WEBVTT - Sam Returns to OpenAI and Nvidia Earnings Beat Estimates

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:06.119
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where innovation, money and power. Collie in Silicon

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loved Love.

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 3>I med Lolo in San Francisco. Caroline hides off today

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 3>this is Bloomberg Technology in my water show we have

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>for you coming up. Sam Outman returns to open Ai.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Will break down the changes at the artificial intelligence company.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 3>As Outman takes the helm after a shock Ouster, we

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 3>speak to Vino Kosler, the first venture investor into open Ai.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Past the world's most valuable chipmaker and Nvidia tops earnings

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>estimates that fails to meet loftier expectations from investors. We

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 3>break down the results and will take a deep dive

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 3>into the world of crypto as cz pleads Gill to

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 3>criminal charges for anti money laundering and US sanctions violations.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 3>All that and so much more ahead a very quick

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>check on the kind of public market perspective of what

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>is going on in the world. Nvidia smashes it in

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 3>the fiscal third quarter, gives a very strong outlook in

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 3>the fiscal fourth quarter ahead of the street consensus. The

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 3>story the impact of US technology curbs taking hold. It

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 3>will impact them in the fiscal fourth quarter. We will

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 3>go deep and bring you the analysis on that stock

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 3>and what the world of AI accelerators looks like going

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 3>into next year. The other publicly traded proxy for the

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 3>big story is Microsoft. Sam Altman is back at open Ai.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 3>This is largely being seen as a big cluss for

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft to stock up one point five percent. It's the

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 3>third time this week that Microsoft has hit a fresh

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 3>record high. There is some element that Microsoft gets what

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 3>it wants. We will discuss that throughout the program. We

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 3>have an excellent external voice coming right up. But first

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>our top story, Sam Outman's return to open Ai as CEO.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 3>I want to bring in Sharen Gafari. Okay, let's start

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>with the basics. Sam Ountman is back as CEO, and

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 3>there are some temporary board changes. We don't know, let's

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 3>be honest, but what are those changes?

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 4>So, there are some new board members and you know,

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 4>it's unclear exactly the details, but it seems like there

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 4>may they may be appointing a new board long term.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 4>For now, it is going to be Larry Summers. Adam

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Dangelo is still on the board, who.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Was already a board member, who was already.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 5>A board member.

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 3>And then we have Brett Taylor.

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Brett Taylor, that's right, who was also a remember on

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 4>the board of Twitter, right.

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 3>He was chairman when Twitter now known as X was

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 3>sold to Elon Musk.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Correct, So he has experience with companies and crises, right

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 4>and during leadership changes. So that's a new board we're

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 4>seeing reported, right. But Tasha and Helen are out.

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm hearing that from sources as well. Yep, Tusha

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 3>and Helen, who were on the board that that fired

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Sam Outman, excuse me, Friday are not as it stands

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 3>my understanding, and I think other outlets are reported they're

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 3>not on the board, correct.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 4>And remember Tasha and Helen were both keyboard members who

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 4>ousted Sam Altman, right, And we're behind essentially this coup.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 4>So it makes sense that with Sam returning, part of

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 4>that negotiation would involve having people who turned on him out.

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>For our audience worldwide disclosure, Larry Summers is a paid

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 3>contributor on Bloomberg Television, So that's that a lot of

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 3>people around the world ask why the drama? Why do

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 3>any of us around the world care about open AI

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>who leads it? The answer to me seems well, open

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Ai is the face of AI, absolutely.

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is an industry leader. Remember that AI

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 4>has been something that Silicon Valley talked about for decades,

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 4>but it didn't really explode onto the market until Opening

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 4>Eye came out with Chatchipt just about a year ago. Right,

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 4>that was a breakthrough moment. So they are the ones

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 4>setting the tone for this industry. They are the ones

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 4>making AI relevant on a consumer level. They're the ones

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 4>who came out with products at one hundred you know,

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 4>one hundred million people are actually using So how AI go,

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 4>how open Ai go, as the rest of the industry

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 4>will go. And that's why I think people should care.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 5>About this story.

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important to recap that this will started

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Friday lunchtime and we are now Wednesday, the day before Thanksgiving,

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 3>and we actually don't have a definitive end to this story.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>There's a part of the resolution where there will be

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 3>an independent investigation into Sam Outman why he was fired.

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Just explain the rest of what was announced late last

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 3>night by open Ai.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Correct, So we're going to see you know, and again,

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 4>remember this is a negotiation between two sides.

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 3>You have the old board who.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 4>Was very skeptical of Sam Altman and pushed him out,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 4>and then you have Sam having this prodigal return. So

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 4>on the other side, we sort of see this concession

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 4>and that there will be an investigation into Sam's.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Conduct.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 4>So far, the only allegations we've seen raised against him

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 4>by the board or people close to the board are

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 4>pretty vague, right, just statements around that he essentially was

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 4>not candid with the board, but we don't know about

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 4>exactly what was he not candid allegedly.

