WEBVTT - Israel Vows Retaliation, VP Debate

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple card playing Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's switch our attention back to the geopolitics,

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the story of the really the last forty eight seventy

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 2>two hours of what's happening in the Middle East. Aaron

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 2>David Miller joins us. He's a senior fellow with the

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Carnegian Downmond for International Piece, joining us from Washington, DC

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 2>via zoom. Aaron, thanks so much for taking the time here. Again,

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it's front and center here for not just geo politics,

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>but also for financial markets. And that's why we hear

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberger paying close attention to what's happening in the Middle East.

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Here.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 2>We had the Iranian attack yesterday. Love for you to

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>put that attack into context of what is happening in

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the Middle overall. What's next for Israel?

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know you got thanks for having me here.

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 4>You've got three wars of attrition going on. One greatest

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 4>role in the moss is one's ball on Israel and Iran,

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 4>which is the premiere event here and over the last

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 4>several weeks. As a consequence of Israeli actions in Isabella,

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 4>the balance of power in these three wars of attrition,

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 4>it's fundamentally been altered.

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 5>His Boula is a ver shadow of itself.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 4>Israeli's estimate, they've they've eliminated half of its high trajectory

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 4>weapons inventory, and those weapons were designed by Iran in

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 4>order to provide a contingency in the event Israel or

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 4>the US attacked around the nuclear sides. Well that's more

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 4>or less degraded. So the Iranians needed to find a

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 4>way to respond both to the Israeli assassination of Ismaila

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 4>ne on July thirty one, leader of Amas. It was

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 4>really didn't think responsibility for that yet, and of course

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 4>the most recent hit on Hassan Azula, the head of

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 4>as a publish So they looked for a response that

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 4>did more than what they did mid April, you recall,

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 4>and they landlu three hundred high trajectory weapons of Israel.

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Most didn't even impact Israeli airspace, but not to trigger

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 4>a major Israeli escalation. I don't think they found the

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 4>sweet spot one hundred and eighty Creuse missiles. Even though

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Iron Dome David slang Arrow intercepted a lot of them.

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 4>US Navy two destroyers took down twelve. The Jordanians participated

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 4>too many got through and two Israelis were lightly wounded,

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 4>and ironically, a Palestinian man from Gaza who was in

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Jericho was killed. But even though there were no casualties

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 4>of a consequential nature other than the unfortunate death of

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 4>the Palestinian man, the Israelis now have to respond in

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 4>and at least portraying their thinking to avoid creating a

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 4>new normal.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 5>A second time.

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 4>The running substruct Israeli territory, and they're going to respond.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Biden's going to talk to Ntayahu today before the Rosa

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 4>Chana holidays. But I think these really responses are going

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 4>to be heavy, multiple targets, oil export facilities, running revolutionary Guard,

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 4>core command and control, conventional military sites.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 5>The nuclear piece fascinating, yep.

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure the argument's being made that now is the

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 4>time for any number of reasons. I'm thinking, though, coordinating

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 4>with the Americans, I don't think the Israelis are going

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 4>to go after the enrichment facilities, very deep underground.

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 5>But we'll see.

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, you mentioned that you have the Richmond facilities under mountains.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>In fact, is that even targetable at this point with

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 3>just with airstrikes right.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 4>Where you need bunker busters, you need shock and awe,

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 4>which only the US military can actually need deliver. You

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 4>need a degree of saturation and redundancy. Despite israel skill

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:11.839
<v Speaker 4>and operational capacity, he's really stone half. Nonetheless, I mean,

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 4>I still wouldn't rule it out as part of the

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 4>target set.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 5>And then the question is.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Of course how and in what fashion will will the

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 4>Runnings respond? I mean, without much imagination, you could, you know,

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 4>you could envision a hopskip and a jump to something

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East has never experienced before, which is a

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 4>multi front walk, not with employment of thousands of ground forces,

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 4>but UAVs AI, cyber cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, one way

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 4>attack groans where Iran if it said badly enough going

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 4>after Saudi oil bruising facilities, which they did as you

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 4>were calling twenty nineteen.

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 5>So we're closer.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm still not convinced we're going to get there. Iron's

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 4>weak and it understands the symmetry of power which I.

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Fa So, Aaron, I look for you to kind of

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 2>give us maybe your assessment of where President Prime Minister

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Netanyahu is in terms of his thinking these days. I

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>guess we started this war almost a year ago with

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the attacks on Israel, and I guess at that point

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Yah said, Hey, our goal is to incapacitate Hamas and

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 2>get our hostages back. That scope seems to have broadened

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>dramatically now to include, you know, maybe some war aims

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 2>in Lebanon, to deal with Iran more broadly. Where is

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 2>he now?

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think you know, don't never write this guy off.

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it was unimaginable that a prime Minister or

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 4>presider or the single body of stayed for Jews since

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 4>the liberation of the Nazi death camps, the worst intelligence

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 4>failure in the history of State of Israel, antrial for

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 4>brid re fraud and breach of trust in.

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 5>A Jerusalem dis re court now four years running, would.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Have gotten himself into a situation where his credibility and

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 4>even some of the numbers.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 5>In the latest Israeli polls have gone.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 4>Up, not surprisingly because of the last several weeks and

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 4>what I think we're on the cuspbol with respect to

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 4>an Israeli strike against Iran. So he still does if

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 4>elected were held today, he still doesn't have enough seats

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 4>to put together a coalition.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 5>But there's no effective opposition.

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 4>And the fact is the kanesstants out of resist until

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 4>the end of October. Benjamin Nataniell will will make an

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 4>assessment on November five with the next President of the

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 4>United States is and he'll adjust his tactics. Importingly, I

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 4>don't see new elections in Israel at the earliest, and

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 4>the government could go to term twenty twenty six. I

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 4>don't see new elections in Israel until sometime in twenty

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 4>twenty five.

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Well what's the response from the rest of the Mid

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 3>East to Saudi Arabia et cetera.

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's the public and the private response, right, I mean,

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 4>nobody is going to miss other than Hezbollah. Certainly, among

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 4>the Sunnis in the region, no one's going to miss

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Ausun Ocella, certainly, the Saudis won't uh and Sunnis in

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Syria that have prosecuted a terrible war against Sunni populations

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 4>isn't going to miss Nuzula either, So and that goes

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 4>by the way, also for Jakna Sinoir, the pre eminent

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Palestinian leader who's hiding in a bunker somewhere meters below ground,

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 4>probably surrounded by hostages the low Raunis. I think the

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Arab States really understand what they didn't in the way

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 4>to October seventh, when Israeli military capacities seemed to be

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 4>not just diluted, but somehow defeated. The last several weeks,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 4>the operational effectiveness, the tactical ingenuity of the Israelis has restored.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 4>I think their street cred comes to the to the

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 4>air world. That's particularly true for the Bobrani societies and

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 4>the Amorates will all have above ground and below ground

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 4>security and intelligence relationships.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 5>With Israel. But again it's the Middle East. Nobody ever

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 5>lost money.

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Against the peace and stability, and I think that we

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 4>have to still be three sober here. Yeah, yes, can

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 4>the can what the Israelis have done be translated somehow

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 4>into political arrangements lead to greater prosperity instability.

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 5>That's the core question, and.

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 4>You know it's one of the many questions I just

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 4>don't have an answer to you.

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Aaron, thank you so much for joining us.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>We really appreciate getting some of your time to share

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>in your expertise. Aaron David Miller. He's a senior fellow

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>at the Carnegian Down for International Piece, has decades of

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>experience in that part of the world. You appreciate getting

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>some of his time.

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 6>Alex deeal here alongside Paul Sweeni and John Tucker. This

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 6>is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We are broadcasting to live for

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 6>Interactive Brokers Studio right here in Midtown Manhattan. So last night,

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 6>Democratic Governor Tim Watson Republican Senator JD Vans sparred during

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 6>the CBS News vice presidential debate in New York that

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 6>featured fireworks over abortion rights, the economy, and foreign policy,

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 6>in part in an appeal to Midwestern voters.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 7>One thing that Joe Biden did is he continued some

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 7>of the Trump tariffs that protected American manufacturing jobs. It's

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 7>the one issue where Kamala Harris has run away from

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 7>Joe Biden's record.

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, Kamala Harris is Day one was Donald Trump's failure

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on COVID that led to the collapse for our economies.

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 7>If Kamala Harris has such great plans for how to

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 7>address middle class problems, then she ought to do them. Now,

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 7>how is it fair.

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>That you're paying your taxes every year and Donald Trump

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't paid any federal text in the last fifteen years.

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, joining us now is Henry Natrez, Managing partner and

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 6>director of Economic Policy at Beta Partners. Henrietta, did we

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 6>learn anything last night.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, we learned that maybe both parties candidates have the

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 8>potential to improve their standing with the American voter. The

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 8>surprise to me was that flash poles that came out

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 8>right after the debate showed that viewers considered the two

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 8>men effectively tied in the race. I thought personally that

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 8>Vance had exceeded Waltz, but that's not what we saw

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 8>in the flash polls. And most importantly, amongst unaffiliated voters,

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 8>not Democrats, not Republicans, but sort of third party voters,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 8>the majority of them thought that Waltz in a better job.

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 8>And you have to think of that as probably some

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 8>of the last moments of the campaign, you know, the

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 8>sort of the debate, the last sort of fifteen minutes

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 8>when they talked about January sixth again. But in general,

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 8>net net, both candidates standing improved materially with voters. I

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 8>want to say that jd. Vance went from a negative

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 8>twenty two percent, a negative thirteen percent rating to a

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 8>negative two percent rating, and Tim Walls also improved from

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 8>his plus three favorability rating to something like plus thirty

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 8>four after last night's debate. So both men did what

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 8>they wanted to do, introduce themselves to the American public,

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 8>and the American public like what they saw.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Henrietta, can you give us a sense, I'm trying to

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 2>get a handle on this particular number, how many independent

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 2>voters are each candidate trying to get at each campaign, Trenting,

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Do we have a sense of how many they are?

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 9>The independent voter base is actually a huge chunk of

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 9>the pie.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 8>As America has gotten polarized and voters have, you know,

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 8>flocked to the far left of the far right within

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 8>their parties, a big chunk of America now qualifies themselves

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 8>as independ voters. That's different than undecided. Undecided is now

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 8>like four percent seven percent of the electorate.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 9>Most people have picked a horse and they're moving forward.

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 8>Unfortunately, most likely the people who are undecided did not

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 8>even watch last night's debate, So they're going to be

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 8>getting their internals from what they see on the internet today,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 8>and it's probably not going to move the needle too much.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 8>If you have to think about the presidential debate not

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 8>moving the needle a whole lot, you know, a couple

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 8>points to Kamala Harris, it's very unlikely to mean that

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 8>the vice presidential debate last night is going to really

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 8>change things for either ticket.

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 6>So it's October second, if I'm not mistaken, and typically

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 6>we talked about in an October surprise when it comes

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 6>to the election. Is the Iran Israel conflict right now

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 6>that October surprise?

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 9>You know, I want to say yes.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 8>Obviously, the escalation that we're looking at right now and

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 8>potential for the Middle East disruption is explosive to the

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 8>point where we haven't seen it in decades and you know,

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 8>rapidly escalating and just waiting for Israel's response now. But

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 8>the you know, the question last night was the first

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 8>one on the gate about how to respond to Iran.

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 8>And I think what was interesting is that the electorate

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 8>as a whole in America doesn't consider this a near

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 8>term issue or even something that ranks in the top

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 8>five areas that they care about.

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 9>It's you know, the economy followed by some.

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 8>Combination of abortion and immigration and then everything else sort

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 8>of way underneath that. Foreign policy is just not a

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 8>forte of American voters.

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Henrietta Kamala Harris has been out fundraising former President Trump

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 2>and in past elections like goes that would be really

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 2>big news. Is that big news this time around?

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 9>I think it is. And I want to tie in

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 9>a couple of different components here.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 8>You know, we have Hurricane Heleen that went straight through

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 8>Trump country in the Panhandle, Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 8>with the exception of Ashville, and like a couple of

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 8>blue pockets. But the turnout campaign, not just on the

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 8>day of the election, but right now as early voting

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 8>has started, is something that all this fundraising is able

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 8>to actually do. Kamala Harris's campaign has you know, a

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 8>dozen field offices in certain states, that are going to

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 8>be pivotal to this election, where Trump has almost none.

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 8>There are campaign volunteers that are getting paid twenty dollars

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 8>an hour to go out into the field and make

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 8>sure that they're knocking on doors and getting people to

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 8>the polls, getting their.

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 9>Mail in ballots.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 8>Said, that's the kind of money that's being spent right now,

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 8>and you're seeing it trickle down into the state races,

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 8>which are now expanding the Democratic map into places they

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 8>have no business being, you know, Texas, Florida, Nebraska, and

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 8>then also on the House side with an expansion of

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 8>the race sort of exponentially in the last couple of weeks.

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 8>And that's because of the massive fundraising campaign that the

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 8>Harris campaign has generated. I think I could think it's

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 8>if my Memory Service two hundred and eighty seven million

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 8>in August to Trump's eighty four million.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 9>So they're tripling their numbers.

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 6>Twenty bucks an hour for volunteer. That's that's pretty solid,

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 6>like that something that.

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't make them a volunteers.

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 6>It is true that feels odd, but you know, maybe

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 6>it's for profit volunteering. Henrietta. When we take a look

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 6>at the broader race in terms of Congress, Senate, and

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 6>the House. Where do we stand? What are some races

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 6>that you're watching?

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, my favorite part of this election is

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 8>that we have the benefit of every single swing state

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 8>also having a Senate race happening. I want to lay

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 8>out two that I think are really important today and

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 8>maybe the VP debate can move the needle.

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 9>In Arizona and Nevada.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 8>You see Kamala Harris's strength coming from the fact that

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 8>she's pulling thirteen to fifteen percent of the Republican voter base.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 8>So in Arizona, fifteen percent of voters that identify as

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 8>Republicans are saying, you know what, not today, not for Trump,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 8>not for Carrie Lake, who is the Republican Senate candidate there.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 8>They're going for Galleo and they're going for Kamala Harris.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 8>And that's why she is even playing ball in a

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 8>state like Arizona that used to be deep red. And

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 8>that's translating just next door to Nevada, where you're seeing

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 8>strength for Kamala Harris amongst Republican voters, and that's translating

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 8>down ballot to Jackie Rosen in that Senate seat, who's

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 8>ahead by ten in the latest polls on average, if

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 8>I'm not mistaken something like that. So the Senate candidates

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 8>down ballot for the Democratic Party are pulling so far

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 8>ahead of Kamala Harris, so far ahead of their Republican challengers,

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 8>and not all of them are incumbents, you know, whether

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 8>that's in Michigan or other states. There are Democratic Senate

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 8>races being held in all these pivotal states that Kamala

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 8>Harris must win and I think get four tens either

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 8>a massive split election or additional votes that Kamala Harris

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 8>can get in the final days of the campaign.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 6>All right, Henrietta, thanks so much. We really appreciate it.

