WEBVTT - Surveillance: Speedy Stimulus Needed, Says Bernstein

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Daily we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. Well

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we like to do with surveillance is not talked to

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the fancy people, all the pundans, pund training, more pundits.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>We like to talk to the people that they read

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and they listen to. One of those is Jared Bernstein

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and the steam career at the Center on Budget and

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Policy Priorities, and a senator from Delaware a few years

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ago discovered this and said Dr Bernstein joined the team.

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Jared Bernstein part of the transition team for the President elect. Jared,

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I know we need to break some news here, and

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I do want to know the Secretary Treasury is going

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to be, but I really want to go to transition Minutia.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You are lined up I think to walk Champ and Major.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna be like first dog walker for the Biden administration.

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>What is it like being on a transition team. I

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>think the most important thing to recognize there is that

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this is such a critical moment for a smooth, normal

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>transition process to happen, And what's happening right now is

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>anything but normal. Remember I was the chief economist to

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the then Vice president elect back in two thousand and eight,

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and at this point we were actively planning. Remember that

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>was the Great Recession. We were actively planning for a

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>fiscal relief package that was legislated less than four weeks

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>after Obama and Biden took office. That's what should be

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>happening now. But this is not normal, my friends, for

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this transition to be thrown off this way, and it's

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>coming at great cost in terms of health and in

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of the economy. Okay, a delicate question, then you know,

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we make fun of Champion Major the dogs. Returning to

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the White with the President Elec Jared, what's so important

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>here is? And what is your action plan if this

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is transition interrupted? Are you planning out a budget process

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>without the knowledge of the President White House? Well, certainly

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we are, obviously, and you'll hear the President like talking

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>about this, thinking about a fiscal package with great urgency

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the things he said. And by the way,

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>President elecs, they like to wait till they're in the

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>office to start moving legislation. He has said that is

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>not the case when it comes to fiscal relief. That

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>should happen in the lame Duck. And I couldn't agree more.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you're talking about preparing for uh, the UH

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for for this job that he is UH, that the

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>American people have elected him for, you've got to talk

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>about virus control and that of course you can see

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the President elect is very active on planning virus control.

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know his UH Vivic Murdy, who's the former

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>surgeon general on the covid T recently talked about how

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>important it is to get that information in transition from

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>folks from bunks that are currently in the White House,

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's not happening. Again, avoidable suffering to Americans in

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of healthcare and economic hardship because this transition is

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>not occurring the way it should. Jaredy, We're lucky to

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have a bit of time with you this morning, so

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about the transition a little bit more.

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>In just the moment, I want to talk about a

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>fiscal plan just a bit with you. The Republican Senate

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>was the obstacle to getting the deal that Pelosi wanted

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>was still likely to have a Republican Senate. We have

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>one now, will likely have one off the January as well.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>What is it that you think that President elect Biden

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>can achieve the Speaker Pelosi couldn't. Well, I think the

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>way you teed it up is exactly right. I mean,

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the President elect continues to talk about how people can

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>decide to cooperate and now is is the perfect time

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for them to do so. We have heard positive sounds

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>about a fiscal package from members of the Republican squad

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and including McConnell himself. What we're not seeing is the

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>kinds of negotiations that the President elect has been stressing,

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and that needs to happen as of yesterday. You know,

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we have an unemployment insurance system where over twenty million

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>people are making claims and at least twelve million we

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>recently learned UH could lose their h support as that's

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as as as it expires at the at the end

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.679
<v Speaker 1>of the year. We have over four hundred thousand small

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>business instead of clothes. The long term unemployment is increasing

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>at a rate we haven't seen in the history of

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that series. We learned this morning that according to zip recruiter.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Job growth is slowing, not just in places where the

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>virus is surging, but in other places as well. So

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the urgency of the economic situation has and

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the health situation, which of course are intimately connected, just

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>has to reach legislators. I'm an economist, I'm not a politician.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you the strategy to get them there,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>but I can certainly stress the urgency of this moment

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in that regard, Well, let's talk about the urgency and

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the size, because currently there is a one and a

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>half trillion dollar spread between the two sides, and I'm

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>not sure how that's closed, that's all, if it has,

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 1>it's all in the last month. What kind of size

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>package do you need in a moment like this, Jared,

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I think probably the best way to think about is

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>start from the bottom up and start adding up what's necessary.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>State and local budgets are are really hurting. Remember they

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>can't run budget deficits. UH. The unemployment insurance system, as

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, needs work. Nutritional support has to be on

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the table. There's lots of people facing a potential evictions

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and foreclosures, so we need those programs to continue and

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to be re upped, and of course virus control is

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the list. Now, if you start

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>summing that up, you'll get into the neighborhood of the

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Heroes Act, which is what the President elect was touting

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the other day. Uh and at least the second version

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of that was somewhere in the two to three trillion range.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But let me say this, I think what matters most

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>right now is speed. So there's speed, their size, their composition,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they're all important, but I would put speed at the

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>top of the list because I think this economy is

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>at a precarious point. Jared, can you elaborate on that.

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>If speed is the biggest issue right now, do you

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think that Democrats should cave to the Republican demand of

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a smaller bill and just get something anything past even

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it's if it's substantially less than what you think is required.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just don't think cave is the word

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>that anyone should be thinking about up there. It's actually

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>cooperation working together to serve both the healthcare and economic

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>needs of the American people. And you know, as the

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>President elect has stressed, I mean, there are uh, not

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>avoidable there are avoidable deaths that could occur if if

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>both sides would get together and start cooperating. Now, by

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, Ron Klain, incoming chief of staff, someone who

0:06:54.720 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>knows a lot about about about pandemics, keep winting out

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>something the other day that I want to stress. He said,

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, yes, vaccine, that's important, it's essential. But you know,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccine without vaccination doesn't get you very far. So along

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with all this other transition planning that should be happening now,

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturer and the distribution of the vaccine is essential

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>planning that has to occur. And I don't think anybody

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>needs the cave to each other to get to work

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on serving the American people. In that regard, Jared, given

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that there is some sort of bridge right now to

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>try to get us through the next very difficult couple

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of months, what do you think is necessary when it

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to potential infrastructure spending, which has been something that's

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>been sort of touted out there, and how should we

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pay for something like that? Yeah, that's a really uh,

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good question. I I think that the

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the we we I focus so much on relief and

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>this fiscal bridge to the other side of the crisis.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should forget. And certainly the President

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>ELECTA has a has an agenda that is extremely I

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>think rich and important in this regard that simply getting

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to the other side of the crisis, back to where

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>we were, isn't nearly good enough. We have to the

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>way he puts it is build back better. That is,

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>have a far more resilient economy on the other side

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of the crisis. And resiliency in the case that you're raising,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>has to do with investments in clean energy and infrastructure,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>healthcare infrastructure, safety net infrastructure, an unemployment insurance system that's

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>up to the task, a healthcare system that's up to

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the task, and all of those investments I think need

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to be made now. In terms of pay for us,

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a discussion that's going to have to happen when

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the President elect becomes the president we start those negotiations.

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I will say that in terms of relief packages right now,

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it is essential to recognize that interest rates are so

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>low and locked in at such a low rate, so

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>government borrowing given the return on the kinds of investments

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about, I mean, we can literally save lives

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>at a and extremely uh favorable interest rate, and the

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>idea that Congress isn't acting with urgency to do that

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>right now, I think it's just a huge mistake. Four

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>basis points on a ten yere Jarek right to catch up,

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>appreciate time, come back, saying John Bernstein that at the

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Center on Budget and Policy, priorities made come surveillance to

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>speak the experts on this pandemic long ago and far away.

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think March. My first conversation was with an esteemed

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>radiologist at Mount Sinai this morning, these many months on

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with Dr David richie's president of the Mount

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Sinai Hospital, a radiologist of Mount Sinai who long ago

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and far away actually bought radiological images snapshots of the

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>lungs of Wuhan. That was our first important interview on

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. Today, David rich joins as president of Mount

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>Sinai Hospital in Mount Sinai, Queens. David, I looked on

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred first Street and I count the ambulances. It's

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>not as bad as it was in April. It's not

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as bad as what is in May, and yet we're

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>hearing about increasing troubles. Give us a snapshot of Mount

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Sinai this Friday morning. This Friday morning, and really for

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the past thirty days, Mount Sawei Hospital has about fifty

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>patients with active COVID infection UH. That is a significantly

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>last At the peak of the crisis, there were seven

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy including patients in the tents across the streets.

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So it is a markedly less severe surge than what

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the first wave. Then why are we

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>closing schools? Why are we seeing hospitals in North Dakota,

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in Utah and Idaho. So challenge is it just a

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>new pandemic of geography or is there something different this time? Well,

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this time we see what's coming at US. We have

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>testing in the region. It's certainly not as good as

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be in the in the long term,

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but we can see the positivity rates. And we didn't

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>know back in February and March what was coming towards US.

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>There was no capacity and then we were overwhelmed. This time,

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>we can see the increase coming at US and take

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>proactive public health measures in advance of effective vaccines in

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>order to control the spread so that we don't see

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the incredible amount of death and excess death outside of

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>COVID that we saw during March April and may Dr

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Rich good morning from London. Is it a different type

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of population that's being affected this time? Is this why

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know fewer people are ending up in hospital or

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is it because of the viral load that we're seeing. Well,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>there there are certain things that are different about this

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>second wave of just looking at it from our perspective.

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>For impatients, we see that they're slightly younger, implying that

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we're doing a better job of protecting our elders. We

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>see a slightly decreased length of stay, and we're very

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>happy that the mortality rate came down from in the

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>first wave to five point one percent in the second wave.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 1>While still a very deadly disease, this does give some

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>hope that something that we're doing, something in terms of

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>therapeutics or better management of oxygen levels is improving the

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>outcome of patients. But still not a disease to take

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>lightly at all. The World Health Organization has ruled using

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>anti vale m desivere as a treatment has ruled against

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>using web deservere as a treatment of COVID nineteen. What

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>treatments are available right now that you are using well

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>remdesse of your it does have some data that are

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are contradictory, but in the early phase of inpatient care,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>remdesivie and inpatients not yet showing their own antibody response

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>convalescent plasma are tools that we're using. And then as

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the disease progresses and we see more involvement, the use

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of UH gluba corticoids commonly noticed steroids such as decks

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and methad zone and UH drugs that in the blood

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>or prevent clotting have been very effective for us in

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>preventing some of the complications that we saw in the

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>first wave. Dr Richard, your thirty six years at Mount Sinai,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in doing the hard work of innesesology, you have seen

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>bed to bed. What people do I want you to

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>speak to our audience worldwide about the emotion of the

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>CDC yesterday basically canceled Thanksgiving or what we're seeing in

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>London about cancel Christmas. How does a pro like you

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>observe the political maelstrom of this pandemic. Well, it's it's

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>very hard for many of us to see that science

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>is not being taken in the in the proper regard

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>throughout the really throughout the United States. I can't speak

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>as much to the rest of the world, but it's

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a problem when we don't have universal acceptance by public

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>health officials and by governments that we must mask be

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>much socially distanced. That the Thanksgiving holiday is in many

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>ways the worst of possible situations for spread of the inspirers,

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>because having large groups of people indoors sharing a meal

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is probably the most effective way of spreading. There for

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>something we must we must avoid. David rich mount sign

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I throught we could take generous time with us today.

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course it's thirty five. I think it's thirty four,

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe thirty six, excuse me, thirty six years at Mount

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sin I truly committed to that institution. The market on

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a hand, whilst founder securities equity strategist joins us right now, Anna,

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.239
<v Speaker 1>we started this program by talking about the cross currents

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>for financial market participants. How do you react to the

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>news this morning? Well, the news this morning is encouraging

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for equities, and like you were talking about earlier, that

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>tugger war. It's one of those items that might be

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>able to join the market a little bit higher, but

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in the near term you know, we think that equity

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of bolatility and equity uncertainty still remains elevated. So in

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the immediate term, it's it's hard to say what's gonna

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>win out the rising COVID cases or is it gonna

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>be this vaccine and uh, you know, perhaps rekindle stimulus

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>talks on both ends. Maybe that's gonna be the winning factor.

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, six months out, John, we still do

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>think equity risk and unsearchain t will decay and equities

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>will march higher. And I want to talk really importantly

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>here and I want to drive it into a physics discussion.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And you're you're working Yale. Do we know the coefficients

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>right now? In this divisive week of bulls and bears?

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you flying blind or within your equation your expectations

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that you see Do you actually feel like you've got

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to handle on how the equations pieced together for us?

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we do think we have some sense, especially

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you see what the rotation has been as the market

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>has been pretty flat this week. Like you mentioned, still

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>underneath the hood, you're seeing certain groups have a higher

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>beta to the more positive COVID news. You're seeing more

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the cyclicals and the value trade out performing, and that

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>has been the trend month to date. We think that

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>has legs and has much longer to go in the

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>longer term outside of six months. Okay, in the longer term.

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>In the short term, how much of a hit could

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that cyclical trade take. Well, as you know, the cyclicality,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very sensitive to economic indicators and how the economic

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>recovery is going. So far, recovery seems to be chugging along,

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but we know the biggest risk it hasn't has always

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>been what happens with the coronavirus cases isn't manageable. You know,

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for example in New York City, you're seeing schools close,

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing restaurant dining get rolled back an hour short.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>These things are concerning if we get them out of

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>nationwide uh spread, the more concerned again of my policy

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>mistikens okay, And I think that's why the biggest news

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps of the night around this market was the gap

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>that's emerging between the Federal Reserve Chairman Pale and the

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary Minute in to him. I think for many

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>people in this credit market right now, there's a worry

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>that if the fedbacks away, you start to see a

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>gapping out and it's signing of financial conditions that would

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>be my concern this morning. I have to say I

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>was surprised that I didn't see if they're moving this market.

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>We had a bit of one eye of the night.

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Then we erased it pretty quickly. Oh. I think everybody

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in Washington at least is overwhelmed by the constitutional news.

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>But what's so important here, John, to your good point

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is the fiscal stimulus timeline has been adjusted. There's no

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>question about that. And I want to go back to beta.

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned beta, and let's call it sector beta. To

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>full disclosure, folks, I don't believe in beta on individual securities.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And is beta now in the beta change into two

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty one? Is it an absolute change or is

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it a relative change? Can I still own tech? You

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>can still own tech. But we think, you know, market

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>can move higher. But we're thinking more pedestrian growth than

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the past two or three years. So

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for us, the game becomes the more relative beta game.

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>We want to know if the market is going to

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>be more pedestrian returns and growth, well, what about underneath that,

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>which sectors are going to have that relative outperformance? That

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>relative beta for us, we think it's more that economically

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>sensitive names that COVID time names. So that's what we've

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>been recommending to investors right now. When you look out

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the financials part of that story on a even with

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the bond market doing what it's done over the last

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, it is it is John, And within

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>financial specifically, you know the trodden and beaten down and

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>unloved banks. You know, recently we've pounded the table and

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>being overweight banks for a longer term trade because you know,

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>evaluations look right for the picking and as we've seen

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>that book to price factor has performed since March and

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>we think it has more to go. That helps that

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>banks argument. And you know, eventually with rates staying at zero,

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>even if we don't get the biggest physical stimulus package,

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and now that we do have concerns what happens to

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that credit support rules off, but seeing if that maintains

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>status quo, that's going to help bas come back, especially

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>longer down the road we get a little reflation. We're

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>speaking with an a hand of what Wells Fargo securities,

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and I want to go back to something John was

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about this rift that's emerging between the Federal Reserve

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Treasury Secretary Stephen Manuchin about this extra money

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that was going toward corporate bond purchases, that was going

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>towards main street lending facilities, that was going towards musicpal

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>bond UH purchases. I'm wondering how much this threatens the

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>idea that the Fed can swoop in as a backstop

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to markets. Frankly, this has been one of the biggest

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>arguments for equities and valuations where they are. Does this

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>threaten that on any level? Based on the sudden inconsistency

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>here in messaging Lisa, you know, you're right, it's absolutely

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a shock to here suddenly treasuring WENUS

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the Fed are taking different stances. As you mentioned,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why we can justify such inflated

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>equity multiples, especially on the SMP five compared to history,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>it's this liquidity. We've had, this monetary accommodation, and you know,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>now you have traging volution asking for a refund. That's

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>unexpected because one of the one steady things we've had

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>through a lot of this turmoil has been monetary support. Now,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>if that is sapped away. If companies lose their access

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to capital, that comes into stress for equities, and equities

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>are likely to see a big pullback. But so far

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>we've seen credit spreads tight well behaved both in the

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>investment grade and the high old markets. So as long

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>as that can remain capped, we think equity volatility stays

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>muted as well, and you know multiples can continue and

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>great to catch up as always, and a hand that

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of one stonger securities person why it works. Gott Kleiman

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and Jim's l or Apollo Management in a week moment

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>took one of the best economists in the street and

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>drag them over into the dark side of asset management

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>economic analysis. They still touristed Slack from Deutsche Bank. Huge

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>loss for Peter Hooper in their team, and we're thrilled

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that Mr Slack could join us. And this one touristed

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a global Wall Street question, how's it different being an

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>economist for a massive global bank versus being an economist

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>for asset managers? Well, the data and then ASIS is

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a really littlely identical. I mean trying to think about

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what markets are doing and where they're going. Then atisis

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>ends up being exactly and the same. So and that

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>sends uh, the job that we all have of trying

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>to think about where is the economy and going, and

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>where a financial marker is going is the same for

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>all of us. You're at the cross section at a

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>very interesting time that we have Dallas FED President Robert

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Kaplan coming out saying that he could expect a contraction

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>even in Q for as a result of the worsening pandemic.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you have Jim Paulson of Luthhole who just

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>came on and says that he expects a five percent

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>expansion in Q four. This sort of bullish attitude in

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>markets versus the parishness of economists. Where do you come

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>out in this divide that seems to be growing. Yeah,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what it's very important to watch is the high frequency

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>data and Jodan has claims yesterday as you also talked about,

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of course what's going up that means that more people

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are becoming unemployed. This is a yellow light for risky assets.

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's something here that's going on in the

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 1>economic data where the nightmare scenario for marguts would be

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>if the unemployer rate November will begin to go higher.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean we are still waiting for the vaccine. There

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>is still some time before the vaccine comes. We have

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>now more conversations about whether we need a second generation

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of a vaccine, and there's a lot of still question

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>marks around how the vaccine will be both deployed and

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>how it will function, etcetera. But the short answer to

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>your question, Lisa is that then in the short term,

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's very different from as a podcast the way normally is.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Normally you have a lot of certainty about the short

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>term and much certainty about the long term. But here

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a complete opposite. We have a much better idea

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>about what things will look like in two thousands twenty

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>one than what we have in the next two months.

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>It's also and I really underestimated the resilience of the

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>US economy and how quickly it would bounce back, and

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>many other people did as well, and we're repeating that

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>again as we work our way through winter. So it

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is the case that the US economy is more resilient

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>than any other economy in the world. We have much

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>more dynamic labor markets, product markets, We have more competition

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>across all markets than literally any other country in the world.

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, the dynamism of the US economy

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>is not being impacted, at least not dramatically at the moment.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>That being said, the cyclical movements around that structural issue,

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it continued to be a risk here in the short term,

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's why some of the high frequently indicators, both

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of mobility you have started to go down. Also, open

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>table restaurant bookies have also started to go down. We

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>have some rollers. Even New York City rented mpt A

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>data has also started to show some more weakness in

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks. So we're a little bit worried

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>about where the high frequency data is taking us at

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Well, let's talk about the policy composition, the

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>policy prescription. Often on programs like this you talk about

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 1>speed and size. We talked about that with Jaan Bernstein

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier this morning. Let's talk about composition. Where you would

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>target the stimulus right now, toss them where does it

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>need to go? I think it is highly unusual, as

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you also just spoke about a little while ago, there's

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>highly unusual that you have the Federal Reserve and the

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank asking fiscal policy for aggressive action. I mean,

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>as you all know, I used to work at the

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>i n F and they're the main lesson is that

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the central bank should be telling polititions to spend less money.

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Now you both have in Europe and in the US

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the central bankers almost asking and pleading polsititions to spend

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>more money, Please increase government expenditures, please cut taxes. That

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is just a really unusual signal and tells you how

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>significant the messages from the Federal Reserve at the moment

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and telling that we do need some more supportant. It

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>comes really from the fact that we're still ten milland

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>jobs below today where we were in February, and that

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>sense the holding the economy is pretty deep and that's

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>why they need a bhiscal expansion and the call from

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that from the Federal Reserve is so significant. Towards into

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>York claim charts. What has moved is service sector inflation

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 1>has become service sector disinflation. What are you advising, Apollo management.

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Does it sustain here, does it become more disinflationary or

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>do we just assume a reversion of that three percent

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>level on the great service sector question. Yeah, this is

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a really important point time because the shock to the

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>economy with this pandemic came to the service sector. It

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>was restaurants, it was retailed, and therefore we saw significant

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>declines in prices and significant declines in employment in the

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>service sector. That's not rebounding. So that's why we're seeing

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in reversal of that. But historically over the last twenty years, remember,

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>if you separate CPI into goods, inflation has basically been

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>zero for the last twenty years. All the inflation that

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>we have seen and most of the variation inflation has

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>come from the service sector. That's why the unusual situation

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>here with the service sector being a driver of inflation

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>first to the downside, now to the upside, is something

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that is very important for the inflation outlogal role that

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we have had this compositional shift where the service sector

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>suddenly is playing a most tychnical role re creative to

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the good sector. So are you framing the American economy

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as a return to previous trend or are we establishing

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a new level of trend that will be a lesser level.

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So in trillions of dollars, we're still one point three

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>trillion in at least in Q three in terms of

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>how far a where we are from getting back to

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the trend that we had pre pandemic. If you want

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 1>to fill up completely the whole that has been treated

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last two or three quarters, then we need

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>something more like folt trillion. This gives you some idea

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>about what is the magnitude of fiscal need, if you will.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And the question exactly is, as you're asking, well, do

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to get just back up to the trendline

0:26:58.400 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>or do we want to fill up the whole completely

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the wets how quickly do we want to get the

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>floor rate to come back to the three and a

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>half per cent that we had in February. So in

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that sense and all this will depend, of course on

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the speed of when the vaccine will come back. But

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it also will depend on this issue that we also

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>talk about all the time, if we will get another

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus or not yet, either before the end of

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>this year or sometime in the beginning of the new Yet,

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, as we try to plug this hole by

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>borrowing money, there is a question of that overhang of debt,

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the unbelievable expansion of debt globally over the past nine months.

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>In order to plug this hole, what that will do

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to growth going forward and I'm just thinking about our

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation about zombie companies. Not that long ago, twenty percent

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>of the large US companies considered zombies. What does that

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>do to long term growth in the United States? Do

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you think it's adequately priced in? So, the b I

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>S has done a lot of work on this, and

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>what they have repeatedly said now the possable years actually

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is that if we have a bigger share of companies

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately more unproductive and using resources, using capex, using workers,

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>then you do run the risk that begins to have

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>some macroeconomic implications. And on top of that comes also

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the other issue to your question, leadser that if you

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>do have such a significant increase in the amount of

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>US treasury is outstanding, what should you then be watching.

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You should be watching for risks of potentially talking about

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>downgrades to the sovereign of the U S. Fitch already

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>has US sovereign on negative watch. Should also be looking

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>at treasury auctions, but what is a bit to coverage

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. You should also be looking more broadly for

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the demanders supplying the treasury markets. So far everything is fine,

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's pretty clear that when you think about the

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>very significant actions from the Federal Reserve. There is some

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>very important questions about demanders applying treasuries that we all

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>need to think about also over the coming ones. Tolsto,

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>what are you optimistic about next year? So I am

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about the vaccine and I do think it will work.

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>But this very unusual situation where there's more clarity about

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty one then there is about the rest

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand twenty that is really making it very

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult when you sit with your spreadsheet and try to

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>put together your forecast for the global economy. It does

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>make it quite complicated to think about well, with market's

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>trade on the bat news and the near term and

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the downside risks, or with markets look through that and

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just focus on the vaccine next year. That's why there

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is still a risk that things could be still a

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>bit bumpy in the next few months before we have

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>their final answer on the vaccine, whether this is something

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that will help everyone and really will be as helpful

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>as we're all hoping at the moment. And toast them

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>wonderful to catch up and great to see you in

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a new seat. Fantastic toastin's luck that now have Apollo Management.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio