WEBVTT - Heads Up (7/13/2017)

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbo.

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm after me. I'm a man, I'm for I've heard

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>so many players say, well, I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>You want to be happy for dake Ado State?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that? Whoo?

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Whoo?

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And Dan and Tie welcome back to the solid verb

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Boys and girls. My name is Ty Hildebrand, joining me

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>as always, but not from New York City. Dan Rubinstein,

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>where are you, sir? How are you?

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm good. I am on the West Coast. I'm in

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Lake Tahoe for work. I'm out here for the American

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Century Championship. He is a celebrity Welf tournament. What now?

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>What is that?

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 2>The American Century Championships? You remember it's right after the

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>what the MLB All Star Game we're recording in? The

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>All Star Game is tonight. Typically this is the time

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 2>of year where no sports are happening, specifically because baseball

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 2>is in its All Star breaks, so nothing's going on.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>So there's a bunch of athletes and actors and stuff

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>like that. I think Ray Romano is here justin Timberlake.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think of notable football Jerry Rice is yeah, okay,

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Steph Curry, fun people. So I'm going to be doing

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 2>fun golf things, which I don't know that much about golf.

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, hold on, hold on, put Yeah, for anyone who's

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>listened to this show for any extended period of time,

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty aware of your adversarial relationship with the fine

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>sport emphasized sport of golf. Will you actually be out

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>there playing amongst the celebrities and stars.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I will not be taking part in any of

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the golf on the course. I'll be doing driving rain stuff.

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>So maybe I'll take a few cracks at the uh

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>what is it the white ball?

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 1>The white ball? Yeah? I demand since you've been doing

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>some Instagram story stuff for us. By the way, follow

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>us on Instagram. We're doing stories now. Yeah, I will

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>get in on the fun, I promise you. But in

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, while you're out there, I demand that we

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>at least get some sort of video evidence of your

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>golf swing.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh. I can play golf.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:57.559
<v Speaker 1>I know you can play, but we'd like to see

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it as interact. I can do that third part. Please

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>take a video and post it on the Instagram story.

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you know who I think is out here? Ty?

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I believe I saw his name on the list. Doesn't

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>mean for sure he's going to be here. Sometimes things

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 2>can come up. Brian Kelly, No, great, believe Brian Piot

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>about here. I'm going to do my very best to

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>get him on the solid verbal Instagram story account. Do it.

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm going to try to do. Follow solid

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>verbal sounds just like it is solid verbal.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're at Lake Tahoe. Yeah, the scenery here is

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>decidedly different. They're actually doing some utility work outside the

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>studio window here, and there's a jackhammer that's been going

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for about twelve straight hours.

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd take it so right now.

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>What I've got is a series of blankets draped over

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>my window in hopes of maybe deadening the sound. It

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like I've configured a kill room.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Dan, I've been hearing Ed Sheeran and Bruno Mars and

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Lana del Rey at a very loud volume at the

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>pool outside. So I would still take yours also, Ty,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I realize something this is unrelated, but I want you

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 2>to do your best to accommodate the people that are

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 2>listening to the show at one and a half speed,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>okay or two time speed? Do you have a preference?

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 2>How fast do you listen to your podcasts.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I usually go about one point twenty five on my

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>overcast player.

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Here's what I want from you. I want you to

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 2>tell people where they can find the solid verbal online,

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>just whether it's Twitter or Facebook or Instagram. But I

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.839
<v Speaker 2>want you to slow down your cadence because I do

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 2>not want people just speeding past.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>You can find the solid verbal on Twitter at solid verbal,

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook dot com slash solid verbal. You can also

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our newsletter newsletter my going to solidverbal dot com.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't do this any longer, Dan, I'm dying here now.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I know. I just listen. We're forcing people in. Screw you, Overcast.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>We are. We are getting a ton of new sign

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>ups on our newsletter, mainly because we've promised you that

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>if you sign up, we'll give you information about shirts

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and take it to the live show, which you and

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I are about to firm up, and we'll probably be announcing,

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say within the next seven to ten days.

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>There's also a subreddit now up and running. I had

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a chance to visit it. Peter, one of the mods

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe as their own, is doing some cool stuff,

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>so check that out. I'm excited to have a community

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that ourverbawlers can go to and you know, secure us

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>behind our backs. I'm sure they'll enjoy that as well. Yep,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing tonight? Dan, you're out in Tahoe.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm back here in eastern Pennsylvania. Typically in a situation

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like this, we'll just punt on the show. We'll say, now,

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to do it this week, too difficult. Correct,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we have figured out the logistics of how we're going

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to do this show, and we're going back to the well,

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>putting a little bit of a different spin on a

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>concept we trotted out for the first time last summer.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we could sort of call it, let's

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>make a deal if we want. In reality, it's kind

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of not that we're gonna do some heads up matchups.

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>We're going to pose some propositions to each other, and

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>not in the way you'd think. These are entirely college football,

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I promise, And we're going to talk through some situations

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we could see coming down the pike here in the

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen college football season. Correct, and we're going to

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>pick which side of things you and I would feel

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable with.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>This is true, and I don't think we're always going

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 2>to come down on the same side. I don't think

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 2>we're always going to agree. But that's okay, Ty. It's

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>about competing. I have Yogi Roth in the back of

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 2>my head. It's about competing. It's about finding who you are,

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's about moving forward. And you know what, Ty,

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 2>if this show is a show in which we start

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 2>to butt heads and we start to go at each other,

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I want you to know in advance that I have

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>contacted a foreign entity and have conducted a bit of opposition. Right,

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 2>all right, just watch yourself Tie.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>First topic, we have a heads up matchup, Dan, which

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation do you fall on? Siday, We've

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>got the total number of Oklahoma Sooners wins in twenty seventeen.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 1>On side B, we have the number of Big Twelve

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>coaches returning for the twenty eighteen season. So this is

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a good one. I like this one. The Vegas over

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>under currently for Oklahoma football wins sits at exactly ten.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>In this case, if Oklahoma wins all ten games, obviously

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>they would at worst be a push. In the situation

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>there's only ten teams in the Big Twelve. I don't

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>think Oklahoma's gonna win ten games this year, and I

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>like more or less, I'll give them like nine wins, right,

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not a bad year at all. But ten wins

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>new coach, some turnover just seems like a tall order

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Again, snap judgments. We haven't done any

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>deep dive of any of these teams, but ten wins

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for me new situation feels like a bit of a stretch.

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So with that in mind, if I'm saying nine wins

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>for Oklahoma, we'd have to retain all ten coaches in

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the Big Twelve in order for the Big twelve side

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of this to win. So I think I'm going to

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>go Oklahoma wins over Big twelve coaches returning for twenty eighteen.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>So you're in the camp of there will be eight

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>or fewer coaches returning.

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I am, and I went through what I counted which

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>ones I thought were the most vulnerable. I don't think

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Kansas is in any danger of losing their head football

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>coach David Beattie because he actually did a half theas

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in job last year.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Could regrets, but yes he did.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ruhle's not going anywhere at Baylor. He just got there.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt Campbell not going anywhere. At Iowa State, he did

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good job La year. Lincoln Riley another situation

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>just kind of got there. Mike Gundy, Gary Patterson, Tom Herman,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Dana Holgerson. I'll even throw into that camp. These are

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>guys that, provided the bottom doesn't fall out, in many cases,

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>they just got there. In many cases they've been there

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for a while and have done some good stuff. You know,

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Holgerson's always kind of on the fence, but I still

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about his situation. West Virginia should have

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a good year. The ones that jump out at me,

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the obvious ones Cliff Kingsbury. Cliff Kingsbury needs to turn

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>some things around. I think they've got a fascination with

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>him in Lubbock that he wouldn't be an easy guy

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of. But the on field results need

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to be there in twenty seventeen more so than they

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have in the past. I'm also very interested to see

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens with Bill Snyder, and not because I think

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Kansas State is gonna have a bad year, but at

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>some point the guy's got to retire, right.

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And coming off of an off season with a

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>pretty serious illness, it doesn't seem like he is much

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>like longer for Manhattan.

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So again, if I'm picking between the two, I think

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma has more. The smart money would be on I

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think nine wins over let's say eight and a half

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>is kind of how I feel about returning coaches in

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Big Twelve.

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's correct. I am going to go

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 2>with Oklahoma wins as well, but I think more comfortably

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 2>than you have it, because I think Oklahoma will win

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>at least ten games. The Ohio State game on the

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 2>road early is much more than tricky. They go to

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma State, so bedlam is earlier on in November. They

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>go to Kansas, they go to Kansas State, they go

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 2>to Baylors So not the most difficult stretch other than

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State on the road in Oklahoma State, Kansas State.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a tough schedule. I'm going to say, by the way, though,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>before we move on, that there will be seven coaches.

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh back, so he're not eight. Who do you have

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>as departing the Big twelve.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Some sort of combination of Dana Holgerson, Gary Patterson. I

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 2>have the Bill Snyder, I have the Cliff Kingsbery. I

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 2>think there's going to be a promotion. I don't know

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 2>if it's Gary Patterson. I don't know if it's whole.

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's even David Baty if he

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 2>has another really good year and proves that he can

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>salvage something and has earned an even bigger job. But

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I think there's going to be even more turnover as

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the Big twelve becomes a less and less desirable place

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to coach.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Interesting.

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, so like ten to seven, eleven to seven

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing. Next topic, Dan, here we go. I'm

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 2>excited about this one. I'm excited. I think we're going

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 2>to get some interesting feedback on this one. Minnesota wins

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 2>in twenty seventeen, the ultimate wild card. Now with an

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 2>ultimate wild card as their head coach in PJ. Fleck,

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 2>they're Vegas over under for wins is seven and a

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 2>half versus total wins by the Iowa Hawk guys in

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>They're Vegas total at least again very early mid July,

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking seven wins, so two comparable teams. If you

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the Bill Connolly previews for both of these schools,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>he sort of weighs in that Minnesota is just that

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>they're a wild card. He could see them finishing anywhere

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>between three and nine and nine and three. And on

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the Iowa side, it's kind of tough to tell whether

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they go up, whether they go down. A typical Iowa team,

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>They've got a solid defensive core coming back, but there

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are questions on office. Our passing game was horrible a

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>year ago. They need to try and turn that around

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if they want to progress things forward. So Minnesota versus Iowa,

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Dan new coach, old coach, A lot of excitement on

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>one side, steady as she goes on the other, what

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think?

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, to take a step back, I

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 2>commend you, and I don't even know if you do

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 2>this intentionally, but this is the matchup that gives out

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the greatest trophy in college football. Floyd Rosedale, that's right

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>by far. It's just a pig on a stand. It's great,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 2>and it is that that is life. I don't know

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 2>what that means, but that is life. So here's where

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I come down. I really like the potential of PJ.

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Fleck and his staff at Minnesota and going a totally

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 2>new direction because we know year over year, you know

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 2>it was it was a similar system moving from coach

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 2>to coach to coach to coach for a little bit.

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think right now, given the fresh blood, the

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>new blood, I'm being very sort of violent talking about

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>pig blood. I don't know, whatever the case may be.

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I am going with Minnesota for one reason and one

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 2>reason only. Their schedule is way better.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it is.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I has got a brutal schedule. Minnesota might just be Okay,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>they might. I think they're going to be pretty good

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>in twenty seventeen, but all things point to them perhaps

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 2>starting at either four and one or five and zero,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 2>which is a nice little base to have for the season. TI.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>We don't know anything about Michigan State. We know Illinois

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 2>is going to be bad. They're road games in the

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 2>second half of the year at Iowa tough, at Michigan

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 2>very tough. At Northwestern decently tough as well. You notice

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 2>how I didn't say Ohio State or Penn State anywhere. Yeah,

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>talking about their schedule. So I think Minnesota can do

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 2>what they do best, and that's like a quiet eight

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and four, nine to three type of season, whereas with

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Iowa's schedule being less than ideal, starting with a very

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>tough group of five team in Wyoming going to Iowa

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 2>State and Alasico getting Penn State pretty early on traveling

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 2>to Michigan State. We don't know Wisconsin on the road,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Nebraska on the road two out of three weeks to

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 2>finish the season. It's a tough year for Iowa scheduling wise.

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 2>With a new offensive coordinator, it's going to be a

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 2>relatively similar offense. But schedule alone, I'm taking Minnesota to

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.839
<v Speaker 2>take home not just the Floyda Rosedale, but also this

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>competition I go. I think they go above seven and

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 2>a half, and Iowa I'm not so sure.

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Iowa's schedule is decidedly more difficult than Minnesota. The thing

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that both schedules share is that the back half of

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the schedule for both is somewhat loaded, something of a

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>murderer's row, And in both cases, I would venture a

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>guess that a game earlier ish in the season for

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>both against Michigan State is sort of going to be

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the bell weather. As I will get Minnesota's schedule, I

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>can very easily see a win over Buffalo and Oregon

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>State and Middle Tennessee and Maryland and Purdue even throw

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Illinois in there. Why not Michigan State. I don't know

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>what to expect that at Michigan State. Michigan State's kind

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of in a weird rebuild for the second year in

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a row. And then after that you go to Iowa

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to Michigan home against Nebraska to Northwestern, which is a

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>weird place to play, and then close out the year

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>against Wisconsin. You could craft a scenario or Minnesota goes

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>zero to five in its final five games. I still

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think I feel better about them than I do Iowa.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But Iowa has fooled me before, so I don't think

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>as a talking to your kids about Iowa kind of year.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>But it wouldn't be beyond them at all to just

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>win with a solid running game and a pretty good defense.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>You know what I'm interested in, time, and this is

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 2>going to sound a little bit strange. I'm interested in

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the Hideo Nomo factory off of these teams. Do you

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>remember Hydeo Nomo?

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>How could I ever forget what.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Was unique about Hideo Nomo's game? His wind up, crazy

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 2>wind up, sure, and early on in his career, hitters

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>just couldn't figure it out. And there was just the

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>thing like, well, Baseball's going to catch up to him,

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 2>baseball is going to catch up to him. It's just

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 2>so new and so weird and different that everybody just

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of struggled with that. I think that factor from

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota with a new staff, new offense, new defense, familiar

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 2>faces obviously, but new schemes, new attitude, whatever, and coming

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 2>off of a very strange back half of the year,

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>given everything that happened off the field, you know, it's

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>a fresh start for the Gophers. I think the Hitdeo

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Nomo factor for Minnesota is higher, although I think it

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 2>still exists with Iowa because the new offense. But I

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>see Iowa even with returning star power in the backfield.

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I think you and I both love Akrom Wadley. Yeah, yeah,

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the Hideo Nomo factor favors Minnesota. So I'm

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 2>going with the Gulf.

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>We're chock full of baseball analogies as it relates to

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the big time.

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I loved Hideo Nomo. I loved Well.

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>You were a Dodgers fan too, you still are, Yeah,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>so I could certainly see why he'd be a big deal.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Who wasn't a Hideo Nomo fan?

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely well. I mean, you were a Yankees fan and

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>you had you had a bunch of Japanese imports. Maybe

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 2>that played a little bit an unorthodox way.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Hideo Nomo was no Hideki rob Who mind you, but

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>he was still pretty good and exciting to watch. But

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we've used the Hideo Nomo factor in the Big Ten West.

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>We've also compared playing in Evanston to trying to hit

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a knuckleballer at some point in our past. So Big

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Ten West should be an interesting year. I think it

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>overall improves. I am gonna go in Minnesota here over Iowa?

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Who would you say? And I'm totally putting you on

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the spot. Here has the biggest, the most robust and

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>dynamic Hideo Nomo fan situation going into the season. Is

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 2>it Oklahoma with a new emergent not emergency but last

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 2>minute coaching change? Is it's who is it? I mean

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Alabama new offense and replacing a bunch of assistants. I

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 2>think the clumbson quarterback? You know, I mean the easy

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>answer is probably Navy football. You could use that one

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 2>every year.

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that Navy football doesn't have quite the

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>same Hedeonomo factor because they've been doing it successfully yeah,

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for a number of years. So it's definitely not a

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>flash in the pan once you get used to him.

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>I also think Texas could be an interesting answer because

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>no one's quite sure what we're going to see from

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the same personnel from a year ago. You can take guesses,

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but in spring game they kept it pretty vanilla. You

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>just don't know how Tom Herman's going to assemble the parts.

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 2>You know What's an interesting one to me? Florida with

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Malik's air and how they might wiggle that offense around

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 2>his talents.

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Alabama and Jalen Hurts would have been an

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting example. Again, the problem with the analogy though, is

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that no one could really beat Alabama.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm just it's much more saying we don't know

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>what they're going to look like at all. Going into

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bamas season. We thought Blake Barnett might be starting,

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>or he did start against USC. But yeah, maybe you

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>know you have the idea Ohio State's offense, there's a

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Hideo Nomo factor with Kevin Wilson taking over Ryan Day.

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, there's a bunch of interesting normal factors.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, next topic, here we go.

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Next topic.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got two prominent quarterbacks, one East Coast, one West Coast.

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>One South one North one. DeAndre Francois fres Waugh from

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Florida State. His quarterback ranking versus FBS teams.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Rating, yeah yeah, the ranking of his rating, yeah, the.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Ranking of his rating okay. So for example, he had

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the thirty ninth best quarterback ranking in twenty sixteen. His

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rating ranking versus Jake Browning touchdown passes he had

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine a year ago. So if you compare DeAndre

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Francois's ranking of his quarterback rating from a year ago,

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he was thirty ninth to Jake Browning's TV passes from

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, he also had thirty nine, So by that metric,

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>By that metric, it's a draw. Here's the problem I

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>have with this, Dan, I'm ready. If DeAndrea Francois gets better,

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that number goes down. The number goes down, well, oh yeah,

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>proves he could seemingly jump up to like twenty four

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and Jake Browning. All he'd really have to do is

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not get hurt and he would easily win this one.

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think the smart money is on Jake Browning.

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>The interesting question though, is if DeAndrea Francois declines it all,

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>if he has a little bit of a sophomore slump. Now,

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I happen to think that that DeAndre francois pretty good

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and that he was a warrior out there and played

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>through pain in a ton of situations. But I've been

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>surprised in just kind of perusing the internet that not

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>everyone shares the opinion that he's just automatically going to

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>get better. There are people out there who adamantly believe

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that he's a good quarterback. He's a serviceable quarterback, but

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.959
<v Speaker 1>that any in all comparisons to like a Jamis Winston

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>or any great quarterback in Florida State's past, is ill

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>placed on DeAndre Francois. He'll be fine, but just maybe

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>not one of the all time greats. On what side

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of the fence do you find yourself on DeAndre Francois.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I think he's fine. I think he's above average. I

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 2>think if you pay attention to him enough. And our

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>pal Buddy about Elliott has talked about this as being

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a major part of the Jimbo Fisher system. He doesn't

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 2>make a ton of mistakes, which is more than you

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 2>can say for a number of huge quarterbacks a big

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 2>schools that sometimes they'll be mistake prone, as Jameis Winston

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 2>was later on in his career at Florida State. So

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 2>that's a big, big item, big factor in Francois's favor.

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I just think he's fine. I think the offense will

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 2>be interesting. I like the running game. I like the

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 2>youth in the backfield the receivers have. There's a ton

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of talents, a ton of depth there. But here's the

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 2>problem I have with just automatically thinking Francois is going

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>to improve upon that specific number. He has a lot

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 2>of good defenses on his schedule. They open against Bama,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>they have Miami, they have NC State, they have an

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 2>improved Wake granted without last year's defensive coordinator, thank you, Tie.

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 2>They have a good Louisville defense, they have a good

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Clemson defense. They have a good Florida defense. Late, I

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 2>think it's going to be a little bit more difficult

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 2>for DeAndre Francois to improve. But then there's another factor, Tie,

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 2>and that's the John Ross factor.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>John Ross factor.

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you know how many receiving touchdowns John Ross had

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 2>last year and will not be there this year because

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 2>he is a National Football League player.

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>A ton.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I think he had seventeen touchdown catches. Wow, he's a

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>special talent. So that number I don't think will be

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 2>matched by anybody or even approached by anybody. So by

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 2>that factor, I still think, just barely, I'm gonna go

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 2>with Jake Browning because I am I'm worried about DeAndre

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 2>France while was rating against this schedule.

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.719
<v Speaker 1>So okay, a point of clarification. Please, If de Andrea

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Francois is the twenty fifth best quarterback in twenty seventeen

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>according to quarterback Ranking, Jake Browning throws twenty nine touchdown passes,

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for the higher number in Jake Browning. Right, Yes,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go Jake Browning.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay.

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I like DeAndre Francois. I think he's going to improve,

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think this is a tougher proposition than meets

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the eye.

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 2>So I think Francois improves a little bit.

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And in fairness, he could improve a little bit

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and still sink in this reigning mm hm okay, next topic, Dan,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>did you unfurl your mattress yet?

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I did not unfurl my mattress. I've been on the road, ah,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I know, we've been cleaning the apartment. I know it's

0:22:57.920 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm a time. I'm a bad person, I'm a bad

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 2>podcast host. This has been long established.

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I've said it once, I'll say it again. My Casper

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>mattress has changed my life. I'm sleeping better, I'm feeling

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>better about my life. I'm not waking up with a

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>dead shoulder next to me on the pillow. It's very important, Dan.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>You know I have shoulder issues. I had surgery on

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>my left shoulder many moons ago. I don't have to

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>worry about waking up looking at it like it's a

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>piece of dead meat, like it typically had felt with

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>my old memory film mattress. Now I've got a Casper mattress, Dan,

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a Casper mattress has been.

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 2>A pot In what position do you sleep?

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm usually a side sleeper.

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Which side.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm usually a restless sleeper, so both sides probably an

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>equal opportunity side sleeper.

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Have you noticed that you have different experiences sleeping on

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 2>different sides?

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't ask, but I've heard that people who

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>sleep in a different position and sometimes have more intense dreams.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Sleeping experience way more intense dreams when I sleep on

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 2>my right shoulder. It's so strange ty it taps into

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a part of my brain that I'm not fully comfortable with.

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Casper has an average of four point eight out of

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>five stars more than thirty thousand global reviews. DAN they

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are the Internet's favorite mattress. Real customers have said, and

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I've said this before, I'll try to say it again,

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it is like sleeping on a brioche again.

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 2>It's brioshe or like.

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Being cradled by the tinkling of baby laughter in the moonlight.

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>If you write that, you are a weird person, but

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not too weird to have a good mattress, so

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's okay.

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Solid wife Kate likes it.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>She likes it because it's got a breathable design. She

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>runs a little hot. It keeps her cool at night.

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Award winning design DAN. They continually develop it using feedback

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>from nearly half a million customers. They sell directly to you,

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>which means they can eliminate the commission driven inflated prices

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>might find elsewhere. And above all that it's easy to buy,

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>easy to buy, go online, you order it and they'll

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>deliver it to your door and in a magical box.

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how they do it and they'll deliver

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to you in the United States, UK or Canada one

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred night risk free, trial, free delivery, free returns. They

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>know how important it is to actually try the mattress

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>before you commit to it, so again, one hundred night's

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>risk free. You can get fifty bucks towards any mattress

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>purchase right now if you go to Casper dot com

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>slash a verbal v erba L and use the code

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>verbal v erba L fifty bucks towards a mattress Casper

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash verbal offer code verbal fifty bucks fifty

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>bones off any mattress purchase. Terms and conditions do apply time.

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 2>I ask you one more follow up question about your

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 2>sleeping Yes, please, How many fewer articles of clothing do

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 2>you wear? Betre between the coldest and warmest night of

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 2>the year, coldest night of the year, how many articles

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 2>of clothing are you were in a.

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Bed coldest night of the year, usually got.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Every piece of cloth on your on your person.

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I've I've already gone socks. I've gone

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like sweatpants. I've gone T shirt and then long sleeve

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>shirt over top of it.

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 2>T shirt and long sleeve shirt over to the coldest.

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Night of the year, and most of the time is

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>because they fell asleep at the couch and didn't feel

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>like changing. But I've done that before.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 2>But I'm saying intentionally going to bed saying this is

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 2>my uniform, this is my sleep uniform.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I've done that. I've done that consciously as well.

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I am staunchly, staunchly anti sock no matter the temperature,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 2>so I will go, Yeah, there's at least two or

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 2>three fewer.

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'd say that's probably accurate.

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't I can't get what the socks night got

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to let the dogs breathe, ty all right.

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I want to mention very quickly, don't

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>forget about our friends over at Blue Apron. As you know,

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you got picnics and pot lucks and dinner parties, barbecues,

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>all that good stuff going on right now. Good food

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is essential to a successful summer.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It's easier than ever to create delicious summer meals with

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Blue Apron for less than ten bucks a meal. They

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.479
<v Speaker 1>will deliver seasonal recipes along with pre portioned ingredients right

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to your door. We use it, We've endorsed it. It's

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. They're very flexible to customize your recipes every week,

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>choose a delivery option that fits your needs. Their Freshness

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Guarantee promises that every Blue Apron ingredient arrives ready to

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>cook or they'll make it right right now. In July,

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>you can get see your chicken and creamy pasta salad

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with summer squash and sweet peppers, or creamy shrimp rolls

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>with quick pickles and sweet potato wedges, fresh basil fetacini

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>pasta with sweet corn and cubanel pepper, and chili butter

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>steaks with parmesan potatoes and spinach.

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Right now.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You can get your first three meals for free with

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>free shipping by going to Blue Apron dot com slash

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>solid Blue Apron dot com slash solid. You'll love how

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>good it feels and tastes to create incredible home cooked

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>meals with Blue Apron, So don't wait one more time.

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Blue Apron dot com slash solid, Blue Apron a better

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>way to cook.

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Next topic, I listen. I'm going to indulge you with

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 2>this one because every single time we do hypotheticals, every

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 2>single time we try to figure out things we like

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>or have crushes on. You come back to your alma mater.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 2>May I ask you something, ty, because we have a

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Penn State item we do, and we made this very

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 2>specific to us. If your fandom right now or not

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>even your fandom, your focus were a meter and on

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 2>one side of the meter it says Penn State and

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the other side it said Notre Dame. And so basically

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a tug of war happening with the needle on

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 2>this meter right where is the needle focused? Are we

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>sixty forty Notre Dame? We fifty to fifty? We seven

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 2>thirty Penn State? Because I'm getting a lot of Penn

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 2>State out of you.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it used to be like ninety five

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>five in favor of under Dame. I was an odd

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>ball and that I was raised in the state of Pennsylvania,

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>where everyone was a Penn State fan, but my family

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>was not. My family trained me from birth to try

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and root for a different team, Notre Dame, and all

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>throughout college I had a negative view of the Penn

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>State football team because I had been brought up in

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a certain way. It wasn't until after college that I

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know what happened, but I softened on Penn State.

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So Notre Dame is still my alpha team, and I

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>don't even think it's close. But if I'm picking a

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>team number two, it's probably Penn State. It definite, probably

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>pens It's definitely Penn State.

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I think if you got a phone call right after

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 2>we finished recording from Mike Kasiki saying you want to

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 2>host a podcast together about college football, Hans Casett, Yeah,

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 2>you you would delete my number so quickly. I might

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 2>do it and even register.

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I might do it.

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so where's your needle right now? If it was

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 2>ninety five to five, where is it right now? I'll go.

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>But Saquon Barkley does strange things to men.

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Saquon Barkley probably makes it about sixty two thirty eight.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's a significant jump.

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I dig it, Ty, I like it. I'm nothing

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if not.

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 2>You know who's gonna love that? You know who's gonna

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 2>love hearing this? Mum age all of our friends in

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the pen life comments.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's right. I can't wait for that. We need

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to get on that show that we need to play

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that game again sometime soon.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, that's true. Okay, all right, where.

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Are we going next?

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Where we going?

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 2>All? Right, So we're gonna go total Penn State. Heisman invites.

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right, there was there, there was an ulterior motive.

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't there.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely total Penn State and anilion. Heisman invites plural plural first,

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 2>and this is about me Los Angeles quarterback. Heisman invites,

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 2>So an obvious reference to CAL State Northridge and cal

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Poly Pomona. Now we're going with Josh Rosen and Sam Darnolds.

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 2>So wow, total Heisman. And it seems on the surface

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 2>this would be a reference to Trace McSorley and Saquon Barkley.

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Right right, Huh. It's interesting you bring that up because

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about this and thinking about a similar question,

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe not geared so much around how many Penn Staters

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>versus how many LA quarterbacks will go to New York,

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but mainly will Trace McSorley join Saquon Barkley in New

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>York City. Now we're assuming that Saquon is going to

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>be there at all, provided doesn't get hurt. I think

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he will. But Trace McSorley is an interesting one. He's

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one I think if he goes at all

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>but ensures that Saquon won't win unless he has a

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>baller of a season. It would ensure that Penn State

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>as a team had a pretty good year if he

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>had enough notoriety to make it to New York to

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>begin with. So it's contingent on a number of factors.

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Saquon will be there. I don't think Trace

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>McSorley will. I think he'll probably finish right outside the

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>running six, seventh, eight somewhere in there. I don't think

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>any quarterbacks from LA will be there zero. I don't

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's necessarily a knock on Sam Darnold or on

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess Josh Rosen. Both could have good years, but

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if either is going to put up

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the kind of pinball numbers that it seems the Heisman requires.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Nowadays, you're going Penn State, who has a trickier schedule

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 2>this year, but has an opportunity. They play Ohio State

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 2>in Michigan consecutive weeks.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, that's correct.

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 2>So just in terms of if Trace mcsorly shines right

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 2>in I believe it's later on in October. If he

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 2>shines right both of those games, if Penn State is

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 2>what we anticipate them being, will be on national stage.

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the Ohio State game is already on Fox.

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a nooner. Though, let's assume the Michigan game is

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>a night game, so he will be on display, him

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 2>and his And it's funny that you don't mention the

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 2>pop gun arm anymore. Isn't that interesting? How you stop

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 2>making that reference?

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I noticed these things, ty, Yeah, it's funny how that works.

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, but the timing is perfect because the schedule

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 2>eases up after that with Michigan State, Rutgers, Nebraska, Maryland.

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the defenses he will face after Ohio

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 2>State on the road, So timing wise, I don't know

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>if it matters that he puts up huge numbers, but

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 2>if he wins and looks good in that back to

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>back with Penn State receiving so much attention in such

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 2>a confined space on the schedule, I think there's a

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 2>good shot.

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I think there's a better that'll make or break that.

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Don't think a combers thing.

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a better shot of Penn Staters making it to

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>New York. Then you know both Sam Darnold and Josh Rosen.

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen, if you told me that week seven, a

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>hole in the earth opened up and he fell into it.

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, I could see that happening. I just

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know what to expect from in twenty seventeen.

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, new offensive coordinator, Hyeah.

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious.

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Third in three years, right, Yeah, Kennedy Polamalu, Jetfish and

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Nolma Zone.

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm curious. Remember the knock on him coming out

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of high school? Is he coachable?

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he is, but I don't know if he's

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>done a whole lot to counter that argument. So we'll see.

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Penn State.

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I almost think, I almost think trace McSorley has a

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:47.879
<v Speaker 2>better shot than Saquon Barkley. And that's not a knock

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 2>at all on Saquon Barkley. I just think it's more

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 2>difficult with Penn State schedule, you know, having Iowa, Michigan,

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State, and obviously he tore up Iowa last year.

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's going to be more difficult unless

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>he is putting up such crazy numbers consistently, and that

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 2>was something he didn't do last year. He had huge

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:07.959
<v Speaker 2>flash games, but he disappeared a little bit other games.

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I think Trace McSorley as a quarterback in this system

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 2>in the second year in the system has a better

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 2>shot because of the way the heisman is laid out,

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily because of football talent.

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, okay, but.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm my gut is to say push. I'm not a

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 2>huge fan of Josh Rosen. With this third coordinator in

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 2>three years, I really really, really like Sam Darnold, and

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I only think he gets better. He's without his number

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 2>one receiver. Offensive line changes a little bit, which worries me,

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 2>given you know, protection issues, but I think he's escape.

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 2>His escapability is enough to the fact, enough to the

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 2>point where I think he gets there. So I'm going

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 2>to say I'm going to give the nod and say

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 2>one La quarterback zero Penn Staters is the most likely,

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 2>but they're both really good.

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do one more here and get out

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a little early since you're out there in tok Okay.

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Give you a chance to go enjare the scenery. Yeah,

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>here is final quot. Did wait, did you put this

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>one in here?

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I must have.

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I didn't see this one. So you've got Colorado

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:14.280
<v Speaker 1>wins versus the pac twelve North versus number of weeks

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>until Tye says, quote, I'm all in on Brandon Wimbush.

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the one.

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So you're thinking one win for Colorado and the PAC

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>twelve North, you're.

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Gonna it's gonna happen that quickly.

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It could, It could, Dan.

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 2>After Temple, you're just making a declaration.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's what we got for Colorado's schedule against the PAC

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve North. They play Washington, they play Oregon State, they

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:42.919
<v Speaker 1>play Washington State. Cal.

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, four games. They every team always misses two in

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 2>the PAC twelve of the opposing division.

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>The over under for them this year is like right

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>on the number at six. Cal would probably be the

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think most obvious win here.

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 2>So they're rebuilding their defense, their defensive court and Jim

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Levitt who goes to Oregon. Offensively, they lose safe a loofou.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 2>But that is a thing Colorado already. That's what they

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 2>do every week. They lose safe. We Loufau comes back,

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 2>they lose safe for a lufau whatever. Steven Monte has

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of time last year. The problem is

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 2>against Washington, the offense was terrible, the defense was great.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 2>The defense is gonna be different. I don't imagine Washington's offer.

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Excuse me, Colorado's offense taking huge steps for versus Washington.

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 2>It was a good game, a good win against Wazoo

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 2>late in the year. Cal I think is a win.

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I just Oregon State's tricky going to Corvallis. They're getting better.

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I like Gary Anderson as a coach. I think that's

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 2>a tricky game. I think one and a half is

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 2>probably the over under of acceptable wins there. And then

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.760
<v Speaker 2>if you compare that against Notre Dame, here's the first

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 2>five weeks, because you're going to say this within the

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 2>first five weeks, if you're going to say it at all, Ris,

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Collins and Temple. I think we assume a good

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 2>defense given what has been recruited to Philly and what

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 2>that defense has looked like consistently over the past three

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 2>or four years. Is that reasonable fare they're going to

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 2>play and Notre Dame has struggled with Temple recently. They're

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 2>going to play Georgia. Is that at home or is

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 2>that a neutral site game?

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>That game is at home at night seven point thirty

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>NBC Week two in Notre Dame.

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Stay okay, Okay, So there's a tricky game. Boston College

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 2>should be relatively easy, not easy, but manageable. Defensively Michigan State.

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.760
<v Speaker 2>We don't fully know what to expect. Even when Michigan

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 2>State's bad, they still look pretty good against Notre Dame

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 2>and Miami Ohio finishes out September. So I would say

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the overunder would be two because I think that Georgia

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 2>game is everything. The Georgia game could definitely sway me

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>as far as your crush. If he looks great against Georgia,

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 2>then I can anticipate a Sunday morning, you know, eleven am.

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm all in, baby, I'm all in.

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:49.959
<v Speaker 1>It could happen.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready, baby. Yeah. So what's your final your final

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 2>judgment you said post Temple's possible.

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Colorado wins. Let's go Colcorada wins.

0:38:58.680 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll do like Mike McIntyre.

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll be a caricature of myself. I lose, but yeah,

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>let's go Colorado wins.

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I like the facts that you can be all in

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 2>on Brandon Wimbush. Let's say after week two it looks

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 2>really good against Georgia and then you have USC, NC State, Miami, Navy,

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and Stanford all to finish out the second half of

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the year. For me to go back and say remember

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 2>when you said, but I really think Brandon Wimbush is

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be be good for Notre Dame this year.

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, there you have it, Dan, Yeah, I have

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 2>one other topic, but this is not a competing thing.

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 2>This is not an either or and it's totally off topic.

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 2>But we are now. It's July eleventh, is that right?

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 2>As we record this, Okay, in front of me, I

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 2>have the Billboard Hot one hundred and since you listen

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>to music of this kind much more than I do,

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 2>just because you have a radio, and I don't really Yeah,

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess I could listen on Spotify, but I'm not

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 2>exposed to this as much as you are. I'm gonna

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 2>give you the top five, okay, okay, that are currently

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 2>a top It's the week of July twenty second, the

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Billboard Hot one hundred. And you tell me what the

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 2>current song of summer is, okay, okay? Of what is

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 2>your job? Here we go? Of the five of these five? Yeah, okay,

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 2>and if there's one outside of the five, you can

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 2>say it after number five? Is the shape of you?

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Ed Sheeran, okay, a little overplayed like Ed Cheron, little overplayed?

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Tye is on the record Love Some smed

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Cheeran doesn't like the overabundance, wild thoughts. DJ Collin featuring

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Rihanna and somebody named Bryson Tiller.

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Not a big DJ Colled fan.

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Do you know that song?

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I do know the song. Not a huge fan. Quite honestly,

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't get the whole DJ col Ed thing.

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 2>But number three, Bruno Mars That's what I like.

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>See now that that is what I like. Dan, This

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>is speaking to you, This is speaking to me. This

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>is speaking to me. Bruno is a true performer, a

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Bruno fan.

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 2>True.

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what else is on this top five list,

0:40:58.120 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but right now I'm feeling number three.

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 2>Number two is back to DJ Collin, which I don't

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 2>know what he does except for yell DJ at the

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 2>beginning of songs. Whatever. I've heard this song. I've heard

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 2>this song. It's DJ Colled featuring Justin Bieber Bieber excuse me,

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Quavo Cuevo. It's the guy from Migos, Chance the Rapper

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 2>and Lil Wayne. That's number two, Okay. Number one is

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Desposito the Remix featuring Justin Bieber.

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>See I'm cool with Bieber as an artist to be honest,

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>not like a fanboy, but Bieber as an artist, definitely

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a person and uh way back, I still think I

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>give the edge to Bruno Mars.

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Bruno Mars, That's what I like. Song of the summer.

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Unless there's something outside of the top five. You gotta

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 2>imagine dragons you got Kendrick Lamar.

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean of those choices, let's say, off the

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 1>top of my head, I gotta go, I gotta go Bruno.

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 2>It's not a bad choice. I might go with I'm

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the one, not a fan. DJ Colled, Yeah, guy from

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 2>mego not a fan. It's a pretty good song. It's

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 2>it's a pop hit, Tye, it is a pop hit.

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Give me Bruno.

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 2>This Posito is also really good. Also, I give points

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 2>to des Basito because it's Daddy Yankee and he is

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 2>back from Gosolina.

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I was in Cancun around the time that Gasolina came out.

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh and let me tell you it was all Daddy

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Yankee on loop ty.

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Have you heard of the following artists Charlie Puff, Pooth, Poof, Poof, Poof. Finally,

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 2>have you heard of Charlie Pooth? I have, yeah, Okay,

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I have not sewn Mendez. I have lil UZI vert nope,

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Halsey yes, Julia Michaels, yes, James Arthur yes. Wow. I

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know any of these people are listen to a

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:49.879
<v Speaker 2>lot of pop radio.

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you do. I know you do. Ty not

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna lie?

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 2>What was what was the song I saw in here?

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 2>All right? I think this is all I have. But

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad to know that you're You're in on Bruno ours.

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 2>That's what I like.

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Song of the summer I'm in baby?

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 2>All right? You sing along in the car?

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Absolutely?

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Ah, Okay, making sure kidding me?

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You've heard these pipes?

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Dan, It's true.

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>If you'd like more information on what we're up to

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple weeks, go on out solid verbal

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com sign up for our newsletter of intent. It's

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>free to do. We won't spam you. We promise we're

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be making an announcement shortly about the status

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of our live show. Just stay tuned to that. Also,

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to follow us on Facebook, on Twitter, on Instagram,

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and if you haven't already, please do going out to

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>either the Facebook page or the iTunes page and write

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a review for us. We're also now on Spotify, so

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>anywhere find podcasts are sold. Anywhere you can write a review.

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>That help would obviously be greatly appreciated. That's all I

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 1>got too.

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, we're good.

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy your golf round. Enjoy your golf round tomorrow.

0:43:59.200 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Whatever it is you'll be doing, take fun pictures. If

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you can get Brian Kelly, that would be nice. At

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a minimum, though, we need your golf swing. Okay, I

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>can get that, but that guy over there, way over

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>there in beautiful Lake Tahoe for myself, Tie Hilde right

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>back here at the homestead in eastern Pennsylvania. Thanks again

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the solid verbal. We will catch you

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>all in a week. In the meantime, stay silent peace,