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 6>Henrita trans managing partner and director of Economic Policy at

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 6>Vita Partners joining us there. You early vootered already, didn't you?

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 7>I did?

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I just mad, I think yesterday early and often. I'm

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 2>a big believer in that. And I'm also happy that

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 2>we are not I'm not in a swing state, John,

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>We're not in a swing state?

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Are we in New Jersey? Well, don't say your vote

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't every single vote Council's inphasized. So I dropped it

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 3>early on even though we're in New Jersey.

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 2>So, but in New Jersey, we're not as state, so

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 2>we're not getting crushed by the political ads yet. But

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 2>even the national buys are noticeable, you know. But I mean,

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 2>you get in a swing state, every local buy is

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 2>on every station.

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 4>You can go.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 6>I can't imagine. I mean, I've always lived in New York,

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 6>so I literally can't imagine.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Looking at the markets here, I mean again you could say,

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 2>given the geopolitical tensions, maybe this market's behaving fairly well,

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, over the past a couple of days. As

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 2>John has just mentioned, we do have a little bit

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of a sell off here, off just on about two

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>ten percent on the SMP five earner. But the question

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 2>is kind of, how do you thinking a little bit

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>more long term as you try to think about the geopolitics,

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe even the strike of the dock workers in the

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 2>economic impact that could have, how does that impact intermediate

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 2>to longer term views. Let's check them with somebody who

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>does this stuff for a living. Mary and Bartel's chief investments.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 2>It just for Sanctuary Wealth. Marion with a name like

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Sanctuary Wealth. I'm thinking you guys think long term, maybe

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 2>relatively low levels of risk. What's your investment view of

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 2>markets these days?

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 10>Oh, I can't get more bullish. And I understand that

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:23.479
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of geopolitical risks. We have a port strike,

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 10>we have an unpresidented presidential election. But what I've learned

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 10>in my forty years is that liquidity trumps everything, and

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 10>the Federal Reserve is on an aggressive path in my

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 10>view of now easing monetary policy at a time when

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 10>our economy is growing, We're growing at least about two percent.

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 10>I would argue, we're still at full employment, and we

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 10>still have corporate profits growth. We're not even a recession

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 10>for corporate profits. That this is going to ignite our economy,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 10>maintain in employment. And I'm pretty bullish.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 10>That's not to say that the markets can't be a

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 10>little tricky or spooky in the month of October. But

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 10>what the month of October has that most people don't

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 10>talk about is we make important market bottoms that allow

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 10>the market to have its strong year end rally.

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Where do you think the best opportunities are now? I

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 2>mean we've had some rotation in this marketplace. It's no

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>longer the big tech stocks that are leading us higher.

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 2>We've had some rotation some other sectors. How are you positioned?

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 10>So that's really a bullish thing that we have the

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 10>breath of the market expanding. So when we recently had

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 10>new record highs in the market, breath hit a new high,

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 10>we got volume expanding. That tells us we're in a

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 10>very strong market or very strong tape. I haven't given

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 10>up on tech. I think tech is in a consolidation.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 10>It's have an extraordinary move, but it's allowed other pockets

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 10>of the markets to move. Can you believe that utilities

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 10>could rally twenty percent this year? As the market is

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 10>expecting rates to come down, they're seeking out yield within

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 10>the equity market, You've seen moves in reads and it

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 10>might be possible next year that the phrase or word

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 10>tina comes back. There is no other alternative as the

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 10>market continues to seek out yield as the baby boomers

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 10>move into retirement.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 2>So I mean we've seen some volatility. I mean we

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 2>have the VIX now just still below twenty. But it

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 2>feels like there's been some volatility in these markets. When

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 2>you talk to a lot of pros out there, how

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 2>do you deal with that? Are there sectors maybe protect

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you from that, or are there other ways to look

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 2>at maybe getting a little bit of stability in a portfolio.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 9>So, I mean, the.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 10>True way to get stability in a portfolio, if you

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 10>really want to be very defensive, is to own cash.

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 10>And the market's already positioned there. We have six six

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 10>point four trillion dollars in money market funds. Many clients

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 10>have tried to lock in that five five and a

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 10>half percent. I would argue that the market is extremely defensive,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 10>but you know, pockets of utilities tend to be very

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 10>defensive also within the marketplace. Enough bright spot is we

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 10>have gold that's recently been hitting record all time highs,

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.239
<v Speaker 10>So you know you can put a little bit of

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 10>gold in the portfolio. Because I do think over time

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 10>we are more in an inflationary environment. Although we're seeing

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 10>inflation come down now and I think into next year,

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 10>I think we already have the ingredients for inflation to

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 10>come back.

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>All Right, we're speaking with Marion Bartel's chief investment strategist

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 2>at shank Sanctuary Wealth. Thankfully, Alex Steele has made it

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 2>back from her sojourn out to Calgary and she's back

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>in our studio.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you say that now, but wait until it

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 6>comes out of my mouth the next how and a

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 6>very good So anyway, I just got back, literally just

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 6>got into the studio. Marian I noticed obviously that you

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 6>were talking about being bullish and being positive and liquidity,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 6>et cetera. How does China factor into this because you're

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 6>already feeling bullish about liquidity regardless of what China is

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 6>actually doing. Could that be a catalyst?

