WEBVTT - GameStop Is Just The Beginning 

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:23.676
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:23.716 --> 0:00:27.156
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:27.716 --> 0:00:31.756
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. This is still the beginning of our

0:00:31.796 --> 0:00:34.956
<v Speaker 1>new season here on Deep Background, and we've been talking

0:00:34.996 --> 0:00:39.356
<v Speaker 1>about the Trump transition, the impeachment trial, and of course

0:00:39.596 --> 0:00:45.076
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing pandemic. This week, though, another story emerged from

0:00:45.116 --> 0:00:49.596
<v Speaker 1>out of the blue, a story sufficiently interesting and unexpected

0:00:49.676 --> 0:00:53.596
<v Speaker 1>that we decided we shouldn't ignore it, in particular because

0:00:53.716 --> 0:00:58.116
<v Speaker 1>this year we're focused on the theme of power. By now,

0:00:58.356 --> 0:01:01.676
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all of you must have heard about last

0:01:01.716 --> 0:01:06.476
<v Speaker 1>week's run on game Stop stock, a short squeeze that

0:01:06.596 --> 0:01:11.756
<v Speaker 1>began around a Reddit group called Wall Street Bets. Within

0:01:11.836 --> 0:01:14.956
<v Speaker 1>ten days, the game Stop stock gained more than ten

0:01:14.996 --> 0:01:18.796
<v Speaker 1>times its value, causing billions and losses to hedge funds

0:01:18.836 --> 0:01:21.476
<v Speaker 1>who had short at the stock, raising the stock to

0:01:21.516 --> 0:01:24.396
<v Speaker 1>a point where almost inevitably it will have to come

0:01:24.436 --> 0:01:29.156
<v Speaker 1>down very substantial because the markets teetered for a moment.

0:01:29.236 --> 0:01:32.756
<v Speaker 1>This became a lead story around the world, and it's

0:01:32.796 --> 0:01:37.116
<v Speaker 1>a strange story. The odd issue on which it appears.

0:01:37.116 --> 0:01:41.036
<v Speaker 1>Both Alexandrio Casio Cortez and Donald Trump Junior seemed to

0:01:41.036 --> 0:01:43.796
<v Speaker 1>be on the same side. Here to speak to us

0:01:43.796 --> 0:01:47.396
<v Speaker 1>today and make sense of this complex and fascinating topic

0:01:47.796 --> 0:01:50.956
<v Speaker 1>is Alexis Goldstein, a former Wall Street pro who now

0:01:50.956 --> 0:01:54.956
<v Speaker 1>works as a senior policy analyst at Americans for Financial Reform.

0:01:55.116 --> 0:01:58.916
<v Speaker 1>She writes the popular newsletter Markets Weekly. I asked her

0:01:58.956 --> 0:02:01.676
<v Speaker 1>to begin by giving us a little summary of the

0:02:01.716 --> 0:02:04.796
<v Speaker 1>game Stop craziness before turning to the question of what

0:02:04.876 --> 0:02:08.596
<v Speaker 1>it means for the allocation of power in markets in

0:02:08.676 --> 0:02:14.716
<v Speaker 1>Polity and beyond. Alexis, thank you so much for joining me.

0:02:15.036 --> 0:02:17.196
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we could start by my just asking you, for

0:02:17.316 --> 0:02:23.756
<v Speaker 1>purposes of the general listener, what happened specifically with respect

0:02:24.156 --> 0:02:28.636
<v Speaker 1>to the Game Stop stock last week. So there has

0:02:28.716 --> 0:02:32.276
<v Speaker 1>been a real increase in what we call retail trading

0:02:32.556 --> 0:02:36.156
<v Speaker 1>since the pandemic. So retail trading just refers to non

0:02:36.236 --> 0:02:39.156
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street people. Maybe it's you, maybe it's me, Maybe

0:02:39.156 --> 0:02:42.836
<v Speaker 1>it's our friends using some kind of online brokerage like

0:02:42.996 --> 0:02:46.516
<v Speaker 1>e Trade, like Fidelity, like Interactive Brokers, and more recently

0:02:46.596 --> 0:02:49.556
<v Speaker 1>like robin Hood just to trade, you know, as a

0:02:49.636 --> 0:02:52.716
<v Speaker 1>non professional. So there has been this really big surge

0:02:52.796 --> 0:02:55.796
<v Speaker 1>in retail trading since the pandemic. Maybe you know, part

0:02:55.796 --> 0:02:58.396
<v Speaker 1>of that is because people are at home. And there's

0:02:58.396 --> 0:03:00.796
<v Speaker 1>also been this growth in the popularity of a particular

0:03:00.876 --> 0:03:04.156
<v Speaker 1>selb breddit called Wall Street Bets that is focused on

0:03:04.516 --> 0:03:08.116
<v Speaker 1>basically gambling in my opinion on the stock market and picking,

0:03:08.196 --> 0:03:11.276
<v Speaker 1>you know, hot stocks to bet four or against. And

0:03:11.356 --> 0:03:15.396
<v Speaker 1>there was one particular person on that subreddit who really

0:03:15.396 --> 0:03:17.476
<v Speaker 1>thought that game Stop was a goodbye and have been

0:03:17.516 --> 0:03:19.036
<v Speaker 1>talking about it for a while. And I guess the

0:03:19.036 --> 0:03:22.356
<v Speaker 1>popularity of that as a position grew and grew, and

0:03:22.396 --> 0:03:24.716
<v Speaker 1>then it was sort of compounded by the fact that

0:03:24.916 --> 0:03:28.756
<v Speaker 1>this reddit forum was looking at the list of stocks

0:03:28.836 --> 0:03:32.916
<v Speaker 1>that are most frequently shorted. So a short is when

0:03:32.996 --> 0:03:36.356
<v Speaker 1>you are betting that the stock price will fall, and

0:03:36.396 --> 0:03:39.476
<v Speaker 1>the way that that is operationalized is you borrow the

0:03:39.516 --> 0:03:42.996
<v Speaker 1>stock from somebody who owns it. They lend it to you,

0:03:42.996 --> 0:03:46.156
<v Speaker 1>You immediately sell it, and then you sit tight and

0:03:46.236 --> 0:03:48.916
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you don't worry too much and wait for the

0:03:48.916 --> 0:03:51.876
<v Speaker 1>stock to drop, and if it drops, you can buy

0:03:51.876 --> 0:03:53.996
<v Speaker 1>it back at a cheaper price, return it to the

0:03:54.036 --> 0:03:56.396
<v Speaker 1>person who loaned it to You give a little bit

0:03:56.396 --> 0:03:58.796
<v Speaker 1>of interest on the loan of the stock, and you

0:03:58.836 --> 0:04:01.316
<v Speaker 1>make a nice profit. That's how it's supposed to work.

0:04:02.716 --> 0:04:04.596
<v Speaker 1>So they were looking at this list of all of

0:04:04.636 --> 0:04:08.116
<v Speaker 1>these stocks that were very frequently shorted, and GameStop was

0:04:08.156 --> 0:04:11.236
<v Speaker 1>one of them, and they decided to manufacture what is

0:04:11.276 --> 0:04:14.636
<v Speaker 1>called a short squeeze. And a short squeeze is essentially,

0:04:14.836 --> 0:04:18.276
<v Speaker 1>if I'm short a stock and I don't want to

0:04:18.316 --> 0:04:21.076
<v Speaker 1>give it up yet, and it starts to move against me,

0:04:21.436 --> 0:04:24.796
<v Speaker 1>and it starts to rise above where I sold at,

0:04:25.076 --> 0:04:28.156
<v Speaker 1>and it rises and rise and rises. The person that

0:04:28.236 --> 0:04:29.956
<v Speaker 1>lends me the stock isn't just going to be like

0:04:30.076 --> 0:04:33.236
<v Speaker 1>chill and normal and wait for me to turn a

0:04:33.276 --> 0:04:36.716
<v Speaker 1>profit again. They're gonna demand some cash because they're worried

0:04:36.716 --> 0:04:38.516
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to blow up and I won't be able

0:04:38.516 --> 0:04:40.676
<v Speaker 1>to perhaps return the stocks to them because I won't

0:04:40.676 --> 0:04:43.556
<v Speaker 1>have any money left. And that's what's called a margin call.

0:04:44.316 --> 0:04:46.156
<v Speaker 1>And so a short squeeze is kind of like when

0:04:46.196 --> 0:04:49.876
<v Speaker 1>collectively all of these shorts start to have their positions

0:04:49.956 --> 0:04:52.836
<v Speaker 1>move against them, the lenders of the stock to them

0:04:53.236 --> 0:04:56.076
<v Speaker 1>demand some money, right, they make a margin call on

0:04:56.116 --> 0:04:57.876
<v Speaker 1>all of them, and then they have a choice. They

0:04:57.916 --> 0:05:00.236
<v Speaker 1>either have to close out the position at a huge loss,

0:05:00.916 --> 0:05:02.676
<v Speaker 1>or they have to sell a bunch of other stuff

0:05:02.716 --> 0:05:04.676
<v Speaker 1>in order to put up some money so that they

0:05:04.676 --> 0:05:08.356
<v Speaker 1>can keep going in hope maybe this position will move

0:05:08.436 --> 0:05:12.236
<v Speaker 1>against them. So these folks on Reddit basically decided collectively,

0:05:12.796 --> 0:05:15.636
<v Speaker 1>all together they were going to try and manufacture a

0:05:15.716 --> 0:05:19.196
<v Speaker 1>short squeeze on game Stop by a bunch of retail

0:05:19.236 --> 0:05:22.156
<v Speaker 1>traders all buying games Stopped together at the same time,

0:05:23.956 --> 0:05:27.636
<v Speaker 1>and they did so. That was a great setup. And

0:05:27.916 --> 0:05:31.356
<v Speaker 1>collective is actually a fascinating word here, because although all

0:05:31.396 --> 0:05:34.836
<v Speaker 1>the people on Reddit in some sense acted collectively to

0:05:35.116 --> 0:05:37.476
<v Speaker 1>do this together, none of them was looking over the

0:05:37.556 --> 0:05:39.756
<v Speaker 1>other's shoulder in such a way that they could actually

0:05:39.796 --> 0:05:42.356
<v Speaker 1>judge whether they were really doing it. But as it happens,

0:05:42.516 --> 0:05:45.276
<v Speaker 1>they really did do it. And once they started doing that,

0:05:45.516 --> 0:05:50.236
<v Speaker 1>the price of game Stop stock started going up, which

0:05:50.236 --> 0:05:51.476
<v Speaker 1>it would have gone up in any case if a

0:05:51.516 --> 0:05:53.316
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were trying to buy it, and then

0:05:53.356 --> 0:05:57.636
<v Speaker 1>that in turn led the short sellers to have to

0:05:57.636 --> 0:05:59.716
<v Speaker 1>buy more of the stock, which also drove the price up,

0:05:59.956 --> 0:06:01.916
<v Speaker 1>and by the end of the process the stock was

0:06:01.956 --> 0:06:06.116
<v Speaker 1>at a remarkably huge multiple of its prior value, right right.

0:06:06.116 --> 0:06:08.156
<v Speaker 1>And it's sort of compounded by the fact that a

0:06:08.156 --> 0:06:10.956
<v Speaker 1>lot of the folks using robin Hood and all Reddit

0:06:12.516 --> 0:06:15.876
<v Speaker 1>are also buying options. So an option gives you the right,

0:06:15.956 --> 0:06:19.236
<v Speaker 1>but not the obligation, to purchase or sell a hundred

0:06:19.276 --> 0:06:21.716
<v Speaker 1>shares of a stock at some point in the future

0:06:21.916 --> 0:06:25.276
<v Speaker 1>for a set price. But the person that you typically

0:06:25.316 --> 0:06:29.436
<v Speaker 1>buy an option from is a market maker who does

0:06:29.476 --> 0:06:34.076
<v Speaker 1>what's called hedges their position by buying the stock. Right,

0:06:34.396 --> 0:06:38.356
<v Speaker 1>if I'm selling you, Noah, an option that lets you

0:06:38.476 --> 0:06:40.556
<v Speaker 1>buy something from me in the future, I need to

0:06:40.596 --> 0:06:42.636
<v Speaker 1>have that hundred shares of stocks to give to you,

0:06:42.996 --> 0:06:44.996
<v Speaker 1>and so typically, if I don't already have it, I'm

0:06:45.036 --> 0:06:46.396
<v Speaker 1>going to go out in the market and buy it.

0:06:46.476 --> 0:06:48.916
<v Speaker 1>So it was even further compounded by the fact that

0:06:48.916 --> 0:06:51.636
<v Speaker 1>there was all of this options activity, which the people

0:06:51.636 --> 0:06:54.276
<v Speaker 1>who sell the options have to hedge by again buying

0:06:54.316 --> 0:06:56.236
<v Speaker 1>the stock. So it was just sort of this confluence

0:06:56.276 --> 0:06:58.956
<v Speaker 1>of things. And then the only other wrinkle that I

0:06:58.996 --> 0:07:01.476
<v Speaker 1>will add to it. And this is just my suspicion, right,

0:07:01.516 --> 0:07:04.116
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we know for sure, but I don't

0:07:04.116 --> 0:07:06.036
<v Speaker 1>think this was just right. I don't think this was

0:07:06.076 --> 0:07:08.996
<v Speaker 1>just retail traders. They were very public about their plans,

0:07:09.396 --> 0:07:12.036
<v Speaker 1>and I suspect that you had a lot of institutional players,

0:07:12.036 --> 0:07:15.116
<v Speaker 1>maybe hedge funds that were also pushing the stock up

0:07:15.116 --> 0:07:17.516
<v Speaker 1>and making their own purchases. We don't know for sure, right,

0:07:17.516 --> 0:07:20.196
<v Speaker 1>but that's my suspicion, And just to clarify less, your

0:07:20.236 --> 0:07:22.956
<v Speaker 1>theory would be that those people were basically or those actors,

0:07:22.996 --> 0:07:25.596
<v Speaker 1>institutional actors were just piggybacking, right. They saw it happening,

0:07:25.596 --> 0:07:27.356
<v Speaker 1>they thought there was some probability that it would work,

0:07:27.516 --> 0:07:29.036
<v Speaker 1>and they said, oh, well, the stock's gonna go up.

0:07:29.076 --> 0:07:31.196
<v Speaker 1>Let's also buy some of the stock earlier on. That

0:07:31.236 --> 0:07:32.836
<v Speaker 1>would have driven the price to stock up as well.

0:07:32.836 --> 0:07:35.276
<v Speaker 1>It's not that those institutional actors would have thought that

0:07:35.276 --> 0:07:38.036
<v Speaker 1>there was quote unquote real value at the higher price point.

0:07:38.316 --> 0:07:40.676
<v Speaker 1>It's just that they saw the squeeze happening and they

0:07:40.676 --> 0:07:43.036
<v Speaker 1>thought they'd want to get in on the fun. Right.

0:07:43.116 --> 0:07:45.796
<v Speaker 1>That's my speculation, right, don't I don't think we know.

0:07:45.876 --> 0:07:47.756
<v Speaker 1>And the other sort of added wrinkle to that is

0:07:47.756 --> 0:07:50.116
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of players who don't really wait around

0:07:50.116 --> 0:07:52.516
<v Speaker 1>for that, who trade in and out of things very quickly,

0:07:52.516 --> 0:07:55.276
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, over fast time periods that may

0:07:55.356 --> 0:07:57.316
<v Speaker 1>also have been trying to profit off of it as

0:07:57.316 --> 0:07:59.516
<v Speaker 1>it went up because there's some volatility, right, It didn't

0:07:59.556 --> 0:08:01.516
<v Speaker 1>just shoot straight up like sometimes it goes up, it

0:08:01.556 --> 0:08:04.156
<v Speaker 1>goes down at Gozepico scone. So I think it was

0:08:04.196 --> 0:08:06.436
<v Speaker 1>a combination of things. But the short version is I

0:08:06.636 --> 0:08:09.236
<v Speaker 1>suspect while Street had some hand in this as well,

0:08:08.956 --> 0:08:11.876
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just retail. Yeah, and if it were institutional investors,

0:08:11.916 --> 0:08:14.116
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't just mean human beings of training desks. It

0:08:14.156 --> 0:08:17.236
<v Speaker 1>also means algorithmic training programs that don't care what the

0:08:17.276 --> 0:08:19.276
<v Speaker 1>thing is, but if they see a pattern of rise,

0:08:19.756 --> 0:08:21.916
<v Speaker 1>they might make the prediction and to buy, So that

0:08:21.956 --> 0:08:25.156
<v Speaker 1>could have contributed to it potentially as well. That leaves

0:08:25.196 --> 0:08:27.676
<v Speaker 1>just one last piece of the setup before we start

0:08:27.756 --> 0:08:29.676
<v Speaker 1>turning to the implications. And I just want to hit

0:08:29.676 --> 0:08:32.196
<v Speaker 1>on that because everything you've said so far just sounds

0:08:32.236 --> 0:08:35.876
<v Speaker 1>like it's a potentially happy story. Right, somebody is short

0:08:35.876 --> 0:08:38.196
<v Speaker 1>the stock, the prices go up. Not good for the

0:08:38.196 --> 0:08:40.156
<v Speaker 1>prisoner shorts to stock, but good for everybody else. The

0:08:40.156 --> 0:08:42.996
<v Speaker 1>stock goes up and up and up. But there's a downside,

0:08:43.036 --> 0:08:45.476
<v Speaker 1>which is that what goes up in this context almost

0:08:45.516 --> 0:08:49.236
<v Speaker 1>certainly must come down. So explain why the stock has

0:08:49.276 --> 0:08:52.436
<v Speaker 1>come down somewhat since then, and what ultimately, at least

0:08:52.436 --> 0:08:55.996
<v Speaker 1>in the view of most financial professionals, yourself included gives

0:08:56.076 --> 0:08:58.356
<v Speaker 1>us reason to believe the stock will end up way, way,

0:08:58.436 --> 0:09:00.556
<v Speaker 1>way lower than it was at its peak, and in fact,

0:09:00.916 --> 0:09:02.756
<v Speaker 1>maybe not so far from where it was when this

0:09:02.796 --> 0:09:07.796
<v Speaker 1>all started. So my concern, and I think other people's

0:09:07.836 --> 0:09:12.036
<v Speaker 1>concerns here, is that this looks like a bubble, and traditionally,

0:09:12.276 --> 0:09:15.716
<v Speaker 1>when you're in a bubble, the bubble bursts, and one

0:09:15.756 --> 0:09:18.836
<v Speaker 1>of the sort of traditional signs that you are in

0:09:18.916 --> 0:09:21.436
<v Speaker 1>a bubble. I don't know if it's scientific, but like

0:09:21.476 --> 0:09:23.636
<v Speaker 1>at least in the dot com bubble and the pre

0:09:23.716 --> 0:09:26.316
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight bubble, when you start to hear

0:09:26.396 --> 0:09:29.276
<v Speaker 1>from people who aren't typically paying attention to the markets

0:09:29.316 --> 0:09:31.116
<v Speaker 1>asking you if they should buy into the markets all

0:09:31.116 --> 0:09:33.196
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, that's usually the sign that the bubbles

0:09:33.236 --> 0:09:35.476
<v Speaker 1>about to burst. And I don't know about you Know it,

0:09:35.556 --> 0:09:37.636
<v Speaker 1>but I've had a lot of people asking me should

0:09:37.676 --> 0:09:40.836
<v Speaker 1>I buy you know, Nokia or BlackBerry? Right now? Should

0:09:40.836 --> 0:09:43.636
<v Speaker 1>I buy dog coin? There's a lot of interest from

0:09:43.636 --> 0:09:45.996
<v Speaker 1>my friends who are typically not people paying attention to

0:09:46.036 --> 0:09:47.956
<v Speaker 1>the financial markets, which says to me that we may

0:09:47.956 --> 0:09:50.876
<v Speaker 1>be approaching what's called the top right and when the

0:09:50.916 --> 0:09:54.236
<v Speaker 1>bubble burst, the bottom falls out. The prices collapse. And

0:09:54.356 --> 0:09:56.436
<v Speaker 1>the other reason that they that very well might happen

0:09:56.476 --> 0:09:59.676
<v Speaker 1>is GameStop isn't really I don't think that it's underlying

0:09:59.796 --> 0:10:03.756
<v Speaker 1>value justifies its current prices. It's certainly been widely reported

0:10:03.756 --> 0:10:06.996
<v Speaker 1>that there is skepticism about the current valuation of GameStop

0:10:07.036 --> 0:10:09.716
<v Speaker 1>and some of these other names like AMC, right, which

0:10:09.796 --> 0:10:12.356
<v Speaker 1>let's think about what that is. It's movie theaters. We're

0:10:12.396 --> 0:10:14.836
<v Speaker 1>still here in a pandemic. People aren't really going to

0:10:14.916 --> 0:10:17.196
<v Speaker 1>movie theaters that much. Does it really make sense for

0:10:17.196 --> 0:10:19.676
<v Speaker 1>the price of AMC to be surging, And so I

0:10:19.716 --> 0:10:22.716
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a concern that with the media attention,

0:10:23.276 --> 0:10:25.756
<v Speaker 1>it's going to draw in even more people to buy

0:10:25.796 --> 0:10:28.676
<v Speaker 1>these stocks, and some of those people are unfortunately probably

0:10:28.716 --> 0:10:31.036
<v Speaker 1>going to buy at the top and then it will collapse.

0:10:31.356 --> 0:10:34.836
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, like it's hard to predict when

0:10:34.876 --> 0:10:37.396
<v Speaker 1>that will happen, and I don't really have a prediction,

0:10:37.556 --> 0:10:39.196
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I think anyone who tells you when

0:10:39.196 --> 0:10:41.796
<v Speaker 1>it will happen doesn't really know for sure. The high

0:10:41.876 --> 0:10:45.876
<v Speaker 1>public interest is always reminiscent of the probably apocryphal story

0:10:45.916 --> 0:10:50.276
<v Speaker 1>about JP Morgan, whose shoeshine boy supposedly asked him a

0:10:50.276 --> 0:10:52.556
<v Speaker 1>few days before the big stock market crash in October

0:10:52.596 --> 0:10:55.396
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen twenty nine, could he the shoeshine Boy and

0:10:55.436 --> 0:10:57.836
<v Speaker 1>some of his friends buy forty dollars of stock through

0:10:57.916 --> 0:11:00.756
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan's brokerage firm, And according to the story, JP

0:11:00.876 --> 0:11:04.316
<v Speaker 1>Morgan went back to his office and told everybody, we're

0:11:04.316 --> 0:11:07.396
<v Speaker 1>getting out of our positions. We're going into cash because

0:11:07.476 --> 0:11:10.236
<v Speaker 1>this is not a good situation. And then Morgan looked

0:11:10.236 --> 0:11:12.156
<v Speaker 1>like a genius. Now again, there's there's a good amount

0:11:12.156 --> 0:11:14.036
<v Speaker 1>of apocryphy of that story, but I agree with you

0:11:14.076 --> 0:11:16.116
<v Speaker 1>as a kind of it's a good indicator. And in

0:11:16.156 --> 0:11:19.036
<v Speaker 1>my household, the indicator is my fifteen year old son,

0:11:19.356 --> 0:11:22.156
<v Speaker 1>whose interest both in crypto and in the stock market

0:11:22.276 --> 0:11:26.276
<v Speaker 1>was actively piqued by the recent rise in crypto prices,

0:11:26.276 --> 0:11:29.756
<v Speaker 1>by the game stop short squeeze, and I think by

0:11:29.796 --> 0:11:34.396
<v Speaker 1>the attention among people in his online worlds to these issues.

0:11:34.436 --> 0:11:37.676
<v Speaker 1>So that's a nice proxy as well for when everybody's

0:11:37.716 --> 0:11:41.916
<v Speaker 1>excited and involved, even the teenagers, there's reason in historical terms,

0:11:41.916 --> 0:11:43.516
<v Speaker 1>you think that maybe you're in some kind of a bubble.

0:11:43.916 --> 0:11:45.996
<v Speaker 1>I should add, by the way, that when I pointed

0:11:46.036 --> 0:11:48.276
<v Speaker 1>this out to my son, he made the sophisticated point

0:11:48.756 --> 0:11:51.756
<v Speaker 1>that you were ascribing to the institutional investors, which is,

0:11:52.036 --> 0:11:53.756
<v Speaker 1>of course that's true. But if you know how to

0:11:53.756 --> 0:11:55.076
<v Speaker 1>get in on it on the way up and don't

0:11:55.116 --> 0:11:57.236
<v Speaker 1>stay in it for too long, there's still profits to

0:11:57.276 --> 0:11:59.356
<v Speaker 1>be made. And you know, unfortunately for me, he is

0:11:59.436 --> 0:12:02.996
<v Speaker 1>analytically speaking correct about that problem. The problem is how

0:12:03.036 --> 0:12:06.436
<v Speaker 1>do you know when to get out? So yeah, exactly, exactly. Okay,

0:12:06.476 --> 0:12:08.876
<v Speaker 1>Now let's turn to analysis. And there's been a huge

0:12:08.876 --> 0:12:10.996
<v Speaker 1>amount of analysis just in a few days that this

0:12:11.036 --> 0:12:14.036
<v Speaker 1>has been going on about what is the deeper meaning

0:12:14.556 --> 0:12:16.276
<v Speaker 1>of these events? And I want to talk about a

0:12:16.276 --> 0:12:18.076
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different angles, but let's start with your take,

0:12:18.116 --> 0:12:22.116
<v Speaker 1>which I found particularly valuable, and that was to sum

0:12:22.156 --> 0:12:25.196
<v Speaker 1>it up, I'm using the quote from your piece the

0:12:25.276 --> 0:12:29.756
<v Speaker 1>GameStop madness. Isn't David against Goliath, namely the little guys

0:12:29.796 --> 0:12:33.356
<v Speaker 1>on the subreddit against the hedge funds. It's Goliath against

0:12:33.436 --> 0:12:36.676
<v Speaker 1>goliath with David as a fig leaf. So explain what

0:12:36.716 --> 0:12:41.036
<v Speaker 1>you mean, please, Alexis. So there's a narrative that's taken

0:12:41.076 --> 0:12:44.116
<v Speaker 1>hold that this is a triumph and a disruption of

0:12:44.116 --> 0:12:47.636
<v Speaker 1>our financial system, and that the folks on reddit are

0:12:48.076 --> 0:12:50.276
<v Speaker 1>you know, figuring out how to play Wall Streets game

0:12:50.396 --> 0:12:52.996
<v Speaker 1>and then play it against them and winning. And while

0:12:53.036 --> 0:12:56.316
<v Speaker 1>I don't dispute that they are absolutely using techniques that

0:12:56.476 --> 0:12:59.356
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street firms use, right like the short squeeze is

0:12:59.396 --> 0:13:02.236
<v Speaker 1>not an invention of Reddit. It is something that I

0:13:02.276 --> 0:13:04.516
<v Speaker 1>think hedge funds try to do to other hedge funds

0:13:04.596 --> 0:13:07.796
<v Speaker 1>all the time. I don't think that this is going

0:13:07.876 --> 0:13:11.756
<v Speaker 1>to topple the financial system, and in fact, I believe

0:13:12.156 --> 0:13:14.076
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have a crystal ball, but I would

0:13:14.076 --> 0:13:16.956
<v Speaker 1>predict that when we see the first quarter earnings of

0:13:16.996 --> 0:13:20.356
<v Speaker 1>the major Wall Street banks that are typically the best

0:13:20.396 --> 0:13:22.756
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trading operations, that they're going to have

0:13:22.836 --> 0:13:26.956
<v Speaker 1>extremely profitable first quarters. And the reason that I'm guessing

0:13:26.996 --> 0:13:29.716
<v Speaker 1>that is because I used to work on the technology

0:13:29.756 --> 0:13:34.236
<v Speaker 1>team with the equity derivatives trading desks at Mary Lynch

0:13:34.316 --> 0:13:37.756
<v Speaker 1>and then later at Deutsche Bank, and their most profitable

0:13:37.876 --> 0:13:40.116
<v Speaker 1>days by far, like the day that they made the

0:13:40.236 --> 0:13:42.996
<v Speaker 1>most money of the whole year, was the days when

0:13:43.036 --> 0:13:45.796
<v Speaker 1>prices were going crazy and there was tons of what's

0:13:45.796 --> 0:13:48.116
<v Speaker 1>called volatility, which is just kind of like you know,

0:13:48.236 --> 0:13:51.596
<v Speaker 1>price moving going up and down, and unpredictable action in

0:13:51.636 --> 0:13:54.476
<v Speaker 1>the markets. That was their favorite kind of day, right,

0:13:54.516 --> 0:13:57.836
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley's

0:13:58.036 --> 0:14:00.836
<v Speaker 1>they're called flow trading desks, but they basically sort of

0:14:00.836 --> 0:14:04.396
<v Speaker 1>sit there as intermediaries between buyers and sellers. It's maybe

0:14:04.476 --> 0:14:06.836
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, it could be insurance companies. It's all these

0:14:06.836 --> 0:14:10.156
<v Speaker 1>big institutional players that want to trade. Sometimes they don't

0:14:10.156 --> 0:14:12.196
<v Speaker 1>even want to trade on in an exchange. They want

0:14:12.196 --> 0:14:14.796
<v Speaker 1>to trade what's called over the counter, which is this

0:14:14.836 --> 0:14:19.316
<v Speaker 1>sort of market that is between Wall Street itself, totally

0:14:19.396 --> 0:14:22.876
<v Speaker 1>unavailable to retail traders, totally unavailable to these people on

0:14:22.916 --> 0:14:25.356
<v Speaker 1>writing you cannot trade over the counter through robin Hood.

0:14:25.756 --> 0:14:29.476
<v Speaker 1>You know, they have sophisticated risk management tools. They have

0:14:29.556 --> 0:14:33.516
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated trading software. They manage their risk. I worked with

0:14:33.556 --> 0:14:36.396
<v Speaker 1>the options trading desk, and so they had they had

0:14:36.436 --> 0:14:39.036
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really fancy risk management software, and they

0:14:39.076 --> 0:14:41.876
<v Speaker 1>knew how to hedge their orders and so they didn't

0:14:41.876 --> 0:14:43.676
<v Speaker 1>really care if the price went up or down because

0:14:43.716 --> 0:14:46.116
<v Speaker 1>they were hedged. And hedge just means like you have

0:14:46.196 --> 0:14:48.676
<v Speaker 1>some sort of risk management strategy in place so that

0:14:48.716 --> 0:14:51.116
<v Speaker 1>whatever the price does, you're not going to lose too

0:14:51.196 --> 0:14:53.356
<v Speaker 1>much money. You also won't make too much money, but

0:14:53.396 --> 0:14:55.796
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be okay, and they make money on volume.

0:14:56.036 --> 0:14:59.156
<v Speaker 1>So I suspect that the big titans on Wall Street

0:14:59.196 --> 0:15:02.276
<v Speaker 1>are doing quite fine, and if anything, this whole mania

0:15:02.436 --> 0:15:05.316
<v Speaker 1>is probably making them a ton of money. That's sort

0:15:05.356 --> 0:15:09.356
<v Speaker 1>of my one piece. The second piece is, so let's

0:15:09.676 --> 0:15:11.796
<v Speaker 1>move off the more traditional Wall Street and look at

0:15:11.836 --> 0:15:15.916
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds. So Wall Street that's the the subreddit that

0:15:16.036 --> 0:15:18.516
<v Speaker 1>has been in the news a lot cheered the collapse

0:15:18.556 --> 0:15:21.116
<v Speaker 1>of Melvin Capital, which was a hedge fund that was

0:15:21.156 --> 0:15:24.316
<v Speaker 1>betting against Game Stop and fell victim to the short squeeze.

0:15:24.836 --> 0:15:27.316
<v Speaker 1>They were rescued by two hedge funds. One of them

0:15:27.356 --> 0:15:30.716
<v Speaker 1>is Citadel LLC, which is run by a billionaire named

0:15:30.756 --> 0:15:33.916
<v Speaker 1>Ken Griffin out of Chicago, and the other is Point

0:15:33.996 --> 0:15:37.236
<v Speaker 1>seventy two, which is the new fund of Steve Cohen,

0:15:37.756 --> 0:15:40.316
<v Speaker 1>who he's also the New York Mets owner, so people

0:15:40.356 --> 0:15:43.396
<v Speaker 1>may know him from that. But his old fund sac

0:15:44.116 --> 0:15:46.796
<v Speaker 1>plaged guilty in twenty thirteen to insider trading and had

0:15:46.836 --> 0:15:49.116
<v Speaker 1>to shut down. So why am I bringing this up.

0:15:49.156 --> 0:15:51.796
<v Speaker 1>I'm bringing this up because one hedge fund blows up,

0:15:52.236 --> 0:15:54.996
<v Speaker 1>other hedge funds rescue it. Now they get to have

0:15:55.076 --> 0:15:58.076
<v Speaker 1>a revenue sharing agreement with Melvin Capital in the future

0:15:58.196 --> 0:16:00.756
<v Speaker 1>that's probably going to be profitable for them, right. So

0:16:00.836 --> 0:16:04.076
<v Speaker 1>I just don't really think that the Goliaths are suffering.

0:16:04.796 --> 0:16:07.076
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that some of the David's are

0:16:07.076 --> 0:16:09.316
<v Speaker 1>going to get rich and have gotten rich, but I

0:16:09.316 --> 0:16:10.796
<v Speaker 1>just don't think that that means that we're going to

0:16:10.876 --> 0:16:13.756
<v Speaker 1>have a fundamental shift in the way that the system works.

0:16:13.796 --> 0:16:15.796
<v Speaker 1>If anything, I think it might make a lot of

0:16:15.796 --> 0:16:18.796
<v Speaker 1>the goliath a lot more rich. Let me press on

0:16:19.196 --> 0:16:21.436
<v Speaker 1>your critique of the narrative, and let me be clear,

0:16:21.516 --> 0:16:24.876
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree with you more that the big institutional

0:16:24.876 --> 0:16:27.916
<v Speaker 1>players will be fine, and that the hedge fund industry

0:16:28.116 --> 0:16:30.716
<v Speaker 1>will be fine. And what's more, even that you know

0:16:30.836 --> 0:16:34.756
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Capital and Gabriel Plotkin, who is the extremely well

0:16:34.796 --> 0:16:37.516
<v Speaker 1>thought of person who runs the fun will be he

0:16:37.556 --> 0:16:39.676
<v Speaker 1>will be just fine. He probably is just fine. But

0:16:39.716 --> 0:16:42.756
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask about what's really going on behind

0:16:42.876 --> 0:16:46.116
<v Speaker 1>the David versus Goliath narrative. I mean, just focusing on

0:16:46.156 --> 0:16:50.316
<v Speaker 1>this one episode in which a small number of people

0:16:50.396 --> 0:16:53.436
<v Speaker 1>who were not for the most part, it seems professional

0:16:53.436 --> 0:16:58.516
<v Speaker 1>investors were able to achieve something on their own as

0:16:58.556 --> 0:17:00.116
<v Speaker 1>it were, and that seemed to me to have a

0:17:00.196 --> 0:17:03.556
<v Speaker 1>kind of symbolic effect, you know, the perception that Wall

0:17:03.556 --> 0:17:06.876
<v Speaker 1>Street wealth is something that's only available to the very

0:17:06.916 --> 0:17:11.436
<v Speaker 1>well healed seemed to east in a moment be broken

0:17:11.516 --> 0:17:12.956
<v Speaker 1>and there in that sense, it seemed to be a

0:17:12.996 --> 0:17:17.916
<v Speaker 1>kind of populism associated with the moment, not unlike the

0:17:17.996 --> 0:17:22.196
<v Speaker 1>populism of the Donald Trump movement. And that narrative seems

0:17:22.236 --> 0:17:24.396
<v Speaker 1>to have some legs to it. Even if everything you

0:17:24.516 --> 0:17:27.436
<v Speaker 1>say is true, as I believe that it is, let

0:17:27.476 --> 0:17:29.276
<v Speaker 1>me ask you about the kind of populous side of

0:17:29.276 --> 0:17:33.956
<v Speaker 1>the narrative. I mean, look, yes, is this a triumph

0:17:33.996 --> 0:17:38.836
<v Speaker 1>of financial literacy and education and people learning perhaps more

0:17:38.876 --> 0:17:43.836
<v Speaker 1>about options than they may have previously planned. Yes? And

0:17:44.036 --> 0:17:47.356
<v Speaker 1>is this an interesting way to try and move markets

0:17:47.396 --> 0:17:48.916
<v Speaker 1>and is it going to be a way that other

0:17:48.916 --> 0:17:50.916
<v Speaker 1>people will try to move markets in the future. Yes?

0:17:51.196 --> 0:17:53.956
<v Speaker 1>And are there people that are making astonishing amounts of

0:17:53.996 --> 0:17:56.596
<v Speaker 1>money right now? Yes? Yes, all of that is yes.

0:17:56.956 --> 0:17:58.996
<v Speaker 1>But look, let's think about the moment that we're in.

0:17:59.036 --> 0:18:01.916
<v Speaker 1>We're in a moment of extreme inequality that's getting worse.

0:18:02.436 --> 0:18:06.556
<v Speaker 1>We have millions of people unemployed, We have over four

0:18:06.636 --> 0:18:11.236
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dead from the coronavirus. And I think speculation

0:18:11.436 --> 0:18:15.316
<v Speaker 1>is an incredibly alluring thing right now in the absence

0:18:15.356 --> 0:18:18.196
<v Speaker 1>of larger government support for our people, which I would

0:18:18.236 --> 0:18:21.196
<v Speaker 1>point out is perhaps an aberration here in the United

0:18:21.196 --> 0:18:22.876
<v Speaker 1>States when you compare us to some of the other

0:18:23.156 --> 0:18:26.716
<v Speaker 1>countries in the world. And so, yes, it perhaps is

0:18:26.716 --> 0:18:28.156
<v Speaker 1>a feel good story, and it's going to be a

0:18:28.196 --> 0:18:31.316
<v Speaker 1>really great tangible material benefit to the people that happen

0:18:31.356 --> 0:18:33.796
<v Speaker 1>to get into game stop in time. But I am

0:18:33.796 --> 0:18:37.036
<v Speaker 1>more concerned with, you know, what do we actually do

0:18:37.116 --> 0:18:39.436
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that everybody is okay? And I don't

0:18:39.516 --> 0:18:42.676
<v Speaker 1>think that using Wall Street's own tools against Wall Street

0:18:43.036 --> 0:18:45.756
<v Speaker 1>is the right way to lift all boats here, because

0:18:45.756 --> 0:18:47.876
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street is, let's remember, at the end of the day,

0:18:47.916 --> 0:18:50.516
<v Speaker 1>a zero sum game, and so when you have winners,

0:18:50.556 --> 0:18:52.196
<v Speaker 1>you are also going to have losers. And who are

0:18:52.196 --> 0:18:55.356
<v Speaker 1>those losers? And what happened when there was the short squeeze?

0:18:55.396 --> 0:18:57.556
<v Speaker 1>Right when there was the short squeeze, the hedge ones

0:18:57.596 --> 0:18:59.956
<v Speaker 1>had to sell some of their assets in order to

0:18:59.996 --> 0:19:02.436
<v Speaker 1>pay the margin call or to close out their position,

0:19:03.036 --> 0:19:06.156
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the stock market went down. And

0:19:06.196 --> 0:19:08.396
<v Speaker 1>there are people who have pensions, and there are people

0:19:08.396 --> 0:19:11.436
<v Speaker 1>who have for k is. And look, let's I always

0:19:11.436 --> 0:19:13.956
<v Speaker 1>like to remind people plenty of people have absolutely no

0:19:14.036 --> 0:19:16.996
<v Speaker 1>exposure to the stock market whatsoever. Forty seven percent of

0:19:17.116 --> 0:19:21.996
<v Speaker 1>America has absolutely no dog in the Wall Street, you know,

0:19:22.076 --> 0:19:23.716
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market. They don't have a pension fund,

0:19:23.716 --> 0:19:25.116
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a four O one K, they don't

0:19:25.116 --> 0:19:28.996
<v Speaker 1>have an IRA, they don't have stocks, they have nothing. Right, So, yes,

0:19:29.196 --> 0:19:33.236
<v Speaker 1>this is a really interesting collective moment, but it's not

0:19:33.316 --> 0:19:36.676
<v Speaker 1>helping people across the board. And That's what I'm interested in.

0:19:36.956 --> 0:19:39.716
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what I am concerned about, is

0:19:39.756 --> 0:19:43.036
<v Speaker 1>people claiming victory that is bigger than perhaps the victory

0:19:43.076 --> 0:19:45.556
<v Speaker 1>actually is. And I would also point out that when

0:19:45.596 --> 0:19:48.676
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street itself talks about what is the solution to poverty,

0:19:48.956 --> 0:19:51.996
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they say it's financial literacy. We just need to

0:19:52.116 --> 0:19:55.996
<v Speaker 1>educate people about how they can invest in Wall Street? Right,

0:19:56.156 --> 0:19:59.036
<v Speaker 1>how can you open an IRA? How can you be

0:19:59.116 --> 0:20:01.316
<v Speaker 1>a smart investor? And I don't think that that is

0:20:01.316 --> 0:20:03.356
<v Speaker 1>the right way to make sure that everybody has enough,

0:20:03.756 --> 0:20:05.796
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the end of their lifetime or in

0:20:05.876 --> 0:20:09.116
<v Speaker 1>order to retire, right, I think the answer is public polity,

0:20:09.156 --> 0:20:11.596
<v Speaker 1>see like Social Security and other programs like that. So

0:20:11.876 --> 0:20:16.196
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a little concerned that the triumph here mirrors

0:20:16.196 --> 0:20:18.716
<v Speaker 1>a little too closely what Wall Street itself holds out

0:20:18.756 --> 0:20:23.076
<v Speaker 1>as the solution for things like poverty. We'll be right back.

0:20:32.636 --> 0:20:35.316
<v Speaker 1>I entirely agree with you that mere education isn't enough.

0:20:35.756 --> 0:20:37.956
<v Speaker 1>I mean the fact that the people you're describing who

0:20:37.956 --> 0:20:40.556
<v Speaker 1>have nothing in the stock market the most fundamental level,

0:20:40.596 --> 0:20:44.356
<v Speaker 1>they are not able to participate in the processes of capitalism,

0:20:44.356 --> 0:20:47.196
<v Speaker 1>and any wealth creation that happens in the markets leaves

0:20:47.196 --> 0:20:49.996
<v Speaker 1>them frankly out, and education is not enough. But surely

0:20:50.116 --> 0:20:53.716
<v Speaker 1>education plus a steak would actually be a help. Well,

0:20:53.716 --> 0:20:55.516
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that, but only if we give

0:20:55.556 --> 0:20:57.676
<v Speaker 1>them a stake, and right now we don't. Right, So,

0:20:57.716 --> 0:21:00.636
<v Speaker 1>if we're combining this idea that let's educate everyone about

0:21:00.636 --> 0:21:04.036
<v Speaker 1>how stocks work, with baby bonds or some program that's

0:21:04.076 --> 0:21:07.556
<v Speaker 1>actually giving people an investment, some capital that they can

0:21:07.596 --> 0:21:09.796
<v Speaker 1>actually invest, then I would agree. But that's not what

0:21:09.876 --> 0:21:12.396
<v Speaker 1>we have, right we have if you just pull yourself

0:21:12.436 --> 0:21:14.916
<v Speaker 1>up by your bootstraps, somehow managed to save money when

0:21:15.036 --> 0:21:16.916
<v Speaker 1>most people don't have, you know, whatever, it is two

0:21:16.956 --> 0:21:20.076
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars to cover an emergency expense, and maybe you

0:21:20.116 --> 0:21:22.356
<v Speaker 1>put two hundred bucks on game stock and you get

0:21:22.356 --> 0:21:24.236
<v Speaker 1>really lucky. Like, that's just not a solution in my

0:21:24.276 --> 0:21:26.796
<v Speaker 1>mind to the like structural inequalities of society. Oh, I

0:21:27.076 --> 0:21:29.196
<v Speaker 1>totally agree that it's not a solution. I'm wondering, though,

0:21:29.236 --> 0:21:31.516
<v Speaker 1>if you think that events like this that draw public

0:21:31.556 --> 0:21:35.476
<v Speaker 1>attention to the markets in a way that potentially draws

0:21:35.516 --> 0:21:38.556
<v Speaker 1>people in might actually play some role in the long

0:21:38.636 --> 0:21:42.476
<v Speaker 1>run in shifting policymakers in the direction of baby bonds

0:21:42.556 --> 0:21:47.076
<v Speaker 1>or other mechanisms to attempt to broaden the capacities of

0:21:47.156 --> 0:21:50.516
<v Speaker 1>ordinary people to participate in the rise of capital. Yes,

0:21:50.596 --> 0:21:53.356
<v Speaker 1>And I would even sort of add to that pitch

0:21:53.476 --> 0:21:56.636
<v Speaker 1>of yours to say, you know, some people like this volatility,

0:21:56.676 --> 0:21:59.436
<v Speaker 1>some people don't. But if you don't like this volatility

0:21:59.476 --> 0:22:01.716
<v Speaker 1>and you don't like rank speculation, like a good way

0:22:01.716 --> 0:22:03.836
<v Speaker 1>to do that is just to make sure everybody isn't

0:22:03.956 --> 0:22:07.116
<v Speaker 1>so desperate for ways to pay their rent or choosing

0:22:07.156 --> 0:22:09.876
<v Speaker 1>between food and medicine. Which to say that I think

0:22:09.916 --> 0:22:12.156
<v Speaker 1>that people who are are trading on robin hood, I

0:22:12.196 --> 0:22:13.796
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they are, but I think some people

0:22:13.796 --> 0:22:16.796
<v Speaker 1>who are will right because they just it looks like

0:22:16.796 --> 0:22:18.836
<v Speaker 1>a way to get rich quick and That's what I

0:22:18.836 --> 0:22:21.116
<v Speaker 1>worry about, is people investing money that they can't afford

0:22:21.156 --> 0:22:24.436
<v Speaker 1>to lose losing it. I think the problem here is

0:22:24.516 --> 0:22:29.436
<v Speaker 1>we have, you know, decades of systemic racism and discrimination

0:22:29.516 --> 0:22:33.116
<v Speaker 1>that have led to unequal outcomes of wealth in this country.

0:22:33.156 --> 0:22:36.196
<v Speaker 1>And the way to fix that is not to democratize

0:22:36.236 --> 0:22:38.876
<v Speaker 1>the casino. The way to fix that is to make

0:22:38.916 --> 0:22:43.076
<v Speaker 1>it so that the house doesn't always win. And unfortunately, historically,

0:22:43.356 --> 0:22:46.076
<v Speaker 1>right like Wall Street is a driver of speculation. In

0:22:46.116 --> 0:22:48.596
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, many of the banks went into

0:22:48.996 --> 0:22:51.796
<v Speaker 1>black and brown neighborhoods and tried to convince you know,

0:22:51.836 --> 0:22:54.756
<v Speaker 1>black homeowners who own their homes out right to take

0:22:54.796 --> 0:22:57.876
<v Speaker 1>out you know, cash out refinances, you know, And they

0:22:57.916 --> 0:22:59.916
<v Speaker 1>exploited the fact that wages have been stagnant for a

0:22:59.916 --> 0:23:02.436
<v Speaker 1>really long time and people needed money. Right The Department

0:23:02.436 --> 0:23:05.556
<v Speaker 1>of Justice found that Wells Fargo, you know, you know,

0:23:05.676 --> 0:23:08.156
<v Speaker 1>gave black borrowers with the same credit scores and the

0:23:08.196 --> 0:23:11.556
<v Speaker 1>same incomes prime loans when they gave white borrowers with

0:23:11.596 --> 0:23:14.676
<v Speaker 1>the same credit and income scores better loans and better terms.

0:23:14.716 --> 0:23:16.956
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to be thinking about, like who

0:23:17.036 --> 0:23:19.756
<v Speaker 1>has power here and how are they wielding that power,

0:23:20.036 --> 0:23:24.156
<v Speaker 1>and historically financial forces have been trying as best they can,

0:23:24.356 --> 0:23:27.876
<v Speaker 1>basically to rent seek and to get as much money

0:23:27.876 --> 0:23:30.436
<v Speaker 1>as they can, especially out of people who can least

0:23:30.436 --> 0:23:32.756
<v Speaker 1>afford to get rid of it. I'm highly sympathetic to

0:23:33.116 --> 0:23:36.196
<v Speaker 1>the answer you give at the broadest level, and in fact,

0:23:36.316 --> 0:23:39.076
<v Speaker 1>this year one of the themes of our podcast is

0:23:39.476 --> 0:23:42.036
<v Speaker 1>to think seriously about power and how it's allocated and

0:23:42.076 --> 0:23:45.516
<v Speaker 1>where it lives. And for sure, economic power does not

0:23:45.676 --> 0:23:48.356
<v Speaker 1>live in the poorest people or the dispossessed people, and

0:23:48.396 --> 0:23:52.676
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, those people are disproportionately black and Latino,

0:23:52.796 --> 0:23:55.956
<v Speaker 1>and so totally in agreement with you, I do think

0:23:55.996 --> 0:23:59.636
<v Speaker 1>that when we're talking about something like the symbolic meaning

0:23:59.636 --> 0:24:02.796
<v Speaker 1>of what's just been happening, though, it's hard to avoid

0:24:02.836 --> 0:24:05.276
<v Speaker 1>the realization that the reason that a lot of these

0:24:05.276 --> 0:24:09.036
<v Speaker 1>investors online think that the hedge funds are the bad

0:24:09.196 --> 0:24:11.476
<v Speaker 1>guys is that they are not investors in hedge funds,

0:24:11.516 --> 0:24:13.516
<v Speaker 1>and it cannot be investors in hedge funds. That's part

0:24:13.556 --> 0:24:16.276
<v Speaker 1>of this David and Goliath narrative. And it might be

0:24:16.356 --> 0:24:21.676
<v Speaker 1>that some degree of regulatory shift would have the effect

0:24:22.356 --> 0:24:25.596
<v Speaker 1>of changing that aspect of the narrative. I agree though

0:24:25.636 --> 0:24:27.836
<v Speaker 1>with you that in some sense that's a side show

0:24:27.836 --> 0:24:29.916
<v Speaker 1>when you compare it to the more underlying questions of

0:24:30.516 --> 0:24:33.836
<v Speaker 1>economic or inequality in the United States. Let me turn

0:24:33.876 --> 0:24:37.836
<v Speaker 1>to a second question, which is about consequences for the

0:24:37.876 --> 0:24:40.396
<v Speaker 1>market as a whole. So one of the reactions that

0:24:40.916 --> 0:24:43.236
<v Speaker 1>some commentators have made just in the few days that

0:24:43.236 --> 0:24:45.836
<v Speaker 1>this has been going on is to raise the question

0:24:45.956 --> 0:24:52.196
<v Speaker 1>of whether the markets generally might be made vulnerable by

0:24:52.276 --> 0:24:55.756
<v Speaker 1>the volatility introduced by things like the game stop or

0:24:55.796 --> 0:24:58.636
<v Speaker 1>the AMC short squeezes. I've heard other people who are

0:24:58.636 --> 0:25:01.356
<v Speaker 1>sophisticating the markets say, look, there's nothing to worry about here,

0:25:01.756 --> 0:25:05.556
<v Speaker 1>It's a small blip. It will all be fine. Where

0:25:05.556 --> 0:25:08.516
<v Speaker 1>do you come down on that question? Because with respect

0:25:08.516 --> 0:25:11.156
<v Speaker 1>to the people who our ordinary investors, who are not

0:25:11.236 --> 0:25:14.476
<v Speaker 1>trying to do stock picking and whose modest life savings

0:25:14.516 --> 0:25:16.876
<v Speaker 1>are in the market, we do have an interest in

0:25:16.996 --> 0:25:21.036
<v Speaker 1>managing the volatility and especially in managing long term decline.

0:25:22.116 --> 0:25:25.036
<v Speaker 1>So I am concerned about future of volatility in the market,

0:25:25.036 --> 0:25:26.916
<v Speaker 1>but I am not concerned about it because of this

0:25:27.036 --> 0:25:29.956
<v Speaker 1>game stop situation. I think game stop is a symptom,

0:25:30.076 --> 0:25:33.036
<v Speaker 1>not a cause. And if you were to ask me

0:25:33.116 --> 0:25:36.396
<v Speaker 1>for a cause. I would point you back to last spring,

0:25:37.716 --> 0:25:40.276
<v Speaker 1>when you know, in the midst of the pandemic, the

0:25:40.716 --> 0:25:45.436
<v Speaker 1>bond market started to seize up and credit spreads started

0:25:45.476 --> 0:25:49.076
<v Speaker 1>to rise because people were very concerned about corporate defaults,

0:25:49.156 --> 0:25:51.396
<v Speaker 1>and the you know, the Federal Reserve, which is the

0:25:51.476 --> 0:25:54.476
<v Speaker 1>largest central bank in the world, did something it never

0:25:54.556 --> 0:25:56.476
<v Speaker 1>did before, which is it said that it was now

0:25:56.516 --> 0:26:00.356
<v Speaker 1>going to buy the debt, the corporate debt of companies,

0:26:00.436 --> 0:26:04.396
<v Speaker 1>including what are called fallen angels, which are companies that

0:26:04.436 --> 0:26:08.396
<v Speaker 1>were previously rated as investment grade, which are seen as safe,

0:26:08.876 --> 0:26:11.836
<v Speaker 1>but had fallen into junk grade. And so if they

0:26:11.836 --> 0:26:14.836
<v Speaker 1>had fallen to junk grade after a certain period in March,

0:26:15.196 --> 0:26:18.116
<v Speaker 1>the FED was still able to purchase their debt and

0:26:18.316 --> 0:26:20.716
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street I think the reaction was the FED will

0:26:20.756 --> 0:26:23.116
<v Speaker 1>just backstop us, and if they need to, they will

0:26:23.276 --> 0:26:25.996
<v Speaker 1>not only buy corporate debt and junk bonds, they will

0:26:26.036 --> 0:26:29.236
<v Speaker 1>buy equities. And so I think that, combined with the

0:26:29.276 --> 0:26:31.836
<v Speaker 1>fact that investing in the fixed income markets and buy

0:26:31.876 --> 0:26:35.196
<v Speaker 1>fixed income I mean things like bonds was no longer

0:26:35.236 --> 0:26:37.836
<v Speaker 1>as profitable as it used to be, it drove a

0:26:37.876 --> 0:26:40.916
<v Speaker 1>lot of large institutional players into the equities markets and

0:26:40.956 --> 0:26:44.036
<v Speaker 1>it overheated the equities markets. Now, somebody asked Chairman Powell,

0:26:44.836 --> 0:26:47.196
<v Speaker 1>Drome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, about this last week,

0:26:47.236 --> 0:26:48.636
<v Speaker 1>and he said, no, no, no no, I don't think that

0:26:48.636 --> 0:26:51.316
<v Speaker 1>that's what's happening. I don't think that the Fed caused

0:26:51.316 --> 0:26:56.116
<v Speaker 1>any kind of overheating. I disagree, and I think that

0:26:56.596 --> 0:26:59.876
<v Speaker 1>it also exacerbated inequality because again, to go back to

0:26:59.916 --> 0:27:02.156
<v Speaker 1>this conversation about hedge funds, the people that are the

0:27:02.236 --> 0:27:06.716
<v Speaker 1>predominant investors in corporate debt, especially junk bonds, are hedge funds.

0:27:07.316 --> 0:27:10.036
<v Speaker 1>And there's an even added wrinkle. If people remember, the

0:27:10.076 --> 0:27:13.036
<v Speaker 1>price of oil went negative. The oil futures went negative

0:27:13.236 --> 0:27:17.876
<v Speaker 1>last year because there was such low demand, and oil

0:27:18.196 --> 0:27:21.076
<v Speaker 1>futures are traded with what's called physical delivery. You have

0:27:21.076 --> 0:27:24.996
<v Speaker 1>to actually physically receive barrels and barrels of oil. If

0:27:25.036 --> 0:27:27.396
<v Speaker 1>you happen to have a futures contract on oil that

0:27:27.476 --> 0:27:29.716
<v Speaker 1>expires and then you know it's profitable, you have to

0:27:29.716 --> 0:27:32.196
<v Speaker 1>receive the oil. And so there was just sort of

0:27:32.196 --> 0:27:34.676
<v Speaker 1>crunch where they had run out of space and no

0:27:34.716 --> 0:27:36.636
<v Speaker 1>one had any space to store the oil, and so

0:27:36.676 --> 0:27:38.596
<v Speaker 1>people were just so desperate to get rid of their

0:27:38.596 --> 0:27:40.996
<v Speaker 1>oil futures contracts that they gave them away. Why do

0:27:41.036 --> 0:27:43.636
<v Speaker 1>I bring that up Because the Federal Reserve bought over

0:27:43.716 --> 0:27:48.316
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars to date in fossil fuel in fossil

0:27:48.356 --> 0:27:52.196
<v Speaker 1>fuel firms, corporate bonds, utility companies, or energy companies, and

0:27:52.276 --> 0:27:56.156
<v Speaker 1>so I think that the FENS has a role here

0:27:56.956 --> 0:28:00.916
<v Speaker 1>in making the market overheated, and I think in making

0:28:01.196 --> 0:28:05.116
<v Speaker 1>equity asset valuations go perhaps higher than they should have, again,

0:28:05.196 --> 0:28:07.556
<v Speaker 1>because you had large investors who were doing what is

0:28:07.556 --> 0:28:11.116
<v Speaker 1>called seeking alpha or yield and trying to find profits

0:28:11.116 --> 0:28:13.156
<v Speaker 1>where there were no longer profits to be had in

0:28:13.156 --> 0:28:16.076
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income markets. And I worry about a bubble,

0:28:16.156 --> 0:28:18.076
<v Speaker 1>not because of Game Stop, which I think is quite

0:28:18.076 --> 0:28:22.476
<v Speaker 1>obviously a bubble, but a larger equity bubble overall that

0:28:22.676 --> 0:28:26.156
<v Speaker 1>might have been aggravated by public policy. And that's the

0:28:26.276 --> 0:28:28.596
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that I worry about. I should just

0:28:28.636 --> 0:28:31.756
<v Speaker 1>say for listeners who are truly faithful listeners, they may

0:28:31.796 --> 0:28:35.116
<v Speaker 1>remember that very shortly after that happened in March, the

0:28:36.156 --> 0:28:38.916
<v Speaker 1>credit market and version that you're describing, we actually had

0:28:38.956 --> 0:28:42.276
<v Speaker 1>on a very well known credit traitor, BoA's Weinstein, who

0:28:42.356 --> 0:28:45.636
<v Speaker 1>was raising alarm about that before it had become a

0:28:45.676 --> 0:28:49.156
<v Speaker 1>big national story, so the most faithful listeners will remember

0:28:49.196 --> 0:28:51.316
<v Speaker 1>our discussion of that. Let me ask you a follow

0:28:51.356 --> 0:28:54.956
<v Speaker 1>up question, though, alexis I mean you began by saying, yes,

0:28:55.036 --> 0:28:58.756
<v Speaker 1>you're worried about volatility. Then you pointed to a series

0:28:58.796 --> 0:29:01.316
<v Speaker 1>of actions taking by the FED, all of which were

0:29:01.516 --> 0:29:06.516
<v Speaker 1>designed to manage volatility. And then you said, if I

0:29:06.596 --> 0:29:10.716
<v Speaker 1>understood you correctly, that you're concerned that those actions taken

0:29:10.716 --> 0:29:14.596
<v Speaker 1>by the FED to manage volatility may be creating overheated

0:29:15.396 --> 0:29:17.916
<v Speaker 1>equities prices such that maybe the stock market itself is

0:29:17.916 --> 0:29:20.236
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a bubble. So if I understood you correctly,

0:29:21.316 --> 0:29:25.236
<v Speaker 1>you know what's the fix there. So my solution is

0:29:25.276 --> 0:29:27.756
<v Speaker 1>actually in the Cares Act, but was not used by

0:29:27.756 --> 0:29:32.156
<v Speaker 1>the FED. Congress suggested that the FED create a series

0:29:32.156 --> 0:29:35.556
<v Speaker 1>of facilities, including a mid sized lending facility that the

0:29:35.556 --> 0:29:38.396
<v Speaker 1>Fed Reserve Act has, you know this section called thirteen three.

0:29:38.516 --> 0:29:42.316
<v Speaker 1>It's their emergency lending facility. They're allowed to create broad

0:29:42.436 --> 0:29:46.076
<v Speaker 1>based support programs. So they did not happen to use

0:29:46.556 --> 0:29:49.276
<v Speaker 1>the new authority that Congress gave it. They just sort

0:29:49.316 --> 0:29:52.476
<v Speaker 1>of did something they could do without Congress. In the

0:29:52.596 --> 0:29:55.676
<v Speaker 1>Cares Act, there was a series of conditions that Congress

0:29:55.716 --> 0:29:58.596
<v Speaker 1>was suggesting that the FED take that included things like

0:29:58.756 --> 0:30:03.516
<v Speaker 1>prohibiting stock buybacks and prohibiting dividends and ensuring that workers

0:30:03.596 --> 0:30:06.116
<v Speaker 1>were not laid off or workers who were laid off

0:30:06.316 --> 0:30:09.396
<v Speaker 1>were rehired, and the FED neglected to include any of

0:30:09.436 --> 0:30:12.796
<v Speaker 1>these conditions in their corporate debt buying. And I think

0:30:12.836 --> 0:30:16.916
<v Speaker 1>you cannot just rescue the bond market without any conditions

0:30:16.916 --> 0:30:19.316
<v Speaker 1>on the companies to ensure that workers are protected and

0:30:19.356 --> 0:30:22.036
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that the companies themselves do not overheat the

0:30:22.076 --> 0:30:25.956
<v Speaker 1>equity markets. The FED did not use the authority in cares.

0:30:26.516 --> 0:30:29.356
<v Speaker 1>I think that you could have done a blended approach.

0:30:29.556 --> 0:30:32.436
<v Speaker 1>You could have rescued the bond market, but you could

0:30:32.436 --> 0:30:36.076
<v Speaker 1>have added these conditions to ensure that you aren't also

0:30:36.156 --> 0:30:38.836
<v Speaker 1>overheating the equity market. And some of those conditions would

0:30:38.876 --> 0:30:42.116
<v Speaker 1>have been, Look, don't spend your money on buying back

0:30:42.156 --> 0:30:44.956
<v Speaker 1>your stock later in the future, spend it on your workers,

0:30:45.036 --> 0:30:48.316
<v Speaker 1>rehire people, and make sure that you aren't doing the

0:30:48.356 --> 0:30:51.956
<v Speaker 1>same old, unfortunate financialization trend that we've been doing for

0:30:51.956 --> 0:30:54.596
<v Speaker 1>so very long, where you know, CEOs at the top

0:30:54.596 --> 0:30:57.116
<v Speaker 1>of companies have real incentives to drive up the price

0:30:57.116 --> 0:30:59.316
<v Speaker 1>of their own stock. Right, This is part of the narrative.

0:30:59.356 --> 0:31:01.876
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. Right. The Reddit folks and the

0:31:01.916 --> 0:31:04.636
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood folks have discovered that while Street does try

0:31:04.636 --> 0:31:07.236
<v Speaker 1>to drive up the price of stocks, it just usually

0:31:07.236 --> 0:31:10.236
<v Speaker 1>happens at an individual company level. Right. A CEO gets

0:31:10.236 --> 0:31:12.916
<v Speaker 1>paid often based on the performance of the company and

0:31:12.956 --> 0:31:15.316
<v Speaker 1>the performance of the stock, and so they have a

0:31:15.356 --> 0:31:17.796
<v Speaker 1>real incentive to see their stock price go up. And

0:31:17.836 --> 0:31:19.516
<v Speaker 1>one way you can do that is buying back your

0:31:19.516 --> 0:31:22.596
<v Speaker 1>own stock. So I think that the answer is it

0:31:22.596 --> 0:31:25.076
<v Speaker 1>would have been to use some of those conditions that

0:31:25.116 --> 0:31:27.876
<v Speaker 1>Congress suggested that the Fed use that they didn't use

0:31:28.196 --> 0:31:30.276
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you didn't just go from rescuing

0:31:30.316 --> 0:31:34.276
<v Speaker 1>the bond market to then juicing the equities market. Coming

0:31:34.276 --> 0:31:36.436
<v Speaker 1>back to the narrative of David and Goliath in the

0:31:36.516 --> 0:31:39.276
<v Speaker 1>question of where the power lies, it's an irony if

0:31:39.516 --> 0:31:42.876
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is right, it's an irony that the

0:31:42.996 --> 0:31:45.276
<v Speaker 1>so called David's or the self described David's in the

0:31:45.276 --> 0:31:49.156
<v Speaker 1>GameStop situation, we're doing exactly what the CEO of game

0:31:49.196 --> 0:31:51.876
<v Speaker 1>Stop would presentally be very happy to see them doing, namely,

0:31:51.916 --> 0:31:54.516
<v Speaker 1>increasing the value of the stock right. I mean, everyone

0:31:54.556 --> 0:31:56.756
<v Speaker 1>who's in the market wants it to stay up. And

0:31:56.796 --> 0:32:00.276
<v Speaker 1>it may be that the broadening of ownership of stock

0:32:00.396 --> 0:32:04.356
<v Speaker 1>through people's retirement accounts has created a shift in the

0:32:04.396 --> 0:32:06.476
<v Speaker 1>political economy of the country. And this is just a

0:32:07.276 --> 0:32:10.596
<v Speaker 1>very general hypothesis, but a shift in the political economy

0:32:10.636 --> 0:32:15.596
<v Speaker 1>of the country where the politician's favoritism and the Fed's

0:32:15.636 --> 0:32:20.316
<v Speaker 1>favoritism to the markets isn't just driven by let's help

0:32:20.396 --> 0:32:23.796
<v Speaker 1>rich people. It's also driven by a concern or a

0:32:23.836 --> 0:32:26.796
<v Speaker 1>worry for ordinary people who own stocks. And then we

0:32:26.836 --> 0:32:29.876
<v Speaker 1>get into situation where it's where the political process is

0:32:29.916 --> 0:32:33.716
<v Speaker 1>basically captured by the interests of the markets, not necessarily

0:32:33.756 --> 0:32:36.236
<v Speaker 1>because it's captured by the very rich, but because it's

0:32:36.236 --> 0:32:39.076
<v Speaker 1>captured by the interests of everybody who holds stocks. And

0:32:39.156 --> 0:32:41.756
<v Speaker 1>that's not only the rich. And in that sense, all

0:32:41.796 --> 0:32:45.596
<v Speaker 1>of the Davids are aligned with the goliaths in wanting

0:32:45.716 --> 0:32:47.236
<v Speaker 1>not all the Davids, but many of the Davids are

0:32:47.236 --> 0:32:49.356
<v Speaker 1>aligned with the goliaths in wanting the stock market to

0:32:49.396 --> 0:32:53.796
<v Speaker 1>stay high. And then we get various governmental policies that

0:32:53.916 --> 0:32:57.876
<v Speaker 1>effectively protect the market. And if that's the case, I

0:32:57.876 --> 0:33:00.556
<v Speaker 1>guess my question for you, is is that a very

0:33:00.596 --> 0:33:03.796
<v Speaker 1>bad thing from the standpoint of the distribution of political

0:33:03.836 --> 0:33:07.516
<v Speaker 1>economic power, that is, of the relationship between the people

0:33:07.556 --> 0:33:10.996
<v Speaker 1>who own the stocks, which excludes some percentage of Americans

0:33:11.036 --> 0:33:15.236
<v Speaker 1>but includes a large percentage of others, and the other

0:33:15.276 --> 0:33:18.596
<v Speaker 1>people who are running our politics. I think yes. The

0:33:18.636 --> 0:33:20.516
<v Speaker 1>short answer is yes. And then we have to step

0:33:20.516 --> 0:33:23.636
<v Speaker 1>back and say why is that? And the answer that

0:33:23.636 --> 0:33:27.076
<v Speaker 1>that is true is because we have had financialization where

0:33:27.436 --> 0:33:30.076
<v Speaker 1>the only way that you can invest right now is

0:33:30.076 --> 0:33:32.796
<v Speaker 1>with Wall Street. You don't have a public option for

0:33:32.996 --> 0:33:35.556
<v Speaker 1>investing unless you are a very wealthy person who can

0:33:35.596 --> 0:33:39.396
<v Speaker 1>buy municipal bonds. This wasn't always the case, right, and

0:33:39.436 --> 0:33:41.956
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have to be this way, and we don't

0:33:41.996 --> 0:33:45.436
<v Speaker 1>have to just you know, finance our own wealth through

0:33:46.076 --> 0:33:50.636
<v Speaker 1>private financial intermediaries. This was a public policy choice, right.

0:33:50.796 --> 0:33:54.836
<v Speaker 1>This was the move away from pensions towards things like

0:33:55.276 --> 0:33:59.236
<v Speaker 1>iras and private investment accounts, which again Wall Street gets

0:33:59.276 --> 0:34:02.036
<v Speaker 1>to take a little fee every time you use those.

0:34:02.436 --> 0:34:05.556
<v Speaker 1>This was a policy decision. If you go back to

0:34:05.596 --> 0:34:08.716
<v Speaker 1>the New Deal, there was an entity called the Reconstruction

0:34:08.796 --> 0:34:11.756
<v Speaker 1>Finance Corporation that was larger than all of the Wall

0:34:11.796 --> 0:34:14.476
<v Speaker 1>Street banks put together at the time, and they directed

0:34:14.556 --> 0:34:18.156
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts to public investment to projects large and small.

0:34:18.516 --> 0:34:20.796
<v Speaker 1>And there's a very interesting paper where if anybody wants

0:34:20.836 --> 0:34:22.836
<v Speaker 1>to think about, like what might be an alternative vision

0:34:22.876 --> 0:34:25.316
<v Speaker 1>for how this would work by an academic named sale

0:34:25.356 --> 0:34:29.436
<v Speaker 1>Omarova who is out of Princeton, called the National Investment Authority,

0:34:29.796 --> 0:34:33.556
<v Speaker 1>and the idea is to sort of invert the private

0:34:33.636 --> 0:34:37.076
<v Speaker 1>public partnership. So instead of public goods being sold to

0:34:37.156 --> 0:34:39.956
<v Speaker 1>private entities like happened in Chicago, right they sold off

0:34:39.996 --> 0:34:43.076
<v Speaker 1>their parking meters to private interests like happens on toll roads.

0:34:43.596 --> 0:34:48.676
<v Speaker 1>We solicit private investment into a new kind of security

0:34:48.956 --> 0:34:50.836
<v Speaker 1>that would be backed by the full faith and credit

0:34:50.876 --> 0:34:54.476
<v Speaker 1>of the government, but we direct our investments into public goods,

0:34:54.876 --> 0:34:58.316
<v Speaker 1>and then you would essentially have not only a way

0:34:58.316 --> 0:35:01.236
<v Speaker 1>to finance projects that Wall Street will never fund because

0:35:01.236 --> 0:35:03.636
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street wants things that they can profit off of

0:35:03.636 --> 0:35:06.676
<v Speaker 1>in this lifetime. Right, They're never going to finance something

0:35:06.836 --> 0:35:09.116
<v Speaker 1>that you can't profit off of in a single lifetime,

0:35:09.396 --> 0:35:11.716
<v Speaker 1>let alone, usually something you can't profit off of in

0:35:11.756 --> 0:35:15.076
<v Speaker 1>a year. We need to find ways to use the

0:35:15.116 --> 0:35:18.076
<v Speaker 1>instrument of government to fund public projects, and this could

0:35:18.076 --> 0:35:20.476
<v Speaker 1>be a financing mechanism for things like the Green New Deal.

0:35:20.836 --> 0:35:22.796
<v Speaker 1>So like, yes, do I think that you are right?

0:35:22.836 --> 0:35:25.236
<v Speaker 1>Do I think that all of the incentives are aligned

0:35:25.276 --> 0:35:27.636
<v Speaker 1>so that we all in a way if we do

0:35:27.716 --> 0:35:30.236
<v Speaker 1>participate in the stock market, which again, to repeat myself,

0:35:30.276 --> 0:35:35.476
<v Speaker 1>forty seven percent of people absolutely do not. Yes, we

0:35:35.556 --> 0:35:38.116
<v Speaker 1>all sort of have this collective interest in the stock

0:35:38.156 --> 0:35:39.796
<v Speaker 1>market staying up. But I don't think that's a good thing.

0:35:39.796 --> 0:35:41.356
<v Speaker 1>And I think we have to ask the question about

0:35:41.396 --> 0:35:43.836
<v Speaker 1>how we got there and why that is, because AA

0:35:43.916 --> 0:35:45.796
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be that way, and be there was

0:35:45.836 --> 0:35:48.476
<v Speaker 1>a series of policy decisions to push it such that

0:35:48.596 --> 0:35:50.996
<v Speaker 1>it was that way, so that if you wanted to

0:35:50.996 --> 0:35:53.156
<v Speaker 1>save for your future, there was no way for you

0:35:53.236 --> 0:35:55.756
<v Speaker 1>to do it without going through Wall Street again, unless

0:35:55.756 --> 0:35:58.916
<v Speaker 1>you're rich enough to pursue these kinds of municipal bonds

0:35:58.956 --> 0:36:00.996
<v Speaker 1>or other investments. And I think that that's a mistake

0:36:01.036 --> 0:36:03.196
<v Speaker 1>and that's the wrong way to structure a society, and

0:36:03.316 --> 0:36:05.076
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to do it that way, and I

0:36:05.076 --> 0:36:07.436
<v Speaker 1>think we should seriously ask ourselves, like, how do we

0:36:07.476 --> 0:36:10.236
<v Speaker 1>remake our society so we don't rely on Wall Street

0:36:10.276 --> 0:36:14.396
<v Speaker 1>just to fund our own retirement. A last question about

0:36:14.876 --> 0:36:18.516
<v Speaker 1>takeaways and popular impulse. And this is something that you

0:36:18.516 --> 0:36:20.316
<v Speaker 1>mentioned you're the top of the interview, and I'm just

0:36:20.356 --> 0:36:21.756
<v Speaker 1>going to come back to it very briefly now at

0:36:21.756 --> 0:36:25.316
<v Speaker 1>the end, and that is that a lot of creativity

0:36:25.396 --> 0:36:28.556
<v Speaker 1>seems to be going into the idea of not having

0:36:28.596 --> 0:36:32.236
<v Speaker 1>to rely entirely on Wall Street. But that creativity seems

0:36:32.276 --> 0:36:34.316
<v Speaker 1>typically not to go to the kinds of long term

0:36:34.316 --> 0:36:38.236
<v Speaker 1>public investment that you're talking about, but rather to the

0:36:38.276 --> 0:36:42.156
<v Speaker 1>world of crypto where one of the animating you will

0:36:42.156 --> 0:36:44.036
<v Speaker 1>call it an ideal if you're a crypto activist, or

0:36:44.076 --> 0:36:46.196
<v Speaker 1>you'll call it a fantasy if you're a crypto skeptic,

0:36:46.916 --> 0:36:52.076
<v Speaker 1>is to get outside of governmental structures and to offer

0:36:52.236 --> 0:36:57.796
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for investment for individuals that in the long run

0:36:59.756 --> 0:37:06.076
<v Speaker 1>can gain in value and provide assurance without falling into,

0:37:06.156 --> 0:37:10.236
<v Speaker 1>as it were, the arms of the big Wall Street investors,

0:37:11.356 --> 0:37:14.876
<v Speaker 1>especially in connection with what's sometimes called the gamification of trading.

0:37:14.996 --> 0:37:16.596
<v Speaker 1>And I think people mean two things by that. They

0:37:16.636 --> 0:37:21.156
<v Speaker 1>mean that trading is more like a video game than

0:37:21.196 --> 0:37:22.756
<v Speaker 1>it used to be on a place like robin Hood

0:37:22.836 --> 0:37:26.236
<v Speaker 1>or on coin base. They also mean that trading as

0:37:26.276 --> 0:37:28.196
<v Speaker 1>a form of gambling in the sense of gaming is

0:37:28.316 --> 0:37:32.836
<v Speaker 1>as gambling. So I think the original white paper for

0:37:32.956 --> 0:37:35.676
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin was very interesting and had a very noble goal.

0:37:36.076 --> 0:37:38.996
<v Speaker 1>I think the blockchain technology that drives a lot of

0:37:38.996 --> 0:37:43.196
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies is very highly applicable for a lot of interesting solutions,

0:37:43.876 --> 0:37:48.076
<v Speaker 1>and I think the intention behind cryptocurrency was quite good, right,

0:37:48.116 --> 0:37:50.596
<v Speaker 1>and it can be used for lots of various things,

0:37:50.636 --> 0:37:53.236
<v Speaker 1>including let's say you live in a government that is

0:37:53.236 --> 0:37:56.516
<v Speaker 1>oppressive for some reason and is trying to limit your

0:37:56.516 --> 0:37:59.276
<v Speaker 1>ability to send money to your family in a different

0:37:59.276 --> 0:38:01.316
<v Speaker 1>country or something like that. Right, Like, there's a lot

0:38:01.356 --> 0:38:04.596
<v Speaker 1>of potential for public good with cryptocurrencies, but unfortunately, I

0:38:04.636 --> 0:38:07.316
<v Speaker 1>think what has happened with cryptocurrencies is what happens to

0:38:07.356 --> 0:38:09.996
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things, which is that you know, because

0:38:10.036 --> 0:38:13.236
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street has this large concentration of power and ability

0:38:13.236 --> 0:38:15.356
<v Speaker 1>to move things, and I by Wall Street. I would

0:38:15.396 --> 0:38:18.716
<v Speaker 1>even broaden it out to say fintech and venture capital firms,

0:38:18.796 --> 0:38:21.836
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've commodified it like anything else. And I

0:38:21.876 --> 0:38:24.316
<v Speaker 1>think we cannot look, you know, look think about this

0:38:24.356 --> 0:38:26.556
<v Speaker 1>and ask about this without thinking. So you mentioned coinbase.

0:38:26.876 --> 0:38:30.356
<v Speaker 1>The former a former executive of Coinbase was just the

0:38:30.396 --> 0:38:33.156
<v Speaker 1>acting director of the office, a controller of the currency

0:38:33.156 --> 0:38:35.476
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important banking regulators in the United

0:38:35.556 --> 0:38:39.196
<v Speaker 1>States under the Trump administration and proceeded to do all

0:38:39.236 --> 0:38:42.836
<v Speaker 1>of this deregulation and allow banks to participate in cryptocurrencies

0:38:42.836 --> 0:38:45.476
<v Speaker 1>in ways that they were not allowed to before. Right,

0:38:45.636 --> 0:38:49.596
<v Speaker 1>Like we it's sort of like you can't escape you here,

0:38:49.756 --> 0:38:53.716
<v Speaker 1>somebody created a thing precisely to escape the sort of

0:38:54.396 --> 0:38:56.876
<v Speaker 1>finance system, and the finance system has found a way

0:38:56.916 --> 0:38:58.836
<v Speaker 1>to profit off of it through all of these different

0:38:58.996 --> 0:39:01.716
<v Speaker 1>you know, various apps and companies, and then you had

0:39:01.756 --> 0:39:04.436
<v Speaker 1>all this deregulations under Trump, and that has sort of

0:39:04.476 --> 0:39:07.836
<v Speaker 1>like brought in cryptocurrency into the banking sector, you know.

0:39:07.876 --> 0:39:10.396
<v Speaker 1>And do I think that hedge funds are betting on crypto? Absolutely,

0:39:10.396 --> 0:39:12.756
<v Speaker 1>they're betting on crypto, right like, I'm sure they are.

0:39:13.116 --> 0:39:15.236
<v Speaker 1>They would be silly probably at this point not to

0:39:15.836 --> 0:39:18.116
<v Speaker 1>But I just think that it's one of those things

0:39:18.156 --> 0:39:20.796
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know that I'm in favor or against.

0:39:21.196 --> 0:39:23.076
<v Speaker 1>I just think we need to think closely about how

0:39:23.076 --> 0:39:25.196
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be regulated, because it is, at the

0:39:25.276 --> 0:39:27.236
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, a currency, and it is something

0:39:27.276 --> 0:39:30.676
<v Speaker 1>that we shouldn't allow to operate in regulatory blind spots.

0:39:30.836 --> 0:39:32.956
<v Speaker 1>And that's the same way that I feel about hedge funds,

0:39:33.156 --> 0:39:35.116
<v Speaker 1>and the same way I feel about a lot of things,

0:39:35.276 --> 0:39:38.316
<v Speaker 1>is like all of this takes robust oversight and regulation,

0:39:38.476 --> 0:39:41.276
<v Speaker 1>and in the wake of the Trump administration, we absolutely

0:39:41.316 --> 0:39:43.116
<v Speaker 1>do not have that. We have the opposite of that

0:39:43.276 --> 0:39:47.276
<v Speaker 1>right now. Alexis, thank you for your fascinating analysis and

0:39:47.316 --> 0:39:50.796
<v Speaker 1>for talking to me about power and how it's distributed

0:39:51.076 --> 0:39:53.476
<v Speaker 1>and the world of finance. The old line goes that

0:39:53.476 --> 0:39:55.476
<v Speaker 1>you can't beat city hall. It's a lot harder to

0:39:55.516 --> 0:39:57.276
<v Speaker 1>beat Wall Street than it is to beat city hall.

0:39:57.916 --> 0:40:00.676
<v Speaker 1>But for that we need to begin with a clearide

0:40:00.956 --> 0:40:04.036
<v Speaker 1>account of who has the power and what that power's

0:40:04.076 --> 0:40:07.916
<v Speaker 1>relationship is to politics and to finance itself. So thank

0:40:07.916 --> 0:40:11.036
<v Speaker 1>you for helping us on that path. Well, thank you

0:40:11.036 --> 0:40:21.116
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Listening to Alexis Goldstein brings home what

0:40:21.236 --> 0:40:24.876
<v Speaker 1>seemed to me some truths and some possibilities with respect

0:40:24.916 --> 0:40:28.116
<v Speaker 1>to how we think about markets and power. I am

0:40:28.196 --> 0:40:32.116
<v Speaker 1>very compelled by her observation that although this may feel

0:40:32.236 --> 0:40:35.076
<v Speaker 1>in certain respects like a David and Goliath story, in

0:40:35.116 --> 0:40:39.436
<v Speaker 1>fact the Goliaths are doing just fine. Some David's may

0:40:39.476 --> 0:40:42.396
<v Speaker 1>have made some money, a lot of other David's will

0:40:42.436 --> 0:40:45.396
<v Speaker 1>probably end up losing money. It is, after all, a

0:40:45.516 --> 0:40:49.156
<v Speaker 1>zero sum game, and the goliaths will live to fight

0:40:49.356 --> 0:40:53.476
<v Speaker 1>another day. Put another way, Goliath isn't dead, in which

0:40:53.476 --> 0:40:55.796
<v Speaker 1>case it's not that much of a David and Goliath

0:40:55.916 --> 0:41:00.036
<v Speaker 1>story after all. Yet at the same time, Alexis points

0:41:00.036 --> 0:41:03.156
<v Speaker 1>out that at a moment where a narrative of populism

0:41:03.196 --> 0:41:06.156
<v Speaker 1>is powerful in the markets, we might want to think

0:41:06.276 --> 0:41:11.516
<v Speaker 1>seriously about where power is in fact allocated. It's great

0:41:11.556 --> 0:41:14.276
<v Speaker 1>that so many Americans participate in the markets if it

0:41:14.356 --> 0:41:17.596
<v Speaker 1>makes them better off, but she points out forty seven

0:41:17.636 --> 0:41:20.476
<v Speaker 1>percent of the population has no skin in the game,

0:41:20.556 --> 0:41:23.716
<v Speaker 1>has no stake in what the markets do, and therefore

0:41:23.836 --> 0:41:27.196
<v Speaker 1>does not benefit from policies designed at the national level,

0:41:27.276 --> 0:41:30.876
<v Speaker 1>including in the Federal Reserve, to keep the markets steady.

0:41:31.436 --> 0:41:35.436
<v Speaker 1>What's more, their unintended consequences of policies designed to keep

0:41:35.436 --> 0:41:38.516
<v Speaker 1>the markets from being too volatile, including the possibility that

0:41:38.556 --> 0:41:44.156
<v Speaker 1>effectively the government using taxpayer dollars ends up ensuring big

0:41:44.316 --> 0:41:49.956
<v Speaker 1>risk taking investors against downside risk, thereby artificially inflating the

0:41:50.036 --> 0:41:56.716
<v Speaker 1>markets and potentially creating the possibility of greater losses going forward, indeed,

0:41:56.796 --> 0:42:02.516
<v Speaker 1>of facilitating bubbles at the level of power analysis. My

0:42:02.636 --> 0:42:06.356
<v Speaker 1>biggest takeaway from talking to Alexis is that this isn't

0:42:06.356 --> 0:42:09.716
<v Speaker 1>really a story about a single stock. It's really a

0:42:09.756 --> 0:42:13.876
<v Speaker 1>story about the aspirations of many ordinary Americans to feel

0:42:13.916 --> 0:42:16.756
<v Speaker 1>as though they are not shut out of the possibility

0:42:16.956 --> 0:42:21.236
<v Speaker 1>of building wealth, in this instance building wealth by speculation,

0:42:21.636 --> 0:42:24.556
<v Speaker 1>but in any case doing the building in some way

0:42:24.676 --> 0:42:28.636
<v Speaker 1>or another. On that account, it's not just greed that

0:42:28.836 --> 0:42:31.596
<v Speaker 1>drives Wall Street or greed that drives the people who

0:42:31.596 --> 0:42:34.196
<v Speaker 1>want to be like Wall Street. It's a deeper question

0:42:34.436 --> 0:42:38.436
<v Speaker 1>of where the power genuinely lies, and the rhetoric that

0:42:38.596 --> 0:42:42.276
<v Speaker 1>drives people to make investments like the investments that lead

0:42:42.556 --> 0:42:45.876
<v Speaker 1>to the game Stop Short Squeeze, may go beyond the

0:42:45.956 --> 0:42:49.036
<v Speaker 1>mere desire to make money and stand at a symbolic

0:42:49.156 --> 0:42:52.476
<v Speaker 1>level for the desire to be involved in the game

0:42:52.716 --> 0:42:56.756
<v Speaker 1>and to be in the action where money is being made.

0:42:58.276 --> 0:43:00.396
<v Speaker 1>That is a story that we will continue to watch

0:43:00.596 --> 0:43:03.276
<v Speaker 1>throughout this year as we look at the question of power,

0:43:03.636 --> 0:43:06.196
<v Speaker 1>and it's a question that will remain salient in our

0:43:06.196 --> 0:43:10.196
<v Speaker 1>minds as we discuss going forward the way Corporation's work

0:43:10.596 --> 0:43:14.516
<v Speaker 1>and the way they interact with Wall Street in our economy.

0:43:15.876 --> 0:43:17.756
<v Speaker 1>When I come back to you next week, we will

0:43:17.796 --> 0:43:20.316
<v Speaker 1>be in the heart of an impeachment trial, and I

0:43:20.396 --> 0:43:24.956
<v Speaker 1>promise to talk to you about that. Until then, be careful,

0:43:25.436 --> 0:43:29.836
<v Speaker 1>be safe, and be well. Deep Background is brought to

0:43:29.836 --> 0:43:33.956
<v Speaker 1>you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Mo laboord, our

0:43:33.996 --> 0:43:37.956
<v Speaker 1>engineer is Martin Gonzalez, and our shorerunner is Sophie Crane mckibbon.

0:43:38.396 --> 0:43:42.276
<v Speaker 1>Editorial support from noahm Osband. Theme music by Luis Guerra

0:43:42.796 --> 0:43:46.716
<v Speaker 1>at Pushkin. Thanks to Mia Lobell, Julia Barton, Lydia, Jean Coott,

0:43:46.996 --> 0:43:51.876
<v Speaker 1>Heather Faine, Carl Vigliori, Maggie Taylor, Eric Sander, and Jacob Weisberg.

0:43:52.276 --> 0:43:54.596
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at Noah R. Feldman.

0:43:54.996 --> 0:43:57.356
<v Speaker 1>I also write a column for Bloomberg Opinion, which you

0:43:57.396 --> 0:44:01.116
<v Speaker 1>can find at Bloomberg dot com slash Feldman. To discover

0:44:01.196 --> 0:44:04.436
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts, go to Bloomberg dot com

0:44:04.476 --> 0:44:07.356
<v Speaker 1>slash Podcasts, and if you liked what you heard today,

0:44:07.756 --> 0:44:11.396
<v Speaker 1>please write a review or Ello frad. This is Deep Background.