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Now you're maybe maybe a philosophical point of difference on

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 3>the existential threat of AI and I reported and you

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 3>reported that one reason Emmitt Sheer has added as the

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 3>CEO and interim basis is that he was an EA.

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 3>He shared that stential threat.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and that gets to a key detail that we

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 4>should mention, which is that you know, the interim CEO,

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 4>em Shear is stepping down right right, and so he's

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 4>being seen in the industry now and seeing a lot

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 4>of people react in texting that he he sort of

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 4>is actually not as maybe bad as people thought who

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 4>were pro Sam, because he's sort of giving up now

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 4>and letting Sam Altman come back.

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 3>All right, Bloomberg's sharing Gafara, You've been just an incredible

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>reporting over the last five days or so. Let's continue

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 3>the conversation. There is another party to this drama, Microsoft,

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>and we need to understand what this means for them.

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 3>Michael Pacter of Webbush joins us. Now someone this covied

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft Clay State for a long time. Simple question, what

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>does this mean for Microsoft?

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty huge, you know.

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that if you think about why we haven't

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>had deep AI solutions for the last twenty years, it's

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 2>that computing power hadn't caught up. And open Ai is

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>integrated into Microsoft Cloud. Microsoft made a huge investment in

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 2>them to make sure that happens. And Microsoft Cloud is

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 2>building its scale. It's scaling all of its products, all

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 2>of its user interface, all of its developer and product

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>interfaces to make sure they work with open Ai. So

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 2>you need massive computing power. You know, if you were

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 2>to decide to write Charles Dickens novel and The Voice

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 2>of Stephen King, you need a product that's going to

0:06:54.920 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>read every tools Dickens ever and that requires massive cloud capabilities.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 2>So Microsoft is leveraging something it's already built and integrating

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 2>it into what they consider it to be the up

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and coming application and developers are going to be forced

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to use Microsoft Cloud if they want to use up

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>in AI.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 3>But Michael Pactor, this is not a Charles Dickens novel.

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 3>This is real life. For what it's worth, I've lived

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 3>it for the last five days. I want to go

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to the point of what Satya Nadella told our Emily Chang,

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.679
<v Speaker 3>which is, surprises are bad. And clearly, as we've reported

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg, a priority for Microsoft was to address governance changes,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>governance structure. Can Microsoft say with any certainty and you

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 3>know you're analyzing the stock right and it's in Microsoft's leadership,

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 3>but can they say with any certainty that this is

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the end of the story, this is the outcome that

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>they wanted.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 5>They meet a.

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Lot of friends, I think by hiring Sam Mortman. And

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, you saw that the letter, you know, demanding

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the board resign was signed by seven hundred and fifteen

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>of the seven hundred and fifty employees they then offered

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>apparently offered all of those employees of job of Microsoft.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 2>So you know, would they rather have rebuilt everything starting

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 2>from scratch with all the same employees or would they

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>rather just leverage what those employees have already built. And ultimately,

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it's easier to just continue the partnership than

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 2>to try to rebuild. So I think that they won

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 2>either way, they win more. I think keeping things as

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 2>is it will require less of an investment. Nadella managed

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>this masterfully. I mean, he honestly was an honest broker

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 2>in the whole process, and he reaffirmed his commitment to

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Altman and to the product and to the product team.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 2>So I think everything that they did was just flawlessly executed.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:54.599
<v Speaker 3>Michael, how closely is Microsoft's valuation tied to the investment

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 3>it made in Microsoft a thesis outline on the show

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 3>yesterday that the ten billion investment they put into open

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Ai at the beginning of the year has translated to

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 3>the one trillion valuation. It's direct. Do you agree with that?

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I look, it's really it's hard to value Microsoft based

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 2>solely on a single investment. The company is worth the

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 2>sum of its future cash flows, and so if the

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 2>market is making a bet that Microsoft can leverage ten

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 2>or thirteen billion into a trillion of ultimate profit, then

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 2>the market's right. I mean, that's really what this comes

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 2>down to that the market thinks that this is going

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>to turn into let's say, one hundred billion to free

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>cash flow a year in perpetuity. You know, at some

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>point twenty thirty years from now. I'm not smart enough

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 2>to tell you what the market is thinking. I can

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 2>tell you that this is worth a lot to them.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>And I as to say current market cap two point

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>eight trillion. Michael Packtive web Bits. Great to have you

0:09:53.840 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 3>on this program, Thank you so much. This is an

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 3>individual H one hundred GPU, or graphics processing unit in

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 3>videos AI accelerator, But in reality, it's not just a

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 3>chip that comes out of a plant. When we talk

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 3>about the h one hundred GPUs training AI models, we're

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 3>likely talking about DGXH one hundred in videos AI supercomputer.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 3>That's eight h one hundred GPUs combined, capable of thirty

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 3>two quadrillion floating point operations per second, crazy computer performance.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 3>It's a server design, and this is what it looks

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>like under the lid. It starts with an H one

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred GPU seen here in the form of an SXM module.