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 10>Yes, it can, and.

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 9>It's not just China.

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 10>We have central banks around the world that are cutting

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 10>interest rates. It is very possible as we move into

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 10>next year that we get monetary stimulus that we haven't

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 10>seen since COVID in two thousand and eight, in two

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 10>thousand and nine.

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 9>And that's what I've.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 10>Learned throughout the years. Even though some bad things can

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 10>be happening around you, the most important thing to the

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 10>market is can companies grow their corporate profits. Markets trade

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 10>on profits, not on potentials of potential risk. Now, what

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 10>would change my view? Because we do have a lot

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 10>of risks out there. If crude oil spiked very sharply

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 10>and especially got to one hundred and stayed over one hundred,

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 10>I would view that to be extremely negative. I mean,

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 10>my bullishness would turn pretty much to bearishness. But you know,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 10>as you mentioned China, I think what China is doing

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 10>seems very unprecedented. I'm not an expert on China, but

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 10>the one thing I've learned is when central banks allow

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 10>you to buy the stock market, you should buy bye

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 10>bye We soart Japan do that near its lows?

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 9>In fact, the central bank.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 10>Actually outright bought its market. So when a central bank

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 10>is allowing buying of the market, I think you should

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 10>own it. I think part of the reason you've seen

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 10>such a sharp move up in China is so many

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 10>traders were short the market, right, so we've had this

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 10>major shortcovering.

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 9>But most fund.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 10>Managers that manage money, either globally or in the marging

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 10>markets are underweight. We have a lot of room to

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 10>actually move money into China.

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, Maria, and thank you so much for joining us.

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 2>Always appreciate getting your thoughts there. Remaining clearly bullish there,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Marion Bartel's chief investment Strategies for Sanctuary.

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Welcome.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am on applecar Play and Android Auto

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also listen live

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station Just

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 2>One of the names it's under pressure here to take

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 2>off about five six percent is Tesla, the company's first

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 2>quarter sales gains this year. They come up short the

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 2>vehicle deliveries. They did rise six point four percent, which

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 2>is good, but they were trailing analyst estimates here. So

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 2>again is stock selling off a little bit. Let's get

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>the latest with Keith Norton. He's a Bloomberg's Auto reporter. Keith,

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 2>what are you hearing out there about Tesla and their

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 2>earnings here?

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, there's a little disappointment on the vehicle sales. They

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 11>came in just under analysts expectations about one thousand vehicles

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 11>under They sold four hundred and sixty two thousand and

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 11>four hundred and sixty three was more of the it

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 11>was a consensus. But more to the point, they kind

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 11>of missed the whisper expectation, which was maybe as high

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 11>as for seventy seems like there's some softness in the

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 11>cyber truck. There also were high expectations for sort of

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 11>a cash for Clunger's sort of promotion going on in China.

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 11>They've doubled the incentive for EV sales if you turn

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 11>in an older model there. That was expected to give

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 11>more tailwind to Tesla, and that didn't quite materialize the

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 11>way that investors expected.

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 6>So the stock is down, you know, just in terms

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 6>of ubers. For example, every Uber I'm in now feels

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 6>like it's a Tesla. I don't know if you guys

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 6>experienced the same thing. And I feel like, is that

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 6>a good or bad sign for Tesla? Because yeah, okay,

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 6>it's promotional, But I feel like the reason why all

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 6>the ubers are now Tesla is is because it's a

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 6>promotion like get this off my lot. Are we at

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 6>the trough with that?

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 11>You know, Model three and Model why that is the

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.479
<v Speaker 11>volume of the company, which are their you know, mainstream cars,

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 11>their luxury model sque does not sell very well anymore.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 11>It's getting pretty long in the tooth. And cyber truck,

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 11>you know, is priced sort of around one hundred thousand,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 11>and that limits its volume under twenty thousand probably for

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 11>the quarter. So they are becoming a more mainstream brand

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 11>and when that happens, they become ubers.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 2>So mail Matt from Westchester emails in here and says,

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 2>is Tesla ever gonna have a new model? We haven't

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 2>had a new model like ever, really like just it

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 2>upgraded model.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 11>This is you know, sort of a long standing issue

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 11>that the product lineup, with the exception of cyber Truck,

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 11>which for now is a niche vehicle, that the lineup

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 11>is getting stale. But you know, Elon Musk is really

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 11>focusing more on Tesla as an AI company. They have

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 11>this event coming up next week to unveil the Robotaxi

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 11>that he's really been talking up. And that's actually talk

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 11>moved up the stock from the way he's positioning the company.

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 11>So he's trying to speak less like a traditional automaker

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 11>and more like an AI tech company.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 6>I feel like it's always been that. It's been like

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 6>Tesla's a tech company, Nope, it's a car company, Nope.

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 6>Now it's an AI company. How does the sales though

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 6>that we're seeing for EV's because that's still the bread

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 6>and butter. How is that stacking up against its peers

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 6>like a GM or Forward.

