WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: The Answer Show

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It's time for the Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Were with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, am Bar Garcia, and

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton's Rimsey, May thirteenth, twenty twenty, Season sixteen, episode

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>number nine. Welcome to another edition of The Break. We

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>are alive from the whole edition of the s WBC

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage Studios. I got my crew here with me, Nick Eatman,

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Dave Helman, Amber Garcia, and we got some Cowboys talk

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for you guys. Hopefully everyone is doing well, and let's

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>jump right in. Last week, the NFL released the NFL schedule,

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>including the Cowboys schedule for the twenty twenty season. They

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>are progressing as though we are going to play a

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>full slate of games, and so I'll open it up

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to you guys. Let's talk a little bit about what

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you think of the schedule. What stood out to you

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>good or bad about this this season's schedule. Let's start

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with you Nick, Well, I mean I think what stood

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>out is that it looked like a normal schedule. So

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll say that first. I mean, I thought that was

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>encouraging to see. And I don't know if we need

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 1>to go into detail on that, but just it looked

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like the schedules we've seen it in the past, other

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>than the Giants being not in the first week or

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, first two weeks of the season. But I

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>just think, you know, it looks it looks like a

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>schedule that is favorable to them as far as you know,

0:01:58.160 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to get off to a good start.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We've learned a long time ago that there's always going

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to be two or three teams that are surprising one

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>way or the other. So what your schedule looks like

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>when me look at last year, what if you were

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, the Cowboys would you know, destroy the Rams,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but then have you know, getting destroyed by the Bills

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>at home. So it never really looks like what you

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>think it is. But as we stand right now, it

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>looks favorable Amber. Honestly, nothing that stood out to me,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>aside from the fact that we're not playing the Giants

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the first game. But to me, you know, with my

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>time being here, I've learned that no team is ever

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the same every year. And a team that you might think, oh,

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be easy to play this year, well that

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 1>might not be the case. You know, it might not

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>depend on what the opposing team is doing. It could

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>be the Cowboys hurting themselves. Although this year, you know,

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know what to expect since we do

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>have an e coaching staff. But as far as the

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>schedule and tough teams are, like, oh, are they going

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to start off easy, or like some teams that maybe

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't necessarily need to win. You know, to me,

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you need to win every single game and you cannot

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>take an opponent for granted or things like, oh they're

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be easy to beat, that's not the case. You know,

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to always be prepared. Dave, I'm gonna repeat

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>what I wrote on the website last week when the

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>schedule came out, and I agree, obviously, I agree with

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>what they just said. I mean, there's gonna be a

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>team that is surprisingly good on the schedule, and there's

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some surprisingly bad ones. But uh, you know,

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>without even worrying about what comes like two or three

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>months into the season, it's it's just hard not to

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>look at those first three games for a variety of reasons,

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>because again we know things change from year to year.

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But the Rams, Falcons and Seahawks have been in the

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>conversation among the NFC's better teams for you know, for

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>four or five years now. You know, the Falcons aren't

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that far removed from being in the Super Bowl. Been

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>seven and nine in the last two years, which puts

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>them right in the mix of contending for the playoffs.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The Rams, obviously we're just in a Super Bowl, and

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks have made the playoffs like ten years in

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a row, or eight of the last nine, whatever it is.

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>You think back to last year, the Cowboys got in

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trouble because they lost those NFC games,

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and it became pretty obvious as early as like October

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that they were going to have to win the division

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to make the playoffs, like they just didn't have the

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>tiebreakers to be there as a wildcard or anything like that.

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So those are three pretty big games against NFC teams

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that you could find yourself in a lot of trouble

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>if you don't get out to a hot start. And

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look back at past schedules, you know,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>they open with the Giants, and then there's a road

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>trip to Washington. You get division games, a chance to

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>get up on the division and against teams that aren't

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>very good and haven't been. And I don't think that's

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the case this year. I think, you know, they can't

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>afford to start slowly this year. And the interesting part

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about that, Dave, is that two of those games are

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>on the road. So you start your first two or

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>three games on the road. You go to to LA

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to open their new stadium against the Rams, and then

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>in week three you're going at the Seattle Seahawks, which

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is not is probably one of the harder places in

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole NFL to play just because of crowd noise.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there are questions as to whether there will be

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a crowd there, but certainly those are those are not

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>those are typically or at least that's typically not a

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>game that's an easy road win for teams. That's a

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>tough place to go and play. That all being said,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is there a particular part of the schedule and and

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I know we're not talking about I'm not talking about

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so much about the teams and how good they will

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>be versus not, but I'm talking more about just the

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of the schedule home versus road cold weather. Is

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>there anything about the schedule that you look at and

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you say, this could be a trouble area for the Cowboys.

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:55.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, anytime you know you're going to play cold

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>weather games in December, I mean they've got three of them.

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You know it's going to be cold in Cincinnati. Um,

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you know it's gonna be cold at Baltimore and then

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and also against the Giants to end the season. So

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't matter what it looks like. Weather

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>can neutralize the situation. And if you can't throw the

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>ball like keep like you want. So who's to say

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>what the Bengals will be like at the end of

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the season. Uh, you know this year or any of

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>those years. But but you know, if the weather is challenging, um,

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that that obviously could could be a problem there.

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Curious to see gonna say sorry, I was just gonna

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>say that, I'm curious to see how McCarthy handles practices

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>because with Jason Garrett, I mean there were times where

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine you go into a road game where

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the weather is going to be colder, or maybe rainy,

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they didn't necessarily practice outside all the time. So I'm

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>curious to see how McCarthy is gonna handle that, whether

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to just kind of have the team practice is mostly

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>outside to kind of although the temperatures are not necessarily

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the same at those places, but it's still something that

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of prepares you for that weekend game. Dave Jeff something. Yeah,

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't want to get into the maths

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of it, because it's really annoying. You know. It's it's

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>not an unfair thing that the Cowboys have to play

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>three games in twelve days. Because the vast majority of

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the teams in the NFL play three games in twelve days.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Instead of going Sunday Thursday Thursday, most teams go Sunday

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Thursday. It's still accounts for three games and twelve

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>days again for the vast majority of the teams in

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the league. Having said that, it does suck for the

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys that they always have to do that stretch so

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>late in the year. You know, some teams get that

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Thursday game out of the way in September and they

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about a wonky schedule again for

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year. The Cowboys are always going

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to have to do that brutal stretch in late November,

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, and you chalk that up with a

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>light bye week, this is gonna be a tire team.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So to think that they've got to play a very

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>talented Vikings team followed by Thanksgiving and then no the

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>reigning MVP right after that, I mean, that won't be easy.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not unfair, but it's gonna suck. Now. I think

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that that late bye week helps though, because that bye

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>week happens two weeks before Thanksgiving a little actually a

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>little less than two weeks before Thanksgiving. How much does

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>he think that? Do you think that helps them? Right

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>before they go into that that tough stretch. Well, let's

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>see how beat up they are, because if they do

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>play five preseason games, then they go nine straight to

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>start the year. That's fourteen consecutive weeks of playing football,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and who knows what kind of offseason schedule of conditioning

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>schedule that you have. It's obviously not going to be

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>as much as that they've had in the past. So

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a challenging, you know, that's a challenging stretch of

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>games right there, to go fourteen consecutive weeks of playing

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>without a break, and you've got some really tough teams

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in there, and the Steelers. I don't care how good

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers are or bad they are, they're gonna beat

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you up. So it's gonna be that's gonna be tough

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>for this team. Yeah, it might work out that the

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>buy works in a perfect situation, but as it stands

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, that looks like a long period of times

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to be playing consecutive games. Yeah, I will say this.

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually we talked a little bit, you guys talked

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit earlier about the cold weather games there

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in December, and I actually think that if you look

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>at it, I actually think that might be an advantage

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys this year because their coach obviously spent

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a number of years coaching a team that played their

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.599
<v Speaker 1>home games in cold situations, and so him preparing his

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>team to be able to handle weather should be a

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>good He should be prepared to be able to do that. Now,

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, that's still an acclimating, an acclimation thing. They

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have to acclimate to the weather when they get there,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because that's not the kind of weather you typically have

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas, Fort worth. But I do think if there's

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a coach out there who's at that kind of experience

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>which McCarthy has, I think that should be a benefit

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys. The next thing I'll ask you, guys is,

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>right now, Cowboys favored in eleven of their sixteen games.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Give me an over under you guys, take the over

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>or the under on them winning eleven games this season.

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you, Dave. Oh geez, I would probably

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>take the under today. I'm really excited about the offseason

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that they've had, But on paper, how much better do

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they look than last year when they were eight and eight?

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, you know, you know, the offense should

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>be a lot better. I expect Dac to play better,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I expect Cede Lamb to help all that good stuff,

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But eleven wins is a lot. I'd see them. I'd

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>see nine or ten as a more realistic scenario. So

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I would probably go under on that amber. You know,

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>people have been asking me that same question, and I

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>honestly don't know how to feel. I don't know what

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to expect because I keep going back and forth, you know,

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And I remember I asked you guys a few months

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>ago about you know, how long does it take for

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a team to acclimate to a whole new coaching staff.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And you guys basically said that it can go both ways.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, they can happenly basically, It can happen basically instantly,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>or it can maybe take a while. And that's the

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>question here. I do think that having a new voice

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>might bring up the spirits around the locker room and

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>players like the defense trying to prove themselves and trying

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to go back to being the hot boys and blah

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. You know, I think that hopefully they can

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>go back to that and just have a different kind

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of spirit and play with more more passion, sorry, more

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>passion because all we're on the offense side of the ball.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we saw great things from Kellen Moore. Clearly

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't really enough, but I'm excited to see what

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>more can this offense do now with a new You

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>hate the coach, Nick, So if you if you asked

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>me right now, I would say, let's keep it out

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of eleven. Let's not go over or under. Let's just

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>say eleven. All right, Nick, Um, I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>go under that. I mean, it's hard to say right

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>now that if we've seen this team better or not,

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't seen him at all. So um, and

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, Dave said it, and I was sat in

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this conversation a few days ago about on paper. You

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>know how much I hate that term about on paper

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because what what's the paper? I mean, who wrote it?

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Who typed it? Is it the paper? Derek shuffling around

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on his computer? I mean, what's the paper? What does

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it say? And so I don't know, like I there,

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>there you go. What does that tell you, Derek? I mean,

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I just I just think that, Um, you know, you

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have to see it because because we were you know,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants to say this team's talented. We'll find out

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>if if they're talented. Well, we'll find out if Don

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Taripo and Gerald McCoy our first round pick players. Are

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>they the players that struggled a little bit last year

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>in Carolina, We'll see. I mean, it's just hard to tell.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say under though, until until we proved differently,

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this is an eight and eight team right now from

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>what we saw last year, and I can't imagine that

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they're three games better. But I mean to just point

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>this out if they would have scored fifteen points, they

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>could have been three or four games better. That's how

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>close it was in their losses. And you can't say

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>it the other way. On their wins, they were blowing

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>out the teams. So that is somewhat of an encouraging sign.

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>You can get a touchdown better and you have a

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>much better football team. At least that's what we saw

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>last year. Oh yeah, oh sorry, go ahead, Derek, No,

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>good day, good good day. I mean that that's why

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>we did this whole thing about well, you never know

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna be good and who's gonna be bad, because

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of like four teams who are clearly

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot better than everyone else and four teams that

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>are clearly a lot worse, Like, it's just a twenty

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>four team jumble and a few touch thouns and a

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>few bounces of the ball's going to dictate the difference

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>between like ten and six and eight and eight. It

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>happens every year, so and I mean, like, I think

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>this team has the potential to win more than eleven

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>games for sure, Like they absolutely could. But you're asking

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of breaks to go your way to

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>improve by you know, four or five games from last year.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It just seems it seems like a lot to ask.

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at how close they were last

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>year though, like just talent wise and and the things

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that they were doing, like the it's not that far

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>away from you win in an extra four games. Well,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, but I completely agree, Like you're you're

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a handful of way of players away from winning two

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>more games and making the playoffs. That's still not eleven wins,

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, even if a few things go

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>your way, like you got to assume you're going to

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>break even in a league with this much parody, I

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>think yeah, And I don't. I don't think they've actually

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at cornerback, they lost Byron

0:14:58.160 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Jones and all the guys that they put in their

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that right now. I can't see that

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be better at that position. I don't

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be better at center. I don't

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be better at the defensive end position.

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Losing Robert Quinn, Randall Cobb versus Ceedee Lamb, I mean, yeah,

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Ceedee Lamb is probably going to be better at some

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>point in his career. I don't know about rate right

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this second, So it's hard to say that they're you know,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be better in these in these positions,

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to be three games better. I just don't think we

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>could say it right now. Yeah, I will say this,

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a believer that, and I will preface this by saying,

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and you guys know this, I'm probably one of the

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>more optimistic people just in everything. I tend to see

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the glass half full. So for me, it's not hard

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to convince myself that they can get to eleven wins

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>or beyond this season. But I will say this, I've

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>seen where new coaches sometimes in a team that has

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>some talent, it'll give them a little bump because there

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>are wrinkles and different things that that coach brings in

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that it may not sustain itself over a second, third,

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth year, but for that first year you could sometimes

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>see a nice little jump there and how a team performs.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm actually expecting that with some of the changes

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they've made, some of the new talent they've brought in,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I expect that maybe they can get a little bit

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>more out of this team than otherwise because of a

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>new coaching staff, and maybe some of the new things

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that they'll implement that uses the talent a little differently

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>than the previous regime that may give them it leads

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bump for this year. We'll see whether they

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>could sustain that. Let's go and take our first break.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we're gonna jump into a little

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of a game here. I have some questions for

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>these guys about this team and about some of the players,

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and we'll do that when we come right back. This

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. There are no apartments

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>big such a great deal. That's okay, just okay. Right

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>about the subway, Well, I bet you don't even notice

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it after that's my neighbor. Ain't deal. That's just okay.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not okay. Get a great deal with America's best network.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Come into an AT and T store to find out

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>how to get one of our popular smartphones for zero

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars down based on GWS one score Stember twenty nineteen.

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you want the most interesting, up to the minute

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys news straight from the Star in Frisco? How

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>about exclusive and on command. That's right, news and nuggets

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you can't find anywhere else. With our exclusive Cowboys content

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>on Alexa, you can have all the answers, secrets, stories

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and more. What's Stephen Jones thinking during a game? What's

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Looney's favorite pregame meal. We take your questions to

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys players and coaches and you can hear the answers

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>directly back to you. Just say Alexa Open Dallas Cowboys.

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Whether you're into being a part of this or more

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>into something like this, segeek has the tickets to the

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>events you love. It's the easiest way to find, buy

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and sell tickets. Plus, with their deal score technology, they'll

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>recommend the best seats in the house at the best value.

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So the next time you're craving this, hey, download the

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>c geek app and let's go see. Ladies and gentlemen,

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's that time again for tailgating with the Auterbox boys.

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Auterbox the company that builds wildly overproductive phone cases, the

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>one and only, but cases are just the start. Auterbox

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is the official outfitter of tailgating. If they can keep

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>my phone safe, what can they do for my parking

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>lot party? How about protecking your beverages from suboptimal drinking

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>temperatures with their elevation tumblers. An Auterbox elevation tumblers come

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in three sizes, a ten ouncer, a twenty ouncer, and

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>even a sixty four ounce growler. Check out all the

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>colors and sizes of their elevation tumblers at auterbox dot com.

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break, Welcome Back to the Break. We're

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>live from the virtual s WBC Borgas studios. It's in

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>our homes. But but we're talking Cowboys football. If you

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>guys appreciate you guys taking some time with us today

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.959
<v Speaker 1>to be will talk a little bit with you. In

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the third segment, we are going to take some questions.

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you happen to ask some questions, you can

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>always tweet them and we'll try to get those questions.

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I know Amber has already accumulated some questions that will

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>take but here in the second segment, what I wanted

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>to do is I saw this actually on Twitter on

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter last week. It was an interesting little set of

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>questions that people could just kind of fill in. So

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I figured we'd take it to the show and I'd

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ask you guys some of these questions. I'm going to

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>throw out a basically a category, and I want each

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of you guys to give me a player that you

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think best suits this category. All right, So we're gonna

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>start with something really simple. Best player on the team.

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you Amber. I think it's Seek. To me,

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been Seek for several years. What he does is amazing.

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of beating he's taking over these few years,

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that he's still running and healthy, and

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we've seen him have to carry the team, obviously

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>with the help of the old line, but but just

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the the way his physical Like what the power that

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 1>he has in such a small body. You look at

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>him in personally and he looks tiny sometimes and then

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you see him on the field, He's like, wow, he

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>has so much power in him. Um, I think to

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>me he would be the best player, all right. Nick

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to be different and say like a Zach Martin,

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, it is Zeke.

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree with her. I think Zeke is the best

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>player on the team for all of the reasons she

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>just said. So, Um, I just think he's He's the

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>engine that makes this team go. Yes, Tyrant and Zach

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>help and those that offensive line, but it's Zeke's is

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the guy for me. There's only two guys on this

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>team who you could say right now have a very

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>very good shot to make the Hall of Fame. That's

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Tyrant and Zach. Tyrn love him to death. Obviously, the

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>health problems have been a problem for him in the

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years. Meanwhile, Zach Martin has just been

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in all pro every moment that he's been in the NFL,

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>literally from the beginning. He's never not been all pro.

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>He's I mean, Zeke and Tank and Tyron all are

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation, but I don't think anybody would argue,

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>especially now that Marshall Yanda retired, Zack Martin is the

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>best right guard in football. Um So I think Zach

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>all right most overrated or underperforming relative to expectations. Let's

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>start with you, Nick Wow, Wow, relative to expectations. I

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>would say, Man, I hate saying this, but it's got

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>to be DeMarcus Lawrence, and I just I say that

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just because of the contract really, I mean, and what

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>they paid for that they needed him to be more

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>of a difference maker on defense last year. You know,

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to knock him. I think he helps

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this team in a lot of ways on and off

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the field. In the locker room, I think he brings

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.360
<v Speaker 1>up the guys around him. But he's got to be

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>better than what he was last year. He's got to

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>be more disruptive and a guy that you look at

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and say, where is number ninety. We've got to get

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>him blocked at all points. And I'm not saying they

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>don't do that because Quinn had a great year. We'll

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.479
<v Speaker 1>see this year, you know what the other side looks like.

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But I just think from a contract standpoint, he's the guy.

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm missing somebody, Dave. I think it's got to

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>be Jail and Smith. Honestly. I mean I don't necessarily

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>disagree completely with Nick, but I can turn on the

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>All twenty two and show you the impact that DeMarcus

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence makes on the team outside of getting sacks. He's

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>constantly double team. He's great against the run, he crashes in.

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>He definitely was part of the reason why Robert Quinn

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>got so many favorable looks to get as many sacks

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>as he did. And then I can and and you know,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to dog people either. Jalen had moments

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of good play last year. But I can also turn

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>on plenty of games where the opposing offense is targeting

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>him to have success. I mean, go watch the Bears

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>game over again. It was playing its day. And you know,

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>fan bases and media of the teams are typically trying

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to campaign for the players that they follow to make

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Bowl. You know, uh, you know, Lyle Collins

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is a great example. A lot of people felt like

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Lyle got shafted last year. Meanwhile, Jaylen Smith made the

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl and like the reaction from Cowboys fans and

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>media was like, he did that happened? And you factor

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in the fact that he's I mean, he himself is

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>also on a big contract. I just think there's there's

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of room for improvement from where he was

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>at last year. Amber. You know, I'm so glad, Dave

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>that you said Jaylen, because that's the guy who I

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>was thinking. And then I was feeling bad. I was

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>going through this battle in my head. I'm like, Okay,

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel bad because you look at where

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>he came from, like how far he's come along from

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the injury that he had, and to see him playing

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the way that he's playing now. But then at the

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>same time, and it's something that it's hard for me

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to explain. I feel like he he tries too hard

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.719
<v Speaker 1>on the field. He it's just it's not as clean.

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know how to describe it, but it's

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>just not as clean. He hesitates sometimes just because he's

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>trying too hard. And you want players obviously to try hard,

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but with him, it's like he needs to chill out,

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>take it back and notch Let's refocus, let's reanalyze what

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. And I think that way he can improve

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>his game and what he's doing on the field, because

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>sometimes he's just like like kind of all over it

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>but then doesn't get it done, you know. So I

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>think I would say Jalen and he tries too hard

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>off the field, and I think that that's a problem

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. So, yeah, those are good, those are good

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>points there about Jalen. But I also think in the

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>offseason something that has happened where if we were to

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about this next year, I think we know who

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the you know the person's going to be. It's gonna

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be the target's gonna be on Dak Prescott. Now, because

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>you don't really say that if you don't have a

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>huge contract, but now he's gonna at least has a

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>big price tag over thirty million, you know, for this year.

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So now he's in the equation as well. And if

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't perform at a high level, I mean, he's

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be a target for this type of conversation

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think, honestly, I think you you could

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>list him right now if you wanted to. And I'm

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the king of the dack defenders, but I mean, last

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>season wasn't good enough for for the starting quarterback, and

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're asking for the type of money that

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he's asking for. I mean, he's gonna get paid regardless.

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>He's either going to play on the tag or get

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>a deal that he likes, but for the amount of

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>money that is being negotiated right now, last season was

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 1>not good enough. Yeah, And I'm kind of shocked that

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys didn't mention a guy like Amari Cooper Cooper

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for the same reason, because Amari Cooper is a guy

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that Cowboys gave up first round pick four, they just

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>paid a new contract, and they were way too many

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>games last year when they needed him and he just

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't show up for them. And so I think when

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you start talking about unmet expectations, I think Amar has

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in that conversation. Now, don't get me wrong,

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I think he is one of the best. I think

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>you can also throw him in the category of guys

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that would get an honorable mention for best player on

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the team, because when he's on, he's on, and he

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is a really, really good player. But there were just

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>too many times where you needed him to step up

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and make a play for you last season where I

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't think he met the expectations that you had

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for a guy in that caliber. I am well aware

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that they struggled to score against the Saints, the Patriots,

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. I think I'm forgetting somebody. I know that

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they had four or five games where they struggled to

0:26:55.880 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>score twenty points. I still they didn't. The majority of

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>their problems from last season on the defense. You know

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Bills are one of those teams. I think

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that this when they played top ten teams, I think

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they were like one in six last year. They just

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't play well against good defenses. I think their

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>number one offensive ranking is very hollow because when it

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was time to score, they couldn't and we talked about

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>this before, so this goes on dec as well. And

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they didn't ever come back in games. They never came

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>back when they were down in the second half, and

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>never came back to win a game. So they had

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>some some issues on offense as well. I mean, both

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the ball. I think they were flashes

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of good play on both sides. Not a lot of

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>flashes of good special teams play. And so when when

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just pretty good, pretty good, and bad that legion's

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>about eight and eight. All right, let's move on best Edition,

0:27:53.520 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Amber best Edition, And can be a draft pick or

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a free agent? Well, I mean I would have to

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>go with see THEE. Lamb just because obviously the obvious

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>talent that he's shown during his college career and the

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Cowboys were able to get him the

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>way that they did. You know, it was just a

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>complete surprise. And when we were thinking about the wide

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver position, there were a lot of questions prior to

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the draft, and you didn't necessarily know what was going

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to happen there, how you were going to reinforce the position.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And to me, I still have my doubts about Amari Cooper.

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't. I don't really know if it

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>was his plane. He's obviously a skilled player, but I

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>really don't know how much his foot injury was affecting him.

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to feel about his foot injury,

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and just see the Lamb is a guy that's going

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to come in and make an immediate impact,

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, so I would say him, all right, Dave,

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>don't need to spend a lot of time on it.

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It's CD. Y' all know how I feel about him,

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's Yeah. I think he's It's the only addition

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that right now is like a definitive upgrade over the

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>guy that played the position last year. Like you could say,

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>ha ha, Clinton Dix. We'll see how good he actually is.

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think Cede Lamb is Yeah. Final answer,

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>don you think he's definitively better than cop at this

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>point where he is coming into the NFL? As always,

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to wait and see. I mean, he might

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>not be, but I think he will be. Let's put

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it that way. Okay, Nick, I'll say I agree with

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>both Yell, but I'll say Griggs rline as well, because

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think that he is a big upgrade for

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>what they had to start last year. You can say

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>four Bath did a nice job, and he did. He

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't miss any kicks. But four Bath is four Bath.

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>The bottom will drop out for him. It just will.

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what his career is. He did a

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>nice job of coming in, but and maybe Zerline will

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>struggle as well. But one thing I do know is

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that your kickoffs are going to be much better. You're

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to depend people back to start each drive.

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that was important and so and you know,

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>just like Maher was a weapon with a strong leg,

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Zerline will give you that as well. So

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I CD of course, And where he is better than

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Cop is a punt returner. He's a dynamic punt returner.

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>He'll be a dynamic punt returner right now. So I

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>think I think that helps you. I've said it before.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>This is very similar to ten years ago when Dez

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>came in as the third receiver with Roy and Miles Austin.

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>You have the same type of dynamic. He'll come in

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and he'll be a good receiver, he'll be a good

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>punt returner, and eventually he will be the man. But

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have to do everything right now. So I

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>think CDs is going to be a great addition. But

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>don't forget Zerline, you know, I'll throw in jeral McCoy

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>because I really believe this is the kind of signing

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that I've wanted the Cowboys to make for years. Go

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>out and get that veteran guy who has a lengthy

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>resume of production that isn't yet so over the hill

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to where he can't bring you some of that, And

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>whether he will be what he was in the first

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>five years of his career or not, who knows. What

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I do know is he's still a productive player, and

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's still at this point. In my opinion,

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he's substantially better than the previous guy that

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was there. I think he's better than Malie Collins, and

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>so I think they upgraded the position. I think they

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>got a guy that still has something left in the tank,

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy that has a lot of production, and I

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>want to see where that goes. These are the kinds

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of veteran signings that I think the Cowboys should have

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>been making, not just the vets that are just you know,

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>longtime journeyman, but a legit guy that has been one

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of the better defensive tackles in the league for the

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>better part of his career. And I think that can

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:50.719
<v Speaker 1>pay big dividends for the Cowboys if you get him

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the right situation and you know, like a CD

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is great, it'll help Dak be better. And that guy

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys were saying is very overrated Jalen Smith, Dontaripo,

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and Gerald McCoy are as good as they they're as

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>advertising and as good as they have been, then Jalen

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Smith will be better. Layton Vanderich will be better because

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the trickle down effect of allowing them to go

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>free up and play and make plays. So you might

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.719
<v Speaker 1>get two upgrades within one if Gerald McCoy is as

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>good as as you say, Derek. All right, let's move

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on to our next question. Next category, could surprise. Let's

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>start with you, Dave, who could surprise? Oh gosh, okay, actually, well,

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>these these tie in together. Um, So I'll say Tyler

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>battish Um because I mean he's he's a Day three pick.

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>You know you shouldn't expect too much, and you know

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>he took the reason he fell obviously injuries, and he

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't his dynamic after his injuries. At Wisconsin, but

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys says healthy and ready to go. This was

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a Remington Award winner. I believe he won it on

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>or this season or two seasons ago. But I mean,

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a highly talented and highly experienced guy, and

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it's conceivable that he can step in and surprise and

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>push for playing time right away. I don't know that

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I expect it, but it's possible, all right. Nick blake Bell,

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna help this team. He's a true

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:29.719
<v Speaker 1>blocking tight end, but he's also dynamic enough to, you know,

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>do some things with the ball in his hand. I

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to be an upgrade at tight end. Now.

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Obviously Jarwin is going to be the starter. He should

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>be an upgrade over Jason Witten. That's what the Cowboys

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>are expecting, of course, but I think Blake Bell will

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>be an upgrade over their backup tight end. And I'm

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>interested to see how McCarthy's gonna use these tight ends.

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>It'll be different than what we've seen with Garrett. I

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>think that he will be a significant signing for this team.

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Amber I don't if this is if it would be

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>much of a surprise, because we did get to see

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a little spark from him last year during training camp,

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>but I would go with Luke Giffer. I'm excited to

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>see him healthy and see him just getting back at

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it and practicing that. I've said this before. He has

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the perfect linebacker mold. He fits right along with Sean

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Lee Jalen late In. Even so, he has a perfect mold.

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>We've seen him have some spark, he has the ability.

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It sucks that his season was kind of messed up

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>because of the injury that he had. But going and

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>getting healthy and getting back at it, I think he

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>might surprise us. I will tell you this. When I

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>put this one down on paper, I had a very

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>clear image in my mind of who this player was,

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and for me, it's Alden Smith. He is the definition

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of this category of good surprise because he's a guy

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't played in forever. He's had a lot of stuff.

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>He's at the battle off the field. Most people feel

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>like gets probably impossible for a guy that hasn't played

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.439
<v Speaker 1>in as long as he hasn't played to come back

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and make an impact, But he does have skill. What

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we know is when he was playing in the NFL,

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>he had a ton of skill and uh and so

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe just maybe he can be the exception to the

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>rule here that if he still has that quick twitch

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and and and actually can get back and play the

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>way that he was kindled even some of that, if

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you could put him in on some pass rushdowns, he

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>could surprise some people and really give you a boost

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>from a pass rush standpoint in an area where, in

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, that's a that's a part of the team

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think they did as much to to

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>make better this offseason, where I think there are a

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of other areas where they did get better. I

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think they necessarily did it pass rush, but I

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>think he is a guy that definitely could surprise some

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>people this season. Let's go on to the next category.

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Takes a leap? Who takes a leap? Let's start with

0:35:50.760 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Amber takes the leap? Oh, how do you know? Um,

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know what to say. I

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 1>would go with maybe Xavier Woods. Maybe maybe he can

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>hopefully take a leap and say and um no, you

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'm gonna change it. I'm gonna go with

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Chittowa Chiba Woozy. I think that he can take a

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>leap and and get back to some of those good

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.879
<v Speaker 1>moments that we did see from him. Um, he does

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>have the talent. I don't know what it was from

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>these previous years. Last year that his playing game, like

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>his game was just going down and but but I've

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 1>seen it, I've seen him have it. I just I

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>just think he needs to do I don't know. Maybe

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>with the new coaching staff he can improve and get better,

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>but him being on a contract year where this is

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>his final year and on his contract, I think he

0:36:55.680 --> 0:37:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can definitely take a leap, all right, Nick Jaylen Jolks,

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about him a lot, but I just think somebody,

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:05.879
<v Speaker 1>one of those defensive ends is gonna take a leap,

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And it could be him, it could be Joe Jackson,

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna go with Jalen Jolkes. I think he's

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna He's got the frame for it. I think he's

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have a different physique than he had a

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.879
<v Speaker 1>last year. I see him. For him, a leap would

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>be making the team. I don't know if that's a

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>huge impact player, but I think he makes the leap

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>and makes a jump to the roster this year. Dave

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>rain Dakota Prescott I mean, obviously, I know he's already

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a good player, but for the amount of arguing, you know,

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there doesn't seem to be a lot of consensus about

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>where to stack this guy in the hierarchy of NFL quarterbacks,

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and one way or another, I don't think that'll be

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>a problem when this season's over, you know, if it

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>happens the way it's supposed to happen, between having another

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>year of Kellen Moore, adding an offensive minded coach and

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Carthy getting a top twenty pick added to your offense,

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and then factor it. You know, Dak thrives under pressure.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 1>We've called him a gamer forever. Well, he's either going

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a big contract to live up to or

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be playing on a tag for a

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>big contract. Either way, the pressures on. So go prove it,

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think he will, and I think by the

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 1>time he's done playing next season, a lot more people

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>will agree that he's a top five six quarterback in

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. You know, right now, Dave, They they came

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>out with, you know, the odds of winning the MVP.

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I believe he was the third highest third, you know,

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>best odds to win it at like eight to one

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, which is surprising to me. But

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean that Vegas is thinking that that

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 1>he's going to have a big year to be in

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the running for MVP. I think that's surprising to me.

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, but I think you got to

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>remember the size of the Cowboys fan base skews a

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of that stuff because there's so many and you know,

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>if he's got bad odds, then a boatload of Cowboys

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fans are going to vet on him, and you know,

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>they stand to take Vegas for a lot of money.

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>So I think the size of the Cowboys fan base

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>skews a lot of those prop bets. But I do

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting that they think that highly of him

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:25.800
<v Speaker 1>before the season. Yeah, but you know that doesn't shock

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 1>me because when you think about it again, we mentioned

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it the earlier part of the show, Cowboys are favored

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in eleven of their sixteen games. At this point, you

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>add in the fact that this is an offense with

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the addition of Cede Lamb a lot of people think

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>is going to be one of the better, if not

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the best offense in the league. So if you got

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback who is leading the best or one of

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the best offenses in the league, and you got a

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>team that can win eleven games, He's going to be

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>right up there in the votes when it comes to

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>League MVP, regardless of well not regardless of but if

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you do all those things, obviously the records going to

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>be reflective of the fact that he's played that well.

0:39:58.239 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So that doesn't really shock me. I think they're a

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>lot lot of people right now, just with the addition

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of Ceedee Lamb, I think there are a lot of

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 1>people out there right now. I feel like the Cowboys

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>offense will be really really good next year and that's

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>going to catapult them too more wins. And I also

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's a little bit of love for Mike McCartney

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't necessarily there for Jason Garrett. Let's going to

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>move on to the next one prove it year. Who

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:25.399
<v Speaker 1>has the biggest prove it year in twenty twenty, Well

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it will be that if he if he has to

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.839
<v Speaker 1>play on the franchise tag, which I don't believe would

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 1>be a smart decision for him. That's why I think

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys have a lot of leverage here, more leverage

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>than he does. Um that he needs to go and

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.919
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, whatever the deal is, he needs

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to sign that because if he plays on a franchise

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>tag this year and they don't make the playoffs, then

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's going to help him. Obviously, it's

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to help him moving forward. So he's got

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a definite prove it year. Um if if he's playing

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 1>on a franchise tag, it doesn't even if he does,

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like Dave said, even if he has a new deal,

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>he's still you know, he needn't need to prove it

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>for you know, his for a contract point, but he

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>needs to kind of prove it for you know his

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, any any the pundits out there that are

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about him. So I don't know if that's the

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>answer you're looking for, You're probably looking for something else.

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But Dak would be right now is the guy that

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>would be on the prove it deal if he doesn't

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>get a new deal. Dave, I don't. I don't completely agree.

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the danswer's gonna be Dak regardless just because

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of how much money's involved. But I mean, Kirk Cousins

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>proved that you can play on the tag and not

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs and still make Bank so and I

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 1>thought it was really interesting, but not here. Well no, no

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, not maybe not with the Cowboys. But

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I out Kirk Cousins regrets the way that

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it went for him personally. Um, I thought it was

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting that he came out and said that he told

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Dak not to be afraid of the tag and I mean,

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at the way things have gone for Cousins, I

0:41:55.840 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>totally understand his line of thought. Um. Anyway, I would say, Williams,

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a year three. He was picked number

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 1>fifty two. He's been He's not a bad pick at all,

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>not a bad player, but maybe hasn't lived up to

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the expectation of being drafted that highly. I mean we're

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 1>sitting here talking about, you know, will he win the

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>left guard job? What do you do with him? And

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not ideal for a guy taken as high as

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 1>he was. So yeah, I think this is a big

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>year for him to come out and grab that job

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 1>or or you know, the Cowboys. And if he doesn't, obviously,

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>then you're probably talking about a different starter, Yamber Um,

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:39.879
<v Speaker 1>obviously from me would be daged. But just to give

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you someone different, I would say Tristan Hill. He's a

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>guy that I mean, he's only had one year, but

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I was expecting a lot more

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>from him and not what we saw last year. So

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he needs to prove it. He needs to

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>prove why the Cowboys drafted him at the place that

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they drafted him. He needs to that he has talent

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to help the defensive line. And yeah, I would say him,

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, I throw out the answer that Amber gave

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 1>for the previous question, which is to take a leap guy.

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's Cheeto. I think what the Cowboys

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 1>have done in the draft and free agency sets up

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where they don't necessarily have to keep Cheeto

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 1>around even this year if they don't want to. And

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 1>so if you start talking about prove it, like he's

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in that situation right now, he could go from being

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a starter to being a guy that doesn't even make

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a team. And so I think, more than anybody else

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on this team, he definitely needs to prove it because

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this is this is kind of the moment when he

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>either makes his career or he becomes that guy that

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of jumps around to the next team and just

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of flounders from there. So I think this is

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a huge year for Cheeto. I actually like the fact

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that there have been sparks in his career where we

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>saw things from him, traits from him that suggested he

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>can play and he can play well. He just didn't

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have a good year last year, and so I want

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>to see if he can actually prove it this year

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:02.840
<v Speaker 1>because it could be the difference between him getting a

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 1>new deal with the Cowboys or what kind of new

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>deal he gets with someone else, if he can play

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.919
<v Speaker 1>well this year or not. Yeah, to me, the reason

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>why I didn't mention him is because I think he

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>has approved training camp and we'll see what kind of

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>camp that's going to be. But because you're right, he

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>may not make the team if he doesn't, you know,

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>if they don't feel like he's a guy that can,

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:24.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of go forward. That they have a

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of cornerbacks right now, and I think that with

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the added competition and with Cheeto being such a competitive guy, um,

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it does push him to do even better.

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Because you looked at last year, I mean, what kind

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of competition did you really have at the cornerback position

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>last year? I don't Yeah, but he got benched. I mean,

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>like he got benched in the middle of the year.

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So well, yeah, that's my point. You're kind of you

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>don't really have anyone behind you kind of pressuring you. Like,

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:57.479
<v Speaker 1>oh it sounds it might sound dumb. It makes sense

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in my head, but I think that the sion of

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>these other cornerbacks are going to put pressure on him

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to have him bring out more out of himself. You know,

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe and maybe and you know, like you said, Derek,

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't have a you know, good year, or

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 1>he gets moves to another team or whatever. I mean,

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>his career path is very similar to the guy that

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:21.360
<v Speaker 1>brought in, Daryl Worley. Uh, he was a you know,

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:23.879
<v Speaker 1>four year guy, and he was I think I think

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a third or fourth round pick and you know, and

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>play okay and then and then moved to another team

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and so and now he's going to be like kind

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of a journeyman. So you know, this is kind of

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a make or break year, make or break training camp

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for a defining point of you know, he's kind of

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in a fork in the road. Which way is he

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna go? So yeah, this is definitely a

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.359
<v Speaker 1>big offseason and year for cheetoh. I mean, you think

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 1>about how teams are willing to pay cornerbacks, and and

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>so if he can do something really special this year,

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 1>then whether the Cowboys sign him or not kind kind

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of becomes irrelevant. It creates an opportunity for him as

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>far as his money making potential in his career. So

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a huge year for him. This is really

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a proved year for him across the league, not necessarily

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 1>just with the Cowboys. All Right, we're gonna take a

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:09.919
<v Speaker 1>final break. When we come back. We got one more question.

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get to one more category we'll do and

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 1>then hopefully we'll get to some questions before the show ends.

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that when we come right back. This is

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. I want to use what

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the pros use. How about the official men's skincare brand

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>or the Dallas Cowboys Jack Black. Right now, you can

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>get the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection of Cowboys

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>locker room favorites, for just ten bucks with free shipping.

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 1>The starter includes four Jack Black skincare favorites, plus a

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>full size and tense therapy lip bomb. Go to get

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com, slash Cowboys and use the code

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>word Team JB. That's get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys,

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Black starter, ten bucks, free shipping. Whether you're

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>into being a part of this one more into something

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>like this, Seekeek has the tickets to the events you love.

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the easiest way to find, buy and sell tickets. Plus,

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>with their deal score technology, they'll recommend the best seats

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 1>in the house at the best value. So the next

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>time you're craving this, download the Sea Geek app and

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go see Geek. I'm Jay Novachik, former tight end

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 1>for the Dallas Cowboys back in the day. I was

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the guy who always got the tough yards and that's

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>why I run with John Deer today. In fact, I

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have a John Dear three zero twenty five E tractor

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that can handle any yard work I need to do,

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you. Visit a John Deer

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:49.720
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys. Your new apartment's big,

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 1>such a great deal, that's okay, just okay, what's not

0:47:54.880 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to run about the subway. I bet you don't even

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>notice it after that's my neighbor. Ange the deal. That's

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>just okay, it's not okay. Get a great deal with

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 1>America's best network. Come into an AT and T store

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to find out how to get one of our popular

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>smartphones for zero dollars down based on GWS one score.

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>September twenty nineteen, Back to the Break. Here at the Cowboys,

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>we can't wait to get back on the field, and

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we know you can't wait to pack at and T

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Stadium to cheer us on when that time comes. Seat

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Geek is the place to get all of your concert

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>or tickets Cowboy tickets plus tickets the hundreds of games

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 1>with rodeos at other live events we'll be able to

0:48:40.560 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 1>enjoy again soon. Every Seat Geek purchase is protected by

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>a buyer guarantee, which means you'll get your money back

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 1>if your event is canceled. Guaranteed Seat Geek, Let's go.

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. Final segment of the Break. We are alive

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>from the home edition of the SWBC Morris Studios and

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:01.279
<v Speaker 1>we've been going through a few categories talking about some

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 1>different players on the team. We got one more category

0:49:03.560 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we want to hit. This category is player the Cowboys

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 1>can least afford to lose. Let's start with you, Dave,

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>least afford to lose. I mean, oh, oh, it's not

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not Dak anymore because they got the red rifle. Yeah, Dalton,

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 1>change and go ahead. Now, I was just gonna say,

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw this into like last year, you would have

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>probably thrown Amar in that mix. Now you got another

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>guy you feel I can maybe be a lead type receiver.

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it changed a little bit with regards to

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:41.359
<v Speaker 1>who we can throw in this category. But go ahead, Dave.

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Who's your answer? Um, I mean it would be easy

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to say Zeke, DeMarcus Lawrence comes to mind. I'll I mean,

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll say Tyron Smith still. Um, I mean I'm talking

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>like for a long stretch of time. I know, you

0:49:57.239 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>know he usually misses two or three games a year,

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but I'm talking if they didn't have him at all,

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of scary, especially you know they'd let go

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of Cam Fleming. I don't think you want Cameron Irving

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>stepping into the starting lineup for a prolonged period of time.

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>So that would be a quick way to have the

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:15.839
<v Speaker 1>season go south as if tired and had to sit

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for a prolonged stretch. All right, amber Um, I would

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:28.399
<v Speaker 1>say DeMarcus Lawrence just because he's the most proven guy

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on the defensive end spot right now. We still don't

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen with Alden Smith. We don't

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>know what's gonna happen with Randy Gregory. So as far

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 1>as talent and experience, I think that you losing DeMarcus

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence for whatever reason would would be a tough loss. Okay, Zeke,

0:50:48.680 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's easy for me, but I mean it's

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>still Zeke. I mean we had him as the best

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:58.799
<v Speaker 1>player now now Tony Pollard is Tony to me is

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 1>a backup running act. That's why he was drafted. When

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he was drafted, I don't believe he would be in

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:06.720
<v Speaker 1>every down back. He can't come in against the Dolphins

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:08.479
<v Speaker 1>and rush for a hundred yards in the fourth quarter

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and everyone says, look at him. I know, I don't

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:13.920
<v Speaker 1>think he would be your lead back. And if he was,

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 1>then who's behind him giving him arrest? So Zeke is

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the guy. He's the guy you can least afford to lose.

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, Yeah, for me, this question is all

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>about the delta, like the delta between the guy you

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:30.399
<v Speaker 1>lose and the next guy. And I hear what you're saying, Nick.

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Obviously Zeke is on a whole different plane. But I

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:36.760
<v Speaker 1>do think Tony Pollard for a stretch of games, could

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that's a suitable replacement for Zeke. I

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with Amber. I think DeMarcus Lawrence is the one

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:44.840
<v Speaker 1>where you look at the largest like there is a

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 1>significant difference between DeMarcus Lawrence and the next guy, not

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:50.839
<v Speaker 1>even considering the next guy that could actually start jump

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 1>in and play for him, right, And so for me,

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>if you lose DeMarcus Lawrence, that's where you're gonna see

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the biggest difference in players. Tyren Smith probably is another

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 1>one that kind fits in that same mole. But I

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think right now, on this defense, he is the best

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>player on your defense. The difference between him and the

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:11.240
<v Speaker 1>next closest guy defensive end is really really large. Losing

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:14.279
<v Speaker 1>him would mean a substantial loss for the defense, and

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the defense because sustain that. All right,

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So we appreciate you guys playing along it. That's a

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:21.719
<v Speaker 1>fun game to play, Amber. We're gonna have you give

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>us some questions from some fans here in the final segment?

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 1>What you got, Well, this one's gonna be kind of

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>hard to answer because we don't really know what's gonna happen.

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 1>But in your opinion, what do you guys think would

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:39.479
<v Speaker 1>be the contingency plan if a player gets COVID during

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the season? I mean, should should teams have a better

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>flexibility to add more players or postpone a game? Or

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:50.400
<v Speaker 1>does in a crisis scenario, do you end up quarantine

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in the whole team? Like, what do you think would

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 1>would happen as the plan to kind of what would

0:52:56.800 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 1>be the procedure to go along with that if a

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>player does have together I'll speak for Dave on this

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:07.040
<v Speaker 1>when I say, Derek, no, you know, and I was

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, I will take this question because I've had

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>some conversations with different people, and I'll tell you this, Like,

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's necessarily a plan in place

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>for all those different scenarios. What I do know is

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is very, very bullish on the idea that

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to play and they want to play the

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty games, but they're also bullish on the idea that

0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:29.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to listen to advice that they get from

0:53:29.920 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the CDC, advice they get from local authorities in the

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:36.800
<v Speaker 1>cities where their teams play, and they're gonna make whatever

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>decisions they have to make. And so I think they're

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:40.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to be flexible. And by the way, that's

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:43.800
<v Speaker 1>probably the whole country right now, like every business owner

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:46.920
<v Speaker 1>out there is doing the exact same thing. They're making decisions,

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 1>but they're also making decisions knowing they have to be

0:53:49.000 --> 0:53:52.800
<v Speaker 1>flexible that just because you make a decision today, tomorrow

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:54.879
<v Speaker 1>something can't happen that makes you have to change course

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and do something different. You hear about the NBA, the MLB,

0:53:57.920 --> 0:54:00.439
<v Speaker 1>everybody's doing the same thing on trying to figure this out.

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So um So, I don't know that there's a plan

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in place. What I do know is they're going to

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:06.479
<v Speaker 1>be flexible. I do know that they're going to listen

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to the experts that they have, both on their staff

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and outside of their staff, and I think they'll make

0:54:11.760 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>whatever decisions they have to make as a season goes on.

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:16.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, let me add this too. I said earlier

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about the schedule, how it looked like a normal schedule,

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that there wasn't anything kind of weird that contingency plans.

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>But there is a one aspect that I thought was interesting,

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and how everybody's Week two opponent is the same has

0:54:28.760 --> 0:54:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the same bye Weekum have y'all seen that? And and yeah,

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>every every Week two opponent, Cowboys and Falcons have the

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:39.799
<v Speaker 1>same bye week, which means, from what I think it

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:42.359
<v Speaker 1>means is if they were to move the season back,

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 1>your Week one game could go to the end of

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the year, your Week two game could go to your

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:51.359
<v Speaker 1>bye week. So that there's a reason why everybody's Week

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:55.319
<v Speaker 1>two schedule it is by um. And and you know,

0:54:55.360 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you saw where Tampa, who's hosting the Super Bowl, has said,

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:00.719
<v Speaker 1>you know we can we can push things back a

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>month or two months, so you know if that were

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:06.319
<v Speaker 1>to happen. So yeah, there are some built in contingencies,

0:55:06.360 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 1>but nothing glaring or anything like that. And somebody on

0:55:09.280 --> 0:55:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Twitter said to me, hey, what if they missed the

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:13.879
<v Speaker 1>first four games of the season, they'll start with Week five,

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:20.200
<v Speaker 1>which is against the Giant York Giants. That is not

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:23.960
<v Speaker 1>by coincidence. I hope it is. I hope it is

0:55:24.000 --> 0:55:29.759
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence. All Right, So over the last few years,

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys have showed that they like incorporating the fake

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 1>jet sweep, or at least the thread of it on

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:38.799
<v Speaker 1>offense with Tavon Austin and Lucky Whitehead while they were here.

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Now that they're off the roster, who do you expect

0:55:42.000 --> 0:55:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to take over that role? Jordan Lewis, Can you see

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the very unamused look on my face right now? Because

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do it. They didn't do it at all.

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Last year. They had Tavon, they had Tony Pollard, they

0:55:57.040 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 1>hated doing it. I don't understand why it is that

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the same look you had when Witton scored that touchdown

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>right in front of us, and you had that really

0:56:06.760 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 1>unamused I was making. It was more like that. I

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was just stressed out. I'm not stressed out by the

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 1>thought of who's going to run the jet sweep. I

0:56:15.280 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just hope somebody tells them they should do it. Tony

0:56:18.000 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Pollard can do it, Ceedee Lamb can do it, um

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael Gallop and Amari Cooper can do it. For that matter.

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:29.799
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that it drove me absolutely nuts when

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:32.359
<v Speaker 1>they were like, oh no, Tavon's hurt, so we gotta

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:34.759
<v Speaker 1>get the gotta get Jordan Lewis on offense to do this,

0:56:34.840 --> 0:56:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and we'll just telegraph it every single time, like you

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 1>have to be fast to play wide receiver in the NFL.

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Anybody can do it. So hopefully yeah, they're a lot

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:51.360
<v Speaker 1>less annoying about it this year. That would be great. Yeah,

0:56:51.440 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 1>well said agreed. All right, So we talked about DAC earlier.

0:57:01.239 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible without the Cowboys just end up giving up?

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I did deadline and say if it, here's the deal,

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 1>sign it exactly like that. I don't again, I think

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys can have I think they've got more

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>leverage here because I think that. I mean, I think

0:57:26.160 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 1>if if if Dad doesn't play at the highest of levels,

0:57:31.000 --> 0:57:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that they'll they'll have a position where they can,

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, pay him what they want to pay him.

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Dak has more to lose in

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this than the Cowboys. That's why. And I don't know

0:57:44.360 --> 0:57:46.200
<v Speaker 1>if you guys agree with that, but so I think

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys can can stand firm on this. I actually

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. I mentioned it last week when we

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:54.600
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Dalton. I think as as though you know,

0:57:54.600 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I know some people don't believe it has anything to

0:57:56.640 --> 0:57:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do with Dak, and quite frankly, it may not have

0:57:58.480 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with Dak. What I do believe is

0:58:00.800 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it does give them some assurances that they have another

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:07.320
<v Speaker 1>capable quarterback on the roster and if for whatever reason,

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Dak does not play well this season, which by the way,

0:58:10.640 --> 0:58:12.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, maybe the Cowboys look at this and say,

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this gives us a reason, the whole firm, because we

0:58:15.160 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>really would like to see another year out of him

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>before we commit to even more money. If we're going

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to go and meet his demands, right, and so if

0:58:21.440 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do that, I think this gives them

0:58:23.400 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some assurances that let's assume they go that route, and

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:27.960
<v Speaker 1>let's assume he plays on the tag, and let's assume

0:58:28.000 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't play as well as they expect him to

0:58:29.840 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 1>play in this year, in this fifth year of his

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:36.160
<v Speaker 1>NFL career, then they have number one. They have another

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback on the roster that maybe they decide can be

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a better option if they decide to move on from Dak,

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>or if they decide to hold firm on their offer

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe tag him a second time. Who knows, But

0:58:46.280 --> 0:58:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think this gives him a ton of different

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:52.120
<v Speaker 1>options and I don't think it really gave Dak more options.

0:58:52.160 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he still has the options he has, which

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:55.919
<v Speaker 1>are very few with them in my opinion. Right now,

0:58:57.200 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree, but I don't think the Cowboys have

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that much leverage. I mean, they don't have to pay

0:59:02.400 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>him if they don't want to. But I think Dak

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 1>can just chill. And at this point, you know, I

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>thought something might happen around the draft, and now that

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't if the Cowboys aren't up in their offer,

0:59:17.120 --> 0:59:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we don't know all the mechanics of it,

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 1>but if Dak's not happy with the offer on the table,

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 1>he can just sit back and wait for something to happen.

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And by that, I mean, you know, if Deshaun Watson

0:59:28.000 --> 0:59:30.480
<v Speaker 1>signs an extension that blows what he was asking out

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of the water, then the ball game changes once again,

0:59:33.280 --> 0:59:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just like it did last summer when Winston Goff sign

0:59:36.960 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and that, but only but only if he plays really

0:59:39.720 --> 0:59:41.760
<v Speaker 1>well this year. Right. Well, But and that's what I

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say, is and I don't know anything. I

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:47.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have any inside information, but I'm starting to feel

0:59:47.040 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 1>like Dak might play on the tack because he he

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:54.960
<v Speaker 1>does not lack for confidence. I said, he's a gamer.

0:59:55.320 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 1>He's always like he loves being doubted. I think it

0:59:58.120 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 1>fuels his competitive fire. I think he thinks that it

1:00:00.920 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>gives him an edge. So if the Cowboys don't say

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:08.040
<v Speaker 1>screw it and just meet what he's asking for, I

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>can see him playing on the tag and being like,

1:00:09.880 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, fine, I'll go out there and show y'all

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that I'm worth thirty eight million. I believe in myself.

1:00:15.280 --> 1:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So so what if he goes out and goes gets

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>they go nine and seven and miss the playoffs again.

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and he played on the tag, he went

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>he played enough to get him out of the playoffs,

1:00:29.640 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>just like he did last year. I mean he I

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>mean did he play well last year? I mean his

1:00:35.200 --> 1:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>passing for all those yards will get you as the

1:00:37.640 --> 1:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback in New Orleans. That's what Jameis Winston did,

1:00:40.280 --> 1:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So all these yards doesn't matter. He almost broke Romo's

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>record in twenty twelve, which was also an eight and

1:00:46.080 --> 1:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>eight season, So I don't think he played that well.

1:00:49.840 --> 1:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Right now. He's had four years in his career, two

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, two out of the playoffs. If he

1:00:54.840 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play well and doesn't get him to the playoffs.

1:00:57.480 --> 1:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if I'm the Cowboys, I'm thinking maybe I'll

1:01:00.600 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>give him another year on the tag. But I mean

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I mean maybe at that point, after five years,

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe it would be time to move on if he

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>if he's got to the playoffs two out of five years,

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>every metric that you can look at, whether it's something

1:01:14.840 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as simple as passing yards or like expected points over average,

1:01:19.400 --> 1:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>or car yards and yards for error, attempt and completion,

1:01:22.920 --> 1:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>all that, all of them points to him being one

1:01:24.800 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the best ten but quarterbacks in the NFL. And

1:01:27.080 --> 1:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody loves to say that wins are a team stat,

1:01:29.920 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>not a quarterback stat, even though quarterbacks get credit for

1:01:33.120 --> 1:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and blame for all of them. Do I think he

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he certainly wasn't amazing last year they were

1:01:38.000 --> 1:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>an eight and eight team. I do think he played

1:01:40.320 --> 1:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like one of the ten best quarterbacks in the NFL.

1:01:42.640 --> 1:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And that comes with a certain price tag that if

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>he if he plays that's the problem. What's what. I'm sorry, David,

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>but you keep saying top ten. The Cowboys would love

1:01:52.520 --> 1:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay him in the top ten, that's I think.

1:01:54.200 --> 1:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>But the problem here is that he has got top

1:01:57.760 --> 1:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ten stats and he's wanting top one or two money.

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That's where I think that, you know, the fork in

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the road is here. The forty nine Ers put Garoppolo

1:02:06.600 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the Pachart after eight games, Like

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this isn't new. I mean, we just Kirk Cousins signed

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>an eighty four million dollars deal which gave him the

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>highest average per year in the NFL at the time

1:02:15.640 --> 1:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it was signed. And that was after two years where

1:02:17.800 --> 1:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>he played on the tag and couldn't get Washington the playoffs.

1:02:20.400 --> 1:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>That's I'm sorry, that's just the way it works. It's capitalism.

1:02:23.320 --> 1:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>If you don't like it, but you let yeah, But

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>well you can just say, I mean, you don't have

1:02:29.320 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to do it just because the Cowboys are because other

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>teams are doing it. I mean the Cowboys don't have

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Absolutely don't have to do it. But

1:02:36.280 --> 1:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it takes a lot of balls to walk

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>away from a competent, good, above average, starting caliber NFL quarterback.

1:02:44.280 --> 1:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it takes a lot. It takes a lot of

1:02:46.480 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>those cajonas to walk away from one hundred and ten

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, which he is just left on the table

1:02:51.240 --> 1:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I mean, it's just a game of

1:02:54.080 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's a game with chicken right now. I mean,

1:02:56.080 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna Who's gonna you know, blink first, really and

1:03:00.520 --> 1:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. But I think I think Dak would be

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>very foolish to go into this season on the franchise tag.

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>He's got that money sitting on the table. You know,

1:03:08.800 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone should feel sorry for him. That

1:03:10.720 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>all he paid for two million dollars. He didn't have

1:03:12.600 --> 1:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to play for two million last year. He had an

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>offer on the tamper, he didn't want it. So I mean,

1:03:18.280 --> 1:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not trying to Hey, I love Dak.

1:03:21.800 --> 1:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I love what he brings to the team. But I'm

1:03:23.560 --> 1:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>saying right now, it's right on the board four years.

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>If he gets to a fifth year and doesn't lead

1:03:29.000 --> 1:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>him to the playoffs, then I think we're gonna be

1:03:31.080 --> 1:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at him in a different light. So see, I

1:03:33.960 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>actually think both of these things can be true. I

1:03:35.920 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>think right now both the Cowboys probably look at themselves

1:03:39.040 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, we're all what we are. And if

1:03:41.160 --> 1:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he wants to play on the on the franchise tag

1:03:42.960 --> 1:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to taking what we take what we offer,

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>then we're okay with that. And I also agree with

1:03:47.520 --> 1:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Dave that on the other side, Dak's probably looking at

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it and saying, I have enough confidence in myself that

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll play well. And if whatever reason Cowboys

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give me a better offer, at some point,

1:03:56.880 --> 1:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they're either going to give me a better offer or

1:03:58.440 --> 1:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody else will is probably how he looks at it.

1:04:00.600 --> 1:04:02.919
<v Speaker 1>And so I think both can be true right now,

1:04:02.960 --> 1:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and again I don't, and that's the reason why, to

1:04:05.520 --> 1:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>go back to Amber's original point, I don't think necessarily

1:04:08.240 --> 1:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not very optimistic that a deal gets done before

1:04:11.120 --> 1:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>franchise tag is up. It doesn't seem like either side

1:04:13.600 --> 1:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is willing to necessarily move beyond where they are. And

1:04:16.160 --> 1:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's gonna be something that happens

1:04:17.800 --> 1:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>between now in July fifteenth that's gonna make them say

1:04:21.320 --> 1:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry June fifteenth, that makes them say, yeah, we'll move. Now,

1:04:24.880 --> 1:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll do something different now, jocker, take up, sorry, don't.

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's anything's gonna happen and that

1:04:29.560 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>meantime it's gonna make them move. And so I think

1:04:31.840 --> 1:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>both are settled. I think that right now, just my

1:04:34.680 --> 1:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>personal opinion, I think he'll play this year on the

1:04:36.880 --> 1:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>franchise tag and then we'll see how this all plays out.

1:04:39.880 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It we'll be right back here next offseason having this

1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation all over again. Which can I make another point

1:04:45.800 --> 1:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>real quick? I know that we're running out of time

1:04:48.840 --> 1:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and all that, but another question that I had to

1:04:51.560 --> 1:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of play along those same lines. You know, we

1:04:55.800 --> 1:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>know that the economy is taking a hit with this

1:04:58.880 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>whole COVID Night team, So looking at a future, you know,

1:05:03.120 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>next year, if for some reason the fact that attendance

1:05:08.280 --> 1:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>game attendance takes a hit and then now you start

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing a drab up as far as income around the league,

1:05:15.240 --> 1:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>does that change up these kinds of contracts? You know

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>what you do in the future. You know, if he

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>was to play under the franchise tag and then looking

1:05:23.440 --> 1:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for another a bigger contract next year, how does that

1:05:27.400 --> 1:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>play a roll in to that whole thing? That is

1:05:30.320 --> 1:05:33.439
<v Speaker 1>an awesome point, and I don't it's a very good point.

1:05:33.440 --> 1:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we have a great answer to it

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>because I've set that all along talking about Garoppolo and

1:05:38.240 --> 1:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Cousins sign the deal, the capital jump, you'll look smart

1:05:41.560 --> 1:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen months. But with all this stuff with COVID,

1:05:44.840 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can guarantee that anymore. I mean,

1:05:47.480 --> 1:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's you can realistically guess at what

1:05:51.080 --> 1:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the cap will be in a year or two years

1:05:53.560 --> 1:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>based on how this might change things. So I will

1:05:56.880 --> 1:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>give the Cowboys credit for that is this might not

1:06:00.280 --> 1:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>be the time to say, ah, screw it, signed the

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>check and we'll have more money later. That might not

1:06:04.960 --> 1:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>be the case. I mean, I wish we had more information,

1:06:08.520 --> 1:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's definitely something you got to keep in

1:06:10.400 --> 1:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the back of your mind. Yeah, And just so people know,

1:06:14.040 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the salary cap is based upon revenues. It's a percentage

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that the players get out of revenues from the club.

1:06:19.560 --> 1:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So it definitely could have an impact one way or

1:06:22.600 --> 1:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the other. Who knows. And we again, we are in

1:06:24.680 --> 1:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>such an unprecedented time. I don't think anybody knows exactly

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>what the outcome is going to be. And so yeah,

1:06:30.880 --> 1:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that should factor in. If I'm dak, I'm

1:06:32.800 --> 1:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at least having some conversations with my representatives about that

1:06:36.280 --> 1:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and how I think that's gonna play out relative to

1:06:38.760 --> 1:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this offer. And what future offers might be. All right,

1:06:41.520 --> 1:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll appreciate you guys joining us. It was a great show.

1:06:43.400 --> 1:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>We had a good time. We'll be back next week

1:06:45.200 --> 1:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for Nick Even, Dave helm and Amber Garcia. I am

1:06:47.200 --> 1:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Derek Elton. This has been The Break live on Dallas

1:06:49.880 --> 1:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a production of

1:06:56.040 --> 1:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football club

1:07:00.360 --> 1:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>own