WEBVTT - #271 Jason Flom with Howard Dudley

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>With the rise of dual income households throughout the eighties

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and nineties, an unprecedented number of families were relying on

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>near strangers for childcare. Subsequently, a wave of child sex

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>abuse hysteria began, in which any claim at all from

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a child was granted credence, no matter how outlandish or

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>probably false they were. At this time, Howard Dudley and

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Diane Moore were jointly raising their daughter Amy, but were

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>never married. Eventually, Howard found her a nude sense of faith,

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>met his wife, and had two sons. Even though Howard

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>paid child support and maintained a presence in Amy's life,

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>one can imagine that Howard's new willingness to settle down

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>was not well received by the mother of his first

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>child or her family, including Amy's babysitter, Lydia May Starkey.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>On October thirteenth, nineteen ninety one, Amy allegedly told miss

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Starkey that her father was quote nasty, already prime to

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>believe the worst about Howard, and demanding an explanation. Starkey

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>began a series of suggestive questions, and Amy allegedly claimed

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>sexual abuse. To look out for Amy's best interest. During

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>the social Services investigation. She was assigned at Guardian ad Ltam,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>who determined that Amy's story was untrue. Nonetheless, the trend

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>demanded that credence be granted to the child's claims, triggering

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Howard's arrest. The prosecution ignored and hid the Guardian ed

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Lam's recommendation, and even though Amy recanted her allegations immediately

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>after trial, Howard's been nearly twenty five years in prison

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>as a child sex offender. This is wrongful conviction. Welcome

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>back to wrongful conviction. I feel a deep sense of

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>responsibility to share this story because it's unique in terms

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of the almost three hundred episodes we've done, but it's

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>not unique because it was a common story at the

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>time that it was happening. It's the story of a

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>man named Howard Dudley who was convicted of a crime

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that never happened, and who spent almost three decades incarcerated

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>because of a series of lies, superstitions, hysteria that sort

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>of swept the nation. So before I introduce the other

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>distinguished guest who we have on here, I want to

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>introduce mister Dudley himself, Howard Dudley. Welcome to RAFEL conviction.

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, excited about being here this morning.

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, I'm excited to have you here. I'm sorry

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you're here because of what you went through with Howard.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Today is a remarkable woman named Teresa Newman. Teresa is

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>recently retired, but she was a clinical professor of law

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>amereta at Duke Law. So this is a serious person.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't get that title by not being tough and smart.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And you also don't get Howard Dudley out of prison

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>without those qualities and characteristics. So Teresa, thank.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 3>You for being here, Thank you so much for having us.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And this story is outrageous. Stories like this have actually

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>kept me up at night. And I mean again, this

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>one is this is about as bad as it gets,

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but it isn't unique, and that's why I think it's

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>all the more important that we tell it. But Howard,

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the story itself, let's talk about

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>your youth. You grew up in a small town in

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina. Is that right?

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>That's correct, that's right, a little town called Institute. I

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 2>grew up in a home mom and dad and nine siblings.

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>And my dad had quick rules and he enforced the talk,

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the work they're out of trouble not to go out

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>and disperse the family.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Name. Yeah, I guess with that many kids, you'd have

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to have some strict rules or it'd be pure chaos.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like your parents instilled some good values

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in you. And I also understand that you played guitar

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and still do, and eventually you grew up and that

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a woman named Diane Moore. You had a daughter together

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>named Amy. But it appears that you never intend on

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>marrying Diane and weren't ready to settle down.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't really a good boyfriend. I ad met to

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>that right there. But we worked out between the court

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and myself and Amoy's mother that I could spend time

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 2>with her. She spent weekends with me. We had a

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>great relationship and we was on good.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Terms, I thought. And while you two tolerated each other

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>for the good of your daughter, Diane ended up becoming

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.799
<v Speaker 1>infected with HIV and she was very ill for a while.

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So a relative named Lydia may Starkey began shouldering more

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of Diane's into the bargain. But nonetheless, you moved on

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>with your life.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>I met my wife and we got married. She would

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>accept me as I was, and after marriage we had

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 2>a son named Dennis who's a musician today, and the

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Adrian living a productive life. I would determine to make

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 2>a good life for my children, and that was my endeavor.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I worked, my wife went to college, and her last

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 2>year in school she had a major squote, and so

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 2>basically I was the provider for my family.

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>So at this time, you were provided for your family,

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>living in a trailer while paying child support for Amy,

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>who would join you on the weekends and during the

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>week her relative, Lydia Mace Darkey would care for her

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>as Diane's health continued to deteriorate.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 3>The babysitter she called Howard mean because he had broken

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 3>up with Diane Moore, who she later died of age

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 3>she was ill, and then Howard, moving on with life,

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 3>became born again. Christian got married, had these two kids.

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So one could easily see how some really you know,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>hard hurt feelings could develop, making it easy for Lydia

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>May to believe horrible things about you, and later on

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe even to cajole young Amy into making wild accusations

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that she would later recant. Amy, as I understand, was

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit more susceptible to suggestion, as she had some

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>intellectual limitations. But even before we get into the specifics

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of your case, I think it's important to mention that

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>this time period, the late eighties and early nineties, was

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the absolute height of a wave of child sex abuse hysteria,

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and cases were weeping across the country, one nonsensical case

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>after the other, and I think probably the most widely

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>known one was the McMartin preschool, but very close by

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to Howard and his family in North Carolina was a

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Little Rascals daycare center, where the accusations were beyond absurd,

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean just absolutely outlandish things that a kid might

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>conjure up on the spot. Now that's not to say

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that there perhaps weren't some real allegations among the false ones,

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but in that climate, social services, police and eventually juries

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>were buying the allegations, credible or not.

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.679
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. And I wasn't a lawyer when these cases were

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 3>sweeping the nation and frankly internationally, but I remember, just

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 3>like you, Jason, reading it and thinking these were fantasy allegations.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 3>And people have different theories about what led to this

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>period of near hysteria, but I think many believe it

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 3>was a time of two parent families. Both parents were working,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 3>children were being taken care of by strangers or near strangers,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>and all it takes is rumor and innuendo that something

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 3>untoured is happening in these places. And the Little Rascals

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 3>is a great example, and that's right here in North Carolina.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>The trial which was against every worker and owner at

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>that daycare center. That trial was occurring for the owner

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 3>of the center, just minutes away from where Howard Dudley lived.

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>The stories were in the New York Times, were in

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the international papers, were in every local newspaper, and in

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 3>that one newborn babies were being tossed to sharks off

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the coast of North Carolina. There were pirate ship allegations.

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:48.119
<v Speaker 3>Clearly the stories of children. But the other important piece

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 3>of this period of time was that no research had

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 3>really been conducted on whether young children could fabricate such stories.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 3>So if they told you a quote story, that story

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>had to be true. Any listener who is a parent

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 3>today knows that that's a crazy notion. Children make up

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>stories all the time. They lived in fantasy. But that

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 3>was that period. Today it is known that children can

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 3>line that it's really important to conduct interviews of children

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>in a certain way that the medical evidence that was

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 3>believed to be dispositive abuse at the time.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Is not a friend of mine named Gus Gussler. I

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he ever came across him, but he's

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a criminal defense lawyer for a long time in North

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Carolina and he defended one of these cases. He was

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>actually representing a man who was a golf pro whose

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>wife operated a day care facility, and just because he

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>would go and pick her up from work once in

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a while, he got caught up in it as well.

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And I believe he got convicted because at the time

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it was just like everybody was just believing anything that

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>anybody said. And of course these were crimes that never

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 1>even happened.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>We represent one of the last surviving multi defendant, multi

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>children cases from this period, and the man was convicted

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen eighty seven and it absolutely nothing happened. But

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 3>he was a van driver for a daycare center with

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 3>some cognitively impaired adults on the van as well, and

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 3>two of those adults were boyfriend and girlfriend, and they

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 3>were doing as the children said, the married people were

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 3>doing married people things on the bus and that's how

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 3>it started. And it ended up with our client Junior

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Chandler in prison since nineteen eighty seven and we'll be

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 3>there for the rest of his life unless we can

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 3>successfully petition the cord.

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>There are still so many people suffering in prison, like

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Junior Chandler, James King, whose case we've covered on the show.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you have the opportunity, please go back and

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>list to that one. That one it hurts my heart

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have it linked in the bio. And then

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>who knows, maybe you know something, maybe there's something you

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>can do to help. And Howard, you haven't even been

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>home that long. It was only two thy sixteen when

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you got out. Let's turn to the story at hand. Here.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>This was October thirteenth, nineteen ninety one, which was a Sunday.

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Amy had just been returned to her mother and had

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Miss Starkey, and I understand that over the weekend you

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>had been firm with Amy about something, as parents off

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and are when trying to raise their children, you know

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the right way, and she had a complaint that you

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>were quote nasty, And it was at this point that

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Miss Starkey began a series of leading questions resulting in

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>some very serious allegations and accusations.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, what's really important is that the babysitter was predisposed

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to believing that Howard was mean and would do anything right.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 3>So when Amy said my daddy is nasty, she went

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 3>straight to sexual and said does he put his mess

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 3>inside of you? So at that, given Amy's other characteristics,

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, she went with it. And she had been

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 3>inappropriately watching adult TV. So she had seen the Sally

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Jesse Raphael show where they had talked about rape.

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So with a head fall of adult content and being

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>pressed for an explanation about her meaning of the word

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>nasty by Miss Starkey with a suggestive line of questioning

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>like does he put his mess inside you? I mean

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the first direction she went in talking about Amy's dad. Eventually,

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>under this absurd and obscene pressure, nine year old Amy,

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>who was even more impressionable than her contemporaries, allegedly said

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that Howard had quote humped her and quote had s

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>e X with her. So the accusation was reported to

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Diane and then the police.

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Diane and Miss Starkey, I think they noted certain things

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 2>that they can run down into the polls with it

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.119
<v Speaker 2>and they gonna come back running with handcuffs and wants.

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they you that Auto tried the Little Rascal.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>They you that as an opportune time to vent her

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 2>ang out at me.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, in this incredibly fraud time period, with the

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Little Rascal case looming in the headlines, the Kingston Police

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and Leonora County DSS were primed to jump on a

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>case like this one. But it soon should have been

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>clear that these accusations of sexual activity on multiple occasions

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>were totally false, because when they began to ask Amy

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to retell it happened. She told at least nine different

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>stories to DSS nine, and the stories were both inconsistent

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and wildly implausible, if not impossible. For example, she said

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that on one occasion she had been stabbed and that

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.599
<v Speaker 1>a neighbor came and halted the alleged attack. There was

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>no evidence, of course, that she had ever been stabbed,

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and no neighbor could corroborate this story. There was also

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a claim about him putting hot sauce on his privates

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and the hot sauce smelled like goats, and you know,

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it starts to go into really bizarre and obviously patently

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>false territory. This was all supposed to be happening inside, remember,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>just a tiny trailer while Howard's wife was there nursing

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>their newborn. Just wholly unbelievable. I mean, there was also

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a claim in which she was supposed to have been

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>raped while wearing pajamas and underwear.

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Which she said that time with the pajamas, she was

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 3>wearing her pandies and pajamas, and yet she was vaginally

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 3>penetrated by her father. Well, you can't do that through pajamas.

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Amy was the evidence, and blessed her heart, she is

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 3>the faulty evidence in the case, and it's not her fault.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Remember she was a nine year old child with intellectual

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>limitations and didn't know how things worked, including sex, and

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what would happen to her father with these false claims.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And we know Amy immediately recanted after trial. She clearly

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>feels guilt about that all these years later, But she

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was a child nine years old and the adults in

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>her life, as well as the authorities, should have known better.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And as it turned out, there was one person that

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>did so. As his protocol in a case where there's

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a dispute between legal guardians and a miner's interest must

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>be looked. After Amy was assigned a guardian ed LTAM,

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and this person also looked into the allegations. While Amy

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>was being interviewed and the claims were being verified.

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 3>The guardian ed Lightem read everything you know. His job

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 3>is to advocate for the best interests of the child

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 3>and he concluded that it was an Amy's best interest

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 3>not to let her testify falsely against her father, and

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 3>he decided that not from the start of his investigation.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 3>He decided at the end of his investigation, he did

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>a full investigation. He interviewed people who knew Amy, He

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 3>went to her school. He understood Amy's pensions, her limitations,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 3>her characteristics, the other actors. He read the reports. He

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>did a full investigation, a fuller investigation, and really tried

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 3>to stop the prosecution of Howard and to try to

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 3>stop the substantiation of abuse by the Department of Social Services,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 3>but he was unsuccessful.

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned an important word here, substantiation. The police

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>were waiting for that to move forward with an indictment

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and as unclear if THESS even knew that. So even

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>though the guardian a item could see the writing on

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the wall after the initial investigation in interviews, dss inexplictably

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>continued down this course towards substantiation, and on December fifth,

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety one, they filed the petition in Lenor County

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Juvenile Court alleging abuse and neglect, and there was a

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>hearing two weeks later in which Howard was ordered to

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>seize contact with Amy and Diana, at which point the

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>social workers also decided, despite the total lack of evidence

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to corroborate Amy's claims, that they would go with the

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>mantra of that time that credence must be given to

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the child's story, thus substantiating the claim and triggering the

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>police to act more aggressively. But something else happens here

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that makes absolutely no fucking sense. It's crazy, and it

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>all goes to show that the social workers didn't really

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>believe Amy's claims. Now, get this. The social workers agreed

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to a plan in which Howard could potentially regain unsupervised

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>visits upon completing some kind of counseling for an unspecified

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>amount of time. I mean, am I missing something here?

