WEBVTT - NFL Week 1 Best Bets (Ep. 101)

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everybody. Welcome back to the Betting Pros Podcast. I'm

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>your host, Dan Harris. Find me on Twitter at Dan Harris.

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Eighty Week one is here. It is time to talk

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>about our best bets, and with me to do that

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is a fellow investor. What I will say in a

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick Sirianni Coach of the Year ticket. That's Sean Green,

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of the Sports Gambling podcast Network and

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>co host of the Sports Gambling Podcasts. Find him at

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Sean T.

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Green. That's s e. A. And Shawn. Welcome to the show.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me, Thanks to be back on the show.

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 4>And yes, I'm so glad you are all over the

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 4>Nick Sirianni Coach of the Year prop as well, because

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 4>everyone says, Sean, you're an Eagles fan, it's blind homerism.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 4>But then when I have plays that are pro Eagles,

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 4>which I am a blind homer at times that both

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 4>people don't believe me. But you laid out the case

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 4>very well. I think in the chat or when we

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 4>were going back and forth. When you're looking for coach

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 4>of the year, first year coaches really have an advantage

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 4>because it's all about exceeding expectations that narrative. Eagles are

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 4>coming off of four win season, so if they can

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 4>get to nine, ten, even eleven, wins Coach of the Year.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 4>And I think when we were when I got down

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 4>on it was fifty to one. I think he may

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 4>have dropped to like thirty five to one.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I think I was thirty five to one

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 2>when I took it.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>By the way, what we were talking about is we

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>were both in an FSGA prop league where you basically

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>draft prop bets, and that was my first one and

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>I did win it by a few, you know, dozen

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars last year. But yeah, we were talking about that.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>We both like that bet, and Sean messaged me afterwards

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>his actual ticket on that bet.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So, yeah, didn't.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>I didn't get it.

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 4>You snaked me in the in the draft on it

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 4>because I thought I'd be able to wait on it,

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 4>and I kep thinking it was just more of a

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 4>homer angle. But the Eagles to win the division is

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 4>like five to one. If Nick Sirianni comes in and

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 4>takes his team to win the NFC East, it just

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 4>seems priced incorrectly there and a lot of the I

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 4>think it's like four to the last six.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 3>We're rookie head coaches, so fun times on that one.

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can definitely make a profit on Coach of

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the Year bets, which we will talk about on our

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>separate new podcast. Sean, I will be launching Nick Sirianni

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Coach of the Year all day, every day, but.

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 3>For maybe one to get behind him, let's do it man.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>At this point though, we are actually going to be

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about week one, our three best bets of the

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>weekend each Now, what was funny is we did not

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>talk about these before selecting them.

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 2>And right before I said, Sean, you know, we haven't

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>talked us through. Do you want to maybe throw it

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>out so we know whether or not.

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>We're going to double up, And my worry was confirmed

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that we both had one overlapping thing bets.

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>So I will choose something different for it. I will

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 2>let Sean.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Explain, but it was my favorite bet of the weekend, Shohn,

0:02:57.919 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>So we'll go through that and then we will just

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>through the remaining games just very quickly, whether we have

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a lean or feel on it. Just in terms of

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the spread. Again, one of my picks is and over under,

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>so we can talk about that. But again let me

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>get some very quick housekeeping out of the way before

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we dive into it. First, the Betting Pros podcast is

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>now going to be three times per week. On Monday,

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to record an episode with a guest talking

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about the lines and early look at the next week's

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>lines and see whether or not we think there's any

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>value that we could make.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, what we expect the lines to do.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>On Wednesday is going to be our standing college football

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast with Joe Pizap.

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 2>And Scott Bagman. You should have already heard that as well.

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be every Wednesday and then Thursday. We were

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>recording this Wednesday, but usually on Thursdays will be this podcast.

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I will have a rotating guest, hopefully Sean will grace

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>us with his appearance a couple more times, and we'll

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>be breaking down each of our three best bets of

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the week. Second, we are doing a giveaway. It is

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>assigned to a tongue Iiloa Jersey. Entry is very simple.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Just leave a review for.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>The show on Apple Podcasts or cast box and then

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>go to Betting Pros dot com slash review. It's a

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>different url to side Bettingpros dot com slash review.

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 2>That is it. It is very simple.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Also, if you want to triple your entries, all you

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>got to do is be subscribed to our YouTube channel

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros. And also if

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you are, that's good because we do a Sunday morning

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>livestream over there from eleven to twelve, me and Matt

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Parral breaking down the games. I will be giving out

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>my favorite props which I come up with because I

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>do projections for every Fantasy relevant player each and every week,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so I find the most value there. Again, that's eleven

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to twelve Eastern at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, I've talked a ton Sean, Let's get into it. Remember,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>we have consensus lines over at Bettingpros dot com.

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 2>That's where I'll be looking.

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But obviously they give you a lot of different books

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so you can check out what you like, what you.

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Don't, which one is favorable, Sean.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Also, we have our app, by the way, sorry, I

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>want to mention that Betting Pros app. It's awesome. You

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>make picks right in the app. You see yourself on

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>a leader board. You can, you know, look at everybody

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and how everything is doing. The percentage of experts that

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are picking a bet. I'm done, Sean Go, I'll stop talking.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Please your first pick, sir, what will it?

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's let's let's knock this one out of the

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 4>out of the way here. We were both on the

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 4>Seattle Seahawks lay in two and a half at the

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.679
<v Speaker 4>Indianapolis Colts. Again, I went through the Carson Wentz saga

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 4>last year, and now Carson Wentz on a new team,

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 4>didn't have much of a preseason, didn't have much of

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 4>a training camp. Sure, he has the rapport with Frank Reich,

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 4>but I think that foot injury was a big issue

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 4>for him and just not being able to connect with

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 4>the receivers.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 3>T Y Hilton is out and it's not just you know,

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Wentz's injuries.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 4>Really why I'm taking this, And normally I'm not a

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 4>guy who likes to you know, a non conference road

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 4>favorite danger spot, but I think the injuries surrounding the

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 4>offensive line for the Colts are really really going to

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 4>be an issue. Quentin Nelson all pro. He didn't practice Wednesday.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 4>He's dealing with the back injury that's flaired. He's been

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 4>on the COVID list. He also had this similar foot

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 4>injury that Carson Wentz had. Xavier Rhoades he didn't practice

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 4>as well. He's day to day with a calf injury.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that's gonna be a big issue, especially when

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 4>you talk about guarding DK Metcalf and Tyler Lockett in

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 4>this new Shane Waldron offense, which really could be an issue.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 4>And then lastly, left tackle, it's really they very well

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 4>could be down to their third string left tackle for

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 4>the Colts. Anthony Costans are retired. Eric Fisher seemed like

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 4>the guy that was supposed to replace him. He's coming

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 4>off an achilles injury, a late achilles injury. He was

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 4>just on the COVID list. He's coming off the COVID

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 4>list today. There's a chance he starts, but again, not

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 4>much of a camp. I can't imagine. He's an amazing shape.

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 4>So I think they could be down to their third

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 4>left tackle. And then I'm just high on the Seattle

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Seahawks and Russell Wilson. I mean Russell Wilson since twenty twelve,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 4>eighty five sixty nine and six against the spread, and

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 4>he actually breaks that non conference rule twenty one fifteen

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 4>and two against the spread, So it's a bet against

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 4>these Colts injuries and a bet on Seattle.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>So this line, I think, Sean, you can reckon move

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong. I think like when it originally opened up,

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>before you know the Wentz injury or anything like that, I

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>think the Colts were favored by two and a half points,

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's gone big with the went injury, which is fine.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand this one. You're right.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>This was my number one as well, and I was

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about it and maybe you can explain it.

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you have these lines sometimes?

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I do, certainly where I look at it and I go, well,

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the public's gotta be all over the Seahawks

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in this game. I imagine this seems like a spread

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>where they are begging you to take the Seahawks.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Does that ever make you nervous?

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Because I agree with everything you said, given the given

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the injuries to the offensive line, given the Wentz, Wentz

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to play.

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 2>That's great.

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>He's had like no time to get up to speed

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in this offense or at least have chemistry with any

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of these receivers, which, by the way, t Y Hilton

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is out. So it's Michael Pittman Junior, who I love.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But no time to get up to speed in this

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this under a field goal Like, I don't know, does it.

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Were you ever when it feels like they're begging you

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to take a line, Oh.

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, definitely, And I think you kind of have to

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 4>bring it back to what's your handicap and style. Mine

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 4>is watch all the games, look at the numbers, and

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 4>break it down from there. There's some people who just

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 4>bet strictly. Hey, when whenever the public gets up to

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 4>eighty ninety percent, that's what And there's certainly I do

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 4>factor that in.

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 3>But in this.

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Spot, this Seattle team is just too much to pass up.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 4>And again, the Colts, to me, were I like fading

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 4>them on the wind total just because they have such

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 4>a hard Like you look at their schedule, those first

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 4>five games they have out of the gate really a

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 4>brutal and then you throw on the offensive line injury

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 4>news and that kind of centers around some of my

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 4>other picks. I love fading a team with offensive line

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 4>injury news because you're in the fantasy world. When a

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 4>star player or the quarterback goes down or is injured,

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 4>that it's a lot of fantasy news. It's factored into

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 4>the line. It's factored into the public betting. But one

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 4>of the places where I still think there is some

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 4>value is people that don't keep up with the O

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 4>line injury news and just assume, like, ah, they're throwing

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 4>whoever out there and left tackle. But that's a huge difference.

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 4>We saw Wentz last year dealing with the banged up line.

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he looked horrible even when he had time

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 4>to throw. But the fact that the Eagles started what

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 4>fourteen different offensive line combinations didn't help Carson Wentz last year.

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't have the mobility that he had like in

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 4>his near MVP season of twenty seventeen, so I think

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 4>that's really going to be a huge issue for him.

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree with this more really, And he's not good.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't good under pressure last year. That It's not

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Seahawks have an amazing pass rush or anything

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. But there'll be enough to get after him

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>given the state of that offensive line.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't get this one.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And also, I mean we haven't even talked, by the

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>way about the other side of the ball, right, like,

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>other than we love Russell Wilson and he's great, but

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Colts have a very good defense, assuming

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>even the Xavier Rhodes is healthy. I mean, their secondary

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is fine. They match up fine here, except that there

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>are two things. Number One, I think we're gonna see

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Sean to repeat kind of what we saw last year

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Seahawks, which is they're gonna let us cook early.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Then they're gonna lose a couple of guys. I've said

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>this on the Fantasy podcast. They're gonna lose a few games.

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Their defense is going to be exhausted because somehow letting

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>Russ cook. They had a couple of three and outs,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the defense got exhausted. We've said, Pete Carroll is seventy

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>years old, dude, Like we we know what Pete Carroll

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is at this point, right, He's gonna be terrified.

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be all right.

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>We gotta run the ball, got to control that clock.

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But for now, I do think they are going to

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>let him cook. And the good thing is the Colts

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>don't blitz a ton seventeen percent of the time last year,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>and Wilson just carves it up if he has time, man,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>he's like he's great. I mean he's always great. But

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>when not he had one hundred and made passer rating

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>last year when opposing offenses didn't a defense is didn't blit.

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>So totally with you.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>This is our combined betting pros best bet of the week.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>We will go with the trap bet. And by the way,

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the only thing I will say about the

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>public versus you know, pros sort of thing.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Fading the public sean.

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I don't I haven't seen the split,

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Like right now, I don't. I'm just assuming this is

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be a public play, but I haven't seen

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the money that's coming in yet. But it's not

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>always wrong, right, Like it's the books and you know

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>they have like long term sort of views, but any

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>one game, like it's not like feeding the public. It's like, well,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>if the public reaches this number, you know.

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>They lose.

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they win, especially early on when I think books

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>are still struggling with the models, right, So I'm really

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>okay with that.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Definitely in week one especially could be good for the

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 4>public because there's or some of like myself who comes

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 4>in with some opinions on the season, on the teams,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 4>and yeah, there's some value there for sure.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so you're gonna hate this next pick. Okay, I'm not.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lay it out here right now. My guess

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is you're going to be on the other side of

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this one and you can be it. And we talked

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>about being a homer. Okay, do you know the team

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I read for Sean It's not been a pretty existence

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for me in multiple ways, but especially not my football.

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I am going to take the Jets here getting five

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half on the road against the Pathers. Here's

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the deal. Sam Darnold, revenge game. I totally get it.

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey's back healthy, I get it. I like Terras Marshall,

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the receivers.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I get it. But you just mentioned something about offensive lines,

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 2>which I feel like you're right. The public is like,

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 2>we don't really care.

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Does anybody out there understand that Carolina has one of

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the worst offensive lines in the league. And not only that,

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but then you're just like, oh, by the way, one

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of our better I guess offensive lineman.

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you rank them. They're not very good.

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>John Miller. Oh, by the way, you're out with COVID.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>So they just lost another offensive lineman in what was

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>already an offensive line that is barely hanging on by

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>a thread. So I guess it's gonna be Dennis Dally.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know it's gonna be terrible. Now, it's

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>not like the Jets have this amazing pass rush. If

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>they had Carl Lawston it i'd feel a lot better

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>about it. Everybody's gonna be on the Panthers on this one,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>then I completely understand why.

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>But here's the thing about the Jets. I didn't know

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>how to value.

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Zack Wilson when he came on. But like I was,

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I was very very hesitant. Okay, I don't I don't.

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't dive deep into film in college football. I

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>need to wait to see it here. I had a

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who loved him, a lot of people

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>who didn't like him. But I've watched him closely in

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this preseason and I think I am just fully in

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>on this and it's it's scary, but watching him a

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of things.

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 2>Number One, the game speed does not look like too

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>much for him.

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, he's got good footwork, he's very poised, he knows

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>how to kind of get it. What means something to me,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And maybe this is done, maybe it's narrative. They just

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>came out with the captains. He was voted a team

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>captain by his teammates. Okay, I think you had a

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>very Johnny Manziel possibility here with Zach Wilson, just given

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, his persona, his confidence, stuff like that,

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it might be there. But for me, I'm encouraged by

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>what I see. I think he's gonna have a big

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>game here. They don't have tape on him, they don't

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>know what to expect necessarily from what they're going to see.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the defense is good enough, and I think

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Sala can.

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Make up for the lack of talent that they necessarily

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have right now, especially without loss. And so I don't know, man,

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't know if they're gonna win, but

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a field little game, so I'm

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with it. I imagine, like most humans, you

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>think I'm insane, But no.

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>No, I was going back and forth on this one.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 4>What it came down to me is do I feel

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 4>comfortable laying five and a half with Sam Darnold and

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 4>no offensive line? And I just can't come to that.

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you. I'm also high on Zach Wilson.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 4>We had Joe Thaisman on our podcast right around the draft,

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 4>and he was super high on Zach Wilson. I ended

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 4>up watching a bunch of BYU during the season, and

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm on board. I have Zach Wilson in Best Ball

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 4>because I do think they're gonna be Yeah, that's where

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 4>you can.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Throw a bunch.

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 4>And again, you bring in Robert Sala for a reason

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 4>to get the most out of this defensive.

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Talent, and I think they're able to do that.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 4>I do like Carolina, you know this season in fantasy

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm a big Robbie Anderson guy, and you know, have

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 4>McCaffrey back will certainly help Donald.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 3>But again, just watched Sam.

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Darnald last year and then imagine this guy laying five

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 4>and a half points against any team, Like you can

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 4>you really feel good about that?

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 3>You can't?

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Now five and a half again.

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I you know, the guy who co hosted Matt Parrel

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>host the Delly Just podcast, he was always like, I

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man, between four and five and a half,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that's like the dead zone. I feel like the books

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>don't really know what to do with it. I don't

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>know what to do with it, so I stay away

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and I do get that to me though. Yeah, it

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is in the realm of possibility that Robbie Anderson has

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a giant, monstrous game as he and Darnald stick it

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Jets right like, it's totally fine, totally possible.

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know, dude. I think right now, without

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>anybody really knowing what they're gonna see from the Jets,

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>with Elijah Moore getting healthy, Corey Davis has looked fantastic.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I know the running backs aren't.

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Awesome or anything like that, but you do have enough

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>depth there. Tivin Coleman is serviceable. Ti Johnson's looked fine.

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You've got Michael Carter. I don't know if he Ryan's

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna play, but the offensive system with Lafleur, I really

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>do think. And again, the Jets back in the Rex

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Ryan days had a lot of talent on defense, obviously,

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but you can make up for not that much talent

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>if you have a really good defensive coach, which I

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>think sala is.

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think the Jets are gonna come here. I

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 2>think they're gonna surprise some people.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Again, I'm not predicting the win, although if I take

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a team under a touchdown, I don't know.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 3>You got you gotta put a little on that money line.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Gotta do and again you predicting that people will be

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 4>on the Panthers. I think is is a smart way

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 4>to go. I would hang around. I don't think you

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 4>have to bet this one early. I think there may

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 4>be is a chance you get it up to six

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 4>points if you're just gonna be taking the points.

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 3>And one last point. I think the Jets are.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 4>Building their team the right way, Unlike you look at

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 4>the Giants, who in the first round are drafting Cadarius Tony.

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, Jets are Jets are putting investing draft capital

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 4>in the offensive line. You got Makai Becton and Elijah

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Vera Tucker. That's the kind of foundation you want blocking. Uh,

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 4>you know for a rookie quarterback like Zach Wilson. So

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 4>and I'm super high on Sala as a coach.

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean what's interesting is the offensive line really didn't

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>play that well this preseason. But I'm throwing it out

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like Beck then had a weird preseason. He just cleared

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>concussion protocol, so he should be fine. But they have

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talent there.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 2>They did they did it the.

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Right way, which they didn't do for poor Sam Darnold,

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't invest. I think offensively, I will say

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, it might climb, but there are I'm looking

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>again at betting pros consensus lines.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 2>The consensus line is five and a half. The overwhelming

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>majority of books are at five and a half.

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>But to the extent they're not. They're actually at five.

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Bed MGM, FanDuel they're at five. So I wait, now,

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>it's it's priced down a little bit. It's like minus

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>one oh four a little bit on the money line.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>It's one ninety right now consensus for the Jets. So

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you can get two ten at like DraftKings and stuff

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like that plus one ninety. So yeah, I'll be sprinkling

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>on it. But good, all right, gua. I was almost

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>certain everybody's gonna be like, come on your Homer, and

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>if people have listened this podcasts for the last couple

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of years, I never think that, like I'm not somebody

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>picked the Jets in week one with little tape with

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.959
<v Speaker 1>some optimism that I'm I'm allowing myself until it all

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>gets smashed. This week.

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take him go to bed number two. What

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>do you got?

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Bet number two another non conference game. This time I'm

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 4>fading the road team and I'm taking the home team.

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 4>Give me the Tennessee Titans laying three points against the

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 4>Arizona Cardinals. This to me is really based on the

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, I like this as a fantasy game as well.

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 3>For Tannehill.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 4>If you're looking to put him in some stacks with

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Julio Jones and AJ Brown, I think it's a good bet. Really,

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 4>this is just a bet against this Cardinal secondary, which

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 4>had issues before. Now you throw in the fact that

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 4>they lost Darquez Denard and then Malcolm Butler randomly retired.

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 4>They're starting a cornerback Byron Murphy who hasn't played since

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty eighteen. These are the kind of teams I like

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 4>to go against. I'm not a massive Kyler fan. On

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 4>the road, I think vrabel is a better coach as well.

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 4>I think they have an advantage there. And then Titans.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 4>You look at their non conference record twenty seven and

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 4>sixteen against the spread in conference home games. It's a

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 4>bit of a travel situation here for the Cardinals as well.

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 4>So Tennessee only being minus three I think is a

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 4>really good spot. Hopefully they get a little bit of

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 4>a pass rush with Bud Dupree. But I think this

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 4>is just gonna be them outscoring the Cardinals.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting because I feel like for me, I

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know necessarily what to expect other than I will

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>say this my second bet. I'll just throw it in here.

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>This was not on my original board. This was a

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>backup in case I knew that Seohn was going to

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>take that Seahawks bet, which I should have figured was

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I this is a high total. It's

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>fifty two and a half. I'm still going over. I

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>don't love it absolutely, like I'm not. It's not something

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm going nuts. It's fifty one and a half right now,

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>as I'm looking at the consensus lines on bet MGM

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and Party Casino that that is something that I would

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>be more likely to say. It's fifty two at Fox Bet,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty two at Points Bet, but fifty two and a

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>half that's up my book DraftKings and total. I'm still

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>going over with it because, correct me, if Verma like

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this is just going to be I think it's going

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty much shootout, Like I really do think,

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think in the best case scenario for Tennessee

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they get off to a really hot start in the

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>game because they're home fans. By the way, this is

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>something like we're not discussing the fact that there are

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be fans at these games. And I think

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>right last year it was like, wow, all the scoring.

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>That's because the opposing team would come into these stadiums

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and they could hear. They could do whatever they want, right,

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they could audible at the line. No big crowds, no

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>big deal, it doesn't matter. It led itself to offense.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>For this, I think, generally speaking, might be a little

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a lower scoring week than we usually expect,

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>except this game, which I am just basically thinking like

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they are just going to go back and forth down

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the field. Neither defense is particularly good. Both offenses are

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely explosive. But that's the one thing for me, Sean

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that gives me hesitation. If I have to choose a side,

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I would take the Titans minus three. But my worry

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>justice like, are they going to be able to stop

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals or do you just think like their offense

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>essentially is just gonna be so unstopable that you're not

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>even worried about it.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean I think that you know Titans do

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 4>have injury concern as well. Again, that's why I put this,

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 4>That's why I did a lot of a stacking in

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 4>my millionmaker lineup from this game, because there's the game

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 4>script could be like you said, the shootout.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you on the total there as well.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Going over to me ultimately the non conference aspect, the

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 4>coaching advantage, and I think I'm more confident in Tannehill

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 4>than Kyler Murray on the road. I know Kyler Murray's

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 4>claiming he's not gonna scramble as much this year.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't want to get banged Yeah.

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 4>He kind of had a really good year last year

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 4>in the first half and then once he got banged up,

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 4>not quite as good. If he's gonna hold true to

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 4>that and be a little hesitant to scramble, I think

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 4>that benefits the Titans, and maybe that maybe that benefits

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 4>the Cardinals long term and that he stays healthy longer.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 4>But I do think in the short term, if he's

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 4>gonna stay true to his word and not scramble as much,

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 4>I want the Tennessee action all day.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to him keeping his word for about

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>half of a first quarter before right I mean, but

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I look again, I'm not I'm not criticizing the side either.

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think that that's the right side if I'm

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna go one way or the other.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 2>For me, it's much more about the fact that, like

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 2>what was the Tyson goat, everybody's got a plan until

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 2>they get punched in the mouth, right, Yeah, that's what

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Murray's got a plan, not the scramble and whatever, and

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be all well and good until they're down

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>seventeen points right in the middle of the second quarter,

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and then he's like, I gotta make stuff happen and

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>everything like that. So I think that might be a

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>long term thing, but I get it. But I do

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>think the over. I think this is gonna be a shootout,

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>like I you know, value wise sean like if it

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>hits fifty three, if it hits fifty three and a half,

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Like I know people hear that, and people who aren't

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like really sophisticated better is they're like, what do you mean,

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you're like really excited, Like you're picking the over

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on fifty two and a half, you're excited about that.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>But if it goes up like half a point or

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>a point.

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna be a little off at yeah that that

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>half a point or a point is monstrous every single

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>time you bet. But for me, I'm with you that

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be high scoring. So I'm going with my

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>second bet again for basically the reason that you said,

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.479
<v Speaker 1>essentially over fifty two and a half. So we can

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>go back to you now for the third one, and

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>then i'll finish mine out a recap. Then we'll just

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>hit everything that we haven't hit yet.

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Awesome.

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 4>My third and final pick, I mean, the New England

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 4>Patriots lay in three against the Dolphins.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm gonna sound like a broken record.

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 4>But again, there are serious, you know, injury COVID issues

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 4>here for the Miami Dolphins. First off Will Fuller is

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 4>still serving that one game suspension. Now they just lost

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 4>their left tackle Austin Jackson. He's on the COVID list also.

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 3>At Adam Shaheen. I'm not a huge to a backer.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 4>I have to see it from TWOA before I'm really

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 4>gonna take him on the road in a division game.

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 4>To last year twenty twenty, he was only six point

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 4>three yards per attempt, and you know New England won

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 4>this game last year at home. But really I think

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 4>the New England defense is going to be revitalized. Of course,

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 4>getting Donta high tower back, Patrick Chung back from the

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 4>opt outs and New England coming back to the offensive

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 4>line quietly one of the better offensive lines in the league.

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 4>And again I think that's kind of why they went

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 4>with mac Jones. They felt confident giving McCorkle the that's

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 4>actually his real name is mccorkyle. He shortened it to

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 4>mack new England's offensive line. I think that's why, you

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 4>know Belichick feels confident starting a rookie, is that he's

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 4>gonna be able to sit back there. They're gonna give

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 4>him easy looks. They're gonna pound the rock with Damian

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Harrison and you know, even Stevenson getting involved in there.

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 3>And Miami's defense who eye test.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 4>To me, I always kind of liked them last year,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 4>but then when I was doing my off season stuff

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 4>and really digging deep, they really benefited from a kind

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 4>of unsustainable turnover differential, and you expect that to kind

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 4>of regress back to something more reasonable. And you look

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 4>at their yards per game. They were twenty second in

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 4>yards per game last year. Their defense at twenty one

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 4>or sorry, two fifty one and a half. But really,

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 4>the Miami rush defense on the road led up hundred

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 4>and thirty two yards per game. I think the Patriots

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.479
<v Speaker 4>are gonna pound the rock and then set up some

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.719
<v Speaker 4>easy play action for mac Jones and they're gonna get

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 4>this w So minus three, I'm all in.

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So the total on this game, which is understandable, it's

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the lowest totals on the board, if not

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the single lowest total is forty three and a half.

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so this is gonna be a low score.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, it's forty two at the Broncos Giants, which

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is more understandable frankly, but forty three and a half

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with our consensus line over here. So this strikes me

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>as a as a as a close game that's gonna

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>be decided within a field goal, which is why I

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really love it either way, do you. I mean,

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a rookie, man, a rookie was named the

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>starter like a week ago, making his first start. I

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>get that he's something against the team that was again,

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you're right, they weren't as good as they played last year.

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>To have struggled a lot last year they're down Will Fuller.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna see like better. I think we're

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a big jump here from two as he

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>gets further away from the hip injury that's sort of

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>limited last year, and just more comfortable with him understanding

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>you got to throw into coverage sometimes to make it happen.

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 2>So long term for the season, I am on to it.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the Pats defense because I think

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>people are like, well, Gilmore's out, blah blah. But I

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>think you're right. I think they're underrated at this point.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know, man, I don't feel that confident.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think either size or right. So this would

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>be a total stay away for me. Well for me,

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised you trust Mac Jones.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, I trust Mac Jones because he's not I mean,

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 4>this guy has played in some big games in Alabama.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Normally a rookie making his debut in the NFL is

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 4>going to be one of the biggest games he's ever played.

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Not for Mac Jones.

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 4>And you again, you talk about the fan base getting back,

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 4>it does seem like Bill Belichick is just itching to

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 4>get some early ws to kind of counterbalance the narrative.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 4>That Brady was really the guy and not him. You know,

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 4>he's just itching to do whatever it takes to get

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 4>into the playoffs. And then the final answer or final

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 4>reason why I feel comfortable with it is Bill Belichick

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 4>versus a former coach now Flores, I think is the

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 4>outlier as far as like belichick disciples, who I think

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 4>are good coaches and have had success. But if this

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 4>game was in Miami, I'd be all over the Dolphins

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 4>because the Patriots usually struggle down there. But early in

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 4>the season, at home, friendly crowd and the you know,

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 4>the Dolphins left tackle being out, don't sleep on this

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Patriots pass rush. I think they could get to Tua

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 4>and really make things interesting for him.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, I'm gonna stay away, I'm gonna watch it.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll be rooting for you on the sidelines as well,

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>my entire crazy Patriots loving family. Okay, my final one,

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to a total here.

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually find the spreads, especially early on, Man, I

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>think the lines aren't that net Like, They're not as

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>sharp obviously as they're gonna be in a few weeks

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>when the books start getting more and more data, of course,

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But I still find it really tough because I really

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>feel uncertain about what we're gonna see. I am going

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to a total though. It's your team. Good Sarah, it's

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>your team. I don't know how I feel about the

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>game and the spread, but I do like the total.

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little surprised that the Eagles and Falcons are

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>only at forty. I mean, that's not a low total

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that, but I kind of thought it

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>would be higher. I'm going over here with the consensus

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>line at forty eight. There is a forty eight and

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a half out there at fandle, but forty eight is

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the consensus. I think we kind of throw out what

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>we saw last year from Hurtz just generally as the quarterback.

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>They've been able to design the offense around him for

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>out this entire offseason. All the rumors aside with the

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Watson like, they've known in my opinion, that Hurts

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the guy. They have better pass

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>catches with the vamp, the Smith zach Ertz is fully healthy.

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Bigger has now looked good after like all those rumors

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in the early part. The offensive line is obviously better.

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Hurts can scramble. That's going to extend drives and I

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think allow them to put up some points, especially if

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they fall behind.

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Which I kind of expect them to a little bit.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Sean like Howe was thinking of the Titans and the Cardinals,

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>where it's like the Titans get out to a big lead.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I just think like Murray might just start running wild

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and create some plays and put up some points. I

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>could see the same thing here with Hurts, because again

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Falcons, I think.

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 2>They're not gonna be a very good team. Their defenses

0:28:58.360 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 2>are very good.

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that even though Arthur Smith doesn't

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>run and gun, I think what he does do a

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ton is play action. Tennessee was the you know, had

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the most play action percentage in their offense of any

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>team last year. He's going to bring that to Matt Ryan.

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan is That's just good for an offense anyway.

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>It's going to make them more effective. But it's particularly

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>good for Matt Ryan. When he was with Shanahan, obviously

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of motion, a lot of play action, he

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>had his best year of his career. I expect him

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to actually be pretty solid. And again I mentioned this earlier.

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Unders I think as a general matter, are the better

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:32.719
<v Speaker 1>bet in Week one, because I do think it's going

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to be a little crazy for these road teams to

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>come on and be like, holy cow, fans are screaming

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>at me, But I don't know, man, at forty eight,

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be a lot of

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>points being put up here. So I'm gonna take the over.

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm I'm one hundred percent on board. I'm usually

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 4>not like a massive total player, but when these Week

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 4>one lines came out and we broke, we immediately broke

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 4>him down and kind of gave our instant reaction. This

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 4>total opening up at this price was just to me comically.

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Low is a guy who the team.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, on the Eagles offensive side of the ball,

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 4>they're O line, all the starters are healthy. He's gonna

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 4>have plenty of time to throw. They're gonna drop some simple,

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 4>easy stuff for him. I think they're gonna be able

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 4>to move the ball against Atlanta. Now flip it over

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 4>to the other side. What did the Eagles struggle with? Well,

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 4>they have a pretty decent defensive line, but really the

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 4>back end is where there are the most questions. They

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 4>have a new scheme coming in Calvin Ridley. I am

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 4>high on him Fantasy even Week one. You know, Sligh

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 4>is like a solid cornerback one, but he struggled. We've

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 4>seen DeVante Adams, We've seen DK Metcalf have big games

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 4>against him. And lastly, we really struggled last year against

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 4>the tight end. I mean George Kittle had a massive

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 4>game against US and Kyle Pitts.

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 3>You know Rodney McLeod one of the safeties.

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 4>He's coming off a pretty rough injury, didn't have much

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 4>of a preseason or a training camp.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 3>He should start.

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 4>They brought over Anthony Harris, but again it's new team,

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 4>new defense. I could see them struggling. This to me,

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 4>just again has shoot out written all over it. And

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 4>I think you know dark Horse DFS play that I've

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 4>just been crowbaring on every podcast is Quez Watkins at

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 4>three thousand dollars. If you're looking to put together a

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 4>million maker lineup in DraftKings, you could do worse than

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Quez Watkins. We saw him break one in the preseason

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 4>with the screen pass to Joe Flacco. Hurts almost got

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 4>him on a deep ball that he was opened. They

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 4>were just like a half second off. I think I

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 4>can I can tell you this for a guy that

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 4>is priced at DraftKings at three thousand dollars.

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I can guarantee you.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 4>He gets like six targets, so I think he's gonna

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 4>be involved in the offense, has a chance to break it.

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 3>And and same with Miles Sanders.

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.719
<v Speaker 4>He didn't have an amazing year last year and certainly

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 4>underperformed his Round one drafting and probably annoyed a lot

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 4>of fantasy owners. But he he certainly has the ability to,

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, break open a big seventy five eighty yard run.

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 4>So I think there's huge potential for big plays on

0:31:58.000 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 4>both sides of the ball. So I'm all over the O.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 3>We're with you here.

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's I mean, I'm not going to touch the side.

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that in two minutes about how you

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>feel about the side. But yeah, there's gonna be points here.

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty confident that. So that is one of

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>my favorites. So let's just very quickly recap. I'll do

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it again at the very end.

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Of the podcast.

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>You like we both club the bet of the podcast,

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Sean is Seattle laying two and a half to the Colts.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You also like the Titans laying three to the Cardinals

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Pats laying three to the Dolphins, right, got that?

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeap?

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 2>That was what it was? Yes, good. I wanted to

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 2>make sure I didn't miss it.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 4>I was just double checking that I didn't mess up something.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>But yes, no, I want to make sure and all favorites,

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>all favorites for you.

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 2>You're getting a little uh, a.

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Little square sean over here.

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't mind taking favorites, you know, kind of under

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 4>under three to me is almost you know, when you're

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 4>where you're taking a favorite under three in the NFL.

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm not too worried about it. I do have some

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 4>some dogs. I like that we're going to rattle through

0:32:58.160 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 4>here on the card.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, wonderful.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Small favorites early on the season. I'm on board, all right.

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>So my three best bets are, of course, the Jets.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Never go wrong lying or rooting for the Jets, trust

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>me getting five and a half from the Panthers, the

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Titans and the Cardinals over fifty two and a half points,

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Eagles and the Falcons over forty eight points.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So again, I will recap that once more at the

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>very end of the podcast, so everybody gets them. But

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>those are the official Betting Pros Podcast six best bets

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of the week.

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I love it again. You can hear more. We're gonna

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 2>break down every game.

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna break on props on the Betting Pros YouTube

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>channel YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros from eleven am

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Eastern to twelve pm on that channel, Meet and Matt Pelt.

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's run through Sean all the spreads and

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>just let me know you have a lean on one

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>side or is it a stay away for you? And

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>again this is coming out this is Wednesday, so we

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>can talk about the Thursday game. The spread on the

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Bucks Cowboys game is now eight. Do you like either

0:33:58.400 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>side on that game?

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I mean I'm I'm all in on the Bucks again.

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Super Bowl winner coming off the Super Bowl at home,

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 4>though very good against the spread. I think it's like

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 4>five and one, six and one. I got it when

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 4>it opened at six. I still like it at eight.

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Deck is not one hundred percent healthy, and they got

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 4>issues on their offensive line as well with Zach Martinel,

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 4>So give me the Bucks.

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you talk about offensive line issues, that's an

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>offensive line issue, right, That's their best offensive lineman being out,

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and I remember Mel Collins is going to play but

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not one hundred percent either, so you know that

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>offensive line really takes a hit.

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you.

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I will take the Bucks minus eight A lean that

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>way anyway, but I will say that I do get

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a little worried, like it might be like party time,

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, celebrating the Super Bowl and then the Cowboys

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get a backdoor cover here. But I agree with you

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that is where I would go. I still feel confident

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>at eight. How about again, we talked about the over under.

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 1>What about the Falcons laying three to your Eagles at home?

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean certainly I liked it better when it

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 4>was three and a half, which I think yesterday was

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 4>three and a half.

0:34:58.120 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 3>I still like it.

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 2>I've got no oh wait, I've got a couple of

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 2>three and a half.

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>There's Caesars. Caesars are still three and a half. There

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:07.919
<v Speaker 1>are a couple three and a half's out there actually.

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 4>So you can get those three and a half. I

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 4>think you do it again. I think this Eagles team

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 4>is gonna surprise some people. And again, our offensive line

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 4>defensive line have a chance to be top five both

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 4>in So I'm taking the points with the Eagles.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I am staying away three and a half. You're right,

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I would be more intrigued by that. And again I'm

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>looking the consensus line is three. The overwhelming majority of

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>books are at three, but there are three and a

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>half's out there for sure. So again that's why it's

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>always good just to check your sports book make sure

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you get the best lines. I wouldn't mind the Eagles

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.240
<v Speaker 1>at minus at plus three and a half, but otherwise

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm really not touching it. What about the Lions at

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>home getting seven and a half from the forty nine ers.

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean this is this is one of those

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:52.919
<v Speaker 4>games that everyone is gonna pick the forty nine ers

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 4>in their survivor pool. And then that's why that reason

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 4>alone I like the Lions. The Jimmy g is a

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 4>seven and a half point road favorite to me is

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 4>just too crazy.

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I think I think you got to take the lines

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 3>in the points.

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not going anywhere near this because you know,

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>even if even if it looks like the fortnit are

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>going to run with it, I'm worried Dan Campbell's just

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna run out there and smack them in the kneecaffs

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. It sounded crazy, Yeah, I think

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that you laid it out correctly, which is

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the value is actually on the Lions here at seven

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half, because you have Jimmy Croppolo as.

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 2>A starting quarterback on the road.

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>There's just no way I'm going to dabble in it,

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like I'm just staying completely away from it. But I

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>do think that that is where the value the game

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody has been talking about for I mean weeks. At

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this point, the only thing everybody wants to watch this

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 1>weekend is, of course, the Texans hosting the Jaguars laying

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>three points.

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing with this? If anything?

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, Tyrod Taylor as a starter twenty four, twenty one

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 4>and one, the Jags were a one win team. Now

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 4>you have a rookie quarterback and rookie head coach going

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 4>on the road as a road division favorite.

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I think on principle alone, you have to take the Texans.

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 2>That is the correct answer.

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>That's something that I say at Tom the Fantasy of

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts a lot where they tease me, yes, I agree

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with you, it's disgusting.

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 2>It's disgusting.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But the value is very clearly on the Texans here.

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>We have not seen very much from the Jaguars right

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>now and everything. Given the situation, that suggests that they're

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to, you know, have a big

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>time performance here. I don't mind the over by the way, again,

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>another thing where I was like under, under, under, and

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>then I'm like, oh, what about all these over is

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the forty four and a half points, that's pretty low.

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I do think both sides will be able to put

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.240
<v Speaker 1>up some points here. But yeah, you're right, Toron Taylor,

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>he's fine. Brandon Cooks is going to get his They

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>have like seventeen thousand crappy running backs.

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 2>They'll be able to move the ball. So we'll see.

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>They did just trade out Bradley Roby, but no, begaint,

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna talk about that.

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 3>They talked about it. The Texans have some issues that they.

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Have one or two issues. They will be the worst

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 1>team in the league. But you know what, the Jaguars

0:37:58.320 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>were the worst team in the league last year.

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 3>That's a great example.

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 4>That Jags Colts game, and I had the Jags and

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 4>the Lions game and the Texans game both kind of

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 4>look like similar to me, similar situations.

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, fun fact, by the way, that reminds me about

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the Colts as we like. The Sea Houxley Colts have

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not won an opener since twenty.

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Thirteen, so that I'm gonna steal that nugget, do it

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 3>all right?

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers getting one and a half in Washington?

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Who do you like now?

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 4>This game is I think quietly one of the better

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:35.959
<v Speaker 4>games on the board. And you could talk me into

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 4>either side here pretty easily.

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 3>I think early lean.

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Here would have to be the Washington football team just

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 4>because they're at home and it's a crazy flight for

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:45.760
<v Speaker 4>a new coach.

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I mean this should be a hell of

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 3>a game.

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with you.

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean I thought about taking Washington plus one here

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>as the home dog as one of my picks.

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 2>I do like it.

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the spreads that I like a little

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>bit more. Agan Washington is going to surprise some people.

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It came out a little earlier now. Doesn't sound like

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel necessarily is going to play. He was trending up,

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but sounds like a little bit. It doesn't do that

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>much for me. I think Antonio Gibson's going to be

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a monster. I love Logan Thomas, Course, Terry McLaurin, and Fitzpatrick.

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 1>There's always the chance that Fitzpatrick Fitzpatrick's and it goes

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:20.760
<v Speaker 1>terribly sideways.

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm with you.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I think Fitzpatrick game one this is where you're like, yeah,

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 4>the Washington football team, they're gonna win the division. And

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 4>we actually had the one of the directors from win

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 4>Bett and they said their biggest MVP liability was Ryan Fitzpatrick,

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:37.360
<v Speaker 4>which I had to laugh at.

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't think. I don't think Fitzpatrick lasts this long.

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 4>Like there's a reason he's been in this league for

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 4>how many years and he only has one winning season,

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 4>starting all sixteen games. I think he eventually hits that

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 4>fitzmagic wall and we'll see. Maybe Heinike can kind of

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 4>carry them, but I think Game one is probably his spot.

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, lean in a WFTS for sure.

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And again we didn't even harp on the fact that

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Washington has one of the better defenses in the league anyway, right,

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And again the charge the Chargers are changing their system.

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know Herbert was great last year, but

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a it was a very you know, kind

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of rookie friendly offensive system. It's a little more complicated

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.240
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing right now. He could definitely struggle early.

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think there is value on Washington here, you know.

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and they didn't they didn't play any of their

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 4>starters in the preseason. Now you got this crazy road trip.

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 4>I think they could start a little slow.

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Look at us, we're talking ourselves right into Washington.

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>My eyes, new best bet replaces the Seahawks absolutely.

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Bill's lank six and a half at home to the Steelers.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 3>This is another one.

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 4>I've kind of been going back and forth on the TJ.

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Watt news to me is big. You know, I was

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.439
<v Speaker 4>refreshing Twitter right before we got on the show.

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Here.

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 2>He did practice today, didn't he? I thought I saw that.

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 4>It seems like he's it seems like he's gonna play.

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 4>But just the fact that it's a little up in

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 4>the air scares me a little bit. I am high

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 4>on the Bills overall this season, but I liked I

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 4>liked what I saw on a big ben, you know,

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 4>slim down. I think again, you want to talk about

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:11.919
<v Speaker 4>dark horse dfs plays that are super cheap.

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 3>Pat Fryarmouth, the Bills struggle with the tight end.

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm high on him this season, so I would take

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 4>the I would take the Steelers in the points.

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they're that bad this year.

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you've mentioned DFS a couple of times.

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I will just I'll tease everybody should just google Sean

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Green and DFS, and yes you will. You would like

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to take his advice. That's all I'm going to say. Okay,

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I am with you, but I think there is value

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>on the Steeler. I'm not going near it. I'm just

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>not because I think the Bills could be absolutely monstrous

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. Sorry, if you can hear that, that's my

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>garage are always open during a podcast.

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I will take the Bills. I think the Bills could

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 2>be explosive, but I will take the Steelers if I

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 2>have to choose a side. I'm really staying away from it.

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>How about the Vikings laying three and a half to

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals in Cincinnati.

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, again, this is one where it's like way too

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.799
<v Speaker 4>obvious and it kind of scares you because why, in

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 4>my mind, why who's taking the Bengals there? I think

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 4>the Bengals are getting a lot of kind of fantasy

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 4>hype because they're expected to throw the ball a ton

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 4>and you have Joe Burrow paired up with Jamar Chase,

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Chase kind of had a down preseason. We'll see if

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 4>that actually matters to me. It seems like Joe Burrow

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 4>doesn't trust his knee yet. And if Joe Burrow doesn't

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 4>trust his knee, I'm not gonna trust his knee. I'm

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 4>gonna take Kirk Cousins here. It's not in prime time.

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 4>I think they get the job done.

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>There are a few threes out there which I obviously

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like better for the push potential, such as points bet

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that, but still I agree with you.

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I will take the Vikings I talked about in fantasy

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole year. I think it's gonna be a little

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of a slow start here for Burrow as he

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just gets more mentally acclimated to the NFL again after

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the injury. I think Jamar Chase, after taking euro of

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>from football, is gonna get off to a little bit

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of a slow start. So I could see the Vikings

0:42:56.440 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>winning handly here. So I lean Vikings plus my three

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half as well. We already talked about the

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 1>justs Panthers. You love that bat, you fully support it.

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to the Saints getting the Packers, sorry,

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Packers laying four and a half to the Saints

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in New Orleans. It's not in New Orleans, it's gonna

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 1>be in Florida. But obviously it's a home game for

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the Saint so Packers laying for.

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, man, this is this one is on my list

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 4>of like really Been Heaven and Hawn As far as

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 4>figuring out the best to angle again, Aaron Rodgers has

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 4>struggled in Florida and that's kind of why. The reason

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 4>according to reports, that's why the Saints picked it is

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 4>because he hasn't played right down in Florida and early

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 4>in September. If there is someone that has experienced playing

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 4>in that Florida heat in September, it's a guy like

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 4>Jameis Winston. But again, then then you have the Saints

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Dome team going outside, and then are you really going

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 4>to take Jamis over Aaron Rodgers?

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 3>That feels a bit crazy as well.

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 4>I think this could be a My lean would be

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 4>the over here on this one, But I gone to

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 4>my I would just take the points.

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am probably just staying away from it, like

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I can easily make the case.

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>For the Packers in this game because I think that

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you get out of the Superdome. That's a pretty big

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 1>move like there to go, even if it's Florida, you

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:17.839
<v Speaker 1>know where he purportedly struggles. The over under, by the way,

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>consensus is fifty points, so I'm staying away from it.

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But if I had to go one way, I'd probably

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.800
<v Speaker 1>go the other way, and I'd probably go with the favorite,

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:29.280
<v Speaker 1>which is weird for us since you love all the favorites.

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to the next game, and that

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:35.240
<v Speaker 2>is we did that one. We did that one. Sorry.

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>How about the Broncos laying three to the Giants in

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:40.320
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey?

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, and again this one.

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 4>I've been kind of keeping an eye on the injury

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 4>news slash arrest news with Bradley Chubb, who you know.

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 4>It seemed on Tuesday he was gonna play at him

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 4>and fant and now it seems like he's closer to

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 4>not playing, but Fans is still gonna play.

0:44:58.160 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 2>To me, Fenton.

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 4>The match that I just can't unsee or unthink about

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 4>is the Broncos pass rush against the Giants. I mean,

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:10.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm not high on Daniel Jones or their offensive line.

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, their offensive line was really bad last year.

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 4>It feels like they didn't do anything to seriously address it.

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 4>He turns the ball over all the time, and you

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 4>have Bridgewater on the other side, who plays a really

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 4>clean game.

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'll take the Broncos absolutely correct. I completely agree

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with you. I think the Giants are going to be

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 1>in big trouble in this game. Especially Saquan is in

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent. Galladay is not one hundred percent. That

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is terrible. And by the way, the consensus

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.280
<v Speaker 1>line is three. That's where it is at most books bet, MGM,

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and fandle it's minus two and a half.

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh, get all over, get all over that. If you're

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 2>in there. Brown's visiting the Chiefs. The Chiefs are six

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 2>point favorites. What do you think?

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this one again kind of keeping a chalky. I

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.359
<v Speaker 4>know everyone's high on the Browns, think they can make

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:56.720
<v Speaker 4>a run. But Andy Reid opening day, Yes, Andy Reid,

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 4>I think he's nineteen to zher last nineteen games straight

0:45:59.920 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 4>up up in September, you got Patrick Mahomes not laying

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:07.359
<v Speaker 4>more than double digits, and big picture, I do think

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 4>the Chiefs kind of fixed their offensive line, which was

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 4>a huge issue for them.

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:13.839
<v Speaker 3>They got some work in the preseason.

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 4>He played his starters. I think they're looking pretty good,

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:21.800
<v Speaker 4>and you know, the Browns defense is solid, and obviously

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Hian Miles, Garrett and some of the other guys they got.

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 4>But I think this is a statement game for the

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Chiefs after that Super Bowl loss.

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Entirely with you, and I like the Browns this year

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally buying them, absolutely, But you're gonna give me

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes in this game after that Super Bowl with

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid in September at under a touchdown, I'm definitely

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>taking it. In fact, I really should have pivoted to

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that game right after the death.

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 2>But it's fine.

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a bunch of over dyers, all right, Rams

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at home lank seven and a half to the Bears.

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm taking the I'm taking the points here.

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 4>I know people are worried about the Bears, their offensive line.

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 4>I still think fantasy wise, I do like David Montgomery.

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 4>I think he keeps them in the game enough. And again,

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:09.959
<v Speaker 4>it's you know, Stafford, new system, new head coach. Maybe

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 4>there's a couple things they got to work out there.

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 4>You could apply the same thing to the Bears. But

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 4>it's it's Week one, Sunday night, Football National TV. I

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 4>think there's gonna be a ton of Bears fans there,

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 4>so I think they get up for this game enough

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 4>to keep it within seven.

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I'm on the other side.

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think if I have to go, I look, I

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 1>just I fear for Andy Dalton and what it things

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna look like.

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 3>In my head, it's justin Field's I get it.

0:47:37.239 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 4>So you're right, Andy Dalton in prime time probably a

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:41.760
<v Speaker 4>good reason to fade.

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 3>The number just seems a hair hut.

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:44.839
<v Speaker 2>I get it. The number.

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>The number is correct, I think because it is something

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you're over a touchdowns really tough. But for me, I

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.879
<v Speaker 1>love Matthew Stafford. I'm very high in the Rams as

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>most people are this year. I love that defense. I

0:47:55.520 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>fear for Andy Dalton, so I'm willing to bite the

0:47:57.719 --> 0:47:59.959
<v Speaker 1>ball a little bit and lay the points. Final game,

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders getting four and a half from the Ravens

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 1>in Las Vegas.

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is another one.

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to go against a Monday night home dog

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:17.439
<v Speaker 4>opening up the stadium, So I you know, I'm really

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 4>going back and forth year on this one.

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I would my.

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Lean would be right now of Raiders, but I could

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 4>change my mind by Monday. This one's tough because you know,

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 4>the Baltimore offense has had so many issues, injuries, everything.

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 4>But then you're really going to back this Raiders team

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 4>which has had to you know, weird offseason as well.

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 4>I got, you know, all things being equal, I think

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 4>you should take a Monday night football home dog at

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 4>four and a half.

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 3>But I'm not a huge Gruden or Raiders fan.

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm staying away, but if forced to go one way,

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually would go with the Raiders because I think

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that place is gonna be nuts, and I don't think

0:48:57.640 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that everybody else is.

0:48:59.160 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 2>Ready for it.

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Also, frankly, I mean, what if Baltimore the Ravens going

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to spend a couple of days in Vegas right leading

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 1>up to it at whenever they travel out there. That's

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 1>my mess with you a little bit. So yeah, right,

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, So we've got a couple of things. Let's

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>just very briefly again recapt the official plays. You've got

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks lank two and a half against the Colts,

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the Titans length three to the Cardinals, and the Pats

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>length three to the Dolphins. I am taking the Cardinals

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Titans over fifty two and a half the

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Falcons and the Eagles over forty eight and the Jets

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 1>length five and a half to the Panthers. If you

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>want to sub out one of my over unders because

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you're like I don't accept over unders as a pick,

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:37.399
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. My other one would be the Chiefs lank

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>six to the Browns. I could also be convinced to

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 1>take the Washington football team laying one to the Chargers.

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Sean, this was great. I love kicking off.

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I loved it.

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I loved it. Remind everybody where they can find all

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 2>of you in your work and all.

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 3>The good stuff.

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, Sports Gambling Podcast. We actually just our network

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.920
<v Speaker 4>as GPN. We launched an app, so that's the easiest

0:49:57.920 --> 0:49:59.719
<v Speaker 4>way to get all our picks podcasts.

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 3>It's all for free. We're doing a contest. It's free

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 3>to enter.

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 4>You have a chance to win one hundred thousand dollars

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 4>NFL Week one. You have to pick a bunch of

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:11.799
<v Speaker 4>things correct, so it's a it's a long shot, but

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:14.399
<v Speaker 4>again it's free. The podcast free, the picks are free,

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 4>So SGPN in the app Store, Google Play Store, give

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:20.879
<v Speaker 4>us a fall on Twitter at Gambling Podcast and yeah,

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:22.240
<v Speaker 4>let it ride let's go baby.

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Week one.

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 4>It feels like going back to school if school was

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 4>being a degenerate sports gambler.

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It is last, especially after last year where it was

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just this weird kind of thing, you know.

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Now it's just it's all gravy. It's all wonderful, all right.

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I really appreciate it coming on.

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And you guys, by the way, you should be following Sean.

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:43.839
<v Speaker 1>You should be following the Sports Gambling Network podcast. They're hilarious,

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way. It's not only just entertaining, they give

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>great advice. So really, I appreciate you coming on.

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 3>We will have you.

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Back for sure.

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>We will exchange picks beforehand so that we don't have

0:50:53.680 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to worry about me randomly.

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna I'm gonna.

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Put in a parlay of our official five, so we'll

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 4>see maybe I come back and yeah, we'll see how

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 4>that goes.

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm in. I'm in, all right.

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So again, we'll be back here on Monday, giving us

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:12.759
<v Speaker 1>an early look in the lines. The meantime, enjoy your

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Week one football, everybody, and we will catch it next week.