WEBVTT - Admiral Stavridis: U.S. Is Entering A Period of Vulnerability

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot Com. It is time for Bloomberg Opinion,

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited now to welcome our next guest, Admiral

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>James Stabrita's retired Navy admiral, former military commando of NATO

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and of course Bloomberg Opinion columnist. Admiral what is the

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that most keeps you up at night right now?

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a plethora smore gas board if you like,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>things that I'm sure bother you and questions that you're

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to answer. But the particular one right now as

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we are, what three weeks out from the election, First

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and foremost, it's the distinct possibility of real turbulence domestically

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States after the election, and let's

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>hope for a clean win on election eve, but I

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think that's unlikely and therefore there'll be court challenges and

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so what worries me, Vonnie and keeps me awake at

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>night at the moment, and the things I worry about

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>in the international sphere is that an opponent might take

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>advantage of this period of weeks or even months of turbulence.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it will resolve by inauguration day one where

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>or the other. But you could see China making a

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>move on Taiwan. You could see Iran doing something in

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the Arabian Gulf. You could see North Korea rattle a

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>saber as they did just a couple of days ago,

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>rolling out a new I CBM. So that sense of

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>potential turbulence in the near term is the first thing

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I worry about, and the second one, less obvious, is

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>cyber um. We have moved so many things into the

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>cyber world, Vanni. I am concerned that our opponents might

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of that. And if you merge those two

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>things together, concern about cyber and that turbulence after the election,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're headed into a period of vulnerability. That's

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 1>what keeps me awake at night right now. Why wouldn't

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>those opponents take advantage, Admiral, Can you give us reasons

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>why it would not be in their interest to do thus,

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 1>because long term, uh, the United States will come out

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of this period capable, ready to respond. We have the

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>most capable military in the world, so we have military deterres.

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>We still have the strongest economy in the world. It

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>will come out somewhat battered, as I don't need to

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>tell a blue Berg columnist, and China is having a

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>better swifter recovery. But I wouldn't bet against the United

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>States in the long term. So I think our opponents

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>are smart enough. I hope to realize that we have

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the military capability, we have the economic kept and lastly,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we have that network of allies, partners and friends around

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the world. I think it would be foolish for China

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to make a move. I think it would be a

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>mistake for Iran to do so, or Russia. But you

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>still have to account for and pay attention to that possibility.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>What's the apparatus that's already up and running that these

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>countries would have to tamp down in order to sort

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of comply with international accepted practices. Pre election, I mean,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we already know that China and Russia have huge troll farms,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know, a huge apporatus basically designed to interfere

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in any election all over the world should they wish to.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there any evidence to suggest that they might tamp

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that down. I don't think so, because at the end

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of the day, there's this sort of sense that, oh,

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the Russians and the Chinese are working to reelect Donald Trump.

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's quite right. I think what the

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Russians in the Chinese are doing is to try and

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>create real divisions in American society, and they will do

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that as you a, using social media, primarily, but also

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>using actual incidents. I think as we get closer to

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the election, I could foresee, for example, a false flag

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>operation where hundreds of ballots are suddenly discovered in a dumpster.

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>It's entirely possible a physical act like that could be

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>undertaken by our opponents, as well as all the social

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>network problems that you've just addressed, and no, there are

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>no international sanctions that can be applied uniformly. That's why

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's important that the United States and clear signals to

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>these nations that we will respond in the moment, will

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>defend better, and we will also respond potentially after the

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>election when we sort out what has happened, and then

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>take action in the cyber world against those who have

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>attacked US. Now, Admiral Cebidas, you have a great column

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>out on the Boomberg today. COVID commission is crucial for

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a US recovery. You say, an investigation of the p

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>that makes it into scientists, doctors, and gasp, a big

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>pharma executive explained to us, you know who might put

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this together given that we're not quite sure who will

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:13.679
<v Speaker 1>be leading the country. There's a lane doc session at

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>some point, and then there'll be, you know, either another

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>four years with President Trump or four years with President Biden.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So what how would this work? Well, let's look at history.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Um After Pearl Harbor, where hundred Americans shockingly died on

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>December seven, there was a national commission set up by

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Congress. After the nine eleven events where three thousand

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Americans died, there was a national commission set up by

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the Congress. I think we're going to see the same thing.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>We're now at two hundred fifteen thousand Americans dead, probably

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>by inauguration will be north of three hundred thousand. Most

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>observers think, so there has to be accountability. We have

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to look back and see how did this happen, just

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like we did at Pearl Harbor, just like we did

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>at kind of eleven. And more importantly, we've got to

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>look forward so that it never happens again. What are

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the practical things we need to do to prepare ourselves

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for this so how it would happen? And I think

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>this will happen. Whoever is in office after January will

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>be a congressional push because all of us, all of

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>us who are American citizens, are to demand that our

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>national government focus on this. And the Congress is very

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>well equipped with the tools to do this. They could

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>appoint to leaders to set it up. You pick about

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a dozen commissioners I lay out in the article, uh

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>some ideas for what it would look like, and you

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>give them. You know this won't be instant work. You

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>give them about two years to put this together. The

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Pearl Harbor Commission took five, Eleven took three. I think

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we can do this in two years. It will be

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the significant such commission American history. You've got to

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>do it all right, well, I imagine it's coming at

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>some point and our thanks to you, it's a mustery

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>today COVID commission crucial for US recovery. Retired Admiral James

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Stabida's former NATO military commander, it is time now to

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>have a look at a big tech. Of course, big

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>tech has been dominating markets basically, even if it hasn't

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>been dominating casual conversation outside of markets. But certainly that

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>might start to change once we start to get Congress

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>looking into the regulation of big tech. Let's bring in

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark Douglas, who CEO of Steel House. He is currently

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in Istanbul, but he is based generally in s in

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>l A. So Mark, thank you so much for joining.

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>First of all, talked to us about Istanbul. What's it

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>like at the moment um. It's bustling, So it's the

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>weather is great and there are a ton of people

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on the street. Everyone's wearing masks and the feels great.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I've been traveling all over the world during COVID, so

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that I got here two days ago. Yeah, it's pretty

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>amazing how the Eastern European countries are treating this slightly

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>differently from some of the rest of the countries in

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the world. And uh, you know, Turkey would be sort

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of a little bit in that group. So talk to

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>us about regulating big tech and what you anticipate will

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>see over the next few days two weeks in Congress.

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're in a sort of strange period where

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, senators are up for re election, we're obviously

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>re electing a president or electing a president, and there's

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty. Is it the best time to

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>be doing this? Well, I think the reasons they're doing

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it are legitimate. I mean, these large companies Apple, Amazon, Google,

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook and maybe even a few others, they legitimately

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>do have monopoly power. I think Apple is kind of

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to fly a bit under the radar, but um,

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they have probably the biggest monopoly, which is the app

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>store and the thirty percent fee that they charge, and

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a complete monopoly on getting apps on into your iOS devices.

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>But I think all these companies are vulnerable, and I

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's legitimate to kind of investigate them and

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>try to find solutions that ultimately create more competition and

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>are better for consumers in the long term. Who's most

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>at risk of having to change what they're doing? So

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know, breaking off the piece or you know,

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>spinning off a piece. Yeah, I think Apple is. So

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>when you look at someone like Amazon and Google, I

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>think the big complaints are mainly about their search results.

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Amazon when you go shopping, and Google obviously with Google Search.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But Apple's entire business model that them breaking the two

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar mark in market gap is essentially based on

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>them having a complete monopoly on um what gets on

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>your onto your iPhone and the and the things they charge.

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And if if the US kind of the as government

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of interferes with them, it's gonna take some time.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that kind of really starts at disrupted the

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>heart of their business model, which was has been driving

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>their market cap. They'll obviously survive, they may have to

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>charge lower fees, but that and you look at bundles

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>they're introducing, like Apple One, the Apple one bundle, which

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is basically you know whether you watch it, read it,

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>listen to it, yet they them or or now Apple

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Fitness is part of that bundle like that could potentially

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>get attacked also by the US government, So so they

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are I think the most vulnerable. What's for the senator is,

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, don't all senators want to keep big tech

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on site in some way? Well, I mean the it's

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a big driver for the US economy. So on the

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>one hand, you want to keep um, these big companies

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>who are create a lot of jobs and generate UM

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot you wanna Essentially you don't want to really

0:10:56.040 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>harm them and allow competition from outside of the United States. Um,

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're kind of like a pro America first type

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>type senator. But I mean it's it's legitimate concerns. I

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>think ultimately tech is an easy target everyone. It's a

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like do nothing right type environment right now, especially with

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the topic of censorship and what should be allowed on

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>social media, talking about Facebook and Instagram and what shouldn't

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>be allowed. So you know, with that bigger talk topic,

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that bigger target and a lot of people being kind

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.599
<v Speaker 1>of angry at social media, I mean, it's easy to

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>join their bandwagon and and try to leverage it to

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>create a kind of populist sentiment towards your candidacy. I mean,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you sort of got the impression that no matter what happens,

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>these talks are going to keep going higher anyway. Um,

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>nothing has dented them up to now. What's your sense

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of where they go on I'm talking about basically Apple

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>and Alphabet I guess yeah, I think well, I think

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is by far the biggest. Apple used to be

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest innovator. Um. I think people think of Apple

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>as an innovator now, but the last real product they

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>introduced that had any level of success with the Apple

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Watching two thousand fourteen. Now it's just cycles of evolution

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>rather than you know, something really innovative. But um, Amazon

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>continues to be the big innovator with the success they've

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>had with the Echo and a lot of the acquisitions

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>that they've done. So I think, UM, I I think

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately Amazon is you know, kind of retakes the top

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>spot as the most valuable company, and the others are

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>playing catch up. Google is kind of being attacked from

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>all sides, um again by Amazon. In terms of Amazon's

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>app business, Um, that search business is obviously like they

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>have no competition basically worldwide except for China with the

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 1>search business. So I think, UM, I don't think they will.

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>They're not as vulnerable as as someone like Apple is,

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and may be to a lesser extent Amazon. Speaking of Apple,

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we have, of course a big event tomorrow. There's a

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>lot going on tomorrow, including some enemy Cony Barrett hearings

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Hill. But at the same time, and a

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of people will be looking at Apple's launch and

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we're meant to get some more phones. What do you

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen? Mark? What have you heard?

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And will people upgrade? Yeah? So the Apple twelve is

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the big announcement. I think there's no secret on that.

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>The probably the most innovative thing coming out of the

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple twelve announcement is the strong rumors that there's going

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a new Apple Mini and which will bring

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the price point down to essentially half. Remember when Apple

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>introduced the Apple X, everyone was complaining about how expensive

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it was. I mean, the phone costs more than like

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple's lowering computer. And so now they're introducing a phone

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>at half the price point. And what's really interesting about

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that think really key to watch is Apple is a

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of their profit is increasingly coming from the services,

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and so the Apple One bundle on an Apple Mini,

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the Apple wants a subscription from every household

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially in the world, and so they are bringing down

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the price point to their products in order to get

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to encourage more people to get an Apple one subscription.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And also with Apple Fitness Plus, which hasn't been launched yet,

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're now going after Peloton and other fitness companies.

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's all about that kind of ongoing revenue stream

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>after you buy the device. So it's a really smart

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>move to bring low, low priced iPhone, current model, low

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>price iPhone and then essentially make hundreds of dollars a

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>year more in the monthly subscription fees that you're gonna

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>pay for for all forms of entertainment and business that

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that they want you to beg Mark, we're out of time.

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But is it a wild success even in pandemic times?

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Say that question one of my time. I comminue people

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>buy it even when cash is low in pandemic times. Um,

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the I think the example twelves are

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a diet. I mean, they were introducing

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>five G but essentially a lot of people seem to

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be the pole. The polling is saying that people want

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to buy them, So I guess they're going to be successful.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you so much for joining us. Mark

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Douglas is a CEO of Steel House. Let's see tomorrow

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>what actually emerges from that Apple event. We appreciate Mark's

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>time today. All right, it is time now to get

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to one of our old chestnuts. Bill Smeade, always love

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>having you on the program. Bill Smide is CEO and

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>CIO of Smade Capital Management, and Bill, I'm sure you

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have varying opinions on everything that's happening this week. Having

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>been in the market so long, what is the one

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that markets will concentrate on this week? Well, thanks

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>for having us, Monny. The the markets are concentrating on

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>um what I call COVID misery investments, and they are

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>exacerbating a trend of concentrating capital in the vast monopoly

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>UH companies, and they just doesn't seem to be any

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>end to the urge on the part of investors to

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>uh extrapolate what is going on far out into the future.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So Bill, I mean, I know that you invest slightly

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>differently to sort of watching the day to day news

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>headlines anyway, as do the same you know, most investors

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for the long haul. But at the same time, you

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder which of these macro events could really

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>change the dynamic in the market. Is there one out there? Well, Actually,

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>what happens is below the surface economics actually do change.

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So for example, you would expect stock prices to peak

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>at the point where the prospects for the industry appear

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to people to be the most favorable. And with all

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of people being afraid of catching COVID and kind of

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>self quarantining, the reliance on the large tech companies will

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>probably never be higher, I would guess, than at this

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>moment in time. So it only makes sense that those

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>stocks are very high right now because the prospects for

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>their profits due to the current circumstances. But at the

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>same time that's going on, it also lays the groundwork

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>for superior economics in other areas where the stock prices

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>are extremely low. And that's our job is to to

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>figure out where economics are very favorable and then uh

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and then adjust appropriately. Have you making any adjustments? We are,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's just painful, Vinnie. We are tacking away from

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>investments that we've made in the last three to ten

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>years that are becoming too popular because of how popular

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>growth stocks are. We're taking money from there and applying

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it to favorable economics in places like energy, in places

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like uh real estate and and by the way, that's

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the two worst performing sectors today, so you know and

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh so I'll give you one example. It was

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>announced that Warren Buffett's lieutenant Ted Wessler now owns almost

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>six percent of Dillard's department stores, and the stock has

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>soared today thirty. Uh. Well, we own two companies that

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are landlords to Dillard's. So if he if he likes Dillard's,

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>he'd probably like the landlords, and that would be Simon

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Properties and mace Rich. Just in the Phoenix Valley where

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I am, there are seven dillard stores at seven separate

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>mace Rich properties, and uh I counted, I think Simon

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>has seventeen dillard stores. So while they're really excited about Dillard's,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>they aspies their landlords, and I would suggest that the

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>two should go in tandem. Well, explain that to me,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>because I've just been looking at mass Ridge and Simon

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Poverty Group and obviously the stocks you know, plummeted and

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>march and they haven't really recovered since. And I think

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the question is okay. So Dillard's might be okay, and

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Dillards might be able to pay his rent, but what

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>about all of the other tenants. Why are you still

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>bullish on these real estate companies? Well, first of all,

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they are very close to uh most American population, and

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>so there's two possibilities here. One is that two or

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>three years from now, the virus is gone, vaccinations are enforced,

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and cures or whoever had it have come to pass,

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and then people go back to something that's a new normal,

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but but closer to the way we used to live.

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And under that environment, these people own very attractive property

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>in some of the most attractive places in the United States, uh, Florida, Texas, California, Arizona.

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That that's where people are moving, uh to the sun

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Belt and and that's that's where they own a lot

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of properties. And uh So the answer is, um, this

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:22.719
<v Speaker 1>idea that we're all just going to huddle in our

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>house and do nothing for the next five years and

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>spend all of our money and never leave the house,

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and spend all of our time on on electronic devices

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and be anti social. I just think it's it's it's

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>highly unlikely it's worth making some investments with a very

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>high reward potential that the risk has been taken out

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>by depressed prices. All right, Bill, thank you so much.

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill Smead is CEO and c IO of Sneed Capital Management.

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Until they're talking about some of the real estate companies

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and It's really interesting to hear the different opinions on

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>on this, because of course you get those that same

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>malls are dead, and you get those that say no,

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they might be in a little bit of

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a lull period, but at some point we'll have to

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>get back to something akin to the life that we

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>had been living. All right, and this portion of Bloomberg

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>markets now concentrating on big tech and break up potentially

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Let's bring in Steven Strauss, who joins

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>US from Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>International Affairs, where he is a visiting professor. Stephen, you know,

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you're a sort of ahead of the game on this,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but the US is a little more let's say, wide reaching.

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the US could actually mandate for these companies

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to start breaking themselves apart. Do you see that even

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>potentially happening. It's going to be a long where um

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>if if history is any guy, I looked up some

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>of the numbers. Breaking up Stairard Oil was about corny

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>year process. The IBM anti trust litigation like years. The

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>A T and T anti trust litigation went about ten years,

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft anti trust went about ten years, and particularly

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in the technology sector, it's not standing still. I mean

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there have been some rueful jokes at by the time,

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>particularly the Microsoft IBM cases were settled, the original basis

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for the cases were essentially irrelevant. That's actually quite stunning.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's really really stunning. Is that a testament

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.959
<v Speaker 1>to the ability of these companies to put up a defense,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>an argument for how they should be how they are?

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, are we looking at something similar? Um,

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly a comment on you know, these companies can

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 1>afford the best lawyers in the world. Um. You know,

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the American legal system has many virtue speed is not

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily among them. So I mean think about the process.

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>First there's the trial and the court. Whoever loses will

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>appeal it. Then there's another round of appeals. I mean,

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it just it can go on for a very long time. Again,

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>past performance is not a necessarily a predictor of future results,

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>but looking at the historical record, and it was a

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>side point, there's a general feeling that to really take

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on these companies there may need some changes to the legislation.

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to have to get through Congress. Okay,

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>when you say the legislation of what legislation exactly are

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we talking about. Well, the antitrust legislation we currently have

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>on the books, you know, originally dates the nineteenth century.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>It was last updated during the nineteen seventies. Uh So,

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, one of the things that the House is suggesting,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>he's rewriting the antitrust laws so that if they're unfairly

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>treating their suppliers, they're kind of crushing their suppliers, it

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.959
<v Speaker 1>will easier, it'll be easier to take action against them.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Most of antitrust at this point is oriented towards are

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>consumers being heard. Whereas the issue with Amazon, for example,

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is there's a strong argument that what it's doing is

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>harming its suppliers. Um, you did so for a lot

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of different reasons. Um, you know, they'd like to change

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the laws on Facebook. Other companies can't buy without proving

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that doing so well enhanced competition and health consumers. Yeah,

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>so there's certainly possibility of action under interesting law. I mean,

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Google's market share and search is something like which and

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>which certainly presents an antitrust issue. And indeed, rumor mill

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think more than rumor mill. At this point, the

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Department of justice is looked. Justice is looking at initiating

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a antitrust action against Google. Yeah, I mean these companies,

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>do they have a plan B in case they're forced

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>or are they just you know, do they have that

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>little humility that they're not even thinking that they might

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>be forced? Well, I mean it depends. I mean, it's

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a question. It's a smart movie. One maneuver on their

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>part might be thinking about, Look, we don't want ten

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>years of litigation, is or something relatively straightforward we can do.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>But honestly, from their point of view, given that, you know,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming their lawyers are pointing out to them that

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>litigation is a process, there's gonna be years before any

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of the settles. I'm not sure I would be making

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>any major plans to split up. Um, they might be

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>making plans to be better, nicer competitors while you're in litigation.

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Probably the last thing you want to be do, want

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to be seen doing, is something that's viewed as anti competitive.

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>People tend to get Microsoft partially got its big start

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>because IBM was in the middle of antitrust litigation and

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be seen as being friendly to a smaller

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>software company. Are there any precedents here when it comes

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>to you know, the law. Well, I mean in what

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>sense to mean precedence. I mean, we've certainly we ever

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>broken up a big company before successfully and permanently. Um well,

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Standard Oil was broken up. H and T was split

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>into seven companies. Microsoft, Microsoft, I'm sorry, IBM was forced

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to spin off some subsidiaries. Um so, yeah, I mean

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's been done. At the side point, it's not necessarily

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>bad for the companies, at least some argument that the

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.959
<v Speaker 1>antitrust litigation forced them to rethink their business models. They

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>may become more lucrative after the fact. Yeah, I mean,

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I suppose Amazon is is the one that most people

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>interact with most. I mean, obviously Apple for those who

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you know can afford to use the Apple Uh equals

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>here if you like. But you know, you could imagine

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a world in which Amazon splits up and each part

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of it is totally viable and successful on its own. Yeah,

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could think of Amazon being split off

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>cloud computing, which you can make an argument really has

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with the retail operation anyway, split up

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the retail operation into vertical silos, the fulfillment centers, the

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>retail front end, Um, there are lots of ways to

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>think about splitting these companies up, but I mean the

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>reality is it's going to be years of litigation before

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone gets to that point. And the other reality is

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean, it's the intention, right, so you split

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>them up in order for there to be more choice

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and for all companies to be better actors because they

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>have you know, peers in their group and they're sort

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of forced to be better actors for their consumers. But

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that won't necessarily happen even if these companies are split up. No,

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, there are certain things you might

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>expect if you split them up, probably more intense competition.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the amount of profits that you know, Google, Facebook, etcetera.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Make are quite impressive, and it's hard to justify those

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>profits in any other way except that their quasi monopolies.

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>So one issue might be, you know, they have to

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>compete more on price, they have to think about different models. Um.

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, to some extent to Google, you are

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the product, I am the product, and they take our

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>data for free. If they're in a more intense competition situation,

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they might actually have to think about, well, how do

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 1>we pay people for data fascinating. My god. Yeah, well,

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly god. They'll haven't give it away all of

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it already then, because there is still something left to buy.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to you very much, as Steven Stroiless, for

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>joining us there, and we do hope you'll come back

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and take us through this process because no doubt, some

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of it will be easy to understand, but there will

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of it that won't be easy to

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>understand for the layman. Steven Stiles is visiting professor at

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Princeton University's at Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs,

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us there. Do continue to listen to Bloomberg Markets

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>throughout the afternoon. You will be taken through all of

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the Columbus Stay News if you like, Bloomberg Business Week

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>taking place a little bit later on. My co host

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Baul Sweeney is on that show this week and next

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>week Bloomberg Business Week filling in in the afternoons on

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Bonnie Quinn and I'm Baul Sweeney. I'm on

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio