WEBVTT - Bucs Insider Live, Oct. 1

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>That's when the video goes first. Then it gets posted

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>over to the Buck's main Facebook page. So I think

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>there's been questions on both of the videos. So if

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we haven't gotten tears, that is probably why. So now

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely getting some here, which is great. So they're

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be all happiness and yes, we're not going

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to pretend like that was how things were supposed to

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>go in Chicago. Uh so before as we let people

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>start getting some of their questions in here on Facebook. Um,

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess I will just begin with I mean the defense,

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to talk about that, and um, after evaluating

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the game, hearing coaches talk about it, what is your

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>sense of what went wrong and how the team can

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>move forward from here? They tend to evaluate things in quarters,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So now the first quarter of the season is done,

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>how can they make this defense? But they know it

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>can be. Yeah, it seemed to be the big The

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>defense has not had good returns for the season as

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole, but this particular game snowball and got out

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of hand. It seemed to be the main new bad

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>thing was a lot of mr aignements or messed up

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>communication or breakdowns in you know, it was everybody on

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the same page, because that's how in the NFL you

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.639
<v Speaker 1>get multiple times of guys wide open. I mean, whenever

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you see a playlight in the NFL that it kind

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>of makes go whoa when there's a guy wide open,

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>And when it happens five or six times in the

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>same half, that is a stunning outcome. And nobody saw

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>that coming, and that's obviously the main problem. From that,

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a way to look at that somewhat optimistically,

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and that is if the main problem in that big

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive breakdown was mental errors, presumably that's something that could

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be fixed, especially when you have a bye week for

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the for the coaches, as they're going to do to

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>thoroughly self scout the team, not just this game, but

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>all four games, and come back with the players next

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>week as they're preparing for Atlanta and a little bit

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this week with some very concrete things of this is

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.639
<v Speaker 1>why this has happened, this is what you did wrong,

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>this is what maybe we did wrong. I'm sort at

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>some points of the coaches will we'll say that as well,

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But if they're trying to help a player avoid that

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>same result, potentially that could be resolved. And we've seen

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it before. I'm not saying it will. We'll have to

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>wait and see if this defense is going to improve.

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>But there there is a bit of track record with

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>these same people. In two thousand and sixteen, the first

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>eight games, we're not good at all defensively, maybe the

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>worst in the league or one of them. And then

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the last eight they really turned it around, started getting

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>lots of lots of in lots of turnovers. UH, did

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>much better job on third down, and so it's conceivable

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that that could happen again. They've got pretty far to

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>go because I think I believe the Buccaneers ranked lass

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>in the league in defense. Um, but you know, we'll

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>have to wait and see if it happens. I think

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>there's reason to believe that it can be fixed. Are

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers going to turn into the best defensive league?

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>That would seem like a long way to go, But

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>with the offense that we have, merely being a decent

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>defense would probably be enough. And that's certainly what we

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>can hope for. And we did get to see Vidave

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>out there for the first time, and we already had

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a question from Seawan. He says he's watching from Washington,

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>d C. And he wondered how Vita graded out from

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this last year. Coach said. Coach said that he was

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>about what you would expect from a guy that hadn't

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>played live football since. Um. I guess maybe like last

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>December in a game, uh I did. He did get

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to play more snaps than they originally intended. I think

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>he ended up playing roughly snaps, which was good because

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it's helping him knock off the rust. They probably we're

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>going to give him a smaller uh set if the

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>game hadn't been so out of hand. Um, coach said,

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was good and bad. Uh. He was

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you could see his power, but there were times when

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>he was handled by professional offensive lineman who have been

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>playing in the league for for quite some time. So

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I probably say it was a middle of the road

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of grade for him. They don't share the exact

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>grades that they give him. I did personally notice a

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. Uh. There are a couple of plays

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>where you could definitely see Viya's power where he got

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a one of them. A couple of times he was

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>battling two guys at once, which is something that he's

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>good for. You know. Coach Mike Smith says, someone else isn't. Yeah,

0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to put four hands on him, not too

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and I saw a couple of times when he pushed

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>his guy back pretty pretty quickly and into the backfield.

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>In neither case did it end up affecting the play

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>very much, but at least he did well in that regard.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I also noticed that when he was in there, we

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>were more likely to really put our ends farther out,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes even JPP was standing up as a pass

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>rusher on right in and uh, it was more like

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a three or four look in his coach will tell

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you every team does some three four and four three

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>looks them over and under packages and so on, and

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's not unusual for us to do that. It

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>looked more like a three four, which app standing up

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and and that's you know, you can just see when

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you're looking down from the press box. He's such a

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>big guy, and that's after losing fifteen pounds and during

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>this time with injury. Well, he can occupy so much

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>space in the middle that it kind of gives you

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>some other options with how to arrange your defensive lineman.

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So in the long run, I think he's going to

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>be the big impact player that they expected to be

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>when they took him in the first round, like overall,

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's a little incomplete so far. Yeah, one game

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is is not enough to say for sure. M. Dennis said,

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion, what kind of leash does Winston have?

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>In other words, might he get benched for Fitzpatrick if

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>he and he said something like three picks happens um

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>or does he say he also has Is there no

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>leash at all? Of basically, Winston's it now and you

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>don't go back to fits unless there's an injury in

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>any particular game. I think that it is possible that

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>he could be relieved if it was just going horrendously bad.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I think it would take quite a

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>bit for them to make the switch back on who's

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the starter if there's not an injury involved in any

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>particular In any particular game, you could see it, though.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, things were going horribly badly and he's responsible

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>for four or five turnovers, and you obviously know you

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>have a guy who's proven he can play well sitting

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>there on the bench. It certainly makes some sense that

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he could be called upon. Bryan, that is, I think

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it would be a fairly long leash, and I think

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>would be an extremely long leash, like one of those

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you can put in the middle of your yard to

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>your dog and run the yard for the point of

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this season as a whole. Right, Okay, the second way

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of putting it, um Ethan said, after a great game

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for Philadelphia in week to what has Ryan Smith's role

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>been and in the large picture, where does he fit

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in that secondary He's He did have a game. In fact,

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the coaches said that was his best game as a pro,

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>which is great because you and I both know you

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>need as much cornerback depth as you can possibly get. Um.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>He also got to play a little bit more um

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in this game because they in a number of positions

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>like they took. They let him play for Brent Grimes

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for the second half, and you know, Vitavea played a

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more. Jameis Winston obviously came in, Ronald Jones got deployed,

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Justin Watson got to play a little bit. They took

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity to look at some other guys in a

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>game that you probably weren't going to come back in,

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and so he got another look there, which is good.

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I still think he is currently serving as a reserve,

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and that your guys are Carlton Davis and Brent Grimes.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>With m J. Stewart in the slot. He's not really

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a slot guy. He's an outside guy. So he has

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to unseat either Brent Grimes or Carlton Davis, and he

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly could if he continues to play really well. UM.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, I believe he's still a reserve, but

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>as you know, all these quarterbacks get used at some

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>point or another. UH. Jesse wanted to know what the

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>issue has been with the run game so far. The

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>issue has been it's not very good. UH. Going into

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that game, a lot of it was situational. You know.

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>In the first two games, the passing game was so

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>good right off the bat, Uh, and then when you

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>were running in the second half, it was generally in

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>those four minute drills and the other team knows you're

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>running and trying to run out the clock, and it's hard,

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that's tough sledding to really put up good numbers in

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that situation. UH. In the last couple of games, there's

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit more of an effort, I think

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to establish the running game early and it hasn't gone

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly well. And that is a that is a good question.

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Is another thing that I'm sure is going to be

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a big part of their self scouting this week. I

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think that you're going to see the Buccaneers of

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>two thou eighteen at any point become a particularly balanced offense.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>The running game needs to be better. But when you're

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>passing game is this good and clearly that much better

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>than your running game, You're going to continue to rely

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>on it. That's that's the NFL nowadays. Every team doesn't

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>have to say we have to APUs to run first. Right.

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Twenty years ago, every team would say that, no team

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>would think about throwing it forty five times a game.

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's that's not the way the NFL is anymore.

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And when you can complete sevent of your passes, you know,

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can approximate the some bits of a running

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>game with little screens and so on, you can make

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that work. Um, what's wrong is is it probably one

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of those questions where coach always says, if it was

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing, we would tell you when we would fix it,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and it would be fine. It's probably a combination of

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a number of things. And as well as those guys

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>have passed blocked up until this last game. Perhaps the

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>blocking up front hasn't been very well, and I don't

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>think either of the two main backs have done a

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of making something out of nothing. Um. Tim wanted

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to know if you saw Andrew Adams playing anytime soon

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>our new safety. Yeah, you know, it wasn't a surprise

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that he really wasn't utilized in that game because he

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>had just arrived that week, and so Isaiah. When Jordan

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Whitehead was suddenly unable to go, UM, it made more

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>sense to have Isaiah Johnson, who has been here for

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>two plus years and all through camp. UM. But yeah,

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I could see him once he's learned the uh, the

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>defense because he has good NFL experience and he has

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>more INFL experienced than the other safeties. So yeah, you

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>could certainly see that. Okay, uh Cam Cameron, Yeah says

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>he what's the status on the bow Alan injury? Do

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you think he'll return in Week six against Atlanta? I

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>hope so. And I thought that maybe the fact that

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 1>we released Darrell Worthy yesterday was a sign of that,

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, because that's defensive tackle depth, and you would

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think that would be you'd want to keep your depth around.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>If bow was still going to be out. But then

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>today we signed another defensive tackle, Rakim Nunez roaches and um,

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>so that we're back to the same number defensive tackles.

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that's not a hint on where he is.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>But coach said that it's possible he'll be back. He's

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to give you a lot of real, good, real,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, detailed injury updates, of course, why help the

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>other team. But it is certainly possible. And if you

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>had finally had Bo, I mean Mitch on Ryan sometime

0:09:58.160 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in the future hopefully too. But if you finally had

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that threesome of Bo and Vita and Gerald, that would

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>really be interesting to see how well it can work. Yeah,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point. Douglas wants to know. Has Father

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>time finally caught up to Brent Grimes. You know, I

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>know why that question would be asked. Um, I don't

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think anybody had a good game in Chicago, so you

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>can't say that Brent had a good game and then

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd been play in the second half. So but but

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>let's not get too overwhelmed over small sample size. Let's

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>say we don't know the answer to that yet, and

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I certainly wouldn't make that judgment based on one game. Uh,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas wants to know how long we think O J.

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Howard is going to be out and how that might

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>affect the offense. Yeah, that's one the coach did say,

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was funny because he actually gave them some

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>information that OJ would be out for a couple of weeks,

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and the media was a bit surprising and says, well,

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't tell you if, but the report's already out there.

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So that response leads me to believe that that report

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is accurate. And that report said two to four weeks.

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Coach said at least a couple of weeks. It feels

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like to me, anytime we have one of these, this

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>guy's gonna be at from X number to wide number

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. It usually ends up on why so Um,

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's the pessimist of me, but I'm worried that

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>will be out for four weeks, which is three games,

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>which isn't the end of the world, especially with Kim

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good for it seems like probably for Bow

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and o J. It was good time. There's always somebody

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that the bye week is a good well timed for

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's always someone you wish that the bye week

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was applying for it as well. Um uh. Nicholas also

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>asked when the last time during the season the Bucks

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>made any sort of coordinator change. The only ones I

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>can think of, UM, and they were really kind of

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>like right before the season was UM when Raheem Morris

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>got the job in two thousand nine, is the head coach,

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>and he brought in UM two well established guys coaches

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>have been around a long time, and UM, the defensive

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>coach was Jim Bates and I can't think of the

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>name of the offensive coach, but they made a change

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>on that right before the season, and uh so that

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>was kind of jarring. And then I think at some

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>point they made it change with Jim Bates. But it

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is extremely uncommon And as coach Cutter said, Okay, you

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>want you want to make a change, you want somebody gone, well,

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the next steps, who's next, who's taking over, and

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>who's changing this? And it's not a thing that you

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>usually particularly common or helpful to do that in the

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>middle of the season, right, And yeah, And I think

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that's something to remember that. It almost reminds me the

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>way people talk about that. It reminds me when people

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, just trade for so and so. That

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like the ideas of things being a lot easier than

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they seem in a league of where oh, we'll just

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>trade for so and so, and you're like, but how

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 1>does that work? I would just sign so and so

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and like, there's just so much more to any change

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>on a team. The ramifications of things are right. It's

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not like you just call your buddy up, like give

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>me this guy, cam Brayton Ronald Jones for Levan Bell right,

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Gary wanted to know, do you think Rojoe is going

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to end up getting this starting job. I think it's

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>still possible. I don't think right away. No, Um, Peyton

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>has probably well, I mean, Ronald Jones only has one

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>game other than the preseason to to you know, compare

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the two. Um Peyton pretty solidly has that had that

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>job to start the season, And um, I don't think

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that anything has happened to make that change yet. Now,

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>if ron Join starts giving you explicit plays in the

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>running game, which was the hope when you drafted him,

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and something that we absolutely have not had, if that

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>starts happening, then yeah, of course they would make that change.

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>But it hasn't happened yet, so we'll end on this one.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think, uh, this is an interesting way of

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at things that Ken brought up the idea that

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're relying so much on a passing game and

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't running as much, it doesn't eat up enough clock

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and your defense ends up having to be out there.

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So even when you're doing really well your offensive scoring, scoring, scoring,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's these big chunk plays, your defense can end

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>up being out there for a really long time. We've

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>seen where even though those couple of games at the

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Bucks one they lost the time of possession idea, which

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like, oh, that's fine, it worked out

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>with big plays, But that that does affect your defense

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to a degree, is that's something that you see being

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a factor. There is definitely a factor, and they discussed

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it is like after a Philly game, as you mentioned,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>when you have to seventy five yard one play drives,

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>your defense is right back out there in the field

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and you want that obviously, when you'll take every seventy

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>figure touchdown you can get, but there is that factor

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of them wearing down. But I would argue against the

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>distinction being made here that that's because of the lack

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of a running game. Because like I said, you're you're

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>completing seventy of your passes, you're still keeping the clock running.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And when we were when it was going very well

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in two and most of a third game, you're passing

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>attack is still it's still in addition to those big

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yard plays, it's still putting together some decently

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>long drives and and whether you get the yards by

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>running the ball or by throwing, it doesn't make any differences.

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you I understand, if you're throwing a

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of incompletions, you're stopping the clock a little bit

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>more often. Um, But if you're completing most of your passes,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just as effective in terms of keeping time of

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>possession is running the ball. Okay, well, thank you all

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining us on this edition of Buccaneers Insider Live,

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>presented by Miller Light. We'll be back here next week

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and we are gonna need plenty of your questions. It's

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be the coming off the bye week. We

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>want of the game to talk about it. We can

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, going up to Atlanta, any other

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>generic buccaneer's questions you have to make sure you come

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>back here next week's We can get all your questions answered.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>That's going to do it for us. See you next time.