WEBVTT - Fantasy Draft Top 24 RB's

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and face for listening.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever, m Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do do Yo. This is

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy best Friends Forever here on the Fantasy Sports

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio your Network alongside Frankie Stamfell. I am Greg Sauceman.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Frank what's going on? Yes, that is what's going on.

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Tell me that like whenever from probably three but like

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>three hours or four hours from now, I'm gonna feel

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna run home. I'm gonna feel like Cory. Honestly,

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to run home. Open whatever is in the

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>apartment and immediately down it the closest I PA that

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you can closest I V I could find the ivy's

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna get you man, like I had a buddy those things.

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's part of the reason why it probably

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>takes me a little more. Like I drink crappy like

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever bud light. Yeah, don't mock you background dude, Like

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I feel so old in saying this, and

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I never felt like this before. But like, I had

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a housewarming last night for a buddy, like within a

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>new apartment whatever. So we all went somebody's birthday also,

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and I had like, I jook him quickly because I

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>enjoy them, you know, And then next thing, you know,

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just like you're feeling something when you just did

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>not expect that. I don't feel that often because personally,

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like I p a. I will tell you this, Greg,

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I've ventured outside of crappy light beer a little bit

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>more recently. I've been drinking blue Point summer ow very good.

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh you're you're in the summer else. That's cool? Yeah

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you madam somewhere else? Pretty good. Favorite. I love the

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>blue Have you tried the Bluepoint suwherew I have? It's good,

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>It's very good. It's good. It's a little too um

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 1>no like, but it's pretty good. Someone's buying us drink today.

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? Yes, our guy Constantine said he's going

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to meet up like four thirty here, be fantastic. So

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>he already bought me a beer at the game. He'll

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>probably buy me another beer. You have to. He doesn't

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>have to write, but I have a feeling he will,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and he in turn he will earn himself a beer.

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>We will be happy to buy him a beer. Look,

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we've advertised this deal for a long time. Constantine is

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>can take yourself on it. Probably about I want to

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>see six to eight months down. No one has seen

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>myself on the offer like that except Constantine. Yeah. I'm

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>excited to have a drink the Constantine, and hopefully more

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>than one. Yeah, you guys want a beer, come here,

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 1>you can see it last beers. I like look in

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the mirror today and like looking at the bags in

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>your eyes and like they're only getting worse. You noticed

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that also, you're starting to look like a little bit

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you think, so, yeah, I see it's not gonna shave

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>you start you start doing like a little little fox

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>hawk thing. You just try it, but like let the

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>let the goatee come in, just let everything hang out.

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>You what's funny? So last night, I matter not this thing,

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and my friend's girlfriend was literal or fiance was literally like,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>do you need a haircut? Like she? It wasn't like

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>my friend or my girlfriend, it was her. This is

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a need a haircut. Haircuts is where we've gotten. What

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think of my hair? Greg? I ask you

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this earlier. I said, I have a very serious question.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>How does my hair look? That's fine? Well Max Massive

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like my hair like hair. I'm sorry, Greg, Yo, Frank,

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>your hair sucks. What is this? It's kind of fair,

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>kind looks like boy meets the world type thing. I'm

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>totally down with it, though. Yeah, I think that's kind

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of what I was. I don't really know him anymore. Yeah,

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it's honestly just too long. I don't know what to

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>do in the morning with it. Why does you shave

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it off? I don't know a good question. That you're

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna let let it grow for a while and then

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you're done with that. It's just I One of the

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>things I hate in this world is well, that too,

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is showering in the morning. I just want to roll

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>out of bed and just like brush my teeth and

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>go to work. I love showering. The morning shower at night. UM,

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I just want to do as little as possible before

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to leave us go to work and coming

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>here that are coming here that early, I know it's

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>not a morning person, Like, yeah you're not. Frank's very

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>ground you early in the morning. Um has been terrible

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>for a week or two now. So like your okay,

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like my hair, so okay. We have we spent all

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we talking about running backs. We're gonna do that today.

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Monday's to be an auction show. Drew, I don't think

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that have Drew Dickmyer on the program as well, so

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that canna be cool. But today we want to we

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>want to to finish out the running backs, the names.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>We haven't gotten to the handcuffs, and I wanted to

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>start kind of where we ended yesterday, which was with

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake. Now you said I'm still buying Kenyan Drake

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're still off of j G. I. Those are

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the last two, if I'm I'm correct, Frankie, that we

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>ended with. Yeah, we spoke a little bit of teammates

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram Yeah, I think yeah. We ended around that

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>like top twenty four range. We didn't really get into

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>like the rookies, carry On Johnson, Ronald Jones, Isaiah Crowell.

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Look a little bit about Jamal Williams, who did get

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>banged up last night, so we have to see what

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>happens there. But yeah, I think that's kind of the

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 1>range we were at. We're like just outside the top twenty. Okay,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>So what you want to talk about those guys now? Yeah? Right, Well,

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I love carry On Johnson. I've been talking

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about him for a while. Now. I look, it's just

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same that I've been saying. I

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>think the offensive line, I think they're one of the

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>most underrated groups. They drafted Frank right now, um Taylor

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Deck is healthy again. With this team, I think they're

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a more balanced approach. We saw carry On

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Johnson did in that first game, what his usage was.

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>We saw that long run that he ripped off. I

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think that they're grooming this guy to be their work

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>horse running back. Eventually, it's not gonna happen out of

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the gate. They signed with Garrett Blunt for a reason.

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>They still have Theo Riddic, But I think people are

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>overrating THEO Rick a little bit too much. Like if

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>carry On Johnson performs well in what they want him

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to do in both running and catching the ball out

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield. I can see THEO Riddick's role really

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>diminishing this season. Yeah so so for me, I was

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>not the hot guy on carry On Johnson. Early on, UM,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I had a pretty low He's my lowest ranked rookie

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>running back. Now I believe it's the second highest due

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to some injuries and whatnot. I have Kerry and Johnson

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty six in my rankings, UM, and I think, okay,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>so we're we're right along. Um, we're right along the

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>same line. So so carry on Johnson. He's twenty six,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and I just hope it doesn't turn into another mirror

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>duel situation where he has a really good preseason game,

0:06:58.040 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we all jump on him as his RB two that

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonn believe in or RB two issue that we're

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna believe in, and then he comes up small. You

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the Garrett Blunt, who I believe is the

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>goal line back, look at THEO Ritic who I believes

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the third down back, and then you have carry On Johnson,

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Aramir and Amir of Doulas. Still there a lot of

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>names in one backfield and that's what scares me ultimately

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that carry On Yeah, I think that is baked into

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>his price somewhat though, right because you're getting him in

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the sixth round. He might rise a little bit up

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>into the fifth round. But you know, if those guys

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>weren't there, if they didn't sign the Garrett Blunt, we'd

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>probably be drafting carry On Johnson in the same range

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>as like a Royce Freeman. I think he would be

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>going in that fourth round range now, So that's baked

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>into his price a little bit. I just don't really

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>trust la Garrett Blunt. I know Matt Patricia, the head

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>coach of the Lions now, brought in the Garrett Blunt

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.119
<v Speaker 1>and they have that familiarity together. They've worked together before,

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so they bring him in. But I just I don't

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>trust like Garrett Blunt. What is he at this point

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>his career. He's just a goal line guy. He's thirty

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>one years old. I think if carry On Johnson takes off,

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to let let le Garrett Blunt be

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in the way of him. And I wouldn't be surprised

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>if know, if they run a mirror dula out a

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit more throughout this preseason game so they could

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>shop him, potentially trade him to a team that needs

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of running back Washington. I think that makes a lot

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of sense to well the person that I had um

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>carry on John's next two in my rankings with Jamal Williams,

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring up certainly today given the ankle

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>injury suffered last night. He was the clear cut starter

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Time Montgomery last night. Obviously Aaron Jones still

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit banged up, but Jamal Williams carry On Johnson, uh,

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>two guys next to each other in my rankings. It

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a low ankle sprain. I doubt he plays

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the third preseason game. I think it'll be fine by

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the time the season rolls around. We've spoken a lot

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>about mark ingram over the past couple of days, and

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams as the CBS guys pointing out like he

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>is the perfect guy. If judging my preseason is any indication,

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I really really like Jamal Williams. I really really like

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>this price. Yeah. I think this is a good range

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>where ideally you don't want one of these guys as

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>your RB two, but if you end up with a

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>carry On Johnson or Jamal Williams or Day. Well, really,

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, just outside the top twenty four, you end

0:08:58.040 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>up with one of those guys as your flex or.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Is your r be three. I think this is a

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>great range to kind of jump in on that. And

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams, we're still getting him in that sixth round range. Look,

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>at some point this year it could be a frustrating

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>situation with Aaron Jones. But the way everything that they've

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>said about this team right now is that Dema Williams

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>is the starter on his team. Aaron Jones seems to

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>be the backup and time on Gary is going to

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have third down duties. Jamal Williams the best, the best

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>at past protection on this team. That means a whole

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>lot when you have a quarterback like Aaron Rodgers. He

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>can catch the ball out of the backfield. Had that

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdown in the first week of the preseason. He

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>had a few receiving touchdowns last year as well. Remember

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone talks about the yards per carry. He didn't get

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>the chance to play with Aaron Rodds, right, So I look,

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's ever gonna be great in terms

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of is he gonna have a lot of breakout runs.

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Is he gonna average five yards per carrying? Probably not.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>He'll probably be in that low four maybe high three range. Um,

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But just playing with Aaron Rodgers, we saw a guy

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like Eddie Lacey who he didn't have the best yards

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>per carry either. Just playing with Aaron Rodgers, you're gonna

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity to score a ton of touchdowns. I

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that range that he's going in sixth round. I have

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>him right now as RB twenty nine, but I have

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to edit this a little bit because of the Birkhead

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>injury now as well. Yeah, I have him twenty nine.

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I have Isaiah Kwell one spot ahead of him, so

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I have listen, these guys are in the same range

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>for me. Also, um, I have Jamal Williams carry On

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Johnson backs back. I think probably. I don't know does

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>they take Williams first, just because I don't know that's

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>whether back to back, very very close to Yeah, yeahs ahead,

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I would undoubtedly take him a kind of

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams and I did in the flex draft last weekend,

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and Florio texted me afterwards he said, there was one

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>one running back you took carry on over that I

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>was very surprised, and I said, oh, Jamal Williams. He's like, yeah,

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly it. So you know, some people like Jamal

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Williams a little bit very close. It is close, but

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, both guys have their flaws. They have other

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 1>guys around. You can definitely say that the Packard's offense

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is better than the Lions. I just think that there's

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a chance. I think carry On has more upside that

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.599
<v Speaker 1>if he becomes like the workhorse here, I think his

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>upside is higher than I can get it. But I

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>also think it's more limited, dude, because I think he's

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>never going to be the PPR back in this offense.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's never gonna happen. Yeah, And I don't think he's

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the goal line back. That's literally why they

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>signed like Garrett Blunt. I think that if Karen Johnson

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>just takes off early on in the season, that those

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>guys are not going to get in the way of

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>If they want to give him like touches a game,

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't think those guys are gonna get in the

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>way of it. If he is performing, which I think

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he is going to. Two more names that are in

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this mix that you have mentioned Rex Burkhead and Isaiah Crowell. Now,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I was the high guy in Isaiah Crowell a couple

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, and then he didn't start that first

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>preseason game. It was Blot Howell that started. Then he

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>got concussed, and that's where we are now with crow

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Rex Burkhead, he's gotta quote small tear in his knee.

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Of Patriots believe it's minor and that he can play

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>through it. It all sounds terrible to me. What is

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this new direct Burkehead? What is his due to Isaiah Crowell? Yeah,

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to lower Rex Burkhead a little bit.

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at what happened last night. They

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>used James White a ton in that game. This Patriot

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>backfield is just an absolute mess. Tony Michelle that used

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the first round pick on him. We spoke about him

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit yesterday as well. But when is he

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get an opportunity to, you know, have a

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>significant role with the Patriots. I think it's gonna come

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of games into the season, maybe closer to

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>mid season. But this is something that can linger for

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the entirety of the season. This knee injury with Rex Burkeheads.

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So really now it's crazy to say. I mean, we

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>could be looking at Jeremy Hill on early downs and

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>James White on passing downs to it. It's just it's

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>a messy situation. I think Rex Burkehead should be dropped

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in the rankings. Uh. Originally he was going,

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he was starting to go in like that fifth round

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>range cemented ahead of these guys harry On Johnson, Jamalba Williams,

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah crow Well, he was going ahead of them. Now

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>I think with this injury, uh and the way it

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>can linger, I think you dropped him behind all those names.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg I wouldn't be surprised if he's in the next

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>tier with you know, Dion Lewis. For me, it's havin

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>call the next tier. I think I'm gonna so I

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>have I while you were talking, literally I dropped Rex

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Burken into my Ronald Jones or shot Penny Tire, which

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is I guess right above the literally all the guys

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you were just talking about. I have all those guys

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>in the same tier right now. They're like, you know,

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>either're like round six running, you know what. I think

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that's my issue. I think I need to cut the

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>tier off earlier. I think that's where I'm going wrong,

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because like because I was looking and we're gonna get

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to Carlos Hide in the second and I was looking

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at Carlos Hide and I'm just like, how he belongs higher,

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and so does Chris Carson. But maybe it's just the

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that I need to start the next tier in

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a different spot. Maybe that's where I'm wrong. Okay, My

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Tier five is RB twenty four mark Ingram then carry

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>on Johnson, Isaiah Crowe, Well, Jamal Williams, Carlos Hide, Ronald Jones,

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>shot Penny, Rex Burk Okay, so the end of the tier,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and then it starts with like Dean Lewis and seven

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>coman Okay, So for me, I'm a little bit different.

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it's a wrong color. I think that was terrible.

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>You gotta see Greg's rank because he's just it's like

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>taste the Rainbow. It's like Marshall lint on that. Because

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>so my Tier four um is Derrick Henry h Dream Williams,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and I have that as a tear. And then the

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>next year begins with Birkhead, Crowell, Ronald Jones, Rashad Penny

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and then gets into Chris Thompson, carlos Hi, Dan Lewis,

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson and those guys. Um, so I we have

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different. He said a lot about Birkehead.

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>What about Crowell, Yeah, I was. I was intrigued by

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the way that they used him in that first game.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Gonna continue to talk about that. They split him out

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>wide as a wide receiver. He caught that ball across

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the middle from Teddy Bridgewater and really ran it in

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a violent touchdown there at the goal line. A big

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>collision he is can cost. But look, this team has

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>showed time and time again that they really don't trust

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>ball Powell. While he has started the first two games

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the preseason for the Jets, they haven't really trusted him.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he has his role. I think he'll see

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from like two ten touches per game. But I

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>think when it's all said and done, Isaiah Crowell leads

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this team and carries leads his team and touches overall.

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget he had forty receptions a few years

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>ago back with the Cleveland Browns. So he can catch

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball to the backfield. I have some stump can

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>turns over the Jets offensive line. But even last year,

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>these guys, Matt forte, Um, even Elijah McGuire, they were

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy relevant, and I think that's gonna be the case

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>again this year. I think Crow l leads a team

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in in Harry's touches. Overall, I just don't think that

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that the respect the ball Powell that much. I don't

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>think agree to use him more than they have in years.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree, as long as I can see that Isaiah

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Crowe is healthy, I'm very excited to go and get

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a share of him. I think we talked about carry

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>On Johnson and he's playing time issues and all the

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>other guys there. I look at Green Bay and I

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>don't see I'm sorry, I look at the Jets and

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't see that green You can see where I'm

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>with there, um bla, how I don't think they like

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bowls has been there long enough time to nobody

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>has a blof how Elijah McGuire is hurt. That's it is, Latmos.

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Crow is healthy, He's going to get every opportunity. An

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity doesn't always create production, but I think in this

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>case it will. When it comes to Carol in the Jets, Yeah,

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>especially where you're getting him to that six seventh round

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>race to Elijah McGuire will be back. That was the

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>guy they were talking up. I think if he broke

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>his leg, they might have even cut balal pal That's

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>something that they were totally so, you know, you don't

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about cutting a player that you're enamored with or

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that is gonna end up being the starter. Yes, he

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>started the preseason games. I think that's more so he's

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a veteran, he's been with the team a couple of years.

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, once McGuire's back, you'll get a few touches.

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, we'll probably be somewhere in that like

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to sixteen touch range per game. Maybe a little

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>bit inconsistent, but I think that's fair for where you're drafting.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>When when we come back, we're gonna take your calls

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>eight four four eight four three seven nine. And what

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to do next, Frankie is is kind of

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>go over the best of the rest. We're gonna do

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the handcuffs to end the show, to end the week,

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>as we wanted to talk about that, but I want

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to do the best of the rest because there's only

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple more guys here that I'm actively looking for, right, Like,

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I really like Carlos Hide. You know that we're gonna

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>get into him next. We want to talk about Chris

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Carson will get into him next. And all of these

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>other guys. There's no one really that stands out to me,

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, Oh, I really want that guy.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there are for you. But as I look at

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty or so running backs, there's not that

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>many that I'm circling with the red bar, with the

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>red markers. We'll take your calls at eat four or

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>four eight, four, three, seven nine, and we will do

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the best of the rest running Back Edition Fantasy Best

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, stick around, so much more come right after

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this like a great pass rusher. The Rohto Experts will

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>help you sack your fantasy football competition. When you register

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for their exclusive Edge Fantasy package, you get a cheat

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>sheet generator, plus a player database with sortable projections and

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.479
<v Speaker 1>rankings from the best in the business, and you can

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>join the fantasy conversation in slack chat channel. Visit roto

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Experts dot com to register for the Exclusive Edge Fantasy

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Package and enter the promo code F and T S

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Y and you get a temper said discount. That's the

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>roto Experts dot com Exclusive Edge Fantasy Football package promo

0:17:52.240 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>code F and T s y uses directed Pieta whoa, whoa,

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>whoa whoa Back with you, Fantasy best Friends Forever. Fantasy

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>s forwards Aready or Network. Frankie snappleed Gregg Sauceman Fridays

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 1>tradition and continues Frankie, I love it. You get pumped

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and do man. I'm excited about it. I'm excited about it.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 1>All right. I went back to your calls three six

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>st seven nine. We said we'd lead it off, and

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>let's do it. Gentlemen. Let's bring in Randy from Brooklyn.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>What's going on, Randy? Do we have Randy? No? R Ko?

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's go to Drew in Indiana. What's up, Drew?

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>It seems like, Hey, Drew, what's up? Dude? Hey? Uh?

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So I had a running back question in a tight

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>end question. Shoot, all right, So my running backs, I've

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>got Freeman, Gordon, and Ingram. I did trade Ronald Jones

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>to acquired Coleman. I did like the upside of Jones,

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but I figured out I need that handcuff for Freeman.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And then I picked up Correl yesterday. Uh, I've got

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Freeman and Gordon on a bye week, both at the

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>same time Week eight, and Coroll is playing in Chicago.

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Should I take Pal or Coel for a week to

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>match up against Chicago. I know it's like a question question.

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know it sounds crazy, but my thought

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is Donald with Pou, I feel like kind of a

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Cohen with Robisky. Look, you know, maybe he's gonna get

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>more touches. Questions. Have Devontae Freeman, You got Tevin Coleman,

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>so you have the handcuff there, you have Melvin Gordon.

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 1>By that time week tend, you have mark ingram As well.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you hold Isaiah for Well more so than

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>a ball all Powell. Anything can happen by weeks end.

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, isaih Well could be heart vice versa for

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>ballal Pal. So I think you just hold the running

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>backs you have right now, and you know the season

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>will play itself out by the time we get to

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks ending. Well, we'll be taking your calls then as

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.239
<v Speaker 1>eight four four, eight, four, three, six, eight, seven nine,

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it's gotta don in Wisconsin's I've done? Hey, how are

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you doing? Guys doing great, man, what's up? Okay? I'm

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>on the two separate ten team half point PPR leagues.

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Each of them have three flex spots available. One of

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the flex spots can be a quarterback, tight end, wide receiver,

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.479
<v Speaker 1>running back. So my question to you, I normally carry

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>two QB's, Should I carry three? Or should I just

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>stick with a quarterback or excuse me, running back, wide receiver,

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>tight end. So I think it's a great question because

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>you are in a super flex league. Now, one of

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the flexes are available for a quarterback. You know normally

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>carry two. Now to it's not normally it has to

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>be you have to have with quarterbacks on your team,

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 1>can you have three? Yes? I absolutely, Um do you

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>need to have three? I don't think you need to

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have three, But as you're going down your draft board,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>if you believe the quarterbacks, the best player on the

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>board a little bit later on is your third quarterback.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm cool with taking a third. You don't like Greig

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>said you don't need to have three, but I agree

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know, with the super flex I would have

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a third quarterback. We did the Scott Fishball draft a

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago. That's deeper. It's like, you know,

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>over twenty rounds, I think I ended up with like

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>four quarterbacks. And that is a super flex format as well.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So especially in the ten team, where you know, hypothetic

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>theoretically speaking, there should be thirty quarterbacks drafted. I think

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Everyone should have that third kind of

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>starter as a bye week super flex replacement. Alright, So

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>there you go at eight four four, eight four, three,

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>six eight seven nine. Um let me let me get

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to Carlos side, Frank, let me get to Carlos side.

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So uh, when it comes to Carlos side, that was

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>my guy last year, right, Like, I love that dude.

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And they went over Cleveland. He gets his big money

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>contract and everyone loves Carlos hide until they extend Duke Johnson.

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>You're like, what it doesn't make sense. And then you go, okay, fine, alright,

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>all good, and then they go and draft Nick Chubb

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's like what the hell. So we had people

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on here experts saying we love Nick Chubb. Nick Chubb's

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the long term play. Make sure you go get Nick Chubb.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And then we watched the preseason and the only person

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>get the first team reps is Carlos Hide. Carlos Hide

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.479
<v Speaker 1>has cost and nothing right now are you buy him

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>back in I think especially where he's going to I

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know he's going even later than carry

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>On Johnson, Isaiah Carol. You're getting Carlos Hide in the

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>eighth round. And that's because everybody was unsure of what

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the Brown situation was going to be. And I think

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you just look at the first preseason game usage and

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you see how he was used. He played the first

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>three snatch of the game. It didn't play the rest

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of the game. That tells me that Carlos Hyde is

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the starting running back on this team. Um due to

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>financials after the season, they can cut him and they won't.

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, they can get rid of his money, his

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>dead money. So I think it makes sense to just

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>use Carlos Hide this year, maybe more so in the

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year. We see Nick Chubb start

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>to emerge a little bit, but especially that first half,

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is Carlos Hides job. I think he's

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the starting running back on this team. The Brown struggled

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>mightily in the red zone last year when it came

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to their running backs. They had just five red zone touchdowns.

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hide had eight by himself with the San Francisco

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>forty niners, so he's a little bit better in that

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the field. I just think Nick Chubb he

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>still has a lot to learn. Um. He has to

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>learn about the past protection as well. So maybe later

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>on in the year he starts to get a little

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>bit more work. But I think Carlos Hide is the

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>best of both worlds here. He can run the ball.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>We saw he could catch the ball. Yeah, last season,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine receptions. I like Carlos Hide where he's going,

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>especially in the first half of the season, and then

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>if you want to so you can hear him with

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb. Nick Chubb is more of a stash candidate.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>But if anything were to happen to Carlos Hide, or

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>if they start to face him out, then it would

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>be Chubb. I like Carl's Hide, especially early on in

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the season. Great, Okay, so there you go. You're with me?

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Is he is he someone good to pair more Ingram? Yeah?

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes sense to a lot of these

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>guys that we're talking about. You need to find who

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to help you out early on in the season,

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>wal mark Ingram's out those first four games. I think

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hide fits that description purposely for for all the

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>reasons I just mentioned. Okay, so there we go. Um,

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>what about his teammate Duke Johnson, who I haven't heard

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>anybody talk about this offseason. And I look at Duke Johnson,

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I look at my rankings, and I have Duke Johnson

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty four right now. I don't know, like when I

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>would take to Johnson. I don't like know what I

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think of Duke Johnson I have. I have no idea

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.239
<v Speaker 1>What's what's Duke Johnson's deal. Duke Johnson is going as

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>RB forty off the board right now according to Fantasy

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Frozen half point PPR drafts, and I have him, I

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>think in a similar range. I have him RB four

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>be three, so a little bit further down behind you.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think that next year that we were talking

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>about Dion Lewis, Tevin Coleman, Chris Thompson, they're all running

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>backs that have a role with their team, and they

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>might also be better as PPR specialists. So there's this

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>whole tier. It's like Chris Carson gonna have a role

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>with the team, especially early on. Jordan Wilkins now Rob Kelly,

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Duke Johnson just kind of fits into that

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>tier as a guy who has a role one on

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the team. He's not necessarily the starter. Well we know

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he isn't the starter, but he might also be better

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the full point PPR format. I don't think he

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>has great upside overall. I think last year was a

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit flukey. But as a bye week replacement and

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>half point pprs your RB four, I think that's I

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's fine. That's a guy just on your bench.

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have a mental upside, though, would you rather

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>draft one of these rookie looking like that that does

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 1>have more ups And that's that's exactly how I have

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it ranked to like, I have Chris Carson ahead of him,

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather take that shot. Jordan Wilkins, a guy that

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're in on as well, I'll take

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a shot on him even in Aaron Jones like,

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a shot there in case he becomes as

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>well in that offense with the Green Bay Packers. So

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I moved Duke Johnson down a little bit. To me,

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not much more than like a Byby replacement. He

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>might also be better in best ball because he could

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have some big weeks. You don't really know when those

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are gonna come. Because I think his usage could be

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit inconsistent. I would much rather have deal.

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they signed Dean Lewis for a reason, the

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>reason why you like Jack McKinnon. I think it comes

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>down to money here with Dean Lewis, and they gave

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>him that solid contract. I think he's a perfect compliment

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to Derrick Henry. Is gonna catch the ball out of

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. I kind of mapped it out yesterday, how

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the projections canna work here. Derrick Henry maybe

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in that two D and thirty two hundred and forty

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Carrie range. I think that Dean Lewis, if healthy D

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty, carries himself with maybe you know, three

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>or four receptions a game. I think he's right in

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that for Thompson range maybe a little bit higher. I

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>think he has a pretty legitimate role with the Titans

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this season, all right, So maybe yeah, so doing Dean

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Lewis right now, I was my thirty third, thirty third

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ranked running having thirty second behind Burke. It he starts

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that next year, so I still have burked re significantly higher,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 1>like maybe I'll drop it. The more injury news that

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>comes out, Um, that's not so often. I guess that's

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>where he goes. Would you take him ahead of Chris

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Thompson because I know you're a Thompson guy. I have

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris Thompson three spots ahead, Okay, I have what do

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>they I have him two spots behind Dean Lewis. Okay,

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I just I worry about you know, him saying he

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>might not be mentally there until November. We've talked about

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>this aton, but I just they're never gonna give him

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>more of a workload just based on the injury that

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>happened to guys. He has his role definitely, and I

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>think Dean Lewis can have a similar role. I think

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the offense a little bit better with the Tennessee Titans.

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I like the offensive line as well. Um, they're both

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>very explosive running backs. I think in very similar situations.

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I just trust Dion Lewis a little bit more based

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>on what they paid him. I think his role is

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more cemento with yeah, maybe not a

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.479
<v Speaker 1>little bit, A little bit more cemented. Like Chris Thompson

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>has a role, and I think people look at Alex

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Smith and I'm like, oh my god, that's perfect, perfect

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>dude to vote with Chris Thompson, and I think it is.

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>And about all the injuries. So that's that's exactly what

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to say, because that's all fair. Like we

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Jay Gruden knows, Chris Thompson knows, and the Redskins organization

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>knows that Chris Thompson can't play aldred snaps a game,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Like that's not realistic, that's not realist for anybody. But

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>like he can't play fifty snaps a game, the snaps

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>per game. Really he's gonna see about he's never going

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to touch the ball or really shouldn't more than twelve

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>times a game. I believe that. Speaking about Washington. By

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, Sanja Pierre and turned his ankle last night.

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>He had a really good run and we're watching this

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>during the Jet game and he's a really good run

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>down the right sideline and he's living off and then

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he actually what was limping off? That's right. I moved

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Rob Kelly all the way up to RB thirty nine

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're never gonna feel good about it. But he

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>looks like the starter right now, like he started the

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>game again yesterday. He started the game last week even

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>before Darius Guys got hurt. For whatever reason, Jay Gruden

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Washington football team they like Rob Kelly. Uh.

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, he looked a little bit more spry

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>last night, looked slim down. H He had a few

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>receptions out of the backfield, to which I found interesting.

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Again the reason you like Chris Thompson Alex Smith. If

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't see a guy clearly opened down the film,

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom just going to dump the ball off. And if

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Rob Kelly is in the game, he is going to

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be the recipient of those receptions. Just because he didn't

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>have receptions in the past, didn't really catch the ball,

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean he can't do it in the future.

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Based on the personnel he's playing with now, and I

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's Alex Smith. So I moved him all the

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.719
<v Speaker 1>way up to RB thirty nine. Now, if they were

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to make a trade or signed someone, that obviously changes,

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think as of right now, Rob Kelly cemented

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>as this team starting running back. All right, So there

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:57.959
<v Speaker 1>you go, that Rob, not skinny Rob, skinny eer Rob Rob,

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you have? You moved them up I haven't

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>moved them up yet. You don't know where to put him, right,

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. You don't want to do it. I

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>think I have. I haven't at fifty four right now

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>because I mean I have to move him up obviously. Um,

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where he is, although just behind Chris

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Carson and Jordan Wilkins. I have those two guys, those

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are right ahead of Robert Kelly. All right, So right,

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so I should move him right behind Chris Carson and

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Wilkins. You can do whatever you want, Graham, just

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>telling you what I did, all right. We just moved

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>up fat Rob, Fat Rob, just like that in my rankings, Rob,

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Fat Rob is number thirty eight in the rankings. How's that?

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you copying me? We're in the same range? There

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is that? I just talked to you? Up so much

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>on Rob Kelly. You moved in my head of where

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I have Rob Kelly in the ranking. Chris Carson, by

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, he's higher for me. He's ever thirty two

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for me. Why is that? Well, I mean, Penny is

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>injured and everything you read about Chris Carson's he's about

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>cow like everything you read. According to Ian Rappaport. Yeah,

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that's everything I read. Seahawks are an absolute mess. We

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>went over this as well yesterday. But I still believe

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that they drafted Rashott Penny for a reason in the

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>first round. I think when he is healthy, whether that's

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the second, third week, whatever it might be,

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>he's going to eat into that. And I wouldn't be

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>surprised if you know, a month of the season, he

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is the starting running back for this team. So I'm

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not buying all the way. You know, Chris Carson, I

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think you have to move them up based on the

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>circumstances that have taken place. But I still don't really

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>love him. I don't think he's all that great. I

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>think last year when he scored one touchdown in five

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>games and everyone was freaking out, that's just because all

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the other Seahawks running backs were absolutely abysmal. I don't

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>want to overhype Chris Carson. I think he's fine where

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he is in that you know, mid thirties running back range. Alright,

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>other names here that are in interest to me before

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we move on back to your telephone calls and we

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>get to the handcuffs. The Colts guys, I have Jordan

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Wilkins and he minds Marlon Mack all back to back

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to back. I don't know which one to take first.

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't have There's no rhyme or reason to it

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to me. Frankie, Yeah, I think more and Mack, even

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with the injury, is still going to be the first

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>one off the board, probably in like that eighth round range.

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you ask me, I'll wait around or two

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and take Jordan Wilkins or Niheim HEINZ one I would take. Well,

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's format dependent, so I think standard even half

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>point PPR, I'll take Wilkins because I think he can

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>end up being the starter, the early down guy, maybe

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the guy that used in the red zone as well.

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>In full point PPR, I wouldn't mind taking Niheim Heins,

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>former wide receiver in college. People have talked him up

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>as this year's Alvin Kamara. I think that's a little

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>bit ridiculous. Um, but he is going to be the

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>past catching running back on this team. I could see,

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I could see a scenario where Niheim Heins

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>catches fifty balls this year, um, where and Jordan Wilkins

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is the early down guy, the guy that used in

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the red zone. Remember the coaching staff that was brought

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in now, they don't owe anything tomorrolwon Mack. He was

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>drafted by the previous regime. They went out, they drafted

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Niheim Heinz and Jordan Wilkins for a reason. I think

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>those guys before long end up being the tandem here

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>um really when they take on that committee approach. Early

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>downs for Wilkins pass catching, running back now probably so

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>as you were talking, looking at me like what the

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>hell is he doing? And was I was moving guys

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>around in my rankings because there was one more guy

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that kind of fits the mold that we're talking about

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that we've never mentioned. We talked about rookie running Max

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>right ra Sean Penny, we talked about carry On Johnson,

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and we mentioned Nick Chubb and your boy Ronald Jones.

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones really struggled that first time out and because

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, Peyton Barber were like, wait, that guy's the starter.

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I know nobody wants Peyton Barber because everybody wants to

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>love Ronald Jones, but from my understanding, Barber is the starter.

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>As of now, where do you have Peyton Barber ranks?

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.719
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about him. So I have Peyton

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Barber ranks as running back forty four. Ultimately, I just

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>don't really trust him being the starter for all that long.

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Um Ronald Jones, I still have him RB twenty nine,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>so I have him much higher. And if something that

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to do with Ronald Jones falling down

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the board, you take Ronald Jones in the sixth round.

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You wait a couple of rounds, maybe round eight, round nine,

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>you come back and you take a Peyton Barber. You

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>just kind of lock up the Tampa Bay Bucks backfield.

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe the first couple of weeks Peyton Barber

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>out touches Ronald Jones. But I think Ronald Jones is

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>very talented. He has to work on the past protection,

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for sure, But this is a team, the Tampa Bay Bucks,

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that have struggled to find a running back who has

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>electric speed, who can make these breakaway runs. And that's

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly what Ronald Jones did in college, and I think

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what he will accept excel at whenever he gets

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity at the NFL level. So I still am

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>buying in on Ronald Jones. I think Peyton Barber is

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher than some of these handcuff guys. Um,

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but he's a little bit lower than like Chris Carson

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Wilkins, who I trust, um maybe have a little

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:50.959
<v Speaker 1>bit more upside. I just really don't think Peyton Barber

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is the starter for all that long, even if it

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is the first week or and I understand that he's

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>number forty three for me once by ahead of Frank Gore.

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I may want to reverse that. Um, and she's about's

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>head of Legarrett Blunt. One name here that comes to

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mind at Freeman. What about Tevin Coleman. Yeah, so Tevin

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Coleman is a guy who has standalone value even if

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>DeVonta Freeman is on the field, we know that he

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>has a role. Again, he's very similar in that range

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of Dion Louis, Chris Thompson. He's gonna tell you haven't there. Yeah,

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna because he's gonna touch the ball at least

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>ten to twelve times per game. And then if something

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>were to happen to Freeman, he legitimately has like top

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>fifteen running back upside. So I think he has standalone value.

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 1>He's more of like he's a handcuff as well. But

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>me he goes a little bit too early if he

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>goes in like that sixth round range. If I get

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>him in the seventh, especially a pair with DeVonta Freeman,

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes a lot more sense. Do you

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>want to remind you he only caught twenty seven basses

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>all of last year because Steve Sarkasan didn't throw the

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>ball to any running backs more and Tevin Coleman, your

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>calls and handcuffs own got up next? Did you know

0:35:58.200 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can listen to this show live on the

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>award winning Fancy Sports Radio Network. Listen on the I

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app to tune in radio app, or download

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the Fancy Sports Radio Network app. The Fancy Sports Radio

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Network is the only totally free seven three sixty five

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 1>fancy sports network of its kind without a subscription. Check

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 1>out YouTube live want the Fancy Sports Network YouTube page

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and participate in the program in there, where you can

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>ask questions, discuss the topics with other fantasy enthusiasts, or

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>tell anyone that you disagree. Call into your favorite show

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and ask your question. The number is eight four four

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>eight four f N T s Y. That's eight four

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>four eight four three six eight seven nine. The fancy

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>sports radio network. You're free, fancy source twenty four hours

0:36:41.120 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a day. All hasn't been done before. Glex saucemen, Frank

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Stanfel here with you hanging out the BFS. Before we

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>get the calls, I want to finish the Tevin Coleman conversation.

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Who is the handcuff? We're gonna end the end the

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>week with the handcuffs. Um, Coleman last year is really interesting,

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Like from weeks one for the middle to end of

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the season like that. That basically November he scored a touchdown, one, two, three,

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>four street games. One game he had two touchdowns. I

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>guess that's probably when Devonte Freeman missed time. Right, that's

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>when Freeman was out with the concussion. I assume, all right,

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I could pull it up for you. I think was

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:40.720
<v Speaker 1>ultimately played four games, so he only was two, Okay,

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>So basically the month of November was a month of

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman. Like he was dominant in that month. He

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>had twenty He had nineteen or twenty carries for three

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>straight games. That's why I was assuming Devonte Freeman was

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>out of those games. Um, it was awesome. He's like

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the is he the top handcuffed own Week eleven and

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Week twelve, which was November November twenty six. DeVonta Freeman

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>missed those games and he only had two carries in

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>on the twelve, So November Devanta Freeman was not really

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>part of the team. Okay, is that when you were

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about I'm talking, I'm talking. No, he's November basically

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>remember twelve, that's exactly, ex exactly his three best games

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>all year. He's haf has to be he is, but

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to invest a lot. So do you want

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to lock up the Falcons backfield, it might take a

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>second in a sixth round pick. That's where he's going.

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Sixth round man pull up Fantasy Pross. I've seen him

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>go that high before. Maybe he's more like a seventh rounder,

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 1>but I'm telling the eighth rounder Kevin Coleman sixty, which

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>puts him in the sixth round RB twenty nine. According

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy pros Greg, you have to invest a second

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 1>and a six to lock up the Falcons backfield. It's

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It's a lot. It's very similar to last

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>year the Titans. You had to invest a second and

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>a seventh or DeMarco Murray and Harry that never even

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>really worked out. It's a lot, I mean, it's a

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>lot to ask for. Coleman might be a better best

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>ball play because you well, Freeman is healthy. I will

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.359
<v Speaker 1>say he has standalone value. But you don't really ever

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>know when Tevin Coleman is going to score a touchdown

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because it seems like they come from outside the red zone.

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Those are kind of hard to predict. We know once

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.839
<v Speaker 1>they get inside the red zone, DeVonta Freeman really does

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>dominate the touches. So maybe Tevin Coleman better as a

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>best ball play. But if you really really want to

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>lock up the Falcons backfield, you have to invest that

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>six or seventh round pick to Para Coleman with Devontay

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Freeman four three, six, seven nine George in Virginia, You're

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>up next. But what's going on? Hey, what's going on? UM?

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Wanted to ask, like, since you guys are we talking

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>about the handcuffs? Um about Oakland and Baltimore And I'm wondering, um,

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know behind um, what's his name? Marshawn Lynch?

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>If that she and worth like investing in like something

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>in like the tenth or of the eleventh round, like

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have a draft um later on this

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>month that is gonna be a twelve teen PPR, So

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I need to maximize my value in the draft. Yeah.

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>So for the Raiders and the Ravens, I think the

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>way that they talked of Doug Martin, you have to

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>treat him as the handcuff right now. And looking at

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the history that John Gruden has used running backs in

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.839
<v Speaker 1>his past, he really has a one A and one beast,

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.399
<v Speaker 1>so a lot like these running backs that were talking

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>about now, Doug Martin also has standalone value because I

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>think he'll see anywhere from you know, seven to ten

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>touches per game. Marshall Lynch not gonna really get twenty carries,

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but he'll be in that fourteen fifteen range. If anything

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>were to happen to Marshall Lynch, I think Doug Martin

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:46.359
<v Speaker 1>steps steps up as that next one a running back

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that's getting around fifteen carries for game. Personally, I don't

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:51.959
<v Speaker 1>agree with it, but the way that that coaching staff

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>has talked up Doug Martin, I don't think you can

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 1>get away from that. Uh. And with the with the Ravens,

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>if you draft Alex Collins, I think all Allen is

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>more of just the PPR back. If anything works to

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.479
<v Speaker 1>happen to Alex Collins, I think Kennet Dixon would step

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:10.959
<v Speaker 1>in as the early downs back probably. I agree rob

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Ian Westchester, what's up? Rob? What's up? Guys? A couple

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of points. You guys actually just talked. I think the

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>number one in comes football is UNIVERA seven Coleman, and

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>he has running value already. He's just he just started

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>running back in the second position for a lot of teams. Yep.

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think the second best hand coast is actually

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin with that offensive rhane in Oakland. It's sick.

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going for those two guys in in the

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>later rounds and hopefully taking up the wide receivers early

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and all. Pretty good. There we go. Yeah, I mean,

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth, he's not wrong. Last year, Tevin

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Coleman overall finishes RB twenty, the same exact spot as

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Marshall Lynch, so he has standalone value. A lot of

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it came in those three games when DeVonta Freeman was out,

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>but he really needs those games that I you know,

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>when Davonte Freeman misses, that's when Kevin Coleman really takes off.

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we all are in agreement that he is

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the number one handcuff. It's just what you have to

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.919
<v Speaker 1>invest to get that. A six seventh round pick, that's

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>very early. Doug Martin a little bit more interesting. You

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>get him late in drafts, you know, double digit rounds,

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>ten eleventh round. Uh. If you draft Marshaw Lynch, I

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>think that makes more sense. If you want to just

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>lock up the Raiders backfield, use a sixth and a

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>tenth round pick, you end up with Marshawn Lynch and

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin. Let's head out to Virginia and talk to George. George.

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>We hit George. You're ready, right, So Kevin in Chicago,

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey you guys, sums for taking my call. All right,

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, Um, I appreciate it. No, So I'm in

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the league. Um. One of them is talk man league,

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately they're trying to be a little different and cute.

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>But that's what it is. There limiting Momana moves and

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>her argument is that you know, it's about strategy and whatnot,

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's we're debating between dirty moves. With that being said,

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 1>going to the draft, how are you are you more

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like to grab um higher cheering quarterback, and are you

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:07.439
<v Speaker 1>more likely to grab a backup quarterback? The bench is deeper,

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I have to mention that the bench

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we're debating between like somewhere between eight or nine. I

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know, alright, So it's a little bit deeper bench.

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Frank eight or nine bench spots. He says that league

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>might limit his transactions to thirty, which I assume is

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 1>throughout the entirety of the season. So if that's the case,

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 1>an eight or nine man bench, I think you absolutely

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have to have a backup quarterback. And while we're on

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the discussion of handcuffs, um, I don't know if you

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:34.359
<v Speaker 1>use fab or if you just use like a first come,

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>first serve um waiver process, but if you only have

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty moves, I'm probably more inclined to draft my handcuffs

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if I have like a workhorses running back, so I

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have to waste those, uh those transactions on the

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>handcuff if something were to happen to my workhorse running back.

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I was leading towards handcuffs as

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>well with a quarterback, Like if your quarterback goes down

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that won't. It's one move, right, like theoretic probably happen

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>all that often. Right, No, it doesn't. And also the

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:06.879
<v Speaker 1>good news is you could just pick up a guy

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that's probabefully after his by and you don't have to

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>waste another one, like just lock that guy in. I

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>would rather scooper as many handcuffs as possible because that's

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>where the majority of eater moves will probably be. Yeah,

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. Do you think in a format like this

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>where you have limited moves, are you more likely to

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 1>draft one of the elite quarterbacks so you just don't

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>even have to worry? Yeah? I want to do that anyway,

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So elite quarterback? Yes, yes, I think one of the

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>guys that you could trust more even going into you don't.

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>You don't. You don't want to have to mess around

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>all year long about Tim And it's left in the program, Frank,

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>we went over some of the top handcuffs, right, We

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>went over Doug Martin, we went over Tevin Coleman, were

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>hit in Washington. I know you've been talking up a

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>lot Trey Aadmonds and Bow Scarborough. I've liked both Scarbrow

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>since back in Alabama. And the reason that. I like

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 1>him because I think he runs hard. He's got the

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Alabama pedigree, which I know isn't great for running backs

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>these days outside of mark Ingram. But I think he's

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a very, very talented back. And I think he's a

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>big back too, So I think if Elliott went down,

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he would really fit right into that role. I think

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they'd hand that rock to him repeatedly. I don't know

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>what he was dreat in the passing game, but I

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think it would be a situation like we had

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>last year, or like is it Rod Smith, is it

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris? What do we know? I think the answer

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is Bo Scarborough and we know that and we know

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>what this offense is. That's why I really like Bo Scarborough. Yeah,

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's why they went out and drafted him.

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>So if something were to happen to Zeke, they just

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>know that he's the next man up. And you look

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>at where he's being drafted, he's nothing. You get him

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the last pick of the draft, pick two sixty seven

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>on Fantasy pros RB seventy three off the board. I

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>think when you are ranking handcuffs specifically, you look at situation. Right,

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>if something were to happen to this running back, Um,

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>does he step into a situation right away where he's

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the starter, good offensive line, a potent offense. I think

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>all those things work for the Cowboys. Maybe not the

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>most potent offense, but they have a great offensive line.

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So if something were to happen to zeke Bo Scarborough.

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Chase Edmonds, who has flashed a little bit

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>here in the preseason. I got that. You know, Emery

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Hunt has been all over dating back to his days

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>at college. He's right behind both Scarboro RB seventy four.

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And they've already said if something were to happen to

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson, Chase Edmonds will step in as the team starter.

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he can run the ball and catch the

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>ball out of the backfield. And while we're on it,

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you just got to talk about you know who would

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 1>who would uh take over for the Steelers if something

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>would have happened to Levion Bell. I think that is

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 1>James Conner. You saw him last night. Um looked very spry.

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>He had like a thirty yard touchdown run RB sixty

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>five off the board. That's another situation where anytime anything

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.440
<v Speaker 1>has happened to Levion Bell, regardless of who the backup

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is they feed that guy. We saw it a couple

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of years ago with Th'angela Williams. He had like twenty

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>five plus touches in whatever games Levian Bell missed. So

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>James Conner I think is also a name in that category.

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>And Connors a dude that's lost a lot of weight

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to like he does not look spry. Last night he

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 1>looked very good. He doesn't literally the massive dude that

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we saw last year. There's a little plotting

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for us. Um, he looked good last night. Yeah, in

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that category as well. Going a little bit higher, we

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>spoke about Latavius Murray, who I think has standalone value

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. He should be see anywhere from you know,

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.839
<v Speaker 1>six to ten touches per game with the Vikings if

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>anything were to happen in Dalvin Cook. We saw last

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>year what let's Avias Murray can do. Um, he scores

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>such downs. He does his work in the in the

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>red zone as well. You know a guy who I

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>think has valued by himself right now, Greg not even

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a handcuff. Who's no one's talking about Austin Ekeler with

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. They're talking him up right now. That he's

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have the Danny Woodhead role in this offense.

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>That worries me a little bit about Melvin Gordon's receptions.

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they take a step back, maybe he's more so

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>in that forty to fifty range. But Austin Ekeler a

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>guy who flashed a little bit last year. They seem

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to like him an awful lot. Maybe he doesn't see

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the same workload that a Danny Woodhead does. But especially

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in PPR, I think there's a chance that Austin Ekeler

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:51.760
<v Speaker 1>himself and catch forty to fifty passes, maybe even exceed

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty receptions this year. Greg, Yeah, you know, I thinks

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 1>a fine handcuffed. He came out of nowhere last year

0:47:57.360 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 1>is a really really nice story, and then he proved

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was fine. He was passing down back like nothing really

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. And I think he's a handcuff. I'm

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>not worried about him replacing Melvin Gordon or taking over

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those receptions. Um. I think he's a

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 1>fine handcuff and that's about it. I think he's gonna

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:15.879
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit more value than that, like as

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a bye week replacement in the PPR League. I think

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that can maybe catch or to five

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>passes per week. They've just been talking up a lot,

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think, um, that's I think that's for FA.

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they like him a lot there too, And

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we do have to mention. I mean, who is the

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>backup to Todd Gurley if something were to happen. They

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 1>went and they drafted John Kelly, who a lot of

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 1>people were raving about throughout the draft. It's crazy. I

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>saw somebody on Twitter. I forget who was. I hate

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that I gave him credit. Um maybe it was Might

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Claim maybe with somebody else, but they were raving as

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>his deep sleever John Kelly that if anything happens, liked

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>him a lot. I remember listening to me he was

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 1>claimed cast throughout the draft process. This was a guy

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:54.840
<v Speaker 1>who really he hit in the metric department, so you know,

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.879
<v Speaker 1>using a lot of advanced metrics he was. They would

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>looked at that throughout his college career, and the Rams

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>went out and drafted him. So I think he is

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the guy to own if anything were to happen to

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Tid Gurley. So if you draft Gurley, maybe in the

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:08.919
<v Speaker 1>best ball format or in your deeper twelve team, leagues.

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking for that next man up, I think

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it is John Kelly for the Rams. Yeah, I think

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so too, And I think it's really smart that you

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>bring up, um, some of these big time guys, right,

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>like first pick Todd Gurley, Right, who's the handcuff? It's

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you're literally your first overall pick. You want to make

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 1>sure you get that handcuff? John Kelly got it? Uh?

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:26.479
<v Speaker 1>The Zeq Elliott we talked about Bot Scarborough, right, Cool?

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson, Jas Edmonds. You you mentioned that great awesome

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>lady on Belle James Conner. Cool. Alvin Camara's interesting situation

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:36.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously with Mark Ingram there until Ingram gets back, it

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.240
<v Speaker 1>might be Jonathan Williams russurrected and dead was the answer

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to this one. I just hope that he doesn't get

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>hurt the first four weeks and then you get the

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>sake Kwon Barkley. Is there a Giants running back that

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is worth drafting as a handcuff? Is Wayne Gallman worth drafting?

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Is Jonathan Stewart worth drafting? I've drafted Wayne Gallman in

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>one league where it has sae Kwon Barkley. It was

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a very deeply I think it was four rounds, so

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that deep I took a shot. But I think if

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>anything were to happen to Sa Kwon Barkley, given the

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:05.839
<v Speaker 1>state of this offensive line, I still don't think they're great. Yes,

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>they made some improvements, but it's pretty terrible. Yeah, they're

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be bad. So I think if something were to

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>happen to say Kwon Barkley, you wouldn't have much value

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:15.359
<v Speaker 1>out of either one. Wayne Gollman Jonan Stewart. Honestly, they

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>probably just take away from each other if something were

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Yeah, okay, fair enough. I don't think I

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>really want anymore. Wayne Golman got some first team action

0:50:22.040 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>this week without say Kwon Barkley practicing. I watch to

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:26.879
<v Speaker 1>night and see what happened exactly. I want to see

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the what the differentiation is between Jonathan Stewart's carries and

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Gollman's carries. People like playing Golman. Last year we

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Melvin Gordon. Then he gets a Kareem Hunt in

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the first round. Who is Kareem Hunt's handcuff? I think

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's Spencer ware again, and you know, similar to Austin Ekeler,

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:42.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance that Spencer Ware could still have a

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:44.760
<v Speaker 1>role on this team, you know, six to eight touches

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 1>a game, maybe a couple of receptions. They liked him

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot before the Kareem Hunt before his injury last year.

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>To Spencer weare so I think if anything were to

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>happen again, it might not be Spencer where might not

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just step in and be like the workhorse. But I

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think if something were to happen to kare Hunt, he

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>would see the bulk of the touches. They probably just

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>get like Damian Williams involved as well. But in the

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:08.319
<v Speaker 1>league where I drafted Kareem Hunt, the Flex League last

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:10.680
<v Speaker 1>weekend that you took part in as well, Greg, I

0:51:10.760 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 1>drafted Spencer were extremely late. I think one of my

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.719
<v Speaker 1>either my second or third to last pick. So I

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:19.839
<v Speaker 1>think Spencer wears the hancuff. Moving down the first round,

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 1>two more spots left Jacksonville in Minnesota, and Letton Fournet

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 1>has got a lot going on behind him, from Corey

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Grant to t J yelled into more is yelled in,

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:31.959
<v Speaker 1>stilled the backup and they want on there another another

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Alabama running back. I like, yeah, I think he probably is.

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't see a full complement of work. If something

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:41.880
<v Speaker 1>happened to Leonard Fournett, I think it would kind of

0:51:41.920 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be like a Mishmas situation. They'd use multiple guys. But

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:47.839
<v Speaker 1>t J yelled in. We saw what he can do. Uh,

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>not really great effective running between the tackles as a

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>pure runner, but you can catch the ball out of

0:51:53.080 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. So he's probably the next man up. I

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 1>think Grant is probably just like that speeds their chain

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>ange of pace. I don't think that if anything would happened,

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 1>he would step in on like early downs. It's probably

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>t J. Yelden, But I don't feel great about like

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:09.920
<v Speaker 1>any handcuff there in Jacksonville, to be honest. And then

0:52:09.960 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you get to Minnesota, which we spoke about yesterday. Obviously,

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh that handcuff is Latavia's Murray. We saw it go

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>into action last year. UM so LaTavia is very clearly

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the heck out of its own for Dalvin Cook. You

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:23.799
<v Speaker 1>want to get it in the second round. Um, I

0:52:23.840 --> 0:52:26.360
<v Speaker 1>have to imagine Cincinnati's Gi Bonnie Bernard with Joe Mixon.

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about Atlanta with DeVante Freeman and Tevin Coleman

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and Carolina. You know c J. Anderson only played the

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarters. He's still the handcuff to c Hims. Yeah. Again,

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:37.800
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have a role himself. They'll have that Jonathan

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Stewart role, maybe a little bit less than what Stewart

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:41.960
<v Speaker 1>did last year because he was around two hundred carries.

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But if anything happened to McCaffrey, Anderson would probably see

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:48.319
<v Speaker 1>around fifteen touches per game, and then I'm sure they

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 1>would find someone else to end up being like the

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:52.920
<v Speaker 1>third down back or whatever. Al Right, so those those

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 1>are your handcuffs, Frank. We have about a minute or

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so minute a half left in the week. Are there

0:52:57.719 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>any other running backs that we have not talked about

0:52:59.560 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>all week long that you're like, I gotta I want

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to mention him for whatever reason. Yeah. I think we've

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:07.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Time Montgomery a little bit while talking about the

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Packers running backs. But if this Jamal Williams situation is serious, uh,

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Time Montgomery is probably the next man up.

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he, like Austin Ekeler, like some of these

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>past catching running backs, has standalone value as well. Uh,

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Corey Clement didn't talk about him all that much, but

0:53:21.719 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 1>when we mentioned j j. I, we kind of talked

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:26.359
<v Speaker 1>about him in passing another guy who's going to have

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a role on this team. They like him for sure,

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:31.160
<v Speaker 1>probably a better best ball running back. I don't know

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that you'll be able to trust Corey Clement at any

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:36.359
<v Speaker 1>certain time this year, but if something were to happen

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to j J I, I think Corey Clement would have

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty legitimate role with you, more so than a

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 1>um wind SMALLO. Yes, okay, I think they're done with

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:47.959
<v Speaker 1>window Smaller. I don't know, man. They talked up Corey

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Clement a lot, and they used him throughout the playoffs,

0:53:50.880 --> 0:53:53.280
<v Speaker 1>so I think they I think that coaching staff trust

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Corey Clement. Okay, So there you go. Next week on

0:53:56.120 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the show Monday, we will get an auction All Auction Show,

0:53:58.640 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Drew dick Meyer. I hope we'll join us. Have a

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>text out him right now All Auctions Show, and then

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 1>starting Tuesday, we're gonna do our wide receiver rankings. Everything

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we did this week, from the first two rounds wide receivers,

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to your middle rounds, to your late rounds, and to

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>your handcuffs because your hand you can a handcuff wide

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 1>receiver like Franks, so you can handcuffs tight ends right

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 1>with Jordan Reed and Ernie Davis. You could probably do

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that in Green Bay with a guy Davante Adams. With

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Jona Allison and Davanta Adams. You worry a little bit

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:27.120
<v Speaker 1>concussions with Davante Adams pretty much every injury with Randall Cobb.

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:31.640
<v Speaker 1>One more name that we didn't mention. Greg Yeah's Ivory

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:33.760
<v Speaker 1>very much so. A guy that you should pay attention

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to lay in drafts as well. All Right, there you go. Uh,

0:54:36.239 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna do it for today's fantasy best friends forever

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it's been It's been an awesome week. Remember subscribe on

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>iTunes