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 3>You're not missing a thing. And they came to that

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 3>conclusion after they had a team meeting how can you

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 3>substantial the allegations, because if they believed them to be true,

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 3>they never could have given visitation to the person who

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 3>perpetrated those kinds of acts. That said, when we interviewed

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the lead social worker years later, I asked, do you

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 3>sometimes just substantiate so you can get access to the family,

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 3>in other words, do a deeper investigation? And she said yes, yes, yes,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 3>evidently without any appreciation about what substantiating the allegations would

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>lead to, and in fact did lead to in Howard's case.

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 3>The police department then charged because the Department of Social

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Services were substantiating, and they were substantiate largely because they

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 3>had to give creence to the child, which is in

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 3>their report, and also because they wanted to figure out

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 3>what was going on with this family, so they had

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 3>to substantiate something to get DSS access to the family,

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 3>if that makes sense. Of course, couldn't have happened the

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>way she described it, given the size of the trailer

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 3>and where people were sleeping, and that Howard's wife was

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 3>home with a newborn and waking up every hour throughout

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 3>the night to take care of this newborn and had

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 3>a two year old close by. It just didn't happen.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 3>And the guardian Atenliden, who was overridden by DSS and

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Kingston Police Department, he didn't succeed in stopping the train

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 3>that had already headed off the station.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, this is a crime that not only didn't happen,

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you also have that there was no opportunity even for

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Howard to have done this or anyone to have done

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this in the space that they cohabitated. As you just said,

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so Howard turned it to you during this period of

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>time time, where were you, were you being held, were

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you out on bond? And what was going on in

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>your mind? You were a guy who had no previous

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>interaction with the criminal justice system. You were a good

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>young man, right.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 2>That's right. I was sitting back in that count of jail.

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 2>My lawyer, mister Harvey, he comes in. He started talking

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 2>with me about a plea bargain. He told me said

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 2>things ain't looking good for you. And I learned that

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the plea bargain basically saying that you were guilty, and

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that's all I need to hear.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Right there.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I said, oh no, I said, no plea bargain for me,

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 2>and he got a little hystericause he said, muster dog.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 2>This is one thing that he told me was true.

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 2>If you don't take the flea bog, you're gonna be

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 2>gone for a long time. That's what he told me.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 2>And then it kind of hit me kind of hard.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 2>Think about my children here, wife here, how were they

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna survive? I begin to think about it. So I

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 2>talked it over with my wife. She pointed at me,

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 2>she said, you tell the truth, just like you've been doing.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And so that's what helped me make my choice to

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 2>stick with it. I don't regret it. I don't regret it.

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I had to leal with Howard. I got to get

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 2>up here more and look at Howard in the mirror.

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 2>If I would had gave them what they wanted to

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 2>taken the pleete boggain, I don't think I'll be sitting

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 2>here talk to y'all today. I think he took me out.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easy to understand not being able to

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>live with yourself if you had to say publicly not

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>only something so disgusting, but also so patently untrue. Although

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 1>some people are fine with things like that, I mean,

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>consider our former president, but Howard is not like that.

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So you stuck to your innocence righteously and went to trial. Now,

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as Teresa mentioned earlier, Amy was the only evidence in

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this case, false evidence of course that she immediately recanted

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>after trial. But that's all there ever was. And I

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>want to turn to Teresa here, because when you dove

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>into this case many years after the wrongful conviction, you

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>did what Howard's learned really everybody else should have done

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, was was to appropriately assess Amy's

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>mental state and competency to stay on trial. Now we

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>alluded to this earlier, the fact that she had some

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>intellectual limitations. Can you tell us what you learned.

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Amy has some challenge, a psychological problem, stid then does

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 3>now she has some cognitive limitations more suggestible than ninety

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 3>nine percent of the population. So this was a little

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>girl who at nine probably was much younger in her

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 3>affect and her intellectual attainments. There's a real question about

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 3>whether she was competent to stand trial, and I think

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 3>everyone will be interested in learning how they assessed her competence.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 3>They asked her if she knew her colors, if she

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 3>knew her letters, if she knew a number of things,

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 3>and she answered yes to each of those, without demonstrating

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 3>that she in fact knew her colors knew her letters.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 3>You could ask a one and a half year old

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 3>yes or no questions and they likely answer yes.

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this poor girl was just thrust into this

0:20:55.720 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>situation answering questions about these vulgar, terrible ass of which

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>she had no knowledge because at most she had heard

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>about them from an episode of Sally Jesse, Raphael, her babysitter,

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>or more likely the prosecutors. She should have just been

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>in school, but instead she was in a courtroom walking

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>through these inconsistent and implausible statements of lies let's call

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>them what they are, that she had made up? So

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>how did they make her sound credible to the jury?

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 3>When she testified, she was asked leading questions because she

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 3>was a child. You usually can't ask leading questions or witnesses.

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 3>There's a prohibition, But with a child you can ask

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 3>leading questions if you request it and you're the stay. So,

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 3>of course, as you might imagine, the testimony was bare bones,

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 3>but also quite different from the previous tellings of the

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 3>story by Amy.

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So the prosecutor was allowed this sort of way of

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>leading Amy through a coherent narrative. Meanwhile, I understand the

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>DSS reports, which contained all of Amy's interviews. Now those

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>reports were all with hell.

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 3>We've been talking about the different retellings by Amy, and

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the wild inconsistencies among the tellings and the outlandish details,

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 3>So all of that was withheld. Howard didn't know about

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 3>them at the time of trial, and his defense lawyer

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 3>didn't know. Now this state new. The prosecutors knew because

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 3>they had access to the DSS records, and certainly the

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 3>DSS social worker who led the investigation knew. Even when

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 3>it's the era of one must give credence to the child,

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 3>there was still one hopes it would have been a

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 3>jur or two at least who would say no, no, no, no,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>that's crazy talk, and maybe would have hung the jury.

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 3>I like to believe that the defense lawyer would have

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 3>won to outright acquittal if he had had those documents

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 3>and had done even a modicum of investigation of his own.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And he had not, and this was a guide I'll

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>forget who had been practicing law for only about a

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>year and had devoted only about thirty hours of this case,

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>including the two day trial. He filed no pretrial motions,

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>nor conducted any of the investigation, including it to Amy's

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>competency or the story she had told. He could have

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>also hired an independent medical expert, who knows how helpful

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>could have been.

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 3>When children are believed to have been physically abused sexually abused,

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 3>child medical evaluation report is completed in this case when

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 3>was worn by DSS. I believe it was done three

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 3>weeks later, which is a mistake. But they did three

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 3>weeks later, and there was no physical evidence of abuse. Importantly,

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 3>at trial, Howard's defense lawyer did not call an independent

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 3>medical expert. He called that doctor, the one who conducted

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the child medical evaluation for the state, and he got

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 3>that doctor to say, no, there wasn't any physical abuse.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 3>But that doctor also said, in a lot of cases

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 3>of sex abuse, the exam is normal. So that was

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 3>completely unhelpful.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean to have the medical examination conducted three weeks later.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Our bodies are elastic, they heal. Of course, they weren't

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>going to find anything three weeks later unless the damage

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was so severe, which I don't even want to imagine,

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and thankfully we don't have to in this case. There

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>was no damage even three weeks earlier, so Amy's mother,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Diane and Lydia made the babysitter also took the stand. Obviously,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>they weren't witnesses to anything, so I'm not sure what

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>they had to offer on And Howard, you took the

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>stand as well, denying the charges, saying that the comment

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about you being nasty, this all started with you disciplining

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Amy for poor behavior. Your wife also testified about the

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>size of your mobile home and how she had never

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>heard any screams or anything unusual during Amy's visits, as

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>well as how she was up at all hours nursing

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a newborn, which rendered all these claims impossible.

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 2>And one more thing, I heard that a jewis said

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 2>that I was believable and Amy was believable, but they

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>said at the end of the day they had to

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>go with the daughter.

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>No, why not go with.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 2>The ether dance?

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Right? I mean, if you have two people telling completely

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>different stories, now granted one of them as a nine

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>year old child, go with the evidence.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>The problem with these cases, particularly during that period of time,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 3>was that people were told they had to believe the children.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 3>His daughter is saying it right, Why would she say

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 3>that it has to be true?

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately, the jury went out. When they came back in,

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>did you still have hope that finally the truth would

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>come out and you could go back to your normal life.

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 2>When you was an innocent individual. Absolutely, you look for

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>them to come back, get this over with, f I

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 2>can go home, go back with my life. As I

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 2>stood that, that's what I was looking to hear. And

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I watched twelve jurors come out and say guilty, guilty, guilty.

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 2>I say, I can't believe this is happening. It's ridiculous.

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 2>You know what society sometimes saying what people in philm say,

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 2>you were found guilty. I liked to use the term

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I was made guilty, but they had absolutely nothing to

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 2>prove that I was guilty. And inside PRISM, that's a

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>terrible case to carry inside the prison because everybody is

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 2>talking have their opinion about your case or what they

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>seen on the news. I slung hard to my relationship

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.239
<v Speaker 2>with God and I met other Christians that was in

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 2>prison God that had made some mistakes, bad choices, and

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 2>we connected and sharing my story talking to them, that's

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 2>what helped me to be again to deal with my

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 2>situation at hand, and it got a little better from there.

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 2>And people began to believe in me. I never dropped my.

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Relationship with God.

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I kept it for the twenty four years in prison, prayer,

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 2>read my Bible each and every day. That's something I

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 2>did every day, repetition. That was my survival course.

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that you found a way through considering what

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>prison in life can be like for someone found or

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>actually made guilty of a crime like the one that

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>never happened in this case. And it must have eased

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>your burden in your mind a bit. When your daughter

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Amy came forward to recant immediately after trial, can you

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>tell us about that? Did it surprise you? I knew

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>my daughter.

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>It didn't surprise me. But what surprised me she did

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 2>it so quickly. I knew my daughter. I knew she

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 2>couldn't live with that because she and I were so close.

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 2>It wouldn't have been so bad. We had a close relationship.

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I was a good day and I loved my daughter,

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.719
<v Speaker 2>still love her the day. That's why it affected her

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 2>so bad when she had to live with what she

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 2>had to live with, which was a lot. Right now today,

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>she'll tell me right now today that I think I

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 2>owe you an explanation I said, no, you don't owe

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>me an explanation. I know I was a good day.

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't a perfect day. I definitely wasn't a perfect boyfriend.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And by the way, you don't get life in

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>prison for being a bad boyfriend. Not even in this

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>country did Diane ever come around.

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Before Diane Amy's mother passed away, she was even trying

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 2>to get me out of prison. We went to court

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 2>and she made a statement. I didn't know Amy wood Lyne.

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I thought she was telling the truth. These are her words.

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So with these two very powerful recantations, plus support from

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>family and your church, they hired a lawyer to mount

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>your post conviction campaign.

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:45.959
<v Speaker 2>My family hired a seasoned lawyer in Kenston, James Perry.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 2>We thought that he would do the investigation that never

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 2>occurred previously when we realized that the information that was

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 2>needed to free me. He didn't get it. But he

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 2>did come down to talk to me when I was

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 2>in prison. But his conversation it was only about me

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 2>taking a flea bark and get out of Frism. I

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 2>wasn't about to say I committed a crime against my

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>daughter just to get out of film. If I was

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 2>going to do that I would never came to film

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 2>because that door was open for me at the very beginning.

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 3>So the reason the earlier lawyers, including mister Perry, failed

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 3>is in part because they had a fundamental misunderstanding of

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 3>what you needed to do to get relief in a

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 3>recantation case. The recantation the case is when the principal

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 3>witness or a material witness lies during the trial and

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 3>then they admitted, like Amy did immediately after the trial,

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 3>she was with a different babysitter. That babysitter was reading

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 3>a Bible story about truth and Amy started crying and said,

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I lied on my daddy. So that gives you an

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to go back into court on a recantation claim.

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 3>But what they did was just put Amy on the stand,

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 3>and Amy says, okay, I lied. But they don't give

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 3>the judge anything else because then the judge has, well,

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 3>she told story a trial and now she's telling story

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.479
<v Speaker 3>b How do I decide which one is the truth?

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So when we got it, we said, how can we

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 3>provide the judge the context to understand that Amy's recantation

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 3>is true and her trial testimony is false?

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Right? Not only was his trial lawyer wildly ineffective, but

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>his seasoned appellat attorney neglected to do what was necessary

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in a recantation case as well, so as I understand it,

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Howard's friend a volunteer who would come into work in

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the prison chapel, a guy named Lewis Alexander May he

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>rest in peace. He advocated for Howard with the Duke

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Wrongful Convisions Clinic, and that really put Howard on the

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>radar and on the path of freedom.

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 3>A really important step along that path, though, was a

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 3>series of articles written by a man of a journalist

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 3>named Joseph Neff who's now with the Marshall Project. He

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 3>worked for the Raleigh News and Observer and he wrote

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 3>a series on Howard's case that really helped us, including

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 3>he got an interview with the Guardian at Lightham who

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 3>spoke out of turn. He realized he shouldn't have spoken

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 3>to a journalist and called the journalist the next day,

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I believe and said, can I say now that that

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 3>was all off record? And the journalist said no, And

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 3>so we had what the Guardian and Lightem thought about

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 3>the case. We accepted Howard's case in two thousand and eight,

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 3>and we investigate fully.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>We had a.

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Remarkable expert, a woman named Sally Johnson, an MD psychiatrist,

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 3>and she did testing of Howard and Amy and it

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 3>was extremely helpful information. But it did take five years

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 3>to file the motion for appropriate reliefs that collected all

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 3>of the evidence. During that time, we were also talking

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 3>to the district attorney, which is what we do in

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 3>every case. We try to get the district attorney to

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 3>agree with us and join us in seeking relief for

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 3>our clients. But it didn't work in that case, actually

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 3>lasted through that district attorney and another. We then had

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 3>to go before the judge, Judge Paul Jones, who was

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 3>the last person to deny relief to Howard. We had

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 3>to convince him not to bar us procedurally which is

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 3>a court mechanism, and to allow us to reopen the

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 3>case in court, and we did. He allowed us to

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 3>go forward with all of our claims and then he

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 3>re accused himself, so we had a different judge.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So now you Jamie Lao, who our listeners will of

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>course remember from the Ronnie Long case, and another great

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>lawyer of Spencer Paris, a friend of yours. Therese a

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>tremendous trial lawyer who came out of retirement just for

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this case. The three of you prepared for this hearing

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen.

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 3>We had seven claims. The very first claim which I

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 3>was amused when I look back at it this morning.

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 3>The very first claim is Howard Dudley is innocent, and

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 3>then we lay out and make just an argument for

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 3>his innocence. You can't win on innocence. There is no

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 3>pre standing claim in North Carolina or nearly anywhere. But

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 3>innocence is enough. But if you actually make a claim,

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 3>a real claim of it, there's just a corresponding increased

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 3>likelihood in the past cases. He looked at of relief,

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 3>so I'm like, we're leading off with claim of innocence.

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 3>So but then the other claims were all the context right.

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 3>So it was that Amy was tested on suggestibility and

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 3>she truly is more suggestible than ninety nine point nine

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 3>percent of the general population. And that was done by

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 3>doctor Sally Johnson. That was a real forensic evaluation that

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Amy has low IQ in the sixty eight range, which

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 3>makes her less able in some ways to understand the

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 3>ramifications of what was happening. That it arose in this

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 3>period of mass hysteria, and we explained the context of

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the little Rascal's trial happening essentially next door. We had

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 3>three claims, and in effective assistance of counsel, that explained

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 3>everything that the lawyer failed to do, including getting all

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the documents from the department's Social services and from Paul Porter.

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 3>The Guardian enlightened, so we put all of that together

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 3>and that bolstered Amy's recantation. One amazing thing that happened

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 3>at that hearing, though, was that when Amy was on

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 3>the stand and it's difficult for her as a nine

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 3>year old, as a teenager again and then as a

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 3>grown woman, but the judge asked if he could speak

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 3>to her directly.

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 2>The judge turned it toward Amy and he said, look

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 2>at me. This ain't got nothing to do with Just

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 2>between me and you. He said, did your daddy do

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 2>anything to you? She said, no, sir, and that was

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 2>all he needed.

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So on March second, twenty sixteen, the Honorable Judge Parsons

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>agreed that Amy's recantation was credible, that there was ineffective

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>assistance of counsel, and that the prosecution failed to disclose

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 1>both the Social Services report as well as the fact

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Guardian ad litem had concluded that Amy's claims

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>were false. The prosecution would eventually dismiss all charges two

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>months later. But what was that moment like when the

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>judge vacated your confection and finally ordered you at least

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>from prison and.

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 2>We sit there and caught miss Newman held my arm.

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 2>She would look around at my family and would a

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 2>smile on and I knew it was going in our favor,

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 2>but I had had so many let down so I

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't know what to believe, you know, and so when

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 2>things really like to knock me out. When that judge

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 2>turned around and looked at me said most of Della,

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 2>you're going home today, I said to myself, did I

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 2>hear what I think I heard? And I didn't tell

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 2>me Nan, I was more fainted. But that was a

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 2>great moment. My family, everybody started to roy in the

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 2>court room, and it was just a high moment.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 3>My favorite story is, because I'm a lawyer and a

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 3>rule follower, We're walking out and Howard's wearing his prison

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 3>guard and he's just dropping it behind him on the ground,

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 3>and I'm like, we've got to read Howard we have

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 3>to return these. He looked at me like I was insane.

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 3>I am not worried about returning.

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Close.

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 3>We get outside and they're just throngs of his supporters

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and reporters and Joe Naffer of the series on News

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 3>attended the whole hearing. He was writing more it was

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 3>a truly joyous, joyous day.

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>It was great.

