WEBVTT - Magic, Skepticism, and Success w/ Dr. Richard Wiseman

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's imagine none of this is true. We're still going

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to learn something about why people have out of body experiences,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>or think they're in telepathic contact with their loved ones,

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>or go to a medium and think they've contacted the dead.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We're going to learn something interesting about psychology. And that's

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>true of magic. You know, when you study magicians and

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>how they manipulate attention and all sorts of other things,

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you're learning about psychology, and people are fascinated by this stuff.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>What psychologists are really good at, academic psychologists is taking

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>people who I find very interesting in our lives and emotions,

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and we love and we hate, and we have beliefs

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that aren't true, and we argue with people and we

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>get on with people, and so taking all of that

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>buzzing complexity and reducing it to something really quite dull,

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and so that saddens me. And a lot of my

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>work is about trying to celebrate the role of people

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in society and keep psychology interesting. I mean, that's why

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I got into it in the first place. You know,

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I read these things, and yet psychologists have this rather

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>uncanny ability to take something as interesting and convert into

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>something quite dull.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to the Psychology Podcast. I'm doctor Scott

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Barry Kaufman, a cognitive scientist interested in the science of intelligence,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 2>creativity and human potential. Today we have doctor Richard Wiseman

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast. Doctor Wiseman holds Britain's only professorship in

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the Public Understanding of Psychology at the University of Hertfordshire

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>and has published over one hundred academic papers examining the

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 2>psychology of magic and illusion, deception, luck, and self development.

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Wiseman has written several popular psychology books, including The

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Luck Factor, Paranormality, Why We See What Isn't There, Quircology,

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Shoot for the Moon and Rip It Up, The Radically

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>New Approach to Changing Your Life. I've been a longtime

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 2>admirer of doctor Wiseman's wide ranging research on magic, well

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>being and success in life. As you will see in

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>this episode, we share a lot of mutual interests. I

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 2>really enjoyed chatting with doctor Wiseman, and I know you

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 2>will enjoy listening to our discussion. So that further ado

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I bring you Doctor Richard Wiseman, Professor Richard wise Man.

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>It is so so good to have you on the

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Secondlogy Podcast.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Finally pleasure, pleasure to be here, and greetings from and

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>not very sunny Edinburgh in Scotland, which is where I

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>find myself.

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not sunny, but I do love Edinburgh.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I love it. It's a very very beautiful city and

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm lucky enough to live right in the middle of it.

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah. Every year the Fringe Festival rolls into

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>town and thousands of shows all over the city. But

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>right now it's a fairly quiet time, particularly as it's

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>quite late at night.

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Wonderful. Well, we have so many areas of mutual interest.

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I have a great and rest in magic and a

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 2>great interest. I see you on the Facebook groups I'm on,

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, and I'm like, oh, there's Richard. You know

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 2>the magic the secret magic groups. Won't mention what any

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 2>of them are called.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, the interconnected world of magic. Yes, the small world.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible, it's it is.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 2>It is remarkably small, and everyone's trying to, you know,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 2>make sure that we keep the secrets, keep the secrets.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 2>But also psychology and the psychology of success. That's a

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 2>very very common area of interest. Not common, that's a

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>mutual area of interest of ours. Is the maybe some

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 2>of the unexpogant talk today about some of some unexpected

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>things that people, you know, might not realize really matters

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 2>for success. And maybe we'll talk about some of the

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 2>things that everyone says matters for success and maybe it

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter so much. So that'd be great to have

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>that conversation. So that's that's all, just uh preamble, you know,

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 2>just setting the stage, setting the stage.

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Letting people know what's going to happen.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, yeah, yeah. Well you're you're you're a lifelong entertainer.

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>So I want to start there a little bit to

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 2>your childhood, because you were a street performer when you

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 2>were what twelve, no.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>A little bit older than that. I got into magic

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>when I was probably eight or nine something like that,

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and by my grandfather, who showed me a very good

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>magic trick. Hearly knew one magic trick, but it's a

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>very good one. A coin that would disappear and appear

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in a nest of boxes. And so I kind of

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>badgered him every weekend to just tell me how this

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>trick was done. He wouldn't do that. Eventually, he said

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the secrets in the local library. So I went and

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>read everything about magic and That's how I got hooked

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on it, and it is an amazing hobby. I mean,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>I've just written a book on all the kind of

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>benefits of learning magic, and they are sizable, you know,

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of confidence, in terms of problem solving, getting

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a can do attitude, and so on. So I got

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>into magic, got into a local magic club, and then

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>went to study psychology because of magic. Actually, I read

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a book that said, as handed magicians are likable and

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>so therefore you should read How to Win Friends and

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Influence People by Doubt Canigi, which is an amazing book.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's dated now, but it's incredible. That

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and How to Stop Worrying and Start Living his other book,

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>both of them incredible. So I read those then when

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I studied psychology at University College London, which is right

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of London, and the reason for that

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is that it's very close to the Magic Circle and

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>also very close to Covent Garden, which is an area

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in London where all the street entertainers are, and so

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in my summer breaks I would go and do street

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>entertaining down there. I guess they're in my sort of

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>early teens, and I was pretty awful. I was pretty

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>bad at it's it's a hard way of making a

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>living because people can walk off, you know, they don't

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like what you're doing, They just they wander off, and

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they did in large numbers when I was doing street entertaining.

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So I did that. And then I mean, we'll talk

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>about sort of as you say, success, but in terms

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity. You know, most of the opportunities that have

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>come my way have been by chance. And so at

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>the end of my degree, I was walking along my

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>friend was walking in the opposite direction and bumped into

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>him and he said, you know, that's the weirdest thing.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I've just seen this poster for a pH d position,

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 1>which would be perfect for you studying the psychology of

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>magic up in Edinburgh. And I often think, well, you know,

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>if that somebody hadn't put that post up, or he

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>hadn't walked that route, or I hadn't walked the route

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and bumped into him, I wouldn't have known about that opportunity.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>This is all prior to email and so on and

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the web. And so this was a professor up in

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Edinburgh who's doing work on the paranormal wanted a magician

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and so I came up to here and studied psychology

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and magic for four years. That's my pH d. And

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>then after that went back down to the University of

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Hertfordshire and did some of the research which a spect

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you may I read about. So that that's my kind

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of career in terms of magic and psychology coming together.

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 2>I love it. What was the name of your advisory.

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Up here is Professor Robert Morris who was the Curseler

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Professor of parapsychology. So Bob was. I don't think he

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>believed in paranormal stuff or not. He's certainly very open

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to it, but he also knew that lots of the

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>psychics and mediums and so on were cheats, and he

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted someone to do some work on psychology and magic

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>so he could sort of separate the two outs. And

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what was amazing about that experience, I was working in

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a parapsychology unit, which is the psychology of the paranormal. Now,

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm skeptical about that stuff, most tragicians are. I was

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>deeply skeptical, and you I was surrounded by people who

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of believed that stuff. And I think it's very

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>healthy to be working an area and to meet people

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>whose belief systems you don't share, because it kind of

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>teaches you how to be tolerant and respectful when you

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with somebody. So it set me in a

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>good kind of stead for that. So yeah, that was

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Bob Morris up here, and that was four glorious years

0:07:58.320 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>doing psychology and magic stuff.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 2>That's so cool. I feel like the psychology of the

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 2>paranormal is a very fringe area of psychology. When I

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 2>go to the APA conferences, I just don't meet many

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 2>paranormal psychologists.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>That's definitely true. Yeah, probably. I mean I was doing

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's probably about fifty people. Now there's probably about twenty

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>people around the world. So yes, it's not an area

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that attracts many people.

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>It's not an area that attracts many people. Yet, Like,

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 2>if there is something to this, then like it's like

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>the most important thing. That's the interesting thing about this

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>is like it's you know, it's the most fringe area.

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 2>But let's say a psychologist does someday actually find something

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 2>that replicates within the parent because yeah, no one's replicating

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 2>this shit. Well let's say soone actually replicates. Well, then

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 2>it's like wait a minute, hold on, maybe we should

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 2>now focus on this.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, now that that's true, it has the opportunity or

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of revolutionizing exactly obviously the mind and so on.

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>But you do need evidence, good evidence. I don't believe

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the evidence is there for extrasensory perception. But Bob's argument,

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>even back then, this would have been the late eighties,

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, his argument was, I think it's true. Let's

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine none of this is true. We're still going to

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>learn something about why people have out of body experiences

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or think they're in telepathic contact with their loved ones,

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or go to a medium and think they've contacted the dead.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>We're going to learn something interesting about psychology. And that's

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>true of magic. You know, when you study magicians and

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>how they manipulate attention and all sorts of other things,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you're learning about psychology, and people are fascinated by this stuff.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>What psychologists are really good at, academic psychologists is taking

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>people who I find very interesting in our lives and emotions,

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and we love and we hate, and we have beliefs

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that aren't true, and we argue with people and we

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>get on with people, and so taking all of that

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>buzzing complexity and reducing it to something really quite dull,

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and so that saddens me. And a lot of my

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>work is about trying to celebrate the role of people

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in society and keep psychology interesting. I mean, that's why

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I got into it in the first place. You know,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I read these things, and yet psychologists have this rather

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>uncanny ability to take something as interesting and converting into

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>something quite dull.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're so right. I mean, you're the literally, you're

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 2>the professor of public understanding at your university. Yes, yes,

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and uh, you know, like you literally I've never heard

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>of that, but maybe Richard Dawkins the only other time

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I ever heard of someone who was a professor of

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>like public you know, why the public should care about something, and.

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Him Richard started he was public understanding science, I think,

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and then when I got my professorship, I went with

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>public understanding of psychology because it allows me to move

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in many different spheres. But also, you know, fundamentally, people

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>should be so honored and excited to study psychology. When

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I first speak to undergraduates on their first day in

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the university, they're all excited. And then when you speak

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>to them in year three or year four, they've kind

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of lost that excitement and it's all become a little

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>bit dull. And I think that's because psychology is quite

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it isn't very interesting. So I always

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>think we should remember why we're doing this stuff, and

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>how wonderful, you know, how wonderful brains are, how wonderful

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>minds are. We've got no idea how the brain creates

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the mind. We don't really have very much an idea

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of how brains work, and we're still only scratching the

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>surface in terms of the complexity and getting our heads

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>around that. So yeah, I always sort of choose topics

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that I find interesting and I think other people will

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>find interesting. For that reason, I don't do much work on,

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, short term memory, because I would find it

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>difficult to bring that live.

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 2>But you did write a book on helping people with

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 2>their memory memory.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about that. Yes, that's eronic crazy, yes, so, yeah,

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a short book on memory. But again, it was about

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>how to improve your memory, right, Well, it wasn't about

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the intricacies of how memories long.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Term Well, exactly, that's right, that's it. Well, I know

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I find the well, I definitely find the topics study

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>interesting for sure. I remember, it's just a shame in

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>psychology that we don't in grad school promote people more

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 2>or encourage encouraged students who want to do public outreach

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 2>of their science. When I was in grad school, I

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>started blogging for Psychology Today, right when that blog network started,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 2>and my advisor called me into his office and he's like,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>we need to talk, like, you know, this is really

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 2>you're really out there, you know, in this department for

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 2>doing this, and you realize this is going to hurt

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 2>your your chances at tenure, and and you know, it

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 2>turns out he was right, But I mean that was.

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>True of me. When I finished by parapsychology stuff in

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety two, I was looking for a job. It turns

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>out nobody wants to employ a parapsychologist or something that's

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>done to work. And so it is that that is

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>totally true that the system is set up for a

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.599
<v Speaker 1>certain type of psychology. Were publish in certain types of

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 1>journals and get certain types of grant and if you're

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>going to sit outside of that, it can be quite challenging.

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know that the key question to me is, well,

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>why are you're doing anything? Quite frankly, what makes something meaningful?

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>And when you ask that psychologist, their answer is, well,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>because I published journal articles and I get grants. That's

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the end point. The end point isn't to understand or

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate humanity. And so the number of times people

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>are confused when you go, well, let's just forget about

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the articles and the why are you studying this? And

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>people just psychologists look kind of a bit bewilled and go,

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just doing it because that's to get those publications,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>get those grants, and that's how you get on. So yeah,

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be nice if there was a dramatic

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>change in my lifetime of encouraging people to think about

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>why they're doing what they're doing and what is meaningful?

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, that would be nice, wouldn't that be nice? Yeah, well,

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 2>sign me up for that. That that club I view

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>you as part of a tradition of that includes James Randy,

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the Amazing Randy, and includes Banacheck. And but it's it's

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>a it's a smaller club than that because you're a

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>psychologist who was formerly I mean, they I put you

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 2>in this sort of tradition because they you know, James

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Randy tried to test to see some of those bullshit,

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 2>but he didn't really do rigorous double blind me for TV. Look,

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to show you how I'm smarter than you.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 2>You know that you're dumb, that you wired and that. Look,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm the amazing Randy. But with all due respect, I

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of respect for him. But that's what

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 2>the TV show is about.

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I'm not quite the same as that.

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look at me.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, yeah, I mean I suppose in terms of

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>going back, I'd probably close to Ray him and Jim

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Orcock people like that who were and still are doing

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of work within psychology. We should say, though,

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Randy who and I knew James very well. You know,

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it was an amazing guy. I mean, it was the

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>amazing Randy. But he's amazing in many many ways. And

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>one is he just very charismatic, very clear thinking, very bright,

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and had a great ability to take skepticism and make

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it exciting on the media. And that is not an

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>easy thing to do. I mean, it's more exciting to

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about why ghosts are real than why they may

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>not exist. But James could bring that alive. You know

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that famous line of people prefer the bunk to the

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>d bunk where he was able to overcome that. And

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>he was great, and some of these investigations are very

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>brave as well. He went after people that he knew

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>were going to kind of come back at him. So yeah,

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>he was a good, big, big fan of his work.

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Banichick is wonderful as well, really talented. Have you ever

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>seen Banichick doing the spoon bending, which I saw in

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Vegas a few years ago. My goodness, it's really good.

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>It's really really good. But yeah, you are right. My roots,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, because they're in academia, will be closer to

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>people like Ray him and Jim l Kock who'd come

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>more from that that kind of tradition.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>And I was very careful and what I said, because

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I could have easily just put you in the camp of, oh,

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>you come from the tradition of Daryl Bem But I

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 2>don't feel like you come from the tradition of Daryl

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 2>in a sense in a sense because in one sense, yes,

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>because you're both rigorous scientists, right, But another sense is

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that I feel like you're even more critical of it,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>of it than he is.

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, Darre's not particularly critical. Now, I mean,

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 1>he starts off, I think, being quite skeptical. He's very

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>good magician. It was actually taught I think by Slodini,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and does some great magic. Yeah, I think, I think, yeah,

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. Certainly I've seen him do Sladini,

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>which we should explain to people is a very particular

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>type of magic. I've seen him do those those those

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sorts of routines. And Darrell's great published main parapsychological papers

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>suggesting there was something to it in mainstream journals and

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>inadvertently kicked off the current crisis in replication in psychology

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>because people looked at those articles started to criticize his research, saying, oh, well,

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe he looked at the data pre analyzed it,

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or he's not reporting everything, or whatever it is. And

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>then other people went old on a minute, that may

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>be true of that parapsychological work, but it's also true

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of psychology as well, And so that

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>kicked off this whole kind of we need to be

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>able to replicate and need to look critically our own studies,

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And now that's become a huge movement, and because of

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that movement, psychologists now are talking about a thing called preregistration,

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>which is where you write down what you're going to do,

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the way in which you're going to analyze data, and

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so on before you conduct the study. And the full

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>circle on it is that parapsychologists were doing that for

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years many many years ago, I mean pro twenty

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Now they ran those sorts of systems because

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>they knew there were problems with the data. So it's

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>another way to which parapsychology can kind of overlap with psychology.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just on a nerdy note, pregistration is kind of

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 2>like mentalism. I mean, aren't they making a prediction? We

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 2>predict this will be our hypothesis.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Correct, that's right, yes, But unlike mentalism, it's quite hard

0:18:55.440 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to change that prediction. So so so yeah, it's an

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>attempt to kind of sort if it.

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Was right, If it goes right, you know it looks impressive.

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>You make a big fuss, that's right. Yes, yeah, yeah,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>So Daryl contributed to that. And actually, weirdly, there's another

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>overlap there because before you go into parapsychology, Darrel was

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.479
<v Speaker 1>doing stuff on self perception theory, which is this notion

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that you figure out how you feel by looking at

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>how you're acting. So it's this idea that if you

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>force your face into a smile, then you cheer yourself

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 1>up because you look at yourself. I think I'm smiling,

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I must be happy. And he did some great work

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>on that, quite early work. And then one of my

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>books was about entirely about self perception theory, the rip

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it Up Book, or called the Asif Principle and states.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So I interviewed Daryl for that when I did that book.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>It was odd talking to him entirely about that and

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>not about parapsychology because that's not viewing. But no, it

0:19:58.760 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is great.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever talked to him about parents because you're

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 2>a rep You have a study right that found it

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 2>didn't replicate. Weren't an author on that at Cothora?

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, we didn't replicate stuff. No,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I've spoken to Daryl and we did summer schools together

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in America on parapsychology, so I know him reasonably well.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, this is what I mean. We within parapsychology.

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't see eye to i with most parapsychologists in

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>terms of whether this stuff is true. But you have

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to sit down the room and have a conversation with

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody without shouting. And that's a that's a useful skill.

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we all know about confirmation bias. We love

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to surround ourselves with people that agree with us. And

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean talking going back to success. I know I'm

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to name them. I know two very very

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>famous magicians and I went to see their shows, and

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I go and see them, see them afterwards. I'm not

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna say who is. I'm not gonna say who is?

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. Each of them said to me, what

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>do you think of the show? And so there's always

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this tradition that you say nice things about someone's show.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And I said, I enjoyed this, and both of them

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>cut me dead. I said, never mind about that. What

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>did you hate? What can I change tomorrow? And that

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they were at the top of their game, and all

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>they're interested in is what can I change? How can

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I improve? And it's an odd skill. It's it's something

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that we don't embrace easily as saying to somebody, yeah,

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but how can I get how to get better? What

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>do you disagree with about what I'm what I'm doing?

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Not what do you agree with? We all want to

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>be surrounded by people that go, oh, you're wonderful, you're great.

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Actually you learn far more from the people that go yeah,

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>not for me. So that was always an important lesson.

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, then that's an importent lesson and about success. I mean,

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 2>and if you look at anyone who's really successful, you

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 2>look at like even you know, things basketball players. I

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 2>feel like that was Kobe Bryant's mentality. You know, it's like,

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, they always wanting to change and improve.

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to do, though. It's easy to say.

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to do.

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And I've done shows. You meet people afterwards and you

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>love it when they go, oh my goodness, that was

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>great and that was funny. It's really hard to go, yeah, yeah,

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what what didn't you like? What didn't you What can

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I do better? It's hard to do. It's easy to

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>say and hard to do.

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>It's true, especially the more personal The comment is yeah,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 2>you know totally, yeah, no, for sure. So where are

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 2>we at with the evidence on this? So I try

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 2>to look at you know, I started with your ninety

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 2>nine paper, Does s I exist? P s I? How's

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 2>it pronounced?

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>A SI?

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah? Does SI exist? Lack of replication of an

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 2>anomalous process of information transfer. I saw your eyes by

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 2>the way, trying to think all the way back to

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine that this.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Happens a lot. Okay, what what's about to happen? Happens

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot now, which is somebody asked me the other

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>day about a book that I'd written, and it was

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd written in the kind of mid nineties, and I

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, I can't remember, and I you know, I

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>don't even I don't even remember writing the book the

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>contents of it. So yeah, particularly with papers like that,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>but I do remember that that was that's the metro

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>analysis again.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 2>The studies, Just in case you forgot, I wrote a

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 2>sentence from the abstract. The studies failed to confirm his

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 2>mean effect of participants scoring above chance on the ESP task.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 2>So you looked at a whole bunch of Now that

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 2>that was before the bemuh, the big the one that

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 2>made the big splash, right, which was more recent.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that is.

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh was that was that? Oh? That was maybe that

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 2>was that was a direct replication of that.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Now now we are getting in stuff I can't remember.

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>So I thought that paper that you got there, well,

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>what's the title of it again?

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Does side exist lack of replication of an anomalous process

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 2>of information transfer.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the metro analysis all, okay stuff. Yeah, the the

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>BEM stuff is about feeling the future, which is was

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>much later on, so later that was about again, yes,

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So that one I think I'm right is

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>about meta analysis where you put lots of studies together

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and when we put them together, we found a kind

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>of null effect. And then there's lots and lots of

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>endless debate about that paper. I think it's still one

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of my most cited papers because so many people have

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>disagreed with it and got to arguments about it. So

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a very contentious paper. And actually one of the

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>reasons why I left the field. I don't do much

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>parasitology now because it was so unpleasant to be consistently

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>opening your email and as criticism and argument, and I

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>was going to conferences and arguing about it, and after

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a while I was just thinking, I don't really want

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to spend my entire life arguing about this stuff. And

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>then that's where I moved into the luck work and

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the more sort of positive aspects of change.

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Because after about ten twelve years in parapsychology. I thought

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd said everything I needed to say, and you know,

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like literally, these beliefs really do matter to some people.

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And so the debates do get quite heated sometimes it does.

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 2>And you know, there are such a part the worry

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 2>right now of the telepathy tapes, and I want to

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>get that.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, don't know about them other than yeah, I haven't

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>listened to them or anything like that. But isn't it

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>amazing that this stuff, you know, that the unsinkable rubber

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>duck hypothesis. You know, you keep on batting it down,

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it keeps on coming back in different forms.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well you do keep batting it down. You took

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 2>on their gangs felts. Can you just describe the methodology

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 2>of a gangs felt? So so on listening to know

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 2>what what? How do we test for this stuff?

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so testing for this stuff is complicated with the

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>gangs felt normally, not always, but normally you're doing send

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a receiver telepathy type study. You take one person and

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you put them with sort of into a gags felt state.

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You put half ping pong balls over their eyes, you

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>put white noise into their ears, you put a red

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>light into their face. And it allows them to turn

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>their attention inwards and they talk about the thoughts and

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>images that come to mind for whatever it is. Twenty minutes.

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>In another room, you have what's called the sender who's

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>given a randomly selected video clip or picture to look at,

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and then at the end of the day you look

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>at the correspondence between that clip and what was being

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>said by the receiver. And I won't go into the

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>stats of it, but you should get about twenty five

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>percent hits. One in four of those trials should be

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and what's called a hit. When you run those studies,

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>some people getting thirty two percent, thirty five percent, and

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that was statistically significant. I it suggested that psychic ability existed.

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Our analysis didn't show that. And that's where it all

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>started to get a word nasty. But Gansfort studies are

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>still going on, and the debate is still going on.

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, the debate is still very much going on. Yeah,

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 2>people will still people will keep pointing out to me,

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 2>but what about jb Ryan's work? What about Jim you know?

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 2>And I read you know, I read Reach of the Mind.

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 2>It's actually one one of my favorite books. I have

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 2>on my bookshelf whenever I do my esp mentalism. I

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>give a whole story about you know, this is actually

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 2>how they tested for this, and and and the argument

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 2>I keep getting from from the scientists who are also believers,

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, is that you know, just in meta analysis

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't invalidate you know, the ones that like it. We

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 2>did find it, like we saw it with our own eyes.

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, you can't, like, no men analysis can strike

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>that from the record. So I find it hard, like

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to do what to do with that? Like, how can

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 2>we ever progress the field if we're just arguing meta

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 2>analysis versus those who are like, but I found the

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 2>effect at one point. Just because you know, on average

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 2>there's it's a chance, doesn't mean that we didn't find it.

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I, if I understand your question correctly, is

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>how you are I mean a lot of paris ecologists

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>have had personal experience of this stuff, so they've had

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>experience which that they think proves side and after that

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they're out to prove it, and experiments are a way

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of doing that and investigating this leg stability. But I

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>think one has to park that and argue it on

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the evidence. And one of the things that parapsychology shows

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>us is evidence can be a bit squishier than we thought,

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and just arguing on evidence can get problematic. So you know,

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Ben did his studies that we spoke about earlier on.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Since then he's tried to replicate it quite rightly. He

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>with two large scale replications that haven't worked, and so

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the evidence for that doesn't look so good. But that's

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>what we have to fall back on. And the scientific method,

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly in psychology, isn't very accurate. You know, it's squishy.

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>There will be errors. What we believe today we're probably

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to believe in six months a year's time.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, as there's models of the mind get better

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and better, we hope more and more accurate. We'll make

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>errors along the way, and we just must get better

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>at dealing with the uncertainties of evidence. People like certainty.

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>They like to know that you know, X and Y

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen. It's not like that in psychology.

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a place where ambiguity thrives, and it's

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>only really over time, when you've got enough evidence collected

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on certain conditions, you can make certain conclusions. But it

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>will take some time.

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I don't even know if there's anything you

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 2>would find evidence wise that would convince the believers.

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, I mean that's be true that, as

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we said, the same might be true the skeptics. No

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>matter what evidence you give them, sometimes they change, you know.

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>We like our entrenched positions, and it probably you know,

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>whenever I was doing that stuff in public stuff, I

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>was always seeing it like a kind of curve where

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you have the extreme believers one in, extreme skeptics the other.

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You're probably not going to change their minds, but there's

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in the middle who don't haven't

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>made up their minds, and they're the people that you're

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to inform as accurately as you can. But it

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>will take time. I mean this, you know, JP Ryan

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>was what nineteen thirties, nineteen forties. We're also one hundred

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>years on from that. We're still having the same debates,

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but will slowly get there. As you will rule psychology.

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 2>We will. And I appreciate your your very rigorous research.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I really liked your paper Think of a Card. I

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 2>like the title A retrospective analysis. The subtitles a little

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 2>more boring, but a retrospective analysis of a classic ESP

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 2>experiment from twenty twenty one you found. The results do

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>not provide evidence for psychic functioning, but they do suggest

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 2>and this is I want to know that data that

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 2>the public's preference for particular playing cards has remained fairly stable.

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 2>So I always hear from my film Magicins females like

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Queen of Hearts and men love Ace of Speeds. Is

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 2>that still true?

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't always did a gender split there, But what

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:54.959
<v Speaker 1>we were showing there was that somebody did a very

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>similar thing in the nineteen I think it was twenties.

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Side of Psychic Research did it where they

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>asked lots of people to name a playing cards. We

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>had that data, and then we also had the data

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for much more recent studies, and it turns out pretty

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>much the same. So preferences, population, stereotypes, if you like,

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for playing cards haven't changed over that time. That the

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>problem it gives magicians is you are right that when

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you say name a card, people tend to say Queen

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a Heart, says the Spades. But the issue is that

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think people also know they're commonly called cards, and

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>so there's almost no point in predicting them or using

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>them in a trick. I mean, you want to get

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>things impressive. You want to say, name a card, but

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>don't make it obvious. One way Spades or Queen of Hearts.

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>At least you've taken out that avenue because as you

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>know good magic, you know there's lots of different methods,

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and to get a really good effect, you need to

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>take out all of those methods. And we're mentalism oh

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Everyone says that is one of those those

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of methods.

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 2>So this is I mean, you really are consistently finding

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 2>in lots of different Methodologi's lots of different ways. Really

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 2>is not a psychic effect, but you do find some

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 2>things that I still think are extraordinarily interesting, maybe just interesting.

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 2>And that's that people who do believe in supernatural phenomenon

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 2>tend to have certain personality characteristics or certain psychological attributes.

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I love that you did a whole review of this.

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Can you tell you you did extensive You looked at intelligence,

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, like cognitive ability, critical thinking, belief in psychic ability.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Who are what is the type of person? Can you

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 2>just outline the type of person who really kind of

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 2>sees the supernatural everywhere they look.

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not just myself. Lots of people looked at

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that literature and continue to look at it. The cognitive

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff certainly in terms of if you want to use

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the word intelligence r i Q doesn't tend to bear out.

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>What tends to be more accurate is it's people who

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>are high on hypnotic susceptibility, so they make good hypnosis subjects.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>They're high on imagination, they're intuitive thinkers. They score high

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>on what's called openness, which is sort of a measure

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of creativity. That's what tends to cluster around belief in

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the paranormal. And that kind of makes sense because to

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>make the paranormal attribution, you have to be quite open

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to something which isn't really sort of widely believed in

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Western society at least. And second, you're often making a

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>connection between two events. So if you have a dream

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and then the following day something happens, you have to

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>see some kind of correspondence between that dream and what happened.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And the more creative you are, the better ability you

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have to see those correspondences. So you might in your

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>dream see and make something up a ship coming in

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to port, and the next day a friend offers you

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a new job. Well, if you're not very creative, you go,

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing like a ship coming into port and a

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>new job. And then if you are creative, you go, oh, yes,

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>but a ship coming in that represents opportunity in my

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>dream world. And look I was off this job at

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Radical Change and so on. So it is it makes

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>sense that people who have these sorts of experiences and

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they tend to then underpin belief, have those sorts of

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of ways of seeing the world. But it's not

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>very related to quotes, intelligence or education levels. It goes

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>across gender, goes across age, goes across time. I mean,

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>belief in ESP you go back to Ryan's day, is

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>not far off of what it is now. So in

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the UK we hit about fifty five percent consistently belief

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in the ESP, about forty percent for ghosts. We like

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>our ghosts over here, and those figures haven't changed much

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>while I was looking at it for about decade.

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:46.919
<v Speaker 2>There's a new study I don't know if you saw

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.879
<v Speaker 2>a really restart off the press study connected by Paul

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Silver and as colleagues on who seems to enjoy magic, Yes,

0:34:55.840 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and they found two very different kinds of people. You know,

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>you one hand, you get the skeptical rational folk is

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 2>a subclass, and then you ask on the other hand,

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 2>you get what you're describing the more superstitious paranormal folk.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 2>But they both seem to equally love it, but for

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>different reasons. Probably.

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true of performing, isn't it. I mean,

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that when you do a magic trick, there

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>are some people that if you paid the money, they

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to know what the solution is. They enjoy

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that magical experience, and other people would pay you for

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the solution and so and of course there's a magician.

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to appeal to both sets. And I think

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>magicians themselves tend to fall into the latter class. They

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>tend to be about methods, how things are done, that

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>was clever and so on, and I think they forget

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that most people are in the former They just want

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>to have this wonderful, pleasant, entertaining experience. And so there's

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a mismatch sometimes between audience and performer.

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>And the other problem I think from a can I

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 1>solve it point of view is the whole point of

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>magic is you can't you know, to use that phrase,

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>it gives you a stone in your shoe. You go

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>around thinking well, it can't be that. It can't be that.

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's very clever because it's not only an individual

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>can't solve it. If you're doing close up magic at

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a table and you walk away, you know everyone's going

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about that trick as a group. They

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 1>can't solve it otherwise, you know, otherwise it's a bad trick.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's very interesting from a problem solving point of view.

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But for me, the challenge, and this goes right back

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to how twin friends and influence people, is how do

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you do magic and remain likable? I mean, the yeah,

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the contract is, you know, there's this trick I'm doing

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and people go right, well, what's the secret and you say,

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you, and they're supposed to like you

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for that. I mean, we don't like people that don't

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us secrets. I cannot perform for my friends. I

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>mean I find it simply impossible because they're just going

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to go, well, how's that done? That? As a friend,

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I would normally tell them anything like that, and you

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>still have to go, oh, I can't tell you. So

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the challenge for magicians is actually to

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>remain likable what'st doing this weird activity of essentially lying

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to people.

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think being likable is like half the battle

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of being a good magician, especially if you do walk around,

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, and getting people receptive to even just I think.

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>It's more more than half the battle. Getting people into

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>that state of mind where they don't care in a

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>good way. How the trick is done is absolutely key

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>to it. You know, magicians are entertainers. Well, and it's

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult.

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, what are your thoughts. What do you

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 2>think of mentalism? I'm obsessed. I love mentalism and I

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.439
<v Speaker 2>and just personally it suits me and I finally gets

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 2>a better reaction than the car tracks. But I just

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 2>find that nothing beats the reaction of like, hey, can

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess your favorite movie?

0:37:59.120 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that?

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's talk about that, let's nerd out about that.

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 2>I there's some people I've asked people why. They're like,

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 2>this is something different. They're like, this is something else

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 2>that you know, like, yeah, I liked all those other

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 2>card tricks you did, and I like, you know, yeah,

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 2>you made a card go through a whole you know case.

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's nice. Okay, But like if you, I

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 2>guess someone's first crush. People feel like that's something different.

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not magic anymore. It's just pure mind reading, and

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 2>it takes it to a different realm. Even though I'm

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm honest, I'm not. I don't say like, oh, I'm psychic,

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 2>you know dot, I don't say I'm psychic, but it

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 2>almost Sometimes when I say that, some people who are

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 2>really into that stuff will be like, well, that's what

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 2>a psychic would say, or that's what a magician would say,

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 2>who is actually psychic. I don't know why that is

0:38:56.520 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 2>what I would say, but anyway, so there's some there's

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 2>something else going on with mentalism in terms of how

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.919
<v Speaker 2>it hits people a personal, like a deep personal, because

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:09.240
<v Speaker 2>you're like going into their minds apparently, and that's different

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>than the separation you have from magic.

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. I think it's a few things.

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>One is you're right, it's normally personal to them. But

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>also I think it's more plausible. I mean, if you're

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna put a coin your hand to make it disappear,

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.800
<v Speaker 1>No one actually believes that. Maybe at some point in

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>history they did, but they don't now. Mentalism, Oh, the

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>idea that somebody could read my mind. What do you

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>believe in esp you believe that if it's a psychological illusion, Oh,

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at your body language. Well, we know that

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>we give off tells in body language. We read each

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>other's body language all the time. Maybe this person is

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just super good at it. So in a sense, it

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>removes exactly what I was talking about before, which is

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the stone in the shoe, that that they have got

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 1>an explanation, so they don't look for any other explanation,

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that's part of the appeal. I

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's the same experience as seeing physical magic.

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a different experience because you're seeing something

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>remarkable rather than something impossible. You have got working hypotheses

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in your head. That may not be what the performer

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is doing, of course, but still it feels like to me,

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's closer if you went to the circus. I'm going

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to the circus in two days. If I go to

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the circus and there's flying trapeze people and they do

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 1>a triple, I go, oh, my goodness. I know you've

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>dedicated your life to that, and I believe that is

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a genuine display of physical skill. And I go, oh,

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, incredible. If I found out actually just on

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 1>a rig and they're being held up by wires, it's

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:56.439
<v Speaker 1>not really a triple, I would be devastated. Yes, that's

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>not the experience I'm paying for. And I think mentally

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of occupies that space. It's like I'm seeing something remarkable.

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's this, maybe it's that. But it's very different

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to magic, which we know is a trick. I think

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>that's why, in part, why people like it. So it's

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a very powerful tool. It's been around for a

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>long time in one form or another, and it always

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>piggybacks on public belief. You know when when public did

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>believe in spirits and seances, well the mentalists were doing that,

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's the esp they were doing that. Now it's

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>all about body language. Well they're doing that. So it

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>has an interesting kind of evolution.

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:43.879
<v Speaker 2>I think. Yeah, but it's very cultural irrelevant right now

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 2>with the telepathy deeps, the the topic deeps in popularity,

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I feel like mentalism is like cool again,

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's like it's bad, we're back.

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, And also depend on performance. I mean, over here

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we have Darren Brown that that style of magic was

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 1>not particularly popular until Darren came along. He's an astonishing performer,

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly you see everybody doing all that kind of stuff.

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. Oh yeah, well yeah, yeah.

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Yeah, that's amazing.

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean he's first special if you look

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the very first one really filmed at the university, yea, yeah,

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he does a a stunt demonstration be twins. I'm there,

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and then I helped out with a couple of the

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>TV programs and stuff, and he's astonishing. I actually thought

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>invented a mind reading item, and I'm not I don't

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>do mentalism, but I showed it to him and it

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was involved in book. He took it off me, performed

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>it himself in two seconds and fooled me with my

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>own creation. I mean, he's he's really really good. So yeah,

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it's great.

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 2>He's so intelligent, you know as well. Yeah, that's so cool.

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 2>When I used to teach cognitive psychology and n y U,

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I would show video of his stuff, and that was

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.839
<v Speaker 2>way back when I didn't even know anything about how

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 2>he actually did stuff. So he actually foroled me. He

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 2>actually fooled me in a sense, like I used an

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 2>example of like how we can really influence people's minds

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:19.240
<v Speaker 2>by articulously, you know, like putting things in the environment.

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, you know what I'm saying. But so anyway,

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 2>but once you've got.

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>That explanation, so I've you and I have been to

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of magic conventions. Yeah, there's very big one

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up next week in this country at Blackpool. I

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.359
<v Speaker 1>will see the air back, but I will see stuff there.

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going this year, but when I normally go,

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.919
<v Speaker 1>I will see stuff that blows me away. I've got

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 1>no idea, But in magic forties, I've got no idea

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>how it's done. When I go and see psychics work,

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and I've sat in on some genuine seances, it's awful.

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>The trickery is awful. And the reason is it doesn't

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>need to be any better because no one's looking for

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a trick to commune with the spirits, true, and so

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't They don't need to be good magicians or

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>good tricksters. It's the magicians that need to be because

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows they're watching a magic trick. So it's it's

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:15.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting that the power of that frame of saying,

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>actually this is genuine or this is body language or

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever is. It prevents people going any deeper where magicians

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>don't have that frame. They're saying it's a trick and

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone's going good. This is a challenge. I'll try and

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>work the outlet.

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 2>What a terrific point. You know. People are I mean

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 2>seanswers what are they called? Psychic psychic sancewers.

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we've done. I've done loads of fake saliances, probably

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred sort of dark room seances. I love doing them. Well.

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 2>The ones that professionally, you know do they have it

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.799
<v Speaker 2>easier because their audience is coming to them with just

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, no question, this is true, right, you know,

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 2>that's far better than having to perform in a drunk

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 2>you know bar with the skeptical you know girl who's

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 2>like okay, well I'm going to change my mind now

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and trying to fool you totally.

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And you go along to a spiritualist church or a

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>psychic reading, you know whatever. People are there to be

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 1>receptive when you say, you know what they're making, they're

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>doing all the work for you. Go along for a

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>palm reading or crystal ball really whatever it is. They

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 1>are there to do that work for you. Magicians will

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>never get away with that stuff because they're tending it

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in it and it can be the same people. The

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>same people at one minute will be believing of a

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>palm reading will be very skeptical of magicians trying to

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:34.720
<v Speaker 1>solve the trick the next because they've switched. They've switched frames.

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:41.280
<v Speaker 2>That is so funny and interesting about humans, just that fact. Yeah,

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 2>so you don't think we can commune with the dead.

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen convincing evidence of that. I've seen convincing

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>evidence of a lack of communicating with the dead. We've

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:57.839
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of fake seances that goes back as

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a magician actor in this country called Andy Nan, who

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>works with Darren a lot actually, and some of Andy's

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>first shows with me doing these fake seances when we

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 1>were both very very young performers, and it was incredible.

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>We have these sort of loominous objects moving around in

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the dark and so on, so much fun music, traditional

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Victorian methods. They're very simple, but still for people because

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're in the darkness, you're very vulnerable. You can't

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>tell how far away objects are or where people are

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>and so on. So yeah, I had a lot of

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>fun doing that that stuff.

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:35.280
<v Speaker 2>My my friend Spencer Greenberg did a ward scale study

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 2>about astrologists and and wanted to know do they really

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:43.800
<v Speaker 2>believe this is true? And he found that an awful lot,

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe even the majority. I mean, they really believe in

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:50.840
<v Speaker 2>what they're not like, it's not like they're they're trying

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 2>to pour fast one over others. But and so I said,

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 2>now do psychics is what I said. He's like, Hey,

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 2>that'll be my next study. But I want to know

0:46:57.840 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 2>if you have any insight into that, because I do,

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Like I have some friends who are mediums. They're professional mediums,

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 2>and I don't, you know, I don't feel like it's

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 2>my place, Like I get the sense of my talk

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 2>to them. They actually believe they are mediums. They are

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 2>communicating with the dead. So I don't think all mediums are,

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, doing the trickery and conscious of their trickery.

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Is there something else going on where like I don't

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 2>know what it is, Like in my head, it just

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 2>seems so obvious that if I'm doing trickery, I know

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing trickery. I can't imagine. I can't imagine myself

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 2>doing trickery not knowing it. But there seems to be

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a case where a lot of psychics believe their psychics,

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and why do they believe their psychics?

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, they're not doing tricks per se. Most of

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>those are being doing readings. I think when you get

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to like to say, physical phenomena, the sunes room phenomena,

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 1>then they are tricking people, and they would know about that.

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Most of them are doing readings. So what happens there?

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Somebody sits down, you come up with a reading, and

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the person goes, my goodness, that's incredibly accurate, and you

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>could easily see how that gets internalized of oh, I've

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>got some kind of gifts. Then, because the feedback you're

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 1>getting so my auntswer used to be up until a

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>few months ago, I think the vast majority of them

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>believe their own kind of abilities. However, I then met

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a friend of mine who works as a professional psychic,

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you're kidding me. He said, I go

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>out every day as all my colleagues do. We say

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the same thing to people. All the readings are the same,

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>he said, I might a minor variation in but people

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>are endorsing the same reading night after night. There's no

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 1>way we're doing that and not realizing that most of

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:45.439
<v Speaker 1>it is blowney. So he flipped me the other way.

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:48.320
<v Speaker 1>He said, what keeps you going are the amazing hits?

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>He said, sometimes you go into a weird space and

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you get hit, and that's what convinces you. But most

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of the time, he said, you know what, We're all

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just saying the same thing and getting the same feedback.

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know.

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I then flip back a little bit.

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Why this is fastening insights? So thank you? Why are

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 2>they ethically okay with that?

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean mentalists, you asked the same question to them.

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>You know that after they don't say to people this

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is a trick. They'll say I'm doing X, Y and

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Z and try and keep them away from the trick work.

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:24.239
<v Speaker 2>But psychics are an entertainers.

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the greater good argument. So the argument is

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 1>for some greater Well, you could say within an entertainment context,

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:36.359
<v Speaker 1>it's all fine, and psychics would probably say the same.

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of it is within entertainment, or I suspect

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>most of them will do a greater good argument, which

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is that it's hard in this country to get access

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to a therapist. Most people can't afford that it's not

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.840
<v Speaker 1>on the national health system. Over here, they give somebody

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:55.399
<v Speaker 1>attention for twenty minutes and it helps that person. And

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the evidence is that I think they're right that most

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:02.399
<v Speaker 1>people enjoy going to psychics and find it helpful. When

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you do those kind of studies, that's probably ethically where

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they go, is my guess.

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:11.240
<v Speaker 2>I see. So you really don't think there's any evidence

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 2>at all for the idea that psychic ability is an

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 2>individual differences variable, that there really are some people on

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 2>this planet that have this gift.

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say it, no, wady Oviously, it's loads of evidence.

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:28.240
<v Speaker 1>You look at upstairs. I've got all the parapsychology journals.

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>They're full of evidence. The question is is it convincing.

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't find it particularly convincing, but who knows. Maybe

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that will change in the future. There's certainly an argument

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>there for carrying out those studies. If you're getting into

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 1>psychically gifted people, you know, those that can sit down

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and instantly do this stuff, and it's a very large

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>effect size, Well that's very easy to test, and I

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>find those tests of the gifted psychics completely unconvincing. So

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 1>most of the lab evidence is it's like a psychologic experiment.

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You test two hundred people. You put all their results together,

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's slightly better than chance. That's very different to you know,

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the psychic that goes. I can turn this thing on,

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:10.799
<v Speaker 1>tell you all about future dead, easy to test, and

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:13.320
<v Speaker 1>normally completely unconvincing the results of those tests.

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 2>It's all sad, like I want there to be I

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 2>want this to exist. Good thing would be interesting. Well

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 2>what do you do you.

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Though, I mean it would it would change some people

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>got different worldviews. I mean, if you believe in life

0:51:27.080 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>after death. I guess that's kind of comforting. This is

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:33.319
<v Speaker 1>what lies about the future, is that it's uncertain. If

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I knew what the future held for you and it was,

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, awful, and I told you that and you

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 1>knew I was correct, I'm not certain that's an uplifting

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that's true.

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 2>I think that there is an individual differences variable that's

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 2>relevant here, even though it's not psychic ability. And that

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:54.560
<v Speaker 2>was the major topic of my pH D, wasn't plsit learning.

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I think there are some people who really do, like

0:51:57.520 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I was curious, Like IQ tests have been studied, but

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 2>they're in an implicit intelligence that are some people generally

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:10.320
<v Speaker 2>better at unconscious pattern recognition and or non conscious patterned recognition.

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:11.960
<v Speaker 2>How does that correlate with IQ? So that was my

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 2>cognition paper, was showing a zero correlation between the two. Yeah,

0:52:16.120 --> 0:52:19.839
<v Speaker 2>and I was like the first to really adopt those

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 2>implicit learning tasks and the cognitive science literature for individual differences.

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:24.360
<v Speaker 2>So that was my dissertation.

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So you tell me what's an implicit learning task.

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 2>One one would be like the zero reaction time task

0:52:31.719 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 2>where you have people just press a key corresponding to

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 2>a letter as fast as they can, and we look

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:43.399
<v Speaker 2>at reaction times and we see that some people over

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 2>time without any understanding or recognition of it because you

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 2>need you debrief them at the end. You're like, do

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:51.400
<v Speaker 2>you think you learned anything from this boring ass task?

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:55.480
<v Speaker 2>And they're like no, And some of them actually were

0:52:55.560 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 2>much quicker at learning the reoccurring like very complex pattern

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.919
<v Speaker 2>And that's one example. Another thing would be like Arthur

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Weber's artificial grammar eLearning task, where some people, after being

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 2>exposed to lots of different a fake grammar, actually learned

0:53:13.760 --> 0:53:18.919
<v Speaker 2>the principles better statistical warning. You know, it's how other

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:20.879
<v Speaker 2>people would in the order to describe.

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:23.839
<v Speaker 1>It years ago. I don't if this council night. It's

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not my field. I did a ESP thing with an

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:29.400
<v Speaker 1>entire class where I had deck of cards I stacked

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:32.479
<v Speaker 1>red red black, red, red black, red, red black, and

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:35.359
<v Speaker 1>as people try to guess it, and they didn't pick

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 1>up on the pattern consciously, but they slowly got better

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:42.440
<v Speaker 1>as a group. Yes, and then slowly thought that And

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you can see in which differences in there. We never

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:46.439
<v Speaker 1>looked at it, but they slowly thought there was ESP

0:53:46.800 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 1>emerging because on different groups of trials they were slowly

0:53:50.719 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 1>getting better. So I didn't that would count as the

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:52.839
<v Speaker 1>same thing.

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 2>It would, it would, it really would. That could have

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:57.840
<v Speaker 2>been another task that, you know, we added to our battery.

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 2>So at the general level, yeah, people show their significant

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:04.520
<v Speaker 2>effects of pussering and and there are individual differences. Both

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 2>are true at the same time. So I am just

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking that I really do think there are some people

0:54:09.600 --> 0:54:13.319
<v Speaker 2>who are more intuitive whatever, you know, Like I think

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:16.560
<v Speaker 2>it's scientifically, scientifically that means something that's not like a

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 2>woo woo statement. And and I don't think it's just

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the high intelligence people. This is something I wanted to

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 2>point out, you know. It's like, so I have I

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:28.359
<v Speaker 2>think called the dual process theory of intelligence. But so

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that with psychics with you know, a lot

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:32.719
<v Speaker 2>of these mediums that I meet. I have a friend

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 2>who's a medium, for instance, and I find her the

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:40.320
<v Speaker 2>most like she's like emotionally open in an incredible way.

0:54:40.800 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 2>She is just so open. And we found a correlation

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:46.719
<v Speaker 2>between and PUSS learning and openness to experience the personality.

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Trait, which is the one I was talking about before

0:54:48.320 --> 0:54:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with stuff. Yeah.

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but but but you meet someone with three forced

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:56.840
<v Speaker 2>inner deviations that mean an openness to experience, and it

0:54:56.920 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 2>is a different kind of person yes, And and I'm

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 2>not saying this is magical, but I'm saying there is

0:55:03.280 --> 0:55:06.239
<v Speaker 2>something there that I think, you know, we could do

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 2>well to appreciate more as an individual differences variable. And

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:11.720
<v Speaker 2>it's a talent, it's a skill even though it doesn't

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:14.320
<v Speaker 2>we don't necessarily have to go to their psychic level.

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 2>But they're picking up on lots of nuances.

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's right. But my understanding is you'd

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>only have those intuitive thoughts and trust them when you've

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of experience with whatever it is that

0:55:25.280 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you're you're doing. Ye, And so you know, I've given

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:32.320
<v Speaker 1>talks on psychology. I give a lot of public talks,

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, there's one particular talk on luck I've

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:38.719
<v Speaker 1>given hundreds of times. During that talk, often I'll get

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 1>an intuitive feeling about that audience that I need to

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:43.279
<v Speaker 1>do this or there's going to be a problem coming up,

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's normally always right. Well, that's because I've given

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the talk so many times, you know. I often say

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when I teach public speaking, silence is odd in a

0:55:53.000 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 1>group because board silence sounds different to interested silence, and

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:00.560
<v Speaker 1>if you've given a lot of talks, you can hear

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference. There's a very subtle difference in board silence

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and interesting. So intuitively I'll go, I have to make

0:56:06.760 --> 0:56:08.399
<v Speaker 1>this more interesting now because I can hear the group

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of board or actually I can take them down that

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:12.319
<v Speaker 1>root because I can hear that they're interesting. I'm not

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:16.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that. I'm just intuitively doing it. So yeah, absolutely,

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think intuition is really important. I think, perhaps, well,

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at this half my ideas for studies and books and

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so on come to me in dreams. I often wake

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 1>up and write down dreams because that's that's where they

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>manifest themselves, solutions to problems and solved, so we shouldn't

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:34.319
<v Speaker 1>throw the baby out with the bath water.

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, I agree. Are you Are you familiar

0:56:43.160 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 2>with Diane Pale's research?

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not. No.

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Diane Hennessy Pale she studies the science of esp and

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 2>she's one of the ones who was featured on the

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Telepathy Teeps podcast. I just had her on my podcast,

0:56:57.239 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 2>so I can I can send you my chat with

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 2>her as well. She seems to be pretty we I mean,

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 2>I guess we both describe ourselves as open skeptics, you know,

0:57:06.160 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 2>which I think is probably the right way to be.

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:10.719
<v Speaker 2>And well, obviously I think it's the right way to

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:13.720
<v Speaker 2>be if that's where I am. But yeah, but doctor Powell,

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 2>she really believes, you know, there's something here. But when

0:57:18.040 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 2>we talked about this, picking up the nuance and stuff,

0:57:20.680 --> 0:57:23.080
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting because a lot of these auto there's something

0:57:23.120 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 2>special here with autistic savants that I think is worth

0:57:26.800 --> 0:57:30.640
<v Speaker 2>further investigation because they're completely nonverbal. I think there in

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 2>plicit learning ability is I did some research at Cambridge,

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 2>University of Cambridge on this topic and I'm gonna I'm

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:41.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna collaborate with UH with uh Simon Baron Cohen to

0:57:41.520 --> 0:57:43.520
<v Speaker 2>test some of these kids, you know from the telep

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Day tapes, because I think there's something, there's something, there's

0:57:46.600 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 2>something here. It's really interesting where if you're completely nonverbal,

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 2>if you're completely uh yeah, completely nonverbal, and you really

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:58.439
<v Speaker 2>hone this incredible ability to just be observant to regularities

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and patterns you're not like in by language so much,

0:58:03.360 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 2>it can really you can become, like you know, talking

0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:07.840
<v Speaker 2>about ericson ten years of deliberate practice, you could become

0:58:07.920 --> 0:58:11.080
<v Speaker 2>such an expert in something that it can really blow

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:13.880
<v Speaker 2>people's minds, you know. And you found in the telepty

0:58:13.960 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 2>tapes that it's usually the mother or the person that

0:58:17.720 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 2>the child. As soon as you bring in like a stranger,

0:58:19.760 --> 0:58:23.440
<v Speaker 2>they can't read their mind anymore. And yeah, I kept

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:25.400
<v Speaker 2>bringing that up. I was like, I was like, I

0:58:25.600 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 2>want to double cook on that, because there's something about that,

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Like if I spend enough time with anyone, you start

0:58:30.720 --> 0:58:33.280
<v Speaker 2>to find like like couples start to complete each other's sentences.

0:58:33.280 --> 0:58:37.800
<v Speaker 2>They don't call themselves psychics, right, They start to know

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 2>each other so well. So I think there's something going

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 2>on there where like these kids get to know their

0:58:43.040 --> 0:58:43.920
<v Speaker 2>moms so well.

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:46.400
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting I mean, I don't know that work. The

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:49.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff I do know, which is about psychology of lying,

0:58:50.080 --> 0:58:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is actually the opposite, which is that when people know

0:58:52.680 --> 0:58:56.960
<v Speaker 1>each other well, they are less able to detect lies

0:58:57.320 --> 0:59:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in their partner's long term friends. But the reason for

0:59:00.400 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that is they exhibit what's called a truth bias, which

0:59:03.160 --> 0:59:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is they don't want to believe their partners and friends

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 1>are lying, so they always say truth on it. So

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is slightly different, but yeah, I guess that could be true.

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting, exciting idea, and yeah, look into it,

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:18.120
<v Speaker 1>go for it. I mean, that gets full circle. That

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:20.560
<v Speaker 1>feels like a meaningful thing to do one way or another.

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. Just to conclude this interview with success

0:59:24.960 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 2>in life, a big.

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:28.960
<v Speaker 1>We haven't touched on at all after saying we would

0:59:29.040 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>do at the.

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Beginning, Yeah, I'm happy to do it now for a

0:59:31.960 --> 0:59:34.240
<v Speaker 2>little bit, a couple of minutes, because I am really

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:37.360
<v Speaker 2>fascinated with a thread that runs through multiple of your books,

0:59:37.400 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and that's from positive thinking to positive action. I think

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 2>that summarizes a lot of the thread that runs, like

0:59:44.960 --> 0:59:48.600
<v Speaker 2>just act already, you know, and can you kind of

0:59:48.600 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 2>explain to me the differencely parsive thinking positive acting And

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:53.800
<v Speaker 2>are you kind of yeah, why do you think action

0:59:53.960 --> 0:59:55.640
<v Speaker 2>is so important for success in life?

0:59:55.960 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I just think as humans we learn by doing stuff.

1:00:00.800 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>There's only so many simulations you can run in your head.

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So for me, if I'm inventing a magic trick, I

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>can think of something I think that will work and

1:00:09.240 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>much small change here, or if I'm doing one of

1:00:11.080 --> 1:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the quackology videos. But you know what, nothing beats getting

1:00:14.960 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>out a deck of cars or whatever it is and

1:00:17.160 --> 1:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>doing it for a real person and you suddenly find

1:00:19.880 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>out that thing that you thought would fly they detect

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in two seconds, and something else that you thought would

1:00:24.640 --> 1:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be awful actually turns out to be brilliant. We learn

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>by doing. And if you look at this on the

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>most successful people, they do they don't just talk about it.

1:00:35.400 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Many many, many, many many years ago, I sat up

1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in a tree house with a good friend of mine,

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Owen, now a very famous European scientist. I know,

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I know Adrian, and I go back to ucl We

1:00:48.040 --> 1:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>were undergraduates together and we shared a flat together. We

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>did the stuff in Covent Garden was jointed with.

1:00:53.400 --> 1:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Adrian don wonderful, wonderful.

1:00:56.600 --> 1:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So we sat there and We sat up in this

1:00:58.040 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>treehouse on our first holiday together in the south of

1:01:01.320 --> 1:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>England and we're talking about various plans and we made

1:01:05.360 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a pact, which is that if we mentioned an idea

1:01:08.520 --> 1:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>three times, we had to do it, and that we

1:01:12.640 --> 1:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>both of us have stayed with that throughout our lives.

1:01:15.800 --> 1:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>It's been thirty something years now that if you say

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>something three times, you have to do it instead of

1:01:22.200 --> 1:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>just talking about it. And it's a very good formula

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for success because you find out this thing's a terrible

1:01:27.560 --> 1:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>idea or a good idea or whatever, but you get

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>out there and when you get out there, you attract

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>other people because they find out what you're doing other

1:01:34.680 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like minded people or help you or whatever. So I'm

1:01:38.000 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge fan of doing where a lot of psychology

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>self help is about thinking and thinking differently where I think,

1:01:46.000 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what, just get on and do it. The

1:01:48.040 --> 1:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>worst that happened is you'll fail and you'll learn something,

1:01:51.680 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know. I did a show of the Edber Fringe

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:57.919
<v Speaker 1>here last year in August, and normally do magic shows. Well,

1:01:58.000 --> 1:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the first one wasn't my best show, to put it mildly,

1:02:01.640 --> 1:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but you have to do ten in a row and

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>by the time you hit show ten, it was pretty

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>tight and I could sat at home imagining this wonderful

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>show and how funny and hilarious it was going to be.

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter until you're out there doing it. That's what

1:02:15.240 --> 1:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you learn.

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Such a deep truth and you know that that is

1:02:18.720 --> 1:02:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the thread that runs through so much of your discussions

1:02:21.080 --> 1:02:24.240
<v Speaker 2>about happiness. And and I'm a super interested integrating your

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:27.400
<v Speaker 2>work with Darren Brown's work on happiness. You know, the

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 2>psychology of happiness, Yes.

1:02:31.080 --> 1:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, and it's great and I think, I mean,

1:02:34.320 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>happiness is slightly different to success, but the two of

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>them are heavily related. Slightly different, but I just think

1:02:43.160 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we're very good at, you know, whatever it is. So

1:02:48.320 --> 1:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I always say to my students, you know, there'll be

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>some passion you've got in life, and you can you

1:02:55.240 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>can pursue psychology if you want, but you'll be far

1:02:58.200 --> 1:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>more successful if you pursue that passion. And pursue means

1:03:01.240 --> 1:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>get out there and do it, don't just think about

1:03:03.720 --> 1:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it or talk about it or whatever. And that was

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>great about psychology is you often combine those two. If

1:03:09.960 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you love horse riding, where you can do the psychology

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of horse riding if you love running, you do the

1:03:14.200 --> 1:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>psychology of running, and you'll be the only person in

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the world that has those Probably that those two things combined,

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>therefore you become an expert and you spend longer doing

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it than anyone else. I spent all my life looking

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>psychology and magic. It doesn't feel like work. I love

1:03:28.840 --> 1:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>doing it. That idea of doing that psychology of magic

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff actually comes from Max Maven. I went to the

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Magic Castle when I was about eighteen nineteen and I

1:03:39.440 --> 1:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>said to Max, I'm thinking of being a professional magician.

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>He said, what's your other option? I said, a psychologist,

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and he said, combine them. You'll become one of the

1:03:46.720 --> 1:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>very few people looking in at psychology of magic. Boy,

1:03:49.960 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that was great advice.

1:03:52.360 --> 1:03:54.040
<v Speaker 2>You're giving me chills. You're giving me a chill. You're

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>a very inspirational figure to me. You really are. I

1:03:58.920 --> 1:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>feel the same way. I feel like there's so many

1:04:02.040 --> 1:04:06.440
<v Speaker 2>mentalists out specifically mentalism. There's so many mentalists out there

1:04:06.480 --> 1:04:11.880
<v Speaker 2>who say they do psychology, but the lane of psychologist,

1:04:11.920 --> 1:04:15.920
<v Speaker 2>like legit psychologists who do mentalism, I feel like, is

1:04:16.000 --> 1:04:19.720
<v Speaker 2>much smaller, and so for me that's exciting. You know,

1:04:19.800 --> 1:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of there's a lot of potential there

1:04:21.400 --> 1:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>to use mentalism to like unlock people's potential or like

1:04:24.600 --> 1:04:27.800
<v Speaker 2>show people that like you know, there there's you know,

1:04:27.840 --> 1:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the reach of their minds. Jb Ryan would say.

1:04:31.160 --> 1:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, probably every psychology paper is potentially a good presentation

1:04:34.400 --> 1:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>for a piece of mentalism, but you have to know

1:04:37.800 --> 1:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. But it goes beyond you know, magic. I

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think you know, every single undergraduate will have some passion

1:04:43.560 --> 1:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and often it's not psychology, it's something outside of that,

1:04:46.720 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and their eyes light up and they starts talking in

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a really energetic way when they're talking about that. And

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>tapping that energy and bringing it into psychology, you know,

1:04:55.440 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is one way and making it meaningful and probably means

1:04:57.840 --> 1:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a far more successful career.

1:04:59.360 --> 1:04:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:04:59.640 --> 1:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Working on a new for In show which will be

1:05:01.600 --> 1:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>out in August for magicians listening. I'll be over at

1:05:05.000 --> 1:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>FISM in July in Italy, which is a sort of

1:05:08.640 --> 1:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>week long celebration of magic, and also doing some other

1:05:13.440 --> 1:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>work which will be published very very soon. I've just

1:05:15.520 --> 1:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>seen that the paper before it goes into the journal,

1:05:18.280 --> 1:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at OPT collusions, particularly ambiguous OPT collusions to kind

1:05:22.960 --> 1:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of duck rabbit things. There's a new take on those.

1:05:25.440 --> 1:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So yes, still doing all this stuff after all these years.

1:05:29.600 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>But thank you for your kind comments throughout this.

1:05:32.360 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>It's very kind, of course I mean them. And I

1:05:35.200 --> 1:05:39.480
<v Speaker 2>love your videos on YouTube, so everyone check out Richard's

1:05:39.600 --> 1:05:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Escape from Prison. Check out Richard's Perception. You like playing

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:47.160
<v Speaker 2>a manipulating perception by putting things closer and farther away.

1:05:47.640 --> 1:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's all on the quacology channel and we did

1:05:50.760 --> 1:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that when. Yeah, and the sort of infancy a YouTube

1:05:53.120 --> 1:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>actually and now I meet people in their sort of

1:05:55.360 --> 1:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>mid twenties and going I watched it as a kid

1:05:57.520 --> 1:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>makes me feel terribly old, but delighted that since ring anyone.

1:06:01.240 --> 1:06:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, anyway, thank you so much, Richard, thank you for

1:06:03.320 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 2>your time today, Thanks for going to be on the podcast.

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:07.640
<v Speaker 2>And now I guess I'll catch you on the Secret

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Magic Facebook groups.

1:06:09.320 --> 1:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, please please do it lovely to chat to you.

1:06:11.320 --> 1:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you