WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Cowboys Draft Wish List

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The following. He's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Wall with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Wednesday, April twenty fifth, twenty eighteen,

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Season fourteen, episode number six. Welcome to another edition of

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>The Break, live from the s WBC Mortgage Studios. At

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the starts Draft week. We're all excited. Cowboys and the

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>rest of the NFL will begin the draft tomorrow night.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of coverage for you guys. There'll

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>be a live draft show that'll happen all tomorrow night

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>throughout the draft from start to finish. Same thing Friday,

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>same thing Saturday. Nick and his guys will be writing articles.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Amber will be putting stuff together in Span for all

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of you Spanish speaking fans out there. So this will

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>be a fun week. How's everybody doing. Dave Hellman is

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>included in pretty much all of that. Yes, he is

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>h He's gonna be writing somebody, Yeah, I think I

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>came in there. We're talking Spanish to each other, so

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe so when you learn Spanish. I don't know Spanish.

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I know a little bit of French and it helps

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>me with Spanish. Tell me something in French? What was

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? What do you want me? Who do

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you say that? Like? Tell me something that's in French? Yeah? Say, uh, Cowboys,

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm betting that's not right. Like I'm

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>betting you say something I said. I don't say. I

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Was he right? You know French? He said

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it halfway? He said half a sentence. Yeah, I got

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>halfway there and then I cut it off. Okay, that's

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>not it, right, yeah, mad, Mad? Yeah? Yeah, all right,

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk some Cowboys football. What I wanted to

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>do today is I want to dissect the conversations yesterday

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>that happened in the annual pre draft press conference. Now,

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I do need to put a caveat on that you

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>probably believe about three percent of what you hear during

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>this week from any GM or owner across the NFL,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>because what they say you always have to put through

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the lens of They could be saying this for the

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>purposes of other teams also hearing that and and that

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>affecting how they approached the draft. So with that being said,

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about some of the things I think

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>that came out yesterday and I want to get your opinions.

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple of questions that I have that

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>came out of those those those statements, and then we'll

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get we'll hear for what you guys have to say,

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and then relate it back to the draft and how

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it could affect the Cowboys draft strategy tomorrow, Friday and Saturday.

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first with the Deys and the wide receiver position.

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jerry said, we don't have a or they're okay

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>with the idea that they don't have a pure X

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver to replace Diaz, and it sounds like they

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>don't expect that that's going to be something that's coming

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in the draft. UM My question for you guys is

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>can this team win without a true X receiver for

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this season? They believe they can, and that's really all

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that matters. I don't know about can they or can

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they not? But they they think they can because they

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>watch the Super Bowl and they don't feel like the

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>two teams in the Super Bowl have a number one receiver?

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. If I don't know, debatable of course,

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but but do they use them as a number one? Yeah? Yeah,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean Jeffrey makes a lot of money, but is

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>he the true number one? Is he the guy? You

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>can make the case? Maybe the same for Jacksonville who

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>got up there? And who did the Eagles be? I

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>mean or the Vikings have two pretty really good receivers,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess, but not guys that you think of as

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>like the prototypical X. I mean, Stefan Diggs is not, yeah,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and Adam Thielan is not. He's your typically MS rams

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>did really well without a clear cut number one receiver,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know so, I mean they didn't have

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a receiver that was all world yeah. I mean, which

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting point because I mean, there is there

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>are guys you could get in this draft to fit

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that mold. One of them is on the cover of

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>our magazine, Courtland Sutton. But I don't necessarily get the

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>hype because they just parted ways with that guy because

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work for them. I mean, obviously price point

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>has something to do with that, but that didn't work

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>with the style of football that they think they want

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to run. So it's weird to me that people think

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>they want to run out and redraft the same player

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a month after they got rid of the guy that

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>fits that mold. I mean they but they definitely could

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>go back to that well in this draft. I just

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe you want to try something new. Well, let's ask

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that question. I think that they've seen what they can

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>do with a great old line and the running game,

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>so I would believe that's their main focus. They saw

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>what they did in twenty sixteen with zek and the

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>old line, so why not. They don't really need that

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of receiver, you know, just someone that kind of

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 1>helps out a little bit, but not the main focus.

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's play Devil's advocate here for a second. Let's

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>say you run up against the team that has a

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>really good run defense. What do you do then, Because

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in this offense, with this offensive line and

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this running back, there have been a few teams in

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the last two years that were able to solve the

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>riddle though stopping this running game. So what do you

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>do when you run up against that If you don't

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>have a true X receive, Well, you lose ten to

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>seven to the Giants up there, which is what they did.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now they did come back and beat him

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>last year, but um, that's a good that's a good question.

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have to be able to solve that.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And they didn't do that so well that Dak's first year.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>About the second year that they had better answers for

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>teams like that. But you're right, I mean, I hear

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying about you're a running team, but you

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>do need to scare some people off a little bit

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>with your with your ability to go deep or at

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>least to stretch the defense. And so I think that

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>they need some um, they need some speed. I think

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it receiver as I've never heard that before. That's what

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought of this morning. I said, well, you know

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>when when two people, you know, line up to race,

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the guy that wins, you want that guy. Yeah, you

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>want that guy, and you know, let him stress the

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>field a little bit. You know what was interesting is

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>as Jerry was talking and making this statement, particularly about

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the receivers m he did mention the fact that you know,

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you kind of want somebody that can come in and

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>contribute a little bit and uh and kind of give

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>you a little speed. And I don't know how many

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>people noticed that, but to me that stood out because

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if even more so than finding a guy that can

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>be an X for you this year, it seems like,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>really to focus should be can you find somebody that

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>does something different than this other ghooping of wide receivers

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and the one thing that they don't have in spades

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>right now is speed. See I'm going a different way

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with this. I don't really agree. And first of all,

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to play a wide receiver in the NFL, you gotta

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>be pretty fast. I mean, just as a you do you,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you generally speak, you have to have better

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>been a couple of percent of the human population. So

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know four or five. Oh no, that's

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>not super fast. I get it, But you gotta have

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>it to play corner two. You do. No, But I'm

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>not that interested in a receiver who's gonna quote unquote

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>tape to take the top off of the defense, because

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the world of Dak Prescott. But I think

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit to be said about how off

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>he was on those deep balls last year. I mean,

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>when him and Dez looked at their worst, more often

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>than not, it was trying to connect on balls more

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>than twenty yards downfield. You just didn't see that, and

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so I think of it more. And plus I think,

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think Terrence Williams is faster than he

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>gets credit for, and Deonte Thompson is a speed guy.

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they brought in a guy with similar characteristics

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to Bryce Butler who can do that what I'm looking at.

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And again you mentioned the Patriots, the Eagles, the Rams.

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>These are all teams, Like, I don't know that they

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>have Brandon Cooks is a pretty fast guy, but I

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they have all world speed among their

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>receivers either. I think big thing for them is finding

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>different ways to get their guys open, Like I'm thinking

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>about mesh points and having receivers running crossing routes and

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>creating space and a guy who can run great route,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>who can create extra separation on a curl because of

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>his footwork or an end and can get that extra

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>step Like I don't care about having home run threats

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think that's suited to this quarterback's strengths.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I would rather just have receivers who can get open

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and make life easy for him. I do agree with

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that. My question would be, it seems

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>like at least over the last couple of years, there

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>were at least a few opportunities, a few times that

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we saw him connect well with Bryce Butler down field. Yeah,

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>so I guess I wouldn't say that that's not a

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>part of his game as much as maybe he and Dez,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just as we all know like he and Dez would

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just not on the same in his career. Obviously, he

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>has shown an ability to hit the deep ball, and

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he and for the millions time I'll say it, he

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>did it with Dez consistently in twenty sixteen. I don't

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>know what happened last year. I mean, I'll never know,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know that anybody will. He can do it,

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think I just think his skill set. I'd

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>just rather have a guy or multiple guys who can

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>consistently be open eight to fifteen yards down field and

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>give him easy throws. I don't really care that much

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>about going, you know, running a nine and being open

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards down field. So how many wide receivers in

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>this year's draft can give you that kind of production?

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this year? Based on where they are

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>right now? Without developing them. They can give you that

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this year. I just described the top two receivers in

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this draft, and that it's only those two. No, No,

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a bad year for receivers. I think, Oh, well,

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>you're being sarcastic. No, I don't think. I mean, I

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a dynamic receiver. If there was, he'd

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 1>be drafted higher. I don't think there's a dynamic receiver.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think that there is a good it's a

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of good receivers. I don't think there's

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>any great ones. And the simple fact is that you

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to get the best one in the

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>class at number nineteen in Calvin Ridley, who is considered

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the best one. You're right in the sense that there's

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of talent at the top. But I

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>think after that, yeah, after that, there is a lot

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of There's as many as twelve guys who could come

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>right in and do something for you right away, which

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, really it's a lot that's I'm not and

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna be surprised if they wait until the

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>third round to draft a wide receiver. If the board

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>falls that way, and you think they could help this year,

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess is the again, that's that's the question. Help. Yes,

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>not step in and be Dez Bryant from day one,

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think they've you know, I think they've taken

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>steps too. They don't need that. Remember this was the

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>third receiver on that team. That's I mean, it's easy

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to forget. Dez Bryant did not have this crazy impact

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in his rookie years and Roy Williams were the starters,

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and I remember I think it was this is me

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for are you talking about his rookie year. Yeah, I'm sorry,

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought you're talking about last year. This is me,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>This is me from the outside. I didn't cover the

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys at the time, but I remember as a younger

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Saints fan in twenty twelve he abused Patrick Robinson and

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>had like almost a two hundred yard day. But if

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember correctly, the first half of his twenty twelve

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>season was pretty bad and he caught fire towards you know,

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, like and then he was just

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he got it, I guess, and he was just reeling

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>off one hundred yard game after a hundred yard game.

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Point being, it took Dez Bryant longer to get acclimated

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to the NFL than people. Remember, that's kind of my point.

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>They're working on it. Well, yeah, no, I mean that's

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that's but I mean he didn't have a thousand yards

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>right out of the gate, is what I'm trying to say.

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's guys that can contribute right away.

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Calvin Ridley maybe, but I don't think

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of guys who could step right in

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and have a really impactful season right away. But I

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's what this team needs. So doesn't bother me.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the linebacker position. Yesterday, Stevens said that

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>his expectations are that Jalen's going to make a t

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge step this year, and he even mentioned that

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they're really looking for depth in this draft. It made

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>me think, or it sounded to me like he was

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that Jalen Smith would be the starter this year

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>along with Sean Lee. Are you guys comfortable with the

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>idea that we haven't seen it yet because he still

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>has been He played a lot last year. I think

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the year, I think he was

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>much better than earlier in the season. But are you

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with the idea of the Cowboys going into this

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>season thinking of Jalon Smith as their number two linebacker.

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm comfortable with that, but I don't know if that

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:20.359
<v Speaker 1>necessarily means not do anything by in the draft. I mean, yeah,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you expect that, But you also have to

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>expect Sean Lee to be hurt. I mean that's what

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to you know, or at least expect him

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to not be their full sixteen games, and then after that.

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just like receiver, you've got to think about

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what the position looks like next year. So I really

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>see them drafting a linebacker pretty high in this. I

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>know they got Joe Thomas for depth purposes. They still

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>have Damien Wilson, but I mean, you know, they haven't

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>really replaced I mean, Hitchens had a role last year

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and they haven't replaced that yet. So I think that this,

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a position of need, and the most

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>important role I think that Hitchens had was in the

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>event Sean Lee goes down, he steps in. That's the

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>part missing, right, Yeah, that's yeah, yeah, I mean you

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>need three to play too, that's I mean, Shaan Lee

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>has in the lengthy injury history he's gonna turn thirty

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>two while we're a training camp Jalen, I'm rooting like

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>hell for the kid. Yeah, we haven't a party, we

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>can see. I'm sure he's the one throwing it. Um,

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be wild. Watching tape on his iPad counts

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>as a party. Sure. I like that kind of pouted.

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you need, you need a guy. And what

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>j Jalen was at his best last year when he

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>was playing like fifty percent of the snaps are less

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 1>like when they threw him into the deep end, he

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't quite ready for it. And I hope, like hell,

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>he takes that step forward that Stephen suggested he would.

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>That's great. Can't count on that. Hoping is a bad strategy. Um,

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they need a guy. They need a guy who can

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>preferably play middle and weak side at a high level

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like they got it. They need him. That's why I

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>keep I don't I would prefer not to draft a

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>linebacker at nineteen, but I just can't talk myself out

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of out of it. I just think they need it

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>too much. The two positions they need to me, the

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.599
<v Speaker 1>most receiver in linebacker that you talked about are exactly

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the same in that that there's nobody there, no, no, no no,

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I take that back. It's not it's safety and linebacker.

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly the same. There's just two really good studs

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that aren't gonna make it to nineteen. Then after that,

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just an incredible drop off safety and linebacker. And

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that's one of them where you would like to get

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>one of those up there, but it's not gonna work

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>for you, and then you have to somewhat reach it linebacker.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Evans's I don't think. I don't think the drop

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>off it's safe linebackers is steep because I think Rashaun

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Evans and Layton Vanderesh, that's you get into this happens

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>every year, like you get into this think tank where

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Layton Vanderesh and Rashaan Evans aren't as

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>good as Roquan Smith, and that means they're bad players

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's just not true. Um, maybe it's a little

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a reach, but I still like nobody's gonna

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>bat an eye if either one of those guys is

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>drafted in the first round. So I don't think it's

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a crazy reach in that regard, but they are not

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>as good as Roquan Smith. I just want you to

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>do more than one year in college. It's fair, Vanderesh,

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>just especially at Boise. I mean, you can't do a

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>lot more of your freshman and sophomore year. And I

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>mean Lake Bloomer, I guess, and he's big, big guy

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>six four, right. I mean, I mean, I'm there. You

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>can talk all day about their ups and downs and

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>their warts and their bright spots, like I get it,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>But let me ask you this question. I heard this

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the other day. I was listening to a program and

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I heard someone who was a draft expertus as there

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>are plenty that seems to be out there now, and

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>his critique of Anderesh was that he's a guy that

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>needs to play more physical. Have you seen that? Is

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that's something that you hear because hearing that from a

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>linebacker reminds me of what was said about Bobby Carpenter

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>coming out was he wasn't he wasn't the most physical guy.

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And and I'm like, if you're playing linebacker and you're

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>not physical, that's it's kind of part of the giant

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>name is bart But but again, I don't watch Vanderesh,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>so I wanted to hear from you I think study

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that goes back into the group think trap where you're like, like,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Brian Broadus goes on the Draft Show and says,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I want him to be more consistently physical. I want

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>him to fight through the trash and get off the blocks.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>The game where he looked the best was Oregon, where

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>nobody could get a second level block on him. But

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>when they do, he doesn't fight off of it that well.

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>People hear that and they say, well, he's not physical.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>He's like he can't tackle, blah blah blah blah blah,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's a valid criticism, but it snowballs into like

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, a guy who's six four, two

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty isn't physical. I don't think I believe that. But again,

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to Nick's point, he's a one year starter. He's got

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of developing to do in consistency to get whereas.

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And then you turn it around on Rashaun Evans, the

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>guy from Alabama, which is I don't feel great about

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>him in coverage. I don't know how, you know, I

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know that I trust his instincts one hundred percent.

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But like when he gets to the ball carrier, no,

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no question about his physicality, like he brings the pain.

0:16:55.880 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So again, I think valid critiques that Snowball too lazy

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>talking points. Okay, do you think that the Cowboys need

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to use one of their top three picks. I'm gonna

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>start with you, Amber, one of their top three picks

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>on a linebacker this year. And then I want you

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>all kind of day if you have some names of

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>some guys that you think that might fall into that category.

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned vander Esh, but any other names that we

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>think fall into that category, I'd love to hear them, Amber,

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have to. I don't know how you

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>go about it without doing so. When when you guys

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Jalen Smith watching him, I'm rooting for him.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe in him. He's a great player, a great guy.

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, there were a lot of

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>occasions where I would watch him play and it looked

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>like he would rush things like his instinct He has

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the instincts, but they're not at the right place yet.

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>He has a lot of learning to you and I

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>watch him and compare him to Sean Lee, very similar

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>player in the way they play, but he's still way

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>far away from being that guy. Now, can you hear me? Yeah,

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it just up now, Sean Lee. You guys talked about

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>him great player, and you can't really rely on him

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and playing him. I don't really like hearing what Stephen

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Jones said about having Jalen Smith and kind of fully

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>trusting him. You still need to bring the guy and

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>rotate him. And like Dave said, fifty percent of the

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>times that he was on there, that's when he was

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at his best. I don't think he's quite there yet.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>And the most popular guy is the one you guys

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about, vandersh He's the one that people

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about and expect him to come in for

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. He's the most popular name. And again I

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have my different opinions. I would like to trade go up,

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>try to get there when James. I don't think that's

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen that. I think we're all in that it's unlikely,

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>but you're not. But there's a there's a scenario that

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>actually makes sense that they may be in position to

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>trade up. But you know what bothers me is like,

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean some of the things I don't really hear

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>much about that, about the need of safety, I'm not

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know I'm worried about it, but I

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>don't hear it around. You know what everyone's talking about.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>People talk about linebacker, wide receiver, what about safety? Like, hello, guys,

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is a big need. I don't understand

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>why people are not talking about that. Oh, maybe there's more.

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they're talking about it. I know I'm talking

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>about it. I've been talking about it for months. I

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>have to off the record. Okay, let's just since the

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>health and it's like sitting right here, let's just talk

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>about it, like, because I think that affects everything that

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you do. You're talking about trading up a trade up

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in and I get you to hold for just a minute,

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>hold on that thought. We're gonna go to a break.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>When we come back. Nick's going to give us this

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>profound wisdom that he has on the safety position. Well

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that when we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>dot com Radio. It can be hard to find the

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>right resource for learning about important financial matters. You search

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>how to build savings, you end up reading about the

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>one weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make you taller.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why Bank America build better money habits dot Com

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a safe little corner of the Internet for answering your

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>financial questions. Full of simple videos and tips, Better Money

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Habits can show you how to make the most of

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>your money without resorting to random searches that always seem

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up.

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>To learn more, visit better money habits dot com. What

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan? It

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>means you've got the passion and the heart to do

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>your part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's why

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season law At

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nations. I

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>am craving at Doctor Pepper. I got some soda. I

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>asked not for soda, I asked for ice. Cold cravable

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper. Its flavor is more one of a kind.

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Been a farts old sloth with a thirst for speed.

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Stop settling for soda and start demanding Doctor Pepper. I

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>love sloths. When you crave a Doctor Pepper, nothing else

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>will do. Grab an ice cold twenty ounce of doctor

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Pepper today, Doctor Pepper, the one you crave. To work

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this big land. You need equipment with values rooted as

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>deep in Texas soil as you are. Like John Deer

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>compact tractors for the six year power train. Warrant to

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>him big features that help you work less so you

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>have more time to do what you love. John Deer

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>was first in the Texas fields, and we're proud to

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>be on the field as the official agg and turf

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized deals at

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>my John Deer Dealer dot com. Slash football terms, conditions, exclusions,

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and warranty limitations apply seem to be loot for details.

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Families and fans of all ages are invited to step

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>into the NFL Draft experience presented by Oiko's Triple Zero.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>This free football celebration features player appearances, good opportunities for

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lombardi Trophy and more, all taking place at at

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, April twenty six to

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. Plucks more fans than ever before. We'll get

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the chance to be inside the theater to see selections

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>made love Register now at nfl dot com, slash band

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>mobile packs and check in at NFL Draft Experience to

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>be part of the action. Back to the Break, Welcome back.

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It is the second second month the Break Clive for

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the s WBC morters studios at the Star. We're talking draft.

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about pre draft press conference today that Jerry Jones,

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Jones, and Jason Garrett held yesterday. Nick, you were

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>about to talk to us a little bit about the

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>safety position. There was some thought you had there that

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's been expressed. Yeah, let's let's get

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to it. This is like ranked second into the I

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>want a speed receiver. I've think have been beat right. Um,

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think that they need to make a trade

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>and they need to try to get a veteran safety

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in here. And I mean, we all know who he is.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>He's sitting out there in Seattle, and if they can,

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>if they pull that off, you know, it would count

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>about eight and a half million on the cap. That's

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to what probably got to resign him though,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean to resign. I think that's part of his

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>problem in Seattle is that but to make it work

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>right now, Yeah, it works because of what you just

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>did with Dez Bryant. So yet technically it works, but

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to make that trade if you don't

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like you could sign him long term. Then again,

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he's not sprinting after a four quarter game to your

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>head coach to say come get me and not looking

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to play a little bit long term. I think so, um,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's got to be. It's got to be

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in the plans though tomorrow. I mean, because if you

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>want to know what you gotta do there is let's

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>say you don't have a second round pick that might

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>affected you want to trade it back a little bit.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>That would be my dream scenario right there. Make the trade,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>lose your second round pick, move back in the first

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>round if you possibly could, I know what's easier said

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>than done from nineteen late or mid twenties, late twenties,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and then take the receiver that you really want. You

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>really want DJ Moore or Courtlandt Sutton and I think

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they sit better at twenty six, twenty seven, twenty something.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>That would be ideal. I mean, if we're just talking

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>dream scenarios, yeah, draft dreams, that would be that would

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>be pretty great. It just seems to me like they could,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>This could happen, and I'm actually expecting if it does happen,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it would happen Friday, because I think those kind of

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 1>things typically happen when when you're kind of faced with it,

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think in the break day if you made

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the point, and I'll let you make the point for yourself,

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>but just kind of think of when it would be

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>advantageous because Seattle would have all the information that they'd

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>want to know. Maybe that is Friday. I mean, I

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>think I read a stat that the Seahawks haven't picked

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in their original slot in the first round since twenty eleven.

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, they're movers and shakers. I don't know why

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>they would agree to do that tomorrow until because again,

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the thing that the thing that even makes me think

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>this is possible is that Seattle doesn't have a second

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>or a third round pick, and we know how much

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they value drafting. We know they need to make their

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>roster younger, and they've gotten they lost a lot of players. Yeah, ton,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>but if they can trade back from eighteen tomorrow night

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and get a second or you know, get the picks

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>they want that way, then all of a sudden, the

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>leverage is gone, and so I don't know why they

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>would agree to that tomorrow. I think it would have

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a Friday thing. You know. There was a

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>moment this week, and hey, I mean he never had

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>he never said the name, not no tampering, blah blah blah.

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>But Stephen Jones answered a question in the press conference

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>yesterday about trading for a veteran who wants a contract extension,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and how you make that stuff work was his response.

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>He I mean, he's like, you know, you gotta that's

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the gamble. You gotta the gamble you gotta make. You gotta,

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you gotta work with their people. You gotta

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>try to get something done. You gotta, you know, either

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>do that or or try to play hardball and hope

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that they'll play under their current terms of their deal

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>while you figure something out. It's happening, but see it

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>better happened. I don't care when it happens. It better

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>happened killing me. Listen, the Cowboys, there's no way they're

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>feeling okay with what they have right nowt of that.

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree with that. I definitely agree, but also

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>not well, okay, I can't think it could be going

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>into this draft dope thinking we don't feel comfortable, we

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>got to do something in the draft. I don't know

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that it necessarily means I will I mean you could.

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>It has to be two parties that want to do

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the deal like this is we always get, you know,

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the fan emails that comes in and says, hey, go

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>out and trade Terrence Williams for Earl Thomas, Like it

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>has to be both sides here, here's here's here's the thing.

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And the difference is Nick loves to point this out.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Earl Thomas put this in the store in the news

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>cycle himself. Yes, he ran across the field and flagged

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>down Jason Garrett and say don't get me room. I

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>mean ultimately, you know that doesn't like he was in

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there taking off his shoulder pads, like what's up, homie?

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean like you know that doesn't matter right at uht.

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Earl Thomas doesn't sound anything like that. He's got this

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>like deep East Texas voice, like like it's it's very

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>startlingly deep. Um point being a million a million trades

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>get talked about in the NFL like all the time,

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>like I have heard after the fact about conversations that

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>were had in this bill for trades where it fell apart.

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, it never got off the ground floor,

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, because so much goes into that.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is obviously something that has been talked about.

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It's been kicked around here, It's been kicked around in Seattle.

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But I would argue ninety eight percent of player trades

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>fall apart. I would I guarantee that that happens. And

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so I look at it. I'm sorry, Nick, you're good.

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I look at it, and I think I think you're right.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they feel one hundred percent comfortable, But

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the flip side of that is like, Okay,

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>we do all this, we take on all this money

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for the thirty year old guy, or we hope, like

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Smith, we hope that Xavier Woods can take that

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>step and be our free safety. And five different times

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in the last month when Stephen Jones has been asked

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>about this, he has said the name Xavier Woods. I

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>thought it was really funny. Actually, Cavon Frasier quote tweeted

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a tweet from Stephen Jones about this last night that

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Xavier Woods and not him, and he was like

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>shaking my head, like, what the hell, man, I'm a

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>bust doesn't even know exactly, no, exactly. So I think

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the flip the flip side of that is they say,

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, we can spend all these resources on this

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>all pro guy, or we hope that our young guy

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that we thought the world of last year can take

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the next step and we draft somebody behind him. And

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they brought in two or three safeties who fit that

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>day two, day three mold. And that's how you do

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>it on the young and cheap. And I know that

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't excite people, and I'm not saying it's gonna work,

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but I won't be surprised if that is what they do,

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 1>because that's way easier to do. And that's wow wow,

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is I mean, I honestly, I honestly

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>believe that they need more help. But I agree with

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Dave that the mo has been that when they get

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on a particular position, they're willing to go young and say,

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to ride it through with these young guys

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and see if we can draft a guy that we

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think and Stephen talked about it yesterday. There's the thing

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about the young guys is if you draft them early

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and you get them playing early, you have a better chance.

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>If they can play, you have a better chance of

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>signing them to longer term deals then playing in that

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>free agency. He Marty didn't do that. They didn't. They

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>drafted early, and they're moving that. The ones that they

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't draft early, Cavon Fraser and Xavier Woods, they're hoping

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they can do something with. But I mean, no, and

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't early in the draft. I mean just drafting

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>them as they're you're drafting them, bringing them in and

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>letting them play early, not necessarily drafting them, right. I

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>think that the reason why I think this is going

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen. I agree, there's a lot of trades that

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>ever get talked about, but this, there's got so many

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>elements to this. Number one, there is a need. There's

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a need at safety. There's so much of a need

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that they moved Byron Jones already. I mean that they're

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>moving him to get a better position. So now they've

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>created even a bigger need. When you get a new

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>coach in here that you like and you want to

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>build some things around him and give him some an idea,

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because I think Chris Rahshard is a guy

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>they really like, maybe leaving long term as a coordinator.

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>You want to give him some some you know, things

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to work with. From what I hear, he's pretty much

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>on the table for this, so that he's you got

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's lobbying for him that you want this

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>system to work. You hired me. Here's a guy that

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we know and can make you know into a really

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>good player. Then also Seattle needing those picks, I just

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you know they're sitting there. It works for them. The

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that he ran over the field and say that

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he wants to be here. There's just a lot of

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>factors here that make this thing work. And the money

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>now works. So there's just a lot of things that

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>just keeps pointing to this. The smoke. There's fire. There's

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of smoke. Let's be some fire. There's and

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I won't be surprised. But like I said, there's twenty

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>components are more to a player of trade that have

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to go right. All twenty of them have to go right.

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Only one has to go wrong for it to not happen.

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And so like san Diego saying, I'll give you the

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>forty sixth pick in the draft and you're like Seattle

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>or you know, New England's like, we need we need

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>our we need our we need our night soldier, we

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>need our right tackle of the future. We're coming up

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen. We'll give you our two or whatever. Actually,

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think New England, No, New England has an

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>extra two. I don't think that changes as much as

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you might think. Like if Seattle trades back and gets

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>another pick or two, I still I don't think that

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>affects that much. Yeah, they're getting more picks. That takes

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>off one of those aspects, but they still don't want

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>him in that price tag and they think they're gonna

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they could get something for him maybe, But I mean

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean, take two picks, take on one one

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>year at eight point five, and then you get a

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>compic when he leaves in free agents? Would you trade

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd trade a two and probably as much as maybe

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a five. What would you do? Maybe that much? Either

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>my two or my three do more than one pick? No,

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>if if they were like two and a four or

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>two and oh five, if that, I mean, if it's

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get it done, I'd probably do it. But I'll

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just say this, like I'm sorry ahead him, No, I

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>would about to change the object. Sorry you got us

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it was, I mean, but what but from what you're saying, Nick,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I actually would be kind of shocked if

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>this happens. And I think it just comes back to

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this has not been what the what the Cowboys have

0:31:57.920 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>done the last several years, Like they don't go out

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and free agency and or and and I guess even

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>from a trade standpoint, they don't go out and get

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>high priced guys. And I just so, so that doesn't

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>mean it doesn't happen. It just means I would be

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of shocked if he did it. Is this a

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Jerry type move? Though Jerry does that these kind of things.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Stephen really doesn't. But also, what could the seat be

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>any hotter for Jason Garrett? I mean, it is what

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it is. It could be going into a season though.

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>If they go is this the hottest seat he's been

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>on since he's been here? If they go ten and six,

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>when the East lose the first round, is he the

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>coach next year? I don't know. I don't know. They

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't win a playoff game, I don't know. I don't

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>even see that. That tells me that is an extremely

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>hot seat. If you're if you could go to the

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and not win a playoff game and you're gonna

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>get fired, that's a hot seat. So my point is

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is that getting a guy that can help me right now,

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the best second round pick you're ever gonna dress

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>bow Bob worries me a little bit. There was a quote,

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was Jerry who said it. He kind

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of talked about when you get rookies in here and

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>how they can be a quick impact and do you

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>remember that listening to it? Something like that that you

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>can trust some of these guys because they've seen it.

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Some rookie guys come in and an impact and make

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>an impact in the game. Now, that worries me when

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I hear something like that, because that's not always the case.

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>You're taking a risk. And when you talk about the

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>group of safeties, the guys that you have right now. Yeah,

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm veteran guys, but you don't have anyone that

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>scares teams. You don't have anyone that is like, oh

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>my god, we're playing against this guy. So you put

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in a rookie and you're expecting him to make be

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a game changer and make a difference that's not very realistic.

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So they need a veteran guy that comes in the

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>game and other teams are worrying about him. A rookie

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna do that, probably not, unless, of course,

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you get somebody like Derwin James. Now, if you can

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>move up and get a Derwin James and maybe you

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>do create that kind of then we're talking about something there. Honestly,

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I would rather take Girl Thomas, really yeah, because I

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>because I still get another player, And I bet Jason

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Garrett would rather do that because he gets two players

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to one. You lose your second round pick

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>by going up six spots or whatever to don't you

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>lose a team. You're a second round pick. If you're

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to get Earl Thomas. He's saying, yeah, but

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you get a nineteenth overall pick as well. Yeah, you

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>have to trade the second the first to move up

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to get James, who you think is going to be

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>good as opposed to But you're not really giving up

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the first because you're going up, you're getting a first

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.240
<v Speaker 1>right right, two players versus one. I get Earl Thomas.

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Trade for Derwin gets you one players with your nineteen

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>one player with your nineteenth and fiftieth. Oh, you're saying

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>because you're counting Earl Thomas as a guess well, I mean,

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna coach or is he gonna play? I

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know. I'm not certain about that,

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>but I guess that, and I ask you that question

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week. I do think there is an argument

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that can be made. Do you want the guy that's

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>approaching thirty or do you want a guy that you

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>think could be just as good at the beginning of

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>his career. Where the money is is is like there's

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff about a young guy approaching thirty

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>with both of his last two seasons significantly affected by injury, Right,

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 1>so there a lot of money. And if you really

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>think Darwin James is a legit player, like you think

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be really great, I know it's still a risk,

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know that I fall. And I'm an

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>old Thomas Thomas fan. I don't know if I fall

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in the category is saying, if I have my choice

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>between the two, if they cost me the same amount,

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 1>like if I got to give it my second for both,

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think I want the young guy. Yeah,

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I mean, how much voice does

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett having this? I mean he has the head coach.

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he has. I think he has a voice.

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And to be honest with you, I think when it

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>comes down to it, that's one areas where I actually

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>do believe Jerry when he says that they make group decisions.

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I really believe Jason has a voice. I think Will

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>has a voice, even has a voice, and I think

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Jerry has a voice. And I think at the end

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of the day, Jerry's the one has to make the

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>final decision. But I don't think Jerry makes decisions on

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>an island. I think he makes decisions based upon the consensus.

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The cool thing about the draft is you can see

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>that play out in the war room. Like it's not like,

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're all together. You can see them all

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>having conversation. Yeah, yeah, I hate that we're talking about

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>here what Yeah he didn't say heck, but yeah, yeah,

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>that was funny. I mean, I'll I'm I'll be the

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>buzzkill I always am. But I don't think either one

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of those two guys is on this team. On Saturday Afternoon,

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Earl am Earl or Irwin. I think it's because you're

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you're bessimistic, and I tend to be a linebacker or

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver and the best valued guy they get somewhere else,

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.439
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they trade for one and that's just the two.

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on. Yeah, sorry, let's move on. I do one,

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't draft. I mean, if if they don't trade

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>for Earl Thomas, I do think they'll be sitting there

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>with the third fourth round picks and they'll be they'll

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>be looking to do that with somebody. I think that

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they do make a trade this year for a veteran player.

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>It may not be Earl Thomas. It'll be somebody. It

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>might be a linebacker that you don't get, you know,

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it'll be I just think that that's a route that

0:36:57.280 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>we're going. Yeah. I think it's a route where we'll

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>see them take this year. And I think they can

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>probably think the Eagles for that. You got the picks

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it. You have the picks to do it, right.

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take our final break, and when we

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>come back. I want to talk about the offensive line.

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>There was some conversation yesterday on the offensive line and

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the players involved there, and then We're going to talk

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>about how that could affect their draft strategy when we

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>come back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. Cowboys

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>fans know that the second best of anything simply won't

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>cut it, and your skincare should be no different. A

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>long time locker room favorite of the players and the

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Dallas based

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black is the number one best selling men's skincare

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 1>brand in the country because we make products that help

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>guys look, smell and feel better. Visit get Jack Black

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys to get ten dollars off your

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>first order of fifty dollars or more. Jack Black Look Good,

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Smell good, Feel good, official men's skincare brand of the

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Star Sports Tours is the only official fan

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 1>travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend

0:37:56.320 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>travel packages with sideline access and photo ops with current players,

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though, You'll get to

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>talk x's and os with Senior Director of Player Personnel

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Will McClay and of course with yours truly me Brian

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>brought us you can trust the official fan travel partner

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us, you'll travel like

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a pro. Visit Cowboys travel dot com to book your

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.439
<v Speaker 1>travel package today. Before there was a draft, you could

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>size up a cowboy by three simple factors. Decrease in

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>his hat, the bend of his brim, and his unbending

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 1>attitude a man. Stetson didn't just protect him from what

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>life through at him, It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit.

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats are still American, made with pride. Right here

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, there's still the unofficial crowd of all self

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>respecting Cowboys, and Stetson is proud to be on the

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>field with America's team. Find a retailer nearest you at

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Stetson dot com slash Cowboys. What does it mean to

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>be a Dallas Cowboys fan? It means you've got the

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>passion of the heart to do your part supporting the

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Boys no matter what. That's why when the game's on

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the line, you're on your feet, whether you're at home

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 1>or in the stands. Actually, you're more than a fan.

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>You are a member of Cowboys Nation, and so is

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>AT and T doing their part to keep you connected

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>to America's team all season law at and T is

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>a proud member of Cowboys Nation. Back to the Break

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Back. It is the final segment of The Break

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Live from the s WBC More Studios at the Star.

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Nick take it away, Well, I have a question for

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Dave or really anybody when you're heading into a draft weekend,

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 1>what's the one thing you really want? A lot of underwear?

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Picks want a lot of You do want a lot

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of underwear, I would think at least one for every

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>person in the room. But also you want a lot

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of picks, picks, draft picks, picks. Now, what you don't

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>want when you're dealing with underwear is a lot of picks.

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>That's one. I was good. I wish i'd played along

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>with that better, right, That's okay. I didn't get where

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going. That's okay though. So the reason you can

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:56.479
<v Speaker 1>where here's one way you can avoid that, Tommy John.

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean as simple as that. Tommy John. You don't

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 1>have no picks. You don't haven't picking anything back side

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever that may be the only time you didn't in football.

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't want picks, well your quarterbacks there so anyways,

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John will prevent picks. Um Tommy John dot com

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>slash Actually it's Cowboys Slash Tommy John. You get twenty

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.359
<v Speaker 1>percent off your your first order, your second order, your

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>third order, Plus you can also personalize them and get

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>some Dallas Cowboy logo on there. I still think that's

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>cool personalized, Like, can I get my name on? You?

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Probably could, really definitely could because you're so boogie. Yeah

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>do that boogie? Yeah, that's not how to word that's

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>ever been used with men that I've been to dinner

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>with you. Are you serious? I didn't have anything to

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>do with boogie. No, I've never had that. Now you

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>could say my wife is boogie, but I'm not bougie.

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>You're bad and boogie kind of You're not bogie. You

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are nobody likes to be called booge. Seriously, I'm there's

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing about me that's boogie. I'm most down to earth

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>person you'll ever meet. You are down to earth, but

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>your taste is bougie, Like that's just a fems to

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>order and at a restaurant. Yeah, I want myself the

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>way I want it. I know, I know, and it's

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 1>just gonna take forever. I mean, you know you want

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to go after Jay like you go first, because I

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>got another fourteen minutes before she's gonna ask. I just

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>like it the way I like my boss is bad

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and boogie. There is there a way that you can

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>put this on the side. Yeah, okay, cool anyways, Timmy

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>John Yeah, no, Reggies, you digress all right. Let me

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>let me throw out one other thing For those of

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you out there who are draft nuts and like to

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to follow the draft and be able to

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>know what's being discussed and the players that are out there,

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you gotta get this magazine. Star Magazine. Um. It is

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the the official magazine the Dallas Cowboys, and there is

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a this edition they put together every year. The whole

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>crew is a part of writing it. Brian Broadus has

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff in here. If we broke down,

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many players it were in broken down,

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe about three hundred players broken down, but this lists

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>about five hundred. Yeah. It's It's an amazing, amazing program

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that you can use for the draft. I use it

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>every year as I'm watching the draft to be able

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to jump to you know, player gets draft I don't know.

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I jump in here, I find that guy. I can

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>get a pretty clear understanding of what Brian and you

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>guys thought of the player and and uh and so

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really really great thing. If you

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>want to check it out, check out Dallas Cowboys dot

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>com Forward Slash Star again at Dallas Cowboys dot com

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Forward Slash Star and you can you can get your

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>own copy and be ready for I'm not just saying

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>this because we you know, I kind of helped contribute

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but this is the first year that

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't purchased another magazine. I always will do that.

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll be at the store, I'll see some some other

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>magazine and take one, But this first year I haven't

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>even considered doing that because this is this one to

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>me is it's just as good, if not better than

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:38.760
<v Speaker 1>than the others. Plus, you know, you have some stuff

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that Dane Brugler does, and we we've looked at his

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 1>draft guide, but I think between the two, I mean,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 1>we know, I just don't know if people are can

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:51.359
<v Speaker 1>watch as much tape as What's Brian starts back in December, yeah,

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and it keeps going. And the other thing about this

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:55.400
<v Speaker 1>there is an online version. So if you're thinking I

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>can't get my copy before a draft starts, go to

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com Forward slash Star. You can see

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that there is an electronic version that you can then

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>pull up on your device and be able to flip

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>through and be able to get all the same information,

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>just without the actual hard coop. I wish they were

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>selling them at the stadium when you go out there.

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I wish they were Oh mat, they are, okay, oh hey,

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what enjoy the experience at the stadium, folks. It was

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 1>that serious, just saying, just check out the experience at

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the stadium. You never know what you'll happen across. All right, Um,

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>let's get into u's getting back into this conversation around uh,

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line. Um, yesterday in the press conference, UM,

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it was I want to say it was

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Stephen that was talking about the offensive line. He said,

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>they have tremendous, tremendous flexibility to look at both guards

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and tackles. You say, that was a pretty good question

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>something you Yeah, it was a question that came from

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>our own David Hellman's true, really good question. I thought

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Stephen had a look on his face where was a

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit I don't know if it was that he

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't like you or a little perplexed by the question,

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:00.839
<v Speaker 1>but he answered it. So that's all I feel like

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Stephen and Jerry or the like, you're like, who's this guy?

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Why he know they know who you are? And they're like,

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 1>he you know who you are? No, No, I mean

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it in the sense of like this guy works for us. No.

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's that they just like that's our guy.

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 1>That's our guy with that question, but like not like

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:19.280
<v Speaker 1>your tone was admirable, admiring, you know that their tone

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is like like that's our guy, that's our guy. That

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:26.240
<v Speaker 1>question whether the statement is yeah, that's our guy. Yeah, anyway,

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>good question, Dave. Um And the thing that stood out

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to me about the about the answer was that it

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sounds like they're comfortable with Fleming, who they got in

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>free agency, coming in and starting at either right tackle

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or being their swing tackle, and they're also comfortable with

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Lyo either being at right tackle or at left guard. Um. So,

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>by question for you guys is what do you think

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is the best scenario you're entering the draft. Do you

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys should be going in thinking, hey, let's

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 1>get a guard so that we can keep Lyo where

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he is and we can have Fleming be our swing

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've then upgraded your offensive line from where you

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>were last year. Do you think they have to go

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in thinking, hey, we need to get a tack we

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>can move Lyle inside because there are better tackles in

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the draft where we're gonna be picking, and we'll still

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have that person can even either battle with Fleming for

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the starting job or be the swing tackle. What do

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you think is the best case scenario for the Cowboys

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on offit splay? I think what the best case scenario

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is if they get their hands on a guard who

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>can compete for the starting job and leave Lyle Collins

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>where he is, and then Cameron Fleming becomes maybe the

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:28.359
<v Speaker 1>best swing tackle in football right now. I mean, like,

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got three really good tackles, two of whom can

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>start on either side. Hell Lyle might even be able

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to start on either side. I don't know. But you've

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>got three great tackles, and then you've got a really

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:42.720
<v Speaker 1>talented rookie who could push Marcus Martin for the starting

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 1>job or maybe even just start. And then I mean, man,

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that sounds nice. Let me interrupt nasty this question. Is

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that more about the fact that you want to keep

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Lyle Collins where he is because I know I've heard

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you say before you really want to keep him out

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>at right tackle. Is this more about a decision of

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 1>keeping him where he is, or is just because you

0:45:57.840 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 1>think that overall that's the best scenario. I think it's

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>are all the best scenario because your lack of tackle

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:06.839
<v Speaker 1>depth killed you last year. It absolutely I think it's

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>as big almost killed to quarterback. It's this bit. It

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is so tied into everything because your line fell apart,

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:15.719
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback got murdered. I think he lost his confidence

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>during that stretch of time where Tyrant Smith couldn't play.

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I think more so than any I think that's why

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he looked worse than normal in November and December of

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. I think I just I think the world

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the job that Lyle Collins did at right tackle

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>last year, and I think it would be a shame

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to dismantle that tackle depth if you don't have to.

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>But having said that, that's what I said, I think

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they should do. What I think will happen is I

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to draft a tackle to either start

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>or be the swing tackle and move Lyle to guard

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think the way this draft shakes out, that's

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>more plausible because unless you draft a guard at nineteen,

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 1>which they could do. They brought in one. I mean,

0:46:57.800 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple guys there that makes sense. But unless

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you do that, then I don't know where you find

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 1>a guard that's definitely gonna be good enough to do

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 1>what you want, Whereas you can find a few tackles

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>who fit that criteria. And I just I think it's

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>easier to find a good tackle in this draft and

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>move lyle than it is to find a good guard.

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I would be focused on guard, and when you have

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy that has done a good job at a

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>certain position, you would want to keep him there, especially

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 1>if that guy comes out and says, that's where my

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:32.320
<v Speaker 1>focus is at, that's where my mentality is at his

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>training right now to be a tackle, to stay at tackle.

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So you don't want to mess with the guys that

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is feeling confident and comfortable at a position that he

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>has shown succeeds success. Yes, so yeah, I would. If

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Cowboys, I would go in with my focus

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:54.839
<v Speaker 1>being guard. Now, worst case scenario, if you need to

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>make a move, then you need to, and there's no

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>way around it. Then yeah, you have that secure. Marie

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Blankett would well that you can move him. But if

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as of right now, I wouldn't be focused on that.

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:08.879
<v Speaker 1>So are you guys at all surprised hearing what Amber said?

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Are you guys at all surprised if they didn't make

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>more of an effort to possibly resign Jonathan Cooper because

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:17.760
<v Speaker 1>if you thought now again, I think that I'm basing

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this on the fact that I think in this room

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we all thought Jonathan Cooper played well last season, not great,

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>but played well. If you had Jonathan Cooper on this

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>team right now now, you really have flexibility because right

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>now you're looking at it, you feel like starting day,

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got your starting five, You've got a good swing tackle,

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you feel really good about where you are from the

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:38.879
<v Speaker 1>offensive offensive live standpoint, and if you happen to run

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 1>across the guard in the draft that you really love,

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:45.239
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason why Jonathan Cooper couldn't be kind of you.

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:47.359
<v Speaker 1>You kind of kind of keep him. Maybe you don't

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 1>keep him, but he did. It's he signed this big

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with San Francisco. Right I don't feel any differently.

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I've never watched Marcus Martin play. It's not my job

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to Brian does that, But based on what they gave

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:01.359
<v Speaker 1>him and where he comes from, I think he's just

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>as good, if not better than Cooper. But the fact

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's not set, I mean, they love to create

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>competition and they love the best five idea. Do you

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:13.719
<v Speaker 1>think Marcus Martin is a starter caliber guard? I think

0:49:13.719 --> 0:49:16.799
<v Speaker 1>he could start on this line. Sure, yeah. I mean

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>again I'm not watching his tape, but just based on

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>how much they paid him to get here and his

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:24.879
<v Speaker 1>prior history, I mean, he could be the weak link

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>on this line just as easily as Jonathan Cooper could be.

0:49:27.520 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's the difference is but the weak

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:32.799
<v Speaker 1>link means you're not in the Pro Bowl, right, No,

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:35.759
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying. But that's okay, right, But there

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ends in the whole line. I don't think they're in lies.

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Therein lies your argument though, Like, do you want to

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have a weak link at guard or move a potential

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>would have been top ten pick over there and have

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>an experienced veteran or a potential high draft pick battling

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 1>out at right tackle. I mean, if you subscribe to

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that best five idea, then you could conceivably have badasses

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:01.799
<v Speaker 1>at every position other than just allowing for a weak

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>link that left guard. They've they've done a nice job

0:50:04.200 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of kind of just protecting themselves at this position for

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing to happen or a lot of things to happen.

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 1>If they get wiped out with the guys they want

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're sitting at nineteen, no trade back scenarios. You

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have to make a pick here, and the best guy

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>available is Mike McGlinchey, then you draft him, and then

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you take him at right use, play them at right tackle,

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and Lyle's probably going to be playing guard for you.

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Or if the best one available is a guard, let's

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>say it's a James James Daniels or maybe Will Hernandez.

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 1>This thirty seven bench press for Will Hernandez pretty strong

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for me, because I mean that's what they need. They

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 1>need a guy that can push the pile, and I

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 1>think that he could come right in and help you

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that happens, and then obviously Lyle's playing right tackle, so

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and then Martin and Fleming are also just going to

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:49.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of factor in if nothing happens here. It's all

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a good scenario, I think for O line. It's

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>all nebulous and literally I mean that. I asked that

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 1>question because I wanted him to say that and basically

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 1>confirm that what they do with their offensive line is

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>going to depend on what they come out of this

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:05.240
<v Speaker 1>draft with that's and he said they have the flexibility

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty much whatever they want to do exactly so or

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:09.719
<v Speaker 1>do nothing, I guess, I mean from where you talking

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 1>about Martin, they did nothing. They probably still feel okay

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about where they are. Well, I don't think they're gonna

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:17.319
<v Speaker 1>do but but it's just a man. I'm saying, do

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>something that affect that that will have an impact this

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:22.760
<v Speaker 1>year if if what happens is you know, and there's

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some mid round guys. There's a kid from Washington

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>State who's like a mid round guy that they brought

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in on a visit. If they draft him and let

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 1>him and Marcus Martin fight it out for guard and

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>leave Lyle where he is, I'm fine with that. And yeah,

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:38.279
<v Speaker 1>like you could have a better left guard, but on

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a line full of pro bowlers, you should be able

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to survive that in my opinion. But you can't survive

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is what you deal with last year at your swing tech,

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:48.400
<v Speaker 1>which is why it seems like they've solved that problem

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 1>at least, well, well, what for the time being. The

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:55.240
<v Speaker 1>problem does become if you move lys All down the guard,

0:51:55.360 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>now you've created that position, You created that situation where

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:00.399
<v Speaker 1>you now have to have somebody that could lay swing

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:02.359
<v Speaker 1>tackleft Tyrn goes down if you're or do you move

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a second guy from their position where they are now

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:06.959
<v Speaker 1>just to be the tackle you put on the left side.

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>You could ask you could draft a tackle and make

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:12.759
<v Speaker 1>him play guard. They did it with Chazz. You could

0:52:12.760 --> 0:52:16.839
<v Speaker 1>do it again. You could draft that. I that's I

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.879
<v Speaker 1>just want every just don't mess with a good thing.

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I agree with. I actually agree with that. Don't mess

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with it. I'm hopeful that they find the right answer

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at guards a Lyle stays attack moving guys your best

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>option as a swing tackle. I love that they signed

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Fleming to be a swing tackle. They did. I mean,

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:37.399
<v Speaker 1>his contract says that he's not going to be making

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money unless he starts so many games,

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:42.399
<v Speaker 1>and then if that happens, then, which is fine, that's

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:44.960
<v Speaker 1>what it should be. Right. You moved Byron Jones because

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not sure what he can be better at Lyle

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Collins was pretty damn good at a more important position

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion. All right, let's uh real quickly. I

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:56.919
<v Speaker 1>did want to talk a little bit about the tight

0:52:57.000 --> 0:53:00.399
<v Speaker 1>end position. U. Something that Stevens said was he thinks

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:03.280
<v Speaker 1>some guys are being overlooked at this position. He mentioned Jarwin,

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:07.440
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned Swam, later he mentioned Rico, and then we

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:10.280
<v Speaker 1>find out last week I think it was that James

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Hannah has decided to retire such one less guy as

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 1>far as your depth is concerned to tight end. Are

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the concerns that you guys have right now about the

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>tight end position. And I want to take it from

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 1>two different standpoints. From the short term, which is this season,

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and also from the long term, knowing that Jason Witten's

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not getting any younger and there doesn't appear to be,

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at least from the standpoint of the amount of time

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that they've played, a clear replacement for him that's on

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the roster. Yeah, I think there it should be a

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>position that they address in this draft, and maybe more

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:41.919
<v Speaker 1>of a pass catcher type, just because I think that

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:44.720
<v Speaker 1>they need that that position. They need to get somebody

0:53:44.719 --> 0:53:46.719
<v Speaker 1>that can kind of get open a little bit. Swam

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jarwin and even Hannah and those guys. I mean

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't really. I mean, Witten is still somewhat

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>getting open. He's making some good plays, He's not getting

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>open as much as as he did. They needs a

0:53:57.719 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more athleticism at that position, um, in my opinion,

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and a guy that's played a lot of football in

0:54:03.280 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>his career as well. I don't care about tight end

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at all. I'm in the short term or the long

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 1>term until eighty two decides that he's okay. Let me

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>ask you this question, do you think and I know everybody,

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, at least from a standpoint the way

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the coach talks about it, Um, it seems as though

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 1>there is this, uh, there's this thought that well, Witt

0:54:24.680 --> 0:54:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and just won't come off the field. Do you think

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that this is a situation where I don't want it

0:54:29.160 --> 0:54:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to give you won't but doesn't I mean either the

0:54:33.200 --> 0:54:39.040
<v Speaker 1>way that its Ricky Waters for who for what? Well?

0:54:39.040 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's my question, that's my question. Should they be

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:45.720
<v Speaker 1>looking to try to get if they if they really

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like Jarwin, if they really like Rico. At some point,

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna have to say, Jason, You're gonna have

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to start splitting up some of those reps because we

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:54.960
<v Speaker 1>need to get these younger guys on the field to

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>see if they can play right. Well, you think they

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:00.839
<v Speaker 1>should do that, Maybe somebody should be drafted. They can

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>take him off there and maybe somebody's drafted. But but

0:55:03.280 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they've they've tried that before and that hasn't worked. They

0:55:05.640 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>drafted a kid in the top fifty not that long ago,

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and they've done it three times since. Okay, but I'm

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:13.840
<v Speaker 1>i mean years. But okay, it's hard to compare Fasano

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and Martellis. I mean, Witton was in his prime back then,

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:20.880
<v Speaker 1>but Witton in the in the third in the final

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 1>chapter of his career, if you I mean break it

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.440
<v Speaker 1>into five year stretches, toward the closer to the end

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:28.279
<v Speaker 1>than the beginning. They drafted a guy in the top

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty and he couldn't really do anything with that. Witten

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:34.359
<v Speaker 1>played ninety seven. He's the reason I love the Earl

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Thomas trade even more. Who give because it gives us

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 1>something to watch a training camp or no? No, because

0:55:40.000 --> 0:55:41.919
<v Speaker 1>well that I'm not even that would matter. I wasn't

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:43.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about that would be a lot of fun. I

0:55:43.320 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was talking about Escobar. Oh you're gonna give a second round.

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, No, when I think about it being picked

0:55:48.160 --> 0:55:50.879
<v Speaker 1>on Kevin Escobar, I'm like, yes, sounds pretty good. How

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>many Sean Lee is really? I was about to say,

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Shaun Lee is about the one I could think of,

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And well, I mean the guy you're paying seventeen million

0:55:58.760 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars to Marcus supposed good SECD round figure. It's there's

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 1>every reason to believe that they can find a good

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:09.279
<v Speaker 1>second round player, but they've got plenty of history with

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:12.319
<v Speaker 1>bad ones too, And I for bet it's It's not

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:15.319
<v Speaker 1>my place to comment on whether Jason Witten should come

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 1>off the field. Honestly, I mean he's he's gonna be

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the longest tenured cowboy in history. He's going to the

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame. He can do whatever he wants until

0:56:21.920 --> 0:56:23.960
<v Speaker 1>he decides he retires. As far as I'm concerned, he's

0:56:23.960 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 1>still he's not as good as he used to be.

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>He still does his job effectively enough that and no,

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>he's not. You know, it would be fun to have

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:33.719
<v Speaker 1>like a David and Joku type of guy, or or

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:35.840
<v Speaker 1>an Evan Ingram who can do all that type of stuff.

0:56:36.360 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't like these guys don't want that type of

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:41.399
<v Speaker 1>guy anyway, Like they've shown nothing to say that that

0:56:41.400 --> 0:56:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that's how they want tight ends to play, Like it's

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>easy to daydream about a tight end with Jimmy Graham

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:48.839
<v Speaker 1>like ability running down the scene. Like they don't want

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:52.279
<v Speaker 1>that guy. They want no offense to Jason went and

0:56:52.280 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>they want like the boring style of tight end play.

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, yeah, but the other part to

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:00.319
<v Speaker 1>that too is that they they respect what he'll does

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:02.719
<v Speaker 1>from a leadership standpoint. We've seen this happen throughout the

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:04.920
<v Speaker 1>NFL history of the NFL. A guy that is a

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:07.919
<v Speaker 1>really great leader, they will give that guy many more

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 1>years of being on a team. It happened with Woodson.

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>You look at a guy like ray Lewis. Ray Lewis

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't playing his best football by the end, but he

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>was such a great leader that they were like, Okay,

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll deal with some of the things where he's taking

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a step back because the leadership is so good, right.

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's kind of the same thing with

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Witton that you have to factor in all of that

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:27.400
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about who he is as a player.

0:57:27.480 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 1>The positives outweigh the negatives in my opinion. I mean,

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he got flagged four times last year, his yards perception

0:57:34.120 --> 0:57:36.320
<v Speaker 1>or the lowest of his career. I still think the

0:57:36.360 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 1>positives outweigh the negatives. I still think he can be

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful contributor to a good team. And I still

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna play ninety five percent or more of

0:57:44.200 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the snaps. He got flagged four times last year. That's

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>what the that's what I read. I mean, we'll not read.

0:57:49.400 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But like I went back and looked at it. I mean,

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:55.439
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like it's almost won a game. It does,

0:57:55.680 --> 0:57:59.439
<v Speaker 1>but that's one a month. Yeah, Ford, I mean that's

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:03.000
<v Speaker 1>got flag. I mean, got a false start every single

0:58:03.040 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 1>game and it was fine. He got flagged three times

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for holding and once for false start last year. That's it. Yeah, God,

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was. He did all he did. He

0:58:11.000 --> 0:58:13.040
<v Speaker 1>might have two of his three There might have been

0:58:13.040 --> 0:58:14.880
<v Speaker 1>some declined ones in the maybe, but two of his

0:58:14.960 --> 0:58:17.720
<v Speaker 1>three holds wiped out like fifty yards of rushing yard

0:58:17.760 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and um, I don't know, man, I just I'll worry

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about that when he decides to retire, because like they'll

0:58:25.640 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>worry about the few, like why just why are you

0:58:27.760 --> 0:58:30.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna draft this guy? You know, Mike Mike Kiseki from

0:58:30.320 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Penn State is like he's that's he's the Jimmy Graham

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. Like you're just gonna have him wither away

0:58:35.480 --> 0:58:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on the bench because he not getting on the field

0:58:37.960 --> 0:58:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'd rather have a guy who can do more

0:58:39.600 --> 0:58:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for me. And the one thing you'll say about tight

0:58:41.120 --> 0:58:44.040
<v Speaker 1>end too, is it seems it seems like replacing a

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:45.760
<v Speaker 1>tight end is a lot different than a quarterback. You know,

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to get the quarterback in there early and

0:58:47.360 --> 0:58:49.400
<v Speaker 1>give him chance to kind of be ready for when

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:51.920
<v Speaker 1>he takes the mantle. For tight end, it seems like

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:53.480
<v Speaker 1>if you draft the right one, you can bring him

0:58:53.520 --> 0:58:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in in year one. They can be a really good

0:58:56.400 --> 0:58:58.200
<v Speaker 1>for you. See what New York did not to mention

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for what they want their tights to do. Hannah and

0:59:02.320 --> 0:59:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Swam can develop just as well at him in their rule.

0:59:05.720 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sorry, um Jarwin, Yeah, I gotta re focus myself,

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but train yourself well. You develop as blockers and all

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that good stuff in practice and in the two and

0:59:13.840 --> 0:59:17.720
<v Speaker 1>three tight end sets like they're not. I'll believe they're

0:59:17.720 --> 0:59:19.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna draft an Evan Ingram when I see it. Anyway,

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at least as long as this coaching staff is in place.

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, we appreciate you guys joining us. We are

0:59:23.520 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>back next week and uh, actually we got so much

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:27.680
<v Speaker 1>coverage coming on this week, and make sure you check

0:59:27.680 --> 0:59:31.320
<v Speaker 1>out Dallas Cowboys dot Com. Were Cowboys Global app back

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>next week? Can I take next week off? No, we're

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:36.800
<v Speaker 1>actually our time will actually change. We're actually gonna be

0:59:36.840 --> 0:59:39.560
<v Speaker 1>coming on on Tuesday next week. Oh that's right, because

0:59:39.600 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday through Friday we ain't gonna be here. We're

0:59:42.640 --> 0:59:45.400
<v Speaker 1>going on vacation. You got vacation coming up, and so

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell you more about that next Tuesay though, But

0:59:47.920 --> 0:59:50.920
<v Speaker 1>until then, for Nick Even, Dave helm and Ambergarcier, Derek Eaelton,

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 1>this has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot

0:59:53.200 --> 0:59:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Less Cowboys Football Club