WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 15 NFL Game (Ep. 404)

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Pros.

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 2>It's time to place your bets, Joe Pisapia, and it

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 2>is week fifteen in the NFL. It's time to look

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 2>at some early values. We had some fun games on

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.319
<v Speaker 2>the slate. And if you watch last week's show, you

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>got Ian early on the Bears money line, on the

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Broncos money line. Because that's what we do here at

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Betting Pros. We go ahead, we look ahead, and we

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>find the early value.

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>We and lock those bad boys in.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 2>And of course to help me break down this week's

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>slate of games, which is every day this week almost

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>you got football.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing. We got all kinds of football going. You

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>like football, You like football? What do you like?

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 2>We got football over the place for you. Pat Fitzmorris,

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 2>my Patty Cakes and Sam Hoppin, who is always popping

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>here on Betting Pros, always knee deep in NFL and NBA.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>He's the hardest working man in show business. It feels

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 2>like so, gentlemen, we've got, like I said, full slate

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 2>of games to get to. I know it's fantasy playoffs,

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 2>but for us, every week is playoffs. We're trying to

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 2>win money. We're trying to do what needs to be

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>done to cross over that threshold of cashing. And before

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>we get to the games on the slate to give

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>something away because it's that time of year, it's festive,

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 2>so we always promise we're giving away Betting Pros Premium

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 2>upgrades for a year, and this week's winner is Curtis Brooks.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Curtis, you are the big winner.

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>So get in touch with us over at Customer Support

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>at mailbag at Fantasypros dot com. Again, mailbag at Fantasypros

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 2>dot com with your proof of subscription to the Betting

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Pros YouTube channel and your current Betting Pros dot com

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>user name, and we'll get you that upgrade again. Curtis Brooks. Congratulations,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 2>you're the big winner. And if you want to be

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 2>let Curtis drop your comments below, subscribe to the Betting

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Pros YouTube channel. We're gonna have coverage all throughout NFL season,

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 2>all throughout the playoffs, NBA Season two, every Monday, and

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, every Wednesday and Friday. We've got our eleven

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 2>AM show here Fast Break Bets, so we've got all

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 2>the content.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You need for all your sports.

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>So make sure you are clicking that beltick goes ding,

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 2>so you know exactly when the content drops, you're on

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the channel and you might be the next winner, just

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 2>like Curtis of that Betting Pros premium subscription. So gentlemen,

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>let's kick things off your Thursday football. I'd love to

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>say it's an exciting one, but it's probably not. Again,

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 2>the Los Angeles Chargers are going to face the Las

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Vegas A Raiders. Both teams are five and eight. The

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 2>over under for this game is thirty three and a

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 2>half on the consensus line of Betting Pros. Three is

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 2>the number. If you like the Chargers to win. It's

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>plus one point thirty all on the money line outright.

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>But we probably won't get Herbert in this game was

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 2>a broken finger. I'd imagine we're not going to get him,

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 2>which means we're gonna get Easton Stick potentially playing quarterback,

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 2>which is exactly what I carried to the plate with

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 2>me back in nineteen ninety three. A good old Easton stick.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Get out there. Nothing like that metal ping FITZI look,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>this one is wacky here. I am leaning early on

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders here on this one. In the minus three,

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 2>I know they did not score. I know it was atrocious,

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>but I'm gonna shake the dust off here and instead

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>think I'm gonna take my chances against the backup QB.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts, FITZI.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you, Joe. I do think there's a

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 3>little bit of value on the Raiders, and it was

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 3>really disappointing to see them just completely lay an egg

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 3>at home against the Vikings and not well. At least

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 3>the offense late and eggs. The defense did its job,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 3>But like, this is a team that has shown a

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 3>spree decorps ever since the firing of Josh McDaniels, Like

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 3>they have been a better team. And now we're getting

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 3>this Chargers team that has shown an inability to finish

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>again under Brandon Staley, and you know now they've got

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the backup quarterback. So I do think the Raiders are

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 3>the better play. But it's interesting that since these lines

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>went up on Sunday night, we've seen a little bit

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>of money come in on the Chargers because now it

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 3>is minus one fifteen to bet the Chargers and minus

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 3>one oh five to bet the Raiders, so it's kind

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 3>of gone the opposite way.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I would have thought, Sam, you're a big Spree de corps. Guy,

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I know that about you already, so let's talk about it.

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about this game here. I'm just gonna go

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>with the team that is at home. I'm gonna go

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 2>with the team that's playing against the backup QB, and

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go with the team that's taking on a

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Staley road team here and just kind of take

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 2>my chances with the Raiders. This is gambling, this is wagering,

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>and it feels like it. But it feels like Vegas

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 2>to me. What does it feel like to you?

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Look from the creators of Bailey Zappy versus Mitch Trubisky,

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 4>we present to you East and Stick versus Aidan O'Connell.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 4>Another riveting Thursday night matchup that I'm sure Al Michaels

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 4>will be thrilled to be calling. But I actually kind

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 4>of like the Chargers here. Robbie Greer Greer NFL on

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 4>Twitter has done some phenomenal research on the performance of

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 4>backup quarterbacks when they come in to replace a starter,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 4>and when a replacement plays in place of an above

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 4>average starter, which I think Herbert is. The backup outperforms

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 4>Vegas expectations and covers fifty four percent of the games

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 4>in their start. And I've mentioned the sort of entropy

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 4>feeling with games in the past and having a lot

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 4>of unknowns in a game and taking the plus money

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 4>in those in those games. So I like the Chargers here.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's gross for sure, But I don't know

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 4>what I saw from the Raiders on Sunday that would

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 4>make me excited to bet them.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I had nothing exciting. They did not show up once

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>on red zone. By the way, that entire game, the

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 2>entire game.

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Not once. People are like, is that happening? Do something

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>happened in that game? Was Aaron delay? Nope?

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Nope, it was going What a strange game that was?

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 2>Now, we've got three Saturday games. First one is the

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota Cincinnati game. Second straight road game here for the

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota Vikings. Both these teams are seven and six. Jake

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Browning playing good football, winning big games here. Thirty nine

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 2>and a half is the number consensus on VP. You've

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 2>got a three and a half point number here on

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the Cincinnati Bengals and the minus Minnesota plus one sixty

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 2>four for the upset Sam. To me, it feels like

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the Minnesota Vikings the Wheels have come off here a

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit. The momentum is completely stopped two road games

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 2>in a row. I don't love this, and I feel

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 2>like the Bengals feel like they have nothing to lose here.

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 2>That makes them supers were as Minnesota, I think, is

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the opposite their team that is playing tens. They had

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 2>to bench Jobs. You don't know about Jefferson. I jumped

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 2>on this one early in the three and a half

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 2>from Cincy, But what do you see in this one?

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm right there with you. The Josh Jobs experience, unfortunately,

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 4>was at a high a couple of weeks ago, is

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 4>now cratering back down to earth. The Vikings defense is legit,

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 4>I think. I mean what Brian Flores has done with

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 4>the team that didn't have a lot of playmakers on

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 4>defense to start the season. Are are playing great. They

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 4>have allowed a success rate over forty percent just once

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 4>since Week eight. That that was against Denver. The thing

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 4>that I'm struggling with here is Jake Browning has an

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 4>eighty four point seven PFF grade against the Blitz this year,

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 4>which is the third best. We know the Vikings love

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 4>to blitz, and I think it's a little bit different

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 4>than some of the other teams that Browning has faced

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 4>so far. If I had to lean one way, it

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 4>would be Cincinnati because I think their offense is the

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 4>probably possibly the best unit out here. But I can't

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 4>click either side of this right now.

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the under is intriguing for this game too.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Thirty nine and a half is a good size number. However,

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 2>with the way that you know Browning's been able to

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 2>make plays with his legs too and extend some of

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 2>these plays of times here pat and look he's getting

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 2>used out of these other weapons he's got. It feels

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>like if this was on the road, I might feel

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>very differently about it. I might be even more concerned.

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 2>But in Cincinnati a little bit shorter week, I feel

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 2>like the Cincinnati Bengals are the more dangerous squad right now.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think.

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you, Joe, and I do like the

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 3>under two because the Vikings are down on firepower. I mean,

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>like the Josh Dobbs thing just hasn't worked, so it's

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna be Nick Mullins justin Jefferson very questionable for this game,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 3>and no Alexander Madison, so they're down to Ty Chandler

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 3>running back, and then you've got Jake brown And going

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 3>up against the Brian Flora's defense, And yes, he has

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 3>grated out well against the blitz but let's face it,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 3>they caught their opponents in a couple of blitzes this

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 3>past week with little dumped offs to Chase brown that

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 3>one that went for a really long touchdown and another

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 3>that went for like a twenty five yard game or so.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>So you know, before we throw too many buquets at

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 3>the feet of Jake Browning, like, I'm not totally convinced

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>that he is just going to move the ball at

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>will against a defense that has really overachieved this year

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 3>and has one of the best defensive master minds in

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the game dialing up the play. So I like the

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 3>under here more than I like either side. But if

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I was going to better side, I would bet the Bengals.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 4>I think. I think. Yeah, a lot of Jake Browning's

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 4>was passing production has come after the catch. I mean,

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 4>you've seen the Chase brown screen that Pat mentioned some

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 4>of the after catch stuff that Jamar Chase has had.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 4>So I know we don't typically talk player pops here,

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 4>but depending on the line for Shake Browning's passing yards.

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 4>I think the under could be in play.

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, Let's move to the midday game on that

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Saturday slate of NFL. The Pittsburgh Steelers somehow seven and six,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 2>somehow on the inside of the playoff picture. Don't ask

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 2>me how after the last two weeks thing on these

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 2>seven and six Indianapolis Colts. This one in Indy, Indy

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 2>is two and a half point favorites at home. Forty

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 2>two is the consensus number. You're getting plus one fifteen

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 2>for the Pittsburgh upset on the money line fits.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It's two weeks in a row.

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 2>We're watching the Pittsburgh Steelers here just lose to bad teams. Now,

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 2>can they get it together and go on the road

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 2>and win in Indy? It seems like a tall order

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>to me.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Oh goodness, I don't know, Joe.

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I've got both teams coming off bad losses. I mean,

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers drop a home game to the Patriots forgettness sakes,

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 3>and the Colts played probably their worst game of the

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 3>season against the Bengals in losing by twenty two backup quarterback.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 5>So I don't know.

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I've just been burned by both of these teams before Honestly,

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 3>there are also six college bowl games on Saturday. I

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 3>might be flicking around to some of the bowl games

0:09:59.400 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 3>during this.

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>One, understandable.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget we've got bowl coverage here with Thor

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>and Scott Bogman on our channel as well. We're always

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 2>prepared for all the college football stuff.

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Sam.

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 2>This one feels a little gross. But if you're talking

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 2>about trends, talking about directions of teams, right, Pittsburgh certainly

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 2>feels like a team that's going in a negative direction

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 2>like that just can't get out of their own way.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 2>They can't win games at home. Now, is this is

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 2>a unique opportunity where you say, to heck with a

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>trend and you go ahead and bet agains that makes

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 2>some money here, or do you stick with the trend

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 2>and go with Indy.

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.599
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna stick with Indy here. We get Mitch Trubisky

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 4>again on Saturday. In relief of blanking on this, both TJ.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Watt and Alex Highsmith for the Steelers defense are in

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 4>concussion protocol. Now they get the extra rest, so it

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 4>might be a little easier for them to come back

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 4>from that, but Indianapolis continues to dictate the pass and

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 4>pass quite a bit over expectation in the last couple

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 4>of days. And this is a Steelers defense that just

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 4>got roasted by Bailey Zappi with three wide receivers active

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 4>for them. So I like the Colts here. I still

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 4>think again, I've mentioned it every single week, but Shane

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 4>stike In, from a procedural standpoint outweighs Mike Tomlin at

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 4>this point. So I like getting Indy e at minus

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 4>two and a half right now.

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 2>You can get India on the money line at minus

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>one thirty five. So if you want to put that

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>together with let's say Michael Pittman, I don't know, Amy

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>over on receptions something another, gimme like that, it's a

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 2>good way to push this right into the positive. I

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 2>think that would be a very smart little duo. Bet

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Denver is the nightcap against the Detroit Lions. This one's

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 2>in Detroit. Detroit is four point favorites for this game.

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Forty six and a half is the number plus one

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>seventy five for the Denver Broncos money line. Now, I

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 2>keep pushing the Denver Broncos in my videos, keep pushing

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 2>for them to make the playoffs. I think you're still

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>getting plus one forty most spots for that. I think

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Denver smells an opportunity here and Detroit is reeling. I

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 2>know they're going back home. I know we should be

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>looking at Detroit really maybe as the get right game,

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 2>but Sam, I can't get there. I like the Denver

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Broncos defense more. I'm on Denver on the money line

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>two weeks in a row.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Here, where are you?

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 4>I think Denver is the side right now, though, I

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 4>just don't want to bet it quite frankly, because I

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 4>still don't believe in this Broncos defense. Despite the fact

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 4>that they haven't allowed more than twenty two points in

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 4>h straight games, they are still thirtieth in defensive DVOA.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 4>They're twenty fourth in defensive rating according to Impredictable, which

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 4>uses future betting lines for that. And so I that

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 4>said that, the Lions offense just looks out of funk.

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't really know what's going on. Ben Johnson had

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 4>some interesting formations. You know, he's lining up. I'm on

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Ross Saint Brown out of the backfield, had a handoff

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 4>to Sam look out of the fullback position there. But

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 4>I could see this game going just a number of

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 4>different ways. I could see the Lions getting back into

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 4>things and blowing the brakes off of Denver. But I

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 4>just I don't really believe in the Broncos offense enough

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 4>to necessarily keep them in contention.

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 2>Pat, how do you see this one, this nightcap game,

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>because this one certainly I think has everybody's attention. Also

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 2>out of conference games too, you know, wacky things can

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 2>happen sometimes.

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 3>When I looked at the lines on Sunday Night Show,

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 3>there were only two games I was motivated to bet

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 3>early and one was getting the better team in this

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 3>matchup and four points, So I was happy to take

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos in this one. And the line's already gone

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 3>down to three and a half, so I'm glad I

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 3>got it at four. Detroit is just reeling and they're

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 3>having a hard time getting the train back on the

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 3>tracks right now. Not only has their defense just gone

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 3>to hell, I mean they are getting firebombed through the

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 3>air and they're not anywhere close to the impregnable run

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 3>defense they had early in the season. But Jared Goff

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 3>has really struggled too. They do have the run game,

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 3>and they are going against a Denver run defense that

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 3>look Denver's really picked it up against the pass, but

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 3>against the run they're still pretty bad. So I could

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 3>see a scenario where the Lions run all over the Broncos,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>which is why Joe, I kind of want to take

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 3>this game and take the points rather than bet the

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 3>money line. Like, if I'm getting a field goal or

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>more with the Broncos, I think that's amazing value and

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I want to take advantage. I don't hate your money

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 3>line bet, and I might even be motivated to throw

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 3>a little something on that later in the week, but

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 3>for now, give me the points and give me the

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>hotter and better team right now with the Broncos.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Hey, oh plus months every five is just enough where

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm very intrigued there. But you're right, the safer bet

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>is definitely the four. On the Denver side, Tampa finds

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 2>himself at the top of the NFC South, so once

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>again nobody wants to win that division. Just like last year,

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>they are six and seven. The Green Bay Packers are hot.

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll see they do a Monday night. They are six

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 2>and six. Right now, they are three and a half

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>point favorites at home. This feels right. Forty two and

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>a half is the number. Plus one fifty for Tampa.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 2>On the money line, Pat Love has played really well

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the last three weeks, eight touchdowns, no picks. We'll see

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 2>again what Monday brings. But the one thing you can

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 2>do certainly is throw on this team. So is it

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>safe here to maybe take the Packers and take maybe

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 2>some Jordan Love passing overs and kind of play this

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>one safe?

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the Packers are safe, Joe. About the passing overs,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna stick a pin in that for now, and

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you why. So you know I'm not a

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>total Packers homer, Joe, but I do love the Packers

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 3>here and part of the reason for that. I mean,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>home field in the NFL is generally regarded as being

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 3>worth two points in most places these days. For a

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 3>game with a team from Florida traveling up to Green Bay,

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Wisconsin in mid December, I would say that home field

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 3>advantage is probably closer to four points. I mean, we

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 3>know what the field is like up there. A lot

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 3>of teams have trouble getting the right cleats, which is

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 3>something the Packers don't really have issues with. I mean,

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Sam Hoppin is from Green Bay, Wisconsin. Sam tell Joe

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 3>about December in green.

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the pride of Green Bay, Sam Hoppin, let's talk

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 2>about this one. What do you think you're confident that

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>your boys can handle their business here?

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I am. And to answer Pat's question, it's miserable in

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Green Bay in December. I cannot stress how much you

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 4>should not really be going to Green Bay in December,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 4>actually December through like mid March. But in any case, Yeah,

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think Love is just going to slice

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 4>this defensive part. Desmond Ritter just through for nearly three

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifty yards against them. I think Green Bay

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 4>will get both Christian Watson and Aaron Jones back in

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 4>this game, which should help Tampa. Bay also lost both

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Carlton Davis and Ryan Neil in the game against Atlantis,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 4>that their status is sable for a secondary that was

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 4>already questionable. So I love Green Bay and the Packers.

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and Joe, by the way, the reason I'm not

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 3>that keen on the Jordan Love over so I just like,

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 3>if it's ten below wind Shell, I'm not excited about

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 3>passing over.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 2>So fair enough, I'm just excited about that secondary coming

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 2>to town at the end of the day. So, and

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 2>if Watson's healthy two that's another one. I like, all right, Atlanta,

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 2>they are six and seven two fighting for that South.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna go to Carolina in a game they should win.

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>But Desmon Ritter on the road has not been great.

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Carolina's at home.

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 2>They are three point underdogs at home, and they've earned

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 2>at least that thirty five is the number for this game,

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 2>minus one sixty eight on the Atlanta side, plus one

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 2>forty on Carolina. This is a tricky one here, Sam,

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>because this feels kind of trappy in a lot of ways.

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Your trust level of Atlanta on the road has certainly

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 2>been I would say all of us cautious to say

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>the least. So do you have any early leans on

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 2>this one or you're just gonna walk away?

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 4>I hate that. My early lean is the Falcons. But

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 4>the Saints, who we're going to talk about here in

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 4>a minute, played terribly against the against the Panthers and

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 4>still blew them out. I mean, like this, the Panthers

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 4>are just a complete mess right now. The Atlanta defense

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 4>has shut down the inferior imponents that they've played lately

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 4>in the Saints, the Bucks, and the Jets. So again,

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 4>it is little trust, as I have in Desmond Ritter

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 4>and Arthur Smith. I think the Falcons should have no

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 4>issue taking care of business.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Fitz.

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised you're not getting a bigger number here, like

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a plus one to eighty or even plus two hundred

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 2>for the Panthers to win this football game, which is

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 2>what gives me hesitation here a little bit too, Like

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 2>what do they know here that's going on that I

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 2>don't have a beat on. This is just a weird

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 2>one to me. It feels like a bad situation for Atlanta.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 2>But to Sam's point, Carolina just can't get out of

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 2>their own way, and from a leadership standpoint, they don't

0:18:58.800 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 2>seem to.

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Have any no.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 3>But the Falcons often can't get out of their own

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 3>way either, So I think that's why maybe there's hesitation to,

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, put bet money on the Falcons and drive

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 3>up this line, and why I think we might see

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>it stick close to three. It just feels like Arthur

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Smith is Wiley Coyote opening the package from the ACME company,

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Like I just yeah, Like I agree with Sam, like

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 3>first instinct, bet the Falcons, but then I think about it,

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 3>and I don't want to bet the Falcons.

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, make sure whatever your betting. Make sure you make

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 2>all your bets count and make sure you're downloading the

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Betting Pros app use all the tools here, and of

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 2>course if you haven't checked it out, and how's a

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 2>good time because if you have iOS the first three

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 2>days you get that premium version for freeze, you can

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 2>really check out all the bells and whistles. This is

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 2>a great weekend to do it too, to download it

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 2>because you got Saturday football, you got the Bowl games

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 2>like Fisy was talking about, You've got the Sunday NFL,

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Monday NFL forget it. We are busy not to mention

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 2>all the NBA stuff too, so make sure you're using that,

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and get.

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>In on our NFL contest too.

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Just click the community tab go in there, or go

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to Bettingpros dot com slash NFL contest. We're still doing

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 2>weekly prizes, monthly prizes, so get in on that as well. Now,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 2>this next game is gonna be interesting to see if

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I can entice either of you on New Orleans is

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 2>six point favorites at home against the New York Giants,

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 2>who have not been good this year. We're gonna see

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 2>what happens with the Giants tonight and Tommy Devido the

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Pride of New Jersey. Thirty six and a half is

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the number for this one plus two fifteen on the

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 2>money line for the Giants, FITZI, I gotta say my

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 2>early lean is Giants money line. Like I'm just kind

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 2>of throwing into the chaos and I'm gonna lean into it,

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 2>which feels like I look at the Saints and I

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>just can't see them as a six point favorite almost

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 2>against anybody. So if I'm gonna go play, I might

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 2>as well go hard. That's my early lean for this game.

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>What's yours?

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't have an early lean for this game, Joe,

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 3>But I can totally understand that perspective. I mean, I

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 3>think by the measure of most power rankings, the Giants

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 3>are I think I think there's still ahead of the

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 3>Panthers as far as being regarded as worst in the

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 3>league in terms of DVOA and like Massy Peabody, you know,

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 3>Sam could fact check me on that one. But even

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 3>though the Giants may be regarded as the worst team

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 3>in the league, You're right, I do not want to

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 3>give six points to anyone with the Saints, and like,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 3>look at how that offense has just struggled, like they're just.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 5>Incapable of getting the ball into the end zone.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 3>It seems like a lot of the times when they

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 3>get down to the red zone on third and eight,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 3>like we're seeing Derek Carr throw short of the sticks

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 3>all the time, or constantly under duress with the pass rush.

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 5>Like this offense is just gross.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 3>So no, I do not want to lay points with

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the Saints by any means, But I'm also not totally

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 3>sure I want to bet the money line and endorse

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 3>the Giants here.

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Joe, all right, well, maybe I can sell you guys

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 2>on the plus six here at side of the Giants

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 2>at the mines one ten. Sam, is that something I

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 2>can interest you for Week fifteen?

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean sure, Like I don't think Tommy DeVito

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 4>at this point is the worst starting quarterback in the league.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Very low in the last month it has.

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 4>Been, especially with all the quarterback turnover. But why is

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 4>Derek Carr still starting? I mean a week after leaving

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 4>a game with a concussion, with a neck injury, a

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 4>rib fracture. Like any he just goes out and just

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 4>isn't isn't capable of producing. There was a report this

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 4>morning that Carr had suffered three different rib fractures this year,

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 4>two of which nobody even knew about until he told reporters.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 4>And so, I you're right, like the Saints really shouldn't

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 4>be favored by this many points against any other team

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 4>in the NFL. Maybe maybe the Panthers, But it's that's

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 4>way too many points for me to lay with with

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Derek Carr and the Saints.

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Now here's an intriguing one Houston seven to six going

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>to Tennessee four and eight. Now, obviously the calculus has

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 2>changed her quite a bit with that injury.

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Here to the quarterback situation. CJ.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Stroud questionable for that game obviously cancussion protocol after that

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 2>game with the Jets where he hit his head on

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>the turf. They are two point underdogs going to Tennessee,

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 2>which feels kind of right right now is like a

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 2>holder situation. Thirty seven and a half is the number

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 2>here on the total plus one h five on.

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>The money line for Houston.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 2>So Sam, this is one of those again, there's early

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>value to be had depending on how you see things

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 2>going out in the future. Here to me, the biggest

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 2>one is potentially that under at thirty seven and a half.

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>That's the one that I want to jump in on,

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 2>and I want to jump in early. But what do

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 2>you think about this game?

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's probably the right side from the total perspective.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 4>I think if the Texans do get Davis Mills in

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 4>this game, they'll probably lean on the run a little

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 4>bit more. But again, like going back to what I

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 4>mentioned earlier in the show with respect to Easton Stick, Like,

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't think Davis Mills is the worst backup to

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 4>He has some experience, has shown some flashes, and this

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Titans pass defense is among the worst in the league. Yeah,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 4>it's a little up in the air as to whether

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:16.239
<v Speaker 4>Stroud comes back from the concussion he left in the

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 4>middle of the fourth quarter. There wasn't really a reason

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 4>to bring him back into the game even if he

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 4>was cleared, given the score of that game. But we've seen,

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 4>for some reason, more players getting cleared from concussion protocol

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 4>more quickly over the last couple of weeks. But the

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 4>hit that he took with the whiplash looked not great

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 4>at all. So I think we get Davis Mills just

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 4>as in an abundance of caution from Houston, saving their

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 4>franchise quarterback from getting hurt anymore. But I still think

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.239
<v Speaker 4>Houston is the better team. I think I like the

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 4>money line for Houston as well. Their defense has continued

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 4>to play pretty well as well. I think Will Anderson

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 4>might have left that get the game, so hopefully he's

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 4>healthy too. But I just don't see much going right

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 4>for Tennessee lately.

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Texans Titans fits any early thoughts.

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I kind of agree with both of you guys,

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 3>show I do like the under on this game because

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 3>even though day Mills is not like one of the

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 3>worst backup quarterbacks in the league, he is going to

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 3>be without Tanked l and probably without Nico Collins too,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 3>so that really limits the Texans passing game. And then

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 3>you've got the Titans with their you know, mediocre offensive line,

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 3>rookie quarterback, aging running back. So I don't see a

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 3>lot of points going up in this game. And I

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 3>do think there's value on the Texans. Like, first of all,

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 3>you're not drawing dead if CJ. Stroud doesn't play on

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 3>this bet, because Davis Mills is a decent backup quarterback,

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 3>But what if CJ. Stroud does clear concussion protocol plays

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:55.479
<v Speaker 3>in this game? And then all of a sudden, you're

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>getting two points going up against Will Levis and the Titans.

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 3>So I'm happy to plunk down some money on the

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 3>money line on this one, and you know, take my

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 3>chances if it's Mills and feel pretty good about it.

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 5>If it's CJ.

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Stroud, that's fair, that's fair.

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 2>This is the time to do that. If that's the

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 2>future you think is gonna happen. The future for this

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>next game, this is another four outcome game for me.

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>This one is my walk away this week, at least

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 2>so far. I can't wait to hear your insights on

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>this one. The Cleveland Browns are eight and five taking

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 2>on the Bears five and eight. This one's in Cleveland.

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland is three point favorites at minus one fourteen. That's

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the consensus line at betting Pros. Thirty eight is the

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 2>consensus number. And then plus one forty.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Five for Chicago.

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Now, I know we were very bullish last week on Chicago,

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 2>whose defense is played better.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Field has made some plays.

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Some creativity in the offense there with DJ Moore has

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 2>been fun. But the Cleveland Browns defense continues to be

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 2>a very strong unit. Joe Flacco is the starter of

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the season. So FITZI any early value

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 2>on this one between the Browns and the Bears.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Joe, we talked a little bit about this one earlier.

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I like the Bears here. I mean, yes, the defense

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 3>has been lights out, but boy, ever since the Bears

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 3>acquired Montese Sweat at the trade deadline. Like the Bears

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 3>run defense had been pretty good before that, now their

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 3>pass defense is very good. Also, as you mentioned, they've

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 3>gotten healthier in the secondary two, which has helped. But

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 3>like right now, the Bears have a top ten defense,

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 3>so I think they can hang in this one. I

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 3>think they can create some problems for Joe Flacco, who

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 3>we know can move the ball but will also make

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 3>some mistakes if you force him into it. And I

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 3>think the Bears are capable of forcing Flacco into mistakes.

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 5>So yeah.

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Add the fields to Dj moore Magic, which, like those

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 3>guys are hooking up for big plays every week, and

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I think Dj Moore is capable of beating these Browns cornerbacks.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 3>Even though maybe the best all around group of cornerbacks

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 3>in the league. This could actually be an entertaining game,

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 3>although I think maybe the under is the better percentage

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>play here than the over because both of these defense

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 3>says are terrific or have been terrific lately.

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Sam, this one's tougher for me because I dig what

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 2>fits a saying. But the Bears on the road is

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>where I start to get a little iffy, Like that's

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 2>where I'm not as confident. But what about you when

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at this game here between the Browns and Bears,

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 2>do you see this the same as fits or maybe different?

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't have a much much of a read on

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 4>this game. The Browns defense has shown some gaps the

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 4>last couple of days, or excuse me, the last couple

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 4>of games. Their advanced stats are still encouraging. Instead of

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 4>this game, I want to tease a little bit of

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 4>a long shot bet on on the Browns to win

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 4>the AFC at thirty five to one. I know it

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 4>sounds crazy.

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't outside actually, outside of.

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 4>The Dolphs likes they control their own destiny to get

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 4>into the playoffs. I think there's still an outside a

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 4>good chance that they could win the division. Given their

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 4>schedule and the Ravens play the Jaguars, forty nine Ers

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 4>and Dolphins in their next three games. That are not

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 4>all guarantees, so they could come away with the division win.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 4>They've beaten the excuse me, the Ravens and the forty

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 4>nine ers. Granted when the forty nine ers were banged up,

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 4>but yeah, but.

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.239
<v Speaker 1>They banged them up. The it's not loose sight of that.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 2>They're the physical football team that banged up that offensive

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 2>line of the forty nine ers.

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying, for a team that looks like they're

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 4>going to get into the playoffs, the defense could carry

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 4>them a couple of things go their way. Joe Flacco

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 4>is not playing the worst quarterbacking by any means right now,

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 4>so just just a.

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Little I don't think it's crazy man, defense travels. They

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 2>got a good head coach. I don't think that's nuts

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 2>at all. I think the AFC is open for business.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there is no like three hundred pound gorilla in

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 3>the AFC. Like, all these teams have their flaws. I mean,

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 3>look at the Chiefs. The Chiefs are struggling to score

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 3>points and.

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Last night is a perfect example of that fact. You know, Yeah,

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 2>nobody's really run away with the AFC. Even the Ravens

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 2>at the top right now, they don't feel.

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Like struggle to put away the Rams at home, right,

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 5>exactly right.

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.479
<v Speaker 2>And the next one here we're gonna talk about Miami,

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 2>which is a team you and I were talking about fits,

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 2>which is they've beaten every team they're supposed to be

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 2>and they haven't punched up one time to any of

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the teams that are theoretically better than them or more experienced.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 2>So this is that after this game here against the Jets,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 2>their schedule obviously becomes very different. You're starting to look

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 2>at them having to take on the Bills, they're gonna

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 2>have to take on the Cowboys, They're going to take

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 2>on some better teams and see if they can actually

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 2>get some w's. But they're another one too that I

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 2>think has a shot to win the AFC. Their twelve

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 2>point favorites at home against the Jets. I know Zach

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Wilson had himself a day against the Texans, but I

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know if that's something we can bet on weekly.

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Forty and a half is the number for this game,

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 2>plus four seventy five for the Jets to win. Sam,

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>We'll start with you on this one, Miami, New York.

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Can Miami cover this twelve That's the question.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 4>I think they can. They took care of business against

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 4>the Jets on Black Friday just a couple of weeks ago,

0:30:55.280 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 4>and there's not really much that has changed. Obviously, they

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 4>lost Jalen Phillips in that game, which which changes things

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 4>a little bit, and Zach Wilson is going to be

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 4>the quarterback instead of Tim Boyle. But twelve right now

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 4>feels like a little bit too much. I mean, the

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Jets defense still can carry its weight by by every

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 4>measure that they've faced, So I'm staying away from this

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 4>one right now.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Fitz.

