WEBVTT - Travis Kelce Underpaid, Tennis Corner Returns & Likely, Maybe, What If

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first. Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What's Drive with Nick Wright episode one sixty

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>three and back today is our regular summer co host

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>de Youora. Before we even get to the show, doorra,

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, your little sister did quite the job in

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>your stead and behind the scenes. She came to me

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 2>and asked, if you know, throughout the summer, if you

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 2>guys could do like an alternating.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Have it No that no, she can have it.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 2>No, No, it's fine, I was about to say, and

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I told her no because you and I have developed

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>quite the rapport here.

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>She However, I will say this, while due to your age,

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>you're a more gifted and seasoned performer. She did have

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>a better top five NBA players than I think you

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>would have. I think her sports knowledge might actually supersede yours.

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 3>I believe it.

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 2>The even though you were just in your spare time

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 2>this the day of the podcast, you were watching a

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>big basketball game at one forty fifth in Linux. Oh

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>And also before we get to the show, what happened

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 2>on your way to that basketball game? For the first

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 2>time ever?

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I was recognized.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 2>You were recognized. The poor fellow that recognized almost got

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>pepper sprayed. But yeah, it was the DOORA was walking

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>with a friend and go ahead, you can tell the story.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Kept like we were in the deli getting like drinks

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>because we're walking up the hill and I we were

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>both like dying, and he keeps looking at the deli

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 3>and my friend and y'alla was like, wow, did you

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 3>see that?

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>And I was like no.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 3>And then once we walked out of the deli, he

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 3>was like waiting right there and like pretended like he

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 3>was still walking, and y'all was like, that's the that's

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 3>the guy. That's the guy. And as he's walking up,

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 3>he keeps looking back and then he finally just stopped

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>on the hill while and we were like, okay, we'll

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>just walk past him. And he's like, excuse me, is

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 3>your name Diora? And I'm like I was like no.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 3>He was like, yeah it is, Yeah, it is. I'm like, yeah,

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 3>that's my name. He was like, aren't you on that

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 3>podcast with Nick? Right? Aren't you Nick Wright's daughter. I

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh my goodness.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 2>You were so excited you facetimeed me. He was great.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>What's his name? Xavier? Yeah, So shout out to Xavier

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>if he's watching. We appreciate you. All right, here's so

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>welcome back to Youra. Here's what missed the cut for

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 2>today's show. Domingo Herman throws the twenty fourth perfect game

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 2>in Major League Baseball history. Connor Bedard selected number one

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 2>overall in the NHL Draft. That I am finding out

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 2>in real time was last night and Crumble Cookies wants

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Tobias Harris to stay in Philadelphia. I'm finding out in

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>real time that Crumble Cookies are a big thing. I

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>had no idea we had him actually on the set yesterday.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Great job by Tobias Harris with his spot because he

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 2>sponsors them actually in getting them a lot of free publicity.

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 2>None of that, however, makes the actual show diora What

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 2>are we starting.

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 3>With the Lakers? GM says that the plan is to

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 3>bring back the core, but not to go after big stars.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>But the rest of the West is the rest of

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the West? Yeah, is getting better this offseason. If you

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.119
<v Speaker 3>were the GM in LA, which moves would you make

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>to get Lebron one last ring?

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>So I actually think and I haven't you know, obviously

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>been a huge Rob Blinka fan, but I think this

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 2>is the right tact. Obviously, can you get Dame? That

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>would be great? You can't. I know some people want

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Kyrie Irving that I don't particularly want Kyrie Irving, but yeah,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 2>if you could flip out D'Angelo Russell for Kyrie Irving,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 2>yeah that's a net positive, even with all the nonsense

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>that comes along with Kyrie. But that's not a realistic option.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 2>So the Lakers are in a spot where aside from Lebron,

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 2>every single guy on the roster should be improving because

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>of their age, with the exception of Ad who's thirty,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>who at the very least should be maintaining of not

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 2>improving a little bit. So they have a very good

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 2>chance of being better without adding significant pieces. Now I

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 2>read last night they might want to go after Bruce

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Brown at the mid level exception. That's fine, but Ruey Hachimura,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 2>because of his age and now opportunity, should improve. Austin

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Reeves he doesn't have to take the giant jump he

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 2>took mid season, but he's just turned twenty five years old.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 2>He should still be improving. Jared Vanderbilt, whose option they

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 2>just picked up, should spend all summer working on corner threes.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>He should improve. Now. I'm not a huge D'Angelo Russell fan.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>He's never been a playoff performer. However, at the right

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>dollar amount, I don't mind him because he does have

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>a utility in the regular season and could be a

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 2>tradable contract at the deadline. The real question for the

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Lakers is the machinations of are we gonna pick up

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Malik Beasley and or Mobamba's options, even though at sixteen

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>million and ten million, respectively, those players are not worth

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 2>that money, just so we have those salaries in order

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 2>to include them in a trade if at mid season

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 2>someone comes available and you need to be able to

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 2>make the salaries match. Those are the types of decisions

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers need to be considering and making but I don't.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 2>They're not gonna go after James Harden and they can't.

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 2>There is not a big ticket free agent or an

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 2>obvious trade piece to go get. It's going to be

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 2>manicuring around the edges. And I don't know that I agree. Sorry,

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 2>there was a gnat in my face. That's what we're

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 2>going there. I don't know that I agree that the

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 2>rest of the West is improving. So let's, you know,

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>go down the list. Denver is basically going to likely

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 2>be the same team minus Bruce Brown, but with Christian

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Brown being a year older, maybe a year better. We'll

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 2>see what director Michael Porter Junior and Aaron Gordon go.

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>But assume they maintain there is right now no holes

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>to poke in Denver. It is just it is very

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>hard to repeat. They are a team that had dealt

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 2>with bad injury luck in years past, had basically no

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>injuries to speak of this year, and then you see

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 2>how next year goes. The other reason for the Lakers,

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 2>in reference to the Nuggets, should I think feel better

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 2>than a four to zero sweep would indicate is not

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>necessarily just because those were close games, but because in

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>that series Jamal Murray, who's a very good player but

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 2>not an all time great player in that series had

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 2>an all time great series. The guy averaged thirty two

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 2>points per game in that series. If he averaged twenty

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>five points per game, which is more in line with

0:07:55.520 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 2>a realistic output, how does that change the series. And

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>then you go down Memphis. I don't think Memphis got

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>discernibly better. I don't think swapping out Tyas Jones from

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Marcus Smart and you're gonna have twenty five games without

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Jaw makes them better that the Warriors. I think Chris

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Paul's better than Jordan Poole, but you then have to

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 2>build in that Staph is thirty five years old. Is

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 2>he gonna be as good? Maybe a touch worse, But

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>say he stays as good. Draymond's on the decline, Clays

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>on the decline, and they still don't have the size.

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Phoenix is the team everyone's gonna say, oh, because they

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>added Bradley Beal. I don't know that they got better

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>at coach going from Monti Williams to Frank Vogel. I

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 2>know they don't have enough defense, and I know they

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 2>don't have enough depth. So I think Denver has clearly

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 2>separated themselves from the rest of the West. But if

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers just run it back, they are to me

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 2>they a clear number two compared to everyone else in

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the conference. And the one other thing about the Lakers,

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>The biggest improvement the Lakers can make is Anthony Davis

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 2>taking the way he played post injury this year, that

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 2>length of time without being hurt, the way he played

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 2>defensively in the postseason, building on that, and Anthony Davis

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 2>taking personally that in the three years since he's won

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the title, all the other seven footers in the league,

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>all the other frontline seven footers, superstar type guys, have

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 2>made giant either leaps or massive accomplishments since AD won

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 2>his title. Giannis has a ring and a finals MVP,

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Jokic has a ring, a finals MVP, and two league MVPs.

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Embiid has a league MVP. AD on the other hand,

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 2>up until this postseason has kind of gone in the

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>wrong direction. So does he take that personal and try

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>to reclaim at least He's not going to reclaim the

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>title of the best seven footer in the league, but

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 2>does he get at least back in the conversation that's

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the bath for the Lakers. And then you hope Lebron

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 2>who averaged twenty eight seven and eight last year twenty

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 2>eight seven and six, maybe I might have it. You're

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>eight and six whatever it was, twenty eight seven and seven.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Call it that that Lebron continues to stave off father

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 2>time better than any athlete ever. That's the path, all right?

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Next, Okay, Travis Kelce loves winning and his role in Case,

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 3>but he knows that he's being underpaid. He says, quote,

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 3>you see how much more more money you could be making?

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, it hits you in the gut a little bit.

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 3>It makes you think you're being taken advantage of. Is

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Kelsey being passive aggressive with the Chiefs or just harmless

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 3>harmlesslie sharing his feelings.

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 2>So I know th he's being passive aggressive because the

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 2>full quote talks about his post career plans, how it's

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 2>never Yeah he saw that Tyreek got thirty million, and

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 2>you know it raised his eyebrows. But that he's happy

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 2>in Kansas City, I think, go ahead.

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think he's trying to start anything. I

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 3>think he's genuinely just being like well, like it hurts.

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Like well, and I could be making more money. Yes,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and so to me this is actually kind of a

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes story. But I want to stay on Kelsey firm.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Well I'll explain why in a moment. But on Kelsey,

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Kelsey is wildly underpaid. I mean the I think people

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 2>would be shocked to know what Kelsey has made over

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the last few years and what he's scheduled to make

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 2>over the next few years. As far as cash money

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Travis Kelsey has taken home.

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 3>What are you laughing about?

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, the reason I say that in the NFL, there's

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>your cap hit, there's a pro rated when you talk

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 2>about each year, how much money did Elsie put in

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>his pocket? Here is it year by year one million,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 2>half a million, seven hundred thousand. That was his rookie deal.

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Then ten million, three million, eight million, nine million. Now

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 2>the last three years nine million, twelve million, ten million.

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 2>As far as what he is scheduled to make over

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the next few years, eleven and a half, twelve and

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 2>then sixteen. So yeah, he has been way underpaid, considering.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 3>He needs at least twenty at least.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 2>And so the reason he doesn't get as much is

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>because the position he's at tight ends don't they they

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>are one of the lower paid positions in the league,

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 2>but he produces better than the top receivers in the league.

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>He could reset the tight end market. Now. He has

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>gotten his extensions early, which adds some security, but he

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 2>also has not pushed the team to pay him more.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 2>The reason I said this is a Mahomes story is

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>because Mahomes is about to be the eighth highest paid

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in football. There's gonna be seven quarterbacks that make more.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes is clearly the best quarterback in football, and Mahomes

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 2>hasn't gone to the team and said you have to

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 2>raise my salary. So the fact that Patrick hasn't adds

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the precedent of guys we are trying to win as

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 2>much as possible here and in a capped sport, that

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 2>means we don't all always press our contractual advantage. Now

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>you can say that's bad business, but I would argue

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that if Kelsey goes down as the greatest tight end,

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 2>he's wildly charismatic. He now has a successful podcast that

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure doesn't make much money. He had his own

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 2>dating TV show years ago before the Chiefs started winning. Yeah,

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>like Chasing Kelsey. It was a dating show on VH

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>one or something or E or one of those channels.

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 2>He's just hosted Saturday Night Live. If he does have

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>real post career aspirations, continuing to make sure he's on

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the best team in the league is very valuable for him.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek Hill was in a different situation. Tyreek Hill was

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 2>never going to be incredibly marketable, was never going to

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>have great post career opportunities because of all of his

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 2>off the field baggage, and he's just not as charismatic

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 2>as Travis Kelsey might be the most charismatic player in

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the whole league. So Tyreek wanted to get paid as

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 2>much as possible with he had time left, you know,

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 2>as a superstar, So he made that choice. But he

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 2>went to Miami and he probably isn't gonna play in

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 2>too many more super relevant games. So I don't think

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Kelsey wants to ever be in that position. He also,

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>at this point, I mean he's turning thirty four, is

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the oldest great skill position player in the entire league.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 2>So I do think he's left some money on the table,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think in the long run it's gonna

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 2>cost him that much. He does seem fine with it,

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 2>and he has become one of the most one of

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 2>the biggest celebrities in the league. And when you do

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 2>have the Mahomes standard of we are not pressing every

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 2>edge possible contractually, as long as we are winning, Andy

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>is here and we are competing at the highest level,

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 2>it really really helps the Chiefs. There's just no way

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>around it. Now. Chris Jones their best defensive player. He

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>is pressing his contractual edge right now, and I don't

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 2>blame him for I wouldn't blame Kelsey if he were

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 2>doing it. But while he doesn't have the off field

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>marketing opportunities Travis has, and as a pass rusher and

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>dominant defensive lineman, he plays a position that just naturally

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 2>gets paid more in the NFL.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, okay show he Otani right yep is

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 3>blowing everyone away. Earlier this week, he hit two home

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 3>runs and got the win with ten strikeouts in the

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 3>same game. This being a slow sports to day, we

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 3>were wondering would there ever be a dominant two way

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 3>player in the NFL.

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I think there could be, I don't think there will be,

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 2>But the only spot that I think would make sense

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 2>would be wide receiver corner and if that could translate,

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 2>I maybe running back safety or running back linebacker. I

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 2>don't think we're going to see it in the NFL.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the Otani conversation is interesting because the conversation

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>this week is is he the best baseball player ever?

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 2>And it's a fascinating kind of thought exercise because he's

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 2>an excellent pitcher, but no one would argue he's the

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 2>best pitcher in baseball. Top five maybe, but I don't

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 2>think many people would say he's the single best pitcher

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 2>in baseball right now. He might be the best hitter

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 2>in baseball. Some people would say Aaron Judge, but he's

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 2>certainly in the argument, but it's not definitive, So he's

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>not the best pitcher in baseball. He's not definitively the

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 2>best hitter in baseball. Yet he's being discussed as the

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 2>best player ever to play because he's the only guy

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.719
<v Speaker 2>that does both, and he's the only guy in one

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred years that has done both at a high level.

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 2>I think you can make the argument he is adding

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>more value to his team on a as a single

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 2>person as any player ever, more than any player ever

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 2>this season because he is a top five pitcher and

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 2>a top two batter, and with Judge Hurt probably the

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>number one batter. I think it gets tricky because the

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 2>other all time greats did add two way value. They

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 2>weren't pitchers, but they were great fielders. So Willie Mays, King,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Griffy Jr. Barry Bonds were elite defensive outfielders and at

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 2>various times in their career all of them the best

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 2>hitter in the sport. So I don't think it's hands down.

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I do think he's in the discussion as far as

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 2>not the greatest player ever, as far as who's had

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the greatest career, but who who has as the most

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 2>impact in a singular season. You know, my answer for

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>grace baseball player ever my whole life has been Willie Mays,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 2>with the caveat of it's clearly actually Barry Bonds. But

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>if you want to disqualify him because of the steroids,

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>so be it. And Griffy I think gets the short

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 2>end of the stick, so to speak. But I'm also

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 2>partially because my favorite player growing up. I do wonder more.

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 2>I do think this we will see another Sho Hey

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 2>o Tani way before we see someone in football try

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to pull off playing both ways, because anybody that knows

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 2>anyone that made it to the majors, if you talk

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 2>as a pitcher, if you talk to them about their

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 2>high school baseball career, almost all of them were the

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 2>best hitter on their team, and we're amazing hitters. And

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 2>then started focusing exclusively on pitching because of the success

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 2>of Otani. I do wonder if we will see another

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 2>freak show athlete like this say that I can do both.

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Don't know a lot of people say that Jackie Robinson

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 3>was like the best baseball player.

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't. I think they say he's

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 2>the most important and Jackie was. Jackie was an all

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 2>time great, a World Series MVP, a League MVP, if

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not mistaken, and a great player. But he has

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 2>outsized importance because he broke the color barrier. Yeah and

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 2>he was. Yeah, I knew he won in l MVP.

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I just checked. But and I don't again, I don't

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 2>want to short change what a great player he was.

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 2>But if not for breaking he is a lot of

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 2>people say he and they're correct, is the most important

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 2>player ever. But when it comes to the best baseball

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 2>player ever, the names that come up are Babe Ruth,

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Willie Mays, some people say Ted Williams, Barry Bonds, and

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 2>lately some people have argued it could be Mike Trout.

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe. I don't agree with that. What makes

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 2>show Hay so interesting is people talk about baseball as

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 2>there's the greatest hitters ever, the greatest players ever, and

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 2>then almost separate category, the greatest pitchers ever, like Bob

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Gibson and Satchel Page and Sandy Kovax, Roger Clemens, those guys.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 2>The fact that o'tani, if he had played his whole

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>career in the majors, might end up in the top

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty of both categories when no one else is in either.

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 2>You know he has any crossover is what makes him unique.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, okay, so now it's time for the

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 3>return of Nick's tennis corner.

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So all right, so we have a lot going

0:21:55.040 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 2>on here. I'm very curious into how sound these questions.

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Wimbledon is done in England. If there was ever a time,

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 2>now is the time? Do you go? Right ahead? Go ahead?

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Wimbledon begins this weekend and we know it's full of traditions.

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 3>So before we get into the question, I got us

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 3>strawberries and cream.

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh you did, Oh, thank you so much? Next to me, Oh,

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 2>here you go, delightful. Oh, strawberries and cream for everyone here. Okay, yeah,

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll take some whip topping if I could take. Okay,

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. Go ahead and go ahead and

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>ask the question. Okay, yeah, back to you. Don't forget

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 2>the accent.

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 3>As I opened up, feel like I could you give

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 3>notoriously bad tennis gambling advice, but give us some winners

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 3>for this year's championships at Wimbledon. All right, so painful.

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 2>You're right that I did give bad gambling advice on

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the French Open. Not as bad as producer Matt who

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 2>is you know, hiding today and staying away in shame

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>because he told us to bet on Nadal and Nadal

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 2>ended up pulling out of the tournament. But I went

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>with al Karez. I said, I thought Alcarez was gonna

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 2>beat Djokovic, and then Djokovic whooped him, and Djokovic won

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 2>the tournament. I'm gonna pick Alcarez again. Djokovic is minus

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 2>one sixty, al Karez is plus three point forty. So

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 2>if you were about one hundred and sixty dollars. On Djokovic,

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 2>you win one hundred. If you were about one hundred

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 2>and sixty dollars. On al Karez, you win more than

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.239
<v Speaker 2>five hundred. I like those odds. If you wanted a

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 2>long shot, my heart would be with Kurios, but I

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 2>think Medvedev would be the right long shot pick. Here's

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the thing, my tennis corners, I am going to I

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 2>am super into Wimbledon once it starts, so over the

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 2>next few what's right we can discuss it. I'm not

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>great at the previewing of it, as proven by my

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 2>disastrous French Open gambling advice that I gave again, not

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 2>as bad as producer Matts, but still disastrous all the same.

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, take a quick break, come back, play some game,

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 2>likely maybe, and what if ant talk a little bit

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 2>about Bronnie James. We'll do all that next What's Right?

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 4>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 4>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblasts, who defined every expectation

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 4>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 4>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 4>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 4>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble CA

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 4>including Jarrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, dun Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Kanavami. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Hey guys, it's Nick right and AG one is the

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 2>daily foundational nutritional supplement that supports whole body health. I

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 2>drink it every morning and love the way it tastes.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 2>All great athletes have one thing in common. They take

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>care of their bodies, and a huge part of that

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>starts with optimizing whole body health. So free agency officially

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 2>does start tomorrow. AG one is a great way to

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 2>improve your health. What team we'll find the free agent

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 2>who can improve the health of their team? And who

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 2>will it be? I actually think a sneaky active team

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 2>in free agency is going to be the Spurs. I

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>think the Spurs are going to want to improve their

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 2>team immediately. So Wimby is playing relatively high leverage and

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 2>meaningful game in a way that he otherwise would not be.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>And so because of that, my answer would be the Spurs.

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 2>AG one is a really effective daily habit with high

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>quality sourced ingredients and is another reason why I trust

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 2>ag one each and every day. I may not have

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 2>all the answers, but if a comprehensive solution is what

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 2>you need from your supplement routine, then try ag one

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 2>and get a free one year supply of Vitamin D

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 2>and five free ag one travel packs with your first purchase.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 2>Go to drinkag one dot com, slash what's right. That's

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>drinkag one dot com. Slash what's right, and that's right

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>with a W like my last name and name of

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the show. Go ahead and check it out. So there

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 2>it is, there's our friends at ag one, whichever endor

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 2>you can come back up here now. I have gotten

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 2>back into writing the peloton every day like I was

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 2>doing honestly, but I did it basically every day for

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 2>a year, and then when we started the podcast, it

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of changed my schedule, so I fell off a bit.

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 2>But I've started doing it again a couple of months ago,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and I pour ag one in my water of during

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 2>my peloton RD. It works great. All right, Diorra, what

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 2>are we doing here?

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay? So now we're gonna talk a little bit about Bronni.

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 2>Right Yuick? So all you fixture Mike real quick and

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 2>get it. There you go.

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 3>A mock draft has Bronni being selected to Atlanta. Apparently

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Lebron loved it because he's He's shared it on his

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 3>ig story.

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Was this his way of saying He'll go wherever Bronni goes.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not certain of that because that could be read

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 2>as if that's where Bronni goes, then the whole you know,

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 2>the whole family's going to be supporting him. Another way

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 2>could have been saying that he's going to go where

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Bronni goes. It is going to be one of the

0:27:53.600 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 2>most fascinating draft decisions ever. Where Let's say Lebron next

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 2>year plays at about the level he did this year,

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 2>where he is not. Most people didn't think he was

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 2>a top five player this year. Everyone knew he was

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 2>a top fifteen player. He made All NBA, he was

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 2>All NBA team again. So let's say Lebron's in there

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 2>somewhere from the eight to twelve range as far as

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 2>best players in the league this season. If it is

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 2>made clear that whoever drafts Bronni, Lebron is gonna sign

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>with them for the league minimum, what does that do

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>for Bronni's draft stock. So let's say Bronni is the

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 2>fortieth ranked player in the draft. He'd be worth us

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>mid second round pick. If you have the fourteenth pick

0:28:54.840 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 2>of the draft. Is it worth overdrafting Bronni if you

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 2>are getting a top fifteen player to come along with

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 2>them for the league minimum, you could almost even look

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 2>at it. So like this year the Miami Heat took

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 2>him Jack West Junior at number eighteen. Would they forget

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the brownie part of it? Would they have flat out

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:26.959
<v Speaker 2>traded the number eighteen pick for Lebron James on a

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 2>minimum contract? Of course they would have. So I do

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 2>find it fascinating. When we get closer to the draft,

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be a lot of discussions on it. Is

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 2>it right? Is it fair? I you know, it would

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>be very awkward for me to say it is inappropriate

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 2>for a parent with some influence or sway. It would

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 2>be very inappropriate for me to say to say it

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 2>is inappropriate for that parent to use it to help

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 2>their kid. Considering I host this podcast with my kids,

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's not like we exactly held an audition process.

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I just did it because I thought it would be

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 2>good for them, and good for me and good for

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the show, and it's what I wanted to do, so

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to be a hypocrite there. I also

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 2>think there I understand there is some potential downside to

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 2>this for Bronni, there's also some real upside, which is

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 2>if he is a fringe NBA guy, if you're a

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 2>second round pick, it's a non guaranteed contract that the

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 2>team does not have a real investment in. But if

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 2>they spend a first round pick on you, it's a

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 2>guaranteed contract. But more so than the money mattering. What

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>matters is the team is invested in developing you because

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 2>they spend a real asset on you. So I get

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I find it fascinating. I also don't know if Bronni

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes is told Lebron, I don't want to

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 2>play on the same team as you. If I make

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>it and all of it, it's going to be one

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 2>of the most interesting, unique stories that we've seen in

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 2>sports because we never thought this was possible. We knew

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 2>brothers could play with brothers, and we've seen teams across

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the league, you know, give Giannis's brother's contracts in hopes

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 2>of either acquiring Giannis or keeping Yiannis happy. We never

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 2>thought it would have with father and son. So it's

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 2>just it's a very fascinating angle, all right, dear, Or

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 2>what's our game?

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 3>So today we're playing? Likely? Maybe what if it's been

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 3>a while since we've played. So here's a refresher for

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 3>you and the audience. I will ask you a question

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and you will respond with three possibilities, each more far fetched.

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what's the first one.

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 3>James Harden is a wild card right now. He hasn't

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.719
<v Speaker 3>made a decision on his player option yet, so what

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 3>do you see him doing.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 2>It's likely he resigns with the Sixers. That's the most

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 2>likely outcome, not on a full max, but it's likely

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 2>he resigns with the Sixers. Morey's there. He had two

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 2>amazing playoff moments with them this year, and then he

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 2>also had the last two games of the playoffs, which

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 2>were old James Harden playoff stuff. They have the best

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 2>chance to win, they need him, they can afford him.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 2>It's likely that maybe he does what has been speculated

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the last year, and he just goes back to Houston

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and goes back to his old stomping grounds. Even though

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:28.479
<v Speaker 2>their world's away from a championship. What if is what

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 2>if the Los Angeles Clippers say what if James says

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back home to LA and the

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Clippers pull off a sign and trade for him. I

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's a real needle mover for them, but

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 2>that is the unlikely but somewhat plausible outcome. The most

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 2>likely though, is he stays in Philly, maybe he goes

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 2>to Houston, with an outside chance that he ends up

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 2>going to the Clippers.

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, next Okay. According to Woj, the market for

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Kyrie is almost non existent outside of Dallas. However, it

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 3>seems Kyrie is more interested in the years than the money.

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 3>How is this going to play out?

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It's likely Dallas overpays and folds their hand and gives

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 2>him three years guaranteed, probably with a partial guarantee in

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 2>year four, and he stays with the Mavericks. That's the

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 2>most likely outcome, okay. Because the MAVs have boxed themselves

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 2>in with the Kyrie trade, they don't want to alienate Luca. Further,

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think getting in. I said it from the

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 2>very beginning that I thought getting in the Kyrie business

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 2>was a mistake. But they did it. Now they probably

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 2>got to follow through. Maybe the MAVs are able to

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 2>find a team that will execute a sign in trade

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 2>for Kyrie where they get depth back and that team

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 2>gives Kyrie a a significant contract. I think that is unlikely,

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 2>but that is maybe that they do a sign in

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 2>trade with Kyrie the and I threw out on TV

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 2>not to bring up the Clippers again, but a sign

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 2>and trade with the Clippers for Paul George would be

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 2>a dream scenario for the Mavericks. I don't know why

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the clippers would do it, except for the fact that

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 2>they're about to open a new stadium. They can't trust

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 2>that Kawhi and Paul George. Either one of them can

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 2>leave after next year. It's very difficult to trust Kawhai's health,

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 2>and they might feel like we have to have a

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 2>headliner in town when we open that new stadium. The

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 2>what if is what if he just says screw the

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 2>money and goes to the Lakers for the mid level exception.

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 2>But that is not happening. Kyrie has left too much

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 2>money on the table to sign up for one year

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 2>twelve million day the Lakers. It's going much like the

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 2>hardened thing. I think the most likely outcome is what's

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 2>actually gonna happen here, which is he stays with Dallas.

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, don't even worry about the follow up question.

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Go on to Draymond.

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 3>The Warriors got rid of their locker room problem, the

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 3>guy who got punched. Now the runway is open for

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Draymond to return to Golden State. But will he?

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 2>All right? It's like, yeah again, I'm sorry to go

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 2>with the chalk answers here, he's gonna return to Golden State.

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 2>It's likely that he returns to Golden State on like

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 2>a three year deal that matches up Steph's contract. Maybe

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:43.720
<v Speaker 2>he goes to Dallas, as Bill Simmons has been speculating

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 2>as is a possibility, and again I don't think that's

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen. But the what if is what if he

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:03.240
<v Speaker 2>visits Sacramento just as as a negotiating ploy and is

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 2>just taken aback by what they're trying to build there

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 2>and likes the idea that he could stay in Northern California,

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 2>spurn the Warriors front office, get a boatload of money

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:20.320
<v Speaker 2>from Sacramento, and then help build a winner there. That's

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 2>not gonna happen. Sacramento open up the cap space and

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 2>their speculation. But that's not gonna happen. Sidebar, is your.

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Sister getting whi cream?

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Annie stopped getting the whip cream. That's for Wimbledon. De

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Or's younger sisters here as well. I think she's really

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>just hoping that at some point she could rush the

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 2>stage and take over for you. But now she's eating then, Deanna,

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Now she's eating all the whip cream all right.

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Next, after reminding the world that he can still play basketball,

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Russ is back on the market. Maybe the Lakers could

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 3>use him. You know where does he end up?

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 2>This one's tough because it can be far fetched though. Yeah,

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 2>but that the Clippers can only pay him three point

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 2>eight million dollars, so I don't see that happening. I

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 2>think it is likely he ends up with the Chicago

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 2>Bulls because Lonzo's career appears to be over. Unfortunately, they

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 2>can pay him more than the Clippers. He would get

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 2>to play. He's a Jordan brand guy. I think maybe

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 2>this would excite you. Diora well, I guess you're gonna

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 2>be in college. You're not even gonna go with me

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 2>to the games? Oh I just got said maybe he

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 2>goes to the Nets.

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 3>You can get me tickets out there. I'll be at

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 3>the games out there.

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 2>There's no there's no there's no basketball team in Santa Cruz.

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Well there is a league team, and there's also he's

0:37:55.160 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 2>too far. I'm close, and maybe he goes to the Nets.

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 2>And what if? What if is that he says I

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 2>don't care about the money, and he takes three point

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 2>eight million minimum from the Clippers. But I don't see

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 2>that happening at all. I think it's the Bulls or

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 2>the Nets are the two teams most likely to sign him.

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.439
<v Speaker 2>Both of the Nets are an interesting one because since

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 2>they don't have their own draft picks, they are not

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 2>incentivized at all to tank, and so they might want

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to stay competitive. He still is a draw, He's still

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 2>a popular player, but I think he ends up with

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the Bulls. We answer your questions next, What's right? The

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Nathan's Hot Dog eating Contest is one day. Joey Chestnut

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 2>is one of fourteen of the last fifteen Some say

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.399
<v Speaker 2>that he's the greatest athlete of all time. Defend them,

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 2>one could argue, usein balt Muhammad Ali, Michael Jordan. None

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 2>of them could have survived, let alone thrived without the

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 2>one skill my client has mastered, which is eating. Now,

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 2>can you eat without being able to run? You can?

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Can you run without being able to eat? You cannot.

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>There was never a period of time where people existed

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.399
<v Speaker 2>in eating, didn't He's the greatest ever. You know who

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 2>could be a better athlete than my client? Bring me

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the greatest breather ever? Someone? If there are breathing competitions

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 2>held worldwide and all of a sudden that guy is

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 2>just kicking everyone's ass and breathing, I might say, you

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 2>know what, Joey, you're now the second go that was.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's the problem do you are with doing public defender?

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Is I do it so well that people then believe

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 2>that's my sincere Take that Joey suss and that's the

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 2>greatest eater ever. That was one year ago today. By

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the way that we did that, the I mean, I

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 2>found myself watching that clip and being swayed by my

0:39:56.239 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 2>own persuasiveness, in my own brilliance of argument. But that

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 2>was a public defender where I defend seemingly the indefensible.

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 2>So that's the little recap from a year ago. What's up?

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 2>It also reminds me how much better our new studio

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 2>is than our living room where we were doing it.

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, dear, or what are the fan questions today?

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay? Noah Rodriguez asked, The Calves are reportedly shopping Darius Garland.

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 3>If the Spurs can get him, where does that put

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 3>them in the Western Conference race for next year, assuming

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 3>they trade Kelton and Picks?

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, then, listen, the Spurs are not competing in the

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 2>West next year. I think that when I was saying

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 2>they could be players in free agency, it's so they

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 2>could maybe hope to get to forty wins, be around

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:49.439
<v Speaker 2>five hundred, But they're not competing in the West next year.

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 2>So I but I like Garland, and I do think

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the Calves need to probably rework some things if they're

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 2>going to try to take the leap to from nice

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 2>story to at least fringe contender. All right, next, Jack

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Fisher asked, yep, No, you're right, go ahead.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Which NBA team is most likely to take a huge

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 3>leap next season like the Kings did last season.

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a really hard one. As far as you know

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the Kings, you could see it coming a bit because

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 2>of the Sabonis trade. If you liked Sabonis. My answer,

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 2>though I don't know if this will be as shocking

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 2>as the Kings, My answer is gonna be okayc I

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 2>like what they've built. If you believe in Chet, that's

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a top three pick they have coming back from last

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.839
<v Speaker 2>year never played for them. Shay was sensational this year.

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I like giddy. I like what they've built. Now the

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 2>MAVs are gonna be way better. But that's a different

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 2>thing because the MAVs were awesome a year ago then

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 2>had a down year. So my answer would be okay,

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 2>see that could go from and also ran to maybe

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 2>a top five seed. My answers, okay, see, but again

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 2>that's way too early and that's pre free agency, so

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 2>all of that can change next okay.

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:17.439
<v Speaker 3>Scott Frazer asked Nick, where do you see d Hop

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 3>going and does he make a difference in Casey or

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Buffalo or does he take the bag and go to

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Houston or New England.

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I d Hop clearly doesn't want to sign in

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 2>New England, but he needs. I mean, they've made him

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 2>an offer, he's done the visit, it's been weeks. He needs.

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 2>He wants a team with an excellent quarterback to go

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 2>after him. Thus far, it hasn't happened. I do think

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.919
<v Speaker 2>he would help Buffalo a lot. I think you can't

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 2>City a little. But Buffalo doesn't have a number two receiver,

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 2>sorry Gabe Davis, and their number one receiver is angry

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 2>at their quarterback. So I think Buffalo he'd move the

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 2>needle on the most. But that doesn't seem to be happening.

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 2>They're in a tough salary cap situation, all right.

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Next Michael Thomas asks, how do you see the Wizards

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.800
<v Speaker 3>rebuild going? Do you see Pool staying long term? I

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 3>think we're ten years too late, but curious about what

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 3>you think our outcome will be in the next few years.

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you're gonna be terrible the next few years.

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 2>But I think that's the point. The point is to

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 2>rip it down. You're right that it's ten years too late,

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 2>but you had to start over. You finally did. Pool is,

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, is going to score a bunch of points

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 2>and play no defense, and by the time you're ready

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 2>to win, Pool won't be a piece of it. But

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 2>you're now at least finally admitting the team is under

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Michael Winger, that you needed to start over. Next.

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Johnson asked, what's your favorite sports man?

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I can ask that all the time, and I don't

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 2>really have one. I don't know. I mean Space Jam

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the original or the remake? The remake the original? I

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 2>mean that was very good.

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it counts.

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean obviously, rock the whole Rocky slash Creed. You know,

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 2>family of movies are the best ones. People love Hoosiers.

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't love Hoosiers. People love Field of Dreams. I

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 2>don't love Field of Dreams. I did love ten Cup,

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 2>but that's almost more of a romance than a sports movie.

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 2>If Happy Gilmore install is a good movie, Hoop Dreams

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 2>is a documentary.

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 2>If Happy Gilmore accounts, Happy Gilmore is my answer, I

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 2>mean that's yeah, that is my answer. Actually, Happy Gilmore

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 2>is my answer. All right, go ahead, and Gabe's questions

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the last one.

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Wait, there's a bit of a follow up. Yeah, okay,

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 3>Public Defense two.

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't need to do that.

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I think you might.

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't need to do that. I would have done

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 2>it if you know my scenes hadn't been cut from

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 2>the movie. But since they haven't, I don't see I

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 2>was supposed to be in the movie. But you know

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 2>we couldn't couldn't make that.

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 3>I was supposed to be in the in the video.

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 2>No, well, I'm I'm just telling you. You know, we

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 2>don't have to get into it. I'm not gonna do that.

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 2>The unlike the Jordan's sikaphants that need to necessarily defend

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:12.839
<v Speaker 2>each and everything he's ever done, I thought I'll let

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Space Jam two stand on its own. All right. What's

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Gabe's question?

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Has Deanna eaten all the whip cream and bear?

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:20.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but that we got in the show

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 2>because we got to see what she's doing in the

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 2>back of this store. By the way, we are off

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 2>next week. We're on TV. Podcast is off next week.

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 2>We will talk to you guys one week from Tuesday.

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 2>I have a great fourth of July. I know Diora

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 2>will as she is doing what she does almost every

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 2>weekend with her friends. And I've gone there Bogi Hampton's.

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 2>You've gone to the Hamptons once for a vacation, arguing, Okay,

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 2>you find your way out there quite a bit.

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 3>You have a you have a I've been out there

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 3>four times total.

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:55.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay, whatever you say. I think we counted up, it's

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 2>probably closer to eight. All right, we'll see you guys

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:00.359
<v Speaker 2>a week from Tuesday. I'll see you on TV today

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 2>at three. What's right, h.