Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. The numbers from the border
Speaker 1: are unsurprising. In fact, I've been predicting this that you'd
Speaker 1: have an all time record for April and May of
Speaker 1: illegal crossing of the US Mexico border. And here we are.
Speaker 1: And I can't even say, Wow, what a great call, Buck,
Speaker 1: because it's so obvious because the Biden Democrats, the Biden
Speaker 1: Harris Democrats, don't want the border to be secure. They
Speaker 1: don't want this to stop, and so it won't that
Speaker 1: much is very obvious. There's a amazing, in all the
Speaker 1: most amusing and somewhat frightening ways, amazing interview with Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris that NBC News Lester Holt had recently. We'll talk
Speaker 1: about that in just a moment. Here. Father's Day is
Speaker 1: around the corner, as you know, And if you're ad
Speaker 1: or grandfather serve this great country of ours, how cool
Speaker 1: would it be to give him something really meaningful this year,
Speaker 1: something that recognized what he gave to this country, something
Speaker 1: like the American flag. If you know your father, grandfather
Speaker 1: would be moved by a gift like this, then let
Speaker 1: me recommend you to my friends at Allegiance Flag Supply.
Speaker 1: Everything this country means to your dad is reflected in
Speaker 1: the quality of the craftsmanship Allegiance Flag Supply puts into
Speaker 1: their flags. These flags are made in America, which is
Speaker 1: actually really uncommon, believe it or not. They're hands sown
Speaker 1: by seamstresses in Charleston, South Carolina whose previous jobs were
Speaker 1: lost to companies who outsourced overseas, and they're made with
Speaker 1: materials that do not allow for cutting corners in the
Speaker 1: manufacturing process. All of this translates into a flag that
Speaker 1: waves proudly outside your father's home, his dock, or on
Speaker 1: his boat and won't get tangled, torn or shredded in
Speaker 1: the fashion other flags in the marketplace often do. This
Speaker 1: is a way to say thank you to Dad on
Speaker 1: multiple levels this Father's Day. Go to show Allegiance dot Com.
Speaker 1: Just go to this website Show Allegiance dot com and
Speaker 1: under promo code buck for ten percent off your order
Speaker 1: Show Allegiance dot Com enter that promo code buck for
Speaker 1: ten percent off your whole order and get yours in
Speaker 1: time for Father's Day. On June twenty. That's Show Allegiance
Speaker 1: dot Com. Enter promo code buck for ten percent off.
Speaker 1: Just quickly put a button. Can you have any plans
Speaker 1: to visit the border at some point? You know we
Speaker 1: are going to the border. We've been to the border.
Speaker 1: So this whole, this whole, this whole thing about the border.
Speaker 1: We've been to the border. We've been to the border.
Speaker 1: You haven't been to the border, and I haven't been
Speaker 1: to Europe. And I don't know, I don't understand the
Speaker 1: point that you're making. I'm not discounting the importance of
Speaker 1: the border. Well, I mentioned it because even I know
Speaker 1: Republicans have certainly commenced you on this. But Democratic Congressman
Speaker 1: quar As, a border district has said to the view
Speaker 1: and the President, come you not care see this? I
Speaker 1: care about what's happening at the border. The best Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris sound bite maybe of all time. And what's amazing,
Speaker 1: in case you were wondering, is NBC News cut it
Speaker 1: out of the main interview segment that they put out there.
Speaker 1: So they were trying to protect her, of course, because
Speaker 1: think about what she said in this interview. Think about
Speaker 1: what she's going with here. We've been to the border.
Speaker 1: We've been to the border. She repeats it like three
Speaker 1: times like a robot, and Lester Holt is looking at
Speaker 1: her like, excuse me, lady, madame Vice President, you haven't
Speaker 1: been to the border. I mean, Kamala Harris is amazing,
Speaker 1: is amazing? How is this school and vice president to
Speaker 1: get exactly? I mean, go back and look at her
Speaker 1: political career, and go back and look at the early
Speaker 1: days of her political career, and you just find that
Speaker 1: there are very few surprises here, very few surprises. Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris is somebody who the elites and the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: have elevated. The Democrat voters by and large had no
Speaker 1: interest in supporting her for president, as you know. But
Speaker 1: the elites, the people that make the calls, who run things,
Speaker 1: they think that Kamala is just fantastic. And now it
Speaker 1: seems we have a border zar without interest in going
Speaker 1: to our border. She will fly over the border to
Speaker 1: get to Central America. She will fly right over it.
Speaker 1: And this is not like, oh, is this tough for
Speaker 1: her to do. She's the vice president, folks, She has
Speaker 1: her own taxpayer funded jumbo. Yet she could get to
Speaker 1: the border any literally any day. She wants to. She's
Speaker 1: not like you and me. She can actually just say,
Speaker 1: you know what, I'm going to the border tomorrow. Staff
Speaker 1: make it so fly down there, be down there for
Speaker 1: a couple hours, talk to border patrol. Why won't she
Speaker 1: go down there? Well, because the photo op of her
Speaker 1: at the border would be visual evidence of her as
Speaker 1: the borders are, and she wants to avoid that at
Speaker 1: all costs. She doesn't want people knowing that she's the
Speaker 1: borders are. I mean in the long term, because this
Speaker 1: crisis is not going away. We have effectively an open border,
Speaker 1: and she doesn't want that photo of her standing there
Speaker 1: talking to border patrol because come the reelection campaign, which
Speaker 1: she knows is gonna be here before you know it. Folks,
Speaker 1: time flies. People will say, hold on a second, you
Speaker 1: were this was an issue that you were given really
Speaker 1: at the beginning of the Biden presidency. What have you
Speaker 1: done with this? How have you fixed it? How have
Speaker 1: you handled it? The Kamala conversation yesterday around climate change
Speaker 1: and gaping from corruption and all the things that she
Speaker 1: was taking Hurricanes. We can't stop hurricanes, We can't stop
Speaker 1: corruption in other countries have never been able to do that.
Speaker 1: We can't actually make the problems of every developing country
Speaker 1: in the Third World go away. It's not actually possible.
Speaker 1: And this all comes down to an absurd belief or
Speaker 1: I'm not even sure it's a belief, it's a talking point.
Speaker 1: I don't think they really believe it, but they like
Speaker 1: to say it. Democrats like to claim that we can
Speaker 1: make things good enough in Central America, in Guatemala, Honduras,
Speaker 1: and El Salvador specifically, you'll notice not a lot of
Speaker 1: people coming up from Costa Rica, not a lot of
Speaker 1: people coming up from countries that are doing pretty well,
Speaker 1: but that we can change things in those other countries
Speaker 1: and stop people from showing up. There are close to
Speaker 1: seventy countries now presented at illegal crossings at our border.
Speaker 1: Close to seventy countries have had therefore nationals coming to
Speaker 1: America illegally. They are coming from all over the world.
Speaker 1: The numbers unofficial but reported for last month for May.
Speaker 1: We just got the May numbers in one hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy thousand plus apprehensions. And remember at least thirty or
Speaker 1: forty thousand gotaways on top of that, which means people
Speaker 1: that cross illegally. We just never apprehended them. So that's
Speaker 1: over two hundred thousand people who are crossing into United
Speaker 1: States illegally, and almost all of them are going to
Speaker 1: get to stay. And that's one month. That's one month.
Speaker 1: This is a remarkable situation. And the Democrats simply don't
Speaker 1: care that our sovereignty is being violated, that our system
Speaker 1: is being game, that our rules are being broken, because
Speaker 1: this benefits them. These are future Amocrat voters in their minds,
Speaker 1: that's how they think of it. Yeah, sure, some will
Speaker 1: become conservative, some will start a small business and realize
Speaker 1: the government's not really their friend, and that's going to
Speaker 1: happen too. But they think on balance, and that's they're
Speaker 1: taking a long term view of this. The Democrats are
Speaker 1: on balance. These are mostly Democrat voters. Their children, their
Speaker 1: families are likely to be aligned with the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: because the Democrat Party is the open borders party. So
Speaker 1: it all makes sense. You can put all this together
Speaker 1: pretty quickly. But instead of dealing with this in an
Speaker 1: honest and straightforward way, the Democrats are living in what
Speaker 1: is honestly a fantasy land. I mean, here's here's Kamala,
Speaker 1: for one, She's telling people that's right, don't don't cross
Speaker 1: the border. Whatever you do, don't cross play one. I
Speaker 1: want to be clear to folks in this region who
Speaker 1: are thinking about making that dangerous truck to the United
Speaker 1: States Mexico border, do not come. Do not come. The
Speaker 1: United States will continue to enforce our laws and secure
Speaker 1: our border. They are legal methods by which migration can
Speaker 1: and should occur. But we, as one of our priorities,
Speaker 1: will discourage illegal migration. And I believe if you come
Speaker 1: to our border, you will be turned back. I believe
Speaker 1: if you come to our border, you know they won't.
Speaker 1: Does she not know that? Is she so ignorant of
Speaker 1: what's really happening at the border that she's not aware
Speaker 1: of the reality. It's tough to say she hasn't been there. Yes,
Speaker 1: she also says she hasn't been to Europe, as if
Speaker 1: that has anything to do with anything. Folks, this administration
Speaker 1: is a bunch of buffoons at the top level. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's a tremendous mediocrity now that is running the country. Look,
Speaker 1: I was honest with you. I said there were some
Speaker 1: good Trump appointees and some who were really bad. Trump's
Speaker 1: Trump's weaknesses were his primary weaknesses were nepotism and personnel
Speaker 1: around him. You know it's true. We all know it's true.
Speaker 1: He even admits it basically. Now that it's all done
Speaker 1: and all done and over with, the Democrats don't have really, like,
Speaker 1: from my perspective, any capable personnel at the very top
Speaker 1: level of this administration, not Biden, not as vice president.
Speaker 1: And would I say capable, I mean people who were
Speaker 1: were able to make highly complicated assessments of policy. I
Speaker 1: mean are of highly complicated situations and approach it with
Speaker 1: a rational and reasonable viewpoint about what's really going to happen.
Speaker 1: But the results are actually going to be No, We've
Speaker 1: got idealogues. It's like the faculty lounge of Barred College
Speaker 1: is running the United States government. That is not good,
Speaker 1: that's not working out well for us. And this is
Speaker 1: how you can have Kamala going down to Central America
Speaker 1: telling everybody about how we're going to change things there
Speaker 1: so people stop coming here. I hate to break the
Speaker 1: news tour, but for a El Salvadoran without a high
Speaker 1: school education and who perhaps is barely able to read,
Speaker 1: the United States is a much better option than Al
Speaker 1: Salvador is going to be Economically at least for you know,
Speaker 1: the next probably forever, but certainly for their lifetime. Al
Speaker 1: Salvadorian Al Salvadorans who come to the United States, I
Speaker 1: understand why they're coming. Same thing with Honduran, same thing
Speaker 1: with Guatemalan's. I get it. America is a better deal.
Speaker 1: But we also take in a million legal immigrants every year.
Speaker 1: So if Democrats just want to add to that million
Speaker 1: number with a lot of illegal fagrance, they should just
Speaker 1: say so instead of pretending that they don't want a
Speaker 1: legal immigration because they do. This is where we are
Speaker 1: people talking about how we're going to change the dynamic
Speaker 1: here because we're going to make Central Americans and Northern
Speaker 1: Triangle country specifically want to stay home. Yes, that's right.
Speaker 1: Kamala's visit and he say telling them don't come. Is
Speaker 1: that going to be more compelling? Or is the prospect
Speaker 1: of living in the best economy and what is still
Speaker 1: the freest, most powerful nation in the world. Is that
Speaker 1: going to be more compelling. They're quite clearly voting with
Speaker 1: their feet and showing up in the hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: because they know that what Kamala's saying is absurd. Is
Speaker 1: there a quick pro quo if you do this, we'll
Speaker 1: do this. No, it's not about quick pro quo. It's
Speaker 1: simply about understanding, if nothing else, that the return on
Speaker 1: our investment is the same return on your investment. That
Speaker 1: if you have a neighbor on your block where you
Speaker 1: can up was having a hard time, it's in the
Speaker 1: best interest not only of your neighbor but yourself to
Speaker 1: help them out. Right, And that's how we think about
Speaker 1: this work. What is the United States interest in this?
Speaker 1: We're prepared to show up and do it in a
Speaker 1: way that is motivated by the best interest of diplomacy
Speaker 1: and democracy and goodwill. I mean, she's babbling like a
Speaker 1: high school student doing model you win here. And I've
Speaker 1: been to those things, so I know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: What the diplomacy, democracy? What there are problems? What are
Speaker 1: the solutions. We don't want people, she says, at least
Speaker 1: we don't want people coming into America illegally. She says,
Speaker 1: don't come. How do we prevent them from coming? Oh,
Speaker 1: it's very simple, really, You increase enforcement at the border.
Speaker 1: You change the policy so there's a remain in Mexico policy,
Speaker 1: so people can't gain the asylum system. The Trump administration,
Speaker 1: This implemented it, that's it. But no, they do the
Speaker 1: exact opposite. Why because whatever Trump did must be bad,
Speaker 1: whatever benefits the Democrat Party must be good. But I mean,
Speaker 1: this is this is laughable stuff she's talking about here. Frankly,
Speaker 1: it's it's just a it's it's absurd, a quid pro quo.
Speaker 1: She's being asked by a quid pro quo. I mean,
Speaker 1: least Lester Wholt is trying to get at all, right,
Speaker 1: what is what is Central America really going to do here?
Speaker 1: These Central American countries? What are they going to do
Speaker 1: to stop the continued flow? And she's saying, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: we're going to give them some aid money and we're
Speaker 1: asking them. You know, the president of Guatemala, I think
Speaker 1: it was just yesterday, said that the reason that so
Speaker 1: many of his people are going to America's because the
Speaker 1: Biden administration has just straight upset. It has made this
Speaker 1: very clear. So anyone who's looking at the situation and
Speaker 1: trying to be serious and honest about it understands what's
Speaker 1: going on here. Democrats have kicked the border wide open,
Speaker 1: and now they're saying, whoa what's going on with this
Speaker 1: open border situation, and I guess we got to do
Speaker 1: something about this. Oh, but it's not open boarders, it's
Speaker 1: not a catastrophe, it's not a crisis. Let's manage the
Speaker 1: optics of it first and foremost. You know, she used
Speaker 1: that analogy of you know, you got a neighbor in trouble,
Speaker 1: and you got to help the neighbor. So you're gonna, okay, Well,
Speaker 1: if your neighbor's house burns down, and your neighbor sees
Speaker 1: your house and says, hey, hold on a second, I
Speaker 1: can just move into your house and live there too.
