WEBVTT - Israel-Hamas War Enters 60th Day; Kerry & Dalio on Climate

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:03.079
<v Speaker 1>Good morning.

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hager and I'm Karen Moscow. Here are the

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 2>stories we're following today.

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 3>First, the latest developments in the Middle East. Israel continues

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 3>to push its military operations further into the southern Gaza strip,

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 3>with more strikes reported overnight. We get the latest from

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Oliver Krook.

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Today marks the sixtieth day of war between Israel and Hamas,

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 4>and after a temporary ceasefire last week of seven days,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 4>fighting is once again raging on the enclave. After intense

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 4>operations in northern Gaza for these last sixty days, the

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 4>Israeli military campaign is really increasing its focus on the

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 4>southern part of Gaza, and much of that around Gaza's

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 4>second biggest city, con Unis. That's a city that held

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 4>more than four hundred thousand people before the war. We

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 4>have satellite photos over the last few days that show

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 4>tanks and troops massing outside the city and under international pressure,

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 4>notably increasingly from the United States. Israel says it is

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>beginning to be more precise about it's so called safe

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 4>zones and where it is striking its operations.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>And Bloomberg's Oliver Krook reports one hundred and thirty seven

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>hostage still remain in Gaza.

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Well back here in the U, asked Nathan. The presidents

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 2>of Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania are set

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>to testify before Congress today about combating anti Semitism on

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 2>college campuses. Bloomberg's Amy Morris reports from Washington.

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 5>The three college presidents will testify before a House committee

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 5>about stopping anti Semitism on campuses. The hearing was called

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 5>in response to protests that have sprung up on college

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 5>campuses across the country since the Hamas attack on Israel

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 5>in October. Committee chair Virginia Fox says she'll hold university

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 5>leaders accountable for anti semitism after the Hamas attack and

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 5>during the Israel Hamas War. There's no mention of any

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 5>plans to investigate Islamophobia or any other forms of hate.

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 5>The hearing begins at ten fifteen in Washington. Amy Morris Bloomberg.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 6>Radio, Okay, Amy, thank you, saying in Washington.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelenski has been invited to address Senators

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 3>today as aid has gotten en snarled in a debate

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 3>over the southern US border.

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg's at Baxter has that story.

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 7>The invitation comes from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 7>speak to senators at a classified briefing on security. Schumer

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 7>says senators need to hear a direct message to untangle

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 7>the circle of debate.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 8>The hold up on the security supplemental has not been

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 8>over Ukraine or Israel or the Indo Pacific, but over

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 8>Republican decision to inject hard right immigration measures into the debate.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 7>Zelenski will be on video now. Schumer also says he

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 7>set up a test vote on advancing a national security

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 7>supplemental package including funding for Ukraine for tomorrow ed Baxter

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg Radio, All right, ed.

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Thanks, We'll be turned to the markets now. And Moody's

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 2>has cut its outlook for Chinese as sovereign bonds to negative.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 2>That's underscoring deepening global concerns about the level of debt

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 2>in the world's second largest economy. Moody says China's usage

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>of fiscal stimulus to support local governments and its spiraling

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>property downturn opposing risks to the nation's economy.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>In European markets, Karen the London Stock Exchange Group is investigating,

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 3>assists that's an issue that earlier affected trading in large

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>numbers of smaller stocks. This is the third outage to

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 3>strike London in a few months.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Well back here in the US, Nathan concerned mounting that

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the November to Remember for stocks and bonds may have

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 2>gone too far. We get the latest from Bloomberg's John Tucker, John.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 9>And Karen Markets. Maybe in technically overbought conditions and extreme

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 9>bullish positioning, maybe leaving traders exposed to corrections. The counseters

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.839
<v Speaker 9>CIO Christopher Allman sees it this way.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if the Fed is going to ease

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 4>very quickly in twenty four.

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 10>We have to readjust to that November people got ahead

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 10>of themselves.

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 9>The S and P five hundred pound Monday from the

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 9>highest since March twenty twenty two, while the Nasdaq one

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 9>hud have dropped one percent amid of decline. At megacaps,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 9>two year yields jump ten basis points, and traders today

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 9>we'll focus on the labor market, looking for any signs

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 9>of weakness in the job openings or jolts data. We

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 9>get that at ten am Wall Street time. I'm John Tucker,

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 9>Bloomberg Radio.

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, John, thanks for watching shares of Noke This morning,

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 3>they're down about seven and a half percent overseas. That's

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 3>because AT and T has chosen rival Ericsson to modernize

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 3>its US wireless network. This project could amount to almost

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 3>fourteen billion dollars over five years, and this is another

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 3>blow to Nokia. In October, the company anounced job cuts

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 3>alongside broader struggles in its five G infrastructure business.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, Nathan, some of the world's biggest tech companies are

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 2>collaborating on an artificial intelligence project to meta platforms and

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 2>IBM are joining more than forty companies and organizations to

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 2>create an industry group that's dedicated to open source artificial

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 2>intelligence work. The coalition called the AI Alliance. We'll focus

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 2>on the responsible development of AI technology, including safety and

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>security tools.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, well, Karen, let's get to the latest from the

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>COP twenty eighth summit in Dubai. Bloomberg has been speaking

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>to some big names at the UN Climate event, including

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>White House Special Climate ENVOYT John Kerry. He's calling out

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 3>big oil companies like Chevron for skipping on a commitment

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>to slash methane emissions.

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 10>You can't be outside of this initiative. The evidence is overwhelming.

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 10>There is no doubt about science, and that is why

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 10>I say it is inexcusable. There's no reason to be

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 10>permitting unabated efforts at this point.

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Now, along with former Secretary of State Kerry, we've also

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>heard from Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalyo. He says it

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 3>is not likely the world will meet the Paris Agreements

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.799
<v Speaker 3>one and a half degree celsius warming target, and addressing

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 3>climate change, he says, is going to be expensive.

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 10>It's estimated that between five and ten trillion dollars a

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 10>year is one way or another.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 11>No matter.

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 7>If you neglect it, you'll pay the price. If you

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 7>don't neglect it, you'll have the cost either way.

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 3>And both Ray Dalyo and John Kerrey spoke at the

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Green Forum on the sidelines of COP twenty eight

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>in Dubai.

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 2>And it's time now for a look at some of

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the other stories making news around the world, and for

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 2>that we're joined by Bloomberg's Amy Moore is saving Good morning.

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 6>Good morning, Karen.

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 5>New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrands says a stronger anti gun

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 5>trafficking law has led to an uptick in seizures of

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 5>illegal guns. Jillibrand is releasing a report and the progress

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 5>law enforcement is made. After the bipartisan Safer Communities Act

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 5>was implemented last year, inspired by a New York City

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 5>teenager who was shot by a stray bullet back in

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and nine, this gun.

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 12>Trafficking statute has been used to prosecute more than two

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 12>hundred defendants across at least twenty states. In total, law

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 12>enforcement has seized over thirteen hundred guns across the.

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 6>Country under the measure.

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 5>The federal government put seven hundred and fifty million dollars

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 5>toward mental health services to help hire more than fourteen

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 5>thousand mental health professionals across the country, including nearly four

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 5>hundred in New York alone. And we should note that

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg LP,

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 5>the parent of Bloomberg Radio, is a donor to groups

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 5>that support gun control, including every Town for Gun Safety.

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 5>The race to replace expelled Congressman George sand is already underway.

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 5>Chairman of the Nassau County Republican Committee Joseph Cairo says

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 5>they're trying to avoid another Santos fiasco by closely examining

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 5>potential candidates credentials.

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 7>We'll have a much more thorough vetting process. Now we

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 7>will retain an outside firm to do a complete background check.

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 5>Both parties need to present a candidate for a special election,

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 5>with Democrats expected to announce their selection this week. Governor

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Hokel could announce a special election this week and when

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.679
<v Speaker 5>it happens, that election has to take place between seventy

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 5>to eighty days. A Congressional oversight hearing is set for today.

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 5>Over national park flights, now, National Park Service rules are

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 5>in effect that limit airplanes and helicopters flying over national

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 5>monuments and parks. Visitors complain about the noise from those flyovers,

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 5>but Baileywood is with the Helicopter Association International.

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 13>We believe that air tours are the least damaging to

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 13>the parks when compared to cars and foot traffic.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Some of the strictest new flight restrictions are at Mount

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Rushmore and Badly National Park in South Dakota. Global News

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 5>twenty four hours a day and whenever you want it

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 5>with Bloomberg News Now.

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 6>I Amy Morrison, this is Bloomberg Karen great Amy.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you what we do bring you news throughout the

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 2>day right here on Bloomberg Radio. As you heard Amy say,

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but now you can get the latest news on demand

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 2>whenever you wanted to. Subscribe to Bloomberg News Now, and

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>you can get the latest headlines right at the click

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 2>of a button. Get informed on your schedule. You can

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 2>listen and subscribe to Bloomberg News Now on the Bloomberg

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Business app, Bloomberg dot com plus Apples, Spotify, and anywhere

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 2>else you get your podcasts. Time now for the Bloomberg

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Sports Update with John Stashaur, John.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 13>Karen Mother Life Football was in Jacksonville. The Jaguars in

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 13>first place in AFC South of Bengals under five hundred

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 13>and last place in the AFC North, but Cincinnati, who

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 13>was playing without the injured Joe Burrows, still one in

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 13>overtime thirty four to thirty one. Burroughs replaced Jake Browning

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 13>thirty two of thirty seven three hundred and fifty four yards,

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 13>including the seventy six yard touchdown pass to Jamar Chase.

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 13>The Bengals won on a field goal with one forty

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 13>five to go in ot The Jacksonville quarterback Trevor Lawrence

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 13>left the game late fourth quarter with a springed ankle

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 13>and a couple of other injured quarterbacks. Pittsburgh's Kenny Pickett

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 13>needing ankle surgery. He's going to miss two to four weeks,

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 13>so the Steelers will turn to Mitchell Trubisky beginning with

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 13>their game Thursday at home against New England. In New Orleans,

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 13>Derek Carr in concussion protocol for the second time in

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 13>a month. Tennessee running back Derek Henry was feared to

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 13>have suffered a concussion last Sunday.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 14>That turned out to be not the case.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 13>Linebacker Shack Leonard, a three time Pro Bowler who was

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 13>surprisingly released by Indianapolis, signing with Philadelphia. He chose the

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 13>Eagles over the Cowboys. Those two teams play a big

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 13>Sunday night football game this week.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 7>That's for first place.

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 13>They played in the quarterfinals the NBA's in season tournament.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 13>Pacers beat the Celtics one twenty two to one twelve

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 13>tybees Halibert in twenty six points his first career triple double,

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 13>and the Pelicans won in Sacramento one twenty seven to

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 13>one seventeen.

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 6>So Indiana and.

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 13>New Orleans heading to Las Vegas for the semifinals Thursday,

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 13>two more games tonight, the Nicks in Milwaukee Phoenix playing

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 13>the Lakers.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 6>Johns Dashawer Bloomberg Sports.

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 11>From coast to coast, from New York to San Francisco,

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 11>Boston to Washington, DC, nationwide on Syria's Exam, the Bloomberg

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 11>Business app in Bloomberg dot Com.

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg Daybreak. Good morning, I'm Nathan Hager.

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 3>After a November to remember for stocks and just about

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 3>every investment asset rally, December has gotten off to a

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 3>bit of a rough start for long traders, dialing back

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 3>some of their bets that the Federal Reserve will cut

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 3>rates as aggressively as they might have thought just a

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 3>few weeks ago. Really, I've seen some weakness in the

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 3>latest economic data, but Fedchairman Jerome Powell is keeping up

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 3>his message that the Central Bank needs to move carefully

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 3>on policy into next year. So let's talk more about

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 3>this economy and the policy path from here on out.

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 3>We are very pleased to be joined this morning by

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Mohammad al Arian, the chief economic advisor at Alliance, the

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>president of Queen's College, Cambridge, and of course columnist for

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Opinion. Muhammad, thank you so much for taking the

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 3>time this morning. I want to start by asking what

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 3>you made of the exuberance we saw over rate cuts

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 3>last month.

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 6>Was it overdone?

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 14>First? Good morning, Nathan, Thanks for having me. Yes, I

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 14>believe it was overdone. I do believe that the Fed

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 14>is done raising weights, but I don't think they will

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 14>validate what's currently christ in by the markets in terms

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 14>of weightcuts next year.

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Now we have this debate going about how long the

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Fed will keep rates elevated, whether it's higher for longer,

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 3>high for longer. I mean the market is pricing in

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty five basis points of rate cuts

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 3>next year. Does the Fed have room for that kind

0:11:57.920 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 3>of easing?

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 11>Yet?

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 14>There's a few things that we have to keep in mind.

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 14>One is inflation dynamic. While we've had goods deflation, services

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 14>remain rather hot in terms of the inflation rate, they're

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 14>not disinflating fast enough, and at some point the goods

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 14>deflation will stop. So getting to two percent inflation is

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 14>the inflation target is far from automatic. Second, and we'll

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 14>get more evidence this week, the labor market is still

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 14>doing really well, and I suspect that the FED would

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 14>like to see some weakening in the labor market. Thirdly,

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 14>the markets have already loosened financial conditions significantly, you know, Nathan,

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 14>November going to the Goman SAX index of financial conditions

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 14>was the biggest loosening of conditions in any month since records,

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 14>So there's been a tremendous loosening of financial conditions. I

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 14>think if you look at these three things, they suggest

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 14>the Fed will be more careful in cutting weights than

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 14>what the markets expect right now.

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's take those three things in turn. Then, starting

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 3>with the stickiness of services inflation, why do you see

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.239
<v Speaker 3>it sticking around as much as it has? Can policy

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 3>make an impact on the elevated services price pressures that

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:23.599
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing in this economy.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 14>Nathan, That's a key question, and a very good one.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 14>The problem with falling behind on inflation, which is what

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 14>has what happened to the FED, is that you allow

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 14>the inflation process to go from a few items in

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 14>this case it was energy and food to the good

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 14>sector as a whole, and then next thing you know,

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 14>it starts getting embedded in the service sector. Now, why

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 14>is that a problem. Because the service sector is less

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 14>sensitive to interest rate hikes, So the minute it gets

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 14>embedded in the service sector, it's harder for the central

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 14>bank to get to that inflation, and that's why the

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 14>stickiness of the service component of inflation is something to

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 14>keep on the weight O skein. Hopefully it's not going

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 14>to last for a very long time, but don't forget

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 14>the outright deflation and good is going to stop. So

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 14>we do need the service sector to disinflate further.

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 3>And that gets to the question about whether cracks in

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 3>the labor market are what it's going to take to

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 3>get inflation down to the target that the Fed has

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 3>set out two percent because services are so tied to

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 3>the labor market. What is your expectation about the data

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 3>that we're going to see on the jobs market this week,

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 3>particularly the JOLTS data today and the all important Friday

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 3>jobs report.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 14>So it's interesting that for the JOLTS data today, Blommerk

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 14>Economics expects only a marginal decline and Roomerk Economics expects

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 14>that the ratio of the unemployed to job vacancies will

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 14>stay above the historical averages. So to put it into context,

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 14>Rulemak Economics expects that way should to go from one

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 14>point five to one point four to four, and that's

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 14>still above the average. Nathan, your question really comes down

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 14>to something that the FED doesn't want to talk about,

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 14>but increasingly others are talking about, which is two percent

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 14>the right inflation target. If our labor market is slightly

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 14>less flexible than what it used to be before, if

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 14>the supply side as a whole is less flexible around

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 14>the world, which it is, should we continue to insist

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 14>on a two percent infation target or should the FED

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 14>be willing to tolerate somewhere above that. Why would the

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 14>FED want to tolerate somewhere above that? Not because it

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 14>wants to create inflation expectations that won't happen, but instead

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 14>because it doesn't want to unduly sacrifice the job market,

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 14>unduly sacrifice growth, and unduly sacrifice aspects of our key

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 14>to the equality of income and wealth. So that's going

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 14>to ultimately be the big question is does the FED

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 14>insist on staying at two percent and therefore with really

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 14>weakening the labor market, or is it willing to tolerate

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 14>slightly higher inflation because that's the reality of today's supply

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 14>constrain global economy.

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 3>We're speaking with Muhammad al Aarian Bloomberg opinion columnist and

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 3>the chief economic advisor at Alliance. That is a big question, Muhammad,

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 3>because this FED has really hammered home the target of

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 3>two percent. They've really been laser focused on that. Do

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 3>you see room from some of the commentary that we're

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 3>hearing from this Federal Reserve that it could be open

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 3>to a higher inflation target?

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 6>And what would that mean for the US economy?

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 14>So I don't think we'll ever hear this FED say

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 14>we are revising our inflation target from two to say

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 14>three percent. That's not going to happen. They're not going

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 14>to explicitly revise up the inflation target because they've missed

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 14>it for so long and by so much that they

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 14>will feel that that will undermine the credibility. What they

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 14>may do is continue to promise us two percent in

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 14>the future, but tolerate I don't get to two percent

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 14>very quickly. Now, what does that mean for the economy?

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 14>I think ultimately the choice facing the FEED is the

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 14>following Nason. Either they stick to two percent and with

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 14>tipping the economy into recession, or they tolerate slightly high inflation.

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 14>They don't push the economy into recession and they find

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 14>out that that is stable, that it doesn't un anchor

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 14>inflation or expectations. My hope is that they will opt

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 14>for the second option, but we will have to wait

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 14>and see.

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Well what could that mean though for market volatility? I mean,

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 3>we've seen a lot of questioning in this market about

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>whether the FED is serious about the message that it's

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 3>putting out there. If we do see the sort of

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 3>rhetorical focus on a two percent target but maybe not

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 3>a realistic two percent target, what could that mean for

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 3>market volatility?

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 14>So, first, the sources of volatility we've seen in the

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 14>fixed income market was unthinkable not so long ago. Everyday

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 14>seven to ten basis points move is often on very little,

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 14>So that's something else going on in the fix income market.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 14>What is more worrisome is the issue you raised, which

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 14>is that the FED says things and the market totally

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 14>ignored it. Last Friday was a perfect example of that.

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 14>Chappout was very clear. He said it would be premature

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 14>to talk about any interest rate cuts and he left

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 14>the door open for interest rate hikes, and yet a

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 14>market that had already rallied by four basis points in

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 14>the front end on the second year. The second year,

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 14>the two year, yield had come down by forty basis points,

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 14>rallied another ten basis points, and that, you know, started

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 14>a whole conversation yesterday about whether Pole was steamrolled by

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 14>the market, whether FED pal was stiff armed by the market.

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 14>The fact is that FED communication is not as impactful

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 14>as it used to.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Be, which gets to a question I've been wanting to

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 3>ask you all morning long. Yeah, I mean, you've been

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 3>very critical of FED messaging FED policy in the past.

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 3>You've said that the FED waited too long to tackle inflation.

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 3>How would you grade the Fed's performance now?

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 14>So, I think they've played major ketchup, which they needed

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 14>to do. So if you look at analysis and action

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 14>where they had failed earlier, they have corrected that. They've

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 14>also paid much more attention to the supervisory role, so

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 14>that is good. Communications remains poor, and again we have

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 14>examples of that over the last few weeks. So they

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 14>still have a significant communication problem, and they still have

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 14>a credibility problem. You know, the whole point of forward

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 14>guidance is for the markets to listen to you and

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 14>for the markets to do the heavy lifting for you.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 14>What we're seeing now is forward guidance. As we saw

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 14>last Friday is being completely ignored by the market, And

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 14>it is really interesting to me, Nathan, that the market

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 14>is taking on the Fed on variable that the FED

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 14>controls completely. I mean, think about that Fed. The market

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 14>is basically telling the Fed, I don't care what you

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 14>think about an indust rate that you set. I think

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 14>you're going to do something completely different. And that's quite

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 14>a statement from the market to the FED.

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 3>So in our last minute, Muhammad, what would it take

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 3>for the market and for you to get that credibility

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 3>back from the Federal Reserve?

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 6>What does the FED need to do to regain its

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 6>credibility in your view?

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 14>So first time, it just say that in terms of

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 14>the outlook for twenty twenty four, I think the market

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 14>should be listening more to the FED. That's why I

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 14>don't think the Fed is going to end up validating

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 14>what the market is pricing in for cuts. In terms

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 14>of what it takes, takes a couple of things. One

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 14>is something that different recent G thirty report on central

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 14>bank stresses is for central banks to be more humble,

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 14>to recognize that we live in a different world and

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 14>they've got to have a much border mindset and much

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 14>greater cognitive diversity, and the second thing will take is

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 14>better accountability. The FED is not as accountable as it

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 14>should be, and therefore, even when it makes mistakes, repeated mistakes,

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 14>and they've made five different mistakes in the last few years,

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 14>even when it makes repeated mistakes, it doesn't own those mistakes,

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.959
<v Speaker 14>and therefore it raises doubt among lots of people as

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 14>to what it's learning from those mistakes. So the two

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 14>things that really would take is being more open minded,

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 14>having greater concenter diversity, and secondly, better accountability.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Today, your morning brief on

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the stories making news from Wall Street to Washington and beyond.

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Look for us on your podcast feed at six am

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Eastern each morning, on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts.

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live each morning starting at five

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>am Wall Street time on Bloomberg eleven three to zero

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one in Washington,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one oh six to one in Boston, and Bloomberg

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>ninety sixty in San Francisco.

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Our flagship New York station is also available on your

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Alexa devices. Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty plus.

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Listen coast to coast on the Bloomberg Business app, SERIUSXM,

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, and on Bloomberg dot Com.

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 6>I'm Nathan Hager and I'm Karen Moscow.

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Join us again tomorrow morning for all the news you

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 2>need to start your day right here on Bloomberg Daybreak