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Eight individual sxms are topped with heat six, designed to

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 3>dissipate heat generated from running big AI workloads. Those are

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 3>connected on a single baseboard by interconnectors, and that assembly

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>alone weighs sixty pounds. Add CPUs and other components, and

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 3>a finished DGX system weighs almost three hundred pounds. But

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the scale in the real world is bigger still. Some

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 3>of the most power of four large language models are

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 3>trained on the Nvidia DGX super Pod. That is thirty

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 3>two DGX eight one hundred systems combined into what's called

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 3>a scalable unit. At its absolute most mind modeling scale,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 3>DGX Superpod can be up to sixty four scalable units.

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 3>That's more than sixteen thousand individual h one hundred GPUs.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 3>An AI company may use several superpods to train their LLLM.

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 3>In the end, the DGX infrastructure sent out to the

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 3>hyperscale cloud providers to put in their massive data centers.

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 3>We bring you that video something we put out before

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 3>because it was a point of discussion on the call

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 3>and video reporting third quarter results beating expectations in the

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 3>fiscal third quarter yesterday, giving an outlook for the fiscal

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 3>fourth which was strong on any account. The Chick Company

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 3>been a major beneficiary of the AI trade up more

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 3>than two hundred and forty percent this year on the stock,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 3>prompting Wolf Research is Chris Casso to remain very bullish

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 3>and outperformed rating and a six hundred and thirty dollars

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 3>price target on that stock, and Chris Casso joins us

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>now welcome to the program, Wolf Research, Managing Director for Semiconductors.

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 3>So the stocks down, we go into this saying really

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.719
<v Speaker 3>high hurdle. They didn't pass the really high herd or

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 3>based on the stock reaction. But what was the big

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 3>takeaway for you? What did you learn about in Video's

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 3>data center business.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 6>Well, certainly the numbers were very strong and as you said,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 6>expectations re elevated coming into the print. But the concern

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 6>that we heard from investors coming into this event was

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 6>not about how strong the numbers are right now. It's

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 6>really about where do we go from here? And I

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 6>think there's some concerns over just kind of peak revenue

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 6>here in calendar twenty four, precisely because in Vidia has

0:12:55.600 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 6>become such a large part of overall cloud capex, and

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 6>what we think they need to do next is give

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 6>people comfortable comfort that you know there's just going to

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 6>be enough dollars to be able to generate in video growth. Right,

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 6>what we think is of the next year, there's enough

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 6>product cycle catalyst, there's new products coming out, and most importantly,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 6>the pricing of those products are substantially higher, which is

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 6>driving growth.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:23.599
<v Speaker 1>But the longer.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 6>Term that I think kind of really moves to the

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 6>stock well over five hundred dollars is convincing people that

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, there's enough dollars flowing into the data center

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 6>to be able to commodate this growth.

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so let's go there. This is what Jensen Huang,

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 3>the CEO of the Video said on the call. Absolutely

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>he sees data center can grow through twenty twenty five.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Several factors or reasons. They're expanding their supply quite significantly.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you buy that and that's calendar year twenty five,

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 3>by the way, not fiscal twenty five.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 6>Well, certainly that's the case, and you know we've seen

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 6>we speak to the suppliers and that, and certainly they're

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 6>Any capacity is a particular type of assembly back end

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 6>capacity that's very unique to Innvidia that nobody expected it

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 6>to be this large at this point. It takes some

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 6>time to add that capacity. That happens again. The other factor,

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 6>which I think is somewhat misunderstood with regard to the

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 6>stock is a large part of the growth is coming

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 6>from pricing, and that's a function of more's loss slowing down.

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 6>The chips themselves are more expensive. The H one hundred

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 6>of the current version is almost three times as expensive

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 6>as the prior version, but the benefit the Nvidia gives

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 6>you is that it's more than ten times the performance,

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 6>so you're.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Basically more of this.

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 6>This pricing is coming to in Nvidia because they're giving

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 6>you so much more performance for the same dollar.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 3>So the big unknown is the long term ability to

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 3>sell chips into China. This is what collect Cres the

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 3>CFO said in the letter to shareholders that basically there

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 3>will be an impact in the fiscal for from US

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 3>technology curves right, and they will ship bless the China

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 3>in that quarter, but they will more than make up

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 3>for it in growth or offset by strong growth in

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 3>other regions. How do you price in the China risk

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 3>on this stock?

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, for right now, for the January quarter guidance, there's

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 6>very little China in there right now, so you know,

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 6>to some extent that's been de risked already. We also

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 6>when a company talked on the call, and our own

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 6>checks have been indicating that there is a new chip

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 6>that will be compliant with China that will come out

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 6>in the first half of next year. You would imagine

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 6>that there's some pent up demand for that chip since

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 6>that you know, they can't ship it in the January quarter.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 6>The question that management doesn't know is what's going to

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 6>be the reception of this chip in China. And it's

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 6>going to have less performance because that's what's required to

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 6>meet the new regulations, but you know, what are the

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 6>Chinese going to do with it? Our view is that

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 6>we think there's the Chinese customers are still going to

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 6>buy it because there's really no alternative in the marketplace

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 6>right now. And the problem is that there are local

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 6>Chinese alternatives from from folks like Huaweih for example, but

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 6>that's also a company with manufacturing restrictions on China. So

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 6>they can build an ANI chap, they can design an

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 6>AI chip, but they can't build it with leading edge

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 6>technology because Chinese manufacturing facilities don't have access to that. So,

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, none of it is we think the Chinese

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 6>are going to have to buy in video product, even

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 6>if it's less performance, because that's all what's going to be.

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 3>A beltwright Chris Chris Casso, Wolf Research Managing director covering

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Semis with tie on time. But we're grateful to have

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>you on the show. Thank you know. Coming up here

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>on b tech Binance, ceocz pleads guilty to anti money

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 3>laundering and US sanctions violations of Jilak. Joe Bamputra, founder

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and managing partner of Future Perfect Ventures, is our guest

0:16:53.880 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 3>with the take. Next. This has been bog Technology. Another

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 3>story we're watching finance after its CEO, Cheng Peng Chao

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 3>pleaded guilty to anti monitoring money laundering in US sanctions

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.719
<v Speaker 3>violations under a sweeping settlement with the US that allows

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 3>the crypto exchange to continue operating. Coinbased CEO Brian Armstrong,

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 3>a competitor, joined Bloomberg Tuesday to discuss.

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think this is really a vindication of the

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 7>long term strategy that coinbase has taken to build a

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 7>trusted and regulated company, going back to twenty twelve. We

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 7>really decided to do that and got the licenses and

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 7>got the teams in place that were necessary to run

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 7>that type of company, and then every few years we

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 7>did see a new company come on the scenes that

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 7>didn't take that approach. Sometimes they would grow very quickly

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 7>because they were able to offer products that we didn't

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 7>think were legal. But inevitably they do come rashing down.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 7>You know, regulators do eventually act even if they don't

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 7>act quickly, and that's what we saw here in this

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 7>case today. So it's not only been I think, an

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 7>opportunity for coinbase to step in, but it's also an

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 7>opportunity for the industry I think to turn the page

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 7>here and say that, yeah, some of the rules are

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 7>clear around AMLKYIC oh fact that the issues that Finance

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 7>really had you know, stepped over line on, but some

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 7>areas of the law are not yet clear. We need

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 7>to go get that regulatory clarity to make sure that

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 7>the future of this industry is built here in America,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 7>not on offshore underregulated exchanges. And so that's what we

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 7>need to go do next, and I think it'll prevent

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 7>this kind of activity in the future.

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, listen, even with this crackdown that you're seeing, there

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 8>were some really scathing allegations in the DJ's crackdown sanctions violations,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 8>illegal trafficking of drugs.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, how do you know that this is it?

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 8>How do you know that there are not more bad

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 8>actors out there that would continue to stay in crypto?

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, I can tell you the companies that I really

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 7>engage with, at least especially the ones here built in

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 7>the United States, they don't get to big headlines because

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 7>it's not salacious. They haven't you know, rocketed up because

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 7>you know they're not following the rules. But there are

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 7>dozens of really well intentioned and well funded and compliant

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 7>US based crypto companies that are building this industry. I mean,

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 7>you have to remember that fifty two million Americans have

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 7>used crypto now about four hundred million people globally. And

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 7>so while there is there are bad actors who try

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 7>to use crypto, the best data we have is that

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 7>that's less than one percent of the activity is for

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 7>illicit purposes. By the way, the US dollar cash is

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 7>about four percent illicted activity. So crypto is really not

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 7>uniquely crime ridden. And the centralized actors in crypto, they

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 7>need to follow these rules around transaction monitoring and kyc AML,

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 7>just that like coinbase has been doing for over a

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 7>decade now to make sure bad actors don't take advantage

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 7>of these systems.

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>That was Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong along with Bloomberg Shnale Bassett.

