WEBVTT - Minisode: Pappas v Giuliani 

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Cool Zone Media. Hello listeners, Molly Conger. Here, this is

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>something a little different. It's not a new full length episode,

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a rerun either. It's just a tiny, little,

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>bite sized story about a weird little guy. I'd like

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>to try to do more of these, just a few

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>minutes about various side characters I found in my research

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>who didn't really warrant their own tangent in an episode,

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but they're interesting enough that you might like to hear

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>about them, just for a few minutes. We'll see if

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I managed to follow through on that, but for now today,

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>here's a little treat I recently found myself for normal

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>work related reasons, combing through the campaign finance reports for

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>David Duke's nineteen ninety six campaign for US Senate. There

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are obviously some names in there that I recognize. A

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>donation from longtime clan lawyer Sam Dixon, salary payments made

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>to a longtime Duke associate who happens to be the

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>son in law of a guy who died in a

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>shootout with US Marshalls, things like that. Some of the

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>names on those forms or stories I'll tell you eventually,

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But as I was flipping idly through lists of small

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar donors. One line caught my eye, not because it

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>was a name that I recognized, but because of his profession.

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Almost all of the people willingly putting their name on

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the record as a David Duke donor by nineteen ninety

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>six were retired. Line after line after line donors list

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>their occupation as retired, and for those who did work,

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they were almost all self employed. But on August twenty seventh,

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety six, David Duke's campaign received a five hundred

0:01:53.880 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars contribution from a New York City Police officer. Nineteen

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety six was a pretty long time ago at this point,

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>so I was pretty sure there was no chance this

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>man was still employed by the NYPD, But I was

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>curious if his fondness for David Duke ever caused any

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>issues for him in his professional life. That seems like

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty safe bet, right, But honestly, it might not

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>make him that much more racist than any given NYPD

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>officer chosen at random. But it turns out that Officer

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Poppus did something else in the mid nineties that

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>almost ended up in front of the Supreme Court. See

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>In the nineties every year, the Miniola Auxiliary Police Department

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>sent out mailings requesting donations to their McGruff, the crime

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Dog anti drug program. Most people throw that kind of

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>thing away. Some people will write a check and put

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it back in the pre addressed return envelope to make

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a donation. But every year one envelope came back to

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that barvolunteer organization stuffed with anti Semitic cartoons, pamphlets with

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>racist conspiracy theories, and materials published by a group called

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the National Association for the Advancement of White People. And

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>by nineteen ninety seven, the volunteer organization receiving these mailings

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>went to the police. After years of getting these hateful mailings,

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they'd hired a company to encode the reply envelopes. If

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>someone mailed back one of these smaller donation envelopes, they'd

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to tell exactly where the original mailing had

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>been sent. So when the racist flyers showed up that year,

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they used the tracking code to connect that envelope to

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a particular PO box, and when they went to the police,

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they were able to determine that PO box was registered

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to a New York City police officer, and so to

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>test their theory, the Nassau County Police sent a fake

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>letter to that po box soliciting donations for a charitable cause,

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and he took the bait, the stuffed reply envelope with

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>racist flyers, and mailed it back. Nasau County then turned

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the investigation over to the NYPD's Internal Affairs Bureau, and

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>they too tested the theory. They mailed Thomas Papus a

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>letter asking for donations to a charitable organization, and he

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>returned the envelope full of anti Semitic cartoons. And when

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>he was confronted with this evidence, he did eventually admit

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that he'd done it. He tried to be casual about it.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>At first he said it was just a hobby, and

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>then it didn't mean anything, and then later in the

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>same interview, he said it was a form of protest

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>because he was quote tired of being shaken down by

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>charitable organizations. And it turned out that while had just

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>been the one organization who finally figured out where the

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mailings were coming from and went to the police, he'd

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>done this hundreds of times over the years to countless organizations.

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>After he admitted to the mailings in nineteen ninety eight,

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>New York Times reported that he was probably going to

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to retire with his pension. After a full

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>investigation and disciplinary hearing and a lot of public outcry,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he was found guilty of prohibited conduct and fired, so

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he sued. He filed a lawsuit in federal court, naming

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>New York City, the police commissioner and the mayor as defendants,

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>which in two thousand makes the case citation Pappas v. Giuliani.

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Papas claimed he'd been unfairly terminated in retaliation for engaging

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in protected First Amendment conduct. The Southern District of New

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.119
<v Speaker 1>York disagreed. Pappas was absolutely within his right to mail

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>people racist pamphlets, but that's not the issue here. He

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't criminally charged for it, and there is significant case

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>law that allows government employers to take disciplinary action when

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to speech by public employees when there is

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate government interest in promoting the efficiency of the

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>public services it performs through its employees. Papas may have

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>had a better case here if he'd been engaged in

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>speech that looked more like pro if he'd made any

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>attempt to engage in public discourse, or if he'd mailed

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the flyers to parties who were engaged in public activity

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on the issues he claimed he was protesting, but he

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>was just mailing garbage to any random organization unlucky enough

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to have sent him a pre addressed envelope. Quoting from

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the opinion, mister Poppus suggests that somehow, by anonymously sending

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>his white supremacist literature to any charity with the misfortune

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>of soliciting a donation from him, he was commenting on

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>perennial matters of public concern, such as taxation, political history, race,

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and religion. This claim defies reason and the record. Although

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the First Amendments protection does not turn on the effectiveness

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of a speaker's media strategy, mister Poppas's purported strategy for

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>addressing the matter of public concern is so plainly unreasonable

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it belies his claim that addressing matters of public concern

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was ever his intention. So his speed, which was, as

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the Court wrote, of relatively low First Amendment value. And

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>then on the other side of the scale, there's the

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>very real concern of the government employer that his activity

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>could disrupt government business. His activities had become a matter

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of real public concern. People were very worried that this

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>cop hated Jews and black people. So they can't fire

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>him for being racist, for having racist ideas. They can't

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>fire him for what's in his heart. But they fired

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>him for being racist in public, out loud, and in

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a way that was damaging to the department's reputation and mission.

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And look, just for the sake of this legal argument,

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>try not to laugh at the idea of the NYPD

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>having a reputation that could be tarnished like this. Okay, So,

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>after he lost this lawsuit, he appealed the decision up

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in two thousand

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and two, and they affirmed the lower court's decision, with

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>one judge on that three judge panel dissenting. And the

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>descent makes a number of arguments. You know, he wasn't

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a supervisor. He did this on his own time. He

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it at work. He did it privately, He

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>did it anonymously, and most alarmingly. The dissent argues that

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>if the department had never disciplined him in the first place,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the public trust wouldn't have been damaged because no one

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>ever would have known that it was a cop doing this,

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that the department itself is responsible for the damage to

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>its own reputation, because I guess the proper course of

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>action here would have been to cover up this policy violation.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>The case was back in the news a few years

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>later when that dissenting Judge Sonya Soto Mayor was nominated

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court. I found several op eds citing

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this dissent as proof that she was a fair minded

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>defender of free speech, and these were largely attempts to

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>counter right wing attacks on her nomination. But if you

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>look back at the majority opinion in this case, for

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>College Leaguess called her descent a misunderstanding of the law

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and seriously misguided. As Oliver Wendell Holmes said in eighteen

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety two, a policeman may have a constitutional right to

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>talk politics, but he has no constitutional right to be

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a policeman. So it turns out police departments really can

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>fire a cop for being extremely racist in his private life.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>They just usually don't want to. We're Little Guys is

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a production of Cool Zone Media and iHeartRadio. It's research,

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>written and recorded by me Wiley Coner. Our executive producers

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are Sophy Leuctriman and Robert Evans. The show is edited

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>by the wildly talented Roy Gagan. The theme music was

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>composed by Brad Did. You can email me at Weird

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Little Guys podcast at gmail dot com. I will definitely

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>read it, but I probably won't answer it. You can

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>exchange conspiracy theoris about the show with other listeners on

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the Weird Little Guys supper at it. Just don't post

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>anything that's going to make you one of my Weird

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Little Guys