WEBVTT - Fed’s Daly Sets High Bar for Slowing Policy Pace

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well, so much for the

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>recent upbeat change in the stock market sentiment that two

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>day equity rallies we just talked about here in the

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>United States with Abigail really coming to an handle, though

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely off our loads of this session thanks to

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>hot economic data pouring cold water on investor thinking that

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the global monetary tightening cycle was close to peaking, and

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we did feel like pigpiling on that thinking was the

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>president of San Francisco fed Mary Daily, who stopped by

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg headquarters. She caught up with our own Bloomberg News

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael McKee, who joins us

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>here in our Interactive Brokers studio. And so we are

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>all talking pivot and yet well we had to ask

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>her about pivot because that's what's the main topic in

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the markets. It's interesting because we've seen markets get very

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>schizophrenic about this. One week, they think the FED is

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>going to cut back. Just last week, the FED was

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to cut rates at all. And now you've

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>got a rate cut priced in starting in March. And hey,

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 1>so I asked Mary Daily about that and uh, and

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the graph you can see on the w I r

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>P function, the bar chart that shows these rate cuts,

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and she said, I'm not going to happen. Well, she's

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>one of these classic data dependent FED non voting member

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this year voting member. But she's basically saying, look at

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>core inflation, core inflation, it's pointing the wrong way. We're

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>accelerating July to August, and we will get September a

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>later date. That's a point where, isn't it. Yeah, here's

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>what you said. I don't see that happening at all.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I see us as raising to a level that we

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>believe is restrictive enough to bring inflation down and then

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>holding it there until we see inflation truly get close

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to two percent and and demonstrate that price stability is restored.

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>So basically, Mary Dale, president of San Francisco, FETs so basically,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>stop it, right, everybody. Yeah, I've actually been warning us.

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Every time we've said it. You're like, no, there's no pivot. Yeah,

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no pivot. And I asked her if we debate

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>constantly for what they're gonna do with the next meeting.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>And I asked her about that, and she said, it's

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>not how much we do at each meeting, it's where

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>we get to and then how long it stays there.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>She wants the the terminal FED funds rate. She thinks

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be somewhere between four and a half and

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>five percent, and that they're going to try to get

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>to percent by the end of this year and then

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they leave it there until they see significant progress. Uh,

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>if inflation should collapse, then maybe we do get a pivot.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>She talks about being nimble. I think, yeah, nimble, but resolute.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 1>And she said, you know, people, I go out to Boise, Idaho,

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and people don't know what I mean. By that, and

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>she said, we are focused on bringing inflation down. That

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is what we're going to do. But how we do it.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>We can be nimble and we can react. You know,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>if there's some issue in the economy, we don't have

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates as fast, or we don't have to

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>raise rates that month or whatever. It's just going to

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>be a question of keeping an eye on the economy,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>but also keeping your eye on the main goal, which

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>is bringing down inflation. So we know you had to

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>ask about the pivot because of the rally that you've seen,

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the equity markets. But what was top of

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>mind for you, Mike, who follows this day in and

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.559
<v Speaker 1>day out. Well, I think that was the biggest Uh.

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>The idea that she communicated, the idea that no, we're

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>not we're not watching the markets for signals for what

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do, We're watching inflation. Uh. She said, Basically,

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed wants to see, and this is something

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind for Friday, is the economy moderating.

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>That we see jobs, job gains start to slow down,

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and we see inflation, particularly core inflation, start to slow down.

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't go away immediately, but you see a process underway,

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll know they're doing the right thing and

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>then they can um sort of stop where they are

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and leave it where they are until they see there's

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>enough restraint on the economy to get this inflation problem

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the way. So today's economic data, how does

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that play into the thought? Uh, you know, it kind

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of goes against the idea that she was talking about

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the the I S M Services numbers today, but she

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>did point out the Jolts numbers yesterday. She said she's

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>been talking to corporations all over the West Big District

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>and they've been saying that they are cutting back on

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>their hiring and in many cases and ed you know

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this better than anybody, the tech companies are just they're

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna hire anymore this year. They're done, and some

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of them are actually talking about some layoffs. Uh. She said.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>What happens is the companies go to these online firms

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>with resident post resumes and job openings, and they signed

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a three month contract and they don't say, all right,

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>call the firm up and cancel a contract a month early.

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>They just let it run out, which is why job

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>postings have remained high. And she said she thinks they've

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>been telling her for months that this is going to happen.

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>She thinks that's what we saw in yesterday's data, that

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the companies are seriously starting to slow down on their hiring. Uh.

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And concomminately, she said, don't look at jobless claims because

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the last thing that's going to happen in this economy.

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>There's still so many openings that nobody's talking about layoffs.

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>They're just talking about not hiring. You've been very kind

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>over the is to take me to meet Mary Daily,

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and she's one of these sort of Fed Inaction type figures.

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>She goes out into the real world and she seems

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to be saying, here, we recognize the pain of everyday Americans,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but they also need to know that the FED is,

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>as you said, resolute in fighting inflation, not necessarily listening

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>to their pain and how they decided to take action.

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>She talks about going to a Walmart in the San

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Bay area, um, just just in a sweatshirt and jeans.

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>She told them she was an economist, but she didn't

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>tell them who she was, and she walked around interviewing

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>customers and they all said they're much more worried about

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation than they are about jobs. More worried about inflation

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>rather than jobs. All right, great reporting has always in

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a great interview Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy Correspondent

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee on Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stenovic on

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. We mentioned as headlines that the judge in

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the Elon Musk Twitter trial saying she hasn't received any

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>filing yet to halt the case. Uh, and that's that

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>October seventeenth trial is still on for now. So I

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like Ed La Loow, you've been covering this story.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>You're here the editor Bloomberg Business Week, also in our studio.

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a story that keeps on giving, just when we

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>think we're getting to an end. Yeah. I mean, as

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it stands, I'm still off to Delaware. But what I

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>would say is language is important. Right, So must said,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I will buy Twitter for fifty four

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars twenty cents to share? What did Twitter say? Twitter said,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we're committed to closing the deal at fifty four dollars

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty cents to share nowhere did they say we accept

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>your re offer, Mr Musk. You know, so we've been

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see what they'll do, whether they drop proceedings

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>against him, and now we know they are yet to

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>do so. All right, we also want to bring in

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and we mentioned to Ael Webber is with us the

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>editor of Bloomberg Business Week. So too is Bloomberg Sarah Fryer,

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>who's writing about Elan's turnabout as well. She's Bloomberg News

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Big Tech team leader, author of No Filter, the inside

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>story of of Instagram. Excuse me, she joins us on

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the phone from San Francisco. But Uh, Jill, I mean,

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>if you had to put this story to bed, what

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>would you do right now? You call, you call Sarah,

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you say, what's going on? Um? Uh, there's a piece

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of art that we commissioned to go with Sarah's story

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that is the art of the moment. It's a tesla

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>covered in bird poop. Um and uh, it's awesome and

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's perfect. In the headline. My headline for it is

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's turn And I think you know, and I think

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this is also, um what what Sarah ultimately rights here is.

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>For a while, it's been sort of like, who's actually

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 1>in charge right here? Who who's Who's who got the

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>high ground? And I think what this shows is that

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter now officially has the high ground. Um. So Sarah

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>talked to us about how you expressed that idea. Well,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think about what Elon Musk is offering here is

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what he's already offered. He's already said that he would

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the company for ford for a billion. This doesn't give

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter anything that they didn't already have. So they have

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>no reason to take him out as a word, because

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>let's look at how his word has has happened, you

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>know how, It's how it's resulted in prior occasions. Right,

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>he said he would join Twitter's board, and then he

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>reneged on that shortly thereafter, um, when he got in

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an argument, and and then he said he would buy

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the company, and then a couple of weeks later he

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>said he wouldn't. So I think that Twitter really has

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>no reason to trust him. And I don't see a

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>scenario where they are going to, um just take take

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this new offer and call it a day. I think

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're going to be really careful and and

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, if they're wise that keep keep

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers involved. So the alternative headline doesn't go quite

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as well with the image that I proposed. But show

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>me the money, right, absolutely, I mean I think that

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that is that's really the ticket here. I mean, we

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>know the funding is in place. Um, we know that

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that everything is is as it should be. Um to

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>close the deal. Um, nothing has really changed on that front.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>What has changed. It's been a you know, particularly embarrassing

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks for Elon Musk. Is private text messages

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>have become public. Um, he's he's a table read of

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>all of those text messages. There are just for like

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>go through a mall, but anyway, go ahead. Oh my goodness,

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>there's so many gems. But but yeah, I think I

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's that. But you know, he he is is.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I talked to a lawyer today who said the most

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>cynical view of this, this move from Elon Musk is

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that he is maybe trying to trying to pressure Twitter

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>publicly into dropping the suit and then he might still

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>not buy Twitter, and it might um, you know, find

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>another another reason to like one of these stories, Joel,

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>where you're like, this cannot get any more weird, and

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you walk into work on a Tuesday, and suddenly it

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>gets more weird. But it is Sarah's point. We learned

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot from the discovery process. The text messages you

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>wonder what we didn't learn, And this is part of

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg reporting what we we have found. If that

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>deposition goes ahead and then it's filed as evidence, Joel

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>later in the week, if the trial happens, perhaps you'd

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>like to go to Delaware for us and find out

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>well as its stands. As I say, I am going

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to Delaware. But I mean, and look like this. This

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is why it's like the best business story of the year.

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think about where this started. I mean

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think about and you know, Matt Levine wrote this in

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>his newsletter today, money stuff that you know, just from

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a money standpoint, like Morgan Stanley, this does not look

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>good for Morgan Stanley the and you know, when when

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>all this was proposed, it all sounded great and like

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we were in a completely different economic environment. Now he's

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the financing talking about the debt here right,

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that must lined up as part of his funding for

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the deer. And and so I think the conversation is

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>um and how much bashing, you know, Twitter hasn't has

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>endured here and you know, ultimately, Sarah, I thought the

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>most interesting thing of that you had in the remarks

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>ultimately is this scene that you you culminate with, which

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is this conversation that's happening at Twitter. Well, when this

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>news happens, right, we'll take us there. So at Twitter,

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in my colleague Kurt Wagner, UM has many sources, sources

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of the company, and he found that they were listening

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of all things, to presentations from teams on our plan,

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>which if this deal goes through, a total waste of time, UM,

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>because Elon Musk has very different ideas about how to

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>run Twitter. And what's interesting was you nobody really stopped

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge that this news had just gone by. And

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is just a company that's used

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to being in limbo. This is this is UM you know,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>always they're always finding themselves at the center of some

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>dramma or other. They have they've had activists on their board,

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>they've shuffled through leaders, they've they've been in UM you know,

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>acquisition flirtations in the past. So I think that these

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>employees they're they're also UM. You think they can they

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>can complain on slack or or make means of the situation.

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that, um, you know, these really

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>big decisions are are probably gonna wait until we actually

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>know the rayon must in this company. Yeah. I was

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>told by a sore Sarah, as you know that in

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the first fifteen minutes of that meeting, paragagrole, the CEO

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter, made a presentation and then disappeared from the

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>meeting and for two or three hours, employees sat there

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>while the news was breaking all around them and nothing,

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was silence, you know, Sarah, what happens

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>next very quickly? Well, I think we have to see

0:13:55.280 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>what how Twitter respond. And the two sides were talking today. Um,

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>whether an agreement will come out of that, we might

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>hear today, we might not. Um. The judges says she

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>has not received the filing for a request to stay

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.719
<v Speaker 1>in the case, So that means that, um, you know,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>things are not all settled. Um, we we still have

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>some Twitter clearly still have some some you know, discussions

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>they need to have to be to their satisfaction. It's

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like an episode of Billions. Oh, I mean, let's have

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>our own show about Way Past the Fall. My my

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>most favorite thing here is Delaware. Yeah, Delaware, alright, Sarta Fire,

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. As always big tech team leader

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, also author of No Filter, the inside story

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of Instagram. These are the remarks this week Mars indeed

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>alright in upcoming issue of the magazine. Of course, that

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was the voice of the editor of Blomberg Business Week, Weber.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Carol mat Sure and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. As we've talked about, I just got to

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>pull up actually Twitter because with the market turnaround, I

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>just want to see what Twitter is doing. Still down

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>about one percent because there's still some uncertainty whether or

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>not Elon Musk will cross the finish line when it

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to buying the company. Meantime, I love this, Ellen, Ellen.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like um Ed is flashing that new shiny

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>thing which he is good about doing, and it's called

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>what X the everything app Yeah. I mean we always

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about this in the context of Tesla, right, that

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>one of his skills is keeping everyone looking to the horizon,

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>forget what's happening right now, you know, look away, look away,

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>from honestly X. What is X? I don't know? Do

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know? Does our next guests? No? I guess we

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>should find out. All right, Tom Giles, come on in,

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>an executive editor of Bloomberg Technology. He's with us from

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>our San Francisco beer. All right, Tom, it's so great

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to have you here, the three of us. Uh, fun conversation.

0:15:55.600 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So what is X? Well, based on yesterday's tweet, he's

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>calling it X the everything app. It makes me think

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of the everything store, right that Amazon wants to provide

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>all of these services and sell all of these items

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to everybody in around the world. What he's talking about,

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what he's alluding to, is some kind of a super app.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a one stop shop where you can go and

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>do much more than what you can do on Twitter. Now.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It's already a very useful tool for those of us

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>who are who are who are big Twitter users, know

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>what we're up to, um stuff we're reporting on. But

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he wants to make it more useful. And one of

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>his one of his complaints, and he has many complaints

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>about Twitter, is that he wants it to be more

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>useful to people. And what he's what he's alluding to

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is the way that companies like ten Cent in China

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have used whee chat and turned it into something called

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a super app. That's something like I said, at one

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>stop shop, where you can go and do much more

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>than communicate. You can you know, you can have your

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>your d ms with folks, you can have group chats,

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but you can also do things like book cars. So

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it plays plays the role of an uber. Or you

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>can use it to order in food. Uh so it's

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>your grub hub. You can use it for a whole

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>host of of of services. And this is something that

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>has taken off in parts of Asian certainly certainly gained

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of popularity in China where tent set is,

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>where we chat is everywhere. And he would certainly, uh,

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>he'd certainly love to have Twitter have that same kind

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>of usefulness. I mean, to me, this is logical because

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe I'm right and saying must said he wanted

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to grow twitters use a base from around two million

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>now to a billion, and you wonder how is he

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>going to get there? I mean, we use Twitter actively,

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>much of the press does, and the media, but you

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder who the new audience for Twitter will be. I mean,

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>what other concrete proposals that we have from Musk. Tom Well,

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>he's talked about you know, he's talked about you know,

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>he talked he's compared to TikTok and wanting there to

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>be more functionality in terms of the stuff that you

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>share on the blogging service. Right now, Twitter is still

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>very much a tool that we use for short, short

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>tweets that are you know, full of our words and

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>sometimes there's images and sometimes there's video. But it's not

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a big video sharing site, um, you know, but there's

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things. I mean, remember where Elon Musk

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>got his start, which was in payments, which is in

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, revolutionizing the way people send and receive money.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So imagine, if you will, if if he has his way,

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and if he you know, can can can unleash his

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>engineers and get them to you know, make the products,

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>uh that that would make it more effective. Think about

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what if what if Twitter was more of like a

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>pain it's company where you could use it to you know,

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to carry out transactions in the way that we currently

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>use Venmo or PayPal or some of these other services.

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>If you could do other you know, carry out other

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>financial transactions with it, Um, you know, and I mean

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that the other thing that people you know,

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>whach tent spent is also a big entertainment purveyor of entertainment.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't think of Twitter as being a platform for

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. We think of that more, you know,

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that's more YouTube, and to some degree even Facebook. But

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 1>uh and and obviously uh, you know, Apple and some

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the other some of the other sellers of devices

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that we have. The problem that I have with this

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>concept of a super app is, while it has taken

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>off in parts of Asia, in the United States, we

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>become really really accustomed to having a whole slew of

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>apps on our phones. We're very comfortable with it. I

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>find it kind of clunky, and I love the idea

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of something more like a super app. The problem is,

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we're really entrenched, and we've really become accustomed to having

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, hundred apps on our phone and just you know,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>scrolling right and left to get from app to app.

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>We've grown accustomed to it, even though it's clunky, even

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>though it's inconvenient. If he could revolutionize that, it would

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly be a sea change in the way at least

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>people here in the United States use our smartphones. Yeah,

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I agree with you. I'd love to have

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>like some streamlining have so many apps. But I do

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder like, how do you move from where we are

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>today to kind of an aggregator to unless to some

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>extent where it's one stop shopping. Um, great stuff. Tom Giles,

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. We always appreciate when you can

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>find time for us. He's Bloomberg Technology executive editor, joining

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>us from our San Francisco bureau. But I do kind

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of a blown away again by Ellen and his ability

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to get us to be having a conversation about something else.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom leads our coverage of TACH. He leads the team,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're already looking to the what next. We're not

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>really you're what now? You know those headlines that the

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.239
<v Speaker 1>trial is still going ahead. We're not done yet. We're

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>not done yet. I really want to know about that

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>white robot, that humanoid. Let's stick stick on topic, the

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>human in the body. Oh my gosh, you can't make

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this stuff up. You are listening and watching Bluebirg Radio.

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm bro journal now, but you let me drive? No,

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, please, I'll do the riding gravels. I

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>want to drive it's a good question. This is the

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Drive to the Clothes on Bluebird Radio. All right, let's

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>get to it, everybody. Just about a little under ten

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in today's trading session. You heard Charlie breakdown

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the numbers. We're just off our highs. We're seeing a

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit of selling in the last few minutes, but

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely off our loads of the session. Call it

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, unchanged, but slightly lower when it

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to those major equity averages. So let's get to

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the Drive to the clothes. Aaron Kennon is back. He's

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>co founder and chief executive officer at Clear Harbor Asset Management,

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>roughly over a billion in assets under management. On the

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>phone from Stanford, Connecticut. Hey, Aaron, good to have you here.

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Ed lud Low is in for Tim on this Wednesday.

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about um, the markets. Do you feel like

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a market capitulation at this point, that

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe we bottomed out when it comes to equities. Well,

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope so, Caroline d but I fear that

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that may not be the case. When you know, we

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of look at the historic analog of what tends

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>to happen when markets find bottoms and bear markets, and

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>usually that means the FED is stopped tightening and they

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>are actually starting to reduce their FED funds rate. It

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>usually means that the interest rate curve is positive and

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>nicely positive. And usually there's some sort of panic um

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>embedded in the market where valuations cut through sort of

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>longer term averages. And we haven't really seen that. We've

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>seen a correction and evaluations, but we haven't sliced through

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>those averages. So somewhat cautious there. And on the bond side,

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably a little more just incrementally constructive. You know,

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the inflation adjusted rates of return,

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>real rates are positive by about a hundred and fifty

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>basis points now, and if we're sitting here in December

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, there were there were negative by about a

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred ten basis points, and so there's certainly more cushion

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and there is an alternative on the margin to two

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>equities at least here in the short term. Yeah, looking

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>at the yield on the tenure pushing up by around

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve basis points is following kind of push hard and

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>yields in Europe earlier he Aaron for you how much

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of this is a story of good data bad news

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in the context of the FED. We've kind of been

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about this all day on Bloomberg Radio and television. Yeah,

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I mean, you know, day to day earlier

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this week that certainly seemed to play out where we

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>had the jolt status suggesting that maybe there was some

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>softening in the employment side of the docket. And then

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we saw the equity market surge and the dollar was

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>was weakening too over the last couple of days, which

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly was a tailwind too. I think the equity and

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>risk on trade, but you know today is a little

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>different yet. I s M services that were stronger than

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>expected in the markets on changed and bonds are actually

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>selling off in price higher and yield. So but I

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>do think the longer term trend is what you're alluding to,

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>which is the FED is looking for evidence that the

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>employment picture is indeed softening and that there's a trend

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.239
<v Speaker 1>line to it. We'll see, of course pay rolls on Friday, um.

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But they're also looking for the economic data to play through,

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's been very mixed. We saw I s M

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing earlier this week, which was weaker than anticipated, and

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>then of course the services number today was stronger. So um,

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, we'll have to see there. There's certainly,

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, caught between a bit of a rock and

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a hard place, and and they know there are reputations

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>on the line. They probably entered the game of raising

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>rates a little too late and they certainly do not

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be accused of pulling the rip cord on

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>their tightening exercise too early. So does that mean we're

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>in a recession, will be in a recession, or I

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, how do you see that side of the conversation. Well,

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I we do debate that question. We

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>have had two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth, so

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that tends to be the definition. Um, some

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>refer to that as a technical recession and others consider

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it an unofficial one. We'll have to see what the

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>NBR says later on on that front. But what I

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>do think, you know, we need to be thinking about is,

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, where where is the trend for earnings. We

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen earnings roll over yet. There's an anticipation that

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that's going to hurt, that's going to occur in the

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>quarters ahead, and how will the markets react to that,

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and will they get ahead of it? Is this going

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a shower recession or a deep recession? And um,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly there there's there's lots of sort of

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>varying opinions around that particular point. Hey guys, just a

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of public service announcement, and then ask that one

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>just ticking into the red down two tents of one percent,

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>joining other major industries. That is a pretty short lived

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>late rally in the session, with about five minutes left

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to go in trading. It's interesting, is recession priced in?

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've kind of seen earnings expectations and equities

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>come down aaron, but in a recession, typically reprice expectations

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>right ten. And it doesn't feel like we actually have

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that full recession pricing, particularly in the technology sector, but

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>other corners of the equities market. Yeah, I think a

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>very shallow recession, I would argue, is probably priced in.

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But if we are seeing some sort of double digit

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>decline and let's say SMP earnings next year, um, that's

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>probably not yet priced into the markets. And um, and

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we'll see how we'll have to see

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>how that how that trend plays out. Certainly there are

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>headwinds to the strong dollar. It was nice to see

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week the dollar weekend, which I think is

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>providing a bit of an airbag for the equity market here.

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of uncertainty outside the United States,

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>which can on the margin, keep the dollar stronger even

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>if our economic that is deteriorating. So where do you

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>commit new money? Which is a question I like to

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ask everybody, and I am curious. You know, Aaron, is

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>new money coming in? Uh? Well yes? And also on

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the on the first question, um, and you know, whenever

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.719
<v Speaker 1>there's uncertainty, there's there's concerned. Whenever there's concerned, there are

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 1>um people that may feel as though they need better

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>advice or they haven't had professional advice before. So we're

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in the business of providing that to two clients and

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>creating you risk adjusted asset allocations and providing advice across

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>their their financial life, whether it's an individual, family or

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>non for profit organization. So for us, we're not heavily tactical,

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but if we are not at target on certain asset classes,

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we will make adjustments. I think at this moment where

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are making adjustments, extending duration on the margin,

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>UH within fixed income makes sense. You can buy an

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>investment grade portfolio that mature is at the end of

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twenty four with a yield to maturity

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of almost five percent right now, and that has an

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>average maturity of less than two years. You can buy

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>something similar that matures at the end of two thousand

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty three with a yield to maturity of four seventy

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and has an average maturity of less than one year.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have two year treasury yields at the

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this year at twenty basis points. Now we're

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>at four fifteen. So we think the portfolio makes a

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>lot more sense going forward here than it did at

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year. And so you know, on

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the margin, on a risk adjusted basis, we think if

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you're underweight, you're fixed income exposure, may want to may

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>want to wake up and and reallocate on the margin. Also,

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>mortgage backed securities Fannie and Freddy mortgages, you can buy

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>them through an e t F for individually. Those are

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>quite attractive, trading below below par right now with a

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>five and a half percent coupon interest been compelling risk

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>adjusted return opportunity or in our opinion, as you said earlier,

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>there's an alternative stocks at this point because of the

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>move up that we've seen in various fixed income and

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>yields in particular. Aaron Kennon, co founder and CEO Clear

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Harbor Asset Management, joining us on the phone from Stanford, Connecticut.

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on YouTube. Search to

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Global News