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Let's keep the conversation going. So much has happened in

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the last twenty four ho job Bampuutra founder, a managing

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 3>partner of Future Perfect Ventures, early stage VC firm zeroed

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>in on blockchain, blockchain tech, CRYPTOAI, human computer interaction. Oppose

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the question that Shanali put to Brian Armstrong, when you're

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 3>in this market and investing in this sector, how do

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 3>you know that that's it? That's all there is left

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 3>to come out?

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's good to talk to you again. At We

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 9>spoke after the FTX ruling, and the way I look

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 9>at this right now is the other shoe has dropped.

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 9>We can't guarantee that there's nothing else out there, but

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 9>those of us in the industry have been waiting for

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 9>a while to see what happened with Finance. We know

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 9>that they've been under investigation for several years now. There

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 9>have been a number of allegations against them. CZ has

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 9>been notorious for moving the company to different jurisdictions, first

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 9>China and then Japan and then Malta and so we

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 9>knew something was coming, and the fact that this finally happened,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 9>these allegations were proven, they've been find cz is out,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 9>but the exchange is still running, and so I think

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 9>that is an indication that regulators also understand that crypto

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 9>is not going away, but they want to encourage the

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 9>good actors, the.

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 5>Ones that want to be compliant.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 9>And our portfolio is full of those entrepreneurs and those

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 9>companies and we welcome this and we really want to

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 9>move forward.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 3>So Jack, we have fifteen seconds. This impact your ability

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 3>to invest, yes or.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 9>No, It makes it even more of an opportunity. We're

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 9>leveling the playing field for those that do want to

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 9>be compliant, and then we're looking forward to what happens

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 9>with the ETF and more adoption of cryptois. As Ryan

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 9>alluded to in this interviewing.

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, jalak, Job and Boucher, we love having you

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 3>on the show. Founder managing partner of Future Perfect Ventures.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Another big news story is experimenting with AI. Last year,

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 3>Walmart launched a text to shop feature, allowing people to

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 3>pick what to buy, automatically, add it to their online card,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 3>and check out right from a text message Wallart wants

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 3>to make its app and website just as conversational with AI.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 3>It's working on a generative AI powered search where you

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 3>can ask a question similar to how you'd ask chat

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 3>GPT on Walwot's app or website and bring up product suggestions,

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 3>for example asking what daycore you need for a housewarming party.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 3>There's also an AI shopping Assistant in the works where

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 3>customers can chat with a virtual assistant when deciding what

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 3>to buy, like getting a recommendation for what kind of

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 3>cell phone to buy for a ten year old. The

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>retailer also introduced augmented reality tools last year to try

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 3>on clothing virtually or see how furniture will look in

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 3>their home. Right now, you can test out how a

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 3>TV will look in your space. For example, you can

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 3>compare different sizes or product suggestions.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So soon Walmart will.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Add generative AI into the met You'll be able to

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 3>ask the AI assistant how to decorate a space and

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 3>get suggestions and frighting, as well as see the items

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 3>in the space using the AR technology. Walmar says it's

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 3>training these tools on a variety of AI models that

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 3>are currently available, not one specific large language model. The

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 3>generative AI tools are still in test phase, Walmart says,

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 3>but will be available to customers very soon. Okay, Walmart

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 3>is in the AI games. Let's get into it with

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Walmart US Omni Platforms and Tech Executive Vice president Triny.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Then contestant Triny, welcome to the program. We outlined some

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 3>of the tools that you guys have been working on

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 3>over at Walmart. Of those that we outlined, what is

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 3>gaining most traction? Right this is about consumer behaviors and

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 3>how we shop. And I guess I'm just curious to

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 3>know which tool you think is going to change the

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 3>game in that respect, Dan.

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 5>Said, foving me on the show at one night.

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 10>We are at the custom dramatic changes that the customers

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 10>are main ways to discover, buy and shop goods right,

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 10>be the speed up delivery, beate the way that they

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 10>want to shop it in an online experience, which is

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 10>very simple for them.

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 5>It has been what we have been trying to do

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 5>is to make it very easy for them to do

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 5>that shopping.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 10>To your question on what is really getting traction is

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 10>as we think about the GENAI decision assistant and search

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 10>our queries, those are things that the customers are really

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 10>starting to use more and we are seeing positive engagement

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 10>so far.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Really, given the events in the last five days, I

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 3>have to ask, where does your technology come from the

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 3>underlying large language model? The power is the tool.

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 10>So at Walmart we're always invested in actual intelligence, right,

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 10>or we have invested it in for transportation and other

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 10>our podcasting and other optimizations that has made us what

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 10>we are in our supply chain.

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 5>And in our transportation sector.

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 10>We have taken those learnings and then we now commented

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 10>that with the GENAI tools that are available out in

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 10>the public, not anyone spressit tools. We have done it

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.479
<v Speaker 10>with all large language models, and we are combining that

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 10>with the extensive data with BI which is our Walmart

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 10>catalog and other data that we have seen changing behaviors

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 10>that we have seen, and that's how we have trained

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 10>our AI to make it really powerful.

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Is there a technology relationship with open ai and their

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 3>GPT technology?

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 5>Now?

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 10>We try to be allla agnostic, right. What we're trying

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 10>to basically get at is how do we get the

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 10>language understanding correct? What pretty much every other provider we've

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 10>tried it with open ai.

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 5>We use Google tools and we also use other open

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 5>open source tools like Lama. What your phocused on is.

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 10>What we call walnot embeddings, which are our internal data

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 10>that we really train the models on which stumbled with

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 10>the query understanding.

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 5>That's it very powerful Twinny.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 3>In the retail context, what are the biggest pitfalls and

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 3>risks with bringing generator to ai technology into the kind

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 3>of sales and transaction stage of your relationship with the customer.

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 10>I think there are twos you can look at again,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 10>like the way that we have trying to frame it

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 10>as like what is the customer really looking for? Like

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 10>what are they really trying to do in a way

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 10>that makes the shopping experience better? So what we've seen

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 10>is the shoppers are doing multiple sessions and multiple things

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 10>to really.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Shop multiple products.

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 10>What we are really trying to honest, a lot of

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 10>genai is explaining my problem and I can get all

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 10>the multi products search at the same time. So I

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 10>think that is kind of people prow of genai. What

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 10>it does is it basically understands that very very much

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 10>more I easily, and it's actually able to make your

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 10>shopping experience much more simpler. Again, there are going to

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 10>be learning out of it as we discover our people

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 10>actually interact with it in a conversational way, and that

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 10>is where our model training and our improvements are going

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 10>to make sure that we are leaning on the right

0:26:58.440 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 10>side for the customer.

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Boma US Omniplatforms Tech Executive Vice President Shriney then can

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 3>tassen thank you so much for your time here on

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 3>bloom Bag Technology. We have so much more head and

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 3>we get back. It's the big story of the week.

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 3>This is Blion Big Technology.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 11>We continue to be committed to open ai, and we

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 11>continue to be committed to Sam and Greg and the

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 11>team in respect you where they are.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 3>I've never seen this in my coverage attack in twenty years.

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 5>I think transparency is key. That's a lesson from this weekend.

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>My number one day is none doesn't twar.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 4>The capped profit model that open ai was spearheading was

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 4>more of an experiment.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 8>I haven't seen this specific structure anywhere else, and I

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 8>can't imagine we ever will again.

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.360
<v Speaker 2>After the debacle that this all was.

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 11>We definitely will want some governance changes so they you know,

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 11>surprises are bad.

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Just some of the many voices we've had on Bloomberg

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 3>this week reacting to the open Ai saga. For more,

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in the founder of Coasta Ventures, Vino Kosla,

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 3>the first venture check written to open AI. Mister Coasla,

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 3>good morning to you. Thank you for your time on

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 11>Great to be here on a hopefully good occasion.

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I get the sense from your posts on X

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 3>that for you this is a good occasion. But just

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 3>start with your reaction to Sam Altman being reinstalled at

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 3>open AI.

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 11>I've stated this before and I'm con stated again. I'm

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 11>very happy to see Sam Beck. He's uniquely positioned to

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 11>for Stuard Chip after this very important company.

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It's much more than just a company.

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 11>It is benefit b FAI to humanity you much larger

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 11>way over the next few decades, and I think we

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 11>restored the patch.

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Mister Kosler, you outlined a thesis that when the board

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 3>on Friday, or the board as it was then on Friday,

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 3>fired Sam Outman, they set back artificial intelligence. Why was

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 3>that the conclusion that you reached?

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 11>Mostly because Sam is uniquely qualified to shepherd this and

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 11>he has a vision over the next decade or two

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 11>of what AI can do. I can't imagine somebody else

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 11>being able to step on those shoes easily and without

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 11>a lot of risks to the mission of what Opening Eye.

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.719
<v Speaker 3>Was, Vinode. When I posted on x that you were

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 3>coming on the show, there was a lot of interest.

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 3>You were the first venture investor in open AI, and

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 3>there was this very specific question posed for you, which is,

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 3>and forgive the framing of the question, but this is

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 3>what the audience asks. What happens if Sam Altman gets

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 3>hit by a bus? What happens if Sam Altman is

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 3>discovered to have had some wrongdoing. What happens to open

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 3>AI in that scenario.

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 11>Here are other people at OPENINGI who are very qualified

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 11>to do that. Greg Brockman would be among my favorites

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 11>in the current Opening I team, and I think they

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 11>should de risk this by adding more people to the

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 11>team who can step in. But if he does get

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 11>hit by a bus, I think we would have to

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 11>do with Greg Brockman, who is very much after the

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 11>same vision and mission Vinode.

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 3>What we're talking about, I guess is key man risk

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 3>and just as you have you know, I've been reporting

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.959
<v Speaker 3>on the story since Friday lunchtime, considering what's happening, But

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 3>the takeaway has been that the value of open Ai

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 3>appears to be the intellectual capital right of its people.

0:30:55.280 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 3>And when Microsoft reacted to the news, the idea was

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 3>in the kind of mutiny that was going on, that

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 3>those people would simply go and join Microsoft, And I

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 3>wondered what you thought about that eventuality, which to some

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 3>extent now is academic, but there is still a close

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 3>tie between the two.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 11>I think the close eye helps make this make progress

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 11>in AI because it needs a lot of resources. And frankly,

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 11>I'm very pleased that open ai is there. Google is there,

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 11>and there's at least two major efforts a few other

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 11>credible efforts in the AI industry, So I do think

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 11>Microsoft's support. Microsoft supporting open Ai really helps it move

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 11>it along, give it the resources Google has internally, and more.

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Competition is generally a good.

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 11>Thing, and more ais will make progress move faster.

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very happy with that.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 11>I won't comment on open Ai team becoming a part

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 11>of Microsoft Ai. I always believe we would find a resolution.

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 11>It was only a matter of time, so I was

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 11>I had complete faith in this solution. In fact, my

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 11>conversation with Sam around noon on Friday, and the first

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 11>one announced is that I don't think it's over. It

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 11>was my first comment back to Sam.

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 3>You didn't think it was over Friday lunchtime. It seems

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>like an eternity ago that it was Friday lunchtime when

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 3>the headlines broke. I mean it is an issue of

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the board in corporate governance, right, And what we know

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 3>is that Brett Taylor, at least on an interim basis,

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 3>joins the board along with Larry Summers. For our audience,

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Larry Summers is a paid contributor of Bloomberg Television. And

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 3>then my understanding is Adam DeAngelo stays at the board.

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 3>To your mind, as an investor in this company, you

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 3>know those names in Silicon Valley? Is this addressing the

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 3>corporate governance question enough?

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 11>I've been on a board with Larry Summer at Square

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 11>or now called Block, and I admired Larry. I think

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 11>over time the board will build up to more governance.

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 11>And I think three is a small board, but over

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 11>time there'll be more governance and better process. I think

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 11>we've learned an important lesson on governance here. And frankly,

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 11>I didn't, in my remote imagination imagine that something like

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 11>this could happen or the board would do this. There

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 11>were some errant people on the board who misinterpreted their

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 11>own religion around EA or effective altruism. I think this

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 11>was really arran surprising, shocking in every way it was,

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 11>but totally unexpected under almost any circumstance, and the employees

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 11>of Opening Eye spoke it by offering to join Sam

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 11>in whatever he did.

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Vinod, I would love to get into the EA an

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 3>X threat debate. We will in just a moment. But

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 3>just you just mentioned what you see as bad actors.

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you know definitively as an investor in this company,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 3>and you said that you'd spoken to Sam Friday at midday?

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a clear sense on why Sam was

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:26.720
<v Speaker 3>fired in the first place.

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 11>I have not talked to the board members who participated

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 11>in that discussion. In frankly, a very little interest in

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.439
<v Speaker 11>talking to the two members that left, but I think

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 11>it's certain behavior on their part. It was, of course,

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 11>as widely reported, triggered by Ilia or having some concerns.

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 11>And Ilia has since changed his mind, and I'm very

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 11>admire Ilia a lot for changing his mind publicly.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he deserves real kudos for that.

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 11>But no, I haven't talked to the board direct that

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 11>made this decision without Sam without Greg, so I couldn't

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 11>speak to it further.

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 3>And to be clear, you were in the school of

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 3>thought that Ilia deserves a second chance to carry on

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 3>or continue with open AI. Absolutely, So let's get to

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the debate, the existential threat debate. You know, much of

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 3>what's been discussed is a philosophical point of difference. Right,

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 3>Sam as least, as I've reported, he's the products guy. Right,

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 3>he leads the global negotiation with policymakers. He is the

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 3>one that attracts the talent. And the board was as

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 3>a Friday, largely made up of academics who seemed to

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 3>have an emphasis on the existential threat that AI poses

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 3>to humankind. Where do you stand on that debate of

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 3>commercialization versus slowing down looking at what the risks are?

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 11>I published penderpiece for the Information at the Information dot

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 11>Com this week on this risk issue and what I

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 11>feel happened. Humanity face is the basket of risk sentient AI.

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 11>Existential risk is no different than an asteroid hitting the

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 11>planet either. There's risks that humanity faces. This basket of

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 11>risk has to be balanced against the basket of opportunity

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 11>to free humanity from the slavery of really bad hourly

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 11>jobs where you do the same thing for eight hours

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 11>a day reputatively for thirty years of your career, or

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 11>where you can have free doctors available to everybody on

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 11>the prompt planet, or near free doctors and near free tutors,

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 11>and my wife's nonprofits se K twelve dot org is

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 11>providing for free free tutors to everybody in conjunction with

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 11>open AI on their website.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And in the open app.

