebook dot com slashbuck Sexton. If people

1:32:56.640 --> 1:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>want to get in on the roll call party, Matt

1:33:00.120 --> 1:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you up first here, Hey Bucky. If you need an

1:33:01.920 --> 1:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>idea for a good show, check out the expanse on

1:33:04.880 --> 1:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Prime. They've got three seasons and the fourth one

1:33:09.040 --> 1:33:10.519
<v Speaker 1>is on the way. If you're looking for something like

1:33:10.640 --> 1:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones only hard sci fi, this is the

1:33:13.800 --> 1:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>show for you. It's not like Star Trek where they

1:33:16.439 --> 1:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>have gravity panels and force fields and photon torpedos. It's

1:33:19.920 --> 1:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>way more grounded in a way that we might actually

1:33:23.400 --> 1:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>achieve someday. You check it out. I can't recommend it

1:33:25.920 --> 1:33:29.559
<v Speaker 1>strongly enough. PS If you're not hooked by the second episode,

1:33:29.640 --> 1:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the show is not for you. Well, I appreciate the

1:33:33.760 --> 1:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>very thorough and helpful endorsement, my friend. Thank you so

1:33:38.920 --> 1:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>much for writing in with it and good to chat

1:33:42.000 --> 1:33:43.639
<v Speaker 1>with you about it. Thank you so much. I will

1:33:43.720 --> 1:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>check out the expense. I like I like escapist fair

1:33:47.560 --> 1:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on the various channels that I watched now and I

1:33:52.160 --> 1:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>am increasingly now a digital on demand person. With my viewing,

1:33:54.880 --> 1:33:58.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm i'm I'm, I think I'm gonna. I think I'm gonna. Well,

1:33:58.680 --> 1:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the only reason I don't is the news. But there

1:34:01.000 --> 1:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>must be ways that I can watch news without being

1:34:03.000 --> 1:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a cable subscriber. I think I'm gonna bail on cable.

1:34:05.600 --> 1:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>If I could just get the major news channels Fox

1:34:08.960 --> 1:34:12.760
<v Speaker 1>for information, CNN for comedy, I would be a cord

1:34:12.800 --> 1:34:15.240
<v Speaker 1>cutter because I don't watch the other cable channels. I

1:34:15.360 --> 1:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>watched digital shows a la carte, So I'm one of

1:34:18.160 --> 1:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>these great Beard millennial types. Clay right, hey, Buck, great show.

1:34:23.920 --> 1:34:26.240
<v Speaker 1>One night. Not too long ago, you mentioned something about

1:34:26.280 --> 1:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Drudge Report smartphone app not working. Well, there's an alternative

1:34:30.520 --> 1:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>called The Report. It has Drudge and other conservative newspeeds.

1:34:34.000 --> 1:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks and shields high. Well, Clay, I was unaware of that,

1:34:37.000 --> 1:34:39.320
<v Speaker 1>so I will check it out. Apparently there weren't that

1:34:39.400 --> 1:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>many of us who were really interested in the Drudge app,

1:34:43.840 --> 1:34:45.479
<v Speaker 1>or at least I guess it wasn't popular enough that

1:34:45.479 --> 1:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they would keep it. I love the Drudge app. I

1:34:47.760 --> 1:34:49.679
<v Speaker 1>used it on my phone all the time. I don't

1:34:49.680 --> 1:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>know why it had to go away. Now they want

1:34:51.080 --> 1:34:52.760
<v Speaker 1>people to go to the site site and not use

1:34:52.840 --> 1:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the app. Well, it is what it is, Bob, Buck.

1:34:57.000 --> 1:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to call you via iHeart. I'm trying to

1:34:59.240 --> 1:35:02.479
<v Speaker 1>call you about a new technology we're developing, et cetera,

1:35:02.520 --> 1:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Personal information, Personal information. All right, Bob, let

1:35:06.760 --> 1:35:11.760
<v Speaker 1>me let me take a look and don't check it out, Jean, right,

1:35:12.160 --> 1:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>howdy Buck. I rather the President made a comment on

1:35:14.160 --> 1:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>suppressors that was not positive. He said I don't like

1:35:17.400 --> 1:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>them when asked about the reason shooting. One of the

1:35:19.560 --> 1:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons I voted for him in twenty sixteen was to

1:35:22.439 --> 1:35:27.800
<v Speaker 1>protect and expand the Second Amendment. I understand expansion is

1:35:27.840 --> 1:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>hard because of Congress, but if he were to banned suppressors,

1:35:30.240 --> 1:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>which are highly regular through the NFA, I will not

1:35:32.800 --> 1:35:35.240
<v Speaker 1>vote for him. In twenty twenty, was wondering what your

1:35:35.280 --> 1:35:39.559
<v Speaker 1>thoughts are, well, John, as somebody who has both fired

1:35:39.680 --> 1:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of suppressed weapons and has even advertised for

1:35:43.880 --> 1:35:47.559
<v Speaker 1>suppressors in the past in my radio on my radio program,

1:35:47.600 --> 1:35:51.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm obviously I'm obviously in favor of suppressors. I think

1:35:51.600 --> 1:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the hearing damage from shooting, and this would make me

1:35:54.080 --> 1:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>sound maybe a little whimpy, but I'm somebody who wants

1:35:56.439 --> 1:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear as well as I can see as well

1:35:58.040 --> 1:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>as I can have my teeth for his long as

1:36:00.439 --> 1:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I can. And the hearing damage from from firing guns

1:36:04.880 --> 1:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is very real unless you have good ear pro which

1:36:07.200 --> 1:36:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I know of those of you who are shooting, I'm

1:36:08.479 --> 1:36:11.280
<v Speaker 1>sure you use that, but it would be nice to

1:36:11.479 --> 1:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>even dampen it down more. And anybody who's ever fired

1:36:15.280 --> 1:36:17.439
<v Speaker 1>a rifle with a suppressor on it knows that this

1:36:17.680 --> 1:36:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is not it's not p pup, not at all. And

1:36:22.200 --> 1:36:25.320
<v Speaker 1>even a twenty two calibers with a silencer on it,

1:36:25.479 --> 1:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>that can sound pretty pretty darn quiet. But anything above

1:36:29.840 --> 1:36:33.439
<v Speaker 1>that caliber you're gonna hear it, and they're already heavily regulated.

1:36:33.479 --> 1:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So look, I just think the president doesn't really know

1:36:35.320 --> 1:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>anything about I'm just gonna say it. I just don't

1:36:37.040 --> 1:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>think he knows anything about suppressors and probably has a

1:36:40.520 --> 1:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>action movie view of them, as you can run around

1:36:44.120 --> 1:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>with a silencer on an MP five, for example, and

1:36:47.280 --> 1:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it just goes pupe pup. It does not go pupu.

1:36:50.280 --> 1:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So as you can tell it like making that noise,

1:36:52.280 --> 1:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's much louder than that. Josh, Right, how about love

1:36:57.120 --> 1:37:00.519
<v Speaker 1>the show. I've been listening since the early Blazed days.

1:37:01.479 --> 1:37:04.479
<v Speaker 1>On Friday, you hinted at a founding father that family

1:37:04.560 --> 1:37:07.679
<v Speaker 1>lore says you're related to. You said the forgotten Founder.

1:37:07.760 --> 1:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So my guess is John Jay. He was a huge

1:37:09.960 --> 1:37:12.760
<v Speaker 1>contributor to early America. You never hear his name. Am

1:37:12.800 --> 1:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I close? Shields high? Josh, Josh, it's a good guess,

1:37:17.960 --> 1:37:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but I can't say it's close, because that's not, in

1:37:19.880 --> 1:37:23.760
<v Speaker 1>fact the one that I am, according to family were

1:37:23.760 --> 1:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>related to. According to family lare I am related to

1:37:26.120 --> 1:37:30.720
<v Speaker 1>George Mason pretty directly. I mean the family tree is

1:37:30.800 --> 1:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>like a well it's not a telephone pole. That would

1:37:32.880 --> 1:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be weird, but it's a pretty straight line according to again,

1:37:35.320 --> 1:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>according to family law, I don't know. I don't I

1:37:37.720 --> 1:37:39.320
<v Speaker 1>don't spend as much time on these things, as some

1:37:39.360 --> 1:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>other folks do. But that is at least a story

1:37:41.760 --> 1:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that we tell people drinking mint julips the cocktail parties

1:37:44.880 --> 1:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in the South out on a lawn, because that's how

1:37:46.920 --> 1:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we do. John right shields high Fan since the real

1:37:51.000 --> 1:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>news days, Man, so many of you the listen have

1:37:53.240 --> 1:37:54.840
<v Speaker 1>been with me for many, many years now, and that

1:37:55.000 --> 1:37:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is a huge testament, and I really really do appreciate it.

1:37:58.560 --> 1:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I heard that the sharn Noble guy, a Russian, said

1:38:01.880 --> 1:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>something about gun deaths in America. I find this amazing

1:38:05.400 --> 1:38:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that someone from mother Russia, where a gun was made

1:38:07.920 --> 1:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that has killed countless numbers of people, tries to make

1:38:09.920 --> 1:38:13.559
<v Speaker 1>America and American guns the problem. I think a lot

1:38:13.600 --> 1:38:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of times folks like this just like to throw this

1:38:15.479 --> 1:38:17.519
<v Speaker 1>stuff out so they get invited to the elite parties

1:38:17.520 --> 1:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>where they serve bacon rap shrimp. Combie Bear leaves John.

1:38:21.960 --> 1:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>First of all, bacon rap shrimp are incredible, So we

1:38:25.240 --> 1:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>start with that fundamental truth. I cannot just let that

1:38:29.120 --> 1:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>go without noting. Now the real question, though, is if

1:38:33.720 --> 1:38:36.519
<v Speaker 1>you could only have one, do you go bacon rap

1:38:36.640 --> 1:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>shrimp or scalop rap shrimp or I'm sorry, wait, bacon

1:38:43.160 --> 1:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>rap scalops, scalop rap shrimp. WHOA, that was weird. I

1:38:46.800 --> 1:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know about that. That's the different dish. No bacon

1:38:49.800 --> 1:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>rap scallop or bacon rap shrimp. I probably go the scalop.

1:38:53.400 --> 1:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest with you. It's a little bougie of me.

1:38:56.320 --> 1:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>As to your point about Russia, I don't know who

1:38:59.000 --> 1:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this Russian is that had this about the guns. But

1:39:01.560 --> 1:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people all over the world try to

1:39:04.560 --> 1:39:06.559
<v Speaker 1>dump on America because they make it makes them They

1:39:06.800 --> 1:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>think it makes them sound more sophisticated, more in touch

1:39:10.280 --> 1:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>with you know, blah blah whatever. So that's not unusual,

1:39:14.280 --> 1:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but we tend to ignore them. Ben writes, your Bill

1:39:18.040 --> 1:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Barr impression is on point. Great work. Did I do

1:39:22.040 --> 1:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a Bill Barr impression? I don't remember if I did,

1:39:25.280 --> 1:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was on point. That's great, But I feel

1:39:26.960 --> 1:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like I don't remember doing that, but I might have

1:39:29.320 --> 1:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>done it. I don't remember a lot of things that

1:39:30.720 --> 1:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I say on this show, which is always sometimes the

1:39:32.960 --> 1:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>better things I say just come out of my mouth

1:39:35.280 --> 1:39:37.599
<v Speaker 1>because that stream of consciousness, and somebody will point out

1:39:37.640 --> 1:39:39.519
<v Speaker 1>to me that thing you said last week about the thing,

1:39:40.040 --> 1:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'll say Yeah, that was amazing. Did I really

1:39:45.000 --> 1:39:46.519
<v Speaker 1>say that? Did that really come out of my mouth?

1:39:46.600 --> 1:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But that does tend to happen. Here we go, Sean says,

1:39:52.120 --> 1:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's rather appropriate and hilarious that your Joy

1:39:55.360 --> 1:39:59.639
<v Speaker 1>beharror impression sounds like Harvey Fierstein. Well, look, it's Joy

1:39:59.760 --> 1:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>bay Aha on the View. You know here. She is

1:40:04.200 --> 1:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just getting paid millions to talk like this to everyone

1:40:07.240 --> 1:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know here, I am. It's got to go a

1:40:09.040 --> 1:40:12.599
<v Speaker 1>little higher, you know. Yeah, why is Trump so terrible?

1:40:13.120 --> 1:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Why is Trump awful? I don't read anything, I don't

1:40:17.080 --> 1:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>know anything, but I'm on the View, and people listen

1:40:21.040 --> 1:40:24.439
<v Speaker 1>to me because I wear glasses like a person who

1:40:24.560 --> 1:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>knows things. That's pretty much Joy Behar. I think you've

1:40:28.720 --> 1:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>got joy right there. I think I managed to nail it.

1:40:32.080 --> 1:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Roger Rites, watch the Americans. It's a great show, Roger.

1:40:36.479 --> 1:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>That is my plan. It is top of my queue

1:40:40.160 --> 1:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>as soon as I finished Billions. The Americans as of

1:40:43.520 --> 1:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>now will be next. Mike Rites, Hey back, I turned

1:40:47.439 --> 1:40:50.479
<v Speaker 1>my wife Peggy onto your show. She's a fan. Well, Mike,

1:40:50.960 --> 1:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>good job marrying a woman who has good taste in

1:40:53.320 --> 1:40:56.519
<v Speaker 1>radio shows. One of our many activities together now includes

1:40:56.560 --> 1:40:58.519
<v Speaker 1>you full disclosure. She saw you for the first time

1:40:58.520 --> 1:41:00.040
<v Speaker 1>on Fox the other night and said, oh boy, he

1:41:00.640 --> 1:41:04.280
<v Speaker 1>needs to do something with that hair and lose the beard. Personally,

1:41:04.280 --> 1:41:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what you look like. Just keep doing

1:41:05.840 --> 1:41:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a great job. Shields shields high and Mike, you know, man,

1:41:11.080 --> 1:41:14.479
<v Speaker 1>it's I'm just I do need to get a haircut.

1:41:14.520 --> 1:41:16.559
<v Speaker 1>I will, I will. She's right about that. The hair

1:41:16.720 --> 1:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is out of control right now. I mean it is,

1:41:18.280 --> 1:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the poof is, the swoop is major. And as to

1:41:23.080 --> 1:41:25.519
<v Speaker 1>the beard, you know, it's getting hot, so the beard

1:41:25.600 --> 1:41:27.760
<v Speaker 1>may go. The beard may go. I've kept it for

1:41:27.800 --> 1:41:31.759
<v Speaker 1>a while. I don't know. And some of my Original

1:41:31.800 --> 1:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Saturday Squad is like, stop talking about your stupid beard

1:41:34.160 --> 1:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and tell us things that are worth hearing. All right,

1:41:36.280 --> 1:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, your voices have been heard. Original team Buck

1:41:40.240 --> 1:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gets very salty with me sometimes, but then I know

1:41:42.720 --> 1:41:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's I know that it's all love, so I'm

1:41:44.720 --> 1:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>okay with it. But you know, they'll say, like, you

1:41:47.040 --> 1:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>look like you put on a few pounds time to

1:41:49.040 --> 1:41:52.240
<v Speaker 1>get a hair cut. That last segment was boring. But

1:41:52.360 --> 1:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I know that they're the ones who love me, so

1:41:53.760 --> 1:41:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it's you or that they are some of those who

1:41:55.800 --> 1:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>love me, so I'm okay. But they're not the only ones, hopefully.

1:41:58.520 --> 1:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes their love is tough, it's little. It's a little

1:42:01.040 --> 1:42:05.919
<v Speaker 1>bit of salty love. Sandra Rights enjoyed the shout out workouts.

1:42:05.960 --> 1:42:07.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the only guy who makes sense to

1:42:07.800 --> 1:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>me and thousand of others is the natural bodybuilder and

1:42:10.400 --> 1:42:13.800
<v Speaker 1>coach Tom Venuto. And he's got a bunch of books.

1:42:13.840 --> 1:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>He's excellent. He's won eight top competitions for natural bodybuilders. Yeah,

1:42:17.200 --> 1:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Sandra, I'm somebody who has never had any

1:42:19.400 --> 1:42:22.280
<v Speaker 1>interest in taking these uh, I mean quite obviously, I've

1:42:22.320 --> 1:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>never done it, so I don't have an interest in

1:42:24.680 --> 1:42:26.599
<v Speaker 1>taking this stuff that makes you get like really big.

1:42:27.160 --> 1:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm I'm trying to see there. Everything's funny when

1:42:30.720 --> 1:42:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the other conversation about well, I don't want to get

1:42:32.520 --> 1:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>too big with muscle. No, no, the problem is I

1:42:35.240 --> 1:42:38.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get too big with chubb So I'm

1:42:38.360 --> 1:42:40.559
<v Speaker 1>just trying to put on some muscle to avoid getting

1:42:40.560 --> 1:42:44.559
<v Speaker 1>the big with the chubbiness. It's a different problem of bigness.

1:42:45.280 --> 1:42:46.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's all about health. It's all about

1:42:46.920 --> 1:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling good about yourself, feeling good in your skin, looking

1:42:49.200 --> 1:42:51.559
<v Speaker 1>good in your clothes. You know, everyone to each his own.

1:42:51.680 --> 1:42:53.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, some people look better with a little a

1:42:53.840 --> 1:42:55.559
<v Speaker 1>little extra going on, or you know, they got their

1:42:55.560 --> 1:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>own thing going on. And we live in this man

1:42:58.240 --> 1:43:00.360
<v Speaker 1>society is more superficial than ever be for it is

1:43:00.360 --> 1:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true. And physical beauty is more highly prized and

1:43:05.479 --> 1:43:08.800
<v Speaker 1>monetizeable than ever before too. So you know, there's all

1:43:08.840 --> 1:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this pressure on all of us all the time. Maybe

1:43:10.400 --> 1:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just like we need to all just start wearing sweats,

1:43:13.360 --> 1:43:15.560
<v Speaker 1>just start hanging out. I'll worry about it. I'm not

1:43:15.640 --> 1:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>sure that's the idea, but it might be an idea.

1:43:19.280 --> 1:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's see here, Corey, Sir Buckman, I feel I've held

1:43:22.960 --> 1:43:25.679
<v Speaker 1>my thoughts back long enough on the Uber issue. Though

1:43:25.720 --> 1:43:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I find myself more in the middle of the road,

1:43:28.520 --> 1:43:30.439
<v Speaker 1>leaning toward your viewpoint. I also could see where it

1:43:30.439 --> 1:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>could have the potential to encourage discrimination. The phrase try

1:43:34.080 --> 1:43:36.720
<v Speaker 1>hailing an myc taxi at two Amasa black Man comes

1:43:36.760 --> 1:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to mind. So long as Uber employees honest brokers, it

1:43:39.360 --> 1:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be an issue. Shields a shields high onwards and upwards.

1:43:42.960 --> 1:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Tally ho, Well, Corey, the whole getting a cab at

1:43:48.080 --> 1:43:50.160
<v Speaker 1>two am thing. I've actually done some research on this

1:43:50.240 --> 1:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and talked about on the past. It's not true the

1:43:51.880 --> 1:43:54.439
<v Speaker 1>way people think it's true, meaning that it's not a

1:43:54.600 --> 1:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>discrimination against against African American passengers by white drivers. It's

1:43:59.400 --> 1:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>actually almost entirely South Asian drivers in the city of

1:44:02.160 --> 1:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>New York, and the discrimination issue is not nearly as

1:44:06.720 --> 1:44:08.640
<v Speaker 1>clear cut as people are led to believe. A lot

1:44:08.680 --> 1:44:11.519
<v Speaker 1>of times they just don't want to go far out

1:44:11.640 --> 1:44:14.519
<v Speaker 1>of Manhattan, where they have generally the fastest and the

1:44:14.560 --> 1:44:16.679
<v Speaker 1>quickest trips, because they don't want to get stuck in traffic,

1:44:17.080 --> 1:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>or they're signing off at the end of their shift.

1:44:19.760 --> 1:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So I just I have a lot of thoughts in

1:44:21.400 --> 1:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the NYC taxi issue. And as for uber No, I

1:44:25.120 --> 1:44:28.400
<v Speaker 1>still think that it's better. It's better for people to

1:44:28.479 --> 1:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>have accountability in their business transactions. You know, if you're

1:44:32.400 --> 1:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're really if you're somebody who's a really bad tipper.

1:44:34.800 --> 1:44:36.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that there's a problem with people knowing

1:44:36.520 --> 1:44:38.639
<v Speaker 1>that you're a bad tipper. I don't know. I think

1:44:38.680 --> 1:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's fair if we're allowed to if we are

1:44:41.160 --> 1:44:43.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed to assess the other side, if I'm allowed to say,

1:44:43.400 --> 1:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and I have that this doctor was terrible, was a

1:44:46.040 --> 1:44:48.720
<v Speaker 1>jerk and didn't know anything. For example, like yet the

1:44:48.760 --> 1:44:51.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor'd be like, this patient always shows up late, isn't

1:44:51.920 --> 1:44:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, doesn't want to play ball, and isn't going

1:44:53.840 --> 1:44:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to listen to me? I don't I know. I look,

1:44:56.000 --> 1:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you got a lot of you disagree with me on this,

1:44:58.040 --> 1:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and I like that. I like it when we keep

1:45:00.080 --> 1:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>things spicy in the family. But I am not backing

1:45:02.760 --> 1:45:04.519
<v Speaker 1>down on this position yet. I have not yet had

1:45:04.600 --> 1:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the compelling moment of Oooh, I guess. I guess they

1:45:07.720 --> 1:45:10.800
<v Speaker 1>were right and I was wrong because I'm a radio

1:45:10.800 --> 1:45:12.439
<v Speaker 1>hosts willing to say that, unlike many of them who

1:45:12.479 --> 1:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>always talk about how fantastic and perfect they are. That's

1:45:15.080 --> 1:45:17.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna be it for the Show Today team. You're all fantastic,

1:45:17.760 --> 1:45:20.599
<v Speaker 1>wonderful and perfect. That I do know for sure. I'm

1:45:20.680 --> 1:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>excited to talk to you all, same time, same place.

1:45:23.880 --> 1:45:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Shield's high