WEBVTT - Week 9 Waiver Wire, Who To Add and Drop, MNF recap, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude, Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do do Do Do Do Do to

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to do Do Do to to do dinant to Yeah,

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>says the Fantasy best Friends Forever. You're in the Fantasy

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network alongside for Rank. I am Greg. What's

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>going on Monday? Grey heading into week nine here on

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a waiver wire Tuesday and talk about who would add

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>who to drop? Obviously, but man, thank god we got

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the bills in prime time out of the way. Let's

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>leave it there, you know. And it was a little

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>close about our bet that we didn't actually make. What

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>bet was that New England plus fourteen? Yeah, I mean,

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, whoever was on that game must have been

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>sweating for for about three quarters yesterday it was close Throughoute.

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was a boring game. Man. Credit to

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bill's defense that game was closer to the score

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>indicates stick six late. Obviously that kind of blew it open.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean Looke just field goals back and forth.

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of fantasy production. And I mean we

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about Rob Gronkowski. Man, what's going on

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>with this guy this year? I mean from a favor

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I know you're still buying your conspiracy theory as you

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>texted us Sport. I mean, it's not even mine. It

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was somebody on Twitter hit me up and said he

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if they were not using Gronk to

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>spite him, because they tried to trade him in the

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.679
<v Speaker 1>off season and he declined the trade. But if you

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>look at what he's done this year from a fantasy perspective,

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>he's done nothing. He's tighten nine in points per game.

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>This was the guy getting drafted in the second or

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>third round. To put that in perspective. Half point PPR

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>leads Zach Ertz averaging fourteen point one fantasy points per game,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey averaging thirteen point eight fantasy points per game,

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you wanted out of those two guys. Rob

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Gronkowski nine Fantasy points per game, which puts him right

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>on par with guys like Austin Hooper. He's behind Trey Burton,

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>He's behind O. J. Howard, He's behind George Kittle, He's

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>behind Bigfoot, Jared Cook, Grunk, where Art Bow? You know,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's a saving to the playoffs.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know. There's no logical answer

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>because our colleague, colleague Michael Florio, ex colleague, friends, friend

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of the program, best friend of the best friend of

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the program, we're best friend forever, kind of whatever. Ironic,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>but Um texted us earlier that this year he's getting

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 1>more separation than he hasn't like years passed. So it's

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>not like he's not open and he could still make

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>big plays. We saw that on the on the catch

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that he had, you know, where he basically caught on

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>top of a dude's head before going out of bounds.

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was a phenomenal catch. I have no

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>doubts that Gronk could still play. I don't think that

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he's washed. I just don't think that there's an explanation

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for why he's If there's not an explanation for why

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he's not being used, right, and he's gaining yards of

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>separation and he's getting open, why wouldn't there be some

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of validity to this conspiracy theory? There's no real like,

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't they use him? It just doesn't make sense.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Yeah, I don't know. Some kind of

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>bad blood between Gronk and the Pats. What did you

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>think that? I mean, James White, classic James White. What

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>did you think of Cordarrel Patterson? I mean, I think

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he was just kind of like a makeshift. All right,

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll give him a couple of carries to fill in

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>until Sony Michelle's back, if Sony Michelle's back, when Sony

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Michell's back, So I think it's just kind of like

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a mishmash like the all right, we'll give a few

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>carries to Corduroll Patterson, will give a few to uh

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Kenyon Barner, will give a few carry a few more

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>carries to James White. But you know, they still they

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>just it was a lot of it was a lot

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of James White. They just gave him his normal workload

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>feed him a bunch of targets, kind of us him

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the out of the backfield as a receiver,

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>as an extension of the running game. When they got

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>down near the goal line, they trust him the most.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>They gave him the goal line carry. It was just

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>more of the same Julian Edelman. Julian Edelman game. Lots

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of carries, lots of targets. It was very scary. Oh

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>how did your How did your matchup turn out? Mine

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>was obviously fine because I was going it'st Brady, Gronk

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and Gordon and they did nothing fantastic for you. Yes,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>um and one one seventeen point one seventeen and a

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>half to one sixteen point eight, less than a point.

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>One more reception. It was one more reception. It was over.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Judy and I were watching, Um Junior and I were

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>watching the game. She's going against James White. She needed

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>James White to be under eighteen points. Obviously, need be

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>under seventeen. It did not work for Judy. She was

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>do you know that feeling? And I know you do,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know that feeling you get like you kind

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of think you're gonna win and you hope and like

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>it all goes wrong and you're just in the worst

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>mood like you it happens to do. That's how I

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, obviously, but but you know that I

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>felt yesterday going into the game. I'm like, all right,

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm up by forty four, Like I feel like I

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have a good chance to win. But I wouldn't have

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>been surprised if Tom Brady just came out and you know,

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>through for three hundred and two touchdowns and you know,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>one of them to Gordon and one of the mc

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>gronk and then I probably lose. Like I wouldn't have

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>been surprised if that happened. But anyway, do you know

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that feeling and you're just like you don't want to

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to watch football. You don't want to

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>watch football anymore. You want to just turn off, you

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>want to watch anything else. You're close to the edge.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>The first time in her life. Judy had that last night.

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>She just turned this game off, but I'm still rooting

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for something. I still need this right And she was

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm bored. I don't want to watch this anymore.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I get it, I get it. That's

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>how I feel. And a lot of Sunday nights. But

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to watch the night football. That's why

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it sucks. But we all get that feeling. It was

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>cool if to watch someone not cool, but it was

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see someone experience that for the first time,

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for the first time popping the I hate Fantasy Football

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>charity exactly pretty much. She's like lost couple of weeks

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>in a row. She's so angry, she's so angry. Do

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you do you give anything to the fact that Za

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Jones head eight or at least eight targets in two

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>of the last three games. I do. I think Derrick

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Anderson targets him. I think Derrick Anderson trusts him. I

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>think if you look at the Bills in general, there's

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>not much here. So like Shady actually a pretty good

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>last night. And obviously z Jones can tell you something.

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>What's up? It's pet peeve. Oh so you just get it.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And somebody texted me yesterday in regards to Marlon Mack

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and they said, quote and he is h this person

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>did it is a year younger than you, so you

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>know a couple he was younger than me, and he goes, man,

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I was watching tape. I was watching tape on the

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>kid and he's great. And he just said, oh, he's

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a second round pick. On the kid kids like two

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>years younger than you. He's like, I mean he's a

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>kid from like a kid. I old. He's just currently

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>three year fall veteran. He's an NFL second calling him

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a kid, I'm not on the kid. He's a kid.

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not on a kid. But I'm referring you know,

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to you about him too, so I definitely

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>compared to you, he's a kid. To me, he's a baby.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But in general, you could be his dad. Maybe he

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't look like that though, Um, I mean he does

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>have some curly curly Hey what's his birthday? Uh? March right,

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>four March. Not a kid, he's a kid in the NFL.

