WEBVTT - 49ers Lose Again, NBA Tipoff & Public Defender

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with all States Savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What Drive with Nick Wright, Episode one e eight.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 2>You know, let's just get right into it. If the

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 2>NBA starts tonight, the Chiefs are in first place in

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the whole league, the Bills are falling apart, and yet

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>none of that. I had a winning weekend of Picks,

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>even though I gave Demond's a terrible teaser advice that

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 2>cost him. None of that is the lead story today. Instead,

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>of course, we'll talk Monday Night football. First, let me

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 2>get to what missed the cut not On today's show.

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Caleb Williams and the USC Trojans lose again. B Jean

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Robinson sick, the NFL's investigating in case you had props

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>or fantasy on it, and Nick's apology to Tyson Bagent.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 2>You'll yeah, listen, Tyson, you were better than I thought

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 2>you would be. Cost you know what. My apologies in

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the form of how much money you cost me this weekend? Demonse,

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 2>how are you doing this morning? We were texting during

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 2>the game, You're calling me a hater? You were, you

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 2>know you were. I think a little disappointed in me.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>But be honest, before we get into the actual story.

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>When you were watching that, did you have a moment

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>where you're like, God, dog it. He can be annoying,

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>he can be obnoxious, but my dad might know what

0:01:58.720 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>he's talking about sometime.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Be honest, Yeah, I mean I think that happens all

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 3>the time. It's just your delivery makes it hard to accept.

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, that is correct, story of my life, more

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>often than not proven correct. People though, don't want to

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>accept it because I'm so abrasive with how I deliver

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the information. Speaking of delivering the information, demonsay, what happened

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>on Monday Night football last night?

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Well so brock Party lost to the Vikings twenty two

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 3>to seventeen. This was in Minnesota though. Yeah, so he

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>threw a pick at the end when he had a

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 3>chance to go down there and win the game.

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 4>But that was followed by a.

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Two nice passes that got them in that position. But

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>when I were to talk about that obviously, So this

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 3>is kind of falling into her eventually, right column. Do

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 3>you think that the party train of the party hype

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 3>has come to a sudden stop or is there a

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 3>way out of this?

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 4>You think you know? Rally?

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Well? No, I mean listen, I Mahomes Mountain on TV

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 2>today and people were like, Oh, how far is perty

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 2>gonna fall? Uh? Probably won't fall because he is who

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I told you he was. Oh, Nick, what more do

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 2>you need to see? Well, I told you exactly what

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to see. Brock Purty down a score, chance

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 2>to drive the field. We saw it last week down two,

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and on the very first play of the drive, he

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>threw it right Greg Newsom, who dropped it. He then

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>threw a dump off pass to Brandon Ayuku took it

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 2>forty yards and people were like, Oh, what more do

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>you want from him? It's not his fault they missed

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 2>the kick, And I was like, I don't know. Over

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the first fifty eight minutes of the game, not get

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 2>out played by PJ. Walker just because you're down a

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 2>couple of Avengers due to injury. Then this week against

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 2>the Minnesota Vikings and that defensive personnel, it's Danell Hunter,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Harrison Smith and a bunch of guys all of a sudden,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>no debo, no Trent Williams looking awful pedestrian, and even

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>over the course of that game he was fine. Over

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 2>the course of the game, brock Purty was doing brock

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Purty things, throwing the open Brandon Ayuk, throwing to an

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 2>open George Kittle. He really only had one bad play

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>early right after his best throw of the night, right

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>as Troy Aikman was saying he threw that ball as

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 2>well as anyone can throw one. He threw George Kittle

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>a hospital ball that Kittle was lucky only resulted in

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 2>him getting hit in the groin and not getting spun

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 2>over on his head. But he had played well. He

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 2>had a really nice scramble early in the game. It's like, oh,

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Perty's doing some nice things. However, he then found himself

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 2>in the exact scenario with the day after he went

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty of twenty one, and I came on this show

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 2>and demonse on behalf of the entire football world said

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 2>to me, what more do you want? What do you

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 2>want him to do? And I said more? I said,

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to see him in a situation where the

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>other team knows he has to pass, where they are

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 2>down late, and see how he comes through. And what

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 2>did he do. He threw one of the worst picks

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 2>of the NFL season, then his defense got to stop.

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 2>He got the ball back and he threw another one.

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 2>And the drive before that, the reason they were punting

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>was because on third and six he had it would

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 2>have been a good play, but he was scrambling, had

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>a guy open across the middle of the field, and

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 2>he skipped the ball to him. You know why, because

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.239
<v Speaker 2>fact of the matter is he's a physically limited guy

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 2>who couldn't get enough arm on the football. And late

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 2>in that game, it is a lot of guys when

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 2>everyone is exactly where they're supposed to be, when the

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 2>defense is more worried about the run. When you have

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 2>a skill advantage all over the field, a lot of

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 2>guys can look sharp, but all of a sudden you're down.

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Somebody all of a sudden, the other team is teeing

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 2>off against the pass all of a sudden, You've got

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 2>to stand there and make throws. And it's not that

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 2>he just didn't come through. He gave the game away

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>on the first pick, got a reprieve thanks to his defense,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 2>and gave it away again. So what more, what did

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to see from Brock Purdy? How he would

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>respond in the exact situation that you have to be

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>able to come through in if you're going to be

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback of a Super Bowl champion. And that is

0:06:55.480 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>where the Niners standard is. And thus far, he's had

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 2>three opportunities in his young career, three drives the last

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 2>three weeks, and he's over three. So I'm not here

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to say I told you so, And I'm not here

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 2>to take a victory lap about a guy who has

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>overachieved for the fact that he was the final pick

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>of the draft. This is not so much about Brock

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Purdy as much as it is about my frustration with

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>my colleagues, most of whom I think deep down agreed

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>with me, but it was not a popular opinion. Well,

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>am I really gonna go on TV and say the

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 2>guy who's never lost and leads the league in passer rating.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he's that good. Well, I don't

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:56.239
<v Speaker 2>know what what what is the job? Is the job

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 2>to say literally what anyone could say if you and

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 2>never watch the games as looked at the box score

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>and be like, well, the guy's never lost, he has

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 2>great stats, he must be awesome. Or is the job

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>to actually look evaluate and give a thought on what

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>is duplicable and what is not? Is the job to

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 2>use data points? Such as Jimmy Garoppolo had similar levels

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 2>of success. He then left and now leads the league

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 2>in interceptions even though he's missed time with the Vonte Adams?

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 2>What is the What is the job? And it was

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>unpopular and people were upset with me, Well, no, their

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 2>job might be that. My job is to evaluate and folks,

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I said it two weeks ago, and I or three

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago, and I retweeted the clip of it so

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 2>people could see the replies. When I said I trust

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Genosi more than brock Party, the responses to that are

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>unanimous in that this guy no one actually believes that.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 2>How can you take him seriously? I trust you know

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Smith more than brock Party. When I said, folks were

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>writing off the Seattle Seahawks as potential division winners a

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 2>bit too early. Well, you wake up this morning. The

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Seahawks have two losses. The forty nine ers have two losses.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 2>You wake up today and all of a sudden, the

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 2>idea that they are just going to run away with

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the division that's gone. And I'm gonna tell you one

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 2>other thing right now, this moment. You know what Kyle

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Shanahan Demonsay saw on that football field for three hours

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 2>last night.