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean, Tesla's still far and away leads to

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 11>the market. But GM, for example, had an excellent quarter

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 11>in EV sales because they've just rolled out this thirty

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 11>five thousand dollars Chevy Equinox electric vehicle and that's a

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 11>great price, and it's below Tesla's lowest prices. So you know,

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 11>new competitors are coming in. Tesla's supposed to have a

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 11>lower priced EV coming next year, but Elon hasn't really

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 11>talked much about that. So you know, as more competitors

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 11>come in, as they come in at the lower end

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 11>of the market, that's going to chip way a Testa's share.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 2>All right, Keith, thanks so much. We appreciate that. As always,

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 2>Keith not an auto reporter for Bloomberg News. Testa reporting

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 2>numbers a little bit light relative to expectations.

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Looking at the market, it's kind of flat here today.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 2>I think the market's trying to digest kind of what

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing coming out of the Middle East, what the

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>economic impacts may be from this ongoing port strike, and

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe the political landscape as well as their traditional earnings

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 2>and FED watch and all those types of things. But

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 2>let's go to somebody who does this stuff for a living, Colschlife,

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Chief Investment Officer at BIMO Family Office, and we appreciate

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 2>getting some of her time. Carol, thanks so much for

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 2>joining us here. Put all that stuff together, you know,

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the geopolitical stuff, the domestic politics, the earnings, the fetter reserve.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Where do you guys come out and just say in

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 2>your communication to your clients. These days we.

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 12>Remind clients a lot. The whole reason we build durable

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 12>and sturdy portfolios is to be able to absorb these headlines,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 12>because it's not at all uncommon for markets to grapple

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 12>these headlines. You know, It's interesting because we end in

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 12>September with many different averages at or near all time highs,

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 12>and so investors are already a little nervous because there's

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 12>that human bias to try to figure out where the

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 12>risk is going to come from. And when you get

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 12>a day like yesterday where all of a sudden it's

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 12>a one two three punch, a lot of times investors

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 12>can be concerned in the short run. But it's interesting

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 12>when you look through it. And the nice thing is

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 12>is we're going into earning seasons, so we'll get a

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 12>lot of color from companies not only about the actual

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 12>earnings that they've reported, but their outlook for what's coming

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 12>next and how they're going to absorb all of the

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 12>shocks from this. But in the in the when you

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 12>look at the last few quarterly reports, especially the big

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 12>months of quarterly report, markets have actually done well because

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 12>the fundamentals have come through and our companies have proven

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 12>very resilient. So having portfolios, your minding investors that we've

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 12>got some fixed income in there for stability, we've got

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 12>some growth bias in there. Because the underlying trends are

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 12>very positive, it's been a great place to be well.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 6>It also goes to the other point of how many

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 6>bullish catalysts there are out there right now. And I'll

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 6>break it down. Okay, we got margins could actually be

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 6>better than expected as interest rates wind up coming down.

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 6>You also have, as you point out, earnings and expectations

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 6>have been revised lower, so the bar is pretty low.

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 6>The Fed is cutting twenty five or fifty in November,

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 6>but they are cutting stimulus from China. Definitely a fiscal

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 6>spend from the US government no matter who wins the

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 6>White House. And I'm obstruct like what is the downside?

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 6>Like how do you not buy equities in this market?

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 6>And plus, excess liquidity is really hot.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 12>Well, and I think that's why a lot of times

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 12>it's called the Wall of Warrior, because the market keeps

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 12>grudgingly hitting new highs, but you're not seeing the traditional

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 12>exuberance or ebulliance you would that would mark a market top.

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 12>And so from that perspective, there is a substantial amount underneath.

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 12>And actually you can make an argument that a lot

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 12>of business activities have actually been held in reserve because

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 12>everyone for the last two years has been fearing a

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 12>recession around every corner, and interest rates were high. Now

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 12>you've got a reversal of those. You've got a lot

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 12>of people saying, which is maybe reaverted the recession. And oh,

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 12>by the way, the GDP revisions that we just had

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 12>erased that technical recession that everyone freaked out about a

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 12>year or two ago, because that's not even in the

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 12>numbers anymore. And it goes again to how resilient these

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 12>companies have been.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Carol, how about the fixed and come space, where do

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 2>you see opportunities there? And again an interest rate environment

0:31:58.160 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 2>where some of the fed's going to continue to lower.

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we actually we're preferring clients not wait around in cash.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 12>Cash has been very comfortable for a lot of people

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 12>that they at least go a bit out on the

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 12>curb and lock in some of these yields that you're getting. Now,

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 12>we're not ready to go out towards the tenure or

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 12>longer because we actually think the tenure yields are lower

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 12>than they'll end up being, because we do believe there's

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 12>an underlying growth bias. You referenced a lot of the

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 12>fiscal spend that's out there. There's a lot of stuff

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 12>that's been targeted and there's thumbtacks in it, but less

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 12>based on some of the numbers, we're seeing less than

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 12>twenty percent of what's been allocated is actually out there.

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 12>And one of the interesting thing is is you've got

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 12>a lot of bonding bills on state and local ballots

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 12>this fall, and to the extent those get passed, you've

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 12>got a lot of spending teeing up that's matched by

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 12>those federal funds, and so you've got the opportunity to

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 12>really put some extra growth underneath a lot of these things.

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 12>And so we think as that gets absorbed that you'll

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 12>see that the tenure yields drift higher, not lower.

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 6>So, Paul, you'll be so proud of me. I did

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 6>email my guy and I was like, Hey, so I

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 6>had this money in my high heeled savings. Should I

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 6>put it in munis? I'm just saying where the money

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 6>should go. I thought of Paul. He likes the munis.

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 6>But it does raise the question of in the equity side,

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 6>where do you wind up rotating that cash. This an

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 6>area that we all talked about in terms of the

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 6>positive catalysts play out. Do you rotate into the cyclicals,

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 6>do you stick with tech? Do you barbel it?

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 7>I think you.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 12>Barbel it, and I also think you move down the

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 12>capitalization curve because there's a lot of argument that a

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 12>lot of those small caps have been very fitful at

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 12>their participation. They'll participate for a week or two or

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 12>a day or two, and then they'll pull it all back.

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 12>And on those pull backs, it's nice to be able

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 12>to round up some of those because they have by

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 12>and large, they're going to have better access, they're going

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 12>to have more floating rate debt, they're going to benefit

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 12>more disproportionately, if you will, from it FED bringing rates down,

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 12>and they're also going to participate as the economic activities

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 12>stays robust in the United States.

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Ellen, I want to get your thoughts on alternative investments.

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 2>How do you put them in the context of your

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 2>the Bemo Family office in terms of asset allocation for

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 2>your clients, whether it's private equity, private debt, hedge funds,

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing.

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 12>Yep, private equity, private debt, we're probably less. We have

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 12>selective spots where we use hedge funds as much, probably

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 12>not as much as we might have a decade or

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 12>two ago, but a lot of private capital in general.

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 12>We also have other things. We are very active in

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 12>doing some custom structured notes for our clients. We look

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 12>at a lot of interesting non correlated asset class catastrophe bonds.

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 12>Some of the interesting niches and credit. The nice thing

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 12>we have in terms of the private capital that we

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 12>go after is we can go to smaller funds rather

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 12>than the multi billion dollar and super big funds. Sweet

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 12>spot is some smaller funds that get a lot of

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 12>less attention, if you will, and are in some very

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 12>niche stoff, so our clients like it a lot.

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 6>We were just talking about Nike with punam Go Oil

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 6>or Bloomberg intelligence analyst, which leads me to the consumer, Right,

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 6>how do you play K shaped economy At the end

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 6>of the day.

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 12>It is difficult, and it's interesting because one of the

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 12>pieces that I'm preparing to write is you do have this.

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 12>There's a lot of angst out there that is coming

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 12>through in consumer confidence numbers and also coming through in

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 12>polling numbers. But you've got the odd part is is

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 12>the top twenty percent of the populace produces forty percent

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 12>of the GDP activity. The bottom twenty percent produces nine percent,

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 12>So that top twenty percent is really going to drive.

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 5>The overall macro number.

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 12>But interestingly enough, that bottom twenty percent has a chance

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 12>to drive what happens at the ballot box in five

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 12>weeks and to the extent that the turnout and vote

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 12>you have a chance to shape policy intermediate, longer term,

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 12>and so we do a lot of talking like that

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 12>because obviously our clients are going to sit at the

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 12>top portion and they're going to be in a very

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 12>different scenario. But their kids, their grandkids are looking at

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 12>a lot different environment because they're finding it difficult to

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 12>find daycare, difficult to find houses, they're over indebted in

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 12>a lot of cases with college stat things like that.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 12>So it really is difficult and we have a lot

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 12>of those conversations one by one.

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Kerl, thank you so much for joining us

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Coush Life. She's a chief investment officer for Bemo Family Office.

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Joining us there via the zoom thing.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Here, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 6>Thirty from Alex Steel alongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 6>Intelligence Radio. We're broadcasting to live from Ournactive Broker studio

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.280
<v Speaker 6>right here. In midtown Manhattan. As Charlie was just talking about,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 6>WTI is up by about seven tens of one percent.

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 6>We're treating at seventy thirty four. The latest headline that

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 6>just crossed from the Wall Street Journal is it apparently

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 6>key members of an alliance made of OPEC plus agreed

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 6>to ease curbs in December. This is at an online

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 6>gathering that took place on Wednesday, and according to delegates

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 6>in the cartel, basically OPEC plus has taken oil off

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 6>the market and they need to find a time to

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 6>put it back onto the market, whether it's going to

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 6>be a slow drip, whether it's going to be a

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 6>full stop, or whether they're going to have to cut

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 6>again in order to support the oil price. All of

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 6>that surrounding the oil market right now. Ellen Wald is

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.720
<v Speaker 6>president of Transversal Consulting and senior Fellow at Atlanta Council,

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 6>and she joins us, Now, what is your read through

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 6>on that headline?

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think that this headline it comes after a

0:37:56.040 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 13>couple of interesting headlines from Saudi Arabia saying, know they're

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 13>worried about oil going down maybe to fifty or they're

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 13>not pursuing hundred dollars oil anymore. I think that this

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 13>is really reflective of a process that OPEK has been

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.959
<v Speaker 13>going through over the past quarter, maybe even half a year.

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 13>At this point where they're looking at the market, they

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.959
<v Speaker 13>know they've got to start unwinding these cuts that they've

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 13>had in place for a long time, but they're really

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 13>conscious of where the market is going, what demand looks

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 13>like in China, and what they have to do to

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 13>kind of ease the market into accepting that, yes, they

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 13>are going to be putting more oil on the market.

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.720
<v Speaker 13>They've already delayed the return of this oil was supposed

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 13>to start coming back on the market in October, and

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 13>they're really just they're pushing it back to December, but

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 13>they're saying, yes, you know, we still plan on doing this.

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 13>I do think, as you mentioned before about Iraq and

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 13>Kazakhstan and some overproduction going on there, it's entirely possible

0:38:55.400 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 13>that they will be excluded from this increase in output

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 13>because the way that it works is each member only

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 13>increases a certain percentage, So each individual member is only

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.720
<v Speaker 13>going to be putting on really a very minimal amount

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 13>of barrels. They may exclude those members that had been

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 13>overproducing from this in order to prevent you know, too

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 13>much oil from flooding the market.

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 7>Hey Ellen.

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Javier Blass, who is a Bloomberg opinion columnist covering the

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 2>energy space. He's out with a note today saying that

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 2>the oil price that matters now is fifty dollars, not

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that one hundred dollars fabled one hundred dollars dollars target,

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 2>that's not relevant anymore. Maybe the new target's fifty. What

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 2>do you think about that?

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 13>You know, that's a that's an interesting conception. I do

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 13>think that there is definitely a we've kind of switched

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 13>from you know, how high is it going to go?

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 13>To how can we prevent you know, how can we

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 13>prevent there from being kind of a bottom. I do

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 13>think that he's saying this in part because the Saudis

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 13>have definitely been hinting at the prospects of you know,

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 13>they have the potential and the ability to flood the

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 13>market with oil and push prices down, and that's really

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 13>the only leverage that they have to get other OPEC

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 13>members and other OPEP plus members in line, and to

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 13>keep them in line and you know, adhering to their

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 13>quotas and so the Satuities say, look, you're you're not hearing.

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 13>We can flood the market. We can open the floodgates,

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 13>and we can you know, increase our production up so

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 13>high that prices will will go down maybe to fifty

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 13>and maybe even lower as we've seen in the past,

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 13>and that will have a major impact on the ability

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 13>of these other countries to bring in revenue. But for

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 13>the Saudis, it's really not that big a deal. Then

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 13>they can take it, whereas those countries will really significantly

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 13>be hurt. And so I don't think that this is

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 13>a threat that they're making idly. But I don't think

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 13>it's you know, around the corner. I think you'd have

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 13>to have some pretty severe actions, you know, to see

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:54.359
<v Speaker 13>the Saudis go through with this.

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and then to that point, their break even for

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 6>oil price is super low, but their fiscal breaking even

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.720
<v Speaker 6>it is like eighty five, So they can just pairback

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 6>spending domestically if they needed to support that. The last

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.760
<v Speaker 6>time they flooded the market, it was to hurt shale producers,

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 6>and I find it interesting that this time if they

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 6>wind up sort of rolling back those cuts, it's to

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 6>force compliance among its own member. It's an interesting twist

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 6>before we let you go how much geopolitical risk premium

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 6>is in the oil price right now and how much

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 6>you think should be in the oil price right now.

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 13>So that's a great question. I do think there is

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 13>some geopolitical risk premium. We've seen prices reacting to events.

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 13>Maybe you know, two percent, three percent is geopolitical risk premium.

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 13>I think, you know, it's hard to kind of divv

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:37.879
<v Speaker 13>that up between the Middle East, between Russia. I think

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 13>that any kind of risk premium that's associated with the

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 13>idea that Iran might say close the straight of form

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 13>moves is really not well founded because this is not

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 13>the same environment that we saw in the nineties or

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 13>the eighties or even the early two thousands. Iran is

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 13>not going to close the straight of form moves. It's

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 13>not even clear that they can physically do that. But

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 13>doing so would so anger China, and China is now

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 13>the mean customer of it's Iran's main customer, it's Saudi

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 13>Rabie's main customer, it's the mean customer of all of

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 13>the Middle East oil producers, and that would so ainger

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 13>China that the consequences would be such that they would

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.280
<v Speaker 13>be devastating, so I don't see any reason why Iran

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 13>would do that. I do think that there is an

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 13>elevated risk in the Red Sea, and that's really where

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:24.720
<v Speaker 13>our analysts should be keeping an eye on in terms

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 13>of the potential for some serious disruption.

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, Ellen, thank you so much for joining us.

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Ellen Wald she is a president a Transversal Consulting and

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a senior fellow at the Atlanta Council, and she is

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 2>one of our go to voices on all things global oil.

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Bihart Radio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.