1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:04,560 Speaker 1: The Action Network podcast named vest Vetting Podcast or radio 2 00:00:04,640 --> 00:00:08,000 Speaker 1: show by the Fantasy Sports and Gaming Association and the 3 00:00:08,160 --> 00:00:14,160 Speaker 1: number one show for the invested sports fan Winna, trick 4 00:00:14,200 --> 00:00:17,599 Speaker 1: your down, h. 5 00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:23,960 Speaker 2: You got real telling, don't concentrate on golf. 6 00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:30,800 Speaker 1: What's up everybody? And welcome once again to the Action 7 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:34,319 Speaker 1: Network podcast, the Golf Edition. I'm Jason Zobel from Golf Bet. 8 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:37,800 Speaker 1: He's Peter Jennings from Fantasy Labs. And this week, if 9 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:40,800 Speaker 1: the last three felt like a little bit of an appetizer, 10 00:00:40,840 --> 00:00:43,720 Speaker 1: this week feels like a big bite into the main 11 00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:48,040 Speaker 1: course of the golf year. The Farmer's Insurance Open at 12 00:00:48,080 --> 00:00:50,560 Speaker 1: torry Pine's always a big event with no football going 13 00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:53,199 Speaker 1: on this weekend? Peedia, what's going on? How have you 14 00:00:53,280 --> 00:00:55,600 Speaker 1: been and how much are you looking forward to this one? 15 00:00:55,840 --> 00:00:58,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's gonna be a great golf tournament. I actually 16 00:00:58,240 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 2: did catch the end of the American Press in between 17 00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:05,800 Speaker 2: commercials of the Chiefs game, so that was a lot 18 00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:08,840 Speaker 2: of fun watching football and catching the end. Can't lay 19 00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:13,360 Speaker 2: with an unbelievable weekend. But Seawou Kim with a nice victory, 20 00:01:13,360 --> 00:01:15,720 Speaker 2: and we've talked a lot about him. You want to 21 00:01:15,760 --> 00:01:17,680 Speaker 2: buy Sea Wu when he's long ger odds because he 22 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:20,120 Speaker 2: can win at any time. When he starts getting to 23 00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:21,880 Speaker 2: be the favorite, that's when I normally get off and 24 00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:24,240 Speaker 2: with the variants in his game. But what a beautiful 25 00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:26,280 Speaker 2: golf swing and a ball striking display that he put 26 00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:26,959 Speaker 2: on last weekend. 27 00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:29,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, first of all, it might have been you, me 28 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:31,800 Speaker 1: and a couple of degenerates listening to this pod. Who 29 00:01:31,800 --> 00:01:34,440 Speaker 1: are the only people actually watching that final round up 30 00:01:34,440 --> 00:01:37,000 Speaker 1: against the AFC Championship game. PJA Tour needs to do 31 00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:40,240 Speaker 1: something about fixing the timing of some of these early 32 00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:43,040 Speaker 1: year tournaments. But other than that, Yeah, Seawou Kim is 33 00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:45,399 Speaker 1: a guy who's really impressed me. We've always known that 34 00:01:45,440 --> 00:01:48,520 Speaker 1: he's got a high ceiling but a low floor. Over 35 00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:50,480 Speaker 1: the past few years. Is a guy that can win 36 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:53,000 Speaker 1: at any given time, but also can shoot seventy eight 37 00:01:53,080 --> 00:01:55,880 Speaker 1: seventy eight be slamming the trunk on a Friday afternoon. 38 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:57,800 Speaker 1: What he's shown us over the last six months or 39 00:01:57,840 --> 00:02:00,400 Speaker 1: so is that he has raised that floor. The high 40 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:03,120 Speaker 1: ceiling still capable of winning, as we just saw this 41 00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:05,960 Speaker 1: past weekend, but he has raised the floor, and I 42 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:08,639 Speaker 1: think that that makes him a lot more valuable when 43 00:02:08,639 --> 00:02:11,440 Speaker 1: we start looking at him moving forward for you know, 44 00:02:11,600 --> 00:02:15,440 Speaker 1: even not just outrights but top ten's top twenties DFS plays. 45 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:19,000 Speaker 1: I think Seawoo becomes a lot more valuable as a 46 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:21,560 Speaker 1: as an option now that he has raised that floor. 47 00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:23,919 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, his ball strangers be really good. I'm 48 00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:25,840 Speaker 2: still I still think there's gonna be a little volatility 49 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 2: in his game, but he's certainly starting to play significantly 50 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:33,840 Speaker 2: better and mentally, I think there's some big improvements. So yeah, 51 00:02:33,919 --> 00:02:36,160 Speaker 2: it's going to be interesting and he's a fun player 52 00:02:36,160 --> 00:02:38,560 Speaker 2: to root for. And yeah, we have a bunch of 53 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:41,160 Speaker 2: really really good players this week, so that's going to 54 00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:42,080 Speaker 2: be a lot of fun as well. 55 00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:44,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, let's move on to this week because last week 56 00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:46,840 Speaker 1: was absolutely awful for me. I apologize to anyone who 57 00:02:46,880 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 1: tried tailing my picks last week. Look, it's been a 58 00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:51,760 Speaker 1: lot of long shots over the past ten years who 59 00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:54,120 Speaker 1: had won the AMEX, and so I tried picking some 60 00:02:54,160 --> 00:02:56,360 Speaker 1: long shots, and we tried picking long shots and they 61 00:02:56,400 --> 00:02:58,840 Speaker 1: don't come through. You look really bad, and so that's 62 00:02:58,840 --> 00:03:00,679 Speaker 1: what I did last week. So to jump back on 63 00:03:00,720 --> 00:03:02,680 Speaker 1: the horse, the great thing about golf is that we 64 00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:04,640 Speaker 1: got a tournament every single week and so if you 65 00:03:04,639 --> 00:03:06,919 Speaker 1: don't come out on top, you don't come out on 66 00:03:06,960 --> 00:03:09,560 Speaker 1: the plus side of things one week. Well a few 67 00:03:09,600 --> 00:03:11,960 Speaker 1: days later you're jumping back in and getting right back 68 00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:14,520 Speaker 1: at it. So cannot wait for this one at Tory Pines. 69 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:17,040 Speaker 1: We've got some weather coming through. I mean, the Tory 70 00:03:17,080 --> 00:03:21,760 Speaker 1: Pines area La Joya is absolutely beautiful when the weather 71 00:03:21,880 --> 00:03:24,160 Speaker 1: is nice. There's no place better. When the weather is 72 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:27,200 Speaker 1: seventy eight with a nice little breeze coming through. It 73 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 1: ain't going to be that this week. It's gonna be 74 00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:31,839 Speaker 1: low sixties with a little wind coming through, a lot 75 00:03:31,840 --> 00:03:35,000 Speaker 1: of rain, especially early in the week moving into Thursday 76 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:37,280 Speaker 1: and Friday. And so when you look at that weather, 77 00:03:37,360 --> 00:03:39,760 Speaker 1: how does that impact some of your plays for this week? 78 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:42,080 Speaker 2: Peter, Well, I think it means that you're gonna have 79 00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:43,880 Speaker 2: to value distance even more of it's going to be 80 00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:46,040 Speaker 2: that cold and the course gets wet. It's already a 81 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:49,160 Speaker 2: course that requires distance. You want the bombers here. And 82 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:52,280 Speaker 2: if the course is going to play damp and cold, 83 00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:55,600 Speaker 2: which temperature has a big impact on the you know 84 00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:58,240 Speaker 2: how far the ball travels. I think it just makes 85 00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:01,240 Speaker 2: a bigger premium on disk. And then you know, if 86 00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:03,040 Speaker 2: we have rain and win. There could be a weather 87 00:04:03,160 --> 00:04:07,040 Speaker 2: edge too in DFS so and obviously betting as well. 88 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:09,400 Speaker 2: So I'm looking at all those things, and I certainly 89 00:04:09,600 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 2: hope there's significant weather because that generally creates more edge 90 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:14,000 Speaker 2: for the sharper handicappers. 91 00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:16,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm completely with you. I think that if you're 92 00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:20,360 Speaker 1: picking guys this week who aren't at least above average 93 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:23,240 Speaker 1: as far as driving distance, as far as distance with 94 00:04:23,320 --> 00:04:26,960 Speaker 1: their irons, which is sort of an underrated stat because 95 00:04:26,960 --> 00:04:28,919 Speaker 1: it's not a stat we look at driving distance. We 96 00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:31,760 Speaker 1: don't look at six iron different distance, we don't look 97 00:04:31,760 --> 00:04:34,920 Speaker 1: at nine iron different distance. And I think that those 98 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:38,000 Speaker 1: things can really help. Mark Leishman is a perfect example, 99 00:04:38,360 --> 00:04:40,599 Speaker 1: the winner of this event last year. He's played well 100 00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:43,839 Speaker 1: here in the past as well. His driving distance isn't fantastic, 101 00:04:43,880 --> 00:04:46,279 Speaker 1: but you look at a big, burly guy and he 102 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:49,160 Speaker 1: hits his irons really long, and so I think that 103 00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:52,000 Speaker 1: that's something we have to take into account, especially this 104 00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:56,240 Speaker 1: week where you know, okay, maybe you know driving distance 105 00:04:56,400 --> 00:04:59,040 Speaker 1: is moderate when it's like one guy's inting at three 106 00:04:59,200 --> 00:05:01,440 Speaker 1: ten and other guys at two ninety five, and one 107 00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:04,200 Speaker 1: guy's considered long and the other guy's considered short, and 108 00:05:04,279 --> 00:05:06,840 Speaker 1: I get it, it's a one club differential. But if 109 00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:09,559 Speaker 1: you could hit a six iron fifteen to twenty yards 110 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:11,760 Speaker 1: longer than some of your peers, I think that makes 111 00:05:12,080 --> 00:05:14,640 Speaker 1: a huge difference. So let's get to the top of 112 00:05:14,640 --> 00:05:16,720 Speaker 1: the board this week, and of course John Rahm is 113 00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:20,760 Speaker 1: the favorite. He's finished first, second, and fifth in three 114 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:24,800 Speaker 1: of his last four starts at this event itself, and 115 00:05:24,880 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 1: so of course got his first PGA Tour victory at 116 00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:31,560 Speaker 1: Tory Pines. Rory mclroy has played only the last two 117 00:05:31,640 --> 00:05:33,920 Speaker 1: years and all he's done is finished third and fifth. 118 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:36,279 Speaker 1: So rightly at the top of the board. Are you 119 00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:39,960 Speaker 1: looking at either of those guys as viable outright picks? 120 00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:41,560 Speaker 1: Of course they can win this week, but are they 121 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:44,760 Speaker 1: viable for you taking them out right at their numbers? 122 00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:49,000 Speaker 2: Rory's really close, and you know, a bullsham on John Ram. 123 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:51,679 Speaker 2: I think it's a little too short of a number. 124 00:05:51,720 --> 00:05:54,320 Speaker 2: But we have a stacked field here and few playing 125 00:05:54,320 --> 00:05:57,360 Speaker 2: well last week. I think he's a fantastic fit here. 126 00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:00,000 Speaker 2: Was hoping that he could get a win last week. 127 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:02,040 Speaker 2: But there's a lot of really good names. If I 128 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:03,400 Speaker 2: had to pick one and B Rory and he did 129 00:06:03,400 --> 00:06:05,840 Speaker 2: play really well last week. He had a really good 130 00:06:05,920 --> 00:06:09,919 Speaker 2: chance to win, but Charrell Hatton one overseas. So for me, 131 00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:12,920 Speaker 2: I am looking I guess a little bit more at Rory, 132 00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 2: who I think should be the favorite over John Am 133 00:06:15,839 --> 00:06:19,159 Speaker 2: considering he's played more recently in his formed from last week. 134 00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:22,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think Ram has two things going against him. 135 00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:24,839 Speaker 1: We talked about the course history being really good, but 136 00:06:25,440 --> 00:06:28,159 Speaker 1: of course just switched to Callaway Clubs at the beginning 137 00:06:28,200 --> 00:06:30,520 Speaker 1: of this year, which just a few weeks ago at 138 00:06:30,520 --> 00:06:33,640 Speaker 1: Coppoluo we were talking about, you know, maybe stay away 139 00:06:33,640 --> 00:06:36,159 Speaker 1: from him for a little bit with switching manufacturers. And 140 00:06:36,160 --> 00:06:37,920 Speaker 1: then the other part is that he was supposed to 141 00:06:37,920 --> 00:06:40,960 Speaker 1: play last week at the Amex and withdrew due to 142 00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:43,120 Speaker 1: what he said was a little tweak of his back 143 00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:45,040 Speaker 1: when he was working in the gym the week before 144 00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:48,000 Speaker 1: and you know, just more of a precautionary measure type 145 00:06:48,040 --> 00:06:51,279 Speaker 1: of thing beforehand. But still the fact that it was 146 00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:54,200 Speaker 1: enough to keep him from playing last week should tell 147 00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:56,120 Speaker 1: us something about going into this week. So let's get 148 00:06:56,160 --> 00:06:58,200 Speaker 1: to the rest of the top tier. You mentioned Tony 149 00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 1: Fenow's name. I mean, it feels like this same old story. 150 00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:04,120 Speaker 1: Pete Fenow fifty four hole co leader, has a chance 151 00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:07,080 Speaker 1: to win, doesn't play badly in the final round, shoots 152 00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:09,560 Speaker 1: sixty eight, missed a couple of short pots, mister Green 153 00:07:09,640 --> 00:07:12,320 Speaker 1: from seventy yards out, and all of a sudden finishes 154 00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:13,880 Speaker 1: in fourth place. And so I know a lot of 155 00:07:13,880 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 1: people are disappointed, discouraged. Feenow doesn't seem like he is 156 00:07:17,040 --> 00:07:20,480 Speaker 1: one of them few. Seems like he is pretty optimistic 157 00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:23,840 Speaker 1: moving forward and he should be here. He has finished 158 00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:25,680 Speaker 1: in the top twenty five and all six of his 159 00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:28,480 Speaker 1: starts at Torry Pines. This is the best course fit 160 00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:31,040 Speaker 1: for Tony fen Now in my mind, of the entire year. 161 00:07:31,120 --> 00:07:34,720 Speaker 1: So I love Fenw this week top five, top ten, 162 00:07:34,800 --> 00:07:36,800 Speaker 1: top twenty props. I will tell you for those who 163 00:07:36,880 --> 00:07:39,280 Speaker 1: are going to watch the gimme on Wednesday evening, I 164 00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:44,400 Speaker 1: will be very heavily invested in those Feenow props. Some 165 00:07:44,400 --> 00:07:47,160 Speaker 1: of the guys Patrick Reid, I don't mind Xander Schoffley's 166 00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:49,520 Speaker 1: got sort of a weird record at this being his 167 00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:52,080 Speaker 1: hometown event. At some point he's going to bust out 168 00:07:52,080 --> 00:07:54,760 Speaker 1: here though, because of course, really does fit him pretty well. 169 00:07:54,800 --> 00:07:58,120 Speaker 1: Harris English one at Coppolua Brooks Keepka, who knows what's 170 00:07:58,120 --> 00:08:00,240 Speaker 1: going on with him. It was just reported that he 171 00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:04,320 Speaker 1: has moved away from swing coach Claude Harmon third. Getting 172 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:07,240 Speaker 1: down a little bit more Handicki Matsuyama, there's my favorite 173 00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:11,120 Speaker 1: outright pick. I think that if Heidiki can put just average, 174 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:13,360 Speaker 1: maybe a little bit above average, he has a really 175 00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:16,400 Speaker 1: good chance of winning. That ball striking has been really solid. 176 00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:19,600 Speaker 1: He puts better on Poanna anybody else in this top 177 00:08:19,640 --> 00:08:21,400 Speaker 1: tier that you're looking at Pete where you say, you know, 178 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:24,360 Speaker 1: that's my guy, That's where I'm putting a decent amount 179 00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:25,000 Speaker 1: of my investment. 180 00:08:25,240 --> 00:08:27,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I Alexander a lot. I think he's 181 00:08:27,320 --> 00:08:29,720 Speaker 2: properly priced, kind of at twelve to one range, which 182 00:08:29,880 --> 00:08:32,880 Speaker 2: you know, basically everyone else I'm showing his negative value 183 00:08:32,920 --> 00:08:36,040 Speaker 2: at the top. I think Rory is basically properly priced, 184 00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:40,000 Speaker 2: and Xander's properly priced showing less value. I think the 185 00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:42,679 Speaker 2: markets I've actually done a really good job this week 186 00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:46,240 Speaker 2: with how they're priced here on Tuesday morning, not as 187 00:08:46,320 --> 00:08:49,199 Speaker 2: much value as we normally see. So hoping the weather 188 00:08:49,280 --> 00:08:51,319 Speaker 2: might shake some things out and give us some edges 189 00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:54,200 Speaker 2: based on tea times, But yeah, I don't see much value, 190 00:08:54,200 --> 00:08:55,960 Speaker 2: and I think the order is right. I mean I 191 00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:58,200 Speaker 2: think it should be. I think Rory and Rom should 192 00:08:58,200 --> 00:09:00,240 Speaker 2: be flipped thing Xander and then female and it's a 193 00:09:00,280 --> 00:09:03,680 Speaker 2: clear top four and then you get it to the 194 00:09:03,760 --> 00:09:07,040 Speaker 2: range of a bunch of guys. I think Kepta's priced badly. 195 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:09,960 Speaker 2: I'd love to fade Kepka if I could. But yeah, 196 00:09:10,080 --> 00:09:14,920 Speaker 2: Matsuyama english in. I like Adam Scott This week, we'll 197 00:09:14,920 --> 00:09:18,080 Speaker 2: see how Jason Day looks. Scottie Scheffler had a you know, 198 00:09:18,720 --> 00:09:23,840 Speaker 2: frustrating miscut on the number, Cameron Smith, Victor Hobblin get 199 00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:25,679 Speaker 2: you a little farther down. Someone that I'm actually pretty 200 00:09:25,720 --> 00:09:28,720 Speaker 2: encouraged by is Ricky Fowler and his stats last week, 201 00:09:28,840 --> 00:09:32,240 Speaker 2: So I'm interested in Ricky. I mean, Matthew Wolfe has 202 00:09:32,280 --> 00:09:34,080 Speaker 2: got some really short odds, but this could be a 203 00:09:34,080 --> 00:09:36,920 Speaker 2: good course for him. Gary Woodland came back and looked 204 00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:41,199 Speaker 2: at healthier Charlie Hoffman. I certainly am interested in. So 205 00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:44,680 Speaker 2: a lot of names kind of in that tie mid 206 00:09:44,720 --> 00:09:47,800 Speaker 2: tier where I see a little bit more value, but 207 00:09:48,360 --> 00:09:51,120 Speaker 2: it is tough to find guys that are going I 208 00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:52,520 Speaker 2: think they've done a really good job with the markets 209 00:09:52,520 --> 00:09:52,880 Speaker 2: this week. 210 00:09:53,400 --> 00:09:56,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree with all of that. I think one 211 00:09:56,040 --> 00:09:58,199 Speaker 1: of the themes that we've seen over the first few weeks 212 00:09:58,280 --> 00:10:02,440 Speaker 1: is that the guys that Sony who had played the 213 00:10:02,440 --> 00:10:05,120 Speaker 1: week before at the Century Tournament of Champions a Kapoloa, 214 00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:08,200 Speaker 1: tended to have an advantage. We saw Kevin Nas the 215 00:10:08,200 --> 00:10:10,760 Speaker 1: winner that week. Kevin Na had played the week before, 216 00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:13,320 Speaker 1: just got those competitive juices flowing just a little bit 217 00:10:13,800 --> 00:10:16,760 Speaker 1: and parlayed that into a victory the next week. Last 218 00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:20,760 Speaker 1: week at the Amex, the guys who had played already, 219 00:10:20,800 --> 00:10:22,280 Speaker 1: I mean, some of the guys I like last week, 220 00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:25,360 Speaker 1: Aaron Wise missed the cut. Doc Redman didn't play very 221 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:27,439 Speaker 1: well at all, near the bottom of those who made the. 222 00:10:27,360 --> 00:10:33,720 Speaker 3: Cut, Doc Redman, Doctor Doctor. 223 00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:39,360 Speaker 1: Any of the new Who's Gotta Days even you hadn't 224 00:10:39,400 --> 00:10:41,760 Speaker 1: played yet in twenty twenty one, and it seemed to 225 00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:44,400 Speaker 1: favor the guys who at least had played one, if 226 00:10:44,440 --> 00:10:48,120 Speaker 1: not both, of the Hawaii Swing events. And so a 227 00:10:48,160 --> 00:10:51,440 Speaker 1: few guys that ostensibly we should like. This week you 228 00:10:51,520 --> 00:10:54,280 Speaker 1: mentioned Jason Day's name, He's a two time champion here. 229 00:10:54,559 --> 00:10:57,840 Speaker 1: Bubba Watson has a really nice record here. Dylan Fortelly, 230 00:10:57,880 --> 00:11:00,040 Speaker 1: I think is a really good course fit. None of 231 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:03,440 Speaker 1: those guys have played yet in twenty twenty one. Does 232 00:11:03,520 --> 00:11:06,240 Speaker 1: that take you off of them just a little bit? 233 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:08,680 Speaker 1: Are you giving a little more value, a little more 234 00:11:09,440 --> 00:11:12,680 Speaker 1: reason to take a guy who's already played at least 235 00:11:12,679 --> 00:11:13,400 Speaker 1: once this year? 236 00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:16,520 Speaker 2: Oh for sure. I mean I've've talked about the podcast. 237 00:11:16,559 --> 00:11:19,400 Speaker 2: I think you know, one indicator that has a ton 238 00:11:19,440 --> 00:11:22,120 Speaker 2: of signal is guys having competitive rounds of golf. So 239 00:11:22,440 --> 00:11:25,480 Speaker 2: I want guys who have played recently. I want guys to, 240 00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:28,280 Speaker 2: you know, for sure at least have one event, And 241 00:11:28,559 --> 00:11:31,080 Speaker 2: just looking through the guys who have played the most 242 00:11:31,080 --> 00:11:33,640 Speaker 2: are actually popping a little bit more for me. So 243 00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:35,920 Speaker 2: I think that's a really good point. And we do 244 00:11:35,960 --> 00:11:38,439 Speaker 2: have a very clear course fit here that's going to 245 00:11:38,440 --> 00:11:42,400 Speaker 2: be dramatic, especially with the rain and the cooler conditions 246 00:11:42,600 --> 00:11:44,600 Speaker 2: and dfs. You might be able to get away with 247 00:11:45,320 --> 00:11:47,959 Speaker 2: taking you know, some of these accuracy guys and hopes 248 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:52,000 Speaker 2: that you get them really loaned. But it is interesting. 249 00:11:52,520 --> 00:11:55,079 Speaker 2: I do think there's some value as we get farther down. 250 00:11:56,520 --> 00:11:56,880 Speaker 1: Yeah. 251 00:11:57,400 --> 00:12:01,600 Speaker 2: My favorite pick I think farther down is Patrick Rogers, 252 00:12:01,600 --> 00:12:04,120 Speaker 2: who I think has a great course fit here. You know, 253 00:12:04,120 --> 00:12:06,720 Speaker 2: he's kind of in that like two hundred to one range. 254 00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:09,760 Speaker 2: I think he should be lower odds than that. I'm 255 00:12:09,800 --> 00:12:13,920 Speaker 2: still interested in Wyndham Clark, who was disappointing, but I 256 00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:18,440 Speaker 2: think he's interesting. I'm somewhat interested in Carlos Ortiz. I 257 00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:20,480 Speaker 2: think he's another interesting one. But there's a lot of 258 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:22,920 Speaker 2: really good names kind of in this mid tier. You know, 259 00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:27,240 Speaker 2: guys like Jason Kokrat, Luke Litz, Bubba Watson, who I 260 00:12:27,240 --> 00:12:32,040 Speaker 2: know doesn't have the best history, but there's he's only one. 261 00:12:32,080 --> 00:12:34,160 Speaker 2: I think he had bad history him as a negative. 262 00:12:34,200 --> 00:12:37,240 Speaker 1: No, no solid history here, yeah, play he took a 263 00:12:37,280 --> 00:12:39,360 Speaker 1: bunch of years off solid history here. 264 00:12:39,600 --> 00:12:41,760 Speaker 2: Okay, he took a bunch of So I'm just looking 265 00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:44,680 Speaker 2: at my spreadsheet right now, so apologies for uh for 266 00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:47,880 Speaker 2: my My history metric on him is actually not that 267 00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:50,160 Speaker 2: great because he probably the time taking off with the 268 00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:52,200 Speaker 2: fact that he won, and he should be a good 269 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:55,080 Speaker 2: course fit. My course fit for him is solid. So yeah, yeah, 270 00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:57,360 Speaker 2: there's a lot of names in this mid tier, even 271 00:12:57,360 --> 00:12:59,600 Speaker 2: guys were talking about before, like Will's Alex Forrest. I'm 272 00:12:59,640 --> 00:13:03,360 Speaker 2: in just see how he plays. Emilianobrio was really playing well, 273 00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:06,000 Speaker 2: was leading last week at times. So I see a 274 00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:08,040 Speaker 2: ton of interesting names you have a favorite kind of 275 00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:09,320 Speaker 2: in this mid to bottom tier. 276 00:13:09,880 --> 00:13:11,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean it always depends where we kind of 277 00:13:11,760 --> 00:13:13,880 Speaker 1: cut off the mid tier, and you know, the lines 278 00:13:13,920 --> 00:13:16,320 Speaker 1: are blurred from mid tier to bottom tier. Sort of 279 00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:18,079 Speaker 1: mid tier. I mean some of the guys that like 280 00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:21,120 Speaker 1: Ryan Palmer, who was in a playoff year three years 281 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:23,880 Speaker 1: ago then finished thirteenth twenty first the last two years. 282 00:13:23,880 --> 00:13:26,439 Speaker 1: He's sort of a coarse fit kind of guy. When 283 00:13:26,480 --> 00:13:28,640 Speaker 1: he gets a course that he likes, he tends to 284 00:13:28,640 --> 00:13:32,160 Speaker 1: play there, play well there every single year. Cameron Davis 285 00:13:32,400 --> 00:13:34,439 Speaker 1: coming off a really good finish, I expect him to 286 00:13:34,480 --> 00:13:37,120 Speaker 1: be really popular in DFS, but he's a guy that 287 00:13:37,200 --> 00:13:40,199 Speaker 1: should continue playing well. Hits it a long way. Gary Woodland, 288 00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 1: you mentioned really like him. Taylor Gooch is a guy 289 00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:46,120 Speaker 1: that's gonna be another popular play this week, but for 290 00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:48,520 Speaker 1: good reason. Charlie Hoffman I think a lot of people 291 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:50,440 Speaker 1: are going to jump off of because he withdrew in 292 00:13:50,440 --> 00:13:52,480 Speaker 1: the third round last week with a back injury, but 293 00:13:52,800 --> 00:13:55,400 Speaker 1: seems like he's fine. He's back home where he grew 294 00:13:55,480 --> 00:13:58,320 Speaker 1: up playing golf, and so I think Charlie Hoffman could 295 00:13:58,360 --> 00:14:00,880 Speaker 1: be a very strong play this week, especially if he's 296 00:14:01,080 --> 00:14:04,400 Speaker 1: a little bit lower owned for DFS purposes, and we 297 00:14:04,440 --> 00:14:07,520 Speaker 1: get down some names. I'll sort of break that off 298 00:14:07,600 --> 00:14:09,480 Speaker 1: from mid tier to lower tier, and then we get 299 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:12,640 Speaker 1: to Maxhoma, who I expect to bounce back from a 300 00:14:12,720 --> 00:14:15,800 Speaker 1: really disappointing final round. He was a fifty four hole 301 00:14:15,840 --> 00:14:19,280 Speaker 1: co leader alongside Sea Wu and Fenaw and shot seventy 302 00:14:19,320 --> 00:14:21,800 Speaker 1: six to finish T twenty one. Can you imagine having 303 00:14:21,840 --> 00:14:25,040 Speaker 1: a Max Homa top twenty ticket this past week. You 304 00:14:25,120 --> 00:14:27,240 Speaker 1: sit there going into Sunday saying, all right, we're tied 305 00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:29,200 Speaker 1: for the lead. I mean this is I'll cash this. 306 00:14:29,280 --> 00:14:31,480 Speaker 1: I'll start spending the money now, and all of a 307 00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:34,240 Speaker 1: sudden you do not cash that one. I mentioned Dylan 308 00:14:34,240 --> 00:14:38,200 Speaker 1: for Telly, really good course fit, just worried a little 309 00:14:38,200 --> 00:14:40,520 Speaker 1: bit that he hasn't played yet this year. Going down 310 00:14:40,520 --> 00:14:44,160 Speaker 1: the list a little bit further, James Hahn has played 311 00:14:44,200 --> 00:14:47,360 Speaker 1: really well lately. James Han has won at Riviera. James 312 00:14:47,360 --> 00:14:49,800 Speaker 1: Han is a guy that every once in a while, 313 00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:54,240 Speaker 1: every few years at a big course against a big field, 314 00:14:54,360 --> 00:14:57,120 Speaker 1: James Han can step up and play some really good golf. 315 00:14:57,200 --> 00:15:00,560 Speaker 1: So he's a guy that I'm targeting. John Han. I 316 00:15:00,600 --> 00:15:04,320 Speaker 1: mentioned last week. I thought John ha was extremely overvalued 317 00:15:04,360 --> 00:15:07,000 Speaker 1: in the marketplace. He finished in twenty first place. He 318 00:15:07,040 --> 00:15:09,680 Speaker 1: didn't play badly. He's got a nice track record at 319 00:15:09,680 --> 00:15:12,120 Speaker 1: Tory Pines, and so you look at John Haw and 320 00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:14,600 Speaker 1: now I think he's valued right. I think he's priced right, 321 00:15:14,640 --> 00:15:17,000 Speaker 1: and so I think that John Haw could be a 322 00:15:17,360 --> 00:15:20,160 Speaker 1: pretty good player this week. Luke list you usually like 323 00:15:20,200 --> 00:15:23,880 Speaker 1: and then you mentioned my guy as far as one 324 00:15:24,080 --> 00:15:26,480 Speaker 1: major sort of long shot. If I could only take 325 00:15:26,520 --> 00:15:29,480 Speaker 1: one guy and throw a dart, Wyndham Clark is going 326 00:15:29,520 --> 00:15:31,520 Speaker 1: to do some damage over the next four to six 327 00:15:31,600 --> 00:15:34,320 Speaker 1: weeks on the West Coast Swing. And he's a guy 328 00:15:34,360 --> 00:15:36,040 Speaker 1: that you know, we can look at all the analytics, 329 00:15:36,040 --> 00:15:38,080 Speaker 1: look at all the stats. I break it down to this, 330 00:15:38,480 --> 00:15:40,280 Speaker 1: he hits the ball a long way and makes a 331 00:15:40,280 --> 00:15:43,840 Speaker 1: lot of putts. At some point, everything in between those 332 00:15:43,880 --> 00:15:47,240 Speaker 1: things is going to come together and he's going to 333 00:15:47,840 --> 00:15:51,000 Speaker 1: start finding himself on leaderboards and maybe even win a 334 00:15:51,000 --> 00:15:53,480 Speaker 1: tournament at some point. So hopefully this is the week 335 00:15:53,480 --> 00:15:54,240 Speaker 1: for Wyndham Clark. 336 00:15:55,080 --> 00:15:57,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I mentioned I love Wyndham Clark putts. 337 00:15:57,480 --> 00:16:00,280 Speaker 2: It's so good, hits it so far in between is 338 00:16:00,280 --> 00:16:02,360 Speaker 2: a little concerning. But if you could get that stuff 339 00:16:02,400 --> 00:16:06,520 Speaker 2: really clicking. I think there's a tremendous upside in Wyndham Clark. 340 00:16:07,240 --> 00:16:09,560 Speaker 4: Hope you're enjoying this great action network podcast. I want 341 00:16:09,600 --> 00:16:12,160 Speaker 4: to make sure you know about the Locked On podcast network. 342 00:16:12,200 --> 00:16:15,120 Speaker 4: Locked On as a daily podcast on your favorite team. 343 00:16:15,240 --> 00:16:17,640 Speaker 1: Welcome to you, Lockdown forty nine ers. You are lockedown 344 00:16:17,640 --> 00:16:18,480 Speaker 1: of the Dallas marriage. 345 00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:20,520 Speaker 2: We came, everybody to the Lockdown Lakers podcast. 346 00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:21,280 Speaker 1: Let's go. 347 00:16:21,560 --> 00:16:24,440 Speaker 4: Locked On podcasts are hosted by the local experts who 348 00:16:24,520 --> 00:16:26,760 Speaker 4: know your team better than anyone and give you the 349 00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:29,600 Speaker 4: inside scoop. So go to your podcast app and search 350 00:16:29,760 --> 00:16:34,080 Speaker 4: locked on your favorite team, subscribe to your locked on podcast. 351 00:16:36,960 --> 00:16:39,040 Speaker 2: Let's do the five questions five questions under five minutes 352 00:16:39,080 --> 00:16:40,160 Speaker 2: and get tour dfs lineup. 353 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:41,240 Speaker 1: All right, let's do it. 354 00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:44,400 Speaker 2: Okay, Well we have a fun one. I'm actually really excited. 355 00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:49,760 Speaker 1: About five minutes, five questions. You never asked. 356 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:51,280 Speaker 2: I gotta be honest with you. 357 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:54,560 Speaker 1: I get a little irritated when somebody called me away 358 00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:58,800 Speaker 1: from my golf. This is five Under with Jason Silbel 359 00:16:58,960 --> 00:16:59,920 Speaker 1: and Peter Jenning. 360 00:17:01,840 --> 00:17:05,440 Speaker 2: Super Bowl addition, we have the Super Bowl coming and 361 00:17:05,480 --> 00:17:08,199 Speaker 2: my first question is do you bet Super Bowl props? 362 00:17:08,240 --> 00:17:10,080 Speaker 2: And if you looked at any Super Bowl props yet. 363 00:17:10,600 --> 00:17:12,879 Speaker 1: I will I bet everything. You know that, Peter, I 364 00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:16,240 Speaker 1: bet everything. I will bet everything. And I have not 365 00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:19,880 Speaker 1: completely looked yet. I need to. I need to look 366 00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:21,879 Speaker 1: at everything on Fantasy labs. I need to look at 367 00:17:21,880 --> 00:17:23,680 Speaker 1: all our Action Network stuff. I mean, come on, I 368 00:17:23,720 --> 00:17:26,440 Speaker 1: can't just blindly jump into this a week and a 369 00:17:26,440 --> 00:17:28,680 Speaker 1: half ahead of time. So I got to do my research. 370 00:17:28,760 --> 00:17:32,600 Speaker 1: But yes, I will get into some. Do I have 371 00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:34,639 Speaker 1: a good one right now? Let me pick out a 372 00:17:34,680 --> 00:17:38,640 Speaker 1: good one. How about Tyreek hill Over on receiving yards. 373 00:17:38,640 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 1: I think he's just going to torch the Buccaneers defense. 374 00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:41,240 Speaker 1: How does that sound? 375 00:17:41,359 --> 00:17:44,640 Speaker 2: Okay? I like it. Did you play any Showdown last year? 376 00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:48,800 Speaker 2: And have you've seen the contests for DraftKings and Fan 377 00:17:48,920 --> 00:17:53,320 Speaker 2: Duel and now Super Draft has some really big contests 378 00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:56,639 Speaker 2: as well, so multiple chances to win a million bucks 379 00:17:57,119 --> 00:17:58,680 Speaker 2: in a DFS contest with Super Bowl. 380 00:17:59,240 --> 00:18:01,920 Speaker 1: I'm sure I played Showdown lineups for the Super Bowl 381 00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:05,200 Speaker 1: last year. I guarantee I did. I don't remember what 382 00:18:05,320 --> 00:18:08,000 Speaker 1: I played because I'm sure I didn't cash much on it. 383 00:18:08,040 --> 00:18:10,159 Speaker 1: But yes, of course I will jump back in on 384 00:18:10,200 --> 00:18:14,119 Speaker 1: those again, recurring theme, there's not much that I pass up. 385 00:18:14,280 --> 00:18:17,000 Speaker 1: You know, I'm sitting there looking at hockey lineups for 386 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:20,119 Speaker 1: tonight right now on both DraftKings and Fandle, so you 387 00:18:20,200 --> 00:18:23,320 Speaker 1: know me, I'm not bypassing anything if they're available. 388 00:18:23,520 --> 00:18:25,239 Speaker 2: All right, I love it, all right enough with the 389 00:18:25,960 --> 00:18:29,680 Speaker 2: advertisements for Fantasy Labs and Action Network and Action Labs 390 00:18:29,680 --> 00:18:32,040 Speaker 2: and everything, which are going to be great. I'm really 391 00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:34,960 Speaker 2: excited about all the opportunity in the Super Bowl. I 392 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:38,440 Speaker 2: think there's tremendous edges to be had in dfs and 393 00:18:38,480 --> 00:18:41,680 Speaker 2: in betting props. But more fun questions, what's your favorite 394 00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:43,040 Speaker 2: Super Bowl commercial ever? 395 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:45,760 Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm thinking like some of those old Budweiser, 396 00:18:46,040 --> 00:18:48,040 Speaker 1: like the Budweiser frogs were probably like that was a 397 00:18:48,040 --> 00:18:49,359 Speaker 1: super Bowl commercial, wasn't it. 398 00:18:49,800 --> 00:18:52,960 Speaker 2: Of Course Betty White with the Snickers in twenty ten 399 00:18:53,040 --> 00:18:55,200 Speaker 2: was one that I went back and watched. That's pretty fun, 400 00:18:55,480 --> 00:19:00,960 Speaker 2: all right. Next question is is Tom Brady the goat 401 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:01,520 Speaker 2: in your mind? 402 00:19:02,040 --> 00:19:04,280 Speaker 1: Oh? No doubt about it. And I say this as 403 00:19:04,280 --> 00:19:07,960 Speaker 1: a New England Patriots fan who pretended for half the 404 00:19:08,040 --> 00:19:10,560 Speaker 1: year that I had never even heard of Tom Brady 405 00:19:10,560 --> 00:19:13,840 Speaker 1: and Cam Newton and Brian Hoyer and Jarrett Stidham were 406 00:19:13,880 --> 00:19:17,480 Speaker 1: all superior quarterbacks to Brady, and they were going to 407 00:19:17,760 --> 00:19:21,200 Speaker 1: lift the Patriots once again to the Promised Land. And yes, 408 00:19:21,280 --> 00:19:25,399 Speaker 1: I but yes, as a huge Brady fanboy for the 409 00:19:25,400 --> 00:19:28,439 Speaker 1: past twenty years and someone who tried to largely ignore 410 00:19:28,520 --> 00:19:30,680 Speaker 1: him for part of the year, I will absolutely admit 411 00:19:30,720 --> 00:19:35,040 Speaker 1: that he is the goat. And it's probably not close, honestly. 412 00:19:35,680 --> 00:19:39,400 Speaker 2: All right, last question, The line's kind of teetering here, 413 00:19:40,000 --> 00:19:43,320 Speaker 2: So yeah, I'll give you multiple choice options. 414 00:19:43,720 --> 00:19:45,880 Speaker 3: You can bet Kansas City minus three and a half 415 00:19:45,960 --> 00:19:48,879 Speaker 3: plus one hundred, You bet Tampa Bay plus three and 416 00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:51,680 Speaker 3: a half minus one twenty ish looking at the action 417 00:19:51,880 --> 00:19:54,600 Speaker 3: for odds right now, or you can get closer. 418 00:19:54,920 --> 00:19:58,480 Speaker 2: If it's three, then you're having to pay more juice. 419 00:19:58,520 --> 00:20:01,119 Speaker 2: On Kansas City, you're getting better than on Tampa Bay 420 00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:04,199 Speaker 2: out of those four. And I asked you can if 421 00:20:04,240 --> 00:20:05,600 Speaker 2: you know you want, If you want to say money 422 00:20:05,640 --> 00:20:08,280 Speaker 2: line too, I'm fine with that. So you got three 423 00:20:08,320 --> 00:20:11,280 Speaker 2: and a half three or money line. What side are 424 00:20:11,320 --> 00:20:13,480 Speaker 2: you taking right now? Jason? You have to make a 425 00:20:13,520 --> 00:20:14,760 Speaker 2: bet right now? What are you taking? 426 00:20:14,920 --> 00:20:17,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'd probably buy the half point and take the 427 00:20:17,640 --> 00:20:22,240 Speaker 1: Chiefs at minus three. I don't like teasing through zero. 428 00:20:22,280 --> 00:20:24,840 Speaker 1: Here's the problem with only having one games that I 429 00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:28,000 Speaker 1: can't tease with nine other things going on and try 430 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:30,160 Speaker 1: to find some value and move the lines a little bit. 431 00:20:30,200 --> 00:20:32,879 Speaker 1: So yeah, I think Chiefs minus three is the right number. 432 00:20:32,920 --> 00:20:35,920 Speaker 1: But betting ainst Brady doesn't feel very good at home either. 433 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:40,320 Speaker 2: Brady is at home, and I think the most underrated element. 434 00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:43,199 Speaker 2: And trust me, I love Mahomes, but man Fisher going 435 00:20:43,240 --> 00:20:45,800 Speaker 2: down with the Achilles injury is brutal, and the Chiefs 436 00:20:45,800 --> 00:20:48,880 Speaker 2: were already thin at the offensive line. So my biggest 437 00:20:48,920 --> 00:20:53,040 Speaker 2: concern is if you're back in the Chiefs is dobinsive line. 438 00:20:53,160 --> 00:20:56,240 Speaker 2: If I'm back in Tampa Bay, betting against Mahomes feels 439 00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:59,480 Speaker 2: really stupid as someone who bet on the Bills last week, 440 00:21:00,560 --> 00:21:03,200 Speaker 2: and I've almost always bet on Kansas City. But there's 441 00:21:03,200 --> 00:21:05,120 Speaker 2: what it is, all right, there's a five Questions Super 442 00:21:05,119 --> 00:21:05,560 Speaker 2: Bowl edition. 443 00:21:07,880 --> 00:21:12,080 Speaker 1: We want to be a DFS millionaire. You're just one lineup away. 444 00:21:12,520 --> 00:21:15,320 Speaker 1: We're gonna go with him, and you're gonna play better 445 00:21:15,359 --> 00:21:16,359 Speaker 1: than you ever dreamed of. 446 00:21:16,760 --> 00:21:19,159 Speaker 2: God, that's what I demanded of you. 447 00:21:19,760 --> 00:21:24,439 Speaker 1: So let's get drafting, all right, Let's get to our 448 00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:27,800 Speaker 1: ultimate DFS lineup. That we do every week, and this 449 00:21:27,840 --> 00:21:29,479 Speaker 1: one is going to be interesting because I think there 450 00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:31,600 Speaker 1: are a lot of ways to go. If you want 451 00:21:31,600 --> 00:21:34,080 Speaker 1: to try to get rom and or Rory in this lineup, 452 00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:36,840 Speaker 1: you gotta go pretty deep to find some long shots 453 00:21:36,840 --> 00:21:39,240 Speaker 1: in there, or you could play a little more balanced lineup. 454 00:21:39,280 --> 00:21:42,240 Speaker 1: So while you kick things off, Peter and see where 455 00:21:42,280 --> 00:21:43,960 Speaker 1: are you going with your first pick here this week? 456 00:21:44,240 --> 00:21:46,959 Speaker 2: Okay, I think there's two guys that I really love 457 00:21:47,040 --> 00:21:49,040 Speaker 2: from a value perspective at the top of DFS, So 458 00:21:49,040 --> 00:21:50,679 Speaker 2: I'm gonna spend money off the bat. I'm gonna go 459 00:21:50,680 --> 00:21:53,800 Speaker 2: with Rory who I think. I mean, it was so 460 00:21:53,840 --> 00:21:57,240 Speaker 2: disappointing to see how he played last year and he 461 00:21:57,280 --> 00:21:59,800 Speaker 2: didn't even play like you go through and you're like, man, 462 00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:03,080 Speaker 2: I had such a disappointing season after the you know, 463 00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:06,800 Speaker 2: the COVID break. He may ever cut after the COVID stretch, 464 00:22:06,920 --> 00:22:10,080 Speaker 2: just wasn't winning, and it was just little things that, 465 00:22:10,160 --> 00:22:15,080 Speaker 2: like his ball striking stats were still pretty elite, very elite, honestly, 466 00:22:15,640 --> 00:22:18,160 Speaker 2: just didn't kind of put it together. And he talked 467 00:22:18,160 --> 00:22:21,840 Speaker 2: about how the motivation and he really likes the crowd, 468 00:22:22,600 --> 00:22:24,679 Speaker 2: which obviously is not going to be relevant this week, 469 00:22:25,160 --> 00:22:28,480 Speaker 2: but man, his performance last week got me interested. I 470 00:22:28,520 --> 00:22:32,040 Speaker 2: feel like this twenty twenty one calendar year is going 471 00:22:32,119 --> 00:22:35,359 Speaker 2: to be extremely good for Rory McRoy, so he should 472 00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:37,119 Speaker 2: be a favorite in my mind, and you're getting him 473 00:22:37,119 --> 00:22:39,560 Speaker 2: three hundred cheaper than John Rahm. I also really like 474 00:22:39,680 --> 00:22:41,760 Speaker 2: Xander at ten four, who I think should be the 475 00:22:41,800 --> 00:22:44,280 Speaker 2: third most expensive, so at the top of the board. 476 00:22:44,320 --> 00:22:46,359 Speaker 2: I like those two for value, and maybe Fenale is 477 00:22:46,359 --> 00:22:49,000 Speaker 2: the contrarian pick, but yeah, I'm gonna. 478 00:22:48,800 --> 00:22:51,000 Speaker 1: Start with Rory. Oh see, I think Feenal is sort 479 00:22:51,040 --> 00:22:52,879 Speaker 1: of a popular pick this week. I think Female is 480 00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:54,159 Speaker 1: a guy that's going to be on a lot of 481 00:22:54,240 --> 00:22:55,920 Speaker 1: radar screens. I like him a lot. 482 00:22:56,080 --> 00:22:58,040 Speaker 2: He should be popular. The only reason I'm saying that 483 00:22:58,160 --> 00:22:59,919 Speaker 2: I don't think he's gonna be like under owned. But 484 00:23:00,359 --> 00:23:02,280 Speaker 2: people are gonna look at the odds and they're gonna 485 00:23:02,280 --> 00:23:05,200 Speaker 2: see Xander's twelve to one and Tony seventeen to one 486 00:23:05,600 --> 00:23:08,959 Speaker 2: and Tony's three hundred. More so more so in high stakes. 487 00:23:08,960 --> 00:23:11,160 Speaker 2: I think Tony fen Now might be a little bit sneaky, 488 00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:12,280 Speaker 2: but not super sneaky. 489 00:23:12,600 --> 00:23:15,200 Speaker 1: I think course history throws a lot of people off 490 00:23:15,280 --> 00:23:17,919 Speaker 1: the Xander scent this week he's played five times at 491 00:23:17,960 --> 00:23:21,840 Speaker 1: Tory Pines, has a t twenty five and four miss cuts. Sure, 492 00:23:22,000 --> 00:23:23,680 Speaker 1: he said he doesn't really understand it. I found a 493 00:23:23,720 --> 00:23:26,400 Speaker 1: quote from him last year saying, I love it here. 494 00:23:26,520 --> 00:23:29,840 Speaker 1: It's home, I live twenty minutes away. I think it's awesome. 495 00:23:29,880 --> 00:23:32,480 Speaker 1: I just haven't played well here yet, but it shows 496 00:23:32,480 --> 00:23:35,080 Speaker 1: how much I love this tournament, in this course, because 497 00:23:35,080 --> 00:23:37,600 Speaker 1: I keep coming back every year. So let's make a 498 00:23:37,640 --> 00:23:38,960 Speaker 1: little bit. I think this is going to be a 499 00:23:39,080 --> 00:23:42,000 Speaker 1: very contrarian lineup to start, so I will throw Xander 500 00:23:42,000 --> 00:23:43,919 Speaker 1: in there. Mentioned him in my column this week. I 501 00:23:43,920 --> 00:23:46,160 Speaker 1: think he's a really nice oad play if you're playing 502 00:23:46,160 --> 00:23:49,440 Speaker 1: one and done pools, because not many, if anybody else 503 00:23:49,480 --> 00:23:51,760 Speaker 1: in your pool's gonna have Xander. So I think there's 504 00:23:51,760 --> 00:23:53,440 Speaker 1: a lot of value there. So we've got Rory and 505 00:23:53,520 --> 00:23:55,919 Speaker 1: Xander to start. And now we've only got seventy one 506 00:23:55,960 --> 00:23:57,800 Speaker 1: to fifty per man left for the last four, so 507 00:23:57,880 --> 00:23:58,879 Speaker 1: we've got to do some digging. 508 00:24:00,000 --> 00:24:03,320 Speaker 2: No problem. I am totally fine doing some big in's. 509 00:24:04,320 --> 00:24:06,479 Speaker 2: Let's throw out. This is a unique one, and I'm 510 00:24:06,520 --> 00:24:08,239 Speaker 2: curious your opinion. We didn't talk about him at all, 511 00:24:08,240 --> 00:24:11,520 Speaker 2: but big beautiful Harry Higgs. I'm throwing him in the 512 00:24:11,560 --> 00:24:14,080 Speaker 2: lineup at a fun price of sixty nine hundred. I 513 00:24:14,080 --> 00:24:17,000 Speaker 2: feel like a lot of things working there start to 514 00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:19,880 Speaker 2: play pretty well down the stretch. There's some volatility here, 515 00:24:19,920 --> 00:24:22,640 Speaker 2: but he's got firepower. So I'm fine with Harry Higgs. 516 00:24:22,920 --> 00:24:25,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm okay with that. Hits ball a long way, 517 00:24:25,359 --> 00:24:28,280 Speaker 1: does have some firepower. I think that he's not a 518 00:24:28,320 --> 00:24:30,840 Speaker 1: great putter, but putting is going to be neutralized. I 519 00:24:30,840 --> 00:24:33,440 Speaker 1: think you look at the guys who don't ordinarily make 520 00:24:33,480 --> 00:24:36,440 Speaker 1: a lot of putts, the Adam Scott's and the DECKI Matsiamas, 521 00:24:36,480 --> 00:24:39,320 Speaker 1: and this week sort of levels the playing field, and 522 00:24:39,359 --> 00:24:41,760 Speaker 1: I think Harry Higgs you can throw in there as well, 523 00:24:41,800 --> 00:24:43,280 Speaker 1: in a level of the playing field for a guy 524 00:24:43,320 --> 00:24:45,320 Speaker 1: like him. So I like that. I'm a good guy 525 00:24:45,320 --> 00:24:47,840 Speaker 1: that I mentioned before. I think Wyndham Clark is going 526 00:24:47,880 --> 00:24:50,919 Speaker 1: to pop at some point very soon. I think it 527 00:24:50,960 --> 00:24:53,040 Speaker 1: can be this week again, hits the ball a long 528 00:24:53,080 --> 00:24:55,400 Speaker 1: way and he does make putts. You know, that's that's 529 00:24:55,480 --> 00:24:57,600 Speaker 1: half the formula, if not more right there for being 530 00:24:57,640 --> 00:25:02,040 Speaker 1: a profitable PGA Tour professional. So Clark at sixty eight 531 00:25:02,119 --> 00:25:03,160 Speaker 1: hundred I think is a nice play. 532 00:25:03,440 --> 00:25:05,679 Speaker 2: I love that. I think Higgs is the worst value. 533 00:25:05,680 --> 00:25:08,080 Speaker 2: I think we're nailing like all my hopbook plays here, 534 00:25:08,280 --> 00:25:10,119 Speaker 2: I threw in Higgs for the fun of it and 535 00:25:10,119 --> 00:25:12,040 Speaker 2: wanted to call him big beautiful. I'm gonna throw in 536 00:25:12,080 --> 00:25:14,159 Speaker 2: another guy who I loved and I already mentioned I 537 00:25:14,160 --> 00:25:16,159 Speaker 2: love Clark. I'm going to give you some money to 538 00:25:16,200 --> 00:25:18,639 Speaker 2: spend too, relative to where we were. I'm going Patrick 539 00:25:18,680 --> 00:25:20,520 Speaker 2: Rodgers at sixty eight hundred, who is one of the 540 00:25:20,560 --> 00:25:24,040 Speaker 2: best values for me in terms of outrights, and I 541 00:25:24,080 --> 00:25:26,120 Speaker 2: just think he is way too cheap in the markets. 542 00:25:26,440 --> 00:25:30,160 Speaker 2: This guy is the perfect type of golfer for this setup. 543 00:25:30,160 --> 00:25:32,679 Speaker 2: And yeah, he missed the cut last week's out seventy 544 00:25:32,680 --> 00:25:35,560 Speaker 2: five and round two. He went pretty good at the 545 00:25:35,640 --> 00:25:38,000 Speaker 2: Miacoba and you know, you look at his results. They 546 00:25:38,040 --> 00:25:41,000 Speaker 2: were a lot of miscuts, but some good results. And 547 00:25:41,080 --> 00:25:43,520 Speaker 2: he's got firepower and he's just such a good athlete. 548 00:25:43,960 --> 00:25:46,240 Speaker 2: I'm hoping we see more out of Patrick Rogers this 549 00:25:46,400 --> 00:25:49,159 Speaker 2: year sixty eight hundred. I'll gamble on that. 550 00:25:49,760 --> 00:25:51,760 Speaker 1: He's a guy that I've liked for a long time. 551 00:25:51,840 --> 00:25:54,159 Speaker 1: I've gotten burned by last year. I got burned by 552 00:25:54,160 --> 00:25:58,000 Speaker 1: Patrick Rogers. An awful lot high ceiling, low floor. In 553 00:25:58,000 --> 00:26:01,400 Speaker 1: this event, it's played five times, two top tens, three 554 00:26:01,440 --> 00:26:05,280 Speaker 1: miss cuts, and so well let's even that out and 555 00:26:05,280 --> 00:26:07,560 Speaker 1: get a third top ten this week and hopefully we 556 00:26:07,600 --> 00:26:09,040 Speaker 1: can be on the right side of that. 557 00:26:09,160 --> 00:26:12,520 Speaker 2: Higgs and Robin's making the cut. You know, one of 558 00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:14,359 Speaker 2: those guys have finished like top ten. Woe's going to 559 00:26:14,359 --> 00:26:14,880 Speaker 2: miss the cut. 560 00:26:14,920 --> 00:26:17,920 Speaker 1: So sorry, all right, Well that's okay. I do love 561 00:26:17,960 --> 00:26:20,480 Speaker 1: the contrarian nature of this lineup though, so if we 562 00:26:20,640 --> 00:26:24,320 Speaker 1: if we see duplicated lineups, well thanks for listening to pod. 563 00:26:24,359 --> 00:26:25,240 Speaker 2: We knew it was you. 564 00:26:25,320 --> 00:26:28,280 Speaker 1: So let's get to uh, I've got eighty one hundred left. 565 00:26:28,280 --> 00:26:31,760 Speaker 1: Will Zlaturus right at eighty one hundred again, he's a 566 00:26:31,800 --> 00:26:33,920 Speaker 1: guy that hasn't played yet this year, so I'm trying 567 00:26:33,920 --> 00:26:37,040 Speaker 1: to stay away from those guys. Same goes for Louis Ustazen, 568 00:26:37,119 --> 00:26:39,560 Speaker 1: who look Louise one of these guys I run him 569 00:26:39,600 --> 00:26:41,480 Speaker 1: up is my favorite fade in my column, just because 570 00:26:41,480 --> 00:26:43,960 Speaker 1: I didn't really didn't have anyone else I hated out 571 00:26:43,960 --> 00:26:45,960 Speaker 1: of that top tier. But louis a guy that you 572 00:26:46,000 --> 00:26:48,520 Speaker 1: watch him play, you go, man, sweetest swing in the 573 00:26:48,560 --> 00:26:51,600 Speaker 1: world on Louis. He's so good man, Louis got a major, 574 00:26:51,800 --> 00:26:53,920 Speaker 1: he's finished runner up in all four of them. He's 575 00:26:53,960 --> 00:26:57,040 Speaker 1: got the Grand Slam of runner ups, and then look 576 00:26:57,080 --> 00:26:59,160 Speaker 1: at me. He's never won an event in the US. 577 00:26:59,440 --> 00:27:01,000 Speaker 1: I just don't see how you could ever bet on 578 00:27:01,080 --> 00:27:05,080 Speaker 1: Louis whose days and and I don't use him very 579 00:27:05,119 --> 00:27:07,679 Speaker 1: often in DFS. He's probably a top fifty player that 580 00:27:07,720 --> 00:27:10,520 Speaker 1: I used less than just about anybody else out there. 581 00:27:10,560 --> 00:27:13,200 Speaker 1: So moving further down, I don't mind Fowler. I really 582 00:27:13,240 --> 00:27:15,919 Speaker 1: like Cameron Davis, Cameron Champ. I thought was gonna have 583 00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:18,800 Speaker 1: more people talking about him right now than are, But 584 00:27:19,320 --> 00:27:21,560 Speaker 1: I'm gonna move down just a little bit less save 585 00:27:21,640 --> 00:27:24,240 Speaker 1: US three hundred bucks on the back end. And Gary 586 00:27:24,280 --> 00:27:26,600 Speaker 1: Woodland is a guy that has played really well here 587 00:27:26,600 --> 00:27:30,119 Speaker 1: in the past, talked about being healthy after last week 588 00:27:30,320 --> 00:27:34,439 Speaker 1: and he's lost about twenty five pounds but should be 589 00:27:34,480 --> 00:27:36,880 Speaker 1: more flexible, hitting that driver really well. So I think 590 00:27:36,920 --> 00:27:38,880 Speaker 1: Gary Woodland is primed for a really nice year. 591 00:27:39,760 --> 00:27:41,760 Speaker 2: I think that's a really good call. He was battling 592 00:27:41,800 --> 00:27:44,720 Speaker 2: a ton of injuries and I think the little time 593 00:27:44,760 --> 00:27:47,879 Speaker 2: off really helped him look good last week. Just to me, 594 00:27:48,119 --> 00:27:50,440 Speaker 2: from the eye test and the statch are pretty decent. 595 00:27:50,520 --> 00:27:54,040 Speaker 2: So I really like this lineup. I would go back 596 00:27:54,640 --> 00:27:58,399 Speaker 2: and change Perry Higgs. I think that's just with Higgs 597 00:27:58,680 --> 00:28:02,200 Speaker 2: and Patrick Rodgers together. Give me someone like James Han 598 00:28:02,240 --> 00:28:04,600 Speaker 2: at seventy one hundred. I think we're really quicking with gas. 599 00:28:04,800 --> 00:28:09,920 Speaker 1: Okay, all right, so we've got Rory McElroy, Xanderschoffley, Gary Woodland, 600 00:28:10,320 --> 00:28:15,160 Speaker 1: Wyndham Clark, Patrick Rodgers and Harry Higgs or James Han maybe, 601 00:28:15,200 --> 00:28:17,800 Speaker 1: but let's put James On in and then okay. 602 00:28:17,600 --> 00:28:19,520 Speaker 2: I'm back next week. If har Higgs plays well and 603 00:28:19,560 --> 00:28:20,440 Speaker 2: say we said that. 604 00:28:21,200 --> 00:28:24,639 Speaker 1: I will say that if I was consulted on that, 605 00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:27,880 Speaker 1: I really like James on this week. I like better 606 00:28:27,880 --> 00:28:28,359 Speaker 1: than Biggs. 607 00:28:28,920 --> 00:28:31,040 Speaker 2: Given that I want to gamble on Patrick Rodgers, I 608 00:28:31,040 --> 00:28:33,520 Speaker 2: think he has better I liked him more than I 609 00:28:33,560 --> 00:28:35,720 Speaker 2: like Higgs. And it's a similar type of setup like 610 00:28:36,040 --> 00:28:37,760 Speaker 2: miscut or really good finish. 611 00:28:37,960 --> 00:28:41,080 Speaker 1: So I like to hon some inside knowledge on Patrick 612 00:28:41,120 --> 00:28:44,320 Speaker 1: Rodgers has moved to LA. I think has a young, 613 00:28:44,840 --> 00:28:47,800 Speaker 1: young baby that's either do or just had a baby. 614 00:28:47,840 --> 00:28:50,640 Speaker 1: So sometimes that's sometimes a good thing. But spoke with 615 00:28:50,680 --> 00:28:53,160 Speaker 1: one player said, look, living in LA and having a 616 00:28:53,200 --> 00:28:56,360 Speaker 1: young kid and traveling from there is not an easy proposition, 617 00:28:56,480 --> 00:29:01,160 Speaker 1: so you might want to hold off on that's not 618 00:29:01,240 --> 00:29:03,360 Speaker 1: in the model. So that's what well inside info, it 619 00:29:03,440 --> 00:29:05,280 Speaker 1: might not be in the model. Some of us have models, 620 00:29:05,280 --> 00:29:07,000 Speaker 1: some of us actually talk to players. So I'm just 621 00:29:07,040 --> 00:29:12,880 Speaker 1: saying that is our lineup, whether it's got Han Higgs, Rogers, 622 00:29:12,920 --> 00:29:16,040 Speaker 1: whatever combo on the back end there. But I like 623 00:29:16,120 --> 00:29:18,600 Speaker 1: that play and I can't wait for this week, Peter. 624 00:29:18,800 --> 00:29:21,000 Speaker 1: No football going on, It's gonna be a lot of 625 00:29:21,000 --> 00:29:24,240 Speaker 1: focus on Tory Pines. I can't imagine this not being 626 00:29:24,280 --> 00:29:27,440 Speaker 1: a big boy leader board. Maybe not just Rory Rohm, 627 00:29:27,800 --> 00:29:32,920 Speaker 1: fenw Hdecki Xander, but I think some combination of you know, 628 00:29:33,560 --> 00:29:37,280 Speaker 1: five of those big name players in the top ten 629 00:29:37,400 --> 00:29:41,440 Speaker 1: going into Sunday's final round is gonna be I think 630 00:29:41,480 --> 00:29:46,800 Speaker 1: a pretty good bet. So I can't wait for this one. Petie, 631 00:29:46,840 --> 00:29:50,160 Speaker 1: thanks for everything, good luck this week, good luck with 632 00:29:50,200 --> 00:29:51,320 Speaker 1: all your Super Bowl players. 633 00:29:52,880 --> 00:29:54,600 Speaker 2: Never been busier, but it's fun to have all these 634 00:29:54,640 --> 00:29:57,120 Speaker 2: opportunities and super fun to be on the podcast. And 635 00:29:57,320 --> 00:29:58,360 Speaker 2: good luck to you Tube cases. 636 00:29:59,160 --> 00:30:02,719 Speaker 1: If you were selling a moment of our podcast, how 637 00:30:02,800 --> 00:30:03,720 Speaker 1: much could you get for it? 638 00:30:04,200 --> 00:30:07,800 Speaker 2: Dude? They're freaking skyrockety these moments in time. Man, we 639 00:30:07,840 --> 00:30:09,720 Speaker 2: lived for moments. That's that's all awesome. 640 00:30:10,360 --> 00:30:12,240 Speaker 1: I did like I'm not sure who it was. I 641 00:30:12,240 --> 00:30:14,760 Speaker 1: think you retweeted it, but I did like it. Life 642 00:30:14,800 --> 00:30:17,600 Speaker 1: is like life is not about the destination, It's about 643 00:30:17,600 --> 00:30:19,960 Speaker 1: buying all the little moments along the way. Yeah. 644 00:30:21,360 --> 00:30:23,600 Speaker 2: I thought that was very right now. 645 00:30:23,960 --> 00:30:26,120 Speaker 1: Very very well said. And that is your life. So 646 00:30:26,720 --> 00:30:29,320 Speaker 1: thanks to everybody for listening to the Action Network podcast. 647 00:30:29,400 --> 00:30:31,160 Speaker 1: Good luck with all of your bets for this week's 648 00:30:31,200 --> 00:30:33,600 Speaker 1: Farmer's Insurance Open, and here's hoping you hit the green. 649 00:30:44,120 --> 00:30:45,200 Speaker 2: We're finished talking