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 4>He looked pretty sad quarterback that he wished he had.

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, the and god, I have I have such

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>a galaxy brain. Perty Kirk Cousins take that I have.

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Cousins was kind of dealing too.

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're gonna talk about that as well. We're gonna

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 2>talk about it. But there is I might I might

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>wait for this afternoon on TV to say what I'm

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 2>thinking right now. I need to. Actually, I don't want

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>to say it off the cuff.

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 4>I've got something I tell you guys. Oh wait, I'm

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 4>not gonna tell you right now. I'm gonna tell you later.

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, so here's the thing. Here's the thing in a

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>world of aggregation and of you know, a half dozen anonymous,

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 2>totally unaccountable football Twitter accounts that post other people's clips

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 2>and other people's news so they can get Elon's money

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 2>for their blue check mark. I want, I don't want

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>to say something Flip Bentley if it's an impossibility, So

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 2>let me actually look into the well, listen, it's not

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 2>a bad business model. I mean there's I'm not gonna

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 2>it's just all these guys and they fight with each other,

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 2>these these anonymous not even necessarily real people football accounts.

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 2>They're like, hey, you stole well, it's like you stole

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 2>my tweet. But that tweet that you're saying was stolen,

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 2>that guy just stole from someone who actually did the work.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>And so like the and one of them the do

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 2>you see last week the news story, the news story

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>that Caleb Williams wants an equity stake in a team

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>if he gets drafted. That was a story from July

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>from Florio that got very little traction when it happened.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Then one of these places posted it like it was

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 2>new information right after Caleb had the brutal game against

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame, and it caught on like wildfire. So I'm

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>just gonna be caught, So I'm gonna I there is

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>a there is an intriguing brock Purty Kirk Cousins question

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 2>that applies to this season that I'm gonna make sure

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm right on and then maybe discuss on television. Now

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 2>to the kirk Cousins side of things, he was brilliant

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Demonsey No Justin Jefferson against an excellent defense. And I

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 2>thought the way he navigated the pocket on that second

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 2>on that last drive they had, they ended up getting points,

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 2>but they you know, they wound very important clock. There

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 2>was a third down play where I was certain and

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 2>so was Troy on the call that he was sacked,

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 2>and then all of a sudden he still had the

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 2>ball and he had I think it was Addison, it

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 2>might have been Osborn, I'm not sure. Up on the

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 2>near side of the field, he like disappeared in the

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 2>pocket for a moment, then he came through with it.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was excellent.

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 4>I thought that was.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Because they weren't getting pressure, correct, and it's not because

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 2>they weren't getting pressure. He was. He was great man.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I thought Cousins was excellent, and to do that with

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 2>no George Jefferson yeah, on prime time with your season

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 2>on the line, three and four. They're alive. And I

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you've looked at what their next handful

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 2>of games are. They're at Green Bay, at Atlanta home

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>for the Saints, at the Broncos, home for the Bears,

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 2>at the Raiders. That's their next six. Yeah. Four. I

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 2>mean you've got four on the road. But none of

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 2>those teams are above five hundred, None of those teams

0:13:58.320 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>right now or and then at the end of the

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 2>year year Bengals, Lions, Packers Lions. So at the end

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>of the year, it gets hard, but they're alive, man,

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 2>And maybe Jordan Jefferson comes back.

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Like.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Just they're alive if they want to be. And so

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>credit to Kirk and Jordan Addison was awesome, man, he

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 2>was awesome rookie wide receiver doing that. And the really

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 2>cool dichotomy of Charvarius Wards stealing the ball away from

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>him on the very first drive of the game and

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 2>then him making the biggest play of the game stealing

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>it away from Ward before halftime.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, it was just really like that.

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 3>That play was kind of confusing because like I saw

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 3>them all jumbled up and then he just takes off

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 3>with it like it was just really cool to see

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 3>in lifetime.

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 4>I thought it was.

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>It was more impressive than the Yeah. I thought that

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 3>play was a lot more interesting and fun than the pick.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Obviously he fell down immediately, Yeah, but it was just

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 3>cool to see him run away with that.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>No, I thought it was picked. I thought threw a

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>pick right before the half. I also, if I'm gonna,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I thought Kevin O'Connell game management wise made a bunch

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>of errors. I thought their field goals inside the five.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I thought they needed to be more aggressive. Here's the thing, though.

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Yo, in the double the back to back tush push.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean I did that, by the way, touch push guy,

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 3>but that was bad.

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 2>But here's the thing on that you had first and

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 2>goal from the one and a half. You want to

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 2>try it one time, so be it. Yeah, once it

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work, Once it doesn't work, just just be like

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 2>you know what, now we're inside the one, because they

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>did get a little bit of yardage, you're just gonna

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 2>run the ball three times. We've got to be able

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 2>to get a single yard like hand it off to

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 2>your running back.

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 4>The So.

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 2>But what I'll say is this real quick about Kevin

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 2>O'Connell being that conservative. That is, whether people want to

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge it or not, a bit of an indictment on Party.

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>The fact that O'Connell felt we can take three points,

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 2>we can take three points, we can punt the ball.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Those think that is him saying I'm not that worried

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 2>about the forty nine Ers offense. And here is also

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 2>why it is important to actually watch the games. Like,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 2>let's just say that on the first Party pick it

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 2>had gotten dropped by the defender and then McCaffrey rips

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 2>off a run and the Niners win. Not only did

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 2>the Niners win, Purdy's stats would have looked really like,

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 2>they would have looked amazing. And prior to the picks,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>he hadn't played poorly. I'm not saying that at all.

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 2>But the only super like, the most impactful pass the

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>game was that little swing pass to Christian McCaffrey that

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 2>was blocked up perfectly. McCaffrey takes it forty five yards

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 2>to the house, like you just gotta you've got to

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 2>be able to have some nuance to this stuff. All right,

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 2>what's the follow up here on the Niners?

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the forty nine Ers are still at

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the top tier of NFC teams, or is Philly and

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 3>everybody else right now?

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Philly deserves to be considered the best team in the NFC.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 2>They won the conference last year, they lost one game

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 2>last year with Jalen Hurts as their starter, and they've

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 2>been excellent that I don't know that they've been excellent

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 2>all year, but they have found a way to win.

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 2>And you know what I mean, it's to me not

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 2>that the two teams that were in the Super Bowl

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 2>last year, there's not a lot of games this year

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 2>where they have start to finish played their A game,

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs and the Eagles. Yet they are the two

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 2>teams that are six and one. They're the two teams

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 2>that have found ways to win in a way that

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 2>the you know, other teams haven't. I don't. I tried

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to Sirianni. He's annoying, but he's been excellent. He lost

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 2>both his coordinators, Like, I gotta give him credit. I

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 2>guess I probably feel about Sirianni the way a lot

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 2>of people feel about me. Annoying but grudgingly admit he's

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 2>excell Yeah, but uh that Here's what I was trying

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to say when everyone was trying to just annoint the

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Niners and Eagles though long season guys. The Lions were

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the hot team a week ago, they get whacked by Baltimore.

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Talk about them in a bit the the There's a

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 2>lot of ebbs and flows to it. No one is

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 2>going here's what I know. No one's running away with

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the NFC. The Eagles haven't looked so dominant that it's like, oh,

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna go fourteen and three and run away with

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the conference, not with the schedule they of coming up.

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 2>The Niners desperately need their guys back. And I know

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 2>you can say that about you know, every team. To

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 2>a degree that's true. But they also play such a

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 2>physical style of football that they are more susceptible to

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>injuries than a lot of other teams are. And so

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 2>it is the Yes, the Niners were not going to

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 2>overreact and act like they're, you know, some second rate team.

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 2>But any team in all of NFL history, if your

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 2>biggest question mark on your team is your quarterback, you

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 2>can always get got you just can't. And the Niners,

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.719
<v Speaker 2>even before last night, everyone would have had to acknowledge

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the biggest question mark was their quarterback and now, and

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>this is the part of when you have nothing but success,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 2>it starts to be a ball rolling downhill in a

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 2>positive direction. Now, the next time brock Purty finds himself

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 2>in this situation, it instantly becomes the biggest moment of

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 2>his career. And he knows it right. There is a

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 2>level of in sports. If the first time you ever

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>take a potential game winning shot, you make it, you

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 2>are so much more likely to then be good at

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 2>those in the short term. And if the first time

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 2>you whiff, then the next time it gets harder, and

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>then it gets way harder, and then all of a

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>sudden you're a guy who just can't do it. And

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 2>so this is where I.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Just like pas like downfall.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>No, No, I'm not No, it's just I'm not trying.

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm not truth in the psychology to it. I get

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 4>what you're saying, But.

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 2>What I this is not this is not fair, but

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's true. It's not It shouldn't say it's

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:21.719
<v Speaker 2>not fair. It seemed well, whatever it is. If the

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Browns kicker hadn't made the field goal against Cleveland, party

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 2>might have been better on those final drives last night.

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>If the previous week he was in this spot and

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 2>he did everything the exact same, but it had resulted

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 2>in a win, then maybe he's a little less anxious

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 2>on these two drives at the end. But instead the

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 2>kicker missed. Then perty made big mistakes and now we'll see, now.

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 3>We see very well could get that same opportunity in

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals game, I feel absolutely.

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, it's gonna be another game with

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 2>no debo, hopefully for them. Trent Williams is back, but

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 2>another game with no deba All right, next.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, man, the Chiefs took care of business and

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 3>they beat a struggling Chargers team that's done everything except

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 3>for lock up the division. You've already hung up the banners.

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 3>When has that ever gone wrong? So is your fear

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 3>that for the Chiefs that their biggest threat is being

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 3>too complacent or being stagnant, given that they haven't really

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 3>played you know.

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 4>Super Bowl teams.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>No, because that's coming. Listen. They're gonna beat the Broncos

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>this weekend, and then they have over their final nine

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 2>games four games against pardon me, legitimate teams Dolphins, Eagles,

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 2>and back to back games the Bills and the Bengals,

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 2>and so they're not going I would have been a

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 2>little nervous about that. If the chief schedule had been

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 2>reversed where the softest part was at the end instead

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 2>of the beginning, that would make me a little nervous

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>for the playoffs, that they wouldn't be sharp. But they're

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to be sharp. And here's the other thing.

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know if you're gonna agree with me

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 2>or not not, but I do truly believe this. Travis

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 2>Kelcey trying to impress his new girlfriend is great for

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs avoiding complacency. This is the greatest tight end ever.

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Who's wildly wealthy, wildly famous, wildly successful. Yeah, and thirty yes,

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 2>and but now at thirty four years old, he listen,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 2>it can go wrong, but you in that. You saw

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the touchdown he scored where he thought he was at

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the one inch line, but was at the three yard

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 2>line and put the ball over his head and then

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 2>somehow must have the strongest hands in football, held onto

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 2>it and scored. He doesn't do that if Taylor Swift's

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 2>not at the game. He was like, oh man, this

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 2>might be my only chance score touchdown. I gotta do it.

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 2>He when he finally didn't catch a pass and he

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 2>was so furious. Like, I do think there is, and

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that basically anyone who's ever played sports knows

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 2>there is an added little sharpness. If someone that you're

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 2>talking to or want to talk to is in the

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 2>crowd demons, truth, listen, you played sports at a far

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.959
<v Speaker 2>higher level than me. True or false, there's an added

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 2>something if your girl or you want to be girl.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Isn't completely correct.

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.479
<v Speaker 3>And it's just really funny because I've never heard it

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 3>like worded like that. But yeah, I do think you

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 3>get plus three on your attributes.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, if you great, If you're a great player. Now

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>if you're not, it can go in the opposite, exact

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 2>opposite direction. Get nervous if you're just like a mediocre player,

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Like I'll be totally I'll be totally honest. Here you were.

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 2>You were a great athlete and a great basketball player.

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I was. I loved basketball. I was by no means

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 2>a great basketball player, and I think I got worse

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 2>at games that my girlfriend was at in high school,

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, like I do, Like I think it was

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 2>it because and because I was like, ah, I'm not

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna have that many opportunities to shine. So like, maybe

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I tried to do too much. But if you're a star,

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 2>if you're a star and you know you're gonna get

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the ball, you know it's gonna run through you.

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's good for the Chiefs. I do. Now.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 2>She goes on an international tour in November, so I

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know how that's gonna play out, but I but yeah,

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not worried about the Chiefs at all. They

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 2>have the best record in football, they have the second

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 2>best events in football. They have a top five dolphins

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 2>in football, and they're doing it all while practicing. So

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm not worried about that in the least. All right,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 2>let's talk Eagles here.

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 3>So Philly looked dominant against the Dolphins, and a big

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 3>part of it was the touch push. They used it

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 3>in key moments and in some moments it even ice

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 3>the game.

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 4>The vikings, we're not talking about that.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 3>After the game, head coach Nick Sirianni said, every first

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 3>I think we're gonna show a quote for those watching

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 3>on YouTube, but he said, every first down is a

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 3>first and nine people can't do it like we can

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 3>do it. Don't ban this play. If everybody could do it,

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 3>everybody would do it. Then he goes, where's the camera at? Yeah,

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 3>some parlays just broke there. Some players broke their sport,

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 3>like Kareem Skyhook. You got steps three and brady sneak?

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Is this cheating or have the.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Eagles just found a cheek code and broke in the NFL?