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 11>But chat GPT stored those kinds of benefits and including

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 11>half the people on the planet from the kind of

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 11>slavery that hourly repetitive jobs afford them, and enough GDP

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 11>growth to pay for that those people is what the

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 11>opportunity is. So risks have to be balanced against opportunity,

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 11>and that has been fundamentally missing. There's a very very

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 11>high risk of China having superior AI and interfering starting

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 11>next year in our twenty twenty four election with persuasive

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 11>AI that convinces voters to persuay save arguments in personal lives.

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>There are many many risks that have to be balanced.

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 11>Not just one exist from a movie science sci fi

0:37:55.840 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 11>movie Fantasy Gone Wild that says or robots takeover and

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 11>destroyed the humans. That's pretty silly in the basket of

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 11>risks we are actually dealing with, and there's serious risks

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 11>we need to address, and in both this weekend's paper,

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 11>in a blog I published on China as our principal

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 11>risk in AI a few weeks ago in medium dot com.

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 11>But what looking at and I think they need to

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:29.479
<v Speaker 11>be treated seriously, but not this way.

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Veno, thank you for outlining that thesis. I want to

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 3>get back to the corporate governance, the not for profit

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 3>versus the for profit. Yesterday we had Josh Wolf of

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 3>Lux Capital on the show. I think that's something you

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.439
<v Speaker 3>probably know, and he said the first thing that Sam

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Altman should do when he returns to open AI is

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 3>take open AI public. Do an IPO. Your response to that.

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 11>You know, I'm not going to comment on what they

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 11>should do. I think open Aie is in a good position.

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 11>It's a good financial position.

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 1>The only reason to go public would be.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 11>Would be because it needs more resources, and I don't

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 11>think it needs more resources right now. What I would

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 11>say the structure is not as unusual that people make

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 11>it out to be. There's companies in Europe owned by nonprofits,

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 11>so at least significantly owned and controlled by nonprofits, So

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 11>that structure has existed in Europe before, and I think

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 11>there's nothing wrong with the structure. There was something wrong

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 11>with the government, and I hope or the next year

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 11>we can fix that.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Mister Coastler. Finally, a lot of people are thinking about

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 3>the seven hundred and seventy open AI employees. One point

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 3>was made to me by sources and the valley is

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 3>this pending tender presented potentially life changing amounts of money

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 3>for those people, and they were willing to put it

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 3>on hold or jeopardize it. In sticking with Sam, do

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 3>you know what the late on the tender is and

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts on the staff.

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 11>I think it's too early to comment, Kanek, but I

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 11>don't know any reason the world will be any different

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 11>tomorrow than what it was on Thursday evening.

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Coastla Ventures founder Vino Costa, I'm incredibly grateful for

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 3>your time. We asked all of your investor counterparts to

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 3>join us in the show. You said yes, and we're

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 3>grateful for it. Thank you for your time. This is

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology, Okay. Also in the news talking tech first Up,

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 3>North Korea is claiming a victory that it successfully put

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 3>a spy satellite into orbit, moving Kim Jongen closer to

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 3>his pledge to keep an eye on the US forces

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that are operating in the region. Officials in South Korea

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 3>say they've assessed the satellite launch, but added it was

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 3>still unclear if the device was operational, and Jack mar

0:40:56.680 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 3>is walking back plans to sell ten million shares. Ali

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Barber Mah, who founded the internet company, will continue to

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 3>hold onto his stake, which is worth about eight hundred

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 3>and seventy million US dollars. Ali Barber shares recently faced

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 3>to sell off, resulting in a twenty two billion dollar

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 3>drop in market value in a single day, plus slim

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:19.720
<v Speaker 3>pickings for the Thanksgiving box office weekend is working against

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Disney's latest animated film Wish. In the past, Thanksgiving US

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 3>ranked among the most lucrative times for movie studios, but

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 3>in recent years a number of factors have conspired against that,

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 3>such as the rise of streaming services and scaled back

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 3>marketing due to the Hollywood strikes. It has been an

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 3>incredible week in Silicon Valley. That does it for this

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 3>edition of Bloomberg Technology. To those in the US, Happy

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Thanksgiving around the world. Don't forget to recap on the podcast.

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Wherever you get your podcasts, so many of you are

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 3>listening to it. Apple's Spotify, iHeart, and of course of

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 3>all the Bloomberg platforms. Again, Happy thanks thanks Giving here

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:04.399
<v Speaker 3>to all Americans in the world. Stay tuned in. This

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Technology.