WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Media and Memory

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you a Stuff to Blow your Mind fan? Are

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you a New Yorker? Do you plan to attend this

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>year's New York Comic Con. If so, then you've got

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to check out our exclusive live show NYCC presents Stuff

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind Live Stranger Science. Join all three

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of us as we record a live podcast about the

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>exciting science and tantalizing pseudo science underlying the hit Netflix

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>show Stranger Things. It all goes down Friday October six,

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>from seven pm to eight thirty pm at the Hudson

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Mercantile in Manhattan. Stuff you missed in history class has

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a show right before us, so you can really double down,

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>learn more and buy your tickets today at New York

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Comic Con dot com slash NYCC hyphen presents Welcome to

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind from How Stuff Works dot com.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Christian Seger, and I'm

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick. And hey, it is time for another listener

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Maile episode. It's been a while since we did one, right, guys, Yeah,

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been a while since Carney has come out of

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>his layer to greet us. With various bits of listener

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>mail from our our our listeners all over the world.

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Carney's has some life changes recently, though, right guys, Well,

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Carney I believe has a crush Carney the mail Bot,

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 1>of course, if you're not familiar, Formerly Arnie the mail Bot.

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>With the addition of Cartesian doubt, we became Carney. And

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>now I think he has learned to love because I've

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>seen him writing the name of another machine here in

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the office, if y'all, if you'll notice, I noticed somebody

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>etched a serial number really long, went into the wall

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>with a saw of some sort. That would be Carney.

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I get a big heart around it, Honestly, I try

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to stay out of the whole thing. They both tried

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to get me into a room to mitigate the whole

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>situation the other day, and I just you know, I'm

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>busy to a podcast. Sorry, Carney, you don't want to

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>get into machine politics. Well, maybe by the end of

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>today's episode he and the coffee machine can work it out.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope so, I hope so. But for now he

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>needs to do his job, that's right, and that is

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to spit out listener mail for us. And it's and

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we need a note here that we receive a great

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>deal of listener mail. We we get it in on

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the email, we get it through the various social media accounts.

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>We get it lots of cool feedback on the discussion

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>module our group on Facebook. These are all tremendous ways

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with us. Occasionally, even some snail

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>mail comes in, but not a lot. Uh, no reason

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>you should stop. Actually do some stuff from Twitter this time.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, cool, I know we see stuff on tumbler

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>even so. The bottom line is we receive a great

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>deal of cool stuff. We try to respond to to

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it, but there's a lot that we

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>can't even you know, we don't have time to respond to.

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But we do like to have Carney bring us some

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>choice bits of listener mail so that we can read

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>them on the air and and discuss the questions. The

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>answers are just sort of basking, you know, the the

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 1>glory of the moment. Well, time is precious, so let's

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>get right into it. I can see he's spitting one

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>out right now. All right, what's it look like? This

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>came in on the discussion module that group on Facebook

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that we were talking about that all of you are

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>welcome to to join in on uh. Darwin writes in

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and says you mentioned on the podcast last week that

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the living in a simulation trope might someday replace

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the alien abduction narrative. Last week on BBC's Infinite Monkey Cage,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Brian Cox, this is the the younger scientists, Brian Cox,

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>This isn't the classic character actoran not Manhunter anyway, Cox

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and his panel discussed this very topic, even submitting that

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>such a belief bordered on the same leap of faith

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 1>that is required for religious beliefs. I think it is fascinating,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>even though I doubt that you would be able to

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>create certain physical phenomena as we observe them using digital methods,

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the problem of pseudo random versus truly random physical events.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, maybe with highly advanced technology is required to

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>recreate a universe such limitations and uh maybe surmountable. It

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is endlessly fascinating topic and I would love to hear

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys weigh in on it at some point. Well.

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Cartesian doubt, this is actually a good point

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>for it, because we talked about this during the Mandela

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Effect episode. This is where I believe this This came up,

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you guys also did it in a what

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>was Your Computer Simulated? Episode? Was that the created universe

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is one yes. In the episode where we talked about

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>creating a universe in the lab, we also talked about

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of creating a universe and a computer simulation

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and how you could know that. I'm skeptical about this idea.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I voiced some of my skepticism in that episode, and

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>we actually got some replies about that. We several people

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>send us really interesting emails about that. I'm going to

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>try to read at least one of those today. And

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Darwin here mentions the alien abduction episode, and yeah, in

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that one, we were talking about this, this trope of

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of alien abduction being the narrative that you draw in

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>when trying to make sense of some sort of you know,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>paranormal sensory experience, and to what degree we might replace

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that in the future with something like the idea that

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>our reality is a computer simulation, Like, at what point

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>would there be a tipping point at which this would

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>become the default or one of the default narratives for

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>some people understanding what happened? Syndia being that like the

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>matrix would sort of replace alien abduction as these the

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>narrative of explanation for these things that we have no

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>scientific explanation for. Well, wait a minute, then what is

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the experience narrative there? So if an alien abduction, it's

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's certain patterns of like I woke up,

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I was in a room surrounded by beings, I was

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>taken up into another place, X, Y, and Z happened

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to me. What what's the simulated universe version of that? Well, Joe,

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was coming back from from the joint

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>uptown a few nights back, and suddenly everything got a

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>little flashy, and the next thing I knew, these uh,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>these people were come infor me. I think what had

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>happened is that I had I had glitched out of

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the computer simulation for a moment. The anti virus software

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is on your case, Yeah, they're on my case. I

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>think I might have flopped out of the future tank

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>that I'm that my actual body is positioned in. So

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they put me back in and they've done something to

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>my memory. But I did get to see through the

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>veil and see through the computer simulation that we all

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>buy into every day. This is an actual argument that

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>a few people have have proposed as an explanation for

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the Mandela effect, that we exist within a kind of

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>like hollow deck simulation, and that when the Mandela effect

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is observed by people, it's because there's some glitch in

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the software. We do not buy it. Our episode strongly

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>argues that the Mandela effect is just a false memory

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and false memory shared false memory. The amazing part about

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it is what it reveals about the inner working of memory. Well, yeah,

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't we get at least one email from someone who

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is fairly angry arguing that it's more likely that we

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>live in parallel universes or a glitchy simulation then that

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>people misremember things. I thought that was just you, you're

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>trolling Probert and me, but it maybe it was a

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>real person. I don't know. I think it's kind of

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>likely that people really often misremember things. Well, yeah, I

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>think that we make a strong case for that, and

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's connected to the alien abduction episode two. We've

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>had kind of like a false memory theme going for

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the last month. Okay, well, I've got at least one

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>more email about the idea of living in a computer simulation.