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 2>So it's not cheating at all, But it's going to

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 2>go away like it's just so so there was there

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>was no way to legislate out Kareem Skyhook. There is

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 2>the people have talked by the way about since the

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 2>proliferation of the three of if the NBA needs to

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 2>tweak some things to make it less reliant on the three,

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 2>but it would take such an overhaul. Brady's sneak was

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 2>different than this because, while just as successful on fourth

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 2>and less than one, it also looked like every sneak

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 2>we've ever seen regularly. The NFL has two kind of

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 2>silver bullets here. One is they already have rules against

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 2>pulling offensive players, so it is not a far stretch

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 2>to tweak the rule to put back in what once

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 2>was and about pushing offensive players. The other one is

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 2>the NFL will put it under the banner of player

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 2>safety and say we you know what I mean, that

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>we need to get rid of this play. But as

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>I told you guys a month ago when everyone got

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 2>mad at me, the reason the NFL will ban this

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 2>is because the place sucks. It's not exciting. It takes

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:28.719
<v Speaker 2>all suspense out. It's an ugly play. That's it. The

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 2>NFL changes rules all the time to make things a

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 2>better television product. This is not good for TV. And

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I listen, I have come around in this regard. I

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 2>do think Philly gets more credit given the fact that

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 2>everyone else sucks at it. It does make it seem

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 2>like there is more. It is more about their personnel

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>and their practicing. I totally agree with that. It doesn't

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 2>change the fact that the NFL is going to, I

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:12.239
<v Speaker 2>believe this offseason get rid of it. And here is

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>the other piece of it that I have said before

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and I will say again that I don't understand why

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 2>there has not been more. Once we saw Philly in

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a game they're up seven on fourth and more than

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 2>one on their own twenty nine in the fourth quarter,

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 2>confidently go for this, and Sirianni's right. It is first

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and nine for them. And if you're playing them on

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 2>third downs, you can't play the sticks. You've got to

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 2>play two yards short of the sticks, because if you

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>get them to fourth in less than two they're just

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 2>going to go for this and they're going to get it.

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 2>But the point that I have tried to hammer that

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I think Philly knows, and I think because they don't

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>want it banned, they are not attempting this. But I

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>wonder if they could right now, Philly can basically with

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent success get one yard and with close

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 2>to one hundred percent success get two yards. If they

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 2>were to become able to get three yards on this play,

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 2>it puts the NFL in a spot where they would

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe ban it mid season if Philly could get three

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 2>right now, they get like one and a half. If

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 2>they could get three yards on this play and you're

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 2>down four to the Eagles with eight and a half

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 2>left in the fourth quarter, and they just run the

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 2>tush push to until the clock expires, which is all

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 2>you would add. Once they can get three yards, then

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 2>it's just game over. You get you do it on

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 2>first down, second down, third down, fourth down, new set

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 2>of downs you wouldn't want to get seventeen yards. You

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 2>just want to do it and be able to run

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the clock out north of the six minute mark. Then

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 2>it irrevocably changes football in a way that you can

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 2>argue is you know what I mean, Philly's earned it,

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is. I'm not trying to have that argument,

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 2>but it would be terrible for the sport, just terrible.

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Philly fans would like it. Kind of Philly fans would

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 2>like it the way you you like it. If your

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 2>team is doing hack a shack in an NBA game,

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.479
<v Speaker 2>You're like, Okay, I guess it's you know, make your

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 2>free throws. But it's not exactly fun. And so the

0:31:55.040 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>fact that Philly is not too good at it is

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 2>right now working in their advantage. But the NFL can't

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 2>leave open to chance that this offseason they master it

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 2>and it becomes the majority of their second half playbook.

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 2>It's like, well, we can get three yards on it,

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I said, just running out the clock. If you could

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 2>get three yards on this, and we're not that far

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 2>from it, you could run it the entire game. If

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you can get three yards on it, you could run

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 2>it the entire game.

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, Yeah, I don't think the Eagles are going

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 3>to do that. They know that that's ugly. I think

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 3>they did it four times this game. That's once a quarter.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I can't see them just like spamming it like they

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 3>know at the end of that nobody's trying to see

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 3>all that.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Come on, now, let me but right, I agree, But

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 2>let me ask you a question. If they're if they've

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the the fact that that possibility exists, is why the

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 2>NFL is going to get rid of it. Like Philly

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 2>fans got so mad at me about this, I am not.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Even from my own perspective. I think it's bad for

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the sport because it's an entertainment product and it's not entertaining.

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:18.239
<v Speaker 2>I would so, but set take take my opinion out

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 2>of it. Non opinion, just prediction. My prediction is the

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Eagles have ten games plus the playoffs left of this

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 2>play being available to them, and maybe, you know, hopefully

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 2>for them, they make the most out of it. All right, next, this.

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Guy's gonna be praying for a Mahomes Tush push in

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years. I feel like it's still gonna

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 3>be going on. You're gonna be like this.

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Rule this place. It's bad for the sport, it's really ugly.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like there and there's an element of like,

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't know. I compared it to seventy

0:33:55.320 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 2>five years ago of baseball owner Bill Veck hired a

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 2>little person I think he was two feet eleven inches

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.439
<v Speaker 2>tall to play on his baseball team, and he went

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and did he had him pinch hit. The guy had

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 2>no strike zone, so he immediately got walked and then

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 2>he put in a pinch runner. And you know, whatever

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 2>it is, Baseball changed the rule like that week like

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and so there are certain things that you can say, oh,

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 2>well that's you know why, it's only it's one teams

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 2>figured it out, but it's just bad for the sport,

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:30.439
<v Speaker 2>all right, next, go ahead.

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 4>All right, man.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 3>So my guy, Lamar Jackson definitely embarrassed Detroit. You've been

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 3>having this team of the Week thing going on. I'm

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty sure Detroit was the team of the week and

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 3>it's all been falling in line. They beat them, Lamar

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 3>obviously looked phenomenal. Is Baltimore the real deal or are they

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 3>just the next team to beat? Do you think they're

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 3>bound for an upset?

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, listen, they're playing at the Cardinals. So

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't you know that would be a horrific loss,

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 2>right They then they Seattle Cleveland Cincinnati in the next

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 2>three weeks. Then you know what I mean, all in Baltimore.

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 2>By the way, those should be three good games. Uh.

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I missed on the Ravens this year. I

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 2>think I missed on it. Lamar looks you listen, I'll

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 2>give you credit, Lamar, Lamar looks great.

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Looks great, great. He looked really good, man. His decision making.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.879
<v Speaker 3>I think there was a bunch of times where he

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 3>it looked like he was about to runoff.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 4>It looked like he was about to get sacked, and he.

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 3>Played around in the pocket a little bit longer, and

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 3>he did the dink and dunk passes that you say

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 3>that he's kind of like been very missy on. He

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 3>was hitting the short ones, he was hitting the long,

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 3>extended played ones. He looked really good, man, He looked

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 3>really good.

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 2>That first point you made, Demanse is exactly what jumped

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 2>out to me as well, which was there were at

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 2>least three times in this game where in the past

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 2>he would have taken off running and instead he kind

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of just stayed not necessarily in the pocket, but behind

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 2>the line of scrimmage with his eyes downfield, and then

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 2>either made One time he made a deep pass to

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 2>the end zone. One time it was a little over

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 2>the top pass, I think, or maybe I'm not sure. No, regardless,

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 2>uh he there. You know, the RPO is the run

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 2>pass option, and he's been a lot more r than

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 2>P in his history on those plays. This week he

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.959
<v Speaker 2>was key. And No, the Ravens are scary right now.

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 2>And the defense, despite the injuries, is allowing fourteen points

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 2>per game that you appears you nailed that one and

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:43.720
<v Speaker 2>he and listen, I'm not gonna all of a sudden

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 2>act like I don't think the Lions are good. The

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Lions are good, and the Lions defense had been playing

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 2>well this year and Lamar cut them up, and the

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Lions offenses golf hadn't had a terrible game in a year,

0:36:56.239 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and he was bad. Like, No, the Ravens are legit,

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 2>they gotta stay healthy, but they're a scary team.

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Just so everybody knows that Lamar and the Ravens that's

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 3>my team. I know I've been advocating very heavy for

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 3>the Niners and Party, but that's just because I'm all

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 3>for a good story.

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 4>My heart.

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 2>That is Demanse's team. That was Demande's Madden team, that

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 2>was his team in the offseason that he announced. No, no, no,

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens are Demanse's team. That is true.

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 4>You can have too.

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So how stupid does it seem that these teams

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't trade to first? For Lamar and the Lions, the Falcons,

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 3>the Colts, the Patriots, Jets, Panthers, Commanders.

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 2>I would say they wouldn't trade to first. Demonse is

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 2>that they proactively like release statements like we're not interested,

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>we don't want to be involved. It's crazy.

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 4>It is crazy.

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 2>How that looks right now is crazy. Even if people think, well,

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens would have matched and you wouldn't have gotten him, Okay,

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 2>so be it. At least then you tried, like the

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 2>could the Patriots right now be five and two instead

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 2>of two and five if Lamar was there instead of

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 2>mac Jones, of course they could. All right, take quick

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 2>break reminder, you guys can ask questions in the chat.

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to them, do a little NBA preview, and

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 2>then get to your questions. All that to next Well,

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 2>that's right.

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable, discover the

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Robliss, who defined every expectation

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 5>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 5>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Pania, and

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 2>All Right, believe it or not, the NBA season starts tonight.

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't really feel like it, but it does. Demand's

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 2>let's talk a little NBA here. This show is gonna

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 2>stay mostly football until February, but we can do a

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 2>little NBA season preview here.

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, all right, let's talk a little Dylan Brooks

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 3>so NBA season. The NBA season tips off tonight, and

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 3>the raining champs are facing the Lakers.

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 4>Lebron and the Lakers to be specific.

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Now, Denver has been talking a lot of trash ever

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 3>since the sweep Los Angeles Lockings for revenge, What do

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 3>you expect out of the new look Lakers on ring

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 3>night in Denver.

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 2>I want to see Austin Reeves.

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 5>Look.

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 2>I want to see how Austin Reeves looks the you know,

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 2>is Austin Reeves going to transition from really good story

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to legit third option? If he does, the Lakers are right.

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 2>They are a cut below Milwaukee, Boston, Denver, but a

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 2>cut above everybody else. And that just means you need

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Denver to falter a little bit. And so I, oh,

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 2>this game tonight, obviously, I think has more of an

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 2>emotional heft for the Lakers than it does for the Nuggets.

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 2>And there is an element of the I go back

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 2>to those Western Armburence finals and Jokic was unbelievable, but

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Jokic was believably unbelievable, Like Jokic's numbers were not shocking

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 2>by Jokic standard, which speaks to, you know, you know,

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 2>what a great player he's become. The player who played

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 2>outside of his mind was Jamal Murray. Jamal Murray, just

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 2>for the record in in the Western Armours finals was

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty three, six and five on fifty two forty ninety five.

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Splits Just a little context there that is more points

0:40:55.640 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 2>per game in a conference finals than Michael Jordan ever averaged,

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 2>then Kobe Bryant ever averaged. Then I think it's everyone

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 2>other than Amari Stodemeyer and Lebron James and there's one

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 2>other guy I can't remember are the only people to

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 2>ever at Maybe that might be right. Actually I'd have

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 2>to look, but that might be right to ever average

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 2>in conference finals. The reason I say that is everyone's like, oh,

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 2>what's the Lakers answer for Jokic? They in order to

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 2>have made those conference finals more competitive, they didn't need

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 2>a different answer for Jokic. They needed Jamal Murray not

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to turn into prime Dwayne Wade, which is what he

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 2>was in that series. And Jamal Murray's an excellent player,

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:50.439
<v Speaker 2>but he had literally one of the greatest conference finals ever.

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 2>And so that's what I So, I'm intrigued to watch

0:41:54.480 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 2>that the Nuggets are mostly the same team. The Lakers

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 2>are not the same, but they have, you know, some

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:08.280
<v Speaker 2>tweaks around the edges, and that you know, Lebron takes

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 2>the court tonight. It's not only year twenty one, which

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 2>only six other guys have ever gotten to, but now

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 2>that Iguidala has retired, demon's he's the oldest player in league.

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 2>In the league, Lebron is literally not like the oldest

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 2>guy who plays a lot. No, he's the oldest player

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 2>in the league. And the fact that the expectations are

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 2>still that, yeah, he's around, you know, a top ten player.

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:40.479
<v Speaker 2>There's no context for that. There's no The best year

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty one season ever is like seven points a game,

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and people expect Lebron to average twenty seven. So I'm

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 2>excited to watch all of that.

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:52.399
<v Speaker 3>So go ahead, I've got a little stat and you're

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:53.720
<v Speaker 3>saying you're excited for the opener.

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 4>So the Lakers haven't won an opener since twenty sixteen.

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 3>That was versus Houston. They haven't won an open on

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 3>the road since two thousand and five, and that was

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 3>also an overtime win against Detroit.

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, oh five. That would mean the defending champion Pistons,

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 2>And that would also be the without Shack. That would

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 2>be the Lakers right after they had traded Shack to

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 2>the Miami Heat. Because the four Pistons beat the Do

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I have that right?

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 2>The four Pistons beat the four Lakers and five in

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the finals. Then Shaq and Kobe officially broke up. I

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 2>don't really care about the opener stats. I mean, I

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you giving them to me, but that's not like

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 2>this is to me a different spot And I am curious,

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 2>like you know, I Jokics doesn't seem like the type

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 2>of guy who gets like extra motivated by stuff. And Jokics,

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 2>to his credit, didn't talk any trash. It was all

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Mike Malone in tertiary pieces that we're talking trash. I'm

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.959
<v Speaker 2>excited to see it, all right, next.

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, so we talked about opening night, Let's talk

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 3>about the season. The Suns obviously built a super team.

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:07.879
<v Speaker 3>Is this Kevin Durant's fourth or fifth super team?

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 4>Do we not count?

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, see because it was like natural, but the Sons

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 3>obviously built a super team. Dame is playing with a

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 3>freshly paid Giannis, and Wimby's finally in the league, and

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 3>sure Lebron's going on number twenty year twenty one with.

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Another super team. It's probably his third super team. What's

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 4>the number one thing?

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 2>How are the Lakers a super team?

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 4>I might have right there.

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 3>They've they've got a the what's the number one thing

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 3>that you're excited to track?

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 4>This NBA season.

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I know it's got to say. I mean, I'm pretty listen.

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I have been the pump the breaks on Wimby Guy.

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 2>The preseason got me pretty excited for him. I mean,

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>it does look the I I still believe the offense

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:59.760
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a major work in progress. But defensively,

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know what the ceiling is. I just

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I mean, it just seems impossible some of

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that he's able to do. So I'm super

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 2>excited to watch that. I don't know if you saw it.

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 2>People got very mad at me last week. The internet

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 2>hated this opinion speaking of Boston Reeves when I said,

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 2>we were talking Suns versus Lakers because Bleacher Report did

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 2>a best duos in the league and they had Katie

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 2>and Booker ahead of Lebron an ad and I said,

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I flatly think that's wrong. I think Lebron is still

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 2>better than Durant and you the argument against Lebron versus

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 2>certain guys is, yeah, okay, he's better, but he misses

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty five games a year. But you can't use that

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 2>argument in a Durant discussion. Lebron has been healthier than Durant.

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, over the last three years ever since Durant

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 2>blew his achilles. Even if you remove that season, Lebron

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 2>has played more games, they score the same amount, and

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Lebron is to me just better over player. And so

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I said, I thought ad was better than Booker. I

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 2>think Lebron is at the very least dead even with Durant.

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 2>So I thought they were the better duo. And then

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Wilde said, okay, we'll find somebody said, I don't know,

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 2>it's wild to brew I want to misquote him. Yeah,

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 2>but then the Suns have the better trio because Bradley

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Beal versus Austin Reeves. And the Internet killed me for this,

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I said, And I said, I disagree with that. I said,

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I would rather have Austin Reeves as my third option. Now,

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 2>there is a very specific point I'm trying to make here,

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 2>which is I think Bradley Beal. If you were like, hey,

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 2>one of these guys has to be the best player

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 2>on your team, obviously you'd rather have Bradley Beal. If

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 2>your team's best player is Austin Reeves, you're in real trouble.

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 2>But if one of if the question is, one of

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 2>these guys has to be the clear cut number three

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 2>on your team. I have more faith and reason to

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 2>believe that Austin Reeves can play that role at a

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 2>high level than Bradley Beal, who's never even been the

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:06.840
<v Speaker 2>number two option on a team. He was the leading

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 2>scorer in the NBA, and I now I I'll also

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 2>say this that people disagreed with. I think both the

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Lakers and the Suns would be better if Beal and

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Reeves switch places. I think if Reeves were on the

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Suns and if Beal were on the Lakers, both teams

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:31.879
<v Speaker 2>be better. I think Beal adds things to the Lakers

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:35.720
<v Speaker 2>shooting that they need, and I think Reeves adds things

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:38.840
<v Speaker 2>to the Suns being able to contribute without having the

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 2>ball in your hands. And just you know, no, no,

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 2>not humbleness. It's not that. I just I think there

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 2>are like, let me put it like this, here's a

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 2>different way to look at it. Take Austin Reeves and

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers out of it. Would the Denver Nuggets last

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 2>year have been better off with Bradley Beal or Aaron Gordon?

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 2>The answer is obviously Aaron Gordon. Is Bradley Beal better

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:04.839
<v Speaker 2>than Aaron Gordon? Sure? But as far as being the

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 2>third option guy doing different things, Aaron Gordon was perfect

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:12.720
<v Speaker 2>for that team. Now, with all that said, Bradley Beal's

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 2>already out for tonight with a back injury. So a

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Sun team that is you know, health is a major

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:20.720
<v Speaker 2>question mark, in depth is a major question mark. Already

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 2>isn't gonna have their full complimented guys. Uh But if Pool.

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Goes and averages forty points this season, this is I

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 3>know this isn't going off on a tangent here, But

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:32.839
<v Speaker 3>if he goes off and average is like, all right,

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 3>not call it forty thirty to thirty five points? Do

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 3>you think any Do you think success from Pool this

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 3>season gets the guy fired that made the trade? I

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 3>just think I really want that trade to end up

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 3>looking really stupid.

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 4>I got a lot of sweat.

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 2>In Then, in what universe can Jordan Poole average thirty

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 2>to thirty five.

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 4>Points in this one?

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:57.800
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean that doesn't exist? The guy can't

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 2>average thirty to thirty five said, he's on the Wizards.

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 2>He's not averaging thirty plus Jordan Poole.

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 3>No, that's what That's what I'll be tracking is the

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 3>usage of Chris Paul over in the in the Warriors,

0:49:15.080 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and what Jordan Poole does over there in Washington.

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Traded up, Jordan pulls in.

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Pool's in a perfect spot. He can put up

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 2>empty numbers on a bad team. I get that, but

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:28.239
<v Speaker 2>he's still not gonna average thirty plus. I mean, give

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 2>me a break. I mean, he's the He's not. I mean,

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know what to do that. That take

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:44.080
<v Speaker 2>took me by storm. The now here is the The

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 2>other most interesting storyline right now in the NBA is

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:51.839
<v Speaker 2>obviously what's gonna happen in Philly. People have written off

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the Miami Heat, maybe a touch prematurely because they didn't

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 2>get Dame. And then do the Warriors have one last

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.879
<v Speaker 2>running them? Which I'm fascinated by. I know you said

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:06.359
<v Speaker 2>they traded Jordan Poole for a fossil. I don't even

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 2>know if Chris Paul is gonna be on that team

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 2>all year? But do they have one more running them?

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 2>And then one last thing in the West? Like who

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 2>who is? Who? Do we know is gonna be bad

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 2>in the West? Okay, I'll start Portland. After that, the

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Spurs will be bad but fun to watch, and the

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Rockets will be bad. Every other team is trying to win.

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the Jazz will be bad. But take those four

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 2>teams out. Here are the other teams, the Pelicans, the MAVs,

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the Nuggets, the Warriors, the Clippers, the Lakers, the Timberwolves,

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the Suns, the Kings, the thunder the Grizzlies. Okay, so

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:59.799
<v Speaker 2>that's eleven teams. One of them won't even make the

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 2>playing three of them won't make the playoffs. The Grizzlies

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:08.399
<v Speaker 2>are an interesting one to watch with Steven Adams being

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 2>done for the year. I the Clippers are an interesting

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 2>one to watch given their health concerns, and the Pelicans,

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 2>given their health concerns, are an interesting one as well.

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:23.720
<v Speaker 2>But there are gonna be some teams in the West

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 2>just devastatingly disappointed on how this season goes.

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, All right, it's time for a game

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 3>we haven't played in a while, Public defender, the time

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 3>has come.

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Bring back what's right? No, no, no uh. The first off,

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 4>we're gonna start off with you encouraging me to bet

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 4>the Bills last week. I think you encouraged me so much.

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:46.279
<v Speaker 3>That that team wasn't even in my teaser, and you

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:48.879
<v Speaker 3>had me take a team out and put them in

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 3>because you were just that's correct.

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I felt Patriots, you know what. I felt terribly about

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 2>that until I realized your teaser died because you didn't

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 2>like yeah, because you had the Lions plus thirteen. I

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 2>really felt sick about that. And then I looked back

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 2>at it, I'm like, oh, you screwed yourself before the

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Bills even did it.

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:13.760
<v Speaker 3>But go ahead, all right, so counselor defend your client

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen and the Buffalo Bills for losing to the

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 3>famished Patriots.

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, you know what I entered. This is one

0:52:20.560 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite games. But in a day where we've

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 2>had Monday Night football and the Brock Party stuff in

0:52:25.640 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 2>an NBA season preview, and we're this late, I'm gonna

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 2>do a half hearted effort at some of these. I

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 2>have no defense of Josh Allen and the Buffalo Bills.

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:36.919
<v Speaker 2>They are exactly what the actual Nick Wright said they were.

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not engaging on this. They are an up and

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:43.240
<v Speaker 2>down team that is untrustworthy that under this iteration, missed

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 2>their window. Next.

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 3>Justin Herbert is twenty seven and twenty eight as a

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 3>starting as a starting quarterback in the NFL he's able

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 3>to hide behind the incompetence of his coach. But Joe

0:52:53.600 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Burrow overcame Zach Taylor, and Tom Brady overcame Bill Belichick.

0:52:58.000 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 3>This guy might just be the Philip Rivers were kids,

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 3>counselor defend your client.

0:53:02.680 --> 0:53:04.360
<v Speaker 4>Justin Herbert.

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so once again, I'm gonna recuse myself from this. Listen.

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I said it before and it was one of the

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:15.000
<v Speaker 2>best compliments Demons ever gave me when I just said

0:53:15.000 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 2>something and he just goes bar and I was like, oh,

0:53:17.680 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 2>he liked what I said. Justin Herbert is not the problem.

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 2>But he's paid to be the solution and he hasn't been.

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 2>And he's had back to back bad games right after

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 2>getting paid. And we listen, he is Justin Herbert is

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 2>a good to very good player. He should be better

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 2>by now. This is on the undeniable.

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Some of the throws that I'm seeing that he's not

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 3>making has got nothing to do with coaching.

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 2>It's Justin Herbert, correct, That's correct. And listen, he's got

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a rocket arm and under better circumstances, like you know,

0:53:53.600 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe things are going differently for him. But it is

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 2>undeniable that up to this point he's been slightly disappointing

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:02.839
<v Speaker 2>given how Grady looked as a rookie. I understand I'm

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 2>not really playing the public defender game right now, but

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 2>that's because we're short on time, so I can't even

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 2>really mentally fully get in character right now. But go ahead.

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 3>So we complain about the refs every year, but the

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 3>refs had a huge role in the Rams, Steelers and

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Brown's cults and Eagles Dolphins finishes, not to mention how

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 3>every single call goes the way of the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:27.719
<v Speaker 3>Counselor defend your client, NFL refs.

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Listen, these are old guys. They're all I mean. Here

0:54:36.400 --> 0:54:40.760
<v Speaker 2>is what I will say. I'm glad folks are now recognizing.

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 2>It's like, oh wow, look at that every nationally televised

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 2>game has an egregious missed call, if not more than one.

0:54:54.080 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 2>It's not about the Chiefs always getting the benefit of

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 2>a the whistle. It's about the fact that the Chiefs,

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 2>because they're the Chiefs, are in standalone nationally televised games

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 2>more often than other teams, so it seems like it

0:55:11.840 --> 0:55:13.640
<v Speaker 2>disproportionately impacts them.

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 4>But every game so far, the Chiefs have come dude,

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Like what you just said.

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:20.879
<v Speaker 2>I know it's wild, I know it's an insane thing,

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 2>but it's true. Uh but every game that you watch

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 2>all the way through, you're like, oh, well that was terrible.

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 2>That was terrible. Like there's a right. The officiating in

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:33.799
<v Speaker 2>the NFL this year has not been good. There's no

0:55:33.840 --> 0:55:36.920
<v Speaker 2>way around it. Just flat lee hasn't been good. And

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 2>then you wanted me to defend myself for betting the

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Bears Raiders game. I'm not gonna do that. It was

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the worst bets I've ever made in my life.

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Quick break right back, answer your questions. What's right? All right, demanse,

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's ask some questions her.

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, all right, Austin are asked, Nick, when are

0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 3>we gonna hear your wife's take on Taylor Swift now

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 3>that she's inspiring Kelsey to play out of his mind?

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, I got to ask her about that, and maybe

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 2>it's evolved. I'm not sure what I will say is

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 2>I think I so Wilds has the best take on this,

0:56:12.640 --> 0:56:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and Wilds hasn't said this on television yet, so I

0:56:16.280 --> 0:56:17.799
<v Speaker 2>just give him credit. I don't know if he's going

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 2>to and his take on this is that life is

0:56:22.239 --> 0:56:25.840
<v Speaker 2>high school, that all of your whole life is just

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 2>high school. And so what's happening here is Taylor Swift

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in high school was the band kid, the music kid,

0:56:34.840 --> 0:56:38.960
<v Speaker 2>and and the idea of like dating the star football

0:56:39.000 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 2>player was like the coolest thing imagining. And now she can.

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:49.400
<v Speaker 2>And she's wearing his letterman jacket, hanging out with the

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:57.240
<v Speaker 2>other star player's girlfriend wife and brisng time and truly

0:56:57.360 --> 0:57:01.000
<v Speaker 2>having the time of her life. And I think this

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:06.760
<v Speaker 2>is genuine man. She is genuinely excited during these games,

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 2>genuinely rooting for him, and you can tell there is

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:14.719
<v Speaker 2>a great There is a great image from this weekend's

0:57:14.760 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 2>game when Mahomes throws to Kelsey in the end zone.

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't catch it, but he gets the past interference

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:24.880
<v Speaker 2>flag and there's Taylor Swift and Britney Mahomes side by

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 2>side in the box and Taylor jumps up, puts her

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:32.080
<v Speaker 2>hands on her face and is like devastated, and Britney

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 2>is momentarily upset, sees the flag and then starts celebrating

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and Taylor's confused, and it's like, oh, this is like

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:43.920
<v Speaker 2>a learning football moment too. Like Britney, who by the

0:57:43.960 --> 0:57:48.360
<v Speaker 2>way another. As Wilde says, another example of this is

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:51.520
<v Speaker 2>high school. Patrick Mahomes had a crush on this girl

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 2>as a ninth grader and it's just been madly in

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:59.040
<v Speaker 2>love with her ever since. Just loves her. But she's

0:57:59.400 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 2>she's been watching football forever and she's like, oh, flag,

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:05.320
<v Speaker 2>we got it. Taylor doesn't understand what's going on. I

0:58:05.360 --> 0:58:08.560
<v Speaker 2>think it's delightful. I like it. And people are like,

0:58:08.560 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 2>oh yeah. And the fact that Kelsey another thing that

0:58:11.240 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 2>was asked me yesterday, They're like, do you buy the

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:16.000
<v Speaker 2>story that Kelsey bought a new house because of this,

0:58:16.200 --> 0:58:19.800
<v Speaker 2>like the relationship, because that was reported, like lightly reported,

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:24.760
<v Speaker 2>and I'm like, totally seems plausible in this regard. People

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:29.440
<v Speaker 2>don't understand Kan City. Kent City has like two gated

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 2>communities in the whole city. There's like two places you

0:58:33.040 --> 0:58:36.160
<v Speaker 2>can live where someone can't just like come knock on

0:58:36.240 --> 0:58:39.959
<v Speaker 2>your door. My guess is I haven't been to Travis's house,

0:58:40.160 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 2>but my guess is Travis was living in a normal,

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 2>nice house in Kansas City, probably in the plaza somewhere

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 2>where just literally anybody can come ring up exactly right, correct,

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:55.960
<v Speaker 2>And so I think it's like, man, like that, and

0:58:56.000 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 2>so I think that's probably what happened, all right.

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Next, sorry, gronky mister chance.

0:59:02.280 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 3>TOC three K said, the brotherly shove is no different

0:59:06.000 --> 0:59:08.360
<v Speaker 3>than when the Bears used to snap it to the fridge.

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Nick Perry was getting the yard, no question, Why would

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the league ban the modern day version of that play.

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:18.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot funner than a touch push dude.

0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so no, but that's also this is where people

0:59:21.880 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I have TOC three K not your fault. I apologize,

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:27.760
<v Speaker 2>but I'm gonna go ahead and say, you don't know

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:30.240
<v Speaker 2>what you're talking about. First of all, because the guy's

0:59:30.320 --> 0:59:33.840
<v Speaker 2>name was Richard Perry or William Perry. Richard Perry, Now

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what I'm talking about. His name was

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 2>William Perry, first of all, not Nick Perry. So and

0:59:41.840 --> 0:59:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to I'll check it in a moment, but

0:59:45.040 --> 0:59:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna guess William the refrigerator Perry has fewer than

0:59:50.640 --> 0:59:56.640
<v Speaker 2>ten career rushing attempts and fewer than five career touchdowns.

0:59:56.960 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 2>The idea that the Bears in the eighties, who had

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Walter Payton at running back, were regularly giving it to

1:00:05.160 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 2>their three hundred pound d tackle because it was funny.

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Is just it is just not what the historical record is,

1:00:12.440 --> 1:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>and it certainly wasn't Nick Perry. All right, well who

1:00:15.960 --> 1:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>is Nick the So hold on, I.

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Think I've heard the name before.

1:00:22.160 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a musician, Nick Perry Blackers actually, now

1:00:26.200 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 3>that I think about it.

1:00:28.280 --> 1:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Now that you think about it, Okay, So here's William

1:00:32.520 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Perry's career numbers. All right. William Perry in his career

1:00:38.320 --> 1:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>has eight rushes for five yards and two touchdowns. So,

1:00:44.520 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>first of all, decidedly did not always work. Second of all,

1:00:49.280 --> 1:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>they did it eight times ever five and one year.

1:00:53.640 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>And then you add in the playoffs. He did it

1:00:56.440 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>once in the Super Bowl. So his entire career, William

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Perry had three touchdowns. So no, it's not quite the

1:01:06.560 --> 1:01:10.960
<v Speaker 2>same as the tush push, which was done successfully more

1:01:11.160 --> 1:01:15.240
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday Night than every carry of William Perry's career.

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, producers.

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Producers asked.

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Joe Lacob said the Warriors should retire thirty five for KD.

1:01:22.720 --> 1:01:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree?

1:01:24.440 --> 1:01:29.760
<v Speaker 2>So just so you know it's lake ub Yeah, he won. Yes,

1:01:30.200 --> 1:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>he won two finals MVPs for you, and then came

1:01:33.320 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>back early from an injury. Because you guys put a

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:40.360
<v Speaker 2>little pressure on him and uh and popped his achilles.

1:01:41.960 --> 1:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I do agree. I agree you should retire

1:01:46.280 --> 1:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>his jersey. He won two finals MVPs for you and

1:01:49.720 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 2>was excellent for you for three seasons, So yeah, you

1:01:52.800 --> 1:01:55.760
<v Speaker 2>retire his jersey. By the way, it's not a statue.

1:01:56.480 --> 1:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Like the statue question is going to be an interesting

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:03.560
<v Speaker 2>question for the Warriors in this regard. Is it just

1:02:03.760 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Steph or do they give one to Steph play and Draymond?

1:02:09.440 --> 1:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>If they do that is Steve Kerr on the statue?

1:02:13.880 --> 1:02:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Is it one giant statue? Do they all get their

1:02:16.160 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>own in that? Like Iguidala to me is a retired jersey.

1:02:21.880 --> 1:02:26.240
<v Speaker 2>He's a retired jersey, not a statue. That's in my opinion,

1:02:26.280 --> 1:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>that's Iggy. Obviously Steph is a statue. I feel like

1:02:31.280 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Clay and Dragon.

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:37.919
<v Speaker 3>What I feel like if yeah, I feel like Kurr.

1:02:38.200 --> 1:02:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it should be Steph, Clay, Kurr, Dre.

1:02:41.120 --> 1:02:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean all their own statue or one giant one

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the four of them. I don't know. Gether that to

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>me though, almost like if they they want to do

1:02:54.280 --> 1:02:57.360
<v Speaker 2>that and then also a Stephan statue, So Steph gets

1:02:57.360 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>too like Stephan needs some special treatment there. Yeah, but

1:03:02.280 --> 1:03:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm also I'm a believer that you know, I think

1:03:06.720 --> 1:03:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Lebron should have a statue in all three places. I

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:17.400
<v Speaker 2>the he obviously Cleveland. The Lakers have a lot of

1:03:17.400 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 2>guys with statues. It's you know what I mean, they

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>have a whole stat monument partner. No, I mean he

1:03:24.280 --> 1:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>wanted he brought they misplayoffs six raight years. He wins

1:03:27.280 --> 1:03:31.080
<v Speaker 2>him a championship. He also broke Kareem's record in your jersey.

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>He's played for the Lakers longer than he played for

1:03:33.760 --> 1:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the Heat at this point. And obviously the Heat. What

1:03:38.120 --> 1:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the the the the again, Like the coolest statue that

1:03:43.320 --> 1:03:46.920
<v Speaker 2>they could make for the Heat would be a statue

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:50.240
<v Speaker 2>of the famous iconic Way. Yeah, but that to me

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>would like be giving Wade a short shrift like you

1:03:55.080 --> 1:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>do that. Then he also still needs his own standalone statue,

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:01.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, because Way he's the greatest player in the

1:04:01.280 --> 1:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>history of the Miami Heat franchise because of what he

1:04:03.360 --> 1:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>did totality of his career. All right, really, good show,

1:04:07.000 --> 1:04:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I gotta run. We don't have to answer any more questions.

1:04:09.840 --> 1:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you guys on the herd. In about ninety minutes.

1:04:12.440 --> 1:04:14.520
<v Speaker 2>See you on First things first at three o'clock. See

1:04:14.520 --> 1:04:17.040
<v Speaker 2>if I unveil my purty cousin's take, we'll do it.

1:04:17.040 --> 1:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll do it all later today. See you guys. What's

1:04:19.200 --> 1:04:19.360
<v Speaker 2>right