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 2>It was great when I walked out the door. Freedom,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:26.720
<v Speaker 2>It was freedom. But it hit me that my wife

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 2>wasn't there to see this. She worked so hard, My

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 2>mama wasn't there to see this. That was a moment

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 2>that called me to break down. They were hard at

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 2>this pacificlar moment because they wasn't there. They worked so hard.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 2>One day my wife just fell digated my mama. I

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 2>visit her the last time in Rex hospital. We sung together,

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 2>we prayed together, we cried together, and I left that day.

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 2>I knew that would be the last time I would

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 2>see her alive. And those emotions just came on me

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 2>all at once when I was walking out, and it

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 2>just overtook me. But very good day, you know, a

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 2>very difficult day.

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Bittersweet, yeah, bittersweet. So then in April twenty eighteen, you

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>followed the federal civil rights suit against the City of Kinston,

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>seeking compensation. They eventually settled in July twenty twenty one.

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I mean nothing they could ever pay

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you with make up for.

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 2>What you lost, absolutely nothing, absolutely nothing.

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>And then you are granted a pardon of innocence from

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Governor Roy Cooper. So not only did the prosecution dismiss

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the charges, but then you've got it officially recognized, officially.

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I got hanging on my wall. I'd like to

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 2>say this right here, Jamie, most of special miss Newman,

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 2>the Duke Law Team. I like to see it like

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 2>this right here.

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>They saved my life.

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 2>They saved my life. I can't put it in no

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>better words in that right there, all of them.

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, we'll be sure to link up to the Duke

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Law School Wrongful Conviction Clinic, but check the link in

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the bio in the episode. And now I'll turn to

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>closing arguments. You know, it starts off with me, of course,

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>thanking both of you for joining us, Teresa Howard, and

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>so now we're going to turn to closing arguments. This

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is the part of the show where I turn my

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>microphone off and leave both of yours on and just

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to anything else you want to share with me

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in our audience. So, Teresa, why don't you go first?

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Then hand the mic off to Howard, and Howard you

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can take us out into the sunset.

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Every time Howard and I have an opportunity to talk

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 3>about this case, whether it's publicly or in private, I

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 3>learn something new about Howard. And what I learned today

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 3>is that Howard sees himself as sort of every man

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 3>or ordinary man, just a regular person trying to live

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 3>his life, when in fact, I and the people who've

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 3>gotten to know him through this long journey would say

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 3>he's truly extraordinary in that he refused to do what

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 3>I think so many of us would do to go

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 3>home to be with our families. He refused to take

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 3>that early exit with the plea bargain before trial and

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 3>later when it looked like maybe it was going to

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 3>be offered through the previous lawyers, and he refused to

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:34.399
<v Speaker 3>do that because he is a man of truly remarkable integrity,

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 3>and as he says, I wanted to be able to

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 3>look in the mirror and say, you know, I could

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 3>not have taken that plea and admitted to doing the

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 3>things that I did not do. In that that I

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 3>have lived my life in a different way from what

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 3>they expect me to say. So, Howard, you're truly extraordinary.

0:39:54.760 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Well on my behalf, I might say that Teresa Jamie Muster, Spencer,

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 4>mister Coleman, the Doke Law students like saying that they

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 4>have helped to restore my integrity of the law.

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 2>Didn't think they were such thing after my situation as

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 2>any lawyer that had a heart, I really didn't think

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 2>that until they restored it. There is some good lawyers

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 2>out there. There is some that got a heart. There

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 2>is some that want to do the right thing. There

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 2>is some that take their work serious. There is something

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 2>that out there that really really care about what they

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 2>are doing people life. Like I said earlier and I

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 2>continue to say this, because they saved my life.

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I was in a.

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Situation that I didn't think I would never get.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Out of it.

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I had so many nose I didn't think it was

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 2>such things. Yes, when it come down to lawyers and

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 2>this was the turn, I had no idea. But I

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 2>can never say enough about what they had done on

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 2>my behalf, restoring my freedom back and back with my family,

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and children, even though they have wrong now, but I hold.

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>It all to them. Well.

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Family will family, real family.

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. I'd like to

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>thank our production team Connor Hall, Jeff Cliburn and Kevin Wardis,

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 1>with research by Lyla Robinson. The music in this production

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>was supplied by three time OSCAR nominated composer Jay Ralph.

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to follow us on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction,

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook at Wrongful Conviction Podcast, and on Twitter at

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>wrong Conviction, as well as at Lava for Good. On

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.800
<v Speaker 1>all three platforms, you can also follow me on both

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and Instagram at it's Jason Flam. Wrongful Conviction is

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the production of Lava for Good podcast and association with

0:41:50.840 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Signal Company Number one