Speaker 1: M watch up and welcome back to another episode and
Speaker 1: No Sillers podcast with your host. Now funk that with
Speaker 1: your low glasses Malone. He told group group roof, saying,
Speaker 1: the dogs trying to stand at the radar. That's it, man.
Speaker 1: I uh, it sounds crazy. I don't know if this
Speaker 1: makes medical sense, but I was telling you before. It
Speaker 1: feels like my body whenever it comes into contact with
Speaker 1: COVID At this point, it automatically goes into full self
Speaker 1: defense mode, so I could always feel it even if
Speaker 1: I'm not going to get sick or COVID is not
Speaker 1: going to You know, it's like a boxing mac. Like
Speaker 1: when you first started learning how to box, right, the
Speaker 1: most scariest thing in the world you fear is getting punched,
Speaker 1: so you overdefend your whole body, put your arms up,
Speaker 1: and you start doing everything. But you know, the more
Speaker 1: you learn about boxing, you tend to you start learning
Speaker 1: how to defend real slick or like more effective to
Speaker 1: where you're still in position to punch like a great fighter.
Speaker 1: You know, a great fighter is the greatest fighters. Rather
Speaker 1: they can put themselves in defense just enough, but they're
Speaker 1: also ready to punch. Uh fighting like Adrian Browner, who
Speaker 1: I think is like a a first ballot Hall of Famer,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. I mean, when he's not,
Speaker 1: they're not gonna get the first ballot, even though he
Speaker 1: probably deserves it. But he's a Hall of Famer. Um.
Speaker 1: His his his main issue. And my boy Salas told
Speaker 1: me this a while ago. It takes him too long
Speaker 1: ago from defense to offense. Does that make sense? So
Speaker 1: like he's and then he goes on offense, and I
Speaker 1: feel like my body is doing that whenever he encounters COVID.
Speaker 1: He goes into like everything blocks up, and it makes
Speaker 1: my whole body almost feel like it's shutting down versus,
Speaker 1: you know, fighting the battle. I don't know if that
Speaker 1: makes somebody enjoys my podcast that's in the medical field,
Speaker 1: and let me know if that sounds crazy. I mean,
Speaker 1: I just talked at length with the research scientist we
Speaker 1: had on like a year ago, like last week, and
Speaker 1: I he sees a lot of stuff. I shot him
Speaker 1: up long form interview with a research scientists from Stanford
Speaker 1: to see what he thought about it, and he's like,
Speaker 1: there's you know, it's absurd not to look at this
Speaker 1: virus as synthetically produced at this point, just giving its
Speaker 1: nature and and the way I could describe the virus
Speaker 1: like as a boxing parallel, like in a touch and go.
Speaker 1: It would be like if you were to take you know,
Speaker 1: a Joe boxer and extend his physical prime fifty years,
Speaker 1: so that he had fifty years of entering boxing knowledge
Speaker 1: and none of the physical deterioration, you know, like it
Speaker 1: was very much manipulated. The generations of evolution that happened
Speaker 1: in the lab occurred, you know, to the extent that
Speaker 1: it's like much more durable then it should otherwise have been,
Speaker 1: and and much more um like like he evolved. You know,
Speaker 1: like when you when you say, like we'll see a
Speaker 1: new variant, it's because the original gene mutates slightly all
Speaker 1: the time. So like I might cough a thousand variants
Speaker 1: out nine and ninety nine of them are like birth
Speaker 1: defect variants, and one of them Superman, and that one
Speaker 1: will survive and it will make you know, offspring of
Speaker 1: that virus, etcetera, etcetera. It's more like attrition than whatever else.
Speaker 1: So yeah, for whatever reason, your body just mine too.
Speaker 1: It's funny because you know, you're bringing up that scientist
Speaker 1: we had on the podcast the research scientists. Did you
Speaker 1: did I ever tell you they wanted to actually take
Speaker 1: that podcast down They was having problems black effect. That
Speaker 1: doesn't surprise me, But no, you never told me that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they didn't. That's why I don't think I made a
Speaker 1: big deal. I'm good at not making a big deal
Speaker 1: out of something unless it becomes a big deal. Um.
Speaker 1: And they wanted to take that down because they It's
Speaker 1: like this, like the one thing America don't have a
Speaker 1: lot of things right as a country. You know, the
Speaker 1: idea of it makes sense, but the way it's you know,
Speaker 1: I call it devolving, it doesn't really make it just
Speaker 1: keep moving into these really weird spaces of selfishness and
Speaker 1: not just was having this conversation. We'll get back into that.
Speaker 1: But the one thing they did have right was the
Speaker 1: concept of freedom of speech. M It was like one
Speaker 1: of the endless concepts that made America great that a country,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, It made the citizen as
Speaker 1: powerful as the government itself. Without it, you know, you
Speaker 1: you you in trouble. And it's a character. I've never
Speaker 1: seen any of his content until now, right, It's a
Speaker 1: character's name is Andrew Tate. I think he was a
Speaker 1: UFC boxer at one time, but he kind of goes
Speaker 1: around speaking and I don't know enough about his content.
Speaker 1: I never really got into it. Just like, um, oh boy,
Speaker 1: rest in peace, that died in Georgia. The brother with
Speaker 1: the glasses. Oh yeah, Um, I don't understand why I'm
Speaker 1: drawing the black name. Don't that much of his content,
Speaker 1: Like I've consumed enough of you to understand this premise.
Speaker 1: Kevin Samuels, Kevin Sam's Rescued Peace, Kevin Samers, Um, but
Speaker 1: I've never seen any of his name. Andrew Tate, excuse me,
Speaker 1: Andrew take. I haven't consumed enough of Andrew takes content. Like,
Speaker 1: but the stuff that I've saw, the little highlights was
Speaker 1: like kind of like caveman type thing, Like it wasn't bad,
Speaker 1: it was just super old primitive. And like I've seen
Speaker 1: all of the outlets, they're starting to like ban him
Speaker 1: right where. It's like, uh, Facebook and I G banned
Speaker 1: his account and now YouTube, if I understand correctly, I'm
Speaker 1: not sure this is true. I don't want to throw
Speaker 1: YouTube under the bus, but you can't search for his channel,
Speaker 1: mom more is giving you like a a broken link.
Speaker 1: I believe YouTube banned two very very very prominent uh
Speaker 1: conservative host shows just last week. And it's weird, right
Speaker 1: because these are private businesses. Yeah, Like, these are very
Speaker 1: much private businesses, uh, I G. Facebook, Meta, you know
Speaker 1: and YouTube their private businesses. But the problem is because
Speaker 1: of their economic growth and their influence, they become as
Speaker 1: influential to the government as the population as a mad
Speaker 1: thousand percent. I heard the most and I'm gonna send
Speaker 1: it to you, um the most powerful interview as far
Speaker 1: as information and X and explanation over the weekend I've
Speaker 1: ever heard in my life. As far as describing it was,
Speaker 1: it was the author of a book called The Scandal
Speaker 1: of Money talking about basically like the last twenty years
Speaker 1: in the relationship between like world banks so to speak,
Speaker 1: government finance and large corporations, and how like I p
Speaker 1: o s used to be seven to one relative to
Speaker 1: mergers and acquisitions and now there's twenty eight mergers and
Speaker 1: acquisitions for everyone I p O. So as far as
Speaker 1: like looking at YouTube, Google, Facebook, Meta, um ship like
Speaker 1: that these you know, the hyper amount of pumping of
Speaker 1: capital through quantitative quantitative easing efforts has turned these governed,
Speaker 1: these private companies into pseudo socialized government funded entities that
Speaker 1: are able to be manipulated and hide behind the private
Speaker 1: corporation status. I mean they obviously there's that section to
Speaker 1: thirty law that protects all the social media companies from
Speaker 1: you know, being libel I guess for what's on their platform.
Speaker 1: But then they're also highly incentivized to manipulate and police
Speaker 1: what's on their platform actively, so they kind of walk
Speaker 1: both sides of the line simultaneously. And it's yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's turning into seriously problematic issues for for people who
Speaker 1: don't know how to go, or don't care or have
Speaker 1: the time or whatever else. And there's a million of
Speaker 1: reasons why Americans aren't able to look at us at
Speaker 1: a topic. Consider how is this topic being given to me?
Speaker 1: Where can I find other sources? How can I find that?
Speaker 1: And what does that mean? You know, it's very difficult
Speaker 1: to get true, reasonable objective reporting on things anymore. No ceilings,
Speaker 1: No ceilings, gl my man Peter in the spot under
Speaker 1: the weather a little bit, but we're gonna rock out anyway. Um.
Speaker 1: It's just what makes it weird for me, Like, I
Speaker 1: don't think nothing is objective, you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't think it's I just think it was always
Speaker 1: healthy to hear both sides of any concept. Yeah, the
Speaker 1: truth lies somewhere in the middle. I feel like reporting,
Speaker 1: you know, if if you're gonna just make it a
Speaker 1: simple spectrum, if purely objective, is zero and conservative or progressive,
Speaker 1: whatever the hell is positive ten and negative ten. I
Speaker 1: feel like fifteen years ago, twenty years ago, spinning slant
Speaker 1: would maybe encroached to like three or four, you know,
Speaker 1: on the spectrum positive or negative. Now it starts at
Speaker 1: positive or negative eight and exists between eight and ten,
Speaker 1: Like like the the distance from neutral on both sides
Speaker 1: has grown tremendously. I agree, I agree, um, but it
Speaker 1: all goes back into that same concept like where I
Speaker 1: feel like I t Van van Lengthen about this all
Speaker 1: the time. But it's like I call that movement it's
Speaker 1: like dr cockto you. Ever seen the the movie Demolition
Speaker 1: Man with Vester Stallone, Yeah, Westerny Snipes with the blood here, Yeah,
Speaker 1: where they all try to find this space of just
Speaker 1: positivity and niceness and blah blah blah that's not really
Speaker 1: nice at a certain place, it starts just becoming ridiculous. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Like that's how I described culture in the Bay Area
Speaker 1: when I lived in Oakland, and like, oh, four or five, Um,
Speaker 1: but I tease him all the time like that. He
Speaker 1: had posted a video of some parents, you know, scaring
Speaker 1: their kids with a with a ghost. Yeah, and I
Speaker 1: thought it was funny, you know what I mean, Like
Speaker 1: I remember getting scared as a kid, and they just
Speaker 1: started to talk about how traumatizing they're traumatizing your kids,
Speaker 1: And don't I shut your bitch as up, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean? Like, I don't know if it's something
Speaker 1: wrong with me or them, but there's something wrong. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna take a shotgun response and just go it's probably them.
Speaker 1: I don't get it. I don't like you want to
Speaker 1: and it's and and I saw another it was like
Speaker 1: a grip of comments on the social media post where
Speaker 1: they was thanking God for silence in his man and
Speaker 1: I'm like, he's so uninterested to me. I never went
Speaker 1: and saw his content, And why are you thanking God
Speaker 1: for something you just don't have to look at? Yeah,
Speaker 1: That's that's what's so interesting to me about it right now,
Speaker 1: is that you described it like perfectly in an indirect fashion.
Speaker 1: People are not concerned about what they take in because
Speaker 1: they think that they're brilliant and geniuses and able to
Speaker 1: cut through the bullshit, but they have no confidence in
Speaker 1: their fellow man, so they're like, well, I know it's bullshit,
Speaker 1: but you just can't let other people see this because
Speaker 1: they're such buffoonish morons that they're going to take it
Speaker 1: and run with it and misinterpret it. So it needs
Speaker 1: to be taken down completely to protect all of us
Speaker 1: from the ocean of idiots, which we assume is everyone
Speaker 1: but ourselves. Mhm. I like it. Oh, I ain't gonna
Speaker 1: lie to you. Some of it is some stuff that's
Speaker 1: hurting my feelings, but I enjoy like it. It brings
Speaker 1: me to another depth of existence, you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: Like it kind of makes my existence a lot more complete.
Speaker 1: And um, I was just having this conversation, and I
Speaker 1: promised myself I wouldn't bring it up until I took
Speaker 1: more time to do research. But I'm starting to think
Speaker 1: the therapy turns everybody into white people. Oh yeah, I
Speaker 1: don't know what the serious sense of selfishness every last person,
Speaker 1: whether it's my homegirl, Debbie dad, It's like all of
Speaker 1: the conversations become I I I me me me me,
Speaker 1: I I I I. And it's like, you know, the
Speaker 1: act of being, the verb of being a human being
Speaker 1: is is humane, right, It's all consistent with caring about
Speaker 1: everyone else. Now, I think there is a place to
Speaker 1: find between the whole world and yourself. But I still
Speaker 1: think the whole world matters. And when you constantly act
Speaker 1: like the whole world doesn't matter, that's when you start
Speaker 1: having problems. You know, like the best parallel that I
Speaker 1: can draw to in real life. That kind of illustrates
Speaker 1: this concept, because you're right, it's all about how I feel,
Speaker 1: me me, me, and damn everybody else. It's like when
Speaker 1: you get to a freeway, we're emerging point and and
Speaker 1: most of the people are trying to merge in an
Speaker 1: orderly fashion, and then you get a handful as always,
Speaker 1: you know, the right lane that's expiring and merging in
Speaker 1: that will pull out race the front jam. It up
Speaker 1: for everybody else to create a traffic jams that they
Speaker 1: themselves can cut everybody else off and get ahead of
Speaker 1: dozen cars, you know. And and that's kind of the
Speaker 1: societal activity that we're seeing happen now, Like everybody's and
Speaker 1: and therapist I don't give the like. I think that
Speaker 1: is the biggest pile of you know what for the
Speaker 1: participants involve there's never really much accountability. It's all about
Speaker 1: just feeling better by hook or by crook, and hopefully
Speaker 1: you don't feel so much better that you stopped coming.
Speaker 1: So there's never seemingly an end point. I just I
Speaker 1: gotta do a lot more research to keep talking about it.
Speaker 1: But man, that ship bothers me back to the censorship ship.
Speaker 1: Then you get manned off of Twitter. That's a fact.
Speaker 1: And what's the actual post that got you man off
Speaker 1: of Twitter? Do you remember? I don't know. It was
Speaker 1: either a sarcastic comment or it was a specific study
Speaker 1: that was sent to me by that same uh researcher
Speaker 1: that we had on the show. That was just an early,
Speaker 1: you know, incredible laboratory scientific study about one aspect of COVID.
Speaker 1: And I put it on Twitter, and then I said,
Speaker 1: and then some I saw some other posts about something,
Speaker 1: and I made some like really obviously sarcastic joke that
Speaker 1: was very obvious and very very watered down, and it
Speaker 1: wasn't even and that's why I don't think it was that.
Speaker 1: And somebody goes oh are you saying that? And I go, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's clearly what I'm saying, being even more sarcastic. But
Speaker 1: sometime in the subsequent couple of hours I got banned.
Speaker 1: I'm assuming it's much more for the study than for
Speaker 1: the sarcastic remark, but but they won't tell me. I
Speaker 1: can't determine what's what it is. When I look back
Speaker 1: at my account, it's like largely wiped, it's still there.
Speaker 1: I mean, I still can't get on Twitter, but I
Speaker 1: don't know. So some guy just um sued Twitter or Facebook,
Speaker 1: some uh COVID research scientists who got banned permanently, and
Speaker 1: it went on and on for a year, and he
Speaker 1: won and got back on because he got discovery of
Speaker 1: communications between the government and the platform where the government
Speaker 1: was attempting to use the platform overtly through clear language
Speaker 1: in the emails exactly. And it was and that was
Speaker 1: what pierced the private corporation protection in court because they
Speaker 1: were like, well, now you're doing the bidding of the government,
Speaker 1: and the government cannot censor under the First Amendment. Therefore
Speaker 1: you cannot on behalf of the government. So you have
Speaker 1: to let this guy back on it and that was
Speaker 1: litigation that went on for about two years or no,
Speaker 1: went on for just uh just about one year, because
Speaker 1: that was a lot of bands. How do you feel
Speaker 1: about is there anything that should be censored? Yeah? Well, yeah, certainly,
Speaker 1: I think that there's a lot of sexual stuff that
Speaker 1: should be censored because you can't necessarily like obviously, like
Speaker 1: pedophile ship is a crime, so you can't have that
Speaker 1: on there. That's not very ambiguous. But also like it's
Speaker 1: probably not great to have like ten year alls looking
Speaker 1: at Twitter porn and I don't know how obviously I'm
Speaker 1: not ten, so when I don't know how to make it,
Speaker 1: like if I'm a kid the seaport at nine and
Speaker 1: ten years old, that's ah another story. Yeah, but like
Speaker 1: if you can't police who's seeing it age wise, there's
Speaker 1: probably you know, might not should be there. Otherwise, as
Speaker 1: far as just simple ideas and should go, no, I ain't.
Speaker 1: Just the only thing I would say is there's certain
Speaker 1: ship that people below a certain age probably certain just
Speaker 1: simply see whether it be obscenely violent or obscenely sexual
Speaker 1: or whatever. Outside of that, I don't think so at all.
Speaker 1: I just think they just a bit too harsh on
Speaker 1: certain parts like women naked who the fund cares like
Speaker 1: when you're growing up seeing I don't know if this
Speaker 1: is normal in other people's community. When I was a kid,
Speaker 1: I saw my mom naked. I never thought it was
Speaker 1: attractive or none is my mom. He's like, man, mom
Speaker 1: put on some clothes and ever see my mom naked life?
Speaker 1: And I think, and I know some of my mommies
Speaker 1: seeing the moms naked not like looking peeking, like your
Speaker 1: mom is a little bit free because it's your mom,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, just like walks out to
Speaker 1: get something from the kitchen, you know what what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: But I think naked bodies is just a bit too
Speaker 1: I get the concept of sex being a little bit
Speaker 1: you know, to glorified, which I still don't know why
Speaker 1: that would matter to a seven year old. I don't
Speaker 1: maybe they would. I don't know what then you be
Speaker 1: thinking at seven, because I didn't not think about sex
Speaker 1: at seven, but there was a different time. Yeah. But uh,
Speaker 1: like they just a bit too harsh on naked women,
Speaker 1: naked women bodies, naked bodies in general. I think, like
Speaker 1: we we we have games where you know, people are
Speaker 1: playing games and you're seeing people die before you see
Speaker 1: it in the naked body. Yeah, you know, kids are
Speaker 1: growing up in today's ever like we didn't see people.
Speaker 1: I mean you had to grow up where I grew
Speaker 1: up back to see somebody get killed when you was young.
Speaker 1: Now today it's in every video game. You're seeing people
Speaker 1: killing each other. They shooting each Do you see in
Speaker 1: damn bodies before you see nakee people? I mean, so,
Speaker 1: I just think the fear of making this versus the
Speaker 1: fear of like violence is just to be unique, it is.
Speaker 1: I know that that's been a conversation comparing like the
Speaker 1: United States application of censorship like FCC ship to um Europe,
Speaker 1: where Europe is like very lax on nudity and very
Speaker 1: restrictive on violence and worthy opposite here for whatever that is,
Speaker 1: I don't give a ship about Europe. It makes more
Speaker 1: sense to me, Like I don't think I would have
Speaker 1: as much fear of seeing somebody naked man seeing somebody
Speaker 1: could be here blew off. Yeah, And like the manifestation
Speaker 1: if we're like talking about like logical extremes, like what
Speaker 1: would be the worst thing that I guess could happen,
Speaker 1: Like you're exposed to a bunch of nudity when you're young,
Speaker 1: and it fux you up and you grow up to
Speaker 1: be a slupt versus your disinsised of violence, you grow
Speaker 1: up to be a killer. Like, honestly, being a slut
Speaker 1: ain't really about letting somebody see you naked. Like, I
Speaker 1: think there's this weird premise of like strippers are slepts,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, no, they're not there. They're fantises. They
Speaker 1: sell fantasy. Some of them trying to sell the reality.
Speaker 1: Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying some people ain't
Speaker 1: just regardless of reality. That was a quote from like
Speaker 1: episode four. I'm trying, you know, they're trying to sell
Speaker 1: fake pussy for money. I'm trying to push real thick
Speaker 1: for free. Mean he no, Like so you know what
Speaker 1: I mean? Like, I think the stripp strippers get a
Speaker 1: Strippers aren't sluts. They sell a fantasy that you could
Speaker 1: have action that a woman that is as you know, sexually,
Speaker 1: as the concept of Because it don't mean that they
Speaker 1: funk good because they stripped. They the two don't have
Speaker 1: nothing to do with each other. Now, strippers don't even
Speaker 1: use their real names. They use fantasy names. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: they do alaja or yeah so but yeah, it's like, um,
Speaker 1: I don't think that person is a slut as much
Speaker 1: as somebody who actually slutting. Yeah, Um, yeah, I don't
Speaker 1: quite get that. And citizenship was getting worse and worse. Um,
Speaker 1: well you heard a Project Veritas. No there. I guess
Speaker 1: the mainstream media describes them as a quote unquote like
Speaker 1: far right pseudo journalistic organization or whatever. But it's just
Speaker 1: like a guy and his team and they basically take um.
Speaker 1: They try to solicit like either hot mikes or um
Speaker 1: whistleblower content. And somebody came across Joe Biden's daughter's diary
Speaker 1: and gave it to Project Veritas to publish. Project Veritas
Speaker 1: got the diary, they looked at it, they decided not
Speaker 1: to publish it, but it was reported that they were
Speaker 1: in possession of it. So at like four in the morning,
Speaker 1: this guy's you know, apartment in New York, the fb
Speaker 1: I came through, full blown hardcore rad handcuffs, arrested, taken
Speaker 1: into custody, and took all of his ship just because
Speaker 1: he had it, and because he's reported a lot of
Speaker 1: ship that isn't particularly favorable for politicians or government agencies.
Speaker 1: And that's something that you know, we don't see through
Speaker 1: like years and years and years of history happening in
Speaker 1: the United States with the with the press. Mm hmm,
Speaker 1: I'm definitely so. Do you think that the masses of
Speaker 1: American population are the masses are ignorant? Right? To some degree?
Speaker 1: They don't have knowledge of pretty much some of these things.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's I don't think there's stupid. I
Speaker 1: think people don't have enough time for sure, Like you
Speaker 1: have to have time to read, you have to have
Speaker 1: time to research, you have to have time to formulate thought. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean you could just think anything, but to formulate
Speaker 1: a a whale thought out thought, you need time. And yeah,
Speaker 1: when most people have children, most people get jaws, most
Speaker 1: people get married. You don't have enough time for yourself
Speaker 1: to fully think ideas out. So you tend to take
Speaker 1: whatever you feel represents you the most and run with it. Right.
Speaker 1: It's easier, right, It's it's easier, and you end up
Speaker 1: and people, you know, they have this weird thing to
Speaker 1: where you know, now once they're running with it and
Speaker 1: they're running into things, right, they're starting to run in
Speaker 1: the things they don't agree with. But now it would
Speaker 1: take too much work and energy to rebuild and go
Speaker 1: into something else totally. And I think that also either
Speaker 1: contributes to or is combined with this reality of just
Speaker 1: like human behavior, where if you believe in something for
Speaker 1: a long time, like you're comfortable with that belief, and
Speaker 1: when that belief is challenged very overtly, you're gonna exist
Speaker 1: that because you don't want to believe that a you
Speaker 1: could be wrong or be whatever it is that you
Speaker 1: are talking about. Their like like, what are the ramifications
Speaker 1: of that belief actually being wrong? What? What? What does
Speaker 1: that mean for me and the people around me? And
Speaker 1: it's funny because I'm the same way like with people,
Speaker 1: like I tend to challenge people think Like I said,
Speaker 1: people think that I'm what's the name it's uh, what
Speaker 1: is it called? It was a word specifically that I
Speaker 1: like to challenge or just argue with people. And it's
Speaker 1: weird because I don't like, oh, yeah, I've called you
Speaker 1: a troll for a hundred years and I'm really not
Speaker 1: like I'm not at all. But it's another word. What's
Speaker 1: the what's the professional word that they use? Uh, contrarian,
Speaker 1: contrarian And I'm not like, I don't like to this.
Speaker 1: I just have more time to I invest more time
Speaker 1: into ideas than most people noticed me, and you rarely
Speaker 1: argue like that's true because I pretty much know you
Speaker 1: put enough thought into it. And whatever we're talking about,
Speaker 1: if I'm arguing with you about it is because I
Speaker 1: know you've put in the thought. Now, that's not to
Speaker 1: say that if I if I because the thing like
Speaker 1: when we talk about concept of racing America, we argue
Speaker 1: all the time. And it's not because I don't think
Speaker 1: you don't know because you're white. I just think you
Speaker 1: don't know because you just don't know, particularly that only
Speaker 1: you don't have any concept. But it's certain times I'm
Speaker 1: gonna not Pete that ain't right. But then most of
Speaker 1: the times I'm not. I don't like, I don't troll
Speaker 1: you because I think you take time to know what
Speaker 1: the funk you'll be talking about most people, Like I
Speaker 1: had this conversation on Twitter and I was saying that um,
Speaker 1: Tim Duncan was a greater player than Kobe Bryant, right,
Speaker 1: and it's splitting here because they're real close. Oh man,
Speaker 1: That I'm sure went over very well, you know, But
Speaker 1: I was saying and I kept I made it simple.
Speaker 1: I said, Tim Duncan, right, is a better power forward
Speaker 1: than Kobe Bryant is a shooting guard. I's had a
Speaker 1: greater career. And it's tough for people to understand that
Speaker 1: because it's a passion that goes behind what they like.
Speaker 1: It's it's almost to the point to where it's like
Speaker 1: what I like has to be the best or I
Speaker 1: can't like it. Like I don't feel like that. I
Speaker 1: can like stuff that's not the best because I don't care.
Speaker 1: I just like it full places that other people don't like,
Speaker 1: and I enjoy it. I don't given what y'all say.
Speaker 1: I enjoy it. I'm gonna go there regardless. I think Wendy's.
Speaker 1: I love Wendy's. Wendy's has the best burger on the
Speaker 1: mainstream franchise. No, not like not counting five guys. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I agree with me. I actually enjoy it. Now. I
Speaker 1: wouldn't argue you that Wendy's is the greatest burger. I
Speaker 1: said they have the best burger. I enjoyed their burgers
Speaker 1: the most. Your favorite huh? Your favorite? Yes? But when
Speaker 1: I have these other conversations, so do you think it's
Speaker 1: like these companies ideas at that point the center because
Speaker 1: it doesn't go with their theory. Like everybody in these
Speaker 1: companies admit it cannot think like people people. You know that.
Speaker 1: I think you'd be very surprised. Yeah, I think that
Speaker 1: you're dealing with very niche personality types and very boutique
Speaker 1: regions of the country. So you get like this distillation
Speaker 1: of echo chamber effect. Like if you're an elite programmer
Speaker 1: that's good enough to be programming at one of these
Speaker 1: companies and you're actually physically writing what's basically your interpretation
Speaker 1: of an instruction for an algorithm and your team is
Speaker 1: that's a very very like minded group of people. Um,
Speaker 1: it's a small area of of the broader economy and
Speaker 1: a small cultural area of the country. Um, that's largely
Speaker 1: the time. I just I literally and not to cut
Speaker 1: you off. We just had a conversation where I'm saying,
Speaker 1: the l g B t Q, the the plus community, right,
Speaker 1: they have so much way on public thought and what
Speaker 1: the government is doing. The country is turning into a
Speaker 1: communist country, is becoming the voice of a small community
Speaker 1: starting to project everything onto the masses. Yeah, that's a
Speaker 1: like I My opinion of that is A is A
Speaker 1: is a little bit in verse. I look at that
Speaker 1: as kind of like an on steroids version of the
Speaker 1: way I look at a lot of the race driven
Speaker 1: rhetoric in the country where you have people that are wealthy,
Speaker 1: powerful white liberals by and large that don't really give
Speaker 1: a ship one way or the other about Black America
Speaker 1: or gay America or Transamerica. But they know that they
Speaker 1: can capitalize on the fact that other people might, so
Speaker 1: they will use those communities as leverage to look good. Yeah,
Speaker 1: to look as the concept of righteous or just that's
Speaker 1: my personal pain. I could be flat as wrong. That's
Speaker 1: just how I see it, right, I think you're right.
Speaker 1: I think you're I mean, I do think yeah, I
Speaker 1: think you're right. I don't think it's every last one,
Speaker 1: but I do think the majority. That's how it is. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and and and the majority. When you're talking about that
Speaker 1: level of sway, the majority defines the apparatus. Mm hmmm.
Speaker 1: Do you think that the public so being the public
Speaker 1: is not concerned? Right, because remember this happening to fair
Speaker 1: con too. Fairy con got banned off of these sites.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah. Do you think it is a helpful thing
Speaker 1: to humanity? Or is it a confusing thing when they
Speaker 1: when they start the censor certain person that these that
Speaker 1: are strong or that are captivating. I think that it's very,
Speaker 1: very bad to do. I think that the mystery is
Speaker 1: oftentimes far worse than the reality. If I was, you know,
Speaker 1: somebody who just said the most horrible things you could
Speaker 1: think of all the time on social media, had a
Speaker 1: large audience that for whatever reason, not every person in
Speaker 1: your audience is listening to you for the same reason,
Speaker 1: and not everybody in your audience is walking away with
Speaker 1: the same message. But if you suddenly banned me, well
Speaker 1: then you're going to get a romanticized caricature you know,
Speaker 1: of the ideas that I was talking about at that point.
Speaker 1: M you can't even monitor it at that point. No,
Speaker 1: you're dealing with like the reality of what I would
Speaker 1: be saying versus like somebody's hypothetical case that I might
Speaker 1: have been saying, you know, and those two things are
Speaker 1: gonna be really different. Mm hmm. It's positives about the sensorship. Besides,
Speaker 1: people just feel better, No, they really aren't. At any
Speaker 1: time that you bury the individual's ability to think. There
Speaker 1: aren't a lot of positives to that because because you
Speaker 1: you don't even learn to properly criticize. You don't even
Speaker 1: learn why you should dislike a bad idea because you
Speaker 1: don't even see it. You know, you don't even you
Speaker 1: don't even grow as a man. That's a great point.
Speaker 1: One of my boys, my boy lc Um from off
Speaker 1: the East Coast, he's from one of the Caribbean islands
Speaker 1: based out of the the East coastal came to American and
Speaker 1: the East Coast, and he's telling me about this particular
Speaker 1: movement and I didn't see what was bad about it.
Speaker 1: He was telling me. He's like, I'm telling you ged
Speaker 1: rhetoric is bad and it's crazy because it is a
Speaker 1: pro black movement. And I didn't see it because I
Speaker 1: felt the just or the initial message of it. But
Speaker 1: over the time I started to realize what was wrong.
Speaker 1: The difference with me is I got a chance to
Speaker 1: think about it. And the difference with me also is
Speaker 1: I didn't just jump head first because I like something.
Speaker 1: It's like, all, let me just look at a little
Speaker 1: bit more, you know what I mean. Like, And then
Speaker 1: over time I started realizing I had to call or
Speaker 1: C and said, hey, man, you was right. Hey, I
Speaker 1: didn't pique this I told you, and I was like, damn,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. It's it's such a weird
Speaker 1: place to be, you know, when you're trying to organize
Speaker 1: human beings. You know what I mean? And too, I
Speaker 1: guess that's why my fear as a leader. I never
Speaker 1: wanted to lead the masses because I would be a
Speaker 1: lot more you know. Um, I'd be a lot more
Speaker 1: like a like a like a parent. I don't believe
Speaker 1: in explaining everything the human beings. Yeah, that's probably why
Speaker 1: I'm not a parent, because I don't want to explain
Speaker 1: everything to you all the time. Sometimes I want to
Speaker 1: explain something to you when there's things, but sometimes your
Speaker 1: children they have to know to just listen and trust you.
Speaker 1: And if you always have to explain something, it could
Speaker 1: you know, where how we grow up. It could cost
Speaker 1: you your life versus you just listening. You know what
Speaker 1: I mean. It's not simple in every other world. And
Speaker 1: that's how I feel. Even like if I was, I
Speaker 1: would be a lot more like a dictator than a president,
Speaker 1: Like I would go with what I know is best
Speaker 1: for humanity, and I see people doing that. But the
Speaker 1: difference is I would be out front with it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't really hide it, and whether it's right or wrong,
Speaker 1: I don't think people like that. No. I think there's
Speaker 1: a huge difference between leading people to a point of
Speaker 1: their own free choice and leading people to a point
Speaker 1: of your free choice, you know, And we've kind of
Speaker 1: cross that bridge a lot in this country. It's the
Speaker 1: social engineering is so severe. It's like, okay, we as
Speaker 1: though whatever like right now is making all decisions. The
Speaker 1: progressive you know movement, we think it's best for all
Speaker 1: of humanity to go specifically there, and we're going to
Speaker 1: lead all of them there, whether they like it or not,
Speaker 1: because we think it's best that they go there, Whereas
Speaker 1: in a more healthy environment, you'd say, all right, we're
Speaker 1: gonna lead people to a place where they can constructively
Speaker 1: make the most of it for themselves. And then we'll
Speaker 1: start to see the negative ramifications that we're seeing the
Speaker 1: negative ramifications of that in the economy right now for sure.
Speaker 1: So we'll start to see it more societally if it
Speaker 1: continues over the next ten years. Okay, So I think
Speaker 1: I remember talking to you. You don't really identify as
Speaker 1: a conservative, even though some of your views line up there. Um,
Speaker 1: if you had to see three major figures in the
Speaker 1: liberal movement be be uh banned on social media? Who
Speaker 1: do you feel rhetoric is just as damaged liberal standpoint?
Speaker 1: What's interesting is that question is defined almost as much
Speaker 1: by the content that they put out as it is
Speaker 1: by like, I think the most impactful like liberal content
Speaker 1: mechanism is the censorship. You know, I think it's less
Speaker 1: about what they do say than what they don't say.
Speaker 1: But I would say, whoever the leading voice in the
Speaker 1: environmentalist movement is, I would say Fauci or whatever the
Speaker 1: leading account is for a lot of this quote unquote
Speaker 1: health and safety bullshit, which has been a train wreck.
Speaker 1: And so it's at that point you would hold them
Speaker 1: liable for the economic breakdown of America over the last
Speaker 1: well we've we've been heading there, but then now we
Speaker 1: just it's just the steam got shortened with real fast. Yeah,
Speaker 1: things have changed a bit, uh and the last few years.
Speaker 1: To me, the most dangerous man in America is Larry Fink.
Speaker 1: Who is Larry Fink. Larry Fink is the CEO of
Speaker 1: black Rock, which is a giant um fund like investment fund.
Speaker 1: I think they control between like eight and eleven trillion
Speaker 1: dollars in assets, and he's the spearhead of this movement
Speaker 1: called e s G, which is Environmental social governance. It's
Speaker 1: basically a credit score system that is pretty opaque that
Speaker 1: he and his team defied line where based on your
Speaker 1: E s G score, this massive behemoth of the financial
Speaker 1: industry will either choke you off from access to money
Speaker 1: or you know, fire hose and into a car, you know,
Speaker 1: money into your company. And that's that's unbelievably damaging. Uh.
Speaker 1: For example, like on the environmental stuff that's obviously green
Speaker 1: related ship. So at one time a very very high score,
Speaker 1: highly rated company was Tesla because there you know, on
Speaker 1: board with the green agendas, an electric car company. When
Speaker 1: Elon Musk proceeded to attempt to buy Twitter, he lowered
Speaker 1: the E s G index score of Tesla below that
Speaker 1: of ex On Mobile because of the social governance aspect
Speaker 1: of him attempting to manipulate the censorship apparatus within Twitter.
Speaker 1: That's to me, you're you're now at a companies because
Speaker 1: of the S and the G part. You're firing, not hiring,
Speaker 1: making determinations of people's lifestyles based off of the way
Speaker 1: they think about ship that you think about. That's a
Speaker 1: huge manipulation of the economy and society at large. When
Speaker 1: you're talking about thousands of companies. That to me is
Speaker 1: the most dangerous man and movement in this country right now.
Speaker 1: And we haven't even begun to see the ramifications of
Speaker 1: that right now. It's like the foundations being laid pretty extensively.
Speaker 1: If that starts to really come home to roost, the
Speaker 1: country is gonna change radically, Uh, for the worst. What
Speaker 1: is the worst version of America look like to you? Um,
Speaker 1: it probably looks a lot like China. No middle class, Um, you,
Speaker 1: extremely wealthy people, entirely too many people living below. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it means it kind of starts to look like California.
Speaker 1: I mean, California has homogenized so many verticals of industry.
Speaker 1: It has tremendous state control over economies, over who can
Speaker 1: develop where and what. There's a housing shortage, there's concentrations
Speaker 1: of enormous wealth that nowhere in the world has ever
Speaker 1: seen before. And now California has a lower per capita
Speaker 1: poverty rate in Mississippi, and California has the fifth largest
Speaker 1: economy by itself in the world, which means it's entire
Speaker 1: to too many rich people or entirely too few people
Speaker 1: that are so obscenely ridiculously rich. Is very few people
Speaker 1: with money and entirely too many people would not enough, absolutely,
Speaker 1: and there's and there's not enough. There aren't enough simple
Speaker 1: net worth millionaires because including you know, your house, your
Speaker 1: comp and in your ship whatever. Yeah, being net worth
Speaker 1: a million and a half isn't like insane that there's
Speaker 1: very little of that in California. There's billionaires disproportionate, and
Speaker 1: then there's people who just proportion Yeah. Good looking out
Speaker 1: for tuning into the No Sellers podcast. Please do us
Speaker 1: a favorite, subscribe, rate, comments, share. This episode was recorded
Speaker 1: right here on the West coast of the USA and
Speaker 1: produced by my homeboy A King for the Black Effect
Speaker 1: Podcast Network and not Heart Radio. Yeah.