Speaker 1: Hey there, folks.
Speaker 2: It's Tuesday, June twenty fourth. We are in the seventh
Speaker 2: week of testimony in the Diddy trial, and as we speak,
Speaker 2: the final witness of the trial is on the stand.
Speaker 2: Welcome to this Ditty update edition of Amy and TJ
Speaker 2: and Robes has been seven weeks. It's weird to say
Speaker 2: this is the last guy where're going to hear from.
Speaker 3: That's right, and right now he is being cross examined
Speaker 3: by Ditty's defense attorneys, and once that cross examination is over,
Speaker 3: that's it. It's it's hard to imagine, but yes, the
Speaker 3: defense says it will rest. It is not calling any
Speaker 3: witnesses to the stand. So what we're hearing from this
Speaker 3: homeland security agent is the end of the evidence for
Speaker 3: the jurors to consider.
Speaker 2: Are they going out I don't know, with a bang
Speaker 2: with a third I don't know, because there have been
Speaker 2: so many explosive witnesses and explosive testimony that it seems
Speaker 2: like a guy going through hotel receipts, some text messages,
Speaker 2: some travel itineraries, like boring stuff, but is important stuff.
Speaker 4: I think.
Speaker 3: Honestly, if you look at what the prosecution presented on
Speaker 3: Friday and yesterday, it was kind of boring. He was
Speaker 3: connecting the dots. He was saying, did he paid for this?
Speaker 3: Did he paid for that? But now with the defense
Speaker 3: cross examining him, I think it's a little bit more
Speaker 3: interesting because they are actually reading text messages between Ditty
Speaker 3: and Jane right now, and also between Jane and an escort,
Speaker 3: and I found it pretty interesting how much she took
Speaker 3: control of coordinating and then also praising and talking about
Speaker 3: how much she enjoyed having sex with the escort and
Speaker 3: telling Diddy that she wanted to have some alone time
Speaker 3: with him, some one on one time with him. She
Speaker 3: said she hadn't actually been with him, she said selfishly,
Speaker 3: I don't know what that means in five months. That's
Speaker 3: interesting to me that pretty much their intimacy was her
Speaker 3: having sex with other men and him watching it.
Speaker 4: But she seemed excited about it.
Speaker 3: Some of these text messages certainly are massively favorable for
Speaker 3: the defense. She said, I haven't stopped thinking about it.
Speaker 3: It just gets better and better. That's what Jane texted
Speaker 3: to Diddy, and then she texted to the escort. This
Speaker 3: was one for the books, so it didn't sound like
Speaker 3: somebody who was coerced or somebody who didn't want to
Speaker 3: be there, or someone who felt like they had to
Speaker 3: be there.
Speaker 2: So before this guy even got on the stand today
Speaker 2: to start the day, there was a significant delay before
Speaker 2: we even got to some of these text messages because
Speaker 2: they had to fight over what text messages they would
Speaker 2: even be allowed to enter. I believe by most of
Speaker 2: the estimates people in the court room seemed like anyway
Speaker 2: from a thirty to forty five minute delay after nine
Speaker 2: am in getting to the.
Speaker 1: Stand of that field.
Speaker 2: What about right, Yes, because the attorneys were arguing, that's
Speaker 2: the right, debate.
Speaker 4: Debated, they were debated, Well, they still argue too.
Speaker 2: Yes, they were debating and arguing in front of the
Speaker 2: judge over text messages they wanted to have entered into
Speaker 2: testimony and entered into evidence. And there were several objections
Speaker 2: by the prosecution, in particular to some of Cassie ventor
Speaker 2: refines text messages to Ditty. In particular, there was one
Speaker 2: that the defense wanted to submit in which she was
Speaker 2: talking about wanting to have sex, to wanting to be
Speaker 2: with him, wanting and they wanted to enter this to
Speaker 2: show look she was initiating this, she wanted this. The
Speaker 2: prosecution objected, and the judge sustained the objection because the
Speaker 2: judge even said, she was talking about one on one time.
Speaker 3: Yeah, she was talking about having sex with Ditty, And
Speaker 3: I think that's really clear, and she's made that clear
Speaker 3: that's all she wanted, and that she was tolerating or
Speaker 3: at worst being coerced into having sex with other men
Speaker 3: just so she could try and get eventually, ultimately alone
Speaker 3: time with Ditty.
Speaker 2: So she will, and it makes sense she would be
Speaker 2: excited or wanting to be with her man one on one,
Speaker 2: and the judge saw that, so he said, absolutely, that
Speaker 2: objection is sustained. You're not going to be able to
Speaker 2: use that one. But then there were three others at
Speaker 2: least that they were trying to get interered, and the
Speaker 2: prosecution objected, but he overruled those objections because she was
Speaker 2: talking about baby oil, she was talking about some other
Speaker 2: things that seemed to show that she was a willing
Speaker 2: participant and initiated some of this stuff. So the defense
Speaker 2: lost on that one text message, but they won on
Speaker 2: all of these others that they are going to be
Speaker 2: able to present.
Speaker 3: And of course this is all the defenses, I mean,
Speaker 3: this is their case. They might not be calling any
Speaker 3: witnesses of their own, but this is their case to
Speaker 3: prove to the jury. They are saying that everything that
Speaker 3: happened was consensual, that Jane and Cassie were both willing participants,
Speaker 3: and in some cases, if you look at these text messages,
Speaker 3: not just willing, but excited and anticipatory of what happened.
Speaker 4: And then even in the aftermath of.
Speaker 3: Some of these freak offs, they were talking about how
Speaker 3: great it was, how amazing it was. So they have
Speaker 3: certainly cast some doubt and in terms of motive or
Speaker 3: why or how this all came about why these women
Speaker 3: were participating.
Speaker 1: What is that good enough?
Speaker 2: What you described there? Is that good enough to say
Speaker 2: for them? The way they explain that is, hey, yes,
Speaker 2: of course they were saying that to Diddy because they
Speaker 2: felt this is what he wanted, this is what they
Speaker 2: had to do. That seems to be always the comeback
Speaker 2: that none of that was authentic. They were performing for him,
Speaker 2: even in the text message.
Speaker 3: Then couldn't you argue that how would did he ascertain
Speaker 3: the difference between the two.
Speaker 4: If he's being told this?
Speaker 3: They did argue that, right, I mean, if he's being
Speaker 3: told by these women that they're excited about it and
Speaker 3: that they want it, and that afterwards they were happy
Speaker 3: about it and wanted more of it. How is he
Speaker 3: supposed to know that they're just performing for him so
Speaker 3: that they can be with him. That doesn't really make
Speaker 3: a lot of sense to me. I mean, it looks
Speaker 3: to me.
Speaker 4: Again. I'll reiterate no legal expert here.
Speaker 3: But man, I think the defense has done an amazing
Speaker 3: job in all of their cross examinations and certainly even today,
Speaker 3: showing the jurors that there is some doubt in terms
Speaker 3: of whether or not these women were forced to participate
Speaker 3: in these freak offs. I think that there is definitely doubt.
Speaker 3: Can you hear their own words in real time of
Speaker 3: when this was all going on.
Speaker 2: Wasn't it a big thing earlier in the trial about
Speaker 2: whether or not I think it was Cassie vent Or
Speaker 2: Fine who was saying she needed to be on drugs
Speaker 2: for these free calls like she does. No way she
Speaker 2: could just she had to numb herself. But one of
Speaker 2: the objections this morning was over a text message that
Speaker 2: Cassie vent Or final Fine had between with her and Didty,
Speaker 2: in which she was asked can she do the freak
Speaker 2: off without the drugs. Her response was, yes, the judge
Speaker 2: overruled the objection to that text. That is going to
Speaker 2: be able to submit into evidence. So that was a
Speaker 2: big deal for a while. This is the only way
Speaker 2: I could get through. And now the jury is being told,
Speaker 2: Oh so she could, in clear conscience and right mind
Speaker 2: participate and she's saying it here.
Speaker 4: And she texted that in real time. She texted it.
Speaker 3: And again, how is Diddy supposed to know that if
Speaker 3: it's true she was lying about it, if she actually
Speaker 3: really couldn't do it without drugs, how's he supposed to
Speaker 3: know she's lying to him when she says she could
Speaker 3: do it without drugs. And yeah, those texts are incredibly
Speaker 3: damning and it undermines a lot of the testimony that
Speaker 3: we heard from both Cassie and Jane while they were
Speaker 3: on the stand.
Speaker 2: And so Jane has been the heart a lot of
Speaker 2: the heart a lot of the conversation this morning with
Speaker 2: this Homeland Security agent.
Speaker 1: I didn't expect him.
Speaker 2: He's been out this as what Friday, Yeah, they knew. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I thought he's gonna be kind of a throwaway, and
Speaker 2: he's been up there and incredibly important but some of
Speaker 2: the text messages, so many of them are focused on
Speaker 2: Jane and there back and forth, and some of the
Speaker 2: the defense, of course the cross examination, now the prosecution
Speaker 2: presented different text messages, but now these are painting a
Speaker 2: wildly different picture of a woman who was giddy.
Speaker 4: Yeah, one a good word.
Speaker 3: That's a very I was trying to find the word
Speaker 3: when I was saying excited or anticipatory, but giddy.
Speaker 4: Giddy is a very good word.
Speaker 3: And they also were just putting up messages where Jane
Speaker 3: was telling it how much she loved him and that
Speaker 3: she would not take him for granted. I mean this,
Speaker 3: that's if the motivation is love, how is that coercion?
Speaker 3: I mean, that's what it seems like to me when
Speaker 3: I when I hear even the testimony from these two women.
Speaker 3: But certainly these text messages that the defense is pointing
Speaker 3: out and having read aloud to me as a layman,
Speaker 3: it seems like these women were motivated by love and
Speaker 3: desire and maybe even some money.
Speaker 4: Maybe even some money, but that's that was their choice.
Speaker 3: They wanted to they wanted to be able to live
Speaker 3: a different kind of lifestyle, so that all seems like
Speaker 3: off benefit to them that and how many other women
Speaker 3: have done things that they didn't want to do because
Speaker 3: they love demand. I mean, I think that's just a
Speaker 3: common thing that has happened. Does that mean a crime
Speaker 3: was committed. Does that mean that someone needs to go
Speaker 3: to prison for the rest of their lives?
Speaker 2: Well, that okay, And I just want to make sure
Speaker 2: you're saying that as far as what the jurors might have.
Speaker 4: Correct, correct, I'm thinking about this. No, no, no, no, I'm
Speaker 4: not saying that.
Speaker 3: I'm saying I think, well, I do think that most
Speaker 3: women can put themselves in that position.
Speaker 4: I actually it'll be so interesting.
Speaker 3: To see if the jurors do decide to speak or
Speaker 3: at least talk about why they made their decisions, but
Speaker 3: like how it falls not just between black and white
Speaker 3: or race, but gender and as a woman. You know, Look,
Speaker 3: I was disgusted and appalled and hearing and seeing all
Speaker 3: of this and just feeling so badly for these women
Speaker 3: who are giving this gut wrenching testimony and putting themselves
Speaker 3: and their reputations on the line, having been forced to
Speaker 3: watch humiliating videos of sexually explicit acts that they were committing.
Speaker 3: So I was definitely wanting to be team team women.
Speaker 3: But hearing all of these other text messages, I can
Speaker 3: kind of see it in a human experience, and I'm
Speaker 3: sure there's regret and I'm sure there's anger, But where
Speaker 3: was their responsibility in participating? And that is where I
Speaker 3: think a lot of jurors, as human beings and maybe
Speaker 3: even as women, can.
Speaker 4: Say, oh, sound they were love sick.
Speaker 3: Sounds like they really just wanted to be with him
Speaker 3: and they would do anything they could to be with him.
Speaker 4: Does that mean there was a crime?
Speaker 2: You're saying that Their question is not a legal one
Speaker 2: but almost an emotional one. It sounds like they're Obviously
Speaker 2: emotions come into any jury deliberation. But all these jury
Speaker 2: instructions and all these lee lees in the back and forth,
Speaker 2: he was like, all right, let's follow the law. But
Speaker 2: this might simply come down to whether or not they
Speaker 2: believe these women, whether or not they believe that they
Speaker 2: were part time. I asked you this the other day.
Speaker 2: I think, can you be a part time victim if
Speaker 2: the other part of the time you're a willing participant?
Speaker 4: Yes? I think the answer to that is yes.
Speaker 1: Okay, so that's the guy. We get past that.
Speaker 2: So then let's go with the part when they were
Speaker 2: possibly a victim. Can you say, I mean, how much
Speaker 2: doubt is someone going to have in their head in
Speaker 2: that jury room? Is that what they're having to really
Speaker 2: decide whether or not these women were willing participants?
Speaker 1: What was in their heart?
Speaker 2: Was it about love that yes?
Speaker 4: Or were they forced because.
Speaker 1: There's that line.
Speaker 4: Coercion for I mean, it's it's so tough.
Speaker 3: It's so tough now and now that we've heard all
Speaker 3: of the testimony and we've really seen Ditty's lawyers be
Speaker 3: excellent in terms of where they took their questioning, where
Speaker 3: they took their cross examination, it's cast a shadow of
Speaker 3: doubt for me, I mean, just as someone who's been
Speaker 3: watching it for sure, this one's tough.
Speaker 1: To our point.
Speaker 2: One of the text messages April twenty twenty two, I
Speaker 2: even wrote a note to myself fear oh shit when
Speaker 2: I saw this, and just that was the note thing.
Speaker 2: Oh but and this is what Jane wrote to Ditty
Speaker 2: in April twenty twenty two. Baby, I want to make
Speaker 2: love to you. I haven't selfishly had you to myself
Speaker 2: for five months. I'm fine with the other stuff, but
Speaker 2: I really just need you right now. Diddy's response, Okay,
Speaker 2: whatever you want. That sounds like a couple. That sounds
Speaker 2: like a relationship, That sounds like an understanding. That eden
Speaker 2: sounds like her telling him what we've been doing is cool.
Speaker 2: Can I just have this? And the follow up to
Speaker 2: this sure enough they had some alone time.
Speaker 1: That's a tough.
Speaker 3: Exchange, man, that really is that is incredibly damning. I
Speaker 3: would think to the prosecution's contention that this was coercion,
Speaker 3: that doesn't sound like coercion.
Speaker 2: I'm fine with the other stuff, but I really just
Speaker 2: need you right now. His response was, Okay, whatever you want.
Speaker 2: How I don't know what the prosecution. I don't know
Speaker 2: if they're going to get up and say anything. They
Speaker 2: get a chance to redirect with this witness, I don't
Speaker 2: know if they're going to try to take that on
Speaker 2: or not. But my word, that is just a totally
Speaker 2: different picture.
Speaker 4: Correct.
Speaker 3: And the one that I just mentioned it, But the
Speaker 3: one that really stood out to me was when and
Speaker 3: it's it's Tenny Garagos who is doing the cross examination
Speaker 3: right now, but when she had the Homeland Security agent
Speaker 3: read aloud the text messages between Ditty and Jane and
Speaker 3: an escort, So they were all there texting, and Jane
Speaker 3: text combs about the freak cops about having sex with
Speaker 3: an escort that the prosecution is maintaining. She was cool,
Speaker 3: worce to do. It just gets better and better, and
Speaker 3: she's telling ditty this. You know, it's so fascinating because
Speaker 3: before we had cell phones and text messages. Imagine how
Speaker 3: much more difficult this trial would be. But these text
Speaker 3: messages tell stories that you can't right, he.
Speaker 1: Would be not guilty.
Speaker 2: It's several years ago. You wouldn't have all this evidence, right,
Speaker 2: That is so weird to think about. You would not
Speaker 2: have this. It would just he says. She said, that's
Speaker 2: all the option they would have at the time. That
Speaker 2: is I never stop to think about this. Whole thing
Speaker 2: has been about interactions and video and surveillance and electronics,
Speaker 2: and it's.
Speaker 4: All iPads about modern technology.
Speaker 3: And you can try to make it look one way,
Speaker 3: but then when the defense shines a light on the
Speaker 3: other text messages, it the fuller picture is around. I mean,
Speaker 3: I do think this gives the jury the best possible
Speaker 3: vantage point other than actually being there and witnessing it
Speaker 3: in the moment. It's kind of close because not only
Speaker 3: look they yesterday. According to the Homeland Security Agent, they
Speaker 3: found fifty video files just in a pretty short period
Speaker 3: of time.
Speaker 2: I believe that was the one that it was like
Speaker 2: five days before Christmas one.
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, it was December of twenty twenty one, I believe.
Speaker 3: And they showed the jurors two of them. So, I mean,
Speaker 3: this is wild. It's as close as you can get
Speaker 3: to being there in the room with them and then
Speaker 3: hearing how each party felt afterwards and beforehand, with text
Speaker 3: messages accompanying these videos.
Speaker 2: Can you imagine if this trial was allowed to be
Speaker 2: on camera on TV, they couldn't think about the Oja trial,
Speaker 2: thinking about even the Amber heard Johnny depth thing that
Speaker 2: people were locked to. If this were on camp, we
Speaker 2: could sit and watch this on TV every day, but.
Speaker 4: They have to blur everything out. You couldn't have that audio, some.
Speaker 2: Of the language.
Speaker 4: It's not for TV.
Speaker 1: Oh my god. I wouldn't miss a second of it.
Speaker 2: Maybe HBO I would have been captivated.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't have missed them.
Speaker 4: Whether you want to admit it or not, you everyone
Speaker 4: would be watching this.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And I.
Speaker 2: Don't know how this one doesn't feel necessarily that voyeuristic
Speaker 2: to me. I suppose it is and there's a celebrity nature,
Speaker 2: but that's so many things having like real societal issues
Speaker 2: like we mentioned of race, of class, of power of man, woman,
Speaker 2: of me too, of right relationships, of coersions, so many
Speaker 2: fine lines, and there's so many things that I hope
Speaker 2: we do discuss all of us after this trial. But
Speaker 2: it was such a I guess it was such a cultural,
Speaker 2: a societal event versus just a celebrity one, and that's
Speaker 2: probably a good thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I know it's salacious and for a lot of folks
Speaker 2: and the stuff, but I don't pay attention to a
Speaker 2: lot of the stuff and the social media we're on.
Speaker 2: I know people probably saying some pretty nasty things about
Speaker 2: baby oil.
Speaker 1: And all those jokes and all that stuff.
Speaker 2: But this has given us all a chance to have
Speaker 2: some pretty important conversations.
Speaker 3: Yeah, this is about the music industry, This is about
Speaker 3: the hip hop culture. This is about you know, where
Speaker 3: is the line between yes and maybe what's the gray area?
Speaker 3: What's a crime what's not? I mean, and that will
Speaker 3: always be in any in any trial, in any case.
Speaker 4: An issue of.
Speaker 3: And there's no rape charge here, but whether or not
Speaker 3: you were forced to have sex or not have sex.
Speaker 3: That has always been one of the most difficult crimes
Speaker 3: to prove ever, because typically it is he said, she said,
Speaker 3: And how do you know who said yes, who said no,
Speaker 3: who wanted to who didn't. It's a very very delicate
Speaker 3: issue that you know, this trial, there's so many ripple
Speaker 3: effects that will happen based on what the outcome is,
Speaker 3: What the jury decides, what the verdict is, could affect
Speaker 3: whether cases come forward again, whether victims come forward again,
Speaker 3: whether people feel empowered to do what they want because
Speaker 3: someone got away with something. You know, is this will
Speaker 3: have long standing, a long standing impact on future cases.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and what's going to happen with I mean, we
Speaker 2: have we considered the possibility that this man could walk
Speaker 2: out of their freeman, What that's going to look like? Man,
Speaker 2: what that's going to mean. Have we considered what it
Speaker 2: looks like if he gets kind of a lesser charge.
Speaker 2: Have we considered what looks like if they decide to
Speaker 2: put him in jail for.
Speaker 1: The rest of his life. I don't know what.
Speaker 2: No, there is no right or wrong. I just don't
Speaker 2: know how we react to all those scenarios. Him walking
Speaker 2: out in the front of that courthouse. I can't imagine.
Speaker 4: We haven't seen him since the rest.
Speaker 2: We have not laid eyes on him.
Speaker 4: We've got court sketch artists renderings of him.
Speaker 1: I was just looking. Maybe I'm talking about this earlier.
Speaker 1: I'm so tired.
Speaker 2: I just see one of the artists drawings of the
Speaker 2: Homeland Security agent that's on the stand. They all it
Speaker 2: looks like Reggie Miller to me from the Indiana Pasers.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm big xalf to y'all.
Speaker 3: I'm we're sketch artists. I have noticed, and I'm sure
Speaker 3: they're phenomenal at their jobs. And I'm not trying to
Speaker 3: knock any of them there. I think there are three
Speaker 3: of them, but they all the people in the court
Speaker 3: room all look ghoulish to me.
Speaker 4: That's the best way I can describe.
Speaker 1: Look have you ever.
Speaker 2: I don't know who's considered a great court remark, but
Speaker 2: it's they're doing this so quickly in the heat of
Speaker 2: them all.
Speaker 1: It's so good.
Speaker 2: Things are moving so fast, So I I really do
Speaker 2: give them credit. They're putting together this rendition in moments.
Speaker 4: It's just, yeah, you're right.
Speaker 1: I think that's so impressive that they're able to do.
Speaker 1: But no, it's not supposed to be the Mona.
Speaker 4: Lisa every time or like some exact science. There is
Speaker 4: some creative license being taken place.
Speaker 3: I just the one takeaway is that Sean Combs has
Speaker 3: a lot of gray hair that I never realized he did.
Speaker 1: We all do, any.
Speaker 2: Dude, any black man you see over forty five with
Speaker 2: a black head of hair as gray as shit. Okay,
Speaker 2: I'm graying. I'm a full gray yet, but I'm graying.
Speaker 2: Oh god, yeah, yes, grow the beard out. My beard
Speaker 2: be full gray?
Speaker 4: Would it really?
Speaker 1: It's insane? Oh yes, we're all stopped.
Speaker 2: He's fifty five, the jet black hair, like stop, I
Speaker 2: love you, but come on.
Speaker 4: Man, Oh my goodness, Oh my goodness. Yes, So you
Speaker 4: know we this is this is it.
Speaker 3: The defense might present or enter into evidence a few
Speaker 3: exhibits or items, and then tomorrow the prosecution and the
Speaker 3: defense will meet with the judge to discuss jury instructions,
Speaker 3: and then it looks like we will have They said,
Speaker 3: I don't know how they know this, but I guess
Speaker 3: both the defense and the prosecution have four hours each
Speaker 3: or their anticipatory is that what it is? Okay, so
Speaker 3: four hours each to present their case. So that will
Speaker 3: be full day on Thursday, and that will be fascinating.
Speaker 3: I actually am really anticipating what they're going to say
Speaker 3: and how they're gonna leave, what they're gonna leave the
Speaker 3: jurors with, what their final final thoughts are.
Speaker 4: And yes, we did four hours. That's a lot. God,
Speaker 4: do different different attorneys take different parts of it? I
Speaker 4: imagine you know.
Speaker 1: What I'm not used to.
Speaker 2: I would say no, from the real cases I remember,
Speaker 2: I don't remember them tag teaming.
Speaker 1: Have you ever an argument?
Speaker 4: Have you ever witnessed a four hour closing argument?
Speaker 1: I don't think so.
Speaker 3: Like you know, I've had obviously some experiences, and I
Speaker 3: feel like nothing lasted more than thirty minutes, and certainly
Speaker 3: when you watch a movie or a TV show it's
Speaker 3: like ten minutes. So four hours that will be interesting
Speaker 3: if they actually do take all that time. That's why
Speaker 3: I thought maybe they might tag team. They've got a
Speaker 3: team of lawyers on both sides, so maybe each lawyer
Speaker 3: has a different section that they're going to present.
Speaker 4: Because also, wouldn't that make it a little bit more
Speaker 4: interesting for the juror to be listening to?
Speaker 3: You have to you'd be like zoning out if the
Speaker 3: same person just stood up there for a four hour monologue,
Speaker 3: even if it was fascinating, riveting stuff about baby oil
Speaker 3: and freak offs, still at a certain point you glaze over.
Speaker 1: Okay, I'm.
Speaker 2: Okay, if this is correct. I just decided to check
Speaker 2: closing arguments OJ Simpson four days.
Speaker 1: What I'm what? I'm looking at it wild? I am again.
Speaker 1: This is a quick Google search.
Speaker 4: Folks, four days for closing argument for.
Speaker 2: Days closing arguments in OJ trial days one through three. Wow,
Speaker 2: recap length of closing arguments four days, length of deliberations
Speaker 2: less than four hours.
Speaker 1: That was in the OJ case.
Speaker 4: That's why.
Speaker 1: Not crazy. But yeah, it's so we're sitting here talking
Speaker 1: about four hours.
Speaker 4: Okay, So I guess that's quick and to the point.
Speaker 3: So yes, But we will continue to monitor everything happening
Speaker 3: in that Lower Manhattan courtroom. We appreciate you listening and
Speaker 3: coming along with us to get the latest on what's
Speaker 3: happening in the Didy trial.
Speaker 4: But thank you for being with us, and we hope
Speaker 4: you all have a wonderful Tuesday.