WEBVTT - Draft Show: Who Will Draft A QB?

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>He's the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Cowboys on

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>your war room for incenter news and draft analysis from

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>deep within the confines of Cowboys Headquarters at the Star

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in Fresco, Dallas Cowboys Select Elliot and now your hosts

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Dane Brugler, David Hellman and Brian brought us Well. We

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>welcome you to the SWBC Mortgage Studios. You've got the

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Draft show here on Dallas Cowboys dot Com, also on

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>our periscope platform as well. We appreciate everybody hanging out

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>with us. I got my scouting buddies here. Dane Brugler,

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>David Hellman, King Garrison executive producing this show today. Boys

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>trading on you this weekend. Huh, guys moving up in

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>this draft, you know, get to spot certain spots, teams

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>moving around. Kind of talked about this Thursday. Didn't we

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sit around all week waiting for some stuff to happen,

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>just you know, it's free agency drafts getting closer and

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>then all held sites to break loose on the weekend.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, Yes, typical when we talked about this on

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Thursday in the Draft show about how teams are going

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to be aggressive moving up for quarterbacks. You know, we

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>know that, and we singled out the Colts as a

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>team that was going to be open for business looking

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>to move back. Now. I didn't think we'd see a

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>trade this early, but it shows just how desperate the

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Jets are for a quarterback, right, And I don't correct

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>me if I'm wrong. I don't remember a trade like

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this this early, when they're clearly trading on for a quarterback.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't buy the sequon Barkley. I don't buy I

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>don't buy it at all. Sure they're trading on for

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback, there's still two teams picking in front of them.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh I know. I mean they must feel comfortable with

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>three quarterbacks in this draft, at least three quarterbacks, because

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no way you can know who the Browns are

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take and what the Giants are gonna do

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>if the Giants even stay at two. So they must

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like three this quarterbacks, which I'm glad you said that.

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I would love if that's the case. I would love

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the refreshing honesty, because I was joking about this over

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Like every team in the league, they love

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to say like this was our guy, this was our

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>number one guy. We got our number one. Everybody else

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can do what they want. But there's four quarterbacks that

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we feel really confident or going early in this draft. Sure,

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>what are the odds? I mean, as many as two

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of them could be picked before the Jets get on

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the clock, assuming there's no more movement. And so you're

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>going to tell me that the guy that could potentially

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>fall to third is definitely gonna be there, Guy Like,

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that's seems risky unless that they are willing to admit

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that they feel good about multiple quarterbacks. Yeah, that's what

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>most teams don't want to admit that. They want to

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>say we got our guy right. Mike mcagnan is a

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine. He's a general manager for the Jets.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike and I worked together nineteen ninety in NFL Europe.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 1>He was a young general manager actually player personnel guy

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for the London Monarchs that won the championship that year.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Right out of school. This kid goes right end up

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>being a you know, worked in working in nflure. Mike's great.

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike's a great guy. He's desperate right now, but he's

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>desperate and this might be somebody else's problem next year.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you start talking about trading away picks

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>and multiple picks and all that and trying to move

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>into draft. Him and a head coach are clearly clearly

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>on the hot seat there, and you make moves like

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this to try and keep your job, and if it

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work, Mike mckegnan will go back and be director

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of college scouting or director of pro personnel or director

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>player personnel somewhere else. But this is a move clearly

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that was made out of desperation for to try and

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>find a quarterback, because again, their jobs are on the line.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the type of move I personally, I personally

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>would have not made that move unless I was going

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to two. I'm not sitting at three and hoping that

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>things work out. They must done. They must like three

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of these quarterbacks. Yeah, well, if you're gonna make a

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>move like that, you're going to like one guy. I

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you could sit there and cast a

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>net out and say, Okay, we like three of these guys.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.679
<v Speaker 1>That's how quarterback desperate they are, though. Yeah, but then

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>then that's really poor evaluation on his partner. I love

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Michael like a brother. Well not if they like three

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>these quarterbacks though. Yeah, but you don't make that move.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>What if the tags are touching and there's clearly one

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>tag above the other three tags, two tags, but you

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>know you're not getting the one. The Browns aren't trading

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>out of one and number two with the Giants. We

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on there are the Giants and

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, are they watched the Buffalo for Buffalo to

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>trade three number ones? Because but we know Buffalo's two

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>number ones this year is Getleman waiting for Buffalo to

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>throw in that sweetener next year's one to go up

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to number two. Maybe it's interesting to hold New York

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>New York. I mentioned it last week, New York New

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>yorked at Dynamic, they've never made a trade. Yeah, these

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>two franchises, it might have been at that right there

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>as a non starter for them. So three might be

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>as early as the Jets were gonna pick. So they

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>might not have had an option to go up to

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>one and two. They go to three, they feel good. Okay,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>let's just say from the Jets perspective, we're sitting here,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>we think Sam Donald's going number one to Cleveland. Sure,

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't have time for Josh Allen to wait. Okay,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>but we feel good about Baker Mayfield or Josh Rosen

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>coming in being capable and NFL starting quarterbacks. We're gonna

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>go up to three. We feel we're gonna get one

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>of those two quarterbacks. I mean, the logic is there

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>at least which and honestly, I would find it refreshing

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>if a team was willing to admit that that's how

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking, because it's all a crapshoot anyway. You know,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>don't don't try to convince me that you got your

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>guy at three when odds are he's probably QB one

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>aka Sam Darnold. Just admit it. And honestly, I mean,

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>nobody really has a consensus on how these quarterbacks stack

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>up anyway. So you get up to three, you know

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no way all of them are gone, and you

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>just hope for the best with the guy you get.

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't I get what you're saying, Like that's kind

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of scary to admit that you're just leaving it to chance. Yeah,

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do what you gotta do, But yeah, you're right.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I understand going up and I understand giving it up.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But I also understand, though, what I'm going to get.

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>YEA We've been very clear they're going to get a quarterback.

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>We've been very clear about this that we our little

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>group is willing to trade up for certain players. Oh sure,

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>not just the hope that somebody's gonna be there. Our

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>jobs aren't on the line though. Not only that, but

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on this show, we've been you know, every time we

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>do that, we're like Roquan Smith or Derwin James. It's

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like always one, it's never We've never been able to

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>come to a consensus on the guy. Here's the other thing, too,

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>is they're not the only team. Look, Arizona Buffalo. They

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>had to do it before anyone else is going to

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>trade up. And with Buffalo having those two first round picks,

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>having the AMMO, they Dije just said, hey, we're gonna

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>beat them to the punch. We're gonna go up to

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.559
<v Speaker 1>number three and we're going to you know, eliminate that doubt.

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And if if the Buffalo wants to go up to

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>number two and trade three number ones, so be it.

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But we're gonna go up to the number three so

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they can't go to is Denver out of the mix

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>had taken the quarterback. Now, oh they Petron case Keams

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a nice quarterback, but he is not. Yeah, but they

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about Paxton Lynch as a development and quarterback for

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>them right now. They've talked about that. You can't as

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they're covering their butts, you can't rule them out. I mean,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>how could you? What? I don't think Paxton Lynch has

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>done absolutely nothing to make have they given him a

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>chance to do anything. He's seen a few starts and

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he's tripped over his feet and I mean he's I'm

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>not saying I'm not completely they they they they missed

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that one up. John Elway messed that one up. And

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>by drafting him or what, oh if you draft him

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>or what, are not playing him? How about that? Yeah?

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>How about everybody else at least has an idea what

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>their quarterbacks can do. That's a terrible, terrible job of it.

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And this we don't know what's going on behind the

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>scenes too though. Oh no, the kid doesn't work hard,

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. I've said that. I mean I've gone on

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>people in Yeah, I've gone on Denver. People love me

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>because I'm like the Denver whisperer. And if he's not

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>pushing himself off the field, then you know he doesn't

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>need to see see the field on my team. So

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I like they botch the Packs and Lynch situation by

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>drafting in the first place. If this is how his

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>legacy in Denver is gonna play out, But no, absolutely

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is still in play. Case Keenum is a nice

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>short term quarterback, which you're about to say something, Yeah,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to ask you a big time question. Go ahead.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>That further approves the logic and what the Jets did

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is like, even at six, you can't just sit back

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and assume that you get a guy you feel good about.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why Buffalo is traded up to Yeah, and we'll

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>see if Buffalo can get there at three somewhere, we

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>just don't know where. We don't know where. At three,

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jets are guaranteed to have a chance at one

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of these prospects that everybody considers. You know, here's my question,

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>where's betting on? Here's my question? And the gentleman, go ahead.

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're Woody Johnson, which current NFL GM would you

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like draft for you? The owner of the New York Jets.

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>You gotta make that pick. You guys, tell me, everybody's

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>telling me that man, they've got three guys, they like,

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>give me a current NFL GM that you want drafting

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>for you in that spot at three, then I just

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>put everybody on the spot a little bit. Yeah. No,

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm like going through my well, through my

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>memory banks, right, Who's gonna pick me the best player

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>at three? Well? You could talk to Mickey, Yeah, Mickey

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>would I don't know. I mean there's plenty of general

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>managers in this league who I would trust with that pick.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if one necessarily stands out as being,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a quarterback guru general manager who nails the

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>quarterback evaluations more so than like another. So you're okay

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>with Mike mcagnan making that pick. I'm okay with him

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>making that pick. Sure. I mean I'm not saying that

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I would prefer him out of thirty two general managers pick.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But he knows the Jets better than any other general manager. No.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you but if you had to have a

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>guy that you know this is, this is a guts

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>pick right here. I really, because you guys are telling me, Hey,

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they like multiple guys picked the multi pick the one

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>guy you like. I really I respect your guy, John

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Schneider a lot everybody busts picks and then um, Kevin

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Colbert in Pittsburgh is another guy who always seems like

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>he does a really good job. But that's I mean,

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.599
<v Speaker 1>franchises have to make big picks on quarterbacks so infrequently,

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>at least the successful ones, the ones that aren't constantly

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>turning over their general managers. It's it's not like there's

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy out there who's got this amazing track record

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of like, well, when he drafts a quarterback, right there

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you go. So I mean, take your best shot at

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it with a guy who's got a good track record.

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think there's one guy that stands

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>above anybody else. Mike mccagnen in New York has been

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on the outside looking in on some of these top

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks last few years. He's helped own a lot of

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>resources at these quarterbacks. I mean he Bryce Petty in

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the fourth round, Christian Hackenberg in the second round. He's

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>tired of doing what the same? What that's not the same? Yeah,

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's been on the outside looking in, Like

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, he hasn't gone for it in the first

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>round on one of these quarterbacks. You're always jobs on

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the line. Now, absolutely so he needs. When you're talking quarterbacks,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>big assets are like top ten picks at like what

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the Jets just did, that's big assets. Hackerberg was a

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>lottery ticket. Spending pick fifty one on Christian Hackenburg is

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not a big roll, That's what I mean. Obviously it

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was a miss, don't get me wrong, but like, that's

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>not when it comes to finding your quarterback for the

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>next decade, that's nothing. I don't think that the Jets

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>never looked at Christian Hackenberg is saying that's our future

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>right there. They looked at him as saying like a

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>und pick, it was a lottery ticket. It's they saw

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>him as different. It's different for quarterbacks. Everything is different

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>for quarterbacks. Have this argument every year, unless unless it's

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a top ten pick or you're trading and something crazy

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to get up there like the Eagles, that's big time

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff getting up to get wins the way they did

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and it worked out. What are the Jets just doing?

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>No exactly, but this you're saying they've been throwing stuff

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>at it for years. I'm saying that's half If you

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>look at a two and a four for a quarterback, Yeah,

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they're throwing stuff out there. No, again, those are lottery tickets.

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not the same to me. They never I don't

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>think they looked at it too become a just because

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a quarterback. Say it's a lottery ticket too. I

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think they ever looked at those two quarterbacks instead,

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this is our future. I mean, christ Iver hasn't taken

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a snap. I mean, I don't think they ever really

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>viewed the I mean he looked at it as how

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>many isab is it? How many quarterbacks taken outside the

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>top thirty five picks have ever blossomed into anything meaningful?

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe half a dozen? Ever, I mean Russell Wilson's

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>you got your Russell Wilson, you got your your Drew Brees,

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you got your dad. Yea, yeah, it's not a long list,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady. It is not a long list. It works

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>out really well sometimes it's not a long list. And

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>so the second round pick not becoming I mean, when

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about it, it's not it's just it's a

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not a guarantee. You draft a you draft a

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>linebacker fifty first overall, he'd better be a starter right now.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>He better be a good player quarterback. You're just like

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>oh this works. Yeah, yeah, it's a chance because there's

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a reason he's not going in the first. But then

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>all that argument you guys made with me about trading

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty up because you wanted to make a pick. Yeah,

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>what's your point? Well, my point is, though, you guys

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>are just kind of treating it like a lot. I mean, oh,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>just a quarter that's a lot. I feel like we

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>did this last year, or maybe it was the year before,

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>which makes me no. I just can't get over the

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that you guys are just saying that a second

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>round pick for a quarterback is a lottery. Everything is

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>different about quarterbacks, everything everything one hundred it just throw

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it out the window. Let me change

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the subject here. Can Buffalo make the Giants move out

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of two? Yeah? Sure, three first round picks? You think

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what it's going to take this year's They have

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>two picks in the first round this year plus the

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 1>first nick because and this is different because the Giants

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>are you're not off the look. I need a GM

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>by the way, too, you're gonna give me a GM. Uh,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with I'll go to Dorsey. Dorsey's got guts.

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>He took a Yeah, he's gonna have to pick a

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback Toomes last year, Yeah, and Mahomes or John Dorsey did.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>He was at his house from June until December last year,

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>sitting at home watching tape on spending most of his

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>time on these quarterbacks. Right. I remember I received a

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>text from him in August. He said, Dan, give me

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>your top four quarterbacks. Yeah, I'm gonna start looking at

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys. I said, in my top four quarterbacks. And

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>he he has been working on these quarterbacks for a

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>while now. He has a probably a better understanding of

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>who these guys are more than any other general manager.

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So for the Jets or the MCA, the owner said, hey,

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>let's get out there and watch these cats play every day.

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mccagnan is one of the hardest working jem Oh.

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I love Mike. You go to a pro day, you

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>go to the shrink, he's gonna be No, he is

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be there, Absolutely he is. But he his job

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is on the line. Exactly. You made me pick a guy.

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I gave you a guy. Okay, I'm with you on Dorsey.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>All right. Back to the Giants, Uh, they're going back.

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>If they trade with Buffalo, They're trading out of the

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>top ten. That's a big drop to go from two

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to outside the top ten. Now again you're picking up

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>three first round picks, but that's a big drop, and

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's going to take a little bit more than

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what other teams have traditionally gone up for.

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Throw the trade value chart out the window for quarterbacks,

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>especially if they do know, especially the quarterback, it does

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>not matter, that's right. It's it's all that you know,

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>second round picks or oh, it's all the rules change

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about quarterbacks, every single one. There are

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>no rules. That's it. I mean, it's and I'm not

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that what the Jets did taking Hackenburg, they're taking

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a chance, was the right thing to do. I had

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a fourth round grade on Hackenburg. I just you know,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say, oh, because they use the second

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>round pick on him, that means that, you know, that's

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they thought he'd be the future. I think they just

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>thought it would be you know, they saw some promise

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and that hasn't you know, come to fruition for him. Okay,

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>time to move on. Christian Hackenburg will not be in

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the jests next year. Does that bother you I just

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this. If you're the Giants, you

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>move three first round picks. I was you know, I

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>was just thinking when Dane was saying, like, we're watching

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the Draft Day show. What I mean, what's that show

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>with Kevin cost What was that movie Draft Day? I

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think it was it called Draft Day? So yeah, I told, like,

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>guy by the way, I fast costs right, un told

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a guy in Seattle, pick that ga Vonte mac no

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>matter what, right, pick, no matter what. Yeah, if you

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>want to go ahead and pick that guy, yeah, pick

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that guy. Nobody comes to it. I never even saw it.

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I heard it was trash, not worth your time, it's

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>not good. But the draft, come on, it is kids.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>The movie Officiano here by the way, Um, what was like?

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I turned that down. I get I get

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting in return, but it would be hard

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>for me to go from picking second in the draft

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to twelve. Oh you earned that spot, and then twenty two.

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I know. That's what I mean. If it was like eight,

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd feel alive. So while you're picking second, because you're

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>not any good, That's what I'm saying. Yeah, I'm going

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to add. But see here's I don't I really don't

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>think much like the Cowboys the year that they were

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>up there. I don't think they're as bad as the

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>record would indicate. And I think that's what makes it

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>tempting to do a deal like that, because you talk

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and you had two first round grades to or near

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>first round grades to your team, can go a long

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>way toward putting you back in contention. Does Gentleman get

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>killed if he doesn't make that trade three first rounds?

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Depends on who they get as if they won't Cleveland.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Does I think they need to look at a quarterback

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>like I know Eli Manning. They think he has another

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>two to three years. They don't expect me picking a

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>top five very often. Sure, well, I'm taking a quarterback

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>while I can now. If they're not taking a quarterback,

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>then you take that deal and run. And I know

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it'd be tempting to stay there and take Barkley, stay

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in there, take Chubb, you take three first round picks,

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and you rebuild that roster. At number twelve, you're gonna

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get a good player. You're gonna get you. Could you

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>get a quarterback or twelve? Sure it's possible, bar Jackson,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know. I mean you have to

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you're contending with think about okay, think about the owner

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>trading in front of you to get a quarterback. Five

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>could be off the board by the time you pick

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson or Teddy Bridgewater from Louisville. Just in general,

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>just in general, just coming out of coming out of Louisville,

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>they're very different, Lamar. You have to with Teddy's knees.

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have no, no, no, just coming out

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of just coming out of Louisville. Still, Lamar, I mean,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>if they're all perfectly, I mean I had a higher prospect.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I'm asking this is because the guy

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>who coached Bridgewater is now you're head coach with the Giants.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't even who who is the job? Suremur yeah,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you, sorry, I mean Bridgewater is in New York,

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the other New York though. Yeah, I'm just saying, coming

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>out of college, who would you rather have, Lamar Jackson

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>or Teddy Bridge. I had a higher grade on Teddy

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater as a prospect than I did do Lamar Jackson

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>as a prospect. But again, Teddy Bridgewater with his twelve

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm too intrigued by everything. Lamar Jackson can do for you.

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I just and there's a good chance he's not going

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to be there at twelve. Yeah, I mean, if you

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>want a quarterback, you take him at two, or you

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>don't trade that far down. I will. It's very I

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about this because we had a mail bad

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>question about it today. It's interesting this conversation. It's interesting

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>being on the outside of it because we were on

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the inside a couple of years ago, and everybody on

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>this show was not firmly anti draft a quarterback, but

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we leaned more toward getting a Zeke Elliott or whoever

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>else was talked about. Oh for no. But what I'm saying,

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, from the outsider's perspective, I agree with Dane.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, the Giants should get a quarterback like Eli

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Manning's not getting any younger, blah blah blah blah blah.

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna be in the top five that often.

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But two years ago I was like, Romo's still got

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>some time left and you can help him out a lot.

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>So like, I'm fascinated to see how that conversation gets

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>resolved on their end, because we know exactly how the Cowboys.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>My point is that Patch coach that style of a quarterback.

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>They he they thought enough. I don't think Bridgewater to

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>get back in the draft, am I right? I don't

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>think there are anything similar though. Yeah, I mean I'm

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:15.959
<v Speaker 1>just saying that's quarterback. I mean, not compared to Lamar Jackson. Yeah, so,

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>but you liked but you liked Jackson. Are you assuming

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you liked Bridgewater to hire prospect grade on Bridgewater because

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>he's a better pastor coming out of Louisville than Lamar.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Lamar offers so much more as an athlete,

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>a much more electrifying player with a ball in his hands.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But Teddy was a more polished pastor coming out of Louisville.

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>So I have had a gray on Teddy. Obviously with

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>his knees, you don't know what you're getting. And now

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>with New York they have McCowan Bridgewater, plus they're gonna

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>draft a quarterback high. It's gonna be an interesting quarterback

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>room for the Jets. Are you trying to make them?

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to make the point that the Giants could

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>trade back and still get a quarterback. Yeah, it's the

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>point I'm trying to make. Yeah, just because maybe the

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>guy who's Maybe they go to Louisville again, maybe they

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>look at that system, maybe they say, wow, this guy

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>gets coached this way. This is why you know. Yeah,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Lamar Jackson is not the passer of

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater. I get it. I think that. I think

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.479
<v Speaker 1>me personally, if you gave me, you give me one

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>or the other. I'm taking Jackson every single day. I'm

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just that's me. I'm taking. I'm just saying, if you're

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Pat Shermer and you felt like that, you know what

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we could what if they do you think you could

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>get the Oklahoma guy twelve? I doubt it. Not really

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>too many quarterback and needy teams. And he's saying the

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Jets are gonna take him. I think the Jets are

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna say Mayfield or Rosen. Okay, they don't have to,

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't. They don't have time to wait for Josh

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Allen mcagnet and Todd Bowles. They got to win pretty

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly here. And even if Josh McCowen or Teddy Bridgewater

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:46.959
<v Speaker 1>is a starter for you guys, he's killing my questions

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>here today. What's the question? This quarterback is ready to start? Now?

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>What the rookie give me a guy. Yeah. Rosen and

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield I think are the closest of these quarterbacks to

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>starting right away. Doesn't mean then necessarily should, but there

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>are the closest of these top five quarterbacks. Mayfield's uh,

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>four year starter. I mean the guy. He There's gonna

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>be a transition from Oklahoma's offense to what they're gonna

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>ask him to do in the NFL, but I think

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>he can handle it. And then Rosen, he's been running

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a pro style scheme at UCLA. He's ready to step Ryan.

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I keep calling him Matt Ryan. Yeah, he's very close

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to that. So he's I'm not saying think Mike White's

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ready to start now. To be honest with you, I

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think Mike White's gonna be a great backup in this league.

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike White's gonna be I think. I think, I like

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the Western Kentucky quarterback by that was a

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 1>good player. He's a really good player. I'm interested. I'm

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not saying he's ready, but I'd be interested to see

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>what Jackson could do in the same way that Deshaun

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Watson's athleticism all I mean, Deshaun Watson's not a polished

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and by a pro standards by any level. But

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>his athleticism allowed him to do a lot of stuff.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder, I wonder if that guy they yeah,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>he did. No. Absolutely, that's what I'm saying. Lamar Jackson's

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not ready to play quarterback in the NFL in the

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>way that you think about it. But he could make something.

