WEBVTT - What the Market Crash Says About How Investing Works

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Hi, all Thoughts listeners. Joe and I are working our

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>way through a pretty big backlog of episodes. So what

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that means is what you are about to hear is

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>something that was reported quite a while ago. We recorded

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this one back on March three. We were in the

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>midst of the big market crash back then, but we

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really seen the effects of that crash work their

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>way through the financial system. So you're gonna hear Joe

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and I talk a lot about how weird it is

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't seen any big trading blow ups just yet.

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, since March we have had a few, notably

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a big oil fund in Singapore and also a hedge

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>fund called Malachite in New York. I think, if anything,

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it makes the episode more interesting and the themes discussed

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>probably more estion. So I hope you enjoyed. Thanks for listening. Hello,

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe. WI isn't all so, Joe?

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>You know what I've been thinking about quite a lot recently. Um, Well,

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Is it the same thing that literally

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone across the entire world can't stop thinking about and

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>dreaming about and talking about or is there something else

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>going on? Wait? Are you thinking of the virus or

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the market sell off? I think I've been exposed to

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>financial markets for too long because they're sort of both

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>entwined in my mind. I literally like dreamed last night

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>about both the virus and the market crash, and I

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>have not thought about anything else. So, but now, what

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is the specific thing that you yourself are thinking about

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>these days? Okay, it's kind of an offshoot of the

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>market crash, and it's basically, uh, investor blow ups, So okay,

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's timely. Yeah. So one of the interesting things

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about this particular sell off is we still haven't seen

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of investors really get taken to the cleaners

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>just yet. We've had a few, um, one of our

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg colleagues wrote about the hedge fund in particular. But

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine with everything that's gone on in the market,

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get more and more of these stories emerging. Yeah.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the things that things are moving so

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>fast right now that even by the time this recording

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>comes out, we might hear a lot more investor blow ups.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>And the one of the reasons, I think we will,

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and one of the is because we've been seeing, you know,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>like so many tried and true strategies in the last

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks have just completely uh failed essentially. So

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>various hedges that investors use to mitigate volatility in their portfolio,

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's treasuries or whatever, haven't behaved the way, all

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of dislocations. So ay, we're almost certainly going to

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>get those blow us and be I think the conditions

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are now in place from the intensity of the moves

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in recent weeks that will sort of

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>finally cause some of those shoes to drop even beyond

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>just the you know, the sell off so to speak,

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. And a lot of those strategies were things

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that people supposedly had piled into, like selling volatility or

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>risk parity where you're sort of relying on the inverse

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>correlation between bonds and stocks. All of those seem to

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>fall apart in the recent sell off. So my question is,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're a professional investor, like a hedge fund or

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a dealer or something like that, what separates you from

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the crowd when it comes to your investment strategies? Because,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it feels like a lot of people

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>have sort of just crowded into the same thing in

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>recent years. Yeah, it has felt like that, and it

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>also is it's been this puzzle and I've certainly like

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>thought about this since well before the crisis hit, which

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is that on the one hand, you don't want to

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>just pile into the same strategies as everyone else. Everyone

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows that, Uh, that's not a particularly desirable it's

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to stand out. On the other hand, for essentially

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the last decade, we've had this situation in which the

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>winning strategy is to go all in on high beta

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and shortening volatility. And if you did anything other than that,

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>essentially for a decade, you faced the situation or like

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>and you have to write a quarterly in estment letter

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and your to your clients it's explain why you underperformed

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>yet again, So there has been this real pickle where

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there's been one dominant strategy for so long and uh,

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if any deviation meant you probably were under performance. Yeah, exactly.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>There's been a real tension between doing your own thing

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and profiting from basically just following the flows. In what

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>has been for the past ten years of really momentum

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>driven market but on this note of sort of standing

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>out from the crowd or um coming up with an

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>edge in professional investment. It's kind of interesting that when

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>people talk about business in general, h and in economics,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.239
<v Speaker 1>people are always talking about competitive advantage and you're supposed

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to organize yourself around what you do best and organize

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>your business around it, and that's what's supposed to make

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you successful. But when it comes to professional investing, you

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>rarely hear that. Yeah, absolutely right. Okay, So today we're

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be speaking with someone who's actually been on

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the show before, but who has written a book exactly

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on this topic competitive advantage in investment and what it

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>means to actually be a big professional investor and how

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>different types of investors will approach investing in different ways.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, our guest is Steven Abraham's. He's a former

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank analyst. Um As I mentioned, he has been

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>on the show before where he was talking about the

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>changing world of the sell side analyst, which is a

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>really good thing to listen to. But he's now over

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at Amherst pure Pont. He's the head of investment strategy

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>over there, and his book is out in April. It's

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>called Competitive Advantage in Investing, building winning professional portfolios. Steven,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the show. Hi Tracy, Hi, how are you good?

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us. Absolutely exciting times. Um So,

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe just to begin with, what do you think about

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the big sell off recently? Pretty uh, pretty dramatic. Oh,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it has been. It has been a drama of historic proportions.

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about that. I would say, unfortunately for

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>some the dramas probably not over. I know that, as

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you were mentioning earlier, we've all been waiting around to

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>see if all of the various players are going to

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>make it through uh, this kind of volatility, and as

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out, we've been doing okay so far. But

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say just within you know, recent days, we've

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>started hearing that there are some portfolios that are in

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>serious trouble and and may not make it so well,

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be watching things very closely. Right. It

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed to take a step up in the seriousness really

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last week, and I think there's a good

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>time to remind let listeners know that by the time

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>they hear this, the entire world may have since changed again.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>But we are recording this on Monday, March twenty three,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so just so that people have a frame of reference,

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because again, things are moving so fast. But you know,

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing I feel like for the value of

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>risky assets to decline and stocks decline, and we all

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>know that stock market crashes are possible, but I think

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>over the last two weeks, what we've really seen on

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>top of that, especially over the last week, is that

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>various hedging strategies that people might have put in place

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>to mitigate a stock market decline or some other risky

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>asset decline, they've suddenly like stopped working as liquidity has

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>started to vanish. Yes, yeah, this is really a as

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you're pointing out, Joe, the normal relationships between assets and hedges,

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>or between in one asset and another in many markets

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>has completely broken down. And underneath a lot of this

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is just a historic reach for cash. That's true at

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the level of individual businesses up and down Main Street,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's also true with the level of some of

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the highest quality investment grade companies that apply their wears

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>day to day around the world. Most of those companies

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are looking at economies that are effectively coming to a

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>complete halt and could remain basically closed for thirty to

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine days. Nobody is quite sure. So they are

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>stockpiling cash and in the process basically selling everything that

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they possibly can, and that includes securities. So the usual

0:09:55.200 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>ideas of stocks being richer cheap or bonds being rich

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>or cheap has been uh completely subsumed under the issue

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of what is liquid and what can be sold and

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever is liquid is definitely getting solved. So just on

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that note, can we talk a little bit about what

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>traditional investment theory would have told us about that big

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>scramble for cash, Because on the one hand, there is

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a saying that in a crisis, correlation goes to one

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and everything sort of sells off at the same time.

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, you know, the reason you

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>pay more for investment grade or something like the U. S.

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Treasury is because it's supposed to be safe in times

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>like this. So what does investment theory actually tell us

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on here? You know, investment theory, probably

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the most relevant theory here is kind of traditional monetary

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>policy theory, which says that when people have doubts about

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the credit worthiness of their counterparties, than any typically does

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>not flow, and the big issue is that with economy

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is coming to a sudden stop, it really is difficult

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to predict which companies have the wherewithal to make it

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>through this crisis. Central banks have really been flooding the

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>market with very plentiful and very cheap money, But the

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>issue is the credit worthiness of the people who need

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>it most now. Traditionally, this is an issue that monetary

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>policy assumes is going to affect banks. You know, the

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>depositors look at the banks, they worry that the banks

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>are making loans that are not prudent, and they try

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to withdraw their deposits. Here in some ways it's just

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. The banks have tremendous amounts of money, but

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they're worried about the credit worthiness of the restaurants and

0:11:53.640 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>bars and taxi businesses that right now, for practical purpose

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>as are shut down. So UM many companies are simply

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at whatever can trade, whatever might be liquid. So

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really monetary policy and UM the ideas around liquidity

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that apply here, and those have dominated any idea of

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the ability to UM call relative value. I want to

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>get more into some of the ways monetary policy can

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>help this crisis, including again some of the things that

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we're just announced this morning, but before we do, I

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just want to sort of go back to this idea

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of historic grab for any cash that people have, the

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>likes of which maybe we've never seen before or very

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>rarely seen. One of the things that's really striking is

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of weeks, how treasuries, which are

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>almost cash, like the sentence that they're completely backed by

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the full faith and credit of the government, counterparty risk free,

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>even those started get selling off, started to be sold

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>off a little bit because if we think right like this,

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like hierarchy of money, Yeah, holding a treasury is really

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>great for you know, lean times and you want to

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>be saved, but if you need to make a bill

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>payment tomorrow, you still just want cash instead. Correct. Yes,

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So in the treasury market, um there has been surprising

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>amounts of illiquidity. Usually in the treasury market, liquidity comes

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of tiers, and the most liquid tier

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is the most newly issued notes or bonds, and those

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>still seem to be maintaining liquidity. But then the older

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>notes and bonds have lost um surprising amounts of liquidity,

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and there have been very large leveraged treasury portfolios. Traditionally,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>those portfolios would have reached through the broker deal or

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>bank network for financing. They may have used repo or

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>other forms. Many of the balance sheets that normally would

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>lend to them have been limited in their ability to

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>expand credit. So, among other things, this starts to get

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>at some of the core competitive advantages or disadvantages of

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these investment platforms. The leveled players really don't

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have any source of funding on their own. Banks now

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>have sources of funding. Traditionally they have sources of funding

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>through their deposit base. Now the FED and other central

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>banks around the world are flooding the bank system with money.

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But some of the post crisis rules on UH the

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>proper ratios of debt to equity, and other issues limit

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the ability of banks to lend endlessly, and that has

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>partly constrained the system, and it's led the FED, I think,

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>at times, to struggle with what it's supposed to do next. Yeah,

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So you had a bunch of these levered funds that

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>were effectively picking up pennies in front of a steam

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>roller for years by exploiting the difference between the more

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>liquid futures and the cash US treasuries, and then that

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>trade blew up rather spectacularly a week or two ago,

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and then that ended up infecting the U S treasury

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>market and causing all sorts of problems. Uh. Just pass

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>forwarding to today again, Monday March, just before we started

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>recording this, the Federal Reserve announced its latest attempt to

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>soothe the market, and that includes potentially unlimited QUEI and

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>also some help for companies and munies. Steve, I know

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you've been thinking a lot about this, but is this

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the right thing for the FED to do? Are they

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on the right track or would you be encouraging to

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>do something else at this point? Well, probably the most

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>important thing the FED did this morning was announced a

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of new facilities that allows the FED to buy

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a much wider range of assets directly from investment portfolios

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and businesses, so this is now no longer limited to

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the typical um set of primary dealers. They announced the

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>term Asset Lending Facility, which basically will buy all kinds

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of asset back securities as long as they have the

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>proper ratings, and they will buy those securities from any

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>eligible um US portfolio. They also announced a series two

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>programs directed at the corporate market, one that will buy

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>corporate debt directly from US companies with headquarters in the

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>United States and doing major business in the United States.

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>So this effectively creates a direct connection between investment grade

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>companies and the government balance sheet. They announced similar programs

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>for secondary corporate debt, and they expanded the program that

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>they announced a week ago for commercial paper. So the

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>FED is slowly stepping in the direction of trying to

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>address this cascading illiquidity across these markets. And my guess

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is these new programs for ingressment investment grade paper will

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>have um a tremendously good effect and should start to

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>eliminate some of the volatility. So just to help people understand,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not that, you know, we're still going to have

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>these sort of main street economic crisis for as long

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>as people are locked down, as long as the virus

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is here and so forth, and that's going to continue

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to ravage the economy. But in the meantime, high quality

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>companies can at least ease up theoretically a little bit

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>on grabbing hold of any cash that they can in

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the system, because for not for the moment, the FED

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>will backstop essentially their short term borrowing. So that should

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that eases some of the overall desperation

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that every person in every company everywhere has for liquidity. Yeah,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Investment grade companies, large investment grade companies at

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this point essentially have substantial direct assess to the FED,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and my guests would be the Fed's going to continue

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>providing and expanding that access as long as it sees

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>signs of stress. The b S facility starts to walk

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:08.959
<v Speaker 1>down the path of providing better access to main street,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and that would have to come through the willingness of

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>banks to make credit card loans and auto loans. The

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>asset back facility basically has elements that will allow auto

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>dealers to finance cars and other vehicles more easily. But

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you still, at this point, I think, have a problem

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>getting credit to a lot of smaller mainstream businesses. Maybe

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the FED has a couple of tricks left in the bag,

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 1>but my guess is you're really going to need some

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of physical policy. So I wanted to go back

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to something you touched on earlier, which was this notion

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of the dealers or the banks being a little bit

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>more restricted in terms of the amount of risk that

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they can take, and maybe some of that risk having

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>shifted to the buy side, because a lot of people

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>right now are talking about how the current crisis resembles

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily Lehman Brothers in two thousand and eight, but

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 1>more lt CM or long term capital management. Back in

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>they dabbled in a lot of derivatives UH and basically

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>exploded UM. So I'm just wondering if if that's the

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>right framework to look at the current state of the

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>financial industry, and if that's the reason why the FED

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is quite focused on expanding UM the parties that it

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>can actually do business with. When it comes to QUEWI,

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the biggest difference between this crisis in two thousand and

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>eight is that the crisis in two thousand and eight

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>was in the financial system. The crisis in is outside

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of the financial system. UM really at its core in

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>corporate America UH, and as a result of corporate America

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>being stressed, it's a problem then on main street and

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in households pretty much around the world. The FED as

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a central bank is really really well equipped to pour

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>water on fires inside the financial system. Outside the financial system,

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it has to get a little bit more creative, because

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the core issue here is the fundamental credit worthiness of

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>main street borrowers and many homeowners. The best possible solution,

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>what which was in some material within the last few

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>days that I published in Financial Times, is to provide

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>government guarantees of emergency bank loans to otherwise credit worthy businesses.

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a problem that the economies of ground to

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a sudden stop, but I think it's widely expected that

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>after a ninety or a hundred and eighty day period,

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>many of these businesses will be viable again. So the

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>trick is bridging that period by providing credit. Banks I

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>think have plenty of money, but I think any banker

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>hesitates to lend to a business about to see its

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>earnings evaporate. If you had, if you had the government

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 1>provide guarantees, I think banks would have a lot more

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>courage in that situation, right, I really Uh. There was

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this great LARRYUS Summers quote that he said a couple

0:22:58.200 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, and I keep thinking about it. He's

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, like somehow I forget his working exactly, But

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially the challenges how do you freeze financial or so

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>how do you freeze economic time, while uh, financial time

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>continues in its current state, and this idea is like, Okay,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows we have to stay inside. Everyone knows that

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of viable businesses that will need

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to shut their doors for days or whatever. But the

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>bills keep coming in regardless and essentially and as you say,

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that sort of outside of the monetary system and subside

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of the banking system per se. So it's somehow going

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to have to be an Act of Congress to come

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>up with a solution that lets everyone pay their bills

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>during the essential time of the FACTI lockdown. Yes, that's

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So, Steven, I wanted to get to your book, uh,

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and we spoke a little bit about it earlier. But

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, when people talk about investment strategy, they're usually

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>treating all the investors in a sort of similar way.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>But as you point out, people tend to do things

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>differently according to their competitive advantages. Could you maybe just

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>walk us through, uh, the premise of your book and

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>why this was something that interested you. Yeah. Absolutely. I

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>think that when you sit in a seat like mine,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>where you're really advising a wide range of investors, you

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>start to see over time that the players matter just

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>as much as the market does when it comes to

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>UM investing. You can UM look from banks to insurance companies,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds to hedge funds, reets, sovereign wealth funds. They

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>all operate UM with very very distinct advantages and disadvantages,

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and those kinds of things not only shape what they

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>buy how they use the as assets, but UM it

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>also ends up turning around and affecting the value of

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>those assets in the marketplace. And they're just plenty of

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>examples of that, including the kind of markets that we're

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at right now. And UH I thought for years

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>that we needed something that went through these different kinds

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of investors and talked about what their strengths and weaknesses

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>might be and how it affected assets. And that's what

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>led me to write the book to expand this further

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>strengths and weaknesses of different types of assets. What does

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that mean specifically, Well, I'll give you an example. It's

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>very relevant to where we are now. UM. Let's take

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>UM source of funds. Some investment platforms just have tremendous,

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>tremendous advantage in the variety and the low cost of

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>their funding. And for example, right now, the the eight

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred pound guerrilla on that front is the banking system.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So banks traditionally have a really wide range of sources

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of funds through their retail deposit base. Some of their

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>retail deposits are a kind of fast deposits from big

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>corporations that are moving money through their accounts quickly. Other

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>other deposits are very very long, steady and stable UH

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>sources of funds. Like, for example, if you look at

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>my checking account, I've probably had some at least minimal

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>balance in my checking account for decades, So banks could

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>use my money that's there for decades, your money that's

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>there for decades, other people's money that may be there

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for far shorter periods of time, corporate money which may

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>come in and out day to day, and they can

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>use that to buy or fund a wide range of

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>not only loans, but securities. If you want to go

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to the opposite extreme, you could look at hedge funds,

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, or reads, which usually borrow based on repurchase

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or repo agreements UH, and those repo or repurchase agreements

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>often last only for a day and have to be

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>renewed every day. Right. That leads those kinds of organizations

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>kinds of investors highly subject to markets where suddenly there's

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 1>a run on liquidity, and those are the those are

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the folks that are struggling at this point, right, some

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of them would have done that levered US treasury trade

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that we just described. So I guess the question is

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>knowing that you have that sort of short term day

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to day funding, shouldn't that change the way you invest

0:27:55.520 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially or at least the way that you hedge. Absolutely? Um.

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean when it comes to the way you invest,

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and you see this in the portfolios at least most

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of the portfolios of prudent leverage investors, that almost forces

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you to hold highly liquid assets. So does it make

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sense to have levered portfolios of treasuries? Um, Yes, it

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>probably does. Would it makes sense to have leveraged portfolios

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>of agency mortgage backed securities? It probably does. Would it

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>make sense for you to have leveraged portfolios of less

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>liquid assets like um certain forms of a corporate debt

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>or loans that may not be easy to sell on

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>short notice. Once you start leveraging less liquid assets, you

0:28:55.200 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>begin to take much more risk uh of a liquidity

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>crunch of the sort that we're in now, and what

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you can see is that in today's marketing current circumstances,

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>lever portfolios of the most liquid assets have been able

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to delever, not necessarily um in a pretty fashion, but

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>nevertheless they've been able to de lever, while levery portfolios

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of less liquid assets have struggled, and at times I

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think some of those organizations have been on the brink

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of failing to meet calls for additional margin, additional cash

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and could go out of business. So a lot of

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this I think makes sense to people right now. I mean,

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we're looking in a market that's been you know, arguably

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the most most volatile, complete turmoil that many

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>people have ever seen in their careers. But you know,

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like in the normal times, you know, two thousand thirt

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>was there, Just like, how do you get this message

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>across and how do you deal with the issue that

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I was sort of talking about at the beginning, where

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.959
<v Speaker 1>prior to right now, the dominant strategy for an investor

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>would essentially just be too go all in on high

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>baya or short volatility or just that that historical correlations

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>UH will maintain, Like how do you how do you

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>apply these lessons to non crisis periods and be a

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>competitive investor. Well, for example, if we we step outside

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the current situation, taking insurers for example, UM, I know

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it probably is not the usual way people think about

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies, but when you hand when you pay your

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>UH life insurance bill or your auto bill, in many cases,

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you're really handing those insurance companies a dollar that at

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>some point in the future they're going to hand right

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>back to you. I mean, an auto UH policy is

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>probably the simplest. You don't expect to be in an accident,

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>but if you are fender bender or otherwise, the auto

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>companies are going to pay to get your car fixed.

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>You you could have held that dollar in your savings account,

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but instead you're giving it to the insurance company, and

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the insurance company gives it back to you. Between the

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>time you give it to the insurance company and the

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>time that company pays it back to you, it has

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to invest in a wide range of assets.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So with life insurance companies, especially since the time between

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>getting the dollar and paying it back is so long,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>life insurers are just beautifully equipped for owning illiquid assets. UM.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>They can hold loans of wide range, they can hold

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>securities that are private play easements instead of public securities.

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>They're able to invest in real estate, where the return

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to the investment really requires a long horizon and the

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>ability to tolerate potential swings in prices. If you were

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>running a mutual fund, in contrast, it would be very

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>difficult to hold securities that have limited liquidity. That's because

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a mutual fund has to provide daily returns to their shareholders.

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So just if you look at funding, and then you

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>look at other aspects of these platforms, like how the

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>accountants measure these things, some are really well equipped to

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hold the liquid assets and others aren't well equipped. You

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>can see that in a bunch of other dimensions as well.

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Where do you see the most extreme liquidity mismatches in

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the current sell off? Is there something specifically that you're

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>um that you're watching out for. Well, in this setting,

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the place you always have to look first are the

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>most highly levered investment portfolios as well as the most

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>highly levered corporate balance sheets, and both of those markets

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>are struggling, both of them. Um. So, we've heard reports

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of days of large hedge fund

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>portfolios that are circulating and looking for bids. We've heard

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of um significant demands for liquidity from real estate investment trusts,

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>which also tend to be leveraged. And you can clearly

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the corporate world, to some extent investment grade,

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but very very clearly in the leverage loan market, where

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>corporations are drawing down their credit lines and trying to

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>fortify their balance sheet for periods of you know, really

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>difficult earnings ahead. Those are the places I think that

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are right now most at risk, and we're seeing that

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll they'll pay for liquidity at almost any price. How

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>do you identify opportunities though, because you know it's really

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>bad right now, it also looked really bad a week ago,

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.439
<v Speaker 1>And if you try to be here, I said, okay,

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be the liquidity provider. You know, I'm gonna

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>be the liquidity provider that jumps into the panic. And

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>you said that a week ago you might already be

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.439
<v Speaker 1>you might already be finished, you might already be taken out.

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So how do you think about risk management and exploiting

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>these opportunities where people will pay almost any price for liquidity,

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but not blowing up yourself in the process By mistiming. Well,

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So if I started with these investment platforms, the strongest

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>players in the market are going to be the ones

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>with the most capital um, the deepest and lowest cost,

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and widest variety of funding. Those are the places that

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to have the strong hand. You might think

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that that would include banks, and to some extent that

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>might be true, but regulations limit the degree of credit

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>risk that banks can take, so while they have great

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>advantages in capital and funding, have some disadvantages in regulatory constraint.

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Insurers are also likely to be in a strong position,

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>especially insurers that have strong capital and deep access to funds.

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>So that would probably include most of the larger players

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and some of the players that are using the investment

0:35:56.160 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>grade bond market to raise cash at this point. I mean, notably,

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you've seen Berkshire Hathaway in past crises right to the rescue,

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and although that clearly reflects the genius of war and Buffett,

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there is no doubt at all, it also reflects the

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>strength of the insurance balance sheet that he's playing off of.

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So those are the those are the strong platforms. Those

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>platforms have the ability two buy assets that otherwise would

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>be in free fall, they're not subject to usually to

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>margin calls. Um, they're accounting rules are very very kind

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>two assets that show price volatility. So what we've been

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>advising investors to do when they have balance sheets like

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that is to buy fundamentally sound cash flows at widespreads

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and those would in flute some government back cash flows

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that are trading at distress levels. And when it comes

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to the corporate market, cash flows from corporations that have

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.720
<v Speaker 1>adequate liquidity to weather the next three to six months

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and have the potential to come out of this crisis

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:23.919
<v Speaker 1>potentially stronger than when they went in. And those would

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>be the kind of investments that right that we've been advising.

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So then you don't have to be a hero. It's

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>not really about timing the bottom or anything like that.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Or this fell another ten percent after I bought it,

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>but take there are looking for opportunities in which the

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>spreads are so wide and the sort of uh predictability

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of future cash flows for whatever reason, as you mentioned,

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 1>something like our insurance et cetera, are so consistent that

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>your your margin for error is quite large. Yes, I mean,

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>timing might be everything in comedy, but most research shows

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't really amount to much in investing. So

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>if you look at some of these stronger balance sheets,

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they are going to be able to absorb these assets

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and honestly um provide good returns to their shareholders for

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>years and years to come. Right, Stephen, we really appreciate

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.479
<v Speaker 1>you coming back on the show, and we're definitely gonna

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>look out for your book when it comes out and

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>equal thanks so much, great, Thanks Tracy, Thanks Joe. Thanks

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that was great. Joe. I was just thinking, uh, Warren

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Buffett has actually been notably absent from the recent sell off. Yeah, right,

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like we have yet to see uh an op ed

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>from him in the New York Times saying, the buy

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>American I am, and I think, and I wonder if

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 1>like everyone is just so shell shocked, what does that

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 1>just maybe that includes Warren Buffett? Like the degree of uncertainty.

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't know, like I mean, I don't

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>know like what what he's thinking, but like the degree

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty here at the sort of path dependency and

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the speed with which things can fire, a lot of control.

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like look in two thousand and two thousand nine,

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we always knew there was a we didn't know that

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they were going to get there, but it was you know,

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>as our guests was talking about, it was a monetary phenomenon,

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>was a crisis of the banks. And you can theoretically

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>always paper over a monetary phenomena, but when you have

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a real economic crisis where you like really do not

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>know how long it will be before people are comfortable

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>spending money in retail establishments, again, I just then the

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>degree of uncertainty and the desire to hoard liquidity or

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.959
<v Speaker 1>hard cash when you have it. I just think that's

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>like what makes this almost feels like incomparable to anything

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 1>we've seen. Yeah, the speed has certainly been unprecedented. And

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>even in two thousand and eight in the financial crisis,

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 1>when we were worried about the banking system collapsing, people

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>still went out and you know, bought sandwiches or you know,

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>like their haircut and things like that. That's just not

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>happening in the current situation. So it does raise all

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>sorts of questions. The other thing I like about Steven's

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 1>framework in particular, this idea of you know, different investors

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>have different ways of funding themselves, different advantages. It's that

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of detail that I find a lot of investment

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>theory just sort of glosses over, like obviously big investors

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 1>want to buy low and sell high. But actually, as

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Stephen was saying, there's a funding consideration there too, and

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you always want to be sort of matching your funding

0:40:55.160 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>with your investment horizon or the assets maturity. Yeah, it's

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a really it's a really good thing to uh to

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.959
<v Speaker 1>think about right now in terms of like how people

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about whether there are in fact opportunities in

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 1>this market, right and whether there are vulnerabilities because as

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, this is sort of so far. I hope

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't change by the time this episode comes out,

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but so far this has sort of been vindication for

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the regulators. Right. They encourage banks to hold a lot

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>of risk to turn out their funding and it's sort

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of paid off in this situation. But the downside, of course,

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>is that you have a lot of stuff that's just

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 1>held outside the banking system and might be harder for

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve and other regulators to actually help. Yeah,

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So so far, there's a there's a argument

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to be made that the bank that the post crisis

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>regulations have done a good job, because we have yet

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear about major concerns with systemically important financial institutions

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>because all of the true risk has been pressed out

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>so so far, there's definitely a case to be made

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that the regulations are working, as the number of times

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you're saying so far in that sentence's nervous. But yeah, yeah,

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>let's hope it stays true by the time this episode

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>comes out. Shall we leave it there? Yes? Okay, This

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has been another edition of the ad Thoughts podcast. I'm

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway,

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at the Stalwart. And you should follow our producer on Twitter,

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson. She's at Laura and Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>head of podcasts, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today, and all

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Bloomberg podcasts. You can find them under the

0:42:44.040 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening. Year to e