1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,400 Speaker 1: This is a closer look with Arthur Levitt. Arthur Levitt 2 00:00:03,440 --> 00:00:05,600 Speaker 1: is a former chairman of the U S Securities and 3 00:00:05,640 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Exchange Commission, a Bloomberg LP board member, a senior advisor 4 00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:13,119 Speaker 1: to the Promontory Financial Group, and a policy adviser to Goldman. Sachs. 5 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:23,439 Speaker 1: Jeffrey Sachs is Professor of Sustainable Development and Professor of 6 00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 1: Health Policy and Management at Columbia University. It's the director 7 00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:32,080 Speaker 1: of both the Columbia Center for Sustainable Development in the 8 00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:37,559 Speaker 1: u N Sustainable Development Solutions Network. He has twice been 9 00:00:37,680 --> 00:00:43,360 Speaker 1: named among Time magazines one hundred Most Influential World Leaders. 10 00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:48,040 Speaker 1: He's a New York Times best selling author. His books 11 00:00:48,040 --> 00:00:53,520 Speaker 1: include The End of Poverty and the Age of Sustainable Development. 12 00:00:54,360 --> 00:01:00,640 Speaker 1: His newest book is Building the New American Economies, Smart, Air, 13 00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:04,720 Speaker 1: and Sustainable, in which he shows how we can find 14 00:01:04,760 --> 00:01:09,280 Speaker 1: a path to growth and economic progress that is both 15 00:01:09,319 --> 00:01:15,240 Speaker 1: fair and environmentally sustainable. He joins me now for a 16 00:01:15,319 --> 00:01:20,120 Speaker 1: closer look, jeff your latest book is about why we 17 00:01:20,200 --> 00:01:25,440 Speaker 1: need to build a new American economy. Did we stop 18 00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 1: building things? Did our government stop investing in its own future? 19 00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:36,360 Speaker 1: Is that what provokes this writing The US economy in 20 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:41,320 Speaker 1: some ways has continued to do what it has done 21 00:01:41,440 --> 00:01:46,880 Speaker 1: for almost two centuries, and that is to achieve economic 22 00:01:46,959 --> 00:01:51,280 Speaker 1: growth and to bring new technologies to the markets. So 23 00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:57,720 Speaker 1: there are some wonderful accomplishments of the US in information technology, 24 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:03,120 Speaker 1: in a Tesla, electric vehicles, in SpaceX, and so forth. 25 00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:08,760 Speaker 1: But there are two huge shortcomings in the US economy 26 00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:13,079 Speaker 1: that we really feel socially and politically. One is that 27 00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:22,000 Speaker 1: our society has become incredibly divided on income and on 28 00:02:22,040 --> 00:02:26,760 Speaker 1: the basis to a large extent, of educational attainment. So 29 00:02:27,639 --> 00:02:31,000 Speaker 1: people in the US that have a college degree, by 30 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:36,520 Speaker 1: and large are doing well, feeling well, having rising income 31 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:40,600 Speaker 1: standards in life expectancy. Those who have less than a 32 00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:45,800 Speaker 1: bachelor's degree are having a pretty hard time, and those 33 00:02:45,919 --> 00:02:51,560 Speaker 1: with a high school diploma or less as their highest 34 00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:58,520 Speaker 1: education attainment are are really bearing the brunt of technological 35 00:02:58,600 --> 00:03:01,920 Speaker 1: change and globals a So that's one big problem, which 36 00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:06,960 Speaker 1: is an increasingly divided society and people just not making it. 37 00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:13,120 Speaker 1: We even have rising death rates for working class white 38 00:03:13,120 --> 00:03:21,000 Speaker 1: Americans that are experiencing more substance abuse, more suicides, more despair. 39 00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:26,560 Speaker 1: The second big problem one that a lot of people 40 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:29,360 Speaker 1: just want to look away at and pretend doesn't exist, 41 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:32,200 Speaker 1: but most of us who live our lives know that 42 00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:36,440 Speaker 1: it is real. Is that we're really wrecking the environment 43 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:42,040 Speaker 1: in a pretty thoughtless way. And the two big problems 44 00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:46,160 Speaker 1: there are the global warming, which we know to be 45 00:03:46,280 --> 00:03:51,640 Speaker 1: caused by our heavy dependence on coal, oil, and gas. 46 00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 1: And second, we are really depleting so many vital parts 47 00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:04,160 Speaker 1: of the environment, like the groundwater that provides the basis 48 00:04:04,240 --> 00:04:08,360 Speaker 1: for a lot of our irrigated agriculture, or the bio 49 00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:12,560 Speaker 1: diversity that's just dying off, not only in the United 50 00:04:12,600 --> 00:04:18,320 Speaker 1: States but worldwide. So I don't despair of our economy. 51 00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:22,080 Speaker 1: I think it's a pretty impressive that we have a 52 00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:28,159 Speaker 1: eighteen trillion dollar annual output about sixty thou dollars per 53 00:04:28,200 --> 00:04:31,520 Speaker 1: person produced in the United States is very impressive, but 54 00:04:31,720 --> 00:04:37,320 Speaker 1: it could be much much better for our well being 55 00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:42,200 Speaker 1: and for our long term sustainability. Well, I'm wondering whether 56 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:49,159 Speaker 1: Trump's plans really coincide with the goals that you've outlined 57 00:04:49,320 --> 00:04:53,240 Speaker 1: in the book. He proposes a package of tax breaks 58 00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:57,720 Speaker 1: meant to help spur a trillion dollars and spending on 59 00:04:57,880 --> 00:05:02,479 Speaker 1: roads and bridges. Do you think the tax breaks are 60 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:07,800 Speaker 1: enough to get the job done in terms of public 61 00:05:07,800 --> 00:05:11,919 Speaker 1: works projects. I think that our country has a little 62 00:05:11,920 --> 00:05:17,800 Speaker 1: bit of a problem with what psychologists called delayed gratification, 63 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:22,960 Speaker 1: which is the ability to wait a little bit, save 64 00:05:23,240 --> 00:05:28,080 Speaker 1: for the future, invest for the future, and then reap 65 00:05:28,160 --> 00:05:34,719 Speaker 1: the benefits. Uh. Too many people and too many influential lobbies, 66 00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:39,160 Speaker 1: unfortunately want want the benefits right now, and so they 67 00:05:39,160 --> 00:05:42,799 Speaker 1: want tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts, But we need 68 00:05:42,839 --> 00:05:48,400 Speaker 1: the taxes to pay for the education, for the science 69 00:05:48,440 --> 00:05:53,560 Speaker 1: and technology, and for the public part of the infrastructure 70 00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:57,840 Speaker 1: in order to be able to have the higher productivity 71 00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:02,240 Speaker 1: in the future. And we need to pay extra right 72 00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 1: now in order to mobilize technologies like wind and solar power, 73 00:06:08,480 --> 00:06:11,800 Speaker 1: which are a little bit more expensive than coal, but 74 00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:15,520 Speaker 1: the heck of a lot cleaner and safer. And so 75 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:20,120 Speaker 1: it's spending a little bit more for a safer future. 76 00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:24,640 Speaker 1: That's delayed gratification. But we don't have it right now, 77 00:06:24,880 --> 00:06:30,520 Speaker 1: and the populists like Trump play to be we gotta 78 00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:35,680 Speaker 1: have it now. We'll continue this conversation with renowned economist 79 00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 1: and Columbia professor Jeffrey Sachs in just a moment. This 80 00:06:40,760 --> 00:06:44,320 Speaker 1: is a closer look with Arthur Levin, it's twelve minutes 81 00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:59,920 Speaker 1: past the hour. This is a closer look at Columbia 82 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:06,760 Speaker 1: professor Jeffrey Sachs. We've been discussing issues like infrastructure investment 83 00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 1: and income inequality, covered in his new book Building a 84 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:19,280 Speaker 1: New American Economy. I'm Artha Levitt, jeff Unemployment at four 85 00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:26,600 Speaker 1: point seven, stock market going reasonably well, and Janet Yellen 86 00:07:26,760 --> 00:07:30,280 Speaker 1: suggesting that we're back to normal. How do you see 87 00:07:30,320 --> 00:07:33,960 Speaker 1: this economy and what do you regard to be its 88 00:07:34,440 --> 00:07:39,000 Speaker 1: major weakness from a macroeconomic point of view, the one 89 00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:43,200 Speaker 1: that Janet Yellen looks at. We're doing okay. We have 90 00:07:43,560 --> 00:07:48,760 Speaker 1: recovered from the two thousand and eight financial crisis. The 91 00:07:48,800 --> 00:07:54,000 Speaker 1: economy is growing, and employment is relatively high. The problems 92 00:07:54,040 --> 00:07:59,120 Speaker 1: that we have are not business cycle problems. They're structural problems. 93 00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:03,000 Speaker 1: Now that we're are we getting the most human value 94 00:08:03,160 --> 00:08:07,520 Speaker 1: out of the eighteen trillion dollar gross domestic product? Are 95 00:08:07,520 --> 00:08:13,240 Speaker 1: we sharing the benefits of prosperity widely enough? Are we 96 00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:17,200 Speaker 1: looking after those who are really hurting? Are we investing 97 00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:21,080 Speaker 1: for the future. That's where we fall short, not so 98 00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:25,720 Speaker 1: much in the short term quartered a quarter macroeconomics, but 99 00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:29,320 Speaker 1: in the longer term questions of what we want to 100 00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:34,080 Speaker 1: be building for this country. The angry voters in the 101 00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:38,439 Speaker 1: last election weren't wrong. All the wealth seems to be 102 00:08:38,480 --> 00:08:42,440 Speaker 1: accruing at the top, and to them, I suppose the 103 00:08:42,480 --> 00:08:47,320 Speaker 1: game does seem rigged. Is there anything that you think 104 00:08:47,400 --> 00:08:52,560 Speaker 1: we can do to redirect this imbalance? I think the 105 00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:59,319 Speaker 1: basic lesson of advanced market economies is that it's normal 106 00:08:59,600 --> 00:09:05,520 Speaker 1: that there would be pretty high inequality of market returns, 107 00:09:05,559 --> 00:09:10,000 Speaker 1: but that these can be reduced by government policies that 108 00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 1: ensure that everybody has access to education, healthcare, vacation time, 109 00:09:17,320 --> 00:09:21,079 Speaker 1: maternity leave, and so on. So the countries they admire 110 00:09:21,160 --> 00:09:27,960 Speaker 1: the most are Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Norway. I think 111 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:33,200 Speaker 1: they run the most balanced ships of states. Canada I 112 00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:36,080 Speaker 1: think does better than we do, also in that they're 113 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:40,400 Speaker 1: all market economies that like the US, they're all very prosperous, 114 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:43,800 Speaker 1: but they tax some more than we do, and they 115 00:09:43,960 --> 00:09:48,040 Speaker 1: use that added revenue to ensure that kids don't have 116 00:09:48,160 --> 00:09:52,600 Speaker 1: a crushing student death. They ensure that every poor child 117 00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:55,880 Speaker 1: can get a decent education. They ensure that everybody has 118 00:09:55,960 --> 00:09:59,240 Speaker 1: vacation time, which I think we're rich enough to ensure. 119 00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:02,360 Speaker 1: Right now, the States is the only rich country that 120 00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:07,000 Speaker 1: doesn't give even a single day of guaranteed paid vacation 121 00:10:07,559 --> 00:10:09,760 Speaker 1: to the labor force, and I think that's just wrong. 122 00:10:09,840 --> 00:10:14,319 Speaker 1: Now we're rich enough to do better and fairer than that. Well, 123 00:10:14,360 --> 00:10:18,720 Speaker 1: that turns us towards emphasis on Wall Street, where you're 124 00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:27,080 Speaker 1: suggesting a turn away from high frequency trading and hedge 125 00:10:27,080 --> 00:10:32,840 Speaker 1: fund trading to long term capital formation, and that inevitably 126 00:10:33,160 --> 00:10:37,040 Speaker 1: those who have spoken about this topic before you and 127 00:10:37,080 --> 00:10:40,800 Speaker 1: those who will come after you will be talking about 128 00:10:40,920 --> 00:10:46,480 Speaker 1: some sort of tax policy to deal with our short 129 00:10:46,600 --> 00:10:51,760 Speaker 1: term thinking in the markets. I've always had reservations about 130 00:10:51,920 --> 00:10:57,160 Speaker 1: using tax policy to influence market structure, but I be 131 00:10:57,320 --> 00:11:02,040 Speaker 1: interested to know how you feel we to deal with this. First, 132 00:11:02,080 --> 00:11:04,160 Speaker 1: I want to thank you for speaking out about these 133 00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:08,080 Speaker 1: issues for so many years. Uh. It is a little 134 00:11:08,120 --> 00:11:12,200 Speaker 1: bit crazy that we're spending a vast amount of money 135 00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:16,760 Speaker 1: and taking the best minds in our country to shade 136 00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:21,680 Speaker 1: the time of trading by nanoseconds. There isn't a single 137 00:11:21,840 --> 00:11:25,520 Speaker 1: human benefit to that activity. There are winners and losers, 138 00:11:25,559 --> 00:11:30,320 Speaker 1: but it's a negative some game because that arms race too. 139 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:37,160 Speaker 1: Trade in in nanoseconds faster accomplishes no social purpose, but 140 00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:40,680 Speaker 1: it does cost a lot of resources. And I think 141 00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:45,480 Speaker 1: the hedge fund industry has a different problem, which is 142 00:11:45,520 --> 00:11:50,480 Speaker 1: that I don't see the social value to it either, 143 00:11:51,280 --> 00:11:55,319 Speaker 1: in that uh they've charged choose huge fees. Of course, 144 00:11:55,440 --> 00:12:00,880 Speaker 1: over the years, they have underperformed the market on average 145 00:12:00,960 --> 00:12:05,240 Speaker 1: for more than a decade. There has been one scandal 146 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:10,679 Speaker 1: after another of insider trading or financial fraud. I follow 147 00:12:10,840 --> 00:12:14,800 Speaker 1: each of them closely. I think that uh, this business 148 00:12:15,000 --> 00:12:18,360 Speaker 1: of thinking that there are gurus that are going to 149 00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:24,280 Speaker 1: systematically and consistently outperformed the market is a mythology to 150 00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:30,520 Speaker 1: begin with. And when these people uh try to live 151 00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:34,320 Speaker 1: up to their mythical status, many of them end up 152 00:12:34,320 --> 00:12:38,760 Speaker 1: breaking the law. And so I'm worried about our general 153 00:12:38,960 --> 00:12:43,280 Speaker 1: moral framework of Wall Street because I think it has 154 00:12:43,400 --> 00:12:50,800 Speaker 1: become an incredibly corrupted place in one financial fraud after another, 155 00:12:51,080 --> 00:12:54,000 Speaker 1: whether it's inside or trading, or live or rigging, or 156 00:12:55,840 --> 00:13:04,960 Speaker 1: selling known toxic assets to count parties, front running a front, 157 00:13:05,080 --> 00:13:10,600 Speaker 1: running takeover bids with insider information, and so on. And 158 00:13:10,880 --> 00:13:16,080 Speaker 1: I wish that our regulators were well, they've they've really 159 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:23,320 Speaker 1: other than collecting some fines, they've not really faced the 160 00:13:23,360 --> 00:13:27,600 Speaker 1: moral question of Wall Street, and uh, we just haven't. 161 00:13:28,040 --> 00:13:30,720 Speaker 1: We've had a debate about it, but we also haven't 162 00:13:30,720 --> 00:13:33,880 Speaker 1: seen statesmen on Wall Street coming forward and saying we 163 00:13:33,920 --> 00:13:36,240 Speaker 1: have to clean up our act even when there's such 164 00:13:36,280 --> 00:13:40,520 Speaker 1: an egregious behavior. As well as Fargo and others. He's 165 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:45,400 Speaker 1: a world renowned professor of economics, leader and sustainable development, 166 00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:50,560 Speaker 1: senior u N advisor, and best selling author whose latest 167 00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:55,600 Speaker 1: book is Building a New American Economy. He's also the 168 00:13:55,679 --> 00:14:01,000 Speaker 1: co recipient of the two thousand and fifteen Blue Planet Prize, 169 00:14:01,800 --> 00:14:07,840 Speaker 1: the leading global prize for environmental leadership. Columbia Professor Jeffrey 170 00:14:07,880 --> 00:14:12,160 Speaker 1: Sachs will return for part two of this interview next 171 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:15,480 Speaker 1: week at this same time. By the way, if you 172 00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:21,000 Speaker 1: have comments about the show or suggestions for topics, please 173 00:14:21,080 --> 00:14:24,920 Speaker 1: email me at a Closer Look at Bloomberg dot net. 174 00:14:25,840 --> 00:14:29,640 Speaker 1: That's a closer look one word at Bloomberg dot net 175 00:14:30,280 --> 00:14:34,040 Speaker 1: and follow me on Twitter at Arthur Levitt one word. 176 00:14:34,960 --> 00:14:38,120 Speaker 1: This is a closer Look with Arthur Levitt. It's twenty 177 00:14:38,120 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 1: five minutes past the hour. This is a Closer Look 178 00:14:49,240 --> 00:14:52,040 Speaker 1: with Arthur Levitt. Arthur Levitt is a former chairman of 179 00:14:52,080 --> 00:14:55,120 Speaker 1: the u S Securities and Exchange Commission, a Bloomberg LP 180 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:58,480 Speaker 1: board member, a senior advisor to the Promontory Financial Group, 181 00:14:58,560 --> 00:15:06,640 Speaker 1: and a policy adviser to go Leman Sachs. This week, 182 00:15:07,080 --> 00:15:12,800 Speaker 1: we continue our closer look renowned economist and Columbia professor 183 00:15:13,320 --> 00:15:17,600 Speaker 1: Jeffrey Sachs widely considered to be one of the world's 184 00:15:17,800 --> 00:15:24,160 Speaker 1: leading experts on economic development, global macroeconomics, and the fight 185 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:28,960 Speaker 1: against poverty. He's a Senior u N Advisor for Sustainable 186 00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:34,320 Speaker 1: Development and best selling author whose books include The End 187 00:15:34,360 --> 00:15:39,240 Speaker 1: of Poverty, The Age of Sustainable Development, and his newest book, 188 00:15:39,960 --> 00:15:44,600 Speaker 1: Building the New American Economy. You spend your days with 189 00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:50,240 Speaker 1: college students, jeff will the young people save us on 190 00:15:50,480 --> 00:15:55,920 Speaker 1: climate change. For young people, they've been hearing about this issue. 191 00:15:56,160 --> 00:16:01,000 Speaker 1: They've been studying it in from elementary school through high 192 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:08,640 Speaker 1: school to university. They have heard rightly from uh the 193 00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:11,280 Speaker 1: scientists in the world that they're going to be bearing 194 00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:14,760 Speaker 1: the brunt of what's happening. So there's a lot of 195 00:16:14,800 --> 00:16:20,640 Speaker 1: interest in this. There's among the college students no doubt 196 00:16:20,760 --> 00:16:24,000 Speaker 1: that this is real, and there's a lot of concern 197 00:16:24,840 --> 00:16:28,840 Speaker 1: that our government doesn't act. China owns five of the 198 00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:35,800 Speaker 1: world's six largest solar manufacturing companies. Aren't these the jobs 199 00:16:35,880 --> 00:16:41,840 Speaker 1: we should be worried about? Absolutely, China is on a 200 00:16:42,040 --> 00:16:48,280 Speaker 1: breakneck course to dominate the sustainable technologies of the future. 201 00:16:48,600 --> 00:16:53,840 Speaker 1: They actually have something called Made in China Initiatives, and 202 00:16:53,880 --> 00:16:59,400 Speaker 1: it's an industrial policy that says China should have cutting 203 00:16:59,480 --> 00:17:09,840 Speaker 1: edge global expertise and competitiveness in industries including information technology, semiconductors, robotics, 204 00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:17,320 Speaker 1: electric vehicles, smart shipping, fast inter city rail, advanced a 205 00:17:17,480 --> 00:17:27,920 Speaker 1: bonics and passenger aviation, advanced agriculture, genomics UH and new 206 00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:35,760 Speaker 1: materials with the renewable energy UH in proto voltaics among those. 207 00:17:36,160 --> 00:17:41,719 Speaker 1: So they've really set out a bold, clear, explicit agenda. UH. 208 00:17:42,040 --> 00:17:46,320 Speaker 1: This is not just the textbook pronouncement. It's what the 209 00:17:46,359 --> 00:17:50,840 Speaker 1: government's actually doing and allocating resources. And so what are 210 00:17:50,880 --> 00:17:58,200 Speaker 1: we doing spinning our wheels or even canceling In Trump's budget? UH? 211 00:17:58,520 --> 00:18:03,120 Speaker 1: Something called aren't e r PAY is the Advanced Research 212 00:18:03,240 --> 00:18:08,440 Speaker 1: Program for Advanced Energy in the Department of Energy. It's 213 00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: a it's a wonderful program. It's looking at cutting edge 214 00:18:11,359 --> 00:18:16,879 Speaker 1: technologies for batteries, for example, for high quality, low cost, 215 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:20,359 Speaker 1: low weight electric vehicles, and it's been going on for 216 00:18:20,400 --> 00:18:24,600 Speaker 1: a number of years. And because Trump is trying to 217 00:18:25,960 --> 00:18:30,840 Speaker 1: pretend that the climate change isn't real, he cut out 218 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:33,800 Speaker 1: all through the government. He obviously had his team go 219 00:18:33,960 --> 00:18:37,040 Speaker 1: through every place that climate change was mentioned, and then 220 00:18:37,119 --> 00:18:41,000 Speaker 1: tried to acts that program. Well, who's going to produce 221 00:18:41,040 --> 00:18:46,439 Speaker 1: the renewable energy of the thirties on this strategy. It 222 00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:49,200 Speaker 1: won't be us if we continue that way, It'll be China. 223 00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:55,280 Speaker 1: Solar power is now cheaper than coal in some parts 224 00:18:55,280 --> 00:18:58,880 Speaker 1: of the world, and I suspect will be everywhere soon. 225 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:03,879 Speaker 1: Don't you think the markets will be able to deal 226 00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:07,679 Speaker 1: with the clean energy and the right way. Markets are 227 00:19:07,920 --> 00:19:14,439 Speaker 1: are absolutely playing a very clear role in certain ways 228 00:19:14,560 --> 00:19:20,720 Speaker 1: right now. For instance, it's heavily polluting oil stands have 229 00:19:20,880 --> 00:19:25,840 Speaker 1: taken properly a big market hit. Despite the Trump saying 230 00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:30,400 Speaker 1: We're gonna be bringing those oil sands to market through 231 00:19:30,920 --> 00:19:34,600 Speaker 1: a new pipeline. What's actually happened is that Shell sold 232 00:19:34,640 --> 00:19:40,320 Speaker 1: its holdings, Conical, Phillips sold its holdings. Chevron is about 233 00:19:40,359 --> 00:19:44,960 Speaker 1: to sell its holdings in the Canadian oil sands. Stat 234 00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:48,800 Speaker 1: Oil sold its holdings in Canada. So the markets say 235 00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:53,520 Speaker 1: no way. And another dramatic case in just the recent 236 00:19:53,600 --> 00:19:59,160 Speaker 1: days is the Tesla is now valued on the market 237 00:20:00,200 --> 00:20:04,359 Speaker 1: more than General Motors and more than Ford. So that's 238 00:20:04,400 --> 00:20:08,760 Speaker 1: the market playing the right role for sure. Uh. And 239 00:20:08,840 --> 00:20:13,000 Speaker 1: I actually think that the message is getting through. So 240 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:20,640 Speaker 1: even though President Trump kind of fulminates against the climate agenda, 241 00:20:20,680 --> 00:20:23,639 Speaker 1: I think real investors know the difference and are going 242 00:20:23,680 --> 00:20:26,520 Speaker 1: to be putting more money into coal plants. But what 243 00:20:26,640 --> 00:20:29,280 Speaker 1: is also true, and I think it's important to note, 244 00:20:29,320 --> 00:20:35,720 Speaker 1: is that some of these clean technologies cost more. They 245 00:20:35,800 --> 00:20:39,480 Speaker 1: really do still cost more because while solar maybe cheaper, 246 00:20:39,560 --> 00:20:44,160 Speaker 1: it can't be stored so cheaply. We'll continue this conversation 247 00:20:44,280 --> 00:20:49,280 Speaker 1: with Columbia professor Jeffrey Sachs, also the director of the 248 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:54,520 Speaker 1: Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University. In just a moment, 249 00:20:55,359 --> 00:20:58,600 Speaker 1: this is a closer look with Arthur Levin. It's twelve 250 00:20:58,640 --> 00:21:15,199 Speaker 1: minutes past the hour. This is a closer look at 251 00:21:15,440 --> 00:21:21,679 Speaker 1: economist and Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs. He's also a 252 00:21:21,760 --> 00:21:26,639 Speaker 1: best selling author and syndicated columnists. And I'd like to 253 00:21:26,680 --> 00:21:30,199 Speaker 1: talk about one of your recent columns Jeff and the 254 00:21:30,240 --> 00:21:38,040 Speaker 1: Boston Globe on our Wars in the Middle East. Could you, uh, well, 255 00:21:39,080 --> 00:21:44,840 Speaker 1: let's say, what do you think of National Security Advisor 256 00:21:46,240 --> 00:21:52,680 Speaker 1: hr McMaster and Defense Secretary Maddis? Are these moderating forces 257 00:21:53,080 --> 00:21:58,120 Speaker 1: in Trump world? Tell? What I do think is that 258 00:21:58,200 --> 00:22:03,560 Speaker 1: our foreign policy establish uh, not the particular individuals, but 259 00:22:04,280 --> 00:22:09,360 Speaker 1: really the the security state that's been there from Clinton 260 00:22:09,480 --> 00:22:15,160 Speaker 1: through Bush, through Obama and remains largely in place till now, 261 00:22:15,640 --> 00:22:19,600 Speaker 1: has taken us into too many wars in the Middle East. 262 00:22:19,840 --> 00:22:27,159 Speaker 1: And uh, we should not have fought the wars of 263 00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:34,000 Speaker 1: choice in Iraq in two thousand three, or overthrowing Kadafi 264 00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:37,560 Speaker 1: in Libya in two thousand eleven, or trying to overthrow 265 00:22:37,720 --> 00:22:42,280 Speaker 1: Assad in Assyria from two thousand and eleven until this 266 00:22:42,400 --> 00:22:48,200 Speaker 1: very day. I think this has been very naive, very costly, 267 00:22:48,920 --> 00:22:53,040 Speaker 1: very destabilizing, and increasingly dangerous because it puts US on 268 00:22:53,080 --> 00:22:57,080 Speaker 1: a collision course with a lot of other powerful countries. 269 00:22:57,440 --> 00:23:02,240 Speaker 1: It's also unleashed the wave of millions and millions of 270 00:23:02,359 --> 00:23:07,240 Speaker 1: refugees that in turn is destabilizing European politics. So these 271 00:23:07,280 --> 00:23:10,240 Speaker 1: are what I call wars of choice. Would you end 272 00:23:10,720 --> 00:23:13,840 Speaker 1: the fighting in the Middle East right away? And would 273 00:23:13,840 --> 00:23:17,880 Speaker 1: you end it everywhere right now? Just pull out. Yes, 274 00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:24,400 Speaker 1: what I would do is stop the covert operations which 275 00:23:24,440 --> 00:23:29,199 Speaker 1: were undertaking in probably a dozen countries right now. I 276 00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:33,960 Speaker 1: would stop the support of the anti Assad rebels in 277 00:23:34,760 --> 00:23:42,960 Speaker 1: uh Syria. I would stop the US military and often 278 00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:50,439 Speaker 1: covert presence in Yemen, in Somalia, in Syria, in Iraq, 279 00:23:51,520 --> 00:23:56,359 Speaker 1: in Afghanistan. But what I would do is a note 280 00:23:56,520 --> 00:24:03,000 Speaker 1: that the powers of the region, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia 281 00:24:04,119 --> 00:24:09,879 Speaker 1: have a real interest in uh stopping the Islamic State. 282 00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:16,919 Speaker 1: For example, none of those standing sovereign nations wants this 283 00:24:17,119 --> 00:24:22,600 Speaker 1: kind of violent, super violent renegade the group running around 284 00:24:22,600 --> 00:24:26,600 Speaker 1: in their territory. Our wars have actually opened up the 285 00:24:26,680 --> 00:24:33,679 Speaker 1: space for these horrible uh jihades groups. And so what 286 00:24:33,720 --> 00:24:37,440 Speaker 1: I would do is pull out the US military. But 287 00:24:37,600 --> 00:24:40,840 Speaker 1: I would try, through the U N. Security Council to 288 00:24:40,960 --> 00:24:45,520 Speaker 1: say that the major powers, especially China, Russia, the United States, 289 00:24:46,240 --> 00:24:52,160 Speaker 1: Britain and France. I push the regional powers, the ones 290 00:24:52,240 --> 00:24:54,879 Speaker 1: that live with this day in and day out, to 291 00:24:55,000 --> 00:25:02,320 Speaker 1: get their act together to actually get end this uh 292 00:25:02,560 --> 00:25:10,560 Speaker 1: isis phenomenon. Realizing that isis is a it's horrible, it's 293 00:25:10,680 --> 00:25:16,760 Speaker 1: it's a vulgar, it's uh incredibly brutal uh in medieval 294 00:25:17,240 --> 00:25:22,680 Speaker 1: but it's only thirty or fifty thousand in total, and 295 00:25:23,240 --> 00:25:28,520 Speaker 1: they're so completely outnumbered by the standing armies of the region. 296 00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:32,040 Speaker 1: If we did this systematically, not with the US, and 297 00:25:32,080 --> 00:25:36,240 Speaker 1: it's a bombastic way, and I used the term because 298 00:25:36,520 --> 00:25:40,879 Speaker 1: we bomb all the time if we weren't doing it, 299 00:25:40,880 --> 00:25:44,480 Speaker 1: but we were doing it through a U N framework 300 00:25:44,600 --> 00:25:48,200 Speaker 1: that recognized the role of the regional powers and didn't 301 00:25:48,520 --> 00:25:52,960 Speaker 1: keep taking sides so relentlessly that we're on the Saudis side, 302 00:25:53,000 --> 00:25:55,720 Speaker 1: were against the Iranian side, and so forth, we would 303 00:25:55,760 --> 00:26:00,919 Speaker 1: actually stabilize a region that urgently needs stabley. Can this 304 00:26:01,040 --> 00:26:05,480 Speaker 1: be done almost immediately? I know that you wrote an 305 00:26:05,600 --> 00:26:09,840 Speaker 1: article on the Boston Globe recently that the United States 306 00:26:09,840 --> 00:26:13,600 Speaker 1: should immediately end its fighting in the Middle East? Do 307 00:26:13,640 --> 00:26:18,919 Speaker 1: you mean everywhere and just pull out suddenly? I'm alarmed, 308 00:26:19,080 --> 00:26:22,400 Speaker 1: and I would alert everybody to the fact that we're 309 00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:28,600 Speaker 1: right now on a path of escalation. We've had the 310 00:26:28,640 --> 00:26:34,199 Speaker 1: Tomahawk drone attacks in Syria. We've had the mother of 311 00:26:34,280 --> 00:26:42,000 Speaker 1: all bombing bomb in Afghanistan. We've had major drone strikes 312 00:26:42,160 --> 00:26:50,200 Speaker 1: in Iraq which killed hundreds of civilians, were rattling, beating 313 00:26:50,200 --> 00:26:55,120 Speaker 1: the drums of war with regard to North Korea. This 314 00:26:55,320 --> 00:27:00,919 Speaker 1: is rather alarming because we have a president who is 315 00:27:02,520 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 1: completely inexperienced in foreign policy. He obviously changes day to 316 00:27:10,200 --> 00:27:17,960 Speaker 1: day even in basic questions, basic alliances, and basic decisions. 317 00:27:18,000 --> 00:27:24,160 Speaker 1: So he's impetuous, inexperienced, and at the command of the 318 00:27:24,200 --> 00:27:28,880 Speaker 1: most powerful arsenal in the history of the world. And 319 00:27:29,080 --> 00:27:32,840 Speaker 1: I don't find that a comforting combination. I find it 320 00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:35,760 Speaker 1: a very worrisome thing. And I wish that some grown 321 00:27:35,800 --> 00:27:39,480 Speaker 1: ups in Congress, not just in the executive branch, but 322 00:27:39,560 --> 00:27:43,520 Speaker 1: in Congress, would say, this is a democracy. Congress that 323 00:27:43,600 --> 00:27:48,679 Speaker 1: declares war, the president does not have the authority to 324 00:27:48,800 --> 00:27:52,159 Speaker 1: go to war on his own. And before we do 325 00:27:52,280 --> 00:27:58,440 Speaker 1: something that could be disastrous, absolutely tragic, for example, attacking 326 00:27:58,440 --> 00:28:04,200 Speaker 1: North Korea and with the potentially horrific consequences, that we 327 00:28:04,680 --> 00:28:08,840 Speaker 1: need some better governance. He is a professor and director 328 00:28:08,880 --> 00:28:13,879 Speaker 1: of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University. The 329 00:28:13,920 --> 00:28:18,280 Speaker 1: New York Times called him probably the most important economist 330 00:28:18,359 --> 00:28:22,200 Speaker 1: in the world, and he has twice been named among 331 00:28:22,320 --> 00:28:27,919 Speaker 1: Time magazines one hundred most influential World leaders. He's also 332 00:28:28,000 --> 00:28:31,760 Speaker 1: a New York Times best selling author whose new book 333 00:28:31,880 --> 00:28:37,520 Speaker 1: is Building a New American Economy, Smart Fair and sustainable 334 00:28:37,920 --> 00:28:42,400 Speaker 1: professor Jeffrey Sachs, thank you for joining us. By the way, 335 00:28:42,480 --> 00:28:47,520 Speaker 1: if you have comments about the program or suggestions for topics, 336 00:28:48,080 --> 00:28:51,680 Speaker 1: please email me at a Closer Look at Bloomberg dot net. 337 00:28:52,080 --> 00:28:56,000 Speaker 1: That's a closer Look one word at Bloomberg dot net, 338 00:28:56,680 --> 00:29:00,080 Speaker 1: and follow me on Twitter at Arthur Levin when we're it. 339 00:29:01,320 --> 00:29:04,600 Speaker 1: This is a Closer Look with Arthur Levitt. It's twenty 340 00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:13,240 Speaker 1: five minutes past the hour. M