WEBVTT - Is Reality a Computer Simulation?

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies. History is

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>learn this stuff they don't want you to know. A

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Hello, welcome back to the show.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 3>My name is Matt, my name is Noel.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 4>They call me Ben.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>We're joined as always with our super producer Paul Mission

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Control decads. Most importantly, you are you, You are here,

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and that makes this the stuff they don't.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 4>Want you to know.

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>This evening, we're asking a big, big question, one that

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>we have surprisingly not tackled before. Guys, what exactly is

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>this thing that we're all in?

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 4>What is life? Well?

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm a normal guy. Yeah, I wake up

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>every sunset at the at the crack of evening and

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>put on my skin one leg at a time like

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone else. But like, what is reality?

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Bro? I think we're just spiritual beings having a physical experience, right,

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 3>So I think and I made that up.

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, we're just animated carbon shambling through the filth.

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 4>Bro.

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're just if you think about it, you know,

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the closest analog to the consciousness is kind of a song, right,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a pattern. So we're sort of the stories and

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the songs we sing to ourselves. If you think about it,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>your brain is kind of like a little figure in

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a big meat mech and it's controlling all sorts of

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>weird stuff.

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, meat mech and.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I you know it's it's weird because people have been

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>arguing about the nature of reality or phenomenology for since

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>time immemorial. And there's this question. Is the set of hardwired, constant,

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>unchanging physical laws. Is it more subjective? Is it just

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this sort of narrative that thinking minds agree upon. Is

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>is it all just a bunch of you know, kind

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of shadows on a cave wall, like Plato said? Or

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>is it some sort of computer program? And if so,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>can this program be hacked? We promise you we are

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>not high. Here are the facts.

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 4>You said that a lot in the last episode too.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like when we talk about these things, we

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>have to establish that baseline.

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 4>Hey, to each their own. I am a little high.

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna perfect facts here.

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 3>We have explored the nature of reality because you know what, guys,

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 3>it's fun. It's like one of the things, like metacognition

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>is one of the things that makes us human. So

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 3>thinking about thinking, thinking about what this all of this is,

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>what we're being presented with it, if it as meaning?

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 3>If not, like all of the things that you said. So,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>this is something that's definitely come up in a lot

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 3>of strange news and Listener Male episodes in the past,

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 3>this idea of some sort of simulation here. But like consciousness,

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>until relatively recently, reality has always kind of been presented

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 3>as some sort of dilemma that needs to be reckoned with, right,

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>like the nature of reality, like what is this? Is

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 3>this a shared experience? Is there a god? Whatever?

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's because all of us can deuce take certain

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 2>actions to affirm for ourselves that this is in fact reality,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 2>and the things that we are experiencing are very similar,

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 2>if not the same, to things that some other seemingly

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 2>conscious being is experiencing. Right, And as humans, as we've

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 2>continued to evolve, we've gotten better at, you know, measuring

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>things and writing down the things that we find as

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>we get deeper and deeper into you know, the sub

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>atomic and go bigger and bigger out into the cosmos.

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 2>But there's a problem, right.

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yes, there are quite a few problems humans experience

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>reality all the time. There's not really a pause from it.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But despite thousands and thousands and thousands of years of

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>contemplating this, humans still struggle to define reality, let alone

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>understand it. And there was this great this great article

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>for new scientists. I think it came out in twenty

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>twenty one or so with these three authors, Jason Arun, Mrogessu,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Joshua al Guego, and Gilead Ahmet, and they put it

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:53.119
<v Speaker 1>this way, they said, reality seems so solid, and yet

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>when we examine it closely, it melts away like a mirage.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't know when it began, how big it is,

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>where it came from, and where it is going, and

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>we certainly have no clue why it exists.

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.799
<v Speaker 3>For another perspective, you could check out the seminal nineteen

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 3>ninety four grunge film Reality Bites, directed by Ben Stiller.

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 4>That's another way of looking at reality.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>But ninety eight percent of bends are just so dope, dude.

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Ben ben Stiller's a good He's one of the good bends.

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 3>I like where his career has taken him. I think

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>he's a talent both in front of and behind the camera.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 3>That was that one he did he directed. I think

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 3>every episode severance also about the nature of reality, very

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>mind bend kind of show, if you're to that kind

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>of stuff. But you know, to your point, it is

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>an interesting thing, because what is reality if not like

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 3>some sort of shared understanding of the truth, you know.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 3>But then it can also become more of a question

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 3>about presentational qualities of what we are seeing and experiencing.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>So reality, it's got a lot of layers to it

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>just as a concept.

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, sure, Yeah, the new scientist quotation continues here. They say, nonetheless,

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the desire to understand reality seems part of our nature,

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and we have come a long way. They're talking as

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>humans about humans. They say, what was once explained in

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of divine creation is now in the purview of science.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Over the past two hundred years or so, we have

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>peeled back the layers of reality, even if we are

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>still not entirely sure what we have revealed. I mean, okay, look,

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously this they can run the risk of becoming a

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>somewhat sophomoric conversation where people just sort of bandy platitudes

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>about but that's not what we're doing this evening, fellow

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy realist people have made progress on navigating the Gordian

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>nod of existence. Even now you can find no shortage

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of people claiming to have capital F figured it all out.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Some of the answers spirituality philosophy. You can't argue with

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>spirituality that is every person's individual choice. I love when

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Descartes said, you know, man, I'm thinking about it, so

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm real because something is thinking.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 4>I was tight.

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, that was good, But I mean, I also

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>think it's interesting to think about the idea of like

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 3>eyewitness accounts and the way people perceive things, and this

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 3>idea of what.

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Is the truth?

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, like that to me is as one of

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the layers I think those researchers were referring to. You know,

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>there there are many layers to the idea of reality,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 3>not just about what we see, but about how people

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 3>interpret things.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.119
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of gatekeepers for that idea.

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Because we're coming now, we're talking about consensual narrative, right,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea that, like a lot of spiritual belief systems

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>will argue that you, if you are cue, you exist

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on the precipice of some greater profound understanding, you know,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>some samsara right piece beyond words, and you can find

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>this if you follow the right spiritual leaders, the right regiments,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if you meditate, or in some cases cough cough, scientology,

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>if you donate money. Other attempts at answering the challenge

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of reality. They rely on the bleeding edge of modern science.

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what we're looking at this evening.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll get into this in a second, but

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we've got to do a tease for our main guy,

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>our protagonist of the show. We're going to go into

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this dude's reality pretty deep tonight. What's his name?

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 4>Who is he?

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 2>He's somebody you should know by this point. Twenty years

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>ago he put out something that has really been foundational

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of the discussions that have been going

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>on on YouTube and TikTok and all these other things. Right,

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>mister Nick Bostrom, philosopher.

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 4>F I'm just amazed.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just amazed because I didn't think about it, Matt,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>until you pointed it out. Two thousand and three was

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:12.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yikes.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is what you will hear known as simulation

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>theory or holographic universe theory. There's all kinds of names

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 2>for it, most often simulation theory, and if.

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not mistaken, I believe Bostrom comes up or maybe

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 3>is even interviewed a little bit in Josh Clark's The

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 3>End of the World series, which is about existential threats.

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Correct correct, yes, yeah, And Josh's show holds up.

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Do check it out.

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>He is a dear old friend of ours. He also

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>does a little show with his pal Chuck that you

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>might know. It's called Stuff you should know, So check

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it out.

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Support that's just going places now that we've given up

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 4>the plug.

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think this is going to be a big

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>year for them.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, hey, kids, their kids book just came out. I

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 2>got a message from writer and his mom. They were

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>in the bookstore there in Decatur, where I guess they.

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Have a sign shop of stories.

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 2>There are a bunch of science copies.

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Former that is a former bank too. That is the

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>coolest children's bookstore in the Atlanta metro area. Also shout

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>out to our pals Annie and sam Annie recent Samantha

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh over at Stuff. Mom never told you they have

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a book on the way. Do check that out. We

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>also have a book if.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 4>We're on the book talk.

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, Bostro, what's this what's this punchy character up to.

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 5>So his idea, and we're going to dig into this.

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 5>His idea, I argues one basic groundbreaking premise, and it's

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 5>it's really interesting.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>It calls a lot back to earlier arguments of spirituality

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and philosophy, or it may remind some of us of

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the premises of gnosticism. He's saying, this whole thing, this

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>whole reality, could be made up. If reality really is

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>somehow a cartoonishly complex computer program, how would you know, folks, Well,

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>starting basis, if it's a computer in any way remotely

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like the computer's Earth's favorite primates have been making for

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a while, then it relies on programming. It relies on code.

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>And if reality has a source code, can you find it?

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps more importantly, can you hack the simulation? This would

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>usually be the moment where we pause for a word

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>from our sponsors. However, we got a lot to get

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to tonight, folks. We're not going to stand on ceremony.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Here's where it gets crazy. Could we hack the simulation?

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Is the universe as you know it a simulation?

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Maybe?

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Actually, yes, just maybe it might be.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 2>What Yeah, And it goes back to the problem that

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 2>we Once we get deep enough again into the micro,

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 2>into the nano, into deeper than that, things get fuzzy

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>and stuff doesn't seem to function the way our models

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 2>of physics say they should function. Isn't that the crazy thing?

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Because that same problem exists on the macro scale, things

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 2>don't function the way we understand they should function within physics.

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 2>If you go in either of those directions, which means

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>that we have an understanding of what we can do

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 2>and really truly interact with with our human meat bodies,

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, and to you know, there's a threshold above

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 2>what we can actually touch, you know, when it comes

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>to like temperate sure heat or lack of heat, when

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 2>it comes over time. Hey, when it comes to time

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 2>and all that stuff. We can go beyond. We can

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>push those bounds with our technology. But when we use

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>that technology to look too hard at something, stuff just

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 2>gets wonky.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, down to the femto scale up to the giga

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>scale and beyond. It's weird because since no one knows

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, since humanity collectively for the entirety of existence

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>up to August twenty first, twenty twenty three, as we

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>record this, since no one knows what the is going on.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We're in a pretty cool spot as a civilization. Even

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the strangest sounding ideas like simulation theory are worth investigating.

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>We are currently in the brainstorming period of figuring out

0:13:55.240 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>reality as a collective thing. So Nick Bostrom has a

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>few basic premises or axioms that we have to understand

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to really understand his argument about simulation theory, and they're

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple, except well, we'll give you three and then

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a big like Shyamalan plot twist.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 4>At the end. Yeah, that's okay.

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's just lay it out before we try

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 3>to dismantle it.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 4>First.

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 3>He argues that humanity, you know, will inevitably reach a

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 3>technological point, a high water mark where a simulated version

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 3>of the universe could be something in the cards to

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 3>be created. Maybybe it's even like a copy of the

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 3>one that we're already inhabiting, whether this be virtual or whatever,

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 3>like a like a miniature. I don't know, we've seen this,

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 3>and this is a science fiction any type stuff for sure,

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 3>which you're definitely gonna get to. So this could be

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 3>what we may be referred to as the singularity when

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>humans and send humanism by you know, basically flexing all

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 3>of these technological and scientific muscles you know that they've

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 3>been honing for all these years. Bostrom says that if

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 3>they humanity can create a universe simulation, they absolutely will.

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, right, it is interesting, And I agree people.

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, we know people do stuff. They

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 3>often leap before they look. Uh so it's not like

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 3>we have a great history of like thinking about things before.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Just let's just try it. Throw things at the wall,

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 4>see what sticks. Of course they're gonna do the thing. Yeah.

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 2>The next question is why would they do that thing?

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 2>What would they use that thing for? Once let's say

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 2>you've created well, because you can, but what do you

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 2>use it for? What's the purpose of this other universe

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that you've created if you could create it?

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Think about the virtuals, like the sims.

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 2>That's what That's exactly what I'm going to think about.

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 2>So we're talking too than and three when Nick Bostrom is,

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, presenting all this stuff. A couple of years

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 2>before that, nineteen ninety nine, a little movie called The

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Matrix came out. That was that captured the popular mind,

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 2>right it did. It was a huge movie. A little

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 2>thing that you just mentioned called the SIMS came out

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 2>a virtual world a couple like literally a year after

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 2>you put out these thoughts. World of Warcraft was first unveiled.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 2>We were getting into virtual worlds as humanity, like real, tangible,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 2>feeling virtual worlds, not some of the older stuff that

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 2>we think about when it comes back to video games.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, drug wars.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Even like the early MMOs like EverQuest or something you

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 2>could put into here, or you know, second life things

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 2>like that. We're we're just thinking about it a lot more, right, So, I.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 4>Mean, I'm glad that you took it there right away.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 3>The idea of the gamification, you know, the immediate thing

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 3>that we would want to do with this is to

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 3>make the world's most advanced mm RPG.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Or something like that. Right, That's one possibility, right, But

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the other possibility would be what maybe.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 4>For study, some studying, yeap, just to see how things work, right,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 4>like to try things.

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 3>Let's see model catastrophic weather situations, model all kinds of

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 3>scenarios to see how they might affect you know, the

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote real.

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Universe or political systems that too.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Let us build a small a small scale, constrained instance

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of a world right and and you know it's no

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>secret longtime listeners. Before doing this podcasting thing, I was

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>tangentially involved in some in some of this stuff I

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 1>learned at the feet of some people who really are

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>doing that thing. There are, as we record now, it's

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>open secret at least that there are very smart people

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>who have constructed simulations with constraints of entire countries and

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they are mapping out stuff. And when you have enough

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>data and you have enough know how, then what your

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>model can do becomes very close to what happens in

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the real world, which maybe for some people proves that

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the real world is another model, not the reality show. Clearly,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>that's an awesome model for human interaction. Thank YOUMTV. So,

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>like that's the idea, the educational aspect. Why would you

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>do this if you could, Well, you would want to

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>learn more about yourself. Humans are humans favorite thing, so

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>you would also be able to use this as a

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>diagnostic predictive tool. Scientists, if this were possible, would probably

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>create as many simulations as they could as a way

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of learning more about their own universe. Like what what

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>if the amino acids that make up DNA are just

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different. How does that change things? What

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if life is silicon based rather than carbon based?

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 4>You know what I mean?

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>These are very interesting questions. The third assumption the Bosstroum

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>needs us to follow on with is he says, we

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>must assume that the virtual inhabitants of any simulated universe

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>possess characteristics similar to our own universe, including consciousness. Key

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>thing being they're not aware they're in a simulation. So

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the quick recap humanity reaches a point where they would

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>create a simulated universe, and they definitely would that's another assumption.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Then second, they would use this to learn more about themselves,

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and third, the that they created would not be aware

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>that they were in a program. And this leads us

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>all to the you know, the big plot twist. I

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's to do this one. I uh, it's

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, yeah, no, we can talk about this. Basically,

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 2>what Bostrom is stating is that if it is possible

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 2>to create a universe like this within whatever universe that

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 2>they live in that are creating this universe, let's say

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>us far in the future, it's almost impossible that it

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 2>hasn't already been done, and we currently aren't living in

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 2>that universe, the simulated one. That that's where it gets

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 2>a little, It gets kind of crazy because it sounds

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 2>like a huge leap, right.

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:46.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I guess it makes me think of the

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 3>inevitable part of the science fiction movie where the cyborg

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 3>realizes it's a cyborg, you know what I mean.

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Like, what what does it mean to know this? And

0:20:57.760 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 4>like we all exist.

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 3>In our heads, we know that we are aware, and

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 3>we feel unique and the product of memories and things

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 3>like that that make us individuals.

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 4>So like if we were faced with this, Nope, that's

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 4>all not real.

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 3>That's all but been created by somebody else, and none

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 3>of it is.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Unique to you.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>That to me is that moment, you know, where like

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 3>the robot who's been living under the assumption that it's.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.479
<v Speaker 6>A real human has its world rocked. You know, uh,

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 6>you're the clone, damn it. That kind of stuff. But

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 6>also also, okay, think about this, like it sounds at

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 6>first blush. It sounds as though we're saying, Hey, the

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 6>following ingredients for a case idea exist. We all know

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 6>those exist.

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Therefore, you are inevitably eating a case adea right now.

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Those two things are don't square, and it does feel

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>like a leap to your point, Matt, because everything that

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>perceives reality appears to tell any living creature. It appears

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to indicate that just because an event can occur does

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily mean it will, has, or does occur, unless,

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of course, we bring in multiversal theory, wherein everything is

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>happening all at once, all possible events do occur. But

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>let's hold off on that one. Let's go back to

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>bosterm He does not accept this idea. He does not

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>accept this objection to the argument. He argues instead that

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we cannot assume some other version of intelligent beings human, posthuman, transhuman,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise. We can't assume they haven't already hit that

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>technological landmark and therefore created a simulation in which we're

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>now living. And then it gets even trickier, because if

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you're living in a simulation, everything that you can gather

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and observe and test and measure also exist within the

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>bounds of that manufactured reality. So we'd have no real

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>way to break the fourth wall, as it were, you know,

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>anymore than like you guys know, we're gamers. We love,

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we especially love deeply immersive RPGs. You know, anymore, it'd

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be like a non player character NPC in Skyrim or

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Fallout all of a sudden saying, holy smokes, I'm a caji,

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm a cat person. Or what's what's like an NPC

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>from Fallout? What do they have?

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 4>A ghoule perhaps, okay, a junk trader or whatever.

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like right, well, I mean, I think another good

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 3>piece of pop culture to refer to with this kind

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 3>of thinking, as Westworld to the series, at least the

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 3>first couple of seasons where they're really in the game.

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 4>I kind of lost track of it after that.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 3>But like all of those characters that are NPCs or whatever,

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 3>some of them have lower level programming, some of them

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 3>are like they do one thing and that's all they do.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Then they're the higher level ones that like can make

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 3>more complex decisions. And they refer to it in game

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 3>theory and in game designing as a loop, and that's

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 3>what they refer to it in the show, as all

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 3>these characters, these storylines are on these loops and then

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 3>they're reset, you know, And a loop could be any length,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you think about it in the scale

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 3>of the universe, or like a really long timeline our

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 3>loop could be very very long. We just in lifetime

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 3>isn't that long in the grand scheme of things, a

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 3>human life?

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 4>So maybe that's loop, you know. I don't know.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a big bang to a great collapse. Yeah,

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and the of course the triumph of entropy.

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I'm sitting here staring at the playhead in audition,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 2>just thinking about time when it comes to this stuff,

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 2>and I'm trying to put it into words. You know,

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I've failed a couple of times, We've beat it out.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 2>But there's also time factors into here, right, like fourth

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 2>dimensional state of time as something that can be accessed

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 2>not in the way we experience time, Like the playhead

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>in audition that's currently recording everything I'm saying, and I

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>can only experience what has you know, hit that playhead, right,

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 2>what that playhead has experienced thus far. But if you

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 2>pull out further than that, it's everything that could possibly

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 2>be in front of that playhead or I don't know, God,

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know what I'm trying to say.

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>No, it makes sense, I hear you, Matt. Because the

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>idea then is that there is a dimension a space

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>right that we call time, and it for observable experience.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It's accessed in one way, via one process. However, the

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>argument would be that without those constraints, time could be

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>accessed in a much less linear way. It could be

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>experienced the way that you experience other dimensions. Right, Like

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this is this is weird, and it gets weirder the

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>concept that Okay, let's just say, for the sake of argument,

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of hanging out, let's say Bullstrom is

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.719
<v Speaker 1>right that they're this reality in which everyone's hearing this

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>show tonight is part of a manufactured reality from some

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>other space. Well why stop it to realities? Okay, right,

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>why not both? What about a Matroshka doll approach? What

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>about the possibility that this universe could be a simulation

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>within another simulation within another simulation, and that humans are

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking minds in this reality could in turn create their

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>own simulations, which is already happening. Then it would just

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>be ones and zeros. It's just code all the way down,

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>all the way up. I think that's kind of cool.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that's walking into a cathedral.

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's very freaking morty.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what's that.

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 3>There's the thing with the universes in the boxes, or

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 3>we talked with with Hartman about that when we had

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 3>them on or that episode anyway, Yeah, I mean, and

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 3>you also there's a lot of people that that throw

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 3>around the idea of let's let's think about like intelligent design,

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 3>or like the idea of a prime mover or like

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 3>a god like force or entity that has control or

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 3>perhaps doesn't have control, just laid the pieces out just

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 3>to see what they do.

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 4>There there is within that even a bit of.

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 3>This kind of simulation theory where it's like for someone

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 3>else's benefit to see to test, to see what the

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.479
<v Speaker 3>things are gonna do, to see what how things are

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 3>going to play out.

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Mm hmm.

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And on the first day God said, hold up, I'm

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to say something, so, uh, you know, we're gonna

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>pause for a word from a responsor here at first, though,

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>before we go, we need to make an important note

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>between Bostrom's concept and between the ideas of gnosticism, the

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>wonderful work of the Wachowski's and the Matrix films. In

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the Matrix, humans live in a simulated environment, but their

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>conscious minds or a product of the outside or quote

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:30.719
<v Speaker 1>unquote real reality. Bullstrom is arguing that you everything that

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>makes you quote unquote you is in fact just another

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>product of this simulated reality. He's calling you a bit

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of an MPC. Not really, but it's a fun tag.

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Before we go to an ad break, I got to

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>ask it. You know, we've got just a few minutes

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>before we come back, and maybe we can just figure

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this out and solve it off air, right.

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 4>To make it a short episode.

0:28:54.240 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I have faith in us, and we have returned.

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:05.239
<v Speaker 4>Did we figure it out now?

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 3>We actually just kind of made more questions. Hopefully we

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 3>can get to a few of them.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>In the episode with the time we writ I guess well,

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the first questions. If you're an observer here,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the idea would be okay, this is really interesting stuff.

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick Bostrom is one of the sharpest minds out there

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and has made a really good, very well reasoned argument

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>with the appropriate axioms and the appropriate caveats and assumptions.

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>But can we prove it? Even Nick spoiler says that

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't really prove it, and three very smart physicists

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>took that personally.

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 4>That's right.

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 3>For one, we have Silas r Bean, Zora Davoodie, and

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Martin Jay's Avage. No way, It is no way to

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 3>not these names with a certain amount of gravitas, for

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 3>they sound like superheroes. They sound like superheroes, and they are,

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 3>for lack of a better way to describe them, scientific

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 3>superheroes in their own right Martin Jay Savage. All of

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 3>these individuals found the notion of the universe as a

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 3>computer simulation should be fascinating, as do we. We share

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>that with them, we are the same, and they started

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 3>to think of how it might be possible to figure

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 3>out if our own universe is a numerical simulation. Back

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 3>to your point about ones and zeros, Ben, we are

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 3>not scientific superheroes, nor are we physicists. So we're gonna,

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, depend on some pretty solid work by our

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 3>buddy Jonathan Strickland that he has done on his podcast

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Tech Stuff to break down some of these concepts, these

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 3>very complex concepts, into understandable form.

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we're gonna.

0:30:55.000 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so these legend tier physicists what they're also names.

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>These researchers decided to work with something called lattice gauge

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>theory and something called quantum chromodynamics or QCD. These may

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>be unfamiliar terms to a lot of us, listening along

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at home. They were certainly new to us when we

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>first started diving into simulation theory many years ago. But

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>here's the way we break it down and again shout

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>out to Strick. All right, the universe in which you

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>exist in what you hear this podcast. He's got a

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff going on, but it is, as far

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>as humans understand, based on four fundamental forces. One is

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>strong nuclear force, one is electromagnetism, one is weak nuclear force,

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and the fourth is vibes. No, I'm kidding, the fourth

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is gravity.

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 3>It is known vibes is in fact a force of nature.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 3>So about the movie itself, it is a force culture

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 3>to be reckoned with.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 4>I missed you guys too. Yeah.

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So lattice gauge theory, which we'll get to, and this

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>idea quantum chromo dynamics. What they do is they focus

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on one of those four fundamental forces, the strong nuclear force.

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 4>This is the.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Force that humans believe holds all the tiny things together.

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>It's what keeps sub atomic particles from drifting away from

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one another. It is the strongest of the four fundamental forces.

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But also it has the shortest range, which already sounds

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>like the kind of give and take that you would

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>encounter in a well programmed game. All right, so that

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>makes sense so far. The basic stuff. What is quantum

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>chromo dynamics. It is a theory that attempts to explain

0:32:56.240 --> 0:33:01.719
<v Speaker 1>how this strong nuclear force works in space time in

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>four dimensions. Right, so that's the three dimensions we know

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>plus the dimension of time.

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 4>And this is crazy.

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>When scientists like our three legendary physicists are studying quantum

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>chromo dynamics, they build their own universes to do so.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>They're just very very small universes.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you may ask how small?

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 3>And this is a very appropriate question considering the topic

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 3>they were trying to take on today, the idea of

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 3>copying the universe, whether it be in virtual form or otherwise.

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 3>What does that even look like down the line? Well,

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 3>this is something that is possible, but again on a

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 3>very very very tiny dining scale. Call you alluded to

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 3>it earlier, Ben, I believe the fempto scale.

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Which is what is this a universe for ants?

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Exactly? I know.

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 3>It's a really funny moment in the film Zoolander. Callback

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 3>once again to Ben Stiller. He contains multitudes a unit

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 3>of measurement the femto scale smaller than the nanoscale, which

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 3>I've always thought of as being as the teeniest of tinies. No, no,

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 3>says Femto, I am am one smaller. A nanometer is

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 3>one billionth of a meter, but a Femto meter is

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 3>one quadrillian. That is a figure or a ten. What

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 3>is that ten to the negative fifteen? Is that what

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 3>we're talking?

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a ten to the negative fifteenth boundin yep, remember

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>those for maths, I sure do.

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 1>They so this very very very very very small universe.

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 1>That's an excellent X explanational It's so small I can't

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>understand it. With all of this in consideration, this is

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>where the lattice structure comes in. The researchers say, let's

0:34:54.520 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 1>represent this universe as bounded by a thing like picture

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a ball around this tiny experience. This ball is not

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a continual shell. It is instead a lattice, and a

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>lattice just means there's an overall bounding structure, but it

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>has holes in it. So like if you look through

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a window screen and you have the the tiny grid

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that keeps bugs and other big things out but still

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>lets air pass through, that's a lattice. And their assumption

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>then is that they can build a tiny universe bound

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>by this non continual structure around it. And they said, look,

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>if we go into this tiny, tiny universe with far

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>fewer variables, it might be possible to observe that this

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>universe is something we created by watching the interaction of

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>energy at the border. What happens when the air and

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the bugs meet that windows screen meet that lattice.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting, but it's weird because it's all through a

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 2>computer simulation. Right, So they're simulating energy moving within their

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 2>simulated computer generated universe.

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's a really solid rhyme scheme. You just dropped

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 4>their mass.

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 2>So the concept is if if they can observe as

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the creators of this mini universe, if they can observe

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 2>particles that they have created moving through that lattice and

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 2>like see it move through the lattice, then if we

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:40.280
<v Speaker 2>could blow up that experience to our scale and find

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 2>similar energetic readings, we would know we're in a simulation.

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. That's the idea. Okay, that's the idea. Uh, Like,

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>what if what if you could zoom back out, get

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>away from the simulate a very small universe and go

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>back to the world in which you became a physicist

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and in your ostensibly larger universe. What if you can

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>find an energy that can prove the lattice? What if

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you can find the boundaries of the simulation. These researchers

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>believe this energy could be cosmic rays, which we guarantee

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>you is not something Stanley made up.

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 2>No, cosmic rays are very real. I just learned about

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:28.479
<v Speaker 2>this because personally, guys, I've been studying this thing called

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:32.959
<v Speaker 2>the ice Cube Neutrino Observatory in Antarctica.

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, ice Cube was not only an excellent rapper

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and an actor, but also a physicist.

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 4>He contains multituders U s iced Tea. Sorry.

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 3>Also, ice Cube is apparently a bit problematic, he said,

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 3>some not very nice things, but please different ice cube.

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Well there. The detector is Oh gosh, I'm gonna get

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.439
<v Speaker 2>it all wrong now that I'm having to like say

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 2>it out loud rather than just read it. It's it's

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful, amazing detector that can sense I don't know

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 2>if it's cosmic rays, guys, but it's like neutrinos or

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 2>something where it, yeah, detect it moving through the Earth,

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's connected in some or could be

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 2>connected to this in some way.

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's part of cern overall. And you nailed it, man.

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's meant to observe neutrinos. And the pain

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in the ass about that is it's actually, uh, it's

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>not possible now for human technology to directly observe neutrinos.

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So what they did is they put a bunch of

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>very powerful sensors around like a cubic kilometer in Antarctica,

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and they look at the ice. That's why it's called

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the ice cube. They look at the ice, and when

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>neutrinos interact with it si ice, they create these electrically

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:08.399
<v Speaker 1>charged secondary particles they're called Now this is deep water

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.439
<v Speaker 1>for me, I'm not because it's with ice.

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 2>It's optical detectors allegedly that are in there. So it

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 2>literally sees these these thousands and thousands of optical detectors

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 2>see the thing. What's just nuts to me.

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's the kind of fabric you're looking for

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to understand, you know, the clothing that

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the universe wears that we call reality. This is like

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>feeling the lapels, you know, what I mean and getting

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>some sensory input. The researchers that we're talking about when

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they're when they're talking about cosmic rays, Silas and the

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 1>gang are looking at this high energy radiation that comes

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 1>from outside the Solar system, and their idea is if

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:05.359
<v Speaker 1>these cosmic behave as though they are interacting with some

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of lattice structure, it would suggest that we exist

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 1>in a computer simulation that uses the same techniques as

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this lattice gauge theory. So if reality as we know

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it is bound by a rough structure that is not

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:25.720
<v Speaker 1>totally continuous or contiguous, that you know, it has holes

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in it like a lattice, then maybe the argument is

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we can notice when some energy like cosmic rays appears

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to hit part of the boundary and then appears to

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:39.240
<v Speaker 1>shoot through the little holes.

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 2>But think about that in a computer simulated like virtual

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:48.320
<v Speaker 2>world that we've created a simulation, right, you can't shoot

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 2>things through a boundary of World of Warcraft because it's

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:52.919
<v Speaker 2>all software.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, you can get to areas of any kind

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of open world RPG wherein your path is blocked.

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 3>You get stuck in the environment. Sometimes you know whatever

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 3>you know I mean, and to me, my mind with

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot of this stuff goes to the concepts of resolution.

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you think about like cameras and pixels,

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 3>you know how large are. Over time, things have gotten

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.280
<v Speaker 3>more and more precise in terms of like how tiny

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 3>the tiny as pixel is.

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 4>This is, I don't know.

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 3>This is just like sort of a more elaborate version

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 3>of that in a weird way, but maybe not. And

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 3>it also makes me think of the concept of a

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 3>very early I believe it was Pythagoras who came up

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.760
<v Speaker 3>with the idea of monads, which was like a unit

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 3>of representational stuff, you know. I think it's described as

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 3>an elementary individual substance that reflects the order of the

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 3>world and from which material properties are derived, which even

0:41:55.640 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 3>in and of itself, is sounds like a construct. It

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 3>sounds like a simulation are derived, you know what I mean?

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I love it because for the longest time

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>humans have been asking themselves. Humans love what are they

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>called superlatives, So humans have always been asking themselves what

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is the smallest thing? What is the biggest thing? We

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have to give a couple of notes about this idea. First,

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for this to be real, humans would have had to

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>would have to develop some very sophisticated technology, the kind

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that doesn't quite exist yet, something that could

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:42.359
<v Speaker 1>measure and detect cosmic rays and their behavior with a

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:47.280
<v Speaker 1>very high degree of accuracy and fidelity, right, because humans

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 1>are still working in linear time. And then that requires

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a few additional assumptions. First, whatever created this simulation would

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>have had to follow a practice similar to what the

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>researchers are doing in their own tiny universe without a

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>common starting point, the whole concept, the whole argument, the

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>whole thought experiment, it collapses, not a wave collapse, but

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 1>hashtag no joke left behind. And then second, whatever creative

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>generative force was there, it would have also had to

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have made a finite universe in which humans exist. Remember, right,

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>If there is no ending to this universe, then there

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is nothing for that lattice to exist around. There's nothing

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for it to contain, so lattice theory doesn't matter. And

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>then maybe the most important assumption, we would have to

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.800
<v Speaker 1>assume the designers of this universe are not actively preventing

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>people from discovering that they are in fact part of

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a simulation I think, I mean, do we want to

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>pause for a word from our response, whatsre we have

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the caveats, the implications.

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 4>What does this mean? You know?

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, it just makes me think about UAP. If

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 2>you wanted to come in and talk to the simulated.

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 2>You could come in as you know, a thing that

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 2>looks like one of the simulated and speaks like one

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 2>of the simulated and just interacts amongst them, or you

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:29.439
<v Speaker 2>could send in whatever you were, you know, like I'm

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to imagine, like, hello, fellow kids, I'm thinking back

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 2>back in the day It's Ultimate Online, when a GM

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 2>game manager would show up and just like pop in

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 2>to where you are and be like, oh, hi, what

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 2>seems to be the problem. Oh, I understand, let's talk

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 2>about it, and like tries to help you with a problem,

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 2>and then just pops out of the universe, Like could

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 2>that happen? Would it look like a UAP that's just

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 2>sitting there floating as a cube inside a sphere?

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 4>This is like tech support?

0:44:58.239 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 2>What a.

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 4>Excuse me? You seem to be having some difficulties with simulation.

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 3>What can we do to make your simulation experience as

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:08.280
<v Speaker 3>as pleasant as possible?

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 6>I love that?

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 4>What if?

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:12.399
<v Speaker 1>What if you in religions are real and you die

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like going to tech support instead of

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 1>having yeah, and it's.

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:18.799
<v Speaker 2>All done over a.

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Really really quickly. Then you have to get in our group.

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Text Threat had mentioned the new balders Gate game, which

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 3>apparently is great. People are screaming about the new balders

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Gate game. And it is a big like choose your

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 3>an adventure type you know, RPG, but it sort of

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 3>is more like a virtual D and D. So it's

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a little less where it's this accurate, super precise simulation

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 3>and more like terms of a tabletop game that you

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:50.439
<v Speaker 3>might recognize, but with all the benefits of it being

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:51.399
<v Speaker 3>a virtual thing.

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 4>I just that hybrid approach is.

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 3>What my mind is starting to go to for like

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 3>what this whole thing is all about?

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And let's pause there in our since we are bound

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>by linear time, we are going to make some time

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 1>for goods and services from our sponsors and we will

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be right back. Or are we already here? Have we

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>always been?

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Sorry?

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go, We have returned.

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 4>So what does this mean?

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're listening to this show now, You're in Brisbane,

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 1>You're in Jakarta, you're in Kansas City, you're in New York.

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Or Atlanta, maybe even Russia. We've gotten some weird emails.

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean for you? If the universe as

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you understand is made up well, honestly, right now, it

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>does not change much. Doesn't change the price of a case. Indea,

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter what your philosophical leanings or your ideology

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or beliefs are. All human minds understand basic truths about

0:46:55.520 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the reality. If you're a human, you emerge into the world,

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:04.399
<v Speaker 1>experience stuff, your body decays over linear time, and at

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>some point you disappear, and no dead person has ever

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>come back in a provable way. If there is some

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:17.760
<v Speaker 1>greater meta reality, we might think about our experiences differently,

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But those experiences are not going to be different from

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:28.240
<v Speaker 1>your phenomenological perspective. Like, You're still going to experience stuff

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the same way. You'll just have different thoughts about what's

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:36.320
<v Speaker 1>happening and why and knowing that you live in a simulation.

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to change those basic truths? Oh, except

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for the part that it means there would be a god.

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>That's like the one thing. It means there would be

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a creator.

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:50.879
<v Speaker 4>I'm on board with that.

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:54.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, man, I think sure do seem for

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 3>it to all be from entropy, for it to all

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 3>be from chaos and un organized you know, madness.

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Things sure did.

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 3>Find themselves into an orderly, relatively orderly way that allow

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 3>us to live here on this planet. And it also

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 3>reminds me of a thing that I think we've all

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 3>talked about with our good buddy Frank friend of the show,

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 3>who took a.

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Class or audited a class or took.

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 3>A massive one of those massive online classes on complex

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 3>systems and the idea of complex systems and like how

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 3>they can be modeled and some of the features of

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 3>complex systems, which can be anything from like the way

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the water table works and the water cycle to like

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, the connection between members of different animal species

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 3>and all of that stuff and just you know, natural

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:44.320
<v Speaker 3>things where you have to look at the individual components

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 3>in order to fully understand the bigger picture. And there's

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 3>tons of simulations that are done in the world of

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:50.720
<v Speaker 3>complex systems.

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, yeah, And before we go any further, because we

0:48:57.000 --> 0:49:02.759
<v Speaker 1>are now we are addressing scientific implications that do go

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 1>into the world of spirituality. So again, your spirituality is

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:10.800
<v Speaker 1>your own. When you hear Matt or Noel or yours

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>truly talking about this kind of deep faith based stuff.

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Know that we're speaking for ourselves. We're not telling you

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:21.880
<v Speaker 1>what to believe. With that being said, I'd like to

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>shout out Epicurus, who has one of my favorite quotes

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>about this kind of thing. Is God? If God is real?

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Is God willing to prevent evil but not able? Then

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>he is not omnipotent? Is he able but not willing?

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Then he is malevolent? Is he both able and willing?

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?

0:49:44.320 --> 0:49:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Then why call him God?

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 4>I love that. I have never heard that. I agree

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 4>with all of that.

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 3>I've always had an issue with the whole It's free will. Man,

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:57.319
<v Speaker 3>God's not gonna, you know, keep you from suffering. That's

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 3>not his deal. I'm like, why not thought we were

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:03.560
<v Speaker 3>all children of God? Like, why doesn't he intervene? And

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 3>if he's not, isn't it all just a game? Isn't

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 3>it all just kind of again that thing that he's

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 3>just observing to see how it'll play out, which seems

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 3>a little nihilistic and not particularly charitable to his creations.

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, well, have you ever been mean to your sims?

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, do you ever play civilization six and just

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 1>think I'll nuke it.

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Why not?

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:30.240
<v Speaker 1>That's like the idea, right or for a human analog

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>walking by an an hill and stepping on it for

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:38.959
<v Speaker 1>a momentary, little little little shot, see like you.

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Grow out of that.

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that's the kind of stuff that petulant

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 3>children do. And I would really hope that, you know,

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 3>someone with the power and.

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Clout of a god would be above that. Maybe.

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 1>But this, okay, So all this means, if if one

0:50:56.080 --> 0:50:59.879
<v Speaker 1>could prove a simulation exists, all this means is that

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>there is some sort of again I hesitate to use

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the word God, some sort of generative force. But from

0:51:07.080 --> 0:51:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the human perspective, it would be something like the divide.

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:14.480
<v Speaker 1>It would be a creator from wind Sprang all creation,

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and it might not have any remote resemblance to any

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:23.800
<v Speaker 1>human concepts of God. Like I think, I went back

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and looked to science fiction for one of my favorite

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>ways to understand this potential new state of reality. And

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we should shout out one of the absolute

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:40.360
<v Speaker 1>best examples of simulation theory from the world of fiction.

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It is a short story called The Nine Billion Names

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of God by Arthur C. Clark, whom we quote often

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:51.359
<v Speaker 1>on this show and our boy Artie he wrote this

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>absolute banger way back in nineteen fifty three.

0:51:55.160 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 7>Do you guys know this story? We've talked about this

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 7>show before, but okay, I don't. I don't even want to. Man,

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 7>It's like, okay, fine, well, okay.

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 4>The setup. The setup.

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It's very short. It's also freely available online as an

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 1>audio book and as text. You can listen to it now.

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It won't take up a lot of time. The setup

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is that there is a remote monastery in the Himalayas,

0:52:26.280 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and they have contracted these two computer engineers to build

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a very advanced computer for them. That's the That's all

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you. I think that's enough of a tease, right, No,

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 1>you are gonna when when you read or hear this, man,

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:47.919
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee you're going to hit the group chat.

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:49.600
<v Speaker 4>What the hell?

0:52:50.280 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I also, you know you you gave a really good

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:56.719
<v Speaker 3>quote about the nature of God from an more uh

0:52:57.400 --> 0:53:00.359
<v Speaker 3>classic kind of source. I would love to offer one

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 3>from a more modern source. An amazing writer and musician

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 3>named David Berman who sadly passed away.

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 4>A handful of years ago.

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:11.439
<v Speaker 3>He has a song called Margerita is at the mall

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 3>from this record he made called Purple Mountains, and I

0:53:14.480 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 3>think the lyrics.

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Are fabulous and really go along with kind of what you.

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 3>Said, Ben, It's how long can a world go on

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:22.720
<v Speaker 3>under such a subtle God? How long can a world

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 3>go on with no new word from God? See the

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 3>plod of the flawed individual looking for a nod from God,

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:32.799
<v Speaker 3>trotting the sod.

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Of the visible with no new word from God.

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, the wordplay alone is worth the price of admission.

0:53:39.239 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 4>But I think it really I think it hits and then.

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 3>We're just shrinking. Margarita is at the mall. That's the

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:48.439
<v Speaker 3>next line. It's yeah, it hits, man, And especially when

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 3>you know this is a very sad individual who struggled

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:55.279
<v Speaker 3>with this kind of stuff and these sort of questions

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 3>and this sort of what does it all mean? And

0:53:57.880 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 3>managed to write it in such a tongue in cheek,

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:04.319
<v Speaker 3>a cerbic kind of way. And this this man took

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:07.360
<v Speaker 3>his own life very shortly after this album was released,

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:09.240
<v Speaker 3>And if you listen to it with that in mind,

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 3>it really does read like the world's most hilarious tongue

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:14.960
<v Speaker 3>in cheek suicide note. So all that to say is

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 3>These questions are not minor. These are like everything, you

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 3>know what I mean, too many people and some people

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 3>can't go on because it's just too much. It's too much,

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, to think about all these possibilities and what

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 3>does it all mean and the meaninglessness or meaningfulness of

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:35.759
<v Speaker 3>it all. I just think it's important to mention the

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:38.320
<v Speaker 3>mental health aspect of a lot of these types of things.

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:43.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, sure, yes it's it's a it's a big,

0:54:44.520 --> 0:54:47.399
<v Speaker 1>big thing to get your head around. And you know,

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:53.320
<v Speaker 1>science is very good at explaining how, and spirituality attempts

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to explain why. So this gets us into a troubling

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:04.399
<v Speaker 1>range ven diagram between those two pursuits, which I would

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:08.359
<v Speaker 1>also argue are not mutually exclusive science and spirituality. We're

0:55:08.360 --> 0:55:11.520
<v Speaker 1>out here on the bleeding edge of metacognitive experience, and

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to ask what would happen if we could

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 1>not just prove the universe was a simulation, but what

0:55:20.719 --> 0:55:25.360
<v Speaker 1>would happen if we could interact with whatever generative force

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:29.319
<v Speaker 1>created this simulation? Would they tell us that they were

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 1>also part of a simulated reality? Would they want to

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 1>hear from you? What would they say? What would their

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 1>priorities be? These are questions that haunt us. They echo

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>from the ancient past, pre linguistic ancient past, to the

0:55:43.320 --> 0:55:46.840
<v Speaker 1>modern day. And for fans of mathematics, the idea of

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe has nothing more than a sophisticated form of code.

0:55:51.280 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>What's super intriguing. That's a umami right there. We can

0:55:54.719 --> 0:56:00.919
<v Speaker 1>understand ones and zeros. You know, it's devilishly if you'd

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:01.640
<v Speaker 1>permit the pun.

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, imagine you're playing SimCity. You create just just one city, right,

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a single city, but you created it. Imagine that each

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 2>of those individual citizens of your city prayed to you

0:56:18.400 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 2>as the god their creator. Each one individually does and says,

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:25.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, praise to you, tries to communicate with you

0:56:25.600 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 2>in some way. You are one person. How do you

0:56:29.719 --> 0:56:32.759
<v Speaker 2>respond to and take care of each one of those

0:56:33.120 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, creature's demands, each one of those individuals demands

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:40.399
<v Speaker 2>or asks or wants or needs, like if we were

0:56:40.400 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 2>if we're taking it to that level right now, Imagine

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 2>instead of a city, it's a planet. And now imagine

0:56:45.719 --> 0:56:49.360
<v Speaker 2>instead of a planet, it's a galaxy and a universe

0:56:49.440 --> 0:56:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and a web of galaxies like I'm imagining just you know,

0:56:55.120 --> 0:56:59.280
<v Speaker 2>asking these questions of like getting to communicate with a creator.

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, I do controlled opposition. I would

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:09.239
<v Speaker 1>create a Promethean Luciferian character in the city and be like,

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:12.239
<v Speaker 1>tell me your grievances, let's team up. You know what

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean. That's just to keep things interesting.

0:57:15.080 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a quote from Stanley Kubrick. I've

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:19.680
<v Speaker 3>seen it attributed to him a bunch and I couldn't

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 3>find anything saying otherwise. I believe I've said this one

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 3>before too, but it's so appropriate. He says, how would

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 3>essentially an ant view the foot that crushes his aunt

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:30.439
<v Speaker 3>hill as the action of another being on a higher

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 3>evolutionary scale than itself, or as the divinely terrible intercession

0:57:35.920 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 3>of God?

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, it's a good question, right, It's one that applies now.

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this planet civilization is one Gamma Ray burst

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>away from just popping, right, and there's nothing you could

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>do about it. Shout out again to Josh Clark at

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the End of the World with Josh Clark, great show.

0:57:56.440 --> 0:58:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Check out the Gamma Ray episode. If here's that's another

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 1>intriguing thing, another baffling thing. There are certain patterns of

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers that seem to spontaneously generate impredictable patterns throughout all

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:21.160
<v Speaker 1>observable human experience. They're the same every time, They're very

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just so. The most famous, of course, would be Pie.

0:58:24.680 --> 0:58:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Do check out that amazing film Pie, But then also

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:32.000
<v Speaker 1>check out the world record, which changes pretty often of

0:58:33.480 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 1>individuals who are able to recite Pie from memory to

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the longest extent. No one knows when Pie ends. Yet,

0:58:41.360 --> 0:58:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just a thing that exists. It's always the same

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in the entirety of the observable universe, and no one

0:58:48.720 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 1>knows why. Another thing would be the Fibonacci sequence. That's

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>where the sum of each number is the sum of

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the two numbers. That can before it sounds really simple,

0:59:03.240 --> 0:59:07.520
<v Speaker 1>gets really interesting. Like that's the thing that gets me.

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 1>How is that stuff the same? How does that never change?

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:16.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that science can't answer because that's a

0:59:16.480 --> 0:59:18.960
<v Speaker 1>why question, that's not a how question.

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:21.880
<v Speaker 3>And like things like the golden ratio that like appear

0:59:22.160 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, in nature so often.

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Ah, yeah, I don't know, man.

0:59:28.080 --> 0:59:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I had a conversation with a dear friend the other

0:59:30.520 --> 0:59:33.920
<v Speaker 3>day about sort of like the nature of reality and

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:35.920
<v Speaker 3>like sort of like a lot of these existential threats

0:59:36.160 --> 0:59:38.360
<v Speaker 3>outside of the simulation thing but I do think that

0:59:39.200 --> 0:59:42.400
<v Speaker 3>whatever the case, you know, we do know that I

0:59:42.440 --> 0:59:47.480
<v Speaker 3>think this experience, whether it's simulation or not, is painfully

0:59:47.600 --> 0:59:51.960
<v Speaker 3>short and pro probably best to do anything we can

0:59:52.080 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 3>to not beat ourselves up psychically over these kinds of things,

0:59:56.560 --> 0:59:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and just to kind of, at least at the very

0:59:59.040 --> 1:00:01.600
<v Speaker 3>least enjoy this ride to some degree.

1:00:01.640 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 4>And if it gives you.

1:00:02.600 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Joy to think about these kinds of things and to

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:06.640
<v Speaker 3>analyze it, then I think it's something that you should do.

1:00:06.680 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 3>But I just I think some people can go down

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 3>really dangerous rabbit holes with these kinds of things, and

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 3>it can lead to problematic lives, and I just don't want.

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:20.440
<v Speaker 4>Everyone to have a good time, that's all. That's my

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 4>whole thing.

1:00:21.360 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Sure, And for those of us playing along at home,

1:00:25.360 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>what you need to know is it's probably best for

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:31.959
<v Speaker 1>us to save the ideas of these what I would

1:00:32.000 --> 1:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>call this constant math for a future episode, a follow

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>up episode. All we need to walk away with is

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this for now, there does appear to be some sort

1:00:43.200 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of again discernible, predictable pattern towards certain events and structures

1:00:48.440 --> 1:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>within this larger universe from the very very small to

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the very very large, until you get to the edges

1:00:55.720 --> 1:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of experience. It seems like there's a weird symmetry to stuff.

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a weird sort of call and response that reality

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is making toward you. It reminds me of all the

1:01:10.200 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the old the old masters were right as above,

1:01:13.920 --> 1:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>so below. When Rumy says you know that which you

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>seek is seeking you, it's okay. Well, now I sound

1:01:24.880 --> 1:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like the photojournalist at the end of apocalypse now, but

1:01:28.440 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep moving on. People don't understand why these patterns exist.

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:33.240
<v Speaker 4>They do.

1:01:34.000 --> 1:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>The Fibonacci sequence is in everything from basic math to

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>patterns of cicada lifestyle. It's very popular here in the

1:01:43.400 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>US South. Scientists have learned to model and predict patterns

1:01:48.200 --> 1:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and everything from fingerprints to cacti. And while the nature

1:01:52.640 --> 1:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of this dilemma may not be readily apparent for everybody

1:01:56.000 --> 1:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>just hanging out as possible simulation, some of the world's

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:03.439
<v Speaker 1>smartest people are working around the clock to figure out

1:02:03.560 --> 1:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>whether or not there is an essential code, some sort

1:02:07.440 --> 1:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of fabric from which this universe's clothing is composed. Before

1:02:13.080 --> 1:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we end, I guess we should add Bostroums totally legitimate.

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a very smart person working in good faith,

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and he says in his paper, which you can read

1:02:24.480 --> 1:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for free online, he says, look, all the points I've

1:02:28.320 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>made do not prove that we are definitely living in

1:02:31.960 --> 1:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a computer simulation. Further, he says, it might be impossible

1:02:36.600 --> 1:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for us to ever reach a point where we can

1:02:39.320 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>build our own universes at home. It might be because

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we can't get the technology, or because there's always a possibility.

1:02:49.680 --> 1:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>It might mean that humans go extinct before ever reaching

1:02:53.920 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that technological point. Here's the thing, it's kind of petering out,

1:03:00.080 --> 1:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are you guys? There's just Jonathan pointed this out over

1:03:04.000 --> 1:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on tech stuff as well, Jonathan Strickland, There's no real

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>way to disprove simulation theory. It is not what we

1:03:12.440 --> 1:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>call a falsifiable claim. It's a thought experiment.

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:23.000
<v Speaker 3>But like so that's one thing that I kind of

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:25.840
<v Speaker 3>held back. I guess Bostrom does he really believe this?

1:03:26.080 --> 1:03:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Is he sort of being a clever, cheeky little devil

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:31.959
<v Speaker 3>or like you know, sort of like do like again,

1:03:32.040 --> 1:03:34.360
<v Speaker 3>to your point about it being a thought experiment, He's

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>basically saying, if then if this heck is possible or

1:03:39.040 --> 1:03:43.959
<v Speaker 3>becomes possible, then it has happened. Before, but then that pause.

1:03:44.040 --> 1:03:47.479
<v Speaker 3>It's a whole nother kind of timey, whimy doctor who

1:03:47.600 --> 1:03:50.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of scenario that also isn't really provable.

1:03:52.120 --> 1:03:53.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like, what's his deal? Does he?

1:03:53.720 --> 1:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Do you really think he's he believes this? Or is

1:03:56.240 --> 1:03:58.640
<v Speaker 3>he just being too clever for his own good?

1:03:59.320 --> 1:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's an exploration, That's what it is.

1:04:03.480 --> 1:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, I mean, clearly he's not. He and

1:04:08.040 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>other people are not attempting to found religious movements based

1:04:12.880 --> 1:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>on this. They're not attempting God right, They're not attempting

1:04:17.800 --> 1:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I was good. They're not attempting to bilk people, you know,

1:04:21.480 --> 1:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And you can also the conversation continues. You can find

1:04:26.960 --> 1:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>plenty of work questioning this or attempting to disprove simulation

1:04:33.280 --> 1:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>as a concept. I think there were I can't remember

1:04:36.200 --> 1:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>their names. There were some physicists who looked at the

1:04:40.600 --> 1:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>knowable balands of classic computers and said it was impossible,

1:04:45.480 --> 1:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>indeed to create a computer that could simulate a universe.

1:04:51.120 --> 1:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's ongoing, and it's quite a high stakes exploration.

1:04:56.320 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Can't wait to hear what everyone thinks about this, But

1:04:59.120 --> 1:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to give space one thing. Matt you've been

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of quiet, as Nola and I are, as he said,

1:05:06.000 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>if then ing through this stuff. And I know there's

1:05:08.800 --> 1:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot on your mind because you and I have

1:05:11.360 --> 1:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about this for many years.

1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:15.840
<v Speaker 4>What do you think.

1:05:16.160 --> 1:05:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I just don't have anything to add. I looked at

1:05:18.080 --> 1:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>some of the latest attempts, like scientific attempts to work

1:05:24.560 --> 1:05:28.600
<v Speaker 2>on this. It's not a problem to put more shed

1:05:28.640 --> 1:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>more light on these questions. Right, I'm not seeing anything

1:05:35.240 --> 1:05:37.840
<v Speaker 2>that's blowing my mind. I always go back to the

1:05:37.840 --> 1:05:40.479
<v Speaker 2>work of James Gates that I remember watching a video

1:05:40.520 --> 1:05:43.360
<v Speaker 2>of him a long time ago talking about these things.

1:05:44.080 --> 1:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>He referred to them as error correcting codes, and they're

1:05:46.640 --> 1:05:50.600
<v Speaker 2>associated with browsers that we use to hang out on

1:05:50.640 --> 1:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the Internet. And when he was studying, you know, stuff

1:05:54.520 --> 1:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>in the atomic level, quarks and those things, he at

1:05:58.320 --> 1:06:01.320
<v Speaker 2>least in his talk back then, years and years and

1:06:01.400 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 2>years ago, he was saying that he was finding error

1:06:04.720 --> 1:06:07.240
<v Speaker 2>correcting codes very similar to the ones we use for

1:06:07.320 --> 1:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>web browsers inside like the code of the universe. Basically

1:06:15.200 --> 1:06:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that was at the sub atomic level, and that always

1:06:17.560 --> 1:06:19.840
<v Speaker 2>blew my mind. But I could never find any further

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:22.640
<v Speaker 2>information on it. I don't know I'm just at a

1:06:22.640 --> 1:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>point right now where I haven't seen anything that is

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:29.320
<v Speaker 2>making me believe it harder.

1:06:29.680 --> 1:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>What if this whole universe is a sponsored ad for

1:06:34.160 --> 1:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>some other universe, you know what I mean?

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:40.600
<v Speaker 4>What if this whole universe is an everything bagel? M m, yeah.

1:06:41.800 --> 1:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>What if there is source code for the universe and

1:06:44.440 --> 1:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it turns out it's something like drink oval teine.

1:06:47.600 --> 1:06:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Remember that movie Source Code with Jake Gillenhall was directed

1:06:52.760 --> 1:06:57.240
<v Speaker 3>by David Bowie's son, Duncan Jones. It had some of

1:06:57.280 --> 1:07:01.040
<v Speaker 3>these kind of themes, the idea of a simulation of

1:07:01.120 --> 1:07:04.320
<v Speaker 3>like the ability to change the past, you know, time

1:07:04.360 --> 1:07:06.320
<v Speaker 3>traveling stuff. But it was a little more on the

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:09.120
<v Speaker 3>simulation to But it's been a minute so I've seen.

1:07:08.960 --> 1:07:10.000
<v Speaker 4>It, but I remember it being good.

1:07:11.520 --> 1:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:07:13.320 --> 1:07:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, but Matt, do you think Bostrom's being a cheeky

1:07:17.160 --> 1:07:19.200
<v Speaker 3>little fella or do you think he, like.

1:07:19.320 --> 1:07:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Is really believes this.

1:07:21.560 --> 1:07:24.040
<v Speaker 3>That's always a big question for me, you know, And

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I guess with scientists it's different. With politicians usually you

1:07:27.440 --> 1:07:29.680
<v Speaker 3>could go either way. But like with scientists, I'm like,

1:07:30.160 --> 1:07:32.680
<v Speaker 3>is it even about belief or is he just conjecturing?

1:07:32.800 --> 1:07:35.440
<v Speaker 4>He's just saying this is a possibility.

1:07:35.920 --> 1:07:40.360
<v Speaker 2>It personally, it's very weird to me. I have been

1:07:40.640 --> 1:07:45.560
<v Speaker 2>under the influence of substances in the past where I fully,

1:07:45.680 --> 1:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>truly thought I understood the fabric of the simulation, not

1:07:49.960 --> 1:07:52.960
<v Speaker 2>of the universe, not of reality, but of the simulated,

1:07:54.360 --> 1:07:58.600
<v Speaker 2>computer generated thing that I was living in. And I've

1:07:58.640 --> 1:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>had those real moments that I like, they stick with

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:05.120
<v Speaker 2>me and I think about them. But for this specific topic,

1:08:05.280 --> 1:08:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't dwell on those moments because I don't like

1:08:07.960 --> 1:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>what like thinking about that further and taking the thoughts

1:08:12.600 --> 1:08:16.120
<v Speaker 2>to maybe their conclusions of if we are in fact

1:08:16.120 --> 1:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>in a simulation like.

1:08:17.360 --> 1:08:19.920
<v Speaker 4>That you're talking about monster energy drink, I assume, right.

1:08:20.680 --> 1:08:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, sure, yeah, that's what I'm talking about.

1:08:23.280 --> 1:08:23.800
<v Speaker 4>It'll do it.

1:08:24.160 --> 1:08:26.760
<v Speaker 2>But what I mean is like that I'm sorry, just

1:08:26.880 --> 1:08:28.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, That's why I've been kind of quiet, because

1:08:28.439 --> 1:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I think about this stuff. But I'm like, I don't know,

1:08:32.240 --> 1:08:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know if I I don't know if

1:08:34.240 --> 1:08:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I personally want to explore it much further.

1:08:37.080 --> 1:08:38.719
<v Speaker 4>It's scary. And we talked a little.

1:08:38.760 --> 1:08:40.519
<v Speaker 3>I think we did a video recently where we all

1:08:40.600 --> 1:08:43.280
<v Speaker 3>give some book recommendations, and I talked about one that

1:08:43.320 --> 1:08:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I think we all appreciated called the spirit molecule about DMT,

1:08:47.840 --> 1:08:53.439
<v Speaker 3>and so many DMT trip experiences have very similar results

1:08:53.640 --> 1:08:56.200
<v Speaker 3>where people see these like creatures, you know, these like

1:08:56.280 --> 1:08:59.400
<v Speaker 3>machine elves or whatever, and there's a lot of conjecture

1:08:59.439 --> 1:09:03.000
<v Speaker 3>around that various communities that these might well be the

1:09:04.240 --> 1:09:08.000
<v Speaker 3>creatures pulling the strings behind the simulation, right, I don't know, Ben,

1:09:08.320 --> 1:09:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I see you kind of just see the wheels turning.

1:09:12.000 --> 1:09:14.479
<v Speaker 3>Is that something that you've heard in terms of like

1:09:14.680 --> 1:09:17.439
<v Speaker 3>that's a way to see through the veil into the

1:09:17.479 --> 1:09:19.880
<v Speaker 3>source code, and maybe there are things that are pulling

1:09:19.880 --> 1:09:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the strings that are observing us that we are not

1:09:23.240 --> 1:09:23.640
<v Speaker 3>aware of.

1:09:24.840 --> 1:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, said that we do function on a constraint of

1:09:28.200 --> 1:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>linear or time and have to wrap this up because

1:09:30.880 --> 1:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that is a favorite hobby horse of mine.

1:09:34.920 --> 1:09:35.360
<v Speaker 4>I would.

1:09:35.520 --> 1:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I know, not everyone agrees with Graham Hancock, but the

1:09:39.040 --> 1:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>guy can spin a story for sure. It goes to

1:09:41.640 --> 1:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the concept of discovery. It goes to the concept of

1:09:48.520 --> 1:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>information being conveyed via human DNA and being able to

1:09:53.840 --> 1:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>interact directly with some sort of sentient force within that

1:09:57.160 --> 1:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>DNA when under the influence of certain usually psychedelic or

1:10:01.800 --> 1:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>who loucinogenic substances. There is so much more to the story,

1:10:06.360 --> 1:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm so glad we finally got to this. I

1:10:08.720 --> 1:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>think this is the first of a continuing series. We

1:10:12.600 --> 1:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>have much more to explore in the existence of numbers

1:10:17.600 --> 1:10:21.599
<v Speaker 1>as source code for reality. But for now, you guys,

1:10:22.240 --> 1:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Noel, Mission Control, fellow conspiracy realist, We've got to

1:10:26.920 --> 1:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>call it an evening. I have become strange. I am doctificant.

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We have miles to go before we sleep. Shall we

1:10:37.200 --> 1:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>pass the torch to our fellow sims and see if

1:10:41.120 --> 1:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>they can solve the question of reality for us?

1:10:44.920 --> 1:10:47.720
<v Speaker 3>What does sims say on their little weird language?

1:10:49.280 --> 1:10:50.720
<v Speaker 4>I like that weird little things like that.

1:10:50.760 --> 1:10:53.280
<v Speaker 3>I can't simulish is a thing that it's called, and

1:10:53.320 --> 1:10:56.639
<v Speaker 3>I used to remember it was like David the Gnome

1:10:56.720 --> 1:11:00.479
<v Speaker 3>type language. But anyhow, please reach out to us. Let

1:11:00.560 --> 1:11:03.360
<v Speaker 3>us know what your experiences of all of these things.

1:11:03.400 --> 1:11:05.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you have any theories to add, let

1:11:05.880 --> 1:11:08.120
<v Speaker 3>us know. You can find us on the internet on

1:11:08.240 --> 1:11:13.000
<v Speaker 3>the platform formerly known as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, where

1:11:13.000 --> 1:11:16.120
<v Speaker 3>we are conspiracy stuff or conspiracy Stuff show on Instagram

1:11:16.120 --> 1:11:16.599
<v Speaker 3>and TikTok.

1:11:16.920 --> 1:11:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you like using your voice? You can call us

1:11:19.479 --> 1:11:24.200
<v Speaker 2>one eight three three std WYTK. It's a voicemail system.

1:11:24.560 --> 1:11:27.120
<v Speaker 2>You got three minutes. That's it, just three minutes. Give

1:11:27.120 --> 1:11:28.920
<v Speaker 2>yourself a cool nickname and let us know if we

1:11:28.960 --> 1:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>can use your voice and message on one of our

1:11:31.160 --> 1:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>listener mail episodes. If you don't want to do that,

1:11:33.720 --> 1:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>why not instead send us a good old fashioned email.

1:11:36.360 --> 1:11:58.599
<v Speaker 1>We are conspiracy at iHeartRadio dot com.

1:11:58.800 --> 1:12:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Stuff they don't want you to know is a production

1:12:00.960 --> 1:12:05.479
<v Speaker 2>of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:12:05.600 --> 1:12:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.