WEBVTT - Apple's iPhone Hits Stores and Microsoft's AI Power Needs

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart.

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation of Money and Power co Lie in Silicon

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Vallet NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Ed Loved.

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Love live from New York and San Francisco. This is

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology coming up Apple's iPhone sixteen. It hits the

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 3>stores today without the crucial AI features what people buy.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 4>And Microsoft's AI power needs prompt the revival of a

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 4>dormant reactor.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Plus we hear from Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff and from

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>the company's head of ventures. But first, let's just check

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 3>in on these markets as we round out a risk.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 3>On week, we are up more than a percentage of point.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's put it at that for the Nasdaq one hundred.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Remember significant gains on this benchmark the previous week, where

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 3>we eclipsed to five percent gain extraordinary moves. We dive

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 3>back on the day Ed we have digested the federal

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 3>reserve whopping cuts. What does that now mean for a

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit of profit taking happening in the MAGS seven

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>for example? But what are you watching in terms of

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 3>a key name.

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Going straight to Apple? Apple ups six tens of one

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 4>percent the iPhone sixteen lineup goes on sale today sixty

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 4>countries around the world. You will have seen the scenes

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 4>in New York City, Caro here in San Francisco, the

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 4>same thing. There's a lot of questions about how or

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 4>whether or not this will drive an upgrade cycle. So

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 4>we think about the iPhone in the context of Apple's

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 4>overall portfolio of products. It is critically important. That's why

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 4>this pie chart tells the story, right. I think there's

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 4>a lot of skepticism about the innovation, the main innovation

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 4>being a button on the side of the handset for

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 4>camera control. Will that be enough? Is the delay of

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 4>the release of Apple Intelligence, its generative AI platform to

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 4>a later date going to impact this cycle? Those are

0:01:58.360 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>all things that we need to consider.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Got the perfect voice to do it with the Rilla profile,

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 5>Senior research director at IDC.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>You run the numbers, you tell us a future of

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>how integral the iOS system and Apple remains. Look, are

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 3>you anticipating growth ultimately of market share Apple here?

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 6>So you know, we all recognized, like right at the

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 6>time of launch, right the features and everything that was announced.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 6>It was exciting, but a lot of people were disappointed.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 7>However, for those.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 6>Who you know, really follow the market market. I think

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 6>we an't understand it's a long term play, right. It

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 6>is definitely a first step for Apple in a long

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 6>journey and in a big step, I think, so long term,

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 6>we do expect this to you know, improve and impact

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 6>Apple in a very positive way. But this year we're

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 6>not expecting iPhone sixteen launch, you know, despite the hype

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 6>and the marketing and the introduction of Apple Intelligence, even

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 6>if it's a little bit rolled out a little later,

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 6>we don't expect that to cause an upgrade cycle.

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 7>This year.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 6>We think things will be slow to to pick up.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 6>But next year, however, we are expecting a four percent

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 6>growth for our.

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 5>Apple Why why the four percent acceleration?

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 7>So you know, we've moved it up.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 6>I think it was about one or two percent, but

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 6>after you know, all the announcements of WWDC and when

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 6>we put out our forecasts, which was just a few

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 6>weeks ago, given everything that we've seen already talked about

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.119
<v Speaker 6>Apple Intelligence of what's to come, right, I think it's

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 6>not really about what's here today, but by next year

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 6>what's going to happen. We're going to get language being

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 6>rolled out and hopefully the issues with the you know,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 6>introduction of Apple Intelligence and EU and in China with

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 6>partnerships being established, we think that will really help accelerate

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 6>the momentum towards you know, the Apple Intelligence fold, whether

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 6>it's sixteen, you know, towards later next year or the

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 6>seventeen series, especially because I think right now it's still

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 6>new in terms of the use cases. But as consumers

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 6>start using it and they see their friends and family

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 6>use it, and of course marketing picks up, consumer awareness

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 6>and education increases, we do think, you know that those

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 6>all those factors combined together will create sort of a

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 6>bump of a certain percentage of people like that are

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 6>because the average of fresh cycle.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 7>Nows are about four years and even five years.

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 6>Right, we know plenty of people that have iPhone elevens

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 6>and iPhone X, but next year, we're thinking it's going

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 6>to lead to those with the thirteens or the fourteens

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 6>even thinking, hey, you know what I want the seventeen.

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 4>So Nabida, you and I were together at Apple Park

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 4>just last week, it seems like a long time ago.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 4>I think it's worth reminding the audience of how Tim

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Cook summarized this generation of phone.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 8>This is this the innovation and invention these products deliver

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 8>will continue to deepen the meaningful impact they have on

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 8>all of our lives. I'm proud of our teams and

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 8>what they've accomplished, and I can't wait for you to

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 8>experience these amazing products.

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 4>So then I look at your own research, your IDC

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 4>forecasts for shit mints of smartphones in the years to come,

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 4>and generate today I And that's my question for you.

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 4>The innovation Tim Cook's talking about, It's not really on

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the hardware side, is it.

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 7>No, And you know they.

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 6>Drove that message very very clearly, right, It's really about

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 6>the change of the user experience. Right, How is these

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 6>new features going to improve your life? And how are

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 6>they going to make your lives easier? And of course

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 6>they showcase some of those use cases, but I think

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 6>it's just really in the long run, going to change

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 6>the complete way we interact with our smartphones, right. And

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 6>I think that's when jen Ai or the super cycle,

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 6>the refresh will really really kick, when those digital assistants

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 6>start coming into play where we can just talk to

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 6>our phones rather than having to go into multiple apps

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 6>to do the task we need to do.

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 7>And I'm really excited for when that happens.

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 3>So software innovation the hardware innovation. Well, that Limelight got

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 3>stolen by Huawei a few hours after Apple. It feels like, look,

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 3>not everyone wants a trifle phone, but how are we

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>seeing innovation? Mean that we all pulling away from market

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 3>share in China.

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 6>So definitely, Huawei's launch, you know, did get a lot

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 6>of attention and they were trying to showcase in a

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 6>different way.

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 7>Right, this is our on the hardware side, right with

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 7>the foldable device.

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 6>But the truth of the matter is, you know, while

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 6>Huawei does remain a very valid competitor for Apple in China, right,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 6>we've all seen the number as recently, the foldable segment

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 6>is still very niche, and we do believe that, you know,

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 6>in terms of foldables or this specific product impacting Apple negatively,

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 6>I don't think so. Again, it's a very niche segment,

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 6>and specifically, you know, with the trifold device, it's still

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 6>going to be even further niche within the foldables because

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 6>of supply challenges that Huawei's seeing. But overall, you know,

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 6>it is a rocky road this year for Apple. But

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 6>we do hope that with as they you know, resolve

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 6>the partnership issues in China, especially because AI is a

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 6>very more important you know, China market consumers are very

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 6>spec driven. When you compare globally in terms of importance

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 6>of AI features to consumers, Chinese consumers are more likely

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 6>to place it incomining.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Appurchase Nabila, We were just showing pictures from around the world,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 4>including China, sixty countries, right, that's important. I think it's

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 4>what reminding ourselves. Like some people will buy some iPhone sixteens,

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 4>it's all relative to prior generations, right that. Could you

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 4>give any sort of geographical context on where you think

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 4>this handset will do well and where it will do poorly.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 6>In terms of you know, this coming for the rest

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 6>of this year. We think definitely there's a large installed

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 6>base of users. Right, Like I mentioned, I'm sure we're

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 6>all you know, iPhone elevens and X and regions where

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 6>the refreshed cycles are longer. I think develop markets where

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 6>Apple has larger share, right, where there's lots of those

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 6>installed based of older models. I think those are the

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 6>regions that will this year. So essentially it's not really

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 6>Apple intelligence that's going to motivate them to buy. It's

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 6>time for them to upgrade anyway, and I think those

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 6>new buyers or shorter reverse cycles that's going to happen

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 6>next year, especially with the trade and promotions. Right right now,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 6>it's more of a future proof device with the Apple

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 6>iPhone sixteenth.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Lebe lipa Pow whose research at IDC on smartphone markets

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 4>so closely followed. Thank you. Good to have you back

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 4>here on Bloomberg Technology. Okay, coming up on the show,

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk is now on the Secret Services Radar after

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 4>deleting a post about assassination attempts on presidential candidates. We're

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 4>going to cover that story next. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Israel continues to carry out strikes against Lebanon. Across Lebanon,

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 4>stepping up hostilities against Hezballah. Thousands of pages and other

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 4>device is exploding in Lebanon this week mark a new

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 4>and deadly escalation in the use of supply chains against enemies,

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 4>an urgency to reduce dependence on technology from rivals. Bloomberg's

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 4>Dwan Flatley covers national security and joined us from Washington.

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 4>And you've done some deep reporting with colleagues on this

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 4>idea that, particularly for cheap goods, that when you go

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 4>across the supply chain and the assembly of these products.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 4>They persent a risk because they can be weaponized. What

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 4>did you learn?

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's a fascinating topic, and obviously what happened in

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 9>Lebanon with these pagers and walkie talkies really I think

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 9>crystallize the issue in a lot of people's minds. Where

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 9>before we had we knew coming out of the pandemic

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 9>that these supply chains were a big deal because we

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 9>were worried about the cutoff of critical you know, PPE

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 9>and other things like that, but this is taking it

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 9>to a whole other level. I mean, I think you

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 9>have to kind of think about this two categories.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 9>You have what happened in Lebanon, which was according to

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 9>what we've been able to ascertain. You know, Israel has

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 9>not claimed responsibility for this, but you know the senses

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 9>that they were involved obviously, and it was a specific

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 9>hack and a specific sort of intelligence operation that has

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 9>been used in various contexts, you know, for a long time.

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 9>This is probably the most dramatic, you know, out outcome

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 9>of that, but that is something that's been around for

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 9>a while. And then you have this sort of separate

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 9>but related issue of supply chains hacking critical infrastructure, and

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 9>both of those two things kind of come together in

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 9>our story, which sort of explains and looks at how

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 9>as supply chains have both been concentrated in some countries

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 9>like China, for instance, there's a vulnerability there. But at

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 9>the same time, diversifying your supply chains also creates some

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 9>vulnerabilities because you have excuse me, more entry points for

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 9>people to to kind of exploit. So it's you know,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 9>it's kind of you there's not a lot of great options.

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 9>But I think the one thing that folks that we

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 9>talked to said was we just need more visibility into

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 9>the supply chain. And so that's one of the takeaways.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about that visibility because many would say, look,

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 3>it is now that the US says this, but previously

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.479
<v Speaker 3>the US and spies have a history of taking an advantage

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 3>of the United States dominance in the supply chain. Now

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the shoes on the other foot, what can be done

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 3>for investment by US companies to just track the supply chain.

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, I mean, it's a great question because it kind

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 9>of goes both ways.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 9>We've seen this in the context of the Russia Ukraine War,

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 9>where the US government has really been leaning on companies

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 9>to get more visibility into the supply chains going out,

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 9>who are you exporting to, who's not only who is

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 9>your customer, but who's your customer's customer. And there's a

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 9>big push on that from the government side, and actually

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 9>on Capitol Hill a couple of weeks ago there is

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 9>a big hearing and Intel and Texas Instruments and some

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 9>other companies were really pressed on this, and basically what

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 9>they were saying was it's very difficult to get that

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 9>kind of clarity on not just who you're selling to,

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 9>but who the people that you're selling to are selling to.

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 9>So that goes out and then coming in same problem

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 9>because you're not necessarily sourcing. You know, when you're buying

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 9>a vast quantity of these types of material semiconductors or whatever,

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 9>you're not buying it from. You know, you may be

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 9>buying it from one point, but that vendor is getting

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 9>it from multiple points. And so it's kind of the

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 9>double edged source of globalization that we're really seeing here.

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 9>So it's a very difficult problem to solve.

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 3>This is where the Internet of Things comes in. Blue

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 3>mugstand flatten me. We really appreciate your time. Thank you.

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, one of email Musk's posts.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 3>On X is facing an investigation by the Secret Service

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>following the latest assassination attempt of form a. President Donald

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump mask took to X writing quote and no one

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 3>is even trying to assassinate Biden Comma in a now

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 3>deleted post for more, Bomberg Stanahal joins us for more,

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>and you learned about this investigation through freedom of information at.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 5>Requests to the Secret Service? What did you ask for?

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, so the backup for a minute. When emailon posts things,

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 10>they see an incredibly wide audience. He has millions of followers.

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 10>His tweets are often amplified by others. And what was

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 10>curious to me is that he posted this on Sunday

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 10>and then he deleted it, and I was wondering why

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 10>did he delete it? And I deleted and I think

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 10>I actually tweeted at him like, hey, did you get

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 10>a phone call from the FBI or the Secret Service?

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 10>So then I just filed a request to the Secret

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 10>Service asking you know, do you have records? Are you

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 10>investigating the side like any email correspondence? And what's funny

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 10>about Foyer? And there's a little bit of an art

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 10>to this is that usually it takes quite a while

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 10>to pry records loose sort of get a response. But

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 10>I immediately got a response, like within twenty four hours.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 10>They sent a record, they said to me a response,

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 10>and simultaneously, our colleague Jason Leopold, who is like the

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 10>master of Foyer requests, had also done the same thing.

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 10>So I was talking to Jason, like, hey, I just

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 10>want to let you know that I filled this request,

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 10>and he's like, oh, I did the same thing, and

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 10>we've gotten very similar responses.

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 4>So dona just real quick. I mean, it is an our.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, I've looked to you so often to try

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 4>and get hold of documentation because you cannot hide from documentation.

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 4>The response of the Secret Service is really interesting because

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 4>in the actual response itself, I'm just going to look

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 4>down on my screen because I don't want to get

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 4>it wrong that they withheld certain thing because disclosure could

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 4>reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings. And it's

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 4>that sentence alone that lets us know what's going on

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 4>in the background between Musk and the Secret Service.

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 10>Correct, And to be clear, we shouldn't like jump to

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 10>a conclusion that this means that there will be an

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 10>enforcement proceeding or that there will be a big outcome.

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 10>But I think the Secret Service, you know, by a law,

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean they have to investigate anything that could be

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 10>seen as a credible bet thread or could be seen

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 10>as something that's a potential incitement of violence, and so

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 10>it's fairly standard operating procedure that they would look into this.

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 7>For me, what I just want to know is what

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 7>happened behind the scenes, Like was.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 10>He urged to take this down by investors or members

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 10>of his family or people in his inner circle. Was

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 10>there a whole back and forth, you know, with campaigns,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 10>or did the Secret Service like call him on the

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 10>phone and be like, hey, buddy, like this is maybe

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 10>not so great.

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 7>Like I just would love to know exactly what happened in.

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 10>Terms of what inspired him to take him down take

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 10>it down, because he got quite a lot of backlash

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 10>and it was up for several hours.

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 3>ANAHA, the ALTA reporting Thank you Now. Palentiner has won

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 3>a one hundred million dollar contract that will extend access

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 3>to AI targeting tools to more US military personnel via

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 3>the company's Digital Warfare platform. Now this will help create

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 3>a picture of the same battlefield on thousands of digital

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 3>screens simultaneously, and it's been used by the US military

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 3>to help identify targets for airstrikes in the Middle East.

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 5>This year, Greenberg is reporting that.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Constellation Energy, it's the owner of the shuttered three Mile

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Island nuclear plant over in Pennsylvania, it's hitting record highs

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 3>in terms of its share price because it's going to

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 3>restart the reactor and set its output to Microsoft to

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 3>power you guess, their oftificial intelligence. Bloomberg's Deinabas reported on

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 3>this and actually there is this florry need for energy.

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 5>And we're turning to nuclear.

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 11>Now absolutely, because it's not just energy that Microsoft, Amazon,

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 11>Google and all the cloud hyper scalers are looking for.

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 11>They want clean energy. And you know, I think often

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 11>we talk about solar and wind. Nuclear is also clean.

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 11>It has some different components. It's always on, whereas wind

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 11>and solar are a bit more variable. That's both a

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 11>strength and weakness. One of the reasons Constellation had shut

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 11>down this site five years ago is that they didn't

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 11>have you know, the customer.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 7>Demand for that always on.

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 11>Because for green energy, people were trying to pair things

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 11>with solar and wind which are again more variable. Incomes Microsoft,

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 11>which needs you know, tremendous amount of clean energy to

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 11>run its ever expanding fleet of data centers and meet

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 11>its climate pledges. And those data centers always need to

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 11>be on so you know, Microsoft, Microsoft Energy chief Bobby

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 11>Hollis told me it's a good match.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 4>It's an interesting deal for Constellation. Obviously, Constellations shares are

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 4>up significantly. They have to invest one point six billion dollars.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 4>But they get a customer who's pledging or contractually applied

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 4>obliged to buy energy for twenty years. That's the mechanics

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 4>of the deal. But I guess we have short memories, right, Diana.

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 4>I remember, let's say two years ago, when not just

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft but Amazon as well had very ambitious energy and

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 4>climate targets.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 4>How much is that a priority for Microsoft?

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 11>So this has been a real issue for Microsoft. They

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 11>still have these climate targets. One is, you know, all

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 11>data centers running on green energy by twenty twenty five.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 11>And the other, which is the one that they're really

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 11>not sure they can make at this point because of AI,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 11>which is there are pledge to be carbon negative by

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 11>twenty thirty. They told us last spring that that pledge

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 11>has been imperiled by the dramatic expansion in AI.

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 4>So the deal.

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 11>Today helps them, but it doesn't help them on the

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 11>hardest problem. The deal today gives them green energy, and

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 11>so it helps them with the green energy goal. But

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 11>the biggest reason they are worried about their carbon negative

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 11>by twenty thirty goal is other the embodied emissions from concrete,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 11>steel and chips which sure used in these data centers.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 11>So you know this part of the deal today that

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 11>does not help them with that.

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 7>That is, as Bobby Hollis told me, a harder problem.

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 4>Bloombergstina Bess on an important deal but also important development

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 4>in the world of AI. Thank you. Let's focus on

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 4>the Xbox side of Microsoft's business, and in particular how

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 4>it's president Sarah Bond is laying the groundwork for the

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 4>company's next console in a bid to catch up to

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Sony and Nintendo. Bloomberg Cecilia the Anastasio joins us. Now

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 4>this is a deep dive into Sarah Bond, a relative outsider,

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 4>but now in what's a massive gaming company or arm

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 4>she's really important. What is she trying to do?

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 12>Sarah Bond is trying to move the Xbox business beyond

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 12>the Xbox console. A head of Microsoft Gaming, Phil Spencer,

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 12>says that they've been selling consoles to the same two

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 12>hundred million global households, and they really want Xbox to

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 12>mean more than the plastic box in your living room.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 12>Sarah Bond's mandate is to expand xbo games into phones,

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 12>into next generation hardware shore but also, you know, potentially handheld,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 12>which is something that she and her boss have have

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 12>sort of teased at.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Your story is so fascinating because you go into the

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 3>relationship between her and her boss, how they turn to

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 3>HR to really ensure that they could communicate more efficiently.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.239
<v Speaker 3>But also her history T Mobile, what is she going

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 3>to bring to the TABLESSMIA.

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Sarah Bond's history from T Mobile really gives Microsoft

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 12>expertise that was lacking in the mobile world and in

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 12>the mobile gaming world in particular. So at T Mobile,

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 12>she's someone who knows a lot about subscriptions, a lot

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 12>about how to keep people coming back to a product

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 12>and also how to trim subscriptions in a way where

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 12>users don't feel bloated by extra services they don't need.

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 12>And Microsoft has a sort of Netflix for game service

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 12>called the game Pass that has thirty four million subscribers,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 12>probably more at this point because that data is old,

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 12>and Sarah Bond is being to reach gamers who want

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 12>sort of a subscription product using game Pass, which will

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 12>be available on phones, on PCs, on tablets, on Xbox,

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 12>on smart TVs, whatever you you know have, Xbox hopes

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 12>to be there.

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 4>So see really quick, A big impetus for the Activision

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 4>deal was mobile gaming and yet to see the story there,

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 4>what is it.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 12>It's a little challenging. So when Microsoft announced the deal

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 12>with Activision, mobile was the fastest growing segment of the

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 12>games industry. Now, global consumer spending on mobile games dropped

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 12>two percent in twenty twenty three. It's still, you know,

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 12>an over one hundred billion dollar industry. But you know,

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 12>PC gaming is actually the fastest growing sector of the

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 12>games industry this year according to one recent study. So

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 12>it's going to be a little challenging for Sarah to

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 12>kind of make good on the Activision acquisition. And at

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 12>the same time, you know, she has high hopes because

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 12>so many people have mobile phones.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Cecilia, it's a great report. We thank you, Cecilia Anastasio,

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 3>We thank you. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Caroline Height.

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 4>In New York and I'm me d Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I need to be discussing when it comes to AIS

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 3>always an open. AI's latest fundraising is near completion, with

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>perspective investors set to find out today whether.

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 5>They'll be part of the deal.

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Sort according to sources, Bloomba's Katie Ruth has more everyone

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 3>wanting in on this.

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 13>Well, certainly a lot of venture firms are in strategics.

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 13>You know, we've reported that Microsoft, which is an existing investor,

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 13>would be putting in more, but also in Nvidia and Apple,

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 13>and then you know a flew of other investors are

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 13>trying to put money in.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 5>They'll find out.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 13>Today after it was over subscribed by billions of dollars.

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 4>What I find interesting, Katie, a source told me a

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks ago. You may remember that in Video

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 4>is only going to put in one hundred million dollars,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 4>and there's other reports out there that there's a threshold.

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 4>But it's not a surprise, is it that the world's

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 4>most important AI company has investors of all kinds fighting

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 4>to get over what is a relatively rare round sure.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 13>Well, I mean they raised last year at an eighty

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 13>six billion dollar valuation, so it's a significant premium to that.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 5>I think.

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 13>You know, there's no question there's a lot of demand

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 13>to be in you know, this this transformative AI company.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 13>By at what price?

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 5>That was the real question.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.239
<v Speaker 13>But they've certainly had plenty of demand at this one

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 13>hundred and fifty billion pre money valuation.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was a liquidity event for the employees. That

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.479
<v Speaker 3>eighty six billion phenomenal at the rate that they've managed

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 3>to raise.

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Do how important is the strategic side of this?

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 3>How much does Open AI want them at the cap table?

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 13>Well, certainly it's good to have trillion dollar companies in

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 13>your court. It remains to be seen, you know what

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 13>exactly they have in mind, what kinds of otnerships they

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 13>want to expand upon. But yeah, you know, I think

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 13>that it's a very competitive race to be the leader

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 13>in AI. And if you have companies like Microsoft, Apple

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 13>and Nvidio betting on you, then it really makes you

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 13>even more competitive.

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 5>Katie Ruth, Wait, thank you.

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Another side of AI is its regulation. The United Nations

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Expert Group says AI governance discussions been too fragmented The

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>group includes government officials, academics, other executives actually from Google,

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft and and deed open AI and it just came

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 3>out with a report suggesting measures like establishing a fund

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 3>to support poorer countries looking to work on artificial intelligence

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 3>and calling on countries to limit military use of AI

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 3>to prevent human rights violations. Meanwhile, we sat down with

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the presidents of Latvia yesterday and asked him whether.

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 5>AI should be more regulated take to.

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 14>Listen the use of social media, artificial intelli joints for disinformation,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 14>the fakes, interference and elections. I think we need some framework.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 14>But at the same time, and this is sometimes a

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 14>challenge for the European Union and about the European Union.

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 14>Let's face it, to be sometimes back in Europe get

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 14>overly regulatory.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Let's keep the conversation going with NYU Professor Emeritus an

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 4>AI expert Gary Marcus, who's known for his critique of

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 4>the booming AI industry. He's also the author of a

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 4>new book called Taming Silicon Valley, How we can ensure

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 4>that AI works for us and he joins us now. Gary,

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 4>based on the idea of fragmentation of regulation, I always

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 4>think about how AI technology is required to respect the

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 4>laws and rules of various jurisdictions. At the same time,

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 4>technology isn't bound by jurisdictions or borders. What do you

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 4>make of the sort of preamble that we're fragmented.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 15>I mean, we certainly are fragmented. I think when we

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 15>think about global AI governance, there's actually an advantage to

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.719
<v Speaker 15>the companies and having global AI governance, and that is

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 15>that fragmentation. You think about how expensive it is to

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 15>train these models you saw earlier today Microsoft buying the

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 15>rights to the energy of three Mile Island one hundred percent.

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 15>It's very expensive to train these models. And if you

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 15>have to do that differently for every jurisdiction, because they

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 15>each have their own rules, that would be an insane

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 15>amount of power, especially when we're talking about maybe making

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 15>bigger models one hundred times, a thousand times, ten thousand

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 15>times bigger than existing models. So fragmentation is actually a

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 15>problem for the companies.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It's also a problem for the world.

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 15>I mean, we really do want to have some uniform

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 15>approach to all of the downsides, things like nonconsensual deep thake,

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 15>foreign misinformation and so forth. There are many downsides, and

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 15>we want a coordinated response to it. So I think

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 15>it's actually in everybody's interest to have some coordination.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>But fragmentation is the DePaul.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk about coordination.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 3>The United Nations has put up this thought process report

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 3>and now they want an independent scientific panel on artificial

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 3>intelligence in the same way they almost have with climate change.

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 5>Is that going to help?

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Is that going to make sure that more people are

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 3>at the table other than basically the G seven and

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 3>some of the biggest companies in the world.

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 15>I mean, God is in the details. But I think

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 15>it's a good start. I think absolutely we need more

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 15>independent scientists weighing in. We also need authority if something

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 15>doesn't work, to do something. So one of the most

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 15>interesting things that happened the last couple of weeks is

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 15>open AI put out a new model and they said

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 15>there's a bioweapons risk here.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Now they might be right about that.

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 15>They might be wrong about it, but let's suppose they're

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 15>right about it. They decided, despite that risk, they would

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 15>go ahead and release it. And that was really just

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 15>ultimately Sam Altman's decision and nobody else's. Who was Senate

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 15>testimony earlier in the week where former employee and a

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 15>former board member said basically they didn't feel listened to, right,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 15>and so open Ai sam Almon doesn't have to listen.

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 15>If his employee say the bioweapons risk here is serious,

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 15>maybe not for this model, but the next model, he

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 15>can go ahead anyway and say, but I need to

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 15>make back the money for one hundred and fifty billion

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 15>dollar valuation, which by the way, is not a trivial thing.

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>And there's also no outside input.

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 15>So even if this IPC panel that says, you know,

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 15>this is dangerous, there's nothing in the UN that can

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 15>immediately do anything about it. There's nothing in the US

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 15>government that immediately do anything about it. So it's a

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 15>very good, I think thought experiment, like when this stuff

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 15>gets worse, who's making these decisions?

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but this has happened time and time again,

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 3>and we always go they should self regulate.

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 5>And in a way, Samon one did just that. You

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 5>just told me that you're coughing.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 3>A bit because you're basically exhausted having written this book

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 3>in two months out of share anger.

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 5>In a way, what's what's the response to the anger?

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 5>What's the answer here?

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 15>Well, I mean the anger is partly I went to

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 15>the Senate. I testified next to Sam Altman, and he

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 15>talked about not just self regulation but real regulation. The

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 15>Senate bipartisan all talked about. This was May of last year.

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 15>Nothing has actually happened. There's been no you know, major

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 15>piece of legislation in the United States to deal with

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 15>any of this. And self regulation is not going to happen.

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 15>I mean, even when they make promises, they often back

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 15>down and they're not they're going to agree to things

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 15>like information sharing. They're not going to agree to, you know,

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 15>deferring the decision about whether to release this new product

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 15>that maybe finally makes them some money to the general public.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And they're not making money right now.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 15>I mean open Ai I had a five billion dollar

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 15>operating last year.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Last year, Let's go back to what you just said

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 4>on open ai. It's not a trivial amount of money,

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 4>but the stakes are also very high. How much does

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 4>that keep you up at night that we have a

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 4>single company with quite confusing governance structure that has the

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 4>world's biggest technology companies and investors fighting over around and

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 4>it's releasing technology at a cadence that you outlined.

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 15>I mean, everybody should have been worried at the drama

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 15>last year. It sort of made for an amazing Netflix

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 15>special or something like that when Sam.

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>All we remember buyed and we hired and all of

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>this drama.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 15>But it also says like who is running this company

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 15>and what are the checks and balances? Right, And the

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 15>ultimate answer is Sam is running it. There are no

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 15>checks and balances, And you know, we should be worried

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 15>if a company can't even govern itself internally. A lot

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 15>of people left after that incident. We should be worried.

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 15>It's a lot of power, and we should be worried,

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 15>not just about open air, but the whole industry, like

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 15>responsible AI excuse me as a watchword for the entire

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 15>field for a few years, and now it's almost like

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 15>nobody really cares because there's so much money on the table.

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 4>We had the President of Latvia here yesterday from the

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 4>European Union. You have Hunger next week. Do you have

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 4>any hope that actually these sort of round table, state

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 4>level discussions will yield some kind of framework in which

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 4>the world's kept safe from AI.

0:30:57.680 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 15>I have a mild bit of hope, but I think

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 15>that we really need the public to be involved and

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 15>say this matters, So you know, politicians always have to

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 15>weigh in competing interests. They get a lot of money

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 15>from the tech companies. They are involved with the tech

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 15>companies in various ways. If the public doesn't speak up,

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 15>I think we will see very light regulation, if any

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 15>at all. The reason I wrote this book is I

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 15>think making these decisions the most important thing that we

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 15>can do for one of the most important things we

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 15>can do in the world in the next few years.

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 15>Think about what happened with social media. We waited too

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 15>long and we entrenched the set of practices that now

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 15>lead to all kinds of polarization, bad for teenage girls

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 15>and so forth, and it's hard to fix these things.

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 15>We have to get AI policy right now.

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I expert Gary Marcus, so good to have you appreciate.

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 5>It, And what are you looking at?

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 4>I think we should reflect on the week in markets, Carol.

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to the mag seven index. It's a Bloomberg

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 4>index of those magnificent seven names, because we spent a

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of the week talking about them in the context

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 4>of the FED that, okay, we now know where we

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 4>stand with rates finally being cut by fifty basis points

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 4>going lower. There's a valuation question around some of those

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 4>that had incredible performance in the first half of this

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 4>year and actually over a longer duration. And then there's

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 4>the idea of, well, what happens if we do or

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 4>don't get a recession? It very closely mirrors. Then there's

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 4>that one hundred that you showed earlier in the show.

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, no dirt. You know a lot of the

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 4>biggest points drivers on that index are than mag seven anyway,

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 4>and it's just interesting to keep our eye on the

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 4>trajectory of them. Will they continue to be the story

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 4>in this market? Okay? Coming up in the program, we're

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 4>going to hear from Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff as they

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 4>launched some new AI tools over at Dreamforce. Their conversations.

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Coming up next Sploomberg Technology.

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Salesforce is launching a slow of new gen AI tools

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 3>known as Agents. CEO Mark Benioff spoke with bloom Megseminey

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Chang at their annual Dreamforce event in San Francis.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 5>Go to take a listen.

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 16>These customers have been convinced something that's not true, that

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 16>they have to buy an LLM, they have to go

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 16>to a hyperscaler, they have to get a database, they

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 16>have to buy a security technology, they have to choose

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 16>a chip, they have to hook it all together themselves.

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 16>They have to deiy their AI. It's not true. You

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 16>do not have to diy your AI. And when we

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 16>started the show, they didn't really believe it. So that's

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 16>why we created a whole factory across the street as

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 16>you saw in Moscowe West, where we have put more

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 16>than ten thousand customers through already, to show them that

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 16>on the Salesforce platform, which they've already been committed to

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 16>for more than twenty years, we've had great success in

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.959
<v Speaker 16>sales and service and marketing and communications and commerce and

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 16>analytics and Slack and all of these technologies that now

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 16>they're also building AI. And this is a shock to

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 16>them and sing for us because they're showing them how

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 16>once again we're future proofing their company with the Salesforce platform.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 9>So you've basically di wied it for them, software company.

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 5>What models you've built it on? Is it?

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Is?

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 11>It?

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 5>Is it?

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 16>We have our own, We have many and they don't

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 16>need to know. Okay, and they don't why what chip

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 16>am I using? You know what hyperscaler? They don't care.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 16>They don't care what I'm using you know, it's like

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 16>what type of flowers in the cake? What kind of

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 16>sugar did I buy at the store? Why does it matter?

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 16>Do you like the cake? Is this the final product

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 16>that you like?

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 7>All right?

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 16>And I think that for our customers, they don't want

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 16>to know all the pieces. They want to know does

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 16>this work and can they make a greater success for

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 16>their own companies.

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 4>That was Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff. Staying with Salesforce, it's

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 4>investment on Salesforce Ventures just announce a five hundred million

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 4>dollar investment fund for AI that is expanding. It is

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 4>discussed as John SUMMERGI, Salesforce Ventures President, and I just

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 4>want to do the mechanics of this really quickly. You

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 4>basically invest now with almost like a billion dollars capital

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 4>play with off balance sheet from Salesforce, Right, and you're

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 4>looking for things that add to what Mark Benioff was

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 4>just talking about. Right, You're looking for the next frontier

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 4>of an actual GENAI tool exactly.

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 17>So we feel that AI is one of the most

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 17>significant innovations in our lifetime, and we're looking for entrepreneurs

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 17>who are helping to solve business challenges in unprecedented ways.

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 17>That AI allows them to do so. And last year

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 17>we announced a five hundred million dollar fund. We invested

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 17>in twenty four companies with that money, and we decided

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 17>to expand it to up to a billion dollars now

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 17>to invest in this very exciting AI innovation.

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 4>We just listened to Mark Benioff talk about why salesforces

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 4>generative air offering is better than any company of any

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 4>size engaging with the GPU provider right through to application layer,

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 4>and it sounds like they're pretty happy with what they've

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 4>got to offer. So how can you go and find

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 4>something new that Salesforce doesn't already have.

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 17>Well, we're seeing interesting companies develop new business applications that

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 17>are in new areas. Like for example, we invest in

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 17>a company called Runway, and if you're familiar with the

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:25.439
<v Speaker 17>Oscar Awards winning film Everything Everywhere, All at once, they

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:30.359
<v Speaker 17>used Runway technology to take their editing staff from you know,

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 17>normally hundreds of people editing this very complex movie down

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 17>to a handful of people using their technology. And this

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 17>is real productivity value that's being delivered. We're seeing interesting

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 17>developments in new models, in new vertical applications, in AI security,

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 17>in areas that are we do not cover today, but

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 17>we want to partner with these companies and deliver more

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 17>solutions to our customers.

0:36:57.640 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 5>You're an Anthropic.

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Listed as one of the wannabes in open Ai.

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 5>Why not?

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 17>So we partner with both open ai and Anthropic and

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 17>the number of other LLM providers. We also have our

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 17>own lms as well, our large language models, and we

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 17>are very excited about what we've invested in with Anthropic.

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 17>We are in hugging Face, which is an open source

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 17>provider of models, and we're also in Mistral, which is

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 17>another another provider, and so we feel pretty good about

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 17>the investments that we've made in the foundational model level.

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 17>And now we're looking to invest in different types of

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 17>companies with this new five hundred million dollar fund.

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 3>What's so interesting is full of Salesforce. Last five acquisitions

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 3>have been funded at some point by Salesforce ventures. How

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 3>much do you end up realizing you should buy these companies,

0:37:57.920 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 3>not just strategically invest in them.

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 17>Well, one of the benefits of investing in a company

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 17>first is that you do get a chance to work

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 17>with them and see how the technology can help deliver

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 17>success to your customers. And we do partner very well

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 17>with a lot of the companies that we invest in.

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 17>But keep in mind we've made investments in over six

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 17>hundred and thirty companies over the past fifteen years. We've

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 17>only acquired twenty of the companies that we've invested in,

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 17>so it's a very small minority of the businesses that

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 17>we've invested in. But we're very excited about some of

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 17>the recent acquisitions we've made out of the fund. Companies

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 17>like SPIF, which do an incentive compensation management airkit, which

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 17>is a big foundational element of our Agent Force technology.

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 1>We acquired them last year.

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 17>Adam Evans, the founder of Erkitt, is a two time

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 17>boomerang back to Salesforce. We're really excited to have him.

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 4>John tens At thousands of people have descended on our

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 4>city for Dreamforce.

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 17>So exciting.

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 4>I've always thought about it as a customer event. I

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 4>know loads of people that either work at Salesforce, MuleSoft,

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 4>or they use CRM right historically, for you, what's the

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:17.240
<v Speaker 4>week been like in terms of unearthing interesting founders, interesting

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 4>startups that you might write a check for.

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 17>I think this week is one of the most exciting

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 17>weeks I've ever been in San Francisco. The energy in

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 17>the city is really palpable, and you're seeing CIOs and

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 17>C suite executives meeting with entrepreneurs at Dreamforce together all

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 17>at Moscowy Center. We had over forty five thousand people

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 17>in person, and from my perspective, I got to.

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Say the traffic was dreadful last night, Thank you very much.

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 17>From my perspective, I got to meet with some fascinating

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 17>founders who are really redefining the way AI is going

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 17>to work in the future and solving critical business challenges.

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 17>So I'm very excited about what I saw this week.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 5>It's great to have some time with you.

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, John SUMMERJAI as sales scance ventures.

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Demand has been really strong in the US. We've had

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 2>incredible large infrastructure projects going on, the overhaul of the

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 2>grid that's going on, AI demands on electrification, telecom and

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 2>everything is being delivered, both services and goods, and this

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 2>has created a whole new sets of business for US.

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.760
<v Speaker 2>So we see incredible demand across all our vehicle lines,

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 2>both here and any of Europe.

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 5>Ford pro CEO Tim Canis.

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 3>They're talking about the accelerating commercial adoption of evs and

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 3>he's there at the outset of a new and revamped

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street Week with David Weston now joins us because

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 3>the host of that show that we're about to be

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 3>able to watch in full later today, David and.

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 18>Ted Cannis is a friend of yours of this show. Actually,

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 18>I've seen him.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>He's the character.

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, but the demand seems well, and he's always been

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 18>somewhat raw raw. I think you'd agree. But the thing

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 18>that I didn't really understand until i'd gone out there

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 18>and talked to him and Jim Farley, the CEO of Ford,

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 18>is there are two stories about EV's i'd heard meaning

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 18>one story, and one of is the consumer side, which

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 18>is slowing down all around the world, frankly, and then

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 18>is the commercial side, these delivery vans and emergency vehicles,

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 18>And that one is just as robust as ever. And

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 18>as you know, Ford has a significant advantage in that

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:28.320
<v Speaker 18>it's something like forty percent market share in that market.

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I think the thing you learn about the EV industry

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 4>is it's complicated. David. You make that point so well,

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 4>So how do we take that to Wall Street Week?

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:39.240
<v Speaker 4>There's always a money story behind everything, and within an industry,

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 4>and even on Wall Street. There's a culture story behind it.

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 4>How are you going to tell us that?

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 18>The question is really and that is the larger story.

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 18>You're exactly right ed. The question is what does this

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 18>mean for an auto industry Detroit, O industry that is

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 18>trying to rebound from some very dark days as you know,

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 18>back in the eighties and the nineties and actually going

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 18>to the brink of extinction during the Great Financial Crisis.

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 18>What is that need they think that the ev impetus

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 18>will really drive them. They're having a little trouble on

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 18>the consumer side, but Ford particularly is relying heavily on

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 18>the commercial side. So it really raises the question for

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 18>investors is this a good investment or not? Is this

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:14.720
<v Speaker 18>someplace you want to put your money or not into

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 18>this resurgent auto industry. And one of the things we

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 18>talk about with Jim Farley particularly is China and China

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 18>coming on the scene and the very high quality, very

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 18>low cost something he says a little bit like Toyota

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 18>because he used to work, as you know, Jim Farley

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 18>at Toyota. Even though he comes from Detroit, he were

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 18>for Toatorya and he saw those battle days.

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be fascinating China, important for higher education.

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 3>You delve into that sea as well as the business

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of restaurants. You don't want to miss it all Street

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 3>week later at David Weston six pm New York Time.

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 3>That does it, though, for this edition of Bloomberg Technology

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Ed What.

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 4>A week Cambionship Technology Recap on the podcast you know

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 4>exactly where to find it from New York and ess

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 4>this is Bloomberg