WEBVTT - The New Deregulatory SEC

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Tops on, Hey, what's going on with the rules for

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>company disclosures? Are they changing? What's happening with crypto companies,

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>mergers and acquisitions, even executive comp It's now under a

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>new regime at the SEC, and some shareholder activists are

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>crying foul. What's going on with the new deregulatory zeal

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>To help us unpack all of this and what it

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>might mean for your portfolio, let's bring in Michelle Leader.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 1>She is an SEC filing specialist and founder of the

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>research service Footnoted, focusing on material information hidden in corporate

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>SEC filing. She's also the author of the book Financial

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>fine Print, Uncover a Company's True Value. So Michelle, let's

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>start out talking about the new regulatory stance or I

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>should should I say deregulatory stance at the SEC. It's

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a little easier, it's a little more corporate friendly. What's

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the state of regulations for public companies these days?

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you know, obviously the basic rules haven't changed.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, the nineteen thirty three Act is

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 2>still there. All of those rules are still there. It's

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>it's the enforcement that is, you know, a bit up

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>in the air. You know, studies are showing that the

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>SEC is doing a lot less enforcement these days, you know,

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>and some of it is partly due to staffing issues,

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.279
<v Speaker 2>right Like, the SEC, I think a lot about twenty

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>percent of the staff have left since the beginning, well

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>since January twentieth, since since you know, Trump term two.

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, people left or they took the buyout or

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 2>or you know what have you. But you know, enforcement,

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, either by number of cases or the size

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>of the settlements, the SEC is just kind of sleeping.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>They're just not as active as they've been in the past.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>And that's been well documented by some academic studies and

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 2>some other people who follow that part of the SEC.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's also been the dismissal of several big

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 2>name cases, right you know. So it's overall a de

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 2>regulatory environment, much more so than you know, the first

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So, Michelle, you mentioned the reduction in headcount. The IRS

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>has seen a large head count reduction, and that legitimately

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>shows up in both enforcement and collection actions. The Senate

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>released report last year you can actually see for every

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar they spend on the IRS, here's how much we

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>generate in taxes collected. That reduction has been some attrition,

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>some of it from DOGE. It sounds like you're saying

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the SEC is seeing a very similar reduction. Did I

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>hear you right? Did you say it's more than twenty

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of the staff? Is that enforcement staff for just

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>across the board?

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's across the board, so, and presumably it

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>would include you know, administrative folks, you know, I mean

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 2>it's it's the numbers I've seen. It's about twenty percent

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>across the board. And of course the SEC has a

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of contractors, like outside people, so I think it

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 2>also includes contractors. You know, There's no definitive head count

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 2>that I've seen, but this has been reported, you know,

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>by multiple outlets. Sin it's around twenty percent.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting, and there's a new sheriff in town. Paul

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Atkins is the head of the SEC. Tell us a

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the philosophy and policies of the new

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>SEC chairman.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, he's a former SEC commissioner, so you know,

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>this is not his first time, you know, at the SEC,

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 2>but it is the first time that you know, he's chairman.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 2>He's known for being you know, he's an attorney. You

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>don't have to be an attorney to be an SEC commissioner,

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 2>but almost always it is an attorney who is doing it.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 2>And he's just known for being a big booster of crypto.

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>In between the time, like when he left the SEC

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>last time and you know, went to work, you know,

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>in private practice, he was you know, representing a number

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 2>of crypto firms, and so he's of course taking that

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 2>you know background with him to the SEC. And so

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of like, you know, I joke around,

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 2>like you know, and I'm gonna be dating myself here,

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 2>but like you know that you know episode of The

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Brady Bunch where it was like Jan Jan Jan, Well,

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 2>this is like crypto, crypto, crypto, and that's all. It

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>seems like the SEC is really focused on, you know,

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know, there's normally The other thing is that

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 2>there's normally five SEC commissioners, and there's only been four

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 2>since Akins came on board. It's typically the party in power,

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>so the Republicans named three commissioners, and then the party

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 2>out of power, the Democrats, name two, but there hasn't

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 2>been I'm sorry not the president has to name the

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 2>SEC commissioners. So three from you know, the majority party,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and two from the minority party, and so, needless to say,

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 2>there hasn't been a Democratic Commissioner that's been named, so

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 2>they're operating with only four and it's so there's basically

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>only one person who is kind of like sounding the

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 2>alarm on all this crypto stuff. Anytime there's like a

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 2>new regulation or like a change in regulations, you know,

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 2>it's it's kind of interesting to see, you know, what's

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 2>said there, you know about you know, all of these

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 2>changes that are.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Going on beyond crypto. I've heard Atkins talk about the

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>initial public offerings market and he wants to jump start again.

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I kind of laughed at make I POS great again.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>What What are your thoughts on the regulation that some

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>people have said the burdensome reporting requirements are leading American

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>companies to stay private longer. What are your thoughts there?

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think that you know, there is you know,

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 2>some regulation that probably could be trimmed. But do you

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 2>do it with like, you know, a scalpel or do

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 2>you do it with like a chainsaw? You know. I

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>think with anything, there's things that can always be made

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 2>better and improved, right, But I think this wholesale approach

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>to like all regulation is bad and it's costing people money.

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Is a little bit of an overkill, you know. I mean,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 2>you can make an argument, for example, they nixed the

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 2>climate rules that they had been working on forever. You

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>could probably make an argument that, you know, maybe the

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 2>climate rules went a little bit too overboard. It was

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be cumbersome for companies to do. You know,

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 2>but you know, climate change is real, and you know

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>some companies are impacted by it more than others, and

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you know there should be disclosures because there is a

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 2>risk to investors about that.

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about what's probably the single biggest idea

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that's been floated by President Trump doing the way with

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterly earnings reporting. You're an SEC geek. What does this

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing mean from your perspective and what does

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it mean for investors?

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I think that you know, first of all,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>let's remember, you know, I think they say, like, oh,

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 2>small companies, this is not like your corner store, you know,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 2>your little bodega in Manhattan, and they're suddenly having to like,

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, put out a ten K or ten Q.

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>These are publicly traded companies that have gone you know,

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 2>are asking me and thousands of other investors for our

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>for our money to grow their business and to you know,

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 2>build their businesses. Now, this idea that you know you

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>can go you know again, I think, like, you know,

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 2>you can throw out I guess the baby with the

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>bath water, so to speak. I hate to use that expression,

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 2>but you know, could there be a little bit less

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, uh in the quarterly earnings? Yeah, maybe we

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>don't have to do like the PowerPoint presentation and the

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>detailed earnings call and like the big thing, but still

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 2>report earnings, you know, and you know, give people a

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 2>taste of what's going on. I think going to every

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>six months would be really, you know, bad for investors overall.

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe it'll benefit the largest, most sophisticated investors,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 2>but you know, other people who are invested in stocks,

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's it's just bad news because a lot

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>can happen in six.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Months, to say the very least a lot happens in

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>three months. So so let's let's talk about executive compensation.

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of a lot of questions to

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>throw you away with this, and obviously we have to

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>start with Elon Musk and the trillion dollar package that

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the board approved. I don't see anyway how he ever

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>gets anywhere near that amount of money. But still it

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>seems like just crazy sky's the limited amount of compensation.

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Are are these giant stock grants a new trend? Is

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this something that's here to stay?

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean there's of course always been stock grants.

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, and you want to reward someone,

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm all about, you know, rewarding someone for

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 2>doing a good job, right, Like if a CFO you know,

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>manages to or a CEO manages to turn around the company,

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, they should be rewarded. That's what you know,

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 2>That's what capitalism is about. Right. But I think that

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>what we're seeing in the wake of the Elon vote,

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, where shareholders overwhelmingly approve the compensation. And I think,

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, Tesla is sort of a special situation, right

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 2>because it's like a cult of personality. I mean, you know,

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 2>nobody I can't think of many other CEOs, let's say,

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>that have that kind of like you know, platform, that

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of you know, personal you know, identification to I mean,

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, obviously because of uh, you know X and

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>and you know all of his followers on X, so

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, and and the fans of Tesla, you know,

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 2>the cars and everything. So it's just a bit of

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>a unique situation. But we're seeing in the wake of

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 2>that situation, we're seeing a number of examples where executives

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 2>are also being rewarded and what seems like outsize awards,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>and it's almost like, well, Tesla did it, so why

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 2>can't wait. It's almost like it's created like a green

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>light for you know, giving away you know, additional equity.

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 2>You know. I was just looking the other day new Menfo,

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 2>which is you know, a company that sells all our

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 2>information to whoever, you know, the highest bidder, you know,

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 2>gave its founder and its ceo. The guy had been there,

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 2>has been there eighteen years, and it gave him nearly

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 2>ten million shares to incentivize him. Does this guy really

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>need ten million shares to be incentivized? I mean, he's

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 2>been at the company eighteen years, you know, So where's

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 2>the guy going? You know? I think also the stock

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 2>is not doing so great, so why is he being rewarded?

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 2>And again I think it comes down to the stock

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 2>is doing great, Sure, reward the ceo, reward the c suite,

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, But if the stock isn't doing good and

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 2>you're giving away ten million shares to someone you know

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 2>who's been there to incentivize them. You shouldn't need to

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>be incentivized to like turn the stock price around, Mark

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 2>do a good job.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Makes a lot of sense to me. Let's let's talk

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about executive compensation clawbacks. How often do we see either

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the company or a shareholders or perhaps the SEC saying, hey,

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this compensation was very undeserved, unearned, and we're going to

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>try and claw some of this back. Tell us about that, Yeah.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, usually you're seeing that on the plaintiff lawyer side,

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.239
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, of course, there's a very active plaintiff's

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 2>bar here in the US where you know, if a

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 2>company says that they're going to earn twenty five cents

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 2>a chair and suddenly they you know, report twenty cents

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>a share, there's you know, a whole group of lawyers,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 2>law firms that you know, will then sue the company

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>and try to you know, do clawbacks and that type

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 2>of thing. You don't you're not really seeing that on

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the SEC side so much. You know, a lot most

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 2>companies where I would say a majority of companies do

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 2>have clawback policies, but usually it's kind of rare that

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, uh, the clawback money. I mean, I can

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 2>really only think of a couple of examples, you know,

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 2>where there's been you know, uh, you know, a clawback

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of compensation. It's it's not something that happens all that regularly.

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned crypto earlier. What does the regulatory framework

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>look like for crypto? How how have the rules changed?

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the SEC has fully embraced this.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think there's just a general uh let's say

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 2>they are approach to crypto at the SEC, whereas you know,

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>which is very very different, you know than the prior

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, SEC chairman Gary Gensler. You know, he was

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 2>all about regulating crypto and trying to call it into

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>account and you know, making sure or that you know,

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't you know, scamming people. And I would say

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 2>that the current SEC is basically, you know, a one

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 2>to eighty degree turn from that, you know, and in fact,

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean I feel like crypto in terms

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 2>of some of their rules and regulations, it seems to

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 2>be the only thing that they care about. You know,

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>they're talking about, you know, combining with you know, doing,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, regulatory combinations to kind of make it easier

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 2>to do this. I think in general, different people have

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 2>different views about crypto. I think that anything that makes

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>it easier for people to get into crypto, especially less

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>sophisticated investors, is problematic for me as someone who cares

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 2>about you know, I don't think like someone's grandma should

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>be in.

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Crypto, to say the very least. So what about cyber

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.239
<v Speaker 1>security disclosures that that seems to be a new requirement.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be really important in the financial industry.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>How important is is cybersecurity to any publicly traded company?

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>What what are their obligations there?

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, anytime there's a cybersecurity A couple of

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 2>years ago, in twenty twenty two, the SEC put in

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 2>new rules again, this was under Gary Gensler that required

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot more disclosure about cybersecurity incidents, and they required

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>companies to actually disclose this in an AK using a section,

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 2>a particular section, so that it could be found very easily,

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, instead of a cyber you know, so that

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you were looking for cybersecurity incidents, you

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 2>can find them pretty quickly. But you know, companies are

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>still disclosing this in haphazard ways. Even though they're required

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>to disclose this in a specific section of the a K,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 2>many companies are not doing that, and you know, to

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 2>be fair, the problem with a lot of these cybersecurity

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 2>incidents is when companies first disclose them, they don't know

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 2>if it's going to be like a you know, a

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 2>five you know, thousand dollars you know fix, or a

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 2>five hundred you know, million dollar fix, right, you know,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 2>oftentimes you know, it takes time to get in there

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 2>figure out what's really going on. But of course, you know,

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 2>these hacks and these cybersecurity incidents have gotten a lot

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 2>more you know, sophisticated these days. I'm sure, like you know,

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>like I mean, I can't count the number of text

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>messages I get, you know that, you know, seem alert.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I got a new one the other day. Someone put

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 2>an event on my calendar and was waiting for me

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>to accept it, and I'm like, how did you even

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, find this on my calendar? You know, So

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of scamming going out there, and you

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 2>can imagine if you're like a big company with a

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 2>lot more money than you know, Michelle Leader has that,

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, the efforts are a lot more intense to

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 2>try to figure.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Out polk hoals. You know.

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, it's just it's it's you know, unfortunately,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>there's bad actors out there, and cybersecurity, you know, is

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 2>much more important. I mean, we do everything online these days.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 2>We pay our bills online, you know, and so you know,

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of you know, I'm sure there's a

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of a lot of incidents that are going on,

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>some of which we probably don't even know about, of course,

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 2>if it's very big. I mean, you know, we kind

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 2>of remember the ones like home Depot had an incident

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 2>a number of years ago. I mean, I feel like,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, the number of times I've gotten an email

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 2>from Kroll offering to like, you know, from some company

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 2>offering to like, you know, secure my you know, identity

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 2>for a year, you know, has grown exponentially recently.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Huh, really really interesting. So to wrap up, there's a

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>new deregulatory regime in Washington, d C. It's very crypto friendly,

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not particularly ESG or climate change friendly, and it's

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>going to have an impact on what companies are obligated

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to disclose to their shareholders. We'll find out the impact

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of this over the next few years. I'm Barry Riddolts.

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:55.359
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Bloomberg's At the Money, a flaw

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>US about the loss of the loves at