WEBVTT - Bucs Looking to Punch Playoff Ticket vs. Panthers, Pro Bowl Preview | Bucs Insider

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in two books. Insider presented by Verizon Casey Phillips

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>here a senior writer and editor Scott Smith. We had

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a big show for you today. We got a tough

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>game to look back on. We got some interesting Pro

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Bowl news, we got a heck of a game to

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>look forward to. Lots going on here. Let's start with

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Bowl news, which we had some great Pro

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Bowl news, and then we had some news that maybe

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>made you a little upset, which is fair and made

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>all of us a little upset.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Call me out there, you know. Let's start with the

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 2>good Pro.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Bowl name, and very deservedly, Mike Evans was voted into

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 3>the Pro Bowl. It's the fifth time he's made it,

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 3>obviously deserving. He leads the league in touchdown catches, has

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 3>over twelve hundred yards. You know, all season we've been

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 3>doing notes about him passing the all time greats in

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 3>terms of touchdown catches, and he's establishing himself well. He

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>already has as one of the greatest players in team history,

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 3>but in terms of a number of times in the

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Pro Bowl, this is number five for him. That is

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>second in team history among offensive players, only to the

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 3>great Mike Alstadt. Those are probably the two most yeah, harolded, harolded,

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 3>good word of uh you look at that Derek Brooks

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.639
<v Speaker 3>eleven but most crazy. Most of those are defensive players.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 3>But still Mike is tied for sixth most Pro Bowls

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 3>and team history.

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Probably not done.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 3>And the way he played this year, you got to

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 3>think there's a couple of more Pro Bowl.

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Seasons in his take. So that's the good news.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Soap box time hit hit us.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I was a little emotional.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Last night, so we covered you up here with his

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>alternate graphics.

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 3>We do have four alternates, and I'm happy these guys

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 3>are alternates. I'm Twine Winfield and uh Tristan wars are

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 3>both first alternates. They've been to the Pro Bowl before.

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Baker Mayfield is a third alternate, which is a great story,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 3>and Vidave is a fifth alternate.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's good.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>But I cannot understand how Antoine Winfield Junior is not

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>one considered one of the having one of the three

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 3>best seasons by safety in the NFC not the NFL

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Can I just throw some numbers out you please? By

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 2>all means?

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Throw them?

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Well here, first of all, here was your okay, Like

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I said, I.

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Was in your fields last night.

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was in my fields. As you said, it

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 3>does not make any sense to me. The Levante David

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 3>season I'm referring to was his second year, when he

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 3>had something like seven sacks and five interceptions and was

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 3>a first team Associated Press All Pro, which is a

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>far more exclusive honor, only like one guy at every position,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 3>so two linebackers. The Pro Bowl lets in a lot

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>more players. Levante was a first team All Pro but

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>did not make the Pro Bowl, which made no sense.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully Antoine gets the same thing this year, because that's

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 3>voted on by various members of the medium. I'm hoping

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 3>he gets first team AP All Pro, and so that

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 3>will take away from what I considered the biggest snub

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>for the Bucks in a long time. And listen, Casey,

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 3>we have counterparts that do the same jobs on other

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 3>team and they're probably all standing at their little podiums

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>right now saying this guy on our team got snubbed.

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 3>This guy, I understand. And if you put somebody in,

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean somebody else is out, I get it.

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>It's still not the same. I'm sorry.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 3>We're right, right, We're more right than those other teams.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Anton Winfield has one game to go, one hundred and

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>seventeen tackles, five sacks as a safety, five forced fumbles,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 3>four funnel recoveries, three interceptions, a team leading twelve passes defensed,

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 3>two turtle doves, and nobody, literally nobody in the league has.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 2>That stat line.

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not at any position, at any position.

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 3>It's I cannot explain how Anti Winfield was not voted

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 3>in to the Pro Bowl and the initial vote. He'll

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 3>probably make it in the long run as an alternate,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 3>but right now I'm not feeling very good about it.

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. I think we would all agree with you,

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately I would love to let you now have

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>an emotional break after that. But now we have to

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about this. Last week's game, which I know was challenging,

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>did not go how the team thought it would wanted

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it to tough one to recover from a little bit

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>going into this very important game this next week. So

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what stands out to you now looking back about the Saints.

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Game, Well, everybody in the locker room, coaches and players,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>they seemed very irritated and frustrated and not sure why.

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 3>And this is their words. They came out so flat

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 3>in such an important game and they felt like they

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 3>had a good week of preparation.

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 2>They came out flat.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 3>The Saints, who had so much to play for and

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 3>have been this team's main rival for so many years now,

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 3>they obviously came out strong if you think about the

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 3>Buckaners were on that four game winning streak excuse me,

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 3>that culminated in the Jaguars blowout of the Jaguars, they

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 3>scored on six of their first seven possessions in that

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 3>game and the only one they didn't score was a

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 3>one play kneel down at the end of the first half.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Then the next week, after all this positive momentum, the

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Bucks didn't score until their tenth possession against the Saints.

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 3>And obviously, turnovers were a big part of the story.

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 3>The Bucks had never committed more than two in any

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 3>game the season that they committed four the only two

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 3>times they made it into Saints territory in the first

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 3>three quarters that drives ended in turnovers. And then in

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the fourth quarter against the defense that was playing the

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 3>style of defense that's supposed to drain the clock and

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>not give up big plays, Baker throws for two hundred

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 3>and twenty yards, two long touchdown passes, that's not supposed

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 3>to happen against that style defense they were playing, and

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 3>it just gives you a little indication of what this

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 3>offense is capable of and what it had been showing

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 3>in the previous week. So what we're hoping, of course,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 3>is that this is just one very bad day and

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 3>the previous four games are more of an indication of

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 3>where this team is for sure.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And of course we know this next upcoming game, the

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>major thing everybody's watching for is just the outcome in

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of the implications for playoffs, but there are also

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>some other major milestones and things to keep track of

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>while you're watching the game as well, So tell people

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>what those are.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 3>So obviously it's not as individual milestones aren't nearly as

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>important as getting the win. But when you think about it,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 3>you're talking some of your team's best players. They have

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 3>good games, you're more likely to win. Yeah, so we

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 3>can still roof for these things. Now, you see, guys here,

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Chris Godwin needs twenty seven yards to get his fourth

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 3>thousand yard receiving seasons, which would be second most in

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 3>team history to Mike of course, Rashad White needs eighty

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 3>five yards for his first thousand yard rushing season and

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>the first five Bucks and Doug martin twenty fifteen, and

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Baker Mayfield is really close to a couple of nice

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>round numbers four thousand passing yards and thirty touchdown passes.

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 3>He's already got a career high in both of those categories.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 3>And then Mike, who scored a million touchdowns this year,

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>one more would tie his own record for both touchdown

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 3>catches and overall touchdowns in a season for the Buccaneers.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 3>But if you put this stuff together, one really interesting

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 3>note is that if Chris and Rashad both hit those milestones,

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 3>it'll mark the first time in Buccaneers history that the

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 3>team has had two thousand yard receivers and a thousand

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 3>yard rusher in the same season. Wow, which would say

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot about this offense, which I'm not sure people

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>expected a lot out of it.

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's a really great point. And then

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.559
<v Speaker 1>I know we showed some of those numbers that Baker

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield put together a really great season statistically in a

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, and we've seen him gut out plays.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of leadership emotion, There's been a

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of things to showcase Baker is having a really

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>great season. But of course this last game, unfortunately, it

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a turnover situation for the offense

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. Baker through a couple interceptions, and that

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>had not been the case. He had really been protecting

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball for quite a while. So what have you

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>noticed about some of the statistics when it comes to

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the ratio that came in with the plus ten differential,

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>best in the league. So what kind of happened this

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>last week and just overall, how has this team been protected?

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, it was the first time that the Bucks had

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>committed more than two turnovers in any game this year,

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 3>which is a great note by the way, that it

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 3>hadn't happened before that. First time Baker threw two interceptions

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 3>in one game. One of them was on a tip ball,

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 3>but I guess that's still on him. First time the

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Bucks lost two fumbles in a game and they were

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 3>zer over four? Are they excuse me? They were negative

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>four in turnover ratio worst of the year. Obviously, didn't

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 3>get any takeaways, and especially against the Saints, it seems

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 3>like in recent years that's the story, and so that's

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 3>going to be a big part of the story in

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Week eighteen in a do or die game, can the

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Buccaneers win the turnover battle? Because when they do, as

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 3>you see here, they usually win, and when they don't,

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't go well.

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Yep, yeah, that's really interesting. So now let's look ahead

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to this Panthers matchup. Tell me what you think are

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the keys to this game? Knowing that we

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>may not have gotten as good of an indicator in

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>what the matchup could look like with the first one

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>being just a torrential downpour that greatly affected both offenses

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and a lot about the game. So what do you

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like in a little bit more normal weather conditions

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this matchup could look like?

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, I think that game is informing the

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Buccaneers this week as they're considering the Panthers because they

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>only won by three. And I know you're right it

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 3>was a torential reign and that affected things, but it

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 3>was the same for both teams, and it was a

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 3>close game right to the end until non pro bowler

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 3>into one winfielder intercepted a pass right at the end.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that how you're going to refer to him the

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season? No, just right now, just right now,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 1>while you're still angry.

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So the Panthers obviously they made the big move

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 3>at quarterback this year and they train it up and

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 3>to the first pick and took Bryce Young, the Alabama star,

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 3>and he's had the sort of ups and downs you'd

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 3>expect from a rookie quarterback.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>They don't all just drop in and be awesome, like CJ. Stroud.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 3>He had a really good game two weeks ago and

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 3>they almost beat the Packers back and forth through for

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 3>like three hundred yards and a couple of touchdowns.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 2>No picks.

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 3>But overall he's had some struggles. He's been sacked fifty

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 3>nine times, which is a lot, and he's actually ranked last. Yeah,

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 3>he's actually ranked last amongst a qualified passers and passer rating,

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 3>And like you said, poor guy. He's not a big guy,

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 3>so taking a lot of hits, you worry, right, But

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 3>he's gutted it through. I think he's a very very

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 3>talented player. The Buccaneers are hoping they can contain him

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 3>in the pocket. They in the last game he got

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 3>out a little bit and made some plays. So that's

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 3>a big deal, you know, Yeah, I think that's what

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 3>that means.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, a pressuring him is going to be the big part.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>What about their defense and what stands out to you.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 3>They've kind of had a quietly good season on defense.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 3>They ranked third in yards allowed, third and passing yards allowed.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Derek Brown is a really big force in the middle.

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Frankie Luvu's a nice linebacker, makes a ton of plays.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 2>It's curious if j. C Orno will play.

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 3>He was active but did not play last week with

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>a toe injury, but he's a really good corner when

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 3>he does play. The weird thing about their defense though, is,

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 3>like I said, they're third in yards allowed, third fewest,

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 3>but they're thirtieth in points allowed, which is kind of

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 3>weird combination. I'm not sure exactly sure how that happened,

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe red zone issues or turnovers, but obviously the Bucks

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 3>care more about points than the yards. So if they

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 3>can keep you know, they can continue that trend for

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers, that'll be a good thing.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, that's gonna do it for us on

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Buccaneers Insider Against Day. Tuned to the

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers website and social media all week for the preview

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>of this matchup against the Panthers, and we'll see you

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>next time.