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>They didn't have a chan though for that Black Friday game,

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's the X factor to me that

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 2>makes me feel much more comfortable at the twelve in

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 2>this one.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, can the Jets ugly it up and

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 3>keep this one close? Like I think they're capable of it.

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 3>I know it didn't work out on Black Friday, but

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, Like, it wouldn't shock me to see

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the Jets make this a close game, and it wouldn't

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 3>shock me to see the Jets lose by three touchdowns.

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 3>And you know, like, I don't think we're going to

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 3>get another Haley's Comet game from Zach Wilson where he

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 3>seventy five percent of his passes for three hundred yards.

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And not so.

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, man, I just like this, This line seems right.

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 3>And I thought about this total, like, what do you

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 3>do with this high powered offense running up a route

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 3>against a really really good pass defense and with the

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Jets having so much trouble putting points on the board

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 3>themselves most weeks. Yeah, forty and a half does seem

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 3>like the right number here. So I just I don't

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 3>see any value here.

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I look at Miami at the twelve.

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm looking at because I think the way

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the Jets have not been able to handle the run

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.479
<v Speaker 2>this year. If I'm them, I'm just running the football

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>down their throats. I'm getting those guys out there on

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 2>jet sweeps too, like Tyreek Hill.

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm doing. I'm attacking. See. The thing that

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Miami can do is attack the Jets at their.

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Weakness, their strike, those their secondary So when you can

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 2>have those guys underneath quick, when you can have those

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 2>guys getting those jet sweeps.

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's the X factor, especially with.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 2>The e chan back, that is the tough thing for

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>me where I think the Jets are going to have

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>a hard time in Miami. The Kansasity Chiefs have been

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.239
<v Speaker 2>having a hard time lately with the referees, with their

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 2>wide receivers, with Garius Tony on numerous numerous reasons, the

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 2>drops the off sides. But they are eight and they're

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna travel to New England. They're nine and a half

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 2>point favorites in this game. Thirty seven and a half

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 2>is the number New England on the money lines. Plus

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>three fifty now fits the Kansasity Chiefs have to get right.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 2>This feels like a get right game here the Newing

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 2>The Patriots are not a good football team. They had

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 2>a wacky game on Thursday against the Steelers. I'm not

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>again gonna copy and paste that here and think that

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna give the Chiefs problems. However, nine and a

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 2>half does feel like a big number. Therefore, Yah, do

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 2>you like New England on that side?

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm tempted by New England and if I were forced

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 3>a bet this one, and I am forced about it

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 3>in some pools where I have to pick every game

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 3>against the spread, So I'm not gonna put my own

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 3>money on this one, but I am going to take

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots and the points in these pools, and like,

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 3>can you believe we have a total this low for

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City Chiefs game thirty seven and a half.

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, look, it's it's their inability to It's

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 2>like everything you've watched with the Chiefs in the last

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 2>few years, where there are the team where things go

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 2>right in these matches, things happen, he's great plays in

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 2>these great moments.

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>None of that's happened.

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 2>This year, and none of it in the last couple

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 2>of games. And that's been the problem. What about Sam

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Hoppins money? You want to bet him his money on

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 2>this game at all? Is that of yours?

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think that's what you like. I think

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 4>here is the Patriots. I mean you can get them

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 4>at plus ten in some places right now. Again with

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 4>this low of a total. I tweeted this out this morning,

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 4>but the Chiefs are one loss away from going under

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 4>their preseason win total for the first time since Andy

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 4>Reid became coach, which again sort of tells you, like

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 4>the over on their win total was the freest money

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 4>that you could find for the past several years. And

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 4>I've got a Chiefs over eleven and a half win

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 4>ticket right now, and I'm sweating this out with the

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 4>remaining schedule that they have and where they're at now.

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 4>But and with such a low total, a double digit

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:06.479
<v Speaker 4>spread is what you want to be looking at. It's,

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, regardless of you know, the teams that are playing,

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 4>because the Chiefs do not look like themselves.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 2>They don't, they don't, and New England has been very

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 2>good against the run, not that that's necessarily what they

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 2>want to do. We'll see if they get to check

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 2>go back for this game, but lots of unknowns. I

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 2>think we're all in agreement here. Maybe that nine and

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 2>a half on New England's way to go. Kansas City

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 2>wins this game, but I don't know, man, they just

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 2>can't keep going in this direction, can they. Washington coming

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 2>off of buye, they're four to nine taking on the

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 2>Rams in LA.

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>They are six and seven.

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 2>They almost almost took out the Baltimore Ravens, but they

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 2>fell short in overtime. Six and a half point favorites,

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 2>though that seems like a lot.

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:43.760
<v Speaker 1>To me for the Rams.

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Forty nine is the number plus two forty five for Washington. Now,

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 2>the value on this board is very clear. It's the

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Washington upset. So, Sam, is that where you're at or

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.439
<v Speaker 2>do you feel like maybe just take Washington with the six,

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 2>or maybe you think the Rams are you know, now

0:35:58.640 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 2>a force to be reckoned with.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps I don't know that they are a force to

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 4>be reckoned with. But the Rams have played very impressively.

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, obviously lost the game against the Ravens in overtime,

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 4>but there are I think few quarterbacks playing and throwing

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 4>the ball as well as Matthew Stafford right now. You know,

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Cooper Cup and Pook Poka Naku with probably the catch

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 4>of the year without any gloves in a rain game

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 4>on Sunday. I love the Rams in this spot. Their

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 4>their defense is still a little suspect, but Aaron Donald's

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 4>just going to tear apart the inside of that Commander's

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 4>offensive line. And Sean McVeigh just a clear, clear tier

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 4>above Ron Rivera right now. And in terms of coaching,

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 4>so I love the Rams here. I think again, teasing

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 4>them down to half a point or minus a half

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 4>point is is a great way to play this game too.

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the thing. It just six and a half

0:36:58.000 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 2>does feel like a bit much to me. That's some

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 2>good advice. Pat you in agreement with Sam.

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Sam hit on it.

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 3>At first I thought the Commanders might make an interesting

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 3>money line bet, and then I thought about the Ron

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Rivera versus Sean McVay coaching matchup, and I had second

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:14.879
<v Speaker 3>thoughts about that money line bet.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 5>So this seems like a good line.

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 3>I just as functional as this Rams offense has been,

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 3>in as pleasant as surprise as the Rams have been,

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I really don't want to lay six and a half

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 3>points with them, even to the Commanders whose defense struggles.

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 3>I do think we're gonna see points in this game,

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't know if we'll get over this, this

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 3>big number forty nine, but like we're gonna see points

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 3>this Washington secondary, those cornerbacks trying to hang with Pooka

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Naku and Cooper Cup.

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Man, I don't see that happening.

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>How do see it either?

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think the thing that broke me towards Sam

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 2>and the being more comfortable with the Rams here is

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the mistake that's coming eventually in this game here with

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Sam Howe hosting them a touchdown and that defensive score,

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 2>that defensive turnover in their own side of the field

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 2>with a short field, that would probably be the seven

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 2>points that I'm looking for in this game, and I

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 2>think you are going to get that. Therefore, I think

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 2>the Rams are probably the right side of this, even

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 2>though that number is a little larger than we're used

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 2>to with the Rams. And to your points, him Stafford

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 2>played really well in that game and he looked very sharp.

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 2>So that was a good thing to see the Arizona Cardinals.

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Not a good thing to see for them at home

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. Forty nine ers come into town. Thirteen and

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 2>a half is the number on this one. San Frian

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 2>obviously ahead on this one. They are minus thirteen and

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 2>a half favorites. Forty seven is the number plus six

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 2>hundred for the Arizona money line. To me, the most

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 2>complete team in the NFL right now is the forty

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 2>nine ers. They went there, they handled their business last week,

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and they did not have a letdown game against Seattle

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 2>after it this week, which was I think very important

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 2>to see that they are focused right. They went out

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 2>there and they kicked the crap out of Seattle too,

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 2>and they continue to play very physically. I just don't

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 2>think Arizona's up for this task. Pat and I know

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 2>it's a big number, but do you think Arizona can

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 2>cover it.

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Oh gosh, I don't know, Joe. I just I

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 3>hate lines like this. I mean, this is like trying

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 3>to decide whether to you know, take Alabama and lay

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 3>thirty nine and a half points to McNeese State, or

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 3>take Michigan and lay thirty five to Eastern Illino.

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Then what about the forty seven?

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 2>What is that something where confident that they get the

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 2>thirty and the Arizona can scratch out seventeen.

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not confident in the Cardinals doing their part.

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 3>So this just I hate games like this because you

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 3>can get back toward in again like this so easily

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 3>if you bet the forty nine ers, and you know, like,

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to bet the Cardinals because I'm not

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 3>confident they can make this a game.

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 5>So I'm just gonna walk away from this one.

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, Fitzy's walking away, Sam, you're walking away or you're

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 2>walking towards it.

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm walking towards the forty nine ers the sense

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 4>thereby they're on a five game winning streak. Their margin

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 4>of victory in those five games thirty one Jacksonville thirteen

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 4>versus Tampa Bay eighteen at Seattle twenty three at Philadelphia

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 4>and twelve this past week versus Seattle. That you said it.

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 4>They're the most complete team. They have everything going there.

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 4>They're mostly healthy on both sides of the ball, save

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 4>a couple of guys on defense that they're going to

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 4>go and take care business.

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I told Pat, I cash out of my hurts MVP

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 2>on the weekend. I made money on that, made three

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 2>x the money, and I reinvested that money in the

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers winning the NFC and winning.

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The Super Bowl.

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 2>And I just think that's right now. I'm looking around.

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't see anybody in the AFC that's really for real.

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 2>And the NFC Cowboys are interesting, but again, like cowboys

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna go on the road and win a game in

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 2>San fran I don't know.

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough sell right now for me. Now that

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 1>San France teams.

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 2>That they're in the they are locked in that one

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 2>spot to me, like, I don't think they're gonna give

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 2>that spot up here looking at the schedule. Dallas though,

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 2>coming off a huge win at home, let's give them credit.

0:40:58.040 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 2>They are ten and three. They go to Buffalo. This

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.240
<v Speaker 2>is a tough game here, right you're waiting you're waiting.

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>For the Eagles.

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 2>You got the Eagles, you handle the Eagles. Now you're

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 2>going on the road into the elements a little bit

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 2>here potentially in Buffalo. They are one and a half

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 2>point favorites. Buffalo coming off a game they needed to

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 2>have to stay alive. They are alive at seven and six.

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Forty nine is the number plus one oh five? What

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:17.479
<v Speaker 2>do you think you're sam you want to go over

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:19.760
<v Speaker 2>here for this forty nine or is this one maybe

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:23.839
<v Speaker 2>something that is more underwhelming potentially in terms of total.

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 4>Man the over, that's a lot of points. I think

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 4>you need a lot to go right. The Dallas defense

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 4>looked a little suspect against Seattle in Week thirteen, but

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 4>man Stefan Gilmour played one of the best games that

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 4>he's had in a while. I still think that Cowboys

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 4>defense is legit. Dan Quinn is coaching his tailoff. The

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 4>weather forecast for Buffalo right now is low forties, mid

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 4>forties for this game, so I don't think weather is

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 4>going to be a concern. I don't think Dak should

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 4>have much issue throwing the ball against Buffalo, especially if

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Micah Hyde is out. I like Dallas on the money

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 4>line here, all.

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, Dallas on the money line of plus one oh five,

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 2>again not getting too much value on that fits.

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Where do you see this one?

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I kind of agree with Sam that maybe the under

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 3>is the way to go here because the Dallas defense

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 3>is so strong and the Buffalo defense isn't bad. Like,

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I think the line is fair, and I wanted to

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 3>think maybe this was another instance where Buffalo's home field

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 3>advantage against a Southern team this time of year might

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 3>be worth more than two. But Sam just kind of

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 3>popped that balloon with his forecast saying that it's not

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 3>going to be too bad in Buffalo this weekend, So

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Joe, we talked about the difference between

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 3>the Dolphins and the Bills, and how the Dolphins stomp

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 3>the bad teams and then can't beat the good teams,

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 3>whereas the Bills will occasionally stub their toe against the

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 3>team they should be but man, like they go in

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 3>there like every time the Bills play a good team,

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:05.800
<v Speaker 3>it's like creed, Yeah, exactly, Like they throw haymakers against

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 3>the good team. So I do think the Bills can

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 3>hang in this one. I'm not interested in betting either

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 3>side to be honest.

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, this next one, I am spinning myself in

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 2>circles about Baltimore Jacksonville. Baltimore's three and a half point

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 2>favorites on the road forty three and a half is

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the number plus one fifty for Jacksonville. Now it's clear

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 2>the value is on Jacksonville in the money line to

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 2>win this game outright, to find a way.

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is the.

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Typical Baltimore stub your toe game. If we watched the

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Ravens long enough this year in years past to know

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 2>that this is the one that scares me the most.

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 2>This is the game and they should go out there.

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 2>They should win, and frankly, they should take advantage of

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 2>the secondary and take advantage of Trevor Lawrence banged up

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 2>and missing Christian Kirk and missing some other pieces. That

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 2>being said, Pat, I can't. I don't find confidence in

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:49.800
<v Speaker 2>any of these lines because they all feel spot on

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to me. I don't see any value.

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:52.479
<v Speaker 1>What do you think I.

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 3>Like the Ravens show. See to me, the Ravens just

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 3>had the toe stubbing game and they averted the toe

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 3>stubbing against the Rams. They almost lost that one, and

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 3>it is pretty rare for the Ravens to play two

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:08.320
<v Speaker 3>poor games in a row under John harbaught just doesn't

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 3>happen that often. So meanwhile, the Jaguars are not looking

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 3>like the team they were maybe a month month and

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 3>a half ago when they had everything rolling. Trevor Lawrence played,

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Gotta give him credit for the grit, but he didn't

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 3>look right. Three interceptions and like the defense just doesn't see.

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:30.279
<v Speaker 3>But against the pass, they've been pretty terrible lately. So

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I like the Ravens a lot here.

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:35.439
<v Speaker 2>All right, how about you, Sam, were looking at Jackson

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of Baltimore?

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you see? Yeah?

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Don't have a lean on either side here, but for

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 4>the total I do kind of like the over Neither

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 4>team really plays that fast, but I think both can

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 4>have success passing the ball. Over the last four weeks,

0:44:51.880 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 4>both of these teams ranked in the top eight in

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:59.720
<v Speaker 4>passing EPU or play. I think both defenses. The Ravens defense,

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a little fraudulent, Like I don't totally

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 4>buy what they're selling in the Jacksonville defense obviously just

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 4>got sort of torn apart by Joe Flacco and the Browns.

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 4>So I like to overhear forty three and a half okay, forty.

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Three and a half their last one here, Philly finally

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 2>gets a breather. They're going on the road though, to Seattle,

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 2>so this is another tricky game. Like I feel like

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles gas tank is on empty.

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Sam.

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 2>They are three and a half point favorites on the

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 2>road against Seattle. Forty eight is the number plus one

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 2>sixty on Seattle money line, Sam, Eagles are the better

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 2>football team. They have just gone up against you heavyweight

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 2>champion after heavyweight champion for about six weeks.

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 2>They should go handle their business. Are you confident that

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 2>they can against Seattle on this Monday night?

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:48.280
<v Speaker 4>I think they can. I mean I think it largely

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 4>depends on who we get at quarterback for Seattle. It's

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:55.240
<v Speaker 4>it was kind of a weird thing with Geno Smith

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 4>dealing with a groin injury. It was I think a

0:45:57.880 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 4>little unexpected towards the end of last week that he

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 4>was was questionable. Obviously didn't play against San Francisco. I

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 4>think we probably get Drew Lock again here. It sounded

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 4>like it was about a two week injury for for

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 4>Gino Smith. So if we get Drew Lock, then I

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 4>love the Eagles here, but I am I'm not totally

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:22.919
<v Speaker 4>confident that in that and honestly, like Drew Lock could

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 4>have some success against this Eagle secondary.

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, fits your thoughts here on this one again

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:32.399
<v Speaker 2>seems on the surface to be a breather, a get

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 2>right game, a restabilization potentially of the Eagles. Is that

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 2>what we get or do we get something far different

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 2>with the Seattle to team that you know, just two

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago all of a sudden took the Cowboys to

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:41.800
<v Speaker 2>their limit.

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 3>I do not want to lay six points with the

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Eagles right now to a team that has a major

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 3>home field advantage.

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think three and a half actually this one, so.

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Oh sorry, I'm looking at the wrong Len. Yes, three

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 5>and a half.

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Still do not want to do that, man, Like exactly,

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:04.959
<v Speaker 3>Drew Lock could throw for three hundred yards and three

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns against this Eagles secondary.

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 5>And like Joe you said it, I mean like the Eagles.

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 3>One thing that maybe isn't talked about enough is the

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 3>loss of Shane Steichen and what that has done to

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 3>the offense. And right now it seems like they are

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 3>having trouble righting the ship with the passing game. Like

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:22.879
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Hurts has not been very effective through the air,

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 3>And we talked about it on the show last week

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 3>and I said, I didn't think Jalen Hurts would be

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 3>able to go toe to toe with Dak Prescott in

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 3>a shootout, and that was kind of the case in

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:38.439
<v Speaker 3>week fourteen now against Drew Locke. Yeah, maybe Jalen Hurts

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 3>can win that shootout. But man, I just do not

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:44.839
<v Speaker 3>want to take the Eagles as a road favorite right

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:47.880
<v Speaker 3>now going coast to coast, Like, I'm just not feeling

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 3>the love for the Eagles right now.

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 5>They need to get it back together before I'm ready

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 5>to endorse them with my hard earned.

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Money, understandably, So I think that's the truer words I've

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 2>never been spoken. And we talked so much about nam

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 2>leaving and what that happened. You know what the Kansas

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 2>City offenses look like ever since. Same can be said

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of psyching too, and I don't think we emphasize that

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 2>enough because the Eagles kept finding ways to win games

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 2>and squeeze out victories, but there's an underbelly there that

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 2>is concerning, especially in these as you said, these shootout games,

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 2>are these games where they really got to match other teams.

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see what happens in week fifteen. It is

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 2>a busy week FI fifteen, and therefore you need the

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Betting Pros app. Make sure you subscribe to the podcast

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 2>where we get your pods, and make sure you download

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 2>that Betting Pros app, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and click that little bell and if you d drop

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 2>a comment below, you just might win a one year

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 2>free premium upgrade to Betting Pros. The premium version is unbelievable.

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 2>It'll help you get through all of the remaining weeks

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 2>of the NFL season and the playoffs as well. There's

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 2>still a lot of NFL way during left in this

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 2>tank here. That'll do it for us, but the story

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:51.240
<v Speaker 2>of the game goes on for Sam and Pat.

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:48:57.239 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 2>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 2>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:12.280
<v Speaker 2>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros