WEBVTT - Surveillance: BOFA's Moynihan on Economic Recovery

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast and I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. Jeffrey

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Curry has given us such good perspective with Goldman says,

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, Uh, he's a guy John who gives us

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge micro economic foundation with his work at the

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>University of Chicago over the years. And John, it's not

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>just about oil, but it's about the commodity complex in general.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Do they get out front of a pandemic and try

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>to expect the recovery. Well, the thing that Jeff I

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>think was on top of was what would happen if

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we started to break you'll getting near to breaching storage capacity.

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And once we got to that point, how quickly this

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>market would have to adjust, Tom and everything else, which

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is fully to place on a really small amount of time.

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's basically what you saw a month ago. The

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 1>real threat of breaching storage capacity prices plunge aggressively lower

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.839
<v Speaker 1>than everything. House has to correct and correct fast, must listen,

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>must watch for Global Wall Street. Jeffrey Curry of Golden

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Sex Jeffrey, good morning. I know that Lisa and John

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of oil questions. Let me ask

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you a general question. Do commodities expect out like equities?

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>If equities are reaching out six months, two years, etcetera.

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Do commodity participants do the same thing at most? Maybe

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in like oil thirty days? Um? I mean there is

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>some expectations in but very small. And you know I

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>can find out. Commodities are spot assets, UM. You know,

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>financial markets their anticipatory assets. They look out to the future.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So today's spot price for oil has to clear today's

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand. So, jeff how much optimism is being

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>priced into that thirty day outlook for oil right now?

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Far too much? You know. We argue that the prices

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>above thirty dollars a barrel, particularly on w T I UM,

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>incentivised producers to bring supply back online that was shut off.

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The only way this market rebalances and creates that optimism

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that the market's trying to price in is that that

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>production stays up. That's the point that Tom's make it.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Commodities are spot assets, UM, and so the investors go

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in bit it up. They try to anticipate it. And

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, every time a commodity market price anticipates

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>something ins and tears for the investors. Jeff. Given the

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that we are already seeing shale drills come back

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>online exactly to your point, could we see negative spot

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>prices once again, at least in the futures market in

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the near term contracts in the US. Probably not. And

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the reason I say that is that the magnitude of

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the surpluses going back last day or this April when

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw the negative prices were unpressed globally, they were

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>running twenty million barrels per day. That is an absolute

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>massive number UM. Having a four or five hundred thousand

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>barrels per day of additional supply comeback online not going

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to create that same type of risk um. So it's

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>so I think the only thing they could recreate that

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>environment again would be a second wave where demand losses

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>are as big or even worse than what we saw

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the first time around, which I'd argue pretty unlikely because

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we know how to cope with it now. Jeff. I

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>think the story of the last couple of days has

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>been about demand demand normal I think, and how quick

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they can normalize. We've had some reports out of China

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're back to pre COVID levels. If you're looking

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>at demand in China in the moment, you have any

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>visibility on how quickly demand is coming back online, yeah,

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd be a little cautious, you know that. I mean

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they argue with you know, thirty million barrels per day

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>right now versus at December, at the end of last year,

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it is running thirteen point seven. So that's still down.

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's still down like three or four percent um.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>The most recent data headed down five percent, So it's

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not going to go as far as

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to say that, uh, you know, it's a full recovery.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the parts there's two things you take out

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of it. Commuting demand is up because people are too

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>afraid to take public transport, and the jet demand is

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>still down. Seriously, Jeff Curry, tell us about your world

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>commodities folded into some of these glide paths of the

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>pandemic in Brazil. I noticed the other day Indonesia is

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>not not doing well at all. I mean some of

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>these commodity and almost commodity importing company countries are really struggling.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>How will the pandemic affect your world? I mean, the

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the biggest and most direct impact, it's a sharp drop

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>off in capex, which starts to create supply problems. UM.

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Further down the road. You know we see it in

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>oil UM. You know you look at even like exon

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Flash their CAPEX budgets. UM decline rates began to set in.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And in the energy markets, UM, you're not making investments

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in all sorts of different commodities, whether if it's mining UM,

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>which starts to create supply constraints as we look further out.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So UM, I would argue that, yeah, it hurts demand

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. I mean India's gold demand was very weak. UM.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think the longer term UM impact really is

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on investment. So link that framework into Brazilian reality. Mean

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I gotta make some money here? Am I going to

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>go weaker reality? Going through six? I mean, link your

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>commodity world into the f X world of Golden Sex.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you play it well? When you when the

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar strengthens, commodity prices typically could go down. And the

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is you take like the as a

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you get a weaker Chile and pay so you can pay.

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Labor becomes lower cost and as a result in dollars,

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the price of the commodity goes down. Um In the

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>current environment, I mean to continue to argue for further

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>strength in the dollar when you're sitting near you know,

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>all time highs um I think it's kind of difficult.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But in no way am I going to go out

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and argue that we're going to get a snap back

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and I want to be short the dollar, but I

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>think you know it's I would. I'm not focused on

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the dollar right now just because it's not it's not

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>a good story one direction or the other. We're speaking

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with Jeff Curry Goldman Sachs Global head of Commodities Research,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>and we've been focusing a lot on the price of oil.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The other area that's been a hotspot has been the

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>price of gold reach and climbing toward all time highs.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to euro denominations and the dollar, it's

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the highest in more than seven years. I'm trying to

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out what the upside here is. What the main

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>argument that you buy into here for an ongoing strength

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in the precious metal is um our. Our near term

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.799
<v Speaker 1>target is eight ounce, So it's got a male modest upside.

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>From here. I want to first talk about what we know.

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Above eighteen hundred, we're going into the world of the unknown. UM.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>What we do know is the two main drivers of

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>gold demand. Investment demand, primarily in the developed markets is

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>very strong, driven by the stimulus. Low real rates in

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>gold is just another defensive asset. UM. You see it

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in the et F holdings have gone up sharply. UM.

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>The other big main driver of gold is the consumersumption

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>or consumer demand in emerging markets like Indian China. Let

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for let's say jewelry. UM. India's numbers were atrocious that

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>came out recently. UM. The Chinese numbers still have yet

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to start to pick up. UM. And so the one

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>leg that's missing and we think you're going to get

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it back in China and first India's a question mark

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is that consumer demand. That's what probably gets you to

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundred. Now the question is how do you go

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>above eighteen hundreds of two thousand's. That's the world of

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the unknown. You have to start making assumptions on inflation

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>expectations off the back of the large stimulus. UM. The

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>reason why it's difficult to model. Monitor to model is

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you're running into the zero bound on nominal rates um

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So to make the argument you know that you know

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>gold is gonna go much higher, you need real rates

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to go much more negative while the nominal rates stays

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed at zero. That means you have to make an

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>assumption on inflation. Jeffredy small stuff as always, Jeff carry

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in London. Jeff, what's London like at the moment? If

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>you made it into the square mile over the last months?

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>For your answer, is this work from home? A government?

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>It's work work from home? I have I haven't seen

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the square mile in a long time. But the weather

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>is great here, and you know it's it's not as

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>up and running as as New York in the US.

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeffreys the city. Don't you missed the city? Town? I do?

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I do? I miss? I miss I missed the square mile.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>You come out of bank station, see the Bank of English.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>It said they said bunk. You call it bunk, bunk,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>bunk in London? Bunk? Who call is it bunk? The

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>British they call it be given it a toll by Frenchman.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>There's something like that. I do I miss the city

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get over there, folks at some point here

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is said and don Jeffrey Curry thank you as always.

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Sullivan joins us some TV securities. Jim, we'll give

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>us an update and give us Chairman Paul and Secretary

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Manution an update on your call. In the unemployment rate,

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>how high can it go? I Tom and all this morning. Well,

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of it to do with measurement

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, you're sight plus numbers, and arguably

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it is there if if you you count everybody's who's

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>suddenly become unemployed. Obviously, the number for last month was

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>fourteen points seven percent. But I mean if you had

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>just for the drop of the participation rate and b

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>less suggest that some people are miss class deified and

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>as employed but just not on their job, and they

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>probably should have been unemployed. If you include those, the

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>number would have been probably around So those sort of

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>statistical issues could continue for the next couple of months.

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think we will necessarily see a number,

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but we probably will see a higher number in April

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>than we saw in May. But the hope is that

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>after that, from June on, the numbers will start coming

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>down again. So yes, I mean, measured maybe properly, it's

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>plus number, but we may not actually see numbers that

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>high in any event. And I mean this is not

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the great depression in the sense that we shouldn't be

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>extrapolating these numbers that there will be improvement in the

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year. We hope there will be improvement,

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>significant improvement in the months to come. Jim, let's talk

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>about the Chairman before the Senate a little bit late

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this morning. We've heard so much from Chairman Power over

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the last several weeks. I'm sure some people welcome that.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure many others don't. What's left from Chairman Power

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that you haven't heard? And well, Jonathan, you were just

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>touching on issues from our perspective, I would not expect

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to get already on those today. In terms of forward guidance,

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's the focus of today's testimony, which

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is more about the Cares Act than the four and

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty four billion it was allocated as capital backstop for

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the very thirteen three programs. And so yes, absolutely we're

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>very interested in terms of forward guidance on the funds

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>rates as well as QWI. What are the conditions for

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimate tightening, which is way down the road arguably, but

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that's I don't think that's the focus today. It's more

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>about the CARES Act. So, given the fact that there

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is this focus right now on future stimulus in Washington,

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>while the markets are basically pricing in additional fiscal stimulus,

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they're also pricing in a near term vaccine at least

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>later this year early next year, is it time to

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>sell in May and go away? And well, I guess

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I would be cautious for sure. I mean exactly what

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that means, I'm gonna try in terms of equities, et cetera,

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and equities of obviously had a had a good run here,

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and arguably there's a lot of optimism in there. I mean, obviously,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>even if we do get a vaccine, it'll it'll take

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a while to be to be fully up and running,

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and there are some promising results out there, and I

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>think the net of it all is that, yeah, I mean,

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a struggle to come back, but

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we will. We will see positive numbers. So I mean,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think optimism is completely crazy in the sense

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that we shouldn't be extrapolating what we're seeing in April

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and into May. But that said, I mean this is

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a big hole to climb out of. It's it's going

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>to be a long time for the economy to recover.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Jimal Sullivan, what is your question for Secretary Monution? You know,

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>we have a parlor game here with the Chairman of

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the Fed, the vice chairman of the rest, and we've

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>got all these smart questions we asked them. Folks are

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee will speak with Eric rosen Gren of Boston

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>later today as well. Nobody ever talks about the questions

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary monution? What would you ask him, Jim And Well,

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course the markets are hurricane on seeing

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>what what more in terms of fiscal stimulus. I mean,

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>that's that's obviously an issue, and I think there is

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the senses that there is going to be another round.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just a question of how much help is in there.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think everybody agrees that the states and cities

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>will will need more aids. So again we'll let question

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be answered today. I suspect not, but that that's obviously

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>an issue for markets over the next month. I think

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are upset as well, Tom about

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>how much is being done to lose some financial conditions,

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and it hasn't been contingent upon the companies that have

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>received the benefits of that maintaining the payroll. The small

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>business program quite clearly small business lending has done that.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to the FED, the amount have

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>built up the bandaged sheet, the amount they have loosened

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>up financial conditions so that people can still come into

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the capital markets and raise money. I think there's been

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a huge disappointment these companies are able to tap it

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>to really loose credit markets largely because of what the

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>FED has done, and not have to follow up by saying,

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we pledge to keep the payroll exactly

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>where it was before COVID hit and John, what's so

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 1>important about your important comment is it's a comment for

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>June and July. Their reporting will be done on that

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and that will drop. You know, there'll be some adventurous reporters,

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>hopefully at Bloomberg News, where that will drop like a

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>bombshell into June and July and frankly into the election season.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the problem, isn't it, Jim, That we haven't really

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>seen the large multinational payroll cuts yet. When we reopen

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and these big multinational companies take a look around at

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the demands backdrop, at the outlook for improvement. Are we're

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>going to see some big job cuts outweigh as some

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of these big multinationals. Isn't that just inevitable at this point, Jim,

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And Well, I mean it's it's it's not. I mean,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly big companies have contributed. It's not I think just

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the small companies that accounted for the twenty million plus.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And certainly there are a lot of furloughs out there.

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even companies like the auto companies obviously are

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>starting to come back. I mean they're they're they're big companies.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think disproportionately it's smaller businesses. But I think

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>across the board, when you got the twenty million decline

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>in April and and again to the extent econ of

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he does start to open up again, then I think

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>there are reasons to think that the big job losses

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>are behind us once we get through. May thank you

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Jim Osullivan, TV Security's

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>chief US macro strategist. Never sleepy at the Bank of America.

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Always important to catch up and certainly during UH this

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>pandemic as well with Brian moynhan. Here is David Weston.

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>We're welcome now our Bloomberg TV and radio and it

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is worldwide as we welcome also the Chairman and CEO

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of Bank of America, Brian moynihan. Brian, thank you so

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Last time we spoke about six

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, and you said you expected a rough second

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter down, maybe some rebound in the third and fourth quarter,

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and then the economy really getting back to full steam

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>sometime in a lot's happened in that six weeks. Has

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>your view changed, but David, our view hasn't changed. But

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes back to what I said before. This is

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a healthcare crisis. And as you're starting to see the

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>healthcare crisis be mittig not solved yet, you're starting to

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>see the economy start to recover. And we can talk

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>about that. But the approach to winning UH, the war

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>against the crisis UH for us, has been a customer centric,

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>community centric, employee centric move and so you know, we've

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>been out there driving, we've been supporting our clients and

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to make sure they have the credit and capital

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to UH to do what they need to do and

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>help them through this trough of activity in the second quarter,

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and you can see that in the loan balances extended,

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the p P P loans and how the things we've done.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We've helped our consumer clients through waivers so they have

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the ability to have better cash flow in the house.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>We helped our teammates by saying no layoffs so they

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>know their job is secure, and then getting them safe

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and working from home. And then we've helped our communities

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>by contributions and a hundred million dollars and c d

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>f I investments which are community belot and financial institutions

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>at two fifty million dollars of which about undred seventy

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>million is already out. So all that is offsetting the

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>impacts of the current second quarter down draft that you've

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>seen with the unemployment numbers, and we don't see much differently,

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just that we're starting to see us come out

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the other side of this. Frankly. So, we have heard

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>from the Federal Reserve and they've expressed some concern at

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>least that as this pandemic continues, there may be some

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>threat to the overall system and specifically talks for example

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>about commercial real estate. Are you seeing some parts of

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the market that are particularly vulnerable on the credit side.

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Remember that the US economy is going to be depended

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>on the activity the consumer base, and and so you

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>always have to start there when you talk about the US.

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So even though we have this year from the Bank

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>American research team, which is the best in the world,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, being minus five percent five and a half

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>percent this year and plus five percent next year, the

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>real question will be how to consumers behave And in

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen since the low point in the second

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>couple first couple weeks of April, in terms of everything

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their spending because of the stay at

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>home edicts, in terms of their borrowing activity, in terms

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of the transfer of money. Um, you saw all that

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>all to a lowest level, and obviously things like travel

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and hotels and things are most affected. But as you've

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>seen steadily as you went through the third week April

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>then on into the first part of May, you're seeing

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>their activities pick up even in the states that are

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>still understay from home, and you're seeing the activity pick

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>up much quicker in the places they're going back to work.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>And so for the month of May, we're seeing it

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>down about you know, two or three four percent versus

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. UH for the year today it's down a

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of percent. And that's the question. The length of

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be how the consumers behave given

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the high levels unemployment that you've seen published, when people

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>get back to work, jobs coming back in the stimulus

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>payments which are all hitting the street of the last

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, and how all works together to see if

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the consumer's behavior changed. And when I hear when you

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>hear Governor, chair Pal and others, the concern I have

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>is have we changed consumer behavior as we look out

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>across the next four or five quarters. Well, that is

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a key question, maybe the key question, Brian, clearly when

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes to consumer I know you've already taken about

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>four point eight billion dollar reserve against credit possible losses

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>given the level unemployment, which is really quite stunning. Do

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you think that's gonna be enough? Well, what you've seen

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>so far is with the consumer help, we've we've granted

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>about a million a half payment deferrals. But if you

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the actual interesting statistics about thirty five or

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the people ask for credit card payment deferral one ahead

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and made the payment. And if you go and a

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>look at those consumers, what you see is because of

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the UH leave aside the issue of where the money

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>is coming from, you're seeing higher balance in our account

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's because the stimulus between you know, the I

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>P payments, between the enhanced unemployment, these measures taken by

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Congress and by the administration by the FED have worked

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as offset the unfortunate aspects of very high unemployment. And

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>so so far you're not seeing the delinquent seas and

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>things rise vs. You've seen payment deferrals UH increase, but

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing them start to level off and come down

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in our book, and so we expect to see you

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>charge offs coming later on as as as this thing

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>goes on. But the reality is right now you're not

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>seeing the kind of credit damage that you'd expect to

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>see with this amount of down draft and activity. The

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>question is what happens next, and that's we're all watching.

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And to that very point you said in the past,

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>China to some extent may give us some indication. We've

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>seen numbers coming out of China, Brian that indicate the

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>industrial production has come back pretty quickly. All consumption is

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>coming back as well. But on the other hand, consumer

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe not so much with retail sales. Does that give

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you cause for concern back here in the United States, Well,

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it does because the question is how did you change behavior?

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>So when you saw Chinese, uh, you know, they went

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>into this earlier, they locked down earlier, they came out earlier,

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're back in our offices in China

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>moving from people back towards so you're starting to see

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>normalization of activity and in the questions what's the underlying

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>activity and restaurants and and shopping and things like that.

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>And so you saw an immediate burst of activity as

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they opened back up and see it fall back down.

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And that we have to watch in the States is

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a burst of activity in some of these

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>places as people who have been you know, in their

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>homes for six, five, six, seven, eight weeks go back

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>out and do things and will let sustain. And that's

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>where you need to look more fundamentally on things like

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>car purchases and things like house purchases and see where

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they start to end up over time. But remember the

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>baseline projection for most people is the economy doesn't get

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>back to its current size until you get to sort

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of the end of next year. That's the definition of recovery.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So but each quarter from this quarter forward is increased

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>economic activity. And what we have to make sure and

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>all the policies and stimulus have been put in place

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>or making sure, is that despite the very highnemployment, despite

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the issues of who's unemployed, despite the issues getting that

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we need to get people back to work from the

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>human toll of all that these stimulus is offsetting. It

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is an attempt off set that. And you have to

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>see that play out of our time, Brian, you have

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>something like a hundred eighty thousand I think people working

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>from home right now. You talked about what you're doing

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>over in Asia. When do you expect him to come

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>back and how and by the way, how many will

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>they all come back? Well, that the ideas we have

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>We've always had people who worked outside the standard office setting,

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>and that's something we do. Um, there's a great debate

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, with this change forever the workforce in America

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and where they want to work. We'll see that play out.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>But that is that is further out there in your term.

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>We have we have been open every day, we have

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>not shut down except for the branches we closed out

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of concerns to keep our teammates safe in those in

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>those branches. Um we which is about branches. Everything else

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>has been open. We've been functioning every day and we're

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning to open those branches, especially in the States, are

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>reopening slowly but surely. So we have the ability to

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>operate very well, very much under control. Our technops team

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>under Kathy Bisson's leadership, did a fabulished job of putting

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>us in position to have a hundred eighty thousand people

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>work from home, so we can operate this way. So

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we have the luxury to go back slowly and with

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>social distancing requirements, with temperature taking while all the policies

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that all employers want to put in place, you know,

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the the ability of the luxury putting people back in

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>place carefully also takes a burden off of the communities

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we operate in, not to have high level of cases

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>are perfections and having people move around and creating pressure

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>on the community. So we will go back slowly. We

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't said any plans yet. We have a top talent

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>team working on the reentry back to the office. It's

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>not back to work. We'll work and every day it's

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the office. Yes, sure, no, I understand, Brian. Finally,

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hear from Federal Reserve Chair J Pow

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>today as part of the cares Actor report on that

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>he's been doing a fair amount taking already. What would

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you like to hear from Chair Pile today? I think

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to hear from both second reminution Schair Pole.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But and I think people have to stack. You know,

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a the p p P program is now. You know,

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it still has money left. The applications are still coming in.

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>That dollar volume of loans is going up, but the

0:23:58.040 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>number loans is going up faster. So the loans are

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>smaller and small. In our case, we've done three thousand

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of them as of this morning, eighty thousand average balance. Uh.

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the employers are under a hundred or under ted employees. Uh.

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a small business that are getting the

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>help they need. And so I think what you want

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear is where's the next rounds of their ideas

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to continue to put money into the economy to help

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's not an unlimited resource, so we need to

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>keep adding carefully in the areas I think that need

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the most help in the near term of the States

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the incredible budget pressure they've been put under,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and if we don't help them, we'll see them have

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to make budget justments which will add to the unemployment

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>burden to the hospitals and things. Is similar issue in

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of having to shut down and lose revenue and

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>they need to get that whole plug so they can

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>get back to it. And in some respect some of

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the nonprofits in the performance nonprofits, especially the same issue university.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 1>So that the idea is the stimulus has to continue

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>help Americans through the unemployment, assis benefits, uh uh and

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>things like that, but also has to it can be

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>targeted in X rounds towards these places that just have

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>operating holes that we have to decide as a society

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to replace so that they can get back

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and provide a great services they provide. And so that's

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>what you like to hear in terms of the work.

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of discussion about facilities and usage

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and other up and operating. A lot of these facilities

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>were put in place to stabilize and you see massive

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>stabilization in the market so that you know high grade

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>issues will have another record month, probably this month. Uh

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>uh uh. You know, high yield will have a strong

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>month if you're starting to see converts and some equity

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>deals get done. The stabilization and the fact those facilities

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>aren't all used, it's actually good news. That means the

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>markets are doing what they're doing and providing capital. So

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what I think people get focused on is how much

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>money's outstanding on facility X or something. The reality is

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>having it there provides a comfort that the private sector

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>can drive it in the banking system can drive it.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So whether it's main street, whether some of these other facilities,

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the debate ought to be not about whether

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it being used about the news. If they're not being used,

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that means you've seen stability the funding structures. Fascinating. Thank

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Brian really appreciated spending time with us.

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>As Brian moynihan, he is the chairman and CEO of

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America. We want to thank all our radio

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>listeners for joining us and this is Bloomberg. One of

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the great joys of doing this, folks, has been over

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the last number of weeks learning and speaking to the

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>consistent excellence of the Johns Hopkins University medical team. We've

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>talked to people at the Bloomberg School of Public Health.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Of course Michael Bloomberg, the founder of Bloomberg LP, is

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>the philanthropist there, but also to their medical school and

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>their nursing school. This morning a conversation where NASA ernest

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we have the adrenaline rush of the ambulances in in

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the days have diminished, but what hasn't really changed is

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the demand for i c U. Bit well, the you know,

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the demand for the i CU beds and the ability

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to go into intensive care. Right now, what does that

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>signal to you? Is it still a large body of

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>older people most vulnerable, or is it across all age groups.

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting it is the majority of the age group

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing here at Hopkins that's impacted is actually

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>in the thirty to fifty year old range. It is

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>spread across all ranges. But that was very surprising to

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>us to see that it wasn't just the elderly population.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>But now you make a point right in saying, look,

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>reopening isn't relaxing. But how do you change perception because

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people will say, well, look, you know,

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we're over the worst, so actually I can get back

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to a normal life. That's a very good question. One

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of the things that you have to do is you

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>have to have a good message about the balance between

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>science and economics and not have it as simply political

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And if you notice, you see it.

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>That what we see quite frequently. But really the things

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that have worked are the masking the social distancing. That

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>part needs to stay. But are people understanding is it

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>not clear from the authorities or are people refusing to

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:18.719
<v Speaker 1>do that? So I don't know, you know what your

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>perception is in what could be done better? Sure, so

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>people are, they're relaxing. I was out the other day

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and I noticed many people without a face mask and

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't the way it was a few weeks ago.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So while I don't want this to be an acceleration

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of doom and gloom, I do want people to really

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>understand that in order for us to stay ahead of

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>this curve that we've been working so hard on, we

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.479
<v Speaker 1>need to keep the mask on. I saw your segment

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about Uganda where they're giving mass to all of the children.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>That's an important message. We need to keep those messages going. Masking,

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>social distancing, washing your hand are all very important things.

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>We are at a different place, but we are not

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>completely out of the woods yet. News earnest with us

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>with Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, and we look

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for those updates tomorrow and here in the coming weeks

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. Cam Harvey, Professor Finance at the FUCAL School

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of Business at the University, former professor of mine. Actually, uh, professor,

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. I tell you,

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>as I think back to my FUKAL at years, Professor,

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall you or any other professors telling teaching

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>us anything about a pandemic and what that means for economies.

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Give us your sense of kind of how you're seeing

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve, central banks around the world, Congress, how

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody's trying to react to this pandemic. What do you what?

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>What what are you seeing right now? Yeah, that's the

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>first thing, all Tom, great to be on the show. Um.

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>My first lecture in risk management is on something called

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>systemic risk, and systemic risk is really hard to hedge,

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>really hard to mitigate, and we kind of brainstorm different

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>systemic risks and you could think of, let's say, a

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>nuclear war between the US and Russia. UM. There's no

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>place to hide nowhere on Earth. UM. And one of

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the four systemic risks that we talk about is pandemic.

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting discussion because pandemic's nothing new. It's no

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>black swan. We've had plenty of pandemics. UM, it is

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>unusual this time around given the response, UH that the

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>economies have effectively been stopped. Uh So if there's any

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>black swan, it's the policy response that's completely unexpected and

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you get numbers that are just off the chart. I

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>don't UM look forward to dealing with the macroeconomic day

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in the future when you've got such extreme observations. So

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the response is the black swan. So the FED, you know,

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of market participants, Professor would say

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED has done a relatively admiral job here. They

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>were early, they were aggressive, appears, they were I think

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>they clearly message kind of what they were looking to do.

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>We heard from Chairman Pale on Sunday on sixty minutes

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>saying there's still more tools in his toolbox. How do

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you kind of view the FETs performance to date? So

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>early on I was very nervous UM and certain actions

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that they took at the beginning I was critical of

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and still am. For example, they cut the interest rate

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>from one point five percent to one percent really early on.

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what you're talking about being kind of early. UM, Well,

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>one point five percent is already a low interest rate.

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And in the global financial crisis when they cut fifty

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>basis points in two thousand and seven, the rate of

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>interest they started from was five point to five So

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>then they cut again from one percent to zero percent,

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and soon usually start doing that, you run the risk

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of a liquidity trap that and we saw this effectively

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>UM play out where the third year bond at some

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>point was less than one percent. Who wants to buy

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the thirty year bond had less than one percent? When

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>just like a moderate increase in rates like one UM,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you get hammered. You lose on that bond. So given

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>given the amount of QUEI going on, giving the amount

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of money creation, UH, the risk shifts and the bonds

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>are no longer safe haven. Kim. One final question, if

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we could cam and I want to go back to

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Madigliana Miller, any idea of on and equities and we

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>all learn this and it's all theory and and all

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that as well. Most of what we're doing now, Professor

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is not in those textbooks. They're not in the textbooks

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we used when we try to keep up with Fama.

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>They were in the textbooks Fama used when he tried

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep up with Frank Night, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. What

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>textbook are we using right now? Yeah, So it's really

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to have a model of all possible situations, and

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to kind of step back and and figure,

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the basics, what what we really know about this?

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And one thing that we do know is that we're

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>borrowing a huge amount of money from the future um

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to kind of get through this, and we need to

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>realize that we need to pay that back, and we

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>pay it back either through taxes or inflation. And also

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we are creating a lot of money. The Fed's balance

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>sheet has exploded and s in the global financial crisis,

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>something similar to happen and there was no inflation. Beware

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of extrapolating from one observation. So this combination of increasing

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>deadedness UH and the exploding balance sheet, to me, the

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>major risk for investors is unexpected inflation in the future. Hey, Cam,

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciate a

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>camp Harvey, Professor of Finance at the Fuqual School of

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Business at Duke University. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio