1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,400 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,880 --> 00:00:11,559 Speaker 2: Joining us this morning, Richmond fed President Tom Barkin here 3 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:15,680 Speaker 2: on Bloomberg Television and radio worldwide, and on radio they 4 00:00:15,680 --> 00:00:17,520 Speaker 2: can't see it, but on television people can see. 5 00:00:17,560 --> 00:00:19,200 Speaker 3: You have a bit of a bandage on your head. 6 00:00:19,440 --> 00:00:24,439 Speaker 2: You just had one of those older people's kind of operations. 7 00:00:24,520 --> 00:00:26,319 Speaker 4: Yeah, there's no truth that it was what happened in 8 00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 4: the last meeting. 9 00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:31,480 Speaker 2: All right, Speaking of the last meeting, we came out 10 00:00:31,520 --> 00:00:35,680 Speaker 2: of that believing that, or at least Wall Street, that 11 00:00:35,720 --> 00:00:38,159 Speaker 2: you're going to cut rates again in October and maybe 12 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 2: in December. But since then, we've gotten some numbers that 13 00:00:40,400 --> 00:00:44,400 Speaker 2: show GDP is hotter, inflation is still running hot, and 14 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:48,479 Speaker 2: the job is claims numbers suggest companies aren't laying anybody off. 15 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:52,680 Speaker 2: So should we have less confidence in the path going forward? 16 00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:54,760 Speaker 4: Well, I don't think you can mark to market the 17 00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:57,960 Speaker 4: next meeting every week, even though that's what the markets do. 18 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:00,880 Speaker 4: I mean, let's see what happens on the on the employment side. 19 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:03,240 Speaker 4: We'll get some important data in a couple of minutes 20 00:01:03,280 --> 00:01:06,160 Speaker 4: here on the inflation side, and I think we'll get 21 00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:07,160 Speaker 4: there when we get there. 22 00:01:07,600 --> 00:01:10,120 Speaker 2: Well, the majority seem to believe, at least according to 23 00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:12,920 Speaker 2: what the Chairman tells us, that inflation is going to 24 00:01:12,920 --> 00:01:15,800 Speaker 2: be a one time rise in the price level. 25 00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:18,119 Speaker 3: And overnight we got a bunch of new. 26 00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:20,919 Speaker 2: Tariffs, as you just saw on a lot of different 27 00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:24,560 Speaker 2: things from the President. How much confidence do you have 28 00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:27,240 Speaker 2: in any kind of inflation forecast at this point? 29 00:01:27,840 --> 00:01:28,360 Speaker 1: Not much. 30 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:30,920 Speaker 4: I mean, what I definitely see happening is there are 31 00:01:30,959 --> 00:01:34,039 Speaker 4: cost increases that suppliers want to pass on. There's no 32 00:01:34,160 --> 00:01:36,200 Speaker 4: question about that, and tariffs are a big part of it. 33 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:39,080 Speaker 4: But you could put health insurance in other other costs 34 00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 4: in there too, But those costs are going to attempt 35 00:01:42,080 --> 00:01:44,759 Speaker 4: to get passed on to a consumer who's frankly exhausted 36 00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:48,360 Speaker 4: of price increases. And so you know, we're seeing a 37 00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:51,080 Speaker 4: lot of trading down, you know, branded to private label 38 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:54,080 Speaker 4: kind of choices, but we're also seeing people trade off. 39 00:01:54,440 --> 00:01:56,560 Speaker 4: And it wouldn't surprise me at all if people who 40 00:01:56,640 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 4: are forced to accept certain price increases therefore something else 41 00:02:00,800 --> 00:02:03,600 Speaker 4: on the other side, and that's your classic relative price 42 00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:06,720 Speaker 4: trade off, and that may mean that you won't see 43 00:02:06,720 --> 00:02:10,840 Speaker 4: as much broad based inflationary impact as you'd see. You know, 44 00:02:10,960 --> 00:02:13,120 Speaker 4: price increases on particular items we'll. 45 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:15,840 Speaker 2: See, and yet you get PCEE in an hour and 46 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:20,400 Speaker 2: basically you've already calculated the numbers. Inflation's not moving in 47 00:02:20,440 --> 00:02:24,320 Speaker 2: the right direction. So can you still justify or how 48 00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:26,720 Speaker 2: long can you justify cutting rates in that environment? 49 00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:29,519 Speaker 1: Well, we have inflation moving in the wrong direction. 50 00:02:29,639 --> 00:02:32,799 Speaker 4: Unfortunately, we also have unemployment moving in the wrong direction. 51 00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:35,440 Speaker 4: And that was the backdrop of the last meeting. You 52 00:02:35,440 --> 00:02:38,880 Speaker 4: have to ask yourself, you know, how are the risks 53 00:02:38,919 --> 00:02:41,639 Speaker 4: still the same as you saw them two three, four 54 00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:44,320 Speaker 4: months earlier, when you had unemployment in the right direction 55 00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:45,680 Speaker 4: and inflation in the wrong direction. 56 00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:46,880 Speaker 1: You know. 57 00:02:46,919 --> 00:02:49,880 Speaker 4: My overall thesis though, is that while it's not, you know, 58 00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 4: ticking in the right place, the downside is relatively limited. 59 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:57,079 Speaker 4: I see, the inflation downside is limited by this customer 60 00:02:57,520 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 4: pushback that I just talked about, also productive, which I 61 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:04,000 Speaker 4: think is we're seeing that at real scale, and so 62 00:03:04,080 --> 00:03:06,840 Speaker 4: that means there's less pressure to pass costs on. And 63 00:03:06,880 --> 00:03:10,120 Speaker 4: then on the unemployment side, obviously, labor supply is dropping 64 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:11,959 Speaker 4: at the same time as labor demand, and that's keeping 65 00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:16,640 Speaker 4: the unemployment rate relatively balanced. And that's the combination of 66 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:23,040 Speaker 4: immigration and ravocation of temporary status also, you know our generation, Mike, 67 00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:24,280 Speaker 4: which is leaving the workforce. 68 00:03:24,320 --> 00:03:25,880 Speaker 1: I mean, you're seeing a million three. 69 00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:29,640 Speaker 4: More people over sixty five out of the workforce every year, 70 00:03:30,120 --> 00:03:32,280 Speaker 4: and so you've got less labor. 71 00:03:32,080 --> 00:03:34,360 Speaker 1: Demand, low hiring, low firing environment. 72 00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:37,280 Speaker 4: But you've also got less labor supply, and that probably 73 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:39,240 Speaker 4: means that the unemployment rate increases are going to be 74 00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:40,160 Speaker 4: relatively limited. 75 00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:42,720 Speaker 3: We at least you and I are still employed as 76 00:03:42,760 --> 00:03:43,280 Speaker 3: of today. 77 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:45,040 Speaker 1: We'll see how this interview goes. 78 00:03:46,360 --> 00:03:49,080 Speaker 2: You suggested that companies in your district are beginning to 79 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:51,200 Speaker 2: feel a little bit better, or at least some of 80 00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:56,200 Speaker 2: the uncertainty has come off of their planning and their thinking. 81 00:03:56,840 --> 00:03:59,040 Speaker 2: Are these kind of big new tariffs that we got 82 00:03:59,080 --> 00:04:02,600 Speaker 2: today just going to change that mind has the idea 83 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:05,920 Speaker 2: that ongoing tariffs and ongoing disruption are going to be 84 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:08,160 Speaker 2: part of this administration and economy. 85 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:09,520 Speaker 3: Is that in their planning. 86 00:04:10,040 --> 00:04:13,080 Speaker 4: Well, I've been describing it as a fog that's created uncertainty, 87 00:04:13,120 --> 00:04:15,160 Speaker 4: and I definitely think in the context of the last 88 00:04:15,200 --> 00:04:18,760 Speaker 4: couple of months, the fog has started to lift. Businesses 89 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:20,840 Speaker 4: don't know exactly what the tariff will be on their 90 00:04:20,880 --> 00:04:22,840 Speaker 4: sector necessarily. 91 00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:24,120 Speaker 1: But they kind of have a sense of the range. 92 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,280 Speaker 4: People aren't really following the news every day, you know, 93 00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:29,400 Speaker 4: the same way they were back in April. And a 94 00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:31,960 Speaker 4: lot of businesses I talk to say, look, I've just 95 00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:34,479 Speaker 4: got to do something, you know, I've got to take action. 96 00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:36,920 Speaker 4: I can't be on the sidelines forever. So I am 97 00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:39,880 Speaker 4: seeing people more in the game now. If you're in 98 00:04:39,920 --> 00:04:42,720 Speaker 4: a particular sector where you see a new announcement, of 99 00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:46,360 Speaker 4: course that's gonna set you back. And so you know, 100 00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:49,120 Speaker 4: what I say about businesses in general is not true 101 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:51,800 Speaker 4: of businesses in every sector. And so there's sectors with 102 00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:54,680 Speaker 4: a lot more clarity and sectors with a lot less clarity. 103 00:04:54,680 --> 00:04:56,480 Speaker 4: And that's I think just going to be part of 104 00:04:56,520 --> 00:04:57,039 Speaker 4: the game here. 105 00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:00,320 Speaker 2: This morning we had an investor on who basically said 106 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:04,080 Speaker 2: markets are rising because of the idea that a year 107 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:06,719 Speaker 2: from now rates will be substantially lower. Is that the 108 00:05:06,800 --> 00:05:08,159 Speaker 2: right way to look at it? The wrong way to 109 00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:08,600 Speaker 2: look at it? 110 00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 1: Oh? 111 00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:10,640 Speaker 4: I wouldn't know how to think about, you know, how 112 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:13,520 Speaker 4: markets ought to rise or not rise. I mean, we're 113 00:05:13,800 --> 00:05:16,080 Speaker 4: very much focused on trying to land the plan here 114 00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:20,560 Speaker 4: and balancing inflation unemployment. As I said, I think both 115 00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:22,440 Speaker 4: of them have ticked in the wrong direction. But on 116 00:05:22,440 --> 00:05:25,200 Speaker 4: the other hand, the downside is limited and we're just 117 00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:27,320 Speaker 4: going to have to, you know, adjust our stance as 118 00:05:27,320 --> 00:05:27,960 Speaker 4: we learn more. 119 00:05:28,279 --> 00:05:29,200 Speaker 3: Well, where's your dot? 120 00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:31,880 Speaker 2: What are you thinking in terms of the next couple 121 00:05:31,960 --> 00:05:33,760 Speaker 2: of meetings? And then for twenty twenty. 122 00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:37,240 Speaker 4: Six, Well, I really like the DOT process for me 123 00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:43,239 Speaker 4: because it's a if forces real integration of your thinking 124 00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:46,280 Speaker 4: in terms of where you think the economy is going, 125 00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:49,080 Speaker 4: where you think policy is going. But I don't have 126 00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:51,799 Speaker 4: it as a forecast prediction. It's not, you know, something 127 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:55,120 Speaker 4: I like to talk about publicly because it adjusts. You know, 128 00:05:55,160 --> 00:05:57,440 Speaker 4: we do mark that dot to market as things go. 129 00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:00,719 Speaker 4: So you know, every meeting for me is one where 130 00:06:00,760 --> 00:06:02,760 Speaker 4: I want to stop and look at the balance between 131 00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:04,600 Speaker 4: how we're doing on the inflation side of the unemployment 132 00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:05,799 Speaker 4: side and make the right decision. 133 00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:09,159 Speaker 2: Well, the story around the FED this week has been, 134 00:06:10,120 --> 00:06:13,360 Speaker 2: shall we say, the debate over where the neutral rate is? 135 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:16,919 Speaker 2: Where do you think it is? And how fast would 136 00:06:16,920 --> 00:06:17,760 Speaker 2: you want to get there? 137 00:06:18,920 --> 00:06:21,520 Speaker 4: Well, you know, I've seen a lot of the stuff 138 00:06:21,520 --> 00:06:23,840 Speaker 4: that's been in the press, and we're studying that, and 139 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:26,520 Speaker 4: you know, I always try to understand all arguments and 140 00:06:26,839 --> 00:06:29,800 Speaker 4: figure out how to integrate them into my thinking. I'd 141 00:06:29,800 --> 00:06:33,840 Speaker 4: point you to the Richmond Fed neutral rate, the lubric 142 00:06:33,880 --> 00:06:36,760 Speaker 4: mathis model. It takes a lot of signal from what 143 00:06:36,760 --> 00:06:38,800 Speaker 4: you see in the real economy, and in the real 144 00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:41,600 Speaker 4: economy over the last couple of years, what you've seen 145 00:06:41,680 --> 00:06:44,919 Speaker 4: is interest rate I mean interest rates go up and 146 00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:48,760 Speaker 4: the economy stay relatively healthy, and so that model doesn't 147 00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:50,680 Speaker 4: take a lot of it doesn't It has a relatively 148 00:06:50,760 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 4: high neutral rate because it takes a lot of signal 149 00:06:53,880 --> 00:06:56,840 Speaker 4: from the current environment. Now things can change, but that's 150 00:06:56,839 --> 00:06:59,320 Speaker 4: where the Richmond Fed model is right now, and i'd. 151 00:06:59,200 --> 00:06:59,760 Speaker 1: Point you to that. 152 00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:03,560 Speaker 4: What number do they have where you it moves around 153 00:07:03,800 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 4: based on what's happening in the economy. 154 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:09,360 Speaker 2: Well, that gets the next question is Chairman Powell saying 155 00:07:09,400 --> 00:07:12,760 Speaker 2: that you really don't want to target the neutral rate 156 00:07:12,880 --> 00:07:16,880 Speaker 2: because it moves around, also saying that for any voter 157 00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:21,320 Speaker 2: to really move things around, you have to be incredibly persuasive. 158 00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:24,680 Speaker 2: Do you find Steven Myron's arguments persuasive. 159 00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:27,520 Speaker 4: I'm looking forward to digging into them with my team, 160 00:07:27,560 --> 00:07:30,560 Speaker 4: and I like every voice in the room and every 161 00:07:30,640 --> 00:07:32,280 Speaker 4: argument in the room. You know, that's what we do 162 00:07:32,320 --> 00:07:34,680 Speaker 4: as a discipline as we sit down and try to 163 00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:36,800 Speaker 4: take those arguments apart and figure out which parts of 164 00:07:36,840 --> 00:07:39,240 Speaker 4: them really resonate with the way we think about things 165 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:40,240 Speaker 4: and which parts don't. 166 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:41,640 Speaker 1: We're looking forward to doing that. 167 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:45,240 Speaker 4: Is on the neutral rate, you know, in general, I 168 00:07:45,280 --> 00:07:48,400 Speaker 4: just want to agree it's not that useful as an 169 00:07:49,320 --> 00:07:50,320 Speaker 4: operational tool. 170 00:07:51,160 --> 00:07:52,720 Speaker 1: The models out there, even the one. 171 00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:55,320 Speaker 4: That I talked about, have a confidence interval of about 172 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 4: two hundred basis points, and so you could say it's three, 173 00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:01,760 Speaker 4: which is a the SEP media, and you could say it's. 174 00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:02,920 Speaker 1: Three and a half or two and a half. 175 00:08:03,600 --> 00:08:05,440 Speaker 4: But if you add a two hundred basis point range 176 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:08,040 Speaker 4: to it, you say, that's not that helpful for making 177 00:08:08,120 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 4: operational decisions on monetary policy. What is more helpful, and 178 00:08:11,160 --> 00:08:13,640 Speaker 4: the reason I favor in the model we've gotten Richmond, 179 00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:16,880 Speaker 4: is how are you seeing the economy react real time 180 00:08:17,400 --> 00:08:19,320 Speaker 4: to the level of rates you've got in the market. 181 00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:21,480 Speaker 4: And if you see it weakening, that's a signal that 182 00:08:21,800 --> 00:08:22,760 Speaker 4: maybe you've got it too high. 183 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:24,920 Speaker 1: If you see it relatively strong, that's the signal. The 184 00:08:24,920 --> 00:08:25,320 Speaker 1: other way. 185 00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:29,880 Speaker 2: Logan went to Richmond to announce her idea of changing 186 00:08:29,960 --> 00:08:32,600 Speaker 2: the operational rate for the FED what do you think 187 00:08:32,640 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 2: of that? 188 00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:35,559 Speaker 4: Well, I appreciate Laurie making the trip. We had a 189 00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:38,400 Speaker 4: balance sheet conference yesterday that was very well attended and 190 00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:41,280 Speaker 4: I thought lots of thoughtful papers, including hers, and I 191 00:08:41,280 --> 00:08:44,560 Speaker 4: thought she made an extremely articulate, well reasoned argument, and 192 00:08:44,600 --> 00:08:46,160 Speaker 4: I'm looking forward to digging into it further. 193 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:49,360 Speaker 3: You anticipate the FED making a change, Oh, I don't know. 194 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:54,120 Speaker 2: The Supreme Court if it allows the President to fire 195 00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:54,720 Speaker 2: Lisa Cook? 196 00:08:54,800 --> 00:08:56,199 Speaker 3: What does that mean for the Fed? 197 00:08:57,400 --> 00:09:02,640 Speaker 4: Well, the judicial processes, local processes will operate, however they operate. 198 00:09:03,200 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 4: What I do every day is show up and try 199 00:09:04,920 --> 00:09:09,200 Speaker 4: to argue for the best monetary policy we can and 200 00:09:09,240 --> 00:09:11,480 Speaker 4: make the case, as you said, in a persuasive way 201 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:14,240 Speaker 4: to my colleagues, and that's what I'm going to continue 202 00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 4: to do. 203 00:09:14,880 --> 00:09:18,240 Speaker 2: Well, let's leave it with this, What is the best 204 00:09:18,280 --> 00:09:19,959 Speaker 2: monetary policy right now? 205 00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:24,400 Speaker 3: Continued rate cuts or do you not know? At this point? 206 00:09:24,520 --> 00:09:26,720 Speaker 4: I think you have to be very adaptive to what's 207 00:09:26,760 --> 00:09:29,560 Speaker 4: playing out here. The world I've described as one where 208 00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:33,000 Speaker 4: the labor market is weakening. It's a low hiring environment, 209 00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:36,040 Speaker 4: but the labor supply is also short, and you have 210 00:09:36,080 --> 00:09:38,640 Speaker 4: to be very attentive to that. Balance because it could 211 00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:42,079 Speaker 4: get out of balance right. Similarly, on the inflation side, 212 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:44,679 Speaker 4: you do have these cost pressures and four and a 213 00:09:44,679 --> 00:09:47,480 Speaker 4: half years of inflation over target. On the other hand, 214 00:09:47,640 --> 00:09:50,079 Speaker 4: you're not seeing that show up and spikes and inflation 215 00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:53,040 Speaker 4: in the real time numbers. We are seeing what seems 216 00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:55,000 Speaker 4: to be a productivity boom. And so I think you 217 00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:58,080 Speaker 4: have to be very attentive to how little we know 218 00:09:58,520 --> 00:10:00,600 Speaker 4: about how each of our mandate very is going to 219 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:03,160 Speaker 4: play out. And so, you know, I feel like very 220 00:10:03,160 --> 00:10:05,000 Speaker 4: adaptive is the way to think about it, as opposed 221 00:10:05,040 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 4: and that's part of why I'm not being prescriptive into well, 222 00:10:07,880 --> 00:10:10,400 Speaker 4: it's this many dood cuts over this period of time, 223 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 4: because I think we're going to see and learn a 224 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:13,920 Speaker 4: lot as we go here. 225 00:10:14,520 --> 00:10:17,160 Speaker 2: Tom Barkin, thank you very much for coming up to 226 00:10:17,280 --> 00:10:20,120 Speaker 2: Washington and joining us this morning here on Bloomberg