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it. I mean, young player, the next

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>second year player, he's a kid in the NFL. Is

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>not a kid. He's a kid when it comes to

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. I'm out on that. I'm not on theology anyway.

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>The pleasing Greg pet Peeves telling you how I feel, Man,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack, you when I trying to tell you how

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel, I didn't ask, see, I don't say I

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>don't say mean dooch thinks to you like that. I do. Yeah,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and you come in here every day and say, oh,

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know Frank's grounty. Frank's gun was definitely I keep

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>your feelings in March. He definitely about that. Yeah. So anyway,

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.599
<v Speaker 1>long story, sure, I think they're something that Johns. I

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>think they want them to be something. This is like

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a deeper league. Four teams, teen teams like PPR. Like, dude,

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we're entering by week. Hell right now, there's six teams

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on a by so you're literally looking for anyone who

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>has a pulse. The Bill is one of the teams

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on a bike. No, they're not. Bills are not on

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a We have the Bengals, Colts, Giants, Eagles, Cardinals, Jaguars.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not a lot of talent to it's gonna be

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a it's gonna be a fun, fun week. Try and

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>replace some of these players. Yeah. So I'm looking at

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>my team like my best team that have a spy.

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So I have Baker, maybe Feld my quarterback, but I'm

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty promised about that this week against Kansas City, will

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>see it. Baker could do without Hugh Jackson. I know,

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>um and I need a running back. I don't know

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>if I want to trust that. Is there anyone else

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>available for you? Can fits magic Man probably probably can Magic.

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>You prefer the Magic Man, Yes, for sure. Yeah, it's

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a it's a well the magic match up against the Chiefs.

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you can't get Fitzpatrick, I would say

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Baker is probably the next sky Up by week replacement

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this week. But if I could, I would really want

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to take await and see approach, just because you don't

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>know what the offensive palling is gonna is it gonna

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>be conservative? There's no wait and see approach. I need

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>him for one week because and you looked my quarterback

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and he starts every week, Yeah, which I am gonna start?

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Look against Jacksonville probably Okay, um, yeah, it's one week.

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Accent has him in the same defense. I have a

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>few other quarterbacks that I've listed as streams for by

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith Agets Atlanta secondary is not good. He hasn't

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>great for fantasy purposes either, but Atlanta's gonna put points up.

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And Derek Carr at San Francisco. San Francisco's defense, if

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>there's one way, I mean, you can attack them pretty much. However,

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you want to. But Derek Carr has actually thrown for

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of yards this year. He hasn't been that

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>great in the red zone, but he's gonna be able

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to attack the San Francisco defense. And we've seen Thursday

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>night football teams cannot stop a nosebleed and nobody can

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>stop anybody on Thursday night football. It's just too short

0:10:57.880 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of a week. It's hard to game plan for a

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>team that that on that quick of a turnaround, and

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of points scored on Thursday Night football.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So I do think Derek Carr can give you, you know,

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to S and two. I think that's definitely possible. That's

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna put him in the conversation for bye week stream

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>this week. That's an interesting one. I get the Baker

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Chiefs, but I just don't want to.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to trust the Browns offense is first

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>game in I could see them trying to run a

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>lot keep Patrick Mahomes off the field. Whether it's going

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to be successful or not, I mean, that remains to

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>be seen. But there's just too much dysfunction within the organization,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the offensive play calling. The Baker's got a lot of

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>town long term. I would not want to trust him

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>this week. I know it's only a one week thing,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but um, yeah, i'll see I haven't done my quarterback rankings,

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but well even Thursday at noon or so let me yeah, yeah,

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do quarterbacks in there. Oh, I think it's

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>even better. So tomorrow at Newity even better, to be

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, So yeah, Derek Carr's an option. I

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>really like this Baker thing that we'll see create deadline

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>day two today. Yeah, that could happen, definitely affect the

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire two, which I think we need to jump

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>into here because there's a lot going on all right,

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>so let's go right into it right now. Some stuff

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>on the rundown. Sorry, running back is that cool? So

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this downstairs to venture there's not much available? Well,

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this downstairs to venture at the running back position.

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>If you need help this week, Elijah McGuire probably doesn't

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>help you this week. I don't think it's probably true.

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Josh Adams definitely doesn't help you this week. Is not

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a boy Derrick Henry maybe out there like he's a

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>fine bye week feeling. I think you can score a

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>touchdown good opportunity. I just row him in because he

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>might have been dropped. He's owned in less than six CBS.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>Fine with that too, all right. Then you get to

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Edo Smith. Maybe he was dropped. I don't buy Okay,

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>fine with that as well. But if they weren't dropped

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody else where, could we look, I'm gonna reach some

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>of the guys on my waiver wire. You let me

0:12:55.120 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>know your level of ventures. That's cool. Alfred Morris. Alfred

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Morris against Oakland Thursday night with Matt Breed up in

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>his last two games and the half point PBR, Alfred

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Morris has two and a half points and two point

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>eight points as a bye week replacement, he is low

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to medium interest. Okay, how you check on Thursday night? Okay,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>all right? DeVante Booker, I figured he was the one

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>that you would bring up. We don't have much on

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Roy's freeman, but given that he's dealing with you know

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that ankle sprain, I would not expect him to play

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>this week. Uh And Denver is going up against Houston.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>They've been pretty stout against the run saw Kenyan Drake.

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Did I like him more than Alfred Morris? You like

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>him more than Alfred Morris. All right, uh quiz Rogers.

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>H No, somebody named Mike Boone. No, it was like

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know he's on the Vikings. Rashan Penny. No,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they never carry this week. I didn't have an offensive

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>snap this week. That's that's all I got. That's the way. Yeah,

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>so you're looking at DeVante Booker and Alfred Morris if

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you're really really desperate, or let me try to make

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a trade for just a bye week. I mean, I

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>don't really condone doing that unless it's just like an

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>end of your bench player, for like an end of

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a bench player on another team to get a running back.

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's pretty much the same level of talent that

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get out of Alfred Morris or Devontae Booker.

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Did someone else's pop up on your waiver wire because

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you had a face like, oh my god, I miss

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this person. No, Kylo, let it get arrested when you

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>thought things couldn't get worse for the New York Football Giants,

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback of the future. Just the traffic violation though,

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>just a trap you got arrested. Oh gosh, the starting

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback coming out of the bar and Week ten, you

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>can't start brought up. Um, I don't know whoever was

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>actually active on the team, like the second active quarterbacks. Yeah,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>bring back David's webb. It's literally crazy. There's no other

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>running back for me. To Devontae Booker this past week,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>he was fine. He played almost of the snaps. He's right,

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, forty four a very close, you know, like

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty five percent for Philip Lindsay for DeVante Booker. And

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it sucks to say, but if Royce Freeman

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>was just never to come back into this backfield, it

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>would look a lot better for purposes, a lot easier

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, it would, you know, we would get

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Philip Lindsay on early downs still, the

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>guy that they could use in the screen game. Um,

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>he would be that you know, fifteen twenty touch guy,

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and then DeVante Booker can do his you know, ten

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of twelve touches whatever you're expecting. But he actually looked

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>really good in this matchup this past week. Um So yeah,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Devontay Booker more so than Alfred Morris. That rests entirely

0:15:53.880 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on uh is name escaping me right now and Cannon

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not yet because I could see them slowly trying to

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>work back, slowly, trying to work Elijah McGuire back in

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Breeda. If he doesn't go, then Alfred Morris is

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna get double digit carries against Oakland. We just

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>saw Marlon Mack and he mines run all over. So

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what you need to pay attention to here, that's

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the caveat. You know, if Matt Breed is not playing

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on a short week, Alfred Morris is your guy. Would

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>rather starts Wolfgang sucks for most of um you know,

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Matt Breed is like the fantasy troll dude. Like all

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>week we thought he wasn't gonna play. The week before,

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>all week we thought he wasn't gonna play. Um yeah,

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it would be Offer Morris just based on

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen there. You know, they're just using him more.

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>They are not willing to give most are more touches.

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Then then Alfred Morris. Right now, it was that one

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Monday night game against the Packers where he kind of

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, flashed a little bit. The next week they

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>used them a little bit, but they also used Alfred Morris,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and in this past week they didn't use him at all,

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't use most of it at all and he you know,

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>he killed a lot of people want to use him

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>in the flex. If Matt Reid doesn't play, it's Alfred Morris.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>If matt Red does play, it's DeVante Booker. Those are

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>really uh top two waiver wire Bye week. Running backs

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>for this week? The day break here? When do we

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>come back? More the wide receivers you can add so next.

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you premier advice. We play every day,

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stop. Industry

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot Com optimize that in minutes, building optimized line

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>up for cast games and turneys. Learned from the game's

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players joined Daily rodo dot com. Is it today?

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Talk with you on the Fantasy Best Friends Forever Fantasy Sports?

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Everybody saw that friend, I don't even know what you're

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>talking exactly exactly. So the running backs that are out

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>there not so much. There's not a lot of help

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>this week. I would still see what I need help.

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Elijah McGuire is still the guy. He's only owned nine

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>percent of leagues that's the guy that I'm still going

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>out there and trying to target. But again he's I

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much he's gonna get worked in this week.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>The Jets like Elijah McGuire a lot. I'm excited about

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>what he can do and that Balal Powell role. Last

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>year we heard Emory Hunt kind of compare Elijah McGuire

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to Tari Cohen. We see what Teri Cohen is doing

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>this year, So I don't know that Elija McGuire has

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that same kind of burst and explosiveness. But there was

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously something on game film that Emery liked a lot

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>about Lolja McGuire, So I think he will get an

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity eventually to fill that ball power roll. I just

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much he gets worked back in in

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>his first week that he's eligible to return, which is

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this week. In week nine, he still leads the running backs.

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to add outside of Derrick Henry and Edo

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Smith if those guys were dropped and then it's Josh Adams,

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>But again, Elijah McGuire and Josh Adams not really gonna

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>help you this week. Adams on a buy, Elija McGuire

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just returning Greg if he if he's activated, we don't

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>even know if we'll be activated ready to play, yeah,

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>because we you know, we were expecting densa Foreman to

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>get activated right off the pup right hasn't happened, and

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller has who looked like I was, honestly, he's

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>running like a bat out of hell right now. I

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 1>was making on forman returning. Yeah. I mean a lot

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of people were, and you know, we were all excited

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>about him. We said, you know, at this point, week nine,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>week ten, he might be the starting running back. That

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>was the thought, and I honestly just had it on

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the IR just as like a stash, you know. It

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>was just like, all right, hopefully he'll be something. If

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>he's not, he's not. I always not costing me anything now,

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 1>like I need him and he's he's not available initia

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is it's an issue for you, it's an issue for

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who were banking on Lamar Miller sucking,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>which he has done the complete opposite the past few weeks. Yeah,

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>he's been great. He's been great. Tree Mood and the

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. Yeah, I mean, look, there's not much here.

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a barren I disagree wholeheartedly. Well, it depends who

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>depends on your league, especially I mean in some of

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>our leagues. But if you look at the ownership percentages,

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>these guys are widely available, Greg, But like nothing you

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>guys available in my league. Well, it doesn't help me.

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>This isn't the Great Suspen Show. Greg. Actually half is

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>these guys available in your er. We're supposed to help

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>other people. I need to help my shop in my

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>home league. David Moore, DeVante Parker, d J. Moore are

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>all available. I think we have the six guys who

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>are on this list. J. David Moore is definitely available.

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the more brothers that aren't actually brothers,

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>d J. Moore and David Moore. First, I poo pooed

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you on David Moore when he was brought up a

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. I was like, look at look

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>at this, there's no consistency. A couple of touchdowns is no,

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>that is sustainable. Well, I still believe that it's been

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>relatively sustainable. What to deal with David Moore? Well, the

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>question is what's the deal with the Seattle Seahawks wide receivers?

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Because I know I tweeted about this this past Sunday,

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>drink Uh. It's basically wide receivers by a committee right now.

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>There is no one wide receiver or tight end that's

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>stepping up. Russell Wilson is making the most of his weapons.

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>He's spreading the ball out, He's taking what defenses are

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>giving to him. He's not force feeding the ball to

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Doug Baldwin. He's not force feeding it to lock It.

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>He's not forced feeding it to David More either. If

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you look over the past three games specifically, greg their

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>target breakdown. Doug Baldwin eleven targets, Tyler Lockett eleven targets,

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>David Moore ten targets. But David Moore does have four

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns over those last three games. He absolutely dominated teas

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>table and the Detroit lines. This past week. You saw

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the touchdown which was you know, deflected off the defender

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to deflect it up in the air. Yeah, he managed

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring it down for a touchdown during that same

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>span these past three weeks, he leads a team in

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>air yards, leads a team in a dot so he's

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>more so the guy that's being targeted down in the field.

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So you can argue that he has the highest upside

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of the three Seahawks wide receivers right now based on

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the way he's playing, the way he's being targeted down

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the field, and the way he's actually converting. You know,

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 1>something that I like to say about, you know, especially

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>players for fantasy football in the NFL. If players are

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>given an opportunity and they continue to convert on those opportunities,

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going to continue to get more opportunities. And that's

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly what's happening with David Moore. No pun intended, um,

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean we can't really ignore what he's doing.

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>A touchdown in three Shade games, four touchdown during that span.

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>The one thing that I'll point out that's a negative

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>here is, you know, as actually, as Raymond Summerlin points out,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a friend of the program, Ray Summerlin, Uh,

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks are attempting just twenty two point six passing

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>attempts over their past five games, so they're not throwing

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball that much. Russell Wilson, he has just been

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>extremely efficient and because of that, his wide receivers have

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>been extremely efficient as well. It's not like any one

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of these guys is just dominating targets, as I've pointed out. Yeah,

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>as you just said, it's very hard to hard to

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>turn away from the guy that scored a touchdown in

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>three straight games. But it's very hard to invest in

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>an offense that's only tempting to twenty two passes per game.

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't get in the end zone, David Moore

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>does nothing. He's completely completely useless to you. Of course,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the other side of that is while he scored three

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 1>straight games, he did have nineties seven yards this week,

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's not completely true. It gives you syards just

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the weeks two weeks prior to that. It was touchdown dependent.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It definitely was. But I think the fact that he's

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>being targeted more down the field, maybe that creates a

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>safer floor. Right, he's also a clear wide receiver three

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and an offensive Yeah, I just laid out the targets

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of past three games. I know it's all within ten

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and eleven targets. It's not just one guy. But if

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you hand thing, we should look at all three wide receivers.

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the same value right now, which is wide receiver threes.

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>But as you know, who do you trust? That's the question.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>If I put Doug Baldwin, Tyler Locket, and David Moore

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in front of you, and they're all on your bench

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and you have to start two of them? What would

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you which you would you start? It's not David Moore targets,

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>The targets and the production say that they're pretty much

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all on the same plate. But you're telling me that

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you still he scored more touchdowns over the past three games,

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and both of those absolutely as I just don't feel

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>any reliability. And how would your money are you spending

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this week on David Moore? Not much? Couple dollars, Yeah,

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but you have to imagine like five to seven percent.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Now I have twenty five dollars left in my home league.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>What is that I might? I mean, we still got

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that. I don't know if I should

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>or not in a super flex league. It's something that

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to think about when it comes to Ryan Fitzpatrick.

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>If you just kind of if you want to dive

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>into that real quick for a second. I saw some

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>awesome stats per Josh Moore at four for four underscore

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh on Twitter. Despite coming in relief Sunday, Ryan Fitzpatrick

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is averaging twenty three point six fantasy points per game,

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>which is third in fantasy football, behind only Patrick Mahomes

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and at Ryan. Between Ryan Fitzpatrick and Jamis Winston, Bucks

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks are averaging three and ninety passing yards per game

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this season. Their defense is that bad. We talked about

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it every single week. That's why you want to target

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the players playing against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers defense. They've

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dealt with a ton of injuries. They fired their defensive coordinator.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter what you do to the defensive coordinator,

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>whoever you put in there, this defense is going to

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>be bad. And because of that, they're gonna get in

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>shootouts and the quarterbacks are gonna have to throw. Aside

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>from this week with Peyton Barber, they haven't really been

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>able to run the ball effectively. It's just a lot

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of volume. And as long as Ryan Fitzpatrick is the

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback for this team, I want him on my

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football team. The problem is, as game laid out

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>during Carton and Friends, how long is he gonna be

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the starter for right because he can have three fantastic

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>games and then what the next time he craps the bed,

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna go right back to Jamis Winston. Dude, he

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>could have three great quarters and they'll be down fifty points.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>But Jameis Winston back in, you got three games. But this,

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like the fantasy product and that he gives is just

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's so Blake Bortle, right, just garbage time. But

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter for fantasy, Like, I mean, it doesn't

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>have to be the prettiest thing. If the guy is

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>storing for three nine yards, even if he's giving you

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>three interceptions, were giving you three touchdowns, I mean that

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>those are fantasy points. So I I want to get

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick. I mean, even if it's just for the

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>short term. Definitely in super reflects two quarterback leagues. But

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you were asking me, you know, who's a bye week

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>replacement quarterback that I could pick up this week? You

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>were you were talking about Baker Mayfield. I'd rather have

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick, even though he's going up against the Carolina Panthers,

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.479
<v Speaker 1>who you know, their defense looked very good against Joe

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Flacco and the Ravens. But I'm just I'm gonna continue

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>to ride Ryan Fitzpatrick. Yeah, I kind of agree with you, right,

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Patrick finds a way every single week Blake Bortles, like,

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>just put up numbers. You know that gonna on the ball.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It's Patrick. If it's Patrick, does they can't run the

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>football when they're down by thirty points, It's gonna be great.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I would start. I'm going to start if it's Patrick

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>over over Baker for sure. If you play in a

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>super flex or two quarterback league, how much fab do

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you put around? I don't think you can put all

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of it on it because they don't. You don't know

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that will be the starter. Like if Dirk Hunter gets

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>fired tomorrow or next Monday, let's set. They could say, listen,

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to the organization, Jason, like the general manager

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and the owner could be like, I understand that, Like

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>what let me go back Dirk Hutter Storry ryanf it's Patrick,

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>who's Ryan? If it's Patrick, is in the best chance

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to win, or he believes that he's fighting for his

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>job when he no longer has his job, and they

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 1>promote whoever, I guess, I guess I have no idea

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>who would because already fired their defensive coordinator and their

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator is is some known name. They promote the

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator to the head coach. He's not going to

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>put right. I don't think he puts Ryan. It's Patrick

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>aff there. I think the organization will dictate. We need

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to see what we have in Jameis Winston, right like,

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to see where bringing James Winston back next

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>year and they play Winston. So I don't think you

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>can go all in. I really don't. I'm sorry. So

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to figure out if I thought Jameis Winston

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>this was the last year of his contract. He's the

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>option next year, all right, So Rural World, yeah has him.

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>As you know, you get paid out twenty one million

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars for the fifth year option next year. So I mean,

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>looks you're having James next year or I mean they

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>might just cut him. I don't know at this point.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>At this point, even though he's twenty four years old,

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>what more do you need to see out of James

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Winston to know what you have in this guy? Let's

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>be honest, We've seen a lot of Jammeis Winston in

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the past three years. I know, what have we seen?

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Bone headed play like he's super frustrating because and it

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was like a perfect microcosm of his career. There was

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a drive this past Sunday where he just through a

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>perfect pass, laid it right into Mike Evans was right

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>down the silent It was a beautiful past the announces

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. This is what's so frustrating about Jameis

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Winston is that he has the ability to make beautiful,

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>beautiful throws, but then the next play he's gonna throw

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it right to a linebacker or right to a safety.

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Like the guy is just so turnover prone. He's second

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in the league in the interceptions, Greg, you only played

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>what three four games? You know who. It's sad to say,

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know who Jameis Winston is. At this point,

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>if you know who James Winston is, you also know

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>who Ryan fitz Patrick is as well. So well, I

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with everything that you're saying that I think I'm

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>just pleading because that's what I was saying, Like, we

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>may know who Jameis Winston is, but we when thousand

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>percent know who Ryan pis Patrick is. Ryan fas Patrick

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is not a part of the future long term in

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa Bay. That's definitely true. The Bucks needs to

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>figure out if Jameis Winston is going to be I

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he will be made, there's no chance.

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>If there's no chance between his play on the field

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and what he's done off the field, there's no way

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>he's part of the future of the Tampa Bay Bucks.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if he gets another starting opportunity

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, another team will bring him in and

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>give him the chance to compete. Is he another starting

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in the NFL? Jameis Winston, I'm not so sure. Okay,

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>should we bad the wide receivers? Now we can? I

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think we just kind of got to put a bow

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on on Fitzpatrick. Um So, what I'm thinking is, in

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>my home league, I have twenty five dollars left, I

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>might put like thirteen on Fitzpatrick. That's fine. I'm okay

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with that, because you need a quarterback. It's super flex.

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I get it. And we know if Ryan it's Patrick

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>can do you probably a one quarterback league. It's not

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>much I was gonna recommend. I was gonna recommend to you,

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but half of what you have on him. But I

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>cannot say go all in. I can't do that. Yeah,

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and it sucks because I put twelve dollars on Joe

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Flacco not too long ago, and now I'm gonna put

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>thirteen on right Patrick, Joe Flacco has just been so

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>hit or miss, I know, like home road splits have

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>been a thing for him. Maybe it's just the whole

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a f C North Division, right, big band, home road

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Splitshoe Flacco home road splits and Dalton Lamar Jackson came

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in and looked good. At the end of that game,

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it was garbage time. Look bad. Store it out there.

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>We hit one of the more, one of the More brothers.

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you want? Are you spending any more than that?

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I would rather David More? Do you guys think and

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>score a touchdown again this week when you're gonna come

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>back and you're gonna say the same thing, would you

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>rather have David Moore? D J Moore? Definitely DJ Moore?

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But I understand there there are reasons for hesitancy here

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>because Ron rivera typically a head coach who likes to

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>play his veteran players, and for whatever reason, they've loved

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>playing Tory Smith and Jarius Right this year, and you

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>know Tory Smith. It took an injury for Tory Smith

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>being out in this game for d J. Moore to

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>see the season high in snaps played in routes run

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in targets in receiving yards. I mean he said season

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>highs across the board, but that was because Tory Smith

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is out. So there is a caveat here. While we're

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>excited about DJ Moore. They used a first round pick

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on him, and he's clearly talented, right yeah, Marly, he's

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a turk. Of course, he's clearly talented. But you get

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy out in space, you know, you put the

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>ball in his hands and he instantly becomes like a

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>running back. You could, I mean, you could see it.

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>He's He's incredibly explosive. He also was targeted down the

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>field a couple of times in this game. He made plays.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>They're using him, uh for running plays as well. I mean,

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the type of explosiveness that he has. I mean,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>not every team has a Tyreek hillesque gadgety type player.

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to just label DJ More as that,

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>but they're going to do some creative things with t J. Moore.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>He's not just a wide receiver. They can use him

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in some you know, run packages as well, and they

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>proved that this past week. So I like him, and

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I like him more than David Moore because I think

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>there is some upside there again, season high and snaps

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>nearly at least five targets down in three straight games.

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's flying under the radar. That's the key

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>stat that you just gave the five targets in his

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>last three games. Because the arrow is now trending up,

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>snaps are, targets are up, and this past week receptions

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>were up. Now we I spoke about this Jimsanas yesterday

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that maybe he's not taking over the number one job

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>from Devon Fudges, but he plays a different role the

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Devon Fudges, And yeah, you have to worry about Christi McCaffrey,

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and yeah you have to worry about Greg Olsen, but

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>d J Moore solidifying he's spot in the offense. I

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>completely agree. I'm much more interested in DJ more than

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>David Moore. Yeah, and it's not just the targets for

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>three weeks in a row. It this past week tied

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for the team leading targets with six, tied with Christian McCaffrey.

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>He led the team in receptions with five, led the

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>team in receiving yards with nine. D So there's a

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>lot to like about DJ Moore. You know what would

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.239
<v Speaker 1>be awesome here is if the Panthers would just kind

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of hand him that slot receiver role, because I look,

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna continue to beat this dead horses fantasy

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>football season. This is the year of the slot receiver

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd Adam fieland Cooper Cup when he was healthy.

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>These guys are just absolutely dominating. So if they would

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>use DJ More in that role, and I think he

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fits that role pretty well, I mean, the very shifty

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, that would be awesome for him. The one

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>problem again is that if Torry Smith comes back, does

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>he eat into the snap percentage again for d J Moore.

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Panthers are a team that typically

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>spreads the ball around. They're gonna still target McCaffrey. They're

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna still target uh, Devin Funchius and Greg Olsen. So

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, we'll play Devil's advocate. We're excited

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>about dj More, but to a certain extent, we we

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have to temper our expectations here. I will say the

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>upcoming schedule for d J Moore phenomenal. Tampa Bay this week.

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.280
<v Speaker 1>In in two weeks it's Pittsburgh. They have another matchup

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>with Tampa Bay later in the season. I mean the

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>down the you know, down the stretch schedule for d J.

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Moore and the fact that the bye week has past

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>him that also helps. It definitely does. The only thing is,

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with everything saying, like I said before,

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the only thing is if he just wound nothing this week,

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>he just gave you a bomb of a game, would

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you be surprised. No, I wouldn't be surprised. I mean,

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for for the reasons we mentioned, you have to temper expectations,

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but you want to be excited. Because the draft capital

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>that they use on him obviously a high draft pick.

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>We know the talent coming out of college um and

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>he flashed some of that talent here. So if they

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to get him involved, I just worry. I mean,

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>will the targets share ever be massive in Carolina because

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>they like to uh to spread the ball around. I

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>will just say these next two matchup against Tampa Bay,

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't need double digit targets. If he gets you know,

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>six seven targets again and can you know, get the

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>ball out in space, then he's going to be incredibly,

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>incredibly dangerous against this Tampa Bay secondary, which is just brutal.

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, for that reason alone, these next two

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>matchups and these matchups down the stretch, you want to

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to take a flyer on DJ More definitely

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>ahead of David Moore. I will say, you know, I

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>uh I tweeted out from the Fantasy PFS account Greg,

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>there's really like a four horsemen group of wide receivers

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this week it's DJ Moore, David Moore, k QT and

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Coreland Sutton was not the player. It was devontaf Corland

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Suton and you've got to talk about him too. Now

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're saying Mary's Thomas is like like you need

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>training again. Yeah, those four are widely available in fantasy.

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talking about all of them on the other side.

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>How you write them, how much you spend. We'll bring

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it down for we have when we return. This is

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Best Friends Forever Fantasy Sports Radio Network. If

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you're someone that needs fantasy sports and by every day,

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network has you covered. When you

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>download the n T S Y Sports Radio Network GAP,

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you get the top fantasy advice every single day right

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>through the weekend. Be sure to listen to our weekend

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Warriors like College Football Today. Welcome to College Football Today

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Weekend Fantasy Update. They called me the Fantasy Jesus in

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>this league is never short of exciting at I T

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>L and so much more. Download the Fantasy Sports Radio

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Network GAP in the iTunes and Google play store now

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and keep the best fantasy experts right in your pocket

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>all day long and all week long. Stop this must be.

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Can't stop even like that Direy pop Thank staff a

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>little goosen the Fantasy Best Fans Forever. Fantasy Sports Radio

0:36:55.920 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Network pop it Off Show. Greg enjoy playing daily fantasy sports,

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but are sick of dealing with the professionals using algorithms.

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>This is like hundreds of lotups entries try to pross

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>build their tool and my bookie dot ag we're gonna

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>having to create multiple line up stitch the hassle too

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>with late scratches and avoid experts. Winning night, he present

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:14.720
<v Speaker 1>on the money investing the players that you want without

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>salary caps. And if you sign up for your account

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>using the promo code f n t S why you

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>can receive a fifty to posit ponents. No more dealing

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>with the late lineup scratches, no experts to compete a yess,

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>just you and the profit you choose, go to my

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>booky dot a G into the promo code fnd is

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>why when you sign up and uose your matchups using

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the props builder tool, that's my Bookie dot a G.

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>The promo code is f n T s hy Hey

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>f you. I also want to remind people to use

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Road to NBA lineup optimized or how did

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you last night? Gregg? You know how I did last night? Well,

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the public doesn't put up a lot of points, just

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>missed out on the castle. This is actually the reason

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I quit Daily Fantasy Basketball, by the way, last year,

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>because I was consistently putting up three hundred points and

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 1>not cashing. And that was the case last night. I

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>had three howny points. We have I don't know what

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to find. I mean, I had to close AD. I

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>was getting too frustrated. Yeah, I thought we had three

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 1>or nine. Yeah, so we had around three ten points

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>or so. The thing is you can't just label it, oh,

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I had three hundred points. Every single night in DFS

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>is different. The cash line is gonna be different every

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>single night. And the reason why it was so high

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>last night is because the same line, which is frusta

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is because the chalk plays hit and everyone had them

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>except us, Pascal, Siackem and Urson Iliasova. They hit and

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they hit big. He had Iliasova, but we didn't have Siackemer,

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, put up over forty Fantasy points at you know,

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:41.800
<v Speaker 1>less than five K salary. And you know, LaMarcus Aldridge,

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>who we paid, you know, nearly nine thousand dollars on

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>had less Fantasy points in Pascal. That's that's it, and

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that's our night. It was La Marcus soldiers Pascal

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's a you know, four five thousand dollar price.

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It's frustrating because the dfs optimized or over at deod

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com like you said he used. Pascal told us

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to say they did for sure. Now we spoke to

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike Leonie and he's like, listen, if you want to

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>pay up for Aldredge, and I specifically asked him in

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the cash game, can I start Pascal Siakam and Urson

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Iliosa And he goes, yes, absolutely, and then I did it.

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And don't listen to me. Every time I've told you

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>anything ever about fantasy basketball, it's been wrong. So just

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>don't listen to me. So did to take Darron foxe

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Rimrocky Rubio. You did not say that. I mean you

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>said quite the opposite. Actually, yes, yeah, we're paying for

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>our sins. We're paying for our fantasy basketball sins right there. Hey,

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 1>my other fantasy basketball team, by the way, went off

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>last night and had more points in my fanuel team

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:44.879
<v Speaker 1>using the same scoring Really. Yeah, a three four point

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:49.879
<v Speaker 1>night in your season long? Yes, because I had Carl

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Towns, which was which was fun. But I also

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>had Darn Fox really CALLI Stein, which is also fun.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And I had Gary Harris and Julius Randall fun. Yeah,

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Random is the only missed on. He texted

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you about him too, and I was like, I want

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to use Randall. I feel like I'm gonna regret it. Um.

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You know amazing last night who I was not in on.

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you might have told me to pick him,

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>so I just did. Rudy Gay, I didn't tell you

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>to pick out. I wasn't on him at all. Oh dude,

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you had fifteen e loving last night with four assists

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and six teals. Yeah, that was a fun game, aside

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>from the fact that Mark Ulster Aldred did nothing. I

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>was watching that mad and Spurs when into overtime to

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Marda Rosen is just amazing, amazing, very great year. When

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I watched him play right, his mid range game just

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>reminds me so much of Kobe, like back to the basket.

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>He could just score on anybody. It's it's really fun

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to watch. We probably get back to the way toward Okay,

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>let's just let's get to the four horse games. Let's

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>get to the four horsemen. Where's the four horsewomen? Do that? Now? Um,

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>these are not women, they're NFL players. Anyway, k QT

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the number one guy will Fuller's will Fuller's out for

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the season, Cat steps in as the number two wide

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>receiver in an offensive was to throw the ball in

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>an offense? Where will Fuller was? He touchdown? In every

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>sense of the word. We know what Q could do

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the slot. He's gonna have even more opportunities.

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>You expect him to be on the field each and

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 1>every play. The question remains, can he stay healthy? That

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is the only question I have. Are going to kick

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Q tay if he's out there? How much do you

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>spend on him? That's a good question. I'm I'm thinking fifteen.

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>That's the number that just came to my mind right now.

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>If you want to be really aggressive and make sure

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you get him, you're probably looking at just over you know,

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of your remaining fab budget. But there's a lot to

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like about q TEA. I mean, we saw what he

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>could do in that limited sample while he was healthy.

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>He looked awesome. A lot of passes close to the

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage, kind of using him as an extension

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>of the run game. Again, the year of the slot,

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Kiki QT was playing the slot and he was dominating there.

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller was wide receiver twenty one in points per

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 1>game while he was healthy this year. So, I mean

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that just kind of gives you a taste of what

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the upside could be for Kiki QT. He's not the

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>same wide receiver as will Fuller. He's not a down

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the field threat, a guy who's gonna burn a bunch

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of people and score the deep touchdown. But what what

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at, what Will Fuller is the number two

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:08.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in the Texans offense, and that's exactly what

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Keiki could be. Even if he misses this week again

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>because of the lingering hamstring issue. I wouldn't be surprised

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>if they sit him out. I almost want them to

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>sit him out so he doesn't re injure himself here

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and then we can have him for the final, you know,

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>five or six weeks of Fantasy football and him just

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to be healthy for those weeks. But there is a huge,

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>huge opportunity here, Greg, and I would say he's the

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>number one wide receiver. To add, A few people were

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>asking me, you know, if DT is traded, wouldn't you

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>rather have Courtland Sutton? In my opinion, the opportunity is

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>better for Kiki and Deshaun Watson is a better quarterback

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>than case Keenum, So those they are the deciding factors

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of why I would have Key Key ranked higher than

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Courtland Sutton in this week's waiver Wire. Yeah, I'm with

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you for me, it's very easy for Kiki qt as

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 1>number one. We know what he could do. We've seen

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>it Courtland Sutton. We expect. If you think Keki plays

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>this week, I do, Yeah, I do. Yeah. I know.

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>He practiced on a limited fashion last week. It was

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously a short week week. Now he's had a while off.

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely think he plays. How much would help a lot.

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.879
<v Speaker 1>How much do we spend is the question? Um we're

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>halfway through the year. So let's assume people have half

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>their budgets left. I know you like do things percentages,

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but let's assume people have half their budgets left. How

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>much of that using the hundred rather than a thousand,

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>you have any bucks left? How much she spend? And

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I know I just said fifteen of your remaining FAB budget.

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I understand, But that's why I said for your percentages,

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you wanna if you want to make sure you get

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 1>him sixteen seventeen bucks at a fifty, which is more

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 1>than what I'm saying. Obviously I was over that. That's

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 1>more than gonna go over. I was gonna be more

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 1>like twenty out of the fifty. So that I mean

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about forty of your remaining FAB budget. I

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I think at this point people have less

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>than fifty. I think so I have twenty five dollars

0:43:58.120 --> 0:43:59.919
<v Speaker 1>left in my Homely, I think people are probably closer

0:43:59.920 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>to like thirty or forty right now, Okay, Which if

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the case and you want to you want to

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive again, and it's probably like twelve thirteen of

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like thirty or forty bucks left I have. If you

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 1>were available. In my home league, I have twenty five dollars.

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I would probably put fifty thirteen on Fitzpatrick and the

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>other twelve on Kiki, and then I just have nothing

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the year. But these are game

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>changing waiver waiver wire editions, especially with fits being in

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the Super Flex League. Um, but yeah, I mean if

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you want Key, you're gonna have to be aggressive. Okay,

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. If you have fifty left, I'm

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>going over twenty. If you have forty left, I'm going

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>over fifteen. I want y Q, I really really do.

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>He's number one. He's ahead of d J. Moore, He's

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:45.959
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Davante Parker. Who if Marius Thomas gets traded today,

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it's Courton Sutton's number two. For me? How much do

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>how much do we spend a Courting Sun? So it

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>would obviously be less than it would be less than

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:58.359
<v Speaker 1>what you were saying about Kiki. So, I mean, if

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you have fifty bucks left, I'm spending like fourteen a

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Cortland Sutton. Yeah, fourteen and sixteen like that. If you're

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>scared someone's gonna bid around that fifteen dollar range, then

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you get you go to the sixteen or seventeen. Right, Well,

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know your league better than we do.

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 1>If people, you know, if if you think the high

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>bid is gonna be around like twelve, then yeah, you're

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at the thirteen fourteen that you're talking about. But

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he's clearly behind Kiki qut. Just to put this in perspective,

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders leads the team and targets share with thirty

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of the targets to Marius Thomas is at nineteen point

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>eight six and Courtland Sutton is at thirteen point one

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>two percent. So if Mary Thomas has traded, you're gonna

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>immediately see Courtland Sutton soar to over twenty percent of

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the targets share. Yeah, tend, I tend to agree with you.

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, um, which is why I referenced him

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 1>last week as a stash did. And then also last

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>week we got the report that oh, it's not likely

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to marry Thomas has traded, and then today we get

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the report it's more likely that he's traded than not

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 1>just a few very frustrated if you're listening to this

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>after where he probably he's gone, he's probably you know

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 1>what's crazy. I guess it's not that crazy. But the

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Lions shopping Golden Tate and only looking for a forefront

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because he's you know, he's in a contract year. I

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>think they very clearly are not going to bring him back.

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>He's going to land demand a lot of money in

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>free agency because he's by far the best wide receiver

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>available on the free agent market. Obviously, players could get cut,

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of players who are expected to be

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.399
<v Speaker 1>free agents as right now, Golden Tate is by far

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the best wide receiver available. Some team is going to

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>clearly overpay him, and the Detroit Lions can afford to

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:33.879
<v Speaker 1>give him up because they clearly have their two wide

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.399
<v Speaker 1>receivers of the future in Marvin Jones and Kenny Golly.

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones is part of that future. Well, I mean

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>he's under contract, so at least the short term future

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:44.880
<v Speaker 1>more so than Golden Tate and in Kenny Holidays. Obviously,

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the wide receiver of the future. It listen

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to more wide receivers here that I want to get

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 1>into before we have to sign off YouTube. That's DeVante

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Parker and Larry Fitzgerald. Lava Gerald is available just about

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of leagues. He's kind of This is on CBS, so

0:46:57.280 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's a more aggressive ownership. But I still

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in Yahoo. He's actually available in more People might have

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 1>dropped him because he was trending downwards. We actually told

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you could drop him. So that's fine. I'm okay with that. Um,

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 1>he's been a little bit better. He's trending upward. Best

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 1>game in the year this past week Byron Leftwich. Maybe

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>there's something here, so Larry but Cherald certainly too bye

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 1>a week. I'm interested in him and Parker his best

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>game of the season this past Thursday. Let's see if

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he can build upon that. I like him too. If

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald and Key Qt are both available, Greg I've

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>told people already on Twitter that I would rather have

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald. I would not. Why is that? I think

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 1>he's in a better offense. I don't trust Josh Rosen

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at all. I think last week, which is a good

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:39.320
<v Speaker 1>game for him, he's the Niners, is a good matchup.

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So target share was there? Gregor iron left which two

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>targets targets of forty attempts. That's a massive target share. Yeah,

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>there's target shares there, and I have a shows the

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>number one target in that offense. Qt will obviously never

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>be number one next to DeAndre Hopkins, but I think

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the offense is just John Watson's definitely be, you know,

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>so give me the better offense. That's where That's why

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with cute. It's probably it's like A one

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:02.319
<v Speaker 1>A one B. For me, I would still put Fits first.

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It's what would you rather have the number two in

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a better offense or the number one on a worse offense.

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.479
<v Speaker 1>But we saw, you know, a positive science this past

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>week with Byron left targets, I mean, Fits his best

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>game of the year by far. It looks like he's

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 1>finally getting over that hampstring injury, looks like he's finally healthy.

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Eight receptions, a hundred yards and a touchdown, So look

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to see that if he can build off that. It

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is worth noting that Larry Fitzgerald and the Cardinals are

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on a by in week nine, so there's a chance

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that he's dropped to which you probably don't expect it

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:32.319
<v Speaker 1>because he's coming off his best game. Also definitely could happen. Also,

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 1>chance Christian Kirkby dropped during the bye week as well,

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 1>you'd want to grab him. Looking at him for sure

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:39.280
<v Speaker 1>at the tight end position before we mentioned DeVante Parker.

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 1>You're right, sorry, Dante Parker. Um I would I would

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>rank him ahead of DJ More, but I had of

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 1>DJ More or definitely David. It's close between him and

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:55.919
<v Speaker 1>d definitely behind Kiki and Courtland Suton, there's no doubt

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. But I will mention Kenny Stills. There's there's

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>still a chance that he would turns. He's not the

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>guy who was shut down for the year. It was

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Albert Wilson. So we saw that when Kenny Stills was healthy,

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the target share was kind of a crapshoot for the

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins wide receivers. There was no main guy. You know,

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>last week on Thursday Night, Devanta Parker was the main

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>guy and he was targeted nine times, hauled in six

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of those a hundred and thirty four yards. He looked spry,

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 1>he looked fast. Uh, he looked like the you know,

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the the early round draft picked that the Dolphins used

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on him. It's just can we trust Adam Gates because

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it always comes back to Adam Gates and we trust

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>him for the usage of Kenyan Drake. Can we trust

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>him for the usage of DeVante Parker because there were

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weeks in a row now where Devanta

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Parker was a healthy scratch. So the talent is undoubtedly there.

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Devanta Parker just needs to stay healthy and he needs

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to he needs the confidence of his coaching staff. If

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he gets those things, I do think that he can

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:49.320
<v Speaker 1>help you out here in the second half of the season. Alright,

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>with that, we say goodbye to everybody watching on YouTube.

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you listening, to appreciate you following, and if

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:55.399
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the podcast, we go for another five

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>minutes to subscribe like us, rate us and make sure

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>he was five stars and leave at the friends. He's

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:04.240
<v Speaker 1>up next Corey Parson, Jim Day and Chris Ventra Reggie

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position, Jack Doyle is out there. He's

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 1>once again a must dad. I need a tight end

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>must that. Yeah. Absolutely. It is worth mentioning as well

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Cults are on a buy in week nine,

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's more of a stash. He can't help you

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>this week. But if you just look at what Jack

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Doyle did in his first game back, seventy three of

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the Snaps, tied for the team lead with seven targets,

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know he had six receptions for seven yards

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. We know that Andrew luck is going

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to throw to his tight ends. We even saw mo

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Ali Cox involved and awesome catch a one handed grab.

0:50:34.440 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about Eric ebron Man because he's basically been

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 1>on the injury report with any possible injury that you

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:42.800
<v Speaker 1>can have. He's training downwards. Jack Doyle is returning and

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 1>he's training upwards. He's undoubtedly the top tight end out

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of the week. Just remember he will not help you

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in week nine because he's on a buy Colo streaming defenses. Frank.

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 1>This week Jets because the Dolphins, and nextly the face

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the Bills. Yeah, so that's one where you're looking for

0:50:56.920 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>two weeks in advance. There you're looking for the next

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. You want to use them for the next

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.080
<v Speaker 1>two weeks in Miami. Looks like brock Osweiler is gonna

0:51:05.080 --> 0:51:07.399
<v Speaker 1>get another start, But then the Bills game is back

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:09.399
<v Speaker 1>at MetLife where the Jets will be home. I don't

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:12.800
<v Speaker 1>know if they're gonna be facing uh Josh Allen or

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Nate Peterman, Nate Peterman or whoever the quarterback is, but

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's likely going to be a good matchup. So I

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. If you're looking for the next two weeks. Uh.

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The other ones that I'll throw out there, the Broncos

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 1>versus Texans is interesting because the Texans offense looks like

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>they're getting back on track. The offensive line has played better.

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>They're still not great, but the Broncos have great pass rushers,

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:35.320
<v Speaker 1>so there's gonna be opportunities for sacks here. And you

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:39.320
<v Speaker 1>know with sacks can come fumbles, come interceptions, crushing the quarterback. Obviously,

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Lebroncos have those two great pass rushers in Bradley Chubb

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and Von Miller. And now I'll throw the Cowboys out

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>there because they're facing the Titans. And you know, I've

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:48.799
<v Speaker 1>bashed the Titans offense all year. They haven't been great,

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been able to move the ball. And in

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>games where Dallas has been home this year that the

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys defense has actually played very well. All right, four

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:58.279
<v Speaker 1>hour four horsemen off the waiver wire. Uh, we gotta

0:51:58.320 --> 0:52:00.040
<v Speaker 1>drop somebody. You gotta be able to drop somebody. The

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Kiki qts of the world. Uh, for the life at Gerald,

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Demante Parker and all those guys. And if you need him,

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Booker Um from Brence in my case, whoever, who

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 1>do we drop for them? He name some people on

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the list. I'm gonna go through quickly and give you

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 1>some more names as well. Let's do it. Jermaine Curse,

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he's drobable. I don't really want anything to do with

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this Jets offense outside of stating Elijah McGuire because you

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>could have that power role and Chris Herndon this week.

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:26.360
<v Speaker 1>If you need a bye week replacement, that's it. Corey Clement,

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Corey Clement, Yeah, I'm done. I don't want anything to

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>do with the Eagles running backs. I know some people

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:34.239
<v Speaker 1>are gonna go out and pick up Josh Adams. He

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 1>showed some explosiveness, but it's a three headed running back

0:52:37.000 --> 0:52:39.439
<v Speaker 1>by committee. Doug Peterson has done this every single year

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and Corey Clement. Maybe he's not healthy. I don't know

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:43.319
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with him. He hasn't been effective. I'm

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:46.759
<v Speaker 1>dropping Ronald Jones. Ronald Jones, I'm dropping him as well.

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Dealing with the multi week injury now, Peyton Barber flash

0:52:49.800 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they used to quiz Rodgers in the past game. I

0:52:52.520 --> 0:52:56.120
<v Speaker 1>don't love the Bucks rushing attack, regardless of Carlos Hide.

0:52:57.880 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a tougher one man. I would try my

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>best to hold onto him. I you don't know if

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be the RB three or the RB one

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the by. It could be either one

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of those things. Out of all the names that we're

0:53:07.520 --> 0:53:08.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna mention, he's the one that I would try to

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:11.239
<v Speaker 1>hold onto the most, but I understand with the Bys

0:53:11.320 --> 0:53:13.920
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have a choice. He's a drop candidate.

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Wolf k I'm ads based on his lack of usage.

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Even when Matt Brida has been banged up. He's third

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:24.839
<v Speaker 1>on the depth chart on a on a rappy San

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Francisco offense, I'm dropping most Jechiem Grant Jachem Grant, Uh yeah, yeah,

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean DeVante Parker looks like he's the wide receiver

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:38.440
<v Speaker 1>one Kenny Stills could return here. The snap shares all

0:53:38.480 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 1>over the place. Um, he's kind of a boomer Bus

0:53:41.600 --> 0:53:48.720
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. I'm okay dropping any Raiders wide receiver. God,

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd hold Jordy for one more week, just to see

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>if it turns around. Fartivs Bryant. Nobody owned Brandon LaFell anyway.

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Seth Roberts, I mean you might have to execuse Seth

0:53:57.719 --> 0:53:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Roberts this week because of the byes, But I mean,

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 1>if you want to drop some one of these other

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:03.040
<v Speaker 1>wider shoes tomorrow, upside, I have no problem with it.

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Hold the New, Hold the phone k QT using textas

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 1>just acquired JA Maarrius Thomas Corey Parson will break you

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>down for your next fantasy football frenzy for free. Stample,

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Gregg Sauceman lut All Gonnamorrow. We hope