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that we this came up in our episode

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>about how to create a universe in the Lab. Now,

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that episode was on the physics idea.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>It was that we talked about one book in particular,

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>but the work of cosmologists like Alan Gooth over the

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:45.679
<v Speaker 1>years about how it might hypothetically be possible. It seems

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like kind of a stretch, but there are plausible physical

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>hypotheses about how you might be able to do an

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>experiment in high energy particle collider that could create a

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>universe in the lab. But we also talked about the

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of creating a universe as a simulation on software,

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about multiple reasons I don't think this

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is likely that our universe is a simulation. Uh number one,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>It would just require so much energy to simulate a

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>realistic universe. Why is that something that we think future

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>civilizations would spend their limited resources on. Well, well, because

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, but also a lot of people spend their

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>limited resources now on simulated worlds. You just you have

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to extrapolate it to like a global economy where just batteries, man,

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're just taking our energy right back. Just

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the information density of simulating an actual world

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>with actual physics that works. I mean, one of the

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>problems is you can do science experiments and the laws

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of physics always seem to hold. So that means at

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>some level they're simulating everything all the way down. It's

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>not just like a low res simulation with some kind

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of put together sprites. At the higher level, they're simulating

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>every physical interaction of every atom and molecule. Well, that

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>just seems like that would be so energy intensive, it's ridiculous.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna I'm just playing defl's advocate here. I

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, But like I immediately think of like

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>rag doll physics in like the video games I play,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like like sky Rim or Fallout or something like that. Right, right,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a very limited version of what you're talking about,

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>which are just orders of magnitude simpler than simulating real physics.

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And what I was saying is the easiest way to

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>simulate real physics would just be to have a real universe. Well,

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we brought up in that episode,

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I think was was the issue of mirrors and video games.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>If you see a working mirror in a video game,

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you're probably you're seeing a great deal of work place

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and all, and some of the times you're actually seeing

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>some trickery to you know, to because there's no light

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in a video game. You don't have photons in a

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>video game. But to have this kind of simulation that

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Joe is talking about, you would need to have that.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I had another objection to the idea of that, that

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>we're living in a simulated universe, and it went sort

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of like this, Um, if we are living in a

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>simulated universe that perfectly mirrors a real universe, we should

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to create a simulated universe within our simulated universe,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and then within the created simulated universe, they should be

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>able to create a universe within the simulated universe. If

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this is all running on hardware that is upstream of

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the simulations that go all the way down, you'd eventually

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>reach a sort of peak information density that the hardware

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at the top could no longer sustain. And that's where

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>this next email comes in. So this comes from our

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>listener Jared, who says, Hi, guys, love the show. I

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>was listening to your Out of Chaos podcast and had

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a few thoughts pertaining to the computational requirements of complex

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>simulation UM and he calls the section relative relativity of

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>our programmer God's time. I work on virtually prototyping satellite

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>imaging systems by simulating photo realistic imagery, taking into account

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the physics of the imaging system and the lights interaction

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with the observed scene. Now I can do a pretty

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>darn good job simulating imagery with any computer. It just

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>takes longer given a less powerful computer. Maybe the being

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>simulating us have a lot more time, so an hour

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in their time is a second in hours, Or they

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>have us turn off for the night and start us

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>back up in the morning for maintenance. My simulations don't

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>notice any or my temporal discontinuity. Also, now the beings

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>want to create a simulation inside their simulation, sure, but

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they have finite computing power too, so it will go

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>extremely slow relative to the original programmer gods, and the

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>embedded simulations will asymptotically approach some constant computational requirement. I

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>thought that was really interesting, but he goes on. Another

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>solution is to give your world some natural equalizer, like

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>an ego. I'd argue the past three years, as humans

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have gotten way more computationally complex, the loss of biodiversity

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>has made the earth as a whole way less computationally complex.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Someday we'll have some computationally tricky doomsday device which will

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>solve its own computational problem. Uh. And then he goes

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>on to just say some very nice things about our

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>show and and all that, and we appreciate the flattery,

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but really especially appreciate these ideas. I think I'm not

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.599
<v Speaker 1>convinced by them that we do live in a computer simulation,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think that is a reasonable objection to my

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>time of computation and information density objection. I have another

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>one too. They just came to mind hearing just just

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>just a spring off of this fantastic response, is that

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we can. We can easily think of

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like a whole world simulation and all the inherent problems there,

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a multi user situation and all the problems there. But

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>how about this. The next time you're in a small windowless,

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>mirror less bathroom, I think, what if this is the

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>simulation and it began basically the moment I walked in here. Yes,

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like this is when the simulation kicked on. Everything else

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is just you know, false memory essentially, and the simul

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>nation is going to end when I flush the toilet.

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's kind of like if you're filming a TV

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>series and you don't have a lot of money for

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>an episode to do what a bottle episode? Right? So

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that's maybe that's how the our far future selves are

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>dealing with this, Like we can't actually recreate the twenty

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>one century, but let's just do a bathroom scene because

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>bathrooms from the twenty one century were pretty cool, and

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>that will immerse the single user in that world, and

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>giving the entire world full of people false memories actually

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>would help, because this goes right along with what y'all

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>were saying about the failures of memory related to the

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Mandela effect. Memory is very low resolution compared to reality.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It's incredibly low resolution. It's you know, so you It

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>would not be all that computationally difficult to supply somebody

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>with the vague kind of memories people actually have, but

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they have the illusion that their memories are vivid. This

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>may explain why sometimes when I go into the bathroom,

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I imagine what life would be like if I was

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>stuck in there forever, Like like how would I sleep

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on the floor? Would I drink water from the sink?

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Would I bathe? In the toilet, et cetera. I would say,

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>next time you are in a work meeting that seems

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to go on forever, you should contemplate the possibility that

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the universe actually began at the beginning of this meeting,

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of your life up until this point

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is just an inserted false memory at low resolution to

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>justify you listening to this pitch about how you're going

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to optimize your new whatever your seo. Dude. Yeah, and

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>then then you get to snap back into it and

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>try and remember what the person was telling you. Sounds good.

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>All right? We got another one related to uh, I

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>think Carney's hand in one do you Oh hey, oh

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this is sharp okay. Oh, this is one about our

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>samurai swords episode. Oh no, wonder okay. So this is

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>from Steve and he says, enjoyed your program on Japanese

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>katana swords. Thanks. I think the development that you skipped

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>over was the reintroduction of swords as standard equipment for

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>officers and sergeants during the period just before World War Two.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Most of these individuals were not samurai class and did

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not own swords, so mass produced pieces were issued to them.

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>These so called showato were distinguished by minuki of three

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>imperial chrysanthemums rather than the traditional heraldic manuki of older swords.

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Most were destroyed during the occupation, but many survive. So

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>what Steve's referring to here is a study that we

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>looked at during our Samurai Swords episode that took a

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>sword that was recovered from presumably some battle during World

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>War Two, so this was the nineteen forties. The U.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>S Army commissioned a metallurgical composition composition study of the

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>sword to determine how it was smith and they found

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that the sword that they had recovered was actually significantly

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>lower in quality than they had been led to believe

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>from the history of sword smith things specifically for katanas,

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>like if I remember correctly, like the carbon composition was

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>off by percentages, the angle of the sword wasn't right way,

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So it seems like Steve is telling

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>us here why that's the case. They had this entire

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>other line of swords that were made specifically for the

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Big War. That's interesting. Yeah, that did not come up

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in in our episode, but that adds a little more

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>background to what they were observing here. Yeah, and so

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>like let's let's try to apply this to a fictional example. Okay,

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>so we talked about kill Bill in the Samura Swords

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>episode when uh the Bride is fighting the Crazy eighty

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>eight with her like super awesome samurai sword that is

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is smithed in the very traditional way, so it's both

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>sharp and flexible and has a has a solid core. Right,

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>she's able to cut in half. Other warriors swords from

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the Crazy eight eighty eight attack her. So maybe they've

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>got these mass manufactured showato swords, but she's got the

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>real deal. She's got hottri Hanzo steel. Crazy eight eight

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>should have really paid more attention to their true gear,

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably exactly. Yeah, each sword is priceless, so

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that's priceless times eight. Yeah. And I guess the argument

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>too is it's like, if you're whaling on someone with

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the A eight Samurai swords, they don't they really don't

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>even need to be sharp. They can you don't even

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>take to take them out of the sheath. Yep. But

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.719
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Steve, I really appreciate that that clarifies that

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>way we assumed, I think in that episode that there

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>was something along those lines that probably like late uh,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century and early twenty century katanas were not of

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the same Make all right, We're gonna take a quick

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>break and when we come back, we will get some

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more listener mail from Carney and share it with the

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of you. All Right, we're back. We have a

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of listener mail here dealing with the episode

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that Joe and I recorded, The buddhais a Mountain, which

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty pretty fun episode about the Lashawn Buddha,

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the giant Buddha uh at one of fines in China,

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>this enormous humanoid structure that has been carved into the

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>mountain itself, lording over the river below, kind of like

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Stone Mountain here in Georgia. Well we we do. I

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think Stone Mountain came up in that. Actually, that was

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a very interest less racist Well that this was a

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>very interesting episode because it did come out ahead of

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the a lot of the political discussions

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have been going on regarding monuments and statues here in

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Yeah, I guess I didn't even think

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about that really, but maybe we did get a little

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>listener mail about that. But yeah, we talked in the

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>episode about the idea of statuary being a type of

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>depiction that inherently carries like a like a moral valence

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to it. It's like if you were to have a

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>photograph of somebody or have well maybe not a photograph,

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, But if you like write a book

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>about somebody, it's not assumed that you think that person

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>was a good person. You might write a book about

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>a serial killer or a horrible dictator. But if you

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>put up a statue of a person, it is just

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>part of our cultural uh language, that that is a

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>thing of honor. You never put up a statue of

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody you don't like. Yeah, you know, we I think

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>we we barely if it all discussed Confederate monuments in

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that episode, because again it was before it really picked

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>up as a topic here. But I do encourage anyone

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>out there who's interested in that topic to listen to

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that episode because it's kind of an interesting way to

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>think about it about a controversial topic free of the actual, um,

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, current events. But the bit of listener, may

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna read here doesn't concern anything happening here in America.

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>It concerns something happening in China and concerns some of

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the local accounts of the Leshan Buddha. We heard from

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a listener by the name of Danny. He's an American

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>with a with a company in Shandu, and they he

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>has his staff listen to our podcast to improve their English.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, sorry, sorry staff, No no, he says. He says,

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they get a lot of a lot of great stuff

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>out of it, out of it and they enjoy They

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyed the episode. Uh, since it related to something

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>local to uh. So he said that he had they

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>had no corrections aside from the fact that, uh, the

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>mountain itself it is you may Shawn Shawn mining mountains,

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>so you you may mountain if you will. But then

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he he went on to share some various tidbits from

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a local inhabitants about basically bits of folklore related to

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the Lashan Buddha. Uh. And he he adds that we

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>don't actually believe any of these points, but a lot

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>of sexilantees do, and they are relatively well known things

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that are said of the Buddha. Um. He said. They

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>also give a little insight into how even modern day

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese mythology bends up the line between the animate and

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the inanimate. So I'm just gonna run through these. I

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>found these tremendously fascinating. Apparently the Buddhist facial expression changes

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>in reaction to tragic events in China. First, he points

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to the lashaan Giant Buddha closed tears event. That's that's

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>a translation from Chinese, where apparently the Buddha closed his

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>eyes and shed tears for all the lost souls as

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a result of the nineteen fifty nine through sixty one famine,

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>which killed between fifteen and thirty million people. Uh. He

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>says the Buddha was seen to look very angry in

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy six, in the year when mal Zadong died.

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>In the same year, the same year that Tangshan earthquake

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>killed thousands of people, says, the Buddha also apparently expresses

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>joy or pride for China as well. His head started

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to glow with a pulsating light in the year two thousand,

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>when China joined the w t O and made the

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>bid to host the two thousand eight to Beijing Olympic Games.

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Another one that they found this kind of a random

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that they found on the internet in Chinese. He

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>points to an event that supposedly happened on May seventh,

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two, in the morning when there's suddenly there

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>were dark clouds around the Buddha and suddenly there appeared

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>at a halo like phenomenon. The rising sun flashed around

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the statue with a diameter of about three creating a

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>colorful halo of light. He says. In two thousand eight,

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>after the earthquake, the Buddha was seen crying. Uh. It

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>says this one a lot of people believe, and there

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>are even pictures online. So this is kind of like

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>when we get um like like stigmata effects on like

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>statues or something like that. Or I'm thinking also of like, um,

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>have you guys ever heard of like manifestations of Jesus

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and like everyday objects. When I was living in a

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts there was one of these that happened in I

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>think it was Malden, Massachusetts, and uh, it was in

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a Catholic hospital window. There was like a manifestation that

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>looked like it was Jesus, but it was like some

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of smoke damage or something to the window. Well,

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, I would definitely say that with Lashawn Buddha.

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Given the irrigation system that's worked out around it. I

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>mean it would make sense that it would appear to

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>weep certain sometimes. Uh. He also points out he says, quote,

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's often said that there is also a treasure built

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>into the statue behind his heart, ears and eyes. No

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>one can tell me what the treasure is supposed to be,

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but I would not be all too surprised if something

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>was there because of the mystical powers that Chinese myth

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>gives to many minerals, such as Jade's ability to transcend

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the realm of the living sometimes something I think you

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>guys have covered before in a previous episode. Yeah, we

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>talked about that in the Jade Burial Suit episode. We

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>sure did. So. I love these tidbits. They really they

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>really had to add a little more depth than a little,

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, local intel to our episode. And I had

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to read this one too. After he shared the following,

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Please feel free to read any of this on the podcast,

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in whole or in part, including my name. If you do,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I will take the whole company out for a day

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to go visit the Buddha and we will bring you

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>back some pictures. Awesome. Yeah, do it so? Yeah? I

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>want to see some pictures. Yeah, it's always great, because

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can sit here in in Atlanta, Georgia

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and do research until our eyes bleed and pull up

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of facts and then present them to you

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the audience. But if you're actually physically close to some

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of these things, like academ Gora doc, we received a

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of mail from people who who have visited there before.

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's especially helpful for us to hear

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>these firsthand accounts. All right, what do you have next

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>for us there, Karney? So we got one coming in

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>from Allison about science communication. This is going back to

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>our episode about science communication from after Robert went to

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the World Science Festival in New York. Oh, yes, science

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>communication breakdown. Wait is that a led Zeppelin reference? I

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>think it may have been an accidental led Zeppelin reference.

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Communication breakdown, but that was what the episode was about, like,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, breakdowns in the communication of science and scientific

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>news scientific topics to yeah public, especially as it relates

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to climate change. Uh, let's see what else vaccines? Yeah,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of it was related into the

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that people are not necessarily convinced by facts and evidence,

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of psychology about what actually causes

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>people to make their minds up about controversial issues, and

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that it's there's a lot of social aspects and cultural

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>identity wrapped up, and how we take sides on issues

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that there appears to be some controversy about, and about

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>how how we can deal with that in science communication.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Allison has a fantastic question and something we

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>actually deal with a good bit, i'd say, She says, Hi, guys,

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I've enjoyed your show for a long time, but only

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>recently had a good excuse to send an email. You

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>recently did an episode on the science communication breakdown, and

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering if in your research you came across

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>any good idea or theories about how science communicators should

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>address the way that scientific facts change as our understanding evolves.

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>For example, for a very long time, nutritional scientists have

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>pushed the idea that carbohydrates are a good energy source

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>for humans, while fat was associated with a bunch of

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>different health problems. Recently, though, our understanding of nutritional science

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.239
<v Speaker 1>has begun to change. Perhaps fat won't kill you, and

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps carbs are more detrimental to health than anybody wanted

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to admit. I've seen a lot of people express a

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of betrayal over this reversal of sentiments. How are

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>you supposed to trust anything these scientists say? They wonder

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>if a few decades down the line, they're going to

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>do a one eight on their position? How are science

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>communicators supposed to convince the public to walk back from

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>positions they have long been considered solid theory? Also, she says,

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>if you guys haven't done an episode on ketosis, I'd

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>love to hear your take on it. I've been living

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>on fewer than twenty grams of carbs a day for

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>two years, contrary to what the dietitians tell me, I've

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>never felt better. Thanks so much for your educational entertainment, Allison.

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So what she's talking about here reminds me of this

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Lewis Black bit that you guys have probably heard before,

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and I've even referenced it on the show before, where

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>he's like, So, when I was growing up, there were

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>these studies and they said milk is good for you.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You gotta drink milk. Drink milk. And then all of

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a sudden there are studies and they said milk is

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>bad for you. Don't drink so much milk. You gotta

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>take the fat out of the milk, right, And then

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden it turns around again, milk is

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>good for you. Right. So these science studies seem to

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>contradict one another back and forth, and this is essentially

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>what she's getting at. Yeah, so I actually have several

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about this, one of the one of them is

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that this is partially an artifact of problems in science

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>communication more so than science itself, though there are problems

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>with some aspects of the science. So a lot of

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>times what will happen is there will be a new

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>study that says, on lab rats, we found that if

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you give them this extremely high dosage of milk proteins

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>over this many months, they have a sixty percent higher

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>chance of having this effect than if you don't. And

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so then the people who are running like newspapers are

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>doing the nightly news. I guess if this back in

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the nineties or the eighties or whatever, would say scientists

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have discovered that milk will give you cancer. It is

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>bad for you. Uh, And so they take this highly nuanced,

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of subtle effect that's been demonstrated in one experiment

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and turn that into an incredibly simple pronounced statement about

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what is good for you or what is bad for you,

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>not really noting that maybe the effect was subtle, that

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the experiment was done on a certain number of animals

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that weren't even humans, you know, stuff like this. Let

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>me see if I can try to reverse engineer this too,

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>from like a media literacy standpoint, because I think even

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for some members of our audience who might actually be

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>scientists themselves, they don't uh necessarily know how that information

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>comes to us science communicators in the media. Right. So

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for instance, we get these press releases and it will say, uh,

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>what was her example, Well, she brings up a fat

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>versus carbs and the health effects there, Right, So we'll

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>get a press release and it will say that and

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>will have a link where you can go and you

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>can read the full twenty page report. But sometimes just

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>behind the paywall, yeah exactly. And sometimes your organization doesn't

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.959
<v Speaker 1>supply you with you know, the access to the databases

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>behind these paywalls. Sometimes you have to go to the

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>researchers home, yes, or call them right, yeah, And not

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>every journalist is actually going to do the work to

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>go get primary resources, especially in this era of mass

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>content creation, right, so usually what ends up happening is

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they just grab the information right out of the press release,

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>rewrite it a little bit, and focus on that one

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thesis statement. Right. What doesn't happen is they don't look

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at the literature review inside the actual paper that sets

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>up the study, within the context of all the other

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>studies that are done on this topic. Right. Another problem

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is that within the world of journalism, especially on the Internet,

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but it was probably true on TV and stuff like

0:29:55.480 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that too, that there's very little incentive to accurately unicate

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the subtleties and the nuances of scientific results, put everything

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in context, communicate, you know, some caveats that that it

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>might not be as clear cut as it first seemed

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>from your headline, because what people want to click on

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is something that says, I have the new answer for you.

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Milk is going to kill you. You will never believe

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>this fact about milk, you know. And here's the other

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>thing too, is that so we have that we have

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the the journalist, we have the scientists, but then of

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>course we also have a consumer in and I can't

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>help but think about what we know all the all

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've been talking about with false NT memories, and misattribution,

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>as well as just the the idea that once a

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>particular narrative gets out there, take lose black pri instance. Now,

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a bit, so I don't I don't

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>really mean to dissect a comedic bit too much. But

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in this example, like, did was he actually like reading

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of literature about milk or is it just

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in the background of his mind he picks up on

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this narrative that milk is is good, and then it's ad.

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's specifically talking about seeing headlines on either

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>nightly cable news or in a newspaper. So on one level,

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's to what degree a certain bit of research

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>makes a splash and the headlines, and then to what

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>extent it's picked up on and and and sticks with

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the individual. Again, the low resolution of your memory is

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>contributing to this. I can't help but be reminded of

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the episode we did on Only Children and the psychology

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>behind it, and the fact that you had one you know,

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>decades and decades old though in like the late nineteenth century, Yeah,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>but basically over a century old, this horrible psychological methodology, Yeah,

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>making the case that that only children were monsters. And

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>plenty of studies have come along, just one after the other,

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>disproving that and showing that only children are not monster,

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not lonely, they're not you know, craven or spoiled, etcetera.

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But we keep sticking to this previously established narrative just

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>because it made such a media splash and nothing after

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that was able to achieve as much residence. And because

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to remember, You've got to think, like the

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>access theory of memory, that things that are simple statements

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that are easy to remember are going to have much

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>more purchase in your memory than things that are complicated

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and nuanced and hard to explain and have some conflicting results,

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and that you've got to put it in a lot

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of context. So yeah, that's one thing. Part of this

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is an artifact of how science journalism gets done. Part

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of it is an artifact of our low resolution memories.

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But there's another thing that has to do with the

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>science itself, which is that some subjects are as it

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.719
<v Speaker 1>stands today, more unstable than others regarding the scientific consensus.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you read scientific literature critically, you can usually

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>start to get a sense of which subject areas are

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>producing more solid, dependable results in which ones are still

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>mired in some kind of legitimate controversy. Experimental design plays

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a big role in this. Nutrition is a classic example

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of an area that can be extremely difficult to properly control.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Experiments like studies need to take place over a long

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>period of time to see long term effects. They often

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>rely on people to accurately report what they eat. You

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>can kind of imagine what some problems with that might

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>be um and add that to the fact that that

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>there have been a lot of financial interest in the

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>production of certain results in nutrition science. So a lot

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff you might have heard in the history

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of science isn't necessarily being done by some independently funded

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>university experiment, but it's done by some research group that's

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>funded by the sugar industry, and what do you know,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they find out that fats are bad for you and

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.239
<v Speaker 1>sugar is good. We actually have a one of my

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite things that's ever been done at How Stuff Works,

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>was created by one of our video producers, Paul Decan,

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and it is a in depth look at the sugar

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>industry's influence on academic papers about the nutritional effects of

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sugar over the last like fifty years, so, so there

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of things to take into consideration. Some

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>subject areas are just they're just swampy, or than others

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>they've got more problems. I mean, you'll notice that in

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, uh, you know, very like material science areas,

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>there's just not going to be a lot of controversy

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>about whether this new alloy is actually as strong as

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they say it is um, but there might be if

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there's somebody who's got a financial interest in it and

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 1>they're publishing the you know, in studies that they've funded. Anyway,

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an excellent question you ask Allison. It's

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>something that we wrestle with all the time, and and

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the answer is difficult. There's no silver bullet on how

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to fix this. I think it has to do with

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>helping people understand the complexities of science and understand the

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>meta complexity of how other people come to believe in

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the ideas about scientific consensus and where they get their

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>impressions about what scientists say. Yeah, I mean, I guess

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 1>like this is a difficult problem to solve of but

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I think like two steps that could be taken to

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>help it, which probably, let's be honest, won't happen in

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the near future. Are that media organizations need to be

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>more thorough in their research and their depiction of these studies.

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But then also the consumers themselves need to have media

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>literacy skills that they can rely on to understand these

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>studies better, or to look at multiple sources and kind

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of triangulate what's actually going on here? All right, what

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Carney is coming at you, Christian with

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>another piece of listener mail. What what's he got there

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for you? Well, this one is great. This is actually

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a letter from a listener named Lindsay telling us about

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>her personal alien abduction experience based on our two alien

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>abduction episodes. Lindsay says, when I was growing up, about

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>ten years old, I had a clubhouse outside of my

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>house and would camp out and sleep inside of it

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on some summer nights. It was sturdy and constructed by hand,

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>lofted on wooden posts acted as stilts, about eight feet

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>off the ground. One night, I climbed up the ladder

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>with my sleeping bag, pulled up the ladder so nothing

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>else could come up. I read some comic books and

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>fell asleep. This is, by the way, like my ideal

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.720
<v Speaker 1>way to go to bed. Lindsay. The clubhouse had one

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>side of double paned windows, one side that had a

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 1>doorless doorway through which you could see my neighbor's yard,

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and the other two were solid wood walls. I slept

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 1>facing out the doorway. I woke up in the middle

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of the night one night and was frozen in fear

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>because in my neighbor's yard I saw a saucer about

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the size of an average circular above ground pool, hovering

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>over their yard, absolutely still about a hundred feet into

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the air. It was large and very cinematically stereotypical, a

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>green glow metallic saucer, a beam coming down from the saucer,

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. I couldn't see anything inside of

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it because it was oriented above me. I sat still,

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking that whatever was inside could possibly sense movement, and

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I felt like I was having trouble breathing. It was

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>silent at first, and then I started to hear something

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that was difficult to describe. It was quiet, but in

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 1>a way that felt loud and overwhelming. I could hear

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a ring in my ears, and I think it felt

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>louder than it was because the world was quiet, but

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the inside of my head, wasn't. I remember being terrified,

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but not that I was going to be hurt, just

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't know what was going to happen. I

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>believe I forced myself to close my eyes, thinking that

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe the saucer couldn't move while I was looking at it,

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and I either fell asleep or I woke up again

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was gone. I didn't tell anybody because the

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>whole situation felt fishy to me, and while I believe

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>in aliens, I don't believe we've had any contact with them,

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 1>nor they with us. Years later, after keeping better track

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of my sleep habits and dreams, I learned about sleep

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>paralysis and had experienced it a couple of other times

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>throughout high school. When i'd wake up with it in

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>my room, I could hear something that sounded like tribal

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>percussion from the living room, though nobody you was in there,

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and I could see that the lights were not on.

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>In these moments, it was the scariest that I couldn't move.

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It felt the same way an arm does when you

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 1>wake up in the middle of the night with your

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>arm behind you and you need to use your other

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 1>arm to pick it up and put it back to

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 1>get the blood flowing again. The difference is that none

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of your body parts are able to move the other

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>ones back into place or shake them out. Though I

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>never again had visual hallucinations from sleep paralysis, only auditory sensations,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I am thoroughly convinced that what I experienced with the

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>saucer in my neighbor's yard was indeed sleep paralysis. Being

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>frozen in fear was probably physically being frozen and unable

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to move due to this. And it all went away

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>when I went back to sleep and somehow broke the cycle.

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>H Well, that's interesting, and that does line up with

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what we talked about, uh, because what

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Luke just think of the elements, they're not only the

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>sleep paralysis, but uh, the reading of the comic book

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>before one goes to bed, potentially contributing to some of

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the like the narrative information you have on hand for

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the interpretation of of stimuli within that that murky period

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of waking and which certain hallucinations can occur, Right, Yeah,

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think what Lindsay experienced is what we

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 1>described in those episodes as being sort of like the

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>first stage of the alien abduction experience, right, you have

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>sleep paralysis or some other kind of event that is

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>difficult to explain, and then it sounds like lindsay didn't

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>go on to the next phase, which was going to

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a therapist or a hypnotist and having false memories created

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that then somehow are extrapolated outward into something worse, right,

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like actually being taken aboard the ship, right, or just

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>any kind of like repeated self analysis of the memory

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>that props up the supernatural explanation. Yeah, but again, this

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is a great example of like, we read lots of

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>studies that were about sleep paralysis connected to the idea

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 1>of alien abduction, but to have a firsthand account like

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.359
<v Speaker 1>this is really nice. I think like the closest thing

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>we had to that was we talked about that documentary

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>That Nightmare, and how there are many people in that

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 1>documentary who thought that their sleep paralysis events were alien abductions.

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, something I think might be interesting would be

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to sort of come up with standard narratives about how

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>people get from having an experience like this to one

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of two end points. You know, the path diverges, it

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>forks off, and you can end up in the place

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>where you say I think I had a strange experience

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and I would explain it through sleep paralysis or I

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know what happened or something like that, and then

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, you have it was absolutely real

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and people won't believe me, Like, how do you get

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>what determines which path you follow? Well, I mean, I

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think there are a number of different factors there, but

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of them is just like, what do

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you need in your life? Do you? Is there a

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>part of you that needs an experience great than yourselves

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that no one else is going to be able to

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>understand or only a select inviting community is going to

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.240
<v Speaker 1>understand it. So you know, it's a desire for religious experience,

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a desire to see God. This is why a number

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of abductees report that their experience, even though scary, is

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately a positive experience for them because they come away

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>from it feeling like, oh, I now know my place

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in the universe and that there's something above me that

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>could be taking care of me. It almost makes me

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>wonder if this is parallel to what we're talking about

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>with the science communication episode, where something that should be

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a question of you making judgments based on like facts

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and reading evidence and stuff like that is really more

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>determined about your social environment. Yeah, absolutely, And I mean

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think both of these things I meant to say

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this when we were talking about science communication. They both

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>come back to a fact that we hit over and

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>over and over again on the show, which is just

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that like human beings as social animals, just are prone

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to making mistakes like this, you know, and how we

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>interpret our events and and especially how we build culture

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>around things that happened to us so that we can

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>explain the world around us. Alright, on that note, we're

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:11.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna take one more quick break, and when we come back,

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Carney will dish out the final trio of listener mail

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for us here today, Thank you, thank you. All Right,

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>we're back. There's another piece of listener mail brought to

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>us by Carney, and this one is from listener Allison.

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Allison writes in and says Mara Hart might be one

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of the coolest people out there, although that may be

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit biased, as I am also a fellow marine biologist,

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>a theologist to be exact. I love your podcast and

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>listen every day while conducting my many hours of lab work.

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Among my favorite episodes are the ones where you had

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Mara Heart as a guest speaker, so I was beyond

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>excited when I had the opportunity to meet Dr Hart

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>this past week at the American Fisheries Society Symposium in

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bay, Florida, where she was one of the planary speakers.

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I was able to find her after her talk and

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 1>have a quick conversation with her one on one, where

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I asked her for her for some advice and commented

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>on how much I love your podcast. Just like you guys.

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Dr Hart is an amazing communicator of science, breaking down

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the barriers of the ivory tower that is often scientific

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 1>research and laying it out in a way that is interesting, engaging,

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly fun. It was really inspiring to listen

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 1>to her speak, especially as a female scientist in the

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.399
<v Speaker 1>early stages of my career as a researcher. Seeing how

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>confident and engaging she was gave me some serious hashtag

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>science goals. And I hope that I can quote unquote

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>grow up to be just like her. Oh that's so cool. Yeah,

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait for your next episode. What a wonderful email.

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>She's got one up on us. We've never met Mara

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in real life. We've only just been able to talk

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to Morrow on the phone before. But you're right, she

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is delightful. She is one of my favorite guests to

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>have on the show. What I love about having Mara

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on the show is that she's so down to earth

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>about the science that she's involved in, but also how

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 1>she this gets back to science communication, how she communicates

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it to the public, and how she she really expresses

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>her wonder and awe over the things that she's studying.

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's yeah, always fun to have her. So

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>let's see what episodes the Osadas boneworm episode, she was on,

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the Coral Reef episode, and then we just recently had

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 1>her on again for our our Shark reproduction episode earlier

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>this summer. Alright, well, our next email comes in in

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>reference to the episode that Robert and I did about

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tower of Babel and the confusion of languages. This

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>was a fun one, wasn't it, Robert? Oh? Yeah, this

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>was This one was great because you had that wonderful

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:51.359
<v Speaker 1>convergence of history, mythology, science, linguistics. It all came together. Yeah,

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And so we talked about the idea of or one

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things we discussed in the episode was the

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>idea of the confusion of languages. In the biblical story

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Tower Babble, it's the confusion of tongues. You know,

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 1>God gets threatened by the Tower project and says, I'm

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>going to make everybody speak different languages. But instead we

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about how languages actually diverge, and one of the

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>things we talked about was the the possible idea of

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>language barriers around the world being a kind of cultural

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>immunity barrier that helps prevent harmful memes from spreading as

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:25.720
<v Speaker 1>quickly as they could if everybody in the world spoke

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the same language, essentially like a like a firewall. Yeah,

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and so like if you've got a language, you've got

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>some horrible meme, Like I think the obvious example would

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be Nazism. But you know things like that that catch

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on really quickly with a bunch of people and are

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>very destructive, they do seem to be very rooted to

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the language system in which they emerged very often, and

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>so they don't spread quite as easily across language barriers.

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is why like I can't as cheeseburger isn't

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that big, and like I don't know Papua New Guinea

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly where we're going with this. Well, it's like

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I read the I didn't, but it's like I read

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the letter. So this is from Chris. Chris says, Hi,

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>my name is Chris, and I was really fascinated by

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>your Tower of Babel episode from last month. I love

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the great global flow of ideas and how

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:17.240
<v Speaker 1>languages play into the movement of philosophies and cultural norms.

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 1>There were two things from your episode that really stood

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>out to me. The first was your brief acknowledgement that

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Japanese as a language has not drastically evolved over time.

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I studied Japanese for about six years and have traveled

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>there twice for about a month each. I have a

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:36.440
<v Speaker 1>theory that Japanese has not evolved very drastically because they

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>actually have two phonetic alphabets and a symbol based method

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of writing. Here a Ghana is their phonetic alphabet used

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>for vocabulary that originated in Japan. Kata Kana is their

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>phonetic alphabet used for all foreign words or expressions that

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>were introduced to Japanese culture. Because foreign concepts are isolated

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to a separate system of expression, the original Hiragana is

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>very rarely forced to adapt or evolve. I guess it

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>would maybe be more accurate to say that one of

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese alphabets is constantly adapting and taking in new

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>words and concepts, while the core original method of writing

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>remains comparatively unchanged. I thought that was really interesting that. Yeah,

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a fascist It's true too. I studied Japanese

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in college, but yeah, I never thought of it that

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>way before. It's kind of a way to enforce cultural tradition. Yeah. Uh.

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's certainly true that loan concepts and loan words

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>from other languages is one of the main ways that

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 1>languages seem to evolve in the modern day, or you know,

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>relatively modern day. I mean, you think about the way

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 1>English came to it came to us as it is.

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's this crazy fusion of German and Old

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Norse and Spanish and all the Latin derived languages French, um,

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and the way those cultures came together. But so, yeah,

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. I love the how you brought up uh.

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I can I can has cheeseburger earlier, because I think

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:05.839
<v Speaker 1>humor is a key way to look at at how

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 1>memes travel like not physical humor, because everybody can get

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:13.840
<v Speaker 1>into the idea of like slapsticks. Slapstick tends to like

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're trying to check out comedy from

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 1>other cultures and cultures with a foreign language. Uh, the

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>slapstick is going to be the easiest to understand or

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the outright like silly, goofy clowney behavior. But when it

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>has a linguistic quality to it and you're having to

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>deal with the barrier of translation, I think that's where

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of the stuff ends up falling flat. Well,

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:34.919
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll be really interested to see where Chris

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>goes next. So Chris says, the other thing I was

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>really inspired by was the section towards the end in

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:43.800
<v Speaker 1>regards to snow Crash, and Chris says, I love that book.

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Um and the notion of a universal language actually being

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>detrimental to global human consciousness as it would allow the

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>spread of potentially evil belief systems. I firmly believe that

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we are already witnessing the growth of a new global language.

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The kernel of this growth is modern meme culture. Memes

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>as a language or a combination of non technical English

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and images or symbols, images are universally understood and very simplistic.

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>English is as close as you can get to a

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 1>global language at this moment. When you combine the two,

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you end up with a type of messaging that can

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be understood and recreated on a global scale. Combined with

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the preferred method of distributing memes the Internet and social media,

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a way to very cheaply communicate ideas on

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 1>a global scale with rapid fire quickness, and not have

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 1>those ideas particularly hampered by translation. A scary part of

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 1>this is that memes allowed for the global spread of

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 1>anti democratic political ideals. It's a fact, a fact that

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we witnessed in Brexit, in the U s presidential election

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and the French election. We witness non English and non

0:49:52.920 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>French speaking actors communicating anti democratic ideas to English and

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>French speaking American, British, and French said. Since Russia has

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>been known to weaponize thought viruses as a comic wo nerd,

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to write that phrase and spread them through

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:13.840
<v Speaker 1>memes and massive disinformation dumps. What really irks me is

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's a one way flow because countries like Russia

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and China maintain such stringent censorship laws and control over

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. They can keep their population somewhat inoculated from

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.960
<v Speaker 1>pro democratic ideas that could potentially flow from us to

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>them in meme form. Meanwhile, we hold freedom of speech

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>as a core value of ours, so that we lack

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the kind of isolation inoculation that would prevent Russian anti

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:41.640
<v Speaker 1>democratic memes from infecting us. And that's pretty much what

0:50:41.680 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I've got. Sorry, it's so long. Thanks for reading. I'd

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 1>love to hear back. Keep up the great work on

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. Thanks again, Chris. I have so many things

0:50:50.719 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about related to this. I think, Yeah,

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a really and this is something

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we've actually talked about a fair bit off off, Mike.

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Is the idea of the ways new forms of communication

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>allow ideas to spread over the Internet so much more easily,

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:07.840
<v Speaker 1>but I've never put it in words like this. I

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 1>think Chris has got a really interesting idea about the

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>role memes play and you can absolutely see it for

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 1>yourself if you watch say, disinformation bots operating on Twitter.

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:22.760
<v Speaker 1>They love memes, right, Yeah, So to his point about

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:26.760
<v Speaker 1>this being very comic, Bookie, there is a classic issue

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of of a book called Global frequency. The uh warren

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Ellis who I end up referencing on the show all

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the time, wrote and it was drawn by the late

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Steve Dylan, and the premise was that a signal was

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>intercepted by set and translated and then subsequently broadcast as

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a mimetic information to the entire world. Because it was

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in meme format, it starts infecting people. Uh, it's designed

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it's to infect people essentially, so that like memes are

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the best carrier for this virus, right, So that is

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting concept on a sci fi level. But

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>then also I think it's interesting to step back and

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>remember like the difference between the term meme that we

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>used to describe JPEG's with the fun impact on them

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet versus what like people like Richard Dawkins

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and Susan Blackmore had in mind when we first came

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>up with the terminology. So maybe we should do a

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>memetics episode. I mean, we've definitely touched on the medics

0:52:28.040 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and lots of episodes in the past, but maybe we

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>could devote something to the core idea. I mean, the

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>basic concept scept of a meme originally is just the

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 1>idea of a self reproducing bit of cultural information. So

0:52:39.480 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it could be a song, it could be a political belief,

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it could be anything that tends to make copies of

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:48.399
<v Speaker 1>itself in the minds of people who share some kind

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of language or cult cultural Well, I guess between anybody

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>really um in the same way that genes make copies

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of themselves in the gene pool, right. Yeah, and then again,

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it's funny there's a theme for this listener meal that

0:53:00.719 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>seems to be coming around. Or maybe it's just I'm

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with this topic again, it seems to me media

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 1>literacy is super important here, right, and that like what

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you see if you're if you see some of these

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 1>memes that are designed specifically as a persuasive tools right there,

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like rhetorical weapons almost that go out there, right. Uh,

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>if you don't stop and try to judge them based

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on their merit, how they were created, who they were

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>designed for, etcetera, then you're more likely to be susceptible

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to them and subsequently fooled by them, which brings us

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to the emoji movie right exactly hit of the summer.

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we talk about issues like this, uh

0:53:41.120 --> 0:53:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that the you know, they involve global politics, interaction between

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:46.759
<v Speaker 1>governments around the world. One thing that I helped that

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I think helps in how we we use language carefully

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in describing problems like this is to correctly identify the culprits.

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:57.399
<v Speaker 1>So when we talk about something like this, I think

0:53:57.400 --> 0:53:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it is undeniably true. There have been, you know, enough

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:03.359
<v Speaker 1>report there's really no question that the Russian government does

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 1>operate tons of disinformation campaigns on the Internet and stuff

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like that. But I like to think of those as

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Crimlin disinformation product products, not Russian disinformation products, such that

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you don't identify them with the Russian people's being responsible

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 1>for the same thing is accusing us of some similar

0:54:23.040 --> 0:54:26.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of disinformation mation campaign or hacking campaign that our

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:30.800
<v Speaker 1>government might be up to behind the scenes. Right, yeah, exactly. Alright,

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:33.319
<v Speaker 1>it looks like we have one more bit of listener mail.

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:37.040
<v Speaker 1>When last scrap here from Carney looks like it's for

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you to read here, Christian. Yeah, this last one comes

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to us from Duncan. And I kind of struggled with

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 1>whether or not I for we got it about a

0:54:45.320 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>week and a half ago, and I was like, I

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to respond to this. And so the

0:54:50.040 --> 0:54:52.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that we were doing a listener mail episode seems

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like a great place for us to address it because

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:58.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a complicated topic. He touches on two episodes that

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:01.759
<v Speaker 1>we've covered, the first being Wicked Problems episode that Robert

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and I did about a year ago maybe, and then

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Cleo Dynamics, which we covered in the last two weeks now.

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Duncan says, Hi, guys, in two separate podcasts, you have

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:16.920
<v Speaker 1>referred to poverty and social inequality as wicked problems, and

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel that this is not only inaccurate, but also dangerous.

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:23.319
<v Speaker 1>It is hard to act from a place of pessimism

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and feeling that these problems are too complicated, and that

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 1>makes most people throw up their hands and go what

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is the point in trying definitions? One of the features

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of wicked problems is the difficulty of defining them. Poverty

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:41.240
<v Speaker 1>has a fairly clear, those scalar definition, although different people

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>will draw the line at different points on the scale,

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the measurable features of poverty are fairly clearly defined. Similarly,

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:52.280
<v Speaker 1>defining the success of a solution is simply a measure

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of whether people move up the scale in a meaningful way. Obviously,

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 1>there are some complexities in ways to subdivide the concepts,

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>but in general definition is not a problem solutions. Here again,

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a primary feature of wicked problems falls down. There are

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 1>solutions to the majority of poverty situations, not a magic

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:14.880
<v Speaker 1>bullet for all of them, but a portfolio of policy

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:18.480
<v Speaker 1>measures that can have drastic effects if used together. In

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the repeating history episode, this is the Cleo dynamics one.

0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:25.760
<v Speaker 1>You quoted Cleo dynamics historians who said that reducing inequality

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is critical. These historians would, I am sure, be able

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to provide a series of policies that would achieve this

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>based on fairly reliable historical data. Most economists that favor

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:42.759
<v Speaker 1>reducing inequality should be able to if asked. Most importantly,

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:45.799
<v Speaker 1>most of these solutions do not have major cyclical or

0:56:45.840 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 1>intermeshed knock on effects, which make them impossible to implement.

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:54.080
<v Speaker 1>In most cases, well thought out equality policy improves a

0:56:54.160 --> 0:56:57.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of nearby issues like crime and drug addiction, but

0:56:57.160 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 1>rarely do they result in any major detrimental eye effects.

0:57:01.000 --> 0:57:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So uh, he says. Finally, in fact, poverty and inequality

0:57:04.480 --> 0:57:07.759
<v Speaker 1>are among the most well behaved, predictable social problems we have.

0:57:08.120 --> 0:57:10.919
<v Speaker 1>He gives a number of examples here for US that

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:13.399
<v Speaker 1>are their weblinks, So I'm not going to read you

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:16.040
<v Speaker 1>U r L s over our listener mail episode. Then

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he he ends by saying, I am not an expert,

0:57:19.200 --> 0:57:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but I am sure there are hundreds of clever ideas

0:57:21.560 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for improving social equality among those that are. The reason

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we are not working to solve poverty is a lack

0:57:28.040 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of political will to do so, not because the problem

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is inherently difficult to solve. In my opinion, the reason

0:57:35.280 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a lack of political will is because inequality

0:57:38.920 --> 0:57:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is a driving force of our current financial and political

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>systems and the mechanism by which those who have power

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 1>hold onto it. Why would the ruling class want to

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:53.760
<v Speaker 1>change it? Please give people hope. Regards Duncan, well, you know,

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he makes some good points here. Um I

0:57:57.880 --> 0:58:00.520
<v Speaker 1>do want to agree that first of all, that that

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I think pessimism uh is an area of inactivity, and

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it is difficult to act from a place of pessimism.

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>We have to act as optimists uh and uh on.

0:58:12.320 --> 0:58:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I would also like to return to the topic at

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>some point in the future and and do an episode

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on the idea of a post scarcity world, like what

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what are what are some of the possible road maps

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to a post scarcity world, What would it look like?

0:58:24.800 --> 0:58:26.760
<v Speaker 1>What are the you know, what are the ideals that

0:58:26.800 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 1>are wrapped up there? And how long have we've been

0:58:28.320 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we've been uh dreaming of it and trying to figure

0:58:31.920 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 1>out how to get there. Um. In terms of Wicked Problems,

0:58:37.720 --> 0:58:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I know that when we did that episode, and it's

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:41.800
<v Speaker 1>been a little while, we weren't so much trying to

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:45.120
<v Speaker 1>get people to focus on objectives like this, but it

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>was more like, Okay, when someone comes at you, particularly

0:58:47.480 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the politician comes to you, and they have a solution

0:58:50.960 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to a complex problem in society, Uh, question what they

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:59.840
<v Speaker 1>are saying. Question the validity of this so called solution

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>comes down to critical thinking. Again. Yeah, I actually pulled

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:06.160
<v Speaker 1>some of our notes from that Wicked Problems episode so

0:59:06.200 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that I could reference them back. And I thought it

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>was interesting actually because when you turn back and you

0:59:12.640 --> 0:59:15.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the guys who phrased this riddle and Weber,

0:59:16.400 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 1>they really dove into this in the nineteen seventy three

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>paper Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. They specifically

0:59:23.600 --> 0:59:28.000
<v Speaker 1>used poverty as an example. Uh, and they said, uh, poverty,

0:59:28.080 --> 0:59:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like tugging a loose string on a garment. What

0:59:30.560 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 1>causes poverty? What is it? If it's merely low income,

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:37.080
<v Speaker 1>then that alone explodes out into concerns of both national

0:59:37.120 --> 0:59:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and regional issues. But what about the economic aspects, the

0:59:40.360 --> 0:59:44.240
<v Speaker 1>health and psychological aspects, and the cultural issues. Right, So,

0:59:44.560 --> 0:59:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in regards to what Duncan was just saying to us, yeah,

0:59:47.560 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easy. Like if you look at it

0:59:49.800 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on a scalar level, especially like an economic one, you

0:59:53.560 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 1>can say, oh, yeah, this is a very easily solvable problem.

0:59:56.760 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But Duncan himself at the end talks about how the

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>real difficulty that makes it inherently difficult to solve is

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>political will inequality and how that leads to our political

1:00:06.960 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>systems and our financial systems, right, and ultimately the the

1:00:11.240 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>ideas that those who have the power to change it

1:00:13.400 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>aren't willing to do so. Right, That is the wicked

1:00:16.120 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>problem nature of poverty in my mind. I mean, one

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>obvious response that occurs to me is that saying a

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>problem is difficult to eradicate with a simple solution is

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>very different than saying a problem cannot be improved upon. Yeah, yeah, exactly. Yeah,

1:00:32.280 --> 1:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think wicked problems are more how do how do

1:00:35.400 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we put this, Like, are something that you should be

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>on the lookout for in terms of the rhetoric that

1:00:40.840 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is being pushed your way, right, in terms of how

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>easy and or difficult something is to solve, for instance,

1:00:47.400 --> 1:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I think this debate is only become

1:00:50.080 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>even stronger since we recorded that wicked episode, Wicked problems episode.

1:00:53.840 --> 1:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>But healthcare, how many people in the last year, how

1:00:56.560 --> 1:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>many politicians in the last year said, oh, healthcare so

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>easy to solve, right, Uh, We've got a perfect plan,

1:01:03.080 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>This is so easy to solve. Then you see in

1:01:05.040 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>action how difficult it actually is. Right, Like, if someone

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>makes the argument, this would be easy to solve, but politics,

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you're missing the point, Like politics and the political system.

1:01:16.840 --> 1:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>That's part of addressing the problem, That the problem is

1:01:20.440 --> 1:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>wrapped around there, that's where the thread is tangled. Like

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be so easy to lose weight if not

1:01:25.560 --> 1:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for my willpower. Yeah, exactly, exactly, Yeah. Now I want

1:01:30.440 --> 1:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the notes here for just one

1:01:31.960 --> 1:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>last bit here on wicked problems. Wicked problems can't be solved,

1:01:35.760 --> 1:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they can only be mitigated, right Uh. And one proposal

1:01:39.400 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>for this is strategic design using empathy and favoring abductive

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>reasoning and rapid prototyping. So essentially the idea here for

1:01:49.000 --> 1:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>abductive reasoning is that the premise doesn't guarantee a solution.

1:01:52.440 --> 1:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Rather that is uh, that's deductive or logic reasoning. So

1:01:56.640 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this is essentially inferring the best, most simple solution. Yeah,

1:02:01.120 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>abductive the search for the best explanation. So I appreciate

1:02:05.920 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Duncan your letter because it really did make me think

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>for a good long week about like how do we

1:02:10.840 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>respond to this? But at the end of the day,

1:02:12.800 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think that poverty can be defined as a

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>wicked problem. I don't disagree with you though, that we

1:02:20.240 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>need to give people hope and we do need to

1:02:22.120 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>think from an optimistic place, and I don't see defining

1:02:25.840 --> 1:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>things as a wicked problem is necessarily pessimistic. No, I

1:02:29.600 --> 1:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>mean another side of that coin is you don't want

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to discourage people, but you also want to help give

1:02:34.720 --> 1:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>people reasonable expectations. Um Like, if you promise somebody the

1:02:39.160 --> 1:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>moon and then you can't quite deliver it, they're going

1:02:42.800 --> 1:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to get disillusioned with whatever mechanism or system tried to

1:02:46.680 --> 1:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>deliver them the moon and failed. Instead, if you. If

1:02:49.880 --> 1:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you promise people reasonably attainable goals and you do attain those,

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that actually has a positive knock on effect that gives

1:02:57.560 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>people confidence in the the ability of or system of

1:03:01.240 --> 1:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>problem solving to succeed again in the future. Anyways, if

1:03:04.800 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you have more information that you want to relate to us,

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>either about Wicked Problems, Cleo dynamics, poverty, or any of

1:03:11.600 --> 1:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the other topics that we talked about here today, you

1:03:13.920 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>can send them to Carney the Robot. How do they

1:03:16.160 --> 1:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with Carney the Robot? Oh, well, you know,

1:03:18.680 --> 1:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of different ways to go about that.

1:03:20.960 --> 1:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>You can head on over to our various social media accounts.

1:03:23.720 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So we're on Facebook. That's where you'll find the Discussion

1:03:26.840 --> 1:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Module group if you want to join that and interact

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>with other listeners as well as as us. UH. You

1:03:34.760 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>can also find us on Twitter, Tumbler, Instagram, The mothership

1:03:38.960 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Yeah, that's

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>where you'll find everything you need to know. That's where

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>all the podcast episodes are, as well as links out

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to those other accounts, And if you want to get

1:03:47.200 --> 1:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us directly, as always, you can email

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>us at Blow the mind at how stuff works dot

1:03:52.320 --> 1:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Does it How stuff works dot Com