Speaker 1: It's you can show up and like offer them you know, uh,
Speaker 1: you offer them some some food. You can show up
Speaker 1: and say, hey, you know, I got you some takeout
Speaker 1: or whatever, try to help you out. But they're still
Speaker 1: gonna say, I think I want to go live in
Speaker 1: the big house on the corner of the block here.
Speaker 1: I want to leave my dilapidated house, and I'm gonna, oh,
Speaker 1: I get to just move into your house. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: do that. That's the part of this that she doesn't understand.
Speaker 1: If if our game, if what the Democrat planning really
Speaker 1: is based on us making other countries places that people
Speaker 1: who want to come to America will stay and instead
Speaker 1: of coming to America, we better find a way to
Speaker 1: turn the rest of the world into Switzerland, Monaco, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe some parts of the United Kingdom or else. We
Speaker 1: got a big problem is this is not serious. Their
Speaker 1: argument here is stupid. It doesn't add up, it doesn't
Speaker 1: make sense. We've been giving aid to these countries in
Speaker 1: Central America for decades. We've been, you know, having diplomatic
Speaker 1: relations and paying State Department bureaucrats and all these people
Speaker 1: to have agreements with these countries. Ultimately, this is about incentives, right,
Speaker 1: Warren Buffett, Show me the incentive, and I'll show you
Speaker 1: the result. It might have been Charlie Munger his number two,
Speaker 1: but it's one of them. Show me the incentive, I'll
Speaker 1: show you the result. What is the incentive here? If
Speaker 1: you come to the US Mexico border right now now
Speaker 1: on foot, and you are part of a family unit,
Speaker 1: you have children with you, you are going to get
Speaker 1: into the United States almost guaranteed. Once you're in the
Speaker 1: United States, there's no enforcement because of the Biden administration
Speaker 1: doesn't want to enforce federal immigration law. So you're free
Speaker 1: to stay as long as you want, that is what
Speaker 1: is actually happening. So we can have this whole talk
Speaker 1: and we can we can pretend like, oh no, there's
Speaker 1: other stuff. No, that's what's going on here. And Kamala
Speaker 1: acting like it's weird that she hasn't been to it's
Speaker 1: weird that people are asking why she hasn't been to
Speaker 1: the border is the most perfect summation of her control
Speaker 1: over this policy portfolio you could ever come up with.
Speaker 1: What do you mean? I actually have to do something
Speaker 1: and show up. It's not just enough to be Kamala.
Speaker 1: It's not just enough to be the vice president. I
Speaker 1: have to actually do this stuff and handle this problem
Speaker 1: and people will judge my result. Volts M. No, let's
Speaker 1: let's just do another you know, favorable press interview, or
Speaker 1: deliver another boring can speech somewhere, you know, and and
Speaker 1: get ready for another vanity fair cover or something. Right,
Speaker 1: give me a break. We've we've been to the border,
Speaker 1: she says three times. No, you haven't. Okay, we've been
Speaker 1: to the border, she says, false, And even NBC News
Speaker 1: New to cut that out of the interview. Isn't that
Speaker 1: so perfect? Oh, to be such a bunch of supplicating sycophantic,
Speaker 1: worthless little cowards in the media. That that's what we have. Now, Oh,
Speaker 1: they're all just whatever we can do to help Biden's
Speaker 1: vice president, you know, that's what we have to do,
Speaker 1: you know, whatever we can do. No, that's not the
Speaker 1: way this is supposed to go. But we know that
Speaker 1: that's also it's an unserious argument that journalism is a
Speaker 1: nonpartisan and fact based or or facts first profession. Right,
Speaker 1: it's narrative first. There are facts in the narrative, but
Speaker 1: the primary purpose is the narrative creation, and it always
Speaker 1: favors one side. It's dominated by Democrats. You know, there
Speaker 1: are plenty of countries where there's only one political ideology
Speaker 1: reflected in them in the news media. I mean, there
Speaker 1: are authoritarian regimes generally, but there are plenty of countries
Speaker 1: where that's the play, where that's the situation. So we
Speaker 1: shouldn't act like this is unthinkable. That's what we're in
Speaker 1: this country. Now. Half the country is republican, and five
Speaker 1: percent or less of the media's republican. Now why is
Speaker 1: that happening? Exactly? Oh, because the left understands how to
Speaker 1: seize nodes of control, and the left also is ideologically
Speaker 1: like an invasive species. You know when those when the
Speaker 1: fish that will come from some other country will take
Speaker 1: over and all of a sudden, all the local fish.
Speaker 1: Where this happens with birds and other species, ideologically, leftists
Speaker 1: infiltrate and institution and cannot coexist with others, and they
Speaker 1: take the whole thing over. When you spend a lot
Speaker 1: of time in the great outdoors, you know, mother nature
Speaker 1: doesn't always play nice. Say Company has all the protective
Speaker 1: gear you need to brave the elements and explore more
Speaker 1: every day. Like they're multi use face shields UPF thirty,
Speaker 1: lightweight and breathable. They come in dozens of eye catching
Speaker 1: designs for the entire family, perfect for your next outdoor adventure.
Speaker 1: I've got a bunch of them myself, and I love
Speaker 1: wearing them. You're gonna really appreciate not only the cool designs,
Speaker 1: but how comfortable and breathable they are. That's what I
Speaker 1: love about Say face shields, and when you use them
Speaker 1: as bandanas, a neckgat or face mask, there's so many
Speaker 1: different ways you realize it's just a great investment. You
Speaker 1: should have a bunch of these by your front door
Speaker 1: for every outdoor adventure you and your family are going
Speaker 1: to go on. Say Company believes in giving back to
Speaker 1: the men and women who put themselves in the front
Speaker 1: lines every day. Through their partnership with Operation Gratitude. Say
Speaker 1: Company has donated over one hundred thousand and face shields.
Speaker 1: With every order, they donate one face shield of first responders.
Speaker 1: And right now they're offering an insane deal. Buy one
Speaker 1: face shield, get four free, a one hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: dollars value for just twenty four ninety nine. Just go
Speaker 1: to s A phishing dot com slash buck to get
Speaker 1: five face shields for the price of one, plus a
Speaker 1: lifetime warranty and free returns. That's s A like Sam
Speaker 1: Adams SA phishing dot com, SA phishing dot com slash buck.
Speaker 1: You know, I found it curious that that Kamalin that
Speaker 1: press conference said we're enforcing our laws when they're not.
Speaker 1: They're letting people go. It's a giant turnstile where they're
Speaker 1: letting them go. You're just showing now footage of the wall.
Speaker 1: They halted construction of the wall, and they had these
Speaker 1: huge holes where they won't put in the gates. They
Speaker 1: just leave leave it open it is and let me
Speaker 1: step back for a second. There's a reason Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: doesn't want to go to the border. There's a reason
Speaker 1: Joe Biden doesn't want to go to the border because
Speaker 1: they know that if they go, the reporters will follow them,
Speaker 1: the TV cameras will follow them. Their strategy is simple.
Speaker 1: It's trying to cover this up. You know, you're airing
Speaker 1: this on Fox, and I'm grateful that you are, but
Speaker 1: you know where they're not airing this on CNN, on ABC, CBS, NBC.
Speaker 1: None of the corrupt corporate media is even acknowledging this exists.
Speaker 1: And that's why Kamala and and and Joe are not
Speaker 1: going to the border because they know if they go,
Speaker 1: it'll drive the coverage. And they don't have a solution
Speaker 1: to this crisis, so they're prepared for it to just
Speaker 1: get worse and worse and worse. He's absolutely right, And
Speaker 1: as I've said, they don't want footage of them at
Speaker 1: the border wall. They don't want an association of this
Speaker 1: administration's top people, Biden and Harris at our southern border.
Speaker 1: A visual reminder for everybody that can come back in
Speaker 1: the election cycle here they are, folks. Yeah, how they
Speaker 1: do with the border thing. No, that way the media
Speaker 1: can downplay it. And it's a problem of the bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: you see, it's a it's a problem of border patrol.
Speaker 1: We don't have enough resources for resources for HHS. This
Speaker 1: was happening under Trump too. They spin it. That's why
Speaker 1: they show up at the border. They actually have to
Speaker 1: have they have video and photo taken them. Kamala gets
Speaker 1: told to her face by chief of the Rio Grande
Speaker 1: sector or chief of of you know, San Diego sector
Speaker 1: of Border patrol, wherever it may be. She gets told
Speaker 1: we have a crisis here, and she hears that that
Speaker 1: comes back to haunt her, or that comes back to
Speaker 1: be a problem for the Biden administration when a week
Speaker 1: later they're gonna have Jensaki at and the West wing
Speaker 1: of the White House saying there is no crisis at
Speaker 1: the border. There's no crisis. No, it's not a crisis, right.
Speaker 1: That's they're trying to manage the optics of this. This
Speaker 1: that's all solutions. They're they're gonna they're gonna give money
Speaker 1: to Central American country so they have less climate change.
Speaker 1: Give me a break. It's it's dumb. There's no they
Speaker 1: don't even have a good argument. There's not even you
Speaker 1: can't be a serious person think this administration is trying
Speaker 1: to stop the illegal flow into this country. One hundred
Speaker 1: and seventy thousand just apprehensions. The month of May, we're
Speaker 1: gonna have over a million, maybe closer to two million
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants entering the country this first year of the
Speaker 1: Biden administration. I'm sorry, I think that's a lot of people. Plus,
Speaker 1: of course a million legal immigrants coming in through the
Speaker 1: process that we have designated that wants to bring in
Speaker 1: that we want. We the American people and our duly
Speaker 1: elected representatives creating laws, want legal immigrants in the country.
Speaker 1: But we didn't. We didn't sign up for this. At
Speaker 1: least we didn't think we were million plus illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: Illegal immigrants coming into America. That wasn't part of this,
Speaker 1: That wasn't supposed to be. This is this is what
Speaker 1: we're going to get. This is what you're going to see.
Speaker 1: The whole Biden Harris approach the border. It's as though
Speaker 1: we've hired a security company to make sure that, you know,
Speaker 1: bank robbers can't get into our vaults. And the first
Speaker 1: thing that the Biden Harris security company, Bank security company
Speaker 1: does they show up, They take all the locks off
Speaker 1: the doors, they cut the silent alarm, they cut the
Speaker 1: actual alarms on the windows, and instead of having a great,
Speaker 1: great big, you know, one of those kind of spinning
Speaker 1: lock things they have on the safe, instead of that,
Speaker 1: they just have a slightly a jarred door with a hey,
Speaker 1: please don't steal our stuff sign put on it. And
Speaker 1: they're walking around saying, well, we really want the bank
Speaker 1: robbers to stop getting into the vault taking the money.
Speaker 1: We really want them to stop doing that, And the
Speaker 1: rest of us are looking at them like this is
Speaker 1: gas lighting, right, You're you're messing with us. That's the
Speaker 1: situation of our southern border in a nutshell, that's what's
Speaker 1: actually going on here. It's going to be interesting to
Speaker 1: see how this plays out for Democrats in the midterms.
Speaker 1: I hope Republicans are making this case, continue to make
Speaker 1: this case. The lawlessness, the lack of respect. I mean,
Speaker 1: they talk about our institutions and our democracy. How can
Speaker 1: they claim to have respect for our democracy when they're
Speaker 1: encouraging people to break our laws and then want to
Speaker 1: give them the right to vote as soon as they
Speaker 1: can once they're in this country. I mean, it'd be
Speaker 1: a fascinating experiment. Ask a Democrat friend of yours, So,
Speaker 1: you know, an immigrant from Central America who came into
Speaker 1: the country illegally breaks our laws? Should they be able
Speaker 1: to vote as soon as they get here? If not,
Speaker 1: why not ask them? They will not have any answers
Speaker 1: for you. They will not have any answers. They'll just
Speaker 1: babble and say, oh, you're being xenophobic or something. They'll
Speaker 1: they'll attack you, but they won't admit it. The same
Speaker 1: way that one of the experiments that I've run many
Speaker 1: times is I ask a Democrat, you say you don't
Speaker 1: want Democrats he Harris and Biden say it, they don't
Speaker 1: want a legal immigration. Don't come. Kamala Harris says, why,
Speaker 1: I ask why you know? Isn't that a fair Why
Speaker 1: does she think people shouldn't come? The answer is because
Speaker 1: it's dangerous to them on the way is that the
Speaker 1: only reason is that the only reason they won't tell
Speaker 1: you is there a downside to illegal immigration for the
Speaker 1: people of America. If they don't have an answer to that,
Speaker 1: if they're not going to say yes, it creates lawlessness
Speaker 1: and it undermines our our system of government, and it
Speaker 1: makes people feel like there are two tiers of justice.
Speaker 1: And it overcrowds in some parts of the country where
Speaker 1: there's a lot of illegal immigrant flow, at overcrowds emergency rooms,
Speaker 1: at overcrowds schools. There is a crime component to illegal immigration.
Speaker 1: The cartels are getting rich over this. They are you know,
Speaker 1: they are transnational gangs that use these pipelines to recruit
Speaker 1: for MS thirteen. If they're not to talk about any
Speaker 1: of that, and they're not, and they think it's xenophobic
Speaker 1: and horrible even bring these things up. Why why is
Speaker 1: Kamala telling people don't come? Why isn't she just making
Speaker 1: sure that it's safer for them? Right? And that would
Speaker 1: be really easy, right, just tell anybody, okay, show up
Speaker 1: at a port of entry and you get you get
Speaker 1: to come into the country. We're not turning anyone away
Speaker 1: anything that would make it really safe. Why what's the
Speaker 1: downside in that? When you try to force Democrats to
Speaker 1: answer the question why aren't you for an open border?
Speaker 1: You see that they want a de facto open border.
Speaker 1: They just don't want to defend it publicly. They want
Speaker 1: the result of an open border, but they don't want
Speaker 1: to make the argument in front of the bulk of
Speaker 1: the American people who still believe that we should have
Speaker 1: immigration laws and they should be enforced. I mean, the
Speaker 1: same people that we're willing to have folks dragged by
Speaker 1: their hair basically out of restaurant or you know, out
Speaker 1: of a church for not double masking, are like, oh,
Speaker 1: immigration laws, we don't really that those aren't real laws.
Speaker 1: Noticing a pattern here, aren't you. The only laws that
Speaker 1: count are the ones that the Democrats ideologically are invested in.
Speaker 1: The law as a general concept is a joke to them.
Speaker 1: It's just something to be manipulated for their own ends.
Speaker 1: Same thing with our system of government. When something comes
Speaker 1: out of our system of government, Democrats like it. They say,
Speaker 1: this is our sacred democracy in action. When something completely
Speaker 1: legitimately comes out of our system through Congress, out of legislature,
Speaker 1: and Democrats don't let work through the Supreme Court, I
Speaker 1: think of the recent decision from the nine justices about
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants applying for legal status in this country. Nine
Speaker 1: oo came down. Democrats say, oh, well, this is this
Speaker 1: is undermining our system, or this is white supremacy in action,
Speaker 1: or this is reason why we need to forget all
Speaker 1: about the Constitution. They don't have principles, they have desires.
Speaker 1: It's not the same thing. And you're seeing it with
Speaker 1: the border as clearly as you are and anywhere else
Speaker 1: speaking of of masking and their desire to enforce things.
Speaker 1: This is a reminder, I think, for a lot of
Speaker 1: conservatives now that if our goal is to create a system,
Speaker 1: if we're always trying to set up choice in different
Speaker 1: ways when it comes to policy, you know, oh well,
Speaker 1: we'll let businesses decide for themselves, and democrats the moment
Speaker 1: they can are pushing their preference through government power, we lose.
Speaker 1: This is what has been happening, and this is a
Speaker 1: big transformation in the thought process of a lot of conservatives,
Speaker 1: and it is part of, I believe, the Trump era
Speaker 1: of the Republican Party right now, where you say hold on,
Speaker 1: our desire to create a neutral space is effectively just
Speaker 1: us allowing the other side to come up with a
Speaker 1: way to fill that neutral space. Now you see this
Speaker 1: with curriculum in schools across the country. You see this
Speaker 1: with approach to so many issues. We think, hold on,
Speaker 1: let's just let it be left to you know, individual
Speaker 1: individual decision making or the local level or whatever. But
Speaker 1: often Democrats come and find a way to make it federal,
Speaker 1: find a way to make it top down national, and
Speaker 1: then that's what we're living with. Well, I'm happy to
Speaker 1: see that, Greg Abbott, instead of just allowing this to
Speaker 1: be a situation where where businesses that have all kinds
Speaker 1: of regulations or for you know, they gotta have regulations
Speaker 1: of how wide the doors into the bathrooms are, they
Speaker 1: gotta regulations about how you know, the breaks they give
Speaker 1: employees and who they can hire and how they can hire,
Speaker 1: all the business regulations out there. State of Tech, thanks
Speaker 1: to Governor Abbott is saying you're not allowed to block
Speaker 1: people from your public accommodation from your establishment based on
Speaker 1: vaccination status. Play fourteen. Texas is open one hundred percent,
Speaker 1: and we want to make sure that you have the
Speaker 1: freedom to go where you want without limits. The Texas
Speaker 1: legislature passed a law that I am about to sign
Speaker 1: that prohibits vaccine passports in Texas, no business or government
Speaker 1: entity can require a person to provide a vaccine passport
Speaker 1: or any other vaccine information. They cannot require it. I
Speaker 1: was going to go to a restaurant here in New
Speaker 1: York over the weekend, a place I've gone many times,
Speaker 1: but it's in you. It's owned by Libs. I know
Speaker 1: it is. And they had a if you're going to
Speaker 1: dine inside, we require proof of your vaccination. And I
Speaker 1: just want to say, you know, if you're going to
Speaker 1: operate an establishment in the United States in New York City,
Speaker 1: I think you shouldn't be allowed to be such psychos.
Speaker 1: How about that? And say, oh, buck, but businesses. There
Speaker 1: are a lot of regulations on businesses, friends, a lot
Speaker 1: of health and OSHA and Health Department, all kinds of
Speaker 1: stuff that comes into play. It's not just the market.
Speaker 1: Let's stop pretending we live in some free market, absolutist
Speaker 1: society where it's all just No, We're already in a
Speaker 1: world where there's all kinds of regulations protecting consumers from
Speaker 1: the neuroses of businesses that are aligned, obviously with a
Speaker 1: political ideology in the process. Sounds good to me. Your
Speaker 1: private health information cannot be required as cannot be required
Speaker 1: as disclosure for you to go into a restaurant in Texas. Great.
Speaker 1: This should happen in other states too. The longer the
Speaker 1: stupid jackasses in charge of places like California and New
Speaker 1: York play these games and require masking for kids in
Speaker 1: schools and require vaccine passports. The more people like me realize,
Speaker 1: you gotta get out of here. You just get we
Speaker 1: just gotta get out of here. The places are run
Speaker 1: by morons. Oh, the masks are gonna save us. Yeah,
Speaker 1: how that work out? How their mask mania really work out?
Speaker 1: I saw an estimate today. What have I been telling you?
Speaker 1: Estimate today one hundred and fifty million people infected in
Speaker 1: this country. They consider that at the upper end, but
Speaker 1: that's the higher end estimate, and I'm sure it is
Speaker 1: the higher end. So basically half the country ended up
Speaker 1: getting COVID in one capacity or another, close to half
Speaker 1: the country with all of our masking, all of our lockdowns. Yeah,
Speaker 1: what an amazing policy fout. You came up with the
Speaker 1: elected a fifty fifty shut up, shruck Democrats majority in
Speaker 1: the House and took President Biden up on a promise
Speaker 1: to your ninth the country. So the question at the
Speaker 1: outset of this work period how Democrats will use their
Speaker 1: razor razor down majority over the next few weeks. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: the Democrat leader already signaled his answer A week ago
Speaker 1: by laying out a June agenda that is transparently designed
Speaker 1: to fail. As I understand, it's center Democrats and tend
Speaker 1: to focus this month on the demands of their radical base.
Speaker 1: It's going to fail. But that also maybe, and I
Speaker 1: want to prepare you all for this, that might be
Speaker 1: a benefit to the Democrats in the midterms if they
Speaker 1: were really able to do some of the things that
Speaker 1: they want to do right now, if they were able
Speaker 1: to get let's say, an amnesty bill through the country,
Speaker 1: would see the results of Democrat policies in ways that
Speaker 1: might be really anxiety producing. Let's put it that way.
Speaker 1: But because of gridlock, and you remember this from the
Speaker 1: Obama years, this is a repeat all over again because
Speaker 1: and grid luck. By the way, I think good luck
Speaker 1: and government is good on a lot of things. On
Speaker 1: major legislation, you should require a clear consensus of the
Speaker 1: people to dramatically transform a major part of American life,
Speaker 1: or to have a transformational policy enacted as law. It
Speaker 1: shouldn't be under a razor thin margin. It shouldn't be oh, well,
Speaker 1: we have fifty point one percent of the vote, and
Speaker 1: therefore we're going to do something that dramatically shifts the
Speaker 1: trajectory of American healthcare, American immigration, or any number of things.
Speaker 1: So I'm all for it. But this creates a narrative
Speaker 1: that the Democrats are very comfortable with, and because they
Speaker 1: have the media in their back pocket, they're in a
Speaker 1: position to just continue on this right. This creates a
Speaker 1: narrative of, oh that if only the Republicans weren't standing
Speaker 1: in our way, we the Democrats, would do all these
Speaker 1: great things for the American people. We the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: and the left would have enacted you know, universal pre K,
Speaker 1: and we would wipe away all your college student loans,
Speaker 1: and we would I don't I would think of something
Speaker 1: that they love to promise and don't deliver on. And
Speaker 1: as we get closer to the election, you know what
Speaker 1: they're gonna say, we brought you Biden a normal presidency.
Speaker 1: It's normalcy. Are you going to vote against normalcy? It's
Speaker 1: not Trump. You know, things are okay, things are going
Speaker 1: pretty well. You know, it's normal. That's what they will
Speaker 1: put out there, and you say, well, that's not compelling,
Speaker 1: that's not transformational. But it might be enough for them
Speaker 1: to hold their very slim majority in the House and
Speaker 1: perhaps in the Senate, they'll be able to get fifty
Speaker 1: one or fifty two seats. Who knows. In essence the
Speaker 1: Democrat they don't see it this way. They are being
Speaker 1: protected from their more radical and transformational impulses by a
Speaker 1: GOP that will not go along with it, which may
Speaker 1: end up being to their electoral benefit. Right, Why isn't
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders president? Because Democrats realized the establishment, the elites
Speaker 1: realized that the country wasn't ready for a socialist as president.
Speaker 1: He wasn't gonna win. They may recognize the same thing
Speaker 1: in the mid term. So there's a part of me
Speaker 1: that feels like they actually benefit from their agenda failing.
Speaker 1: As Mitch McConnell points out, We've got a big announcement
Speaker 1: to make here on the show that affects the show,
Speaker 1: and it also affects one of our favorite people in
Speaker 1: this business. He's certainly his favorite person in this business,
Speaker 1: but our good buddy, Jesse Kelly. You may have seen
Speaker 1: somewhere on social media today the announcement some of the
Speaker 1: media coverage that he is taking over the coveted six
Speaker 1: to nine slot for Premiere Radio Networks Coast to Coast.
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly is going to be on over two hundred
Speaker 1: stations with the Jesse Kelly Show, and he joins us, Now,
Speaker 1: what's what's it like in that rarefied air up there, buddy?
Speaker 1: How is it to be kidding the world today? Eh? Well,
Speaker 1: it's just so I gonna be honest, Buck, It's something
Speaker 1: I always knew I deserved. So it's something I really
Speaker 1: saw coming from the very beginning. I woke up every
Speaker 1: day and thought to myself, obviously you're gonna take over
Speaker 1: the world. So I'd love to say I'm surprised, Buck,
Speaker 1: but I mean, who deserves it more than someone with
Speaker 1: almost three years of community college credits. Very proud of you,
Speaker 1: big guy. Everyone's very excited and for everybody listening on
Speaker 1: a terrestrial station right now as across the country, our
Speaker 1: buddy Jesse Kelly is gonna be in six to nine.
Speaker 1: As you all know, I'm gonna be moving twelve to
Speaker 1: three with Clay Travis on Premiere Networks and Jesse Kelly
Speaker 1: on Premiere Networks will be your six to nine. So
Speaker 1: those of you are listening down in WIOD Miami and WFLA, Tampa,
Speaker 1: and out in Salt Lake City and out in San Diego,
Speaker 1: and out in PORTLANDA, Jessee. Do you even realize you're
Speaker 1: gonna have to learn all these call letters? Buddy? Are you?
Speaker 1: Are you aware of this? This is gonna have to
Speaker 1: be I mean you're gonna have to be able to
Speaker 1: sit there. Yeah, I know, you know KPRC Houston and
Speaker 1: you're still gonna be on KPRC Houston, But you gotta
Speaker 1: have to learn all these letters. So there is a
Speaker 1: catch here. Well, I think it's important for people to
Speaker 1: understand that I have such a low intellect. I won't
Speaker 1: even attempt to memorize all the letters. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: have to have a list in front of me that
Speaker 1: tells you what they are. Because I'll remember the faces
Speaker 1: at the stations, and I'll remember the towns and I
Speaker 1: love the cities. I'll remember where to eat, but I
Speaker 1: won't remember the actual call letters, because that's the important thing.
Speaker 1: So that's what my mind will lose. What should people
Speaker 1: know about what they will be hearing. I mean they're
Speaker 1: getting a sense of it right now, but what they'll
Speaker 1: be hearing from you for now? Three hours in syndication
Speaker 1: on the Jesse Sell Kelly Show from six to nine
Speaker 1: Eastern Time. I'm not gonna make you miserable. Look, we're
Speaker 1: gonna obviously talk about politics and the big news of
Speaker 1: the day, and we're gonna make fun of Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and talk about how unbelievably screwed we are and how
Speaker 1: we should get a national divorce and things like that.
Speaker 1: But you're not going to get done after three hours
Speaker 1: and just be miserable. We have fun and laugh, and
Speaker 1: I'm gonna make fun of myself and you and I'll
Speaker 1: be offensive, and it's just it should be fun. My
Speaker 1: job is not to save the world. It's just to
Speaker 1: make your better, your day better, for fifteen minutes at
Speaker 1: a time. That's all I'm here to do. I think
Speaker 1: that's a mission, folks, that Jesse is going to complete
Speaker 1: with Gusto. So you should definitely bland to tune in.
Speaker 1: Do we know Jesse when your first day of the
Speaker 1: national syndication begins twenty eighth. June twenty eighth will be
Speaker 1: the opening of the The Jesse Kelly Show that when supernova.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I should note to the audience
Speaker 1: that I know loves you so much. Your man Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton is hugely responsible for the reason I'm sitting in
Speaker 1: that radio chair. I want everybody to know that that
Speaker 1: I know he's a big jerk on the radio, but
Speaker 1: behind the scenes he reaches out and helps people who
Speaker 1: he has no business helping. And I have never done
Speaker 1: anything for Buck Sexton, and he reaches out and helps
Speaker 1: me continuously with advice and making the proper connections. Oh dude,
Speaker 1: you are so welcome. But obviously, officially I can neither
Speaker 1: confirm nor deny that I go to war behind the
Speaker 1: scenes to help out my man Jesse Kelly whatever possible.
Speaker 1: So you know, I can neither officially confirm or deny
Speaker 1: other than just to say you're You're most welcome, my friend,
Speaker 1: and most deserving, and I'm honestly happy on so many levels.
Speaker 1: Happy for you, happy for your family. I mean, two
Speaker 1: hundred plus stations, This is you're gonna have. I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't want to say with the exact numbers, it's
Speaker 1: going to be one of the ten biggest radio shows
Speaker 1: in America, that's for sure. So I don't know if
Speaker 1: that's sunk in for you yet, but you'll be in
Speaker 1: the top ten by audience and pretty pretty deep into
Speaker 1: that top ted. Although I don't want to, I don't
Speaker 1: want to cause any problems with any other any other
Speaker 1: hosts out there. But you're definitely gonna be in the
Speaker 1: top ten for conservative talk. In terms of audience, You'll
Speaker 1: be reaching, which is great. And and I just also think, man,
Speaker 1: that it's good to see good people doing well because
Speaker 1: this audience that I've now spent gosh five years with
Speaker 1: six to nine, they are now being entrusted into into
Speaker 1: your capable and freakishly large hands. So there you go. Well,
Speaker 1: the good news is, like you pointed out, I am
Speaker 1: six eight, so my hands are enormous. But it is
Speaker 1: not lost on me that they have been well served
Speaker 1: and well taken care of them for five years. I
Speaker 1: can't promise you a high intellect or level of education
Speaker 1: or anything else. I can promise you this, though I will.
Speaker 1: I will go into it knowing this audience has certain
Speaker 1: demands because of Buck Sexton, and I plan on deliver.
Speaker 1: Are you going to give them some good history special stuff, Jesse,
Speaker 1: Because that's how I get this request all the time,
Speaker 1: and have now for all almost ten years I've been
Speaker 1: in radio, and I've done a few history specials and
Speaker 1: gone in depth in detail a few times. It's never enough, though,
Speaker 1: for the folks. You love it. They're like, where's the
Speaker 1: next one. I'm like, oh gosh, I got I gotta
Speaker 1: do the research. I gotta do the research. Is history
Speaker 1: gonna be a big part of the show. You're gonna
Speaker 1: do well? History is? I mean history Right now, my
Speaker 1: show is syndicated, but it's a much much, much smaller
Speaker 1: I mean, nothing even close to this level. And the
Speaker 1: first hour of my show is a history story every
Speaker 1: single day. Now, I'm not carrying that over to this
Speaker 1: because I actually have, by the grace of God, they're
Speaker 1: so wonderful to work where Premier Networks has allowed me
Speaker 1: to start a once a week separate history podcast. It's
Speaker 1: not part of my show. I look at everything through
Speaker 1: a historical perspective, so it'll be part of the daily show.
Speaker 1: It'll be a part of every single daily show. And
Speaker 1: then I get a separate podcast once a week where
Speaker 1: I'm not limited by commercials or teasers or time or anything.
Speaker 1: I can sit down and just tell a story. History
Speaker 1: is what I geek out on more than anything. So
Speaker 1: we're gonna have a lot of fun. There you go, folks.
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly now in national syndication, hitting the airwaves June
Speaker 1: twenty eighth, and if you're listening right now, that's that's
Speaker 1: you're going to be hearing Jesse Kelly starting June twenty eight.
Speaker 1: At this time, as you all know, I'm moving twelve
Speaker 1: to three. Jesse's moving in six to nine. I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna sit here and say, I mean, we've got Glenn Beck,
Speaker 1: clan Buck, Hannity, Jesse. I don't. I don't think you
Speaker 1: could have a stronger radio lineup in that, folks. I
Speaker 1: think Premiere is like the Avengers of radio right now. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, I guess that's what makes them Premiere. That's
Speaker 1: why they have the reputation they have. It's the one.
Speaker 1: It's the one. You know. It's a dream to work
Speaker 1: with them, honestly, and so everyone wants that phone call.
Speaker 1: It's a phone call. Everyone who does what we do
Speaker 1: dreams about getting. It's not lost on me that I'm
Speaker 1: the luckiest guy on the planet that I got one.
Speaker 1: I know you feel the same way. And like I said,
Speaker 1: my day is my job is not to lead America.
Speaker 1: It's just to make your day better. I plan on doing. Jesse.
Speaker 1: Speaking of which, we got people who are listening, who
Speaker 1: are tuning in now we're joining us, and they're probably thinking, well,
Speaker 1: tell us about what's going on. So we've got we
Speaker 1: know that Jesse's going into national syndication June twenty eight,
Speaker 1: six to nine Premiere networks across the country to understate,
Speaker 1: so we put that one in. We know that Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris has still not gone to the border, and you've
Speaker 1: been something of a of a Kamala expert. I think
Speaker 1: for some time now in the media you've been covering
Speaker 1: the Vice president quite closely, and I just think that
Speaker 1: this is it's gonna be fascinating to watch the corporate
Speaker 1: democrat media try to explain to us all that even
Speaker 1: though there's no success or even clarity in the Kamala
Speaker 1: led policies at the border or anywhere else for that matter,
Speaker 1: right now, she's amazing and if you don't agree with that,
Speaker 1: you're a terrible person. So, oh, I have to tell you,
Speaker 1: I think there's something deeper going on here, Buck too.
Speaker 1: And I said this right when Joe Biden put Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris in charge of the border. The border is a disaster.
Speaker 1: Everyone listening right now knows that. I know your audience
Speaker 1: knows that, but I don't know that people know the scale.
Speaker 1: We're looking at three million this year. Three million, that's
Speaker 1: one percent of the population of the United States of
Speaker 1: America is going to come here illegally in the year
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one. That is a disaster like no nation
Speaker 1: has faced as far as immigration goes in that period
Speaker 1: of time. Joe Biden immediately puts Kamala Harris in charge
Speaker 1: of it. I think, and I've had this theory for
Speaker 1: a while, Kamala Harris is never going to the border
Speaker 1: because she doesn't want to be caught on TV or
Speaker 1: on camera down at the border in a situation that
Speaker 1: is a disaster for Democrats. Yep. There's a city in
Speaker 1: Texas called McCallen, Texas. It's always Democrat all the time.
Speaker 1: I think they voted for Joe Biden, like plus fifteen.
Speaker 1: They just voted in a Republican mayor. Republican mayors do
Speaker 1: not get elected in McCallen, Texas. It's right down there
Speaker 1: on the border. It just happened. I think Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: is running away from an issue Joe Biden gave to
Speaker 1: her on purpose to make her look bad, and she
Speaker 1: knows it'll make her look bad, so she is going
Speaker 1: to avoid this thing like the plague. That's my theory,
Speaker 1: and I think that the Biden administration is hoping that
Speaker 1: the way the media. By the way, you and I
Speaker 1: totally agree on Kamalano's the optic of this. Her talking
Speaker 1: to somebody in a border patrol uniform at the border
Speaker 1: becomes OPO when she decides that she's either taking over
Speaker 1: for Biden or running or whatever is going to happen,
Speaker 1: because there's no way to spin what's going on, especially
Speaker 1: as the year gets through and we have the full numbers.
Speaker 1: This is the worst the border, Jesse. I mean, I
Speaker 1: was down in McCallan about what two months ago now,
Speaker 1: and they were all saying it, and I mean everybody
Speaker 1: at the border, border patrol, everyone, you talk to, local politicians.
Speaker 1: The worst it has ever been. I mean, going back
Speaker 1: even to the nineties. Well, buff we invited him in.
Speaker 1: We have that Joe Biden clip that I know you've
Speaker 1: played where he invited a surge at the border. They
Speaker 1: told everyone to come. We have ten thousand Venezuelans this year.
Speaker 1: They're coming from deep down in South America. Now that's
Speaker 1: not just Central America anymore. And they used to release
Speaker 1: people with a court date to show up the court,
Speaker 1: which in and of itself as a joke because most
Speaker 1: people don't show up. Now we're getting so many people
Speaker 1: they don't even have time to give them a court date.
Speaker 1: They're releasing them into a Merica with the promise that
Speaker 1: they'll get back to them on their court date, that
Speaker 1: they then won't show up for. This is this is
Speaker 1: a fund problem now and it's only going to compound
Speaker 1: as the year goes on. And she is, Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: is if there's nothing if not ambitious. She has worked
Speaker 1: very hard to get where she is. She's not going
Speaker 1: to waste that on a border issue. You think that
Speaker 1: the enough voters you know what always see the American people,
Speaker 1: there's thirty or forty percent of and we're speaking to
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly folks as you know, going into national syndication
Speaker 1: on six to nine on Premiere Networks. I'm moving twelve
Speaker 1: to three. Jesse's moving six to nine. We got a great,
Speaker 1: great lineup on Premiere. That's that's getting some some movement
Speaker 1: here in the next couple of weeks. Jesse, the we
Speaker 1: can't convince thirty or forty percent of Democrat voters It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter what happens, right, I mean, we could have
Speaker 1: hyperinflation and and Biden could could fire everybody in border
Speaker 1: patrol and we could defund all the police. They still
Speaker 1: vote Democrat, but it doesn't matter. So when I say,
Speaker 1: are you know the American people, I mean, are those
Speaker 1: who are persuadable one way or the other seeing enough
Speaker 1: of what this administration's so called normalcy and unity looks
Speaker 1: like that they're that they're worried about how this is
Speaker 1: going to go in the midterms and there might be
Speaker 1: a Biden administration that's effectively boxed in and can't get
Speaker 1: very much done. Or do you think do you think
Speaker 1: that they believe this is going well for them politically?
Speaker 1: That that's really what the heart of the question is.
Speaker 1: I ask this exact same question to somebody who has
Speaker 1: a bunch of inside sources. I'll put it this way
Speaker 1: in the White House, and the response I got back
Speaker 1: it really run true what Joe Biden has around him.
Speaker 1: The people running the country are Barack Obama's people. These
Speaker 1: are not people who care about winning a midterm or
Speaker 1: winning re election. These are one hundred percent committed cultural Marxists.
Speaker 1: They are going to They don't care that they won't
Speaker 1: pass legislation. They're going to tear through this country like
Speaker 1: a blow towards soup butter. They don't care that they'll
Speaker 1: lose in the midterms. They don't care they'll lose in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four because as soon as they lose, these
Speaker 1: people aren't out of a job. They walk right back
Speaker 1: into acadee and all make half million dollars a year
Speaker 1: at CNN or at Yale or something like that. You
Speaker 1: have to understand how insidious this is. These people hate
Speaker 1: the country. I'm not trying to build that up for radio.
Speaker 1: The people in charge of America hate America. They don't
Speaker 1: care about legislation. They don't care that it's a disaster.
Speaker 1: This isn't going poorly for Democrats. It's going exactly as planned.
Speaker 1: That's how bad it. Jesse Kelly. Everybody taken over six
Speaker 1: to nine national syndication on Premier Network starting June twenty eighth.
Speaker 1: This time slot folks in great hands going forward. You're
Speaker 1: going to be listeners then, I know. So you can
Speaker 1: listen twelve to three, you listen six to nine, get
Speaker 1: everything you need. Courtesy of Premier Networks. Jesse Congratulations again,
Speaker 1: my friend, honestly a hard fuck. Congratulations and thanks for
Speaker 1: joining us. Be good, my brother, Io, you appreciate you.
Speaker 1: We had the January sixth insurrection, and now you have
Speaker 1: Trump out on the road once again, because he hasn't
Speaker 1: been pushed to the side by his party again repeating
Speaker 1: these same dangerous lies and wolf, I think there's a
Speaker 1: very strong chance that we may see more politic violence
Speaker 1: in this country, stoked and incited by this president. He's
Speaker 1: done it before. It looks like he may do it again.
Speaker 1: He's gonna do it again, folks, another insurrection any moment
Speaker 1: now from Trump. They're never gonna quit. They're never gonna
Speaker 1: stop saying this stuff. And while you and I can
Speaker 1: brush this aside and say, come on, it's it's so obvious,
Speaker 1: it's such cheap theater, all right, Trump's not calling for
Speaker 1: There was no insurrection in the first place. There was
Speaker 1: a protest that turned into a riot. And yet now
Speaker 1: they're saying that Trump is going to have another insurrection attempt.
Speaker 1: Why do they keep bringing this up because it feeds
Speaker 1: the need that Democrats have to really despise the other side.
Speaker 1: God forbid, they actually take a moment to think about
Speaker 1: how destructive you know, things like critical race theory and
Speaker 1: planned parenthood and Marxism and all you know, these these
Speaker 1: now increasingly central ideas for the Democrat Party. God forbid,
Speaker 1: they actually take a moment to think about what they're
Speaker 1: doing to the country. No, it's so much more preferable
Speaker 1: to focus on how evil the Republicans are, because we're
Speaker 1: all sitting around plotting another insurrection. No, we're plotting away
Speaker 1: to win back seats in the next election and to
Speaker 1: win the presidency back from this sub mediocre idiot Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: That's what we're plotting. Okay, that's what we do. That's
Speaker 1: how our side does things. And they know that at
Speaker 1: some level, which is one of the reasons why they
Speaker 1: want to work so hard to get HR one pass
Speaker 1: so they can just just like they do with the border,
Speaker 1: they kick it wide open, so that there really are
Speaker 1: no rules or regulations to speak of that are meaningful.
Speaker 1: It's it's so easy to break the law, so easy
Speaker 1: to break through. They wanted the same thing with elections.
Speaker 1: Sure they say they want secure elections, but let's eliminate
Speaker 1: all the safeguards. Sure they say they want a secure border,
Speaker 1: but Let's eliminate all the safeguards. Let's get rid of
Speaker 1: the only ways that we would have to stop bad
Speaker 1: things from happening, to stop violations of law, and also
Speaker 1: make it effectively impossible to even know what's going on
Speaker 1: to have any transparency. Doesn't that doesn't that seem like
Speaker 1: a theme here, whether it's the border elections, Oh no, sure,
Speaker 1: they wanted to work just fine. They just want to
Speaker 1: make sure that whatever we try to do to make
Speaker 1: it work, they stop, They stand in the way of
Speaker 1: Whenever it comes to more secure elections, Democrats have a problem.
Speaker 1: Whenever it comes to more secure border actions, the Democrats
Speaker 1: have a problem border enforcement. Really, listen to the rhetoric
Speaker 1: they're using now, listen to the way they speak about
Speaker 1: these issues. I mean, here's a Congressman Clyburn who is
Speaker 1: straight up telling us if we don't allow for the
Speaker 1: the federalization of elections, which is contrary to the actual
Speaker 1: constitutional attent and states to run their elections, but if
Speaker 1: we don't allow for essentially a federal overhaul by Democrats
Speaker 1: with a razor thin majority in Congress to change the
Speaker 1: way elections are conducted, we're gonna end up like the
Speaker 1: Roman Empire play seven. You know when I used to
Speaker 1: teach this, actually tell my students all the time. I
Speaker 1: don't want you to remember the two days when I
Speaker 1: was studying history. People tell me about the dates full
Speaker 1: seven to six eight d full seven to six eight.
Speaker 1: That's the year the Roman Empires failed and passed the
Speaker 1: whole world into doctness. And it did not come to
Speaker 1: lot again utin ten sixty six, when William the Conqueror
Speaker 1: opened it up again. And if we're not careful, this
Speaker 1: the greatest democracy on the face of the earth will
Speaker 1: go the way of the Roman Empire. The history is
Speaker 1: very clear, and so I would say this is not
Speaker 1: a democratic problem. This is not a problem for democrats.
Speaker 1: This is a problem but every person in these United
Speaker 1: States of America, and with better wake up, or we
Speaker 1: are going to find ourselves going the way for the
Speaker 1: Roman Empire and many others. Sin that's right, pass hr
Speaker 1: one or it will be like the fall of Rome.
Speaker 1: Not worried about hyperinflation, unsustainable spending, open borders, do not
Speaker 1: worry of any of that. Pass hr one or will
Speaker 1: be the Roman Empire and in its decline, in its collapse,
Speaker 1: I think there's a lot of parts of that history
Speaker 1: that Congressman Cleberon might want to go back and revisit,
Speaker 1: because it wasn't the absence of HR one, I could
Speaker 1: assure you that caused the fall of ancient Rome. It
Speaker 1: shouldn't matter what your politics are. You should be able
Speaker 1: to share your thoughts online and conduct your Internet activity
Speaker 1: without being spied on. But guess what, you can't. It's
Speaker 1: the reality of the world we live in right now.
Speaker 1: You know it, I know it. If you're a conservative,
Speaker 1: you're being suppressed, you're being surveiled, you might even be targeted.
Speaker 1: You need to fight back against big text control of
Speaker 1: the Internet with a virtual private network of VPN. The
Speaker 1: one that I use the s when in the marketplace
Speaker 1: right now is Express VPN. With Express VPN, it's just
Speaker 1: an app you have on your computer or your smartphone.
Speaker 1: You anonymize a lot of your online presence by hiding
Speaker 1: your IP address. That makes your activity much more difficult
Speaker 1: to trace and sell to advertisers, and Express VPN encrypts
Speaker 1: one hundred percent of your network data to protect you
Speaker 1: from eavesdroppers and cyber criminals. What I like most is
Speaker 1: how easy it is to use. It takes just one
Speaker 1: click to protect all your devices. That's why Express VPN
Speaker 1: is rated number one by snet and Wired. Revoke big
Speaker 1: text right to your data, Secure your Internet with the
Speaker 1: VPN I trust for online protection. Visit Express vpn dot
Speaker 1: com slash buck that's Express vpn dot com slash buck
Speaker 1: to get three extra months free with my exclusive link
Speaker 1: on a one year package. That's right, three months free
Speaker 1: on a one year deal when you go to Express
Speaker 1: vpn dot com slash buck right now to learn more.
Speaker 1: Protect yourself and your privacy online with Express BPN. I
Speaker 1: also think that there are certain right wing media venues,
Speaker 1: for example, that monetize and capitalize on stoking the fear
Speaker 1: and resentment of a white population that is witnessing a
Speaker 1: changing America and seeing demographic changes, and do everything they
Speaker 1: can to give people a sense that their way of
Speaker 1: life is threatened and that people are trying to take
Speaker 1: advantage of the men. We're seeing it right now, right
Speaker 1: where you would think with all the public policy debates
Speaker 1: that are taking place right now that you know, the
Speaker 1: Republican Party would be engaged in a significant debate about
Speaker 1: how are we going to deal with the economy and
Speaker 1: what are we going to do about climate change and
Speaker 1: what are we going to do about low? And behold,
Speaker 1: the single most important issue to them, apparently right now
Speaker 1: is critical race theory. Who knew that that was the
Speaker 1: threat to our republic? Another classic Obama tactic here of
Speaker 1: the of the creation first of all the gas lighting
Speaker 1: and then the creation of a massive straw man. Really
Speaker 1: do we do? We not talk about anything but critical
Speaker 1: race theory? What what did I leave the show with today?
Speaker 1: The border? Well, what is the primary news story in
Speaker 1: America right now? It's it's the disaster at the border.
Speaker 1: How many times have you seen people on the right
Speaker 1: talking about the week Biden recovery, the week Biden jobs
Speaker 1: market compared to what it should be, the overspending. No,
Speaker 1: we talk about all these things, but let's pretend that
Speaker 1: there's a a hyper focus, an exaggerated focus on critical
Speaker 1: race theory. And really what Obama's getting at here is
Speaker 1: he's saying that that there's a a GOP play on
Speaker 1: on resentment that's going on here. That's what he's That's
Speaker 1: what he's getting at. He's saying, Oh, well, they're just
Speaker 1: they're playing up resentments. Well, no, what's actually happening is
Speaker 1: we're looking at the effort that the left uses with
Speaker 1: critical race theory to indoctrinate children and university students, and
Speaker 1: now corporations and now government action to make distinctions about
Speaker 1: people based upon race is racist. That is the fundamental
Speaker 1: position of conservatives of the right in America to look
Speaker 1: at someone's skin color and say you get X, and
Speaker 1: look at someone else's skin color and say you get
Speaker 1: why is wrong. Critical race theory rejects that. Critical race
Speaker 1: theory says, no, we have to treat people differently on
Speaker 1: the basis of skin color because we've decided, we the
Speaker 1: critical race theories that there are pre existing racial benefits
Speaker 1: in society, and so those must be balanced out. And
Speaker 1: you say, how can any government do this in a
Speaker 1: way that does not exacerbate racial divides and resentment. How
Speaker 1: can you implement racial Marxism in America without tearing at
Speaker 1: the very fundamental premises of America that we are all
Speaker 1: equal under the law, we're all equal in the eyes
Speaker 1: of God, and that our race is irrelevant to our
Speaker 1: status as Americans, to human beings. How can you do this?
Speaker 1: How can you implement this ideology without creating all of
Speaker 1: that damage and dissent and resentment. All the Democrats don't
Speaker 1: worry about that, because the Democrat elites who are white
Speaker 1: view critical race theory as a means of one creating
Speaker 1: the or continuing perpetuating huge amounts of minority support political
Speaker 1: support for them. And also, as I've told you, the
Speaker 1: Pelosi's and the Schumers they are they are perfectly happy
Speaker 1: giving lip service to critical race theory because they're already
Speaker 1: rich and powerful, and this stuff doesn't really affect them,
Speaker 1: and they elevate themselves beyond what the rest of white
Speaker 1: America has to deal with. There there's no guilt associated
Speaker 1: with being a white liberal who espouses critical race theory.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's a it's moral preening. It's oh, yes,
Speaker 1: I've confronted my whiteness. So now I'm a great person.
Speaker 1: That's what Nancy Pelosi instructure. So I'm one of the
Speaker 1: good ones. I'm a good person. But you know, Obama
Speaker 1: taking shots at the critical race theory. Was the country
Speaker 1: more united along racial lines as a result of some
Speaker 1: of the primary policies of the Obama administration some of
Speaker 1: the primary narratives of the Obama administration. It's an interesting
Speaker 1: question to ask. Remember the BLM movement started under Barack
Speaker 1: Obama's watch. The BLM movement happened because of first the
Speaker 1: beginnings of it. I think you could say where the
Speaker 1: George Zimmerman Trayvon Martin situation, which didn't even involve police.
Speaker 1: And then there was the the Mike Brown shooting in
Speaker 1: Saint Louis, which was a lawful shooting by law enforcement
Speaker 1: officer under threat from a criminal. That is what happened.
Speaker 1: But they created a whole story about hands up, don't shoot,
Speaker 1: as we know, and it was in fact the Obama
Speaker 1: Justice Department that had an investigation of hands up, don't
Speaker 1: shoot and the whole Mike Brown incident and said it's
Speaker 1: just not true. Eric Holder's DJ had had eyewitnesses that
Speaker 1: they they interviewed for that and it just wasn't true.
Speaker 1: But it didn't matter. It was about the narrative, all right.
Speaker 1: It was about the Native The Republican Party view of
Speaker 1: race relations in America is that we to stop discriminating
Speaker 1: on the basis of race. We must stop discriminating on
Speaker 1: the basis of race. It's it's it's actually quite straightforward
Speaker 1: racial categorization, characteristics, any benefits, any help up or pushing
Speaker 1: down of anybody based upon race, which is itself and
Speaker 1: often amorphous and and uh and sloppy categorization. It doesn't
Speaker 1: really hold up. And especially as you get into more
Speaker 1: and more um of these of two race couples having children.
Speaker 1: So you know, I mean, my my nephew would be
Speaker 1: considered by racial for example, my own nephew is by
Speaker 1: racial So does he have to self categorize or you know,
Speaker 1: where where does he fall into the CRT when he
Speaker 1: grows up and he's a baby now, but where will
Speaker 1: he fall into the CRT framework? You know? If somebody
Speaker 1: is is uh, you know, half half South Asian by
Speaker 1: parentage and half white, do they are they confronting their whiteness?
Speaker 1: Or how does that work? Do these these ideas that
Speaker 1: they put forward are inherently flawed and self contradictory and
Speaker 1: divisive and destructive. But when we start to point that out,
Speaker 1: you'll know then there's a sensitivity. WHOA why all the
Speaker 1: focus on critical race theory all of a sudden? What
Speaker 1: are you guys doing? No? They much prefer the left
Speaker 1: prefers to be able to institute this racial Marxism throughout
Speaker 1: America without any without so much as a word of
Speaker 1: protest from the other side that would be much more
Speaker 1: to their liking. And so now that we're actually taking
Speaker 1: this on because oh what we're gonna pretend like Democrats
Speaker 1: don't spend a lot of time talking about race? What
Speaker 1: was BLM? What does BLM all about? Black Lives matter?
Speaker 1: But really, what's it about racism and law enforcement? That's
Speaker 1: what That's what is at the heart of it, that
Speaker 1: that cops, particularly white cops, kill unarmed black men, and
Speaker 1: this happens in a way that is systemic and unpunished,
Speaker 1: and as a huge national emergency in crisis, you want
Speaker 1: to talk about exaggerating something and creating a massive narrative
Speaker 1: of catastrophe when it's actually isolated incidents that in the
Speaker 1: grand scheme of things are quite rare statistically, which is
Speaker 1: the truth that is in conflict with the central premises
Speaker 1: of a central premise of Black lives matter. The BLM
Speaker 1: movement is the perfect example. And we had to go
Speaker 1: through billions of dollars of damage, and people lost their lives,
Speaker 1: and people lost their livelihoods, and tremendous anger and rage
Speaker 1: displayed for months on end with the BLM movement. What
Speaker 1: did it accomplish nothing, just destruction and anger. Didn't actually advance,
Speaker 1: There was no legislation, there was no greater social cohesion afterwards.
Speaker 1: So they're just like well, literal arsonists in some cases,
Speaker 1: but arsonists of our society running around and acting like
Speaker 1: they're rebuilding. No, they're just burning things down. They're just
Speaker 1: destroying things. This is what the left so often does.
Speaker 1: And Obama comes from this school of thought. And Obama's
Speaker 1: used to being told his entire adult life that everything
Speaker 1: that he leaves when it comes to CRT, everything he
Speaker 1: believes when it comes to a Marxist outlook is brilliant.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, everything he says is amazing. Now that
Speaker 1: there's a greater focus on this and the public is
Speaker 1: looking at these issues, they can come to their own
Speaker 1: conclusions about Hold on a second, is CRT is it sensible?
Speaker 1: Is it coherent? Is it even? Is it a good
Speaker 1: idea in any respect? Or is this just about divide
Speaker 1: and conqueror is this just about creating further division and
Speaker 1: disruption in society so that some people can advance and
Speaker 1: their own power and their own interests. Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: I think we can all see where this is going.
Speaker 1: And then we get into cancel culture, we'll get into
Speaker 1: Obama's view of cancel culture here coming up a lot
Speaker 1: of the dangers of cancel culture, and you know, we're
Speaker 1: just going to be condemning people all the time, at
Speaker 1: least among my daughters that they'll acknowledge that. Sometimes among
Speaker 1: their peer group or in college campuses, you know, you'll
Speaker 1: see folks going overboard, but they have a pretty good
Speaker 1: sense of Look, we don't want we don't expect everybody
Speaker 1: to be perfect. We don't expect everybody to be politically
Speaker 1: correct all the time, but we are going to call
Speaker 1: out institutions or individuals if they are being cruel, if
Speaker 1: they're you know, discriminating against people. We do want to
Speaker 1: raise awareness. So just to get a sense of Barack
Speaker 1: Obama's judgment about where America is right now on these issues,
Speaker 1: I wanted you to hear that because he is making
Speaker 1: the case that, Okay, yeah, cancel culture. Maybe it goes
Speaker 1: a little far sometimes, but overall, the people who like
Speaker 1: to use cancel culture, they're really fair minded about it.
Speaker 1: They don't expect you to be politically correct all the time.
Speaker 1: That'll bull crap. What world this key living in? What
Speaker 1: planet is he on. Is he really not able to
Speaker 1: observe what can get you canceled? Now? Is he really
Speaker 1: not able to observe that there's no grace, no forgiveness
Speaker 1: offered by the cancel frenzy left? Now he knows, but
Speaker 1: he understand this is a weakness of his own side.
Speaker 1: It has now gotten to the point where enough Americans
Speaker 1: of goodwill see what's happening to their country, see what's
Speaker 1: going on as a result of the cancel culture mania
Speaker 1: out there, and they're uncomfortable with it. Even some people
Speaker 1: who are on the left, generally speaking, have started to
Speaker 1: say this has really gotten out of hand, and that
Speaker 1: just feeding people to the frenzied mob for their destruction,
Speaker 1: the annihilation of their career and their reputation. Because the
Speaker 1: most hyper sensitive and victimology obsessed among us get some
Speaker 1: joy out of this, I mean they like it, you know,
Speaker 1: the same way that when you actually do psychological studies,
Speaker 1: you find that people will say, oh, bullies are unhappy
Speaker 1: with themselves. Yeah, maybe at some subconscious level, but bullies
Speaker 1: enjoy bullying. That's why they do it. Cancel culture. The
Speaker 1: cancel culture shrieks that you hear come from people who
Speaker 1: enjoy watching the public annihilation of their ideological foes, or
Speaker 1: they just enjoy the use of the power that they've
Speaker 1: accrued in this cancel culture world against individuals. They like
Speaker 1: seeing others careers and reputations lit on fire. There's something like,
Speaker 1: you know the villagers in medieval times who would just
Speaker 1: go see somebody put on the rack, go see somebody
Speaker 1: who's in the stockade and suffering. Ooh, look at that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that this state is making them suffer in our names.
Speaker 1: So I'm a part of that power, right. There's a
Speaker 1: joy that the cancel culture mob derives from all of
Speaker 1: this too. Don't ever forget that they like it. They
Speaker 1: feel good about themselves for pushing it. And Barack Obama
Speaker 1: wants to make excuses for them, wants to say that
Speaker 1: they're usually right. Usually they're just calling out cruelty. Really,
Speaker 1: the people doing the cruelty these days are those who
Speaker 1: find the most minute, the most distant possible violation of
Speaker 1: some kind of the ever changing codes of cancel culture
Speaker 1: and call for people to suffer real consequences. I mean,
Speaker 1: call for the destruction of people's lives, their job gone,
Speaker 1: their reputation ruined, maybe not able to rent a house anymore,
Speaker 1: or maybe not able to you know, find work anymore.
Speaker 1: Their families impoverished. Yeah, because you use the wrong pronoun. Well,
Speaker 1: because you dead named somebody, How how evil, how awful
Speaker 1: of you? And I will say this too, even on
Speaker 1: the pronoun issue. I'm I'm now at a point where
Speaker 1: I'm hearing conservatives all the time, and they're referring they're
Speaker 1: referring to Caitlin Jenner as she I hear this all
Speaker 1: the time. Is that is that? Now? What we've decided
Speaker 1: is that where we are so have we given up?
Speaker 1: You don't notice they say, oh, why are you so
Speaker 1: obsessed the critical race theory? Hold on? It used to
Speaker 1: be why are you so obsessed with gender pronouns? And
Speaker 1: and now it's still that the right has conceded. Apparently
Speaker 1: now the right has concedered on this issue. Now you
Speaker 1: can be canceled for refusing to say that a biological
Speaker 1: male is in fact a female, for refusing to accept
Speaker 1: that that is a transition, that is that is possible,
Speaker 1: that is actually medically possible. You know, when they can
Speaker 1: take a man. You know, even the Biden administration now
Speaker 1: is referring to birthing people I'm serious. This is appearing
Speaker 1: in real, real documents now from this White House birthing people.
Speaker 1: This would have been aligned from a parody of left
Speaker 1: excess ten years ago. Now it's standard. But we're the
Speaker 1: ones who are obsessed with it. No, this is the
Speaker 1: gas letting the Left does so they can continue to
Speaker 1: rack up wins while we keep thinking that playing defense
Speaker 1: on our own goal line somehow makes us the aggressors.
Speaker 1: Were the ones. We're the oppressive group. The individual rights,
Speaker 1: constitutional protection. Let people live their lives in peace. Try
Speaker 1: to show some degree of humility and mercy and decency
Speaker 1: to your felly human beings at all times. Do your
Speaker 1: best in that regard. We're the bad people. While they
Speaker 1: keep ramming down racial Marxism and you know, gender identity
Speaker 1: politics and all this stuff, and every opportunity they keep
Speaker 1: push and push it put and it's never enough, never playkated.
Speaker 1: There's always another realm to go to. There's always oh well,
Speaker 1: you know, now it has to be the twelve year
Speaker 1: olds take the hormone transfer drugs. Now, it has to be.
Speaker 1: This is what we face. We are in a fight, friends.
Speaker 1: The question is do we fight back or do we
Speaker 1: just allowed to be a one way war? Is that
Speaker 1: where we are here? A culture war in which only
Speaker 1: one side gets to fight, and anytime the other side
Speaker 1: gets tired of getting punched in the face, the side
Speaker 1: that's been doing all the punching up that point says,
Speaker 1: whoa whoa wa way getting so aggressive? Way, getting so aggressive. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what's happening now. And I think we see this,
Speaker 1: we understand this, and there's a recognition that is growing
Speaker 1: among conservatives that we are losing ground here. We keep
Speaker 1: we lost ground. I hate to say we lost ground
Speaker 1: in the culture war under four years of the Trump
Speaker 1: presidency too. It was slower, there was some pushback, but
Speaker 1: when you when all said and done, you really think
Speaker 1: that we gained We ended the Trump presidency told we
Speaker 1: couldn't go to church, and then we had to wear
Speaker 1: two cloth masks over our faces or else we're evil.
Speaker 1: We're really going to act like we had a four
Speaker 1: ye for your run for victory, for your run of
Speaker 1: victory for freedom. I don't think. So. Let's check in
Speaker 1: with our friend Ryan Gordosky. He's the author of Their
Speaker 1: Not Listening How the Elites created a National populous Revolution.
Speaker 1: He's a political consultant with his finger on the pulse
Speaker 1: of what's going on actually behind the scenes in the
Speaker 1: GOP and across the country. Mister Goodusky, great to have
Speaker 1: you back. Thanks for having me. So did you see
Speaker 1: the Kamala interview, because I gotta say this for me,
Speaker 1: even I've always thought that Kamala was someone who very
Speaker 1: popular in the CNN green rooms and executive suite and
Speaker 1: like not anywhere else in America. It seems really, I mean,
Speaker 1: not with Democrat voters, not with the Democrat base, but
Speaker 1: the people who run stuff like Kamala a lot. You
Speaker 1: see this interview, you say, it's amazing that this woman
Speaker 1: even became senator from California, never mind that she's actually
Speaker 1: now the Vice president of the United States. Well, and
Speaker 1: it wasn't a hard interview, like that's the crazy. They
Speaker 1: didn't sit there and say who is the vice president
Speaker 1: of Guatemala or you know, the top three most populacies
Speaker 1: that these migrants are coming from. It wasn't this wasn't
Speaker 1: a jeopardy question. She remember back in O eight when
Speaker 1: Obama vers Hillary and they asked, you know, Hillary, who
Speaker 1: the president of Swaziland was? And then they asked by
Speaker 1: Obama if he was comfortable. Remember that. I mean that
Speaker 1: was like they were throwing like very This reminds me
Speaker 1: of Trump, the Trump administration people versus the Biden administration people.
Speaker 1: They're not throwing hardballs at them. And she blatantly lied,
Speaker 1: and she really thought she was going to get away
Speaker 1: with it when she said, we've been to the border
Speaker 1: six or seven times in a row, and he just
Speaker 1: said you haven't. And then she goes, well, we haven't
Speaker 1: been to Europe yet. She seems so delusional to the
Speaker 1: entire thing and looking at it and examining this entire
Speaker 1: migrant crisis as being the product of discrimination against LGBT
Speaker 1: people in Central America and and climate change. Those are
Speaker 1: the two issues that she really thinks. She thinks as
Speaker 1: if on January twenty twenty one, the things that made
Speaker 1: this gigantic wave of hundreds of thousands of people pay
Speaker 1: coyotes and and and uh and human smugglers billions of
Speaker 1: dollars was I don't know, this crackdown against gaze in
Speaker 1: Guatemala and Honduras. It's it's totally bizarre. She's living in
Speaker 1: a parallel universe, and she's so used to and Democrats
Speaker 1: are so used to the media sitting there and saying, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, ignore it, will give you an easy We'll
Speaker 1: give you an easy way out. Well, you know, we'll
Speaker 1: give you an easy Well, we'll let you let you
Speaker 1: lie through the thrower interviews that she thought she could
Speaker 1: lie through this one again. You know that she had
Speaker 1: been to the border, and you know her answer was, well,
Speaker 1: I've never been to Europe either. It was amazing that
Speaker 1: Lester Halt in the interview too. You could tell he
Speaker 1: didn't want to be the g he didn't want to
Speaker 1: push her on anything, but he was like, well, I mean,
Speaker 1: you haven't actually been to the border. It was actually
Speaker 1: kind of fun. He's like, he's like, look, lady, I
Speaker 1: can't you're the vice president. I'm a Democrat. You're a
Speaker 1: Democrat like I wish I could be. But I mean
Speaker 1: there is some level of like I gotta be, I
Speaker 1: gotta be somewhat real here. And you think that you
Speaker 1: would think that her people, her media handles would have
Speaker 1: sat there and said, you need a better answer to
Speaker 1: another country or content that you have. I'm actually kind
Speaker 1: of shocked the Kamala has never been to Europe, but
Speaker 1: because she I mean, she used to live in Canada.
Speaker 1: She's not a not you know, she's not been, she's
Speaker 1: she's not worldly, she likeness, she's not traveled. But she said,
Speaker 1: you know, I have him into Europe either, which is
Speaker 1: you know that was that was such a bizarre answer.
Speaker 1: And I guess they're so used to the media just
Speaker 1: you know, licking their chops to praise them. Brian Stilter
Speaker 1: had on Jen Saki the other day and he said,
Speaker 1: what could we be doing better for you? That was
Speaker 1: this hardball question. I mean, I mean, and it's not shocking.
Speaker 1: How then the media, how Americans are just being guests
Speaker 1: that into believing all kinds of lies um that media
Speaker 1: is throwing at them things, And why Biden's approve rating
Speaker 1: is still about fifty percent. I guess if you don't
Speaker 1: see a crisis and you don't hear about a crisis,
Speaker 1: it's hard to have a naive opinion about the crisis.
Speaker 1: It's been Ryan Grdusky, author of They're Not Listening, how
Speaker 1: the elites created a national populous revolution, And Ryan here
Speaker 1: tell us again about this this the superpack that you're
Speaker 1: creating that's going after to tell us how that's going
Speaker 1: and critical racer yes. I started to pack two weeks
Speaker 1: ago called the seventeen seventy six Project Pack pac at
Speaker 1: seventeen seventy six Project pack dot com. And what it
Speaker 1: does is it's going to campaign for candidates running for
Speaker 1: school boards, the first national school board pack who opposed
Speaker 1: critical race theory. Critical race theory is the belief that
Speaker 1: we can inject basically Marxism visa racial animosities between white
Speaker 1: people and non whites, and they have a whole re
Speaker 1: education on the history of America. They want to socially
Speaker 1: engineer America through a Marxist prism based solely on race.
Speaker 1: That every inequity and every inequality in society he was
Speaker 1: specifically created. It is. It is not just didn't just happen.
Speaker 1: They actually was specifically created to keep non whites down.
Speaker 1: So the pack has been doing great. We were used
Speaker 1: over fifty thousand dollars in two weeks from over six
Speaker 1: hundred individual donors across the country. It's been really incredible
Speaker 1: how how many people have reached out to us. And
Speaker 1: hopefully by the end of the summer we will have
Speaker 1: a list of endorsements and school boards we're going to
Speaker 1: be announcing we're campaigning for on behalf of school board candidates,
Speaker 1: and yeah, I'm very hopeful for it. I think that
Speaker 1: I think that getting involved in curriculum is where conservatives
Speaker 1: have been missing out on because they've been so focused
Speaker 1: on things like school choice and you know, we've all
Speaker 1: heard the same talking wots from conservatives for decades of education,
Speaker 1: but we've really missed out on curriculum. And I think
Speaker 1: curriculum and the public education is really where the fight
Speaker 1: needs to be. You have Barack Obama, the former president
Speaker 1: and still really the most beloved and powerful democrat I think,
Speaker 1: out there on the scene saying who knew the single
Speaker 1: most important issue right now for the goops critical race theory,
Speaker 1: and he said that the right wing media is stoking
Speaker 1: fear for white of white Americans. Um, I gotta say, man,
Speaker 1: this whenever the left starts to say why why are
Speaker 1: you guys so focused on this thing that they're so
Speaker 1: focused on, this is a trap that a lot of
Speaker 1: people fall into. This is like the pronoun thing. Oh,
Speaker 1: why are you so focused on on, you know, preferred
Speaker 1: pronouns right wing people? What's your problem? Well, because they've
Speaker 1: been running a campaign for a long time to brainwash
Speaker 1: everybody into thinking that you know, Z or z or
Speaker 1: whatever is a pronoun you have to use now for people.
Speaker 1: That's why we're focused on it. And with CRT it
Speaker 1: strikes me as the same thing. I mean, they they
Speaker 1: clearly have made a huge push on this, and now
Speaker 1: you're starting to hear, hey, what's with all this right
Speaker 1: wing focus on CRT because they don't like the pressure concerns.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't care about children, you know, pushing self castration on children.
Speaker 1: We need to focus on what apple stock is like,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is what they want to sell us
Speaker 1: on rather than what should be sold on. This is critical.
Speaker 1: Race theory is really the most important fight. It's in
Speaker 1: grammar schools all across this country. It's not in every school,
Speaker 1: by the way, I want to make it perfectly clear.
Speaker 1: There are schools I don't have, but it's in thousands
Speaker 1: of classrooms across the country, and it teaches non white
Speaker 1: children that they cannot succeed in life because the country
Speaker 1: is built against them. It tells white children that they
Speaker 1: are born oppressors, and that the history of this country
Speaker 1: and all the foundations that we have had as a
Speaker 1: nation for two hundred some odd years is they're all
Speaker 1: institutionally racists, and they need to be broken apart. And
Speaker 1: that's why you have a lot of kids coming out
Speaker 1: of these things completely mind warped into assuming, you know,
Speaker 1: both a self hatred for themselves if they're white, or
Speaker 1: just angry at the country, and believing that everything is
Speaker 1: working against them, and it gives them excuses why it's
Speaker 1: appropriate for them to fail in life. It is the
Speaker 1: most detrimental way of thinking for both, and it's so
Speaker 1: harmful for both on white children and white children. And
Speaker 1: it's incorporated in incorporate America, it's incorporated in the military.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's in all branches of civil society. And
Speaker 1: it needs to be broken apart and defeated. And this
Speaker 1: is the seventeen seventy six project. Pack is my little
Speaker 1: way of being able to fight back at it on
Speaker 1: some institutional level. Speaking Ryan Gurdusky, he started the seventeen
Speaker 1: seventy six Pack, as he just said, and is also
Speaker 1: the author of They're Not Listening How the Elites created
Speaker 1: the National Populace Revolution. And Ryan, have you seen or
Speaker 1: heard the audio of this this psychiatrist at Yale who's
Speaker 1: talking about fantasizing the shooting white people in the head.
Speaker 1: What this is, Yes, it's it's it's horrifying. But but
Speaker 1: what's so amazing to me is that this was said
Speaker 1: at Yale on a you know, on a in a
Speaker 1: public lecture, public forum, zoom call. People saw it, and
Speaker 1: not only did they not think it was a huge problem,
Speaker 1: there are people that are quote like other Yale professors
Speaker 1: who say it was really good sitting here like this
Speaker 1: is the world we live in now, folks. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: it's true. And there has been multiple sites that white
Speaker 1: liberals are the only are the only group to have
Speaker 1: new negative in group opinions about other people of their race. So,
Speaker 1: you know, black, Hispanics, Asians, all other people will look
Speaker 1: at someone of their own race and have a positive feeling.
Speaker 1: White liberals are the only ones to not have that
Speaker 1: in effects, have an inverse feeling, a negative feeling. And
Speaker 1: it's it's it's it's it's insane. A lot of this
Speaker 1: hatred is coming from these white progressives who look at
Speaker 1: you know, white people as truly the enemy of of
Speaker 1: you know, of of every other type of person. That
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that there's never been racism in our country
Speaker 1: or never been you know, a racist alive, but to
Speaker 1: imagine that this country that gave people like Oprah Winfrey
Speaker 1: and Michael Jordan billion dollars multi billion dollar fortunes, elected
Speaker 1: a black president and hundreds of members of state legislators,
Speaker 1: Congress and senators over the course of our history as
Speaker 1: being you know, systematically oppressing them time and time and
Speaker 1: time again, forever and ever and always. Is just it's
Speaker 1: not living in this reality. And you know, I mean, listen,
Speaker 1: if you want to sit there and pretend you're pretend
Speaker 1: you're an animal or have a fantasy in the privacy
Speaker 1: of your own house, go ahead and do it, but
Speaker 1: don't impress it and push it on children in grammar
Speaker 1: schools and primary schools. Another thing that I find remarkable, Ryan,
Speaker 1: is there are all these these these clips that are
Speaker 1: going viral of people who are are on TikTok and
Speaker 1: they're talking about pan sexuality. Oh you saw that one, yeah,
Speaker 1: and and yes that was weird and decades it was
Speaker 1: very weird. And Democrats, I mean, it's so weird and
Speaker 1: I don't even think I could play it for this audience.
Speaker 1: And what's a basic is like the leftist that I know,
Speaker 1: they keep saying, why are you guys also worked up
Speaker 1: about things. And I'll say, what about the the very odd,
Speaker 1: very disturbed lady, I'm assuming lady who you know, was
Speaker 1: talking about being a pan sexual. I don't even know
Speaker 1: what that I mean, I know what it means in
Speaker 1: terms of the actual you know, she was thinking about
Speaker 1: pan sexuals having aggression towards bisexuals and then some other
Speaker 1: sexuals were crossing between. Mind you, For those who haven't seen,
Speaker 1: in the video, she has black eyeliner smearing down her
Speaker 1: face with like multiple uh a facial piercings across her
Speaker 1: entire face. Um, and that is and that's the person
Speaker 1: we're supposed to be taking seriously and in a bowl
Speaker 1: haircut from you know, from like the nineties. Uh, that is,
Speaker 1: that is what this wan. What's remarkable is that is
Speaker 1: that we mean, you know, Obama also recently talked about
Speaker 1: cancel culture and how sometimes it can be a little excessive,
Speaker 1: but overall they love this accountability word. Now they'll say, well,
Speaker 1: it's really about accountability. What's fascinating is that we're not
Speaker 1: allowed to cancel absurd, detrimental, crazy, honestly ideas that are
Speaker 1: that are that look like they're just mental illness on display.
Speaker 1: That's people like living their truth or establishing their personhood
Speaker 1: or whatever it is. But if you want to be like, hey,
Speaker 1: I'm like a you know, I'm a traditional Roman Catholic
Speaker 1: who like believes in church teaching, it's like, how dare you? Oh,
Speaker 1: oh you know, yeah, you're the and they explicitly say
Speaker 1: you're the enemy if you believe they also I mean,
Speaker 1: the worst part of critical race, if people aren't realized,
Speaker 1: is they mock up certain habits of people as being
Speaker 1: If you're an entrepreneur, you are supporting whiteness. If you
Speaker 1: believe in individualism, you're supporting whiteness. It's not a matter
Speaker 1: of like if you are white. If you are a
Speaker 1: black person who does not believe in critical race, there,
Speaker 1: if you're like Kennis Owens or Clarence Thomas, you are
Speaker 1: internalized whiteness. I mean, this is this is so delusional,
Speaker 1: and this is becoming corporate sponsored I'm probably soon under
Speaker 1: the Bide administration state sponsored racism. And that's how it
Speaker 1: asked me viewed you can't think of this as you know,
Speaker 1: the extension of the Civil Rights Act. This is state
Speaker 1: sponsored racism. This is truly what we would oppose if
Speaker 1: it was having to any other race in this country.
Speaker 1: But the fact that's happening to white people. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of white progressives who have support you, but that's
Speaker 1: because they have a problem with white people. It's not
Speaker 1: because this isn't racism. Where do people go? Ryan for
Speaker 1: the seventeen seventy six pack, seventeen seventy six Project Pack,
Speaker 1: pac dot com, Ryan Gradusk, everybody, Ryan, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Why wearing mask outs? I just feel like
Speaker 1: to wear I don't know why we're weird. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: guess like my friends wear them so much. I won't
Speaker 1: take off my mask until everybody does. Yeah, we have
Speaker 1: a control modeling, right, I mean, it's just if there's
Speaker 1: a lot of anxieties, but taking the mask off, you know,
Speaker 1: for the first time, said it's probably been so long. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's like a social anxiety at this point, it's just
Speaker 1: a mental old So it's virtually impossible to yet coronavirus
Speaker 1: outside whilere vaccinating. Okay, does that change your thought process
Speaker 1: at all? Really? Just to keep wearing it, I persons
Speaker 1: still wouldn't want to take that of the risk anyways,
Speaker 1: And I don't trust anyone else. I'm just doing it
Speaker 1: for mine, even if the science said it was like
Speaker 1: basically impossible, it just doesn't matter. You can't extra precaution
Speaker 1: because I want to protect others and they're still a
Speaker 1: risk of no matter what. So it's also a little
Speaker 1: bit of a protest. But then the protest being like
Speaker 1: being well, I shouldn't be a given the privilege to
Speaker 1: not wear a mask. It's a protest because I shouldn't
Speaker 1: be given the privilege to not wear a mask. Amy Horowitz,
Speaker 1: a documentary filmmaker and a longtime friend of mine, doing
Speaker 1: some just walking around asking folks who wearing masks outside
Speaker 1: and at least some of whom, if not all of them,
Speaker 1: are vaccinated. I mean, at this point, if you're an
Speaker 1: outdoor masker, I assume you're also vaccinated, right, because if
Speaker 1: you're so concerned about COVID that you'd wear a mask outdoors,
Speaker 1: even after the CDC says it is not necessary, it
Speaker 1: is not medically necessary, then I'm assuming you got the
Speaker 1: vaccination right, because that actually does create a very real
Speaker 1: and very provable layer of protection that that works quite
Speaker 1: well for people. But it's remarkable, isn't to hear those answers,
Speaker 1: and and I'm really troubled by this. I didn't think
Speaker 1: that this could happen in this country. I gave the
Speaker 1: American people overall more credit on this point than is deserved. Yeah,
Speaker 1: about about half of us, roughly speaking, think that being
Speaker 1: told you must wear a cloth a cloth restriction across
Speaker 1: your your mouth and your nose for basically all of
Speaker 1: your public life, including just being outdoors, is insane and
Speaker 1: is absurd and is tyrannical. About half of us kind
Speaker 1: of figured that out, knew that at one level or
Speaker 1: another for the whole thing. But about half the country
Speaker 1: it's like, yeah, sure, i'll mask up, I'll double mask,
Speaker 1: I'll triple mask anything you say. And the propaganda around
Speaker 1: this is so effective that now they keep doing it,
Speaker 1: and we all know it's not comfortable, it doesn't feel good,
Speaker 1: it's weird, but they keep doing it even when they
Speaker 1: have no explanation to give for why they're doing it.
Speaker 1: But they just know about the signaling and the symbolism
Speaker 1: behind it. They know that this is what the good
Speaker 1: people are supposed to do. And that was really the
Speaker 1: process for so many who became mask maniacs. And I
Speaker 1: have contempt for people that went around telling others in
Speaker 1: public places to mask up. Those people are sheep. I'm
Speaker 1: contemptuous of their intellectual and moral and character insufficiency. I
Speaker 1: think it's gross what they did. People want to wear
Speaker 1: a mask themselves fun, that's I don't have. I don't
Speaker 1: get angry about that. I think it's silly. But that's
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the people that went around being the
Speaker 1: mask shamers. Now we see that the mentality was so
Speaker 1: strong among the mask shamer types that they still wear
Speaker 1: them even when there was actually no reason for it whatsoever.
Speaker 1: It's like walking around, you know, and covering yourself in
Speaker 1: a rubber tarp because you're afraid you're going to get
Speaker 1: hit by lightning? Is that reasonable? Our man from Staten
Speaker 1: Island joins us now, Joe Barelli of the New York
Speaker 1: City Council. Mister burrelly, great to have you, Great to
Speaker 1: be here as always, but thanks for having me. So
Speaker 1: tell me this, what is going on in NYC right
Speaker 1: now with this mayor's race? What do we have to
Speaker 1: pay attention to? Who's going to do what? Who stands for? What?
Speaker 1: Break it down? Well, I mean, you have New York
Speaker 1: on the precipice of going back to the bad old
Speaker 1: days of rising crime, fleeing population, decline in business opportunity
Speaker 1: to decline in new business's job market, the draining of
Speaker 1: office space in Lower Manhattan, and from the sound of it,
Speaker 1: you would actually not think that the Democrats lived in
Speaker 1: the same city. You had Maya Wiley, who is sort
Speaker 1: of the darling on the left. She was an MSNBC
Speaker 1: contributor endorsed by AOC. You know, she actually reacted to
Speaker 1: a shooting, a horrible shooting of a ten year old
Speaker 1: playing queens, by tweeting out that it was the NYPD's
Speaker 1: fault for not protecting this kid. Meanwhile, you know, she's
Speaker 1: against every single policy that even rational Democrats are in
Speaker 1: favor of when it comes to proactive policing and going
Speaker 1: after guns on the street. And it's just an incredible
Speaker 1: just change in mentality of what Democrats expect the public
Speaker 1: to buy into. It's almost like they don't see that
Speaker 1: this calamitous collapse of the city right in front of them.
Speaker 1: It's scary buck and as you look, you're a resident,
Speaker 1: and you know it's one of those things where you're
Speaker 1: gonna have to make a gut check, as are the
Speaker 1: Barelli family of whether it's worth staying here for the
Speaker 1: long haul. Are any of the Democrat mayoral candidates for
Speaker 1: America's biggest city serious about dealing with this crime issue?
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm sure they're all gonna say they are,
Speaker 1: but in terms of the policies they would pursue and
Speaker 1: the willingness to do what will upset the anti cop
Speaker 1: defund the police left. Is there any Democrat in the
Speaker 1: race who you think will at least take the problem
Speaker 1: with the seriousness that it deserves. Well, well, let's just
Speaker 1: let's start here. No. I mean, you know, I'm supporting
Speaker 1: Curtis Leebo, who's a Republican. He should win the Republican
Speaker 1: primary fairly. Well, if you're listening and live in New York,
Speaker 1: make sure you vote early. Voting starts on Saturday. Make
Speaker 1: sure you vote for Curtis Leevo, because that is the
Speaker 1: only way you can ensure someone who respects the police
Speaker 1: wants to make sure they do their job correctly and
Speaker 1: rightly and justly. The only way you get that is
Speaker 1: with Curtis Leewa. There are Democrats on the spectrum, and
Speaker 1: you know, a couple of weeks ago, we had a
Speaker 1: horrific shooting that grabbed headlines in Times Square where some
Speaker 1: tourists were shot, and it did sort of change the
Speaker 1: verbiage that some of the candidates were using. Where it
Speaker 1: went from you know, strictly hashtag you fund the police too.
Speaker 1: Of course, the police are part of the solution against
Speaker 1: gun violence. You know, it was like that one headline
Speaker 1: seemed to scare them, because it really did scare a
Speaker 1: lot of people in New York City. Was it was
Speaker 1: one of those incidents, and these incidents have happened when
Speaker 1: you know, Rudy Giuliani was the mayor and Bloomberg was
Speaker 1: the mayor, that there's always crimes that grabbed headlines. But
Speaker 1: this really did send a shock wave into the New
Speaker 1: York political world that, you know, just as we're starting
Speaker 1: to reopen, just as you know, God blessed there was
Speaker 1: the person who got shot was a tourist. I mean,
Speaker 1: just as a tourist was returning to Times Square, the
Speaker 1: poor lady gets shot. And it did change the momentum,
Speaker 1: It did change sort of the verbiage. But the issue
Speaker 1: is the left doesn't go away. I mean, these candidates
Speaker 1: will say anything they have to say. I mean, they
Speaker 1: change their position with the wind so we know that
Speaker 1: once they're elected, once they're in office, they're gonna be
Speaker 1: like every other radical progressive and they're gonna have their
Speaker 1: eye on the White House as as the mayor of
Speaker 1: New York City often does, never successfully, but often does,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna try to be the cheer leader for
Speaker 1: the work woke left and build the Blazio. You know,
Speaker 1: tried this. He wasn't successful. He wasn't successful as mayor,
Speaker 1: and probably you know, there's really no world where he
Speaker 1: would have been successful in the presidential race. But the
Speaker 1: next mayor could be more successful in implementing progressive policy
Speaker 1: and be a real contender. Speaking of Joe Barelli of
Speaker 1: the New York City Council and also a frequent guest.
Speaker 1: You see him on Fox News as well as listen
Speaker 1: to him here on this show. Joe, what are the
Speaker 1: Democrats on City Council? For example? I mean this New
Speaker 1: York City is becoming a crime story. The whole country
Speaker 1: is paying attention to. That's where we are now. Because
Speaker 1: you have the largest not only the largest data set
Speaker 1: to draw upon, it's the biggest population. You also have
Speaker 1: the story of the near miracle of the crime drop
Speaker 1: from the nineties, into the two thousands, and then into
Speaker 1: the two thousand and tens, and now it looks like
Speaker 1: it's dramatically going in the wrong direction. Do the people
Speaker 1: who are in the Democrat Party of New York City
Speaker 1: do they understand the gravity of the situation or are
Speaker 1: they just are they are they deluded about the trajectory
Speaker 1: of the city. What's what's the tone from the left
Speaker 1: about this when you're hearing them talking about this at
Speaker 1: city Council. That's that's the crazy thing. You know. The
Speaker 1: public is aware, and they are scared, and they are concerned.
Speaker 1: But these candidates, they pander to a very small fraction
Speaker 1: of voters. I mean, Build A. Blasio became mayor of
Speaker 1: New York City because one hundred thousand people voted for
Speaker 1: I I can't do the math, but that's about nine
Speaker 1: percent of the population. You know, that's incredibly lowered voter turnout.
Speaker 1: So when you go to a neighborhood that is plagued
Speaker 1: with crime, and I mean, ask any cops, I mean,
Speaker 1: don't believe me, ask any cop on the beat who
Speaker 1: gets branded as this you know, right wing bootstopper, ask
Speaker 1: them about the people in these neighborhoods, because there are
Speaker 1: great people in every single neighborhood in New York City,
Speaker 1: and frankly, they are as angry and as aggravated as
Speaker 1: the rest of us, and in any neighborhood and the
Speaker 1: worst precinct in New York City, it's still one percent
Speaker 1: of people, if even that, who are committing all these
Speaker 1: violent crimes. And the problem is that all of democratic policy,
Speaker 1: from reforming the way police officers operate to reforming the
Speaker 1: criminal justice system on the court side, it seems to
Speaker 1: cater to making the lives of these one percent of
Speaker 1: criminals more simple and easier, more more whatever, more progressive,
Speaker 1: at the expense of the ninety nine percent of everyone
Speaker 1: else who just wants to go to work, you know,
Speaker 1: celebrate their family milestones, can get on with their life.
Speaker 1: Speaking of Joe Barelli of the New York City Council
Speaker 1: and Joe, Governor Cuomo still thinks of himself, clearly from
Speaker 1: these press conferences and all the rest, as the great
Speaker 1: decider in New York state of pandemic policy. Where are
Speaker 1: we now as of this moment on masks for kids
Speaker 1: and and mask for kids outside in school? And I
Speaker 1: just prefaced this by saying kids should have never worn
Speaker 1: masks outside the fact that we're even having this conversation
Speaker 1: is insane. But the Democrat Party's favorite pandemic governor, what
Speaker 1: is the latest? Well it really it really makes you
Speaker 1: think once these masks go away, it's like, what are
Speaker 1: what are these people going to have going for them?
Speaker 1: Like like these real Karens who just you know, just
Speaker 1: prey on people who aren't wearing masks in their local supermarket.
Speaker 1: It's just incredible that there's such little in their live
Speaker 1: going on that they would be just so pro mask
Speaker 1: and pro everyone else wearing a mask. And it's going
Speaker 1: to be interesting to see how that all plays out
Speaker 1: when when sort of that you know, life goal of
Speaker 1: being a Nanni state masker is no longer possible. But
Speaker 1: on the policy side, you had on one day the
Speaker 1: State Department of Health, who you would presume makes health policy,
Speaker 1: they said that we're changing the rules. You know, kids
Speaker 1: no longer need to wear masks in school anymore. The
Speaker 1: New York City Department of Education and the State Department
Speaker 1: of Education. As soon as that was announced, parents rejoiced.
Speaker 1: Even you know, there was a candidate for governor Republican
Speaker 1: and a friend of mine. I want to mention his
Speaker 1: name because it sounds silly now, but he sent out
Speaker 1: an email blast saying we did it. We put pressure
Speaker 1: on Cuomo and he changed the mask policy. Right after
Speaker 1: all that. The State Department of Education, the New York
Speaker 1: City Department of Education, they unanimously said no, we are
Speaker 1: still wearing masks basically in the foreseeable future, through the
Speaker 1: end of the school year. It's amazing how people are
Speaker 1: clinging to them. And I'm seeing it where I live.
Speaker 1: All over my building, everyone still masked. They're all vacted,
Speaker 1: and they're basically all young and healthy. They're masking up
Speaker 1: all over the place inside. Still it's it's stunning to
Speaker 1: be including in the gym. But Joe Barelli, our man
Speaker 1: from Statton Allan, always dropping some truth bombs for us. Joe,
Speaker 1: great to have you. We'll talk to you soon. Thank you, sir.
Speaker 1: Take care, Saint. No party like a Team Bug party,
Speaker 1: because a Team Bug party don't stop. It's time for
Speaker 1: roll call. Roll call. My friend producer Mark, did you
Speaker 1: watch any games last night and it ain't fun on
Speaker 1: your radar? Yeah? Something fun? Actually, The Food Fighters just
Speaker 1: announced the first capacity concert in New York since March
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty, and I'll be attending at Madison Square Garden.
Speaker 1: I'm very excited. I gotta say, we like a lot
Speaker 1: of same music. I think the food Fighters are great.
Speaker 1: Food Fighters are awesome. I've seen them live. I saw them.
Speaker 1: Remember when Dave Groll broke his leg during a tour.
Speaker 1: I don't know them that well. Okay, so Dave girl
Speaker 1: broke his leg during a tour and he they built
Speaker 1: a throne so he could keep performing. So he was
Speaker 1: just sitting there at City Field And I saw them
Speaker 1: a couple of years ago when that, And they're awesome,
Speaker 1: So I'm excited. It should be a fun time. That's cool.
Speaker 1: Yeah know, he's a he's a he's a real rock star.
Speaker 1: You know, there's a few of them left, There's not
Speaker 1: that many of them left. He's an actual rock star.
Speaker 1: You know, there's like Aerosmith. Of those guys, I think
Speaker 1: they all qualify for Social Security benefits now. And uh,
Speaker 1: you know there's Aerosmith, there's um you know, there's Dave
Speaker 1: Grohl and the Foo Fighters. You know there's some of
Speaker 1: the Red Hot Chilie Peppers. Rock stars. Not a lot
Speaker 1: of rock stars A lot of pop, hip hop and
Speaker 1: country stars out there right now, but true rock stars.
Speaker 1: It feels like we've entered an era where, you know,
Speaker 1: you got the old rock. The old rockers are really
Speaker 1: the top rockers. Yeah, they're the only ones around. I
Speaker 1: can't name a newer rock band. Like there's alternative bands
Speaker 1: like if you want to call panic at the Disco
Speaker 1: of band or that kind of genre. But I think
Speaker 1: I've always liked the Black Keys. I feel like they're
Speaker 1: kind of old school rock. Yeah, I would, I would
Speaker 1: agree with that. Do you know them? Yeah? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Already,
Speaker 1: let's get into a roll call. We'll congrats pruser Mark.
Speaker 1: That'll be really exciting. Let's get in a roll call here.
Speaker 1: We got first up, Cooper. Oh do you know, prus
Speaker 1: of Mark that a cooper is actually a profession and
Speaker 1: it is a person who makes barrels. Huh. I did
Speaker 1: not know that a cooper is a person who makes barrels.
Speaker 1: Why are they called Cooper's I do not know, but
Speaker 1: I know that a cooper is a farrier as a
Speaker 1: person who who's making sure that the horses are shod,
Speaker 1: makes horseshoes. A cooper is a person who makes barrels.
Speaker 1: Baker who a person who bakes. We all know that one, right,
Speaker 1: So these are all names that are professions. I like
Speaker 1: Baker's better than Cooper's, but nothing against Cooper's. Baker's just
Speaker 1: give me treats. Yeah, if I can have one of
Speaker 1: my family, I feel like I'll go buy my barrel
Speaker 1: at bed bath and beyond. I'd rather have somebody who's
Speaker 1: making me cookies exactly. Yeah, that's fair, all right, well, Cooper,
Speaker 1: I don't even know if Cooper knew his name what
Speaker 1: it was all about. Buck. I've been listening to your
Speaker 1: show for about two years now. I can't begin to
Speaker 1: describe how refreshing it is to hear my own thoughts
Speaker 1: and opinions expressed in such an intelligent and articulate matter.
Speaker 1: I know in my heart and mind what's right and wrong,
Speaker 1: but I've never been good enough with words that truly
Speaker 1: expressed that to the people around me. When I get
Speaker 1: into a debate, I often think, how would Bucks say this?
Speaker 1: You have an amazing talent. I'm so appreciative of what
Speaker 1: you do. Thank you. Keep up the good work, Cooper.
Speaker 1: That is really kind to you, man. I appreciate that
Speaker 1: a lot, and that kind of stuff. Knowing that there
Speaker 1: are folks out there who have that run through their head.
Speaker 1: What would bucks say if they're in a debate? You know,
Speaker 1: that motivates me to try to just do the strongest
Speaker 1: shows I can every day and put out their lines
Speaker 1: of argument and approaches to rhetoric and debate that will
Speaker 1: be useful for all of you in your own lives
Speaker 1: and your own thought processes. So that's really one of
Speaker 1: the highest goals here on the show. But I always
Speaker 1: want to entertain you, but I certainly hope that at
Speaker 1: some level you just feel like by listening to this show,
Speaker 1: you're getting you're getting an approach to argument and hearing
Speaker 1: a way of It's funny, now I'm not sounding very
Speaker 1: articulate at all, so I'm trying to describe, but you're
Speaker 1: hearing the way that I do it, and that that
Speaker 1: may be able to influence, support and perfect your own discussions,
Speaker 1: debates and ways you think about these things. That's that's my,
Speaker 1: honestly one of my top goals for this Matthew Oss
Speaker 1: member here, Okay, not original Saturday Squad, but original Spoken Squad.
Speaker 1: When people want to fix schools and make them better,
Speaker 1: when they want to fix roads and make them better,
Speaker 1: fix hospitals. The one thing they do in every situation
Speaker 1: is put more money into that project. Then logic would
Speaker 1: say we need to invest more money to fix and
Speaker 1: help make police forces better. Matthew raise a variance there.
Speaker 1: First of all, thank you so much and welcome from
Speaker 1: the original Spokane Squad. I'll take it. The police forces
Speaker 1: getting more funny, Yeah, but what you're what you're pointing
Speaker 1: out here is that the Democrats essentially want more money
Speaker 1: for all aspects of government. Every government employed should get
Speaker 1: more money, more funding, bigger paycheck as far as the
Speaker 1: Democrats are concerned, except police forces. Right, police should have
Speaker 1: budgets cut. Police will be more effective at their jobs
Speaker 1: if they are defunded. Because even the more radical leftist
Speaker 1: that I talk to, they stay away from the disband
Speaker 1: or abolish police thing. They'll say it, but then they'll say, well,
Speaker 1: I don't really mean abolished police. You know, they play
Speaker 1: these word games, but they recognize that at some level.
Speaker 1: You know, they can point to a country like you know,
Speaker 1: like like Britain or Japan and say, well they they
Speaker 1: have police that aren't even armed, right, Well, yeah, but
Speaker 1: they also do have I mean if somebody you know,
Speaker 1: calls in a you know, somebody calls in a terror threat.
Speaker 1: For example, in London, you're going to see very highly
Speaker 1: trained guys with machine guns showing up very quickly. Right.
Speaker 1: I mean it's not you know, so that you get
Speaker 1: into at some level, everyone understand that if the state
Speaker 1: is going to enforce its will, it has to have force.
Speaker 1: It can't just ask people gently to comply. So they
Speaker 1: need they need cops at some level. But the defund
Speaker 1: movement is saying, well, we just need far less money
Speaker 1: for them and more money for other things that will
Speaker 1: make law enforcement less the front line of dealing with
Speaker 1: it into that, I just I go back to your
Speaker 1: point your Matthew. Oh, so only cops are the only
Speaker 1: employees out there who will be better at their jobs
Speaker 1: with fewer resources, which I think is the essential point
Speaker 1: you're making here. Only cops. Only cops get better with
Speaker 1: less money when while working as a government government entity.
Speaker 1: So yes, excellent, Matthew. Well done, Steve. I know Buck's
Speaker 1: too famous and busy now for a response, but I'm
Speaker 1: really excited about this. Buck is very insightfuled down to
Speaker 1: earth concerntive talk show hosting gives me hope for the future.
Speaker 1: It will be a definite bump up for my spirit
Speaker 1: each afternoon at work when I have time to listen
Speaker 1: on the road between jobs. Well, Steve, thank you man,
Speaker 1: And don't worry. I've always I've always got my feet
Speaker 1: on the grounds. I got Producer Mark watching over me
Speaker 1: like a hawk, who will point out that my head
Speaker 1: is literally large, but also figuratively is not allowed to
Speaker 1: get large, right Yeah, figuratively you can't even walk through
Speaker 1: any door right now. Yeah, I mean figuratively, the head
Speaker 1: maybe a little big. With Producer Mark is there to
Speaker 1: make sure that it stays nice and compact so it
Speaker 1: can actually fit into into helmets or hats that are
Speaker 1: not my special sized hats, which, as I've had to
Speaker 1: tell you, I have had to I have actually had
Speaker 1: to buy special baseball hats so that I can have
Speaker 1: a hat that fits my giant head. If there's ever
Speaker 1: Clay and Buck show swag where they're gonna have to
Speaker 1: get like a giant giant hats. Yeah, Josh, hey Buck,
Speaker 1: congratulations of the new opportunity. I've listened for years. It's
Speaker 1: good to know I've made a good decision trusting you
Speaker 1: all these years. Josh, thank you. I appreciate that. Also,
Speaker 1: everything you predict comes true, and you're pretty entertaining. Here's
Speaker 1: my prediction. I'm with rond to sand Is twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1: I think Trump really loves our country enough, and he'll
Speaker 1: eventually endorse de Santis. I think on a policy level,
Speaker 1: he's a lot like Trump, He's less polarizing, and as
Speaker 1: tremendous results through the pandemic, the media will obviously start
Speaker 1: making allegations about him and people around him. Let's see
Speaker 1: how crazy they can be this time. Josh, thank you
Speaker 1: so much, man. And yeah, I think for a lot
Speaker 1: of people that are team Buck, especially that I've been
Speaker 1: team Buck for years, you know, I do feel like
Speaker 1: this is a win for all of us that I'm
Speaker 1: going into the twelve to three because I am like
Speaker 1: the band that they saw, especially oss original Saturday Squad.
Speaker 1: I'm the band that they saw playing a venue with
Speaker 1: thirty people with a five dollars cover charge. And now
Speaker 1: this is the I mean, this is the radio equivalent
Speaker 1: soon of being Foo Fighters at Madison Square Garden with
Speaker 1: producer Mark showing up. I mean, that's that is the
Speaker 1: transformation we've seen here over the last ten years of
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show. So I, Josh, I appreciate that
Speaker 1: a lot, and thank you very much for writing in
Speaker 1: and a team. I'm with you every day this week.
Speaker 1: Next week we're gonna have some guest hosting. I'll tell
Speaker 1: you more about that tomorrow, but here with you every
Speaker 1: day this week. So keep passing the buck, remember the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and podcast continues. Say if your podcast listener,
Speaker 1: that doesn't change at all, you're gonna hear me every day,
Speaker 1: just me on the podcast, but back tomorrow on Radio
Speaker 1: Shields High