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But he can make things happen, which presents problems while

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>about learning. Absolutely, yeah, And if that's what's I'm okay

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:17.479
<v Speaker 1>with quarterbacks starting right away as rookies if they're ready.

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we saw last year with Deshaun Kaiser. All

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I heard was he's ready. He's ready. He wasn't ready

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>when ready, But you know, I just again, Mike White's ready.

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Do not keep saying, do not try to predict who

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you're starting quarterbacks gonna be. Hugh Jackson came out and

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>said that Tyrod Taylor's starting quarterback. I mean, that's fine.

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>We everyone knows he's going to be. We don't why

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you come out and say that. It's dumb. You wait

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and you let training camp decide that. Yeah. Do not

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>come out and say you're starting three or whatever, one

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in thirty one whatever. That I didn't get that either,

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and like, why why why I throw that out there now?

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know nothing. We're gonna have a new staff

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>there in Cleveland. Get ready. That's the way it is. Sorry, Dane,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and go save that franchise. You door see Elliott and

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>all those guys have fun room. You get a quarterback,

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you said at Jackson, Right, you think it's gonna be interesting?

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, what like my my QB one? Like,

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't do the ranking stuff. I'm just saying you,

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>who's ready to start? You said at Jackson. I didn't

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>say he's ready to start? I said he has. The

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>question was he has gifts that the other guys don't

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>have that could make him a viable threat in an

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>offense right away. I mean as a runner, getting out

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>of bad situations, extending plays. But if you if you're

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the Giants and you do really like Lamar Jackson, do

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you feel comfortable trading at twelve and still getting him?

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I would. You're not worried about another team

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>trading up. But Aaron, let me ask you this. It's

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sitting a fifteen training up to eleven to get him.

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>That's Miami moving right well, any just in gen But

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the great debate is like, why get cute if

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>you feel good about a guy? Let me tell you

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>what if I what about the Giants? What how much

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think about Alan? Do you think Alan would

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>be there at twelve? No? Because the NFL teams are stupid. Okay.

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 1>If Buffalo is going up to two and quarterbacks are

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>going one, two, three, right, okay, and then we think,

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>good chance Denver could take one as long as the

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback they like is there at five. That's four quarterbacks

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>right there, there's one quarterback left. Let's just say it's

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>actually two, two three, five, and then okay, let's just say,

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>for hypothetical sake, it's Lamar Jackson. Who's the fifth quarterback?

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So between pick six and eleven, that's gonna feel like

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>an internity. Yeah, for a team like the Giants say,

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>if that's who they really want, and I don't. There's

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>not a single team in that stretch that really fits

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the mold of needing a quarterback. So you're talking about

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean trade candidates like if an Air Arizona, what

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you start? So you got San Francisco in there, you

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>got Oakland, you got Chicago, you got Tampa a whole

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of teams that don't need quarterback, does Arizona. Arizona

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>signed Sam Bradford for a whole lot of money that

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't deserve. What they got to do something at quarterback?

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>They can't be done. Yeah, no, they got to make

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a bold move here. Could go from fifteen to eleven.

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Sounds doable. Absolutely well, they wouldn't do that, un let's

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>say neither to see their quarterbacks in position to trade

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>for right, I mean, there goes your let's go to

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Miami to eleven. That that well, I'm just saying when

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>when if the quarterback gets to eleven, that's when you

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>make that trade, not now right? Well, no, sure, oh,

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Arizona would do something like that right

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:31.959
<v Speaker 1>now until they're on the clock. But right, I think

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Dane's point is that the Giants probably shouldn't trust that

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing's going to happen on draft night. Yeah, that's if

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>they really want Lamar Jackson. I don't think you go

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to twelve and you feel great, you're gonna get them there.

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to be I'm okay doing that

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>deal because you're picking up three first round picks, but

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>then you better be prepared to move up from twelve

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to eight something else, because if you last year in

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the first round, the Saints they were ready to take

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Pat Mahomes at eleven. Right, they were sitting there thinking, okay, well,

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>sure quarterback of the future, Chiefs leap frog him, huge,

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>huge jump. They get Pat Mahomes at ten, and it

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>worked out okay for the Saints. They got Marshawn Latimore

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>there at eleven. But you cannot sit back and wait

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for your quarterback to fall to you. You need to

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive, go get your guy if he is your guy.

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm so fascinated by this and by this conversation, mainly

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>because of Lamar Jackson, which we're sitting here saying he

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>might not last till twelve. And then you can look

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>at a boatload of information on the Internet that tells

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you he'll prest mock draft round. Where's in your mock

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>draft fifteen to Arizona. But I don't predict any trades. Yeah,

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>fall as late as like twenty seven. Yeah, and so

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for three first round picks, I might roll the dice.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I would do it. Yeah, But like I said, I

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>think you need to prepare to package two threes to

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>move up three or four spots or something. I got

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you Oakland Gruden, here you go, get in there, John.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Thank you boys for that. I appreciate you in lighting

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>me and just decided to say nuts to the schedule today. Wow,

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean twenty eight? Just the conversation's too good.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Not that I have a problem with it now when

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>people get fired up, I'm all for it. When we

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>come back, we'll have a little Twitter on the twenty

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned. It can be hard to find the right

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>resource for learning about important financial matters. You search how

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to build savings, you end up reading about the one

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make you taller. That's

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>why Bank of America build Better Money Habits dot com,

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>a safe little corner of the Internet for answering your

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>financial questions. Full of simple videos and tips, Better Money

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Habits can show you how to make the most of

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>your money without resorting to random searches that always seem

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up.

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>To learn more, visit Better Money habits dot com. What

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan? It

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>means you've got the passion of the heart to do

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>your part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's why

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season. Law AT

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nations. Ice Cold,

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper and the Dallas Cowboys go way back. They

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>belong together like Texas and football, Silver and Blue shotgun

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>formations and Hail Mary's. Having a Cowboys football party without

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>doctor Pepper is like having Thanksgiving without the Cowboys. Basically,

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't recommend it. So next time you have a tailgate, homegate,

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever else kind of gate, grab some ice cold

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper for you and your friends to enjoy. It's

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a Dallas Cowboys tradition. Doctor Pepper the one you crave.

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>To work this big land. You need equipment with values

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>rooted as deep in Texas soil as you are. Like

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>John Dear compact tractors with a six year power train,

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>warrant to h big features that help you work less

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>so you have more time to do what you love.

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>John Deer was first in the Texas fields, and we're

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field as the effe issual

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>agg and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>sized deals at mind John dear Dealer dot com. Slash

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>football terms, conditions, exclusions, and warranty limitations apply, so you

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>can you love for details. This is the Dallas Cowboys

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com Draft Cowboys. We're back here in the SWBC

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage Studios. Brian brought us Stain Bruger, David Helma, Kent Garrison,

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Executive Producing. I've got a couple of guides and stuff

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>coming up for your hair that you need to get

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>your hands on. The one I'm holding in my hands

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, Ken't Garrison. I know you get a shot

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of that, I'll hold it steady. That's gonna be our

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. That's gonna be our Star magazine Draft guide

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>right there. Good job Kent moving that thing around. As

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you can see, we got three Texas kids on the

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>cover there. Kids from the state of Texas only, but

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>some quality receivers there. Chuck full of information everything you

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>need to know about the draft. Kind of a little

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>supplement for you and working hard on that. A lot

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of guys working hard, a lot of guys and gals

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>both working hard. That should be out the first of

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>April or the week first week of April. This one

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>also will be out, Dan Burglar, this will be the Beast.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about the Beast. I'm hoping April second. That's

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the date I'm hoping for it to be out, So

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>we're that's two weeks from the day, so it's I

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>just got anxiety thinking about that. There's it's a lot

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to do to figure to finish it up. There's gonna

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be a ton of reports, more details than you could

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>possibly want. I'd give you a word count, but it's

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be there. You go right there. Those are just

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>scouting reports on guys. Dan, just promise me you won't

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lose sleep if you you know, if there isn't a

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.239
<v Speaker 1>tidbit about like why this guy got his name and

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like his nickname, and like what year it happened, like,

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it'll be better than that. It'll be okay. You know

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this is I literally work on this three hundred and

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty five days a year. So if i'll like it

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>happened last year, where I finished it, sent it out,

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm cleaning up my office and I found a

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>post it note about exactly what you're talking about, Like

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy's nickname was this, and I was like, oh no,

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>damn it, I forgot to add this, like I just

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that kills me because my favorite Seials, Captain Runch, got

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>into Scotting Report. Yeah, well, I'll tell you what though,

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what you need to get though the Star magazine.

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Dame Bruger's part of the Star magazine coverage as well. Yeah,

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that's our preview. Goodies in there, some goodies for you,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and then again the Beast. That link will be on

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>his Twitter page. It'll be the best way to find

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>easy to order band it like I do. You can't

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>take it to Kinko's fed Exos people, they'll put it

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.719
<v Speaker 1>together for you. But it's so worth to have everything

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to know to get you ready for those

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>three days here in the irving as we get ready,

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, David Hellman, give me a little twitter on

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter. Thank you very much. Let's do it. Let's

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>cover some current news inside this team, okay, and how

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it pertains the Cowboys draft, you know, as as I

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's out there Cowboys are hosting some free agents

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. They're getting involved in the cheaper aspect of

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>free agency. A couple veteran linemen, a couple of veteran receivers,

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think making their way through here at our point

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this week. So Daniel wants to know would a veteran

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>offensive line signing eliminate offensive lineman as a need at

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen I'm trying it to ninth nineteen um. And we

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>got the Patriots guy whose name escapes me right now, Flemming,

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Fleming, and then Marcus Martin from Bright. Those

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of guys that I've looked at myself already.

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>My question real quick on Fleming, Patriots lost Nates Soldier. Yeah,

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got a forty one year old quarterback. Yeah, Fleming,

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.479
<v Speaker 1>is that good? How are the Patriots letting them walk

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>out to walk him out the door? Solder? I get

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>he got a lot of money, yeah, but how are

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you letting I think they want this guy? Yeah, I

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>think they want this guy back. I do if they

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>want him back that badly building. But I think it's

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a situation where they're gonna it'll probably be okay, go

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>get offers and then come back, they come back to us,

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Patriots have a weird way of doing that.

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>They get guys to they get shopped offers, and so

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you got to if if it works, it works. If not,

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean they'll let guys go. But yeah, I I

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think it. I don't think it takes him out

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of that mix. I really really don't don't either. I mean,

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I to me, we've kind of heard that, you know,

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>the thirty visits will tell us a lot. You know,

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>that'd be I've checked on that. Would that would be.

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>We're probably two weeks away from those starting here, and

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that'll tell you from what I understand, Hernandez

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 1>is one of the visits that they brought in. So

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>with that, you know, maybe it's a situation where they

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>signed one of these guys and still visit Hernandez. You know,

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that from this team in the past, where

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>they've signed a running back and then all of a

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>sudden they draft Ezekiel Elliott. So I don't think this

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>keeps the Cowboys out of We thought Colton Miller too.

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>You and I were talking in pre show Coulton Miller

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>or hearing rumors that he's one of the thirty visit

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>guys for the Cowboy. That's a tackle right there. So

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's about looking at, you know, what's available

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>on free agency and what can help us in this draft.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that stops him at all. Let's fold

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this over on itself, because that's another thing. I mean,

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.879
<v Speaker 1>with these veteran lineman coming in, you know, word going

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>around that the Cowboys would at least consider signing a

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>starting right tackle and moving Lyle Collins back to left guard.

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 1>So Tom's asking about that, and really, I mean it's

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a question that I have too, because that kind of

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>changes how you view this whole puzzle if that's something

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they're actually talking about, which and on it. Like, for

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>my part, I don't even know what to make of it.

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you could try to make switches

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like that before you even have a guy on the

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 1>roster who can do that job. Also, Fleming, I think

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>has twenty starts over the last five years, which that

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>watched him. I watched him in preseason, I watched Martin

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>in preseason. Fleming I watched play the Super Bowl and

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a playoff game and against the Steelers during the year

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he was at right tackle at right tackle. How'd that go?

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 1>You know what? Against Philip Dolphyeah, I was good that.

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>It's encouraging to see that he had some good snaps

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>against him, because that's a team you played twice a

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>year if he has to play. But I the guy

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I liked. I liked Martin at guard. I mean Fleming

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>to me is I think Fleming is a for three

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and over twenty pounds. I think he's a good athlete,

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but I saw him at I mean positionally feet and

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>hands and body balance and stuff kind of a little

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>bit everywhere, but he's such a good athlete that he

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>can recover when things go back. I mean I saw

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>some guys getting the edge on him a little bit.

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>So if this team signs hyothetical they signed Martin, do

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you think guard is still in play at nineteen Well,

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he becomes the Joe Looney player. I think

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Martin becomes the center guard Joe loo you sign which

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of the same thing with Fleming. I mean,

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>until until I'm told otherwise anything's possible, And they have

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>their personnel meetings and decide to move all back to

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the left guard, which I don't like. That, but until

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm told otherwise, I would assume either one of these

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 1>signings would be guys that you're signing to fill the

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:10.760
<v Speaker 1>role of departed free agents. I get Looney and Byron Bell. Yes,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, he's trying to upgrade those spots, and even

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Cooper to a to a point, yeah, Fleming sounds

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>like just based on his resume, sounds like a massive

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>upgrade over what they had, Oh, no doubt. Yeah, And

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean you could play with this, which was no

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>question you could even if you took like I would

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be willing to drastically overpay him to be my swing

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>tackle if it meant that. I felt, if you if

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't like, if you don't like Chaz Green and

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to do anything, and you draft yes

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and Tyron Smith and Tyron Smith at the back. I mean,

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>now again, I watched Fleming play right tackle onely, he's

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 1>made some starts of left tackle. I've only saw him

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 1>play but in the game, in the big time games,

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, the playoff game against Jacksonville, much better

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>against power being Pittsburgh than he was Speed Jacksonville and Philly.

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>But so that's what I'm just saying. And to go

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>back to Dane's point or Dane's question, if you make

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that signing of Martin or In whatever, just put in

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>a veteran guard there. You're thinking of that more as

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:13.760
<v Speaker 1>your depth swing interior lineman, leaving you open to drafting

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>your starter sure somewhere in the draft. I don't disagree

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>with that. I don't disagree. I just think that you

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:23.240
<v Speaker 1>got to look at it. This is a chain. Dane's

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>not buying it. I mean, skeptical look on Dan's face.

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Give me a starting guard, I mean they're not. You

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.919
<v Speaker 1>can find a cable starting guard for Oh, I don't

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>think I think Martin can start. I personally think Martin

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>could start. I do so. But you still think there's

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>an option of guard at nineteen. I think that if

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>you said, if you said, okay, if they're looking at

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>him just at the question, was was he they looking

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 1>at him just as that swing player. Yeah, I mean

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 1>he did. But I just going a little deeper. I

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 1>my notes. I wrote down, I wrote down original ron Leary.

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm talking about the big Ron Leary, not

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the slim down ron Leary, the one that remains. I'm

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about a big guy that's physical, that's got some

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>upper body strength. You know, ron Leary wasn't always great

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>getting to the second level and you know all that.

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But this guy he's got he's got some ron Leary

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>traits to him. From what I saw, I would just

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 1>love I'm with Dane in this. I mean, and they

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>need they need a swing guy too, but I would

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>love to just get that need out of the way. Well,

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>if they might, they might draft, they might draft again.

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I think Dane's gonna be right. They they probably won't

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>take a guard at nineteen. They probably won't if they

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>signed Martin they I don't know if they will. Along

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the same line, Like I said, there's a couple of

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>veteran receivers come gard. I think Sean wants to know.

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Would signing a veteran receiver kill the dream of taking

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 1>a receiver early? Not not with the Wednes. That's why

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I I think Justin Hunters one of them. Yeah, out

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of here, Justin Hunter's we're talking about maybe a fourth receiver.

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about like vet minimum signings too, like not, Yeah,

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>don't there was a time when Justin Hunter I thought

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna be the next aj Green Tennessee kid.

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Right at Tennessee, he looked like, recruited him, coached him,

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>he looked like the next day J Green, and then

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>towards acl Mesta, he hasn't looked the same since, hasn't

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>done anything, uh, since he was a second round pick

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 1>because the Titans way back when. So yeah, that's you're

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to replace Bryce Butler with those picks exactly. Yeah,

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Yeah, all right, we'll wrap up the last

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of this like current events, um with a question from

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>d Davis, which, Okay, I haven't seen this from any

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>credible source. I think it's just fans speculation. You correct

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.399
<v Speaker 1>me if I'm wrong, But he wants to know, would

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you take the colts thirty sixth overall pick for David Irving.

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Seems like there's a lot of speculations out there, bad

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Eber coordinator. Yeah. Yeah, And the Colts now have two

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>second round picks, which I think I read if they

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>were to do that deal, they would have to surrender

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>their air own, Yes, their own, and Chris Ballard was

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in CASEC when Irving was originally on that roster on

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the practice squad, but which okay, hey, I'm there's a

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of links that make this makes sense. But have

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you heard it from anything credible other than this makes sense? No? Either,

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>have I what kind of messes that up is? I

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think Chris is really focused on the draft. Yeah, I

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's looking too because they got out some

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>money to spend and they've barely spent any dollars. Yeah,

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so they they've looked at somebody's price tags and said, well,

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll go wholesale, not retail. We'll go build through the draft.

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll get these draft picks, and next year we'll we'll

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>see you. I mean, we'll save up some money, maybe

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>resign some of our own guys. I mean, I think

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris is doing it the right way. He's not just

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>throwing money out there and seeing what happened. So I

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>would be surprised if we saw anything happen with Irving,

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 1>especially with the Colts. Who knows? Are the Cowboys doing

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it the right way? What do you mean with the

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>way they're handling free agency? And it's hard to say

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 1>that when they're literally the only team that has not

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>signed a player from the outside. But no, but you

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 1>praise Balor for what his his because they're not in

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a Colts aren't winning this year. You know, he's not

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to put a band aid on some holes and

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to mean trying to build something. They're in a

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty different phase of their roster building. It seems right

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are willing to there there they need to shoot

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 1>with with seventy million dollars, shouldn't he be trying to

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>rebuild his roster then for the right price tag? Yeah,

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the same philosophy applied to a different situation. Obviously,

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the Colts have a lot more money. I think. You know,

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion I've come to is like building through the

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 1>draft and doing it that way is overall the right strategy.

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>But you're not going to get where you want to

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.359
<v Speaker 1>go without bringing in some outside help, I don't think.

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the Colts are in a different spot where,

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 1>like I think it's probably understood that the Colts aren't

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>expect to contend for at least a year or two,

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and so that's not something they need to be doing

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. Where if the Cowboys were bad, we would

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>be if the Cowboys just drafting guys, If the Cowboys

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 1>were bad, they would have tens of million dollars more

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in cap space and probably a lot more draft picks

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>or higher draft picks to work with. Like you look

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Jets, that's a desperate team. The amount of

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>money they gave Tremaine Johnson. I mean, Tremaine Johnson's a

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>nice player, but they gave him a lot of money

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>because they're desperate and they have some money to spend,

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're going to try and win right now. Indianapolis

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to do that. They need to build for

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the future. And I mean, I get some of the fans,

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Indie fans, being upset because they haven't spent a lot

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.359
<v Speaker 1>of the money, but I mean, I don't know, it's

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 1>hard to get too upset when I think they're just

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to build for the future, not necessarily, you know,

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 1>plug a few holes when they're not going to win

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>next year. Plus they had to factor in Luck is

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of holding that franchise hostage right now. And not

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Luck specifically, but his injury, his arm injury, it's the shoulder,

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's you just don't know. But the fact that they've

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 1>unknown there, the fact that the Cults are willing to

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 1>trade out of a top three pick tells you they

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>must at least feel optimistic about him. Oh yeah, and

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they do, but I don't. You can't go

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 1>all in for this year, yeah, you know, no without

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>knowing for sure Luck what's going on with him, and

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>then the state of your roster. But yeah, I think

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the cults are gonna be interesting because I don't think

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they want to move back, but they're going to be

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>open to and it's gonna be pretty enticing if they

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>get some more offers. But I think they'll be perfectly

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>fine sticking at six and taking Quentin Nelsen. Yeah, if

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Chubb gets there, they'll be fine taking a guy there. Spencer,

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.720
<v Speaker 1>going back to what we were just talking about, Spencer says,

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just whatever, pick a name, it doesn't matter for this exercise.

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>But just assuming the Cowboys address their offensive line in

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a satisfactory manner over the next few weeks, would that

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>make you more or less likely to trade up? And

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think his logic is that if you do that,

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of wide receiver, I guess the vast

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>majority of your needs are on defense. So does that

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>make you more likely to use draft capital to go

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>get a defender that you really feel good about or

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>trade away from it? If there's not a guy that

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.839
<v Speaker 1>fits at nineteen. I guess I recently did a mock

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>draft just posted on Twitter today, and the top defensive

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>players available at nineteen in this scenario Tavin Bryan Florida

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>three technique, Layton vander Esch linebacker. Both those players went

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty and twenty one his mock, Marcus Davenport with twenty three,

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Harold Landry, Mike used or On Pain. So those are

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the defensive players that would just available be available in

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this scenario. I don't know if anyone necessarily sticks out

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 1>as yeah, we should stay and get that guy. I

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if who would you wind up picking for Dallas.

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley? Yeah, I think I feel better about Calvin

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Ridley than any of the guys you just named off.

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>You want to go? Where did you pick? Roquan Smith

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>thirteen Redskins? We're We're back. No, I'm back on this. No,

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm just thinking Derwin James. You have him,

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Sampa seven, Tampa Minka went nine to the San Francisco

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a quick question about him? Which one?

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Mika Minka? What do you got? Is he really sliding?

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Is he gonna slide? I don't know. No, he's not sliding.

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Dane Burglar told me a couple of weeks ago to

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:31.720
<v Speaker 1>mark it down that he was going forward to the Browns.

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So wow, he's sliding. Dan, No, I don't think he's sliding.

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>It's he's a top ten pick. I mean, I don't

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>think he's a top five lock. Where's the top ten pick?

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't If he goes nine doesn't mean sliding.

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 1>And we get so, well, we thought he was a

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>top four pick, didn't we Just because we had n't

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 1>going forward doesn't mean oh, definitely going top four. Yeah,

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean we get so like locked in this, like

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we had Minka going forward was a staple in mock drafts.

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure it was. And then all of a sudd

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and when he doesn't go forward, it's like, oh gosh,

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 1>he's falling. No, No, I'm just asking, No, I know,

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I get that a lot, how Minka is falling. You're

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>being kind of combative today. I feel like it's Monday falling.

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay because along the top five. No. But the funny

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>thing this happens too, where like we in the media

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>go away from a guy and in the league like

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>their opinion never changed. So all of a sudden, the

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:28.959
<v Speaker 1>media catches up to what the teams have already learned.

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:30.760
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like a lot of times the media

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>will spend it even further forward than that, and all

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, a guy they're projecting to go at

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:38.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve goes at five, and everybody's like, oh, that's so surprising,

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 1>when it really it's not at all. No, it's not

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>surprising at all. People get so a little over the

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 1>top of some of these. You know, if a player

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:50.439
<v Speaker 1>we had projected going top five falls to eight or nine,

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean he's falling. It's just there wasn't a natural

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>fit at five, six or seven, you know. I mean,

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just Quentin Nelson. You know, he could fall to eleven.

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good point. Like wait, I mean we've

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the very first show we did in January was like,

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that's he's the best prospect in the draft. He's gonna

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 1>be on the cover of your book. It's not absolutely

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>he can fall all the way to like twelve, yeah,

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know what could happen. So since Leonard

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Williams fell to five, yeah, six, about six exactly? All right,

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>let's we gotta take we gotta take a quick breakcare

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and thank you everybody on Twitter. We appreciate that take

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. We'll come back. We'll finish up with

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 1>some tell me more. Stay tuned. Cowboys fans know that

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the second best of anything simply won't cut it, and

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 1>your skincare should be no different. A long time locker

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>room favorite of the players and the official men's skincare

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Dallas based Jack Black is

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the number one best selling men's skincare brand in the

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>country because we make products that help guys look, smell,

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and feel better. Visit get Jack Black dot com slash

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys to get ten dollars off your first order of

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars or more. Jack Black Look Good, Smell good,

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>feel good, official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboy.

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Star Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboy is offering exclusive game weekend travel

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>packages with sideline access and photo ops with current players,

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though, You'll get to

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:11.840
<v Speaker 1>talk xs and os with Senior Director of Player Personnel

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Will McClay and of course with yours truly me, Brian

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>broad Us. You can trust the official fan travel partner

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel like

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a pro. Visit Cowboys travel dot com to book your

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>travel package. Today. I hear all this talk about what

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it takes to be a cowboy. Everyone's got their ideas,

0:49:28.960 --> 0:49:31.399
<v Speaker 1>but I just say to myself, it's what's up top

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that matters. Sure, you need men with the muscle and

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>heart to get her done. But if your scouts and

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 1>coaches are listening out there a word of advice. Pick

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the man with the most well worn stetson. That's the

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 1>one most cut out to be a cowboy. Stetson hats

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 1>are handmade right here in Texas and have been on

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys heads for over one hundred fifty years. The rest

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of you can visit stetson dot com slash cowboy to

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>find a retailer nearest you. What does it mean to

0:49:55.760 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be a Dallas Cowboys fan. It means you've got the

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 1>passion of the heart to do your part supporting the

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:04.359
<v Speaker 1>boys no matter what. That's why when the game's on

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the line, you're on your feet, whether you're at home

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:09.479
<v Speaker 1>or in the stands. Actually, you're more than a fan.

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>You are a member of Cowboys Nation, and so is

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:15.760
<v Speaker 1>AT and T doing their part to keep you connected

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to America's team all season. Law At and T is

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a proud member of Cowboys Nation. This is the Dallas

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com. Draft your Cowboys back here the SWBC

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Studios. Brian brought us a very frazzled Dane Brugler. Frazzled,

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I am hey, okay, I'm frazzled. All right, we're good.

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about you man. A little bit story about

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:45.479
<v Speaker 1>you've just been throwing grenades at him for the last hour.

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, he's tough. It gets tough. He handled that.

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>He could surely hang on the handle. That okay. David

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Hillman Kent Garrison as well. David, let's called blue. Will

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>tell me more if we could. I did this one

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:57.360
<v Speaker 1>just for you, Brian. Thank you because I listened to

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you and I respect your opinion. And you haven't shut

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:02.759
<v Speaker 1>up about this guy. So I want you to tell

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>me more about Memphis linebacker Jennard Avery. Jenard Avery, do

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about him a little bit yourself?

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Like you're a guy, This says, the guy won't shut

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 1>up about So I love I love this guy. Hold on,

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I gotta get my notes all pulled up. Leave Dan alone.

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, his first name Jennard, Jennard Avious,

0:51:24.640 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Genard Avious. Yes, he's a flyer Avius related to my

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:31.919
<v Speaker 1>guy Mingo at a lsu or Jennard Avious and Barkivius.

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>This guy's a six foot two hundred and forty eight

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>pound missile. This guy is four or five nine on

0:51:38.160 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the speed. By the way, not bad run a little bit, ya.

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for those guys. I'm looking for guys to

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>have got again just over six foot two hundred and

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>forty eight pounds. Like I said, I'm looking like guys

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that will step up, take on blocks, be physical, play

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the point of attack. This guy's a violent tackler. I

0:51:57.840 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>saw that. I mean, at times a little bit too

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 1>aggress if at times an overrun some plays. But yeah,

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what you know. The guy plays with

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 1>some balance. I thought he could work through the trash.

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>He works against double teams. He could split those and

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 1>do all right. He's quick to read plays, he could

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 1>get outside in a hurry. He never gives up on

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a play. I just see a relentless player. I mean,

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I like how he comes back. If he goes up

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to field the balls there, he comes back, makes the play,

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 1>retraces his steps close down on the edge. This this guy.

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot to like about this guy. And they

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:33.840
<v Speaker 1>use him though as a rusher. I mean that's his

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 1>big thing though. He is a guy that they take

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 1>off the edge and he can get low and dip

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and get around the corner and cause some problems in

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the pocket games. I watch Central Xtreme Connecticut, Tulane sim

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in Central Florida with the games, I took a peek

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>at this kid. I'm just not sure where you're gonna

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>play him. I mean, maybe he's just a MIC linebacker,

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't see that at all, because he can't cover,

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and he can't he's a downhill only player. Well you

0:52:57.200 --> 0:52:59.400
<v Speaker 1>know what though, That's what I'm saying though, when you

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't and as as mike linebacker, they could take him.

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean they could use him. They're using Jalen Smith

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>as a rusher. Now, Jalen Smith is going to end

0:53:07.480 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>up being a MIC linebacker rusher. Let me tell you that.

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna use this guy as a strictly a rusher,

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay. With that, not strictly as a rusher. I'm

0:53:15.120 --> 0:53:18.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about a point of attack player that's physical that

0:53:18.560 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he play sideline the sideline there. Yeah, if you're gonna

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>use him strictly only going downhill, you might have something there.

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:27.759
<v Speaker 1>But what's your draft grade on him? I got him

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the third round, Okay, so so I'm getting him at

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>eighty one for me is for him. He sounds like

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go. Well, I meant at all eighty one. Overall,

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not the steepest price in the world to pay

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for an early down linebacker, Like if you got to

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 1>take him off the field in obvious passing situations. I

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:50.280
<v Speaker 1>mean third, he's pick eighty one, He's not picked nineteen.

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 1>See the thing about it is though he has not

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 1>seen any film with him cover. That's why he's making

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the adjustment thing. Oh sure, no, nor your analysis was

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:01.759
<v Speaker 1>he can't cover, but he plays as a rush. He

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 1>gets I've seen him getting throwing lanes and see him

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 1>tip balls. I mean what started wanted him to do.

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not he said. But for seven years a year

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>he started a week side linebacker. They use him as

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a rush. They use him as a rusher because he

0:54:13.880 --> 0:54:17.759
<v Speaker 1>can affect the pocket. You haven't seen him cover? Say that, No,

0:54:17.880 --> 0:54:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the year he played as a

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher. The first half of the year he plays

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a week side linebacker. I've seen him cover plenty. He

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 1>not just not very that's not his forte. He can rush,

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>he can get after the quarterback. He's at his best

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>when he's going downhill. He's very aggressive, sometimes over aggressive.

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, Yeah, I just if I'm going to

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 1>take a player in the top one hundred, I need

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a guy that I feel more comfortable staying on the

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>field in any down situation. And with him, I don't

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:44.960
<v Speaker 1>feel that I see. To me, he's more of a

0:54:45.320 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 1>nickel player, a sub package guy. I don't know. I

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 1>just I finding the exact position for him is my

0:54:51.680 --> 0:54:56.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest struggle with this guy. The Cowboys like the Cowboys

0:54:56.440 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 1>creativity with legendary so I mean, I'm sure they get

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 1>true hear it out. Yeah, um, let's stick at linebacker

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 1>right here. I got one for you, Clemson's Dorian O'Daniel.

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a guy. Tell me about that guy. That's another

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:12.560
<v Speaker 1>guy where you kind of you picked all the guys.

0:55:12.560 --> 0:55:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's going, oh, hey, what does he some people of

0:55:15.400 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 1>some people say the film has gotten bad. I never

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:20.959
<v Speaker 1>saw a great film on him. No, but he didn't

0:55:21.000 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>have terrible film either. You know, he's but he's kind

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:27.879
<v Speaker 1>of a safety. He's an overhang linebacker. Another guy where

0:55:27.880 --> 0:55:29.320
<v Speaker 1>where you're gonna play him you kind of have to

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 1>specialized position for him because he's he's not a true

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>linebacker and he's not a true safety. He's kind of

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a hybrid in the middle. And you can use those

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 1>types of guys, sure, but again you have to have

0:55:39.880 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a plan for how you're going to use him. Uh

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Nickel's safety. I mean, that's why I put him my Yeah, No,

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you there. He's because he doesn't have

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the ideal measurements that you want, right have the ideal speed.

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:53.040
<v Speaker 1>He's a little bit of a tweener. And again, you

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 1>can use those types of guys, but you have to

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>have a specific plan in place for how he's gonna

0:55:57.200 --> 0:56:00.759
<v Speaker 1>fit your defense. That scares me more than it. Like

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:03.279
<v Speaker 1>when you tell me that about a guy, I'm just like, ah, well,

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:06.439
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna I mean he's basically a box safety. Yeah,

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that's basically what he is. And I said the last line,

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you don't want him carrying receivers down the field. No,

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that you know. Now you talk about somebody they

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:17.760
<v Speaker 1>can't cover. Yeah, Oran O'Daniel can't cover, and he covered.

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he covers like a box safety. One of

0:56:20.000 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 1>my one of my favorite names in this draft for sure,

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:27.360
<v Speaker 1>though it's just fun to say, rolls off the tongue. Um.

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows about the NC State defensive line. They got

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of good guys on there, but one guy

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember talking about is defensive tackle Justin Jones. Yep.

0:56:39.280 --> 0:56:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's easy to overlook some of those. Yeah, there's

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:45.920
<v Speaker 1>like they're, uh, yeah, they don't have talent anywhere else.

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:49.920
<v Speaker 1>All four of their defensive linement are gonna get drafted. Um, yeah,

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jones is probably the if you're gonna talk about

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the four, Cantavius Street, Bradley Chub, B. J Hill, Justin

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Jones is probably the least talented of the four. But

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:01.839
<v Speaker 1>that's not I mean, that's not a knock against him.

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 1>It's just those other guys are three really talented guys

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:07.399
<v Speaker 1>that are probably drafted in top five rounds. Yeah, Bradley Chubb,

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 1>top five, BJ Hill to me's a top one hundred

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 1>pick and I than Cantavious Street, probably in a top

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>five mix, top five round mix. Justin Jones probably more

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of a later round guy. But in my notes, get

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:24.680
<v Speaker 1>off handwork, uh struggles to disengage or win to the

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>point of attack you can too easily neutralize by interior threats.

0:57:29.040 --> 0:57:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Yea loves to play the bully role. Um. He can

0:57:32.280 --> 0:57:34.360
<v Speaker 1>provide depth on an NFL roster as a block eater,

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 1>so I think he can help. But he's more of

0:57:36.880 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a rotation guy, not so much. You're gonna step in

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 1>expect to be a starter early on. I agree. That

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:45.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds like more what they need. In my opinion, I

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:47.680
<v Speaker 1>canna live with that. Yeah, no, you will. What's this,

0:57:47.840 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>uh the m of this team and drafting your one

0:57:50.400 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 1>technique tique? You're yeah, late in the draft, so six

0:57:55.360 --> 0:57:58.320
<v Speaker 1>seventh round. Yeah, hey you never know. Hey, maybe you

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 1>get a lucky and find a bo Allen. There you go?

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 1>How about that like the Eagles? Yeah, sure did, I've

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 1>actually watched this guy, but I still want you to

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:09.960
<v Speaker 1>tell me more about Vanderish. No, well, we need to

0:58:10.000 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>do a whole segment on him. Yeah, that would be Yeah,

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:19.200
<v Speaker 1>usc wide receiver Deonte Burnett slot player right day. Yeah,

0:58:19.240 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and give him credit. He was really productive this year. Um.

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Sam Darnold said it. As much as we talked about

0:58:25.200 --> 0:58:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald having an off year, He's the only USC

0:58:28.160 --> 0:58:30.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterback to ever throw for four thousand yards and he

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:33.120
<v Speaker 1>did that this year. So not bad. Deonte Burnette was

0:58:33.120 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a big part of that. He had almost thirteen hundred

0:58:35.480 --> 0:58:39.920
<v Speaker 1>yards receiving. He's a smallish guy and he plays small.

0:58:39.960 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean he he'll make some Yeah, he'll make some

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:46.600
<v Speaker 1>highlight reel catches, you know him do some impressive things.

0:58:46.640 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, he's a smallest receiver. Uh,

0:58:49.760 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he's got some reliability issues, focus issues. But out of

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the slot, you know, he's your mid round not he

0:58:57.840 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 1>might not go top one hundred, but maybe four round

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>slot option. He's used a lot on screens, is what

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw. He can he can break some tackles for

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a small guy, which is a little bit surprising. But

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing about him, the most important thing

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is like the slot stuff, he knows how to find space,

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:17.400
<v Speaker 1>he knows how to get open that way. But I

0:59:17.440 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>think that he you know, he doesn't deal with much

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 1>press coverage too, so I never really saw him having

0:59:22.440 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to deal with how to you know, you know, but

0:59:24.680 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 1>his size again at five eleven, one seventy, that's going

0:59:27.760 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to limit some of the stuff. What he's gonna do. Yeah,

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 1>he's the underneath player only. Yeah, got another show after this.

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:35.479
<v Speaker 1>We gotta get to Oh that's true. Well, we gotta

0:59:35.520 --> 0:59:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to piece out. I got one more piece out,

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll save it, save it for the next day.

0:59:39.640 --> 0:59:41.760
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. Yeah, we've got a show coming up here

0:59:41.840 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 1>next with Shannon and Nate and uh, Kurt Daniels and

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 1>those guys. They're coming up next here. Stay tuned on us,

0:59:48.120 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So stay tuned for that. Uh for my buddies, Uh,

0:59:52.240 --> 0:59:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Dane Burgler, David Hellman, Kent Garrison. Thank you guys so

0:59:55.720 --> 0:59:59.400
<v Speaker 1>much for joining the Draft show. We'll be back eleven

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a him next Thursday with more coverage. Make sure you

1:00:04.360 --> 1:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>guys keep watching that tape. We'll see you then.