WEBVTT - Week 13 NFL Bets: Nick's Picks

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Love Herts. Keith

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>week Kwan has had quite a career, from childhood roles

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in Indiana, Jones and the Temple of Doom and The

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Goonies to a recent Academy Award win for Everything, Everywhere,

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>All at Once. But now Keith finally stars as a

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>leading man in the film Love Hurts. Love Hurts is

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a perfect date night movie with its mix of over

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the top action comedy and a ton of heart. Love

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Hurts Only at theaters February seventh.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 2>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 2>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheadle, Michael Pania, and

0:00:53.880 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Knavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in What's Right? Nick Right? Episode one oh two

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>our week. My god, is this week fourteen our Week

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 3>fourteen gambling show. Week thirteen gambling Show. I'm all thrown

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 3>off because we haven't been on TV the last few

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 3>days because of the awesome World Cup. I hope you

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 3>guys saw the What's Right Show yesterday where we did

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 3>a deep dive into the World Cup and I discussed

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the most irritating soccer commentary that exists that's available on

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 3>our YouTube page and on our podcast feeds. However, we're

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna get into this week back to the same regular schedule.

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Five picks. We do our picks, we do our stayaways,

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>our be carefuls at our perfectly priced Last week we

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 3>did six picks, and thank god we did because that

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 3>added sixth pick is what saved us from having a

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 3>losing week. Who was a very odd a weekend of gambling,

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 3>which was we went two and oh on Thursday, one

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>and oh on Monday with our bonus pick, and zero

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 3>and three on Sunday afternoons. So let's go through it.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Detroit plus ten versus Buffalo obviously the right side. They

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 3>could have won out right. Giants plus nine and a

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 3>half against Dallas got away with one there the late

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>cover touchdown, Thank you Giants. Tennessee plus two and a

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 3>half against Cincinnati didn't work out. His Cincinnati was better.

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 3>I liked the Zach Taylor matchup his tennis Cincinnati, the

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Zach Taylor versus Mike Brabil match, if I should say,

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>but Cincinnati did a wonderful job of shutting down Derrick

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Henry except for the screen pass. Seattle minus three and

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 3>a half against Vegas went to overtime. Seattle had plenty

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 3>of opportunities. Good for Vegas. We were on the wrong

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 3>side of it. Another right move down the tubes, and

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 3>that one was a torturous bet to lose. Had no

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 3>reason to lose. Should have at least pushed the fact

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 3>that Tampa couldn't get couldn't that we talked about it

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 3>on Monday. The clock management at the end of the game,

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the inability to move the ball in overtime was disastrous.

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 3>And then Pittsburgh plus two and a half against the

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 3>Fight and Jeff Saturdays. So last week three and three,

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 3>so we remained three games under five hundred. Again not

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 3>the exact place we want to be in, but still

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 3>alive for a great season, if a long season. These days.

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>This week we have we thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen,

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and week eighteen. We have almost a third of the season.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 3>In fact, we have exactly a third of the season remaining.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.119
<v Speaker 3>So let's just go four and one over the next

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>few weeks and we'll be good to go. We will

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>start this week with Atlanta plus one against Pittsburgh. Okay,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta has not looked good lately. I'm not going to

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 3>give a deep analysis of the game. This one is

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>very very simple. Pittsburgh is coming off a nationally televised

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 3>victory and the game before that, while the defense didn't

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 3>play well, the offense did. I think right now, they're

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 3>a little overvalued. Atlanta at home in Atlanta has to

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>feel like even though they just put Kyle Pitts on,

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I are we are still alive. And because they are

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 3>still alive, because the Bucks can't take control of anything.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 3>And my analysis on this, even though it's only one point,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>is very simple. Kenny Pickett should not be a road

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 3>favorite over anybody. I think Atlanta wins this game. Pittsburgh

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 3>got a nice win for them. They saw some nice

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>things from Kenny Pickett the last few weeks at I

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 3>thought when this game I thought it would be Atlanta

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 3>by two and a half. It's Pittsburgh by one. I

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 3>like Atlanta getting the one point. We'll move on to

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the next game. These first two games, by the way,

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>are ugly games, not incredibly interesting. We'll do them quickly.

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 3>We like the value on them. The Giants plus two

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 3>and a half against Washington Again, are the Giants headed

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 3>in the wrong direction? Obviously? Does Washington look like they

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 3>could end up stealing their playoff spot?

