WEBVTT - March 1st, Hour 2: Starting pitching, Hendricks issues, and more... 0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope 0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079 and type in you guessed Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find 0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.520 us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're 0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:36.960 listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Did we just 0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:53.320 become best friends? Fantasy best friends forever? Our number two 0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.080 Fantasy best friends forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network, that is 0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:02.280 Frankie Stanford join us right now. It's the closer, Chris Venture. 0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.480 What's up? Chris? What's up? What's up? Everybody? Yep? Back 0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.800 for starting pictures, which but honestly, I'm not entirely prepared for. 0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.800 But we'll take it one by one by one. The 0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.600 honesty is literally all we can have so much entirely 0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.080 prepared for. But hey, you know what we'll learn on 0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:24.000 the fly hitters? Pretty mumuch done. You're very pared for 0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.039 our hitter shows. Yeah, the hitters, you know, but the 0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:27.960 pitch is a whole different animal. You know what I mean. Like, 0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:32.000 it's not huge project, but I'll be on it. We 0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:33.920 I want to saw this off with a tribute question 0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.040 if you don't mind, sure what active picture you actually 0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.760 like this year? Give me that's a hint. What active 0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.480 picture has the record for most consecutive games with a strikeout? 0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.000 Most starting picture starting with starting Because so potence has 0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.000 had the record of forty four gay appearances in a 0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.000 row with a strikeout for a reliever? What active? What 0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:02.600 active player holds it for a starter? Wait, but what 0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.720 do you mean? She explained the question again. The starting 0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:11.560 picture with the most active, the most consecutive starts start 0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.120 with a strike with at least one strike on strike 0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:23.040 ext No, that was too obviously an answer. Yeah, Chris Sale. No, Yeah, 0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.840 you're older than a guy like Chris Sale. Ch Oh 0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.679 yeah right, it's gotta be somebody's done for long while 0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:34.320 longer Berlander, So that's what I thought it was. It's 0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.880 not Land it would have been my guess. That is 0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.320 not correct, Evely. Wow, you just gonna remember if you 0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.280 if you started and got hurt or something and left 0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.440 the gate like counts. So I don't know what deals 0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:50.200 Verlind Verlander is not correct. Okay, who's around a while? 0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:58.160 It's a good questioner, No, yeah, no, I think Kershal 0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.480 a second. I think second. I'll get you the number 0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:15.640 three h sixteen consecutive starts shrikeouts, so Verlander would be second. 0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.400 If it was appearances, Cole Hamils would be first on this. 0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:26.040 That is correct. What do we think of do you? 0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.680 I am a fan of Cole Hamiles. Um what he 0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.320 did last year while he was with the Chicago Cubs. 0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.000 He basically went through through a transformation, little renaissance here 0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.720 for for Cole Hamils last year. Look two point three 0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.360 six e r A in seventy six innings twelve starts 0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.840 with the Chicago Cubs. I'm not expecting that, but his 0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.640 underlying numbers were pretty good. I think he just kind 0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:51.320 of needed that chea change scener. He goes over to 0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.680 the winning contender like the Chicago Cubs. He gets out 0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.720 of Texas, which is a tough ballpark to pitching, especially 0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.760 for a guy like him with the age picture like 0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.920 Cole Hamile's, the walks came down last year. The strikeouts 0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.080 went up near forty percent strikeout rate, the strand rate, 0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:08.680 the left on base percentage was a little bit lucky 0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.280 last year with the Cubs. But overall, look, I don't 0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.400 think he's gonna be a two point three six e 0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.720 r A. But if all the peripherals are saying that 0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.400 he was a his time with the Cubs, that he 0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.640 was a sub, you know, like three six ear a 0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.200 kind of guy. If I could get a hundred and 0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.960 eighty innings out of like a three six three seven 0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.919 e r A Cole Hamiles with that offense, with that 0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.840 defense behind him as well, especially where he's gonna, I 0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:36.440 think he's gonna have a lot of opportunities to win 0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.520 games too. I don't want him as one of my 0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.200 top two starting pictures, but if I could get him 0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.000 as like my three or four, I'm I'm all right 0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.839 with that fours I would be cool with like ideally. Yeah, 0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.039 So like he's ranked forty one on Fantasy pros dot Com. 0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.880 That who's who's right around him? Alice k I Nether 0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:59.520 have handles definitely, Bieber, Uh they have you let to 0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.719 have Hamile, Ben happ Hey, Pavetta. Pavetta is ahead of him. 0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.400 Uh at Water Rodriguez ahead of an all the hype guys, 0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.680 all of the hype Vetta, Bieber and Warter Rodrick like 0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.880 these are all like all the h and you know, 0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.839 I like those two guys. What's up? I really like 0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.000 those two guys, Pavetta and Rodriguez, of course I do. 0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.359 I like guys at K people. That's it. It's that simple. 0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:26.960 Do you like Cole Hamils? Can you buy back in? 0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.760 That's the problem. So I've had Cole Hamils a lot. 0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.520 I had him the year he his last great year, 0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.080 He's been bad. No, like, there's no way to sugarcoat it. 0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.480 I mean last year his collective ear a was three 0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.360 point seven eight. The year before that with the Rangers 0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.359 four point two zero. It kind of, you know, it 0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.640 looked like the end was coming, right, That's when I 0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.560 thought it was over. You know, it kind of looks 0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.360 like that. But he kind of had a renaissance last 0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.680 year with the Chicago Cubs, and I don't know that 0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:56.880 he's getting the uh his swingy striker he was still 0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.640 over twelve percent less. Yeah, the strikers when people are 0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.400 chasing pitches outside his zone thirty two three percent of 0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.560 the time. With Cole Hamil's he almost had any right. So, 0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:08.800 but the year before he had a hundred dings and 0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.120 a hundred and five k's that worried me. Um the 0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.599 four two, right, I thought, now I had him like 0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.600 the year he had the three three two on Texas 0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.039 and everything like that. But I seen like his his dead, 0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.440 you know, him declining. Also I had him like a a 0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.240 couple of years in a row. I thing I kept him, 0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.240 I think, Um, But like I just don't know, I 0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:29.640 don't know if I want to buy back in the thing. 0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.000 Is that where the value is right now, it's not bad. 0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.359 That's gound pick one fifty one, right, So an A 0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.120 d P and NFBC ADP is gonna pick one one 0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.559 pitcher off the board that's not starting pitcher because relief 0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.360 pitchers are included here. But Vetta again it's going just 0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.400 ahead of him, Bieber going right around him as well. 0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.800 Edward Rodriguez. You know, if you ask me, Greg, I 0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:51.200 think he's a good guy to kind of pair with 0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.000 one of these guys, because these are starting pitchers who 0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.640 are young, who might have a little bit of volatility. Like, yes, 0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.960 we all think that they have great upside, but if 0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.600 in Cole Hamils is one of those guys that can 0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.280 kind of balance it out where proven that kind of 0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.640 expect him to be around that, you know, three six, 0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.200 maybe three seven a uh like a one two oh 0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.000 whip something like that. Any he's gonna get wins. I'm 0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:18.840 worried about the endings pitched with Hamilt's really Yeah. That's 0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:20.040 why I think he's a good guy to pair with 0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.880 these guys, because I I worry about the endings pitch 0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.800 for a guy like Hurt all the time, or Nick 0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.760 Pavetta who hasn't necessarily done it. What happened when he 0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.800 only put your hundred forty eight ins? Why why did 0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.640 he only pitch? I don't remember. I guess he was hurt. 0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.120 It must have been hurt. But every season other than that, dude, 0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.080 it's been a hundred ninety every year since oh seven. Yeah, 0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:43.400 I know. I don't want to look too far back 0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:44.920 because the guy's thirty five years old. I mean, I 0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.360 wouldn't project it right, but I would project Cole Hamils 0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.760 for one, you know one and that right, three six, 0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:52.680 three seventy r a with with a near strike up 0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:54.920 for any four four. Not that kind of what you 0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:56.880 want these guys to be like, Yeah, I think they 0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.680 have a little bit more upside like Vetta and in 0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.520 Water of Rodriguez, like you might think that, Okay, you 0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.240 know they have this next step that they could take 0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.280 where you know, the this is the range where last 0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.120 year we were finding Blake's now and tie on and 0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.160 and not even flower right because he was going even 0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.440 later than this, but uh, Mike Clevinger right, like he 0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.160 was going around this range last year. So you want 0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:19.560 to try and load up on as many of these 0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.480 upside guys as you possibly can to see if you 0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.720 can hit. But again, not all of them are gonna hit. 0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.800 So I think co Hambles is kind of like a 0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.160 safe starting picture to pair with one or again, just 0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.199 try and get as many of these I guess upside 0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:33.960 pictures as you can. I guess he's safe. I just 0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.880 think that, Yeah, I guess it's ages um, but thirty 0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.000 five years old, Like I I worry about the decline, 0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.640 So is it coming? You worry? You worry about like 0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.760 justin Verlander two early on in your drafts, if of 0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.040 all the big guys in the front of the draft 0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.240 as as pictures, Vilin is the one I worry about 0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:50.880 the moment, and then we're after talking to Nick, I'm 0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.520 more worried about Cluber than Marlander. What do you say 0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.920 about Cluber the skills are declining, that the fast ball 0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.319 has been declining. He doesn't necessarily have the side of 0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.560 like other guys in that range, with Garrett Cole and 0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.040 Trevor Bauer, who took these huge steps forward last season, 0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.080 even Aaron Nola to an extent um is the hard 0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.040 hit rate was up last year was like thirty seven 0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.600 percent for Corey Kluberg was like, by far and away 0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:16.559 the most in his career. Let me ask you this, Frank, 0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:18.480 who would you rather have this year? Cole Hamils or 0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.840 Kyle Hendrix. Definitely Hamil's, Ok, I'm not doing the Kyle Hendricks. Yeah, 0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.240 Hendricks is another one at a good at a good 0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.640 end of the year. He did Greg he did. We 0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:29.880 did the same thing last year and then we owned him. 0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.000 How fun was it to own was its own? Kyle Hendricks? 0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.800 Kyle Hendricks? How fun was that? Wasn't so funny? I 0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:40.480 mean he did have a three full four year, right. 0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.920 He wasn't good, dude. I'm telling you, I'm not gonna 0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.720 do what I promise you. He was bad most of 0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.080 the season till the end, like late all September. He 0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.679 was very good before that. He was like I dropped him. 0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.120 I just dropped him. He was that bad. I do 0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.520 not regret it. Yeah, No, he was super frustrated on 0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:00.520 especially in a points league like a star to start 0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.080 bassis like, he was very frustrating to own. And I know, 0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.480 you know Florida was here shout out to Florida, miss 0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.120 you buddy. Uh No, he didn't die so that he 0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.280 actually just tweeted. You know that was me pointing towards California. 0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.360 I guess I don't know, but Florio, you know, his 0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.000 ears are probably ringing right now because like every year 0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.400 he loves him for points leagues, and I'm sure like 0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.360 he's going to tell people again like rab Kyle Hendricks 0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.480 points leagues just because oh I actually I have his 0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.240 I have his rankings. I don't want well, you can't 0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.320 give out too much. They're behind the pay. Well I understand, 0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.280 but you want me to give out. Where does he 0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.640 have Kyle Hendricks rank? Why don't actually the order? I 0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.880 have the order, I don't have the number. Who does 0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.079 he have high Kyle Hendricks or Cole Hamil's guaranteed he 0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:48.959 as Kyle Hendricks higher? Right, So I just hot he's 0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:57.680 not old, he's nine. Kyle Hendrix is his rank starting Pitcher. Wow, Look, 0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.679 he's ahead of names, ahead of names like Miles Mikolas, 0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:08.920 David Price, Michael assumed Man, Chris Archer, Robbie Ray probably 0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:17.440 come on, Mike Pistillo as he's thirty four, pikel Rich Hill. 0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.679 I understand having Hendricks ahead of some of those like 0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.840 I have him head right, So Kyle Hendricks number five 0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:31.960 according to Mike Florio, co Hamil's number. Wow, decline, alright, 0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:38.120 you gotta talk to out about bathroom right now at 0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:42.800 your job listening so we can discuss this god so 0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.839 clearly seven, So clearly. Florio thinks that he could get 0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:57.640 behind guys like Ross Stripling, behind jap, behind and behind 0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.800 Tyler Scaggs as well. I like Skaggs, like Gags to 0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.120 well ahead of some ahead of Chris Padock, though, if 0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.400 they're points the HiPE guy and you want to talk 0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.719 about Hike, everyone's get excited about christ Pack. You don't 0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.360 think that Hendricks get back to under three right Ever, again, 0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.280 I think it's still possible. He still could do it. 0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.720 He's trending in the wrong direction and his his peripherals 0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.800 have been right around three point eight. The past two years. Right, 0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.040 his fifth and X fit in seventeen three point eight eight, 0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.800 three point seven six, His FIP and X fit in 0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.040 three point seven eight and three point eight seven. So 0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.000 he's a three points consistency. He's right around there two 0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.400 years in a row. He's closer to his skills. This 0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:43.480 is what it's telling us. His skills are around a 0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.400 three point seven three point eight picture. But he's been 0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.520 helped out because he has a great defense. Obviously three 0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.680 five Chicago Cubs. I mean, you know, you see some 0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:52.760 of the players that Javier Baias makes. I mean, the 0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.160 guy's a magician out there. He's been helped by great 0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.559 defense behind him for years. So you could say he's 0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.760 a three five to three seventy r A guy. Right, 0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.160 He's just gonna be closer to with three seven three 0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.800 eight e r A. According to Cole, Hamiles could be 0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.400 better than that. And I think Cole Hamiles could be 0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.240 a strikeout for any kind of guy, or at least close, 0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.400 you know, like between eight and nine, case for nine. 0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.840 I mean, the thing you gotta loved, his strikeouts have 0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.600 been declining. He's not a big strikeout guy. I don't want, 0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.920 I don't like in the mid tier of starting pitchers 0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.240 and talking about the Chicago Cubs here. I mean, I'm 0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:25.840 not he's not a big key guy. But his thing, 0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.800 you gotta like, his whips always gonna be low. He 0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.400 don't walk anybody, That's true. He doesn't walk. Yeah, I 0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.200 mean the whip has never been higher than one point 0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.480 one nine. So even if you're playing rodo like, this 0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:36.760 is a guy that you can target in the middle 0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.960 round whip, but you gotta, you gotta, you know what, 0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:41.800 he's a good guy to pair with, like a Robbie Ray. 0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.520 You know what I'm saying, Ok, Because he's gonna give 0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:45.719 you a lot of strikeouts, but he's gonna have a 0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.200 high whip too, because he walks. A lot of guys. 0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.679 I think that makes them sense, right, like your pair 0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.840 Kyle Hendricks with a guy that has that strikeout upside, 0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:55.760 but it's also gonna have a high whip, maybe even 0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.959 like an award of Rodriguez, right, like something like what 0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.679 it makes sense co Hamils. Then he still kind of 0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:06.200 represent like those two guys combined. Theoretically. He's older, and 0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.440 I think that's like the problem. He was really bad 0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.600 in Texas last year. It's really good with the Cubs 0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:15.040 though I know animal, I don't know. I might be 0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.360 with Floria here. I might take Hendricks before call him dude. 0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:24.960 I'm not saying that's fine. Picks spots higher in his rankings, 0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.600 that's a lot. I don't know about that. But you know, 0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.320 if he likes me, likes you want Floria's rankings, I 0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:36.360 do his patriarch I like that. He I like Floria, 0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.760 you know. I like how Floria doesn't let anybody phase 0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.680 what he does. He just doesn't do. The thing is 0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:44.720 he hasn't that to deal with us. That's why he 0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.280 did it. He did it his way. I could understand 0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.400 that because every day being when you guys you guys 0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.600 influenced me a little bit to like not like guys. 0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.320 And then you know, like certain year, that's kind of 0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.280 the point though, where we learned to like Kyle Hendricks. 0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.560 Last year that was hated Michael Floorio. Listen, that was me, 0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.480 that was this was a headache man. Yeah, but you 0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.840 can't go. I'll take the I will take the want 0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.120 to rip my hair out as little hair as I have. Yeah, 0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.480 eighty six soft tosser, but he's so accurate. Guys like 0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.480 Jamie Moyer. He's like not even thirty years old. How 0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.560 old is Kyle Hendricks? It was eighty six miles per 0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.520 hour to Greg. If you can make it work, if 0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:32.560 you're would you have Kyle Hendricks Dallas Kaiko? You don't 0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:33.960 know what team he is on. I don't care all 0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.160 I love Kaiko. Maybe I liked Kaiko last year and 0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:39.480 he let me down to he did you want to 0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.800 talk about a frustrating pitcher to watch last season? He'll 0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.440 let you. I don't want either one of these guys. 0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.280 They're not active targets like cool handles over both. But 0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.920 the upside of Kaiko is much better. Love cool alum. 0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.400 The Kayako upside is huge. I'm currently working on my 0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.840 starting pitcher rankings, so I don't know where Cole Hamil's 0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:56.960 is gonna be yet. It's not gonna be fifty seven. 0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:01.120 I'll tell you that right now, so you can census 0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:08.080 ranking for Hamil's right now is forty three. Doing math 0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.640 in my head a little bit. Right now, your best subject, 0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.280 Cole Hamiles is going to be like in like the 0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.200 thirty five to forty range. He's gonna be a top 0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:24.600 forty starting pitture for me. Okay, fair enough. I mean, 0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.360 where do you draw on this? I don't know where 0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:29.960 he is in my rankings. I don't think fifty seven 0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:34.480 seems low, but I do think that what we're saying 0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.360 Parry Cole Hamiles is one of these hype guys. It 0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.240 makes a lot of sense. And that's what I tried 0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.680 to do last year, know honestly, with Kyle Hendricks, which 0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.760 is why I brought Kyle Hendricks up because pared and 0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:49.440 Louise cast That's what I did, and very badly that's 0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.359 going to happen to do it with her Man marquesas 0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:56.600 year this year is No, he's much more safe. I'm 0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:58.520 not saying in terms of like what I expect his 0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:05.200 performance to be mean, but he's get rapidly starting. Pitch 0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.840 loves her mind a lot of people like, I mean, 0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.520 Pitch two D two. What's not to like that? That's 0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.119 what he said. It's not like not to like that, 0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.960 you know. For I'm okay with that, though, I'm okay 0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:19.920 with good luck with that, you know, take a break. 0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.639 We'll try to get back on track here, back to 0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:32.240 the top and try daily rode up dot Com learned 0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.600 from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give 0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:40.520 you premier advice. We play every day, all major sports, 0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.919 all year round. We never stop. Industry leading DFS tools 0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.639 and custom projections, and now the Daily roados dot com 0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.120 optimize her and mints building optimized line up for cash 0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.960 games and turneys learned from the game's best DFS players 0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:01.560 joined Daily Roado dot com. My name is Lily. My 0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.680 mom and dad used to fight about money all the time. 0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.040 Then one day I heard them talking about this guy, 0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.800 some uncle I never knew, called Uncle Sam. Well, they say, 0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.719 this Uncle Sam guy wanted them to pay him like 0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.920 a gazillionon dollars, and they didn't have a gazillion dollars. 0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.560 So they called this company they heard on the radio 0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.199 called the tax Doctor. And the tax Doctor worked with 0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.520 Uncle Sam's people. I think they're called the I R S. 0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.040 And they're able to work it out. So my mom 0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.960 and dad didn't have to pay Uncle Sam very much 0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.080 money at all. So now mom and dad are happy, 0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.960 and I'm happy to thanks Tax Doctor. If you owe 0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.240 ten thousand dollars or more to the I R S 0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.240 or state, call now and pay less eight hundred to 0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.000 one five one seven to seven, eight hundred to one 0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.040 five one seven to seven. That's eight hundred one five 0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:02.960 seven seven am time decisions. They're talking about baseball like 0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.880 people are sort of negative, like old baseball is this problem? 0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.400 Not problem, But the fact is there the news every 0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.840 day just because of Bryce Harper and before because of 0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.399 Manny Machado and I brought up college football. You remember 0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.720 the old days mark. But it's good for sports. Business 0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.760 is good for the Barer. Business is good for anybody 0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.280 that follows sports because we all have an opinion on 0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.560 the sport. The guy said talking about the Barron share, 0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.720 and that's exactly the business that we're in weekend days, 0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.880 four pm Eastern one pm Pacific only on the Fantasy 0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.639 Sports Radio Network. Joined the experts live on the air 0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.200 every day by calling in at April four, six, seven 0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:52.880 nine to join the Fantasy Sports Networks and Network. One 0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.680 thing I can tell you, don't draft Dallas Kiko and 0:19:54.720 --> 0:20:01.200 don't drafty come on favorites like I'm looking deeper. I've 0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.840 never heard like one of those guys that you want 0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:05.840 to own until you own and then when you own 0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:13.720 them it sucks. I've never heard just come on, Dallas 0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.320 Kiel of the ground ball rate is declining. It went 0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:21.360 from sixty seven percent we got a little un lucky though, 0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.439 was seven legs terrible? Well, he's not gonna k a 0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.240 ton of guys aside throws ninety miles an hour barely. 0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.760 How would you pointsonly like this guy, I love K guys. 0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:33.440 But then know the next best thing, I like guys 0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.560 that go deep into game games? Yeah, how could you 0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.840 not like? Yeah, like he could go deep into games 0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.040 because he doesn't K people. Guys that k people are 0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.920 less likely go deep because so many pitches kan people, 0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.439 you know what I mean, They're going deeper into counts. Kiko, Mike, 0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.080 get a groundball, ground ball and in three pitches. This 0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.880 is this is the Roado versus points discussion though, because 0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.120 again for points, you want volume. That's what Ventures saying. 0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:56.560 You want guys that are gonna go deep into games, 0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.840 guys that are gonna give you ennings. But with Rhodo 0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:01.800 you want the guys that are It doesn't matter if 0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:03.600 they go five innings, because if they're giving you eight 0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:05.639 strikeouts during that spanning a you know, a two e 0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.399 r A and five innings pitched, you're fine with that 0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.040 is they're helping your peripherals and strikeout. So for roto like, 0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.600 you don't really care how deep a guy goes. Obviously 0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.040 you wanted to go deep. You have use wins and 0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.640 quality starts in the road. We do, I mean some 0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.400 people do quality starts as a category instead of wins 0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.600 that you know, winds are lucky. I mean, look at 0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.000 King Felix's career. He has very few wins, but the 0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.560 quality starts a much much better. Getting updates from Michael 0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.480 Floria here read the text mess here, don't do the 0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.760 hamilest thing. In my opinion, l l one good month 0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:43.800 September deeper numbers on par with months not August. He's right, 0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.359 I will do the hamilest thing late, is right? Explain 0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:51.480 to Yeah, he's not right, but look he's got a 0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.359 full season of the Cubs defense behind him, right, Like, 0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.360 isn't that part of the reason why we've liked Kyle 0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.320 Hendrix all this time, because he has a good defense 0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.800 behind him and then he can out pitch his peripherals. 0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.359 Why can't call Hamile's do it? Then? Why do we 0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.919