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 3>However, the Giants at home getting almost a field goal

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 3>against Taylor Heineke, who, while has the Washington's been winning,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 3>Heineke has not played exceptionally well. The Giants desperate with

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 3>some extra rest because of the Thanksgiving game, all of

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 3>those reasons. I like the Giants this weekend to win,

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 3>to kind of stabilize their season a bit. Now, will

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 3>they make the playoffs? Maybe not right now Giants, Washington,

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Seattle two of them are going to make the playoffs.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 3>One of them is not. So for the Giants when

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>they have to go to Washington in a couple weeks.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 3>And I know Washingtons getting Chase Young back, this is

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 3>as close to him must win as you're gonna have

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 3>for a team. I like the Giants getting points at

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 3>home that Giants defense, and I like Saquam's chances of

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.799
<v Speaker 3>bouncing out of his little mini slump this weekend, Giants

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 3>getting nearly a field goal at home. If you're thinking

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 3>about betting this one, I would wait a bit because

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 3>if it goes down to Giants plus two, you're not

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 3>losing much value at all, And I would hold on

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 3>to the hope that maybe gets up to Giants plus three.

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 3>But I like the Giants and Atlanta to both win

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 3>outright as slight home dogs. Now we get to much

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 3>more interesting games. The Chargers minus a point and a

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 3>half at the Raiders. The Raiders needed overtime and the

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 3>game of Josh Jacob's life last week to beat Seattle.

0:06:55.160 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 3>The Chargers are in a spot where they are enough

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 3>and they will be getting healthier as the year goes

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 3>on to not only be a playoff team, but to

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 3>be a potentially dangerous playoff team. But the only way

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 3>that can happen is if they they got to start

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 3>winning more games. Because the Jets stabilize themselves a bit,

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 3>it would appear by putting in Mike White. The Patriots

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 3>have a brutal schedule moving forward. But if you think

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots are going to be able to split with

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>the Bills, and by the way, Patriots Bills is tonight,

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>you guys will when you guys hear it, it will

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 3>have been last night. So we don't pick the Thursday

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 3>night games anymore. If I were picking a side in that,

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I would like the Patriots plus the points, but I'm

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 3>not betting that game either way. The Chargers, this is

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 3>for if they are going to sneak their way into

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the wild card and be a dangerous wild card team,

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 3>they have to build on the momentum of their win

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 3>against the Cardinals last week. It's the they've got to

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 3>because they've got this week. They have the Raiders, and

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>then they have two tough games in a row. Granted

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>they're at home, but they have no home field. They're

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 3>home for Miami than home for the Titans. So let's

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 3>just assume the Chargers lose both of those games, that

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden would put them at seven losses.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 3>So they have to win all of their other games

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 3>to get to the ten wins it's gonna take to

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 3>make the postseason. They have the Raiders, then Dolphins, Titans,

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 3>then Colts, Rams Broncos. Colts Rams Broncos about as nice

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 3>of a finishing three games as you can have. They

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 3>need to make it so they're alive going into those

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 3>final three. That means they win in Vegas. I like

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers' ability to move the football on a Raiders

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 3>team that is troubled, that has had trouble last week,

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 3>and I was saying to get into the passer all year.

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm only laying a point and a half. I don't

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 3>mind doing that, even though they're on the road. Chargers

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 3>minus one and a half.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 5>So you know last week you had to pick six

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 5>teams to save you from a losing week. Yeah, so

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna give you a piece of advice here. Okay,

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 5>you could avoid betting on the two most unpredictable teams

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 5>in the league.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, listen, I could. But I also think that

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders should. The Raiders have shown us nothing that

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 3>they should be that. How do I put this? The

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Raiders are getting less than a field goal. I know

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 3>they're at home against what I consider a good team,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 3>and I understand they just beat the Seahawks in overtime,

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 3>but prior to that, their only victories this year had

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 3>come against the Texans and the Broncos. So why do

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the Raiders are going to all all of

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 3>a sudden string together back after winning. By the way,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 3>they've already went back to back string together three straight wins.

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Josh McDaniel is one of the worst coaches

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 3>in the league. I think the Chargers are desperate, and

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers, to me, are not that unpredictable. They're just

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 3>incredibly banged up. I think Justin Herbert has a big game.

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 4>I like the Chargers have their last two wins come

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 4>from overtime.

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, both of them. Both of them walk off overtime touchdowns.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 3>The DeVante Adams a touchdown against russ and the Broncos

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty two to sixteen, and then the eighty five yard

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Josh Jacobs run all right next, one of my favorite

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 3>bets of the year. I'm gonna be in Vegas for

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 3>this game.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna be.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Watching the World Cup in the morning and then getting

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 3>ready for one of the games of the year in

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the NFL. You guys know, I have not included the

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs and Knicks picks hardly at all this year. Kansas

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 3>City minus less than a field goal minus two against Cincinnati.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>So if the Chiefs win this game, they they don't

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 3>lock up the one seed because Buffalo and Miami are

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 3>right there, but they already have the tiebreaker with Tennessee,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 3>who is the AFC South Divisional leader. They currently they

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 3>would get the tiebreaker with Cincinnati, who is the tied

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 3>for the lead in the AFC North. They'd still have

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 3>to end Cincinnati be down to five losses, they would

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 3>eliminate Cincinnati from there. Also, if the Chiefs win this game,

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 3>the rest of this is their last truly difficult game

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 3>on their schedule. The rest of the way for the

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs after this game Broncos Texans home for the Seahawks

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Broncos Raiders. If they win this game, their absolute floor

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 3>is fourteen and three, which would mean Buffalo or Miami

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>would play each other by the way, one of them

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 3>would have to go undefeated the rest of the way.

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 3>For the Chiefs not to get the one seed, Baltimore

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>would be out of it. Because the Chiefs are if

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 3>they win this game, they are not losing two of

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 3>the following two of Broncos Texans, Seahawks Broncos Raiders flatly

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 3>not happening. Add to it. Patrick Mahomes has never lost

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 3>three in a row to a team. It's incredibly rare.

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 3>He's ever lost two in a row to a team.

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I think the only team to beat him

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>too in a row might be the Patriots when they

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 3>had Brady. One of them was an overtime AFC Championship game.

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not certain on that. I'm gonna have to check that.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 3>The single the only true dark moment of Mahomes' career

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 3>was the second half of the AFC Championship game last

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 3>year against this very team. This is everyone has wanted

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 3>to make the Bills the Chiefs rival, and I get

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 3>that because they've played great games, but the Bills have

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 3>played them in the playoffs and lost each time. If

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals were to win this game, Joe Burrow would

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>be three and zero in his career against Patrick Mahomes.

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 3>There is a lot on the line here. I don't

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 3>want to say legacy wise, but as far as a

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 3>and they could play again in the playoffs, Like, wait,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 3>do we have everyone in the conference's number except for Cincinnati?

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 3>I think now, Cincinnati, what they did defensively against Derrick

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Henry was incredibly impressive. The Chiefs are just not going

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 3>to run the ball. The Bengals are without Chadobia Wuzia,

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 3>who's been on IR for a while, with their best corner.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm laying less than a field goal. And here's the

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 3>other thing. Kansas City laying less than a field goal

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 3>is a must bet against anybody. I love the Chiefs

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 3>minus the two. It might be my favorite bet of

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 3>the year.

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 5>I think you should be a little bit of a

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 5>little nervous given these following numbers. Okay, Kansas City is

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 5>one and seven against the spread this year after wins. Okay,

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 5>and the last time they were on a five game

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 5>wins winning streak, they lost to Cincinnati on the road.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.599
<v Speaker 3>Listen, it's hard to go on long winning streaks in

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 3>this league. The one in seven against the spread after

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 3>wins is not as noteworthy to me. However, in this regard,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 3>it's usually because they're big favorites. It's usually because that

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 3>point spread has been inflated enough to cover this. They

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 3>just need to win the game. I mean, I understand

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>they could they push with a two point win and

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 3>they lose against the spread with a one point win.

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I like the Chiefs here. I like the Chiefs making

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>a statement, having a statement game, and the Chiefs not

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 3>getting because both the games against Cincinnati last year, the

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs annihilated them in the first half and then we're

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 3>nowhere to be seen in the second half. And so

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 3>all those reasons I love the Chiefs minus two here,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and then lastly, this one, I'll be very quick on it.

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 3>It's just too many points. The Colts plus eleven and

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 3>a half at Dallas. Do I like Jeff Saturday?

0:14:58.640 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Does it terror by me that Matt Ryan is gonna

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 3>get sacked eight times in this game, have three fumbles, Yeah,

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 3>against that Cowboys pass rush. The Cowboys are the team

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 3>on the extra rest. The extra extra rest, by the way,

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>because the Cowboys played on Thanksgiving, the Colts played on

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Monday night. All of those things are in the favor

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 3>of the Dallas Cowboys. Eleven and a half is too

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 3>many points. There's just so many results here where the

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys dominate this game. And the Colts still cover. Twenty

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 3>seven to seventeen, that's a Colts cover. Twenty eight to seventeen,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 3>that's a Colts cover. Thirty one to twenty that's a

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Colts cover. There's eleven and a half points the Cowboys.

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 3>The Cults are not a horrible team. They have some

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 3>horrible games, but when Matt Ryan has played this year,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the Colts have been around five hundred, and they have

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 3>some games where they look totally incompetent. However, Dallas's one

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 3>weakness is it's one glaring weakness. Is it run defense.

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Now they shored that up a bit on Thanksgiving. I

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 3>don't know if that means they fixed it. The Colts

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>will run the football, The Colts will try to make

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 3>this a fast game. It's too many points. The Colts

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 3>plus eleven and a half is a bet. It's just

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 3>too many points. I like that one a lot. That also,

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 3>by the way, it is a sign of how powerful

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys are from a ratings perspective that NBC could

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 3>have had on Sunday Night Football Dolphins Niners, which might

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 3>be the Super Bowl. The Niners are the second favorites

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 3>in the NFC, the Dolphins are the third favorites in

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 3>the AFC, and instead they kept it Colts Cowboys, even

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 3>though the Colts are terrible and we're on National TV

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>last week, because they just know people want to see

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the Dallas Cat Cowboys, so it just that's not a

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 3>gambling note.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 4>It's like America's team.

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean that's what they're called. And I mean

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the Fox did forty million people on Thanksgiving. Forty million

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 3>people watch that football game on Thanksgiving. The Fox has

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 3>the super Bowl this year and they have a real

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 3>shot at what would be the highest rated super Bowl

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 3>in modern times, which would be Cowboys Chiefs. Kayu, you

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 3>have the star power of Mahomes the Cowboys in the

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 3>first super Bowl in the quarter century. Cowboys, anybody would

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 3>be crazy rated Cowboys Chiefs would have to be. I

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 3>would imagine Fox's number one pick if they could pick,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 3>and that's on the board.

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 5>All right, So you go to I mean, you kind

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 5>of covered the question that I was going to ask.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 5>It was just regarding Dallas mean on a short week,

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 5>and I mean Dallas mean on a long week and

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 5>Jeff Saturday being on a short one.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen, I don't like Jeff Saturdays in game adjustment

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 3>into the clock management stuff for Monday night was a

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 3>total Travis dy pardon me. That's been well documented. But

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 3>I don't expect this game to be one where clock

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 3>management's really a factor. I do expect Dallas first of

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 3>a clock. Management's a factor. They covered the eleven and

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>a half, you know what I mean? Like if it's

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 3>close enough to where time out management matters, They've covered

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 3>the eleven and a half, so that doesn't matter. This

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 3>to me is more about can they keep it close

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 3>ish and be alive for a backdoor cover or be

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 3>alive for Dallas to be taking knees up eight or

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 3>ten late? I think so? I like the Colts plus

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 3>eleven and a half. All right, stay aways, be carefuls

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 3>and perfectly priced.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>All that.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Next, what's right?

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 6>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 6>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 6>said for your investments. Cebo index options like SPX and

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 6>xsp can help expand your investing with cash settlement and

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 6>potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more dynamic

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 6>game plan, head to Better with Options dot com. Cebo

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 6>Life is better with options. Your investments could be two.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 6>There are risks associated with Cibo company products. Review the

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 6>disclosures and disclaimers at cebo dot com slash us underscore disclaimers.

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 3>All right, welcome back in What's Right with Nick? Right,

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>we just gave you our five picks of the week

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta plus one, Giants plus two and a half, Chargers

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 3>minus one and a half, CAC minus two, and Indie

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 3>plus eleven and a half. I said, Kancity minus two

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>is my favorite bet, one of my favorite bets of

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>the year. Will I make that the right move? I

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 3>might not, because I might feel like there's so much

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 3>bad right move juju that I don't even want to

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 3>deal with it. Can I tell you a sad I

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 3>should have sent this to our producers, A sad DM

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>I got from arguably the greatest poker player of all time,

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Texas Dolly. Doyle Brunson sent me this on Monday. I

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 3>followed your pick Sunday and I am still bleeding. I

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 3>hate the red board games, but I think we were

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 3>pretty unlucky. Angry guy emoji. I cost Doyle Brunson probably

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 3>thirty thousand dollars by going oh for three on Sunday.

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 4>And our mailman, what do you mean our mail man?

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean he said that when he when he asked

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 5>me to come out for the FedEx Pi kach or whatever,

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 5>he said that the prince that was promised has cost

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 5>him a lot of money this year.

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Listen, I don't take that stuff lightly. I feel badly

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 3>about which is why I spend so much time, and

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 3>which is why it is important to me. Listen, this

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 3>is not me taking a shot, but Bill Simmons does

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 3>these things. He does his weekly pictures called million Dollar Picks,

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 3>and on this year on the million Dollar Picks, he's

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 3>down like four million bucks and it's all like on

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 3>teasers and parlays. And I would say, this is the

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 3>worst year picking games I have had, I think since

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I've been on TV, and I'm three games below five.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Let's note that it's the only one that's documented.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, not the only one that's documented. Just

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 3>because you weren't there for it doesn't mean I wasn't

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 3>giving the picks on TV and on Twitter on a

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 3>weekly basis. But you mentioned it costs. If you bet

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred dollars on all of our games, okay, you

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 3>would be minus three hundred plus the big you'd be

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 3>minus six hundred and ten dollars. Right now. Over the

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 3>course of the season, you would have won twenty eight

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred dollars worth of bets. You would have lost thirty

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>four hundred and ten dollars worth of bets. You'd be

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 3>minus six to ten. That's not on. If you're one

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred dollars better, that's not great. But over the course

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 3>of twelve weeks you'd be down fifty dollars a week.

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 3>It's manageable, you know what I mean. I haven't cost

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 3>any body their shirt here where and so, and we

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 3>still have a very real chance of finishing above five hundred,

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 3>slightly in the green, which is what we would like

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 3>to We would like to be massively in the green. Sure,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 3>would we like our picks to be shaping up well

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 3>against the Las Vegas super Contest leaders like they did

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago. Sure, thus far this year it

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 3>hasn't been that. But you can survive on around five

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred and still have had a good football season.

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 4>At least. You've just got to clean it up and.

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Not turn it around exactly exactly. You know what, that's exactly.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 3>That's a great way to put it. I need to

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 3>clean it up, not a full on turnaround. So now

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 3>it's because we've stayed true to this system. Our picks,

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 3>our stay aways are be carefuls and are perfectly priced.

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Are three stay aways this week Cleveland and Houston, Green

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Bay at Chicago and Jacksonville Detroit. Let's start with Cleveland

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 3>at Houston. This is very simple on why it's a

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 3>stay away. We've actually seen Deshan Watson play football in

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 3>two years, so you might say them, why would I

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 3>not grab Houston at home? Grabbing the points Houston? Brandon Cooks?

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Did you see this quote? Brandon Cooks? It was probably

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 3>the best player on the Texans offense. Was asked after

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 3>the Dolphins game, when did you guys know you were

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 3>out classed? And he said, probably first play of the game.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 3>We just knew, like they're done. Lovey is not an

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 3>NFL head coaching, Are you supposed to say? No? He

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 3>wanted to be trade. He was very angry they didn't

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 3>trade him at the deadline, very angry they didn't. He

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 3>wanted to go play for a real team. So you

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 3>can't bet on Houston right now. They can't score in

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 3>the first half, they went to they were starting Davis Mills.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Then they went to what was it, Brandon Allen. I

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 3>don't even know who their quarterback was. This past week

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 3>was terrible. Uh, and Cleveland is so you can't bet

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 3>on Houston, But you to me, it would be insane

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 3>to bet on Deshaun Watson in his first game in

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>two years, laying a touchdown. So that is the definition

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 3>of a stay away.

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 4>So wouldn't it make.

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Sense to bet on some first half lines since, like

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Deshaun Watson might be a little rusty.

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 3>But now we're getting what do you think Houston is

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 3>in the first half getting four? So now I'm betting

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 3>on Hueston. Do you know how many points Cleveland needs

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 3>to cover four in the first half? Seven? That's how

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 3>many they need to cover four in the first half,

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 3>like the So no, I'm just to me, that is

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 3>the definition of a stay away. Green Bay at Chicago,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Chicago getting four and a half as we record this,

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 3>we don't know if Justin Fields is playing, and far

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>far Rogers should play. He's banged up, so you have

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 3>injuries to both quarterbacks as we're recording this.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 5>We must stay away. I like, I'm sorry, go ahead

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 5>tell me. I like Green Bay in Chicago with no

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 5>Justin Fields. I mean the way they got done by

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 5>the Jets last week.

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I totally agree with you. But it might be

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 3>with Justin Fields, right ye of course. And if it's

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 3>no Justin Fields, that line probably moves to seven.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 4>Right, So that.

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 3>You know what, it's just right now it's a stay away.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 3>And then Jacksonville laying one in Detroit?

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 4>Wow? What in the stay away? Not even be careful? Why?

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 4>What's so since them only they've only won run road

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 4>game since December twenty nineteen. Okay, you can't jump on it.

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean?

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I've ever seen the Jags in the

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 4>stay away category?

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Is my band over for the Jags?

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 4>I think it's up this week?

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>This week I'm allowed to beat on. Yeah, six picks again,

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 3>six picks again? Add the Jags? Are you The Jags

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 3>are not losing. The prince that was promised is not losing.

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 3>They are to Jared Goff in Detroit. You know what

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 3>that means? You know what my big takeaway from the

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 3>ming in Detroit is, you know what Detroit has over

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 3>that stadium a roof. So I'm not gonna have to

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 3>worry about the rain. I'm not gonna have to worry

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 3>about the elements. I'm just gonna get the prince that

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 3>was promised, wheeling and dealing for a Jags team that

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I told you all they have to do is win

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>out and they make the playoffs. Addam to the list,

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 3>we only have two stayaways Chicago, Green Bay and Cleveland Houston.

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 3>What was I thinking with my band lifted and not

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 3>betting the frisky Jags after Trevor Lawrence just diced up

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 3>the Baltimore Ravens.

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Trevor Lawrence has never lost his I mean, has never

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 4>won as a favorite by the way.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's a BS stat because he's probably only only

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 3>been a favorite like three times in his career. He's

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 3>probably like zero to three as a favorite. One point

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 3>is not even really a favorite.

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 4>What The Jags also have nineteen straight losses to the NFC.

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Again, that is a BS stat because so.

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 4>He wasn't playing for eighteen games.

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Well not for eighteen, but they played the NFC five

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 3>times last year and what a couple times this year?

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 3>So Trevor Lawrence is I don't care about any of them?

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Seven Yeah, but again, what did.

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 3>We tell you guys last week about on Monday about

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Trevor that his first year didn't count exactly right? Throw

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 3>all those records out, doesn't matter. Jaggs minus one, Adam

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 3>of the picks. We're doing six picks again, be carefuls

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee at Philly, Seattle at the Rams and New Orleans

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 3>at Tampa, Okay, Tennessee at Philly is in the be

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 3>careful category. You seem to have a question as to.

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Why tomorrow, So why is this in the be careful?

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.199
<v Speaker 5>Rabel cover is seventy five percent of the time as

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 5>an underdog and is sixteen and ten straight up.

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 4>As an underdog of over a field goal.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, this is so. That is exactly the reason that

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 3>this is a becase. I don't feel comfortable enough in

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 3>that to me, so let me explain it. The Eagles

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 3>weakness right now is going to be their past defense.

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 3>They're very banged up in the secondary. Jordan Davis isn't

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 3>back yet, and Jordan Davis isn't He's their big nose tackle.

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 3>But what he allows them to do with the other

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 3>guys on the defensive line. Losing him, even as a rookie,

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 3>affects every part of their team right. The way to

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 3>get after Philly is their runt is to throw the football.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't trust the Titans' ability to consistently throw the

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 3>football to be able to exploit that. But everything you

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 3>said about Vrabel is why this is to be careful,

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 3>Because I think the general public is going to be

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 3>all over Philadelphia. Philly at home laying less than a

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 3>touchdown when they just ran for three hundred and fifty

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 3>yards on national television this past weekend. I think everyone's

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 3>going to be on Philly. I think the smart side

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 3>is Tennessee, but I don't trust Tennessee's ability to be

0:28:55.840 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 3>able to necessarily exploit the one thing phill is weakest at.

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 3>So for those reasons, it's a be careful. But the

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 3>right side is what you were implying. The right side

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 3>would be Tennessee. Seattle at the Rams is a be

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 3>careful for this reason. Everyone after watching Bryce Perkins against

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs, everyone is going to be on Seattle. And

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I understand this will be a Seattle home game and

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Donald's out there are is so Aaron Donald's out,

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Stafford's out. I know it's technically a Rams home game,

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 3>but Seattle's gonna have the crowd cups, cup's been going exactly.

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 3>How could anyone possibly bet the Rams? The Chiefs played

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 3>terribly this past weekend and they still covered fifteen and

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 3>a half. I think this is a game that Seattle

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 3>is going to be in everyone's teaser, everyone's teaser and

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Seattle minus seven is going to be the most popular

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 3>bet of the week. That's why it's to be careful.

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Do I have any analysis as to why the Rams

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 3>could cover. I don't do. I also think Seattle blows

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 3>them out. I do, But it feels like, given what

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 3>we saw from Perkins, given the fact that Donald's not

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 3>expected to play all of these things, it should be

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Seattle minus ten and a half. They're only minus seven.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 3>The general public is going to be all over them.

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 3>My guess is Matt can tell me my year if

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm right Victor, who's done well this year. But Victor

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 3>is our winning square better. Victor has Seattle involved in

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 3>everything he's doing this weekend and loves them. I know it.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 3>So all those reasons just make me a little concerned

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>that Seattle minus seven is too good. Demonte's gonna have

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 3>another thirteen team parlay Seattle money line, and Seattle is

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna be all over it. I already know these things.

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Just be careful, and the last one be careful. New

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Orleans at Tampa Bay Tampa minus three and a half.

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Tom Brady could lose.

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing. Dennis Allen is one of the

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 3>worst coaches ever, I have a fun fact for you,

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 3>So I gotta find the guy's name. Gosh darn it,

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 3>or like an original owner Philadelphia Eagles. So here's so.

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 3>I was looking up the worst coaches in NFL history. Okay,

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 3>I got it, worst coaches in NFL history, and because

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.239
<v Speaker 3>Dennis Allen's sixth worst ever, and four of them are

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 3>other like Rod Marinelli and Hugh Jackson and people that

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 3>have been relatively recently. But if the Saints lose out

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.959
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the way, Dennis Allen could catch some

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 3>of those guys. And then there is one guy. His

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 3>name is Burt Bell, who coached I'm going to tell

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 3>you his coaching record. He coached Philadelphia in the late

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 3>thirties and early forties. And this is what Philadelphia did.

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 3>They were one and eleven, they were then two and eight,

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 3>they were then five and six, they were then one

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 3>and nine, and then one in ten. He finished his

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia career ten and forty four, winning less than twenty

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 3>percent of his games. He then and I saw that

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 3>he then was the head coach of the Steelers the

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 3>next year, and I was like, hold on a minute.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 3>This guy started his career in Philly three and nineteen

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.479
<v Speaker 3>and got to coach three more years, ended his career

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>in Philly two and nineteen, and then got another job.

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 3>So I said, I was in the TV meeting when

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 3>it happened, and I said, did he own the team

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 3>or something? And I looked it up. He did. He

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 3>owned the Eagles and then coached him to hell. So

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 3>then sold him and bought the Steelers and made himself

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 3>the coach there too, and then finally hired a new

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 3>coach and then guess what, sold the Steelers and became

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 3>the commissioner of the NFL. Bert Bell, the worst coach

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 3>ever who owned two teams, made himself the head coach

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 3>of both, then was the commissioner of the league for

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 3>thirteen years and is a Hall of Famer. What a

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 3>life it was like? How did this guy get six

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 3>years of coaching winning nineteen percent of his games? And

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the anger was buying the team and then becoming and

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 3>then becoming the commissioner of the league. All right, here's why,

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 3>al right, here's why that Drelevan that is wild, right,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 3>So here's why that relevant. Dennis Allen's name was on

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 3>same list as Burt Bell, So I'm not betting on

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Dennis Allen. Ever, ever, he's the Saints head coach. However,

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 3>why should the Bucks be favored by more than a

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 3>field goal go ahead?

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I was saying that shouldn't been on Tom Brady.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 5>But the way that they lost is kind of like

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 5>the fact that they even went into overtime, like.

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 4>They really held the Browns of course the entire game.

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 3>And the Saints are doing this weird thing where they

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 3>won't let Jameis Winston play even though he's clearly better

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 3>than Dalton, and I think people were like, well, they

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 3>know they need a quarterback, so they're you know, kind

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 3>of shadow tanking their season, but they don't have their

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 3>draft pick. The Eagles have the same draft pick. Think

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 3>about that the Eagles might get a top eight pick

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 3>in this year's draft, even though they're gonna go fifteen

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 3>to two or fourteen and three or something. Point is this,

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I can't lay more than a field goal with Tampa.

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Tristan Wurf's got hurt in overtime Tampa. I think Tampa

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 3>probably wins, but I just be careful there. And then

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 3>the perfectly priced games last three Jets at Minnesota, Denver,

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.439
<v Speaker 3>at Baltimore, and Miami at San Francisco. We're always quick

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 3>in these categories. Minnesota at Minnesota and the Jets to

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 3>me are nearly equivalent quality teams. Jets have an unbelievable defense,

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota is an unbelievable player in Justin Jefferson. I'm actually

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 3>excited to watch this game purely to watch Sauce on

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Justin Jefferson. I think Sauce is already the best corner

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 3>in football. I know he's a rookie. Seeing him on

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 3>Justin Jefferson's excellent. Minnesota getting the three points for.

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 4>I've got a quick question.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I was Mike White getting three points against a

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 5>nine to two team on the perfectly on the road,

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 5>on the perfectly priced category.

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:47.760
<v Speaker 4>What are they smoking in Vegas?

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, I think that is just right, because I

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 3>don't think Minnesota is that good, and I think the

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Jets defense is exceptional and so Minnesota. What they're saying

0:35:57.880 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 3>is they think the Jets and the Vikings are about

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 3>equivalent teams, and that Minnesot's getting the three points at home.

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Some people might think the Vikings are way better than

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 3>the Jets. I don't think that, and I think Mike

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 3>White will be exposed against a team that can get

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pressure. I don't think the Vikings are that,

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 3>but I expect the Vikings to win. Like twenty to

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 3>seventeen Denver Baltimore Baltimore Baltimore minus eight is exactly where

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 3>it should be more than a touchdown, not ten points

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:27.959
<v Speaker 3>because the offenses look shaky lately. And Miami at San Francisco,

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 3>which might be the game, one of the games of

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the year to I think that line is just right.

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco is better than Miami, but not much better.

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 3>They're at home, Miami's got to go all the way

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 3>up to San Francisco. So San Francisco minus four and

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 3>what I expect to be around a twenty one to

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 3>seventeen game. I do expect two to come down to

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 3>earth a bit against this Niners defense. If Two alights

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 3>this Niners defense up, then I will have to on Monday,

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 3>come on this show and maybe start to evolve on

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 3>my tool opinion. I don't have to do that yet.

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 3>There's our perfectly priced category. We'll do the right move,

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 3>We'll see if we have any exotics, and we'll do

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.760
<v Speaker 3>the offer. By the way, last week gave out two offers,

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 3>I didn't take one. I did take the other. They

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 3>both hit the Thanksgiving Day offer and the Jags money

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 3>line offer. Never doubt on the Jags money line offer

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 3>two point conversion.

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Because there was like a doubt up until they got to.

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 3>Never a doubt. Maybe you doubted it. I never doubt that.

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 5>The offer was like covering basically from start to finish.

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 5>The entire time, there was no question.

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys, I mean, the Bills were in question. The Bills

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 3>money line was in question. Don't say that. All right,

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 3>we'll be right back, all right, welcome back in what's

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 3>right with Nick?

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 3>We've got our six picks this week. We were supposed

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 3>to be five. We made it six. Atlanta plus one

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 3>against Pittsburgh, canny pick. It shouldn't be a road favored

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.760
<v Speaker 3>against anyone. Giants plus two and a half against Washington

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Heineke should not be a road favorite against a

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:06.720
<v Speaker 3>good defense. Chargers minus one and a half against the Raiders.

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Chargers have to win the game. Raiders have a terrible coach.

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I like the Chargers. Kan City minus two against Cincinnati

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes less than a field goal favorite is a

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 3>must bet against anyone. Colts plus eleven and a half

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 3>at Dallas it's just too many points. And then our

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 3>bonus pick Jags minus won at Detroit. The Prince that

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 3>was promised betting ban is off. Last week. We had

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 3>him on the money line as part of the offer.

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 3>This week he gets for the you know, just the

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 3>second time in his career back to back victories. Jags

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 3>are back, Prince. That was promises back Jags over win

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 3>total alive again. That was one of our big bets

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 3>of the year. Remember our season preview show, what do

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 3>we say our single favorite future was Tampa under eleven

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 3>and a half. That bet has cashed and it's week thirteen.

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 3>They are already have hit. They could win the rest

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 3>of their games and they would go eleven and six.

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.959
<v Speaker 3>How about that for a sharp wager by your guy.

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.240
<v Speaker 3>So there it is. There's our six bets this week.

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Now time for the right move. The right move is

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 3>not going well. First this year, it has been cursed

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 3>a bit. However, you though I joked about this earlier,

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't believe in curses. Can't City minus two is

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the right move. I'm not scared. What are you laughing about?

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 3>It's the best bet on the board. The Chiefs minus

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 3>two is the best bet on the board. I'm flying

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 3>to Vegas in a few hours. I'm gonna go there.

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna bet some World Cup. I'm gonna play some

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 3>poker and I'm gonna win a lot of money. And

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 3>then all of the money that I've won, I'm gonna

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 3>take it up in a big bundle to the counter

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'm gonna slid it into the teller and say

0:39:55.719 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 3>can City minus two please, sir or ma'am, And they're

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna have to call someone over. They're gonna be like, you,

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 3>are we allowed to take a bet this? You're allowed

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 3>to take the bet?

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 5>Well, it will be dope that you will be right

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 5>next to some slot machines to win your money back

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 5>if you don't hit.

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I don't play slots. First of all, I've never

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.800
<v Speaker 3>played slots. Show me some respect. I will play a

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 3>little bit of blackjack, a lot of poker, and watch

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of World Cup. That's my plan for this weekend.

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 3>Your mom will be shopping. That's my plan. And then

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm all of my profit. I am doubling it by

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 3>betting it on Kensity minus too. This is not sound

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 3>gambling strategy, by the way, but I'm in Vegas, it's

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 3>my team, it's the game of the year. I don't

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 3>have an exotic.

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 4>For you this week.

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.479
<v Speaker 3>There's not a teaser. I like every teaser you could

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 3>build involve Seattle being teased down, and I'm a little

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 3>nervous about that Seattle Rams game for one reason or another.

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 3>So I don't have an exotic for you, Demonse, what's

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 3>the offer.

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 4>The offer this week is called Maholmes locks up the MVP.

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 5>Okay, the producers the producers, and I have heard you

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 5>say that you like the Pats on Thursday Night. So

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 5>let's say Josh Allen can't cover the three and a

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 5>half versus New England, Jalen hurts, Eagles don't cover versus Tennessee,

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 5>and Kansas City beat Sincy by an adjusted spread of

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 5>six and a half payout plus seven ninety two.

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I don't do adjusted spreads because I'm not a child. However,

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to counter your offer with this one because

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the one piece of jot of the MVP that you

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 3>guys didn't include was Tua, who has a better chance

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:37.800
<v Speaker 3>right now than Josh Allen. Josh Allen, So my counter

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 3>offer would be the Patriots plus three and a half,

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs minus two. What's the other one you had?

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 3>It's Jalen Hurts and the Eagles don't cover against Tennessee. Okay,

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 3>so Tennessee plus five, and then the Miami Dolphins team

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 3>told under, let me see what that is. They are

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the away team Miami total points under twenty and a half.

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 3>That is plus thirteen hundred. I'm taking that offer. So

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:18.919
<v Speaker 3>your offer, I decline. I am instead I am doing

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 3>New England plus three and a half, Tennessee plus the

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 3>five KC minus two, and the Dolphins under twenty and

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 3>a half points against San Francisco. That's my counter offer.

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 3>That way, we're fading Tua and not being invested in

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Garoppolo, which I don't want to have to be

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 3>plus twelve fifty eight to be exact. I'll take that offer.

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Good luck everyone. If you're in Vegas this weekend, come

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 3>say lo if you see me, I'll be in the

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 3>sports book. We're in the Aria poker room. Talk to

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:56.800
<v Speaker 3>you guys on Monday. What's right